Abstract
The aim of the preface is to introduce the scope of this special issue (SI). We explain our editorial approach and summarise our findings based on articles included in this SI. Finally, we outline future research questions which stemmed out of the discussions of this SI.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The impact of disasters on people lives and properties across the world has attracted significant attention from governments, policy makers, non-governmental organizations and scholars (Altay et al. 2018; Dubey et al. 2019). Altay and Green (2006, p. 475) argue that, “Disasters are large intractable problems that test the ability of communities and nations to effectively protect their populations and infrastructure, to reduce both human and property loss, and to rapidly recover”. Our review of available databases such as EM-DAT, maintained by the Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), suggest that in the year 2018 alone, there were 281 climate-related and geophysical events recorded in the EM-DAT with 10,733 deaths, and over 60 million people affected across the world. Galindo and Batta (2013) further explain disaster relief operations as the set of activities performed before, during and after a disaster to reduce its impact on human lives and properties (c.f. Altay and Green 2006). However, many of these activities often require operations research (OR)/management science (MS) skills (Altay and Green 2006; Galindo and Batta 2013). For instance, location of shelters in preparation for evacuations may be addressed as a special case of location analysis; evacuation itself can be better analysed through the applications of gravity location model or transportation techniques. Moreover, in the era of large data, the location intelligence (i.e., big data analytics capability powered by artificial intelligence) may reveal better opportunities. Despite the increasing applications of OR/MS techniques, it is often observed that most of the times the disaster relief team fail to understand the survivors’ needs and even when the disaster relief team reaches the affected areas in time, the relief to the survivor is still far from reality (Altay 2008; Chakravarty 2014; Gunasekaran et al. 2018). Hence, in such cases statistics and probabilistic approach may further help address uncertainties associated with such large events in disaster locations and demands; and in general various OR/MS techniques can be applied to the different stages of disaster relief operations involving multiple diverse actors. In the past we have seen some significant efforts from OR/MS scholars in shaping the disaster relief operations field via application of OR/MS techniques (see, Altay and Green 2006; Galindo and Batta 2013; Besiou et al. 2018). We have noted some significant rise in articles focusing on disaster relief operations/humanitarian operations with rich applications of mathematical techniques or statistical methods to address some of the pressing issues like coordination among humanitarian actors, vehicle routing problems, demand forecasting or optimization of resources at various stages that includes: mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery. However, the application of OR/MS techniques in disaster relief operations has often attracted criticisms from scholars (see Galindo and Batta 2013). This may be attributed to the lack of adequate understanding of disaster relief operations management field (Kovács and Spens 2011; Holguín-Veras et al. 2012). We have noted this as a clear gap in the existing literature. Hence, to address this gap we have organized a SI for Annals of Operations Research (AOR). We have attempted to address the following research questions via this SI:
- 1.
What is the current state of art in disaster relief operations management?
- 2.
How were various OR/MS techniques used to address various issues in various stages of disaster relief operations management?
- 3.
What are the gaps noted in the applications of OR/MS techniques in various stages of disaster relief operations?
To address our research questions we have invited articles via various platforms to build a collection of high-quality research that further our understanding towards complex disaster relief operations involving multiple actors characterized by different nationalities, cultures and values. Moreover, with this SI we wanted to invite articles in context to applications of OR/MS techniques in various stages of disaster relief operations. Hence, the invitation was not limited to a specific method or methods. We encouraged scholars to submit qualitative based research, survey based studies, mathematical modelling, and simulation based studies. These methods offered solid contribution to theory and practice. Potential topics for this SI included:
Disaster relief operations
Agility in disaster relief chains
Adaptability in disaster relief chains/humanitarian supply chains
Alignment in disaster relief chains/humanitarian supply chains
Coordination and collaboration in disaster relief network/humanitarian supply chains
Resilience in humanitarian supply chains
Role of emerging technologies in disaster relief operations
Innovations in humanitarian supply chains
Swift-trust
Military–civil interface in humanitarian operations
Capacity building
Behavioural humanitarian operations
Relationship management in context to humanitarian operations
Performance measures and metrics in humanitarian supply chains
Logistics in humanitarian operations
Total quality management in humanitarian supply chain and logistics
Costing in humanitarian logistics and supply chains
After discouraging many inappropriate submissions, we ended up with 94 online submissions within the scope of our special issue. We invited two or more subject matter experts to review the 94 submissions. Based on their reports, we either rejected some of the papers or invited the authors to undertake extensive revisions. Finally, after multiple rounds of review and revision we accepted 59 articles for our SI classified into two parts.
2 Classification of accepted papers
In this section we have organized our accepted papers based on two complementary approaches: qualitative and quantitative (Kilmann and Mitroff 1976). We further propose the classification scheme (see Fig. 1), the two sub-categories (i.e., review and conceptual or case based studies) under qualitative category and three sub-categories (i.e., articles based on MCDM techniques, optimization and econometric modelling) under quantitative category.
We have further distributed 59 accepted articles based on the contributors (Fig. 2).
3 Future research directions
Based on the 59 articles, we have observed that the contributing authors to our SI have used qualitative and quantitative approaches. We have accepted 8 articles based on critical review of existing literature and 6 articles focusing on theory building (Figs. 1, 2). Hence, these 14 accepted articles in this SI provide comprehensive understanding of the state of the art of disaster relief operations management field. Hence, we can argue that these 8 articles may provide numerous directions to the humanitarian or disaster relief operations management scholars or policy makers to formulate their research hypotheses.
Secondly, we have 45 articles based on quantitative methods. We have further categorized these 45 articles into three sub-categories: MCDM techniques (5), optimization (34) and econometric modelling (6). Hence, these articles provide in depth understanding of the situation or circumstance under which MCDM tools, optimization techniques and econometric modelling can be applied to address complex situations at any stage in the disaster relief operations.
Further, this SI also offers interesting insights for building resilient disaster relief chains, developing inventory strategies for disaster relief materials and how emerging technologies like IoT and big data analytics capability can improve coordination among various partners engaged in disaster relief operations. These contributions have led to further theoretical debates surrounding disaster relief operations using OR/MS techniques. Yet, some research questions remain unaddressed:
RQ1. How can big data analytics capability powered by artificial intelligence help to improve the visibility in disaster relief chains?
RQ2. How can intelligent optimization techniques be used to solve complex vehicle routing or location analysis problems?
RQ3. How can game theoretic model help to explain the civil and military cooperation under limited information environment?
RQ4. How can soft OR techniques improve coordination among various humanitarian actors engaged in disaster relief operations?
We believe these research questions may further help to bridge the gap between disaster relief operations management and OR/MS field.
References
Akter, S., & Fosso Wamba, S. (2017). Big data and disaster management: A systematic review and agenda for future research. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2584-2.
Altay, N. (2008). Issues in disaster relief logistics. In M. Gad-el-Hak (Ed.), Large-scale disasters: Prediction, control and mitigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Altay, N., & Green, W. G., III. (2006). OR/MS research in disaster operations management. European Journal of Operational Research,175(1), 475–493.
Altay, N., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2018). Agility and resilience as antecedents of supply chain performance under moderating effects of organizational culture within the humanitarian setting: A dynamic capability view. Production Planning and Control,29(14), 1158–1174.
Anparasan, A., & Lejeune, M. (2017). Resource deployment and donation allocation for epidemic outbreaks. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2392-0.
Baharmand, H., Comes, T., & Lauras, M. (2017). Defining and measuring the network flexibility of humanitarian supply chains: Insights from the 2015 Nepal earthquake. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2713-y.
Baidya, A., & Bera, U. K. (2018). New model for addressing supply chain and transport safety for disaster relief operations. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2765-7.
Banomyong, R., Varadejsatitwong, P., & Oloruntoba, R. (2017). A systematic review of humanitarian operations, humanitarian logistics and humanitarian supply chain performance literature 2005 to 2016. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2549-5.
Bao, S., Zhang, C., Ouyang, M., & Miao, L. (2017). An integrated tri-level model for enhancing the resilience of facilities against intentional attacks. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2705-y.
Behl, A., & Dutta, P. (2018). Humanitarian supply chain management: A thematic literature review and future directions of research. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2806-2.
Besiou, M., Pedraza-Martinez, A. J., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2018). OR applied to humanitarian operations. European Journal of Operational Research,269(2), 397–405.
Çankaya, E., Ekici, A., & Özener, O. Ö. (2018). Humanitarian relief supplies distribution: An application of inventory routing problem. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2781-7.
Chakravarty, A. (2014). Humanitarian relief chain: Rapid response under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics,151, 146–157.
de Camargo, J. A., Mendonça, P. S. M., de Oliveira, J. H. C., Jabbour, C. J. C., & de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L. (2017). Giving voice to the silent: A framework for understanding stakeholders’ participation in socially-oriented initiatives, community-based actions and humanitarian operations projects. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2426-2.
de Mattos, R. G., Oliveira, F., Leiras, A., de Paula Filho, A. B., & Gonçalves, P. (2018). Robust optimization of the insecticide-treated bed nets procurement and distribution planning under uncertainty for malaria prevention and control. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3015-8.
Dubey, R., Altay, N., & Blome, C. (2017). Swift trust and commitment: The missing links for humanitarian supply chain coordination? Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2676-z.
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Roubaud, D., Fosso Wamba, S., Giannakis, M., et al. (2019). Big data analytics and organizational culture as complements to swift trust and collaborative performance in the humanitarian supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics,210, 120–136.
DuHadway, S., Carnovale, S., & Hazen, B. (2017). Understanding risk management for intentional supply chain disruptions: Risk detection, risk mitigation, and risk recovery. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2452-0.
Elluru, S., Gupta, H., Kaur, H., & Singh, S. P. (2017). Proactive and reactive models for disaster resilient supply chain. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2681-2.
Fazli-Khalaf, M., Khalilpourazari, S., & Mohammadi, M. (2017). Mixed robust possibilistic flexible chance constraint optimization model for emergency blood supply chain network design. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2729-3.
Fok, D., van Stel, A., Burke, A., & Thurik, R. (2019). How entry crowds and grows markets: The gradual disaster management view of market dynamics in the retail industry. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03322-y.
Fosso Wamba, S., Edwards, A., & Akter, S. (2017). Social media adoption and use for improved emergency services operations: The case of the NSW SES. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2545-9.
Galindo, G., & Batta, R. (2013). Review of recent developments in OR/MS research in disaster operations management. European Journal of Operational Research,230(2), 201–211.
Goldschmidt, K. H., & Kumar, S. (2017). Reducing the cost of humanitarian operations through disaster preparation and preparedness. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2587-z.
Griffith, D. A., Boehmke, B., Bradley, R. V., Hazen, B. T., & Johnson, A. W. (2017). Embedded analytics: Improving decision support for humanitarian logistics operations. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2607-z.
Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., Wamba, S. F., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B. T., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2018). Bridging humanitarian operations management and organisational theory. International Journal of Production Research,56(21), 6735–6740.
Gupta, S., Altay, N., & Luo, Z. (2017). Big data in humanitarian supply chain management: A review and further research directions. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2671-4.
Han, S., Huang, H., Luo, Z., & Foropon, C. (2018). Harnessing the power of crowdsourcing and internet of things in disaster response. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2884-1.
Holguín-Veras, J., Jaller, M., Van Wassenhove, L. N., Pérez, N., & Wachtendorf, T. (2012). On the unique features of post-disaster humanitarian logistics. Journal of Operations Management,30(7–8), 494–506.
Hoskins, A. B., & Medal, H. R. (2018). Stochastic programming solution for placement of satellite ground stations. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2798-y.
Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2019). Simultaneous structural–operational control of supply chain dynamics and resilience. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03231-0.
Jabbour, C. J. C., Sobreiro, V. A., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., de Souza Campos, L. M., Mariano, E. B., & Renwick, D. W. S. (2017). An analysis of the literature on humanitarian logistics and supply chain management: Paving the way for future studies. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2536-x.
Jana, R. K., Chandra, C. P., & Tiwari, A. K. (2018). Humanitarian aid delivery decisions during the early recovery phase of disaster using a discrete choice multi-attribute value method. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3074-x.
John, L., Gurumurthy, A., Soni, G., & Jain, V. (2018). Modelling the inter-relationship between factors affecting coordination in a humanitarian supply chain: A case of Chennai flood relief. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2963-3.
Kaur, H., & Singh, S. P. (2016). Sustainable procurement and logistics for disaster resilient supply chain. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2374-2.
Khalilpourazari, S., & Khamseh, A. A. (2017). Bi-objective emergency blood supply chain network design in earthquake considering earthquake magnitude: A comprehensive study with real world application. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2588-y.
Kilmann, R. H., & Mitroff, I. I. (1976). Qualitative versus quantitative analysis for management science: Different forms for different psychological types. Interfaces,6(2), 17–27.
Kim, D., Lee, K., & Moon, I. (2018a). Stochastic facility location model for drones considering uncertain flight distance. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3114-6.
Kim, S., Ramkumar, M., & Subramanian, N. (2018b). Logistics service provider selection for disaster preparation: A socio-technical systems perspective. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-03129-3.
Kovács, G., & Spens, K. M. (2011). Trends and developments in humanitarian logistics-a gap analysis. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,41(1), 32–45.
Laguna-Salvadó, L., Lauras, M., Okongwu, U., & Comes, T. (2018). A multicriteria master planning DSS for a sustainable humanitarian supply chain. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2882-3.
Leigh, J., Dunnett, S., & Jackson, L. (2017). Predictive police patrolling to target hotspots and cover response demand. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2528-x.
Li, S., & Teo, K. L. (2018). Post-disaster multi-period road network repair: Work scheduling and relief logistics optimization. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3037-2.
Lodree, E. J., Altay, N., & Cook, R. A. (2017). Staff assignment policies for a mass casualty event queuing network. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2635-8.
Malekpoor, H., Chalvatzis, K., Mishra, N., & Ramudhin, A. (2018). A hybrid approach of VIKOR and bi-objective integer linear programming for electrification planning in a disaster relief camp. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2877-0.
Mediouni, A., Zufferey, N., Subramanian, N., & Cheikhrouhou, N. (2018). Fit between humanitarian professionals and project requirements: Hybrid group decision procedure to reduce uncertainty in decision-making. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2782-6.
Mishra, D., Kumar, S., & Hassini, E. (2018). Current trends in disaster management simulation modelling research. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2985-x.
Nilsang, S., Yuangyai, C., Cheng, C. Y., & Janjarassuk, U. (2018). Locating an ambulance base by using social media: A case study in Bangkok. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2918-8.
Olaogbebikan, J. E., & Oloruntoba, R. (2017). Similarities between disaster supply chains and commercial supply chains: A SCM process view. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2690-1.
Oloruntoba, R., Hossain, G. F., & Wagner, B. (2016). Theory in humanitarian operations research. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2378-y.
Prasad, S., Woldt, J., Tata, J., & Altay, N. (2017). Application of project management to disaster resilience. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2679-9.
Pyakurel, U., Nath, H. N., & Dhamala, T. N. (2018). Partial contraflow with path reversals for evacuation planning. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3031-8.
Rahmani, D. (2018). Designing a robust and dynamic network for the emergency blood supply chain with the risk of disruptions. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2960-6.
Sabouhi, F., Bozorgi-Amiri, A., Moshref-Javadi, M., & Heydari, M. (2018). An integrated routing and scheduling model for evacuation and commodity distribution in large-scale disaster relief operations: A case study. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2807-1.
Salehi, F., Mahootchi, M., & Husseini, S. M. M. (2017). Developing a robust stochastic model for designing a blood supply chain network in a crisis: A possible earthquake in Tehran. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2533-0.
Samani, M. R. G., & Hosseini-Motlagh, S. M. (2018). An enhanced procedure for managing blood supply chain under disruptions and uncertainties. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2873-4.
Shareef, M. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Mahmud, R., Wright, A., Rahman, M. M., Kizgin, H., et al. (2018). Disaster management in Bangladesh: Developing an effective emergency supply chain network. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3081-y.
Sharma, B., Ramkumar, M., Subramanian, N., & Malhotra, B. (2017). Dynamic temporary blood facility location-allocation during and post-disaster periods. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2680-3.
Singh, J. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Kumar, A., & Kapoor, K. K. (2017). Event classification and location prediction from tweets during disasters. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2522-3.
Sinha, A., Kumar, P., Rana, N. P., Islam, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2017). Impact of internet of things (IoT) in disaster management: A task-technology fit perspective. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2658-1.
Song, M., & Du, Q. (2017). Analysis and exploration of damage-reduction measures for flood disasters in China. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2589-x.
Sushil, (2017a). Efficient interpretive ranking process incorporating implicit and transitive dominance relationships. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2608-y.
Sushil, (2017b). Theory building using SAP-LAP linkages: An application in the context of disaster management. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2425-3.
Tayal, A., & Singh, S. P. (2017). Formulating multi-objective stochastic dynamic facility layout problem for disaster relief. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2592-2.
Turkeš, R., Cuervo, D. P., & Sörensen, K. (2017). Pre-positioning of emergency supplies: Does putting a price on human life help to save lives? Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2702-1.
Venkatesh, V. G., Zhang, A., Deakins, E., Luthra, S., & Mangla, S. (2018). A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach to supply partner selection in continuous aid humanitarian supply chains. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2981-1.
Yahyaei, M., & Bozorgi-Amiri, A. (2018). Robust reliable humanitarian relief network design: An integration of shelter and supply facility location. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2758-6.
Yang, Z., Guo, L., & Yang, Z. (2017). Emergency logistics for wildfire suppression based on forecasted disaster evolution. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2598-9.
Zhang, J., Wang, Z., & Ren, F. (2019). Optimization of humanitarian relief supply chain reliability: A case study of the Ya’an earthquake. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-03127-5.
Zhu, L., Gong, Y., Xu, Y., & Gu, J. (2018). Emergency relief routing models for injured victims considering equity and priority. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3089-3.
Acknowledgements
We are extremely grateful to Annals of Operations Research Editor-in-Chief, Professor Endre Boros, for his immense support and guidance throughout the review process. We are equally grateful to Ms. Katie D’Agosta for her continuous support throughout the review process. We are also grateful to Ms. Ann Pulido for her timely support which helped us conclude this big project. We are also equally grateful to our reviewers who have played a significant role in this project. Finally, we are thankful to Professor David Roubaud and Montpellier Business School team for their excellent support that enabled us to accomplish this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A. & Papadopoulos, T. Disaster relief operations: past, present and future. Ann Oper Res 283, 1–8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03440-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03440-7