Introduction

Inputs of atmospheric nitrogen (N) into terrestrial ecosystems have sharply increased in the past thirty years (Reay et al. 2008). For example, temperate forests received approximately 20 kg N ha‒1 yr‒1 during 2000–2010 (Ackerman et al. 2019; Yu et al. 2019). Studies indicate that N deposition can substantially affect carbon (C) flow, particularly decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems (Hou et al. 2020; Song et al. 2015). While extant observations of decomposition under N deposition have mainly focused on aboveground tissues (e.g., leaf litter), little effort was directed to fine roots (Dong et al. 2019; Li et al. 2019; Ye et al. 2019). Fine roots, usually referring to roots ≤ 2 mm in diameter (Chen and Brassard 2012; Wang et al. 2020), and are key contributors to the terrestrial C cycle (Kou et al. 2018). Studies of fine root decomposition under N deposition are essential to predict the impact of N deposition on C dynamics in terrestrial ecosystems (Fan and Guo 2010; Sun et al. 2015).

Research has shown both inhibitory and promotion effects of N application on fine root decomposition (Argiroff et al. 2019; Jiang et al. 2018; Li et al. 2016). Study has attributed the inhibitory effect of N application on decomposition to the role that N plays in dampening the release of root exudates to the rhizosphere (Sun et al. 2016). This appears to reduce the energy required by the decomposers to synthesize extracellular enzymes that degrade C components (Kuzyakov et al. 2007). In addition, studies report that the inhibitory effect of N application on decomposition may also relate to changes in substrate chemistry (Helmisaari et al. 2008; Tu et al. 2015). For example, increasing the P and decreasing the C:P ratio during decomposition that could not meet the needs of microbial populations may result in reduced decomposition (Jing et al. 2019). However, studies have also found that exogenous N can stimulate the decomposition rate of fine roots (Berg 2014; Dong et al. 2020). The promotional effect of N application on fine root decomposition may be due to changes in the soil microbial community structure, pH, available N and other soil characteristics (Dong et al. 2020; Sun et al. 2016). This, in turn, can stimulate the production of hydrolytic enzymes, which increases the degradation of hemicellulose and cellulose (Berg 2014; Waldrop et al. 2004). So far, we still do not have an overall understanding of the various factors driving N decomposition under N application, and that we need to better investigate how the driving factors interacts in a wide range of climatic and soil conditions.

Numerous studies have found that experimental factors can affect fine root decomposition under N deposition (Gholz et al. 2000; Jing et al. 2019; Silva et al. 2019). For example, the rate of N application can affect the decomposition of fine roots, with promotion and inhibition effects found at low (e.g., 30 kg N ha−1 yr−1) and high (e.g., 90 and 120 kg N ha−1 yr−1) N application rates, respectively (Jiang et al. 2018; Mao et al. 2011; Nadelhoffer 2000; Song et al. 2017). Additionally, the form of N could play an important role in study outcomes. Research has shown that inorganic N (e.g., NH4NO3) inhibits the decomposition of fine roots, which occurs as a result of its inhibitory effect on ligninolytic enzyme activity (Kou et al. 2018; Song et al. 2017; Tu et al. 2015). However, research shows that organic N (e.g., urea) mildly stimulates fine root decomposition as a result of its positive effect on the production and activity of hydrolytic enzymes (Dong et al. 2020; Hobbie et al. 2012). In addition, studies have found that the decomposition rate of fine roots is greatest when mixtures of organic and inorganic N forms are added (Dong et al. 2020). Compared to the application of only organic or inorganic N, the application of mixed N forms can meet the needs of a diverse decomposer community with special preferences (Hobbie 2005; 2015).

In addition to experimental factors, root decomposition under N application may also be affected by environmental factors, soil characteristics and root traits, such as the mean annual temperature (MAT), soil pH values, and root lignin content (Berg 2014; Castle et al. 2017; Peng et al. 2017). MAT positively affects root decomposition through its substantial impacts on microbial activities (Kirschbaum 2006; See et al. 2019). Moreover, MAT affects decomposition via its induced changes in TN and C:N in litter (Zhang et al. 2008). Soil pH positively correlates with decomposition, which may be linked to promoted soil enzyme activities with increasing pH (Castle et al. 2017; Sinsabaugh et al. 2008). Lignin, a group of complex aromatic polymers that exist in plant cell walls, usually acts as a structural barrier preventing microorganisms from obtaining labile C compounds and thus resisting enzymatic degradation (Austin and Ballare 2010). Nevertheless, the dominant factors regulating fine root decomposition under N application remain unclear.

With increasing N deposition, temperate forests have been proven to be the strongest C sink in temperate terrestrial ecosystems (Galloway et al. 2008; Yu et al. 2014). Despite the essential roles of fine roots in the C cycles, our understanding of the C budget of temperate forests based on fine root decomposition under N application remains unclear (Kou et al. 2018). Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to study the effect of N application on fine root decomposition in temperate forests using data from 20 peer-reviewed publications. Based on the fertilization condition of root growth and decomposition, we partitioned decomposition into two groups: FF (from fertilized to fertilized conditions) and UFF (from unfertilized to fertilized conditions). Roots were harvested either under UF (unfertilized) or F (fertilized) conditions; then, for decomposition, UF roots were incubated under either UF (UF UF) or F conditions (UF F) (first: growing condition; second: decomposition condition), whereas F roots were incubated only under F conditions (F F). For FF, N was added under both growth and decomposition conditions, while for UFF, N was added only under decomposition conditions. We aimed to (1) examine the general patterns of the responses of fine root decomposition to N application in temperate forests; (2) explore how different N application rates, N forms, FF vs. UFF, tree functional types and soil depth influence fine root decomposition in response to N application; and (3) identify the key drivers of fine root decomposition. We hypothesized that (1) N application reduces the decomposition of fine roots, resulting from inhibited activity of ligninolytic enzymes (Song et al. 2017; Weand et al. 2010) or decreased microbial biomass and fungi to bacteria ratio (Cheng et al. 2019), and that (2) experimental factors have large impacts on fine root decomposition. For example, medium N application rates (100–150 kg N ha−1 yr−1) may have a significant effect on decomposition because of altered acid-unhydrolysable residue (AUR) (Kou et al. 2015); and (3) initial root traits, such as lignin content, which regulate decomposition. Lignin is related to structural protection from microbial degradation, which generally slows the decomposition process (Austin and Ballare 2010).

Methods

Data sources

We compiled 123 independent data points from 20 studies that were published between 2004 and 2019 using Web of Science, Google Scholar and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) (supplementary material). We used the search string: (fine root OR fine roots) AND (decomposition OR decay OR breakdown) AND (simulated N deposition OR N application OR N additions). Observations that met the following criteria were selected in our analysis (Fig. S1): (1) experiments were conducted in temperate forest ecosystems with all kinds of roots having diameters ≤ 2.0 mm (Figs. 1 and S2) (Ferreira et al. 2015); (2) both fertilized and unfertilized plots were established with consistent biotic and abiotic conditions; (3) at least one of the variables was measured and did not include modelled values; (4) only unfertilized and N fertilized data were selected (other experimental factors were excluded); (5) either the decomposition rate or mass loss of fine roots over a known duration was reported; and (6) data were collected once if reported by multiple publications. Studies were considered independent based on the following criteria: (1) studies conducted at different sites and with different N application rates; (2) discrete studies at the same site (LeBauer and Treseder 2008; Liu and Greaver 2010); (3) different species in a study; or (4) a study including several experiments under various abiotic conditions, such as different locations, N application rates and soil layers (Chen et al. 2019). Our 123 records met at least one of the above criteria and thus were assumed to be independent. The 123 records are from the upper midwestern part of the USA or in China. There may be some latitudinal and possibly phylogenetic bias, which needs further study with more data in temperate forests.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Global distribution of experiments measuring fine root decomposition in temperate forests with N application (n = 123). Different sample sizes are represented by different colours, and numbers represent sample sizes

We collected four categories of factors: environmental (including MAT, mean annual precipitation (MAP), latitude and longitude), experimental factors (including soil depth, decomposition duration, N application rate, fertilization frequency, mesh size and initial root mass), soil characteristics (including initial pH, N:P, TN and TP), and initial root traits (including lignin, N, P, N:P, C:P, C:N and cellulose). When the data were reported graphically, we used GetData Graph Digitizer v.2.24 (http://getdata-graph-digitizer.com/) to extract data values.

We either directly collected MAT and MAP when they were reported or indirectly extracted them if not reported from the Global Climate database (http://www.worldclim) using the latitudes and longitudes of the study areas. MAT ranged from 2.0 to 17.9 °C, and MAP ranged from 66 to 1490 mm in these studies. N application rates varied from 5 to 300 kg N ha‒1 yr‒1, and we grouped them into < 50, 50–100, 100–150 and ≥ 150 kg N ha‒1 yr‒1 (Tian and Niu 2015). Different forms of N were applied, including NH4NO3, NH4Cl, urea and NaNO3. In the lnRR calculation, for UF F, lnRR = ln (X UF F/X UF UF) = ln (X UF F) − ln (X UF UF), and for F F, lnRR = ln (X F F/X UF UF) = ln (X F F) − ln (X UF UF). The same initial roots were incubated in the F and UF treatments. Tree functional types were divided into broadleaf and conifer trees based on leaf morphological and phenological traits (Wu et al. 2017). Soil depth was categorized into surface (0–10 cm) and deep layers (0–20, 0–30 and > 30 cm).

Statistical analysis

We estimated decomposition coefficients based on the fine root mass remaining during the decomposition period if the data were not directly reported. Negative exponential models were used for coefficient estimation (Berg 2014; Olson 1963): mt/m0 = ek t, where mt is the residual mass of fine roots at time t (years), m0 is the fine root mass at the beginning of the experiment, and k is the decomposition coefficient (per year). We used the natural log response ratio (lnRR) as the effect size to assess the response of fine root decomposition to N application (Zheng et al. 2019): lnRR = ln (Xt/Xc) = ln (Xt) − ln (Xc), where Xt and Xc are the mean of the fertilized and unfertilized groups, respectively. We estimated the linear relationship between lnRR and continuous predictors by comparing linear and log-linear responses (Chen et al. 2019). However, in our database, sampling variances were not reported in 4 of the 20 studies. More importantly, weighting based on sampling variances would assign extreme importance to some individual observations (Ma and Chen 2016). Similar to previous research (Pittelkow et al. 2015), we used the number of replicates for calculating weighting: Wr = Nt Nc/(Nt + Nc), where Wr is the weight for each observation and Nt and Nc are the replicates of observations in fertilized and unfertilized groups, respectively. We compared linear and log-linear responses to assess the assumption of linearity between continuous predictors and lnRR.

Our analyses used stepwise multiple regressions to identify the relationship between the fine root decomposition rate and the four factor categories. In cases where the number of common points in each category was insufficient, factors that significantly correlated with the log response ratio were used in a stepwise regression of each category except environmental factors (including MAT, MAP, latitude and longitude). The stepwise multiple regression analysis had two steps: (1) factors in each category were contained in the analysis (Models A1–4), and (2) we ran analyses of all variables included in Model A (Model B). We used the Akaike information criterion (AIC), which provides information about the likelihood of a model being significant for the given data and its parameterization, to compare the likelihood of competing models. When comparing two alternative models, a lower AIC is more likely (Bond-Lamberty et al. 2018; Manning et al. 2008). All statistical analyses were performed in R 3.5.1.

Results

In general, our analyses showed that the exogenous N application decreased the decomposition of fine roots (p < 0.01; Fig. 2a). Decomposition decreased substantially at the application rate of 100–150 kg N ha−1 yr−1 (p < 0.01; Fig. 2b), and it was not significantly affected by the other application rates (all p > 0.05; Fig. 2b). NH4NO3 reduced the decomposition of fine roots (p < 0.05; Fig. 2c), but the effects of the other forms of N fertilizers on decomposition were not significant (all p > 0.05; Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The overall effect of N application on the fine root decomposition rate (a) and the effects of N application on decomposition changes with N application rate (b) and N form (c). The N application rates were < 50, 50–100, 100–150 and ≥ 150 kg N ha−1 yr−1. N forms include NH4NO3, NH4Cl, urea and NaNO3. The sample size is indicated next to each attribute, and error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01

Decomposition decreased in FF (p < 0.01; Fig. 3a) but did not significantly change in UFF (p > 0.05; Fig. 3a). Among the tree functional types, broadleaf trees experienced a decrease in fine root decomposition with N application (p < 0.05; Fig. 3b), but conifer trees did not experience a decrease (p > 0.05; Fig. 3b). While N application did not change fine root decomposition in the surface soil layers (p > 0.05; Fig. 3c), it decreased decomposition in the deep soil layers (p < 0.01; Fig. 3c). The decomposition bag and mesh sizes did not significantly affect decomposition (all p > 0.05; Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of N application on fine root decomposition rate for FF vs. UFF (a), different tree functional types (b), and soil layers (c). FF: from fertilized conditions to fertilized conditions and UFF: from unfertilized conditions to fertilized conditions. The sample size is indicated next to each attribute, and error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of N application on the fine root decomposition rate among different bags (a) and mesh sizes (b). Bag sizes include 10 × 10, 15 × 15 and 20 × 20 cm. Mesh sizes include < 0.2 mm and ≥ 0.2 mm. The sample size is indicated next to each attribute, and error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals

Fine root decomposition in response to N application was influenced by both environmental and experimental factors and initial soil characteristics and root traits (measured before N application in the decomposition experiments). The response ratios of fine root decomposition were positively correlated with MAT (p < 0.05; Fig. 5a) and initial soil pH (p < 0.001; Fig. 5d) and negatively correlated with soil depth (p < 0.001; Fig. 5b), decomposition duration (p < 0.05; Fig. 5c), initial soil N:P (p < 0.05; Fig. 5e), initial root lignin (p < 0.01; Fig. 5f), N (p < 0.01; Fig. 5g) and P (p < 0.01; Fig. 5h). We found no significant correlations of the response ratios of fine root decomposition with MAP, N application rate, frequency, mesh size, initial root mass, initial soil total N (TN), soil total P (TP), initial root N:P, C:P, C:N, cellulose, the response ratios of root N, P or initial root mass per unit area of bags (all p > 0.05; Fig. S3).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The relationships between the response ratios of fine root decomposition and environmental factors: (a) MAT, experimental factors: (b) soil depth, and (c) decomposition duration; soil characteristics: (d) initial soil pH and (e) initial soil N:P; and initial root traits: (f) lignin, (g) N and (h) P in N application experiments. In Fig. 5f-h, others indicate herbs. *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001

Multiple regression analyses showed that the fine root decomposition response to N application was affected by MAT (p < 0.05; Table 1), initial soil pH (p < 0.01; Table 1), soil depth (p < 0.001; Table 1) and initial root lignin (p < 0.01; Table 1) within each category. Further analysis showed that initial root lignin was the most important factor regulating fine root decomposition responses to the N application (p < 0.01; Table 1).

Table 1 Regression analyses of the response ratios of the fine root decomposition rate to N application, including environmental and experimental factors, soil characteristics and initial root traits. *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001

Discussion

Effects of N application on fine root decomposition

Consistent with previous findings (Carreiro et al. 2000; Gholz et al. 2000), our results showed that N application decreased fine root decomposition in temperate forest ecosystems. Decreases mainly resulted from the suppression of lignin degradation — the activity of ligninolytic enzymes was inhibited (Song et al. 2017; Tu et al. 2015). Phenol oxidase, a critical lignin-degrading enzyme (Hobbie et al. 2012; Kellner et al. 2008), was found to significantly decrease under N application (Fig. 6). Moreover, we found that phenol oxidase was positively correlated with the root decomposition rate (Fig. 6). Fine roots are usually composed of lignin-rich substances in temperate forests (Rasse et al. 2005; Xia et al. 2015). Therefore, the inhibition of lignin degradation by N application leads to a negative effect of N application on fine root decomposition in temperate forests. These results indicated that fine root decomposition significantly changed under N application experiments, which likely affected ligninolytic enzymes, but further research is needed to fully understand the impact of N application on ligninolytic enzymes, especially phenol oxidase. Additionally, under conditions that support nitrification, N input could significantly increase the loss of soil TN, NO3 and cations from the soil solution and increase H+ in the soil through NH4+ nitrification (Conn and Day 1996), leading to a significant decrease in the root decomposition rate (Kou et al. 2018; Manning et al. 2008).

Fig. 6
figure 6

The relationship between the response ratios of the fine root decomposition rate and the response ratios of phenol oxidase

Effects of the N application rate and N form on decomposition

Our results demonstrated the inhibition of decomposition when the N application rate was 100–150 kg N ha−1 yr−1, but no significant inhibition or promotion effects occurred at other greater or lesser application rates. Kou et al. (2018) suggested that the rate of N application is one of the factors affecting fine root decomposition. Inhibition effects at an application rate of 100–150 kg N ha−1 yr−1 might result from inhibited microbial enzyme activity (Sun et al. 2016) and increased concentrations of AUR in fine roots that reduced decomposition (Kou et al. 2015). Our results showed that fine root decomposition decreased when the N application rate was 100–150 kg N ha‒1 yr‒1, considering that the globally relevant range of N deposition values is from 0 to 50 kg N ha‒1 yr‒1, which may not affect fine root decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems (for example, temperate forests). However, with a continuous increase in N deposition, the decomposition of fine roots may decrease in future terrestrial ecosystems. On the other hand, our results showed that N application decreased fine root decomposition when NH4NO3 was applied, while other forms of N had no significant effect on decomposition. Previous studies have proposed that the application of NH4NO3 reduces fine root decomposition through (1) the suppression of ligninolytic enzyme activity (Song et al. 2017; Tu et al. 2015) and (2) an increase in the combination of inorganic N ions with AUR in decomposing roots (Jiang et al. 2018). Other forms of N fertilizers had no significant effects on decomposition, but this was likely due to the limited number of observations leading to high variation (low statistical power).

Effects of N application on decomposition differed with fertilization condition of root growth and decomposition

The lnRR of fine root decomposition showed a decrease in FF but not in UFF. Evidence is growing that litter usually decomposes faster in its native habitat than in other habitats (Freschet et al. 2012). The vast majority of these studies indicate that home-field advantage (HFA) effects exist in leaf litter decomposition (Gholz et al. 2000; Lin et al. 2020). However, some studies show that a HFA also exists in fine root decomposition (Freschet et al. 2012; Jacobs et al. 2018), which may also be applicable to our results. With respect to FF, the decomposition in the fertilized groups decreased with N application, while decomposition in the unfertilized groups occurring under their original conditions changed little, leading to a general decrease in lnRR. For UFF, decomposition decreased in not only the fertilized group but also the unfertilized group, resulting in nonsignificant effects of N application on fine root decomposition in UFF. Another possible reason for this outcome is that fertilized roots have a different initial chemical composition than that of unfertilized roots since N application would increase the N content and decrease the C content (Li et al. 2015). N application can increase nitrate availability to roots, which causes the roots to absorb more N and store it in fine root tissue (Nadelhoffer 2000; Reay et al. 2008). This, in turn, can inhibit decomposition (Li et al. 2015). Additionally, cost–benefit theory indicates that less C is devoted to roots when soil resource availability is high, which may lead to a decrease in decomposition under N application (Gough et al. 2004; Wang et al. 2012).

Effects of N application on decomposition in relation to tree functional types and soil depth

We found that N application reduced decomposition in broadleaf trees but had no significant impacts on decomposition in conifer trees. Fine roots of broadleaf trees usually have a high N content compared with that of conifer trees (Silver and Miya 2001). Previous studies have shown that a high N content may inhibit the synthesis and activity of ligninolytic enzymes (e.g., phenol oxidase) or convert lignin into other compounds that are resistant to degradation, ultimately inhibiting decomposition (Kou et al. 2018; Tu et al. 2015). Additionally, our results showed that N application inhibited fine root decomposition in the deep soil layers but not in the surface soil layers. Phenol oxidase in the deep soil layer is inhibited under N application (Jian et al. 2016). This slows lignin degradation, ultimately leading to a decrease in the rate of decomposition in deep soil layers (Hobbie et al. 2012; Sinsabaugh et al. 2009).

Effects of N application on decomposition in relation to mesh and bag sizes

Neither bag size nor mesh size had significant impacts on the response ratios of decomposition. Mesh size affects decomposition by interfering with decomposition processes (Heinemeyer et al. 2007; Maillard et al. 2021). For example, larger organisms (e.g., microarthropods) that carry microbes on their body and soil fauna (e.g., macro- and meso-invertebrates) are excluded by small mesh and thus cannot bring microbial decomposers inside (Beidler and Pritchard 2017; Kampichler and Bruckner 2009). In our study, mesh size did not affect decomposition. This result may be attributable to the low quality (e.g., high in lignin) of the fine roots in temperate forests (Rasse et al. 2005; Xia et al. 2015), which diminished the differences in decomposition rates associated with mesh sizes. Additionally, we found no significant correlations between the response ratios of decomposition and initial root mass per unit area of bags (Fig. S3n), probably indicating nonsignificant bag-size effects on decomposition.

Factors regulating decomposition under N application

Substrate quality is one of the important factors controlling the responses of litter decomposition to N application (Knorr et al. 2005). Our results found that the highest decrease in root decomposition was as high as 42.99% when roots were rich in lignin, N and P (Fig. 5f-h). Because of its structural irregularity, lignin has a strong resistance to decomposition and generally slows the decomposition process (David et al. 1988; Fogel and Kermit 1977). High root N concentrations may enhance the reaction between N and intermediate products of lignin degradation and slow decomposition processes (Tu et al. 2015). Root P negatively affected root decomposition, which may have resulted from a high P content inhibiting microbial activity (Jing et al. 2019; Sinsabaugh et al. 1993). N application can change substrate quality, such as increasing lignin, N, and P concentrations in fine roots, thereby inhibiting decomposition (Tu et al. 2015). However, we found no significant correlations between the lnRR of root decomposition and the lnRR of root traits (e.g., N, P). Possible reasons for this result may include (but not limited to): (1) the fine root decomposition that decreased under N application may have been related to suppressed lignin degradation rather than to altered root traits (Berg and Laskowski 2006; Fang et al. 2007; Hobbie 2008), and (2) the number of studies was limited, leading to no significant correlations being found.

In addition to initial root traits, MAT, soil depth and pH also affected decomposition. High temperatures increase decomposition by enhancing microbial activity (Davidson and Janssens 2006; Petraglia et al. 2018). The impacts of the soil layer and pH on decomposition may be linked to soil enzyme activities (Hobbie et al. 2012; Sinsabaugh et al. 2008). Phenol oxidase in the deep layer is inhibited, leading to decreased decomposition (Jian et al. 2016). A high pH can stimulate the production of hydrolytic enzymes, thereby increasing the degradation of hemicellulose and cellulose, leading to increased decomposition (Berg 2014; Sun et al. 2015). N application affects decomposition by changing soil characteristics (Tu et al. 2015). For example, in long-term N application experiments, with the decrease in soil N:P, microbial activity increased and decomposition accelerated (Ashraf et al. 2020; Geisseler and Scow 2014). Nevertheless, because of the limited number of data points for the soil variables (e.g., soil TN = 6, TP = 1 and pH = 9), we did not test the relationships between the lnRR of root decomposition and the lnRR of soil variables.

Overall, our study contributed to understanding and predicting the impacts of N application on fine root decomposition in temperate forest ecosystems. However, the decomposition of fine roots in response to N application may differ among different ecosystems (Fig. S2), and more attention should be given to belowground impacts. Moreover, functional differences between absorptive and transport fine roots cause them to differ in structural development and nutrient concentration (McCormack et al. 2015). The effects of N application on decomposition should be related to the type of fine roots (Kou et al. 2015; Sun et al. 2015). Further study is needed to fully understand the impact of root types on decomposition under N application.