Abstract
Assessing intracranial pressure (ICP) remains a cornerstone in neurosurgical care. Invasive techniques for monitoring ICP remain the gold standard. The need for a reliable, safe and reproducible technique to non-invasively assess ICP in the context of early screening and in the neurocritical care environment is obvious. Numerous techniques have been described with several novel advances. While none of the currently available techniques appear independently accurate enough to quantify raised ICP, there is some promising work being undertaken.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Early work done by Guillaume and Janny in 1951 [1], followed by Lundberg’s magnum opus in 1960 [2] laid the foundation for subsequent developments in intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring [3–6]. The association between raised ICP and poor neurological outcome has been widely reported, with distinct clinical and therapeutic implications [7–10]. Though some reports have questioned the merits of monitoring ICP [11, 12], the diagnostic and therapeutic role of invasive monitoring techniques, especially in traumatic brain injury (TBI), has been well supported [3, 13–17].
The benefits of reliably and non-invasively assessing ICP, however, have also been described, and while invasive ICP monitoring remains the gold standard, the development of accurate, non-invasive alternatives is ongoing [2, 18, 19]. Perhaps the most benefit of a reliable non-invasive technique lies in early detection, especially where the clinical presentation of raised ICP may be subtle.
In children, determining the threshold for raised ICP is complex because of physiological and morphological heterogeneity. Lower ICP treatment thresholds for younger children are often considered appropriate, but there is still a lack of data to support this. The current recommendation in the guidelines for acute medical care of severe traumatic brain injury in neonates, children and adolescents suggests an ICP treatment threshold of 20 mmHg for children, but there are no age-specific recommendations [20, 21], while age-related ICP thresholds of 2 to 6 years—6 mmHg, 7 to 10 years—9 mmHg and 11 to 15 years—13 mmHg have been described [22]. An ICP threshold of 20 mmHg demonstrated significant correlation with outcome in children with traumatic brain injury [23]. It therefore remains specifically relevant to interpret any recommended ICP threshold in the context of clinical presentation, underlying aetiology, monitoring of physiological variables (where appropriate) and imaging findings in an individual patient.
Monitoring of ICP
There is still no ideal method for evaluating ICP. While the benefit of continuous, real-time monitoring provided by invasive ICP monitoring is clear, it also comes with distinct limitations. The appeal of non-invasive ICP monitoring lies in obviating the need for placement of an intracranial device and avoidance of the risks associated with these procedures. Current non-invasive ICP monitoring techniques are, however, limited by inadequate diagnostic accuracy as most non-invasive techniques provide qualitative estimates of ICP but lack quantitative value [19, 24].
The use of invasive ICP monitoring is suboptimal in clinical practice. Patients being ventilated in a neurocritical care environment are good candidates for invasive monitoring, but ambulant patients are less suitable, and as a result, ICP monitoring may not be performed in many patients in whom it is indicated.
Invasive ICP monitoring remains the standard against which all non-invasive methods of assessing ICP are compared [13, 25]. The gold standard for invasive ICP monitoring remains measurement via a transduced intraventricular catheter [14]. The risks and limitations associated with invasive ICP monitoring have inspired considerable efforts towards the development of non-invasive techniques that are reliable, easy to use, cost-effective and reproducible [18, 19, 24, 26]. A variety of non-invasive techniques have been described for assessing ICP; their widespread use, however, remains quite limited. The shortcomings of these non-invasive techniques include the range of cut-off values for detecting raised ICP, inter-rater variability and qualitative rather than quantitative measurement of ICP [18, 19, 26]. For a non-invasive technique to be considered reliable, it would have to correlate well with invasively measured ICP, predict ICP within 2 mmHg in the 0–20 mmHg range, with a maximum error of 10 % for ICP >20 mmHg, which are the specifications supported by the Brain Trauma Foundation [27].
Non-invasive ICP monitoring
The ideal non-invasive technique should be relatively inexpensive, repeatable, portable and radiation-free and allow continuous monitoring. It could facilitate screening and triage in the acute care setting, allow easier long-term monitoring in a neurocritical care environment and augment follow-up assessment in patients with chronic conditions presenting with raised ICP, e.g. hydrocephalus. The benefits of such a technique are certainly not limited to a neurosurgical environment but include medical emergencies, ophthalmology assessment, anesthesiology and aeronautical health assessment.
Current methods of non-invasive ICP assessment usually involve evaluating physiological or anatomical characteristics influenced by increases in ICP. There are a variety of techniques which include both clinical and technological assessment with varying degrees of diagnostic accuracy [18, 19, 26]. These techniques include the following:
-
i.
Clinical assessment
-
ii.
Methods utilising natural bony windows in the skull
-
iii.
Methods assessing cerebral fluid dynamics properties
-
iv.
Electrophysiological methods
-
v.
Imaging methods
-
vi.
Novel methods
Clinical assessment
Clinical neurological assessment remains an important initial diagnostic and monitoring tool. Careful history taking can be an invaluable tool in making the diagnosis of raised ICP, where symptoms suggestive of raised ICP include headache, impaired level of consciousness, visual disturbance, nausea and vomiting, developmental delay and failure to thrive (in younger children).
The nuances of clinical evaluation differ in the paediatric and adult population. In children with an open anterior fontanelle (AF), where the skull sutures have not yet fused, an abnormal increase in the head circumference and bulging of the fontanelle are good indicators of raised ICP [28, 29]. In severely raised ICP, the sutures may often be separated and palpable. Distended scalp veins may be visible.
After the cranial sutures have fused, assessment of ICP becomes more difficult. Finding papilledema on fundoscopy is a useful but inconsistent finding in raised ICP [30, 31]. Papilledema is usually bilateral and generally develops within 5 days of an abnormal increase in ICP [32, 33]. Fundoscopic examination can provide significant additional evidence of underlying raised ICP, which includes papilledema, haemorrhage, loss of spontaneous venous pulsation and optic atrophy. Spontaneous venous pulsation (SVP) is a sensitive marker for normal ICP but should be interpreted in the context of the patient’s clinical presentation [34–36].
Cranial nerve palsies, usually the third and sixth cranial nerves and abnormalities of gaze (usually upward gaze palsy), are ominous signs that raised ICP may be present. Bradycardia and hypertension with abnormal respiration (Cushing’s response) may accompany cerebral herniation syndromes, usually signalling critically raised ICP requiring emergent treatment. The benefit of a thorough history and clinical examination can therefore not overemphasised.
Methods utilising the natural bony windows of the skull
The most accessible anatomical windows in the bony skull used to assess ICP are transorbital, auditory canal and AF in infants (Table 1).
Transorbital methods
-
i.
Pupillometry
Infrared pupillometry has been used to quantitatively measure subtle changes in pupil size in response to light stimulus. Pupillometers have been found to be more sensitive than manual scoring for noting small changes in pupil size [37, 38]. In normal individuals, the pupil decreases by 34–36 % in size, in response to a standard light stimulus. This response is reduced to 20 % in head-injured patients, with a reduction of less than 10 % associated with an ICP >20 mmHg [39, 40]. While promising, the clinical applicability of this technique requires further investigation.
-
ii.
Intraocular pressure (IOP)
The appeal of this technique lies in the anatomical proximity and direct communication between the eye and the intracranial space [41]. The indirect transmission of ICP to the orbit via intervening venous anatomy has long been recognised [42]. The use of handheld tonometers by clinicians without any specialised training has increased the interest in IOP as a rapid screening tool for raised ICP [41, 43, 44]. Lehman et al. demonstrated in their study on rhesus monkeys that a relationship between IOP and ICP did exist, albeit at rather high mean values of ICP (46.8 mmHg) [45]. Later studies evaluating the relationship between IOP and ICP provide mixed results [42, 43]. A meta-analysis by Yavin et al. concluded that the pooled diagnostic accuracy suggested IOP may be a useful clinical adjunct in the detection of raised ICP, but felt the benefit of the technique would be best assessed in future studies where clinical equipoise exists regarding the use of invasive ICP monitoring [46]. While there appears to be a relationship between an increase in IOP and raised ICP, IOP does not appear sufficiently accurate for predicting individual patient ICP measurement [47].
-
iii.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT)
OCT is a technique using broadband near infrared light. This technology can be used to quantitatively measure and monitor the thickness of the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) and the optic nerve head morphology [48], making it a useful, objective method for distinguishing nerves with papilledema from normal nerves, and optic atrophy. This application has been found useful in adults and children with raised ICP and papilledema [49, 50]. A recent study has also demonstrated structural changes of the optic nerve head on OCT in a small group of patients before and after lumbar puncture [51].
-
iv.
Scanning laser tomography (SLT)
SLT uses a laser to produce a 3D scan of the retinal surface. It can be used as an alternative to OCT when measuring the RFNL. The technique has been described as being highly reproducible [52, 53]. Though SLT measurements of the optic nerve volume and height have been found reliable in quantifying papilledema [54] and have been correlated with CSF pressure measured via LP [55], its value in reliably estimating ICP has yet to be established.
-
v.
Venous ophthalmodynamometry (vODM)
This method was originally described by Baurmann in 1925 and involves measurement of the retinal venous outflow pressure (VOP) while observing the retinal vessels with an ophthalmoscope [56]. The technique usually involves applying a suction cup to the globe in order to increase the IOP until the central retinal vein (CRV) collapses and begins to pulsate, which usually happens at the point when the applied external pressure nears the VOP, which is an approximate of ICP. The venous outflow pressure which has a close linear relationship with ICP [57] is calculated by adding the pressure from the ophthalmodynamometer to the IOP. The technique requires the pupils to be dilated and should be performed by an experienced ophthalmologist. The application of external ocular pressure could also trigger the oculo-cardiac reflex, leading to hypotension, which is undesirable, especially if ICP is increased.
-
vi.
Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD)
The optic nerve originates from the central nervous system. It is surrounded by a CSF-filled, perineural, subarachnoid space and encased by a dural sheath. Direct communication with the intracranial subarachnoid space means that an increase in ICP displaces CSF along this pathway, leading to an increase in CSF within the ONS and subsequent expansion of this sheath. Changes in the ONSD can be visualised on ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT scan [58–64]. Several studies have demonstrated a strong association between distension of the ONSD and an increase in ICP [60, 65–69]. The suggested cut-off value in adult studies ranges between 4.1 and 5.9 mm and the definition of increased ICP varies between 14.7 and 30 mmHg [24, 60, 65, 67, 68]. In children, there are age-related differences in ONSD cut-off values [63, 70, 71]. Recent work suggests that using patency of the anterior fontanelle is a more useful marker for describing ONSD cut-off values [72]. ONSD measurements using higher frequency, smaller footprint ultrasound probes to better define the borders of the ONS have been larger than historic values [72, 73]. Comparison to invasive ICP measurements has allowed the relationship between ONSD and ICP to be evaluated at different ICP thresholds [72]. The main limitations of ultrasound-based ONSD measurements are hyperechoic artefacts, inter-rater variability, submillimetric measurements, variation in optic nerve sheath cut-off values and heterogeneity of the patient population [63, 65, 70, 71, 74–81]. Despite these limitations, ONSD measurement remains a very promising method for detecting raised ICP [63, 82–84].
Methods utilising the auditory canal
The cochlea of the ear is in direct communication with the intracranial subarachnoid space via the cochlear aqueduct. Methods investigating displacement of the tympanic membrane and measurement of sound generated by movement of the ossicles have been described as markers of ICP.
-
i.
Tympanic membrane displacement (TMD)
Tympanic membrane vibration is usually transmitted through the ossicles in the middle ear to the cochlea. Contraction of the stapedius and tensor tympani muscles is accompanied by a small, measurable displacement of the tympanic membrane from its resting position. As the perilymph and CSF communicate through the cochlear aqueduct, an increase in ICP is directly transmitted to the footplate of the stapes leading to a change in the direction and magnitude of TMD.
Movement of the tympanic membrane caused by stimulation of the stapedial reflex can be quantitatively assessed. This movement is altered by increased ICP, where inward displacement is suggestive of high ICP, and outward displacement is suggestive of normal or low ICP [85]. While it appears to have a utility in detecting raised ICP, limited accuracy confines it to providing qualitative ICP data [86–88]. In the study by Shimbles et al., no valid measurement of TMD could be made in about 60 % of patients, casting doubt on the clinical value of the technique [89]. Patency of the cochlear aqueduct, integrity of the tympanic membrane and strength of the acoustic reflex influence the TMD, which is further limited by poor inter-subject reproducibility [90].
-
ii.
Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs)
OAEs are sounds originating from movement of the sensory hair cells within the cochlea in response to auditory stimulation. These sounds can be recorded by a probe placed in the ear canal. OAE is often used in clinical practice to test for hearing deficits in young children where cooperation is poor.
Auditory measurements of OAEs that depend on middle ear function are theoretically influenced by changes in ICP [91]. This method has been used as an alternative to TMD; specifically, a technique called distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) has been shown to change with ICP [91, 92]. It has the advantage over TMD of not requiring the middle ear reflex arc, which involves brainstem pathways. Poor inter-subject variability limits its use in measuring ICP, but it could be useful for monitoring patients once baseline ICP has already been measured [24, 93].
Assessment of the anterior fontanelle
Palpation of the AF, measurement of head circumference, shape and palpation of suture ridges during clinical examination are basic but extremely valuable assessments which can be performed by health-care workers at all levels. Raised ICP in infants almost always causes a bulging or tense AF, and this should prompt further investigation. ICP assessment via the AF includes measuring pulsation of the AF [94–96] and the use of an applanation transducer, modified Shiotz tonometer [29] and the Rotterdam Teletransducer (RTT) [97]. None of these have been widely used in routine practice and are largely of historic significance. Recently, transfontanelle ICP monitoring using an existing ICP probe secured against the AF was described as an accurate technique for detecting raised ICP in infants [98]. Where the AF is closed or not reliably patent, other non-invasive techniques are required to assess ICP.
Methods assessing cerebral fluid dynamic properties
Studying dynamic changes in ICP, cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral compliance can be quite challenging. Reliable non-invasive techniques for assessing these parameters are therefore rather limited. Ultrasound, MRI and infrared spectroscopy have been used to examine some of these dynamic alterations (Table 2).
Transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD)
TCD measures the velocity of blood flow through major intracranial vessels by emitting a high-frequency (>2 MHz) wave and detecting the frequency shift between the incident and reflected wave. This difference directly correlates with the speed of blood flow (the Doppler effect) [99]. TCD as a technique for evaluating cerebral haemodynamics was described by Aaslid et al. in 1982 [100]. It has since been used to measure the CBF velocity in the circle of Willis and the vertebrobasilar system, both diagnostically and to adjust treatment strategies in a variety of neurovascular disorders [101–104]. Insonation of one of the arteries, usually the middle cerebral artery, produces a reproducible arterial waveform. The most commonly assessed parameters using this arterial waveform are the peak systolic and diastolic velocity, mean velocity, resistance index (RI) and pulsatility index (PI). The criteria for adequate vessel insonation include the cranial window used, transducer position, angle of insonation, depth of sample volume, direction of blood flow, relative flow velocity and experience of the investigator [99, 105].
The measurement is taken over regions of the skull with the thinnest bony windows (temporal region, transorbital or at the back of the head). TCD is most suited to providing a qualitative estimate (low, normal or high) of ICP [101, 106].
In an adult study, the PI (difference between systolic and diastolic flow velocity divided by the mean flow velocity) correlated well with ICP (correlation coefficient of 0.938, p < 0.001) [101]. A study in children with severe TBI found the PI to be a less reliable indicator of absolute ICP values [107], while a subsequent study also in children found TCD to be an excellent first-line examination for identifying patients likely to need invasive ICP monitoring [108].
TCD remains an attractive alternative to invasive ICP because of its ability to detect cerebral ischemia, relative cost effectiveness and widespread availability. The main disadvantages are the requirement of a trained and skilled operator to perform and interpret the measurements and the limited accuracy for estimating absolute ICP [107].
Magnetic resonance imaging-based elastance index
MRI-based cine phase-contrast pulse sequences are used to determine the blood and CSF volumetric flow rates within the brain. A novel method using the arterial inflow, venous outflow and CSF flow between the cranium and spinal compartment to calculate changes in intracranial volume; these measurements are then used to derive ICP using an elastance index [109, 110]. Prediction of ICP using this dynamic MRI technique has demonstrated strong correlation with invasive ICP measurement. In children with hydrocephalus, dynamic MRI correlated well with shunt valve opening pressure and symptom resolution [111, 112].
Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)
Transcranial NIRS is a method for assessing regional changes in cerebral blood oxygen saturation (rSO2) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) and CBF [113]. NIRS works in the infrared spectrum (700–1000 nm) of light, where low absorption allows it to easily pass through the skin and bone resulting in deep-tissue penetration. This light is both scattered and absorbed as it passes through brain tissue. Variations in the absorption of infrared light by different substances allow the detection of changes in deoxyhaemoglobin and oxyhaemoglobin concentration. A significant difference in rSO2 values was demonstrated in a study of severe TBI patients with normal and raised ICP [114]. Changes in cerebral oxygenation correlated well with vasogenic ICP slow waves in CSF infusion studies and TBI [115]. NIRS allows for the calculation of certain indices which have been correlated with cerebrovascular pressure reactivity in TBI patients [116]. At present, NIRS does not provide an estimation of absolute ICP nor does it facilitate the detection of changes in ICP [19]. The technique is also limited by the requirement for specialised equipment and the extended period required to obtain the required indices [116].
Electrophysiological methods
Electroencephalography (EEG)
EEG represents spontaneous electrical activity of the cerebral cortex recorded through electrodes placed on the scalp. These electrical signals are then amplified, filtered and displayed according to the number of channels required (generally 8 or 16 channels).
The use of a novel technique called EEG power spectrum analysis has recently been reported by Chen et al. [117]. Power spectral analysis allows a graphical representation of the EEG readings over time. An index called the intracranial pressure index (IPI) was derived using the EEG power spectrum analysis, and this was then correlated with ICP measurements. The authors concluded that there was a correlation between the IPI and ICP. Its clinical utility depends on validation in further studies. Recent development of both wireless, portable and field deployable EEG systems has improved the application of this technique [117].
Visual evoked potentials (VEPs)
VEPs are recorded from electrodes positioned in the occipital scalp and accurately reflect disturbances of the visual pathways [118, 119]. Rosenfeld and Owen described a method using flashing light into the eye and estimating ICP through recordings obtained from a few occipital EEG electrodes, using the latency of the second negative-going wave (N2) [119]. A linear relationship between ICP and the latency of the third positive-going wave (P3) has also been reported using high-density electrode arrays and independent component analysis extraction [120]. The N2 wave appears to be stable and easily identifiable using flash-evoked VEPs in healthy control patients. Earlier studies demonstrated a strong correlation between the N2 latency of the VEP and ICP in children with hydrocephalus and young adults with head trauma [121, 122]. The relationship between a prolonged N2 latency period and raised ICP has subsequently also been reported in children [123, 124]. A recent study has, however, demonstrated a high inter-subject variability, suggesting a limited ability to reliably predict ICP [125].
Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs)
This technique employs vestibular stimulation of the extraocular muscles to generate electromyographic activity. These evoked potentials can be recorded from the contralateral eye using surface electrodes. A recent study has suggested that this technique may have a role in non-invasive ICP assessment [88] (Table 3).
Imaging methods
Radiological imaging has historically been a fundamental tool in making the diagnosis of raised ICP. Skull X-rays were used to assess whether chronically raised ICP was present by detecting separation of the skull sutures, ‘copper beaten’ appearance of the skull and erosion of the clinoid [126–128]. This modality is perhaps less useful in the modern era [129]. Imaging features on CT and MRI consistent with clinical findings of raised ICP have been well described [64, 126, 130–133].
CT scan
CT scan still remains the most widely used diagnostic imaging modality when assessing patients with acutely raised ICP. A variety of findings on CT have been associated with raised ICP, depending on the underlying aetiology. These findings include the following:
-
Absence/compression of the basal cisterns and/or ventricles
-
Midline shift
-
Enlarged ventricles (hydrocephalus)
-
Transependymal fluid shift
-
Presence of haematoma/space occupying lesion
-
Blood in the subarachnoid space
-
Size of sulci
-
Grey/white differentiation
The benefit of the initial CT scan has been investigated widely in the context of traumatic brain injury [64, 126, 131, 134]. CT scan still forms the cornerstone of acute imaging in hydrocephalus, where features depend on the aetiology and relate to the level of obstruction, presence of transependymal fluid shift, volume of CSF in the subarachnoid space and shape of the third ventricle [135–137].
The discussion regarding which of these CT findings and which correlate best with raised ICP is still ongoing [19, 24, 64, 134]. While CT scans remain a valuable diagnostic adjunct in the acute diagnosis of raised ICP, it must be remembered that a ‘normal’ CT scan does not rule out raised ICP. In children, additional radiation exposure to the susceptible, developing brain and the compound effect over the lifetime of the child should always be considered [135, 138–142]. To this effect, the ‘image gently’ recommendations for children should always be kept in mind (www.imagegently.org).
MRI scan
MRI provides superb quality images of the brain but can be time consuming and costly as a first-line diagnostic modality in the acute care setting. MRI techniques for evaluating ICP are based on the relationship between intracranial compliance and pressure [109, 143]. Using a motion-sensitive technique to measure the arterial, venous and CSF flow into and out of the cranial cavity during the cardiac cycle, Alperin et al. demonstrated a strong correlation between the MRI-derived elastance index and invasively measured ICP [109]. These results, however, were found to have poor repeatability in a subsequent study, due to technical errors in measurement and intra-individual variation, with the authors suggesting caution when interpreting individual measurements [144]. Despite these shortcomings, specific MRI sequences appear promising, both for screening in acutely raised ICP and for assessment of ICP in other conditions, like hydrocephalus [145]. MRI has also been used to evaluate the optic nerve sheath diameter as a marker for raised ICP [146], and appears to be more accurate than ultrasound in assessing the CSF-filled subarachnoid space surrounding the optic nerve [78]. The current role of MRI as a diagnostic and monitoring tool in neurosurgery far outweighs its function as a purely non-invasive technique for assessing ICP.
Novel methods
Ultrasonic time of flight (TOF) for non-invasive assessment of ICP is based on measurement of the acoustic properties of intracranial structures, i.e. dura, brain, blood and CSF. Using the propagation speed and attenuation of ultrasound and the respective change within the intracranial components in the acoustic pathway, an estimation of ICP was described [147, 148]. Two-depth transorbital Doppler (TDTD) is an innovative technique using the principle of externally applied pressure to the eyeball as a means of equilibrating the blood flow pulsation parameters between the intracranial and extracranial segments of the ophthalmic artery. This technique is based on the assertion that the external applied pressure is equal to ICP at this balance point [149, 150]. While initial work described very high correlation between this method and CSF pressure measurement on lumbar puncture, subsequent external validation has demonstrated much lower accuracy [150, 151]. A method using dynamic imaging of the ONS to evaluate the stiffness of the sheath in cases of raised and normal ICP described a novel parameter, the deformability index (DI), to define the motion of the ONS as a marker of its stiffness. The DI demonstrated a significant difference in raised ICP, and the authors described coupling DI with ONSD to improve our understanding of the ONS response in raised ICP to further refine the diagnostic accuracy of this method [152].
Despite a relatively long history of innovative thinking regarding suitable techniques for non-invasively assessing ICP, most developments remain in an exploratory phase. The main limitations are inadequate diagnostic accuracy for detecting raised ICP, poor quantitative estimation of ICP and lack of continuous monitoring capability. Most methods appear suitable to identify subjects with low to normal ICP or very high ICP, but are poor at detecting moderately raised ICP, which arguably is the most important group. The idea of combining selected non-invasive techniques to improve accuracy in a ‘non-invasive multi-modality model’ is certainly appealing in principle.
Non-invasive ICP assessment is still most suitable as a screening tool for patients with suspected raised ICP. Future development of non-invasive techniques will likely depend on substantial improvements in the accuracy, ease of use and potential for continuous monitoring. This need is perhaps most distinct in the children, where early detection of increasing ICP has the potential to spare the developing nervous system unnecessary exposure to radiation from repeated CT scans or limit the need for invasive monitoring in certain cases making this quest worthwhile. Promising developments aimed at improving diagnostic accuracy and possibly even simplifying the acquisition technique may contribute significantly towards improving the performance of these methods [149, 150, 152].
References
Guillaume J, Janny P (1951) Continuous intracranial manometry; importance of the method and first results. Rev Neurol 84(2):131
Lundberg N (1960) Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 36(Suppl 149):1–193
Saul TG, Ducker TB (1982) Effect of intracranial pressure monitoring and aggressive treatment on mortality in severe head injury. J Neurosurg 56(4):498–503
Miller JD, Becker DP, Ward JD, Sullivan HG, Adams WE, Rosner MJ (1977) Significance of intracranial hypertension in severe head injury. J Neurosurg 47(4):503–516
Avezaat CJ, Van Eijndhoven JH, Wyper DJ (1979) Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure and intracranial volume-pressure relationships. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 42(8):687–700
Marmarou A, Anderson RL, Ward JD et al (1981) Impact of ICP instability and hypotension on outcome in patients with severe head trauma. Special Supplements 75(1):59–66
Becker DP, Miller JD, Ward JD, Greenberg RP, Young HF, Sakalas R (1977) The outcome from severe head injury with early diagnosis and intensive management. J Neurosurg 47(4):491–502
Marshall LF, Smith RW, Shapiro HM (1979) The outcome with aggressive treatment in severe head injuries: part I: the significance of intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurosurg 50(1):20–25
Smith M (2008) Monitoring intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury. Anesth Analg 106(1):240–248
Chesnut RM, Marshall LF, Marshall SB (1993) Medical management of intracranial pressure. Head Injury 4:229–263
Salim A, Hannon M, Brown C et al (2008) Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe isolated pediatric blunt head trauma. Am Surg 74(11):1088–1093
Shafi S, Diaz-Arrastia R, Madden C, Gentilello L (2008) Intracranial pressure monitoring in brain-injured patients is associated with worsening of survival. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 64(2):335–340
Czosnyka M, Pickard JD (2004) Monitoring and interpretation of intracranial pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75(6):813–821
Padayachy LC, Figaji AA, Bullock MR (2010) Intracranial pressure monitoring for traumatic brain injury in the modern era. Childs Nerv Syst 26(4):441–452
Citerio G, Andrews PJ (2004) Intracranial pressure. Intensive Care Med 30(10):1882–1885
Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Laing RJ, Menon D, Pickard JD (1997) Continuous assessment of the cerebral vasomotor reactivity in head injury. Neurosurgery 41:11–17
Treggiari MM, Schutz N, Yanez ND, Romand JA (2007) Role of intracranial pressure values and patterns in predicting outcome in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care 6(2):104–112
Wiegand C, Richards P (2007) Measurement of intracranial pressure in children: a critical review of current methods. Dev Med Child Neurol 49(12):935–941
Kristiansson H, Nissborg E, Bartek J Jr, Andresen M, Reinstrup P, Romner B (2013) Measuring elevated intracranial pressure through noninvasive methods: a review of the literature. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 25(4):372–385
Adelson PD, Bratton SL, Carney NA et al (2003) Guidelines for the acute medical management of severe traumatic brain injury in infants, children, and adolescents. Chapter 5. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring in pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Pediatr Crit Care Med 4(3 Suppl):S19–24
Morris KP, Forsyth RJ, Parslow RC et al (2006) UK Paediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Study Group. Intracranial pressure complicating severe traumatic brain injury in children: monitoring and management. Intensive Care Med 32(10):1606–1612
Chambers IR, Siddique MS, Banister K, Mendelow AD (2001) Clinical comparison of the Spiegelberg parenchymal transducer and ventricular fluid pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 71(3):383–385
Michaud LJ, Rivara FP, Grady MS, Reay DT (1992) Predictors of survival and severity of disability after severe brain injury in children. Neurosurgery 31(2):254–26
Rosenberg JB, Shiloh AL, Savel RH, Eisen LA (2011) Non-invasive methods of estimating intracranial pressure. Neurocrit Care 15(3):599–608
Raboel PH, Bartek J, Andresen M, Bellander BM, Romner B (2012) Intracranial pressure monitoring: invasive versus non-invasive methods—a review. Crit Care Res Pract 2012(12):1–14
Anderson RC, Kan P, Klimo P, Brockmeyer DL, Walker ML, Kestle JR (2004) Complications of intracranial pressure monitoring in children with head trauma. J Neurosurg Pediatr 101(2):53–58
Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J et al (2006) Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VI. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurotrauma 24(S1):S37–44
Hanlo PW, Gooskens RH, Faber JA et al (1996) Relationship between anterior fontanelle pressure measurements and clinical signs in infantile hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 12(4):200–209
Wealthall SR, Smallwood R (1974) Methods of measuring intracranial pressure via the fontanelle without puncture. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 37(1):88–96
Tuite GF, Chong WK, Evanson J et al (1996) The effectiveness of papilledema as an indicator of raised intracranial pressure in children with craniosynostosis. Neurosurgery 38(2):272–278
Sajjadi SA, Harirchian MH, Sheikhbahaei N, Mohebbi MR, Malekmadani MH, Saberi H (2006) The relation between intracranial and intraocular pressures: study of 50 patients. Ann Neurol 59(5):867–870
Hedges TR, Zaren HA (1973) The relationship of optic nerve tissue pressure to intracranial and systemic arterial pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 75(1):90–98
Hedges TR (1974) Papilledema: its recognition and relation to increased intracranial pressure. Surv Ophthalmol 19(4):201–223
Jacks AS, Miller NR (2003) Spontaneous retinal venous pulsation: aetiology and significance. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74(1):7–9
Levin BE (1978) The clinical significance of spontaneous pulsations of the retinal vein. Arch Neurol 35(1):37–40
Wong SH, White RP (2013) The clinical validity of the spontaneous retinal venous pulsation. J Neuroophthalmol 33(1):17–20
Larson MD, Muhiudeen I (1995) Pupillometric analysis of the absent light reflex. Arch Neurol 52(4):369–372
Du R, Meeker M, Bacchetti P, Larson MD, Holland MC, Manley GT (2005) Evaluation of the portable infrared pupillometer. Neurosurgery 57(1):198–203
Taylor WR, Chen JW, Meltzer H et al (2003) Quantitative pupillometry, a new technology: normative data and preliminary observations in patients with acute head injury: technical note. J Neurosurg 98(1):205–213
Boev AN, Fountas KN, Karampelas I et al (2005) Quantitative pupillometry: normative data in healthy pediatric volunteers. J Neurosurg Pediatr 103(6 Suppl):496–500
Lashutka MK, Chandra A, Murray HN, Phillips GS, Hiestand BC (2004) The relationship of intraocular pressure to intracranial pressure. Ann Emerg Med 43(5):585–591
Salman MS (1997) Can intracranial pressure be measured non-invasively? Lancet 350(9088):1367
Czarnik T, Gawda R, Kolodziej W, Latka D, Sznajd-Weron K, Weron R (2009) Associations between intracranial pressure, intraocular pressure and mean arterial pressure in patients with traumatic and non-traumatic brain injuries. Injury 40(1):33–39
Spentzas T, Henricksen J, Patters AB, Chaum E (2010) Correlation of intraocular pressure with intracranial pressure in children with severe head injuries. Pediatr Crit Care Med 11(5):593–598
Lehman RA, Krupin T, Podos SM (1972) Experimental effect of intracranial hypertension upon intraocular pressure. J Neurosurg 36(1):60–66
Yavin D, Luu J, James MT et al (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of intraocular pressure measurement for the detection of raised intracranial pressure: meta-analysis: a systematic review. J Neurosurg 121(3):680–687
Li Z, Yang Y, Lu Y et al (2012) Intraocular pressure vs intracranial pressure in disease conditions: a prospective cohort study (Beijing iCOP study). BMC Neurol 12(1):66
Hee MR, Izatt JA, Swanson EA et al (1995) Optical coherence tomography of the human retina. Arch Ophthalmol 113(3):325–332
Scott CJ, Kardon RH, Lee AG, Frisen L, Wall M (2010) Diagnosis and grading of papilledema in patients with raised intracranial pressure using optical coherence tomography vs clinical expert assessment using a clinical staging scale. Arch Ophthalmol 128(6):705–711
Driessen C, Eveleens J, Bleyen I, Van Veelen ML, Joosten K, Mathiijssen I (2014) Optical coherence tomography: a quantitative tool to screen for papilledema in craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 30:1067–1073
Anand A, Pass A, Urfy M et al (2016) Optical coherence tomography of the optic nerve head detects acute changes in intracranial pressure. J Clin Neurosci 29:73–76
Kruse FE, Burk RO, Völcker HE, Zinser G, Harbarth U (1989) Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the optic nerve head with laser tomographic scanning. Ophthalmology 96(9):1320–1324
Rohrschneider K, Burk RO, Kruse FE, Völcker HE (1998) Reproducibility of the optic nerve head topography with a new laser tomographic scanning device. Ophthalmology 101(6):1044–1049
Trick GL, Vesti E, Tawansy K, Skarf B, Gartner J (1998) Quantitative evaluation of papilledema in pseudotumor cerebri. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39(10):1964–1971
Heckmann JG, Weber M, Jünemann AG, Neundörfer B, Mardin CY (2004) Laser scanning tomography of the optic nerve vs CSF opening pressure in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology 62(7):1221–1223
Baurmann M (1925) On the origin and clinical significance of retinal venous pulse. Zusammenkunft Deutschen Ophthalmologie 45:53–59
Firsching R, Schütze M, Motschmann M, Behrens-Baumann W (2000) Venous ophthalmodynamometry: a noninvasive method for assessment of intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 93(1):33–36
Geeraerts T, Duranteau J, Benhamou D (2008) Ocular sonography in patients with raised intracranial pressure: the papilloedema revisited. Crit Care 12(3):150
Hansen HC, Helmke K (1996) The subarachnoid space surrounding the optic nerves. An ultrasound study of the optic nerve sheath. Surg Radiol Anat 18(4):323–328
Geeraerts T, Newcombe VF, Coles JP et al (2008) Use of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the optic nerve sheath to detect raised intracranial pressure. Crit Care 12(5):R114
Gibby WA, Cohen MS, Goldberg HI, Sergott RC (1993) Pseudotumor cerebri: CT findings and correlation with vision loss. Am J Roentgenol 160(1):143–146
Sekhon MS, Griesdale DE, Robba C et al (2014) Optic nerve sheath diameter on computed tomography is correlated with simultaneously measured intracranial pressure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med 40(9):1267–1274
Newman WD, Hollman AS, Dutton GN, Carachi R (2002) Measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter by ultrasound: a means of detecting acute raised intracranial pressure in hydrocephalus. Br J Ophthalmol 86(10):1109–1113
Padayachy LC, Kilborn T, Carrara H, Figaji A, Fieggen G (2015) Change in optic nerve sheath diameter as a radiological marker of outcome from endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children. Childs Nerv Syst 31(5):721–728
Rajajee V, Vanaman M, Fletcher JJ, Jacobs TL (2011) Optic nerve ultrasound for the detection of raised intracranial pressure. Neurocrit Care 15(3):506–515
Soldatos T, Karakitsos D, Chatzimichail K, Papathanasiou M, Gouliamos A, Karabinis A (2008) Optic nerve sonography in the diagnostic evaluation of adult brain injury. Crit Care 12(3):R67
Kimberly HH, Shah S, Marill K, Noble V (2008) Correlation of optic nerve sheath diameter with direct measurement of intracranial pressure. Acad Emerg Med 15(2):201–204
Hansen HC, Helmke K (1997) Validation of the optic nerve sheath response to changing cerebrospinal fluid pressure: ultrasound findings during intrathecal infusion tests. J Neurosurg 87(1):34–40
Wang L, Feng L, Yao Y et al (2015) Optimal optic nerve sheath diameter threshold for the identification of elevated opening pressure on lumbar puncture in a Chinese population. PLoS One 10(2):e0117939
Helmke K, Hansen HC (1996) Fundamentals of transorbital sonographic evaluation of optic nerve sheath expansion under intracranial hypertension. Pediatr Radiol 26(10):701–705
Ballantyne J, Hollman A, Hamilton R et al (1999) Transorbital optic nerve sheath ultrasonography in normal children. Clin Radiol 54(11):740–742
Padayachy LC, Padayachy V, Galal U, Pollock T, Fieggen AG (2016) The relationship between optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement and invasively measured ICP. Part II: age related ONSD cut-off values and patency of the anterior fontanelle. Child’s Nerv Syst (in press)
Steinborn M, Friedmann M, Makowski C, Hahn H, Hapfelmeier A, Juenger H (2016) High resolution transbulbar sonography in children with suspicion of increased intracranial pressure. Childs Nerv Syst 32(4):655–660
London A, Benhar I, Schwartz M (2013) The retina as a window to the brain—from eye research to CNS disorders. Nat Rev Neurol 9(1):44–53
Moretti R, Pizzi B (2011) Ultrasonography of the optic nerve in neurocritically ill patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 55(6):644–652
Malayeri AA, Bavarian S, Mehdizadeh M (2005) Sonographic evaluation of optic nerve diameter in children with raised intracranial pressure. J Ultrasound Med 24(2):143–147
Beare NA, Kampondeni S, Glover SJ et al (2008) Detection of raised intracranial pressure by ultrasound measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter in African children. Trop Med Int Health 13(11):1400–1404
Steinborn M, Friedmann M, Hahn H et al (2015) Normal values for transbulbar sonography and magnetic resonance imaging of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in children and adolescents. Ultraschall Med 36(1):54–58
Dubourg J, Javouhey E, Geeraerts T, Messerer M, Kassai B (2011) Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter for detection of raised intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 37(7):1059–1068
Soldatos T, Chatzimichail K, Papathanasiou M, Gouliamos A (2009) Optic nerve sonography: a new window for the non-invasive evaluation of intracranial pressure in brain injury. Emerg Med J 26(9):630–634
Padayachy L, Padayachy V, Galal U, Grey R, Fieggen G (2016) The relationship between transorbital ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and invasively measured ICP in children. Part I: repeatability, observer variability and general analysis. Childs Nerv Syst (in press)
Girisgin AS, Kalkan E, Kocak S, Cander B, Gul M, Semiz M (2007) The role of optic nerve ultrasonography in the diagnosis of elevated intracranial pressure. Emerg Med J 24(4):251–254
Tayal VS, Neulander M, Norton HJ, Foster T, Saunders T, Blaivas M (2007) Emergency department sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter to detect findings of increased intracranial pressure in adult head injury patients. Ann Emerg Med 49(4):508–514
Major R, Girling S, Boyle A (2011) Ultrasound measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter in patients with a clinical suspicion of raised intracranial pressure. Emerg Med J 28(8):679–81
Reid A, Marchbanks RJ, Burge DM, Martin AM, Bateman DE, Pickard JD et al (1990) The relationship between intracranial pressure and tympanic membrane displacement. Br J Audiol 24:123–9
Gwer S, Sheward V, Birch A, Marchbanks R, Idro R, Newton C, Kirkham F, Lin J-P, Lim M (2013) The tympanic membrane displacement analyser for monitoring intracranial pressure in children. Child’s Nerv Syst 29:927–33
Samuel M, Burge DM, Marchbanks RJ (1998) Quantitative assessment of intracranial pressure by the tympanic membrane displacement audiometric technique in children with shunted hydrocephalus. Eur J Pediatr Surg 8(4):200–207
Jerin C, Berman A, Krause E, Ertl-Wagner B, Gürkov R (2014) Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential frequency tuning in certain Meniere’s disease. Hear Res 310:54–59
Shimbles S, Dodd C, Banister K, Mendelow AD, Chambers IR (2005) Clinical comparison of tympanic membrane displacement with invasive intracranial pressure measurements. Physiol Meas 26(6):1085
Silverman CA, Linstrom CJ (2013) How to measure cerebrospinal fluid pressure invasively and noninvasively. J Glaucoma 22:S26–S28
Voss SE, Horton NJ, Tabucchi TH, Folowosele FO, Shera CA (2006) Posture-induced changes in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and the potential for noninvasive monitoring of changes in intracranial pressure. Neurocrit Care 4(3):251–257
Büki B, Avan P, Lemaire JJ, Dordain M, Chazal J, Ribari O (1996) Otoacoustic emissions: a new tool for monitoring intracranial pressure changes through stapes displacements. Hear Res 94(1):125–139
Frank AM, Alexiou C, Hulin P, Janssen T, Arnold W, Trappe AE (1999) Non-invasive measurement of intracranial pressure changes by otoacoustic emissions (OAEs)—a report of preliminary data. Zentralbl Neurochir 61(4):177–180
Kiesler J, Ricer R (2003) The abnormal fontanel. Am Fam Physician 67(12):2547–2552
Purin VR (1964) Measurement of the cerebrospinal fluid pressure in the infant without puncture. A new method. Pediatriya 43:82–85
Vidyasagar D, Raju TNK (1977) A simple noninvasive technique of measuring intracranial pressure in the newborn. Pediatrics 59(6):957–961
Peters RJA, Hanlo PW, Gooskens RHJ, Braun KPJ, Tulleken CAF, Willemse J (2005) Non-invasive ICP monitoring in infants: the Rotterdam Teletransducer revisited. Childs Nerv Syst 11(4):207–213
Behmanesh B, Setzer M, Noack A, Bartels M, Quick-Weller J, Seifert V, Freiman TM (2016) Noninvasive epicutaneous transfontanelle intracranial pressure monitoring in children under the age of 1 year: a novel technique. J Neurosurg Pediatr 27:1–5
Lupetin AR, Davis DA, Beckham I, Dash N (1995) Transcranial Doppler sonography. Part 1. Principles, technique, and normal appearances. Radiographics 15(1):179–191
Aaslid R, Markwalder TM, Nornes H (1982) Noninvasive intracranial Doppler ultrasound recording of flow velocity in basal cerebral arteries. J Neurosurg 57:769–774
Bellner J, Romner B, Reinstrup P, Kristiansson KA, Ryding E, Brandt L (2004) Transcranial Doppler sonography pulsatility index (PI) reflects intracranial pressure (ICP). Surg Neurol 62(1):45–51
Adams RJ (2005) TCD in sickle cell disease: an important and useful test. Pediatr Radiol 35(3):229–234
Radolovich DK, Aries MJH, Castellani G et al (2011) Pulsatile intracranial pressure and cerebral autoregulation after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care 15(3):379–386
Leliefeld PH, Gooskens RH, Peters RJ et al (2009) New transcranial Doppler index in infants with hydrocephalus: transsystolic time in clinical practice. Ultrasound Med Biol 35(10):1601–1606
Krejza J, Mariak Z, Babikian V (2001) Importance of angle correction in the measurement of blood flow velocity with transcranial Doppler sonography. Am J Neuroradiol 22:1743–1747
Voulgaris SG, Partheni M, Kaliora H, Haftouras N, Pessach IS, Polyzoidis KS (2005) Early cerebral monitoring using the transcranial Doppler pulsatility index in patients with severe brain trauma. Ann Transplant 11(2):CR49–CR52
Figaji AA, Zwane E, Fieggen AG, Siesjo P, Peter JC (2009) Transcranial Doppler pulsatility index is not a reliable indicator of intracranial pressure in children with severe traumatic brain injury. Surg Neurol 72(4):389–394
Melo JRT, Di Rocco F, Blanot S et al (2011) Transcranial Doppler can predict intracranial hypertension in children with severe traumatic brain injuries. Childs Nerv Syst 27(6):979–984
Alperin NJ, Lee SH, Loth F, Raksin PB, Lichtor T (2000) MR-intracranial pressure (ICP): a method to measure intracranial elastance and pressure noninvasively by means of MR imaging: baboon and human study 1. Radiology 217(3):877–885
Alperin N, Hushek SG, Lee SH, Sivaramakrishnan A, Lichtor T (2005) MRI study of cerebral blood flow and CSF flow dynamics in an upright posture: the effect of posture on the intracranial compliance and pressure. Acta Neurochir Suppl 95:177–181
Muehlmann M, Koerte IK, Laubender RP et al (2013) Magnetic resonance-based estimation of intracranial pressure correlates with ventriculoperitoneal shunt valve opening pressure setting in children with hydrocephalus. Invest Radiol 48(7):543–547
Glick RP, Niebruegge J, Lee SH, Egibor O, Lichtor T, Alperin N (2006) Early experience from the application of a noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging-based measurement of intracranial pressure in hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 59(5):1052–1061
Ghosh A, Elwell C, Smith M (2012) Cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy in adults: a work in progress. Anesth Analg 115(6):1373–1383
Kampfl A, Pfausler B, Denchev D, Jaring P, Schmutzhard E (1997) Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in patients with severe brain injury and elevated intracranial pressure. Acta Neurochir Suppl 70:112–114
Weerakkody RA, Czosnyka M, Zweifel C et al (2012) Near infrared spectroscopy as possible non-invasive monitor of slow vasogenic ICP waves. Acta Neurochir Suppl 114:181–185
Zweifel C, Castellani G, Czosnyka M et al (2010) Continuous assessment of cerebral autoregulation with near-infrared spectroscopy in adults after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 41(9):1963–1968
Chen H, Wang J, Mao S, Dong W, Yang H (2012) A new method of intracranial pressure monitoring by EEG power spectrum analysis. Can J Neurol Sci 39(4):483–487
Liasis A, Thompson DA, Hayward R, Nischal KK (2003) Sustained raised intracranial pressure implicated only by pattern reversal visual evoked potentials after cranial vault expansion surgery. Pediatr Neurosurg 39(2):75–80
Rosenfeld JP, Owen RL (1972) Instrumental conditioning of photic evoked potentials: mechanisms and properties of late component modification. Physiol Behav 9(5):851–858
Wu X, Ji Z (2007) Non-invasive detection for intracranial high pressure with FVEP picked-up by independent component analysis. J Biomed Eng 24(5):1015–1018
York DH, Pulliam MW, Rosenfeld JG, Watts C (1981) Relationship between visual evoked potentials and intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 55(6):909–916
York D, Legan M, Benner S, Watts C (1984) Further studies with a noninvasive method of intracranial pressure estimation. Neurosurgery 14(4):456–461
Desch LW (2001) Longitudinal stability of visual evoked potentials in children and adolescents with hydrocephalus. Dev Med Child Neurol 43(02):113–117
Zhao YL, Zhou JY, Zhu GH (2005) Clinical experience with the noninvasive ICP monitoring system. Acta Neurochir Suppl 95:351–355
Andersson L, Sjölund J, Nilsson J (2012) Flash visual evoked potentials are unreliable as markers of ICP due to high variability in normal subjects. Acta Neurochir 154(1):121–127
Hiler M, Czosnyka M, Hutchinson P et al (2006) Predictive value of initial computerized tomography scan, intracranial pressure, and state of autoregulation in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 104(5):731–737
Tuite GF, Evanson J, Chong WK, Thompson DN, Harkness WF, Jones BM et al (1996) The beaten copper cranium: a correlation between intracranial pressure, cranial radiographs, and computed tomographic scans in children with craniosynostosis. Neurosurgery 39(4):691–699
Thompson P, Toga AW (1996) A surface-based technique for warping three-dimensional images of the brain. Medical Imaging 15(4):402–417
Reed MJ, Browning JG, Wilkinson AG, Beattie T (2005) Can we abolish skull X-rays for head injury? Arch Dis Child 90(8):859–864
Sadhu VK, Sampson J, Haar FL, Pinto RS, Handel SF (1979) Correlation between computed tomography and intracranial pressure monitoring in acute head trauma patients 1. Radiology 133(2):507–509
Eisenberg HM, Gary HE Jr, Aldrich EF et al (1990) Initial CT findings in 753 patients with severe head injury: a report from the NIH Traumatic Coma Data Bank. J Neurosurg 73(5):688–698
Eide PK (2003) The relationship between intracranial pressure and size of cerebral ventricles assessed by computed tomography. Acta Neurochir 145(3):171–179
Miller MT, Pasquale M, Kurek S et al (2004) Initial head computed tomographic scan characteristics have a linear relationship with initial intracranial pressure after trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 56(5):967–973
Toutant SM, Klauber MR, Marshall LF (1984) Absent or compressed basal cisterns on first CT scan: ominous predictors of outcome in severe head injury. J Neurosurg 61(4):691–694
Pauwels EK, Bourguignon MH (2012) Radiation dose features and solid cancer induction in pediatric computed tomography. Med Princ Pract 21(6):508–515
Bruwer GE, Van der Westhuizen S, Lombard CJ, Schoeman JF (2004) Can CT predict the level of CSF block in tuberculous hydrocephalus? Childs Nerv Syst 20(3):183–187
Schoeman JF, Van Zyl LE, Laubscher JA, Donald PR (1995) Serial CT scanning in childhood tuberculous meningitis: prognostic features in 198 cases. J Child Neurol 10(4):320–329
Krille L, Zeeb H, Jahnen A (2012) Computed tomographies and cancer risk in children: a literature overview of CT practices, risk estimations and an epidemiologic cohort study proposal. Radiat Environ Biophys 51(2):103–111
Mizutani T, Manaka S, Tsutsumi H (1990) Estimation of intracranial pressure using computed tomography scan findings in patients with severe head injury. Surg Neurol 33(3):178–184
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380(9840):499–505
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357(22):2277–2284
Smyth MD, Narayan P, Tubbs RS et al (2008) Cumulative diagnostic radiation exposure in children with ventriculoperitoneal shunts: a review. Childs Nerv Syst 24(4):493–497
Zhang X, Burstein R, Levy D (2012) Local action of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-6 on intracranial meningeal nociceptors. Cephalalgia 32(1):66–72
Marshall I, MacCormick I, Sellar R, Whittle I (2008) Assessment of factors affecting MRI measurement of intracranial volume changes and elastance index. Br J Neurosurg 22(3):389–397
Raskin PB, Alperin N, Sivaramakrishnan A, Surapaneni S, Lichtor T (2003) Noninvasive intracranial compliance and pressure based on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of blood flow and cerebrospinal fluid flow: review of principles, implementation, and other noninvasive approaches. Neurosurg Focus 14(4):1–8
Gass A, Barker GJ, Riordan-Eva P et al (1996) MRI of the optic nerve in benign intracranial hypertension. Neuroradiology 38(8):769–773
Petkus V, Ragauskas A, Jurkinos R (2002) Investigation of intracranial media ultrasonic monitoring. Ultrasonics 40(1-8):829–33
Ragauskas A, Daubaris G, Ragaisis V, Petkus V (2003) Implementation of non-invasive brain physiological monitoring concepts. Med Eng Phys 25(8):667–78
Ragauskas A, Daubaris G, Dziugys A, Azelis V, Gedrimas V (2005) Innovative non-invasive method absolute intracranial pressure measurement without calibration. Acta Neurochir Suppl 95:357–61
Ragauskas A, Matijosaitis V, Zakelis R et al (2012) Clinical assessment of noninvasive intracranial pressure absolute value measurement method. Neurology 87(21):1684–91
Bershad EM, Anand A, DeSantis SM, Yang M, Tang RA, Calvillo E, Malkin-Gosdin L, Foroozan R, Damani R, Maldonado N, Gupta P (2016) Clinical validation of a transcranial Doppler-based non-invasive ICP meter: a prospective cross-sectional study. World Neurosurg 89:647–653
Padayachy L, Brekken R, Fieggen A, Selbekk T (2016) Pulsatile dynamics of the optic nerve sheath and intracranial pressure: an exploratory in vivo investigation. Neurosurgery 79(1):100–107
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest to declare.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Padayachy, L.C. Non-invasive intracranial pressure assessment. Childs Nerv Syst 32, 1587–1597 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3159-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3159-2