Introduction

Biocides are chemical compounds largely employed in anthropogenic activities, which often results in high ecological impacts. These xenobiotics reach freshwater bodies, threatening both animal life and human health. Synthetic pyrethroids (SP) are pyrethrin-derived insecticides that can be classified as types I and II, depending on cyano-radical absence or presence, respectively (Haya 1989; Kumar et al. 2009). They interfere with voltage-dependent Na+ channels of nervous cells, preventing membrane repolarization and avoiding termination of nervous impulse transmission (Soderlund et al. 2002; Prusty et al. 2015). These biocides arose as an alternative to organochlorines and organophosphates, due to their high efficiency in agricultural and domestic pest control, and being less harmful to birds and mammals (Soderlund et al. 2002; Corcellas et al. 2015). In addition, SP are also used to control fish ectoparasites in a concentration range of 2.0–5.0 μg L−1 (SEPA. Scottish Environment Protection Agency 2008; Van Geest et al. 2014; Aznar-Alemany et al. 2017), which contributes to their presence in all environments. Notwithstanding the benefits, these xenobiotics are extremely toxic to fishes.

Exposure to SP can result in physiologic, metabolic, and morphological injuries to freshwater fish (Muranli and Güner 2011; Guardiola et al. 2014; Narra 2016). Blood alterations in fish are often related to SP exposure (Fawole and Yekeen 2014). In unraveling these biocide effects, some key enzymes are also widely used, such as acetylcholinesterase (AChE), which is responsible for terminating neurotransmission (Tilton et al. 2011), and Na+K+/ATPase (NKA), pivotal in fish osmolality balance maintenance (Begum 2011). Recent findings report that SP act as endocrine disruptors, and their metabolites exhibit great estrogenic activity (Wielogórska et al. 2015; Brander et al. 2016). Studies on bioaccumulation in aquatic organisms questioned SP safety, raising concerns on human consumption of contaminated fish (Corcellas et al. 2015; Tu et al. 2016; Muggelberg et al. 2017).

Detoxification mechanisms might contribute to the observed imbalances of antioxidant metabolism in teleosts exposed to SP (Marigoudar et al. 2013; Bacchetta et al. 2014; Abdelkhalek et al. 2015). Some organs are highly responsive to chemical exposure, such as gills, which are the first organs in contact with the surrounding water, and liver, which plays a vital role on metabolism and detoxification of chemical stressors. Hepatic responses are normally fast and efficient to cope with stressors, but SP can affect regulatory mechanisms and, besides the organ’s high plasticity, lead to structural injuries (Kan et al. 2012; Marigoudar et al. 2013).

Lambda-cyhalothrin (LCH) is a type II SP widely used worldwide (Fonseca-González et al. 2011; Muranli and Güner 2011; Kumar et al. 2014), and often observed in water bodies (Marino and Ronco 2005; Jabeen et al. 2015). Cypermethrin and LCH are reported in soy production areas of Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay at concentrations able to cause acute toxicity in aquatic organisms (Hunt et al. 2016). Matrinxa Brycon amazonicus (Spix & Agassiz 1829) presents high commercial relevance in South American countries, since it is one of the main aquaculture species produced. Additionally, it is sensitive to xenobiotic exposures (Avilez et al. 2013; Moraes et al. 2018), meeting toxicology model needs.

In this context, the aim of this study was to evaluate LCH impacts on B. amazonicus, considering antioxidant metabolism, osmoregulation, and morphological changes. Such experimental design was able to test the responsiveness of these biomarkers to SP contamination. Since xenobiotics presence in water bodies is intermittent (Handy 1994), fish recovery was also accessed, enabling a wide frame on this pyrethroid’s impact on a freshwater species. The proposed investigations are critical in understanding LCH effects in non-target organisms, besides shedding light on the outcomes of water contamination by this unreasonable insecticide use.

Material and methods

Chemicals

The commercial formulation Trinca Caps® (DVA), containing 250 g L−1 of the active ingredient lambda-cyhalothrin (LCH) was used. Butylated hydroxytoluene, pyrogallol, NADP+, NADPH++H+, 1,1,3,3-tetramethoxypropane, and reduced glutathione were from Sigma-Aldrich; all other reagents were from Merck.

Fish maintenance and experimental design

Juvenile B. amazonicus were kindly donated by Polettini Fish Farm (Mogi-Mirim, Sao Paulo, Brazil). Fish were acclimated for 2 weeks at 2500-L tanks, filled with dechlorinated tap water, in a flow-through water system, under a 12–12-h photoperiod and fed daily with commercial pellets. Afterward, 48 fish (82.6 ± 18.6 g) were equally divided into 12 250-L tanks, under the same acclimation conditions, remaining undisturbed for 6 days. Feeding was discontinued 24 h before the beginning of the experimental span and animals were not fed until the end of the experiment. Six tanks were assigned as exposure and received 0.65 μg L−1 of LCH, which corresponds to 10% of the LC50;96 h (Moraes et al. 2013), ensuring a sub-lethal exposure. The remaining tanks, assigned as control, remained in xenobiotic-free water. After the pesticide was added, the water flow was interrupted and the whole system (exposed and control tanks) was kept static for 96 h. Water parameters were monitored daily and remained stable over the experiment: pH (7.3–7.5); T °C (27.3 ± 0.8); pO2 mg L−1 (6.0–7.0); [NH3-NH4+] μmol L−1 (0.38–0.42); hardness as mg L−1 HCO3/CO32− (19–20); alkalinity as CaCO3 mg L−1 (22–24).

After 96 h, three exposure and three control tanks from the 12 experimental ones were randomly chosen. Four fish from each of them were sampled (n = 12, per condition, exposure and control), blood was withdrawn, and liver, brain, and gills were excised as detailed below. The water of the six remaining tanks was renewed, and kept in continuous water flow for 7 days. This period corresponded to the recovery span. After recovery, blood and tissues were sampled as explained below.

Blood and tissue sampling

At the end of experimental spans (96 h of exposure and 7 days of recovery), fish were anesthetized into eugenol solution (Inoue et al. 2003) and blood was drawn from the caudal vein. A blood aliquot was centrifuged for 3 min at 13,400×g for plasma obtainment. Fish were then killed by spinal cord section for liver, brain, and gills excision. These organs were immediately rinsed with cold saline solution (NaCl 0.9%). Liver and brain were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, while gills were immersed in SEI buffer (sucrose-EDTA-imidazole, pH 7.4) before freezing. Tissues and plasma were stored in − 80 °C until analyses. Liver slices (3 mm) were fixed in buffered 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution for histology.

Blood and plasma parameters

Hematocrit (Hct%) was determined in heparinized microcapillaries after centrifugation for 3 min at 13,400×g. Red blood cells (RBC, cells mm−3) were counted in a Neubauer chamber. Total hemoglobin concentration (Hb, g dL−1) was determined according to Drabkin (1948). Mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCHb), and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) were calculated from hematimetric data (Wintrobe 1934).

The ions Na+, K+, and Cl were determined in plasma after dilution in distilled water (1:100 v/v). A flame photometer was used to estimate Na+ and K+ concentrations, against standard solutions of 140 mEq of Na+ and 5.0 mEq of K+. Chloride anion was quantified at 480 nm using 0.9% mercury thiocyanate diluted in ethanol and 0.4 M nitric acid at 3:10 v/v (APHA 1980), against NaCl standard solution. Plasma protein concentrations were determined with Bradford reagent against a standard solution of bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Kruger 1994).

Cell-free extracts

Liver was homogenized in 5% TCA (trichloroacetic acid) at 1:50 (tissue: TCA) for 1 min, in a Turrax® T10-Ika homogenizer at 1000 rpm under ice-bath, and centrifuged at 13,400×g for 3 min at 4 °C. Supernatants were used for ascorbic acid quantification. Tissue extracts for GSH determinations followed similar procedure using liver pieces at 1:20 (tissue: 0.2 M PO42− buffer pH 7.0).

Cell homogenates

Hepatic tissues were homogenized as described above in 0.1 M PO42− buffer pH 7.0 with 0.25 M sucrose at 1:1 tissue:buffer. Homogenates were centrifuged for 10 min, at 15,000×g at 4 °C. The supernatant was used as a crude antioxidant enzyme source. Brain samples were homogenized in 0.1 M PO42− buffer pH 7.0 in anhydrous glycerine (v/v) at 1:1 tissue:buffer and centrifuged at 13,400×g for 3 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was used as a crude AChE-enzyme source. Gill filaments were thawed, homogenized in SEI (sucrose-EDTA-imidazole) buffer pH 7.4, as reported above and centrifuged at 10,000×g for 5 min at 4 °C. Supernatant (0.7 mg protein) was used as a crude NKA-enzyme source.

Hepatic antioxidant biomarkers

Ascorbic acid was quantified with 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol in meta-phosphoric/sulfuric acid medium and dinitrophenyl hydrazine at 524 nm, against ascorbic acid standard solution (Carr et al. 1983). Reduced glutathione (GSH) concentration was determined through the interaction of GSH with 5,5′-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid in 0.1 M PO42− buffer pH 8.0, resulting in 2-nitro-5-thiobenzoate, which was read at 412 nm (Beutler 1984).

SOD was assayed by pyrogallol self-oxidation, which is inhibited in the presence of SOD (Beutler 1984, modified). Absorbance readings were performed at 420 nm, considering that 1.0 UI inhibits 50% the pyrogallol self-oxidation. CAT activity was assayed by reading H2O2 decay at 230 nm (Beutler 1984). One unit of CAT was defined as the amount of enzyme required in 1.0 μmol of H2O2 min−1 oxidation, and the molar absorptivity used was (H2O2)ελ230 = 0.071 mM cm−1. GPx was assayed through NADPH+H+ extinction, read at 340 nm with glutathione reductase as an auxiliary enzyme (Beutler 1984). Molar absorptivity used was (NADPH+H+/NAP)ελ340 = 6.20 mM cm−1. GST assay was based in GSH conjugation to 1-chloro-2,4 dinitrobenzene (CDNB), catalyzed by GST, and read at 340 nm (Habig and Jakoby 1981). Molar absorptivity used was (CDNB)ελ340 = 9.6 mM cm−1. G6PDH was assessed through NADP supply to antioxidant enzymes, which was performed reading NADP+ extinction, at 340 nm (Beutler 1984). Molar absorptivity used was (NADPH+H+/NADP)ελ340 = 6.3 mM cm−1.

TBARS were determined as Draper and Hadley (1990). Liver aliquots were homogenized in 5% (w/v) TCA with 0.5 g L−1 of butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). The homogenates were boiled for 30 min, cooled in ice, and centrifuged at 1000×g for 10 min. Thiobarbituric acid (TBA) was mixed to the supernatants (1:1 v/v) and mixture was boiled again for 30 min. The samples were read at 532 nm against a standard curve of tetramethoxypropane.

Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and Na+K+/ATPase (NKA) assays

Brain AChE was assayed in 100 mM PO42− buffer pH 7.0 with acetylthiocholine as substrate and 5,5-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid as a reagent (Ellman et al. 1961). AChE activity was recorded at 412 nm (ελ412 = 16,950 M−1 cm−1). Gill NKA activity was determined with ouabain as inhibitor through optical detection of phosphate, read at 620 nm (Quabius et al. 1997).

Protein

Protein was determined with Bradford reagent against a standard solution of BSA (Kruger 1994).

Histological analysis

After fixation, samples were dehydrated in ethanol and embedded in Historesin® (Leica, Heidelberg, Germany). Liver sections of 2 μm were stained with toluidine blue and basic fuchsin. Ten random microscopic fields of each section were observed with an optic microscope (Olympus BX51). Images were captured with a digital camera and analyzed with the Motic Images Plus 2.0 software. Histopathological index (HI) was calculated as Camargo and Martinez (2007), modified from Poleksic and Mitrovic-Tutundzic (1994). It is based on location, type, and severity of tissue lesions, which are classified into four groups: parenchymal lesions; cytoplasmic and nuclear modifications; blood vessel changes and necrosis. After the environmental stressor is withdrawn, the damages are classified into three progressive stages considering the organ recovery: stage I (SI), the lesions are not severe, do not affect organ normal function, and are reversible; stage II (SII), moderate to severe lesions, can affect the organ function, might be reversible when the environment is improved; stage III (SIII), very severe lesions, great impairment of organ function, irreversible even with environment amelioration. Estimative of HI is based on the sum of tissue lesions times the stage index, accordingly HI = 100ΣSI + 101ΣSII + 102ΣSIII (Poleksic and Mitrovic-Tutundzic 1994), in which ΣSI, ΣSII, and ΣSIII are the sum of alterations in each stage and 100, 101, and 102 are the calculated factors, based on lesion severities. The HI values are grouped into the following categories: 0–10 = structurally normal organ; 11–20 = slight to moderate organ injuries; 21–50 = moderate to severe organ injuries; 51–100 = severe organ injuries; and > 100 = irreparably injured organ.

Statistical analysis

The normality of data was tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Then, the parametric test t of Student or the non-parametric test of Mann-Whitney was used, accordingly. The statistical significances of differences among control × exposure and control of recovery × recovery are reported accepting a confidence interval of 95% (p < 0.05). The used software was GraphPad Prism, 5.0.

Results

After LCH exposure, there was an increase of Hct (10%), Hb (31%), RBC (18%), MCHb (26%), and MCHC (17%). Hematocrit and Hb remained high after recovery, at 9.5% and 24%, respectively. Concerning plasma ionic balance, Na+ and Cl concentrations diminished due to LCH exposure, in 15% and 19%, respectively. No changes were observed in plasma K+ concentrations (4.57 ± 0.6 mEq mL−1). After recovery, only Na+ was held low at 5%. Plasma protein was 13% lower in LCH-exposed fish, while no changes occurred after recovery. The activity of gills NKA was raised in 43% after sub-lethal exposure, while no differences were observed in recovered fish. Table 1 brings blood and osmoregulatory outcomes.

Table 1 Blood and osmoregulatory parameters of Brycon amazonicus exposed to 0.65 μg L−1 of lambda-cyhalothrin and recovered

Brain AChE activity was unchanged at nearly 0.22 mU min−1 mg protein−1 in both experimental spans.

Hepatic ascorbic acid concentration remained steady at both evaluations, being not responsive to LCH. On the other hand, GSH augmented 41% after sub-lethal exposure, and 29% after recovery. The antioxidant enzymatic activities of SOD, CAT, and GPx presented decreases of 37%, 35%, and 32%, respectively, while GST and G6PDH remained stable after LCH exposure. After recovery, SOD activity diminished 19% and GPx activity increased 141%. Enzyme activity of CAT was recovered to control values. In spite of G6PDH activity being not directly linked to ROS scavenging and no significant changes were observed in the experiment, its role is discussed moving forward. Lipid peroxidation (LPO) occurred in the liver of B. amazonicus after LCH exposure, as shown by a 22% increment of TBARS in exposed animals. There was no hepatic TBARS generation after recovery. Table 2 presents the aforementioned data.

Table 2 Hepatic antioxidant biomarkers in Brycon amazonicus exposed to 0.65 μg L−1 of lambda-cyhalothrin and recovered

Liver of exposed fish presented blood vessel hyperplasia, cellular deformation, hepatic cell cord disorganization, nuclear and cytoplasmic vacuolization, eosinophilic aggregates, and lipid accumulation. The HI of exposed groups was indicative of moderate to severe organ injuries (HI control 11.0 ± 1.2 and HI exposed 45.8 ± 2.5; Fig. 1). Recovered fish presented hepatic cellular and nuclear hypertrophy, cellular deformation, cell cord disorganization, cytoplasmic and nuclear vacuolization, eosinophilic aggregates, and cytoplasmic and nuclear degeneration. The recovery span was not enough for hepatic recovery, as can be inferred from the HI values (HI control of recovery 15.3 ± 1.5 and HI recovery 44.7 ± 3.1; Fig. 1). Table 3 brings the frequency of alterations, and Fig. 2 exhibits the histopathological observations.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Liver histopathological index (HI) of Brycon amazonicus exposed to 0.65 μg L−1 of lambda-cyhalotrhin and recovered. C, control; E, exposed; CR, control of recovery; R, recovery. Asterisk indicates differences between control and exposed groups and between control of recovery and recovery groups (p < 0.05). Data are presented as mean ± standard error (n = 12)

Table 3 Frequency of observed histopathological lesions in the liver of Brycon amazonicus exposed to 0.65 μg L−1 of lambda-cyhalothrin and recovered
Fig. 2
figure 2

Photomicrographs of Brycon amazonicus liver sections. C, control. Tubular arrangement of hepatocytes indicated by (H). CR, control of recovery. Sinusoids indicated by (S). E, exposed. Simple arrow: nuclear deformation. Double arrow: cellular deformation. R, recovery. Triple arrow: eosinophil aggregates. Toluidine blue and basic fuchsin. Scale bar, 20 μm

Discussion

Toxic effects caused by synthetic pyrethroids in non-target organisms are not always lethal, and yet they can cause serious sub-lethal effects, leading to impairments in individual and population fitness and survival. The LCH concentration here reported is environmentally relevant, already found at water bodies and recommended for fish parasite treatment (Marino and Ronco 2005; Hunt et al. 2016; United Kingdom 2017). B. amazonicus exposed to LCH presented hematologic parameter alterations, imbalances in antioxidant metabolism, and changes in liver structure; a physiological frame that was not recovered even after 1 week under clean water.

The energetic cost to metabolize xenobiotics is a critical point in detoxification processes (Hammer 1995; Geeraerts and Belpaire 2010) and the energy demanded comes preferentially from aerobic metabolism. For this reason, cell strategies aiming to achieve uptake and transport of oxygen are usually enhanced after poisoning by xenobiotics. It is well known that one of the major routes of toxicant entry into the fish body is through the gills, a relevant interface between blood and water. Lipophilic compounds, such as SP, rapidly permeate this barrier for their chemical affinity with cell membranes. This mechanism is reported as mainly responsible for the body burden of these xenobiotics (Randall et al. 1998). Gills are the main organs for gas exchange in fish, and accumulation of lipophilic compounds might interfere with the permeability of cell membranes, impairing transports executed by these structures (Payne et al. 1978). Moreover, gill morphological changes reported in fish exposed to SP, e.g., cell hyperplasia, augment the water-blood barrier, hindering gas exchange (Yildirim et al. 2006; Cunha et al. 2018; Moraes et al. 2018). Along these lines, LCH presence in water can impair oxygen uptake, which would lead to the compensatory blood changes observed in B. amazonicus (augmented Hb, Htc, and RBC). These responses are also seen in fish submitted to environmental hypoxia (Moraes et al. 2002; Gaulke et al. 2014).

Stress related to LCH intoxication might also explain the blood outcomes. Stress for SP exposure is reported to increase blood cortisol in fish (Saravanan et al. 2009; Firat et al. 2011), a potential reason for RBC enhancement. The recovery period of 7 days was not enough to eliminate the stress caused in B. amazonicus by LCH. This fact is central considering the health status of fish that inhabit water bodies close to agricultural lands, as this pesticide is heavily used in crop farms.

In freshwater fish, ionic and hydric balances are held by glomerular filtration rates and urine flow, associated with active reabsorption of ions by branchial epithelium (Evans et al. 2005). Ion transfer through gills is mediated by NKA activity in chloride cells. NKA is a target for SP toxicity, as seen upregulated NKA encoding genes in liver of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. exposed to deltamethrin, which are downregulated in gills (Olsvik et al. 2014). Additionally, structural changes of ATPases are supposed to be partially responsible for the neurotoxic action of these xenobiotics (Kakko et al. 2003; Riar et al. 2013). Hemodilution presented by B. amazonicus exposed to LCH might happen due to an inhibition of active ion uptake by NKA, resulting in a decrease of plasma concentrations of anions and cations (Wendelaar Bonga and Lock 1992). Nevertheless, the rise of NKA activity in fish exposed to LCH might also be a result of high levels of blood catecholamines, due to intoxication stress. Increases of NKA would work as a compensatory adaptation to cope with low plasma ion concentration, although such compensatory response was not enough to keep normal patterns of blood Na+ and Cl.

Increases in enzyme expression, as observed in NKA, can worsen the metabolic syndrome associated with xenobiotic exposure. Proteins can be the main energy source in detoxification processes, leading to hypoproteinemia, as reported in Clarias batrachus L. exposed to SP (Kumar et al. 2011). Moreover, osmoregulation disturbances inferred from low concentrations of Na+, Cl, and protein can also be attributed to kidney and/or intestine dysfunction, particularly considering SP nephrotoxicity (Haya 1989; Mohapatra et al. 2012). In addition, impairment of oxygen uptake caused by LCH, just discussed above, would cause blood acidification aggravated by increases of metabolic rate from detoxification processes. A decline in Na+ and Cl concentrations, as observed in B. amazonicus, would keep the blood pH into acidic ranges, since adjustments to recover physiological values are primarily dependent on bicarbonate concentrations.

The decrease of plasma Na+ was the only ionic alteration observed after 7 days of recovery; even the NKA activity returned to basal levels. B. amazonicus was able to re-establish normal conditions after LCH poisoning considering these physiological parameters. Our findings agree with those observed in C. batrachus exposed to cypermethrin, in which NKA activity was restored after 10 days of recovery (Begum 2009). The osmoregulatory imbalance observed in B. amazonicus is an early biomarker of xenobiotic injuries, enabling diagnosis before morphological changes are noticed.

Acetylcholinesterase activity is not the main target of SP toxicity, nevertheless some authors suggest that its use as a biomarker should not be limited to organophosphorous and carbamates, instead it might be extended to other pollutants (Guilhermino et al. 1998). Brain AChE in some fish is reported as an SP biomarker (Toumi et al. 2015; Singh et al. 2018); however, some studies do not observe altered AChE activity due to SP intoxication (Wheelock et al. 2005; Hernández-Moreno et al. 2010; Ensibi et al. 2014). Notwithstanding its role as an important biomarker widely used in fish, AChE activity changes due to SP exposure seem highly inconsistent. We hypothesize that other esterases might be affected by SP intoxication, since B. amazonicus brain AChE activity is unresponsive to this neurotoxicant action. Other esterases might interact with pyrethroids in this fish species, and should be considered in future studies.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are continually produced as a natural consequence of aerobic life, but their overproduction brings on severe consequences. B. amazonicus exposed to LCH depicted characteristics of hepatic oxidative stress. Xenobiotics are able to produce high levels of oxyradicals through metabolic reactions of detoxification (Kelly et al. 1998); moreover, SP are known for inhibiting mitochondrial complex I (Gassner et al. 1997), which would contribute to sharp rises in cellular ROS. A plausible hypothesis for the observed metabolic frame is that oxidative stress and all of the injuries associated to it (LPO, enzyme inhibition, DNA injuries) were already set in 96 h, indicating that B. amazonicus responses to LCH insults were insufficient.

The SOD-CAT joint activities are the organism’s first approach in dealing with ROS, being pivotal for the proper functioning of the antioxidant enzymatic system (Doria et al. 2018). This pair inhibition, after 96 h of LCH exposure, might have contributed for the development of LPO chain (e.g., TBARS increase) and consequent cellular injuries. The presence of superoxide radicals that were not vanished by the fish defenses would exacerbate Harber-Weiss reaction, boosting the damages caused by hydroxyl radicals, including enzyme inactivation (e.g., SOD, CAT, and GPx inhibitions) and LPO. Additionally, high hepatic levels of O2•- radicals were probably responsible for CAT and GPx inhibition (Odajima and Yamazaki 1972; Kono and Fridovich 1982). Regarding SOD activity, it could have been inhibited both by hydroxyl radicals and superoxide radicals, which is its own substrate (Bagnyukova et al. 2006; Modesto and Martinez 2010). Moreover, some studies link excessive H2O2 levels arisen from a lack of CAT activity to SOD inhibition (Kono and Fridovich 1983).

Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) reduces H2O2, preventing the expansion of chain reactions that cause lipid peroxidation (Di Giulio et al. 1989). This enzymatic defense inhibition after 96 h of exposure leads to an augmented Fenton reaction due to a surplus of H2O2, which induced higher HO levels, contributing for LPO development. When installed, LPO causes loss of membrane fluidity, increased permeability, possible release of cell and organelle content, and inactivation of membrane enzymes and protein receptors (Kappus 1985; Gutteridge 1995). Although being a potent antioxidant, GSH by itself is not able to protect the tissue from lipid peroxidation, even when in higher levels as observed in B. amazonicus.

After 7 days of recovery, B. amazonicus antioxidant metabolism was not completely restored, but it seemed less affected by oxyradicals than after exposure, presenting a delayed adaptive response. SOD activity remained lower than control, but noticeably higher than that after exposure (inhibition of 37% and 19%, respectively). This increase on SOD activity would provide substrate (H2O2) for CAT and GPx activities. Indeed, CAT activity was retaken towards control levels, while GPx was sharply increased. Both enzymes might have taken part on the blocking of LPO chain development, since TBARS were no longer detected, besides preventing further enzyme inhibition. Reduced glutathione contents were still high, accounting for the rises in GPx and tissue protection against ROS deleterious effects.

Glutathione-S-transferase is fundamental in a particular type of detoxification mechanism, in which GSH is chemically conjugated to the xenobiotic molecule. Electrophilic metabolite conjugation to GSH is one of the major drug detoxification pathways known (Halliwell 2006; Di Giulio and Meyer 2008). Conjugation of GSH to toxicant molecules is a way of transforming them, usually reducing their deleterious effects. The unaltered activity of GST observed after LCH exposure and recovery was probably due to the type of mechanisms elected to cope with this xenobiotic. Conjugation to GSH should not be relevant to detoxify LCH in B. amazonicus, at least over the present experimental span. Contrastingly, GST hepatic activity is stimulated by LCH in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus L. (Piner and Üner 2012). On the other hand, CAT and SOD activities and GSH and TBARS levels in Prussian carp Carassius auratus gibelio (Bloch 1782), submitted to deltamethrin, are similar to those observed in B. amazonicus (Dinu et al. 2010).

A couple of pentose’s pathway enzymes, such as dehydrogenases, are critical in maintaining the cell redox potential. The activity of G6PDH is key in NADPH+H+ production, which is involved in anabolic redox reactions. Unaltered G6PDH activity all over the experiment indicates that LCH did not affect NADPH+H+ supply to the metabolism of B. amazonicus. In Oncorhynchus mykiss, G6PDH is inhibited by cypermethrin and deltamethrin (Sentürk et al. 2009). Considering the oxidative stress, NADPH+H+ is oxidized to NADP+ by glutathione reductase to re-establish GSH levels. The steady activity of G6PDH in B. amazonicus should contribute in maintaining the observed elevated levels of that peptide. The upkeep of hepatic ascorbic acid levels could also be explained by G6PDH regular activity maintenance, since NADPH+H+ acts in the regeneration of vitamins C and E oxidized forms.

Liver is a crucial organ in detoxification processes. The histopathologic observations in B. amazonicus evince LCH toxic effects, and have been reported in other freshwater fish exposed to SP (Muthuviveganandavel et al. 2013). However, the morphological frame cannot be interpreted as a specific response to LCH intoxication; instead, it can be attributed to xenobiotics in general. One of the most frequent hepatic alterations observed after exposure to xenobiotics is an increase of vascularization. This physiologic response leads to raises in blood flux and increases of catabolite excretion from LCH metabolism, which occurs mainly through bile (Bradbury and Coats 1989; Kolo et al. 2010). Eosinophil aggregates are typical of inflammatory reactions from several etiologies such as parasitism, allergies, infections, and injuries (Ferrero-Milani et al. 2007). In particular, two possibilities arise to explain eosinophil aggregates: allergic processes, local or generalized, for the poisoning effects; or local lesions caused directly by LCH. Local lesions seem the most plausible hypothesis and might be due to an exacerbated ROS production, owing to LCH action on cell mitochondria. The influence of SP in the electron transport chain, already discussed, could increase ROS generation, and consequently enhance local cellular lesions.

There was a clear cytoplasmic vacuolization in hepatocytes of B. amazonicus linked to LCH intoxication. This was likely associated to inhibition of protein synthesis, energy depletion for detoxification processes, and disaggregation of microtubules, as also proposed by Hinton and Laurén (1990). In this regard, inhibition and/or depletion of antioxidant enzymes were just discussed above, and likewise, other proteins are also liable of suffering the same kind of injuries. Besides being reversible, cell and cytoplasmic degeneration are considered severe injuries, since the metabolic active volume is diminished (Maduenho and Martinez 2008). Hepatic modifications observed in B. amazonicus were enough to alter normal functions of the liver, although being considered moderate to severe. Disorganization of typical hepatocytes’ cords suggests that the organelle distribution was altered, affecting the organ functions as just proposed (Akaishi et al. 2004; Marinho et al. 2014). Considering the range of HI estimated to B. amazonicus in the present degree of poisoning, and the return of GPx and GSH to normal levels, it is possible to assume that the liver injury level can be reverted if LCH action is withdrawn in time. Nevertheless, the recovery span was not enough to allow complete re-establishment of hepatic normal morphology.

Shifts in hematologic parameters and osmoregulatory issues, combined with imbalances in hepatic antioxidant metabolism and morphological changes, were observed in B. amazonicus after LCH exposure, and homeostasis was not completely restored after recovery. These are critical alterations, since they could potentially impair the species’ regular life cycle. Considering the risks offered by SP contamination, reliable biomarkers are of great interest in detecting and evaluating these xenobiotics’ effects on non-target species. The reported metabolic frame emphasizes the relevance of the responsible use of this synthetic pyrethroid, along with adequate legislation to its use and discharge, especially considering the impairments caused in this non-target species exposed to low LCH doses.