Abstract
Symmetric and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced asymmetric fusions between Swertia mussotii and Arabidopsis thaliana protoplasts generated >100 putative hybrid cell lines. Of these, 65 were shown to have a hybrid origin, based on molecular markers, chromosome number, and morphology. An assay directed at the A. thaliana CACTA transposon family detected only three positive lines among the 65 hybrid calli tested. The CACTA sequence amplified from clone D14 was highly homologous with CAC2, indicating that the chromosome content of the hybrid cell lines was largely inherited from S. mussotii. Profiles of secondary metabolites identified a number of S. mussotii- or A. thaliana-specific compounds, as well as significant proportions of compounds not represented in the profile of either parent.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Somatic hybridization, unlike conventional crossing, is not restricted by sexual incompatibility and has been used to obtain hybrids involving parents drawn from a wide range of species (Dudits et al. 1987; Fahleson and Glimelius 1999; Xiang et al. 2004; Davey et al. 2005; Liu et al. 2005; Xia 2009). Hybrids between Bupleurum scorzonerifolium and several Gentianaceae species have recently been produced with the aim of synthesizing specific valuable secondary metabolites in a fast-growing species (Wang et al. 2010; Jiang et al. 2012; Yu et al. 2012). The annual species Swertia mussotii Franch. (Gentianaceae) is adapted to the high altitude environment of Tibet and Qinghai. Extracts of the whole plant are functional against various forms of hepatitis (Yamahara et al. 1978; Kikuzaki et al. 1996), and the major active molecules have been identified as oleanolic acid, mangiferin, swertiamarin, and amarogentin (Brahmachari et al. 2004). How these molecules are synthesized in planta has not yet to be determined.
Arabidopsis thaliana is an important model plant with facile genetics and small genome. As whole genome sequencing has been completed, A. thaliana has a relatively well understood genetic background and thus provides unique opportunities for genome and functional genome analysis.
The initial aim of the current research was to generate somatic hybrids between S. mussotii and A. thaliana. Asymmetric hybrids which harbored the smallest contribution of S. mussotii DNA could be used to identify the genes underlying the synthesis of the key secondary metabolites. However, most of the hybrids were dominated by DNA from the S. mussotii parent. Here, we describe the production and characterization of a number of independent asymmetric somatic hybrids between S. mussotii and A. thaliana. The secondary metabolite profiles of the hybrids and parents were evaluated, and the analysis of CACTA transposon movement was used to identify pericentromeric and centromeric regions insertion events among the asymmetric somatic hybrids.
Materials and Methods
Origin of parental protoplasts, protoplast fusion, and regeneration.
A cell suspension of A. thaliana ecotype Col-0 was maintained in D1 liquid medium on a shaker at 150 rpm with a 10–12-h photoperiod under 25°C with 7-d subculture intervals (Wang et al. 2005). The S. mussotii cells were obtained from cultured compact calli maintained on KT medium (Wang et al. 2010). Both cell types were converted to protoplasts after incubation in an enzyme solution (0.6 M mannitol, 5 mM CaCl2, 1.5% cellulase Onozyka RS, and 0.3% pectolyase Y-23) for 3–4 h as described by Xu et al. (2003). The S. mussotii protoplasts were used either directly for fusion (combination I) or were exposed to 300 W/cm2 ultraviolet (UV) light for 30 s prior to fusion (combination II). For both combinations, the S. mussotii protoplasts were subsequently mixed with those of A. thaliana in a ratio of 1.5:1 and fused using PEG. Briefly, the protoplast mixture was precipitated for 30 min in culture dish, then four drops of PEG solution [0.11 M glucose, 0.09 M Ca(NO3)2, 40% (w/v) PEG 6000] were added to the border of the protoplast mixture. Fusing protoplasts were then incubated for 15–20 min. Next, four drops of 0.27 M Ca(NO3)2 were added in two subsequent steps, with incubation for 10 min each time. The solution was replaced twice with washing buffer with incubation for 10 min each time. Finally, the washing buffer was replaced with P5 liquid medium (Xu et al. 2003), incubated for 10 min, after which the P5 medium replaced (Xu et al. 2003). The fusion products were cultured in P5 liquid medium in darkness at 25°C. Developing calli ∼2 mm in diameter were transferred to D1 medium to encourage proliferation, then to IB and B1 medium to promote differentiation (Jiang et al. 2012). All the media (Table 1) used were MB basal media supplemented with 2 mg/l glycine, 146 mg/l glutamine, and 300 mg/l casein hydrolysate. All cultures were incubated in darkness or in a chamber with a 10–12-h photoperiod. A light intensity of 18–20 μmol m−2 s−1 was provided by cool-white fluorescent lamps.
Genotypic analysis.
Genomic DNA was isolated from putatively hybrid calli and both parents using a modified CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle 1990). A set of 18 random-sequence decamer oligonucleotides obtained from OperonTechnology (Huntsville, AL) were used as PCR primers, as described elsewhere (Xia et al. 1998). Each reaction was subjected to 94°C/5 min, 45 cycles of 94°C/10 s, 36°C/30 s, 72°C/50 s, and 72°C/7 min, and the amplicons were separated through 1.5% (w/v) agarose gels and detected by ethidium bromide staining. In addition, the DNAs were also amplified using a primer pair targeting the 5S rDNA spacer sequence (Cox et al. 1992). These reactions were subjected to 94°C/5 min, 35 cycles of 94°C/40 s, 57°C/60 s, 72°C/90 s, and 72°C/7 min, and the amplicons were separated through 2% agarose gels and stained in ethidium bromide. For chloroplast simple sequence repeats (SSR) analysis, seven primer pairs were used (Ishii et al. 2001). These reactions were subjected to 94°C/5 min, 35 cycles of 94°C/60 s, 55°C/75 s, 72°C/120 s, and 72°C/7 min. These amplicons were separated by 6% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and visualized by silver staining (Xu et al. 2003). Finally, a pair of primers was designed based on the consensus sequence of the A. thaliana transposons CACTA1 (AB052792.1), CACTA2 (AB052793.1), CACTA3 (AB052794.1), and CACTA5 (AB095515.1). The primer sequences were 5′-ACGCTAAGACCGTAAATCC and 5′-AATCGCATCACAGACAAGT. These reactions were subjected to 94°C/5 min, 35 cycles of 94°C/30 s, 50°C/30 s, and 72°C/100 s, and the amplicons were gel-purified and cloned into pMD18-T (TaKaRa, Co., Dalian, China) for sequencing.
Chromosome counts.
Chromosome counts were obtained from callus cells as detailed by Xia and Chen (1996).
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of secondary metabolites.
A 30-mg aliquot of powdered shade-dried callus as described by Cai et al. (2009) was obtained from hybrids and parents and extracted in 10 ml methanol. The suspension was sonicated for 60 min and then filtered by vacuum through a 0.22-μm membrane. A GC-MS device (QP-5050A, Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan) was fitted with a DB-5 MS column (0.25 mm × 30 m, 0.25 μm film thickness) (J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA), through which the helium flow split ratio was 10:1, and operated at 70 eV ionization voltage with a scan range of 40–400 Da. The column temperature was 50°C for 2 min, raised thereafter by 8°C/min to 150°C, where it was held for 2 min, and then raised at 15°C/min to 250°C, where it was held for 20 min.
Results
Regeneration of fusion products and their morphology.
The first division of fused cells was observed after a dark incubation period of 10 d, and tiny calli, ranging from 0.5 to 1 mm in diameter, appeared about 1 mo later. Proliferating calli reached a diameter of 2–3 mm after 6 wk. Twenty-six putative hybrid clones were produced using combination I (D1–26), and 75 were produced using combination II (B1–75) treatments. The majority of yellow-colored calli remained yellow and compact during their culture on D1 medium and went on to develop profuse numbers of roots and shoots after 2 mo on IB or B1 medium (Fig. 1a, b and Table 1). However, the watery, light yellow-colored hybrid clones, although they grew rapidly, were unable to form shoots or roots and eventually became necrotic (Fig. 1c ). Protoplasts of neither parent were able to form callus.
Genotypic analysis of hybrid clones.
The hybrid characteristics of the regenerated candidate hybrids callus were demonstrated by random amplified polymorphic DNA (random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)), 5S rDNA, chloroplast SSR, and CACTA transposon analyses. The RAPD profiles produced by 4 of the 18 primers were consistent with the presence of DNA from both parents in 65 of the 101 hybrid calli (Fig. 2a–c ). The profile of a few clones included fragments not present in either parent’s RAPD profile. With respect to the 5S rDNA analysis, all hybrids showed amplicons that included fragments from S. mussotii. In clones B16 and B40, a non-parental fragment was also present (Fig. 2d ). Only one chloroplast SSR marker target within the intron of atpF gave stable amplicons (Fig. 2e ). Most hybrids had S. mussotii fragments, and several new bands were amplified in B18, B30, and B40 (Fig. 2e ). When the primers designed to detect CACTA transposons were employed, the amplicons from hybrids D14, B16, and B19 each included a fragment of the same size as one present in the profile of A. thaliana, while S. mussotii and the rest of the hybrids failed to yield an amplicon (Fig. 2f ). When the sequence of the D14 amplicon was subjected to BLAST analysis, an 88–96% level of homology with the CAC1–5 transposons was detected. The highest homology was with CAC2, disturbed by a 28-nt insertion and several single nucleotide substitutions (Fig. 3).
Chromosome number variation.
Chromosome analysis was used to further examine the genetic constitution of the hybrids. The somatic chromosome number detected in the S. mussotii protoplasts was 18–22 and in A. thaliana protoplasts was 9–11, with few fragments (Fig. 4a, b ). The A. thaliana chromosomes were much smaller than those of S. mussotii. In all of the combination I-derived and most of the combination II-derived hybrid clones, the somatic number ranged from 18 to 24 (Fig. 4c ); however, in clone B40 (asymmetric hybrid), the number was much higher (38–40) (Fig. 4d ). On the basis of the size of the chromosomes in the hybrid clones, most were concluded to be either complete S. mussotii chromosomes or recombined products.
Secondary metabolite content.
Metabolite profiles of the hybrids and their parents showed that hybrids D1, B20, and B40 and the parents S. mussotii and A. thaliana produced 32, 36, 33, 31, and 26 peaks, respectively. Some of the compounds produced by the hybrid calli were similar to those of either A. thaliana or S. mussotii (Table 2), and some additional novel compounds were identified in some of the hybrids (Table 2). Pyrethrin, a terpenoid used as a plant-derived insecticide, was present in B40, although its synthesis was not detected in either of the parental species (Table 2).
Discussion
The genomic content of the hybrid calli.
The hybrid lines recovered, whether from combination I or II treatments, were all highly asymmetric. Their chromosomes were uniformly large (like those of S. mussotii and unlike those of A. thaliana), and the number of RAPD products was greatly biased in favor of S. mussotii (83–87% of fragments) and against that of A. thaliana (12–15%). Only 3 of the 65 lines analyzed carried sequences homologous to the A. thaliana CAC transposons. Chromosome elimination is a common event in symmetric somatic hybrids and occurs more frequently as the phylogenetic separation between the parents increases (Pental et al. 1986; de Vries et al. 1987; Endo et al. 1988; Xia 2009). Attempts have been made to minimize asymmetry by pretreating the protoplasts of the donor parent with radiation, while a general strategy applied to bias the elimination in favor of a particular parent has been to expose the protoplast of the non-favored protoplasts to UV irradiation prior to fusion ( Liu et al. 2005; Cai et al. 2007; Jiang et al. 2012). In some cases, the outcome has been surprising in that chromosomes of the favored parent are eliminated (Wang et al. 2005; Zhou et al. 2006), perhaps because they are more sensitive to the presence of free radicals induced by the UV irradiation treatment applied to the non-favored parent protoplasts (Wang et al. 2005). An unexplained outcome from the present experiments was that the UV pre-treatment seemed to have no noticeable effect on the chromosomal constitution of the hybrids, which may suggest that the phylogenetic separation between S. mussotii and A. thaliana had a greater influence on the pattern of chromosome elimination than whether or not the S. mussotii protoplasts were exposed to UV irradiation.
The CACTA transposon PCR assay—an efficient method for centromeric regions identification.
Various molecular markers are employed for chromosome identification in somatic hybrids, such as RAPD, inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), and SSR (Cai et al. 2007; Xiao et al. 2009; Yang et al. 2009; Xiang et al. 2010). Markers that depend on arbitrarily primed amplicons such as RAPD, ISSR, and AFLP are not locus-specific, so it is difficult to determine which fragments from the parents are present in the hybrids. Locus-specific markers such as SSRs are codominant, sometimes species/genus-specific; however, their detectabilities are very limited, which means numerous marks are needed to identify locus from donor parent. As such, Xiang et al. (2010) reported only 11 of 58 SSR markers from wheat/oat somatic hybrids had the donor oat alleles.
The CACTA transposon family is found in many plant genomes (Miura et al. 2001). The A. thaliana Col-0 genome harbors five members (CAC1–5), all located in the pericentromeric and centromeric regions (Kato et al. 2003; Miura et al. 2004). No sign of transposon activity has been demonstrable in an inter-ecotype hybrid or its subsequent generations of self-pollinated progeny (Kato et al. 2004). The rare recovery of CACTA transposons among the somatic hybrids (3/65 clones) is consistent with the transposons remaining in a silenced state, despite the genomic shock induced by the protoplast fusion process. Therefore, locus-specific PCR marker-based CACTA transposon analysis afforded us an efficient method to identify the introgressed pericentromeric and centromeric regions from A. thaliana in hybrids.
Metabolite profiles of the somatic hybrids.
GC-MS was used to characterize the metabolic profiles of the two parents of the somatic hybridization events to identify the origin of the metabolites present in their hybrid offspring. GC-MS has been previously used as an efficient means of comparing the metabolic profiles of various A. thaliana genotypes in order to gain some insight into gene function (Fiehn et al. 2000). In this study, a significant proportion of metabolites were not present in the profile of either parent (13/32 in D1, 13/36 in B20, and 14/33 in B40). The production of the indole derivative 1H-indoleacetic acid (present in both D1 and B20) may have been a consequence of the more elevated level of auxin (IAA) in these hybrids, which contributed to their rapid growth, an important criterion for selection of putative hybrids (Xia et al. 2003; Cai et al. 2007). The presence or increase of the unsaturated fatty acids linoleic acid, 8,11-octadecadienoic acid, and 9,12-octadecadienoic acid in the hybrids has previously been noted by Wang et al. (2010) and Jiang et al. (2009). Although the terpenoid pyrethrin is well known to be produced in chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium) (Crombie 1995), it has not been identified to date in either of the parental species. The novel production of so many compounds in these hybrids suggests that genomic shock may have occurred. Genomic shock, which can occur in somatic hybrids, is the nuclear response to an unusual challenge in which the genome becomes extensively restructured (McClintock 1984). The “unusual challenge” most frequently encountered is a wide sexual cross (Pikaard 1999; Comai 2000), but the outcome of somatic hybridization—the fusion of two heterologous nuclei—is in principle no different from this, and genomic shock-associated events, such as altered microsatellite profiles, gene silencing, and epigenetic changes, have been well documented for a number of somatic hybrids (Cai et al. 2007; Bassene et al. 2009; Shan et al. 2009).
Somatic hybridization provides a means to transfer chromosomal fragments and therefore in principle complete metabolic pathways, across a wide phylogenetic distance. This option is seldom available via the sexual route or requires transgenic approaches. The genome of the S. mussotii–A. thaliana somatic hybrid calli and regenerated plantlets was composed largely of S. mussotii DNA, but there was evidence of some introgression from A. thaliana that was sufficient to disturb the metabolic profile.
References
Bassene JB, Froelicher Y, Dhuique-Mayer C, Mouhaya W, Ferrer RM, Ancillo G, Morillon R, Navarro L, Ollitrault P (2009) Non-additive phenotypic and transcriptomic inheritance in a citrus allotetraploid somatic hybrid between C. reticulate and C. limon: the case of pulp carotenoid biosynthesis pathway. Plant Cell Rep 28:1689–1697
Brahmachari G, Mondal S, Gangopadhyay A, Gorai D, Mukhopadhyay B, Saha S, Brahmachari AK (2004) Swertia (Gentianaceae): chemical and pharmacological aspects. Chem Biodivers 1:1627–1651
Cai YF, Liu YL, Liu ZH, Zhang F, Xiang FN, Xia GM (2009) High-frequency embryogenesis and regeneration of plants with high content of gentiopicroside from the Chinese medicinal plant Gentiana straminea Maxim. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 45(6):730–739
Cai YF, Xiang FN, Zhi DY, Liu H, Xia GM (2007) Genotyping of somatic hybrids between Festuca arundinacea Schreb. and Triticum aestivum L. Plant Cell Rep 26:1809–1819
Comai L (2000) Genetic and epigenetic interactions in allopolyploid plants. Plant Mol Biol 43:387–399
Cox AV, Bennett MD, Dyer TA (1992) Use of the polymerase chain reaction to detect spacer size heterogeneity in plant SS-rRNA gene clusters and to locate such clusters in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 83:684–690
Crombie L (1995) In: Quistad GB, Casida JE (eds) Pyrethrum flowers: production, chemistry, toxicology and uses. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 123–178
Davey MR, Anthony P, Power JB, Lowe KC (2005) Plant protoplasts: status and biotechnological perspectives. Biotechnol Adv 23(2):131–171
de Vries SE, Ferwerda MA, Loonen AEHM, Pijnacker LP, Feenstra WJ (1987) Chromosomes in somatic hybrids between Nicotiana plumbaginifolia and a monoploid potato. Theor Appl Genet 75:170–176
Doyle JJ, Doyle JI (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15
Dudits D, Maroy E, Praznovszky T, Olah Z, Gyorgyey J, Cella R (1987) Transfer of resistance traits from carrot into tobacco by asymmetric somatic hybridization: regeneration of fertile plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84:8434–8438
Endo T, Komiya T, Mino M, Nakanishi K, Fujita S, Yamada Y (1988) Genetic diversity among sublines originating from a single somatic hybrid cell of Duboisia hopwoodii+Nicotiana tabacum. Theor Appl Genet 76:641–646
Fahleson J, Glimelius K (1999) Protoplast fusion for symmetric somatic hybrid production in Brassicaceae. Methods Mol Biol 111:195–209
Fiehn O, Kopka J, Dörmann P, Altmann T, Trethewey RN, Willmitzer L (2000) Metabolite profiling for plant functional genomics. Nat Biotechnol 18:1157–1161
Ishii T, Mori N, Ogihara Y (2001) Evaluation of allelic diversity at chloroplast microsatellite loci among common wheat and its ancestral species. Theor Appl Genet 103:896–904
Jiang JJ, Zhao XX, Tian W, Li TB, Wang YP (2009) Intertribal somatic hybrids between Brassica napus and Camelina sativa with high linolenic acid content. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 99:91–95
Jiang L, Cai YF, Xia GM, Xiang FN (2012) Introgression of the heterologous nuclear DNAs and efficacious compositions from Swertia tetraptera into Bupleurum scorzonerifolium Willd. via somatic hybridization. Protoplasma 249(3):737–745
Kato M, Miura A, Bender J, Jacobsen SE, Kakutani T (2003) Role of CG and non-CG methylation in immobilization of transposons in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 13:421–426
Kato M, Takashima K, Kakutani T (2004) Epigenetic control of CACTA transposon mobility in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 168:961–969
Kikuzaki H, Kawasaki Y, Kitamura S, Nakatani N (1996) Secoiridoid glucosides from Swertia mileensis. Planta Med 62:35–38
Liu J, Xu X, Deng X (2005) Intergeneric somatic hybridization and its application to crop genetic improvement. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 82:19–44
McClintock B (1984) The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 226:792–801
Miura A, Kato M, Watanabe K, Kawabe A, Kotani H, Kakutani T (2004) Genomic localization of endogenous mobile CACTA family transposons in natural variants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genomics 270:524–532
Miura A, Yonebayashi S, Watanabe K, Toyama T, Shimada H (2001) Mobilization of transposons by a mutation abolishing full DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Nature 411:212–214
Pental D, Hamill JD, Pirri A, Cocking EC (1986) Somatic hybridization of Nicotiana tabacum and Petunia hybrida. Recovery of plants with P. hybrida nuclear genome and N. tabacum chloroplast genome. Mol Gen Genet 202:342–347
Pikaard CS (1999) Nucleolar dominance and silencing of transcription. Trends Plant Sci 4:478–483
Shan XH, Ou XF, Liu ZL, Dong YZ, Lin XY, Li XW, Liu B (2009) Transpositional activation of mPing in an asymmetric nuclear somatic cell hybrid of rice and Zizania latifolia was accompanied by massive element loss. Theor Appl Genet 119:1325–1333
Wang JF, Zhao CZ, Liu C, Xia GM, Xiang FN (2010) Introgression of Swertia mussotii gene into Bupleurum scorzonerifolium via somatic hybridization. BMC Plant Biol 11:71
Wang MQ, Xia GM, Peng ZY (2005) High UV-tolerance with introgression hybrid formation of Bupleurum scorzonerifolium Willd. Plant Sci 168:593–600
Xia G (2009) Progress of chromosome engineering mediated by asymmetric somatic hybridization. J Genet Genomics 36:547–556
Xia GM, Chen HM (1996) Plant regeneration from intergeneric somatic hybridization between Triticum aestivum L. and Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel. Plant Sci 120:197–203
Xia GM, Li ZY, Wang SL, Xiang FN, Liu JY, Chen PD, Liu DJ (1998) Asymmetric somatic hybridization between haploid wheat and UV irradiated Haynaldia villosa. Plant Sci 37:217–223
Xia GM, Xiang FN, Zhou AF, Wang H, Chen HM (2003) Asymmetric somatic hybridization between wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Agropyron elongatum (Host) Nevishi. Theor Appl Genet 107:299–305
Xiang FN, Wang JF, Xu CH, Xia GM (2010) The chromosome content and genotype of two wheat cell lines and of their somatic fusion product with oat. Planta 231:1201–1210
Xiang FN, Xia GM, Chen HM (2004) Hybrid plant regeneration in relation to the nuclear and cytoplasmic genomes of wheat and Setaria italica. Genome 47:680–688
Xiao W, Huang X, Gong Q, Dai XM, Zhao JT, Wei YR, Huang XL (2009) Somatic hybrids obtained by asymmetric protoplast fusion between Musa Silk cv. Guoshanxiang (AAB) and Musa acuminate cv. Mas (AA). Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 97:313–321
Xu CH, Xia GM, Zhi DY, Xiang FN, Chen HM (2003) Integration of maize nuclear and mitochondrial DNA into the wheat genome through somatic hybridization. Plant Sci 165:1001–1008
Yamahara J, Konoshima T, Sawada T, Fujimura H (1978) Biologically active principles of crude drugs: pharmacological actions of Swertia japonica extracts, swertiamarin and gentianine. Yakugaku Zasshi 98:1446–1451
Yang Y, Guan S, Zhai H, He S, Liu Q (2009) Development and evaluation of a storage root-bearing sweetpotato somatic hybrid between Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. and I. triloba L. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 99:83–89
Yu YC, Li ZD, Wang P, Xiang FN (2012) Genetic and biochemical characterization of somatic hybrids between Bupleurum scorzonerifolium and Gentianopsis paludosa. Protoplasma 249:1029–1035
Zhou C, Xia G, Zhi D, Chen Y (2006) Genetic characterization of asymmetric somatic hybrids between Bupleurum scorzonerifolium Willd and Triticum aestivum L.: potential application to the study of the wheat genome. Planta 223:714–724
Acknowledgments
This research was financially supported by the National Key Technology R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology (2011BAI06B01), National High Technology Research and Development Program “863” (2013AA102602-4), National Natural Science Foundation (grant nos. 30970243, 31270328, 31200226, and 31201269), Science & Technology Plan of Shandong Province (2013GNC11010), and Research Program for International S&T Cooperation Projects of Shandong Province (2011176). We thank Dr. Robert Koebner (UK) for English editing of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editor: Kazuo Watanabe
Yunfei Cai, Taiyong Quan and Yang Yu contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cai, Y., Quan, T., Yu, Y. et al. Genotyping and metabolite characterization of somatic hybrids between Arabidopsis thaliana and Swertia mussotii . In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 51, 360–368 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-015-9680-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-015-9680-2