Abstract
This article reported an extensive review of computational modelling and analysis on damping and vibrational behaviors of viscoelastic structures, including experimental techniques. viscoelastic materials have emerged as an effective technology for enhancing damping characteristics in composite structures because of their ability to damp vibration and the ability to conserve the geometry of the material after deformation. In structural design viscoelastic material is never employed alone, it is always adhered to the thin-walled structure to form a damping layer of different structural configurations such as sandwich structure configurations and reinforced configurations. It is worth mentioning that viscoelastic materials are quite frequency-dependent meaning that the vibrational properties keep varying with the excitation frequency, accordingly, yielding complex natural frequencies of vibration. This paper provides a primary discussion on the basic forming principles of linear viscoelastic material providing comparisons of different viscoelastic material mathematical models, and applications of viscoelastic material including their effects on composite structure damping and vibrational behaviors. Moreover, different computational methods for dynamic behaviors of viscoelastic sandwich structures including analytical method, finite element method, and mixed method were assessed to provide insights into the limitations of each approach. The drawbacks of each calculation theory for various traditional and recent configurations are systematically presented in engineering structures containing viscoelastic followed by a detailed description and comparison of different modeling methods, their applicability, and their respective comparisons.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The viscoelastic (VE) material has been extensively used as an efficient vibration suppression technology that can be applied to a variety of applications like electronics [1], automotive [2], aerospace [3], marine [4], and civil engineering [5]. One of the main design directions of modern mechanical applications is lightweight design, which directly leads to thin-walled structures integrated with VE damping layer. Thin-walled structures are represented by thin beams [6,7,8,9,10] thin plates [11,12,13,14] and thin shells [15,16,17,18,19,20]. Accurate modeling of VE material damping characteristics is essential for the vibration-damping structural design process of composite structures thus, many researchers proposed a variety of mathematical models called constitutive models based on traditional differential form [21, 22]. Those models are limited since they are less compatible with measured creep and relaxation behaviors of VE material [23, 24]. Unlike traditional constitutive models, which assume that the material response is instantaneous, fractional constitutive models account for the time-dependent nature of the VE material [25,26,27,28,29]. The VE material dynamic characteristic parameters are not only affected by frequency but temperature provides significant effects on the VE material behaviors which cannot be neglected [30]. In this regard, the mechanical parameters of VE materials are easier to measure in the frequency domain, these models are mathematically represented as complex modulus models, which can accurately simulate the frequency-dependent properties of VE materials in the frequency domain, and capture the creep and relaxation characteristics of VE materials in the time domain [31,32,33]. Those complex models rely on internal dissipation auxiliary coordinates that provide less number of parameters to accurately simulate the frequency dependence behaviors of VE materials such as GHM model and Biot model so that these models are applicable in various engineering applications [34,35,36,37].
VE materials exhibit temperature–frequency equivalence in their mechanical and damping properties [38]. This principle states that the damping characteristics acquired at high temperatures are similar to those found at low frequencies and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) parameter curves of VE materials at various temperatures can be adjusted to a reference temperature to derive the master curve [39,40,41]. Ercan and Durmus [42] quantified the VE behaviors of thermoplastic elastomers based on creep tests by using DMA method. Müller-Pabel et al. [43] provided a comprehensive review of recent DMA developments on VE behaviors of Epoxy resins thermosets-based. Mu [44] investigated the VE mechanical behaviors of amorphous plastic composites by using creep and DMA tests. You et al. [45] developed micro-mechanical model to predict the time-dependent mechanical behavior of linear VE particulate composites by utilizing DMA and direct numerical approach.
Nowadays, damping vibration techniques for composite structures using VE material are mainly divided into passive-damping treatment and passive–active damping treatment [46,47,48]. The former refers to damping treatment technique utilizing VE material as a potent passive damping layer, but the latter refers to the combination of actuation scheme of piezoelectric materials and VE materials to augment structural integrity by optimizing the performance of composite structures under various conditions [49, 50]. Kuchak et al. [51] investigated the damping performance of rail damper with rubber layers based on improved FE model and experimental approach. Irazu and Elejabarrieta [52] explored experimentally and numerically the influence of adhesive frequency-independent VE film thickness on the dynamic response of thin sandwich structures. Xing et al. [53] examined the dynamic behaviors of hybrid passive–active lattice sandwich structures with VE-filled corrugated or honeycomb cores imposing periodic boundary conditions. Wang et al. [54] investigated the vibrational damping performance of 3D Kagome lattice truss sandwich panels filled with VE thermosetting polyurethane.
The accurate modeling of VE composite structure is the premise of its vibration analysis therefore, modeling methods of VE composite structure are mainly divided into two categories: analytical method and finite element (FE) method. In addition, some scholars have proposed a modeling method between the first two methods, that is, semi-analytical and semi-numerical modeling methods. It should be mentioned that the application of analytical methods in engineering practice is limited since it requires a solution of higher-order partial differential equations [55]. Park [56] derived the fourth-order differential equation of motion for a damped sandwich beam with a partially VE Layer including transverse deformation and longitudinal shear deformation. Aenlle and Pelayo [57] developed an analytical model for flexural damped vibration of laminated glass beam including the longitudinal inertia effects of VE core. Galuppi and Royer-Carfagni [58] analytically analyzed the time-dependent behavior for VE simply-supported laminated beam and the VE core modeled by prony’s series that incorporated into the modified Maxwell model. Guo et al. [59] performed an analytical study to explore the thermo-VE behaviors for VE laminated sandwich composite structure based on thermo-viscoelasticity theory. Sun et al. [60] developed FE to investigate the dynamics response of VE sandwich beam and the governing equation of motion derived based on virtual work principle. Araújo et al. [61] proposed an FE model to explore the vibration response of active–passive hybrid sandwich plate based on the combination of FSDT and HSDT. Sairajan et al. [62] proposed an FE correlation model to estimate the damping in VE sandwich composite panel. The VE layer was modeled as eight-node hexagonal element while the aluminum face sheets were modeled as four-node quadrilateral shell element. Hernández et al. [63] analyze the uncertainty propagation of design factors and the constitutive parameters of proposed FE model that was formulated based on FSDT for damped VE sandwich beam.. Although FE modelling is extensively used in the dynamic modeling of VE complex sandwich structures, sometimes it is computationally expensive. Thus, some researchers proposed mix model between the analytical method and finite element method (FEM) to improve the calculation efficiency [64]. Eratli et al. [65] used Laplacian mixed FE and Timoshenko beam theory to perform vibrational analysis on VE rod.
At present, many researchers have utilized different damping modelling configurations to achieve high performance in dynamics VE structures. For example, Chen and Liu [66] proposed effective topology optimization design guidelines of constraining layer damping treatment (CLDT) with microstructure VE periodic unit cell. Li et al. [67] analytically and experimentally investigated the damping behaviors of laminated plates embedded with VE considering von Karman nonlinearities effects. Jalaei and Civalek [68] studied the dynamic instability of axially loaded embedded VE porous FGM nanobeams subjected to magnetic field. Kang et al. [69] investigated the forced vibration response of a free–free CLDT beam considering VE frequency-dependent complex parameters based on the combination of analytical and experimental methods. Gupta et al. [70] preformed a comparative study for Active–Passive CLDT of conventional VE material and 0–3 VE symmetric and asymmetric composite sandwich plate. Shahsavari et al. [71] analysis the size-dependent wave propagation response in VE porous FGM curved nanobeam based on HSDT. Youzera et al. [72] developed an analytical model for forced vibration analysis and nonlinear model loss factor of FGM composite beam with VE core by utilizing zig-zag theory coupled with HSDT. Karmi et al. [73] established a numerical model based on a modal stability approach to elaborate the vibro-acoustic response of sandwich beam integrated with frequency and temperature-dependent VE core.
Few scholars reported the recent developments of damping characteristics of VE composite sandwich structures. For example, Trindade and Benjeddou [74] provided a literature review on different modeling approaches of hybrid active–passive damping treatments of beams. Hajianmaleki and Qatu [75] provided a comprehensive review study on the vibrational behaviors of straight and curved laminate composite beams with integral VE layers. Zhou et al. [76] presented a comprehensive review on dynamic and static analysis of sandwich structures containing various VE damping materials. Lewandowski et al. [77] reported the recent achievements of theories for dynamic behaviors of structural elements integrated with VE material. Although research related to VE materials and composite structures is quite broad and covers many different aspects, there is no existing extensive review article in the open literature on computational modelling and analysis of effect of VE materials on damping and vibrational behaviors of composite structures. This work aims to present an organized novel extensive review on the vibration analysis of sandwich composite structures integrated with VE damping materials utilizing computational modelling approaches.
1.1 Literature Research Methodology
The documents assessed in this review article were obtained by using the Scopus database. The first string search was entered as (“viscoelastic” OR “viscoelastic material”) followed by (“damping” OR “vibrational behaviors” OR “dynamic analysis”) then, (“sandwich structure”). Based on the search string keywords, 400 documnets were acquired from the published papers between 1974 and 2023. The results were limited to engineering, material science, mathematics, and energy subject areas then the short surveys and book chapter were excluded from the results while the language was limited to English. The documents were accessible then the search was carried out on on March 12, 2023. Further, many documents were attained from other sources such as ScienceDirect and web of scienece to form recent developments of Computational modelling for VE sandwich structures.
Figure 1 represents statistical data from Scopus of published papers per year from 2000 to 2023. The statistical data in Fig. 1 reveals that there has been a gradual increase in the number of documents published per year between 2014 to 2023. Figure 2 illustrates the statistical data distribution representation of published different document types. The majority of the documents are article-based with 78% and 21% being conference paper, while 1% are review paper. The statistical data representation of published papers by country from Scopus between 2000 and 2023 is displayed in Fig. 3, implying diverse international contributions to the filed of VE modelling and damping methods. Further, It can be pointed out from Fig. 3 that china has a major contribution, which was followed by several other nations. In this review the recent developments VE materials computational modelling and analysis of their implementation on composite sandwich structures were addressed. the paper’s overall structure is organized as follows: The introduction section includes an overview of VE material modelling and testing methods. In Sect. 2 different damping methods and configurations using VE material will be explored. Moreover, the summary of studies reported on VE composite structure’s different modelling approaches including analytical modelling, FEM, and mixed modelling will be presented in Sect. 3.
1.2 Theoretical Background of VE Material
The VE material combines two distinct properties when subjected to an external force. The term “elastic” implies the material deforming recovery behavior and pure viscous fluids involve deformation followed by a permanent rearrangement of the fluid molecules [78]. The mechanical properties of materials are commonly investigated using stress–strain behavior but, VE materials form what so-called “hysteresis” loop as shown in Fig. 4a where the area within this loop represents the energy dissipated in the form of heat [79,80,81,82]. Thus, this energy absorption mechanism explains why VE materials are suitable for damping vibration applications [83]. Different parameters may affect the energy dissipation ability of VE materials such as excitation frequencies, applied amplitudes, VE material density, and temperatures Fig. 4b–e [84].
Another important feature of VE materials is that their mechanical properties are affected by the rate at which they are deformed. Because the molecule’s motion gradually kept up with the external force, the dissipated energy and dynamic stiffness are decreased, as shown in Fig. 5. As a result, the deformation behavior at different deformation rates is represented by a family of curves rather than a single stress–strain curve [85]. Futhuer, temperature influences VE mechanical behaviors because material stiffness varies with temperature so when choosing materials for a certain application, it’s crucial to understand VE materials’ behaviors at a given loading rate and temperature [86]. From Fig. 6, it is seen that the storage modulus, loss factor, equivalent stiffness, and equivalent damping decrease significantly by increasing the temperature [87].
1.3 Theory of VE Material Modelling
The relationship between the stress–strain of VE materials is called the constitutive relationship, and the equation that describes this behavior is the constative equation [88, 89]. For this purpose, researchers have proposed many mathematical models called constitutive models of VE material. According to different forms of establishment, the constitutive model of a VE material can be divided into a differential type and an integral type. The differential type is based on the constitutive equations established by the spring-damper system and these equations are in differential form while the integral models are based on the measured creep or relaxation function and these equations are in integral form [90,91,92,93,94,95].
1.3.1 Differential Constitutive Models (Classical Models)
The classic constitutive mechanical models consist of spring and damper elements in series and parallel. The spring-dashpot system employs the elastic behavior of the VE material which is represented by the spring element while the VE behavior is represented by the damper element [96]. Typical models include the Maxwell model, Kelvin–Voigt model, and Zener model are shown in Fig. 7. Although these classical models are simple, they cannot simulate the real mechanical behaviors of the VE material [97, 98]. For instance, in the Maxwell model, there is no anelastic recovery which means that the creep response prediction is poor, which is inconsistent with reality while the relaxation response of the Kelvin–Voigt model does not change with time [99]. In addition, the creep and relaxation of the VE material have been improved but the main disadvantage is that it cannot accurately describe the frequency characteristics such as the storage moduli and loss factor [100].
The following summary can be detected from Table 1: under static load conditions, the storage modulus E of the Maxwell model is zero while the loss factor η approaches infinity. In addition, at high frequencies value the loss factor η is approaching zero. The storage modulus E of Kelvin–Voigt is a constant value and equal to the stiffness of the spring K, while loss factor η is zero and unbound at high frequencies. The Zener model tends to be more realistic than the Maxwell and Kelvin–Voigt models in terms of capturing material dynamic characteristics.
Many scholars have improved the previous classical models such as the standard rheological model which can accurately describe the relaxation response in the frequency domain [104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111]. The main disadvantage is that it needs to obtain the parameters of VE material in a wide frequency range. Bagley et al. [112, 113] proposed a fractional derivative model that can accurately describe the mechanical properties of the VE material in a wide frequency range. Karner et al. [114] developed fractional generalized Maxwell model to anticipate the VE creep behavior of dielectric elastomer actuator. Valvano et al. [115] used Kelvin–Voigt fractional derivative model to explore the frequency-dependent properties of VE sheets in composite plates. The disadvantage of this model is that it is difficult to transform it into time domain, and the calculations are immense when the vibration analysis of the structure is performed, which limits the application of the model [116]. Those classical constitutive models are not compatible with the FEM and are difficult to realize in engineering applications.
1.3.2 Integral Constitutive Models (Complex Models)
The integral constitutive model is a complex modulus model derived from the creep and relaxation functions of VE material. The main standard experiment for VE material is to obtain those mechanical behaviors and the determination of these complex models is based on experimental work, thus they can capture the mechanical properties of VE materials [117]. Furthermore, they simulate the frequency-dependent characteristics of the VE material since these characteristics are easier to measure in the frequency domain. The stress–strain relationship in the integral form can be expressed as [118]:
The linear VE material satisfies the Boltzmann Superposition Principle where \(\sigma \left(t\right)\) and \({\varepsilon }_{0}\) are the stress relaxation and amplitude of the applied strain respectively, and \(G\left(t\right)\) is the shear stress relaxation function, which is a decreasing function representing the energy loss of the VE material [119]. The constitutive stress–strain relationship consists of two parts: initial stress and stress relaxation, the constitutive equation can be obtained in the frequency domain as:
where \({G}^{*}\left(s\right)=sG(s)\) is the complex shear stress modulus function of the VE material in the Laplace domain.
1.3.2.1 Complex Constant Modulus Model
The complex constant modulus of VE material G can be expressed as:
where \({G}{\prime}\) is the real part, also called the storage modulus, and \({G}^{{\prime}{\prime}}\) is the imaginary part which is called the energy dissipation modulus. \(\eta = \frac{{G}^{{\prime}{\prime}}}{{G}{\prime}}\) is the loss factor, which is the ratio of the energy dissipation modulus to the storage energy modulus that physically represents the ratio of energy consumed from the VE material to the total energy. Many researchers have used the shear complex modulus, since the frequency variation is not considered, they have obtained a simple dynamic equation by applying a simple harmonic excitation force [120,121,122]. As mentioned above, the shear modulus of VE materials is affected by frequency and temperature, and it is difficult to accurately describe it mathematically. The effect of temperature can be unified with the effect of frequency through the principle of temperature–frequency equivalence, so only the influence of frequency is generally considered in practical applications. It should be pointed out that the complex modulus of VE material is not constant, and it is related to the excitation frequency [123].
1.3.2.2 GHM Model
The GHM (Golla–Hughes–Mctavish) model uses a series of Mini-oscillator functions to represent the complex shear modulus function of VE materials [124, 125]. The mini-oscillator is composed of a virtual spring-mass-damper unit that is connected to the system’s space coordinate x through spatial coordinates z as illustrated in Fig. 8a. The complex shear modulus can expressed as [125, 126]:
where \({G}^{\infty }\) is the steady-state value of the relaxation function when t = ∞ and s is the Laplace operator. N is the number of terms of Mini-oscillator, and each Mini-oscillator behavior is captured by a second-order rational function determined by three normal parameters {\({\alpha }_{k}\), \({\widehat{\omega }}_{k}\), \({\widehat{\zeta }}_{k}\)}. If the Mini oscillator takes N, the model has 3N + 1 parameters to determine, which can be obtained by curve fitting to the experimental data through optimization algorithm problem [127]. Due to the efficient computational capacity of GHM model, many researchers used it to capture the frequency-dependent VE behaviors of polymers, composites, and other VE materials under various loading conditions. Gibson et al. [128] implemented GHM into FE model imported from NASTRAN FE solver to represent the frequency-dependent characteristics of VE material. [129, 130]. Huang et al. [131] utilized GHM model to capture the frequency-dependent dynamic characteristics of ZN-1 VE material which were incorporated into the FE model of VE sandwich structure. It can be noticed from Fig. 8b and c that the measured value of ZN-1 complex modulus can be well approximated by the GHM model with relatively low error.
1.3.2.3 Biot Model
Biot [132] proposed a complex model that connects a series of micro-vibrators in parallel where these micro-vibrators are parallel with a spring. micro-vibrators elements are coupled to the global coordinates of the system by the internal local coordinates as shown in Fig. 9a to simulate the mechanical dynamic behaviors of VE material. The Biot’s first-order shear relaxation function can be expressed in the frequency domain as [133]:
where \({G}^{\infty }\) is the equilibrium value of shear stress modulus relaxation of the VE material, s is the Laplace operator, N is the number of micro-vibrators, and if N mini vibrator is selected 3N + 1 must be determined. [ai, bi] are positive model parameters determined by the nonlinear curve fitting method using the experimental data of VE material. Few scholars have used the Biot model to study the dynamic behavior of many applications such as composite VE structures. For example, Zhang et al. [134] used Biot model to predict the complex dynamic properties of ZN-1 VE material with different perturbing terms m = 1, m = 2 and then incorporated it into FE model for damping behaviors of VE sandwich structure. It is worth mentioning that the measured value of ZN-1 real and storage modulus and loss modulus can be approximated effectively by the Biot model as shown in Fig. 9c and d respectively. Guo et al. [135] utilized the Biot model to simulate the VE material behavior in the truss damper of the truss sandwich structure. Lin et al. [136, 137] proposed a design methodology to study the vibroacoustic of multi-layered damping beams using Biot damping model. Eugeni et al. [138] and Mastroddi et al. [139] incorporated generalized Biot damping model into FEM for linear structural and aeroelastic systems using Hilbert correction.
There are also damping models that consider the frequency-dependent complex shear modulus of VE materials. Such as augmenting thermodynamic fields (ATF) [140, 141] and anelastic displacement fields (ADF) [142] shown in Fig. 9b considering both elastic and ADF and Yiu [143] model. Like GHM models and Biot models, they introduce auxiliary coordinates to simulate the frequency dependence of VE materials more accurately.
1.4 Testing of VE Material
1.4.1 Creep/Creep Recovery and Stress Relaxation
The VE properties of many materials can be experimentally evaluated by analyzing the creep, creep recovery, and stress relaxation behaviors of materials such as polymers in many biological applications [144,145,146]. Due to the elastic properties of VE material, creep recovery occurs when a VE deforms under constant load before returning to its original shape where the load is removed Fig. 10a. Accordingly, creep compliance and creep recovery compliance J(t) can be used to express the measured creep and recovery deformation (Fig. 10c), as indicated in Eq. 1. [147]. In addition, stress relaxation occurs under constant strain Fig. 10b where the stress gradually decreases over time [148,149,150] as illustrated in Fig. 10d.
Moreover, those phenomena are influenced by various parameters such as temperature and stress/strain applied level therefore many researchers investigated the effect of those parameters on the VE material time-dependent behaviors. In this regard, to anticipate time-dependent behaviors, Ornaghi et al. [151, 152] explore the time–temperature creep and stress relaxation response of advanced composites material over material glassy, glass transition, and rubbery states. Further, higher temperatures and stress levels result in greater deformation for creep see Fig. 11a, and the recovery rate is minimal at glass transition temperature Tg as shown in Fig. 11b. Monticeli et al. [153] established an experimental approach based on Taguchi method and analysis of variance to explore the influence of the three VE composite regions on the time-dependent mechanical properties of composite CFR plastic. Sorvari and Malinen [154] proposed numerical model to estimate stress relaxation modulus of linear VE material based on modified Zapas and Phillips model. Song and Wang [155] experimentally investigated stress relaxation, and creep VE behaviors of shape memory polymers including temperature effects, particularly at Tg.
1.5 Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA)
DMA is an experimental technique used to characterize the VE mechanical properties such as complex modulus considering wide range of temperatures and frequencies to provide significant facts on the material’s stiffness, strength, toughness, and capacity to resist deformation and fatigue [156, 157]. Many researchers have applied different DMA scientific approaches to capture the frequency-dependent behaviors of VE material. Chia et al. [158] measured the VE damping behavior of plasma spray coatings by using DMA. Singhet et al. [159] presented a novel displacement modulation method for measuring the DMA properties of VE materials with depth-sensing nanoindentation equipment. Melo and Radford [160] presented an experimental method to examine the VE mechanical properties of unidirectional fiber-reinforced composite materials over a range of temperatures and frequencies. Hong et al. [161] used DMA to measure the VE behavior of the ternary graft copolymers at different temperatures. Jrad et al. [162] combined Dahl model with generalized Maxwell model to develop a new visco-tribological model for VE joint while, the identification of VE material characteristics is based on DMA tests. Cheng et al. [163] and Li et al. [164] used time–temperature superposition principle to obtain complex modulus master curve of VE polymers imposing different frequencies and temperatures. Manoharan et al. [107] synergistically investigated the influence of fiber reinforcement on the VE temperature-dependent mechanical properties of hybrid friction composites. Asadian and Shelesh-Nezhad [165] experimentally predicted the VE dynamic behavior of polymer/clay nanocomposite to develop modified generalized Maxwell model that incorporates into FE model. Xu et al. [166] employed dynamic thermomechanical analysis (DTMA) to investigate mechanical performance parameters of VE material including micro effects. To anticipate the nanoscale DMA of composite polymer fluorinated ethylene propylene, Pittenger et al. [167] developed experimental model based on atomic force microscopy approach which could provide more wider range of frequencies up to 20 kHz. The investigated microscopic structure is illustrated in Fig. 12a where the copolymer forms almost circular cross-section area with a diameter of 1 \(\upmu\)m within the propylene matrix. At room temperature, there is no significant difference between the storage modulus of the propylene matrix and copolymer see Fig. 12b. The damping capacity of copolymer is quite lower than propylene matrix as shown in Fig. 12c. Further, as temperature increases the storage modulus of the two-phase materials keeps decreasing but the divergence rate of Propylene (PP) matrix is higher than the divergence rate of copolymer since the matrix phase since PP softens as it reaches its point of melting at 164 °C. on the other hand, time temperature superposition principle (TTS) used which require a DMA data over range of (0.1–100) Hz with temperature sweeping of (25–130) °C as shown in Fig. 12d to generate the master curve. Wang et al. [168] explored the effect of frequency and temperature on the dynamic performance characteristics of VE damping material by using DMA at frequencies of 1–136 Hz in the temperature range of 50–150 °C, and the relationship between elastic modulus, loss factor of VE material with temperature at different frequencies obtained as shown in Fig. 13. It can be seen from Fig. 13a that as temperature increases the storage modulus gradually decreases, this relationship is valid since, VE materials exhibit solid state at low temperatures in contrast, at high temperatures the VE tends to exhibit rubber state. Likely, when the temperature is lower than Tg the storage modulus increases so the material most likely behaves more elastic and stores the energy rather than dissipates it. On the other hand, Fig. 13b shows an initially increasing in the damping factor then decreases as temperature increases. At the same time, as frequency increases the damping factor decreases, and the Tg increases. At room temperature, as frequency the storage modulus increases Fig. 13c but damping factor show an increasing trend then gradually decreasing trend as depicted in Fig. 13d. The summary of reported studies on VE testing method are presented in Table 2.
2 VE Material Applications
2.1 Passive Damping Methods Configurations
VE materials are widely used to suppress the vibration of thin-walled components. A typical passive damping treatment structure consists of unconstrained treatment as shown in Fig. 14a a VE core sandwiched between the constraining layer and the base beam also called the “Damped layer “as shown in Fig. 14b. The VE core allows the vibration energy to dissipate through a cyclic deformation within it, while the main advantage of the constraining layer is to increase the cyclic shear deformation of the core and withstand high stress, hence directly leading to an increase in the damping energy within the VE core [182, 183]. Those configurations have been utilized in different applications such as automotive and aerospace [3], it has been found that when the constraining and base layers have the same thickness and material properties, the longitudinal shear deformation is maximized [184, 185]. Also, many researchers investigated the damping vibration of railway carriages using passive damping vibration technology to improve the comfort of the passenger interior [186,187,188,189].
2.2 Un-constraining Layer Damping Treatment (UCLD)
The traditional free-damping layer has been utilized by many researchers to achieve optimum passive damping design of vibrational structures. Yi et al. [191] performed a forced vibration analysis of the UCLD plate to explore the efficiency of free damping treatment. The parametric study showed the significant effect of many parameters such as VE layer thickness on the damping behavior of the UCLD plate. Kumar and Panda [192] investigated the passive damping mechanism of UCLD beam integrated with pure VE or with 1–3 VECM, as shown in Fig. 15a using FE model based on Hamilton principle. The model demonstrated the variation in the structural damping capacity with different thicknesses of pure VE Fig. 15b and 1–3 VECM composite material Fig. 15c and a different number of graphite-phase volumes. To show the practical efficiency presented by the conventional UCLD technique, Cortés, and Elejabarrieta [193] elaborated on the damping behavior of the UCLD beam by utilizing different FE models and the FRF extracted using superposition mode. He et al. [194] examined three measures to improve damping in a lightly damped aluminum bridge Fig. 16a using rubber sheet pavements, rubber bearings, and external passive dampers. Experimental comparisons are made to determine their effectiveness in damping increment. The external damper is observed to exhibit the highest efficacy in damping increments followed by rubber bearings and rubber sheet pavements respectively see Fig. 16b. Due to the significant difference in elastic modulus between aluminum and rubber, the rubber sheet exhibits minimal strain during structural vibration, resulting in a lack of internal friction among particles. Consequently, the rubber sheet contributes insignificantly to the overall damping of the material. Additionally, Fig. 16c and d depict the unique free decay oscillation of the bridge when exposed to an external damper with varying liquid viscosity; thus, as expected, the damping vibration is more effective as the viscosity of the liquid increases. Therefore, it is crucial to select a damping material with properties that closely match those of the structure to achieve effective damping. Additionally, the choice of damping material should also consider factors such as durability and compatibility with the surrounding environment to ensure long-term effectiveness.
2.3 Constraining Layer Damping Treatment (CLDT)
Another effective conventional way of passive damping of the vibrational structure is CLD treatment, the configuration is way such that the VE is a core layer bonded together with a constraining layer and base layer as shown in. Chen and Huang [195] proposed an effective analytical model to describe the damping vibrations of CLD cylindrical shell strips Fig. 17a, based on the energy approach method which accounts for the compatibility relations between layers Fig. 17b, the discretized equations of motion based on Hamilton principle were obtained considering different transverse modes of the shell. The FRF has been derived analytically from Fig. 17c, to expose the practical validity of the proposed CLD treatment under various parameters. Nayfeh [196] developed FE model for the flexural vibration behavior of sandwich composite beam and the numerical model was validated against the experimental results. In addition, Berthelot [197] investigated the flexural vibration behavior of composite beams and plates by utilizing the Ritz method considering the effect of the beam width, frequency flexural vibration, and boundary condition on the damping vibration behavior of composite sandwich beams and plates. Sher and Moreira [198] performed a dimensionless study analysis of sandwich structure with a single or multi-layer core of VE considering various parameters’ effects to provide design guidelines for CLD treatments. Khalfi and Ross [199] investigated experimentally the transient response of a partially CLD layer sandwich plate using Fourier-Transform with VE frequency-dependent material approximated by Prony series expansions.
Kumar et al. [200] proposed an FE model based on FSDT for augmented CLD with a 0–3 VE composite layer as shown in Fig. 18a, The 0–3 VE composite layer consists of a thin array of rectangular graphite strips including within the VE layer shown in Fig. 18b. The numerical results show a significant improvement in the damping behavior of the composite sandwich plate. To obtain optimal design, a parametric study considers the effects of geometric and mechanical parameters of 0–3 VE composite layer on the model damping factor of the plate as shown in Fig. 18c. On the other hand, FRF is estimated around natural frequency values considering the optimal design of the composite plate, the results show relevant improvement in damping performance in the presence of the proposed 0–3 VE composite layer Fig. 18d.
Duan and Huo [201] proposed a novel pounding tuned mass damper (PTMD) with constrained layer damping (PTMD-CLD) consisting of a VE layer sandwiched between two metal layers, which effectively dissipates vibration energy through internal friction as shown in Fig. 19a. The experimental results show that the PTMD-CLD system significantly reduces the amplitude of free vibrations Fig. 19b and effectively mitigates the pounding force between adjacent structures rather than conventional systems. As depicted in Fig. 19c. Additionally, numerical simulations confirm the effectiveness of the CLD-PTMD in reducing structural vibrations and highlight its potential for practical applications in various engineering fields.
2.4 Hybrid Passive–Active Damping Methods Configuration
By combining the VE passive system and piezoelectric active control, a hybrid damping treatment can effectively address both resonance peaks and lower frequencies, which directly enhance the structure’s dynamic stability [202]. This can be achieved by integrating an active-constrained damping layer (ACLD) made of piezoelectric material into the passive system to increase the shear strain within the core or the induced bending stress of sandwich structures [203, 204]. Accordingly, increase the damping energy of the hybrid passive–active system [205]. therefore, several studies and models, including various configurations, modeling techniques, and parametric investigations are reported. Trindade et al. [206] investigated the dynamic performance of hybrid active–passive damping beam consisting of constraining VE (3M ISD112) layer and piezoelectric (PZT5H) actuator using model strain energy (MSE) method that was implemented into FE model of C–F sandwich beam. Ro and Baz [207] developed an optimization technique to address the optimum design parameters of ACLD patches attached to passively damped plate based on MSE method considering variation of thickness and shear modulus of VE layer. Unlike previous conventional ACLD treatments, Trindade [208] proposed a topological optimization algorithm to maximize the damping performance of C–C beam and simultaneously minimize the aggregated weight added to the structure. Further, the results show that direct active case has the highest damping performance but they also result in a higher mass increase. On the other hand, passive damping treatments offer a lower mass increase but may not be as effective in certain schemes of damping/added mass regions. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully evaluate the specific requirements and constraints of the application before selecting a damping treatment design.
In addition, Kumar and Singh [203] experimentally investigated velocity feedback control of C–F beam exposed to ACLD patches considering the variation in thickness, coverage, and placement for each VE layer. Furthermore, optimizing the position and coverage of the treatment can obtain a more uniform distribution of damping, ensuring consistent damping ratios across all vibration modes. Wang et al. [209] developed analytical model to investigate the stability improvement of VE thin plate with piezoelectric layer subjected to follower force. The analytical model incorporates piezoelectric effects while expressing the differential equation of the plate with uniformly distributed tangential follower forces. The governing equation is derived using the element-free Galerkin method. The obtained results show that, as piezoelectric layer moves closer to the plate’s center, the critical load increases. Further, dimensionless voltage leads to higher critical load, and instability types vary due to surface-bonded piezoelectric layers. Zhai et al. [210] introduced an experimental platform approach for vibration closed-loop control of ACLD aero pipeline system including closed-loop control system and vibration monitoring system to verify the vibration damping performance as depicted in Fig. 20a. The experimental results were validated using the proposed FE numerical model results. Different control voltages were considered to contrast the damping efficacy of ACLD patches. Figure 20b and c show gradual decrease in acceleration time and frequency domain responses respectively, as applied voltage increases However, the acceleration response decreases by 56.93%, but, as voltage keeps increasing, the reduction in vibration reduction per unit voltage becomes smaller, meaning that the effect of ACLD patches on vibration reduction could be limited under certain conditions. Liu et al. [211] investigated the failure mechanism of FGPE-MR as depicted in Fig. 21a by implementing novel fractional feedback equation process parameters optimization based on Grunwald–Letnikov derivative analysis to enhance the efficacy of the control feedback response and mitigate the shortcomings associated with active–passive damping. The actuator layer is a constraining layer, while the sensor layer is a base layer. The actuator layers consist of PZT-4 and PZT-5H. The FGPE-MRE sandwich plate is implemented using a Cartesian coordinate system on a linear orthotropic elastic Pasternak foundation. Figure 21b shows the signal delay curve between expected and actual input voltages for the actuator layers and by incorporating this method, failure characteristics of active–passive damping systems may be obtained more effectively. In addition, this approach allows for the capturing of compressibility behavior of MRE core in a simplified manner by considering the virtual springs as a collective entity see Fig. 21c thus, the proposed method effectively captures the transverse deformation characteristics of the FGPE-MRE.
2.5 Recently Embedded Configurations
To attain mankind’s need for new technology development, small-size composite structures with VE material are explored. Lin [6] proposed a numerical model to predict the vibration behavior of nanocomposite beams with VE core reinforced by various sizes of nanofiller particles fraction from 10 to 50 wt%. Guedes et al. [212] investigated experimentally the effect of different multi-walled carbon nanotubes MWCNT fractions on the damping behavior of medical grade ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Ansari et al. [213] investigated the nonlinear size-dependent free vibration response of FG microbeams utilizing the strain gradient SGT and Reddy beam theory based on Hamilton’s principle. The developed model considers the material length-scale parameters to demonstrate the influences of size effect on the vibrational response of FGM microbeams. SGT and CT were found to predict the highest and lowest values of non-dimensional natural frequency for all values of dimensionless length among the different microbeam models. Furthermore, it was proven that decreasing non-dimensional natural frequencies results from increasing the material property gradient index. Based on the nonlocal strain gradient theory and high-order refined beam theory, Ebrahimi et al. [214] investigated the hygro-thermal vibrational behavior of VE FG nanobeams. To accurately describe the size-dependency of nanobeams, take into consideration the size-dependent parameters’ influence on the damping frequency. The model has two parameters. and graded material properties modeled according to a power-law model which is assumed to be temperature-dependent. To determine the governing equations and boundary conditions, Hamilton’s principle is used. Karličić et al. [215] analyze the transverse free vibration of the multi-nanoplate system (MNPS) embedded in a VE medium shown in Fig. 22a, considering the small size-dependent parameter effects based on nonlocal theory as Based on the Kirchhoff–Love plate theory. The modified Kelvin–Voigt VE constitutive relation was employed to model the material and nano-scale characteristics of nanoplates. It can be noticed from Fig. 22b and c that as the nonlocal parameter is increased, both components of the complex eigenvalue decrease. This suggests that the small-scale effect decreases the system’s stiffness, resulting in the nanocomposites being “softer.” also, an increase in the system’s nanoplates (m) results in a decrease in the complex natural frequency components. Khaniki et al. [216] investigated the damping vibration behavior of VE DLNPS with moving nanoparticles using Galerkin’s base solution. Kirchhoff–Love plates and D’Alembert’s principle are used to establish the governing equations of motion while the coupling between layers and the size-dependent effects are modeled using Kelvin–Voigt VE theory and Eringen’s non-local elasticity theory.
Ansari et al. [217] proposed a fractional nanoscale Euler–Bernoulli beam model reinforced with CNT to study the size-dependent nonlinear free vibration response of VE nanobeams. The governed equation of motion is derived based on the Galerkin bases method to convert it into a fractional ordinary differential equation. To analyze the size effect and fractional behavior in the nanoscale fractional VE structures, respectively, the nonlocal parameter, VE coefficient, and order of fractional derivative were taken into consideration in the proposed model. The rate of decay amplitude was found to decrease as the order of the fractional derivative or nonlocal parameter increased. To illustrate the free vibration response, Arani et al. [218] study the damped free vibration of a VE FG-CNTRC microplate integrated with a piezoelectric sensor and actuator layers subjected to electromagnetic fields embedded in an orthotropic visco-Pasternak foundation. The equation of motion was established based on the Hamilton principle while Kelvin–Voigt model was utilized to model the VE material. Furthermore, the influences of certain significant parameters on the damped free vibration of a system are investigated, including the damping ratio of VE plates, volume fraction of CNT, various types of functionally graded distributions of CNTs, magnetic field, and external voltage. It has been pointed out that, the volume fraction of CNTs and FG distributions of CNT have the main role to increase the whole stiffness of the reinforced micro-composite plate. Oskouie et al. [219] investigated the size-dependent vibration behaviors of VE Euler–Bernoulli nanobeams using fractional derivative and the Gurtin–Murdoch theory. A thorough parametric investigation is carried out to explore the effects of the initial displacement, fractional derivative order, viscoelasticity coefficient, surface elastic modulus, residual surface stress, and thickness-to-length ratio on the nonlinear response of VE nanobeams. Additionally, it is found that surface effects can alter the nanobeam’s stiffness based on the surface elastic modulus and residual surface stress values.
Loghman et al. [220] employed the MCST and the fractional Kelvin– Voigt theory together for nonlinear size-dependent vibration behavior of the fractional VE micro-beam by using FDM coupled with Galerkin bases. the effect of the order of the fractional derivative, the VE model, and the micro-scale parameter on the nonlinear frequency response curve is taken into consideration as shown in Fig. 23. The maximum amplitude of the response can be greatly influenced by the fractional derivative order thus, it can be found that by increasing the order of the fractional derivative, the damping of the VE micro-beam is increased; therefore, the maximum amplitude is decreased as presented in Fig. 23a. Figure 23b shows the influence of the exciting force on the fractional VE micro-frequency beam’s response curve. It is revealed that the resonance frequency amplitude is significantly influenced by the excitation force’s amplitude. When the micro-effect is considered by applying MCST, the maximum amplitude and resonance frequency are seen to decrease and increase, respectively, as shown in Fig. 23c. For investigating the effect of viscous damping on the frequency–response curves of the fractional VE micro-beam, Fig. 23d is shown. It is obvious that viscous damping has a significant effect on the response’s amplitude, and that this influence is strongest close to the resonance. Rahmani et al. [221] proposed a comprehensive mathematical-mechanical model based on nonlocal Eringen’s, theory coupled with MCST by utilizing HSDT and Reddy’s beam theory (RBT) to investigate the wave propagation of a rotating VE nanobeam embedded in a Winkler -Pasternak foundation, as well as the effect of many parameters on the wave propagation frequencies, such as the nonlocal parameter and thermal gradient.
Furthermore, based on NSGT Hajmohammad et al. [222] investigated the dynamic buckling of embedded conical shells composed of sandwich layers of carbon fiber, CNT, and epoxy multiphase nanocomposites resting on the visco-Pasternak foundation. shown in Fig. 24a. The motion equations are constructed by employing FSDT, the energy method, and Hamilton’s principle. and the first dynamic instability region (DIR) of the structure was obtained using the differential quadrature method (DQM) and Bolotin’s method. The first DIR of the structure is explored concerning several parameters, including VE medium, the volume fraction of CNTs, temperature variations, and boundary conditions. Figure 24b. The DIR of the structure for various CNTs weight percentages 0, 1%, 2%, and 3%. It can be stated that as the weight % of CNTs is increased, the DIR of the structure occurs at higher frequencies. because the stiffness and flexibility of the sandwich structure increase with the increase in the weight % of CNTs. In addition, Fig. 24c. represents the effect of temperature variation on the DIR, it makes sense from a physical perspective that the structure becomes less stiff as the difference in temperature increases. Figure 24d. shows the effect of VE medium types on the DIR of the sandwich structure: without VE medium, visco-Winkler, Winkler, visco-Pasternak, and Pasternak. It can be observed that the excitation frequency of the structure is higher in the presence of VE medium, and Visco-Winkler or visco-Pasternak foundations have a lower excitation frequency than Winkler or Pasternak foundations, respectively. Also, the Pasternak foundation’s excitation frequency is higher than the Winkler foundation’s because the Pasternak foundation also considers the medium’s shear constant in addition to the Winkler foundation’s spring constant. Furthermore, Fig. 24e. shows the influence of the sandwich structure’s layer number on the DIR, four-layer numbers of 2, 3, 4, and 5 are taken into consideration, where layer 2 and layer 4 correspond to the anti-symmetric lamina and layers 3 and 5 to symmetrical lamination., the symmetric lamina has a higher DIR than the anti-symmetric lamina due to the stronger structural stability. It is also important to note that since DIR occurs at higher frequencies, layer number 3 is superior to layer number 4 in terms of performance. Yuan et al. [223] performed size-dependent dynamic buckling vibration analysis on truncated conical micro-shells composed of an FGM integrated with magnetostrictive face sheets embedded in a two-parameter Winkler -Pasternak foundation, exhibiting to-size-dependent dynamic stability axial compressive load and a magnetic field are applied to the micro shells as shown in Fig. 25a. while nonlocality and strain gradient size dependencies are maintained. The strain gradient and nonlocal load–frequency responses are compared with the traditional load–frequency responses for the dynamic stability behavior of the system under consideration. It is observed that, during the pre-buckling phase, the strain gradient, and nonlocal forms of size dependency cause, respectively, a decrease and an increase in the frequency of the system under consideration for a given value of the axial compressive load. Al-Furjan et al. [224] developed a mathematical model of size-dependent laminated annular microplates embedded in VE foundation based on non-classical continuum MSCT. The non-classical governing equations of motion and corresponding boundary conditions were established by adding strain gradient rotation using the HSDT and Hamilton’s principle respectively. Summary of several investigated VE embedded configurations are presented in Table 3.
3 Studies Reported on VE Composite Structures: Theories and Methods
The accurate modeling of the VE sandwich structures is the main key to its vibration analysis. Therefore, a lot of researchers have done a lot of work related to this problem. Nowadays, the modeling of VE sandwich structures is mainly divided into three categories: analytical, FEM, and mixed method. The mixed method proposed by some scholars is semi-analytical and semi-numerical.
3.1 Analytical Models
In 1959, Kerwin [232] developed the first analytical model of VE sandwich structure that defines the relative motion between the three layers of the EVE’s beam structure. Later, based on Kerwin’s works, DiTaranto [233] proposed a sixth-order, homogenous differential equation to study the free vibration of a three-layer beam. The results show that the damping loss factor does not depend on the boundary conditions. Mead and Markus [234, 235] utilized DiTaranto’s model to develop a model that can be applied to various boundary conditions. The Model considered the constrained layer and the base beam as the Euler–Bernoulli beam, neglecting the moment of inertia of the VE layer. According to the Mead-Markus model, the three layers have the same lateral displacement, while the longitudinal displacement of the VE layer can be expressed in terms of the longitudinal displacement of the constrained and base layers. In 2005, Ghinet [236] established a method based on wave theory to analyze the vibration of curved laminate and sandwich composite panels. The previous analytical models assume that damping vibration is only due to the shear deformation assumption of the VE layer. Although this assumption has been widely accepted, some researcher has adapted the compression deformation of the VE layer to be the damping vibration mechanism. In 1997, Douglas and Yang [237] established an analytical model and then proved experimentally the existence of the transverse compression damping mechanism in EVE’s beam in a narrow frequency band centered on the compression resonance frequency of the VE layer. Few scholars like Sylwan [238] established a composite analytical model based on the shear and compression dissipation energy assumption but the model showed an overestimation of the model loss factor in a wide frequency band. Summary of reported studies on VE composite sandwich structures using an analytical solution are presented in Table 4.
3.2 FEM Models
In engineering practice, VE composite sandwich structures have complex geometric shapes and boundary conditions. At this time, such problems cannot be solved effectively by the analytical process hence the FE approach is commonly used. There is two main finite element construction for modeling VE sandwich structure, Layered FEM and Direct FEM. The Layered method considers different units for each layer Fig. 26a while Global Direct FE. Considers the displacement of the three layers through nodal element degree of freedom (DOF) Fig. 26b [249]. The layered FEM was used in early commercial software, and it is less efficient. On the other hand, the advantage of Global Direct FE is that it provides less DOF with high accuracy [8]. Based on the shear assumption of damping energy, many researchers have developed FE models such as Johnson and Kienholz [250] and Plouin and Balmms [251] who used triangular shell elements (QUAD4) to discrete the elastic faces and solid elements (HEXA8) for the VE core implemented in NASTRAN commercial software [252]. The traditional shell elements and solid elements have been used to model the core layer. Also, Ma et al. [253] modeled the elastic surface layer and VE layer using shell elements and fully (HEXA8) compatible solid elements.
Arvin et al. [254] reported a numerical FE investigation on the free and forced vibrational response of a composite sandwich beam with a VE core using the Mead and Markus modified model taking into consideration the effects of Young modulus, rotational inertia, and core kinetic energy. Also, a parametric study on the effects of several impressive parameters involving fiber angle, the thickness of faces, and core thickness was investigated. Bilasse et al. [255] reported a study on the investigation of VE sandwich beams Linear and nonlinear vibration response. To elaborate on the linear damping characteristics of VE sandwich structures, Elmoghazy et al. [256] proposed a combined dynamics analysis methodology by utilizing 2D and 3D FE models based on shear deformation theory. The complex eigenmodes of clamped-free and simply-supported VE sandwich structures were explored based on model effective mass approach. In addition, they investigated the effect of core layer thickness and VE material damping factor \({\eta }_{v}\) on the free and forced vibration damped response as shown in. What can be seen from Fig. 27 is there no significat change noticed in natural frequancy but as increasing the VE core damping factor\({\eta }_{v}\), the rate of structural damping performance is likely to increase.
Zhang et al. [257] established electromechanical FE model for analyzing VE cylindrical sandwich smart structures, with a stacking sequence of [PZT/elastic/VE/elastic/PZT] as shown in Fig. 28a based on the zig–zag hypothesis that derived from the Reissner–Mindlin theory, which employs an eight-node element seven different transitional and rotational DOF for each node Fig. 28b. The dynamic equation was derived using Hamilton principle so that the global stiffness contains coupled stiffness matrix, the piezoelectric coupled capacity matrix, and the piezoelectric capacity matrix. To anticipate transient response of the proposed shell cylindrical sandwich smart structures, a step-driving voltage was applied, the vibration of the tip node along the hoop and radial direction (Fig. 28c). Various scenarios are taken into account to display the hoop displacements of the tip node: one involving only structural damping Cs, another involving only VE damping Cv, and a third example that takes into account both structural and VE damping Cs + Cv see Fig. 28d. The results show that the damping provided by the elastic structure has a minimal impact on vibration suppression of the proposed shell cylindrical sandwich smart structures, while the incorporation of VE material substantially enhances the damping ratio.
Wang and Inman [258] developed a two-dimension FE model to investigate the dynamic vibration of a composite beam integrated with a VE damping layer. The 10 nodal DOFs of the composite element are shown in Fig. 29a. The FE model assembled based on the Hamilton principle and the VE frequency-dependent material incorporated into the equation of motion of the composite beam through an auxiliary coordinate using the GHM model. Moita et al. [259] proposed FE model for the vibrational response of active–passive damped multi-layered plates consisting of VE and piezoelectric layers. later on, Barbosa and Farage [260] proposed an FE modeling formulation of VE sandwich beam. The FE element (shown in Fig. 29c) consists of seven elements: one four-node plate quadrilateral linear VE element; two-node elastic frame elements; and four rigid connection elements. The proposed model element has 24 physical DOF besides five dissipative DOF of plane stress for VE element resulting in a super element model with 29 DOF. Lin and Rao [136, 261] performed a vibration analysis study of multiple-layered structures with a VE damping layer using FE model. The non-linear behavior of the VE layer was simulated with the Biot damping model. The model showed high accuracy in predicting the time-dependent dissipative energy. Won et al. [262] developed six DOF 2-node beam element model based on Hamilton principle to investigate the damped force vibration of VE three-layered sandwich beam. Kpeky et al. [263] introduced solid-shell FE model (Fig. 29b) coupled with Diamant approach to model the vibration behavior of VE sandwich beam. Eshaghi et al. [264] established FE plate mode ((d)) based on CPT to study the dynamic characteristic of sandwich composite plate. The VE core material was identified as magnetorheological fluids and the experiment characteristics were incorporated into FE model. Ren et al. [264] developed layerwise four-node quadrilateral FE with 17 DOF per node (Fig. 29e) to examine the existence of transverse compression damping for sandwich plate with relatively thick frequency-dependent VE core. The equation of motion derived based virtual work principle in the variation form includes the higher-order variation of the transverse displacement within the VE core.
3.3 Mixed Models
The FEM has been widely used in the dynamic modeling of complex structures, but some problems are difficult to implement and computationally expensive. Therefore, some researchers try to ensure accurate modeling based on looking for ways to improve computational efficiency, some models between the analytical method and the FEM are proposed type, called semi-analytical semi-numerical method [266]. Daya and Potier-Ferry [267, 268] used the homotopy algorithm and the asymptotic method to solve the nonlinear eigenvalue problem of composite structure with a VE layer and obtain the natural frequency and loss factor. This method can greatly simplify the solution process. Bostrom et.al [269] derived the flexural vibration equations for homogenous, elastic, isotropic pates using displacement field expansion series Koutsawa et al. [270] studied the non-linear behavior of laminated glass beam by applying the asymptotic numerical technique to establish a diamond toolbox. The performance of the diamond toolbox was demonstrated numerically and experimentally. Lampoh et al. [271, 272] performed sensitivity studies on the non-linear mechanical behavior of laminated glass beam. This approach allows for efficient computation of the parameter convergence radius, ensuring accurate sensitivity analysis results. Additionally, by carefully selecting the modeling parameter increase, the sensitivity analysis can provide valuable insights with high precision. Ganguly et al. [273] combined Euler–Bernoulli shaft theory and Maxwell model with finite element formulation to model a damped VE shaft to obtain the vibrational response of the shaft, the results are validated by observing the effect of increasing the number of Maxwell elements on the loss factor and storage elasticity. Zhang et al. [274] conducted a multi-objective optimization of laminated VE composite plates for enhancing sound transmission performance while minimizing the additional mass of a VE damping layer. The design variables include several key parameters, including the thickness, offset position of the damping layer, fiber orientation, maximal first-order modal loss factor (MLF), maximal first sound transmission loss (STL) dip value, and minimal additional mass. Further, to investigate the average sound transmission loss (STL) within the low-frequency range of 10–1 kHz, as well as the STL values at the lowest dip frequencies, particularly the STL value at the first dip frequency, were evaluated. Figure 30a illustrates the STL in the frequency range of 10–1 kHz for plates with three different thicknesses of VE layer. In addition, it is observed that the STL curves of composite plates including a damping layer exhibit three distinct dips. Additionally, Fig. 30b presents the comparisons of the average sound transmission loss (STL) values of the composite plates within the frequency range of 10–1 kHz, as well as their STL values at the three lowest dip frequencies. These comparisons take into consideration the added mass resulting from the increased thickness of the inserted VE layer. The observation reveals a clear correlation between the average STL within the frequency range of 10–1 kHz and the averaged STL at the first three dip frequencies, with both parameters exhibiting an upward trend as the added mass of the VE increases. Summary of reported studies on VE composite sandwich structures using mixed methods and FEM are presented in Table 5.
4 Conclusion
This paper presented a comprehensive review of many computational models that were put forth to describe frequency-dependent dynamic properties of VE material, which inherently affected the dynamic response of different VE structural damping configurations using different analysis methods to obtain accurate results. Although passive vibration attenuation of modern mechanical structures is one of the most essential technologies applied to the arsenal of modern mechanical structures, it only efficiently reduces the vibration's amplitude and enhances the overall structure dynamic performance over a limited frequency range. On the contrary, hybrid passive–active damping methods may offer an optimal damping performance of composite structures since they include the ability of both sensing and actuation control. Nonetheless, small-size structures embedded with VE materials are utilized due to humanity's need for innovative multifunctional structures. However, the damping performance of VE composite structures is greatly influenced by the choice of suitable VE materials and their properties. Therefore, additional research and experiments are required to determine the ideal VE material dynamics properties and configurations for composite sandwich structures to achieve the highest damping performance. In the previous article, the research status abroad was summarized from three aspects: VE material constitutive models, VE composites structural modeling, and damping performance research. It can be seen from the literature review that for half a century, scholars have done a lot of work in these three aspects and achieved a lot of results, which greatly promoted the developments of structural dynamics research for VE composites structures, but in the following, there are still some deficiencies, which require further in-depth research:
-
The error introduced by traditional differential constitutive relations is too large, which is incompatible with FE modelling and difficult to realize engineering applications; although the complex constant modulus model is simple and easy to solve and reflects some properties of VE materials under the condition of harmonic loading, it cannot truly capture the frequency-dependent characteristics of VE materials. On the other hand, GHM and Biot models describe the frequency-dependent properties of VE materials very well, and they can be integrated into the FEM thus, more applicable in terms of engineering practice.
-
Due to the complexity of the constitutive relationship of VE materials, considering the frequency-dependent characteristics of VE materials, the introduction of complex modulus will lead to the complexity of the system matrix.
-
Although there are many modeling methods, in general, the analytical method relies on simple mathematical formulations and special boundary conditions, it shows less applicable, limited, and difficult to be used in practical engineering applications; the traditional FEM has many elements, and the calculation work is very difficult. The mathematical models established by the semi-analytic and semi-numerical method is often more complex, and the truncation during the solution will also introduce errors. So how to establish an accurate and efficient FE model needs further research.
-
In the study of the damping performance of VE composite sandwich structures, the methods of most scholars are limited to the definition and extraction of both loss factor of VE materials and the model loss factor of the structure so, there is still a lack of in-depth research on the damping mechanism, such as the shear of VE materials during vibration. There are still some controversies on shear energy consumption or compression energy consumption, and there is still a lack of quantitative research on the scope of application of various energy consumption models.
-
Various studies on numerical modelling of VE composite structures are reported immensely, yet there exist limited/none reported studies on the implementation of machine learning and deep learning techniques. Thus, further work can be dedicated to these areas.
References
Fang Y, Xia J (2022) Highly stretchable, soft, and clear viscoelastic film with good recoverability for flexible display. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 14:38398–38408. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSAMI.2C11141
Kim SY, Kim SH, Oh HJ et al (2010) Residual stress and viscoelastic deformation of film insert molded automotive parts. J Appl Polym Sci 118:2530–2540. https://doi.org/10.1002/APP.32371
Cunha-Filho AG, De Lima AMG, Donadon MV, Leão LS (2016) Flutter suppression of plates subjected to supersonic flow using passive constrained viscoelastic layers and Golla–Hughes–McTavish method. Aerosp Sci Technol 52:70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AST.2016.02.022
Shahali P, Haddadpour H, Kordkheili SAH (2020) Nonlinear dynamics of viscoelastic pipes conveying fluid placed within a uniform external cross flow. Appl Ocean Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APOR.2019.101970
Hock K, Langlie C (1991) Calculation of shafts in deposits with regard to imperfections, buckling and visco-elastic material properties. Comput Struct 40:329–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(91)90358-S
Lin JC (2010) Characterization and numerical evaluation of vibration on elastic-viscoelastic sandwich structures. Compos Struct 92:669–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2009.09.025
Lu P, Liu XD, Ma X, Huang WB (2012) Analysis of damping characteristics for sandwich beams with a polyurea viscoelastic layer. Adv Mater Res 374–377:764–769. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.374-377.764
Elkhaldi I, Charpentier I, Daya EM (2012) A gradient method for viscoelastic behaviour identification of damped sandwich structures. Compt Rend Mec 340:619–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2012.05.001
De Lima AMG, Guaraldo-Neto B, Sales TP, Rade DA (2014) A time-domain modeling of systems containing viscoelastic materials and shape memory alloys as applied to the problem of vibration attenuation. Eng Struct 68:85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2014.02.035
Patil R, Joladarashi S, Kadoli R (2022) Bending and vibration studies of FG porous sandwich beam with viscoelastic boundary conditions: FE approach. Mech Adv Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2022.2079030
Mahmoudkhani S, Haddadpour H (2013) Nonlinear vibration of viscoelastic sandwich plates under narrow-band random excitations. Nonlinear Dyn 74:165–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-013-0956-y
Sheng M, Guo Z, Qin Q, He Y (2018) Vibration characteristics of a sandwich plate with viscoelastic periodic cores. Compos Struct 206:54–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.110
Lewandowski R, Litewka P, Wielentejczyk P (2021) Free vibrations of laminate plates with viscoelastic layers using the refined zig-zag theory – Part 1. Theoretical background. Compos Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114547
Litewka P, Lewandowski R, Wielentejczyk P (2021) Free vibrations of laminate plates with viscoelastic layers using the refined zig-zag theory—part 2. Numerical analysis. Compos Struct 278:114550. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2021.114550
Hu YC, Huang SC (2000) Frequency response and damping effect of three-layer thin shell with viscoelastic core. Comput Struct 76:577–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00182-0
Boutyour EH, Daya EM, Azrar L, Potier-Ferry M (2006) An approximated harmonic balance method for nonlinear vibration of viscoelastic structures. J Eng Mater Technol 128:330–334. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2204944
Yang C, Jin G, Liu Z et al (2015) Vibration and damping analysis of thick sandwich cylindrical shells with a viscoelastic core under arbitrary boundary conditions. Int J Mech Sci 92:162–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.12.003
Sahu NK, Biswal DK, Joseph SV, Mohanty SC (2020) Vibration and damping analysis of doubly curved viscoelastic-FGM sandwich shell structures using FOSDT. Structures 26:24–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.04.007
Chen Z, Gong Q, Zhao W, Gui H (2022) Analysis of viscoelastic damping effect on the underwater acoustic radiation of a ring-stiffened conical shell. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031566
Marinković D, Rama G (2017) Co-rotational shell element for numerical analysis of laminated piezoelectric composite structures. Compos Part B Eng 125:144–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2017.05.061
Seilsepour H, Zarastvand M, Talebitooti R (2022) Acoustic insulation characteristics of sandwich composite shell systems with double curvature: the effect of nature of viscoelastic core. JVC/Journal Vib Control. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775463211056758
Marynowski K, Kapitaniak T (2002) Kelvin–Voigt versus Bürgers internal damping in modeling of axially moving viscoelastic web. Int J Non Linear Mech 37:1147–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7462(01)00142-1
Fancello E, Ponthot JP, Stainier L (2006) A variational formulation of constitutive models and updates in non-linear finite viscoelasticity. Int J Numer Methods Eng 65:1831–1864. https://doi.org/10.1002/NME.1525
Lewandowski R, Bartkowiak A, Maciejewski H (2012) Dynamic analysis of frames with viscoelastic dampers: a comparison of damper models. Struct Eng Mech 41:113–137. https://doi.org/10.12989/SEM.2012.41.1.113
Ye K, Li L, Tang J (2003) Stochastic seismic response of structures with added viscoelastic dampers modeled by fractional derivative. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 2:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02857545
Xu H, Jiang X (2017) Creep constitutive models for viscoelastic materials based on fractional derivatives. Comput Math with Appl 73:1377–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAMWA.2016.05.002
Di Paola M, Reddy JN, Ruocco E (2020) On the application of fractional calculus for the formulation of viscoelastic Reddy beam. Meccanica 55:1365–1378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-020-01177-3
Sahoo SR (2020) Active damping of geometrically nonlinear vibrations of smart composite shells using elliptical smart constrained layer damping treatment with fractional derivative viscoelastic layer. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 31:587–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X19888800/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_1045389X19888800-FIG2.JPEG
Kusche S (2016) THE BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD FOR VISCOELASTIC MATERIAL APPLIED TO THE OBLIQUE IMPACT OF SPHERES. Facta Univ Ser Mech Eng 14:293–300. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME1603293K
Heise R (2015) Flash temperatures generated by friction of a viscoelastic body. Facta Univ Ser Mech Eng 13:47–65
McTavish DJ (2003) Shock response of a damped linear structure using GHM finite elements. In: Collecion of technical papers—AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, vol 3, pp 1681–1689. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-1591
Afshin M, Sadighi M, Shakeri M (2011) Vibration and damping analysis of cylindrical sandwich panels containing a viscoelastic flexible core. J Sandw Struct Mater 13:331–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636210382313
Martin LA, Inman DJ (2013) A novel viscoelastic material modulus function for modifying the Golla-Hughes-McTavish method. Int J Acoust Vib 18:102–108. https://doi.org/10.20855/IJAV.2013.18.3325
Shi YM, Li ZF, Hua HX et al (2001) The modelling and vibration control of beams with active constrained layer damping. J Sound Vib 245:785–800. https://doi.org/10.1006/JSVI.2001.3614
Huang Z, Wang X, Wu N et al (2019) A finite element model for the vibration analysis of sandwich beam with frequency-dependent viscoelastic material core. Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/MA12203390
Bottoni M, Mazzotti C, Savoia M (2008) A finite element model for linear viscoelastic behaviour of pultruded thin-walled beams under general loadings. Int J Solids Struct 45:770–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2007.08.028
Huang Z, Pan J, Yang Z et al (2021) Transverse vibration of viscoelastic sandwich structures: finite element modeling and experimental study. Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/MA14247751
Wang H, Thompson DG, Schoonover JR et al (2001) DMA-FTIR creep-recovery study of a poly(ester urethane) elastomer with molecular-level viscoelastic modeling. Macromolecules 34:7084–7090. https://doi.org/10.1021/MA001783B/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/MA001783BF00004.JPEG
Lewandowski R, Przychodzki M (2018) Approximate method for temperature-dependent characteristics of structures with viscoelastic dampers. Arch Appl Mech 88:1695–1711. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00419-018-1394-6/FIGURES/7
Xu Y, Xu ZD, Guo YQ et al (2023) Study on viscoelastic materials at micro scale pondering supramolecular interaction impacts with DMA tests and fractional derivative modeling. J Appl Polym Sci 140:e53660. https://doi.org/10.1002/APP.53660
Xu ZD, Yang Y, Zhu YN, Ge T (2023) Experimental study and mathematical modeling of viscoelastic dampers with wider temperature range based on blended rubber matrix. J Build Eng 70:106414. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2023.106414
Ercan N, Durmus A (2022) Structure–property relationships and constitutive viscoelastic behaviors of polyether-block-amide elastomers in melt and solid states. J Appl Polym Sci 139:e52458. https://doi.org/10.1002/APP.52458
Müller-Pabel M, Rodríguez Agudo JA, Gude M (2022) Measuring and understanding cure-dependent viscoelastic properties of epoxy resin: a review. Polym Test 114:107701. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.POLYMERTESTING.2022.107701
Mu Q (2022) Experimental data for creep and dynamic mechanical properties of polycarbonate and polycarbonate/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene. Data Briefs 42:108264. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DIB.2022.108264
You H, Lim HJ, Yun GJ (2022) A micromechanics-based time-domain viscoelastic constitutive model for particulate composites: theory and experimental validation. Adv Aircr Spacecr Sci 9:217–242. https://doi.org/10.12989/aas.2022.9.3.217
Chantalakhana C, Stanway R (2001) ACTIVE CONSTRAINED LAYER DAMPING OF CLAMPED-CLAMPED PLATE VIBRATIONS. J Sound Vib 241:755–777. https://doi.org/10.1006/JSVI.2000.3317
Milić P, Marinković D, Klinge S, Ćojbašić Ž (2023) Reissner–Mindlin based isogeometric finite element formulation for piezoelectric active laminated shells. Teh Vjesn 30:416–425. https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20230128000280
Milić P, Marinković D, Ćojbašić Ž (2023) Geometrically nonlinear analysis of piezoelectric active laminated shells by means of isogeometric FE FORMULATION. Facta Univ Ser Mech Eng. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME050123059M
Soni ML, Bogner FK (2012) Finite element vibration analysis of damped structures. AIAA J 20:700–707. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.51127
Marinković D, Köppe H, Gabbert U (2006) Numerically efficient finite element formulation for modeling active composite laminates. Mech Adv Mater Struct 13:379–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376490600777624
Kuchak AJT, Marinkovic D, Zehn M (2020) Finite element model updating—case study of a rail damper. Struct Eng Mech 73:27–29. https://doi.org/10.12989/SEM.2020.73.1.027
Irazu L, Elejabarrieta MJ (2015) The influence of viscoelastic film thickness on the dynamic characteristics of thin sandwich structures. Compos Struct 134:421–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2015.07.086
Xing YX, Gao YS, Liu T et al (2023) Homogenization modeling and numerical simulation of piezolaminated lattice sandwich structures with viscoelastic material. Mater Today Commun 35:105682. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTCOMM.2023.105682
Wang R, Shang J, Li X et al (2018) Vibration and damping characteristics of 3D printed Kagome lattice with viscoelastic material filling. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27963-4
Ditaranto RA, Blasingame W (1967) Composite damping of vibrating sandwich beams. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 89:633–638. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3610124
Park TH (1997) Vibration and damping characteristics of a beam with a partially sandwiched viscoelastic layer. J Adhes 61:97–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218469708010518
Aenlle ML, Pelayo F (2013) Frequency response of laminated glass elements: analytical modeling and effective thickness. Appl Mech Rev. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023929/369924
Galuppi L, Royer-Carfagni G (2012) Laminated beams with viscoelastic interlayer. Int J Solids Struct 49:2637–2645. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2012.05.028
Guo H, Shang F, Tian X, He T (2020) An analytical study of transient thermo-viscoelastic responses of viscoelastic laminated sandwich composite structure for vibration control. Mech Adv Mater Struct 29:171–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2020.1756544
Sun CT, Sankar BV, Rao VS (1990) Damping and vibration control of unidirectional composite laminates using add-on viscoelastic materials. J Sound Vib 139:277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(90)90888-7
Araújo AL, Mota Soares CM, Mota Soares CA (2010) A viscoelastic sandwich finite element model for the analysis of passive, active and hybrid structures. Appl Compos Mater 17:529–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10443-010-9141-3
Sairajan KK, Aglietti GS, Walker SJI (2014) Correlation of finite element models of multi-physics systems. J Sound Vib 333:4051–4070. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSV.2014.04.010
Hernández WP, Castello DA, Ritto TG (2016) Uncertainty propagation analysis in laminated structures with viscoelastic core. Comput Struct 164:23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.10.006
Pradeep V, Ganesan N, Padmanabhan C (2006) Buckling and vibration behavior of a viscoelastic sandwich cylinder under thermal environment. Int J Comput Methods Eng Sci Mech 7:389–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502280600790413
Eratli N, Argeso H, Çalim FF et al (2014) Dynamic analysis of linear viscoelastic cylindrical and conical helicoidal rods using the mixed FEM. J Sound Vib 333:3671–3690. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSV.2014.03.017
Chen W, Liu S (2014) Topology optimization of microstructures of viscoelastic damping materials for a prescribed shear modulus. Int J Solids Struct 50:287–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1049-3
Li H, Li Z, Safaei B et al (2021) Nonlinear vibration analysis of fiber metal laminated plates with multiple viscoelastic layers. Thin Walled Struct 168:108297. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TWS.2021.108297
Jalaei MH, Civalek Ö (2019) On dynamic instability of magnetically embedded viscoelastic porous FG nanobeam. Int J Eng Sci 143:14–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJENGSCI.2019.06.013
Kang L, Sun C, Liu H, Liu B (2022) Determination of frequency-dependent shear modulus of viscoelastic layer via a constrained sandwich beam. Polymers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM14183751
Gupta A, Panda S, Reddy RS (2023) Damping capabilities of viscoelastic composites for active/passive constrained layer damping of the plate vibration: a comparative study. J Vib Eng Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42417-023-00882-Z/TABLES/14
Shahsavari D, Karami B, Tounsi A (2023) Wave propagation in a porous functionally graded curved viscoelastic nano-size beam. Waves Random Complex Media. https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2022.2164376
Youzera H, Selim Saleh MM, Ghazwani MH et al (2023) Nonlinear damping and forced vibration analysis of sandwich functionally graded material beams with composite viscoelastic core layer. Mech Based Des Struct Mach. https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2023.2229911
Karmi Y, Tekili S, Khadri Y, Boumediri H (2023) Vibroacoustic analysis in the thermal environment of PCLD sandwich beams with frequency and temperature dependent viscoelastic cores. J Vib Eng Technol 1:3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-023-01065-6
Trindade MA, Benjeddou A (2002) Hybrid active–passive damping treatments using viscoelastic and piezoelectric materials: review and assessment. J Vib Control 8:699–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546029186
Hajianmaleki M, Qatu MS (2013) Vibrations of straight and curved composite beams: a review. Compos Struct 100:218–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2013.01.001
Zhou XQ, Yu DY, Shao XY et al (2016) Research and applications of viscoelastic vibration damping materials: a review. Compos Struct 136:460–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2015.10.014
Lewandowski R, Litewka P, Łasecka-Plura M, Pawlak ZM (2023) Dynamics of structures, frames, and plates with viscoelastic dampers or layers: a literature review. Build 13:2223. https://doi.org/10.3390/BUILDINGS13092223
Menard KP (1999) Dynamic mechanical analysis: a practical introduction. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Tschoegl NW (1980) Energy storage and dissipation in a linear viscoelastic material. In: International conference on plastic surgery and aesthetic surgery, vol 3, pp 697–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73602-5_9/COVER
Cooper RF (2002) Seismic wave attenuation: energy dissipation in viscoelastic crystalline solids. Rev Miner Geochem 51:253–290. https://doi.org/10.2138/GSRMG.51.1.253
Sharma S, Shankar V, Joshi YM (2023) Viscoelasticity and rheological hysteresis. J Rheol (N Y) 67:139–155. https://doi.org/10.1122/8.0000462
Gould PL, Feng Y (2018) Viscoelasticity. In: Introduction to linear Elasticity, pp 277–296. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73885-7_10
Sarwar W, Sarwar R (2019) Vibration control devices for building structures and installation approach: a review. Civ Environ Eng Rep 29:74–100. https://doi.org/10.2478/CEER-2019-0018
Jiang F, Ding Z, Wu Y et al (2020) Energy dissipation characteristics and parameter identification of symmetrically coated damping structure of pipelines under different temperature environment. Symmetry 12:1283. https://doi.org/10.3390/SYM12081283
Wang J, Sun D, Liu S, Zhang X (2017) Damping characteristics of viscoelastic damping structure under coupled condition. Math Comput Appl 22:27. https://doi.org/10.3390/MCA22010027
Gröhlich M, Lang A, Böswald M, Meier J (2021) Viscoelastic damping design—thermal impact on a constrained layer damping treatment. Mater Des. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2021.109885
Xu Y, Xu Z, Guo Y et al (2021) Dynamic properties and energy dissipation study of sandwich viscoelastic damper considering temperature influence. Buildings 11:470. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11100470
Burlon A, Alotta G, Di Paola M, Failla G (2021) An original perspective on variable-order fractional operators for viscoelastic materials. Meccanica 56:769–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11012-021-01316-4/FIGURES/15
Guo H, Chen Y, Tao J et al (2019) A viscoelastic constitutive relation for the rate-dependent mechanical behavior of rubber-like elastomers based on thermodynamic theory. Mater Des 178:107876. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2019.107876
Tsenoglou CJ, Voyiatzis E, Gotsis AD (2006) Simple constitutive modelling of nonlinear viscoelasticity under general extension. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 138:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNNFM.2006.05.002
Lahellec N, Suquet P (2007) Effective behavior of linear viscoelastic composites: a time-integration approach. Int J Solids Struct 44:507–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2006.04.038
Muliana A, Rajagopal KR, Tscharnuter D (2015) A nonlinear integral model for describing responses of viscoelastic solids. Int J Solids Struct 58:146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSOLSTR.2014.12.026
Ding H, Tang YQ, Chen LQ (2017) Frequencies of transverse vibration of an axially moving viscoelastic beam. JVC/Journal Vib Control 23:3504–3514. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546315600311/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_1077546315600311-FIG6.JPEG
Xu Y, Wei P (2023) Dynamic response of fractional-order viscoelastic high-order shear beam based on nonlocal strain gradient elasticity. Acta Mech Solida Sin 36:875–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10338-023-00428-6/FIGURES/5
Ananthapadmanabhan S, Saravanan U (2023) Multi-field formulations for solving plane problems involving viscoelastic constitutive relations. Appl Eng Sci 13:100120. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLES.2022.100120
Roylance D (2001) Engineering viscoelasticity. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
Sun C, Lu Y (1995) Vibration damping of structural elements. Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs
Zener CM, Siegel S (1949) Elasticity and anelasticity of metals. J Phys Colloid Chem 53:1468–1468. https://doi.org/10.1021/j150474a017
Wineman A (2020) Viscoelastic solids. In: Solid mechanics and its applications, vol 262. Springer, Cham, pp 81–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31547-4_4
Roland CM (2011) Viscoelastic behavior of rubbery materials. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Duque-Daza C, Alexiadis A (2021) A simplified framework for modelling viscoelastic fluids in discrete multiphysics. ChemEngineering 5:61. https://doi.org/10.3390/CHEMENGINEERING5030061/S1
Tanaka E, Van Eijden T (2003) Biomechanical behavior of the temporomandibular joint disc. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 14:138–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/154411130301400207/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_154411130301400207-FIG9.JPEG
Bonfanti A, Kaplan JL, Charras G, Kabla A (2020) Fractional viscoelastic models for power-law materials. Soft Matter 16:6002–6020. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SM00354A
Eldred LB, Baker WP, Palazotto AN (1995) Kelvin–Voigt versus fractional derivative model as constitutive relations for viscoelastic materials. AIAA J 33:547–550. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12471
Padovan J, Guo Y (1988) General response of viscoelastic systems modelled by fractional operators. J Franklin Inst 325:247–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-0032(88)90086-5
Park SW (2001) Analytical modeling of viscoelastic dampers for structural and vibration control. Int J Solids Struct 38:8065–8092. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(01)00026-9
Manoharan S, Ramadoss G, Suresha B (2014) Investigate the fiber reinforcement effect on viscoelastic response and thermal stability of hybrid friction composites. Appl Mech Mater 591:132–136. https://doi.org/10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/AMM.591.132
Banks HT, Hu S, Kenz ZR (2010) A brief review of elasticity and viscoelasticity. Adv Appl Math Mech 3:1–51
Wang D, de Boer G, Ghanbarzadeh A (2022) A numerical model for investigating the effect of viscoelasticity on the partial slip solution. Materials (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/MA15155182
Stolyarov O, Mostovykh P (2022) Creep and stress relaxation behavior of woven polyester fabrics: experiment and modeling. Mech Time-Depend Mater. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11043-022-09537-0
Vu AT, de los Angeles Avila Hernandez R, Grunwald T, Bergs T (2022) Modeling nonequilibrium thermoviscoelastic material behaviors of glass in nonisothermal glass molding. J Am Ceram Soc 105:6799–6815. https://doi.org/10.1111/JACE.18605
Bagley RL, Torvik PJ (1983) Fractional calculus—a different approach to the analysis of viscoelastically damped structures. AIAA J 21:741–748. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.8142
Bagley RL, Torvik PJ (1986) On the fractional calculus model of viscoelastic behavior. J Rheol (N Y) 30:133–155. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.549887
Karner T, Belšak R, Gotlih J (2022) Using a fully fractional generalised Maxwell model for describing the time dependent sinusoidal creep of a dielectric elastomer actuator. Fractal Fract. https://doi.org/10.3390/FRACTALFRACT6120720
Valvano S, Alaimo A, Orlando C (2023) Higher-order models for the passive damping analysis of variable-angle-tow composite plates. Comput Struct 280:106992. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUC.2023.106992
De Espiíndola JJ, Da Silva Neto JM, Lopes EMO (2005) A generalised fractional derivative approach to viscoelastic material properties measurement. Appl Math Comput 164:493–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMC.2004.06.099
Brinson HF, Brinson LC (2008) Polymer engineering science and viscoelasticity: an introduction. Springer, New York
Drozdov AD (1998) Mechanics of viscoelastic solids. Wiley, Chichester
Bergström J (2015) Mechanics of solid polymers: theory and computational modeling. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Sun PX, Yang H (2021) Time-domain calculation method based on improved hysteretic damping model. Gongcheng Lixue/Eng Mech 38:8–19. https://doi.org/10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.05.0313
Scanlan RH (1970) Linear damping models and causality in vibrations. J Sound Vib 13:499–503
Bert CW (1973) Material damping. an introductory review of mathematic measures and experimental technique. J Sound Vib 29:129–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(73)80131-2
Shu Z, You R, Zhou Y (2022) Viscoelastic materials for structural dampers: a review. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2022.127955
Golla DF, Hughes PC (1985) Dynamics of viscoelastic structures—a time-domain, finite element formulation. J Appl Mech 52:897–906. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3169166
Mctavish D, Hughes P (1992) Finite element modeling of linear viscoelastic structures—the GHM method. In: 33rd AIAA structures structural dynamics and materials conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1992-2380
McTavish DJ, Hughes PC (1993) Modeling of linear viscoelastic space structures. J Vib Acoust 115:103–110. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2930302
Cao YQ, Deng ZX, Li J, Liu HJ (2010) Multi-parameter optimization algorithm of frequency-dependent model for viscoelastic damping material. Adv Mater Res 129–131:416–420. https://doi.org/10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/AMR.129-131.416
Gibson WC, Smith CA, McTavish DJ (1996) Implementation of the GHM method for viscoelastic materials using MATLAB and NASTRAN. Smart Struct Mater 2445:312–323
Balamurugan V, Narayanan S (2002) Active–passive hybrid damping in beams with enhanced smart constrained layer treatment. Eng Struct 24:355–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00101-8
Kattimani SC, Ray MC (2014) Smart damping of geometrically nonlinear vibrations of magneto-electro-elastic plates. Compos Struct 114:51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2014.03.050
Huang Z, Qin Z, Chu F (2016) Damping mechanism of elastic-viscoelastic–elastic sandwich structures. Compos Struct 153:96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.105
Biot MA (1955) Variational principles in irreversible thermodynamics with application to viscoelasticity. Phys Rev 97:1463–1469. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.97.1463
Biot MA (1954) Theory of stress-strain relations in anisotropic viscoelasticity and relaxation phenomena. J Appl Phys 25:1385–1391. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1721573
Zhang J, Zheng GT (2007) The Biot model and its application in viscoelastic composite structures. J Vib Acoust 129:533–540. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2731408
Guo X, Jiang J (2011) Passive vibration control of truss-cored sandwich plate with planar Kagome truss as one face plane. Sci China Technol Sci 54:1113–1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11431-011-4354-8
Lin F, Rao MD, Chang W et al (2013) Vibroacoustical analysis of multiple-layered structures with viscoelastic damping cores. ISRN Mech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/645232
Lin F (2010) Vibro-acoustical analysis and design of a multiple-layer constrained viscoelastic damping structure constrained viscoelastic damping structure. Dissertation, Michigan Technological University. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etds/383
Eugeni M, Saltari F, Mastroddi F (2021) Structural damping models for passive aeroelastic control. Aerosp Sci Technol 118:107011. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AST.2021.107011
Mastroddi F, Martarelli F, Eugeni M, Riso C (2019) Time- and frequency-domain linear viscoelastic modeling of highly damped aerospace structures. Mech Syst Signal Process 122:42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YMSSP.2018.12.023
Lesieutre GA (1992) Finite elements for dynamic modeling of uniaxial rods with frequency-dependent material properties. Int J Solids Struct 29:1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(92)90134-F
Lesieutre GA, Mingori DL (2012) Finite element modeling of frequency-dependent material damping using augmenting thermodynamic fields. J Guidance 13:1040–1050. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20577
Lesieutre GA, Bianchini E, Maiani A (1996) Finite element modeling of one-dimensional viscoelastic structures using anelastic displacement fields. J Guid Control Dyn 19:520–527. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21652
Yiu YC (1993) Finite element analysis of structures with classical viscoelastic materials. In: Collecion of technical papers—AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, pp 2110–2119. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1993-1551
Lin CY, Chen YC, Lin CH, Chang KV (2022) Constitutive equations for analyzing stress relaxation and creep of viscoelastic materials based on standard linear solid model derived with finite loading rate. Polymers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM14102124
Lin CY (2020) Alternative form of standard linear solid model for characterizing stress relaxation and creep: including a novel parameter for quantifying the ratio of fluids to solids of a viscoelastic solid. Front Mater 7:11. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMATS.2020.00011/BIBTEX
Lin CY, Chen WC (2022) How complex viscoelastic behaviors within a viscoelastic three-layer structure affect the measurement accuracy of ultrasound viscoelastic creep imaging. Mech Adv Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2022.2049933/SUPPL_FILE/UMCM_A_2049933_SM6180.PDF
Kolawole JT, Combrinck R, Boshoff WP (2020) Rheo-viscoelastic behaviour of fresh cement-based materials: cement paste, mortar and concrete. Constr Build Mater 248:118667. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.118667
Zhou Z (1991) Creep and stress relaxation of an incompressible viscoelastic material of the rate type. Int J Solids Struct 28:617–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(91)90175-F
Findley W, Davis F (2013) Creep and relaxation of nonlinear viscoelastic materials. DOVER, New York
Yetkinler DN, Litsky AS (1998) Viscoelastic behaviour of acrylic bone cements. Biomaterials 19:1551–1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00115-4
Ornaghi HL, Almeida JHS, Monticeli FM, Neves RM (2020) Stress relaxation, creep, and recovery of carbon fiber non-crimp fabric composites. Compos Part C 3:100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCOMC.2020.100051
Ornaghi HL, Almeida HS, Monticeli FM et al (2020) Time-temperature behavior of carbon/epoxy laminates under creep loading. Mech Time-Depend Mater. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-020-09463-z
Monticeli FM, Ornaghi HL, Neves RM, Odila Hilário Cioffi M (2020) Creep/recovery and stress-relaxation tests applied in a standardized carbon fiber/epoxy composite: design of experiment approach. J Strain Anal Eng Des 55:109–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309324719892710
Sorvari J, Malinen M (2006) Determination of the relaxation modulus of a linearly viscoelastic material. Mech Time-Depend Mater 10:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11043-006-9011-4/METRICS
Song WB, Wang ZD (2013) Characterization of viscoelastic behavior of shape memory epoxy systems. J Appl Polym Sci 128:199–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/APP.38158
Schoff CK (2008) Dynamic mechanical analysis. Coat TechNOL 5:44. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429190308/DYNAMIC-MECHANICAL-ANALYSIS-KEVIN-MENARD-NOAH-MENARD
Ferry J (1980) Viscoelastic properties of polymers. Wiley, New York
Chia CT, Khor KA, Gu YW, Boey F (2002) Viscoelastic properties of plasma sprayed NiCoCrAlY coatings. Thin Solid Films 405:146–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01701-1
Singh SP, Singh RP, Smith JF (2004) Displacement modulation based dynamic nanoindentation for viscoelastic material characterization. MRS Online Proc Libr 841(R4):6. https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-841-R4.6
Melo JDD, Radford DW (2005) Time and temperature dependence of the viscoelastic properties of CFRP by dynamic mechanical analysis. Compos Struct 70:240–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2004.08.025
Hong H, Jia DM, He H (2006) Influences of grafted side chains on the viscoelastic behavior of ternary graft copolymers. Polym Plasticity Technol Eng 45:1263–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602550600915169
Jrad H, Renaud F, Dion JL et al (2013) Experimental characterization, modeling and parametric identification of the hysteretic friction behavior of viscoelastic joints. Int J Appl Mech. https://doi.org/10.1142/S175882511350018X
Cheng G, Gelin JC, Barrière T (2013) Physical modelling and identification of polymer viscoelastic behaviour above glass transition temperature and application to the numerical simulation of the hot embossing process. Key Eng Mater 554–557:1763–1776. https://doi.org/10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/KEM.554-557.1763
Li ZL, Qin Y, Sun B et al (2019) A fractional approach to the time-temperature dependence of dynamic viscoelastic behavior. J Mech Sci Technol 33:139–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12206-018-1214-5
Asadian H, Shelesh-Nezhad K (2020) Simulation of dynamic mechanical and viscoelastic behavior in polymer/clay nanocomposites. Polym Compos 41:817–823. https://doi.org/10.1002/PC.25412
Xu Y, Xu ZD, Guo YQ et al (2021) Mathematical modeling and test verification of viscoelastic materials considering microstructures and ambient temperature influence. Mech Adv Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2021.1992689
Pittenger B, Osechinskiy S, Yablon D, Mueller T (2019) Nanoscale DMA with the atomic force microscope: a new method for measuring viscoelastic properties of nanostructured polymer materials. JOM 71:3390–3398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-019-03698-z
Wang F, Liao J, Huang C et al (2022) Study on the damping dynamics characteristics of a viscoelastic damping material. Processes. https://doi.org/10.3390/PR10040635
Asaletha R, Bindu P, Aravind I et al (2008) Stress-relaxation behavior of natural rubber/polystyrene and natural rubber/polystyrene/natural rubber-graft-polystyrene blends. J Appl Polym Sci 108:904–913. https://doi.org/10.1002/APP.27395
Reddy KS, Umakanthan S, Krishnan JM (2012) Constant strain rate experiments and constitutive modeling for a class of bitumen. Mech Time-Depend Mater 16:251–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-011-9155-8
Saravanan U (2012) On the use of linear viscoelastic constitutive relations to model asphalt. Int J Pavem Eng 13:360–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2011.599386
Bier JM, Verbeek CJR, Lay MC, Van Der Merwe DW (2014) Short-term viscoelastic properties of bloodmeal-based thermoplastics. Adv Polym Technol. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADV.21420
Farina A, Fusi L, Rosso F, Saccomandi G (2022) Creep, recovery and vibration of an incompressible viscoelastic material of the rate type: simple tension case. Int J Non Linear Mech. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJNONLINMEC.2021.103851
Zhou J, Tan Y, Song Y et al (2021) Viscoelastic mechanical behavior of periodontal ligament: creep and relaxation hyper-viscoelastic constitutive models. Mech Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MECHMAT.2021.104079
Wan L, Lin F (2023) Measurement of relaxation modulus of viscoelastic materials and design of testing device. Appl Sci 13:6511. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP13116511
Herzog B, Gardner DJ, Lopez-Anido R, Goodell B (2005) Glass-transition temperature based on dynamic mechanical thermal analysis techniques as an indicator of the adhesive performance of vinyl ester resin. J Appl Polym Sci 97:2221–2229. https://doi.org/10.1002/APP.21868
Esmaeeli R, Aliniagerdroudbari H, Hashemi SR et al (2019) Designing a new dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) system for testing viscoelastic materials at high frequencies. Model Simul Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7026267
Pierro E, Carbone G (2021) A new technique for the characterization of viscoelastic materials: theory, experiments and comparison with DMA. J Sound Vib 515:116462. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSV.2021.116462
Burgarella B, Maurel-Pantel A, Lahellec N et al (2019) Effective viscoelastic behavior of short fibers composites using virtual DMA experiments. Mech Time-Depend Mater 23:337–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-018-9386-z
Burgarella B, Maurel-Pantel A, Lahellec N et al (2022) Modeling the effective viscoelastic properties of PEEK matrix reinforced by arbitrary oriented short glass fibers. Mech Time-Depend Mater 26:49–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-020-09475-9
Prusty JK, Papazafeiropoulos G, Mohanty SC et al (2023) Experimental verification of the neural network optimization algorithm for identifying frequency-dependent constitutive parameters of viscoelastic materials. J Vib Eng Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-023-00972-y
Nashif AD, Jones DIG, Henderson JP (1985) Vibration damping. Wiley, New York
Johnson CD (1995) Design of passive damping systems. J Vib Acoust 117:171–176. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2838659
Huang Z, Qin Z, Chu F (2015) A comparative study of finite element modeling techniques for dynamic analysis of elastic-viscoelastic-elastic sandwich structures. J Sandwich Struct Mater 18:531–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636215623091
Huang Z, Qin Z, Chu F (2016) Vibration and damping characteristics of sandwich plates with viscoelastic core. J Vib Control 22:1876–1888. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546314545527
Létourneaux F, Guerrand S, Poisson F (2000) Assessment of the acoustical comfort in high-speed trains at the SNCF: integration of subjective parameters. J Sound Vib 231:839–846. https://doi.org/10.1006/JSVI.1999.2567
Rao MD (2003) Recent applications of viscoelastic damping for noise control in automobiles and commercial airplanes. J Sound Vib 262:457–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00106-8
Hong JY, Cha Y, Jeon JY (2015) Noise in the passenger cars of high-speed trains. J Acoust Soc Am 138:3513. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4936900
Parizet E, Hamzaoui N, Jacquemoud J (2002) Noise assessment in a high-speed train. Appl Acoust 63:1109–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(02)00017-8
Nakra BC (1998) Vibration control in machines and structures using viscoelastic damping. J Sound Vib 211:449–466. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1997.1317
Yi S, Ahmad MF, Hilton HH (1993) Dynamic responses of plates with viscoelastic damping treatment. In: Proceedings of ASME international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, pp 437–445. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC1993-0133
Kumar A, Panda S (2016) Design of a 1–3 viscoelastic composite layer for improved free/constrained layer passive damping treatment of structural vibration. Compos Part B Eng 96:204–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.020
Cortés F, Elejabarrieta MJ (2008) Structural vibration of flexural beams with thick unconstrained layer damping. Int J Solids Struct 45:5805–5813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.06.015
He W, He K, Yao C et al (2022) Comparison of damping performance of an aluminum bridge via material damping, support damping and external damping methods. Structures 45:1139–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ISTRUC.2022.09.089
Chen LH, Huang SC (2001) Vibration attenuation of a cylindrical shell with constrained layer damping strips treatment. Comput Struct 79:1355–1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00009-8
Nayfeh SA (2004) Damping of flexural vibration in the plane of lamination of elastic-viscoelastic sandwich beams. J Sound Vib 276:689–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2003.08.034
Berthelot JM (2006) Damping analysis of laminated beams and plates using the Ritz method. Compos Struct 74:186–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.04.031
Sher BR, Moreira RAS (2013) Dimensionless analysis of constrained damping treatments. Compos Struct 99:241–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.11.037
Khalfi B, Ross A (2013) Transient response of a plate with partial constrained viscoelastic layer damping. Int J Mech Sci 68:304–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.01.032
Kumar A, Panda S, Narsaria V, Kumar A (2018) Augmented constrained layer damping in plates through the optimal design of a 0–3 viscoelastic composite layer. JVC/Journal Vib Control 24:5514–5524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546318756502
Duan Y, Huo L (2023) Pounding tuned mass damper with constrained layer damping. Adv Struct Eng 26:2110–2122. https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332221149484/FORMAT/EPUB
Benjeddou A (2001) Advances in hybrid active-passive vibration and noise control via piezoelectric and viscoelastic constrained layer treatments. JVC/Journal Vib Control 7:565–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/107754630100700406
Kumar N, Singh SP (2009) Vibration and damping characteristics of beams with active constrained layer treatments under parametric variations. Mater Des 30:4162–4174. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2009.04.044
Gupta A, Panda S, Reddy RS (2021) Shear actuation-based hybrid damping treatment of sandwich structures using a graphite particle-filled viscoelastic layer. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 32:2477–2493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X211002649/FORMAT/EPUB
Tomlinson GR (1996) Overview of active/passive damping techniques employing viscoelastic materials. In: 3rd international on conference on Intelligent Materials 3rd Eur Conf Smart Structures and Materials, vol 2779, p 656. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.237033
Trindade MA, Benjeddou A, Ohayon R (2000) Modeling of frequency-dependent viscoelastic materials for active–passive vibration damping. J Vib Acoust 122:169–174. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.568429
Ro J, Baz A (2002) Optimum placement and control of active constrained layer damping using modal strain energy approach. JVC/Journal Vib Control 8:861–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/107754602029204
Trindade MA (2007) Optimization of active–passive damping treatments using piezoelectric and viscoelastic materials. Smart Mater Struct 16:2159–2168. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/16/6/018
Wang Y, Wang Z, Zu L (2013) Stability of viscoelastic rectangular plate with a piezoelectric layer subjected to follower force. Arch Appl Mech 83:495–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-012-0698-1
Zhai J, Li J, Wei D et al (2019) Vibration control of an aero pipeline system with active constraint layer damping treatment. Appl Sci 9:2094. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP9102094
Liu J, Xie Z, Gao J et al (2022) Failure characteristics of the active-passive damping in the functionally graded piezoelectric layers-magnetorheological elastomer sandwich structure. Int J Mech Sci 215:106944. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJMECSCI.2021.106944
Guedes RM, Pereira CMC, Fonseca A, Oliveira MSA (2013) The effect of carbon nanotubes on viscoelastic behaviour of biomedical grade ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Compos Struct 105:263–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2013.05.027
Ansari R, Gholami R, Sahmani S (2014) Free vibration of size-dependent functionally graded microbeams based on the strain gradient reddy beam theory. Int J Comput Methods Eng Sci Mech 15:401–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502287.2014.915249
Ebrahimi F, Barati MR (2016) Nonlocal strain gradient theory for damping vibration analysis of viscoelastic inhomogeneous nano-scale beams embedded in visco-Pasternak foundation. J Vib Control 24:2080–2095. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546316678511
Karličić D, Kozić P, Pavlović R (2014) Free transverse vibration of nonlocal viscoelastic orthotropic multi-nanoplate system (MNPS) embedded in a viscoelastic medium. Compos Struct 115:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2014.04.002
Bakhshi Khaniki H, Hosseini-Hashemi S (2017) Dynamic response of biaxially loaded double-layer viscoelastic orthotropic nanoplate system under a moving nanoparticle. Int J Eng Sci 115:51–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJENGSCI.2017.02.005
Ansari R, Faraji Oskouie M, Gholami R (2016) Size-dependent geometrically nonlinear free vibration analysis of fractional viscoelastic nanobeams based on the nonlocal elasticity theory. Physica E Low-dimens Syst Nanostruct 75:266–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PHYSE.2015.09.022
Ghorbanpour Arani A, Mosayyebi M, Kolahdouzan F et al (2017) Refined zigzag theory for vibration analysis of viscoelastic functionally graded carbon nanotube reinforced composite microplates integrated with piezoelectric layers. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J Aerosp Eng 231:2464–2478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410016667150
Oskouie MF, Ansari R, Sadeghi F (2017) Nonlinear vibration analysis of fractional viscoelastic Euler–Bernoulli nanobeams based on the surface stress theory. Acta Mech Solida Sin 30:416–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAMSS.2017.07.003
Loghman E, Bakhtiari-Nejad F, Kamali EA et al (2021) Nonlinear vibration of fractional viscoelastic micro-beams. Int J Non Linear Mech 137:103811. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJNONLINMEC.2021.103811
Rahmani A, Safaei B, Qin Z (2021) On wave propagation of rotating viscoelastic nanobeams with temperature effects by using modified couple stress-based nonlocal Eringen’s theory. Eng Comput 1:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00366-021-01429-0/FIGURES/9
Hajmohammad MH, Azizkhani MB, Kolahchi R (2018) Multiphase nanocomposite viscoelastic laminated conical shells subjected to magneto-hygrothermal loads: dynamic buckling analysis. Int J Mech Sci 137:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJMECSCI.2018.01.026
Yuan Y, Zhao X, Zhao Y et al (2021) Dynamic stability of nonlocal strain gradient FGM truncated conical microshells integrated with magnetostrictive facesheets resting on a nonlinear viscoelastic foundation. Thin-Walled Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.107249
Al-Furjan MSH, Samimi-Sohrforozani E, Habibi M et al (2021) Vibrational characteristics of a higher-order laminated composite viscoelastic annular microplate via modified couple stress theory. Compos Struct 257:113152. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2020.113152
Alimirzaei S, Mohammadimehr M, Tounsi A (2019) Nonlinear analysis of viscoelastic micro-composite beam with geometrical imperfection using FEM: MSGT electro-magneto-elastic bending, buckling and vibration solutions. Struct Eng Mech 71:485–502. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.71.5.485
Alipour MM, Rajabi I (2017) viscoelastic substrates effects on the elimination or reduction of the sandwich structures oscillations based on the Kelvin–Voigt Model. Lat Am J Solids Struct 14:2463–2497
Zenkour AM, El-Shahrany HD (2022) Controlled motion of viscoelastic fiber-reinforced magnetostrictive sandwich plates resting on visco-Pasternak foundation. Mech Adv Mater Struct 29:2312–2321. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2020.1861395
Zhu R, Liu Y, Bojja N et al (2023) Vibration attenuation of rotating disks via acoustic black holes. Int J Mech Sci 242:108025. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJMECSCI.2022.108025
Cheng TH, Ren M, Li ZZ, Shen YD (2015) Vibration and damping analysis of composite fiber reinforced wind blade with viscoelastic damping control. Adv Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/146949
Liang X, Wang Z, Wang L, Liu G (2014) Semi-analytical solution for three-dimensional transient response of functionally graded annular plate on a two parameter viscoelastic foundation. J Sound Vib. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSV.2014.01.021
Arani AG, Jalaei MH (2017) Investigation of the longitudinal magnetic field effect on dynamic response of viscoelastic graphene sheet based on sinusoidal shear deformation theory. Phys B Condens Matter 506:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PHYSB.2016.11.004
Kerwin EM (1959) Damping of flexural waves by a constrained viscoelastic layer. J Acoust Soc Am 31:952. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907821
Ditaranto RA (1964) Theory of vibratory bending for elastic and viscoelastic layered finite-length beams. J Appl Mech Trans ASME 32:881–886. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3627330
Mead DJ, Markus S (1970) Loss factors and resonant frequencies of encastré damped sandwich beams. J Sound Vib 12:99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(70)90050-7
Mead DJ, Markus S (1969) The forced vibration of a three-layer, damped sandwich beam with arbitrary boundary conditions. J Sound Vib 10:163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(69)90193-X
Ghinet S (2005) Statistical energy analysis of the transmission loss of sandwich and laminate composite structures. http://savoirs.usherbrooke.ca/handle/11143/1770
Douglas BE, Yang JCS (1978) Transverse compressional damping in the vibratory response of elastic-viscoelastic-elastic beams. AIAA J 16:925–930. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.7595
Sylwan O (1987) Shear and compressional damping effects of constrained layered beams. J Sound Vib 118:35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(87)90253-7
Ungar EE (1962) Loss factors of viscoelastically damped beam structures. J Acoust Soc Am 34:1082–1089. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1918249
Yan MJ, Dowell EH (1972) Governing equations for vibrating constrained-layer damping sandwich plates and beams. J Appl Mech Trans ASME 39:1041–1046. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3422825
Rao DK (1977) Vibration of short sandwich beams. J Sound Vib 52:253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(77)90644-7
Rao DK (1978) Frequency and loss factors of sandwich beams under various boundary conditions. J Mech Eng Sci 20:271–282. https://doi.org/10.1243/JMES_JOUR_1978_020_047_02
Durocher LL, Solecki R (1976) Harmonic vibrations of isotropic, elastic, and elastic/viscoelastic three-layered plates. J Acoust Soc Am 60:105–112. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381077
Wang G, Veeramani S, Wereley NM (2000) Analysis of sandwich plates with isotropic face plates and a viscoelastic core. J Vib Acoust Trans ASME 122:305–312. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1303065
Sisemore CL, Darvennes CM (2002) Transverse vibration of elastic-viscoelastic-elastic sandwich beams: compression—experimental and analytical study. J Sound Vib 252:155–167. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2001.4038
Sisemore CL, Smaili AA, Darvennes CM (2021) Experimental measurement of compressional damping in an elastic-viscoelastic-elastic sandwich beam. In: ASME’s international mechanical engineering congress & exposition 1999–X, pp 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE1999-0202
Lee BC, Kim KJ (1999) Shear and normal strain effects of core layers in vibration of square sandwich plates under clamped boundary conditions. J Sound Vib 228:845–856. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1999.2450
He J-F, Ma B-A (1988) ANALYSIS OF FLEXURAL VIBRATION OF VISCOELASTICALLY DAMPED SANDWICH PLATES. J Sound Vib 126:37–47
Kosmatka JB, Liguore SL (1993) Review of methods for analyzing constrained layer damped structures. J Aerosp Eng 6:268–283. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(1993)6:3(268)
Johnson CD, Kienholz DA (1982) Finite element prediction of damping in structures with constrained viscoelastic layers. AIAA J 20:1284–1290. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.51190
Plouin A-S, Balmms E (1998) Pseudo-modal representations of large models with viscoelastic behavior. In: Proceedings of SPIE—the international society for optical engineering
Larbi W, Deü JF, Ohayon R (2016) Vibroacoustic analysis of double-wall sandwich panels with viscoelastic core. Comput Struct 174:92–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUC.2015.09.012
Ma BA, He JF (1992) A finite element analysis of viscoelastically damped sandwich plates. J Sound Vib 152:107–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(92)90068-9
Arvin H, Sadighi M, Ohadi AR (2010) A numerical study of free and forced vibration of composite sandwich beam with viscoelastic core. Compos Struct 92:996–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.09.047
Bilasse M, Daya EM, Azrar L (2010) Linear and nonlinear vibrations analysis of viscoelastic sandwich beams. J Sound Vib 329:4950–4969. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSV.2010.06.012
Elmoghazy YH, Safaei B, Sahmani S (2023) Finite element analysis for dynamic response of viscoelastic sandwiched structures integrated with aluminum sheets. Facta Univ Ser Mech Eng. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME231004045E
Zhang SQ, Gao YS, Zhao GZ et al (2021) Numerical modeling for viscoelastic sandwich smart structures bonded with piezoelectric materials. Compos Struct 278:114703. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2021.114703
Wang Y, Inman DJ (2013) Finite element analysis and experimental study on dynamic properties of a composite beam with viscoelastic damping. J Sound Vib 332:6177–6191. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSV.2013.06.016
Moita JS, Araújo AL, Martins P et al (2011) A finite element model for the analysis of viscoelastic sandwich structures. Comput Struct 89:1874–1881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.05.008
Barbosa FS, Farage MCR (2008) A finite element model for sandwich viscoelastic beams: experimental and numerical assessment. J Sound Vib 317:91–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2008.03.013
Lin F, Rao MD (2010) Vibration analysis of a multiple-layered viscoelastic structure using the biot damping model. AIAA J 48:624–634. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.44339
Won SG, Bae SH, Cho JR et al (2013) Three-layered damped beam element for forced vibration analysis of symmetric sandwich structures with a viscoelastic core. Finite Elem Anal Des 68:39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FINEL.2013.01.004
Kpeky F, Boudaoud H, Abed-Meraim F, Daya EM (2015) Modeling of viscoelastic sandwich beams using solid–shell finite elements. Compos Struct 133:105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2015.07.055
Ren S, Zhao G, Zhang S (2020) A layerwise finite element formulation for vibration and damping analysis of sandwich plate with moderately thick viscoelastic core. Mech Adv Mater Struct 27:1201–1212. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2018.1504360
Eshaghi M, Rakheja S, Sedaghati R (2015) An accurate technique for pre-yield characterization of MR fluids. Smart Mater Struct 24:065018. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/24/6/065018
Saravanan C, Ganesan N, Ramamurti V (2000) Vibration and damping analysis of multilayered fluid filled cylindrical shells with constrained viscoelastic damping using modal strain energy method. Comput Struct 75:395–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(99)00099-1
Daya EM, Potier-Ferry M (2002) A shell finite element for viscoelastically damped sandwich structures. Rev Eur Elem 11:39–56. https://doi.org/10.3166/reef.11.39-56
Daya EM, Potier-Ferry M (2001) Numerical method for nonlinear eigenvalue problems application to vibrations of viscoelastic structures. Comput Struct 79:533–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00151-6
Boström A, Johansson G, Olsson P (2001) On the rational derivation of a heirarchy of dynamic equations for a homogeneous, isotropic, elastic plate. Int J Solids Struct 38:2487–2501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00180-3
Koutsawa Y, Charpentier I, Daya EM, Cherkaoui M (2008) A generic approach for the solution of nonlinear residual equations. Part I: the Diamant toolbox. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:572–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CMA.2008.09.003
Lampoh K, Charpentier I, Daya EM (2011) A generic approach for the solution of nonlinear residual equations. Part III: sensitivity computations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200:2983–2990. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CMA.2011.06.009
Lampoh K, Charpentier I, El Mostafa D (2014) Eigenmode sensitivity of damped sandwich structures. Compt Rend Méc 342:700–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CRME.2014.08.001
Ganguly S, Nandi A, Neogy S (2018) A state space viscoelastic shaft finite element for stability and response analysis of rotors with structural and frequency dependent damping. J Vib Eng Technol 6:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42417-018-0006-7/FIGURES/27
Zhang G, Zheng H, Zhu X (2023) Optimization of composite plates with viscoelastic damping layer for high sound transmission loss under stiffness and strength constraints. Compos Struct 306:116563. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2022.116563
Lewandowski R, Wielentejczyk P, Litewka P (2021) Dynamic characteristics of multi-layered, viscoelastic beams using the refined zig-zag theory. Compos Struct 259:113212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113212
Abdoun F, Azrar L, Daya EM, Potier-Ferry M (2009) Forced harmonic response of viscoelastic structures by an asymptotic numerical method. Comput Struct 87:91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.08.006
Duigou L, El Mostafa D, Potier-Ferry M (2003) Iterative algorithms for non-linear eigenvalue problems. application to vibrations of viscoelastic shells. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192:1323–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(02)00641-2
Alvelid M, Enelund M (2007) Modelling of constrained thin rubber layer with emphasis on damping. J Sound Vib 300:662–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSV.2006.08.031
Bilasse M, Azrar L, Daya EM (2011) Complex modes based numerical analysis of viscoelastic sandwich plates vibrations. Comput Struct 89:539–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUC.2011.01.020
Cai C, Zheng H, Liu GR (2004) Vibration analysis of a beam with PCLD patch. Appl Acoust 65:1057–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APACOUST.2004.05.004
Baber TT, Maddox RA, Orozco CE (1998) A finite element model for harmonically excited viscoelastic sandwich beams. Comput Struct 66:105–113
Zapfe JA, Lesieutre GA (1999) A discrete layer beam finite element for the dynamic analysis of composite sandwich beams with integral damping layers. Comput Struct 70:647–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00212-0
Sainsbury MG, Zhang QJ (1999) The Galerkin element method applied to the vibration of damped sandwich beams. Comput Struct 71:239–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00242-9
Amichi K, Atalla N (2009) A new 3D finite element for sandwich beams with a viscoelastic core. J Vib Acoust 10(1115/1):3025828
Cristina Galucio A, Deü J-F, Ohayon R (2004) Finite element formulation of viscoelastic sandwich beams using fractional derivative operators. Comput Mech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-003-0529-x
Moreira RAS, Dias Rodrigues J (2006) A layerwise model for thin soft core sandwich plates. Comput Struct 84:1256–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUC.2006.01.020
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Elmoghazy, Y.H., Safaei, B., Asmael, M. et al. Computational Modelling and Analysis of Effect of Viscoelastic Materials on Damping and Vibrational Behaviors of Composite Structures—An Extensive Review. Arch Computat Methods Eng 31, 2611–2662 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-10057-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-10057-4