Abstract
Sudden cardiac death is one of the most important causes of death worldwide. Advancements in medical treatment, percutaneous interventions, and device therapy (ICD and CRTD) showed consistent reduction in mortality, mainly in survivors of SCD and in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and depressed left ventricular function. Patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathies, mildly reduced LV function, and channelopathies have increased risk for SCD. Identifying the subgroup of these patients before they experience life-threatening or fatal events is essential to further improve outcomes. In this review, we aimed to summarize the current knowledge for risk stratification and primary prevention, to describe the gaps in evidence, and to discuss future directions for screening and treating patients at risk for SCD.
Purpose of Review
The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive description of the etiologies of sudden cardiac death, risk stratification strategies, and to describe the current medical and interventional therapies. We aimed to discuss the current gaps in our knowledge of primary prevention of SCD and to review novel approaches and interventions.
Recent Findings
The incidence of SCD has decreased in the last two decades due to improved pharmacological treatment and ICD implantation in SCD survivors and in patients with reduced left ventricular function and ischemic cardiomyopathy. The efficacy of ICD in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy is challenged by new findings from the DANISH trial. Catheter ablation is new emerging strategy to prevent SCD in patients with scar relater or PVC-triggered ventricular arrhythmias.
Summary
Despite the new treatments, SCD is still a major burden. ICD remains the cornerstone for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, whereas appropriate risk stratification of the patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and channelopathies is needed to further improve outcomes. The future of ablation as the treatment and prevention of SCD remains to be studied.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is defined as sudden and unexpected death occurring within an hour of the onset of the symptoms, or occurring in patients found dead within 24 h of being asymptomatic, presumably due to cardiac arrhythmia or hemodynamic catastrophe [1]. Within all cardiovascular disease (CVD), 25% are secondary to SCD, mainly tachyarrhythmia [2, 3]. SCD is associated with high social, health utilization and economic burden, and thus precise risk stratification is important. Recently, Shubi et al. showed that in a large Canadian SCD registry, patients who died suddenly utilized healthcare systems more frequently before the fatal event, but were not diagnosed to be at high risk. This study, however, did not identify predictors of SCD [4].
This review aims to discuss the current understandings of SCD in patients with structurally normal and abnormal hearts, current strategies of risk stratification, treatments, gaps in evidence, and future perspectives.
Pathophysiology, Mechanisms, and Epidemiology of SCD
The primary mechanism of SCD is thought to be tachyarrhythmia, predominantly ventricular, followed by premature ventricular complexes (PVCs), bradyarrhythmias, and non-arrhythmic mechanisms (rupture of an aortic aneurysm or pump failure) [5]. The mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) are a complex interaction between arrhythmogenic substrate (myocardial scar, patchy fibrosis, channelopathies) and triggered activity induced by early or late afterdepolarizations [6].
In terms of risk stratification, patients can be divided into two major groups, either structural heart disease (SHD) or structurally normal heart. SHD can be further divided into patients with myocardial scar due to ischemic heart disease (IHD) and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies with patchy fibrosis and adverse remodeling. The latter group is represented by outflow tract VAs, channelopathies, bradyarrhythmias, or high-risk accessory atrioventricular aberrant pathways (Wolff Parkinson White (WPW)).
These patients are highly sensitive to altered cardiac metabolism, electrolytes disturbances, autonomic tone changes, and shifts in ion channels that can interfere with the cardiac action potential.
Patients with Structurally Abnormal Hearts
The rate of SCD in patients with IHD is consistently decreasing, whereas the proportion of patients with hypertensive heart disease and myocardial fibrosis has increased [7]. This decrease is attributed to better revascularization and better control of IHD risk factors [8, 9].
Patients admitted with MI are prone to VA prior to the reperfusion and in the next 48 after revascularization. Late VA (after 48 h) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) is associated with increased mortality [10]. In the settings of acute MI and VA event, urgent and complete revascularization is advised, even in comatose survivors with signs of STEMI [11, 12]. In the FAST MI 2005 registry, early VF (within 48 h) during ACS was associated with five-fold increase in-hospital mortality, but not with long-term mortality [13]. A recent study including almost 39,000 patients with acute MI, the lowest risk of VF, cardiac arrest, or death was associated with potassium concentrations of 3.5–4.5 mmol/L [14], and therefore, aggressive control of electrolytes is warranted.
Several studies showed genetic predisposition for SCD in the context of MI, and that family history of SCD is an independent risk factor for sudden death [15,16,17,18]. Two genome-wide association studies compared patients with STEMI with and without VF. The AGNES study showed association with single-nucleotide polymorphism located in the 21q21 locus [19]. In the second study, 2q24.2 locus signal correlated with increased risk of SCD; however, they could not replicate the results of the AGNES study [20].
Dilated cardiomyopathy is one of the most common cardiomyopathies accounting for a significant part of SCD, occurring unpredicted in 26% of the cases without IHD etiology and mainly out of the hospital [21].
In younger patients, IHD is less prevalent while other conditions such as myocarditis, mitral valve prolapse (MVP), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), coronary anomalies, conduction disorders, and cardiomyopathies are more important causes of SCD [22,23,24,25,26,27].
A recent observational study consisting of 2094 adult patients with HCM showed that the systematic enhanced ACC/AHA strategy [(risk factors: family history of SCD, LV hypertrophy > 30 mm, unexplained syncope, non-sustained VT (NSVT)] predication capacity improved by adding late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) identified fibrosis and systolic dysfunction with LVEF < 50% by echocardiography or cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) or LV apical aneurysm). The new score is highly sensitive (87–95%), but less specific in terms of identifying the ones without SCD events (78%). In the same study, European Society of Cardiology (ESC) risk score was applied retrospectively to the same group of patients and was shown to be significantly less sensitive [28•].
The correlation between SCD and MVP remains controversial. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis [29•] demonstrated that the prevalence of MVP among all SCD was 1.9% and that MVP was demonstrated by autopsy in 11.7% of unexplained SCD. The investigators of that study identified several potential predictors of SCD including VA (79% of the patients—bigeminy, multifocal ventricular ectopy, and sustained or non-sustained VT/VF), ST-T wave abnormalities (65.3%), cardiac fibrosis (in 70.7%), and bi-leaflet MVP (80%) [29•].
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited cardiomyopathy with structural abnormalities predominantly in the right ventricle (RV), but also with common LV involvement, presenting with VA and an increased risk of SCD. Calkins et al. [30] identified several risk factors including electric instability (frequent PVCs and sustained VA), the extent of the RV and LV structural involvement, cardiac syncope (CS), male sex, proband status, multiple mutations, or a mutation in TMEM43. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), endocardial or epicardial, seems to have the highest success rates in ARVC-related VT treatment and in eliminating frequent VT episodes and ICD shocks rather than a curative therapeutic approach [31]. In bundle branch reentrant tachycardia patients, antiarrhythmic medical therapy is usually ineffective, whereas RFA is reported as a successful procedure in terms of preventing recurrences [32, 33].
Myocarditis is described as a cause of SCD in athletes [34, 35]. Surprisingly, there are only small series and case reports and most are associated with fulminant myocarditis. Further dedicated research is needed.
Medical Treatment to Reduce SCD in Patients with Abnormal Heart
Adverse remodeling is associated with ion-channel alterations and has the potential to exacerbate the potential for VA. ACEi [36], ARBs [37], and MRAs [38] were shown to improve reverse remodeling and reduce the risk of SCD [39, 40] in patients with depressed LV function. In the AVID trial, statins were shown to reduce the incidence of SCD in high-risk patients [41]. Recently, PARADIGM-HF investigators showed that the angiotensis-receptor-neprilysin inhibitor reduced SCD and deaths from worsening of heart failure (HF) [42]. Beta blockers are highly effective in treating VAs as well as in reducing SCD in patients with or without HF [43]. However, a registry of 34,661 patients with acute MI STEMI or non-STEMI demonstrated that in patients with two or more risk factors for shock, the risk of shock or death was significantly elevated in those under treatment with beta blockers. Consequently, in this setting, beta blockers should not be initiated [44]. In the CAST trial [45], it was shown that the class Ic antiarrhythmics were associated with excessive mortality or non-fatal cardiac arrest rate (7.7%) among post-MI patients as compared with the placebo-treated patients (3.0%), and hence, the use of Ic antiarrhytmics after MI is contraindicated [46, 47]. The use of the class III agent amiodarone was widely investigated; in GESICA trial, the use of amiodarone in patients with severe HF reduced mortality and hospital admissions compared to standard treatment, especially in patients with higher baseline heart rate [48]. In this trial, patients were not on beta-blockers, and therefore, the mortality benefit could be explained by the beta-blockade effect. In Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) in which patients were on a beta-blocker, no benefit from amiodarone, when compared to placebo, was noted [49].
Device Therapy in Patients with Abnormal Heart Structure
ICD is a well-established therapy for secondary prevention of SCD [46, 47]. In antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) [50], cardiac arrest study Hamburg (CASH) [51], and Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS) [52] trials, patients who had suffered a cardiac arrest or life-threatening VA were recruited—secondary prevention. Anti-arrhythmic vs ICD were compared in these trials, with a statistically significant reduction in the rate of total mortality in the ICD arm only in AVID. In CASH and CIDS, only arrhythmic death was significant, but not all-cause mortality. According to a meta-analysis of these trials, ICD therapy demonstrated a 50% reduction in arrhythmic mortality and a 28% reduction in total mortality. A sub-group analysis of the AVID trial results clearly demonstrated that the benefit was primarily to patients with an LVEF between 20 and 34% [53]. ICD is indicated for the primary prevention of arrhythmias that could lead to mortality in patients with HF who does not suffer from other conditions that limit life expectancy to 1 year, according to the ESC and AHA/ACC/HRS guidelines [46, 47]. In the MADIT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial), 196 patients with prior MI, LVEF < 35%, and positive EPS were randomized to receive an ICD (95 patients) or conventional medical therapy at the time (101 patients) and showed improved survival in the ICD arm [54]. In MADIT II trial [55], 1232 patients with a history of MI and LVEF < 30% were recruited. This trial showed that all-cause mortality reduced by nearly 60% over the average follow-up of 20 months. The analysis from Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT) showed that non-inducible patients with LVEF < 30% had nearly identical total mortality and SCD rates as patients who were inducible but had an LVEF between 30 and 40%, and hence, a negative EP study in a patient with an LVEF < 30% cannot be reassuring [56].
The indication for ICD in the first 40 days post-MI is questionable. The Defibrillator in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (DINAMIT) did not show any benefit with ICD therapy for patients in the first 40 days post-MI and LVEF < 35%. The ICD arm was associated with a statistically significant decrease in death by arrhythmic causes, but a statistically significant increase in death by non-arrhythmic causes, and hence no difference in overall survival rates [57]. The IRIS trial did not show reduction in overall mortality in patients after ICD implantation between 5 and 31 days after MI with LVEF < 40% and heart rate higher than 90 beats per minute. There were less SCD in the ICD group, but the number of non-SCD was significantly higher [58]. Similarly, in the Beta-blocker Strategy plus, ICD study (EPS guided ICD 5–30 days after acute MI vs conventional medical treatment) did not show mortality difference [59]. In this group of patients, wearable defibrillators (WD) can be a temporary measure. The safety and efficacy of this device were shown in Wearable Defibrillator Investigative Trial II [60]. The randomized VEST trial showed no significant arrhythmic mortality reduction with WD; however, the all-cause mortality was significantly reduced [61].
While ICD is a well-established therapy for ischemic cardiomyopathy, its role in NICMP (non-ischemic cardiomyopathy) is less established. The Defibrillators in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE) trial was set to assess if ICD therapy can abort SCD in 458 patients with NICM with LVEF < 36% and documented PVCs or non-sustained VT. Patients with ICD had significant reduction in SCD but not all-cause mortality. In a subanalysis, male patients with NYHA III and LVEF between 20 and 35% benefited the most from ICD [62]. Importantly, in the recent DANISH trial [63••], there was no benefit with ICD in terms of all-cause mortality and only SCD was reduced significantly. The current guidelines are still based on the old SCD-HeFT trial in which ICD therapy vs amiodarone was compared among 2521 patients with LVEF < 35% (either ischemic or non-ischemic) and NYHA II-III on conventional therapy and divided into 3 groups—placebo, amiodarone, and shock-only single-lead ICD. The use of ICD was associated with decreased risk of death of 23% compared to placebo [49]. The results did not vary according to either ischemic or non-ischemic causes of CHF, but a greater reduction of mortality in patients with NYHA II was noted. The trials of ICD for primary and secondary prevention are summarized in Table 1.
Biventricular pacing is known to reduce mortality in selected groups of patients with depressed LV function and prolonged QRS. Table 2 summarizes the trials. In the MIRACLE trial, CRT-P therapy has been shown to reduce HF, and mortality in patients with NYHA III-IV, LVEF < 35%, and wide QRS [64]. The beneficial effect of biventricular pacing with ICD in a similar group of patients was proved also in MIRACLE-ICD [65]. Similar effects were shown in the RAFT trial [66] in patients with NYHA II-III, in addition to, a decrease of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. In the COMPANION trial, the combined primary endpoint of risk of death or first hospitalization in both CRT-P and CRT-D arms was met; however, the mortality reduction was limited to the CRT-D arm [67]. The initial outcomes and the long-term mortality follow-up of CARE-HF trial showed significant reduction of death in patients with CRT [68, 69]. In MADIT-CRT, patients with ICMP and NICMP with NYHA I-II showed a reduction of HF events, without a difference in risk of death [70] in the short term. In the long-term trial, only patients with LBBB had significant mortality reduction [71].
There is a notion that ICD shocks might be associated with increased mortality [72]; this was recently debated by Biton et al. showing that the underlying rate of the VA and not the shock is associated with mortality [73]. MADIT-RIT and PROVIDE trial demonstrated that more conservative ICD programming schema for primary prevention can reduce the rate of inappropriate shocks without increasing mortality [74, 75].
Catheter Ablation for the Prevention of SCD
In patients with ICM and NICM, scar-related reentry is known to be the mechanism of monomorphic VT. Prior studies showed that patients treated with VT ablation after an ICD shock had a significantly lower risk of death and HF as compared with patients managed with antiarrhythmics (Table 3). The adverse event rates after VT ablation were similar to patients with ICDs but without VT [76,77,78]. In SMASH-VT trial, VT substrate-based ablation was performed on patients with IHD during ICD implantation, and the patients were compared to patients with ICD implantation and no VA [79]. The patients receiving ablation and ICD showed reduced ICD shocks at 2-year follow-up and a trend toward reduced mortality compared to those receiving ICD without ablation. In VTACH trial, prophylactic VT ablation before defibrillator implantation seemed to prolong time to recurrence of VT in patients with stable VT, previous MI, and reduced LVEF [78]. Della Bella et al. enrolled 528 patients with SHD who experienced electrical storm, incessant VTs, or recurrent paroxysmal VTs for RFA VT ablation. After follow-up of 26 months, it was shown that the group of patients with successful VT ablation had significantly lower recurrences of VTs and lower cardiac death and SCD [80]. In the VANISH trial, RFA of VT was associated with greater quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and less SCD, episodes of VT within 24 h, and appropriate ICD shocks than escalated drug therapy [81]. Sauer et al. demonstrated similar results in terms of survival rate in patients with ischemic and NICM after successful ablation of VT [82]. To date, three studies, STAR VT, BERLIN-VT, and PARTITA, are evaluating the use of early VT ablation in preventing sudden death.
SCD in Patients with Structurally Normal Hearts
Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is the most studied channelopathy. The risk of SCD in patients with LQTS is increased due to polymorphic VT [83,84,85]. Barsheshet et al. showed that the risk of SCD and Torsades de Points (TdP) can be predicted by previous events of TdP or another form of VA, CS without documented arrhythmia, QTc > 500 ms, and low potassium levels [86]. Additional risk factors are female sex, age, pre-existing cardiovascular diseases, resting heart rate, and mutation location. Genetic information can inform the risk of SCD. Moss et al. have shown that in LQTS1, the location, type, and biophysical function of the KCNQ1 mutation are an important independent risk factor for CS or SCD [87]. In patients with LQTS2, the type and location of the KCNH2 mutations are in correlation with an elevated risk of life-threatening cardiac events [88]. Gender is playing a major role in LQTS1 and LQTS2, female patients have a longer baseline QTc, associated with more TdP episodes [89].Buber et al. demonstrated that the perimenopausal period is associated with an elevated risk of CS in LQTS2 [90]. Currently, there is no data about the correlation of type and location of the mutation in LQTS3. According to Wilde, Moss et al., females had a higher probability of a first cardiac event than did males, especially in the 30 to 40 years of age [91].
Beta blocker, specifically nadolol [92], is considered to be the mainstay of treatment in LQTS mainly LQT1 and LQT2 with very low risk of SCD [91, 93]. Despite that some LQTS patients will still have life-threatening events while treated with BB and these patients require ICD for secondary prevention. Primary prevention is more challenging, in a registry of patients who received an ICD for primary prevention QTC > 550 ms, prior syncope on BB, and genetic data were found to be predictive of appropriate shocks [94].
Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited channelopathy associated with an elevated risk of SCD. To date, there is no validated universal risk stratification strategy [95]. Procainamide challenge is used for diagnosis, but it is not clear how to interpret the results. In asymptomatic patients, provoked type 1 ECG pattern was not associated with increased risk of death [96]. However, in symptomatic patients, positive test was associated with increased mortality [97]. Several studies have been proposing different risk factors. In the FINGER registry, only CS and spontaneous type 1 ECG pattern were statistically significant predictors [96]. Other risk factors were proposed but not validated in larger studies, including QRS fragmentation, ventricular repolarization period < 200 ms, QRS duration > 120 ms, positive programmed electrical stimulation test, sinus node dysfunction, and male gender [98, 99]. In the SABRUS registry, a quarter of the patients presented with life-threatening arrhythmic event did not meet the current criteria for ICD implantation [100]. Genetic factors might have a greater role in the risk stratification in the near future, as well as the assessment of the arrhythmogenic substrate in the RV [101]. Belhassen et al. showed that treatment with quinidine decreased the inducibility of VF in patients who had inducible VF at baseline EP study [102]. To date, quinidine is reserved for patients who refuse ICD implantation [46, 47]. ICD therapy or RFA should be considered in symptomatic patients or patients with VF storm. In asymptomatic patients with BrS, quinidine therapy or no therapy is both acceptable. There is a subgroup of patients with BrS who manifest with polymorphic VT/VF, triggered by RVOT ectopy PVCs; in this selected subgroup, ablation is a reasonable option [103].
Catecholaminergic polymorphic VT (CPVT) is caused by a mutation in the Ryanodine receptor and causes polymorphic VT with normal QT interval. Flecainide in combination with beta-blockers has demonstrated partial or complete suppression of VA in 76% in a recent review of 15 clinical studies [104]. Short QT syndrome (SQTS) is a rare malignant channelopathy causing VA and SCD. The diagnosis is based on ECG findings (QTc < 330 ms or < 360 ms in combination with CS, arrest, family history of SCD at young age (< 40), or family history of SQTS) and genetic findings. Currently, hydroquinidine is the first-line therapy for SQTS [105]. Early repolarization syndromes have recently been reported to be more malignant than previously thought, especially with elevation in inferior or lateral leads [106, 107]. Idiopathic VF (IVF) is a rare cause of SCD that can overlap with VA syndromes, and hence, full electrophysiological assessment should be performed before calling this diagnosis.
In patients with high-risk accessory pathways (AP), RFA is recommended. It should be noted that post-ablation the mortality is patients with WPW syndrome is similar to the general population [108]. Prophylactic AP ablation is not recommended to all asymptomatic patients with low-risk pathways [109,110,111,112,113].
The Role of PVCs and Non-sustained VT as a Cause of SCD
Frequent PVCs are defined if occurring ≥ 1 time during a standard electrocardiographic recording or ≥ 30 times over a 1-h recording. In a meta-analysis of 11 studies with a total of 106,195 participants, frequent PVCs were associated with increased risk for sudden cardiac death and total cardiac death [114]. It should be noted that the participants in those studies were screened for underlying SHD. In addition, the presence of multifocal PVCs and NSVT association with a higher incidence of mortality is well described in various series [115,116,117]. In a single study, PVCs that occur during recovery are a powerful predictor of death compared with PVCs occurring during exercise [118]. High PVC burden (> 10,000–20,000 a day) can be associated with a deterioration of the LVEF [119]. Early recognition of LV deterioration and early intervention are critical.
Evaluation, Risk Stratification, and Current Guidelines
Systemic evaluation and risk stratification in patients at risk for SCD or SCD survivors are important [46, 47]. Accurate personal and family history taking, baseline 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), 24-h (or more) ECG monitor (Holters, loop/event recorders), exercise stress test, provocative tests, cardiac imaging (TTE, CMR), and genetic testing are recommended. CAD should be excluded in patients without acute coronary syndrome by non-invasive test when possible in patients above the age of 40 and risk factors for CVD. For patients with a documented VA, cardiac biomarkers, invasive cardiac imaging by cardiac catheterization or CT angiography is recommended to rule out CAD.
Among several non-invasive markers of risk of SCD, only the LV dysfunction (in both ICMP and NICM), in combination with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, is consistently predictive of SCD and therefore used to identify candidates ICD for primary prevention of SCD [49, 55]. Several biomarkers have been tested. Pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (both NT and B-type) are showing correlation with the risk of VA [120]. Galectin-3 and ST2 showed association with markedly increased risk of cardiac death, all-cause mortality, and heart transplantation [121,122,123]. ECG markers including heart rate variability, late potentials, microvolt T-wave alternans, and QT interval dispersion were shown to predict SCD in several studies. Relative wall thickness is an echocardiogram marker that was shown to correlate with VA in patients with HF and HCM [124]. To date, none of these markers is used in clinical practice.
CMR can identify arrhythmogenic substrate and guide ablation therapy or inform ICD indication. In an HCM cohort of 177 patients with no or only mild symptoms, myocardial fibrosis detected by CMR was associated with greater likelihood and increased the frequency of VA (including NSVT) on ambulatory Holter ECG [125]. In addition, patients with a VA event and HCM had a wider extension of LGE [126]. Moreover, CMR-detected mid-wall myocardial fibrosis was demonstrated as an independent predictor of mortality in patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis providing an 8-fold increase in all-cause mortality compared to similar patients without LGE [127]. Additionally, gadolinium kinetics reflecting cardiac amyloid burden can be used as predictor of the mortality risk [128]. The introduction of T2 CMR to identify myocardial siderosis and appropriate intensification of iron chelation treatment was named as a game changer in the treatment protocols [129]. Interestingly, post-mortem MR imaging of the heart, which identified correctly the diagnosis in 12 patients who subsequently had positive findings at conventional autopsy for ARVC, and hence was found useful in determining the cause of sudden death [130]. Moreover, ARVC patients with syncope have greater LGE than those of patients without syncope [131].
Electrophysiology study (EPS) is recommended in patients with symptoms suggestive of VA, with known CAD and myocardial scar and SHD. It may help to differentiate ARVC from RV outflow tachycardia and sarcoidosis and to serve as a risk-stratification tool [30, 132]. EPS is not recommended for risk stratification for VA in the setting of long QT syndrome (LQTS), CPVT, short QT syndrome, or early repolarization syndromes. The utility of EPS is a matter of a debate in BrS [133].
Wide population screening tools are still not available. ECG is not recommended due to cost-benefit considerations and the potential for false positive/negative results. Genetic screening is very expensive and may confer ethical problems. Currently, screening is recommended for selected groups such as athletes. Unfortunately, in a registry from Israel, the incidence rates of SCD in competitive athletes following the implementation of screening programs did not improve [134]. American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Rhythm Society (AHA/ACC/HRS) and ESC [46, 47] guidelines are recommending for screening first-degree family members of sudden death victims to identify individuals at risk and adequately prevent sudden death in conditions like CPVT, or ARVC, HCM, and some channelopathies like LQTS [135,136,137,138,139]. Yet, according to a report from 2008, only 40% of family members are screened [140].Figure 1 summarizes the workup for SCD.
Gaps in Evidence and Future Perspectives
Currently, there is no data regarding patients with HF with mildly reduced LVEF; this question will be assessed in the PRESERVE-EF and REFINE-ICD trials. EPS-guided ICD placement in the first 40 days post-MI will be assessed in the PROTECT-ICD trial. New studies are needed to refine the indications for ICD in NICMP.
Conclusion
SCD is a major cause of death despite that advancement is our knowledge and treatment. Future studies will need to be done to accurately identify patients at risk. The implantation of big data, artificial intelligence, and genetic data will open a new era in the understanding and treatment of SCD.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Buxton AE, Calkins H, Callans DJ, DiMarco JP, Fisher JD, Greene HL, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2006 key data elements and definitions for electrophysiological studies and procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical data standards (ACC/AHA/HRS writing committee to develop data standards on electrophysiology). Circulation. 2006;114(23):2534–70.
Goldberger JJ, Buxton AE, Cain M, Costantini O, Exner DV, Knight BP, et al. Risk stratification for arrhythmic sudden cardiac death: identifying the roadblocks. Circulation. 2011;123(21):2423–30.
Mendis S, Puska P, Norrving B, Organization WH. Global atlas on cardiovascular disease prevention and control/edited by: Shanthi Mendis...[et al.]. Global atlas on cardiovascular disease prevention and control/edited by: Shanthi Mendis[et al]. 2011.
Shuvy M, Qiu F, Lau G, Koh M, Dorian P, Geri G, et al. Temporal trends in sudden cardiac death in Ontario, Canada. Resuscitation. 2019;136:1–7.
Stevenson WG, Stevenson LW, Middlekauff HR, Saxon LA. Sudden death prevention in patients with advanced ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 1993;88(6):2953–61.
Cherry EM, Fenton FH, Gilmour RF Jr. Mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmias: a dynamical systems-based perspective. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012;302(12):H2451–63.
Junttila MJ, Hookana E, Kaikkonen KS, Kortelainen ML, Myerburg RJ, Huikuri HV. Temporal Trends in the Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of Victims of Sudden Cardiac Death in the Absence of Previously Identified Heart Disease. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9(6):e003723.
Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127(1):e6–e245.
Nichols M, Townsend N, Scarborough P, Rayner M. Cardiovascular disease in Europe: epidemiological update. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(39):3028–34.
Volpi A, Cavalli A, Franzosi MG, Maggioni A, Mauri F, Santoro E, et al. One-year prognosis of primary ventricular fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction. The GISSI (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto miocardico) investigators. Am J Cardiol. 1989;63(17):1174–8.
Dumas F, Cariou A, Manzo-Silberman S, Grimaldi D, Vivien B, Rosencher J, et al. Immediate percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with better survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: insights from the PROCAT (Parisian region out of hospital cardiac ArresT) registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(3):200–7.
Spaulding CM, Joly LM, Rosenberg A, Monchi M, Weber SN, Dhainaut JF, et al. Immediate coronary angiography in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(23):1629–33.
Bougouin W, Marijon E, Puymirat E, Defaye P, Celermajer DS, Le Heuzey JY, et al. Incidence of sudden cardiac death after ventricular fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction: a 5-year cause-of-death analysis of the FAST-MI 2005 registry. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(2):116–22.
Goyal A, Spertus JA, Gosch K, Venkitachalam L, Jones PG, Van den Berghe G, et al. Serum potassium levels and mortality in acute myocardial infarction. Jama. 2012;307(2):157–64.
Jouven X, Desnos M, Guerot C, Ducimetiere P. Predicting sudden death in the population: the Paris prospective study I. Circulation. 1999;99(15):1978–83.
Friedlander Y, Siscovick DS, Weinmann S, Austin MA, Psaty BM, Lemaitre RN, et al. Family history as a risk factor for primary cardiac arrest. Circulation. 1998;97(2):155–60.
Dekker LR, Bezzina CR, Henriques JP, Tanck MW, Koch KT, Alings MW, et al. Familial sudden death is an important risk factor for primary ventricular fibrillation: a case-control study in acute myocardial infarction patients. Circulation. 2006;114(11):1140–5.
Kaikkonen KS, Kortelainen ML, Linna E, Huikuri HV. Family history and the risk of sudden cardiac death as a manifestation of an acute coronary event. Circulation. 2006;114(14):1462–7.
Bezzina CR, Pazoki R, Bardai A, Marsman RF, de Jong J, Blom MT, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies a susceptibility locus at 21q21 for ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction. Nat Genet. 2010;42(8):688–91.
Arking DE, Junttila MJ, Goyette P, Huertas-Vazquez A, Eijgelsheim M, Blom MT, et al. Identification of a sudden cardiac death susceptibility locus at 2q24.2 through genome-wide association in European ancestry individuals. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(6):e1002158.
Gorgels AP, Gijsbers C, de Vreede-Swagemakers J, Lousberg A, Wellens HJ. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest--the relevance of heart failure. The Maastricht circulatory arrest registry. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(13):1204–9.
Lecomte D, Fornes P, Fouret P, Nicolas G. Isolated myocardial fibrosis as a cause of sudden cardiac death and its possible relation to myocarditis. J Forensic Sci. 1993;38(3):617–21.
Frick M, Pachinger O, Polzl G. Myocarditis and sudden cardiac death in athletes. Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Herz. 2009;34(4):299–304.
Basso C, Calabrese F, Corrado D, Thiene G. Postmortem diagnosis in sudden cardiac death victims: macroscopic, microscopic and molecular findings. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;50(2):290–300.
Drory Y, Turetz Y, Hiss Y, Lev B, Fisman EZ, Pines A, et al. Sudden unexpected death in persons less than 40 years of age. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68(13):1388–92.
Neuspiel DR, Kuller LH. Sudden and unexpected natural death in childhood and adolescence. JAMA. 1985;254(10):1321–5.
Basso C, Corrado D, Thiene G. Cardiovascular causes of sudden death in young individuals including athletes. Cardiol Rev. 1999;7(3):127–35.
• Maron MS, Rowin EJ, Wessler BS, Mooney PJ, Fatima A, Patel P, et al. Enhanced American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association strategy for prevention of sudden cardiac death in high-risk patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;22(5):1391. This observational study suggests that the enhanced ACC/AHA guideline- and practice-based risk-factor strategy was highly effective at predicting SCD events to allow for timely prophylactic ICD placement.
• Nalliah CJ, Mahajan R, Elliott AD, Haqqani H, Lau DH, Vohra JK, et al. Mitral valve prolapse and sudden cardiac death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2019;105(2):144–51 This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that the absolute number of patients exposed to the risk of SCD is significant in the general general MVP population, although the incidence of life-threatening arrhytmic events remains relatively low.
Calkins H, Corrado D, Marcus F. Risk stratification in Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2017;136(21):2068–82.
Romero J, Grushko M, Briceno DF, Natale A, Di Biase L. Radiofrequency ablation in Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017;19(9):82.
Blanck Z, Dhala A, Deshpande S, Sra J, Jazayeri M, Akhtar M. Bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia: cumulative experience in 48 patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1993;4(3):253–62.
Tchou P, Jazayeri M, Denker S, Dongas J, Caceres J, Akhtar M. Transcatheter electrical ablation of right bundle branch. A method of treating macroreentrant ventricular tachycardia attributed to bundle branch reentry. Circulation. 1988;78(2):246–57.
Maron BJ, Haas TS, Murphy CJ, Ahluwalia A, Rutten-Ramos S. Incidence and causes of sudden death in U.S. college athletes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(16):1636–43.
Durakovic Z, Misigoj Durakovic M, Skavic J, Tomljenovic A. Myopericarditis and sudden cardiac death due to physical exercise in male athletes. Coll Antropol. 2008;32(2):399–401.
Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moye LA, Basta L, Brown EJ Jr, Cuddy TE, et al. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. The SAVE investigators. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(10):669–77.
Young JB, Dunlap ME, Pfeffer MA, Probstfield JL, Cohen-Solal A, Dietz R, et al. Mortality and morbidity reduction with candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction: results of the CHARM low-left ventricular ejection fraction trials. Circulation. 2004;110(17):2618–26.
Berbenetz NM, Mrkobrada M. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016;16(1):246.
Alberte C, Zipes DP. Use of nonantiarrhythmic drugs for prevention of sudden cardiac death. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003;14(9 Suppl):S87–95.
Pitt B, Remme W, Zannad F, Neaton J, Martinez F, Roniker B, et al. Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(14):1309–21.
Mitchell LB, Powell JL, Gillis AM, Kehl V, Hallstrom AP. Are lipid-lowering drugs also antiarrhythmic drugs? An analysis of the Antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(1):81–7.
McMurray JJ, Packer M, Desai AS, Gong J, Lefkowitz MP, Rizkala AR, et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(11):993–1004.
Reiter MJ, Reiffel JA. Importance of beta blockade in the therapy of serious ventricular arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82(4a):9i–19i.
Kontos MC, Diercks DB, Ho PM, Wang TY, Chen AY, Roe MT. Treatment and outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction treated with acute beta-blocker therapy: results from the American College of Cardiology's NCDR((R)). Am Heart J. 2011;161(5):864–70.
Ruskin JN. The cardiac arrhythmia suppression trial (CAST). N Engl J Med. 1989;321(6):386–8.
Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, Bryant WJ, Callans DJ, Curtis AB, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 2018;138(13):e272–391.
Priori SG, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, Blom N, Borggrefe M, Camm J, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: the task force for the Management of Patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Eur Heart J. 2015;36(41):2793–867.
Nul DR, Doval HC, Grancelli HO, Varini SD, Soifer S, Perrone SV, et al. Heart rate is a marker of amiodarone mortality reduction in severe heart failure. The GESICA-GEMA investigators. Grupo de Estudio de la Sobrevida en la Insuficiencia Cardiaca en Argentina-Grupo de Estudios Multicentricos en Argentina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29(6):1199–205.
Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, Poole JE, Packer DL, Boineau R, et al. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(3):225–37.
The Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators. A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(22):1576–83.
Kuck KH, Cappato R, Siebels J, Ruppel R. Randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest : the cardiac arrest study Hamburg (CASH). Circulation. 2000;102(7):748–54.
Connolly SJ, Gent M, Roberts RS, Dorian P, Roy D, Sheldon RS, et al. Canadian implantable defibrillator study (CIDS) : a randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator against amiodarone. Circulation. 2000;101(11):1297–302.
Connolly SJ, Hallstrom AP, Cappato R, Schron EB, Kuck KH, Zipes DP, et al. Meta-analysis of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator secondary prevention trials. AVID, CASH and CIDS studies. Antiarrhythmics vs Implantable Defibrillator study. Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg. Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study. Eur Heart J. 2000;21(24):2071–8.
Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Klein H, et al. Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(26):1933–40.
Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Klein H, Wilber DJ, Cannom DS, et al. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(12):877–83.
Klein HU, Reek S. The MUSTT study: evaluating testing and treatment. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2000;4(Suppl 1):45–50.
Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH, Dorian P, Roberts RS, Hampton JR, Hatala R, et al. Prophylactic use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(24):2481–8.
Steinbeck G, Andresen D, Seidl K, Brachmann J, Hoffmann E, Wojciechowski D, et al. Defibrillator implantation early after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(15):1427–36.
Raviele A, Bongiorni MG, Brignole M, Cappato R, Capucci A, Gaita F, et al. Early EPS/ICD strategy in survivors of acute myocardial infarction with severe left ventricular dysfunction on optimal beta-blocker treatment. The BEta-blocker STrategy plus ICD trial. Europace. 2005;7(4):327–37.
Kutyifa V, Moss AJ, Klein H, Biton Y, McNitt S, MacKecknie B, et al. Use of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator in high-risk cardiac patients: data from the prospective registry of patients using the wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WEARIT-II registry). Circulation. 2015;132(17):1613–9.
Olgin JE, Pletcher MJ, Vittinghoff E, Wranicz J, Malik R, Morin DP, et al. Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(13):1205–15.
Kadish A, Dyer A, Daubert JP, Quigg R, Estes NA, Anderson KP, et al. Prophylactic defibrillator implantation in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(21):2151–8.
•• Kober L, Thune JJ, Nielsen JC, Haarbo J, Videbaek L, Korup E, et al. Defibrillator implantation in patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(13):1221–30 The findings of this trial induced further studies on ICD implantation indications in NICMP and questionned the established prevention strategies in this group of patients.
Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, Delurgio DB, Leon AR, Loh E, et al. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(24):1845–53.
Young JB, Abraham WT, Smith AL, Leon AR, Lieberman R, Wilkoff B, et al. Combined cardiac resynchronization and implantable cardioversion defibrillation in advanced chronic heart failure: the MIRACLE ICD trial. Jama. 2003;289(20):2685–94.
Healey JS, Hohnloser SH, Exner DV, Birnie DH, Parkash R, Connolly SJ, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation: results from the resynchronization for ambulatory heart failure trial (RAFT). Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5(5):566–70.
Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, Krueger S, Kass DA, De Marco T, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(21):2140–50.
Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(15):1539–49.
Cleland JG, Freemantle N, Erdmann E, Gras D, Kappenberger L, Tavazzi L, et al. Long-term mortality with cardiac resynchronization therapy in the cardiac resynchronization-heart failure (CARE-HF) trial. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012;14(6):628–34.
Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, Klein H, Brown MW, Daubert JP, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(14):1329–38.
Goldenberg I, Kutyifa V, Klein HU, Cannom DS, Brown MW, Dan A, et al. Survival with cardiac-resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(18):1694–701.
Poole JE, Johnson GW, Hellkamp AS, Anderson J, Callans DJ, Raitt MH, et al. Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(10):1009–17.
Biton Y, Daimee UA, Baman JR, Kutyifa V, McNitt S, Polonsky B, et al. Prognostic importance of defibrillator-appropriate shocks and Antitachycardia pacing in patients with mild heart failure. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(6):e010346.
Moss AJ, Schuger C, Beck CA, Brown MW, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, et al. Reduction in inappropriate therapy and mortality through ICD programming. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(24):2275–83.
Saeed M, Hanna I, Robotis D, Styperek R, Polosajian L, Khan A, et al. Programming implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with primary prevention indication to prolong time to first shock: results from the PROVIDE study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(1):52–9.
Bunch TJ, Weiss JP, Crandall BG, Day JD, May HT, Bair TL, et al. Patients treated with catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia after an ICD shock have lower long-term rates of death and heart failure hospitalization than do patients treated with medical management only. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(4):533–40.
Tung R, Shivkumar K. Integrated care for management of ventricular arrhythmias: can a specialized unit and catheter ablation improve mortality? Circulation. 2013;127(13):1354–6.
Kuck KH, Schaumann A, Eckardt L, Willems S, Ventura R, Delacretaz E, et al. Catheter ablation of stable ventricular tachycardia before defibrillator implantation in patients with coronary heart disease (VTACH): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9708):31–40.
Reddy VY, Reynolds MR, Neuzil P, Richardson AW, Taborsky M, Jongnarangsin K, et al. Prophylactic catheter ablation for the prevention of defibrillator therapy. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(26):2657–65.
Della Bella P, Baratto F, Tsiachris D, Trevisi N, Vergara P, Bisceglia C, et al. Management of ventricular tachycardia in the setting of a dedicated unit for the treatment of complex ventricular arrhythmias: long-term outcome after ablation. Circulation. 2013;127(13):1359–68.
Sapp JL, Wells GA, Parkash R, Stevenson WG, Blier L, Sarrazin JF, et al. Ventricular tachycardia ablation versus escalation of antiarrhythmic drugs. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(2):111–21.
Sauer WH, Zado E, Gerstenfeld EP, Marchlinski FE, Callans DJ. Incidence and predictors of mortality following ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7(1):9–14.
Algra A, Tijssen JG, Roelandt JR, Pool J, Lubsen J. QTc prolongation measured by standard 12-lead electrocardiography is an independent risk factor for sudden death due to cardiac arrest. Circulation. 1991;83(6):1888–94.
Straus SM, Kors JA, De Bruin ML, van der Hooft CS, Hofman A, Heeringa J, et al. Prolonged QTc interval and risk of sudden cardiac death in a population of older adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(2):362–7.
Soliman EZ, Prineas RJ, Case LD, Russell G, Rosamond W, Rea T, et al. Electrocardiographic and clinical predictors separating atherosclerotic sudden cardiac death from incident coronary heart disease. Heart. 2011;97(19):1597–601.
Barsheshet A, Dotsenko O, Goldenberg I. Genotype-specific risk stratification and management of patients with long QT syndrome. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2013;18(6):499–509.
Moss AJ, Shimizu W, Wilde AA, Towbin JA, Zareba W, Robinson JL, et al. Clinical aspects of type-1 long-QT syndrome by location, coding type, and biophysical function of mutations involving the KCNQ1 gene. Circulation. 2007;115(19):2481–9.
Migdalovich D, Moss AJ, Lopes CM, Costa J, Ouellet G, Barsheshet A, et al. Mutation and gender-specific risk in type 2 long QT syndrome: implications for risk stratification for life-threatening cardiac events in patients with long QT syndrome. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(10):1537–43.
Lehmann MH, Hardy S, Archibald D, Quart B, MacNeil DJ. Sex difference in risk of torsade de pointes with d,l-sotalol. Circulation. 1996;94(10):2535–41.
Buber J, Mathew J, Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Barsheshet A, McNitt S, et al. Risk of recurrent cardiac events after onset of menopause in women with congenital long-QT syndrome types 1 and 2. Circulation. 2011;123(24):2784–91.
Wilde AA, Moss AJ, Kaufman ES, Shimizu W, Peterson DR, Benhorin J, et al. Clinical aspects of type 3 long-QT syndrome: an international multicenter study. Circulation. 2016;134(12):872–82.
Abu-Zeitone A, Peterson DR, Polonsky B, McNitt S, Moss AJ. Efficacy of different beta-blockers in the treatment of long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(13):1352–8.
Goldenberg I, Bradley J, Moss A, McNitt S, Polonsky S, Robinson JL, et al. Beta-blocker efficacy in high-risk patients with the congenital long-QT syndrome types 1 and 2: implications for patient management. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(8):893–901.
Biton Y, Rosero S, Moss AJ, Goldenberg I, Kutyifa V, McNitt S, et al. Primary prevention with the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in high-risk long-QT syndrome patients. Europace. 2019;21(2):339–46.
Mizusawa Y, Wilde AA. Brugada syndrome. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5(3):606–16.
Probst V, Veltmann C, Eckardt L, Meregalli PG, Gaita F, Tan HL, et al. Long-term prognosis of patients diagnosed with Brugada syndrome: results from the FINGER Brugada syndrome registry. Circulation. 2010;121(5):635–43.
Sacher F, Probst V, Maury P, Babuty D, Mansourati J, Komatsu Y, et al. Outcome after implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with Brugada syndrome: a multicenter study-part 2. Circulation. 2013;128(16):1739–47.
Priori SG, Gasparini M, Napolitano C, Della Bella P, Ottonelli AG, Sassone B, et al. Risk stratification in Brugada syndrome: results of the PRELUDE (PRogrammed ELectrical stimUlation preDictive valuE) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(1):37–45.
Sieira J, Conte G, Ciconte G, Chierchia GB, Casado-Arroyo R, Baltogiannis G, et al. A score model to predict risk of events in patients with Brugada syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(22):1756–63.
Milman A, Andorin A, Gourraud JB, Postema PG, Sacher F, Mabo P, et al. Profile of patients with Brugada syndrome presenting with their first documented arrhythmic event: data from the survey on arrhythmic events in BRUgada syndrome (SABRUS). Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(5):716–24.
Lambiase PD, Ahmed AK, Ciaccio EJ, Brugada R, Lizotte E, Chaubey S, et al. High-density substrate mapping in Brugada syndrome: combined role of conduction and repolarization heterogeneities in arrhythmogenesis. Circulation. 2009;120(2):106–17 1-4.
Belhassen B, Glick A, Viskin S. Efficacy of quinidine in high-risk patients with Brugada syndrome. Circulation. 2004;110(13):1731–7.
Haissaguerre M, Extramiana F, Hocini M, Cauchemez B, Jais P, Cabrera JA, et al. Mapping and ablation of ventricular fibrillation associated with long-QT and Brugada syndromes. Circulation. 2003;108(8):925–8.
Lieve KV, Wilde AA, van der Werf C. The role of flecainide in the Management of Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol Rev. 2016;5(1):45–9.
Gaita F, Giustetto C, Bianchi F, Schimpf R, Haissaguerre M, Calo L, et al. Short QT syndrome: pharmacological treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(8):1494–9.
Haissaguerre M, Derval N, Sacher F, Jesel L, Deisenhofer I, de Roy L, et al. Sudden cardiac arrest associated with early repolarization. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(19):2016–23.
Sinner MF, Reinhard W, Muller M, Beckmann BM, Martens E, Perz S, et al. Association of early repolarization pattern on ECG with risk of cardiac and all-cause mortality: a population-based prospective cohort study (MONICA/KORA). PLoS Med. 2010;7(7):e1000314.
Borregaard R, Lukac P, Gerdes C, Moller D, Mortensen PT, Pedersen L, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of accessory pathways in patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-white syndrome: the long-term mortality and risk of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17(1):117–22.
Pappone C, Santinelli V, Manguso F, Augello G, Santinelli O, Vicedomini G, et al. A randomized study of prophylactic catheter ablation in asymptomatic patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-white syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(19):1803–11.
Pappone C, Manguso F, Santinelli R, Vicedomini G, Sala S, Paglino G, et al. Radiofrequency ablation in children with asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-white syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(12):1197–205.
Bunch TJ, May HT, Bair TL, Anderson JL, Crandall BG, Cutler MJ, et al. Long-term natural history of adult Wolff-Parkinson-white syndrome patients treated with and without catheter ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8(6):1465–71.
Obeyesekere MN, Klein GJ. The asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-white patient: time to be more proactive? Circulation. 2014;130(10):805–7.
Pappone C, Vicedomini G, Manguso F, Saviano M, Baldi M, Pappone A, et al. Wolff-Parkinson-white syndrome in the era of catheter ablation: insights from a registry study of 2169 patients. Circulation. 2014;130(10):811–9.
Ataklte F, Erqou S, Laukkanen J, Kaptoge S. Meta-analysis of ventricular premature complexes and their relation to cardiac mortality in general populations. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112(8):1263–70.
Lin CY, Chang SL, Lin YJ, Lo LW, Chung FP, Chen YY, et al. Long-term outcome of multiform premature ventricular complexes in structurally normal heart. Int J Cardiol. 2015;180:80–5.
Ruberman W, Weinblatt E, Goldberg JD, Frank CW, Chaudhary BS, Shapiro S. Ventricular premature complexes and sudden death after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1981;64(2):297–305.
Maggioni AP, Zuanetti G, Franzosi MG, Rovelli F, Santoro E, Staszewsky L, et al. Prevalence and prognostic significance of ventricular arrhythmias after acute myocardial infarction in the fibrinolytic era. GISSI-2 results. Circulation. 1993;87(2):312–22.
Frolkis JP, Pothier CE, Blackstone EH, Lauer MS. Frequent ventricular ectopy after exercise as a predictor of death. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(9):781–90.
Lee GK, Klarich KW, Grogan M, Cha YM. Premature ventricular contraction-induced cardiomyopathy: a treatable condition. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5(1):229–36.
Levine YC, Rosenberg MA, Mittleman M, Samuel M, Methachittiphan N, Link M, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide is a major predictor of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(7):1109–16.
Pascual-Figal DA, Ordonez-Llanos J, Tornel PL, Vazquez R, Puig T, Valdes M, et al. Soluble ST2 for predicting sudden cardiac death in patients with chronic heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(23):2174–9.
Daniels LB, Clopton P, Iqbal N, Tran K, Maisel AS. Association of ST2 levels with cardiac structure and function and mortality in outpatients. Am Heart J. 2010;160(4):721–8.
Ky B, French B, McCloskey K, Rame JE, McIntosh E, Shahi P, et al. High-sensitivity ST2 for prediction of adverse outcomes in chronic heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2011;4(2):180–7.
Biton Y, Goldenberg I, Kutyifa V, Baman JR, Solomon S, Moss AJ, et al. Relative Wall thickness and the risk for ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(3):303–12.
Adabag AS, Maron BJ, Appelbaum E, Harrigan CJ, Buros JL, Gibson CM, et al. Occurrence and frequency of arrhythmias in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in relation to delayed enhancement on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(14):1369–74.
Amano Y, Suzuki Y, Yanagisawa F, Omori Y, Matsumoto N. Relationship between extension or texture features of late gadolinium enhancement and ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:4092469.
Dweck MR, Joshi S, Murigu T, Alpendurada F, Jabbour A, Melina G, et al. Midwall fibrosis is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(12):1271–9.
Maceira AM, Prasad SK, Hawkins PN, Roughton M, Pennell DJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and prognosis in cardiac amyloidosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008;10:54.
Modell B, Khan M, Darlison M, Westwood MA, Ingram D, Pennell DJ. Improved survival of thalassaemia major in the UK and relation to T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008;10:42.
Puranik R, Gray B, Lackey H, Yeates L, Parker G, Duflou J, et al. Comparison of conventional autopsy and magnetic resonance imaging in determining the cause of sudden death in the young. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16:44.
Cheng H, Lu M, Hou C, Chen X, Wang J, Li L, et al. Comparative study of CMR characteristics between arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy patients with/without syncope. Int J Card Imaging. 2014;30(7):1365–72.
Okada DR, Smith J, Derakhshan A, Gowani Z, Zimmerman SL, Misra S, et al. Electrophysiology study for risk stratification in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and abnormal cardiac imaging. IJC Heart Vasc. 2019;23:100342.
Brugada J, Brugada R, Brugada P. Determinants of sudden cardiac death in individuals with the electrocardiographic pattern of Brugada syndrome and no previous cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2003;108(25):3092–6.
Steinvil A, Chundadze T, Zeltser D, Rogowski O, Halkin A, Galily Y, et al. Mandatory electrocardiographic screening of athletes to reduce their risk for sudden death proven fact or wishful thinking? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(11):1291–6.
Priori SG, Wilde AA, Horie M, Cho Y, Behr ER, Berul C, et al. Executive summary: HRS/EHRA/APHRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(12):e85–108.
Charron P, Arad M, Arbustini E, Basso C, Bilinska Z, Elliott P, et al. Genetic counselling and testing in cardiomyopathies: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on myocardial and pericardial diseases. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(22):2715–26.
Groeneweg JA, Bhonsale A, James CA, te Riele AS, Dooijes D, Tichnell C, et al. Clinical presentation, long-term follow-up, and outcomes of 1001 Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy patients and family members. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2015;8(3):437–46.
Christiaans I, Birnie E, van Langen IM, van Spaendonck-Zwarts KY, van Tintelen JP, van den Berg MP, et al. The yield of risk stratification for sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy myosin-binding protein C gene mutation carriers: focus on predictive screening. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(7):842–8.
Bai R, Napolitano C, Bloise R, Monteforte N, Priori SG. Yield of genetic screening in inherited cardiac channelopathies: how to prioritize access to genetic testing. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2(1):6–15.
Christiaans I, Birnie E, Bonsel GJ, Wilde AA, van Langen IM. Uptake of genetic counselling and predictive DNA testing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur J Hum Genet. 2008;16(10):1201–7.
Acknowledgments
Dr. Yitschak Biton is a Mirowski-Moss Career Development Awardee.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Ivaylo Tonchev, David Luria, and Yitschak Biton declare that they have no conflict of interest.
David Orenstein reports personal fees from Biotronik, Johnson and Johnson, and Medtronic.
Chaim Lotan reports personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Invasive Electrophysiology and Pacing
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tonchev, I., Luria, D., Orenstein, D. et al. For Whom the Bell Tolls. Curr Cardiol Rep 21, 106 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-019-1191-z
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-019-1191-z