Abstract
Advanced image retrieval technology has been widely adopted in many academic and industrial institutions. Mobile technology has been adopted in teaching and learning in various disciplines. Image retrieval technology can improve learning efficiency, enhance memory by providing similar learning content, and engage students in learning. However, mobile technology presents a number of software and hardware barriers, such as computing capability, screen size, and the quality of wireless connections (see “Characteristics of Mobile Teaching and Learning”). It is believed the adoption of the advanced image retrieval technology will enhance the capability of visual content search and the teaching and learning experience of educators and students. The advanced image retrieval technology will play an important role in future mobile teaching and learning and higher education.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alhassan, R. 2016. Mobile learning as a method of ubiquitous learning: Students’ attitudes, readiness, and possible barriers to implementation in higher education. Journal of Education and Learning 5 (1): 176.
Alkhezzi, F., and W. Al-Dousari. 2016. The impact of Mobile learning on ESP learners’ performance. The Journal of Educators Online 13 (2): 73.
Alley, M. 2009. Mobile learning. Edmonton: AU Press.
Cheon, J., et al. 2012. An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education 59 (3): 1054–1064.
Datta, R., et al. 2008. Image retrieval: Ideas, influences, and trends of the new age. ACM Computing Surveys 40 (2): 1–60.
Demouy, V., et al. 2015. Why and how do distance learners use mobile devices for language learning? The EUROCALL Review 23 (2): 10–24.
Deng, J., et al. 2009. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. Miami: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
Duc, S., A. Depeursinge, I. Eggel, and H. Müller. 2011. Mobile medical image retrieval. In Medical imaging 2011: Advanced PACS-based imaging informatics and therapeutic applications, 79670G. Bellingham: SPIE.
Evans, C. 2008. The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers and Education 50 (2): 491–498.
Fraga, L.M. 2012. Mobile learning in higher education. Ph.D., The University of Texas at San Antonio, Texas.
Hennig, N. 2016. Library technology reports. Vol. 52. Chicago: American Library Association.
Hunt, E. and N. Zhou. 2017. What does the future hold for students starting university today? The Guardian. Australia, The Guardian.
Hwang, G.-J., and S.-C. Chang. 2016. Effects of a peer competition-based mobile learning approach on students’ affective domain exhibition in social studies courses. British Journal of Educational Technology 47 (6): 1217.
ITU. 2016. Measuring the information society report, ITU.
Kumar, A., et al. 2010. Evolution of Mobile wireless communication networks: 1G to 4G. International Journal of Electronics & Communication Technology 1 (1): 68–72.
Larive, C.K. 2008. A picture is worth a thousand words: Animations and simulations in the teaching of analytical science. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 390: 71–75.
Matzke, J., et al. 2017. Education and career development: Usefulness of virtual reality in assessment of medical student laparoscopic skill. Journal of Surgical Research 211: 191–195.
Metzgar, M. 2017. Community-focused versus market-driven education. Hybrid Pedagogy. http://www.digitalpedagogylab.com/hybridped/community-focused-versus-market-driven-education/?utm_campaign=Feed%3A+HybridPed+%28Hybrid+Pedagogy%3A+a+digital+journal+of+learning%2C+teaching%2C+and+technology%29&utm_medium=feed&utm_source=feedburner
Mishra, S.K. 2013. Quality education for children, youth, and adults through mobile learning. In Pedagogical applications and social effects of mobile technology integration, ed. J. Keengwe, 225–237. Hershey: Information Science Reference.
Peter, E.D., and J.M. Gina. 2008. Working memory capacity and mobile multimedia learning environments: Individual differences in learning while mobile. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 17 (4): 511–530.
Picard, D., et al. 2008. Image retrieval over networks: Active learning using ant algorithm. Multimedia, IEEE Transactions on 10 (7): 1356–1365.
Qiu, M., and D. McDougall. 2013. Foster strengths and circumvent weaknesses: Advantages and disadvantages of online versus face-to-face subgroup discourse. Computers & Education 67 (0): 1–11.
Rattanarungrot, S., et al. 2014. A mobile service oriented multiple object tracking augmented reality architecture for education and learning experiences. International Association for Development of the Information Society, Madrid, Spain.
Razavian, A.S., et al. 2014. CNN features off-the-shelf: An astounding baseline for recognition. The IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR) workshops, IEEE Xplore, 806–813.
Rennie, F., and T. Morrison. 2013. E-learning and social networking handbook, resources for higher education. New York/London: Routledge.
Roediger, H.L., III, and M.A. Pyc. 2012. Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 1: 242–248.
Sana, F., et al. 2013. Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education 62 (0): 24–31.
Sharples, M. 2000. The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers & Education 34 (3–4): 177.
Sikora, T. 2001. The MPEG-7 visual standard for content description-an overview. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 11 (6): 696–702.
Smeulders, A. W. M., M. Worring, S. Santini, A. Gupta, and R. Jain. 2000. Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22: 1349–1380.
Starostenko, O., et al. 2009. CBIR for image-based language learning within mobile environment. In Proceedings of the 52nd IEEE international Midwest symposium on circuits and systems, 734–738. Cancun: IEEE.
Statista. 2016. Most popular Apple App Store categories in 2016 from http://www.statista.com/statistics/166976/popular-categories-in-the-app-store/.
Sun, D., and C.K. Looi. 2017. Focusing a mobile science learning process: Difference in activity participation. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 12: 3.
Vogel, D., et al. 2009. Does using Mobile device applications Lead to learning? Journal of Interactive Learning Research 20 (4): 469–485.
White, I., et al. 2014. A virtual reality endoscopic simulator augments general surgery resident cancer education as measured by performance improvement. Journal of Cancer Education 29 (2): 333–336.
Yang, J., et al. 1998. Intelligent mobile agents for information retrieval and knowledge discovery from distributed data and knowledge sources. In Information technology conference, 1998. IEEE.
Yousafzai, A., et al. 2016. Multimedia augmented m-learning: Issues, trends and open challenges. International Journal of Information Management 36: 784–792.
Yuh-Shyan, C., et al. 2004. A mobile butterfly-watching learning system for supporting independent learning. Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2004. Proceedings. The 2nd IEEE international workshop on.
Yu, G.J., Y.S. Chen, and K.P. Shih. 2004. A Content-Based Image Retrieval System for Outdoor Ecology Learning: A Firefly Watching System, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Application (AINA’04), IEEE, Fukuoka, Japan.
Zhang, Y. 2012a. An analysis of collaboration in the Australian and Chinese mobile telecommunication markets. School of Economics. Wollongong, University of Wollongong. Doctor of Philosophy (Economics): 321.
Zhang, Y. 2012b. Developing animated cartoons for economic teaching. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 9 (2): 1–15.
Zhang, Y. 2015. Characteristics of mobile teaching and learning. In Handbook of Mobile teaching and learning, ed. Y. Zhang. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Zheng, Y., et al. 2017. Travi-Navi: Self-deployable indoor navigation system. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 25 (5): 2655–2669.
Zidoun, Y., et al. 2016. Students’ perception about mobile learning in Morocco: Survey analysis. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies 10 (4): 80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Wang, L., Zhang, Y.(. (2019). Advanced Image Retrieval Technology in Future Mobile Teaching and Learning. In: Zhang, Y., Cristol, D. (eds) Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_53-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_53-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41981-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41981-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Advanced Image Retrieval Technology in Future Mobile Teaching and Learning- Published:
- 13 October 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_53-2
-
Original
Advanced Image Retrieval Technology in Future Mobile Teaching and Learning- Published:
- 18 April 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_53-1