Abstract
Agricultural soils receive large amounts of anthropogenic nitrogen (N), which directly and indirectly affect soil organic matter (SOM) stocks and CO2 fluxes. However, our current understanding of mechanisms on how N fertilization affects SOM pools of various ages and turnover remains poor. The δ13C values of SOM after wheat (C3)-maize (C4) vegetation change were used to calculate the contribution of C4-derived rhizodeposited C (rhizo-C) and C3-derived SOM pools, i.e., rhizo-C and SOM. Soil (Ap from Haplic Luvisol) sampled from maize rhizosphere was incubated over 56 days with increasing N fertilization (four levels up to 300 kg N ha−1), and CO2 efflux and its δ13C were measured. Nitrogen fertilization decreased CO2 efflux by 27–42% as compared to unfertilized soil. This CO2 decrease was mainly caused by the retardation of SOM (C3) mineralization. Microbial availability of rhizo-C (released by maize roots within 4 weeks) was about 10 times higher than that of SOM (older than 4 weeks). Microbial biomass and dissolved organic C remained at the same level with increasing N. However, N fertilization increased the relative contribution of rhizo-C to microbial biomass by two to five times and to CO2 for about two times. This increased contribution of rhizo-C reflects strongly accelerated microbial biomass turnover by N addition. The decomposition rate of rhizo-C was 3.7 times faster than that of SOM, and it increased additionally by 6.5 times under 300 kg N ha−1 N fertilization. This is the first report estimating the turnover and incorporation of very recent rhizo-C (4 weeks old) into soil C pools and shows that the turnover of rhizo-C was much faster than that of SOM. We conclude that the contribution of rhizo-C to CO2 and to microbial biomass is highly dependent on N fertilization. Despite acceleration of rhizo-C turnover, the increased N fertilization facilitates C sequestration by decreasing SOM decomposition.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Soil organic matter (SOM) increases soil fertility, sustainability, and crop yield in agricultural ecosystems (Lal 2006). Because SOM contains a large amount of carbon (C), even small changes in SOM storage can affect crop yield, CO2 release in the atmosphere, and C budget (Lal 2006; Fischlin et al. 2007). Nitrogen (N) fertilization has been widely used as a common agricultural management strategy to increase crop yield. It also directly and indirectly affects the C input, SOM stocks, and CO2 emissions (Mulvaney et al. 2009). The annual input of anthropogenically derived N is about 30–50% greater than that from natural sources and is tenfold greater than 100 years ago (Galloway et al. 2008; Schlesinger 2009). Understanding how these additional N inputs affect terrestrial ecosystems is becoming increasingly important within the context of the global C budget, especially in agricultural ecosystems (Liu and Greaver 2010).
Nitrogen fertilization has divergent effects on soil CO2 emissions, including increased (Cleveland and Townsend 2006), decreased (Burton et al. 2004), or unchanged levels (González Polo et al. 2015). Nitrogen can influence C turnover through direct effects on soil properties (e.g., N availability, pH), enzyme activity, microbial community composition, and microbial biomass (Ramirez et al. 2012; Zang et al. 2016). Nitrogen fertilizer also can either stimulate plant growth, increasing C inputs into soil (Liang et al. 2012), or even decrease root biomass and C inputs (Grulke et al. 1998), thus indirectly influencing C cycling in soil. N fertilizer can either reduce the decline in SOM or even cause a small increase of SOM in long term (Ladha et al. 2011). In soils with very low N availability, N inputs may stimulate microbial activity to mine nutrients from SOM, thereby accelerating SOM decomposition—a positive priming effect (PE). Conversely, in high N availability soils, microbes will switch from decomposing SOM to utilizing the external N and newly rhizodeposited C (rhizo-C) (Dijkstra et al. 2013). Generally, the amount and frequency of N addition are strongly related to changes in microbial biomass and soil CO2 emission (Treseder 2008; Ramirez et al. 2012).
The SOM stability depends on various pools with different physico-chemical properties and turnover times (von Lützow et al. 2007; Blagodatskaya et al. 2011). Young C pools consist mainly of rhizodeposition as well as breakdown plant residues of small size and fast turnover rates (Pausch and Kuzyakov 2012; Lin et al. 2015). The turnover of young C is about six to seven times faster than that of old C (Blagodatskaya et al. 2011; Pausch and Kuzyakov 2012), which is presumably due to its lower stabilization on clay minerals, low molecular weight, and high solubility in water (Zang et al. 2015). The age of recent C varies between years and decades in various studies (Pausch and Kuzyakov 2012; Lin et al. 2015; Dou et al. 2016). Such aged C is already microbially processed and turned over many times within soil pools. To our knowledge, no study has estimated the turnover of very recent C, which is deposited within a few days or a week. This knowledge gap calls for gaining experimental evidence of the N fertilization effect on such very recently deposited C.
The discrimination of 13C occurs during CO2 assimilation of C3 and C4 plants results in natural differences in the δ13C signature and enables separating young from old C pools (Balesdent and Mariotti 1996; Werth and Kuzyakov 2008). Therefore, when C3 vegetation changes to C4, old (C3-derived) and young (C4-derivered) SOM can be partitioned based on their δ13C signature. N fertilization is predicted to increase the decomposition rate of labile C pools and decreases the decomposition rate of more recalcitrant pools (Riggs et al. 2015). Remarkably, the size of recent C pools in this study was very small (less than 2% of SOC) because of only 4-week maize cropping. Therefore, we assume that the decreased decomposition rate of old C will be more pronounced than the increased decomposition of recent C after N fertilization.
The objective of this study was to determine the effects of N fertilization on the decomposition of rhizo-C (here derived from C4 maize) and SOM pools (here derived from original C3 wheat) in an agricultural soil using 13C natural abundance after a C3-C4 vegetation change. Thus, we used the soil from wheat (C3 soil) and from maize rhizosphere (C3-C4 soil) to examine the effects of increasing N fertilization on CO2 emissions, microbial biomass, and dissolved organic matter (DOM) over a 56-day incubation. The C3 to C4 vegetation change approach was also used to quantify the contribution of rhizo-C (C4-derived) and SOM (C3-derived) sources to CO2 emission, microbial biomass, and DOM. Our hypotheses were (1) rhizo-C is strongly affected by N fertilization due to its very fast turnover; (2) N fertilization will reduce CO2 efflux from soil because of the higher N availability and less microbial demand for mining SOM for N; therefore, N fertilization will suppress the mineralization of SOM pools; and (3) the relative availability of rhizo-C will increase with N availability.
Materials and methods
Soil sampling and preparation
Soil samples were collected from the upper layer (0–10 cm) of the Ap horizon of a wheat field in northwest Göttingen, Germany (51° 33′ 36.8″ N, 9° 53′ 46.9″ E). The soil is a Haplic Luvisol whose organic carbon originates from the permanent C3 vegetation. The basic soil characteristics were pH (H2O) 6.6, organic C 11.7 g C kg−1, total N 1.2 g N kg−1, NO3 −830 μg N g−1, and available P 160 μg P g−1 (Zang et al. 2016). The soil was air-dried, homogenized, and sieved (<2 mm). Fine roots and other plant residues were carefully removed manually.
The soil was placed into pots and kept at a very thin soil layer (about 5 cm). The maize (C4) and wheat (C3) seeds were germinated on wet filter paper in Petri dishes for 3 days, and sufficient seedlings were transferred to each pot. The plants were grown in a greenhouse at room temperature. During plant growth, artificial lighting was used and maintained at 100 μmol m−2 s−1 for 14 h day−1; soil moisture was kept at 50–60% of the available field capacity. After 4 weeks of growth, all plants and fine roots were carefully removed from the soil, and then, the soil was mixed thoroughly. Because the maize or wheat roots completely occupied the entire pots, the two soils were regarded as the wheat (C3) or maize (C3-C4) rhizosphere and used for the subsequent incubation. Soil (C3) under wheat without C3-C4 vegetation change was used as a reference to estimate the δ13C shifts between the pools caused by isotopic fractionation. We define rhizo-C and SOM as newly deposited C from C4 maize and SOM pools derived from original C3 wheat, respectively.
Experimental design and soil incubation
Thirty grams (oven-dried weight) of the rhizosphere soil (C3 or C3-C4 rhizosphere) was weighed into a 100-mL jar. The soil was adjusted to 50% of the water-holding capacity (WHC) and pre-incubated for 3 days at 20 °C. After pre-incubation, the increasing levels of NH4Cl solution (low N 52, medium N 104, high N 208 μg N g−1 soil) and distilled water (control) were applied using a syringe to reach a final soil moisture content of 60% of WHC. Medium N input to the soil was equivalent to 150 kg N ha−1, which is the conventional amount of mineral N fertilizer application in northern Germany. Thus, the increasing N addition was 0, 75, 150, and 300 kg N ha−1 for the control, low, medium, and high N treatment, respectively. Then, the jars were incubated in the dark at 20 °C for 56 days. During the incubation, the CO2 evolved from the soils was trapped by 3 mL 1.0 M NaOH solution in small tubes that were exchanged at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days and then weekly. In addition, three jars for each treatment were destructively sampled at 3, 7, 21, 40, and 56 days to measure microbial biomass, DOM, and for δ13C analyses.
CO2 emission, microbial biomass, and DOM
The concentration of CO2 trapped in the NaOH solution was measured by titration, and 0.5 mL solution was titrated with 0.1 M HCl against phenolphthalein after addition of 0.5 M BaCl2 solution. Microbial biomass was determined by the chloroform extraction method (Vance et al. 1987; Wu et al. 1990). After destructive sampling, the soil was carefully mixed and 5 g soil was directly extracted using 20 mL of 0.05 M K2SO4. Another 5 g soil was fumigated with chloroform for 24 h and extracted in the same manner. The extracts were analyzed for the total C concentration using a 2100 TOC/TIC analyzer (Analytik Jena, Germany). The extracts of the non-fumigated samples were used to measure DOM. The microbial biomass C (MBC) was calculated based on the difference of K2SO4-extractable C between fumigated and non-fumigated soil samples using the k ec factor 0.45 (Joergensen 1996).
Isotopic analyses
CO2 trapped as Na2CO3 in NaOH was precipitated with 3 mL 1.0 M SrCl2 aqueous solution. The NaOH solution containing the SrCO3 precipitate was centrifuged three times at 1450g for 10 min and washed in between with deionized and degassed water to remove NaOH and to reach a pH of 7. After washing, the SrCO3 was dried at 105 °C (Blagodatskaya et al. 2011). The δ13C of the SrCO3 was analyzed at the Center for Stable Isotope Research and Analysis (KOSI) of the University of Gottingen with an Elemental Analyzer (Eurovector) coupled to an IRMS (Delta Plus XL IRMS, Thermo Finnigan MAT, Bremen, Germany). Two acetanilide standards were measured every 12 samples. For the DOM and microbial biomass pools, the K2SO4-extracted solution was freeze-dried (Beta 1–8 LSCplus, Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen GmbH, Harz, Germany) and analyzed using IRMS.
Calculation and statistics
Priming effect
Priming effects were calculated according to the following equation:
where [CO2]treatment and [CO2]control represent the cumulative CO2 respiration in N amendment treatments and control, respectively.
Contribution of rhizo-C to total CO2 emission, microbial biomass, and DOM
A mass balance equation (Balesdent and Mariotti 1996) was used to determine the δ13C value of total microbial biomass (δ13CMB):
where δ13Cf and Cf are the δ13C values and amount of C in fumigated samples, respectively, and δ13Cnf and Cnf are the δ13C values and amount of C in non-fumigated samples, respectively.
The proportional contributions of the C3 (fC3) and the C4 (fC4) source to total microbial biomass or CO2 were calculated as follows (Amelung et al. 2008):
where δ13Ct is the δ13C value of the C pool under C3-C4 mixed sources and δ13C3 is the δ13C value of the corresponding C pool in reference soil (C3 soil). The δ13C4 was calculated based on the δ13C value of maize (mean of root, shoot, and leaves) and corrected for isotopic fractionation during humification by subtracting the differences between δ13C3 of C3 vegetation and δ13C3 of SOM of the C3 soil. This approach assumes equal isotopic fractionation by humification of C3 and C4 plants (Schneckenberger and Kuzyakov 2007).
Microbial biomass derived from recent rhizo-C (C4-MB) and SOM (C3-MB) was calculated as follows:
where CMB is the total amount of SOM-derived C in microbial biomass.
Relative contribution of rhizo-C
The relative contributions of rhizo-C to CO2 emission, microbial biomass, and DOM were estimated based on the contribution of rhizo-C to SOM, CO2, microbial biomass, and DOM. In order to evaluate the availability of rhizo-C that entered the soil within 4 weeks and to compare it with the availability of SOM that had entered the soil before maize cropping, the ratios of C4- to C3-derived C in CO2, microbial biomass, and DOM were related to that in SOM. The respective C4/C3 ratios were calculated using linear two-source isotopic mixing models (Phillips and Gregg 2001).
where fC4 (pool) is the contributions of the C4 source to total CO2, microbial biomass, or DOM and fC4 (SOM) is the contribution of the C4 source to total SOM.
Mean residence time of rhizo-C and SOM
The cumulative C mineralization data for rhizo-C and SOM were fitted individually to the following first-order one C-pool model (Kuzyakov 2011):
where C(t) is the cumulative CO2 emission from rhizo-C and SOM during the 56-day incubation, C is the initial size of the C pools, and k is the decomposition rate. Mean residence time (MRT) was calculated as reciprocal to decomposition rates.
Statistics
The significant differences of cumulative CO2, microbial biomass, and DOM under N fertilization are shown as least significance difference (LSD) (5%) estimated by one-way ANOVA. The values presented in the figures and tables are given as means ± standard errors (SEs).
Results
The δ13C dynamics in CO2 and microbial biomass during incubation
The growth of maize (C4) on a C3 soil increased the δ13C in all soil C pools (Fig. 1). The increase was much stronger in CO2 (1.6–4.6‰) and microbial biomass (3.0–5.0‰) than in SOM (0.3‰), indicating fast processing of rhizo-C by microorganisms. The δ13C of CO2 and microbial biomass in C3-C4 soil varied from −22 to −26‰. The δ13C of microbial biomass decreased from −22.2 to −24.2‰ during the 56-day incubation and that of CO2 decreased from −22.6 to −25.5‰ (Fig. 1). The δ13C of CO2 and microbial biomass increased with N fertilization, showing the higher contribution of rhizo-C in the microbial pool with N fertilization. The δ13C of the DOM pool varied within a narrow range of −26.1 to −27.3‰ and was almost unaffected by N fertilization (Fig. 1). The δ13C of CO2 and microbial biomass all decreased with time, which shows reduced utilization of exudates within 56 days. The δ13C of DOM pool, however, was always similar to that of SOM and only showed small changes over time. Overall, N fertilization increased the δ13C of CO2 and microbial biomass and smoothed the time effect.
Soil respiration, microbial biomass, extractable C, and N
N fertilization decreased CO2 emissions by 27–42% compared to the control without N (298 μg C g−1; Fig. S1). The cumulative PE during 56 days was always negative and became more strongly negative with increasing N fertilization. N addition had no effects on microbial biomass and DOM over the 56 days (P < 0.05; Fig. S1). The microbial biomass varied from 68.1 to 96.5 μg C g−1, while DOM decreased by a factor of 2.5 from 48.7 to 18.4 μg C g−1 during incubation. Overall, N fertilization decreased the intensities of C turnover (CO2 release), even though microbial biomass remained nearly constant.
Contribution of rhizo-C to total CO2 emission, microbial biomass, and DOM
Based on the δ13C difference, we calculated the contribution of rhizo-C and SOM to all C pools (Eq. 6). Only 1.8% of SOM were derived from rhizo-C, whereas it was much higher in CO2 (7–28%), microbial biomass (6–22%), and DOM (2–5%). The contribution of rhizo-C to CO2 emission decreased from 16.6–27.6% at day 3 to 6.9–13.2% at day 56 of incubation across all treatment. N fertilization increased the contribution of rhizo-C to CO2 emission, which varied from 37 to 91% compared to 0 N (Fig. 2c). N fertilization decreased the SOM incorporation into CO2 but did not affect rhizo-C; accordingly, the rhizo-C contribution to CO2 increased (P < 0.05). However, N fertilization increased the rhizo-C and decreased the SOM to microbial biomass; this caused an increase in rhizo-C contribution (P < 0.05; Fig. 3). The contribution of rhizo-C to DOM slightly decreased from 3–5 to 2–3% during incubation and was also slightly decreased by N addition (Fig. 3). Rhizo-C contributed only a small proportion (<6%) to DOM, which was about ten times smaller than that in microbial biomass and CO2. Overall, N fertilization increased the contribution of rhizo-C to CO2 emission and microbial biomass, and both of them latter decreased within 2 months. The DOM pool was not sensitive to N fertilization.
Relative contribution of rhizo-C to CO2 emission, microbial biomass, and DOM
The relative contribution of rhizo-C—estimated by relating the contribution of rhizo-C to CO2 (microbial biomass or DOM) to its contribution to SOM (Eq. 8)—demonstrated relative incorporation of rhizo-C into pools and fluxes. The ratio of C4 to C3 was 0.02 in SOM, 0.06 in DOM, 0.07 in microbial biomass, and 0.18 in CO2 (Fig. 4). Thus, the relative contribution of rhizo-C increased from 3 (0.06 / 0.02 = 3) and 4 (0.08 / 0.02 = 4) to 10 (0.18 / 0.02 = 10) for DOM, microbial biomass, and CO2, respectively (Fig. 4). We designate this parameter as a “relative contribution of rhizo-C,” which helps to compare the changes in contribution of rhizo-C from DOM, microbial biomass, and CO2 to SOM. With N fertilization, the relative contribution of rhizo-C to microbial biomass increased by five times (from 3.7 to 19.8) at the early stage and by two times (from 4.8 to 8.9) at the late stage (Fig. 4). Similarly, the relative contribution of rhizo-C to CO2 was increased by two times with N fertilization, from 10.0 to 18.4 at the early stage and from 3.2 to 7.2 at the late stage. The relative contribution of CO2 and microbial biomass both decreased with time (Fig. 4, bottom). Overall, the fractions of rhizo-C in CO2, microbial biomass, and DOM all decreased with time, reflecting the C4-derived C consumption during incubation. The response of rhizo-C to N fertilization was stronger for microbial biomass and CO2 than for the DOM pool.
Discussion
Dynamics of isotopic composition of soil C pools
The 13C enrichment of CO2 (1.6–6.9‰) and microbial biomass (3.0–6.8‰) was comparable with the 3.6–5‰ 13C enrichment found for CO2 in Inceptisol using 13C natural abundance methods (Formánek and Ambus 2004). This indicates that mainly young pools (13C–enriched, including sugars, starch, cellulose) were used for mineralization. The 13C fractionation between SOM as a substrate and CO2 respired by microorganisms is the sum of the 13C fractionation during microbial uptake of the substances and during respiration. This 13C enrichment partly reflects the preferential use of certain organic compounds during metabolism (Werth and Kuzyakov 2010), and the 13C enrichment is due to new maize rhizodeposition (C4 signature). These low molecular weight organics deposited by maize roots such as amino acids and sugars can be very rapidly taken up by microorganisms, within several minutes (Fischer et al. 2010). The preferential use of this 13C-enriched SOM fraction (rhizo-C) leads to a more rapid loss of 13C than 12C during decomposition, causing 13C depletion in the remaining SOM. Hence, microbial biomass was 13C enriched because of preferential utilization of rhizodeposits (C4), but respired CO2 was depleted in 13C by −0.9‰ on average during incubation (yet still remaining enriched compared to SOM) (Fig. 1). This was comparable with the −0.1 to −7.4‰ depletion in microbial biomass during 30 or 40 days of incubation elsewhere (Blagodatskaya et al. 2011).
The δ13C of CO2 and microbial biomass in the C3-C4 soil became increasingly negative with incubation time, demonstrating a depletion of more readily available rhizo-C compared to C3-derived organics. CO2 produced at the beginning mainly originated from those compounds with fast decomposition rates, whereas compounds with lower decomposition rates contributed more to the CO2 over time (Werth and Kuzyakov 2008; Pausch and Kuzyakov 2012). The δ13C of CO2 and of microbial biomass increased with N fertilization (Fig. 1), because fertilization induced relatively more rhizo-C incorporated into the C cycle.
The δ13C increase caused by C4 rhizodeposition was pronounced in microbial biomass and CO2, while it was rather weak for the DOM (Fig. 1). Even with increasing N fertilization, the δ13C values of DOM remained almost stable during incubation. This can be explained as the quick selective microbial uptake of available substrates from DOM originating from root exudates and plant residues (Esperschütz et al. 2009). Thus, rhizo-C is rapidly incorporated into microbial biomass (see the δ13C shift in Fig. 1) (Bol et al. 2009). Similarly, root exudates were quickly taken up by microorganisms during rice growth, while DOM remained unchanged (Yuan et al. 2016). The remaining soluble C originating from SOM (C3-derived) was 13C depleted compared to microbial biomass. A similar higher enrichment of microbial biomass compared to the soluble C pool has been observed in rhizosphere soil (Esperschütz et al. 2009). This indicates that the higher microbial biomass and activities in the rhizosphere lead to rapid consumption of rhizo-C. Accordingly, most of the DOM originated from native SOM and not from the rhizodeposits, which is reflected by similar δ13C values for DOM and SOM (Fig. 1).
Priming effect and contribution of rhizo-C to soil C pools
N fertilization strongly decreased (by 27–42%) the CO2 emissions and induced pronounced negative PE in the rhizosphere soil (Fig. S1). These findings correspond to the 8–15% decrease in CO2 emissions after N fertilization elsewhere (Janssens et al. 2010; Liu and Greaver 2010). Previous studies also found that mineral N additions reduced microbial biomass by 15–20% and decreased soil CO2 emissions (Treseder 2008; Liu and Greaver 2010; Ramirez et al. 2012). In our study, however, microbial biomass was not affected by N addition (P < 0.05; Fig. S1). This probably reflects sufficient labile C (e.g., exudates) that is readily available for microorganisms in the rhizosphere (Kuzyakov et al. 2007). Thus, the microbial biomass in the rhizosphere remained constant under N fertilization, in contrast to studies with bulk soil.
A high contribution of rhizo-C to CO2 and to microbial biomass, and the moderate contribution to DOM, was in contrast to the much lower fraction of rhizo-C in SOM (Figs. 2 and 3). These results again illustrate the very rapid uptake of easily available rhizo-C by microorganisms (Bol et al. 2009; Fischer and Kuzyakov 2010). A higher contribution of recent C to CO2 (40–79%) and to microbial biomass (56–82%) and a lower contribution to SOM and to DOM (29–32%) were already detected elsewhere (Pausch and Kuzyakov 2012; Luo et al. 2017). Even after 37 years of maize cropping, the contribution of C4-derived C accounted for only 15% of total SOM but for about 58% of CO2 (Flessa et al. 2000). Despite a slow asymptotic increase of C4-C in the SOM, its portion in the CO2 increased much faster (Kuzyakov 2011). This means that after a short period (4 weeks) of C4 rhizodeposition, despite the low portion of C4-C to SOM, its contribution to the CO2 efflux can amount to more than 20% (Fig. 5) and therefore cannot be ignored.
N fertilization retarded the decomposition of old and stable SOM but did not affect newly deposited C (P < 0.05; Fig. 2). This confirmed the hypothesis 2. Microorganisms reduce the mining of recalcitrant SOM (lower N requirements) and shift towards labile C under N fertilization (Chen et al. 2014; Vogel et al. 2015). Similarly, N addition stimulates enzymes that degrade labile C and inhibits enzyme activities that contribute to decomposing recalcitrant C (Hobbie et al. 2012; Riggs et al. 2015). Thus, the retardation mechanism of stabile SOM decomposition under N fertilization is explained by intensive microbial metabolism of the easily available C of rhizodeposits when N is not limited. The decreased decomposition of SOM can also be interpreted as preferential substrate use, which has already been hypothesized as the reason for a suppressed decomposition of native SOM under elevated atmospheric CO2 (Cheng 1999; Cardon et al. 2001). According to one C-pool model, N fertilization increased the MRT of SOM but did not affect the MRT of rhizo-C (Table 1). The MRT in the current study was shorter than the MRT for both recent C (21 days) and old C (64 days) in 12 years after C3-C4 vegetation change (Blagodatskaya et al. 2011). The shorter MRT reflects the fact that the decomposition rate of very recent (4 weeks) rhizo-C was two times faster than that of moderately recent C (several years old) (Blagodatskaya et al. 2011), the latter having already been microbially processed and turned over many times within soil C pools. The decomposition rate of rhizo-C was 3.7 times faster than SOM, and it increased 6.5 times under high N fertilization. Moreover, the qCO2 fall with N fertilization in both rhizo-C (by three times) and SOM (by two times) (Table 2). The qCO2 is a function of substrate availability, microbial community structure (e.g., fungal-to-bacterial ratio), maintenance requirements, and carbon use efficiency (CUE) (Insam and Haselwandter 1989; Wardle and Ghani 1995). The three former parameters, however, are assumed to remain static under microbial biomass steady-state conditions, when the qCO2 is mainly dependent on the CUE. As no changes in microbial biomass were observed between days 21 and 40, the microbial metabolism efficiency estimated by specific respiration (qCO2) may reflect the physiological characteristics (Blagodatskaya et al. 2014). Thus, we can assume that N fertilization increased microbial CUE in both rhizo-C and SOM based on the decreased qCO2. N fertilization reduces the cumulative CO2 emission due to the higher efficiency of microbial C reutilization as compared with N-limited conditions (Blagodatsky et al. 1998). Thus, we demonstrated the applicability of both mechanisms, which are preferential substrate utilization and increased CUE under N fertilization (Figs. 1 and 4).
N addition had no effects on total microbial biomass and DOM over 56 days (P < 0.05; Fig. S1). Remarkably, N fertilization increased recent labile C incorporated into microbial biomass, which may be due to the increased dominance of fast-growing microorganisms benefiting from labile C supported by N input (Fontaine et al. 2003). Microorganisms reduced the decomposition of recalcitrant C because their N requirements were met by N fertilization (Fig. 3). The more readily available portion of C4-derived DOM was intensively involved in microbial metabolism (Pelz et al. 2005). Therefore, the small proportion of C4-derived DOM (decreasing from 5 to 2% during incubation) indicated microbial metabolic activity and rapid rhizo-C decomposition (Fig. 3). The decreased rhizo-C in microbial biomass and DOM during the incubation also confirmed the fast turnover of newly deposited C versus SOM. Overall, N fertilization strongly increased the contribution of rhizo-C to CO2 (37–91%) and microbial biomass (0.6–2.6 times), depending on the duration and the amount of N added (Fig. 5). All these N effects declined with time.
Relative contribution of rhizo-C to soil C pools
The relative contribution of rhizo-C to CO2, microbial biomass, and DOM at the early stage was 10, 4, and 5, respectively (Fig. 4). The relative contribution of this very recent C to microbial biomass and CO2 was much higher here than in other studies, in which the defined “recent C” was already microbially processed and turned over many times within soil pools. For example, the relative contribution of maize-derived C (<1 year) to CO2 flux was about seven times higher than that of SOM stabilized in soil for longer than 1 year (Pausch and Kuzyakov 2012). The turnover rate of recent rhizo-C (<12 years) was 6 and 3.7 times higher than SOM in CO2 and microbial biomass, respectively (Blagodatskaya et al. 2011). After 37 years of maize cropping, the relative contribution of recent C was about 4 (Flessa et al. 2000). These decreases in the relative availability of recent C with increasing age reflect the greater stability of C after long-term turnover.
N increased the relative contribution of rhizo-C in microbial biomass (two to five times) and CO2 (two times) but had a minor effect on DOM. This confirmed the hypothesis 3 that the relative availability of rhizo-C will increase with N availability. Inorganic N accelerates the decomposition of soluble carbohydrates but may well have the opposite effect on more recalcitrant organics (Fog 1988). The increased fraction of rhizo-C in CO2 under increasing N fertilization was mainly caused by inhibited native SOM mineralization; at the same time, the increase in microbial biomass was caused by both an increase of rhizo-C and a decrease of SOM incorporation. This is confirmed by the lower qCO2 and higher MRT of rhizo-C under N fertilization (Tables 1 and 2), which means increased turnover and CUE of rhizo-C.
The availability of soil C decreased with time, as shown by the higher relative contribution of rhizo-C to C pools and fluxes at the early versus late stage (Fig. 4). The decrease in the relative contribution of rhizo-C to CO2 and to microbial biomass with time was much stronger than in the DOM pool, possibly because of the very small pool size of DOM, which mainly originated from native SOM. The decrease in the relative contribution of rhizo-C over time mainly reflected the reduction of labile recent C in the soil without a permanent input of fresh C4-C. The decreased rhizo-C in the microbial biomass may show a reutilization of the C4-microbial pool. Nonetheless, according to the decreased rhizo-C in the microbial biomass, the maximum reutilized C4-C (1.6–3.3 μg g−1) was insufficient to have a strong effect on C4-CO2 emissions (Figs. 2 and 3). Overall, the time effect of the relative contribution of rhizo-C to CO2, microbial biomass, and DOM significantly correlated with the recent C pool size and incubation time.
Conclusions
N fertilization increased the δ13C of CO2 and microbial biomass due to preferential utilization of C that was newly deposited from maize roots (13C-enriched) versus SOM (relatively 13C-depleted) sources. N fertilization did not affect microbial biomass (P > 0.05) but decreased the CO2 emissions (27–42%) and caused negative PE —a decrease of SOM decomposition. The negative PE occurred due to higher CUE by microorganisms, as confirmed by the lower qCO2. The contribution of rhizo-C was much higher to the CO2 efflux (17–28%) and to microbial biomass (9–38%) compared to DOM (4–7%) and SOM (2%). This indicates that soluble organics (here originated from maize roots, C4 signature) are preferably used and decomposed by microorganisms as compared to SOM. N fertilization increased the contribution of rhizo-C to CO2 emissions and to microbial biomass, reflecting acceleration of its turnover. The availability of rhizo-C for microorganisms was up to 10 times higher than C older than 4 weeks. N fertilization increased the relative contribution of rhizo-C to microbial biomass by two to five times and to CO2 by about two times. DOM was not sensitive to N because only a very small part was originated from maize rhizodeposits, while the main part originating from SOM was less decomposed under N fertilization. The fraction of rhizo-C in CO2, microbial biomass, and DOM decreased over time, demonstrating a high preference of rhizo-C for microbial utilization compared to C from SOM. The turnover of very recent rhizo-C (within 4 weeks) was 3.7 times faster than that of SOM and increased with N fertilization. We conclude that N fertilization facilitates C sequestration in agricultural soils by decreasing SOM decomposition mainly through an increase in the turnover of newly deposited C and through an improved CUE of rhizo-C.
References
Amelung W, Brodowski S, Sandhage-Hofmann A, Bol R (2008) Combining biomarker with stable isotope analyses for assessing the transformation and turnover of soil organic matter. Adv Agron 100:155–250
Balesdent J, Mariotti A (1996) Measurement of soil organic matter turnover using 13C natural abundance. In: Boutton TW, Yamasaki S (eds) Mass Spectrometry of Soils; Boutton, T.W., Yamasaki, S., Eds.; New York,. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 47–82
Blagodatskaya E, Yuyukina T, Blagodatsky S, Kuzyakov Y (2011) Turnover of soil organic matter and of microbial biomass under C3-C4 vegetation change: consideration of 13C fractionation and preferential substrate utilization. Soil Biol Biochem 43:159–166. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.09.028
Blagodatskaya E, Blagodatsky S, Anderson TH, Kuzyakov Y (2014) Microbial growth and carbon use efficiency in the rhizosphere and root-free soil. PLoS One 9:e93282. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093282
Blagodatsky SA, Yevdokimov IV, Larionova AA, Richter J (1998) Microbial growth in soil and nitrogen turnover: model calibration with laboratory data. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1757–1764. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00029-7
Bol R, Poirier N, Balesdent J, Gleixner G (2009) Molecular turnover time of soil organic matter in particle-size fractions of an arable soil. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 23:2551–2558. doi:10.1002/rcm.4124
Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Crawford JN, Zogg GP, Zak DR (2004) Simulated chronic NO3 − deposition reduces soil respiration in northern hardwood forests. Glob Chang Biol 10:1080–1091. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00737.x
Cardon ZG, Hungate BA, Cambardella CA, Chapin FS, Field CB, Holland EA, Mooney HA (2001) Contrasting effects of elevated CO2 on old and new soil carbon pools. Soil Biol Biochem 33:365–373. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00151-6
Chen R, Senbayram M, Blagodatsky S, Myachina O, Dittert K, Lin X, Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y (2014) Soil C and N availability determine the priming effect: microbial N mining and stoichiometric decomposition theories. Glob Chang Biol 20:2356–2367. doi:10.1111/gcb.12475
Cheng W (1999) Rhizosphere feedbacks in elevated CO2. Tree Physiol 19:313–320. doi:10.1093/treephys/19.4-5.313
Cleveland CC, Townsend AR (2006) Nutrient additions to a tropical rain forest drive substantial soil carbon dioxide losses to the atmosphere. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:10316–10321. doi:10.1073/pnas.0600989103
Dijkstra FA, Carrillo Y, Pendall E, Morgan JA (2013) Rhizosphere priming: a nutrient perspective. Front Microbiol 4:1–8. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00216
Dou X, He P, Cheng X, Zhou W (2016) Long-term fertilization alters chemically-separated soil organic carbon pools: based on stable C isotope analyses. Sci Rep 6:19061. doi:10.1038/srep19061
Esperschütz J, Buegger F, Winkler JB, Munch JC, Schloter M, Gattinger A (2009) Microbial response to exudates in the rhizosphere of young beech trees (Fagus sylvatica L.) after dormancy. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1976–1985. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.07.002
Fischer H, Kuzyakov Y (2010) Sorption, microbial uptake and decomposition of acetate in soil: transformations revealed by position-specific 14C labeling. Soil Biol Biochem 42:186–192. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.015
Fischer H, Ingwersen J, Kuzyakov Y (2010) Microbial uptake of low-molecular-weight organic substances out-competes sorption in soil. Eur J Soil Sci 61:504–513. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01244.x
Fischlin A, Midgley GF, Price JT (2007) Ecosystems, their properties, goods and services. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 211–272
Flessa H, Ludwig B, Heil B, Merbach W (2000) The origin of soil organic C, dissolved organic C and respiration in a long-term maize experiment in Halle, Germany, determined by 13C natural abundance. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 163:157–163. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2624(200004)163:2<157::AID-JPLN157>3.0.CO;2-9
Fog K (1988) The effect of added nitrogen on the rate of decomposition of organic matter. Biol Rev 63:433–462. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1988.tb00725.x
Fontaine S, Mariotti A, Abbadie L (2003) The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition? Soil Biol Biochem 35:837–843. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00123-8
Formánek P, Ambus P (2004) Assessing the use of δ13C natural abundance in separation of root and microbial respiration in a Danish beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forest. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 18:897–902. doi:10.1002/rcm.1424
Galloway JN, Townsend AR, Erisman JW, Bekunda M, Cai Z, Freney JR, Martinelli LA, Seitzinger SP, Sutton MA (2008) Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320:889–892. doi:10.1126/science.1136674
González Polo M, Kowaljow E, Castán E, Sauzet O, Mazzarino MJ (2015) Persistent effect of organic matter pulse on a sandy soil of semiarid Patagonia. Biol Fertil Soils 51:241–249. doi:10.1007/s00374-014-0961-4
Grulke NE, Andersen CP, Fenn ME, Miller PR (1998) Ozone exposure and nitrogen deposition lowers root biomass of ponderosa pine in the San Bernardino Mountains, California. Environ Pollut 103:63–73. doi:10.1016/S0269-7491(98)00130-4
Hobbie SE, Eddy WC, Buyarski CR, Adair EC, Ogdahl ML, Weisenhorn P (2012) Response of decomposing litter and its microbial community to multiple forms of nitrogen enrichment. Ecol Monogr 82:389–405. doi:10.1890/11-1600.1
Insam H, Haselwandter K (1989) Metabolic quotient of the soil microflora in relation to plant succession. Oecologia 79:174–178. doi:10.1007/BF00388474
Janssens IA, Dieleman W, Luyssaert S, Subke JA, Reichstein M, Ceulemans R, Ciais P, Dolman AJ, Grace J, Matteucci G, Papale D (2010) Reduction of forest soil respiration in response to nitrogen deposition. Nat Geosci 3:315–322. doi:10.1038/ngeo844
Joergensen RG (1996) The fumigation-extraction method to estimate soil microbial biomass: calibration of the k EC value. Soil Biol Biochem 28:25–31. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(95)00102-6
Kuzyakov Y (2011) How to link soil C pools with CO2 fluxes? Biogeosciences 8:1523–1537. doi:10.5194/bg-8-1523-2011
Kuzyakov Y, Hill PW, Jones DL (2007) Root exudate components change litter decomposition in a simulated rhizosphere depending on temperature. Plant Soil 290:293–305. doi:10.1007/s11104-006-9162-8
Ladha JK, Reddy CK, Padre AT, van Kessel C (2011) Role of nitrogen fertilization in sustaining organic matter in cultivated soils. J Environ Qual 40:1756–1766. doi:10.2134/jeq2011.0064
Lal R (2006) Enhancing crop yields in the developing countries through restoration of the soil organic carbon pool in agricultural lands. L Degrad Dev 17:197–209. doi:10.1002/ldr.696
Liang Q, Chen H, Gong Y, Fan M, Yang H, Lal R, Kuzyakov Y (2012) Effects of 15 years of manure and inorganic fertilizers on soil organic carbon fractions in a wheat-maize system in the North China Plain. Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems 92:21–33. doi:10.1007/s10705-011-9469-6
Lin J, Zhu B, Cheng W (2015) Decadally cycling soil carbon is more sensitive to warming than faster-cycling soil carbon. Glob Chang Biol 21:4602–4612. doi:10.1111/gcb.13071
Liu L, Greaver TL (2010) A global perspective on belowground carbon dynamics under nitrogen enrichment. Ecol Lett 13:819–828. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01482.x
Luo Y, Zang H, Yu Z, Chen Z, Gunina A, Kuzyakov Y, Xu J, Zhang K, Brookes PC (2017) Priming effects in biochar enriched soils using a three-source-partitioning approach: 14C labelling and 13C natural abundance. Soil Biol Biochem 106:28–35. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.12.006
von Lützow M, Kögel-Knabner I, Ekschmitt K, Flessa H, Guggenberger G, Matzner E, Marschner B (2007) SOM fractionation methods: relevance to functional pools and to stabilization mechanisms. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2183–2207. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.007
Mulvaney RL, Khan SA, Ellsworth TR (2009) Synthetic nitrogen fertilizers deplete soil nitrogen: a global dilemma for sustainable cereal production. J Environ Qual 38:2295. doi:10.2134/jeq2008.0527
Pausch J, Kuzyakov Y (2012) Soil organic carbon decomposition from recently added and older sources estimated by δ13C values of CO2 and organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 55:40–47. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.06.007
Pelz O, Abraham WR, Saurer M, Siegwolf R, Zeyer J (2005) Microbial assimilation of plant-derived carbon in soil traced by isotope analysis. Biol Fertil Soils 41:153–162. doi:10.1007/s00374-004-0826-3
Phillips DL, Gregg JW (2001) Erratum: uncertainty in source partitioning using stable isotopes (Oecologia (2001) 127:2 (171–179)). Oecologia 128:304. doi: 10.1007/s004420100723
Ramirez KS, Craine JM, Fierer N (2012) Consistent effects of nitrogen amendments on soil microbial communities and processes across biomes. Glob Chang Biol 18:1918–1927. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02639.x
Riggs CE, Hobbie SE, Bach EM, Hofmockel KS, Kazanski CE (2015) Nitrogen addition changes grassland soil organic matter decomposition. Biogeochemistry 125:203–219. doi:10.1007/s10533-015-0123-2
Schlesinger WH (2009) On the fate of anthropogenic nitrogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:203–208. doi:10.1073/pnas.0810193105
Schneckenberger K, Kuzyakov Y (2007) Carbon sequestration under Miscanthus in sandy and loamy soils estimated by natural 13C abundance. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 170:538–542. doi:10.1002/jpln.200625111
Treseder KK (2008) Nitrogen additions and microbial biomass: a meta-analysis of ecosystem studies. Ecol Lett 11:1111–1120. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01230.x
Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6
Vogel C, Heister K, Buegger F, Tanuwidjaja I, Haug S, Schloter M, Kögel-Knabner I (2015) Clay mineral composition modifies decomposition and sequestration of organic carbon and nitrogen in fine soil fractions. Biol Fertil Soils 51:427–442. doi:10.1007/s00374-014-0987-7
Wardle DA, Ghani A (1995) A critique of the microbial metabolic quotient (qCO2) as a bioindicator of disturbance and ecosystem development. Soil Biol Biochem 27:1601–1610. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(95)00093-T
Werth M, Kuzyakov Y (2008) Root-derived carbon in soil respiration and microbial biomass determined by 14C and 13C. Soil Biol Biochem 40:625–637. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.09.022
Werth M, Kuzyakov Y (2010) 13C fractionation at the root-microorganisms-soil interface: a review and outlook for partitioning studies. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1372–1384. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.009
Wu J, Joergensen RG, Pommerening B, Chaussod R, Brookes PC (1990) Measurement of soil microbial biomass C by fumigation-extraction—an automated procedure. Soil Biol Biochem 22:1167–1169. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(90)90046-3
Yuan H, Zhu Z, Liu S, Ge T, Jing H, Li B, Liu Q, Lynn TM, Wu J, Kuzyakov Y (2016) Microbial utilization of rice root exudates: 13C labeling and PLFA composition. Biol Fertil Soils 52:615–627. doi:10.1007/s00374-016-1101-0
Zang H, Yang X, Feng X, Qian X, Hu Y, Ren C, Zeng Z (2015) Rhizodeposition of nitrogen and carbon by mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) and its contribution to intercropped oats (Avena nuda L.) PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121132
Zang H, Wang J, Kuzyakov Y (2016) N fertilization decreases soil organic matter decomposition in the rhizosphere. Appl Soil Ecol 108:47–53. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.07.021
Acknowledgements
We thank the China Scholarship Council for funding to Huadong Zang in Germany. This study was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; KU-1184/13-2) within the Research Unit: Soil Food Webs. EB’s participation was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 14-14-00625). The isotopic analyses were performed at the Kompetenzzentrum Stabile Isotope (KOSI), Goettingen. The authors also would like to thank Karin Schmidt and Anita Kriegel for their laboratory assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Fig. S1
(DOCX 479 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zang, H., Blagodatskaya, E., Wang, J. et al. Nitrogen fertilization increases rhizodeposit incorporation into microbial biomass and reduces soil organic matter losses. Biol Fertil Soils 53, 419–429 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-017-1194-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-017-1194-0