Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using glycine nano-selenium (NS-Gly) as a feed supplement and to evaluate its influence on production performance, egg quality, serum biochemistry, oxidative status, and the intestinal morphology and absorption of laying hens. A total of 864 hens at 40 weeks were randomly assigned into six groups including the basal diet (control, 0.13 mg Se/kg); basal diet + 0.30 mg Se/kg (Na2SeO3) diet; and basal diet + 0.15, 0.30, 0.45, and 0.60 mg Se/kg (NS-Gly) diet. After 8 weeks of Se supplementation, no difference was observed among the treatments on production performance and egg quality (P > 0.05). The levels of albumin (ALB) and alanine aminotransferase (GPT) were significantly influenced by dietary Se supplementation (P < 0.05). In the serum, the level of glutathione peroxide (GSH-Px) was significantly increased in the groups with the dietary NS-Gly supplementation (P < 0.05). The superoxide dismutase (SOD) and total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) levels in all groups of NS-Gly supplementation had a remarkable increase (P < 0.05). In the liver, GSH-Px was significantly increased in 0.45 and 0.60 mg/kg NS-Gly groups (P < 0.05). The activities of SOD and catalase (CAT) were significantly increased in the groups of 0.30 mg/kg NS-Gly diet (P < 0.05). The results of intestinal morphology showed that the crypt depth was affected by higher dose groups of NS-Gly diets in the duodenum, and the differences (P < 0.05) were obtained in villus height, the crypt depth, and the V/C in the jejunum. In the ileum, a significant increase (P < 0.05) of villus height was observed in 0.15 and 0.3 mg/kg Se-added groups. The V/C was the highest in the SS groups (P < 0.05). The mRNA levels of solute carrier family 3 member 1 (rBAT), solute carrier family 6 member 19 (B0AT1), and solute carrier family 15 member 1 (PepT1) increased at different degrees in the duodenum, especially in 0.15 and 0.60 mg/kg NS-Gly groups (P < 0.05). In the jejunum, the expression of B0AT1 was similar to that in the duodenum, and the expression of rBAT increased significantly in the 0.30 and 0.45 mg/kg NS-Gly groups (P < 0.05). The mRNA level of PepT1 increased significantly in the 0.30 mg/kg SS group. Conclusively, dietary NS-Gly supplementation could improve the antioxidant capacity, as well as the structure of small intestine in laying hens, although have no significant effects on the production performance and egg quality.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Selenium (Se), as an essential trace mineral, is vital for the healthy growth and development of animals and human beings [1]. For birds, an adequate intake of Se is required to overcome the risks of immunodeficiency, exudative diathesis, nutritional muscular dystrophy, and other diseases related to Se deficiency [2, 3]. Numerous studies reported that Se might improve the productive and reproductive indices of laying hens when supplied inadequate levels [4, 5]. It also affects the antioxidative status, immune response, and tolerance against different stressors [6, 7]. As some natural feeds are insufficient of Se, this element is commonly extra added. Normally, Se occurs in two chemical forms: organic and inorganic, both of them have been used in poultry diets [8]. Studies have shown that the organic form of Se is more conducive to the deposition of Se in human tissues and eggs, and reduces the transfer of Se to the environment through feces [9, 10]. However, the excessive Se addition can also cause toxic effects in animals.
Recently, Se in nanoparticle form (nano-selenium, NS) has been applied in animal feed due to its high bioavailability and low harmfulness [11,12,13]. Nanoparticles are easier to pass through cell membranes in organisms and interact rapidly with biological systems [14]. It suggested that the superiority of nanoparticles is on account of smaller particle size and larger surface area, which may increase mucosal permeability, and improve intestinal absorption due to the formation of nano-emulsion droplets [15]. It has been reported that the range between optimal and toxic dietary levels of NS was greater than that of SS [16]. It has been demonstrated that metal chelated with amino acid or protein has a better bioavailability to poultry [17, 18]. Most of the NS reported are single Se particles with protein as its nucleus, red selenium as its membrane and protein as its dispersant. NS-Gly is a new type of Se source that uses glycine as an adsorbent and a stabilizing agent of NS. There are 0.9 weight portion of Se and 85 to 95 weight portions of glycine form granular nano-selenium, and the average particle size is 60 nm [19]. It has stable physical and chemical properties and good dispersion and does not reunite. Compared with regular sodium selenite, NS can improve antioxidant status and Se absorption more efficiently on broiler chickens [20]. NS appears to be more effective than other forms of Se at upregulating selenoenzymes, scavenging free radicals, and increasing the antioxidant capacity [21, 22].
Accordingly, the objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using NS-Gly as a feed supplement for laying hens and to evaluate its influence on production performance, egg quality, serum biochemistry, oxidative status, and the intestinal morphology and absorption.
Materials and Methods
Birds Management
A total of 864 laying hens (Huafeng layers, 40 weeks) were obtained from a commercial poultry layer farm (Jiande, China). Hens were randomly assigned into 6 treatments, each of which included 6 replicates (n = 24 laying hens). All hens were raised in the naturally ventilated windowed poultry house with temperature between 23 and 26 °C, the relative humidity between 65 and 75%, and illumination at 16 h/day (20 lx). Feed and water were offered ad libitum. The environmental conditions were the same for all groups. The experiment lasted for 9 weeks, including 1 week of acclimation period and 8 weeks of test period.
Experimental Design and Diets
The protocol of treatments was as follows: (1) basal diet (control, 0.13 mg Se/kg); (2) basal diet + 0.30 mg Se/kg diet (Na2SeO3, SS); (3) basal diet + 0.15 mg Se/kg diet (NS-Gly); (4) basal diet + 0.30 mg Se/kg diet (NS-Gly); (5) basal diet + 0.45 mg Se/kg diet (NS-Gly); and (6) basal diet + 0.60 mg Se/kg diet (NS-Gly). NS-Gly, feed grade, with an average particle size of 60 nm and 1% content of Se, was provided by Weifeng Feed Co., Ltd. (Jiande, China). The composition and nutritional level of the basal diet are presented in Table 1. The different contents of glycine caused by the addition of graded NS-Gly were balanced by adding extra glycine in the premixes to make all nutrients in diets kept at the same levels except for the Se content. The analysis concentrations of dietary Se in the six experimental groups were 0.13, 0.44, 0.30, 0.42, 0.58, and 0.75 mg Se/kg diet, respectively.
Sample Collections
During the test period, the number of eggs and egg weight was recorded everyday (at 14:00) on a replication basis and the laying rate was calculated. Feed consumption was measured once a week on a replication basis and the average daily feed intake (ADFI) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were calculated. At the end of the experimental period, twelve birds per treatment (2 birds each replicate) were randomly selected. After the hens fasted 12 h (water was offered ad libitum), the blood samples were collected in 1.5 ml of Eppendorf tubes by puncture of the wing vein. These tubes were centrifuged at 3000×g for 15 min to separate serum and stored at − 80 °C for biochemical and serum antioxidants analysis. Then, birds were euthanized by cervical dislocation. Immediately, samples of liver were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C for antioxidant and molecular analysis. The intestinal mucosa was collected and stored at − 80 °C from the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum for molecular analysis. The small intestine was kept in 4% paraformaldehyde for histological evaluations.
Egg Quality Determination
A total of 18 eggs (3 eggs per replication, 6 replications per treatment) from each treatment group were randomly collected at the end of the experiment to determine the egg quality. Egg weight, eggshell strength, albumen height, Haugh unit, and yolk color were measured by a digital egg tester (DET-6000, Nabel Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan). Eggshell thickness was measured (without shell membrane) with an egg shell thickness gauge (ESTG-1, Orka Food Technology Ltd., Ramat Hasharon, Israel).
Serum Biochemical Analysis
Serum contents of total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), glucose (GLU), total cholesterol (T-CHO), and triglyceride (TG), along with the activities of aspartate aminotransferase (GOT) and alanine aminotransferase (GPT), were determined and calculated following the instructions of commercially available assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China).
Serum and Liver Antioxidant Enzyme Assays
Samples of liver were cut into small pieces, added with ice-cold physiological saline at a ratio of 1:9 (weight:volume) to prepare 10% tissue homogenate mechanically, and then centrifuged at 3000×g for 10 min to separate supernatant at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and stored at − 80 °C for the following analysis. The activities of glutathione peroxide (GSH-Px), superoxide dismutase (SOD), total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), and catalase (CAT) and the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) in the serum and hepatic supernatants were assayed using commercially available assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) according to the instructions of the manufacturer.
Histopathological Analysis
About 1 cm segment of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde were trimmed and embedded in paraffin wax. The paraffin sections were cut into 5–6 μm thick using a microtome (Leica Microsystems, RM2016), then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for histopathological observation. In the villus height, villus width, villus area, and crypt depth of 8 villi, each intestinal sample was calculated by optical microscopy (Nikon Eclipse 80i, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
Total RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted from the liver and the intestinal mucosa from duodenum, jejunum, and ileum samples with TRIzol (Takara code: 9109, Shiga, Japan). Its concentration and purity were detected and assessed by nucleic acid concentration analyzer NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was generated by a HiScript II Q RT SuperMix Reverse Transcriptase (Vazyme Biotechnology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China). Quantitative real-time PCR was employed by a SYBR Premix PCR kit (Vazyme Biotechnology, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China) and normalized to β-actin in the CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, USA). There were 6 samples in each group, each sample was conducted in duplicate, and no template control was included. The primer sequences for qRT-PCR are presented in Table 2. The relative expression of each gene was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method.
Statistical Analysis
The data were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA using SPSS 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and expressed as means and SEM. The Duncan test was used to compare the significant differences (P < 0.05) between means.
Results
Production Performance
The effects of glycine nano-selenium supplementation on production performance are shown in Table 3. There is no significant difference in laying rate, egg weight, ADFI, and FCR among the experimental groups.
Egg Quality
As shown in Table 4, no significant difference of egg weight, albumen height, yolk color, Haugh unit, eggshell thickness, and strength was observed among all groups.
Serum Biochemistry
The current study revealed the effects of dietary Se on the serum biochemical changes. The results presented in Table 5 showed that the groups of SS, 0.15, 0.3, and 0.45 mg/kg NS-Gly were improved (P < 0.05) in the ALB compared with the control group, whereas there was no significant difference between the group of 0.6 mg/kg NS-Gly and the control group. On the contrary, the level of GPT decreased significantly in the groups of 0.3, 0.45, and 0.60 mg/kg NS-Gly diet compared with the control group (P < 0.05).
Serum Antioxidant Parameters
The effect of Se on the antioxidant parameters in the serum is summarized in Fig. 1. The activity of GSH-Px was significantly increased in the groups with the dietary NS-Gly supplementation (P < 0.05) compared with the control group. The activities of SOD and T-AOC in serum in groups of 0.15, 0.3, 0.45, and 0.60 mg/kg NS-Gly had remarkable increases (P < 0.05) when compared to the control, whereas no marked differences were observed between the control and the SS group. There are no significant differences among all groups in serum CAT activity and MDA level.
Hepatic Antioxidant Parameters
The effects of Se on the liver antioxidant indices of laying hens are shown in Fig. 2. The activity of GSH-Px was increased with the increase of dietary NS-Gly supplementation, and significantly in the groups of 0.45 and 0.60 mg/kg NS-Gly diet (P < 0.05). The activity of SOD was significantly increased in the group of 0.30 mg/kg NS-Gly diet (P < 0.05), then decreased in the groups of 0.45 and 0.60 NS-Gly diets. Similarly, the activity of CAT increased with the increase of NS-Gly treatments, and significantly in the group of 0.30 mg/kg NS-Gly diet (P < 0.05), then decreased in the group of 0.45 and 0.60 mg/kg NS-Gly diet, compared with the control group. Furthermore, no significant differences were shown between the SS and control groups in hepatic antioxidant parameters.
The Intestinal Morphology
Histological changes in the small intestine were evaluated by a light microscope. As shown in Table 6, in duodenum, the crypt depth was the lowest in the 0.45 mg/kg NS-Gly groups, and significantly reduced in the NS-Gly groups, except for the 0.15 mg/kg NS-Gly group, compared to the control (P < 0.05). The significant differences were not detected in villus height and V/C. In the jejunum, the differences (P < 0.05) were obtained between the 0.15 mg/kg NS-Gly and the control group in villus height. Crypt depth was reduced in all NS-Gly groups (P < 0.05), leading to the V/C reduced significantly in the 0.15 and 0.45 mg/kg NS-Gly groups, compared to the control group. In the ileum, a significant increase (P < 0.05) of villus height was observed in the groups with 0.15 or 0.3 mg/kg Se added. Treated with Se shown no obvious difference in crypt depth compared with the control group, and only the V/C of SS group was significantly different from that of the control group (P < 0.05).
Gene Expression of rBAT, B0AT1, and PepT1
The gene expression of transporters in the small intestine is shown in Fig. 3. In the duodenum, the mRNA levels of rBAT, B0AT1, and PepT1 were the highest in 0.15, 0.15, and 0.60 mg/kg NS-Gly groups (P < 0.05), respectively. In the jejunum, the expression of rBAT presented an increase trend, significant in the 0.30 and 0.45 mg/kg NS-Gly groups (P < 0.05), and then, it went down in 0.6 mg/kg NS-Gly group. The mRNA level of B0AT1 increased significantly in the group of 0.15 mg/kg NS-Gly diet (P < 0.05), and the expression of PepT1 was the highest in both the 0.15 mg/kg NS-Gly and 0.30 mg/kg SS groups.
Discussion
Although Se is essential for animal nutrition, the excess level of Se can be toxic when provided above the biological requirement [23]. The addition of Se at 0.30 mg/kg in the diet is recommended for laying hens, while the study showed that 1.5 mg/kg of NS is safe for chicken and indicated that NS operates a similar way to organic selenium and could potentially be used in poultry feed as a trace element additive [24]. In this study, after 8 weeks of Se supplementation, there were no significant differences among treatments in production performance and egg quality. Similarly, the previous reports found that dietary Se supplementation at 0.3 mg/kg from SS, selenium methionine, NS, Se-enriched yeast, and Se-enriched bean sprout did not affect productivity and egg quality [25, 26]. It is contrast to the results that supplementation with 0.3 mg Se/kg of SS, SY, or NS was beneficial for the performance of laying hens [5, 27]. These differences could be associated with the background Se in the feedstuffs, breeds, or the environment.
Serum biochemical indexes reflect the metabolism of the body, some of them could be used to measure liver function in clinical practice, which reflects body health [28]. In the current study, Se supplementation significantly enhanced the levels of serum ALB, except for the group of 0.6 mg/kg NS-Gly. Serum ALB is a major extracellular source of reduced sulfhydryl groups, which are potent scavengers of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species [29]. GOT and GPT are important amino acid transferases in animals, which are the indicators of protein metabolism in the body. They are released from the liver or cardiac cells into the plasma and the increase beyond the normal range indicates liver injury or damage [30]. Studies demonstrated that Se may prevent the decrease in GOT and GPT activities in the liver and kidneys caused by harmful substances and it was speculated that Se has the function of protecting animal liver [31]. Similarly, our results showed that, with the Se administration, the activities of GPT were significantly reduced in the NS-Gly addition groups compared with the control group. Therefore, these results indicated that NS-Gly is associated with the liver function of laying hens and may promote the utilization of amino acids by the body.
Oxidative stress is defined as the presence of metabolic and radical substances or the so-called reactive (oxygen, nitrogen, or chlorine) species [32, 33]. Se is a vital antioxidant, it forms selenocysteine which is a part of the active center of GSH-Px, and at least another seven selenoproteins may play a role in combating oxidative stress and removing toxins associated with reactive oxygen species [34, 35]. It has been previously reported that different forms of Se (organic, inorganic, or Nano-Se) affect antioxidant activity [36,37,38,39]. Our results showed that dietary SS or NS-Gly supplementation led to significant increases in serum GSH-Px activity compared to the control, consistent with the previous studies. Also, we found that, with the increasing supplementation of Gly-NS, the levels of hepatic GSH-Px increased. However, there was no significant effect on serum and liver SOD activity under 0.30 mg/kg Se supplementation observed. In terms of T-AOC of the liver or serum, high Se supplementation did not seem to be necessary to resist oxidation; similar reports were obtained by Gan et al. [40]. Therefore, Se supplementation can improve the antioxidant capacity of laying hens to ensure the maintenance of health.
The small intestine is the main site for nutrient digestion and absorption [41]. The basic function of the small intestinal mucosa, which consists of a single layer of epithelial cells, is to digest and absorb nutrients and block pathogenic bacteria and toxic substances in the intestinal cavity [42]. The crypt is a tubular gland formed by the small intestinal epithelium descending into the lamina propria at the root of the villi [43]. A higher villus height to crypt depth ratio (V/C) indicates a higher rate of the digestion and absorption function; it is more representative when measure of individual [44]. On the current trial, dietary Se intake was conducive to the structure of duodenum, jejunum, and ileum, which were agreed with the previous researches of Lianping et al. [45] and Ahmed [46]. They found that dietary organic Se supplementation produced positive effects on some villi morphological characteristics in both duodenum and jejunum. The changes in crypt depth indicated that Gly-NS may improve the intestinal structure and function by promoting the proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells. Our results also suggested that Gly-NS performed better in the duodenum and jejunum than in the ileum. Meanwhile, the SS group just showed significant difference in villi height of ileum compared with the control group. Those may be related to the main site and mode of absorption of different forms of Se in the intestine.
The transportation of NS across the biological body is determined by its physicochemical properties, including size and shape [47]. Theoretically, nano-sized particles (NPs) can pass through the intestinal epithelium in two ways: paracellular or transcellular [48]. Gly-NS is too large to get into paracellularly, restricted by the narrow region of intercellular spaces and by the tightness of the junctions between the epithelial cells [49]. Transcellular transport of NPs takes place through a process called transcytosis, which starts with endocytosis in the apical membrane of the cells. Subsequently, the NPs are transported through the cells and released on the basolateral pole [50]. Gangadoo et al. [24] and Shi et al. [51] suggested an active transport mechanism of NS similar to organic Se. Perhaps it is possible for Gly-NS to enter cells through organic Se transporters. Selenomethionine is commonly used as organic Se source. The major route for the uptake of selenomethionine is the system b0 and + rBAT [52], and the B0 system may dominate overall transport of selenoamino acids [53, 54]. So, we evaluated the expression levels of rBAT, B0AT1, and PepT1, which play a critical role in the epithelial amino acid and small peptide transportation, and found that the expression of rBAT, B0AT1, and PepT1 increased at different degrees in the duodenum, but oddly, they did best in 0.15 and 0.60 mg/kg NS-Gly groups. In the jejunum, the expression of B0AT1 was similar to the duodenum, and the rBAT presented increase trend, significant in the 0.30 and 0.45 mg/kg NS-Gly groups, but then it went down in the 0.6 mg/kg NS-Gly group. The mRNA expression of PepT1 caught our attention as it significantly increased in the 0.30 mg/kg SS group. We speculated that the absorption efficiency and mode of NS-Gly may be different in different intestinal segments. It is generally believed that the duodenum is the main site of Se absorption. Liu et al. [55] indicated that the jejunum was the main SS absorption site, and the Se absorption is a saturated carrier-mediated process in the duodenum, but a non-saturated diffusion process in the jejunum and ileum. It was shown that the addition of NS-Gly did change the expression of amino acid transport carrier, but whether it means that NS-Gly can be absorbed and transported by amino acid transport carrier needs further study.
Conclusion
The present study indicated that laying hens with NS-Gly supplementation were more tolerant to oxidative stress, and NS-Gly was conducive to the structure of the small intestine but have negligible effects on their growth performance and egg quality. There was slight difference between the 0.15 mg/kg NS-Gly and 0.30 mg/kg SS group. It is practical to use lower concentration of NS-Gly as a feed Se supplement for laying hens.
References
Rayman MP (2000) The importance of selenium to human health. Lancet 356(9225):233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02490-9
Combs GF (1987) The role of selenium in nutrition. Q Rev Biol 46(1):124–125. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/46.1.124-a
Lv-Hui S, Huang J-Q et al (2018) Avian selenogenome: response to dietary Se and vitamin E deficiency and supplementation. Poult Sci 98:4247–4254. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey408
Khan MT, Mahmud A, Zahoor I, Javed K (2017) Organic and inorganic selenium in Aseel chicken diets: effect on hatching traits. Poult Sci 96(5):1466–1472. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew403
Rajashree K, Muthukumar T, Karthikeyan N (2014) Comparative study of the effects of organic selenium on hen performance and productivity of broiler breeders. Br Poult Sci 55(3):367–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2014.921663
Abd El-Hack ME, Mahrose K, Askar AA et al (2017) Single and combined impacts of vitamin A and selenium in diet on productive performance, egg quality, and some blood parameters of laying hens during hot season. Biol Trace Elem Res 177(1):169–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-016-0862-5
Laika M, Jahanian R (2015) Dietary supplementation of organic selenium could improve performance, antibody response, and yolk oxidative stability in laying hens fed on diets containing oxidized fat. Biol Trace Elem Res 165(2):195–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-015-0251-5
Surai PF, Kochish II, Fisinin VI, Velichko OA (2018) Selenium in poultry nutrition: from sodium selenite to organic selenium sources. J Poult Sci 55:79–93. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0170132
Payne RL, Lavergne TK, Southern LL (2005) Effect of inorganic versus organic selenium on hen production and egg selenium concentration. Poult Sci 84(2):232–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.2.232
Pan C, Huang K, Zhao Y, Qin S, Chen F, Hu Q (2007) Effect of selenium source and level in hen’s diet on tissue selenium deposition and egg selenium concentrations. J Agric Food Chem 55(3):1027–1032. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf062010a
Zhang J, Wang X, Xu T (2008) Elemental selenium at nano size (nano-Se) as a potential chemopreventive agent with reduced risk of selenium toxicity: comparison with Se-methylselenocysteine in mice. Toxicol Sci 101(1):22–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfm221
Skalickova S, Milosavljevic V, Cihalova K, Horky P, Richtera L, Adam V (2017) Selenium nanoparticles as a nutritional supplement. Nutrition 33:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2016.05.001
Bhattacharjee A, Basu A, Bhattacharya S (2019) Selenium nanoparticles are less toxic than inorganic and organic selenium to mice in vivo. Nucleus 62(3):259–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-019-00303-1
Reda FM, El-Saadony MT, Elnesr SS, Alagawany M, Tufarelli V (2020) Effect of dietary supplementation of biological curcumin nanoparticles on growth and carcass traits, antioxidant status, immunity and caecal microbiota of Japanese quails. Animals 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10050754
Chithrani BD, Chan WCW (2007) Elucidating the mechanism of cellular uptake and removal of protein-coated gold nanoparticles of different sizes and shapes. Nano Lett 7(6):1542–1550. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl070363y
Mohapatra P, Swain RK, Mishra SK, Behera T, Swain P, Mishra SS, Behura NC, Sabat SC, Sethy K, Dhama K, Jayasankar P (2014) Effects of dietary nano-selenium on tissue selenium deposition, antioxidant status and immune functions in layer chicks. Int J Pharmacol 10(3):160–167. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijp.2014.160.167
Xie C, Elwan HAM, Elnesr SS, Dong XY, Zou XT (2019) Effect of iron glycine chelate supplementation on egg quality and egg iron enrichment in laying hens. Poult Sci 98(12):7101–7109. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez421
Xie C, Elwan HAM, Elnesr SS, Dong X, Feng J, Zou XT (2019) Effects of iron glycine chelate on laying performance, antioxidant activities, serum biochemical indices, iron concentrations and transferrin mRNA expression in laying hens. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 103:547–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13061
Hong Z (2009) Glycine nano-selenium and preparation method thereof. China Patent CN101558826-A 21 Oct 2009 A23K-001/16 200974
Lee J, Hosseindoust A, Kim M, Kim KY, Choi YH, Lee SH, Lee SY, Cho HJ, Kang WS, Chae BJ (2020) Biological evaluation of hot-melt extruded nano-selenium and the role of selenium on the expression profiles of selenium-dependent antioxidant enzymes in chickens. Biol Trace Elem Res 194(2):536–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-019-01801-8
Peng D, Zhang J, Liu Q, Taylor EW (2007) Size effect of elemental selenium nanoparticles (nano-Se) at supranutritional levels on selenium accumulation and glutathione S-transferase activity. J Inorg Biochem 101(10):1457–1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2007.06.021
Boostani A, Sadeghi AA, Mousavi SN, Chamani M, Kashan N (2015) Effects of organic, inorganic, and nano-Se on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, cellular and humoral immune responses in broiler chickens exposed to oxidative stress. Livest Sci 178:330–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.05.004
Ohlendorf H (2003) Ecotoxicology of selenium. In: Handbook of ecotoxicology, 2nd edn. Lewis, New York, pp 466–491. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420032505.ch17
Gangadoo S, Dinev I, Willson NL, Moore RJ, Chapman J, Stanley D (2020) Nanoparticles of selenium as high bioavailable and non-toxic supplement alternatives for broiler chickens. Environ Sci Pollut R 27(14):16159–16166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07962-7
Chinrasri O, Chantiratikul P, Thosaikham W, Atiwetin P, Chantiratikul A (2009) Effect of selenium-enriched bean sprout and other selenium sources on productivity and selenium concentration in eggs of laying hens. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 22(12):1661–1666. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.90220
Qingyan S, Shugeng WU, Haijun Z et al (2016) Effects of dietary supplementation of different selenium sources on production performance and antioxidant activity of laying hens. Chin J Anim Nutr 28(04):1177-1185. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2016.04.028
Meng T, Liu YL, Xie CY, Zhang B, Huang YQ, Zhang YW, Yao Y, Huang R, Wu X (2019) Effects of different selenium sources on laying performance, egg selenium concentration, and antioxidant capacity in laying hens. Biol Trace Elem Res 189(2):548–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-018-1490-z
Ozer J, Ratner M, Shaw M, Bailey W, Schomaker S (2008) The current state of serum biomarkers of hepatotoxicity. Toxicology 245(3):194–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2007.11.021
Quinlan GJ, Margarson MP, Mumby S, Evans TW, Gutteridge JMC (1998) Administration of albumin to patients with sepsis syndrome: a possible beneficial role in plasma thiol repletion. Clin Sci 95(4):459–465. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS19980191
Kim G, Sprague SM (2002) Use of vitamin D analogs in chronic renal failure. Adv Renal Replace Ther 9(3):175–183. https://doi.org/10.1053/jarr.2002.34844
Hafeman DG, Sunde RA, Hoekstra WG (1974) Effect of dietary selenium on erythrocyte and liver glutathione peroxidase in the rat. J Nutr 104(5):580–587. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/104.5.580
Elwan HAM, Elnesr SS, Xu Q, Xie C, Dong X, Zou X (2019) Effects of in ovo methionine-cysteine injection on embryonic development, antioxidant status, IGF-I and TLR4 gene expression, and jejunum histomorphometry in newly hatched broiler chicks exposed to heat stress during incubation. Animals 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9010025
Elnesr SS, Elwan HAM, Xu QQ, Xie C, Zou XT (2019) Effects of in ovo injection of sulfur-containing amino acids on heat shock protein 70, corticosterone hormone, antioxidant indices, and lipid profile of newly hatched broiler chicks exposed to heat stress during incubation. Poult Sci 98(5):2290–2298. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey609
Koehrle J (2000) The deiodinase family: selenoenzymes regulating thyroid hormone availability and action. Cell Mol Life Sci 57(13–14):1853–1863. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00000667
Yang Z, Liu C, Liu C, Teng X, Li S (2016) Selenium deficiency mainly influences antioxidant selenoproteins expression in broiler immune organs. Biol Trace Elem Res 172(1):209–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-015-0578-y
Bakhshalinejad R, Kakhki RAM, Zoidis E (2018) Effects of different dietary sources and levels of selenium supplements on growth performance, antioxidant status and immune parameters in Ross 308 broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci 59(1):81–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2017.1380296
Jing CL, Dong XF, Wang ZM, Liu S, Tong JM (2015) Comparative study of DL-selenomethionine vs sodium selenite and seleno-yeast on antioxidant activity and selenium status in laying hens. Poult Sci 94(5):965–975. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev045
Liu H, Yu Q, Tang X et al (2020) Effect of selenium on performance, egg quality, egg selenium content and serum antioxidant capacity in laying hens. Pak J Zool 52(2):635–640. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20190424040448
Kahraman Z, Yenice E, Goger H et al (2020) Effect of source and concentration of dietary selenium on laying performance of egg-type breeders and antioxidant status of their offspring under delayed post- hatch feeding. Eur Poult Sci 84. https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2020.294
Gan L, Liu QO, Xu HB, Zhu YS, Yang XL (2002) Effects of selenium overexposure on glutathione peroxidase and thioredoxin reductase gene expressions and activities. Biol Trace Elem Res 89(2):165–175. https://doi.org/10.1385/bter:89:2:165
Abdelnour SA, Abd El-Hack ME, Alagawany M, Farag MR, Elnesr SS (2019) Beneficial impacts of bee pollen in animal production, reproduction and health. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 103(2):477–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13049
Mowat AM et al (2014) Regional specialization within the intestinal immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 14:667–685. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3738
Clevers H (2013) The intestinal crypt, a prototype stem cell compartment. Cell 154(2):274–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.004
Chee SH, Iji PA et al (2010) Functional interactions of manno-oligosaccharides with dietary threonine in chicken gastrointestinal tract. II. Mucosal development, mucin dynamics and nutrient utilisation. Br Poult Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2010.517251
Lianping C, Yingshuang S, Mengchu HE et al (2018) Effects of selenium-enriched yeast and Bacillus subtilis on intestinal mucosal morphology and rectum microflora of Hu lambs. Chin J Anim Nutr 30(11):4660-4669. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2018.11.043
Ahmed Z, Malhi M, Soomro SA, Gandahi JA, Qureshi TA (2016) Dietary selenium yeast supplementation improved some villi morphological characteristics in duodenum and jejunum of young goats. J Anim Plant Sci 26(22):382–387
Constantinescu-Aruxandei D, Frîncu R, Capră L, Oancea F (2018) Selenium analysis and speciation in dietary supplements based on next-generation selenium ingredients. Nutrients 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10101466
Rieux AD, Fievez V, Garinot M, Schneider Y-J, Preat V (2006) Nanoparticles as potential oral delivery systems of proteins and vaccines: a mechanistic approach. J Control Release 116(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.08.013
Nellans HN (1991) (B) Mechanisms of peptide and protein absorption: (1) paracellular intestinal transport: modulation of absorption. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 7(3):339–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-409x(91)90013-3
Shakweh M, Ponchel G, Fattal E (2004) Particle uptake by Peyer’s patches: a pathway for drug and vaccine delivery. Expert Opin Drug Del 1(1):141–163. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.1.1.141
Shi L, Xun W, Yue W, Zhang C, Ren Y, Shi L, Wang Q, Yang R, Lei F (2011) Effect of sodium selenite, Se-yeast and nano-elemental selenium on growth performance, Se concentration and antioxidant status in growing male goats. Small Rumin Res 96(1):49–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.11.005
Ristic Z, Camargo SMR, Romeo E, Bodoy S, Verrey F (2006) Neutral amino acid transport mediated by ortholog of imino acid transporter SIT1/SLC6A20 in opossum kidney cells. Am J Physiol-Renal 290(4):F880–F887. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00319.2005
Nickel A, Kottra G, Schmidt G, Danier J, Hofmann T, Daniel H (2009) Characteristics of transport of selenoamino acids by epithelial amino acid transporters. Chem Biol Interact 177(3):234–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2008.09.008
Kekuda R, Torres-Zamorano V, Fei Y-J et al (1997) Molecular and functional characterization of intestinal Na+-dependent neutral amino acid transporter B-0. Am J Phys 272(6 PART 1):G1463–G1472
Liu GQ, Zhang SM, Zhi-Min AN, Feng YZ, Liao XD (2020) Kinetics of selenium absorption in ligated small intestinal loops of chicks. J Integr Agric 19(8):2095–2102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63194-X
Funding
This research was supported by the Modern Argo-Industry Technology Research System of China (CARS-40-K10) and Science and Technology Development Project in Hangzhou of China (20180416A10).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Wenting Zhou, Xinyang Dong, and Xiaoting Zou conceived the idea; Wenting Zhou and Sasa Miao performed the experiment; Wenting Zhou, Sasa Miao, and Mingkun Zhu performed the data analyses and wrote the manuscript; all authors contributed to the revisions.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The current study was approved by the Animal Care and Welfare Committee of Animal Science College and the Scientific Ethical Committee of the Zhejiang University (No. ZJU2013105002) (Hangzhou, China).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, W., Miao, S., Zhu, M. et al. Effect of Glycine Nano-Selenium Supplementation on Production Performance, Egg Quality, Serum Biochemistry, Oxidative Status, and the Intestinal Morphology and Absorption of Laying Hens. Biol Trace Elem Res 199, 4273–4283 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-020-02532-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-020-02532-x