Abstract
Biofortification of staple food crops is an economical and practical way to mitigate micronutrient malnutrition as it predisposes humans to different health maladies. Despite the availability of various methods for biofortification, the biofortified crops, especially millets, could offer a great scope. Foxtail millet has adequate content of minerals, non-starchy polysaccharides, vital amino acids, and proteins, and is regarded as one of the most important nutri-cereals. However, biofortified foxtail millet can potentially alleviate the micronutrient deficiency. Genetic modification to improve the micronutrient content through the available zinc and iron-regulated transporters in foxtail millet can be useful to fine tune the enrichment of micronutrients. The availability of well annotated foxtail millet genome sequence information can facilitate gene mining, transcripts and proteins related to nutritional quality. Combining the insights gained from proteomics, transcriptomics, genomics, and metabolomics might help foxtail millet to become a model system. This article describes the different aspects of biofortification in foxtail millet as the biofortified crop for the present and future.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Malnutrition, caused by vitamin A, iodine, and/or iron insufficiency, as well as zinc inadequacy, affects the human population including women and children in the world’s poorest communities however, pregnant women and children under five years are at a higher risk (Pritwani and Mathur 2015). Considerable progress has been made to reduce the extent of malnutrition, but the deficiencies continue to impinge on the health of women and children (Kennedy 2002). Several sustainable food production strategies and nutri-crop systems are being developed to manage nutritional security in developing countries (Singh and Mondal 2017). The four major staple crops that meet food security are rice, wheat, maize and barley, however biofortified crops such as millets are thought to significantly contribute to nutritional security (Kaur et al. 2019). Millets are mainly produced in the central regions of Africa and Asia. The global scenario of millet production at 28.4 million metric tons with India as the major producer (Fig. 1 A; FAOSTAT 2021). Millets belong to the family Poaceae and vary in shape, size and color. Several types of millets such as; kodo millet (Paspalum scrobiculatum L.), pearl millet (Cenchrus americanus L. Gaertn & Morrone), barnyard millet (Echinochloa esculenta (A. Braun) H. Scholz), finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.), little millet (Panicum sumatrense Roth. ex Roem. & Schult.), proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.), foxtail millet (Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv) are indigenous to several countries (Neeraja et al. 2017; Garg et al. 2018; Kumar et al. 2018). Some of the major millets are grown in Asia and Africa (Fig. 1B-I).
Millets are rich in different nutrients, proteins, and various minerals, and almost 80% of millet grains are used as food while 20% is utilized for feed and industry (Shivran 2016; Kumar et al. 2018). Millets are considered as ideal nutrition for newborn children, lactating mothers, convalescents and old. The grains dissipate sugar gradually into the circulatory system and are considered “sans gluten” (Arendt and Dal Bello 2008). There is a high demand for the millets due to rich protein and high fiber content which favored them as dietary nourishment for individuals with cardiovascular sicknesses and diabetes (Arendt and Dal Bello 2008). Flavonoids and phenolic acids in millets have an important function in scavenging free radicals caused by oxidative stress, which has a lowering influence on blood glucose levels (Kunyanga et al. 2012; Muthamilarasan et al. 2016). Pearl millet has iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) in the range of 5-11.2 and 3- 7.1 g/100 g, respectively (Kulp 2000; Hadimani et al. 2001) with considerable amounts of bioactive substances such as phenols, carotenoids and phenolic acids (Kumar et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2007). Finger millet has abundant polyphenols (Chandrasekara and Shahidi 2011; Devi et al. 2014), minerals such as calcium, magnesium, and potassium (Devi et al. 2014; Kumar et al. 2018) and elevated levels of amino acids such as lysine and methionine, tryptophan (Bhatt et al. 2011). Barnyard millet has high rough fibre (13.6%) and Fe (186 mg/kg dry matter), while proso millet has the highest protein content (12.5%) (Kumar et al. 2018). Barnyard millet grains have gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and -glucan, which act as cell reinforcing biochemicals which help lower blood lipid levels (Sharma et al. 2016). The dietary fibre level of little millet and kodo millet is high, while little millet has high magnesium concentration (1.1 g/kg dry matter).
Foxtail millet is reported to have been domesticated in China almost 8700 years ago and is regarded as one of the world’s oldest crops (Yang et al. 2012; Goron and Raizada 2015). The most extensive collection of foxtail millet germplasm, totaling 27,059 accessions is maintained at the Chinese Academy of Agriculture Science (Diao and Jia 2017) followed by 14,000 foxtail millet germplasm accessions in gene banks of Japan, Korea, the United States of America, Russia, and in other countries, and 1542 foxtail millet germplasm accessions are maintained at the International Crop Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) (Vinoth and Ravindhran 2017). The genetic diversity of foxtail millet has been explored by using morphological and biochemical indices (Van et al. 2008; Jia et al. 2009; Nirmalakumari and Vetriventhan 2010). The modern foxtail millet has a variability based on waxy and non-waxy grain type which is due to low amylase levels in the grain endosperm, imparting a sticky texture to grain upon cooking (Van et al. 2008). Interestingly, such diversity is seen to set a coincidence of ethnological preferences with the geographical occurrence of these two groups of foxtail millet. For example, some local communities prefer waxy millet phenotype (Van et al. 2008), while the non-waxy grain phenotype is more widely planted and grown in Africa and Eurasia (Kawase et al. 2005). To date, two complete reference genome sequence data have been generated in genotypes Yugu1 and Zhang Gu (Wang et al. 2012; Lata et al. 2013).
Foxtail millet has high content of minerals, non-starchy polysaccharides, vital amino acids, and proteins, and hence it is regarded as one of the world’s most important nutri-cereals (Gowda et al. 2022). The main carbohydrate present in foxtail millet is starch and it contributes up to 60% of dry weight. Amylose makes up 25% and amylopectin, up to 75%. The linear structure of amylose and the amylopectin’s branched structure contribute to the millet’s unique nutritive quality. The major amino acids present in foxtail millet are methionine, valine and lysine. The grain composition of foxtail millet has high protein (14–16%), fat (5–8%) and minerals as compared to cereals (Thathola et al. 2011; Ravindran 1992). Further, digestible protein also has majority of the essential amino acids compared to major cereal crops such as rice and wheat (Zhang et al. 2007). Nutritional superiority of foxtail millet grain is also shown by more edible fiber content (2.5 fold) and the bran has 9.4% crude oil containing 66.5% linoleic and 13.0% oleic acid (Liang et al. 2010; Black et al. 2013).
Foxtail millet is extensively used as an energy source for the children, diabetic patients and pregnant and nursing women (Pasricha et al. 2021). Health benefits are represented by its effects in reducing serum lipids, blood glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin in patients with type 2 diabetes (Thathola et al. 2011). The mineral content of foxtail millet ranges from 1.7 to 4.3 g/100 g dry weight. The calcium, iron, phosphorus, and zinc concentrations in foxtail millet are 31, 3.5, 300 and 60.6 mg/100 g dry weight, respectively. Thiamine, niacin and riboflavin are present in foxtail millet and their concentration is 0.60, 0.55, 1.65 mg/100 dry weight, respectively. A higher concentration of vitamins and minerals than other cereals makes foxtail millet an easy and cheap substitute to tackle nutritional adversity (Neeraja et al. 2017). Besides macro and micronutrients, foxtail millet possesses important phenolic acids, flavonoids, and tannins, known for their antioxidant, anti-mutagenic, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory effects (Neeraja et al. 2017). A detailed presentation of different phenolic compounds along with vitamins, macro and micronutrients is given in Fig. 2.
Micronutrients and biofortification
Micronutrients are mainly composed of vitamins and minerals and they are vital for human growth and development. It is estimated that malnutrition-associated mortality in children accounts for 3.1 million deaths, of which 1.1 million are due to micronutrient deficiencies (Black et al. 2008; Brown et al. 2001). The percentage of population with selected micronutrient deficiencies is represented (Fig. 3). The deficiency of micronutrients results in serious illness, weakened immune system, malnutrition and underdevelopment. This problem has been identified as a serious and increasing problem in both developing and underdeveloped countries. One of the key causes impacting children, premenopausal women, and adults in low- and middle-income nations is iron deficiency anemia (Brown et al. 2001). Iron, folate and vitamin B12 deficiency results in anemia while there is also coassociation of the deficiency with other ailments such as lower learning ability, memory and neuropsychological behavior among children (Bailey et al. 2015). Iron also plays a crucial function in hemoglobin, myoglobin, enzymes, and cytochromes and is necessary for oxygen transport and cellular respiration (Bailey et al. 2015). Unlike iron, zinc does not experience a decline in blood levels in the event of a severe defficiency. Children often have a severe type of zinc deficiency. The diets of people in South Asia, South East Asia, and Africa appear to contain relatively little zinc (Bailey et al. 2015; Lockyer et al. 2018). As zinc interacts with 925 proteins in humans, the symptoms of zinc deficiency may be multiple and indiscriminate, which makes it extremely difficult to diagnose in humans. Deficiency of Vitamin A is associated with childhood mortality and morbidity in the developing nations, particularly in Africa and Southeast Asia (Hodge and Taylor 2022).
Supplementation and fortification are relatively the sustainable approaches that can tackle the problem of micronutrient deficiency. Short-term and long-term strategies have been identified considering the importance and relevance of micronutrient deficiency worldwide (Ruel and Levin 2001). The “Short term strategies” involve the addition of additional food or nutrients in the form of capsules, pills, or syrups to a high-risk population. Considerable success has been made by using the vitamin A and zinc supplementation methods to manage micronutrient deficiencies (Black et al. 2008). One of the success stories includes the vitamin A Global Initiative by the World Health Organization in 1998, leading to the prevention of an estimated 1.25 million deaths in 40 countries (Ruel and Levin 2001). The long-term strategies include food-based strategies to enable increased intake and bioavailability of micronutrients which can be accomplished through boosting the production, availability, and consumption of micronutrient-rich foods, as well as the bioavailability of micronutrients in the diet, trace mineral and vitamin concentrations, and absorption boosters. Currently, the options to improve nutritional conditions include, dietary diversification, which is referred to as consuming a variety of foods such as fruits, vegetables and livestock products rich in micronutrients can tackle the micronutrient deficiency (Mannar and Sankar 2004).
Phytobiofortification and biotechnological interventions
Phytobiofortification is an innovative platform for delivering the nutrient density to improve the nutrition and livelihood of vulnerable population (Neeraja et al. 2017). Biofortification is utilized to promote mineral transport from roots to tissues, as well as mineral mobilization from soils to roots and mineral absorption in the body (Pérez-Massot et al. 2013). Different techniques of genetic engineering including genetic transformation using Agrobacterium sp., particle gun, genome editing is now used for improving crop plants for various traits such as stress tolerance, yield, plant architecture and nutritional quality (Gantait et al. 2022). Genetic engineering approach for increasing the required micronutrients is facilitated by the expression of genes for the regulation of metal homeostasis and carrier proteins that serve to increase the micronutrient content, bioavailability and greater productivity (Garg et al. 2018). In this regard, the transgenic approach of using transporters has become a good option for the higher uptake of nutrients (Shewmaker et al. 1999; Pérez-Massot et al. 2013). Genetic modification of various crops to improve their micronutrient content has been reported by several researchers (Nadeem et al. 2018, 2020). Genes for phytoene synthase (PSY), carotene desaturase, and lycopene β-cyclase for nutrients, ferritin and nicotinamide synthase for minerals, egg whites for basic amino corrosive, and ∆6 desaturase for basic unsaturated fats are the available target candidates for biofortification research (Fig. 4) (Ravindran 1992). Successful examples include high unsaturated fat soybean, vitamin A fortified golden rice, iron and zinc content in pearl millet, high lysine maize, high provitamin A and high iron and provitamin A cassava (Bouis and Welch 2010; Jaiswal et al. 2022). Furthermore, research needs to be prioritized on inducing genetic variability for the higher synthesis of micronutrients, their tissue redistribution and expanding biochemical pathways in palatable tissues (Yang et al. 2012; Garg et al. 2018).
Foxtail millet and biofortification
The potential for biofortification of foxtail millet is immense and it can be achieved through conventional breeding, genetic modification and agronomic approaches for increasing the nutrient level in the grains or by increasing the availability of the nutrients by decreasing the anti-nutrient content (Bouis and Welch 2010; Vinoth and Ravindhran 2017). Agronomic methods that apply various minerals as fertilizers are not regarded economical as they require additional costs and management. In foxtail millet, Liang et al. (2020) evaluated the foliar spraying of sodium selenite (Na2SeO3), which led to a 9.8-fold rise in selenomethionine and selenocysteine with a concurrent increase in potassium and iron content. The findings suggest that foxtail millet has Se-inducible proteins that may prove valuable in Se-enriched millets. Nanoscale biofortification and supplementation with numerous micronutrients are advised for biofortifying Se in millets (Schiavon et al. 2020). If the desirable trait is not available in the germplasm, genetic modification technology is used to introduce desirable traits from different plant or non-plant sources. The advantages of this method are that multiple genes of interest can be incorporated and targeted expression in tissues can be achieved (Vinoth and Ravindhran 2017). More recently, engineering of membrane bound nutrient transporters has been viewed to play a key role in the biofortification of crops (Krishna et al. 2022).
Foxtail millet has desirable attributes of drought tolerance, pest resistance and the crop are enriched with micro and macronutrients. The development of a successful core collection depends on the proper sampling of phenotypic associations which are linked to the co-adaption of gene complexes (Reddy and Vijayaraghavan 1995). In this regard, phenotypic correlations are important for initial characterization by trait identification (Jia et al. 2009). Molecular and morphological markers have been used to identify genetic variability for nutritional traits in foxtail millet (Trivedi et al. 2018). Microsatellites, known as simple sequence repeats or SSRs, are responsible for maintaining their high number of polymorphism and high variation levels. Molecular evaluation of 30 foxtail millet accessions, led to exploring of untapped genetic diversity of foxtail millet in the Himalayan region for variability in nutritional traits such as dietary fiber, starch, protein and amino acid content. In the Indian context, there are also new biofortified varieties (SiA 3088: 129 ppm, SiA 3142 & TNAU-186) developed for high iron (> 129ppm) which have shown promise for use in the HarvestPlus program (Singh 2017). High iron foxtail millet varieties can find greater utility in the biofortification programs for alleviating iron deficiency among the preschool children, non- pregnant, non-lactating women of reproductive age (Andersson et al. 2017).
Nutrient transporters of foxtail millet
Plants are endowed with several metal transporters, which play a crucial role in the uptake of metal ions to maintain metal homeostasis. One of the essential nutrients, nitrate, is transported by the high-affinity transport system (NRT2.1) and NRT1.1. In foxtail millet, both SiNRT1.11 and SiNRT1.12 are up regulated under conditions of nitrogen limitation (Ceasar et al. 2017; Nadeem et al. 2020), and up regulation of SiPHT1.1, SiPHT1.2, and SiPHT1.4 has been observed in roots for better inorganic phosphate (Pi) uptake (Ceasar et al. 2017; Alagarasan et al. 2017). Also, downregulation of SiPHT1;2 affected the Pi uptake in foxtail millet seedlings (Ceasar et al. 2017). The zinc and iron-regulated transporter-like Proteins (ZIP) are majorly involved in the acquisition of zinc and iron (Krishna et al. 2022). In rice, OsZIP4, OsZIP5 and OsZIP8 are functionally validated as zinc transporters, whereas in foxtail millet, SiZIP genes have been shown to be Zn and or Fe transporters engaged in divalent metal ion absorption, transport, and storage (Ortiz et al. 1998). These studies suggest the crucial role of transporters, including the ZIP genes and their regulation in foxtail millet may be useful for enriching the micronutrients content. Membrane transporters for Zn / Fe which are associated with grain filling have been shown to be good candidates for genetic improvement (Krishna et al. 2022; Ramegowda et al. 2013) achieved higher Zn accumulation in finger millet grain through the transfer of rice zinc transporter OsZIP1. In wheat, a vacuolar iron transporter gene (TaVIT2) under the control of endosperm-specific promoter led to 2-fold higher iron in the grain (Connorton et al. 2017; Boonyaves et al. 2017) reported increased iron levels in grain (10.46 µg/g dry weight) by transgenic expression of a metal transporter, nicotianamine synthase. In rice, knock-out of zinc transporter OsZIP9 in rice showed reduced Zn levels in grain and other tissues suggesting crucial role of the gene in Zn uptake (Yang et al. 2020).
Transgenic foxtail millet
Nutritional quality of foxtail millet can also be improved via genetic engineering (Ceasar and Ignacimuthu 2009). The first agrobacterium-mediated foxtail millet transformation was developed by Liu et al. (2005). This method yielded a 6.6% transformation frequency. Until recently, all published reports on foxtail millet have relied on the transgenic methods of Wang et al. (2011) or Liu et al. (2005). Furthermore, both these methods employed undeveloped inflorescence as beginning explants and have a poor transformation efficacy (5.5%). In a novel finding, Ceasar et al. (2017) studied the possibility of employing shoot apices for transformation and achieved higher transformation efficiency of 9%. However, the development of chimera transgenic plants is a shortcoming of employing shoot apices (Ceasar et al. 2017). In recent reports, a simple and robust agrobacterium-mediated transformation method developed in foxtail millet with 27% transformation efficiency (Sood et al. 2020), that may speed up forward and reverse genetic investigations in foxtail millet.
The transgenic approaches for vitamin production in plants have been made possible through metabolic engineering. Golden rice is an example that has been genetically engineered to produce provitamin A (Paine et al. 2005). In order to permit commercial production of genetically modified (GM) crops, regulatory challenges are being solved utilizing scientific data. GM millets with increased vitamin levels can offer good scope for biofortification (Vinoth and Ravindhran 2017). Further, the application of CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis in foxtail millet modified the phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene was accomplished using protoplast transfection in foxtail millet (Lin et al. 2018). In a recent study, Liang et al. (2022) have developed single gene and multi-gene knockouts and single base substitution by CRISPR/Cas9 method in Setaria italica and isolated a herbicide mutant by cytosine base editing to target the SiALS (acetolactate synthase) gene. Further utilization of genome editing tools like CRISPR/Cas could help to improve nutrients in foxtail and other millets (Ceasar 2022). This method could be further utilized for editing the target genes to improve crop nutritional quality.
Genomics
With the rapid advancement of genome sequencing in recent years, the majority of crops now have high resolution genetic linkage maps and genomic sequencing information (Varshney et al. 2021). Furthermore, the sequencing data enables the mapping of sequence variation related to traits of interest, as well as the creation of molecular tools for crop improvement using genomics. Recently, genome-wide association studies have been applied for understanding the genetic regulation of natural variation in foxtail millet for certain agronomic features (Zhang et al. 2012; Jia et al. 2013). Marker-assisted selection has helped to speed up the conventional breeding process. Genotyping diverse foxtail millet germplasm using high throughput resequencing will make it easier to develop novel genetic markers to map important traits. The population genetics of diverse foxtail millet germplasm has been studied using SNPs and SSRs (Jia et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2012). A foxtail millet haplotype map has been built based on 0.85 million SNPs discovered in 916 cultivar genomes throughout the world, as well as 512 quantitative trait loci (QTL) (Jia et al. 2013). For effective crop breeding using marker-assisted selection, it is critical to identify important QTLs (Wang et al. 2017). Also, the identification of markers such as SNPs and InDels, associated with nutritional factors will interpret information on possible genes driving these variables. Because millets have good cross-genera transferability, use of molecular breeding or genetic engineering to introduce nutrient-linked genes into other cereals may become feasible. Transcriptome data on changes in gene expression of storage compound associated genes (Jayaraman et al. 2008) can be looked into for the selection of genes of pathways involved in the biosynthesis of nutritional compounds for calcium accumulation.
The foxtail millet was the first millet crop to have its whole genome sequenced, and it has the smallest genome (423–510 Mb), serving as a paradigm for C4 crop species. Also, the disclosure of draft genome sequences of Yugu1 and Zhang gu, cultivars of foxtail millets has progressed studies for its further improvement (Bennetzen et al. 2012; Zhang et al. 2012). Shi-Li-Xiang, a foxtail millet waxy landrace, was resequenced utilizing Solexa sequencing technology and the Genome Analyzer II to investigate the nucleotide alterations spanning agronomic trait-related genes. InDels, SVs and SNPs were discovered using alignment with reference genomes. Re-sequencing yielded novel markers that aided in the genome mapping of starch synthase, which encodes the GBSS 1 peptide. The GBSS 1 gene was sequenced and transposable elements were discovered, confirming its waxy nature (Bai et al. 2013). Advances in genome editing and use of programmable site-specific nucleases can be useful to genetically alter non-waxy elite cultivars into desirable waxy types (Vinoth and Ravindhran 2017) and will accelerate improvement of biofortified foxtail millet and other millets.
Proteomics
Information on the composition and quality characteristics of foxtail millet must be evaluated in order to generate value-added and functional protein in foods. The seeds of foxtail millet have health-promoting effects due to their exceptional protein composition, which has important amino acids in abundance. In foxtail seeds, setarins make up roughly 60% of the total protein composition, with less disulfide cross-linked proteins than other crops. Protein fractionation methods can help researchers learn more about the nature of foxtail millet proteins (Sachdev et al. 2021). WD40 proteins have been discovered to play an important role in protein-protein interactions by acting as scaffolding molecules and therefore aiding the proteins’ optimal performance. (Mishra et al. 2014). Within the WD40 repetitions, these proteins include 16 conserved amino acids known as the “DWD box” (Angers et al. 2006; Hua et al. 2011). The FT-NIR has been used to assess the protein, amino acid, carbohydrate, and lipid contents of the foxtail millet (Chen et al. 2013). Using computational methods, 16 prolamin encoding genes known as setarins were recently characterized in foxtail millet and it has been shown that setarin genes’ sequence alignment with other grains and millets indicated the least similarity, suggesting uniqueness in increased protein quality (Muthamilarasan and Prasad 2016). The authors also overexpressed setarin genes in growing spikes for functional verification in seed protein accumulation (Muthamilarasan and Prasad 2016). Such functional genomics studies might pave way for the development of high protein foxtail millet cultivars.
Metabolomics
Metabolites are hypothesised to serve as a connection between the genome and the phenotype of the organism, and the metabolomic studies provide a metabolic atlas of the plant’s physiological status (Chen et al. 2016). A metabolite study in millet and rice revealed species-specific accumulation of secondary metabolites such as flavonoids (Li et al. 2018). The Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization-Tandem Mass Spectrometry equipment was used to identify 116 flavonoid metabolites in foxtail millet, of which 33 flavonoid metabolites were found to be substantially different between high and low eating quality types. These findings demonstrate the diversity in flavonoid accumulation in foxtail millet for breeding for high-flavonoid foxtail millet varieties (Zhang et al. 2021). An LC-MS-based metabolic profile study revealed variations in metabolite accumulation among 150 foxtail millet accessions from India and China. Cyanidin 3-O-glucoside and quercetin O-acetylhexside were found at 43.55 Mb on chromosome 5 and 26.9 Mb on chromosome 7, respectively, based on the mGWAS study, and two Lc genes were identified as candidate genes. This is the first study to use mGWAS in foxtail millet, making way for more research into exploring metabolomic diversity, especially for nutritionally relevant flavonoids (Wei et al. 2021).
Conclusions and future perspectives
Micronutrient deficiency is considered to have a profound effect on global health. In this regard, millets are exceptionally nutritious crops that can be exploited extensively in the regions of Asia and Africa to overcome the nutrient deficiency. Biofortification is a highly sustainable and cost-effective way to mitigate micronutrient deficiency. However, more evidence will have to be generated on the impact of different strategies on health, morbidity, mortality, adverse effects, composition, use and delivery. The relationship between bioavailability, absorption of micronutrients and outcome requires urgent focus for long-term solutions of nutritional security. With desirable grain characteristics and significant levels of essential amino acids, minerals, and nutrients, foxtail millet is in favor of good acceptance to suit the needs of biofortification strategies. It is becoming the nutri-cereal crop since it is high in nutrients, essential amino acids, non-starchy polysaccharides, and proteins. It has nutritional properties equivalent to or greater than other crops, with high protein, minerals, essential amino acids, carbohydrates, flavonoids and vitamins. The bioavailability of nutrients can be improved by reducing antinutrients or by using innovative transgenic and genome editing tools. Understanding the functions of different transporters in nutrient absorption, translocation, and storage may aid in positioning macro- and micronutrients in millets’ edible parts. Thus, biofortification programmes created to combat malnutrition can benefit from using foxtail millet. Further, the understanding of primary and secondary metabolism in foxtail can be useful to fine tune metabolic pathways to achieve high flavonoids accumulating foxtail millet genotypes for biofortification purpose. The availability of highly efficient genome editing systems with single, multiple genes associated with nutritional quality should contribute to fostering biofortification research in foxtail millet. Furthermore, biofortified millets offer a great scope in creating low-cost, protein-rich functional food items for improved nutritional security.
References
Alagarasan G, Dubey M, Aswathy KS, Chandel G (2017) Genome wide identification of orthologous ZIP genes associated with zinc and Iron translocation in Setaria italica. Front Plant Sci 8:775
Andersson MS, Saltzman A, Virk PS, Pfeiffer WH (2017) Progress update: crop development of biofortified staple food crops under HarvestPlus. Afric Jr of Food, Agri, Nut and Develop 17(2):11905-35
Angers S, Li T, Yi X, MacCoss MJ, Moon RT, Zheng N (2006) Molecular architecture and assembly of the DDB1-CUL4A ubiquitin ligase machinery. Nat 443:590–593
Arendt E, Dal Bello F (2008) Gluten-Free Cereal, Products and Beverages (Food Science and Technology). International Series Academic Press, London
Bai H, Cao Y, Quan J, Dong L, Li Z, Zhu Y, Zhu L, Dong Z, Li D (2013) Identifying the genome-wide sequence variations and developing new molecular markers for genetics research by re-sequencing a Landrace cultivar of foxtail millet. PLoS ONE 8(9):e73514
Bailey RL, West KP Jr, Black RE (2015) The epidemiology of global micronutrient deficiencies. Ann of Nut and Metab 66:22–33
Bennetzen JL, Schmutz J, Wang H, Percifeld R, Hawkins J, Pontaroli AC, Estep M, Feng L, Vaughn JN, Grimwood J, Jenkins J, Barry K, Lindquist E, Hellsten U, Deshpande S, Wang X, Wu X, Mitros T, Triplett J, Yang X, Ye C-Y, Mauro-Herrera M, Wang Li, Li P, Sharma M, Sharma R, Ronald PC, Panaud O, Kellogg EA, Brutnell TP, Doust AN, Tuskan GA, Rokhsar D, Devos KM (2012) Reference genome sequence of the model plant Setaria. Nat Biotech 30(6):555–561
Bhatt D, Negi M, Sharma P, Saxena SC, Dobriyal AK, Arora S (2011) Responses to drought induced oxidative stress in five finger millet varieties differing in their geographical distribution. Physio Mol Bio of Plants 17(4):347–353
Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, De Onis M, Ezzati M, Grantham-McGregor S, Katz J, Martorell R (2008) Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet 371(9608):243–260
Bouis HE, Welch RM (2010) Biofortification—a sustainable agricultural strategy for reducing micronutrient malnutrition in the global south. Crop Sci 50:S–2032
Boonyaves K, Wu TY, Gruissem W, Bhullar NK (2017) Enhanced grain iron levels in rice expressing an iron-regulated metal transporter, nicotianamine synthase, and ferritin gene cassette. Front Plant Sci 7(8):130
Brown KH, Wuehler SE, Peerson JM (2001) The importance of zinc in human nutrition and estimation of the global prevalence of zinc deficiency. Food and Nut Bullet 22(2):113–125
Ceasar A (2022) Genome-editing in millets: current knowledge and future perspectives. Mol Biol Rep 49(1):773–781
Ceasar SA, Baker A, Ignacimuthu S (2017) Functional characterization of the PHT1 family transporters of foxtail millet with development of a novel Agrobacterium-mediated transformation procedure. Sci Rep 7(1):1–16
Ceasar SA, Ignacimuthu S (2009) Genetic engineering of millets: current status and future prospects. Biotechnol Lett 31:779–788
Chandrasekara A, Shahidi F (2011) Inhibitory activities of soluble and bound millet seed phenolics on free radicals and reactive oxygen species. Jr of Agri and Food Chem 59(1):428–436
Chen J, Ren X, Zhang Q, Diao X, Shen Q (2013) Determination of protein, total carbohydrates and crude fat contents of foxtail millet using effective wavelengths in NIR spectroscopy. Jr of Cereal Sci 58(2):241–247
Chen W, Wang W, Peng M, Gong L, Gao Y, Wan J, Wang S, Shi L, Zhou B, Li Z, Peng X, Yang C, Qu L, Liu X, Luo J (2016) Comparative and parallel genome-wide association studies for metabolic and agronomic traits in cereals. Nat Comm 7(1):1–10
Connorton JM, Jones ER, Rodríguez-Ramiro I, Fairweather-Tait S, Uauy C, Balk J (2017) Wheat Vacuolar Iron Transporter TaVIT2 Transports Fe and Mn and Is Effective for Biofortification. Plant Physiol 174(4):2434–2444
Devi PB, Vijayabharathi R, Sathyabama S, Malleshi NG, Priyadarisini VB (2014) Health benefits of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) polyphenols and dietary fiber: a review. Jr of Food Sci and Tech 51(6):1021–1040
Diao X, Jia G (2017) Foxtail millet germplasm and inheritance of morphological characteristics. Genetics and genomics of Setaria. Springer, Cham, pp 73–92
FAOSTAT (2021) https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/millets-market
Garg M, Sharma N, Sharma S, Kapoor P, Kumar A, Chunduri V, Arora P (2018) Biofortified crops generated by breeding, agronomy, and transgenic approaches are improving lives of millions of people around the world. Front in Nut 5:12
Gantait S, Mukherjee E, Jogam P, Babu KH, Jain SM, Suprasanna P(2022) Improving crops through transgenic breeding—Technological advances and prospects. Adv in Plant Tiss Cult (2022) 1:295–324
Goron TL, Raizada MN (2015) Genetic diversity and genomic resources available for the small millet crops to accelerate a New Green Revolution. Front Plant Sci 6:157
Gowda NAN, Siliveru K, Prasad PVV, Bhatt Y, Netravati BP, Gurikar C (2022) Modern Processing of Indian Millets:A Perspective on Changes in Nutritional Properties. Foods 11(4):499
Hadimani N, Muralikrishna G, Tharanathan R, Malleshi N (2001) Nature of carbohydrates and proteins in three pearl millet varieties varying in processing characteristics and kernel texture. Jr of Cereal Sci 33(1):17–25
Hirschi KD (2009) Nutrient biofortification of food crops. Ann Rev Nut 29:401–421
Hodge C, Taylor C (2022) Vitamin A deficiency. InStatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL)
Hua Z, Vierstra RD (2011) The cullin-RING ubiquitin-protein ligases. Ann Rev Plant Biol 62:299–334
Jaiswal D, Ram K, Chouhan G, Pereira A, Ade A, Prakash S, Verma S, Prasad R, Yadav J, Verma J (2022) Bio-fortification of minerals in crops: current scenario and future prospects for sustainable agriculture and human health. Plant Growth Regul 98:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-022-00847-4
Jayaraman A, Puranik S, Rai NK, Vidapu S, Sahu PP, Lata C, Prasad M (2008) cDNA-AFLP analysis reveals differential gene expression in response to salt stress in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.). Mol Biotech 40(3):241–251
Jia G, Huang X, Zhi H, Zhao Y, Zhao Q, Li W, Chai Y, Yang L, Liu K, Lu H, Zhu C, Lu Y, Zhou C, Fan D, Weng Q, Guo Y, Huang T, Zhang L, Lu T, Feng Q, Hao H, Liu H, Lu P, Zhang N, Li Y, Guo E, Wang S, Wang S, Liu J, Zhang W, Chen G, Zhang B, Li W, Wang Y, Li H, Zhao B, Li J, Diao X, Han B (2013) A haplotype map of genomic variations and genome-wide association studies of agronomic traits in foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Nat Genet 45(8):957–961
Jia X, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Zhang C, Shi Y, Song Y, Wang T, Li Y (2009) Development and genetic mapping of SSR markers in foxtail millet [Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.]. Theor App Genet 118(4):821–829
Kaur P, Purewal SS, Sandhu KS, Kaur M, Salar RK (2019) Millets: A cereal grain with potent antioxidants and health benefits. Jr of Food Meas and Charact 13(1):793–806
Kawase M, Fukunaga K, Kato K (2005) Diverse origins of waxy foxtail millet crops in East and Southeast Asia mediated by multiple transposable element insertions. Mol Genet Genom 274(2):131–140
Kennedy G(2002) The scourge of” hidden hunger”; global dimensions of micronutrient deficiencies. Food, Nutri Agric 32
Krishna TPA, Maharajan T, Ceasar SA(2022) The Role of Membrane Transporters in the Biofortification of Zinc and Iron in Plants.Bio Trace Element Res:1–15
Kulp K(2000) Handbook of Cereal Science and Technology, revised and expanded. Crc Press, ISBN-9781420027228
Kumar A, Tomer V, Kaur A, Kumar V, Gupta K (2018) Millets: a solution to agrarian and nutritional challenges. Agric Food Security 7(1):1–15
Kunyanga CN, Imungi JK, Okoth MW, Biesalski HK, Vadivel V (2012) Total phenolic content, antioxidant and antidiabetic properties of methanolic extract of raw and traditionally processed Kenyan indigenous food ingredients. LWT-Food Sci Tech 45(2):269–276
Lata C, Gupta S, Prasad M (2013) Foxtail millet: a model crop for genetic and genomic studies in bioenergy grasses. Crit Rev Biotech 33(3):328–343
Li S, Dong X, Fan G, Yang Q, Shi J, Wei W, Zhao F, Li N, Wang X, Wang F, Feng X, Zhang X, Song G, Shi G, Zhang W, Qiu F, Wang D, Li X, Zhang Y, Zhao Z (2018) Comprehensive Profiling and Inheritance Patterns of Metabolites in Foxtail Millet. Front Plant Sci 9:1716
Liu YH, Yu JJ, Zhao Q, Ao GM (2005) Genetic transformation of millet (Setaria italica) by Agrobacterium-mediated. Agri Biotech Jr 13:32–37
Liang K, Liang S, Zhu H (2020) Comparative proteomics analysis of the effect of selenium treatment on the quality of foxtail millet. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Tech 131(2):109691
Liang S, Yang G, Ma Y (2010) Chemical characteristics and fatty acid profile of foxtail millet bran oil. Jr of the Ame Oil Chem Soc 87(1):63–67
Lin CS, Hsu CT, Yang LH, Lee LY, Fu JY, Cheng QW, Wu FH, Hsiao HC, Zhang Y, Zhang R, Chang WJ, Yu CT, Wang W, Liao LJ, Gelvin SB, Shih MC (2018) Application of protoplast technology to CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis: from single-cell mutation detection to mutant plant regeneration. Plant Biotec Jr 16(7):1295–1310
Liang Z, Wu Y, Ma L, Guo Y, Ran Y(2022) Efficient genome editing in Setaria italica using CRISPR/Cas9 and Base Editors.Front Plant Sci12
Lockyer S, White A, Buttriss J (2018) Biofortified crops for tackling micronutrient deficiencies–what impact are these having in developing countries and could they be of relevance within Europe? Nut Bull 43(4):319–357
Mannar MV, Sankar R (2004) Micronutrient fortification of foods—rationale, application and impact. The Indian Jr Ped 71(11):997–1002
Mishra AK, Muthamilarasan M, Khan Y, Parida SK, Prasad M (2014) Genome-wide investigation and expression analyses of WD40 protein family in the model plant foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.). PLoS ONE 9(1):e86852
Muthamilarasan M, Dhaka A, Yadav R, Prasad M (2016) Exploration of millet models for developing nutrient rich graminaceous crops. Plant Sci 242:89–97
Nadeem F, Ahmad Z, Ul Hassan M, Wang R, Diao X, Li X (2020) Adaptation of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) to abiotic stresses: a special perspective of responses to nitrogen and phosphate limitations. Front Plant Sci 11:187
Nadeem F, Ahmad Z, Wang R, Han J, Shen Q, Chang F, Diao X, Zhang F, Li X (2018) Foxtail Millet [Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.] Grown under low nitrogen shows a smaller root system, enhanced biomass accumulation, and nitrate transporter expression. Front Plant Sci 9:205
Neeraja C, Babu VR, Ram S, Hossain F, Hariprasanna K, Rajpurohit B, Prabhakar, Longvah T, Prasad K, Sandhu J(2017) Biofortification in cereals: progress and prospects.Curr Sci:1050–1057
Nirmalakumari A, Vetriventhan M (2010) Characterization of foxtail millet germplasm collections for yield contributing traits. Elect Jr of Plant Breed 1(2):140–147
Ortiz R, Ruiz-Tapia E, Mujica-Sanchez A (1998) Sampling strategy for a core collection of Peruvian quinoa germplasm. Theo Appl Genet 96(3–4):475–483
Paine JA, Shipton CA, Chaggar S, Howells RM, Kennedy MJ, Vernon G, Wright SY, Hinchliffe E, Adams JL, Silverstone AL, Drake R (2005) Improving the nutritional value of Golden Rice through increased pro-vitamin A content. Nat Biotech 23(4):482–487
Pasricha S-R, Tye-Din J, Muckenthaler MU, Swinkels DW (2021) Iron deficiency. Lancet 397(10270):233–248
Pérez-Massot E, Banakar R, Gómez-Galera S, Zorrilla-López U, Sanahuja G, Arjó G, Miralpeix B, Vamvaka E, Farré G, Rivera SM (2013) The contribution of transgenic plants to better health through improved nutrition: opportunities and constraints. Gen Nut 8(1):29–41
Pritwani R, Mathur P (2015) Strategies to combat micronutrient deficiencies: a review. Int J Health Sci Res 5(2):362–373
Ramegowda Y, Venkategowda R, Jagadish P, Govind G Hanumanthareddy RR, Makarla U, Guligowda SA(2013) Expression of a rice Zn transporter, OsZIP1, increases Zn concentration in tobacco and finger millet transgenic plants.Plant Biot Rep7 (3):309–19
Ravindran G (1992) Seed protein of millets: amino acid composition, proteinase inhibitors and in-vitro protein digestibility. Food Chem 44(1):13–17
Reddy V, Vijayaraghavan K (1995) Carotene rich foods for combating vitamin A deficiency. National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, India, p 39
Ruel MT, Levin CE(2001) Discussion paper 92. Assessing the potential for food-based strategies to reduce vitamin A and iron deficiencies: A review of recent evidence. Food and Nut Bull 22 (1):94–95
Sachdev N, Goomer S, Singh LR (2021) Foxtail millet: a potential crop to meet future demand scenario for alternative sustainable protein. Jr Sci Food Agri 101(3):831–842
Schiavon M, Nardi S, Dalla Vecchia F, Ertani A (2020) Selenium biofortification in the 21st century: Status and challenges for healthy human nutrition. Plant Soil 453(1):245–270
Sharma S, Saxena DC, Riar CS (2016) Isolation of functional components β-Glucan and γ-Amino Butyric Acid from raw and germinated barnyard millet (Echinochloa frumentaceae) and their characterization. Plant Foods Human Nut 71(3):231–238
Shewmaker CK, Sheehy JA, Daley M, Colburn S, Ke DY (1999) Seed-specific overexpression of phytoene synthase: increase in carotenoids and other metabolic effects. The Plant Jr 20(4):401–412
Shivran AC(2016) “Biofortification for nutrient-rich millets,” in Biofortification of Food Crops, eds U. Singh, C. S. Praharaj, S. S. Singh, and N. P. Singh (New Delhi: Springer), 409–420
Singh RL, Mondal S(2017) Biotechnology for Sustainable Agriculture: Emerging Approaches and Strategies. eds RL Singh, S Mondal, 1st Edition pub ISBN: 9780128122389
Sood P, Singh RK, Prasad M (2020) An efficient Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation method for foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.). Plant Cell Rep 39(4):511–525
Thathola A, Srivastava S, Singh G (2011) Effect of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) supplementation on serum glucose, serum lipids and glycosylated hemoglobin in type 2 diabetics. Diabetologia Croatica 40(1):23–29
Trivedi A, Arya L, Verma S, Tyagi R, Hemantaranjan A, Verma M, Sharma V, Saha D (2018) Molecular profiling of foxtail millet (Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv) from Central Himalayan Region for genetic variability and nutritional quality. Jr of Agri Sci 156(3):333–341
Varshney RK, Bohra A, Yu J, Graner A, Zhang Q, Sorrells ME (2021) Designing Future Crops: Genomics-Assisted Breeding Comes of Age. Trends in Plant Sci 26(6):631–649
Van K, Onoda S, Kim M, Kim K, Lee S-H (2008) Allelic variation of the Waxy gene in foxtail millet [Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.] by single nucleotide polymorphisms. Mol Genet and Genomics 279(3):255–266
Vinoth A, Ravindhran R (2017) Biofortification in millets: a sustainable approach for nutritional security. Front Plant Sci 8:29
Wang C, Jia G, Zhi H, Niu Z, Chai Y, Li W, Wang Y, Li H, Lu P, Zhao B (2012) Genetic diversity and population structure of Chinese foxtail millet [Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.] landraces. Gen Genom Genet G3(7):769–777
Wang J, Wang Z, Du X, Yang H, Han F, Han Y, Yuan F, Zhang L, Peng S, Guo E (2017) A high-density genetic map and QTL analysis of agronomic traits in foxtail millet [Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.] using RAD-seq. PLoS ONE 12(6):e0179717
Wang M, Pan Y, Li C, Liu C, Zhao Q, Ao GM, Yu JJ (2011) Culturing of immature inforescences and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Afr Jr Biotech 10:16466–16479
Wei W, Li S, Wang Y, Wang B, Fan G, Zeng Q, Zhao F, Xu C, Zhang X, Tang T, Feng X, Shi J, Shi G, Zhang W, Song G, Li H, Wang F, Zhang Y, Li X, Wang D, Zhang W, Pei J, Wang X, Zhao Z (2021) Metabolome-Based Genome-Wide Association Study Provides Genetic Insights Into the Natural Variation of Foxtail Millet. Front Plant Sci 12:665530
Yang M, Li Y, Liu Z, Tian J, Liang L, Wang YuQGuangyuan, Du Q, Cheng D, Cai H, Shi L, Xu F(2020) Xingming Lian A high activity zinc transporter OsZIP9 mediates zinc uptake in rice. The Plant Jr 103:1695–1709
Yang X, Wan Z, Perry L, Lu H, Wang Q, Zhao C, Li J, Xie F, Yu J, Cui T (2012) Early millet use in northern China. Proceed Nat Acad Sci 109(10):3726–3730
Zhang C, Zhang H, Li J (2007) Advances of millet research on nutrition and application. Jr Chin Cereals Oils Assoc 22(1):51–55
Zhang G, Liu X, Quan Z, Cheng S, Xu X, Pan S, Xie M, Zeng P, Yue Z, Wang W, Tao Ye, Bian C, Han C, Xia Q, Peng Q, Cao R, Yang X, Zhan D, Hu J, Zhang Y, Li H, Li H, Li N, Wang J, Wang C, Wang R, Guo T, Cai Y, Liu C, Xiang H, Shi Q, Huang P, Chen Q, Li Y, Wang J, Zhao Z, Wang J (2012) Genome sequence of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) provides insights into grass evolution and biofuel potential. Nat Biotech 30:549–554
Zhang Y, Gao J, Qie Q, Yang Y, Hou S, Wang X, Li X, Han Y (2021) Comparative analysis of flavonoid metabolites in foxtail millet (Setaria italica) with different eating quality. Life 11(6):578
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Biotechnology department, Dr. PDKV, Akola for linguistic improvement of manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Krishnananda P. Ingle, Gopal Wasudeo Narkhede, Antony Ceasar Gholamreza Abdi, Aamir Raina, M. P. Moharil and Atul Singh. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Krishnananda P. Ingle and Gholamreza Abdi and edited by Aamir Raina. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Communicated by Zhen Liang.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ingle, K.P., Suprasanna, P., Narkhede, G.W. et al. Biofortified foxtail millet: towards a more nourishing future. Plant Growth Regul 99, 25–34 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-022-00900-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-022-00900-2