Abstract
Key message
WRKY transcription factors are among the largest families of transcriptional regulators. In this review, their pivotal role in modulating various signal transduction pathways during biotic and abiotic stresses is discussed.
Abstract
Transcription factors (TFs) are important constituents of plant signaling pathways that define plant responses against biotic and abiotic stimuli besides playing a role in response to internal signals which coordinate different interacting partners during developmental processes. WRKY TFs, deriving their nomenclature from their signature DNA-binding sequence, represent one of the largest families of transcriptional regulators found exclusively in plants. By modulating different signal transduction pathways, these TFs contribute to various plant processes including nutrient deprivation, embryogenesis, seed and trichome development, senescence as well as other developmental and hormone-regulated processes. A growing body of research suggests transcriptional regulation of WRKY TFs in adapting plant to a variety of stressed environments. WRKY TFs can regulate diverse biological functions from receptors for pathogen triggered immunity, modulator of chromatin for specific interaction and signal transfer through a complicated network of genes. Latest discoveries illustrate the interaction of WRKY proteins with other TFs to form an integral part of signaling webs that regulate several seemingly disparate processes and defense-related genes, thus establishing their significant contributions to plant immune response. The present review starts with a brief description on the structural characteristics of WRKY TFs followed by the sections that present recent evidence on their roles in diverse biological processes in plants. We provide a comprehensive overview on regulatory crosstalks involving WRKY TFs during multiple stress responses in plants and future prospects of WRKY TFs as promising molecular diagnostics for enhancing crop improvement.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Environmental vagaries exert detrimental effects on plants including almost all phonological stages. Evolution of an intricate signaling system to sense and react to external stimuli is crucial for the survival and perpetuation of plants to the next generation (Takahashi and Shinozaki 2019). Signaling events encompass reception, interaction and reaction following a change in the environment, which remains under the control of regulatory molecules at the cellular and sub-cellular levels (Joshi et al. 2017). Transcription factors (TFs) are important constituents of plant signaling pathways that define plant responses against biotic and abiotic stimuli in addition to their response to internal signals which coordinate different interacting partners during developmental processes (Joshi et al. 2016). WRKY TFs are among the largest families of transcriptional regulators in plants (Bakshi and Oelmüller 2014). In recent years, several WRKY superfamily members have been reported in different plant species including Glycine max (197), Raphanus sativus (126), Oryza sativa (109), Populus (104), Pinus monticola (80), Arabidopsis thaliana (75), Sorghum bicolor (68), Citrullus lanatus (63), Carica papaya (52), Hordeum vulgare (45), Physcomitrella patens (38), Selaginella involucrate (35) and Ipomoea trifida (83) (Mangelsen et al. 2008; Liu and Ekramoddoullah 2009; Song et al. 2010; Pan and Jiang 2014; Fan et al. 2015; Karanja et al. 2017; Yang et al. 2018; Li et al. 2019). Binding of WRKY TFs with the (T)TGAC(C/T), i.e., W-box cis-element in the promoter of target genes induces gene expression to achieve cellular homeostasis (Bakshi and Oelmüller 2014; Machens et al. 2014). WRKY DNA-binding domain (DBD) is characterized by an invariant heptad WRKYGQK amino acid motif at their N-terminus and a zinc-binding motif at their C-terminus (Jiang et al. 2017). Considerable diversity has been evident in the structure and function of WRKY TFs from a growing body of research. Variations have been found in the number of WRKY genes and proteins per genome, number of introns, nucleotide sequence, among and within different evolutionary levels of the plant kingdom. WRKYs have gained attention owing to their involvement in diverse plant processes including growth, development, biotic and abiotic stress responses and plant innate immunity including microbe- or pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity (MTI or PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) (Rushton et al. 2010; Phukan et al. 2016; Jiang et al. 2017). WRKYs can act as activators or repressors, in various homo- and heterodimer combinations, and form a TF net that contributes to various cytoplasmic and nuclear processes including signaling events from organelles or the cytoplasm to the nucleus (Bakshi and Oelmüller 2014). In this review, we summarize recent advances in our understanding of the WRKY TF family, with an emphasis on the plant stress response. We then elaborate on the WRKY-mediated regulatory networks that impart innate immunity to plants.
Structural characteristics and classification of functional domains
Despite having a highly conserved W-box, the varying binding abilities of WRKY TFs could be credited to variable numbers of DBDs and zinc-finger-like motifs. Based on these features, WRKY proteins are classified into four groups: I (two WRKY DBDs), II (single DBD with different C2–H2 zinc finger), III (single DBD with C2–HC zinc finger) and IV (incomplete WRKY domain without zinc finger) (Xie et al. 2005). Unlike group I, II and IV, group II is not monophyletic and is further divided into IIa, IIb, IIc, IId, and IIe based on additional conserved structural motifs besides the WRKY domain (Chen et al. 2012; Phukan et al. 2016). In lower plants, such as algae (Dunaliella bardawil), four WRKY TFs have been identified and all of them contained WRKYGEK sequence of amino acids at N-terminal, a difference due to Zn-finger at C-terminal. For instance, DbWRKY1 contained CX4CX23HXH, DbWRKY2 contained CX4CX21HXH while DbWRKY3 and DbWRKY4 contained CX4CX22HXH. Investigations on WRKY structures suggest that pre-WRKY structures (Pro-WRKY) must have a single domain as an origin. This might have doubled to give group I members of WRKY TFs, while a loss of N-terminal WRKY domain gave rise to group IIc members. Group IIc might have branched prophylactically to give rise to other subgroups of group II, and group III is the youngest and less diverse compared to other two groups (Song and Gao 2014; Wu et al. 2017a). The proposition that group II and III WRKY members should have evolved from group I gathers strong support from sequence similarity that the WRKY domains of group II and III members share with the C-terminal WRKY domain of group I WRKY TFs (Chen et al. 2019).
Though WRKY domain is highly conserved, substitutions occur in amino acid sequence of WRKYGQK; for example, WRKYGKK in maize, banana, populus, mulberry and soybean (Eulgem et al. 2000; Zhou et al. 2008; Zhang et al. 2017), WRKYGRK in populus and banana, FWRKYGQK in populus, WRKYGEK in rice and banana. In banana, other variants are also reported, such as WRKYGNK and WRKYGHK. Several monocot crops have also been studied with regard to WRKY TFs. Distribution of WRKY genes across a genome is not uniform and varies even within chromosomes (Goel et al. 2016; Xu et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2017; Chanwala et al. 2020). In rice, the WRKY family members have 19 variants of the WRKY domain where WRKYGEK and WRKYGKK are the two common variants shared by seven and five domains (Zhang and Wang 2005). The other variants include WRICGQK, WRMCGQK, WKKYGQK, WIKYGQK, WKRYGQK, WSKYEQK, and WRKYSEK (Zhang and Wang 2005). In a few WRKY proteins, the WRKY motifs are also replaced by WIKY, WRMC, WRIC, WKKY, WVKY, WKRY, WSKY patterns (Jiang et al. 2017). Further, in the primary WRKYGQK motif of DBD, the WRKY residues are replaced by WRRY, WSKY, WKRY, WVKY or WKKY (Jiang et al. 2017). In addition to the above, variants of metal-chelating zinc finger motifs, such as C–H4-5–X22-23–H–X–H and C–X5-8–C–X25-28–H–X1-2–C, are characteristics of WRKY proteins (Zhang and Feng 2014). Besides, HARF motif (RTGHARFRR (A/G) P) of unknown function was also reported in sub-group IId in Arabidopsis thaliana, Salvia miltiorrhiza and Phaseolus vulgaris (Li et al. 2015a; Wang et al. 2016). A Calmodulin (CaM)-binding domain (DxxVxKFKxVISLLxxxR) was also reported in Arabidopsis Group IId WRKYs, such as AtWRKY7 (Park et al. 2005).
WRKY TFs bind specifically through both the terminals of WRKY domains to W box-type cis-elements in target gene promoters and activate or inhibit their transcription (Kim et al. 2008; Yamasaki et al. 2013; Li et al. 2020a, b, c). W-box consists of a degenerated/core TGAC motif, a conserved GAC core which interacts with the WRKY proteins, and its flanking thymine and pyrimidine (C/T) residues are recognized by specific WRKY factors (Jiang et al. 2017; Chen et al. 2019). Further, functional W-box elements are mostly present in WRKY TFs that bind with their own promoters or other WRKY TFs for auto- or cross-regulation (Liu et al. 2021). WRKY-DBDs recognize the regulatory motif sequence and bind through an α-helix or a β-sheet with the major groove of hydrophobic W-box element allowing base-specific interaction between the protein and the DNA (Deeba et al. 2017). However, NtWRKY12 having WRKYGKK sequence binds with WK-box (required for the PR-1a induction by salicylic acid (SA) and bacterial elicitors), not with W-box (van Verk et al. 2008). Mutation from GKK to GQK or GEK is reported to impair the DNA-binding activity of NtWRKY12 (van Verk et al. 2008). Similarly, SUSIBA2 (HvWRKY46) binds to W-box and SURE (Sun et al. 2003), OsWRKY13 interacts with W-box and PRE4 (Xiao et al. 2013), AtWRKY70 binds to W-box and WT-box (Machens et al. 2014) and AtWRKY50 interacts with TGA2 and TGA5 TFs, and simultaneously bound to PR1 promoter (Hussain et al. 2018). Further, by swapping β4–β5 strands, OsWRKY45-DBD forms a homodimer which provides flexibility around strands (Cheng et al. 2019; Xu et al. 2018). The inhibitor and mutational analyses of WRKY domain structures demonstrate that Tyr, Trp and two Lys residues in the WRKYGQK sequence (Ciolkowski et al. 2008) and zinc finger structures (Cheng et al. 2019) are indispensable for DNA binding. Further, differences between amino acid heptad affect the structure of WRKY domain, thereby enabling the concerted and selective regulation of WRKY TF target genes (Chen et al. 2019).
The distribution of different groups of WRKY TFs is also reported to differ among different plant species, exemplified by the abundance of group I WRKY proteins in A. thaliana and O. sativa as compared to strawberry. Similarly, poplar genome consists of 50% of WRKY TFs that belong to group I. Group I members in mulberry family constitute only group Ia sub-group. Also, a distinct motif of GGDFDDNEPEAKRWKGE was found at C-terminal of all group Ia members and one member of the group IIb family (Baranwal et al. 2016). Tea also shows substitution, in residual protein sequence, of glutamine by lysine (Wu et al. 2016). Research on woody dicots like Populus has offered evidence for formation of WRKY III after duplication events that occurred during monocot-dicot divergence (Wang et al. 2015). The structural complexity of WRKY genes is also manifested in point of spliced domains with V-type or R-type introns, with a low diversity between monocots and dicots than among lower plant groups (Liang et al. 2017). For example, both in strawberry and wheat, number and type of introns varied from zero to twenty and V-type introns were specific to IIa and IIb type groups (Zhou et al. 2016; Ning et al. 2017). In dicots like pepper, group IIa family contains members having leucine zipper structure, that serves as elicitors that mediate binding of WRKY TFs to W-box (Cormack et al. 2002). In tomato, a divergence in group IIe and group III members was observed at WRKY domain sequence, and also in group III members at Zn-finger motifs (Huang et al. 2012). In addition to this, WRKY TFs are reported to have undergone positive or neutral selection as well as gene duplication and loss (Tang et al. 2013; Zhou et al. 2016). Presence of a large number of duplicated blocks suggests occurrence of duplications during evolution and genome expansion within the WRKY family members (Xu et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2017). In gymnosperms like pine, introns show synteny with the angiosperms as well as, among different WRKY families, group IId + IIe shows expansion with the highest number of members and WRKY3 family with the least representation (Liu and Ekramoddoullah 2009). This observation contrasts with angiosperms where WRKY members of all the families are present, though the number differs with different genomes. Therefore, binding affinity of various WRKY domains to W-box and others seems to be ambiguous, requiring deeper investigations on the domains outside the DBD.
WRKY TF and plant stress response
Role in biotic stresses
Plants have evolved mechanisms to respond to a range of biotic stresses, such as pathogen attacks, that they encounter in their life cycle (Sun et al. 2015; Jha et al. 2020). The role of WRKY TFs as key regulators in plant immune response to a variety of biotic stresses has been extensively investigated (Singh et al. 2017; Cui et al. 2019). WRKYs regulate expression of defense-related genes through binding to a consensus cis-element referred to the “W-box” (TTGACT/C) in the promoter regions of these genes. As reviewed in Peng et al. (2018), PAMP (pathogen-associated molecular patterns)-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) constitute the two lines of plant immune response, with former involving recognition of molecular patterns of the pathogen (PAMPs) with pattern-recognition receptors (PRR) in host cells; whereas toxins/effectors are detected by plant resistance (R) proteins in ETI that often involves a hypersensitive response (HR). Receptor-like kinases (RLKs), one of the largest gene families in plants, form the major class of pathogen recognition receptors. WRKYs were reported to play pivotal roles in repressing or activating both kinds of plant defense responses through direct or indirect interaction with PAMPs/effector proteins or their regulation by mitogen-activated protein kinases (Phukan et al. 2016). Peng et al. (2008) demonstrated a role for a WRKY transcription factor OsWRKY62 in both PTI (basal) and ETI (mediated by Xa21) in rice. Transgenic plants overexpressing OsWRKY62.1 (one of the two splice variants) showed impairments in both PTI and ETI, with suppression of defense-related genes. This study established OsWRKY62 as a negative regulator of innate defense response in rice against bacterial blight. By contrast, OsWRKY67 acts as a positive regulator of PTI and ETI against two rice pathogens, Magnaporthe oryzae and Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) (Vo et al. 2018).
In A. thaliana, Kim et al. (2008) described the action of WRKY38 and WRKY62 in reducing basal defense response to bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae through transcriptional activation of some unknown regulatory players. Also, an antagonistic action of Histone Deacetylase 19 (HDA19) against WRKY38 and WRKY62 confirmed HAD19 as a positive regulator of defense response. An enhanced level of disease resistance was found in single (wrky38 and wrky62) as well double mutant (Kim et al. 2008). In response to pathogen infection (P. syringae) in Arabidopsis, the association of MAP kinase 4 (MPK4) and MKS1 with WRKY33 in the nucleus is disrupted following the activation (MPK4) and phosphorylation (MKS1) events. The released WRKY33 then represses phytoalexin deficient3 (PAD3) gene, thus impairing the synthesis of antimicrobial compound camalexin (Qiu et al. 2008). Earlier, Zheng et al. (2006) showed greater susceptibility of Arabidopsis overexpressing WRKY33 against necrotrophic fungal pathogens (Botrytis cinerea and Alternaria brassicicola). Previously in soybean, authors identified 174 WRKY genes from the genome sequence and overexpression of the three WRKYs GmWRKY 136, 53 and 86 in the soybean cyst nematode (SCN)-susceptible cultivar Williams 82 enhanced SCN resistance level up to 55% (Yang et al. 2017). No significant increase was observed in these transgenic lines following SA application. In wheat, RNA-Seq associated differential expression of two WRKY genes (TaWRKY49 and TaWRKY62) with high-temperature seedling-plant resistance to stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici). Gene silencing experiments further validated the RNA-Seq results, and TaWRKY49-silencing enhanced resistance while silencing of TaWRKY62 reduced resistance. Authors suggested negative and positive regulatory roles of TaWRKY49 and TaWRKY62, respectively, in High-Temperature Seedling-plant resistance to Pst (HTSP) through modulating SA, jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene and reactive oxygen species (ROS) pathways (Wang et al. 2016). Another example of negative regulation of plant immunity by WRKY includes CaWRKY40b, which regulates a set of immunity associated genes in pepper under Ralstonia solanacearum infection. Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of CaWRKY40b and overexpression of CaWRKY40b-SRDX caused up- and down-regulations of positive and negative regulators, respectively; whereas CaWRKY40b-overexpression exerted an opposite role (Khan et al. 2018). Further, enhanced transcript levels of CaWRKY40 were reported to induce SA, JA and ethylene mediated pathways during R. solanacearum infection. Overexpression of CaWRKY40 regulates hypersensitive response (HR)-associated and pathogenesis-related genes, thus providing resistance to R. solanacearum (Dang et al. 2013). CaWRKY40b thus acts as a negative regulator by directly modulating immunity associated gene CaWRKY40. Further, CaWRKY6 positively regulates R. solanacearum resistance by activating CaWRKY40 (Cai et al. 2015). Isolation of SpWRKY1 from wild tomato (Solanum pimpinellifolium) following cloning and RT-PCR approaches, and its subsequent transformation into cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) caused an increase in resistance to Phytophthora infestans via mediating the regulation of abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis genes (Li et al. 2015b). In another attempt, tobacco plants transformed with SpWRKY1 showed lower contents of malondialdehyde, relative electrolyte leakage and higher antioxidant enzymes peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activities, indicating plant’s resistance to Phytophthora nicotianae (Li et al. 2015c). Concomitantly, the expression of genes related to JA/SA and deference response also altered as a result of SpWRKY1 overexpression.
Role in abiotic stress
A growing body of literature supports the involvement of WRKY transcription factors in the regulation of abiotic stress response in plants. Meeting the challenge of feeding nine billion by 2050 necessitates a sustainable increase in crop yields in an environment that is increasingly challenged by drought and salinity (Tester and Langridge 2010; Singh et al. 2015; Wani et al. 2018; Jha et al. 2019). A variety of biotic and abiotic factors have been reported to induce WRKY TFs, such as OsWRKY45, and Arabidopsis transformed with OsWRKY45 had enhanced tolerance to drought via regulating stomatal closure and stress-related genes (Qiu and Yu 2009). An acquired drought tolerance (adt) mutant having improved drought tolerance was isolated in Arabidopsis after surveying 43 WRKY-associated T-DNA insertion lines. The insertion in adt caused an elevation in WRKY57 expression level. The drought tolerance of adt could be credited to enhanced ABA levels. Further, the binding of WRKY57 with stress-responsive genes (RD29A, NCED3) via the core W-box sequence was confirmed with chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), PCR and quantitative real-time (RT–PCR) analysis (Jiang et al. 2012). In wheat, overexpression of TaWRKY146 having homology with the AtWRKY46 showed hypersensitivity towards salt and drought stress in Arabidopsis (Ma et al. 2017). Significant up-regulation of WRKY146 in wheat leaves and roots was found under osmotic stress. Further, transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing TaWRKY146 showed improved drought tolerance with elevated contents of proline and soluble sugar and lesser malondialdehyde (MDA) content, besides induced stomatal closure and reduced transpiration rate. Moreover, Arabidopsis plants overexpressing WRKY46 from Fagopyrum tataricum (FtWRKY46) showed improved tolerance against salt stress by scavenging ROS (Lv et al. 2020). In contrast, overexpression of AtWRKY46 in Arabidopsis (OV46) resulted in hypersensitivity to drought and salt stress, achieved by modulating the expression of QUA-QUINE STARCH (QQS) (Ding et al. 2014). Wan et al. (2018) identified a set of 53 WRKY genes from the transcriptome data in Caragana intermedia, and functional validation of the two WRKY genes CiWRKY75–1 and CiWRKY40–4 was evident with enhanced drought tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis. Genome-wide analysis of 97 WRKY genes in Pennisetum glaucum demonstrated differential expression patterns in different tissues under drought and salinity stress conditions (Chanwala et al. 2020). Out of these PgWRKY33, PgWRKY62 and PgWRKY65 were found to be regulated under both dehydration and salinity stress responses. It was also shown earlier that transformation of tobacco with SpWRKY1 increases tolerance against drought and salt stress (Li et al. 2015b). Given the highly up-regulated expression under drought stress, the transformation of WRKY3 TF gene, isolated from horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum), was performed in groundnut and consequently, improved drought tolerance of the transgenic lines was evident by less accumulation of MDA, more proline and higher antioxidant activities (Kiranmai et al. 2018). Other recent examples where overexpression of WRKY TF caused an improvement in drought tolerance of plants including wheat WRKY1, WRKY2 and WRKY33 into Arabidopsis (He et al. 2016; Gao et al. 2018) and Malus baccata WRKY2 and WRKY3 into tobacco (Han et al. 2018a, b).
Currently, salt-deteriorated soils form 20% of the irrigated land and 2% of the dry land, and half of the total arable land is likely to be impacted by salinity by 2050 (Kaashyap et al. 2017). Under osmotic/salt stress, an interplay between WRKY46 and “ABA signaling” and “auxin homeostasis” was elucidated in the regulation of lateral root (LR) development in Arabidopsis (Ding et al. 2015; Li et al. 2020a, b, c). LR development was hampered in a mutant (wrky46) in contrast to WRKY46 overexpressing lines that had enhanced LR. Exogenous application of the mutants with α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)/ indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) rescued the LR phenotypes, whereas 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid (TIBA) inhibited the LR development in both WT and OV46. WRKY46 was also shown to affect auxin conjugation in lateral roots. Also, the action of WRKY46 on downstream ABI4 was illustrated through the genetic analysis of the double mutants (wrky46 abi4). Recently, Wu and colleagues (2017b) found significant differences in expression levels of PeWRKY83 in Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) during abiotic stresses (drought, salinity and ABA treatment). Further, authors defined the functional role of PeWRKY83 by transforming it into Arabidopsis, and the transgenic Arabidopsis plants showed enhanced tolerance to salt stress, with higher germination rates, higher content of proline, less electrolyte leakage and lower MDA. Transgenic plants showed reduced sensitivity to exogenous ABA and PeWRKY83 positively regulated ABA-related genes under salt stress. A new WRKY TF DgWRKY5 was isolated recently from Chrysanthemum and the expression level of the TF showed up-regulation in response to various stresses (salt, ABA and H2O2) (Liang et al. 2017). Further, the transformation of Chrysanthemum with DgWRKY5 elucidated improved salt tolerance of the transgenic plants consequent upon DgWRKY5 overexpression, with contents of proline, soluble sugars and proteins accumulating proportionate to salt stress. Differential expression of GmWRKY49 was obtained in salt-tolerant and salt-susceptible soybean genotypes and authors further performed functional characterization of GmWRKY49 by overexpressing it into soybean seedlings and Arabidopsis (Xu et al. 2018). Enhanced tolerance to salt stress was evidenced in both soybean seedlings and transgenic Arabidopsis, with improvements in germination rate, survival rate, root length, in addition to proline content. Similar studies where overexpression of WRKY genes improved salt tolerance of plants include Dendranthema grandiflorum DgWRKY2 and DgWRKY4 into chrysanthemum (Wang et al. 2018; He et al. 2018) and so forth. In contrast, salt sensitivity was promoted following overexpression of WRKY genes like CmWRKY17 (Chrysanthemum) and PcWRKY33 (Polygonum cuspidatum) in Arabidopsis, resulting in down-regulation of stress-related genes and reduction in other parameters like antioxidant enzymatic activities, and proline content (Li et al. 2015c; Bao et al. 2018).
Heat stress is defined as an increase in air temperature above a threshold level (Teixeira et al. 2013). In tropical and subtropical areas, threshold levels of heat stress are above 32–35 °C (Bita and Gerats 2013), while in temperate crops, temperature above 25 °C is considered as heat stress (Wahid et al. 2007). Implications of heat stress on plant growth and function depend upon the intensity, duration of exposure, and the degree of the elevated temperature (Sita et al. 2017). In response to heat stress, a variety of WRKY genes enable plants to adapt temperature levels beyond “optimal tolerance range” (Jiang et al. 2017). In Arabidopsis, research groups have shown participation of WRKY 25,WRKY26, WRKY33, and WRKY39 in plant response to heat stress (Li et al. 2009, 2010,2011). Previous study has shown the interaction of B-cell lymphoma2 (Bcl-2)-associated athanogene 7 (BAG7) and WRKY29 is required for heat tolerance in Arabidopsis (Li et al. 2017a, b). It was reported that CaWRKY40 is induced by heat shock and its overexpression enhanced heat shock tolerance in tobacco, while its silencing impaired thermotolerance in pepper (Dang et al. 2013). Further, it was observed that CaWRKY6 binds and activates CaWRKY40 promoter and thus acts as a positive regulator of heat stress tolerance (Cai et al. 2015). Other important plant WRKY TFs that confer combined tolerance to drought and heat include TaWRKY1 and TaWRKY33 from wheat (He et al. 2016), OsWRKY11 from rice (Wu et al. 2009) etc. It was also shown earlier in Arabidopsis that WRKY47 directly regulates Xyloglucan Endo Transglucosylase Hydrolases17 (XTH17) and Extensin‐Like Protein (ELP), thus regulating aluminium tolerance (Li et al. 2020a, b, c).
Signalling of WRKY TFs and regulation by plant hormones
As described in earlier sections, WRKY TFs play an essential role in the adaptation of crop plants to both biotic and abiotic stresses, and the adaptation results from an interplay between WRKYs and a variety of plant hormones. Empirical evidence suggests that exogenous application of different plant hormones altered expression of WRKY genes upon exposure to multiple abiotic stress including drought, salt and H2O2 (Yan et al. 2014). Under stressed conditions, WRKY TF may work independently or in coordination. Synergistic action of different WRKY TFs and enormous crosstalk with plant hormones and stress tolerance pathways demonstrates their differential expression. For instance, the synergistic interaction between ABA-inducible OsWRKY51 and OsWRKY71 genes inhibits gibberellic acid (GA) signalling in the aleurone cells of rice seeds (Xie et al. 2006; Hwang et al. 2016). Likewise, AtWRKYs 18, 40 and 60 are shown to participate in signaling pathways that are mediated by plant hormones SA, JA and ABA (Chen et al. 2010). One of the mechanisms of plant signaling involved receptor stimuli interaction and downstream signaling cascade that leads to expression of TFs and amplification of target genes and the corresponding response (Joshi et al. 2016). One of the major signalling pathways underlying both biotic and abiotic stresses is mediated through MAP kinase signaling cascade. It was demonstrated recently that ABA signalling repressor OsWRKY29 suppresses expression of OsABF1 and OsVP1, thus leading to a repressed seed dormancy (Zhou et al. 2020).
WRKY signalling in biotic stress
With regard to biotic stress, receptor R genes having NBS LRR domain activate downstream MAP kinase signaling cascades and WRKY18/22/29/30/33/53 genes, thus serving against P. syringe, Magnaporthe grisea, and B. cinerea (Fig. 1) (Sheen et al, 2002; Chujo et al 2014). Upon infection to B. cinerea, MAPK3/6 phosphorylates WRKY33 and phosphorylated WRKY33, in turn, activates PAD3, causing an increase in resistance through phytoalexin biosynthesis (Fig. 1) (Mao et al. 2007; 2011). In contrast, a decline was observed in resistance level as a result of overexpression of WRKY38 and WRKY62. Both genes, induced in a Non-expresser of Pathogenesis-Related genes 1 (NPR1)-dependent manner by SA or by virulent P. syringae, work additively as negative regulators of plant’s basal defense (Kim et al. 2008). The NO signalling pathway mediated by AtWRKY27 improves defense against R. solanacearum (Mukhtar et al. 2008). Several defense-related genes and regulatory NPR1 genes have statistically enriched WRKY TF binding sites (W box elements) in their promoter region, such as pathogen inducible ICS1 gene, suggesting either autoregulation or cross-regulation by other WRKY proteins (Dong et al. 2003).
Out of 72 WRKY genes reported in Arabidopsis, 49 genes have been reported to be differentially regulated by P. syringae or SA treatment (Dong et al. 2003). Research suggests that TFs like WRKY3, WRKY4 and WRKY33 positively regulate the SA-mediated plant resistance pathways to necrotrophic fungal infection, such as B. cinerea (Zheng et al. 2006; Lai et al. 2008). Similarly, WRKY33, WRKY46, WRKY53 and WRKY70 positively regulate SA-mediated defense pathway against biotrophic bacterial pathogen, such as P. syringae (Zheng et al. 2006; Hu et al. 2012). Two alleles of OSWRKY45, both regulated by WRKY13, showed a contrasting response to Xoo (Qiu et al. 2007). OsWRKY45-1 overexpressing plants showed increased susceptibility in contrast to OsWRKY45-2-overexpressing plants that had enhanced resistance to Xoo and X. oryzae pv. oryzicola (Xoc) (Tao et al. 2009). Further, OsWRKY45-1 exhibited control to SA and JA levels, while OsWRKY45-2 only JA levels. Recently it was found that in rice, VQ13 (JA-responsive valine-glutamine (VQ)-motif-containing protein) activates MPK6 and WRKY45, and positively regulates JA-induced resistance to Xoo (Uji et al. 2019). AtWRKY18 and AtWRKY40 suppress Jasmonate-Zim Domain (JAZ) repressors which repress JA-signaling, causing suppression of several defense-related genes, such as FMO1, PAD3, and CYP71A13. All these eventually help Trichoderma root colonization (Brotman et al. 2013). As shown in Fig. 1, CaWRKY27 acts as a positive regulator in tobacco resistance responses to R. solanacearum infection through modulation of SA, JA, ethylene, and NO-mediated signaling pathways (Dang et al. 2014). A recent study revealed that HbWRKY83 is a positive regulator of JA-, ethylene-, and wound-responsive genes in the laticiferous cells of rubber tree (Kang et al. 2020).
Fu and Dong (2013) found that SA or benzothiadiazole (BTH)-induced systemic acquired resistance (SAR) can be achieved by transcriptional regulation of NPR1 genes. Various WRKY TFs were identified as key regulators of NPR1-dependent or -independent SAR, such as AtWRKY18, AtWRKY58, and AtWRKY70 (Wang et al. 2006), OsWRKY03 and OsWRKY71 (Liu et al. 2005, 2007) and OsWRKY45 (Shimono et al. 2007). Recently, wheat transgenic lines overexpressing barley HvWRKY6 and HvWRKY70 showed improved resistance against Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici pathotype CYR32 and Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici pathotype E20 (Li et al. 2020a, b, c).
WRKY signalling in abiotic stress
In plants, ABA is a key regulator of both biotic and abiotic stress responses and its biosynthesis and accumulation are also enhanced under stress (Xiong et al. 2002). Abiotic stress tolerance signaling works through both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent pathways. Different WRKY TFs function co-ordinately or independently to the ABA signaling pathway. Thus, overexpression of AtWRKY21/33/40/57 and AtWRKY70 improves osmotic stress tolerance in an ABA-dependent manner; while AtWRKY25, ATWRKY45 and TaWRKY93 work via ABA-independent pathways. ATWRKY40 represses the expression of ABA-responsive genes (Rushton et al. 2012). Under abiotic-stressed scenario, ABA binds to PYR⁄PYL⁄RCAR protein phosphatase 2C-ABA complex and the chloroplast envelope located ABAR–ABA complex in the nucleus. These two complexes remove AtWRKY40 from the nucleus and depress ABA-responsive genes including ABI4, ABI5, ABF4, MYB2, DREB1a, DREB2b, RAB18 and AtWRKY60 (Fig. 2) (Rushton et al. 2012). Research in rice on the regulation of WKRY TFs under abiotic stress and plant hormone revealed that a set of WRKY genes is induced following abiotic stress whereas plant hormones act on another set of genes. Authors noted that majority of genes were regulated by both abiotic stress and plant hormones [ABA, IAA, GA3, Methyl jasmonate (MeJA) and SA] with extensive occurrence of crosstalks between both (Ramamoorthy et al. 2008). Analysis of GsWRKY20-overexpressing lines in Arabidopsis led authors to find an improved response to ABA, which reduced water loss and enhanced tolerance to drought stress via stomatal closure and reduced stomatal density (Luo et al. 2013). Further, multiple WRKY genes are deemed to be regulated by ABA-mediated responses (Fig. 2). ABA induces expression of different WRKY genes in rice, such as OsWRKY11, OsWRKY71, OsWRKY72 and OsWRKY77, and it may reduce expression or negatively regulate OsWRKY24 and OsWRKY45 genes. Further, OsWRKY51 and OsWRKY71 mediate the cross-talk between GA and ABA signaling. In rice, ABA-inducible nature of these genes is evident; however, these genes remain GA-repressible (Xie et al. 2006). OsWRKY24, OsWRKY51 and OsWRKY71 negatively regulate GA signaling pathway (Xie et al. 2005; Zhang et al. 2009). The transgenic lines overexpressing OsWRKY45-1 and OsWRKY45-2 registered their contrasting response to ABA. OsWRKY45-2 overexpressing lines showed increased ABA sensitivity and reduced salt stress tolerance which is phenotypically contrasting to OsWRKY45-2-suppressing lines (Tao et al. 2011). Overexpression of different WRKY genes could lead to salt tolerance by following different tolerance mechanisms. The enhanced expression of TaWRKY93 upon exogenous application of NaCl or abscisic acid improved salt tolerance via both ABA-dependent and -independent pathways and also by enhancing osmotic stress tolerance (Fig. 2) (Qin et al. 2015). Osmotic stress tolerance has been regulated by AtWRKY70 and AtWRKY54 with both working cooperatively and negatively regulating stomata closure (Li et al. 2013). The study established the role of both WRKY genes for improving drought tolerance in plants. Under salt stress, AtWRKY25 and AtWRKY33 have improved salt stress tolerance through SOS-pathway-independent manner. However, AtWRKY33 showed salt tolerance through ABA-dependent signaling pathway (Jiang and Deyholos 2009). Recently, it was demonstrated that Arabidopsis plants overexpressing IbWRKY2 (Zhu et al. 2020) and HbWRKY83 (Kang et al. 2020) were tolerant against salinity and drought stress via improved ROS scavenging system. Under heat stress, AtWRKY25 regulated expression of heat-inducible and oxidative stress-inducible genes containing W box at their promoter region, independent of the SA pathway. Overexpression of WRKY25 increased the expression of HsfA2, HsfB1, HsfB2a and Hsp101, implying a role in HsfB2a and HsfB1 pathway (Li et al. 2009). Cold stress tolerance is primarily regulated through cold-responsive (COR) regulon (Fig. 2). Overexpressing WRKY46 in cucumber conferred cold tolerance by modulating cold signalling pathway in an ABA-dependent manner (Zhang et al. 2016). AtWRKY34 regulates CBF and GM20 regulates ICE1 gene. Further, COR regulon regulates AtWRKY6/187/22/30/32 and AtWRKY40 genes (Banerjee and Roychoudhury 2015). Generally, abiotic stress signal activates or works through MAPK signaling pathways.
More recently, a global analysis of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) WRKY TF identified 71 genes, of which 26 were drought-responsive while 33 genes responded to waterlogging (Li et al. 2017b). The gene WRKY1 of Poncirus trifoliate and Citrus grandis was analyzed under cold and drought stresses, and the results showed that both genes showed induced expression in response to drought while cold could evoke response only from PtrWRKY1 (Şahin-Çevik and Moore 2013). Similarly, overexpression of various WRKY TFs led to tolerance to various abiotic stress, such as OsWRKY89-overexpressing lines in rice, showed enhanced tolerance to ultraviolet B irradiation (Wang et al. 2007), OsWRKY11 under the control of the heat shock protein 101 (HSP101) promoter enhanced heat and drought tolerance in rice (Wu et al. 2009). In summary, recent evidence in plant species supports multiple roles for WRKY genes against a variety of abiotic stresses.
WRKY-mediated crosstalk between abiotic and biotic stress responses
Recent evidence supports the involvement of WRKY TF in mediating response and adaptation to biotic and abiotic stresses. This crosstalk phenomenon is exemplified by the action of several WRKY TFs, such as OsWRKY13, in rice that alters plant response to both biotic (Xoo and M. grisea) and abiotic stresses (Qiu et al. 2007; 2008). OsWRKY13 is possibly regulated by both OsWRKY45-1 and OsWRKY45-2, the two alleles identified, respectively, from japonica and indica rice. Previous research has established OsWRKY45 and SlWRKY8 as the positive regulators of PR gene expression, resistance to P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (PsPto), tolerance to drought and salt stress and ABA sensitivity (Qiu and Yu 2009; Gao et al. 2020). Subsequent experiments elucidated that OsWRKY45-1, a negative regulator of ABA signaling, plays no role in salt tolerance in rice. In contrast, OsWRKY45-2 is a positive regulator of ABA signaling, and a negative regulator of salt stress tolerance (Tao et al. 2011). Similarly, constitutive expression of grape WRKY3 gene in Arabidopsis provided insights into its role in defining plant response to biotic (Golovinomyces cichoracearum, B. cinerea) and abiotic stresses (drought and salinity) (Guo et al. 2018). Research by Lee et al. (2018) established OsWRKY11 as a positive regulator of rice–Xoo interaction and drought stress in rice through activating expressions of deference- (Chitinase 2) and drought-(RAB21) related genes. Improved resistance to PsPto and drought/salt stress in tomato was achieved by overexpression of SlWRKY39 (Sun et al. 2015). The higher tolerance level of transgenic plants could be ascribed to the abundance of PR (SlPR1, SlPR1a1) and stress-related genes (SlRD22, SlDREB2A), and lower and higher contents of MDA and proline, respectively. Taken together, WRKY TFs participate in various cross regulatory networks related to defense response and their interaction provides insight into their coregulated functional dynamics of signaling response during different biological processes.
Other roles of WRKY TFs
In addition to stress response, WRKY TFs role in a range of important processes including plant development are well documented (Chen et al. 2017). The SPF1 (Sweet Potato Factor1), first identified WRKY protein, participated in tuberous root development in Ipomoea batatas (Ishiguro and Nakamura 1994). Further, WRKY proteins ABF1 and ABF2, isolated from Avena fatua were found to regulate seed germination (Rushton et al. 1995). Besides, WRKY1, WRKY2, and WRKY3 were reported to regulate ribosomal protein gene expression in Petroselinum crispum (Rushton et al. 1996). WRKY42, WRKY45, WRKY75, WRKY6 from Arabidopsis and WRKY74, WRKY80 from rice were involved in plant nutrient (i.e., phosphorus, boron and iron) utilization (Chen et al. 2017). AtWRKY6, AtWRKY53 and OsWRKY45 regulate leaf senescense (Miao and Zentgraf 2010). Moreover, AtWRKY12, AtWRKY13, AtWRKY71 and OsWRKY11 were reported to be involved in floral development in angiosperms (Cai et al. 2014; Li et al. 2016; Yu et al. 2016). A recent study in Arabidopsis elucidated down-regulation of a set of genes associated with senescence (SAG12, SAG13 and SAG29) and chlorophyll degradation genes (PPH, PAO, NYE1/SGR1, NYC1, NOL) resulting from the overexpression of CiWRKY40–4 caused delayed leaf senescence in the transgenic plants (Wan et al. 2018).
WRKY’s participation in plant reproductive development is evident from severe fertility defects resulting from a compromise in WRKY-mediated regulatory network. In Arabidopsis, gene expression patterns in mature pollen grains, inferred from publically available data, qRT-PCR assay and genetic analysis, led authors to assume that WRKY2, WRKY34 and VQ20, suppress the expression of MYBs (MYB97, MYB101 and MYB120) during male gametogenesis. Further, binding of the WRKY2/WRKY34 with MYB97 via the promoter containing W-box was confirmed (Lei et al. 2018). Prioritization of defense response overgrowth, as shown by OsWRKY70 in mitigating insect herbivory in rice, can often yield unintended consequences (Li et al. 2015a). The authors highlighted the profound implications that these trade-offs may have, in breeding resistant plants.
Implications for future crop improvement
In recent years, a plethora of information has been generated in the wake of growing research interest on TFs, both in model and non-model crops. More comprehensive information is warranted on the activities of WRKY TFs in the plant genome, their communication with other biomolecules and sorting complexities of upstream elements that regulate them. It is further being traversed by modern tools of omics, analysis of complementarity with (cis-) promoter, systemics and several useful tools of bioinformatics. Different WRKY genes/TFs behave in a versatile manner even to an extent that homologs behave differently in different backgrounds (Cai et al. 2014). A set of WRKY TFs is known to regulate multiple genes with opposite effects (Liu et al. 2015) or could be induced and repressed depending on the external stimuli (Huang et al. 2016; Yan et al. 2016; Ding et al. 2013). In some cases, WRKY TFs upregulate both useful genes as well as unwelcomed genes (Wang et al. 2014). So, it is important to characterize them, elucidate their function and select the key TF translating gene for crop improvement. This deluge of information will be immensely useful when translated in crop improvement for the benefit the farmers and the mankind. However, practical implications of WRKY for crop improvement face a set of challenges.
Evidence suggests that WRKY TFs not only participate in plant growth and development, but also show complex regulatory mechanisms and networks involved in external abiotic stresses. A variety of roles of WRKYs have been elucidated on parts of the plant like root, leaf, etc.; however, evidence based on the whole plant is currently lacking. Considerable possibility exists that inferences gained from in vitro experiments might yield uncertain outcomes when applied for plant improvement in a different environment. Nothwithstanding this, there has been plenty of crop improvement illustrations recently based on transgenics and genomics-assisted breeding. Some of the recent examples are listed in Table 1. Growing body of literature on WRKY TFs advocates their usefulness for genetic characterization of a given crop population and evolutionary studies at different levels as a function of WRKY TFs may vary as a consequence of environmental stress and in the process of adaptation (Yan et al. 2016). In conclusion, considerable scope exists for understanding WRKY TFs with respect to their functionality, evolution and intra/inter communication with other TFs in cooperative and antagonistic manner, noncoding RNAs and epigenetic modifications to find a common link in the complex signal pathways to facilitate improvement of agricultural crop yield and quality.
References
Bakshi M, Oelmüller R (2014) WRKY transcription factors: jack of many trades in plants. Plant Sign Beh 9(2):e27700
Banerjee A, Roychoudhury A (2015) WRKY proteins: signaling and regulation of expression during abiotic stress responses. Sci World J 2015:807560
Bao W, Wang X, Chen M, Chai T, Wang H (2018) A WRKY transcription factor, PcWRKY33, from Polygonum cuspidatum reduces salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep 37:1033–1048
Baranwal VK, Negi N, Khurana P (2016) Genome-wide identification and structural, functional and evolutionary analysis of WRKY components of mulberry. Sci Rep 6:30794
Bita CE, Gerats T (2013) Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: scientific fundamentals and production of heat tolerance crops. Front Plant Sci 4:273
Brotman Y, Landau U, Cuadros-Inostroza Á, Takayuki T, Fernie AR, Chet I, Viterbo A, Willmitzer L (2013) Trichoderma-plant root colonization: escaping early plant defense responses and activation of the antioxidant machinery for saline stress tolerance. PLOS Pathog 9:e1003221
Cai H, Yang S, Yan Y, Xiao Z, Cheng J, Wu J, Qiu A, Lai Y, Mou S, Guan D, Huang R (2015) CaWRKY6 transcriptionally activates CaWRKY40, regulates Ralstonia solanacearum resistance, and confers high-temperature and high-humidity tolerance in pepper. J Expt Bot 66:3163–3174
Cai Y, Chen X, Xie K, Xing Q, Wu Y, Li J, Du C, Sun Z, Guo Z (2014) Dlf1, a WRKY transcription factor, is involved in the control of flowering time and plant height in rice. PLoS ONE 9:e102529
Chanwala J, Satpati S, Dixit A, Parida A, Giri MK, Dey N (2020) Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of WRKY transcription factors in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) under dehydration and salinity stress. BMC Genom 21(1):1–6
Chen F, Hu Y, Vannozzi A, Wu K, Cai H, Qin Y, Mullis A, Lin Z, Zhang L (2017) The WRKY transcription factor family in model plants and crops. Crit Rev Plant Sci 36:311–335
Chen H, Lai Z, Shi J, Xiao Y, Chen Z, Xu X (2010) Roles of Arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40 and WRKY60 transcription factors in plant responses to abscisic acid and abiotic stress. BMC Plant Biol 10:281
Chen L, Song Y, Li S, Zhang L, Zou C, Yu D (2012) The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant abiotic stresses. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech 1819:120–128
Chen X, Li C, Wang H, Guo Z (2019) WRKY transcription factors: evolution, binding, and action. Phytopathology Res 1:13
Cheng X, Zhao Y, Jiang Q, Yang J, Zhao W, Taylor IA, Peng YL, Wang D, Liu J (2019) Structural basis of dimerization and dual W-box DNA recognition by rice WRKY domain. Nucl Acids Res 47:4308–4318
Chujo T, Miyamoto K, Ogawa S, Masuda Y, Shimizu T, Kishi-Kaboshi M, Takahashi A, Nishizawa Y, Minami E, Nojiri H, Yamane H, Okada K (2014) Overexpression of phosphomimic mutated OsWRKY53 leads to enhanced blast resistance in rice. PLoS ONE 9:e98737
Ciolkowski I, Wanke D, Birkenbihl RP, Somssich IE (2008) Studies on DNA-binding selectivity of WRKY transcription factors lend structural clues into WRKY-domain function. Plant Mol Biol 68:81–92
Cormack RS, Eulgem T, Rushton PJ, Köchner P, Hahlbrock K, Somssich IE (2002) Leucine zipper-containing WRKY proteins widen the spectrum of immediate early elicitor-induced WRKY transcription factors in parsley. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Struct Expr 1576:92–100
Cui X, Yan Q, Gan S, Xue D, Wang H, Xing H, Zhao J, Guo N (2019) GmWRKY40, a member of the WRKY transcription factor genes identified from Glycine max L., enhanced the resistance to Phytophthora sojae. BMC Plant Biol 19:1–15
Dang F, Wang Y, She J, Lei Y, Liu Z, Eulgem T, Lai Y, Lin J, Yu L, Lei D, Guan D (2014) Overexpression of CaWRKY27, a subgroup IIe WRKY transcription factor of Capsicum annuum, positively regulates tobacco resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum infection. Physiol Plant 150:397–411
Dang FF, Wang YN, Yu LU, Eulgem T, Lai YA, Liu ZQ, Wang XU, Qiu AL, Zhang TX, Lin J, Chen YS (2013) CaWRKY40, a WRKY protein of pepper, plays an important role in the regulation of tolerance to heat stress and resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum infection. Plant Cell Environ 36:757–774
Deeba F, Sultana T, Mahmood T, O’Shea C, Skriver K, Naqvi SS (2017) Involvement of WRKY, MYB and DOF DNA-binding proteins in interaction with a rice germin-like protein gene promoter. Acta Physiol Plant 39:189
Ding Z, Yan J, Li C, Li G, Wu Y, Zheng S (2015) Transcription factor WRKY46 modulates the development of Arabidopsis lateral roots in osmotic/salt stress conditions via regulation of ABA signaling and auxin homeostasis. Plant J 84:56–69
Ding ZJ, Yan JY, Xu XY, Li GX, Zheng SJ (2013) WRKY 46 functions as a transcriptional repressor of ALMT 1, regulating aluminum-induced malate secretion in Arabidopsis. Plant J 76:825–835
Ding ZJ, Yan JY, Xu XY, Yu DQ, Li GX, Zhang SQ, Zheng SJ (2014) Transcription factor WRKY46 regulates osmotic stress responses and stomatal movement independently in Arabidopsis. Plant J 79(1):13–27
Dong J, Chen C, Chen Z (2003) Expression profiles of the Arabidopsis WRKY gene superfamily during plant defense response. Plant Mol Biol 51(1):21–37
Eulgem T, Rushton PJ, Robatzek S, Somssich IE (2000) The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci 5(5):199–206
Fan X, Guo Q, Xu P, Gong Y, Shu H, Yang Y, Ni W, Zhang X, Shen X (2015) Transcriptome-wide identification of salt-responsive members of the WRKY gene family in Gossypium aridum. PLoS ONE 10(5):e0126148
Fu ZQ, Dong X (2013) Systemic acquired resistance: turning local infection into global defense. Ann Rev Plant Biol 64:839–863
Gao H, Wang Y, Xu P, Zhang Z (2018) Overexpression of a WRKY transcription factor TaWRKY2 enhances drought stress tolerance in transgenic wheat. Front Plant Sci 9:997
Gao YF, Liu JK, Yang FM, Zhang GY, Wang D, Zhang L, Ou YB, Yao YA (2020) The WRKY transcription factor WRKY8 promotes resistance to pathogen infection and mediates drought and salt stress tolerance in Solanum lycopersicum. Physiol Plant 168:98–117
Goel R, Pandey A, Trivedi PK, Asif MH (2016) Genome-wide analysis of the Musa WRKY gene family: evolution and differential expression during development and stress. Front Plant Sci 7:299
Grunewald W, De Smet I, De Rybel B, Robert HS, Van De Cotte B, Willemsen V, Gheysen G, Weijers D, Friml J, Beeckman T (2013) Tightly controlled expression mediates Arabidopsis embryo development. EMBO Rep 14: 1136-1142
Guan Y, Meng X, Khanna R, LaMontagne E, Liu Y, Zhang S, Twell D (2014) Phosphorylation of a WRKY Transcription Factor by MAPKs Is Required for Pollen Development and Function in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet 10: e1004384
Guo R, Qiao H, Zhao J, Wang X, Tu M, Guo C, Ran W, Li Z, Wang X (2018) The grape VlWRKY3 gene promotes abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci 9:545
Han D, Ding H, Chai L, Liu W, Zhang Z, Hou Y, Yang G (2018) Isolation and characterization of MbWRKY1, a WRKY transcription factor gene from Malus baccata (L.) Borkh involved in drought tolerance. Can J Plant Sci 98(5):1023–1034
Han D, Zhang Z, Ding H, Chai L, Liu W, Li H, Yang G (2018) Isolation and characterization of MbWRKY2 gene involved in enhanced drought tolerance in transgenic tobacco. J Plant Interac 13(1):163–172
He GH, Xu JY, Wang YX, Liu JM, Li PS, Chen M, Ma YZ, Xu ZS (2016) Drought-responsive WRKY transcription factor genes TaWRKY1 and TaWRKY33 from wheat confer drought and/or heat resistance in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol 16(1):116
He L, Wu Y-H, Zhao Q, Wang B, Liu QL, Zhang L (2018) Chrysanthemum DgWRKY2 gene enhances tolerance to salt stress in transgenic Chrysanthemum. Intern J Mol Sci 19(7):2062
Hu Y, Dong Q, Yu D (2012) Arabidopsis WRKY46 coordinates with WRKY70 and WRKY53 in basal resistance against pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Plant Sci 185:288–297
Huang S, Gao Y, Liu J, Peng X, Niu X, Fei Z, Cao S, Liu Y (2012) Genome-wide analysis of WRKY transcription factors in Solanum lycopersicum. Mol Genet Genom 287(6):495–513
Huang Y, Li MY, Wu P, Xu ZS, Que F, Wang F, Xiong AS (2016) Members of WRKY Group III transcription factors are important in TYLCV defense signaling pathway in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). BMC Genomics 17:788
Hussain A, Li X, Weng Y, Liu Z, Ashraf MF, Noman A, Yang S, Ifnan M, Qiu S, Yang Y, Guan D (2018) CaWRKY22 acts as a positive regulator in pepper response to Ralstonia solanacearum by constituting networks with CaWRKY6, CaWRKY27, CaWRKY40, and CaWRKY58. Intl J Mol Sci 19:1426
Hwang SH, Kwon SI, Jang JY, Fang IL, Lee H, Choi C, Park S, Ahn I, Bae SC, Hwang DJ (2016) OsWRKY51, a rice transcription factor, functions as a positive regulator in defense response against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Plant Cell Rep 35:1975–1985
Ishiguro S, Nakamura K (1994) Characterization of a cDNA encoding a novel DNA binding protein, SPF1, that recognizes SP8 sequences in the 50 upstream regions of genes coding for sporamin and b-amylase from sweet potato. Mol Gen Genet 244:563–571
Jha UC, Bohra A, Jha R, Parida SK (2019) Salinity stress response and ‘omics’ approaches for improving salinity stress tolerance in major grain legumes. Plant Cell Rep 38:255–277
Jha UC, Bohra A, Pandey S, Parida SK (2020) Breeding, genetics and genomics approaches for improving Fusarium wilt resistance in major grain legumes. Front Genet 11:1001
Jiang J, Ma S, Ye N, Jiang M, Cao J, Zhang J (2017) WRKY transcription factors in plant responses to stresses. J Intgr Plant Biol 59:86–101
Jiang Y, Deyholos MK (2009) Functional characterization of Arabidopsis NaCl-inducible WRKY25 and WRKY33 transcription factors in abiotic stresses. Plant Mol Biol 69:91–105
Jiang Y, Liang G, Yu D (2012) Activated expression of WRKY57 confers drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant 5:1375–1388
Joshi R, Anwar K, Das P, Singla-Pareek SL, Pareek A (2017) Overview of methods for assessing salinity and drought tolerance of transgenic wheat lines. Wheat biotechnology. Humana Press, New York, NY, pp 83–95
Joshi R, Wani SH, Singh B, Bohra A, Dar ZA, Lone AA, Pareek A, Singla-Pareek SL (2016) Transcription factors and plants response to drought stress: current understanding and future directions. Front Plant Sci 7:1029
Kaashyap M, Ford R, Bohra A, Kuvalekar A, Mantri N (2017) Improving salt tolerance of chickpea using modern genomics tools and molecular breeding. Curr Genom 18:557–567
Kang G, Yan D, Chen X, Li Y, Yang L, Zeng R (2020) Molecular characterization and functional analysis of a novel WRKY transcription factor HbWRKY83 possibly involved in rubber production of Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Physiol Biochem 155:483–493
Karanja BK, Fan L, Xu L, Wang Y, Zhu X, Tang M, Wang R, Zhang F, Muleke EM, Liu L (2017) Genome-wide characterization of the WRKY gene family in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) reveals its critical functions under different abiotic stresses. Plant Cell Rep 36:1757–1773
Khan MI, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Hu J, Liu C, Yang S, Hussain A, Furqan Ashraf M, Noman A, Shen L, Xia X (2018) CaWRKY40b in pepper acts as a negative regulator in response to Ralstonia solanacearum by directly modulating defense genes including CaWRKY40. Intern J Mol Sci 19(5):1403
Kim KC, Lai Z, Fan B, Chen Z (2008) Arabidopsis WRKY38 and WRKY62 transcription factors interact with histone deacetylase 19 in basal defense. Plant Cell 20(9):2357–2371
Kiranmai K, Lokanadha Rao G, Pandurangaiah M, Nareshkumar A, Amaranatha Reddy V, Lokesh U, Venkatesh B, Anthony Johnson AM, Sudhakar C (2018) A Novel WRKY Transcription Factor, MuWRKY3 (Macrotyloma uniflorum Lam. Verdc.) Enhances Drought Stress Tolerance in Transgenic Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Plants. Front Plant Sci 9:346
Lagacé M, Matton DP (2004) Characterization of a WRKY transcription factor expressed in late torpedo-stage embryos of Solanum chacoense. Planta 219: 185-189
Lai Z, Vinod KM, Zheng Z, Fan B, Chen Z (2008) Roles of Arabidopsis WRKY3 and WRKY4 transcription factors in plant responses to pathogens. BMC Plant Biol 8(1):68
Lee H, Cha J, Choi C, Choi N, Ji HS, Park SR, Lee S, Hwang DJ (2018) Rice WRKY11 plays a role in pathogen defense and drought tolerance. Rice 11(1):5
Lei R, Ma Z, Yu D (2018) WRKY2/34–VQ20 Modules in Arabidopsis thaliana negatively regulate expression of a trio of related MYB transcription factors during pollen development. Front Plant Sci 9:331
Li C, Li D, Shao F, Lu S (2015) Molecular cloning and expression analysis of WRKY transcription factor genes in Salvia miltiorrhiza. BMC Genomics 16:200
Li CX, Yan JY, Ren JY, Sun L, Xu C, Li GX, Ding ZJ, Zheng SJ (2020) A WRKY transcription factor confers aluminum tolerance via regulation of cell wall modifying genes. J Intgr Plant Biol 62(8):1176–1192
Li D, Liu P, Yu J, Wang L, Dossa K, Zhang Y, Zhou R, Wei X, Zhang X (2017) Genome-wide analysis of WRKY gene family in the sesame genome and identification of the WRKY genes involved in responses to abiotic stresses. BMC Plant Biol 17(1):152
Li H, Wu J, Shang X, Geng M, Gao J, Zhao S, Yu X, Liu D, Kang Z, Wang X, Wang X (2020) WRKY transcription factors shared by BTH-induced resistance and NPR1-mediated acquired resistance improve broad-spectrum disease resistance in wheat. Mol Plant-Microbe Interac 33(3):433–443
Li J, Besseau S, Törönen P, Sipari N, Kollist H, Holm L, Palva ET (2013) Defense-related transcription factors WRKY70 and WRKY54 modulate osmotic stress tolerance by regulating stomatal aperture in Arabidopsis. New Phytol 200:457–472
Li JB, Luan YS, Liu Z (2015) Overexpression of SpWRKY1 promotes resistance to Phytophthora nicotianae and tolerance to salt and drought stress in transgenic tobacco. Physiol Plant 155(3):248–266
Li JB, Luan YS, Liu Z (2015) SpWRKY1 mediates resistance to Phytophthora infestans and tolerance to salt and drought stress by modulating reactive oxygen species homeostasis and expression of defense-related genes in tomato. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 123(1):67–81
Li S, Fu Q, Chen L, Huang W, Yu D (2011) Arabidopsis thaliana WRKY25, WRKY26, and WRKY33 coordinate induction of plant thermotolerance. Planta 233(6):1237–1252
Li S, Fu Q, Huang W, Yu D (2009) Functional analysis of an Arabidopsis transcription factor WRKY25 in heat stress. Plant Cell Rep 28(4):683–693
Li S, Zhou X, Chen L, Huang W, Yu D (2010) Functional characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana WRKY39 in heat stress. Mol Cells 29(5):475–483
Li W, Wang H, Yu D (2016) Arabidopsis WRKY transcription factors WRKY12 and WRKY13 oppositely regulate flowering under short-day conditions. Mol Plant 9(11):1492–1503
Li X, Tang Y, Zhou C, Zhang L, Lv J (2020) A Wheat WRKY transcription factor TaWRKY46 enhances tolerance to osmotic stress in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Intl J Mol Sci 21:1321
Li Y, Williams B, Dickman M (2017) Arabidopsis B-cell lymphoma2 (Bcl-2)-associated athanogene 7 (BAG 7)-mediated heat tolerance requires translocation, sumoylation and binding to WRKY 29. New Phytol 214(2):695–705
Li Y, Zhang L, Zhu P, Cao Q, Sun J, Li Z, Xu T (2019) Genome-wide identification, characterisation and functional evaluation of WRKY genes in the sweet potato wild ancestor Ipomoea trifida (H.B.K.) G. Don. under abiotic stresses. BMC Genet 20(1):1–15
Liang QY, Wu YH, Wang K, Bai ZY, Liu QL, Pan YZ, Zhang L, Jiang BB (2017) Chrysanthemum WRKY gene DgWRKY5 enhances tolerance to salt stress in transgenic chrysanthemum. Sci Rep 7(1):4799
Liu JJ, Ekramoddoullah AK (2009) Identification and characterization of the WRKY transcription factor family in Pinus monticola. Genome 52(1):77–88
Liu S, Kracher B, Ziegler J, Birkenbihl RP, Somssich IE (2015) Negative regulation of ABA signaling by WRKY33 is critical for Arabidopsis immunity towards Botrytis cinerea 2100. Elife 4:e07295
Liu X, Bai X, Wang X, Chu C (2007) OsWRKY71, a rice transcription factor, is involved in rice defense response. J Plant Physiol 164(8):969–979
Liu XQ, Bai XQ, Qian QI, Wang XJ, Chen MS, Chu CC (2005) OsWRKY03, a rice transcriptional activator that functions in defense signaling pathway upstream of OsNPR1. Cell Res 15:593–603
Liu ZQ, Shi LP, Yang S, Qiu SS, Ma XL, Cai JS, Guan DY, Wang ZH, He SL (2021) A conserved double-W box in the promoter of CaWRKY40 mediates autoregulation during response to pathogen attack and heat stress in pepper. Mol Plant Pathol 22:3–18
Luo X, Bai X, Sun X, Zhu D, Liu B, Ji W, Cai H, Cao L, Wu J, Hu M, Liu X (2013) Expression of wild soybean WRKY20 in Arabidopsis enhances drought tolerance and regulates ABA signalling. J Expt Bot 64:2155–2169
Lv B, Wu Q, Wang A, Li Q, Dong Q, Yang J, Zhao H, Wang X, Chen H, Li C (2020) A WRKY transcription factor, FtWRKY46, from Tartary buckwheat improves salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol Biochem 147:43–53
Ma J, Gao X, Liu Q, Shao Y, Zhang D, Jiang L, Li C (2017) Overexpression of TaWRKY146 increases drought tolerance through inducing stomatal closure in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci 8:2036
Machens F, Becker M, Umrath F, Hehl R (2014) Identification of a novel type of WRKY transcription factor binding site in elicitor-responsive cis-sequences from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol 84:371–385
Mangelsen E, Kilian J, Berendzen KW, Kolukisaoglu ÜH, Harter K, Jansson C, Wanke D (2008) Phylogenetic and comparative gene expression analysis of barley (Hordeum vulgare) WRKY transcription factor family reveals putatively retained functions between monocots and dicots. BMC Genomics 9:194
Mao G, Meng X, Liu Y, Zheng Z, Chen Z, Zhang S (2011) Phosphorylation of a WRKY transcription factor by two pathogen-responsive MAPKs drives phytoalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 23:1639–1653
Mao P, Duan M, Wei C, Li Y (2007) WRKY62 transcription factor acts downstream of cytosolic NPR1 and negatively regulates jasmonate-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell Physiol 48:833–842
Miao Y, Zentgraf U (2010) A HECT E3 ubiquitin ligase negatively regulates Arabidopsis leaf senescence through degradation of the transcription factor WRKY53. Plant J 63:179–188
Mukhtar MS, Deslandes L, Auriac MC, Marco Y, Somssich IE (2008) The Arabidopsis transcription factor WRKY27 influences wilt disease symptom development caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. Plant J 56:935–947
Ning Y, Liu W, Wang GL (2017) Balancing immunity and yield in crop plants. Trends Plant Sci 22:1069–1079
Pan LJ, Jiang L (2014) Identification and expression of the WRKY transcription factors of Carica papaya in response to abiotic and biotic stresses. Mol Biol Rep 41(3):1215–1225
Park CY, Lee JH, Yoo JH, Moon BC, Choi MS, Kang YH, Lee SM, Kim HS, Kang KY, Chung WS, Lim CO (2005) WRKY group IId transcription factors interact with calmodulin. FEBS Lett 579:1545–1550
Peng Y, Bartley LE, Chen X, Dardick C, Chern M, Ruan R, Canlas PE, Ronald PC (2008) OsWRKY62 is a negative regulator of basal and Xa21-mediated defense against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in rice. Mol Plant 1(3):446–58
Peng Y, van Wersch R, Zhang Y (2018) Convergent and divergent signaling in PAMP-triggered immunity and effector-triggered immunity. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 31:403–409
Phukan UJ, Jeena GS, Shukla RK (2016) WRKY transcription factors: molecular regulation and stress responses in plants. Front Plant Sci 7:760
Qin Y, Tian Y, Liu X (2015) A wheat salinity-induced WRKY transcription factor TaWRKY93 confers multiple abiotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 464(2):428–433
Qiu D, Xiao J, Ding X, Xiong M, Cai M, Cao Y, Li X, Xu C, Wang S (2007) OsWRKY13 mediates rice disease resistance by regulating defense-related genes in salicylate and jasmonate-dependent signaling. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 20:492–499
Qiu JL, Fiil BK, Petersen K, Nielsen HB, Botanga CJ, Thorgrimsen S, Palma K, Suarez-Rodriguez MC, Sandbech-Clausen S, Lichota J, Brodersen P, Grasser KD, Mattsson O, Glazebrook J, Mundy J, Petersen M (2008) Arabidopsis MAP kinase 4 regulates gene expression through transcription factor release in the nucleus. EMBO J 27:2214–2221
Qiu Y, Yu D (2009) Over-expression of the stress-induced OsWRKY45 enhances disease resistance and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Environ Expt Bot 65(1):35–47
Ramamoorthy R, Jiang SY, Kumar N, Venkatesh PN, Ramachandran S (2008) A comprehensive transcriptional profiling of the WRKY gene family in rice under various abiotic and phytohormone treatments. Plant Cell Physiol 49(6):865–879
Rushton DL, Tripathi P, Rabara RC, Lin J, Ringler P, Boken AK, Langum TJ, Smidt L, Boomsma DD, Emme NJ, Chen X (2012) WRKY transcription factors: key components in abscisic acid signalling. Plant Biotechnol J 10:2–11
Rushton PJ, Macdonald H, Huttly AK, Lazarus CM, Hooley R (1995) Members of a new family of DNA binding proteins bind to a conserved cis-element in the promoters of a-Amy2 genes. Plant Mol Biol 48429:691–702
Rushton PJ, Somssich IE, Ringler P, Shen QJ (2010) WRKY transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci 15:247–258
Rushton PJ, Torres JT, Parniske M, Wernert P, Hahlbrock K, Somssich E (1996) Interaction of elicitor induced DNA-binding proteins with elicitor response elements in the promoters of parsley PR1 Genes. EMBO J 15(20):5690–5700
Şahin-Çevik M, Moore GA (2013) Identification of a drought-and cold-stress inducible WRKY gene in the cold-hardy Citrus relative Poncirus trifoliata. New Zealand J Crop Hort Sci 41:57–68
Sheen J, He P, Shan L, Xiong Y, Tena G, Yoo S, Cho Y, Boudsocq M, Lee H (2002) Signaling specificity and complexity of MAPK cascades in plant innate immunity. In: 13th International Congress on Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 1–30.
Shimono M, Sugano S, Nakayama A, Jiang CJ, Ono K, Toki S, Takatsuji H (2007) Rice WRKY45 plays a crucial role in benzothiadiazole-inducible blast resistance. Plant Cell 19:2064–2076
Singh AK, Kumar SR, Dwivedi V, Rai A, Pal S, Shasany AK, Nagegowda DA (2017) A WRKY transcription factor from Withania somnifera regulates triterpenoid withanolide accumulation and biotic stress tolerance through modulation of phytosterol and defense pathways. New Phytol 215:1115–1131
Singh B, Bohra A, Mishra S, Joshi R, Pandey S (2015) Embracing new-generation ‘omics’ tools to improve drought tolerance in cereal and food-legume crops. Biol Plant 59:413–428
Sita K, Sehgal A, HanumanthaRao B, Nair RM, Vara Prasad PV, Kumar S, Gaur PM, Farooq M, Siddique KH, Varshney RK, Nayyar H (2017) Food legumes and rising temperatures: effects, adaptive functional mechanisms specific to reproductive growth stage and strategies to improve heat tolerance. Front Plant Sci 8:1658
Song Y, Chen LG, Zhang LP, Yu DQ (2010) Overexpression of OsWRKY72 gene interferes in the abscisic acid signal and auxin transport pathway of Arabidopsis. J Biol Sci 35:459–471
Song Y, Gao J (2014) Genome-wide analysis of WRKY gene family in Arabidopsis lyrata and comparison with Arabidopsis thaliana and Populus trichocarpa. Chinese Sci Bull 59(8):754–765
Sun C, Palmqvist S, Olsson H, Borén M, Ahlandsberg S, Jansson C (2003) A novel WRKY transcription factor, SUSIBA2, participates in sugar signaling in barley by binding to the sugar-responsive elements of the iso1 promoter. Plant Cell 15:2076–2092
Sun XC, Gao YF, Li HR, Yang SZ, Liu YS (2015) Over-expression of SlWRKY39 leads to enhanced resistance to multiple stress factors in tomato. J Plant Biol 58:52–60
Takahashi F, Shinozaki K (2019) Long-distance signaling in plant stress response. Curr Opin Plant Biol 47:106–111
Tang J, Wang F, Wang Z, Huang Z, Xiong A, Hou X (2013) Characterization and co-expression analysis of WRKY orthologs involved in responses to multiple abiotic stresses in Pak-choi (Brassica campestris ssp. chinensis). BMC Plant Biol 13(1):1–188
Tao Z, Kou Y, Liu H, Li X, Xiao J, Wang S (2011) OsWRKY45 alleles play different roles in abscisic acid signalling and salt stress tolerance but similar roles in drought and cold tolerance in rice. J Expt Bot 62(14):4863–4874
Tao Z, Liu H, Qiu D, Zhou Y, Li X, Xu C, Wang S (2009) A pair of allelic WRKY genes play opposite roles in rice-bacteria interactions. Plant Physiol 151(2):936–948
Teixeira EI, Fischer G, van Velthuizen H, Walter C, Ewert F (2013) Global hot-spots of heat stress on agricultural crops due to climate change. Agric For Meteorol 170:206–215
Tester M, Langridge P (2010) Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 327:818–822
Ueda M, Zhang Z, Laux T (2011) Transcriptional activation of Arabidopsis axis patterning genes WOX8/9 links zygote polarity to embryo development. Devel Cell 20: 264-270
Uji Y, Kashihara K, Kiyama H, Mochizuki S, Akimitsu K, Gomi K (2019) Jasmonic acid-induced VQ-motif-containing protein OsVQ13 influences the OsWRKY45 signaling pathway and grain size by associating with OsMPK6 in rice. Intl J Mol Sci 20:2917
van Verk MC, Pappaioannou D, Neeleman L, Bol JF, Linthorst HJ (2008) A novel WRKY transcription factor is required for induction of PR-1a gene expression by salicylic acid and bacterial elicitors. Plant Physiol 146:1983–1995
Vo KT, Kim CY, Hoang TV, Lee SK, Shirsekar G, Seo YS, Lee SW, Wang GL, Jeon JS (2018) OsWRKY67 Plays a positive role in basal and XA21-mediated resistance in rice. Front Plant Sci 8:2220
Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad M (2007) Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environ Expt Bot 61:199–223
Wan Y, Mao M, Wan D, Yang Q, Yang F, Li G, Wang R (2018) Identification of the WRKY gene family and functional analysis of two genes in Caragana intermedia. BMC Plant Biol 18(1):31
Wang D, Amornsiripanitch N, Dong X (2006) A genomic approach to identify regulatory nodes in the transcriptional network of systemic acquired resistance in plants. PLoS Pathol 2(11):e123
Wang H, Hao J, Chen X, Hao Z, Wang X, Lou Y, Peng Y, Guo Z (2007) Overexpression of rice WRKY89 enhances ultraviolet B tolerance and disease resistance in rice plants. Plant Mol Biol 65(6):799–815
Wang H, Xu Q, Kong YH, Chen Y, Duan JY, Wu WH, Chen YF (2014) Arabidopsis WRKY45 transcription factor activates PHOSPHATE TRANSPORTER1;1 expression in response to phosphate starvation. Plant Physiol 164:2020–2029
Wang K, Bai ZY, Liang QY, Liu QL, Zhang L, Pan YZ, Liu GL, Jiang BB, Zhang F, Jia Y (2018) Transcriptome analysis of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflorum) in response to low temperature stress. BMC Genom 19(1):319
Wang N, Xia EH, Gao LZ (2016) Genome-wide analysis of WRKY family of transcription factors in common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris: chromosomal localization, structure, evolution and expression divergence. Plant Gene 5:22–30
Wang Y, Feng L, Zhu Y, Li Y, Yan H, Xiang Y (2015) Comparative genomic analysis of the WRKY III gene family in populus, grape, arabidopsis and rice. Biol Direct 10(1):48
Wani SH, Tripathi P, Zaid A, Challa GS, Kumar A, Kumar V, Upadhyay J, Joshi R, Bhatt M (2018) Transcriptional regulation of osmotic stress tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Mol Biol 1:1–9
Wu J, Chen J, Wang L, Wang S (2017) Genome-wide investigation of WRKY transcription factors involved in terminal drought stress response in common bean. Front Plant Sci 8:380
Wu M, Liu H, Han G, Cai R, Pan F, Xiang Y (2017) A moso bamboo WRKY gene PeWRKY83 confers salinity tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Sci Rep 7:11721
Wu X, Shiroto Y, Kishitani S, Ito Y, Toriyama K (2009) Enhanced heat and drought tolerance in transgenic rice seedlings overexpressing OsWRKY11 under the control of HSP101 promoter. Plant Cell Rep 28(1):21–30
Wu ZJ, Li XH, Liu ZW, Li H, Wang YX, Zhuang J (2016) Transcriptome-wide identification of Camellia sinensis WRKY transcription factors in response to temperature stress. Mol Genet Genom 291(1):255–269
Xiao J, Cheng H, Li X, Xiao J, Xu C, Wang S (2013) Rice WRKY13 regulates cross talk between abiotic and biotic stress signaling pathways by selective binding to different cis-elements. Plant Physiol 163:1868–1882
Xie Z, Zhang ZL, Zou X, Huang J, Ruas P, Thompson D, Shen QJ (2005) Annotations and functional analyses of the rice WRKY gene superfamily reveal positive and negative regulators of abscisic acid signaling in aleurone cells. Plant Physiol 137(1):176–189
Xie Z, Zhang ZL, Zou X, Yang G, Komatsu S, Shen QJ (2006) Interactions of two abscisic-acid induced WRKY genes in repressing gibberellin signaling in aleurone cells. Plant J 46(2):231–242
Xiong L, Schumaker KS, Zhu JK (2002) Cell signaling during cold, drought, and salt stress. Plant Cell 14(suppl 1):S165–S183
Xu H, Watanabe KA, Zhang L, Shen QJ (2016) WRKY transcription factor genes in wild rice Oryza nivara. DNA Res 23(4):311–323
Xu YP, Xu H, Wang B, Su XD (2020) Crystal structures of N-terminal WRKY transcription factors and DNA complexes. Protein Cell 11:208–213
Xu Z, Raza Q, Xu L et al (2018) GmWRKY49, a salt-responsive nuclear protein, improved root length and governed better salinity tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci 9:809
Yamasaki K, Kigawa T, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yokoyama S (2013) DNA-binding domains of plant-specific transcription factors: structure, function, and evolution. Trends Plant Sci 18:267–276
Yan H, Jia H, Chen X, Hao L, An H, Guo X (2014) The cotton WRKY transcription factor GhWRKY17 functions in drought and salt stress in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana through ABA signaling and the modulation of reactive oxygen species production. Plant Cell Physiol 55(12):2060–2076
Yan JY, Li CX, Sun L, Ren JY, Li GX, Ding ZJ, Zheng SJ (2016) A WRKY transcription factor regulates Fe translocation under Fe deficiency in Arabidopsi. Plant Physiol 171:2017–2027
Yang X, Li H, Yang Y, Wang Y, Mo Y, Zhang R, Zhang Y, Ma J, Wei C, Zhang X (2018) Identification and expression analyses of WRKY genes reveal their involvement in growth and abiotic stress response in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). PLoS ONE 13(1):e0191308
Yang Y, Zhou Y, Chi Y, Fan B, Chen Z (2017) Characterization of Soybean WRKY gene family and identification of soybean WRKY genes that promote resistance to soybean cyst nematode. Sci Rep 7(1):17804
Yu Y, Liu S, Wang L, Kim S, Seo P, Qiao M, Wang N, Li S, Cao X, Park C, Xiang F (2016) WRKY71 accelerates flowering via the direct activation of FLOWERING LOCUS T and LEAFY in. Arabidopsis thaliana Plant J 85:96–106
Zhang T, Tan D, Zhang L, Zhang X, Han Z (2017) Phylogenetic analysis and drought-responsive expression profiles of the WRKY transcription factor family in maize. Agri Gene 3:99–108
Zhang Y, Feng JC (2014) Identification and characterization of the grape WRKY family. BioMed Res Intl 2014:787680
Zhang Y, Wang L (2005) The WRKY transcription factor superfamily: its origin in eukaryotes and expansion in plants. BMC Evol Biol 5(1):1
Zhang Y, Yu H, Yang X, Li Q, Ling J, Wang H, Gu X, Huang S, Jiang W (2016) CsWRKY46, a WRKY transcription factor from cucumber, confers cold resistance in transgenic-plant by regulating a set of cold-stress responsive genes in an ABA-dependent manner. Plant Physiol Biochem 108:478–487
Zhang ZL, Shin M, Zou X, Huang J, Ho TH, Shen QJ (2009) A negative regulator encoded by a rice WRKY gene represses both abscisic acid and gibberellins signaling in aleurone cells. Plant Mol Biol 70(1–2):139–151
Zheng Z, Qamar SA, Chen Z, Mengiste T (2006) Arabidopsis WRKY33 transcription factor is required for resistance to necrotrophic fungal pathogens. Plant J 48(4):592–605
Zhou C, Lin Q, Lan J, Zhang T, Liu X, Miao R, Mou C, Nguyen T, Wang J, Zhang X, Zhou L, Zhu X, Wang Q, Zhang X, Guo X, Liu S, Jiang L, Wan J (2020) WRKY Transcription Factor OsWRKY29 represses seed dormancy in rice by weakening abscisic acid response. Front Plant Sci 11:691
Zhou H, Li Y, Zhang Q, Ren S, Shen Y, Qin L, Xing Y (2016) Genome-wide analysis of the expression of WRKY family genes in different developmental stages of wild strawberry (Fragaria vesca) fruit. PLoS ONE 11(5):e0154312
Zhou QY, Tian AG, Zou HF, Xie ZM, Lei G, Huang J, Wang CM, Wang HW, Zhang JS, Chen SY (2008) Soybean WRKY-type transcription factor genes, GmWRKY13, GmWRKY21, and GmWRKY54, confer differential tolerance to abiotic stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Plant Biotech J 6(5):486–503
Zhu H, Zhou Y, Zhai H, He S, Zhao N, Liu Q (2020) A novel sweetpotato WRKY transcription factor, IbWRKY2, positively regulates drought and salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Biomolecules 10:506
Zou C, Jiang W, Yu D (2010) Male gametophyte-specific WRKY34 transcription factor mediates cold sensitivity of mature pollen in Arabidopsis. J Expt Bot 61: 3901-3914
Acknowledgements
RJ acknowledge the financial support from project GAP0254 and MLP0201 for this study
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SHW conceived the idea. SHW, SA, BS, AB and RJ wrote the manuscript. RJ and AB revised and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.
Additional information
Communicated by Wusheng Liu.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wani, S.H., Anand, S., Singh, B. et al. WRKY transcription factors and plant defense responses: latest discoveries and future prospects. Plant Cell Rep 40, 1071–1085 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-021-02691-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-021-02691-8