Abstract
Plant organelles like chloroplasts and mitochondria are essential organelles serving critical functions like photosynthesis and respiration, respectively, in plants. While most of the processes and the components required by the functioning of these organelles are contributed by nuclear DNA, they have few of their own components encoded by their respective genome. Mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes give a real insight into the evolution of land plants, as evident by several studies. Few studies have successfully conducted gene transfer technology into these organelles’ genomes. Although extensive research on plant organelle genome is yet to be done, recent research has shown the probability of these organelles as a target of genome engineering. From targeting individual genes of their genome to incorporating new genes from other species, they hold promises to produce improved traits. Packaging of their genome, which varies significantly in various hierarchies of land and primitive plants, has also been studied in few plant species. This chapter summarizes the current studies and findings in the study of the organellar genome concerning their structure, organization, distribution, regulatory mechanism, and gene transfer technologies. This chapter provides an updated account of the evolution of these organelle genomes.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
12.1 Introduction
The genome is defined as an organism's complete set of genetic materials. Tom Roderick coined the term genomics in 1920, which is the study of the genome and is a more recent idea than genetics and genes. Genetics entails studying genetic information, the transmission of genetic information from generation to generation in the form of DNA, and the study of a restricted number of genes. In a pre-genomic era, the mechanism of information transfer to new cells at the functional level was not precise (Goldman and Landweber 2016; Hjort et al. 2010), which could be explored in the last few decades due to the advancement in molecular techniques. The human genome consists of the nuclear genome inside the nucleus, having 3.2 billion base pairs and 35000 genes (Schneider and Grosschedl 2007). The DNA packaging into the chromosome occurs in a highly systematic manner and is regulated at various levels. The genome inside the nucleus in base-pair information is a highly compact nucleosome structure made up of histone and other proteins and nuclear DNA. The highly repetitive and large number of noncoding sequences are involved in the regulatory mechanism. Apart from the nuclear genome, the extra-nuclear genome, which includes the mitochondrial and chloroplastic genome, plays an essential role like the initiation of apoptosis, aging, a large amount of ATP production, amino acid biosynthesis, steroid biosynthesis, β-oxidation of lipid, in mitochondria and photosynthesis, and important biochemical reactions in the chloroplast
According to endosymbiont theory, these organelles evolved separately via endosymbiosis, holding and merging free-living bacteria and cyanobacteria with the host eukaryotic cell around 1.4 billion years ago (Smith and Keeling 2015). This mechanism led to structural diversity as well as functional diversity of both the organelles. When an α-proteobacterial endosymbiont integrates into the eukaryotic host organism existing at the moment, mitochondria were formed, which evolved with due course of time. Because all eukaryotic cells include mitochondria, we may certainly propose that α-proteobacteria are the ancestors of all extant eukaryotic organisms. Photosynthetic cyanobacteria merged with the eukaryotic progenitor of archiplastida via chloroplast-derived letter via initial endosymbiosis to form chloroplast
12.2 Organelles Genome
The first mitochondrial genome was sequenced entirely in 1981 (Bibb et al. 1981; Anderson et al. 1981), whereas the chloroplastic genome of Marchantia polymorpha and tobacco was entirely sequenced five years later in 1986 (Shinozaki et al. 1986; Ohyama et al. 1986). Because of their evolutionary histories, mitochondrial and chloroplastic genomes share high sequence similarities. The organelle genome size (Mt genome, Pt genome) gradually decreased over billions of years in comparison to free-living α-proteobacteria and cyanobacteria through the transfer of several genes involved in DNA repair mechanisms, replication, from the nucleus to organelle (Timmis et al. 2004). It is also important for functional and structural stability, as well as a variety of metabolic processes. The mitochondrial genome's regulatory element is not confined to noncoding regions within genes (Lee and Han 2017)
12.3 Plant Mitochondrial Genome
Mitochondria are an important cellular organelle in the plant responsible for growth, fitness, reproduction, energy generation, metabolism, and cell homeostasis due to its semi-autonomous genetic system. Plant mitochondrial genome encodes several critical polypeptides involved in oxidative phosphorylation chain complex formation. Plant mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) varies from that of animals and fungi in several ways. Higher plants have a larger mitochondrial genome than lower ones. In addition, mitochondria have nucleoids that replicate independently of the nuclear chromosome in many plants although many components of the replication machinery are derived from nuclear-encoded proteins. Plant mtDNA sequences evolved deliberately as compared to the mtDNA of animals, where point mutations were infrequent.
The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) originated from the symbiotic ancestral genomes of α-proteobacteria through the endosymbiosis process. The genomes of the mitochondria have an array of distinct characteristics in higher plants. Plant mitochondrial genomes are significantly bigger and vary greatly in size, even among relatively similar. (Allen et al. 2007; Kubo and Newton 2008). While the mitochondria of most mammals have circular DNAs having around 15–17 kb, plant mitochondrial genomes are quite larger, which vary significantly in terms of their size. In angiosperms, they typically range from 200 to 750 kb (Anderson et al. 1981) although some lineages have larger genome size, e.g., the organization of the mitochondrial genome into three independent chromosomal structures having 1556, 84, and 45 kb, respectively, is attributed to the expansion of dispersed repeats and existing introns, and accretion of nuclear, plastidial, viral, and bacterial sequences in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) (Alverson et al. 2011). The mitochondrial genome of the plants is enormous, yet their ploidy seems to be less, which is surprising. Plants have significantly lower mtDNA levels than human cells, which can have thousands of copies of mtDNA (Preuten et al. 2010). The Arabidopsis thaliana mtDNA is 367 kb in size, encodes 32 protein-coding genes, 22 transfer RNAs, and three ribosomal RNAs (5S, 18S, and 26S). On the other hand, the 16.5 kb human mtDNA code for 13 proteins, two rRNAs (12S and 16S), and 22 tRNAs (Anderson et al. 1981; Unseld et al., 1997; Stupar et al. 2001). Simpler organisms can have more mitochondrial genes, e.g., Reclinomonas americana having a 69 kb mtDNA encodes around 100 genes (Lang et al. 1997). The structure of the mitochondrial genome of the Arabidopsis thaliana has been shown in Fig. 12.1a. Mitochondrial genome sequences of plants have become more widely available, but the origin and role of noncoding DNA remain unknown, and thus, it is difficult to compare various species. The analysis of whole mitochondrial genomes of two Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes, C24 and Columbia-0 (Col-0) (Davila et al. 2011), allows for noncoding sequence comparison and molecular evolution organelle genome in plants. Plant mtDNA contains numerous introns and repetitive sequences (accounting for 90 percent of the total sequences). It is susceptible to various gene gain, gene loss, gene transfer, and duplication, as well as genomic rearrangements (Li et al. 2020). Although mitochondrial genomes’ structure and gene composition vary from species to species in plants, gene-coding sequences of most seed plants species develop gradually, with synonymous substitution rates 100 times lesser than that of mammalian mitochondria (Kitazaki and Kubo 2010).
Despite the fact that the nucleoid of the plant mitochondria is less well-known, it most likely possesses the PolI-like DNA polymerases1A and PolI-like DNA polymerases1B, the replicative DNA primase-helicase (TWINKLE), the type II topoisomerase Gyrase, the RecA-like recombinases (RECA2, RECA3), the SSB-like ssDNA-binding proteins (SSB1, SSB2), the RecA-like recombinases (RECA2, RECA), RPOTm and RPOTmp phage-type RNA polymerases, the MutS-like homolog MSH1, and some of the additional proteins (Palmer and Herbon 1988; Xu et al. 2011). DNA repair and homologous recombination are also facilitated by several of these proteins.
12.4 Structure of the Chloroplast Genome
A plant biologist discovered the chloroplast genome for the first time in 1950. Due to the lack of advanced techniques at that time, comparative restriction site mapping and cloning were being used to study genome organization, structure, and gene order. The genome size is more variable than the mitochondrial genome size and highly conserved, ranging from 35 to 217 kb in most plants species (Chumley et al., 2006). The chloroplast genome consists of 79 protein-coding genes out of 113 total genes, where 30 genes code for transfer-RNA and 4 genes encode rRNA genes in tobacco. It is a circular and quadripartite structure having a unique sequence like a small single-copy region(SSC), a large single-copy region(LSC), and one pair of inverted repeats (IRs) (Yang et al., 2010). The structure of the chloroplast genome of Nicotiana tabacum with its different regions has been provided in Fig. 12.2a. In the inverted repeat (IR), 5 protein-coding, 4 rRNA, and 7 tRNA genes are present, which evolved during the duplication event. The LSC region consists of 62 protein-coding, 22 tRNA genes in contrast to the SSC region, which contains 12 protein-coding genes and a single tRNA gene. In the chloroplast genome, only 12 genes possess introns, out of which ycf3 and clpP genes contain two introns, and the other genes possess a single intron. In the LSC region of 5′end, trans-splicing occurs in rps12 genes. Duplication event has also been reported in the IR regions of the chloroplast genome (Liu et al. 2016). The chloroplast genome possess some protein-coding region having several initiator codons. The psbC and rps19 use the GUG initiator codon, while the rpl2 and ndhD use ACG initiator codon. The schematic representation of the start codon diversity has been given in Fig. 12.2b. The rest 75 genes code universal tRNA. Translational efficiency is higher in the non-canonical initiator GUG codon than the canonical initiation codon AUG. In Oryza minuta, the initiator codon of the rpl2 and rps19 genes are ACG and GUG, respectively. AUG was used as the initiator codon in the rps19 and psbC genes in plants belonging to the Brassicaceae family (Kuroda et al. 2007; Hu et al. 2015). The chloroplast genome has a large molecular marker to study large-scale evolutionary concepts in different taxonomic groups. One of the advanced techniques is DNA barcoding, in which a small segment of DNA from a given gene(s) is used for species identification. Some chloroplast genes like matK, rbcL, and ycf1 act as barcodes to study evolutionary conservation in the plant kingdom via DNA barcoding (Asaf et al. 2017; Wu et al. 2010).
12.5 Mitochondrial Genome Diversity in Angiosperm Plants
Rearrangements among large repetitive sequences within the genome often occur in mitochondria of most angiosperms, and the genome exists in different conformations inside the mitochondria among different species (Mower et al. 2012). Consequently, mitochondrial genomes in angiosperms have multipartite genome maps that can be depicted as a single “master circular” or a collection of subgenomes (Palmer and Shields 1984; Sugiyama et al. 2005; Arrieta-Montiel and Mackenzie 2011). In flowering plants, mitochondrial genomes highly vary in structure and size (Mower et al. 2012). While the genomes are typically depicted as single circular rings, plant mitochondrial chromosomes have also been found in a variety of shapes and sizes, which include linear or circular forms, highly branched or σ-like structures, and multi-chromosomal structures capable of co-existing in a single plant (Kitazaki and Kubo 2010). The different conformations of the genome inside the mitochondria have been depicted in Fig. 12.1b.
Some CMS (Cytoplasmic Male sterility) lines in maize and rice, as examples, exhibit linear mitochondrial genome (Allen et al. 2007; Notsu et al. 2002). The mitochondrial genome in the case of Eruca sativa is multipartite, with six bigger circular and four smaller subgenomic circular DNA, indicating that repeat-induced genomic rearrangement is possible (Wang et al. 2014). Brassica oleracea, which has a tripartite structure having a 220 kb circular genome divided into two smaller circular genomes of 170 and 50 kb by homologous recombination of repetitive sequences, has a similar arrangement (Grewe et al. 2014).
12.6 Mitochondrial Genome Stability
The mitochondrial genome has a high risk of DNA damage due to the high ROS produced during electron transport in the respiratory mechanism (Møller 2001). Plants use different mitigating strategies for their genome stability and proper functioning. Repeated sequences play a significant part in higher plants for the stability of mtDNA (Kmiec et al. 2006). It may also function in homologous recombination and, as a result, have a significant influence on the structure of mtDNA. Massive repeated sequences (>1 kb), average-size repeats (50–500 bp), and micro-homologies (50 bp) are the three types of mtDNA repeats. Large size repeats are frequently engaged in changeable reciprocal recombination processes that regulate mtDNA flexibility in plants, which is generally made up of a combination of interconvertible subgenomes (Negruk et al. 1986; Oda et al. 1992). Homologous recombination (HR) appears to be the main DNA repair mechanism in plant mitochondria, with the end-joining mechanism being uncommon. HR is also required for the replication and segregation of mtDNA and is accountable for the genome’s fast evolution (Cappadocia et al. 2010). As an outcome, the large number of HR must precisely be controlled to circumvent intragenomic rearrangements that might be harmful to the mitochondria because of repetitive sequences in mtDNA (Wallet et al. 2015).
Nuclear genes that play a crucial role in the stability of mtDNA have been discovered through studies in mutants with variegated leaves or by altering genes previously thought to be involved in organelle DNA metabolism (Maréchal and Brisson 2010). RECA1 was found in the mitochondria of the bryophyte Physcomitrella patens which are the homologs of bacterial RecA protein (Terasawa et al. 2007; Inouye et al. 2008). A RECA1 knock-out strain has abnormalities in development and mitochondrial morphology and a decreased rate of mtDNA repair (Terasawa et al. 2007; Odahara et al. 2009). Furthermore, the RECA1 knock-out mutant exhibits large rearrangements due to abnormal recombination between short repeats ranging from 62 to 84 bp dispersed across mtDNA, indicating that RECA1 keeps mt genome stable by inhibiting gross rearrangements (Odahara et al. 2009). Mutations in plant-specific single-strand DNA-binding proteins, such as WHY2 from the whirly protein family (Cappadocia et al. 2010) and organellar single-stranded DNA-binding protein 1 (OSB1), also cause abnormal recombination between repeats (Dong et al., 2013). Recombination occurs between short repetitions (30 bp) in the OSB1 mutant and is gyrase inhibitor-dependent in the WHY2 mutant (Cappadocia et al. 2010).
12.7 Chloroplast Genetic Engineering
There are currently new technologies for sophisticated chloroplast genome engineering. Through enabling genome engineering of chloroplast genomes in major crops and increased expression of foreign genes using modular vectors, RNA interference (RNAi), and crop-specific vectors, multigene engineering can be utilized to create high-value desired bioproducts. Introgression of a single gene into the chloroplast genome can be employed to give biotic/abiotic stress tolerance or increase biomass (Jin and Daniell et al. 2015). Retrograde signaling allows genes expressed in chloroplasts to regulate the nuclear genome. Photosynthesis is the process of producing vital energy sources for the whole world as a form of ATP, oxygen, fuel, food, etc., done in the chloroplast. The chloroplast genome can be modulated by the genetic engineering and biotechnology tool for enhanced agronomic traits, medicines, and industrial enzymes for a beneficial approach. Chloroplast genome engineering is used for stable introgression and expression of the foreign gene from the heterologous system like fungus, virus, animal for producing biopharmaceutical proteins, industrial enzymes, antibiotics, and benefitted agronomic traits (Chen et al. 2014). Plastid transformation has various advantages like the very less unwanted effect of transgene due to compartmentalization, transgene confinement via maternal or uniparental inheritance. Double homologous recombination is required for chloroplast transformation (Verma and Daniell 2007; Verma et al. 2008). The diagrammatic representation of chloroplast genome engineering and its applications for plant trait enhancement has been provided in Fig. 12.3.
Hundreds of genes from other organisms have been expressed in chloroplasts, which exhibit substantially elevated expression than expression systems inside the nucleus in many situations. However, the requisite expression level has still not been obtained in a few cases. Protein N-terminal degradation is a well-known phenomenon in heterologous systems. Insulin, the most renowned chimeric protein in the blood, has not been expressed without N-terminal fusion proteins in any expression vector (Lee et al. 2011). As a result, numerous human therapeutic proteins have been discovered. To confer stability, green fluorescent protein (GFP) has been expressed in chloroplasts by tagging with cholera toxin B (CTB) to aid oral delivery and stability (Lee et al. 2011; Kohli et al. 2014; Shenoy et al. 2014).
12.7.1 Agronomic Trait Enhancement Via Chloroplast Modulation
Synthetic antimicrobial peptide production by chloroplast genome engineering for protection against various fungal infections, bacterial, pathogens, viral particles, and abiotic stress has also been established in few studies (Lee et al. 2011; Kwon et al. 2013). The expression of β-glucosidase in chloroplast activates the ester conjugates to produce hormones (indolyl-3-acetic acid, zeatin, gibberellic acid). It has been used for high biomass, height, internode length, increase leaf area in the targeted plants. It also provides protection against whitefly and aphid via sugar esters which are produced in high amounts in the dense globular trichomes on the leaf surface (Jin et al. 2011).
12.7.2 Engineering of the Metabolic Pathway in Chloroplast for the Beneficial Product
The heterologous expression of chloroplastic enzymes involved in the isoprenoid pathway (mevalonate pathway) without any regulatory sequences like (promoter, UTR) in the host chloroplast shows an increase in the amount of mevalonate, carotenoids, sterols, squalene, and triglycerols, in the transformed plants (Kumar et al. 2012). Carotenoids are photoprotective compounds synthesized by the terpenoids pathway. Astaxanthin, a carotenoid, acts as an antioxidant and is responsible for the pigmentation of salmon and few other organisms. Transfer of gene isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase, β-carotene hydroxylase, and β-carotene ketolase from marine bacteria to the chloroplast genome of lettuce produced key carotenoids (ketocarotenoids) astaxanthin fatty acid esters (Harada et al. 2014). Lipid soluble tocopherols act as antioxidants in plants and are known for scavenging of the reactive oxygen species (ROS). The α-tocopherol, an isoform of the tocopherol, was synthesized by the expression of tocopherol cyclase (TC) and γ-tocopherol methyl-transferase (γ-TMT) in the chloroplast. Some rate-limiting enzymes like homogentisate phytyltransferase (HPT), TC, and γ-TMT elevate the total tocopherol content up ten-fold. Enhanced synthesis of α-TOC in transplastomic plants enhances the nutritional, biotic, and abiotic stress tolerance by reducing the ROS level, lipid peroxidation, and ion leakage in plants (Lu et al. 2013; Jin and Daniell 2014).
12.7.3 Enhancement in Photosynthesis Efficiency Via Plastid Engineering
Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, abbreviated as RuBisCO, is a major enzyme operating in the Calvin cycle that has sparked interest to improve the catalytic activity, carbon fixation efficiency, and decrease oxygenase activity. The assembly of small subunits of Rubisco from the nucleus to chloroplast forms functional Rubisco. Early efforts entailed relocating the small subunit gene to the chloroplast genome (Dhingra et al. 2004). The heterologous expression of Rubisco subunits in chloroplasts has been the subject of more recent investigations. The CO2-concentrating mechanism (CCM) from cyanobacteria has recently been introduced into transplastomic plants, which has resulted in a breakthrough in crop improvement (Lin et al. 2014). Within chloroplasts, hybrid assembly of Rubisco from Synechococcus elongates Se7942 and CcmM35, a β-carboxysomal protein, led to enhanced carbon fixation efficiency but decreased growth. This is a significant footstep toward chloroplast genetic engineering to increase photosynthesis. Other discoveries increased recombinant Rubisco biogenesis by simultaneous expression of the RuBisCO accessory chaperone RAF1 and RuBisCO (Whitney et al. 2015).
12.7.4 Chloroplast Genome Engineering for Insect Resistance
Although significant progress has been witnessed in expressing biopesticide genes from a gram-positive bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis in the chloroplast for the production of Bt toxin crystals, plastidial expression of these genes in many crops has yet to reach commercial development because of the saturation of the market value of Bt crop products. However, a new revelation of successful Bt resistance has prompted the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations to plant Bt maize (De Cosa et al. 2001; Dufourmantel et al. 2005). As a result, recent attention has shifted to identify novel features or methodologies to aid commercial development.
The chloroplast genome has recently been engineered using RNA interference technology (RNAi). Chitin synthase (CHS), V-ATPase, and cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (CYP450) found in lepidopterans were chosen as the target for RNAi in this work. Cleaved and processed dsRNA had a higher quantity than the native psbA transcript, which was robustly expressed (Redick et al. 2015). The expression level of the targeted genes was lowered significantly in the mid-gut of the insects feeding on leaves, having silenced CYP450, CHI, and V-ATPase gene, most likely due to additional processing of engulfed siRNA in the insect gut. The larvae’s net weight and their development and pupation rates were drastically decreased. In separate research, Bock and colleagues used the stably expressed dsRNA in the chloroplast genome against the insect β-actin gene and evoked resistance to the potato beetle; this groundbreaking work was confirmed as effective in the field trials.
12.8 Evolution of Organelle Genome
Both organelle genomes (Mt genome and Pt genome) originated from prokaryotes (alfa proteobacteria and cyanobacteria, respectively) through the endosymbiosis process. Both are independent events in eukaryotic evolution over a billion years ago. RNA editing refers to mechanisms that add or remove the specific nucleotides in RNA molecules and mechanisms that add or remove nucleotides. The information in the mature mRNA is different from the gene that encodes this mRNA (Aphasizhev and Aphasizheva 2011). The pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are nuclear-encoded factors necessary for editing in sites of different mitochondria and plastids. RNA editing occurs in viruses, early eukaryotes, mammals, fungi, and plants in various ways. RNA editing mechanisms are employed as checkpoints, and they can maintain the function of the encoded protein and produce new proteins (Koito and Ikeda 2012). Comprehensive studies of numerous processes in diverse species that detail their mechanistic and functional features and their origins have recently been studied (Nishikura 2010).
12.8.1 Mitochondria Genome for Phylogeny Analysis
Phylogenetic and phylogenomic reconstructions suggest mitochondrial origin from a single ancestor, which is also known as monophyly. Two further pieces of genetic study back up the theory that all mitochondrial genomes originated from a single ancestor. The eubacterial origins of this genome have been adequately confirmed by studies on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). The mtDNA sequences have facilitated tracing the evolution of mitochondria from a single ancestor connected to the Proteobacteria (Timmis et al. 2004). Anaplasma, Rickettsia, and Ehrlichia are the closest eubacterial relatives of mitochondria in the rickettsial subgroup of the α-Proteobacteria, which are a group of intracellular obligate parasites that also includes the above 3 genera (Gillham 1994).
In several areas of biology, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has evolved as a valuable tool. One of the uses in evolutionary and phylogenetic investigations is the ability to swiftly and cheaply assemble organelle genomes. In evolutionary investigations, metazoan mitochondrial genome possessing 13 protein-coding genes, 22 tRNA, and 2 rRNA have been proved to be particularly helpful biomarkers (Yang et al. 1985). It may also be helpful in evolutionary studies by comparing the rates of base substitution among species, in addition to the other gene sequences. Moreover, the mitochondrial gene ordering can also help study phylogenetic inferences (Gissi et al. 2008).
RNA editing was discovered in the mitochondria of the flowering plants (angiosperms) because of the sequence variations between DNA and RNA in 1989 (Covello and Gray 1989). This variation in the locations of U nucleotides in RNA and C nucleotides in DNA was discovered to be caused C-to-U substitution in the RNA. After editing, the codons are more comparable to those found in orthologous proteins from other species at the same locations (Gualberto et al. 1989; Covello and Gray 1989).
In understanding species-level phylogenies, mitochondrial DNA data can be extremely useful. The arrangement of genes in the mitochondrion varies, and the extensive stretches of noncoding DNA divide them. The mitochondrial genome rearrangement occurs more often, resulting in several altered forms in a single cell. Because of the advancements in isolation methods of mtDNA, the use of restriction endonucleases to recognize specific nucleotide differences, PCR methodologies, the applicability of universal primers for DNA amplification in phylogenetics, and population genetic studies, mitochondrial genes are becoming progressively demanded in phylogenetics and population genetic studies (Borsch and Quandt 2009).
Cytochrome oxidase I/II, the electron transport-chain enzyme cytochrome c oxidase, is present in both bacteria and mitochondria. This gene, commonly employed to estimate molecular phylogenies, is gradually changing compared to other mitochondrial genes that encode protein (Lavrov and Lang 2005). The mitochondrial 12S rRNA sequence analysis is widely used in phylogenetic studies and molecular taxonomy. Its sequences have previously been proposed as a tool for determining intermediate to lengthy divergence dates (Lavrov and Meyer 1996). The cytochrome-b gene is the most helpful marker for resolving phylogenetic relationships between closely related species although it lacks clarity at deeper nodes. Although it has been reported to be beneficial in retrieving phylogenetically significant information about taxonomic levels, its use is lineage-dependent and diminishes as evolutionary depth increases.
12.8.2 Evolution of Chloroplast Genome and Its Use in Phylogeny Analysis
The gene content, structure, and organization of the chloroplast genome are largely conserved in comparison to the mitochondrial and nuclear genome. The rate of substitution in nucleotide sequences is higher in the chloroplast genome than mitochondrial genes but lower than the nuclear genome (Burger et al. 2003). However, a number of studies have shown evolutionary processes like gene duplications, mutations, deletions, and rearrangements. This organellar genome has long been regarded as a suitable model for comparative and evolutionary genomic investigations owing to its small size and preserved gene content. Comparative studies of chloroplast genomes have been conducted on several focused species, genera, or plant groups in recent years (Drouin et al. 2008; Dong et al., 2013).
RNA editing, including C-to-U alterations, has also been observed in the chloroplast, apart from (Hoch et al. 1991). All the plant lineages from simpler bryophytes to advanced angiosperms show this type of editing in plastids (Sugita et al. 2006). Several species from the order Marchantiales, for example, have mRNAs that stay as dictated by the chloroplast and mitochondrial genome (Rüdinger et al. 2008). RNA editing has not yet been discovered in plant cytoplasmic RNAs. It appears that the process is limited to these two organelles.
Comparative examinations of chloroplast genomes at higher taxonomic levels are valuable for phylogenetic research and in comprehending the evolution of the genomes in the context of genome size changes, gene deletions, and nucleotide changes. However, choosing a gene with the right length and substitution rate is critical. The atpB, matK, ndhF, rbcL, rpl16, and many more genes were currently utilized CpDNA genes for this purpose.
12.8.2.1 rbcL Gene
RuBisCO, the first enzyme in the C3 cycle, is the world’s most abundant and significant protein and a key component of the global carbon cycle (Raven 2013). The rbcL gene is a single-copy gene found on the cp-genome that has a lot of phylogenetic usefulness. The rbcL gene has a length of 1428 bp and is located in all plants, excluding some parasites (Dong et al. 2018). It is straightforward to examine, align. Its secondary confirmation is well-studied and exists as multiple copies with few insertions and deletions. The rbcL gene codes for a large subunit of RuBisCO, whereas the rbcS gene in the nucleus encodes a small subunit. The first and one of the most commonly sequenced regions of the plant is the rbcL gene. It has frequently been employed in systematic research of terrestrial plants, particularly angiosperms. Phylogenetic connections among angiosperms and extant seed plants were investigated using around 500 rbcL sequences. Even though rbcL is conserved and easily alignable among the taxa, it has a greater replacement rate than 18S rDNA (Chase et al. 1993).
12.8.2.2 MatK Gene
MatK (maturase), a maturase enzyme, is involved in the splicing mechanism of type II introns in the RNA transcripts. It was situated within the intronic region of the chloroplast gene trnK, which encodes lysine tRNA. This gene’s use in rectifying the intergeneric or interspecific connections among angiosperms has recently been demonstrated in research. The gene has high rates of substitution in comparison to other grass systematics genes and has a high proportion of transversion mutations. The three sections of its coding region help construct phylogenies in the Poaceae at the subfamily level (Patwardhan et al., 2014).
12.8.2.3 ndhF Gene
The ndhF genes, which encode for NADP dehydrogenase subunit F, are approximately 1100 bp long and are found in a single-copy region. The sequence variation among these genes was employed to rebuild a phylogenetic tree between 282 species representing 78 monocot groups. Furthermore, based upon rbcL alone or in combination with atpB and 18S rDNA, they demonstrated that relationships within orders are consistent. However, this gene provides more informative characters than rbcL and other genes (Givnish et al. 2006).
12.9 Conclusion
Besides serving as a tool for phylogenetic and evolutionary studies, the organellar genome can be used as a target for the improvement of essential agronomic traits. Plant chloroplast genome contributes mainly to the synthesis of carbohydrates, in addition to few other molecules. Our review gives a comprehensive and updated account of the basic structural organization of chloroplast and mitochondrial genome as studied in several plant species. A regulatory mechanism like RNA editing, DNA damage repairs inside the two organelles has also been discussed as studied in few plant species. Many researches have focussed on improving the photosynthetic efficacy and growth performance through genome engineering via transgene technology. However, more detailed studies on the various regulatory mechanism of gene expression need to be studied in major crop species.
References
Allen JO, Fauron CM, Minx P, Roark L, Oddiraju S, Lin GN, Meyer L, Sun H, Kim K, Wang C, Du F (2007) Comparisons among two fertile and three male-sterile mitochondrial genomes of maize. Genetics 177(2):1173–1192
Alverson AJ, Rice DW, Dickinson S, Barry K, Palmer JD (2011) Origins and recombination of the bacterial-sized multichromosomal mitochondrial genome of cucumber. Plant Cell 23(7):2499–2513
Anderson S, Bankier AT, Barrell BG, de Bruijn MH, Coulson AR, Drouin J, Eperon IC, Nierlich DP, Roe BA, Sanger F, Schreier PH (1981) Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome. Nature 290(5806):457–465
Aphasizhev R, Aphasizheva I (2011) Uridine insertion/deletion editing in trypanosomes: a playground for RNA-guided information transfer. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 2(5):669–685
Arrieta-Montiel MP, Mackenzie SA (2011) Plant mitochondrial genomes and recombination. InPlant mitochondria. Springer, New York NY, pp 65–82
Asaf S, Waqas M, Khan AL, Khan MA, Kang SM, Imran QM, Shahzad R, Bilal S, Yun BW, Lee IJ (2017) The complete chloroplast genome of wild rice (Oryza minuta) and its comparison to related species. Front Plant Sci 8:304
Bibb MJ, Van Etten RA, Wright CT, Walberg MW, Clayton DA (1981) Sequence and gene organization of mouse mitochondrial DNA. Cell 26(2):167–180
Borsch T, Quandt D (2009) Mutational dynamics and phylogenetic utility of noncoding chloroplast DNA. Plant Syst Evol 282(3):169–199
Burger G, Gray MW, Lang BF (2003) Mitochondrial genomes: anything goes. Trends Genet 19(12):709–716
Cappadocia L, Maréchal A, Parent JS, Lepage É, Sygusch J, Brisson N (2010) Crystal structures of DNA-Whirly complexes and their role in Arabidopsis organelle genome repair. Plant Cell 22(6):1849–1867
Chase MW, Soltis DE, Olmstead RG, Morgan D, Les DH, Mishler BD, Duvall MR, Price RA, Hills HG, Qiu YL, Kron KA (1993) Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Nat Biotechnol 1:528–580
Chen PJ, Senthilkumar R, Jane WN, He Y, Tian Z, Yeh KW (2014) Transplastomic Nicotiana benthamiana plants expressing multiple defence genes encoding protease inhibitors and chitinase display broad-spectrum resistance against insects, pathogens, and abiotic stresses. Plant Biotechnol J 12(4):503–515
Chumley T, Palmer JD, Mower JP, Fourcade HM, Calie PJ, Boore L, Jansen RK (2006) The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Pelargonium hortorum organization and evolution of the largest and most highly rearranged chloroplast genome of land plants. Mol Biol Evol 23(11):2175–2190
Covello PS, Gray MW (1989) RNA editing in plant mitochondria. Nature 341(6243):662–666
Davila JI, Arrieta-Montiel MP, Wamboldt Y, Cao J, Hagmann J, Shedge V, Xu YZ, Weigel D, Mackenzie SA (2011) Double-strand break repair processes drive evolution of the mitochondrial genome in Arabidopsis. BMC Biol 9(1):1–4
De Cosa B, Moar W, Lee SB, Miller M, Daniell H (2001) Overexpression of the Bt cry 2Aa2 operon in chloroplasts leads to formation of insecticidal crystals. Nat Biotechnol 19(1):71–74
Dhingra A, Portis AR, Daniell H (2004) Enhanced translation of a chloroplast-expressed RbcS gene restores small subunit levels and photosynthesis in nuclear RbcS antisense plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(16):6315–6320
Dong W, Xu C, Cheng T, Zhou S (2013) Complete chloroplast genome of Sedum sarmentosum and chloroplast genome evolution in Saxifragales. PLoS One 8:e77965
Dong WL, Wang RN, Zhang NY, Fan WB, Fang MF, Li ZH (2018) Molecular evolution of chloroplast genomes of orchid species: insights into phylogenetic relationship and adaptive evolution. Int J Mol Sci 19(3):716
Drouin G, Daoud H, Xia J (2008) Relative rates of synonymous substitutions in the mitochondrial, chloroplast and nuclear genomes of seed plants. Mol Phylogenet Evol 49(3):827–831
Dufourmantel N, Tissot G, Goutorbe F, Garcon F, Muhr C, Jansens S, Pelissier B, Peltier G, Dubald M (2005) Generation and analysis of soybean plastid transformants expressing Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab protoxin. Plant Mol Biol 58(5):659–668
Gillham NW (1994) Organelle genes and genomes. Oxford University Press
Gissi C, Iannelli F, Pesole G (2008) Evolution of the mitochondrial genome of Metazoa as exemplified by comparison of congeneric species. Heredity 101(4):301–320
Givnish TJ, Pires JC, Graham SW, McPherson MA, Prince LM, Patterson TB, Rai HS, Roalson EH, Evans TM, Hahn WJ, Millam KC (2006) Phylogenetic relationships of monocots based on the highly informative plastid gene ndhF Aliso. J Syst Evol B 22(1):28–51
Goldman AD, Landweber LF (2016) What is a genome. PLoS Genet 12(7):e1006181
Grewe F, Edger PP, Keren I, Sultan L, Pires JC, Ostersetzer-Biran O, Mower JP (2014) Comparative analysis of 11 Brassicales mitochondrial genomes and the mitochondrial transcriptome of Brassica oleracea. Mitochondrion 19:135–143
Gualberto JM, Lamattina L, Bonnard G, Weil JH, Grienenberger JM (1989) RNA editing in wheat mitochondria results in the conservation of protein sequences. Nature 341(6243):660–662
Harada H, Maoka T, Osawa A, Hattan JI, Kanamoto H, Shindo K, Otomatsu T, Misawa N (2014) Construction of transplastomic lettuce (Lactuca sativa) dominantly producing astaxanthin fatty acid esters and detailed chemical analysis of generated carotenoids. Transgenic Res 23(2):303–315
Hjort K, Goldberg AV, Tsaousis AD, Hirt RP, Embley TM (2010) Diversity and reductive evolution of mitochondria among microbial eukaryotes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 365(1541):713–727
Hoch B, Maier RM, Appel K, Igloi GL, Kössel H (1991) Editing of a chloroplast mRNA by creation of an initiation codon. Nature 353(6340):178–180
Hu S, Sablok G, Wang B, Qu D, Barbaro E, Viola R, Li M, Varotto C (2015) Plastome organization and evolution of chloroplast genes in Cardamine species adapted to contrasting habitats. BMC Genomics 16(1):1–4
Inouye T, Odahara M, Fujita T, Hasebe M, Sekine Y (2008) Expression and complementation analyses of a chloroplast-localized homolog of bacterial RecA in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 72(5):1340–1347
Jin S, Daniell H (2014) Expression of γ-tocopherol methyltransferase in chloroplasts results in massive proliferation of the inner envelope membrane and decreases susceptibility to salt and metal-induced oxidative stresses by reducing reactive oxygen species. Plant Biotechnol J 12(9):1274–1285
Jin S, Daniell H (2015) The engineered chloroplast genome just got smarter. Trends Plant Sci 20(10):622–640
Jin S, Kanagaraj A, Verma D, Lange T, Daniell H (2011) Release of hormones from conjugates: chloroplast expression of β-glucosidase results in elevated phytohormone levels associated with significant increase in biomass and protection from aphids or whiteflies conferred by sucrose esters. Plant Physiol 155(1):222–235
Jin S, Singh ND, Li L, Zhang X, Daniell H (2015) Engineered chloroplast dsRNA silences cytochrome p450 monooxygenase, V-ATPase and chitin synthase genes in the insect gut and disrupts Helicoverpa armigera larval development and pupation. Plant Biotechnol J 13(3):435–446
Kitazaki K, Kubo T (2010) Cost of having the largest mitochondrial genome: evolutionary mechanism of plant mitochondrial genome. J Bot. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/620137
Kmiec B, Woloszynska M, Janska H (2006) Heteroplasmy as a common state of mitochondrial genetic information in plants and animals. Curr Genet 50(3):149–159
Kohli N, Westerveld DR, Ayache AC, Verma A, Shil P, Prasad T, Zhu P, Chan SL, Li Q, Daniell H (2014) Oral delivery of bioencapsulated proteins across blood–brain and blood–retinal barriers. Mol Ther 22(3):535–546
Koito A, Ikeda T (2012) Apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing, catalytic polypeptide cytidine deaminases and retroviral restriction. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 3(4):529–541
Kubo T, Newton KJ (2008) Angiosperm mitochondrial genomes and mutations. Mitochondrion 8(1):5–14
Kumar S, Hahn FM, Baidoo E, Kahlon TS, Wood DF, McMahan CM, Cornish K, Keasling JD, Daniell H, Whalen MC (2012) Remodeling the isoprenoid pathway in tobacco by expressing the cytoplasmic mevalonate pathway in chloroplasts. Metab Eng 14(1):19–28
Kuroda H, Suzuki H, Kusumegi T, Hirose T, Yukawa Y, Sugiura M (2007) Translation of psbC mRNAs starts from the downstream GUG, not the upstream AUG, and requires the extended Shine–Dalgarno sequence in tobacco chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol 48(9):1374–1378
Kwon KC, Verma D, Jin S, Singh ND, Daniell H (2013) Release of proteins from intact chloroplasts induced by reactive oxygen species during biotic and abiotic stress. PLoS One 8(6):e67106
Lang BF, Burger G, O’Kelly CJ, Cedergren R, Golding GB, Lemieux C, Sankoff D, Turmel M, Gray MW (1997) An ancestral mitochondrial DNA resembling a eubacterial genome in miniature. Nature 387(6632):493–497
Lavrov R, Meyer (1996) Phylogenetic performance of mitochondrial protein-coding genes in resolving relationships among vertebrates. Mol Biol Evol 3(7):933–942
Lavrov DV, Lang BF (2005) Poriferan mtDNA and animal phylogeny based on mitochondrial gene arrangements. Syst Biol 54(4):651–659
Lee SR, Han J (2017) Mitochondrial nucleoid: shield and switch of the mitochondrial genome. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8060949
Lee SB, Li B, Jin S, Daniell H (2011) Expression and characterization of antimicrobial peptides Retrocyclin-101 and Protegrin-1 in chloroplasts to control viral and bacterial infections. Plant Biotechnol J 9(1):100–115
Li X, Li L, Bao Z, Tu W, He X, Zhang B, Ye L, Wang X, Li Q (2020) The 287,403 bp mitochondrial genome of ectomycorrhizal fungus Tuber calosporum reveals intron expansion, tRNA loss, and gene rearrangement. Front Microbiol 11:3048
Lin MT, Occhialini A, Andralojc PJ, Parry MA, Hanson MR (2014) A faster Rubisco with potential to increase photosynthesis in crops. Nature 513(7519):547–550
Liu TJ, Zhang CY, Yan HF, Zhang L, Ge XJ, Hao G (2016) Complete plastid genome sequence of Primula sinensis (Primulaceae): structure comparison, sequence variation and evidence for accD transfer to nucleus. Peer J 4:e2101
Lu Y, Rijzaani H, Karcher D, Ruf S, Bock R (2013) Efficient metabolic pathway engineering in transgenic tobacco and tomato plastids with synthetic multigene operons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(8):E623–E632
Maréchal A, Brisson N (2010) Recombination and the maintenance of plant organelle genome stability. New Phytol 186(2):299–317
Møller IM (2001) Plant mitochondria and oxidative stress: electron transport, NADPH turnover, and metabolism of reactive oxygen species. Annu Rev Plant Biol 52(1):561–591
Mower JP, Sloan DB, Alverson AJ (2012) Plant mitochondrial genome diversity: the genomics revolution. Plant Genom Divers 1:123–144
Negruk VI, Eisner GI, Redichkina TD, Dumanskaya NN, Cherny DI, Alexandrov AA, Shemyakin MF, Butenko RG (1986) Diversity of Vicia faba circular mtDNA in whole plants and suspension cultures. Theor Appl Genet 72(4):541–547
Nishikura K (2010) Functions and regulation of RNA editing by ADAR deaminases. Annu Rev Biochem 79:321–349
Notsu Y, Masood S, Nishikawa T, Kubo N, Akiduki G, Nakazono M, Hirai A, Kadowaki K (2002) The complete sequence of the rice (Oryza sativa L.) mitochondrial genome: frequent DNA sequence acquisition and loss during the evolution of flowering plants. Mol Genet Genom 268(4):434–445
Oda K, Kohchi T, Ohyama K (1992) Mitochondrial DNA of Marchantia polymorpha as a single circular form with no incorporation of foreign DNA. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 56(1):132–135
Odahara M, Kuroiwa H, Kuroiwa T, Sekine Y (2009) Suppression of repeat-mediated gross mitochondrial genome rearrangements by RecA in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Plant Cell 21(4):1182–1194
Ohyama K, Fukuzawa H, Kohchi T, Shirai H, Sano T, Sano S, Umesono K, Shiki Y, Takeuchi M, Chang Z, Aota SI (1986) Chloroplast gene organization deduced from complete sequence of liverwort Marchantia polymorpha chloroplast DNA. Nature 322(6079):572–574
Palmer JD, Herbon LA (1988) Plant mitochondrial DNA evolved rapidly in structure, but slowly in sequence. J Mol Evol 28(1):87–97
Palmer JD, Shields CR (1984) Tripartite structure of the Brassica campestris mitochondrial genome. Nature 307(5950):437–440
Patwardhan A, Ray S, Roy A (2014) Molecular markers in phylogenetic studies-a review. J Evol Biol 2:2
Preuten T, Cincu E, Fuchs J, Zoschke R, Liere K, Börner T (2010) Fewer genes than organelles: extremely low and variable gene copy numbers in mitochondria of somatic plant cells. Plant J 64(6):948–959
Raven JA (2013) Rubisco: still the most abundant protein of Earth. New Phytol 198(1):1–3
Redick TP, Galey MR, Feitshans TA (2015) Litigation and regulatory challenges to innovation in biotech crops. Drake J Agric L 20:71
Rüdinger M, Polsakiewicz M, Knoop V (2008) Organellar RNA editing and plant-specific extensions of pentatricopeptide repeat proteins in jungermanniid but not in marchantiid liverworts. Mol Biol Evol 25(7):1405–1414
Schneider R, Grosschedl R (2007) Dynamics and interplay of nuclear architecture, genome organization, and gene expression. Genes Dev 21(23):3027–3043
Shenoy V, Kwon KC, Rathinasabapathy A, Lin S, Jin G, Song C, Shil P, Nair A, Qi Y, Li Q, Francis J (2014) Oral delivery of Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and Angiotensin-(1-7) bio encapsulated in plant cells attenuates pulmonary hypertension. Hypertension 64(6):1248–1259
Shinozaki K, Ohme M, Tanaka M, Wakasugi T, Hayashida N, Matsubayashi T, Zaita N, Chunwongse J, Obokata J, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Ohto C (1986) The complete nucleotide sequence of the tobacco chloroplast genome: its gene organization and expression. EMBO J 5(9):2043–2049
Smith DR, Keeling PJ (2015) Mitochondrial and plastid genome architecture: reoccurring themes, but significant differences at the extremes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(33):10,177–10,184
Stupar RM, Lilly JW, Town CD, Cheng Z, Kaul S, Buell CR, Jiang J (2001) Complex mtDNA constitutes an approximate 620-kb insertion on Arabidopsis thaliana chromosome 2: implication of potential sequencing errors caused by large-unit repeats. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 98(9):5099–5103
Sugita M, Miyata Y, Maruyama K, Sugiura C, Arikawa T, Higuchi M (2006) Extensive RNA editing in transcripts from the PsbB operon and RpoA gene of plastids from the enigmatic moss Takakia lepidozioides. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 70(9):2268–2274
Sugiyama Y, Watase Y, Nagase M, Makita N, Yagura S, Hirai A, Sugiura M (2005) The complete nucleotide sequence and multipartite organization of the tobacco mitochondrial genome: comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes in higher plants. Mol Genet Genomics 272(6):603–615
Terasawa K, Odahara M, Kabeya Y, Kikugawa T, Sekine Y, Fujiwara M, Sato N (2007) The mitochondrial genome of the moss Physcomitrella patens sheds new light on mitochondrial evolution in land plants. Mol Biol Evol 24(3):699–709
Timmis JN, Ayliffe MA, Huang CY, Martin W (2004) Endosymbiotic gene transfer: organelle genomes forge eukaryotic chromosomes. Nat Rev Genet 5(2):123–135
Verma D, Daniell H (2007) Chloroplast vector systems for biotechnology applications. Plant Physiol 145(4):1129–1143
Verma D, Samson NP, Koya V, Daniell H (2008) A protocol for expression of foreign genes in chloroplasts. Nat Protoc 3(4):739–758
Wallet C, Le Ret M, Bergdoll M, Bichara M, Dietrich A, Gualberto JM (2015) The RECG1 DNA translocase is a key factor in recombination surveillance, repair, and segregation of the mitochondrial DNA in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 27(10):2907–2925
Wang Y, Chu P, Yang Q, Chang S, Chen J, Hu M, Guan R (2014) Complete mitochondrial genome of Eruca sativa mill. (Garden rocket). PloS one 9(8):e105748
Whitney SM, Birch R, Kelso C, Beck JL, Kapralov MV (2015) Improving recombinant Rubisco biogenesis, plant photosynthesis and growth by coexpressing its ancillary RAF1 chaperone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(11):3564–3569
Wu FH, Chan MT, Liao DC, Hsu CT, Lee YW, Daniell H, Duvall MR, Lin CS (2010) Complete chloroplast genome of Oncidium Gower Ramsey and evaluation of molecular markers for identification and breeding in Oncidiinae. BMC Plant Biol 10(1):1–2
Xu YZ, Arrieta-Montiel MP, Virdi KS, de Paula WB, Widhalm JR, Basset GJ, Davila JI, Elthon TE, Elowsky CG, Sato SJ, Clemente TE (2011) MutS HOMOLOG1 is a nucleoid protein that alters mitochondrial and plastid properties and plant response to high light. Plant Cell 23(9):3428–3441
Yang D, Oyaizu Y, Oyaizu H, Olsen GJ, Woese CR (1985) Mitochondrial origins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82(13):4443–4447
Yang M, Zhang X, Liu G, Yin Y, Chen K, Yun Q, Yu J (2010) The complete chloroplast genome sequence of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). PLoS One 5(9):e12762
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the core grant of the National Institute of Plant Genome Research and the Department of Science and Technology-SERB for a Startup research grant to AP. SS and JN acknowledge the University Grant Commission and Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Government of India, for Junior and Senior Research Fellowships, respectively. The authors are thankful to DBT-eLibrary Consortium (DeLCON) for providing access to e-resources.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Singh, S., Naik, J., Pandey, A. (2022). Genetics of Plant Organelles: Plastid and Mitochondrial Genomes. In: Singh, R.L., Mondal, S., Parihar, A., Singh, P.K. (eds) Plant Genomics for Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6974-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6974-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-6973-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-6974-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)