Abstract
Interspecific hybrids between related species have long been used for transferring desirable genes, broadening genetic diversity and utilizing intersubgenomic heterosis. In this study, we developed a novel Brassica rapa type (AA, 2n = 20) exhibiting certain features derived from interspecific hybridization between natural B. rapa and Brassica juncea (AABB, 2n = 36). In pollen mother cells (PMCs) of the novel B. rapa type, normal chromosome pairing with 10 bivalents and 10:10 segregation was observed, and the novel B. rapa lines were completely fertile. However, GISH showed that certain B chromosomes or fragments were introgressed into B. rapa. Genetic components of the novel B. rapa lines were investigated by GISH, AFLP and SSR analyses. GISH analysis of F1, BC1F1, and BC1F2 plants confirmed the identities of three addition lines and seven translocation lines. AFLP and SSR analyses of 60 hybrid progenies from BC1F4 plants, their parents, and some B. juncea and B. rapa resources indicated that the AJ and B chromosome(s) or fragment(s) introgressed to the novel B. rapa. AFLP revealed that 60 BC1F4 plants contained B chromosomes or fragments, which evidenced introgression into the hybrid progeny. SSR analysis indicated that the A-genome (A1–A10) of B. juncea was introgressed into the hybrid progeny at 1.0 to 42.7%. Lastly, we obtained some yellow-seed and early-flowering B. rapa resources. The novel B. rapa lines can be used to genetically improve B. rapa in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and to study the origin and evolution of the A- and B-genomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Introgressive hybridization plays a crucial role in the evolution of plant species (Ma et al. 2006) and is an important approach used to broaden the genetic base and transfer superior traits; it has been widely used for improving crops. Introgressive hybridization consists of incorporation of the genetic material from one species into another using distant hybridization and repeated backcrosses. The term “U triangle” refers to six agriculturally important Brassica species, three of which are diploids and the other three allopolyploids. Nagaharu (1935) showed that B. rapa (genome AA, 2n = 20) can synthesize two types of allopolyploids, with B. nigra (BB, 2n = 16) to form B. juncea (AABB, 2n = 36) and with B. oleracea (CC, 2n = 18) to form B. napus (AACC, 2n = 38); the other diploid, B. nigra, and B. oleracea form B. carinata (BBCC, 2n = 34). Plants with the B-genome, namely, B. nigra (BB, 2n = 16), B. carinata (BBCC, 2n = 34) and B. juncea (AABB, 2n = 36), have excellent resistance characteristics, e.g., heat and drought tolerance, seed shattering, and blackleg, that are effective throughout the life of the plant (Woods et al. 1991; Fredua-Agyeman et al. 2014). Therefore, to produce B. rapa or B. napus cultivars that have similar resistance characteristics, many researchers have attempted to use the B-genome from Brassica species as a donor in either sexual crosses (Zhu et al. 1993; Navabi et al. 2010, 2011) or somatic hybridization (Waara and Glimelius 1995).
Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) is a sophisticated tool that has been successfully used to discriminate between parental genomes in interspecific introgression lines (Wang et al. 2004; Hua and Li 2006; Ma et al. 2006). GISH techinque utilizes total genomic DNA with specific probes that are easier to identify and amplify. In addition, the ratio of probe/blocking DNA should be sufficient to inhibit chromosome labeling of both genomes together, and blocking DNA plays an important role in hybrids derived from closely related species because there is high possibility that homology can be arisen during hybrid production (Xie et al. 2010; Younis et al. 2015). GISH offers direct visual analysis to differentiate parental genomes and can be used to investigate genome associations in allopolyploid species, interspecific introgression lines, and interspecific hybrids (Jiang and Gill 1994). GISH can also effectively and accurately identify alien chromatin stages and consolidation positions. Moreover, GISH has been successfully used to distinguish the parental chromosomes in intergeneric hybrids and interspecific hybrids with relatives and progenies, i.e., Brassica species (Ma et al. 2006; Kang et al. 2014; Yao et al. 2010), Triticum species (Molnár and Molnár-Láng 2010; Tang et al. 2014; Li et al. 2015), Zea species (Gonzalez et al. 2006), Allium species (Yamashita et al. 2005), orange (Fu et al. 2004), Secale species (Zhou et al. 2010) and Lilium species (Barba-Gonzalez et al. 2006).
Molecular markers have widely used to detect introgressive genes in Brassica species. Recently, a complete set of monosomic alien addition lines between B. napus and Isatis indigotica was developed using GISH/FISH and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers (Kang et al. 2014). Intertribal somatic hybrids between B. napus and Isatis indigotica and backcross progenies were analyzed using GISH and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers (Du et al. 2009). The combination of GISH and molecular marker techniques can better characterize hybrids and their genomic changes, particularly karyotypically unstable or partial hybrids (Hua et al. 2006; Ma et al. 2006).
B. juncea has several valuable agronomic characteristics, including yellow seeds, high oil content, heat and drought tolerance, disease resistance, tolerance to poor soil, seed shattering resistance and early maturity (Woods et al. 1991; Dhaka et al. 2017). Some valuable characteristics of B. juncea introgressed into B. rapa, making it highly suitable for planting in spring rapeseed regions. In this study, to obtain novel B.rapa, some genes or fragments of B. juncea introgressed into B. rapa by interspecific hybridization, and the genomic compositions of novel B. rapa types were analyzed using GISH, AFLP and SSR. We finally obtained several novel B. rapa lines, i.e., yellow seeds and early flowering.
Materials and methods
Plant materials
The B. juncea cultivar “Luhuo” originating from Luhuo County, Sichuan Province, China, was used as the recipient parent, and the elite B. rapa landrace “Menyuan rapeseed” originating from the Qinghai–Tibetan plateau was used as the donor parent. All plants were self-pollinated for more than seven generations. The F1 plants between B. juncea cv. Luhuo (2n = 4x = 36, AABB) and B. rapa cv. Menyuan (2n = 2x = 20, AA) were backcrossed to Menyuan rapeseed to obtain BC1F1 populations and BC1F1 plants were self-pollinated to obtain BC1F2 plants, which were self-pollinated to obtain BC1F3 plants, which were selfed to obtain BC1F4 plants (Fig. 1). In addition, two parents, five contrast varieties and 60 BC1F4 plants were analyzed using molecular markers, together with Menyuan rapeseed, Luhuo, B. nigra, Haoyou 11 (landrace, B. rapa), Qingyou241 (B. rapa), Huangzi (B. rapa), Dahuang (landrace, B. rapa) and 60 hybrid progenies.
Observation of pollen viability
Anthers with mature pollen at the flowering stage were collected from 9 to 11 am, and pollen fertility was determined as the percentage of pollen grains stained with 1% acetocarmine. The stained pollen grains were observed under a fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse 80i, Japan), and pictures were obtained with a Nikon DS-Fil camera.
Cytology observation
The ovaries and anthers from young flower buds were collected from 9 to 11 in the morning to determine the chromosome numbers and analyze the meiosis of hybrids and progenies. The ovaries were first pre-treated with a 2 mM 8-hydroxyquinoline solution for 3 h at room temperature, fixed in Carnoy’s solution (3:1, ethanol:glacial acetic acid, v/v) for 24 h and stored in 75% ethanol at − 20 °C until further use. The anthers were fixed in Carnoy’s solution for 24 h and then stored in 75% ethanol at − 20 °C until further use. Cytogenetic observations were performed according to methods described by Li et al. (1995).
DNA isolation and GISH analysis
Genomic DNA was extracted using methods described by Warude et al. (2003), with some modifications. The DNA concentration and purity were measured at wavelengths of 260 and 280 nm, and the final DNA concentration was 50 ng/μl in TE buffer, which was suitable for AFLP and SSR analyses.
Total genomic DNA was isolated from the young leaves of B. nigra using the cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method. Slide preparations for GISH were generated according to the procedures described by Zhong et al. (1996). The B. nigra genomic DNA was labeled with Bio-11-dUTP (Fermentas) by nick translation and used as a probe. The blocks were generated by boiling B. rapa DNA for 30 min to produce DNA fragments of 300–500 bp. Anthers selected at meiosis were digested at 37 °C for approximately 70 min in an enzyme mixture containing 0.02% snailase (Beijing Baitai Biochem Co., China), 0.4% pectinase (Merck, Germany) and 0.6% cellulase “Onozuka” (Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd., Japan).
GISH was performed according to methods described by Cui et al. (2012). The hybridization signals of the B. nigra probe were discerned using Cy3-labeled streptavidin (Sigma Aldrich Co., Switzerland) and the chromosomes were counterstained with a 0.2% 4′-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) solution. The samples were mounted in Citifluor antifade medium. Photographs were taken using a computer-assisted fluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse 80i, Japan) with a Digital Sight camera.
AFLP marker analysis
AFLP marker analysis was performed based on methods described by Vos et al. (1995). The DNA was digested at 37 °C using 5 U EcoRI and 2 U MseI in a reaction volume of 25 μl, and the ends of the restriction digest fragments were ligated to the artificial adaptors (E-F: 5′-CTCGTAGACTGCGTACC-3′, E-R: 5′-AATTGGTACGCAGTC-3′ and M-F: 5′-GACGATGAGTCCTGAG-3′, M-R: 5′-TACTCAGGACTCATC-3′) (Sangon, China). The ligation product was amplified using pre-amplification primers (EA/MC), and the pre-amplified products were diluted (1:30) and then amplified using selective primers. Selectively amplified products were separated using electrophoresis on 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gels and silver stained. In this study, we selected 31 pairs of high-polymorphism AFLP primer EA/MC combinations for the whole-genome scan of the BC1F4 plants.
SSR marker analysis
The primer sequences for the SSR markers were obtained from the Brassica database (http://ukcrop.net). Initially, 220 primer pairs were randomly selected. Among these 220 primers, 85 SSR markers were assessed for successful PCR amplification and polymorphisms by testing the genomic DNA of the novel B. napus lines. PCR amplifications were performed in a volume of 10 μl containing 50 ng of genomic DNA, 10 × Taq buffer (containing Mg2+), 10 mM dNTPs (Sangon, China), 0.2 U Taq DNA polymerase (Takara, Japan), and 5 μM forward and reverse primers (Sangon, China). The PCR reaction program was as follows: 94 °C for 2 min; 10 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 45 s, with a decrease of 0.5 °C in the annealing temperature for each successive cycle; 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 45 s; and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplification products were separated using electrophoresis on 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gels, followed by silver staining. Finally, photographs were acquired to analyze the polymorphisms amplified by PCR.
Data statistics
The genetic similarity coefficient (GS) between accessions A and B was calculated by the formula GSAB = 2NAB/(NA + NB), in which NAB was the number of common bands shared by accessions A and B, and NA and NB were the total number of bands in accessions A and B, respectively. The genetic distance (GD) was calculated by the formula GDAB = − ln(GS) (Nei and Li 1979). The data from the GS matrix among 67 genotypes were subjects to GD using the NTSYS-pc version 2.10e (Rohlf 1997). The introgression rate (IR) was calculated by the formula IRAB = NA/(NA + NB). The correlation coefficient was calculated using Microsoft Excel.
Results
Morphology of hybrid progenies between B. juncea and B. rapa
There were significant variations in the morphology of the hybrid progenies between B. juncea and B. rapa. The young plants of the hybrid progenies were divided into B. rapa-like, intermediate, B. juncea-like and other types based on characters, such as leaf shape, stem length, and florescence. Figure 2a, b shows the parents. Figure 2c shows the F1 hybrid plant, B. juncea-like. Figure 2e–g shows the B. rapa-like, intermediate, and B. juncea-like BC1F3 plants, respectively.
The 48 F1 plants between Luhuo and Menyuan were morphologically similar to B. juncea and male sterile. In total of 28 BC1F1 plants obtained from the F1 plants pollinated by the B. rapa parent were investigated. Herein, B. rapa-like, intermediate and B. juncea-like plants accounted for 28.6, 46.4, and 25% of the BC1F1 population, respectively (Table 1). A total of 119 BC1F2 plants obtained from self-pollinating BC1F1 plants were investigated. In the BC1F2 population, the intermediate, B. rapa-like and B. juncea-like plants accounted for 54, 34.4 and 11.8%, respectively (Table 1). A total of 161 BC1F3 plants obtained from self-pollinating BC1F2 plants were investigated. Intermediate, B. rapa-like, B. juncea-like and additional plants accounted for 46.6, 32.3, 11.2 and 9.9% of the BC1F3 population, respectively (Table 1); the additional plants were different from the parent, intermediate, B. rapa-like and B. juncea-like plants. As shown in Table 1, the intermediate type comprised the majority of the BC1F1 plants; B. rapa-like and B. juncea-like plants were in the minority, with similar plant numbers. With an increase in self-pollination, the intermediate plants of the BC1F2 and BC1F3 populations accounted for approximately half, and the proportion of B. rapa-like plants was significantly higher than that of B. juncea-like plants. In addition, a similar phenotype was found between the novel BC1F4 B. rapa plants and the B. rapa parent plants. The novel BC1F4 B. rapa plants included those with early flowering and yellow seed coat, but there were remarkable phenotypic differences among the individual BC1F4 plants (Fig. 2g–l).
Pollen viability observation of hybrid progenies between B. juncea and B. rapa
With in the increase of selfing times of the hybrid progenies from this interspecific cross, pollen viability gradually returned to normal (Table 2). The percent viable pollen of 28 BC1F1 plants was analyzed and found to average 34.8% and range from 0 to 84% among individual plants. The percent viable pollen of 81 BC1F2 plants was also analyzed and found to average 79.7% and range from 7 to 99%. In the BC1F3 plants, 158 individuals were analyzed; the percent viable pollen of 148 fertile individuals was > 93.7%, and the percent viable pollen of five individuals was < 30%. Therefore, the percent viable pollen of BC1F2 and BC1F3 plants was greater than that of BC1F1 plants.
GISH analysis of hybrid progenies between B. juncea and B. rapa
A total of 41 pollen mother cells (PMCs) were observed at diakinesis in the hybrid F1 plants (Table S1), and eight B chromosomes were detected and labeled with the B. nigra probe. Of these 41 PMCs, 26.8% contained univalent B chromosomes; 65.9% of the PMCs contained partially homologous paired chromosomes in the B-genome that formed bivalents (Fig. 3a–c); and some PMCs contained A and B chromosomes that formed bivalents and multivalents. In total, 105 PMCs were observed at metakinesis I; these PMCs had lagged chromosomes that formed clavate bivalents to the majority of the A chromosomes and were tidily arranged in the equatorial plate. Both sides of the equatorial plate had lagged B chromosomes that existed in four to eight univalents; the other chromosomes were bivalents or multivalents (Fig. 3d). Furthermore, 157 PMCs (26.1%) had lagged chromosomes (Fig. 3f), and 14% of the PMCs had chromosome bridges. The A chromosomes had 10 II + 10 II, and the eight B chromosomes had 3 I + 5 I (Fig. 3e), 4 I + 4 I, and 2 I + 6 I that were observed at anaphase I (A I). 78 PMCs were detected at anaphase II (A II); the majority of PMCs containing B chromosomes divided into four daughter cells (Fig. 3g), 38.5% of PMCs had lagged chromosomes, and 28.2% of PMCs divided into three or five daughter cells (Fig. 3h).
A total of 13 BC1F1 plants were obtained from the F1 × B. rapa cv. Mengyuan, and GISH was used to analyze (Table S1) and detect the number of B chromosomes introgression (Table 3). Nos. 140-1, 140-2, 141-2 and 143-2 were B. rapa-like and exhibited early flowering, a light-green leaf color, smooth leaves, and normal fertility. These plants had stable chromosome numbers (20 chromosomes), and four plants contained B chromosomes or fragments of the B-genome and were considered translocation lines of B chromosomes.
Nos. 140-1 and 140-2 had two B chromosomes, and Nos. 141-2 and 143-2 had three B chromosomes. No. 141-2 had 10 II + 10 II at A I, and the B chromosomes had 2 I + 1 I (Fig. 4a). Four daughter nuclei had ten chromosomes at A II, two daughter nuclei had one B chromosome, and the other nuclei had two B chromosomes (Fig. 4b). The meiosis the three B chromosomes in No. 141-2, along with their fertility, had almost recovered to normal. It was assumed that the pairing of the two B chromosomes and the partial homologous pairing between an additional B chromosome and A chromosome indicated that meiosis was normal.
Chromosomes of Nos. 144-1, 142-2 and 141-3 tended to intermediate phenotypes; the phenotypes and flowering phases were between those of the parents. The chromosome numbers were 22–25, with an additional 2-5 B chromosomes. There were 22 chromosomes of No. 144-1, which had two additional B chromosomes. Of 84 PMCs of No. 144-1, 83.3% exhibited 10 II + 2 I at diakinesis (Fig. 4c), and two B chromosomes existed as univalents, followed by 8 II + 2 III (3.6%) (Fig. 4d) and 11II (13.1%) (Fig. 4e) at diakinesis. A trivalent formed between two B chromosomes and one A chromosome, and 11 bivalents fromed between 20 A chromosomes and two B chromosomes, indicating homoeology between A and B chromosomes and between B and B chromosomes. There were 25 chromosomes of No. 141-3, with five additional B chromosome. A total of 41 PMCs exhibited two to five lagged chromosomes at metakinesis I (Fig. 4f); 46 PMCs (23.1%) exhibited lagged chromosomes at A I, followed by 11:14 (23.1%) (Fig. 4g) and 12:13 (27.0%) (Fig. 4h) segregations.
There were 26 chromosomes of Nos. 143-4, 142-3, 366-5, 140-5 and 142-5 which were B. juncea-like: tall and dark green, with rough and pinnatifid leaves and stocky stems. They exhibited late flowering, staminodes, small siliques and low seed set. A total of 18 PMCs (55.6%) had partial homologous pairing between B and B chromosomes (Fig. 5a), 11.1% formed multivalent chromosomes between A and B chromosomes at diakinesis in chromosomes of No. 140-5, and the remaining (33.3%) retained univalent chromosomes. A total of 40 PMCs contained 2-6 lagged chromosomes, approximately 80.0% at metakinesis I (Fig. 5b). A total of 48 PMCs (81.2%) contained lagged chromosomes (Fig. 5c–e), and the chromosomes of 6.3% formed chromosome bridges at A I (Fig. 5f).
The phenotype of No. 140-4 included late-flowering; extended stigma; normal fertility; small siliques; low seed set; tall plant; stocky and large stem; pinnatifid basal; and lobed and striped leaves, making No. 140-4 B. juncea-like and mixoploid (2n = 20, 36, 41, 44, 54), with a preponderance of 2n = 44. The PMCs of No. 140-4 contained chromosomes of 2n = 44 (including 16 B chromosomes) and were B. juncea-like in morphology but had normal fertility. The percent viable pollen was approximately 63%, so we speculated that the 16 B chromosomes were an additional complete set of diploids and normal chromosomes paired in meiosis. Four PMCs contained 2-3 lagged chromosomes at metakinesis I. A total of 35 PMCs (8.6%) contained 2-6 lagged chromosomes, and the chromosomes of 5.7% formed chromosome bridges, followed by 10:6 (Fig. 5g), 9:7 (Fig. 5h) and 8:8 segregations of B chromosomes at A I. A total of 21 PMCs contained no lagged chromosomes or chromosome bridges, and the chromosomes of 9.5% contained abnormal tetrads (including trisections and five sections) at A II. The chromosomes of 31 PMCs (6.3%) had a micronucleus at the tetrad stage.
PMCs of the BC1F2 plants of three substitution lines and two AA-B addition lines were identified (Table S1). Nos. 814-1, 820-4 and 850-3 were substitution lines that had different B chromosome numbers. No. 814-1 had twenty chromosomes, including two B chromosomes (Fig. 6a). No. 820-4 had twenty chromosomes, including four B chromosomes, and pairwise coupling of B chromosome resulted in two bivalents at diakinesis (Fig. 6b); two B chromosome bivalents were tidily arranged at the equatorial plate at metakinesis (Fig. 6c), followed by 2:2 stable segregations of the four B chromosomes at A I (Fig. 6d). No. 830-5 had 20 chromosomes and contained two hybrid signals, one located at the end of a chromosome and the other located on a whole chromosome (Fig. 6f). The result indicated that No. 830-5 was a monosomic substitution to a translocation between an A and a B chromosome.
Nos. 830-4 and 892-5 were addition lines. No. 830-4 had 22 chromosomes, including two B chromosomes (Fig. 6e). No. 892-5 was mixoploid with 19, 21 and 22 chromosomes in PMCs and a preponderance of 21 chromosomes that accounted for approximately 45%. There were two hybrid signals in somatic cells (Fig. 6g) and located near the centromere during diakinesis of PMCs in meiosis phase (Fig. 6h). We speculated that a chromosome segment translocated while A and B chromosomes homoeologous pairing occurred near the centromere.
Observation of BC1F3 cytology and pollen staining
Through morphological investigation, cytological observation (Fig. 7a–e) and pollen staining (Fig. 7f) of the BC1F3 interspecific hybrid progenies between B. juncea and B. rapa, 124 novel B. rapa plants (AA, 2n = 20) were found to have obvious morphological differences, normal fertility and percent viable pollen ≥ 80% (Fig. 7f). According to cytological observation, PMCs had steady chromosome numbers of 10 II at diakinesis (Fig. 7b), had no lagged chromosomes at metaphase I (Fig. 7c), 10:10 segregation at A I (Fig. 7d), and 10 chromosomes of a tetrad nucleus at A II (Fig. 7e).
AFLP and SSR marker analysis of BC1F4 plants
A total of 60 BC1F4 plants were selected by AFLP and SSR analyses. AFLP analysis was conducted using 256 randomly selected primers. Among these markers, 31 pairs showed polymorphisms in two parents and check materials, and of 530 amplified bands, 519 (97.92%) were different. Each primer detected an average of 16.74 allele locations; the sizes of the bands were 80–1400 bp. There were 59 identical bands between B. nigra and B.rapa (Mengyuan) that had maximum GD; these lines each had 211 bands and 232 bands, respectively. B. nigra and B. juncea had the B-genome and produced B-specific bands. A total of 60 BC1F4 plants produced 13,054 bands, including 522 (4.4%) B-specific bands. This demonstrates that B chromosome(s) or chromosome segment(s) introgressed into hybrid progenies between B. juncea and B. rapa (Table 4).
SSR analysis was conducted using 220 primers designed from the A-genome (Fig. S1). Primer selection used two parents and two random progenies. A total of 85 primers had polymorphic bands and amplified 265 bands, 258 (97.4%) of which were different. Each primer detected an average of 3.04 allele locations, and the band sizes were 65–430 bp. B. juncea and B. rapa contained the A-genome, which underwent changes to long-term evolution. The A-genome of B. juncea indicated as AJ. The A-genome (A1-A10) of B. juncea was introgressed into the hybrid progenies, and the IR ranged from 1.0 to 42.7%. The A6 IR was the highest, whereas the A10 IR was the lowest (Table 5).
The AJ and B chromosome(s) or chromosome segment(s) of B. juncea introgressed into the 60 novel B. rapa (Fig. S2). The average IR of AJ was approximately 20.7%, and ranged between 12.7 and 29.2%. The IR of No. 28 was the highest, whereas the IR of No. 54 was the lowest (Table 4). The average IR of the B-genome was approximately 3.7% and ranged between 1.5 and 8.1%. The IR of Nos. 17 and 38 was the highest, whereas the IR of Nos. 19 and 20 was the lowest (Table 4). In the 60 novel B. rapa plants, the A-genome IR was significantly higher than that of the B-genome. The GD between Mengyuan and the novel B. rapa was 0.224–0.538. The GD of No. 16 was the highest, whereas the GD of No. 56 was the lowest. The correlation coefficients were significantly different among the GD between the novel B.rapa and B.rapa versus Menyuan and among the IR of the A and B chromosome(s) or chromosome segment(s) of B. juncea introgressed to the novel B. rapa, which was 0.52 and 0.83, respectively. The results showed that the more AJ and B chromosome(s) or chromosome segment(s) of B. juncea that were introgressed into the novel B. rapa, the greater the GD between the novel B. rapa and the parent vs. B. rapa was.
Development of novel B. rapa
The seed color of B. juncea cv. Luhuo was yellowish-brown, that of B. rapa cv. Mengyuan was red-brown, and that of the F1 plants was brown. Five shallow yellow-seed individuals were discovered in BC1F2; three individuals maintained this seed color, but that of the others segregated into brown and yellow in progenies. Five yellow-seed individual BC1F2 plants were self-pollinated to obtain 57 BC1F3 individuals that showed different degrees of seed color (Fig. 8). We also investigated the somatic chromosome numbers of 28 yellow-seed BC1F3 individuals that were 20. Thus, most of the yellow-seed BC1F3 individuals were B. rapa-type (Table S2).
Some of the BC1F4 plants flowered early, a phenotype similar to that of the B. rapa parent, but there were remarkable phenotypic differences among the various plants. N153-2 was less branched, with elongated leaves and early flowering (Fig. 1g). N151-3 exhibited a pinnatipartite leaf of the basal stem, symmetrical and orderly leaves on the side lobes, and an irregular oval leaf at the top of the stem (Fig. 1h). N26-1 had dark-green leaves, long petioles, and long, oval leaves (Fig. 1i). N10-1 was compact, with waxy and long, oval leaves (Fig. 1j). N169-1 displayed early flowering, wide and compact leaves and less branching (Fig. 1k). N66-1 had circular, waxy, wide and compact leaves and long petioles (Fig. 1l). Other traits, such as yield and oil content, were not assessed. These results showed that the novel B. rapa plants obtained by interspecific hybridization between B. juncea and B. rapa varied widely, broadening genetic diversity and enriching germplasm resources.
Discussion
B. juncea has many valuable agronomic characteristics, many of which have been transmitted into B. rapa, which can broaden its genetic diversity. In this study, the studied seeds included those resulting from a cross between B. juncea cv. Luhuo as the female parent and B. rapa cv. Mengyuan as the male parent, as well as some novel B. rapa with valuable traits, i.e., early flowering and yellow-seed. Unfortunately, seeds were not obtained using B. rapa as the female parent and B. juncea as the male parent. Similar studies have demonstrated that progeny from such crosses are rare. The reason for this result may be lower pairing between the B-genome and A- or C-genome, which are distantly related (Attia et al. 1986; Mason et al. 2010; Tan et al. 2017), and difficultly obtaining seeds. However, there is little evolutionary difference between the A-genome and the C-genome (Attia et al. 1987), as mentioned in previous reports in Brassica species (Leflon et al. 2006; Wen et al. 2008; Bennett et al. 2012; Li et al. 2013; Rahman et al. 2015).
With increased backcrossing, plants with viable pollen continued to be produced. Consistently, the percent viable pollen (0 ~ 30%) of BC1F3 plants was 3.2%, much lower than that of BC1F1 plants (53.6%), but the percent viable pollen (> 80%) of BC1F3 plants was 93.7%, much higher than that of BC1F1 plants (3.5%) (Table 2). The reason for this result might be the normal pairing of more homologous and homologous chromosomes through increased backcrossing. Pollen stainability observed in B. juncea × toria and B. juncea × yellow sarson hybrids was, on average, 16.5 and 20.4% in F1 plants and 39.9 and 43.2% in F2 plants, respectively (Choudhary et al. 2002). Pollen fertility increased with cross generation.
The B.juncea-like morphology of the B. juncea × B. rapa F1 hybrids in this study contrast with the results of Choudhary et al. (2002) and Röbbelen (1960), who found an intermediate morphology. The majority of the 28 chromosomes were 10 II + 8 I, which was observed in the PMCs with univalent, bivalent and trivalent chromosome pairing. Such variation could accounted for the differences in the genotypes of the species involved in the production of the hybrids.
The occurrence of 10 II + 8 I in the majority of the PMCs of the F1 hybrids (2n = 28) could be attributed to the homologous pairing of 10 chromosomes belonging to the A-genome, one each derived from B. juncea (AABB, 2n = 36) and B. rapa (AA, 2n = 20), leaving eight chromosomes of the B-genome as V + IV+ III + II + I. The occurrence of three additional lines and seven translocation lines might be due to autosyndesis between A- and B-genome chromosomes. This would result in structural similarities in a few chromosomes of the A- and B-genome. The occurrence of multivalents in the form of trivalents, quadrivalents and pentavalents indicated the presence of duplicate segments on the chromosomes or heterozygous translocation (Röbbelen 1960). The presence of the A- and B-genomes suggested the possibility of multivalent associations in hybrid progenies. Such affinity revealed allosyndetic pairing and provided the basis for genetic exchange between the genomes. Maternal- and intermediate-type plants were frequent among the hybrid progenies. Wide phenotypic variation and transgressive segregation for many traits in the hybrid progenies might have resulted from recombination and/or eventual segregation of aneuploid forms arising in the populations.
Introgressive hybridization, the incorporation of genetic materials from one species into another by wide hybridization and repeated backcrossing, plays a vital role in the evolution of plant species (Guttman 2001), genetic modification and enriching the gene pool for breeding (Anamthawat-Jonsson 2001), as evidenced in abundance (Li et al. 1995, 2005, 2006; Hua et al. 2006; Chen et al. 2007; Mason et al. 2010; Tan et al. 2017). AFLP and SSR results showed that A-genome transmission was higher than that of the B-genome. The reason for this result is likely that pairing and recombination preferentially occurred between homologous chromosomes in triploid AAB hybrids in F1 plants as well as between homologous chromosomes at a low rate (Tan et al. 2017). This study also suggested that B-genome chromosomes can be introgressed into hybrid progenies (BC1F1, BC1F2, BC1F3 and BC1F4).
Addition lines and translocation lines could be used to increase the genetic diversity of B. rapa and provide new breeding materials for genetic improvement in Qinghai-Tibet. They could also be used to study the origin and evolution of the A- and B-genomes. In this study, we report the successful development of novel B. rapa lines with early flowering and yellow-seed phenotypes and many unidentified characters (i.e., resistance, quality, and yield). These lines serve as new genetic sources for B. rapa breeding through successive selections of the progenies from one interspecies hybrid between B. rapa and B. juncea.
References
Anamthawat-Jonsson K (2001) Molecular cytogenetics of introgression hybridization in plants. Methods Cell Sci 23:139–148. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013182724179
Attia T, Robbelen G (1986) Cytogenetic relationship within cultivated Brassica analyzed in amphihaploids from the three diploid ancestor. Can J Genet Cytol 28:323–329. https://doi.org/10.1139/g86-048
Attia T, Busso C, Robbelen G (1987) Digenomic triploids for an assessment of chromosome relationships in the cultivated diploid Brassica species. Genome 29:326–330. https://doi.org/10.1139/g87-053
Barba-Gonzalez R, Van Silfhout AA, Visser RGF, Ramanna MS, Van Tuyl JM (2006) Progenies of allotriploids of Oriental × Asiatic lilies (lilium) examined by GISH analysis. Euphytica 151:243–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9148-x
Bennett RA, Séguin-Swartz G, Rahman H (2012) Broadening genetic diversity in Canola using the C-genome species Brassica oleracea L. Crop Sci 52:2030–2039. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2011.11.0580
Chen HF, Wang H, Li ZY (2007) Production and genetic analysis of partial hybrids in intertribal crosses between Brassica species (B. rapa, B. napus) and Capsella bursa-pastoris. Plant Cell Rep 26:1791–1800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-007-0392-x
Choudhary BR, Joshi P, Rao SR (2002) Cytogenetics of Brassica juncea × Brassica rapa hybrids and patterns of variation in the hybrid derivatives. Plant Breed 121:292–296. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.00715.x
Cui C, Ge X, Gautam M, Kang L, Li Z (2012) Cytoplasmic and genomic effects on meiotic pairing in Brassica hybrids and allotetraploids from pair crosses of three cultivated diploids. Genetics 191:725–738. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.112.140780
Dhaka N, Rout K, Yadava SK, Sodhi YS, Gupta V, Pental D, Pradhan AK (2017) Genetic dissection of seed weight by QTL analysis and detection of allelic variation in Indian and East European gene pool lines of Brassica juncea. Theor Appl Genet 130:293–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2811-2
Du XZ, Ge XH, Yao XC, Zhao ZG, Li ZY (2009) Production and cytogenetic characterization of intertribal somatic hybrids between Brassica napus and Isatis indigotica and backcross progenies. Plant Cell Rep 28:1105–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-009-0712-4
Fredua-Agyeman R, Coriton O, Huteau V, Parkin IA, Chèvre AM, Rahman H (2014) Molecular cytogenetic identification of B genome chromosomes linked to blackleg disease resistance in Brassica napus × B. carinata interspecific hybrids. Theor Appl Genet 127:1305–1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-014-2298-7
Fu CH, Chen CL, Guo WW, Deng XX (2004) GISH, AFLP and PCR-RFLP analysis of an intergeneric somatic hybrid combining Goutou sour orange and Poncirus trifoliata. Plant Cell Rep 23:391–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-004-0828-5
González G, Comas C, Confalonieri V, Naranjo CA, Poggio L (2006) Genomic affinities between maize and Zea perennis using classical and molecular cytogenetic methods (GISH–FISH). Chromosome Res 14:629–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-006-1072-3
Guttman B (2001) Evolution. In: Brenner S, Miller JH (eds) Encyclopedia of genetics, vol 2. Academic, San Diego, pp 663–666
Hua YW, Li ZY (2006) Genomic in situ hybridization analysis of Brassica napus × Orychophragmus violaceus hybrids and production of B. napus aneuploids. Plant Breed 125:144–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2006.01200.x
Hua YW, Liu M, Li ZY (2006) Parental genome separation and elimination of cells and chromosomes revealed by AFLP and GISH analyses in a Brassica carinata × Orychophragmus violaceus cross. Ann Bot 97:993–998. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl073
Jiang J, Gill BS (1994) Nonisotopic in situ hybridization and plant genome mapping: the first 10 years. Genome 37:717–725. https://doi.org/10.1139/g94-102
Kang L, Du X, Zhou Y, Zhu B, Ge X, Li Z (2014) Development of a complete set of monosomic alien addition lines between Brassica napus and Isatis indigotica (Chinese woad). Plant Cell Rep 33:1355–1364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-014-1621-8
Leflon M, Eber F, Letanneur JC, Chelysheva L, Coriton O, Huteau V, Ryder CD, Barker G, Jenczewski E, Chèvre AM (2006) Pairing and recombination at meiosis of Brassica rapa (AA) × Brassica napus (AACC) hybrids. Theor Appl Genet 113:1467–1480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0393-0
Li Z, Liu HL, Luo P (1995) Production and cytogenetics of intergeneric hybrids between Brassica napus and Orychophragmus violaceus. Theor Appl Genet 91:131–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00220869
Li MT, Li ZY, Zhang CY, Qian W, Meng JL (2005) Reproduction and cytogenetic characterization of interspecific hybrids derived from crosses between Brassica carinata and B. rapa. Theor Appl Genet 110:1284–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-1965-0
Li M, Chen X, Meng J (2006) Intersubgenomic heterosis in rapeseed production with a partial new-typed Brassica napus containing subgenome Ar from B. rapa and Cc from Brassica carinata. Crop Sci 46:234–242. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0759
Li Q, Mei J, Zhang Y, Li J, Ge X, Li Z, Qian W (2013) A large-scale introgression of genomic components of Brassica rapa into B. napus by the bridge of hexaploid derived from hybridization between B. napus and B. oleracea. Theor Appl Genet 126:2073–2080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-013-2119-4
Li G, Lang T, Dai G, Li D, Li C, Song X, Yang Z (2015) Precise identification of two wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium substitutions reveals the compensation and rearrangement between wheat and Thinopyrum chromosomes. Mol Breed 35:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-015-0202-z
Ma N, Li ZY, Cartagena JA, Fukui K (2006) GISH and AFLP analyses of novel Brassica napus lines derived from one hybrid between B. napus and Orychophragmus violaceus. Plant Cell Rep 25:1089–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-006-0171-0
Mason AS, Huteau V, Eber F, Coriton O, Yan G, Nelson MN, Cowling W, Chèvre A (2010) Genome structure affects the rate of autosyndesis and allosyndesis in AABC, BBAC and CCAB Brassica interspecific hybrids. Chromosome Res 18:655–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-010-9140-0
Molnár I, Molnár-Láng M (2010) GISH reveals different levels of meiotic pairing with wheat for individual Aegilops biuncialis chromosomes. Biol Plant 54:259–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-010-0045-8
Nagaharu U (1935) Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn J Bot 7:389–452
Navabi ZK, Parkin IA, Pires JC, Xiong Z, Thiagarajah MR, Good AG, Rahman MH (2010) Introgression of B-genome chromosomes in a doubled haploid population of Brassica napus × B. carinata. Genome 53:619–629. https://doi.org/10.1139/g10-039
Navabi ZK, Stead KE, Pires JC, Xiong Z, Sharpe AG, Parkin IAP, Rahman MH, Good AG (2011) Analysis of B-Genome chromosome introgression in interspecific hybrids of Brassica napus × B. carinata. Genetics 187:659–673. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.110.124925
Nei M, Li WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endouncleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci 76:5269–5273
Rahman H, Bennett RA, Séguin-Swartz G (2015) Broadening genetic diversity in Brassica napus canola: development of canola-quality spring B. napus from B. napus × B oleracea var. alboglabra interspecific crosses. Can J Plant Sci 95:29–41. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJPS-2014-017
Röbbelen G (1960) Beitrage zur analyse des Brassica-genoms. Chromosoma 11:205–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328652
Rohlf FJ (1997) NTSYS-pc 2.1. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Exeter Software, Setauket
Tan C, Cui C, Xiang Y, Ge X, Li Z (2017) Development of Brassica oleracea-nigra monosomic alien addition lines: genotypic, cytological and morphological analyses. Theor Appl Genet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-017-2971-8
Tang X, Shi D, Xu J, Li Y, Li W, Ren Z, Fu T (2014) Molecular cytogenetic characteristics of a translocation line between common wheat and Thinopyrum intermedium with resistance to powdery mildew. Euphytica 197:201–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-013-1059-z
Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/23.21.4407
Waara S, Glimelius K (1995) The potential of somatic hybridization in crop breeding. Euphytica 85:217–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023951
Wang YP, Snowdon RJ, Rudloff E, Wehling P, Friedt W, Sonntag K (2004) Cytogenetic characterization and fae1 gene variation in progenies from asymmetric somatic hybrids between Brassica napus and Crambe abyssinica. Genome 47:724–731. https://doi.org/10.1139/g04-024
Warude D, Chavan P, Joshi K, Patwardhan B (2003) DNA isolation from fresh, dry plant samples with highly acidic tissue extracts. Plant Mol Biol Rep 21:467. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02772600
Wen J, Tu J, Li Z, Fu T, Ma C, Shen J (2008) Improving ovary and embryo culture techniques for efficient resynthesis of Brassica napus from reciprocal crosses between yellow-seeded diploids B. rapa and B. oleracea. Euphytica 162:81–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9566-4
Woods DL, Capcara JJ, Downey RK (1991) The potential of mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Coss) as an edible oil crop on the Canadian Prairies. Can J Plant Sci 71:195–198. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps91-025
Xie S, Khan N, Ramanna MS, Niu L, Marasek-Ciolakowska A, Arens P, van Tuyl JM (2010) An assessment of chromosomal rearrangements in neopolyploids of lilium hybrids. Genome 53:439–446. https://doi.org/10.1139/g10-018
Yamashita K, Takatori Y, Tashiro Y (2005) Chromosomal location of a pollen fertility-restoring gene, Rf, for CMS in Japanese bunching onion (Allium fistulosum L.) possessing the cytoplasm of A. galanthum Kar. et Kir. revealed by genomic in situ hybridization. Theor Appl Genet 111:15–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-1941-8
Yao XC, Ge XH, Chen JP, Li ZY (2010) Intra- and intergenomic relationships in interspecific hybrids between Brassica (B. rapa, B. napus) and a wild species B. maurorum as revealed by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Euphytica 173:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0131-1
Younis A, Ramzan F, Hwang YJ, Lim KB (2015) FISH and GISH: molecular cytogenetic tools and their applications in ornamental plants. Plant Cell Rep 34:1477–1488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-015-1828-3
Zhong XB, Hans de Jong JH, Zabel P (1996) Preparation of tomato meiotic pachytene and mitotic metaphase chromosomes suitable for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Chromosome Res 4:24–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02254940
Zhou J, Yang Z, Li G, Liu C, Tang Z, Zhang Y, Ren Z (2010) Diversified chromosomal distribution of tandemly repeated sequences revealed evolutionary trends in secale (Poaceae). Plant Syst Evol 287:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0288-z
Zhu JS, Struss D, Röbbelen G (1993) Studies on resistance to Phoma lingam in Brassies napus-Brassica nigra addition lines. Plant Breed 111:192–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1993.tb00629.x
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Dr. Bin Zhu for his critical reading of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was financially supported by funds from the National Key Research and Development Plan of China (2016YFD0100202), the Key Laboratory of Spring Rape Genetic Improvement of Qinghai Province (2017-ZJ-Y09) and the Industry Technology Systems for Rapeseed in China (CARS-13).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZZ and DD designed and managed this study. CT and YN performed the experiments and analyzed the data. CT wrote the manuscript. QY designed and executed the artificial synthesis of B. rapa.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work. There are no professional or other personal interests of any nature in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled, “Production and genetic analyses of novel Brassica rapa L. introgressions from interspecific crosses with Brassica juncea L. landraces native to the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau”.
Ethical approval
This article does not describe any studies involving human participants or animals.
Additional information
Changcai Teng and Yan Niu are equally contributed to the work and should be regarded as co-first authors.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teng, C., Niu, Y., Du, D. et al. Production and genetic analyses of novel Brassica rapa L. introgressions from interspecific crosses with Brassica juncea L. landraces native to the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Euphytica 214, 23 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-018-2108-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-018-2108-4