Abstract
Introduction
Root-mediated changes in soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition, termed rhizosphere priming effects (RPE), play crucial roles in the global carbon (C) cycle, but their mechanisms and field relevance remain ambiguous. We hypothesize that nitrogen (N) shortages may intensify SOM decomposition in the rhizosphere because of increase of fine roots and rhizodeposition.
Methods
RPE and their dependence on N-fertilization were studied using a C3-to-C4 vegetation change. N-fertilized and unfertilized soil cores, with and without maize, were incubated in the field for 50 days. Soil CO2 efflux was measured, partitioned for SOM- and root-derived CO2, and RPE was calculated. Plant biomass, microbial biomass C (MBC) and N (MBN), and enzyme activities (β-1,4-glucosidase; N-acetylglucosaminidase; L-leucine aminopeptidase) were analyzed.
Results
Roots enhanced SOM mineralization by 35 % and 126 % with and without N, respectively. This was accompanied by higher specific root-derived CO2 in unfertilized soils. MBC, MBN and enzyme activities increased in planted soils, indicating microbial activation, causing positive RPE. N-fertilization had minor effects on MBC and MBN, but it reduced β-1,4-glucosidase and L-leucine aminopeptidase activities under maize through lower root-exudation. In contrast, N-acetylglucosaminidase activity increased with N-fertilization in planted and unplanted soils.
Conclusions
This study showed the field relevance of RPE and confirmed that, despite higher root biomass, N availability reduces RPE by lowering root and microbial activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Agricultural soils are central with regard to global climate change because they may act either as potential C sinks (Smith et al. 2013) or as net sources of greenhouse gases (Lal 2011; Smith 2012). This makes it important to evaluate and balance the C inputs via living roots (rhizodeposits) and dead plants (litter) versus outputs via SOM decomposition. Altered dynamics of SOM decomposition in the rhizosphere play a significant role in the global C cycle (Coleman et al. 1992). This calls for a better understanding of the SOM dynamics in the rhizosphere in the field. In a meta-analysis, Finzi et al. (2015) showed that microbially mediated SOM decomposition is enhanced in the rhizosphere of various vegetation types and concluded that rhizospheric processes in SOM decomposition and subsequent nutrient release are quantitatively important at the ecosystem level. Thus, along with the importance of soil moisture and temperature for SOM decomposition, increasing recognition is being given to biotic processes in the rhizosphere regulating SOM decomposition (Zhu and Cheng 2012). Besides various processes occurring in the rhizosphere, rhizodeposition is the most important link between plant growth and microbially mediated processes in soils (Pausch et al. 2013a). The availability of easily utilizable C substrates is a key limiting factors for microbial activity in soil, and C availability is a main factor controlling SOM turnover (Fontaine et al. 2007; Paterson and Sim 2013). Thus, labile C input, e.g. root exudates, may alter the microbial decomposition of SOM, a process termed ˈrhizosphere priming effectsˈ (Kuzyakov 2002).
Living roots may either inhibit or stimulate the decomposition of SOM (Dijkstra et al. 2006; Fu et al. 2002; Reid and Goss 1982) via synergistic or antagonistic interactions, or both. The RPE of maize on the decomposition of SOM ranged from −30 % to more than 300 % considering the effects of soil types, time period, N and CO2 regimes in various studies (summarized by Cheng et al. 2014). Although RPE has been investigated in many studies, the underlying mechanisms are currently widely debated, but there is evidence that RPE mainly depends on decomposable C (Dormaar 1990; Meier et al. 2015) and the mineral N content in soil (Craine et al. 2007).
Rhizodeposition is an ecologically important part of rhizosphere processes because it serves as the primary energy source for microorganisms. This may enhance the metabolic activity of microorganisms and consequently affects the dynamics of SOM decomposition and, thus, rhizosphere priming (Microbial activation hypothesis, Cheng and Kuzyakov 2005; De Nobili et al. 2001; Kuzyakov et al. 2007; Pausch et al. 2013b). A trace amount of root exudates (μg g−1) may enhance the microbially mediated decomposition of SOM (De Nobili et al. 2001). Furthermore, altered root exudation may change the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere. This subsequently affects the SOM decomposition. Moreover, microbial N mining (Craine et al. 2007) may enhance SOM decomposition when nutrients are limited. Microorganisms as well as plants may thus benefit from nutrients released by extra decomposition of SOM (via RPE).
Here, we investigate the mechanisms of RPE and address the ecological importance of RPE. We applied a C3-to-C4 vegetation change in the field to estimate RPE. This approach is based on the discrimination of heavier (13C) and lighter (12C) C isotopes during CO2 assimilation by C3 and C4 plants, which are characterized by distinct photosynthesis types (Balesdent and Mariotti 1996; Kuzyakov and Domanski 2000). Hence, by planting maize, a C4 plant, on a soil which developed solely under C3 vegetation, we introduced a distinct isotopic signal. This enabled partitioning total soil CO2 efflux for root- and SOM-derived CO2 and thus to estimate the RPE of field-grown maize. Moreover, the extracellular activity of three enzymes (BG, NAG and LAP) was determined to link rhizosphere priming to microbial activities.
We hypothesized that (i) planting increases SOM decomposition via microbial activation through root exudates, and that (ii) mineral N application reduces RPE because plants alter their root activities and microbes are less dependent on nutrient gains from SOM decomposition.
Materials and methods
Experimental setup
The experiment was established on an agriculture field at the experimental research station Reinshof of the Georg-August University, Göttingen, and was solely under C3 crops. Therefore, the organic C in the soil originated from C3 vegetation. In this experiment, a vegetation change from C3 to C4 (maize) crops was used to introduce a distinct 13C signal into the soil and to partition the total soil CO2 efflux into root-derived and SOM-derived CO2.
Four plots (5 × 5 m2) were established: bare fallow (Unplanted), bare fallow with N-fertilization (Unplanted + N), maize-planted (Planted) and maize-planted with N-fertilization (Planted + N). In both planted plots, maize was grown with a plant density of 6 plants m−2. For N-fertilization, urea (Weiterer, Landhandel GmbH) was applied at the soil surface at a rate of 160 kg N ha−1.
Before the incubation started, maize (Zea mays L.) was sown in the field for 10 days. For incubation, mesh pots (height 35 cm, diameter 18 cm) were constructed from stainless metal mesh covered with nylon gauze to avoid soil losses from the pot. The nylon gauze allowed water and other solute transport across the mesh. Four undisturbed soil cores were collected from each plot (Unplanted, Unplanted + N, Planted, and Planted + N) with a soil corer (height 35 cm, diameter 18 cm) and transferred to the pots. In both planted plots, each soil core contained one 10 cm-high maize plant. The pots were then placed back in the holes made with the corer and incubated in the field.
CO2 trapping
The pots were incubated in the field for 50 days. We have chosen the time point of 50 days after planting in order to sample during the period of maximum growth and root exudation. Afterwards, the pots were removed from the field and brought to laboratory and placed in a growth chamber for 30 h with conditions adapted to those in the field. Total soil respiration was measured using a closed-circulation CO2 trapping system (Fig. 1). Briefly, each pot was placed in a PVC column (KG tubes; height 40 cm, diameter 20 cm). Air inlet tubing at the upper end and outlet tubing at the lower end of the PVC column were connected to a membrane pump. An aliquot of 1 M NaOH solution was inserted between the air outlet tubing and membrane pump (Fig. 1). The planted pots were sealed with plastic foil, and at the base of plant stem with a non-toxic gel (Wasserfuhr, GmbH), to avoid any leakage. Prior to CO2 trapping, CO2 inside each pot was removed by circulating the isolated air through 1 M NaOH for 2 h. Afterwards, the CO2 produced in each pot was trapped in 400 ml of 1 M NaOH solution for a period of 24 h by periodic air circulation for 1 h at 6 h intervals. Blanks were included (empty but closed PVC columns) and treated in the same way to correct inorganic C for handling errors. One subsample from each NaOH solution was analyzed for total inorganic C (SHIMADZU,TOC-5050) and another subsample was precipitated as SrCO3 with 1 M SrCl2 for δ13C analysis using an isotopic ratio mass spectrometer (Delta V Advantage, Conflo III) coupled to an elemental analyzer 2000 (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Cambridge UK).
Total soil CO2 efflux (Ctotal) was separated into SOM-derived CO2 (CSOM) and root-derived CO2 (rhizosphere respiration) (Croot) using a two-source mixing model (Pausch et al. 2013b).
where, δTOTAL, δSOM and δROOT are the δ13C values in ‰ for total CO2 efflux, SOM- and root-derived CO2. CTOTAL, CSOM and CROOT are the CO2 concentrations (mg C day−1 kg−1 soil).
RPE was calculated as the difference of CSOM between planted and unplanted soils (Pausch et al. 2013b) as shown below in Eq. 3 and Eq. 4.
Note, the 13C isotopic fractionation between root C and root-derived CO2 was not considered in the present study, which may have affected the calculated RPE. As reviewed by Werth and Kuzyakov (2010), the fractionation for C4 plants is on average − 1.3 ‰ with variations up to ±2 ‰. Since the fractionation is unknown for our plant-soil system, we decided not to include the literature value, as this would not add greater certainty to the results.
Harvest
Directly after CO2 trapping, the total weight of each pot was determined and the pots were destructively harvested. Shoots were cut at the base and dried at 60 °C for 3 days. The soil cores were pulled out of the pot and the “main” root system was carefully removed. A representative homogenized soil sample (400–500 g) was taken from each pot to determine soil moisture, microbial biomass C and N, and extracellular enzyme activities. Soil moisture was about 12.5 to 14 % and did not differ significantly between the planted and unplanted soils.
For root analyses, a soil subsample (300 g fresh soil) was taken and fine roots were picked from the soil for 15 min. Afterwards, the “main” roots and the fine roots (from root picking) were scanned by an EPSON (PERFECTION™ V700 PHOTO) scanner and the root length density was determined using WinRhizo (Regents Instruments Inc., Quebec, Canada) software. All roots with diameters <2 mm were considered as fine roots. The root length density of roots picked from 300 g soil was up-scaled to the whole pot weight. After scanning, all roots (“main” and picked roots) were dried at 60 °C for 3 days. Roots were analyzed for δ13C values using the isotopic ratio mass spectrometer and elemental analyzer 2000 noted above. All the isotopic analyses were performed at the Center for Stable Isotope Research Analysis (KOSI) at the University of Göttingen, Germany.
Soil microbial biomass
Soil microbial biomass C (MBC) and N (MBN) were analyzed on fresh samples using the chloroform fumigation-extraction method (Vance et al. 1987). Briefly, a non-fumigated soil sample (8 g fresh soil) was extracted with 40 ml of 0.05 M K2SO4 by continuously shaking (Laboratory shaker, GFL 3016) (150 rpm) for 1 h. After shaking, the soil suspension was filtered through Ahlstrom-Munktell filters (Grade: 3hw, diameter 110 mm). The organic C and N contents of filtered solution were measured with a multi N/C analyzer (multi N/C analyzer 2100S, Analytik Jena). The same extraction procedure was followed for fumigated soil. Fumigation was carried out in a desiccator with 80 ml of ethanol-free chloroform at room temperature for 24 h.
MBC and MBN were calculated by dividing the difference between extracted C and N from fumigated and non-fumigated soil samples with a KEC and KEN factor of 0.45 and 0.54, respectively (Joergensen and Mueller 1996). The C and N contents from non-fumigated soil samples were considered as dissolved organic C (DOC) and dissolved N (DN), respectively.
Enzyme assays
Extracellular enzymes activities were measured using the method described by Marx et al. (2001). Fluorogenic methylumbelliferone (MU)-based artificial substrates were used to estimate the activities of β-1,4-glucosidase (EC 2.2.1.21) (BG), which catalyzes the terminal reaction in hydrolyzing structural carbohydrates (i.e. cellulose) and the activities of β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase (EC 3.2.1.14) (NAG), which catalyzes the terminal reaction in chitin and other N-acetylglucosamine-containing polymer hydrolysis. Fluorogenic 7-amino-4-methycoumarin (AMC)-based artificial substrate was used to estimate the activity of L-leucine aminopeptidase (EC 3.4.11.1) (LAP), which hydrolyses the terminal reaction in peptide breakdown, releasing leucine and other amino acids (Sinsabaugh and Shah 2012).
Briefly, soil suspension was made by dissolving 1 g fresh soil sample in 50 ml autoclaved water using a low-energy sonication (50 Js−1) for 120 s (Koch et al. 2007; Stemmer et al. 1998). An aliquot of 50 μl was dispensed in a 96-well black microplate (Puregrade, Germany) while stirring the soil suspension to ensure uniformity. Afterwards, 50 μl of MES buffer (pH 6.5) was added to the well. Finally, 100 μl serial concentrations of substrate solutions (20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 200, 400 μmol substrate g soil−1) were added to the wells. The microplate was rippled and measured fluorometrically (excitation 360 nm; emission 450 nm) at 0, 30, 60, 120 m after substrate addition with an automated fluorometric plate-reader (Victor3 1420–050 Multi-label Counter, PerkinElmer, USA).
To estimate enzyme activity (V), we used the Michaelis-Menten equation for enzyme kinetics (Marx et al. 2001, 2005; Razavi et al. 2015):
where, Vmax is the maximal rate of enzyme activity; Km (Michaelis constant) is the substrate concentration at which Vmax is half; and [S] is the substrate concentration.
Statistics
The experiment was carried out with 4 field replicates for each measured parameter. The values for RPE, microbial biomass C and microbial biomass N, plant biomass, and enzymes activity were expressed as means ± standard errors (mean ± SEM). Prior to analysis of variance (ANOVA), the data were tested for normality (Shapiro-Wilk test, P > 0.05) and homogeneity of variance (Levene-test, P > 0.05). We used factorial ANOVA to test the effects of plantation and N-fertilization on MBC and MBN, SOM-derived CO2, and Vmax of extracellular enzymes. The ANOVAs were followed by post-hoc tests for multiple comparisons using least significant differences (Tukey-test). We used Student’s t-test to test the differences in plant biomass (root- and shoot biomass), RPE, root-derived CO2, specific RPE, and RPE as percent of control in Planted and Planted + N soils. In general, a significance level of P < 0.05 was used for ANOVA and t-test if not mentioned specifically. Statistical analyses were performed with STATISTICA for Windows (version 7.0; StatSoft Inc., OK, USA).
Results
Plant biomass
Total plant biomass (shoot and root biomass) per pot was higher in the N-fertilized plants (Planted + N) (36.3 ± 8.1 g pot−1) than in unfertilized plants (Planted) (20.7 ± 2.2 g pot−1) (Fig. 2). The shoot to root ratio was lower in N-fertilized plants (Planted + N) (7.5 ± 0.9) than unfertilized plants (Planted) (10.2 ± 1.3), although the difference was not statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Total soil CO2 efflux and source-partitioning
Plants increased the total soil CO2 efflux in both N-fertilized and unfertilized soils (Fig. 3). However, the CO2 efflux was lower in N-fertilized treatments (both in Unplanted + N and Planted + N) compared with unfertilized treatments (Unplanted and Planted). Total CO2 efflux ranged from 27.7 ± 5.9 to 116.0 ± 26.2 mg C day−1 kg−1 soil, being lowest in bare fallow with N-fertilization (Unplanted + N) and highest in unfertilized soils planted with maize (Planted).
A linear two-source isotopic mixing model was used to calculate the contribution of SOM-derived and root-derived CO2 to total CO2 efflux in unfertilized and N-fertilized soils planted with maize. SOM-derived CO2 was higher (87.4 ± 16.1 mg C day−1 kg−1 soil) (P < 0.05) in unfertilized soils with maize (Planted), whereas N-fertilization resulted in less SOM-derived CO2 emission (37.2 ± 2.6 mg C day−1 kg−1 soil) (Planted + N) (Fig. 3). Furthermore, specific root-derived CO2 was calculated by dividing root-derived CO2 to total root biomass. Specific root-derived CO2 was higher (P < 0.05) in unfertilized plants (Planted) (131.6 ± 22.5 mg C day−1 g−1 root) than in N-fertilized plants with (Planted + N) (38.4 ± 5.8 mg C day−1 g−1 root) (Fig. 3; inset).
Rhizosphere priming effect
Positive RPE was found in both planted soils (Planted and Planted + N), resulting from enhanced decomposition of SOM. Nonetheless, the RPE was lower (P < 0.1) in N-fertilized soils with maize (Planted + N) (9.6 ± 2.6 mg C day−1 kg−1 soil) compared to unfertilized soils with maize (Planted) (48.8 ± 16.1 mg C day−1 kg−1 soil). SOM-decomposition in unfertilized and N-fertilized soils with maize increased by 126.2 ± 41.7 % and 34.5 ± 9.2 %, respectively, compared to the unplanted soils (Fig. 4). Specific RPE was calculated by dividing RPE by total root biomass. Specific RPE was higher (P < 0.05) in unfertilized soils (Planted) than N-fertilized soil (Planted + N) (Fig. 4; inset).
Microbial biomass and extracellular enzyme activity
Plants had stimulating effects on MBC and MBN. The lowest MBC was in bare fallow (Unplanted), whereas N-fertilization increased MBC (20 %) especially in planted soils (Planted + N) versus bare fallow. There was a trend of increasing MBC with N-fertilization and under plants with and without N-fertilization in the sequence: Unplanted < Unplanted + N < Planted < Planted + N (Fig. 5). Planting also increased MBN (P < 0.05) (Planted and Planted + N) compared to bare fallows (Unplanted and Unplanted + N). N-fertilization, however, had only a minor effect on MBN. The ca. 30 % increase in MBN in planted soils reflected microbial activation.
The activities of three enzymes were stimulated by planting (Planted and Planted + N), resulting in increased reaction rates. Planting increased the potential activity of BG (84 % and 97 % for N-fertilized and unfertilized soils with maize), NAG (80 % and 65 % for N-fertilized and unfertilized soils with maize), and LAP (27 % and 53 % for N-fertilized and unfertilized soils with maize) in comparison with N-fertilized and unfertilized bare fallow (Fig. 6). N-fertilization lowered the potential activity of BG and LAP by lowering Vmax in planted soils, but it increased the activity in bare fallow (not statistically significant). When compared to BG and LAP, NAG showed a different pattern. Vmax of NAG followed a pattern in ascending order: bare fallow < bare fallow with N-fertilization < unfertilized maize-planted soil < N-fertilized maize-planted soil (Fig. 6).
Discussion
Effects of living roots on SOM decomposition
The rhizosphere priming effect has been widely observed in numerous studies under controlled conditions, but field studies are still rare (Cheng et al. 2014). Here, we provide measurements of RPE of SOM decomposition in a maize field based on SOM-derived CO2. In agreement with other studies (Dijkstra et al. 2013; Finzi et al. 2015; Mwafulirwa et al. 2016; Pausch et al. 2013b), the plants accelerated the decomposition of SOM.
Positive priming has often been explained by the microbial-activation hypothesis (Chen et al. 2014; Cheng and Kuzyakov 2005). The secretion of labile C compounds by roots enhances microbial growth and activity, leading to higher extracellular enzyme activities and, hence, accelerated SOM decomposition (Fig. 7) (Fontaine et al. 2003; Kuzyakov 2010; Loeppmann et al. 2016; Neumann and Römheld 2007).
SOM-derived CO2 was about 35 % higher for N-fertilized and 126 % higher for unfertilized planted soils compared to the bare fallows. Accompanied by positive rhizosphere priming, MBC and MBN were increased through planting (Fig. 4). Furthermore, in the rhizosphere; the higher microbial activity in response to root exudation (root-released easily available substrates) was characterized by increased Vmax for BG, NAG and LAP in comparison with bare fallows. The rhizosphere priming effect increased with activities of BG, LAP and NAG. In a similar study, BG activity and SOM decomposition were positively correlated (Zhu et al. 2014).
ΒG is involved in the degradation of structural carbohydrates (i.e. cellulose). It catalyzes terminal hydrolysis in cellulose degradation by producing two moles of glucose per mole of cellobiose, and glucose is an important energy source for microorganisms (Turner et al. 2002). Furthermore, BG synthesis is triggered by the presence of cellobiose, glucose and other metabolites of cellulose degradation (Stewart and Leatherwood 1976). In the rhizosphere, root exudation triggers enhanced synthesis of BG, which is accompanied by RPE in the decomposition of SOM.
When labile C sources with high C/N ratios are available for microorganisms, they start producing N-degrading enzymes to obtain N from SOM (Fontaine et al. 2011). Proteins and chitins are the most abundant organic N sources (Moorhead et al. 2012). For proteins, LAP is involved in the terminal hydrolysis of polypeptides, releasing amino acids. For chitins, NAG hydrolyses N-acetylglucosamine (monosaccharide derivative of glucose) from chito-oligosaccharides (i.e. chitobiose) (Sinsabaugh 1994). LAP and NAG are the most commonly detected N-degrading enzymes for SOM decomposition (Moorhead et al. 2012). Taking into account the microbial activation hypothesis (Cheng and Kuzyakov 2005), the present study provides evidence that, also under field conditions, living roots activate microorganisms for SOM decomposition.
Effect of N-fertilization on SOM decomposition
Planting induced positive priming effects in the rhizosphere (Fig. 4). When N was added, however, the extra SOM decomposition (positive RPE) was much lower in N-fertilized soils (35 % of bare fallow with N-fertilization) than in unfertilized soils (126 % of bare fallow), despite a higher shoot and root biomass of N-fertilized maize plants. Increased N supply may increase net assimilation, and plants produce higher biomass (Hodge et al. 1996; Warembourg and Estelrich 2001; Zhu et al. 2015). Although the root biomass of N-fertilized maize was about twice as high, the rhizosphere respiration (root-derived CO2) was lower, indicating lower root activity (Fig. 7). It is well known that plants invest more C resources for root exudation under nutrient limitations (Hodge et al. 1996; Kraffczyk et al. 1984; Ratnayake et al. 1978). Root exudation also stimulates microbial activity and nutrient availability (Smith 1976; Yin et al. 2013). Both theoretical (Cheng et al. 2014; Wutzler and Reichstein 2013) and experimental studies (Drake et al. 2013; Phillips et al. 2011) have shown that enhanced root exudation may accelerate RPE for SOM decomposition, thus increasing the flux of nutrients to forms available for plants. Reduced root exudation in N-fertilized maize plants, indicated by lower root-derived CO2 (consisting of CO2 from root respiration and CO2 released by decomposition of exudates), showed that these plants do not rely solely on nutrients from SOM decomposition. RPE can increase with increasing root activity (Zhu et al. 2014). Rhizosphere respiration was positively correlated with RPE (P < 0.01). In addition, the specific root length density (fine root length density (< 2 mm) per gram root) was higher (P < 0.059) for unfertilized maize plants (data not presented). This altered root architecture of unfertilized maize may help to make the limiting resources accessible by maximizing root surface area and enabling roots to have greater contact with soil surfaces (Paterson and Sim 1999).
These findings suggested that root activity is intimately connected with microbially mediated SOM decomposition. Furthermore, root exudates are characterized by high C to N ratios (Cheng and Kuzyakov 2005). Such high ratios results in higher C availability and a severe N limitation for microorganisms (Kuzyakov and Blagodatskaya 2015; Kuikman et al. 1990; Liljeroth et al. 1990; Merckx et al. 1987). Moreover, there is a strong competition for mineral N between roots and microorganisms (Kuzyakov and Xu 2013). With addition of N-fertilizer, microorganisms are less dependent on extra N released via priming because the competition between plant roots and microorganisms for mineral N becomes weaker (Van Veen et al. 1989): microorganisms start utilizing exudates and the available mineral N (preferential substrate utilization) (Kuzyakov 2002; Sparling et al. 1982). The present study detected no differences for the effect of N-fertilization on microbial biomass C and N. Nonetheless, N-fertilization altered extracellular enzyme activity differently. Inorganic fertilizers may either maintain or reduce the activities of many extracellular enzymes in planted soils, but increase their activities in unplanted soils (Ai et al. 2012). In the present research, the activities of BG and LAP were generally lowered in maize-planted soils with N-fertilization, whereas their activities increased in bare fallow with N-fertilization. Moreover, the NAG activity increased in both bare fallow and maize-planted soils with N-fertilization. This could be an indirect evidence for shifts in microbial communities in favor of fungi. Various studies showed this shift in microbial taxonomic groups in favor of fungi with N-fertilization (Bardgett et al. 1999; Paul and Clarke. 1996 in Keeler et al. 2009; Weand et al. 2010). In summary, N-fertilization lowered the root release of available C, which subsequently lowered microbial activity by decreasing extracellular enzyme production. The net result is less SOM decomposition in the rhizosphere.
Conclusions
RPE were measurable in the field. Higher MBC and MBN in the rhizosphere support the microbial activation by root exudation. This microbial activation is accompanied by increased extracellular enzyme activities, which further confirm that extracellular enzyme production is an important mechanism of SOM decomposition in the rhizosphere. The N status of soils largely controls the magnitude of rhizosphere priming. N fertilization substantially reduced rhizosphere priming by lowering SOM decomposition. Lower root-derived CO2 and enzyme activities in the rhizosphere with N-fertilization confirmed that the availability of mineral N weakens the competition between roots and microorganisms. However, increased root-derived CO2 and enzyme activities without N fertilization intensify the root and microbial competition for N and the dependence of microorganisms on N mining.
References
Ai C, Liang G, Sun J, Wang X, Zhou W (2012) Responses of extracellular enzyme activities and microbial community in both the rhizosphere and bulk soil to long-term fertilization practices in a fluvo-aquic soil. Geoderma 173-174:330–338. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.07.020
Balesdent J, Mariotti A (1996) Measurement of soil organic matter turnover using 13C natural abundace. In: Boutton TW, Yamasaki S (eds) Mass Spectrometery of soils. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 83–111
Bardgett RD, Mawdsley JL, Edwards S, Hobbs PJ, Rodwell JS, Davies WJ (1999) Plant species and nitrogen effects on soil biological properties of temperate upland grasslands. Funct Ecol 13:650–660. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00362.x
Chen R, Senbayram M, Blagodatsky S, Myachina O, Dittert K, Lin X, Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y (2014) Soil C and N availability determine the priming effect: microbial N mining and stoichiometric decomposition theories. Glob Chang Biol 20:2356–2367. doi:10.1111/gcb.12475
Cheng W, Kuzyakov Y (2005) Root effects on soil organic matter decomposition. Agronomy:119–144. doi:10.2134/agronmonogr48.c7
Cheng W, Parton WJ, Gonzalez-Meler MA, Phillips R, Asao S, McNickle GG, Brzostek E, Jastrow JD (2014) Synthesis and modeling perspectives of rhizosphere priming. New Phytol 201:31–44. doi:10.1111/nph.12440
Coleman DC, Odum EP, Crossley DAJ (1992) Soil biology, soil ecology, and global change. Biol Fertil Soils 14:104–111
Craine JM, Morrow C, Fierer N (2007) Microbial nitrogen limitation increases decomposition. Ecology 88:2105–2113. doi:10.1890/06-1847.1
De Nobili M, Contin M, Mondini C, Brookes P (2001) Soil microbial biomass is triggered into activity by trace amounts of substrate. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1163–1170. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00020-7
Dijkstra FA, Cheng W, Johnson DW (2006) Plant biomass influences rhizosphere priming effects on soil organic matter decomposition in two differently managed soils. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2519–2526. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.02.020
Dijkstra FA, Carrillo Y, Pendall E, Morgan JA (2013) Rhizosphere priming: a nutrient perspective. Front Microbiol 4:1–8. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00216
Dormaar JF (1990) Effect of active roots on the decomposition of soil organic materials. Biol Fertil Soils 10:121–126. doi:10.1007/bf00336247
Drake JE, Darby BA, Giasson M-A, Kramer MA, Phillips RP, Finzi AC (2013) Stoichiometry constrains microbial response to root exudation- insights from a model and a field experiment in a temperate forest. Biogeosciences 10:821–838. doi:10.5194/bg-10-821-2013
Finzi AC, Abramoff RZ, Spiller KS, Brzostek ER, Darby BA, Kramer MA, Phillips RP (2015) Rhizosphere processes are quantitatively important components of terrestrial carbon and nutrient cycles. Glob Chang Biol 21:2082–2094. doi:10.1111/gcb.12816
Fontaine S, Mariotti A, Abbadie L (2003) The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition? Soil Biol Biochem 35:837–843. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00123-8
Fontaine S, Barot S, Barré P, et al. (2007) Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply. Nature 450:277–280. doi:10.1038/nature06275
Fontaine S, Henault C, Aamor A, Bdioui N, Bloor JMG, Maire V, Mary B, Revallot S, Maron PA (2011) Fungi mediate long term sequestration of carbon and nitrogen in soil through their priming effect. Soil Biol Biochem 43:86–96. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.09.017
Fu SL, Cheng WX, Susfalk R (2002) Rhizosphere respiration varies with plant species and phenology: a greenhouse pot experiment. Plant Soil 239:133–140. doi:10.1023/a:1014959701396
Hodge A, Grayston SJ, Ord BG (1996) A novel method for characterisation and quantification of plant root exudates. Plant Soil 184:97–104. doi:10.1007/BF00029278
Joergensen RG, Mueller T (1996) The fumigation-extraction method to estimate soil microbial biomass: calibration of the kEN value. Soil Biol Biochem 28:33–37. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(95)00101-8
Keeler BL, Hobbie SE, Kellogg LE (2009) Effects of long-term nitrogen addition on microbial enzyme activity in eight forested and grassland sites: implications for litter and soil organic matter decomposition. Ecosystems 12:1–15. doi:10.1007/s10021-008-9199-z
Koch O, Tscherko D, Kandeler E (2007) Temperature sensitivity of microbial respiration, nitrogen mineralization, and potential soil enzyme activities in organic alpine soils. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 21:1–11. doi:10.1029/2007GB002983
Kraffczyk I, Trolldenier G, Beringer H (1984) Soluble root exudates of maize: influence of potassium supply and rhizosphere microorganisms. Soil Biol Biochem 16:315–322. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(84)90025-7
Kuikman PJ, Jansen AG, Van Veen JA, Zehnder AJB (1990) Protozoan predation and the turnover of soil organic carbon and nitrogen in the presence of plants. Biol Fertil Soils 10:22–28
Kuzyakov Y (2002) Review: factors affecting rhizosphere priming effects. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci Fur Pflanzenernahrung Und Bodenkd 165:382–396. doi:10.1002/1522-2624(200208)165:4<382::AID-JPLN382>3.0.CO;2-#
Kuzyakov Y (2010) Priming effects: interactions between living and dead organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1363–1371. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.003
Kuzyakov Y, Blagodatskaya E (2015) Microbial hotspots and hot moments in soil: concept & review. Soil Biol Biochem 83:184–199. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.025
Kuzyakov Y, Domanski G (2000) Carbon input by plants into the soil. Review Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkd 163:421–431. doi:10.1002/1522-2624(200008)163:4<421::aid-jpln421>3.0.co;2-r
Kuzyakov Y, Xu X (2013) Competition between roots and microorganisms for nitrogen: mechanisms and ecological relevance. New Phytol 198:656–669. doi:10.1111/nph.12235
Kuzyakov Y, Hill PW, Jones DL (2007) Root exudate components change litter decomposition in a simulated rhizosphere depending on temperature. Plant Soil 290:293–305. doi:10.1007/s11104-006-9162-8
Lal R (2011) Sequestering carbon in soils of agro-ecosystems. Food Policy 36:S33–S39. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.12.001
Liljeroth E, Van Veen JA, Miller HJ (1990) Assimilate translocation to the rhizosphere of two wheat lines and subsequent utilization by rhizosphere microorganisms at two soil nitrogen concentrations. Soil Biol Biochem 22:1015–1022
Loeppmann S, Blagodatskaya E, Pausch J, Kuzyakov Y (2016) Substrate quality affects kinetics and catalytic efficiency of exo-enzymes in rhizosphere and detritusphere. Soil Biol Biochem 92:111–118. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.09.020
Marx MC, Wood M, Jarvis SC (2001) A microplate fluorimetric assay for the study of enzyme diversity in soils. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1633–1640. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00079-7
Marx MC, Kandeler E, Wood M, et al. (2005) Exploring the enzymatic landscape: distribution and kinetics of hydrolytic enzymes in soil particle-size fractions. Soil Biol Biochem 37:35–48. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.05.024
Meier IC, Pritchard SG, Brzostek ER, McCormack ML, Phillips RP (2015) The rhizosphere and hyphosphere differ in their impacts on carbon and nitrogen cycling in forests exposed to elevated CO2. New Phytol 2:1164–1174. doi:10.1111/nph.13122
Merckx R, Dijkstra A, den Hartog A, Van Veen JA (1987) Production of root-derived material and associated microbial growth in soil at different nutrient levels. Biol Fertil Soils 5:126–132. doi:10.1007/BF00257647
Moorhead DL, Lashermes G, Sinsabaugh RL (2012) A theoretical model of C- and N-acquiring exoenzyme activities, which balances microbial demands during decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 53:133–141. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.05.011
Mwafulirwa L, Baggs EM, Russell J, George T, Morley N, Sim A, Canto CF, Paterson E (2016) Barley genotype influences stabilization of rhizodeposition-derived C and soil organic matter mineralization. Soil Biol Biochem 95:60–69. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.12.011
Neumann G, Römheld V (2007) The release of root exudates as affected by the plant physiological status. In Pinton R (ed) The Rhizosphere: biochemistry and organic substances at the soil- plant interface, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, pp 23–72
Paterson E, Sim A (1999) Rhizodeposition and C-partitioning of Lolium perenne in axenic culture affected by nitrogen supply and defoliation. Plant Soil 216:155–164. doi:10.1023/a:1004789407065
Paterson E, Sim A (2013) Soil-specific response functions of organic matter mineralization to the availability of labile carbon. Glob Chang Biol 19:1562–1571. doi:10.1111/gcb.12140
Paul EA, Clark FE (1996) Soil microbiology and biochemistry, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, p 340
Pausch J, Tian J, Riederer M, Kuzyakov Y (2013a) Estimation of rhizodeposition at field scale: upscaling of a 14C labeling study. Plant Soil 364:273–285. doi:10.1007/s11104-012-1363-8
Pausch J, Zhu B, Kuzyakov Y, Cheng W (2013b) Plant inter-species effects on rhizosphere priming of soil organic matter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 57:91–99. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.08.029
Phillips RP, Finzi AC, Bernhardt ES (2011) Enhanced root exudation induces microbial feedbacks to N cycling in a pine forest under long-term CO2 fumigation. Ecol Lett 14:187–194. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01570.x
Ratnayake M, Leonard R, Menge J (1978) Root exudation in relation to supply of phosphorus and its possible relevance to mycorrhizal formation. New Phytol 81:543–552. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1978.tb01627.x
Razavi BS, Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y (2015) Nonlinear temperature sensitivity of enzyme kinetics explains canceling effect—a case study on loamy haplic Luvisol. Front Microbiol. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01126
Reid JB, Goss MJ (1982) Suppression of decomposition of 14C-labelled plant roots in the presence of living roots of maize and perennial ryegrass. J Soil Sci 33:387–395. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01775.x
Sinsabaugh RL (1994) Enzymic analysis of microbial pattern and process. Biol Fertil Soils 17:69–74. doi:10.1007/BF00418675
Sinsabaugh RL, Shah JJF (2012) Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of recalcitrant organic matter decomposition: the growth rate hypothesis in reverse. Biogeochemistry 102:31–43. doi:10.1007/s10533-010-9482-x
Smith WH (1976) Character and significance of forest tree root exudates. Ecology 57:324–331. doi:10.2307/1934820
Smith P (2012) Agricultural greenhouse gas mitigation potential globally, in Europe and in the UK: what have we learnt in the last 20 years? Glob Chang Biol 18:35–43. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02517.x
Smith P, Haberl H, Popp A, Erb KH, Lauk C, Harper R, Tubiello FN, Pinto ADS, Jafari M, Sohi S, Masera M, Böttcher H, Berndes G, Bustamante M, Ahammad H, Clark H, Dong H, Elsiddig EA, Mbow C, Ravindranath NH, Rice CW, Adab CR, Romanovskaya A, Sperling F, Herrero M, House JI, Rose S (2013) How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? Glob Chang Biol 19:2285–2302. doi:10.1111/gcb.12160
Sparling GP, Cheshire MV, Mundie CM (1982) Effect of barley plants on the decomposition of 14C-labelled soil organic matter. J Soil Sci 33:89–100. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1982.tb01750.x
Stemmer M, Gerzabek MH, Kandeler E (1998) Invertase and xylanase activity of bulk soil and particle-size fractions during maize straw decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 31:9–18. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00083-2
Stewart BJ, Leatherwood JM (1976) Derepressed synthesis of cellulase by Cellulomonas. J Bacteriol 128:609–615
Turner BL, Hopkins DW, Haygarth PM, Ostle N (2002) Glucosidase activity in pasture soils. Appl Soil Ecol 20:157–162. doi:10.1016/S0929-1393(02)00020-3
Van Veen JA, Merckx R, Van De Geijn SC (1989) Plant and soil related controls of the flow of carbon from roots through the soil microbial biomass. Plant Soil 115:179–188. doi:10.1007/BF02202586
Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19:703–707. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6
Warembourg F, Estelrich H (2001) Plant phenology and soil fertility effects on below-ground carbon allocation for an annual (Bromus madritensis) and a perennial (Bromus erectus) grass species. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1291–1303. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00033-5
Weand MP, Arthur MA, Lovett GM, McCulley RL, Weathers KC (2010) Effects of tree species and N additions on forest floor microbial communities and extracellular enzyme activities. Soil Biol Biochem 42:2161–2173. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.012
Werth M, Kuzyakov Y (2010) 13C fractionation at the root-microorganisms-soil interface: a review and outlook for partioning studies. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1372–1384. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.009
Wutzler T, Reichstein M (2013) Priming and substrate quality interactions in soil organic matter models. Biogeosciences 10:2089–2103. doi:10.5194/bg-10-2089-2013
Yin H, Li Y, Xiao J, Xu Z, Cheng X, Liu Q (2013) Enhanced root exudation stimulates soil nitrogen transformations in a subalpine coniferous forest under experimental warming. Glob Chang Biol 19:2158–2167. doi:10.1111/gcb.12161
Zhu B, Cheng W (2012) Nodulated soybean enhances rhizosphere priming effects on soil organic matter decomposition more than non-nodulated soybean. Soil Biol Biochem 51:56–65. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.016
Zhu B, Gutknecht JLM, Herman DJ, Keck DC, Firestone MK, Cheng W (2014) Rhizosphere priming effects on soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization. Soil Biol Biochem 76:183–192. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.033
Zhu B, Panke-Buisse K, Kao-Kniffin J (2015) Nitrogen fertilization has minimal influence on rhizosphere effects of smooth crabgrass (Digitaria ischaemum) and bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). J Plant Ecol 8:390–400. doi:10.1093/jpe/rtu034
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Thomas Splettstößer and Yue Sun for field assistance and Dirk Böttger for his help in constructing the closed-circulation system. We also would like to thank Karin Schmidt and Anita Kriegel for laboratory assistance and Reinhard Langel at the Center for Stable Isotope Research Analysis (KOSI) at the University of Göttingen for isotopic analyses. We gratefully acknowledge the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) for a scholarship award to Amit Kumar. This study was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within project PA 2377/1-1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Eric Paterson.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, A., Kuzyakov, Y. & Pausch, J. Maize rhizosphere priming: field estimates using 13C natural abundance. Plant Soil 409, 87–97 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2958-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2958-2