Abstract
Purpose
Obesity is prevalent after orthotopic solid organ transplant mainly due to immunosuppressive therapy, decreased physical activity, and unbalanced diet, which leads to development or worsening of other comorbidities, such as hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Morbid obesity increases the risk of graft loss and has negative effects on postoperative morbidity and patient survival. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery after organ transplant.
Material and Methods
A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent bariatric surgery after organ transplant between July 1, 2010, and June 30, 2019, was performed. Demographics, surgical data, immunosuppressive treatment, postoperative adverse events, and weight loss were collected.
Results
Thirty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. The median (range) time between transplant and bariatric surgery was 54.3 (10.0–253.0) months. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass were performed in 28 and 10 patients, respectively. Only 1 conversion to open procedure was required. Median length of stay was 2 days, with a 30-day adverse event rate of 23.7%. No leaks were documented. At 12-month follow-up, mean (SD) percentage excess body weight loss was 58.54 (21.91) and 68.74 (23.13) after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, respectively. Comorbidity-related medications were decreased in most patients, while transplant organ rejection occurred in 2 patients.
Conclusion
Bariatric surgery after organ transplant enables considerable postoperative weight loss and improvement of obesity-related comorbidities; however, it presents with higher morbidity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Obesity is a major health concern as it affects 39.6% of the US adult population [1]. In patients undergoing orthotopic solid organ transplant (OSOT), obesity prevalence rises from 5.6% before transplant to 11.5% 1 year after [2]. It is a multifactorial condition usually related to immunosuppressive treatment, decreased physical activity, unbalanced diet, and endocrine and metabolic changes [3]. Morbid obesity increases the risk of graft loss and delayed graft function and decreases patient survival [2, 4].
Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity in the long term [5], also helping achieve better control of obesity-related comorbidities, such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus [6]. However, its safety and efficacy in patients after OSOT have not been well established. Most studies in the literature are case reports or small case series about sleeve gastrectomy [7, 8], with little data regarding long-term outcomes [9]. The main concerns in this population are a higher rate of adverse events due to immunosuppressive state and prolonged corticosteroid use [10] and the effect bariatric surgery may have in the absorption of medications and, consequently, graft function.
Management of patients with OSOT presents a number of challenges to the bariatric surgeon. Concerns include increased risk of morbidity and mortality than in the general population [10], a more complex operation with longer operative time and length of hospital stay [11], and postoperative changes in medication absorption and immunosuppressive state [12, 13].
The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery after OSOT by evaluating adverse event rates, graft rejection, weight loss, and comorbidity control.
Methods
After institutional review board approval, patients who underwent bariatric surgery at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida, from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2019, were retrospectively identified based on billing codes. All patients with previous OSOT were included in this study. Patient records were reviewed for the following clinical characteristics: transplanted organ; history of organ rejection; immunosuppressive medication daily dosage and blood levels; time from OSOT to bariatric surgery; sex, age, and body mass index at the time of bariatric surgery; and obesity-related comorbidities, such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea, and hyperlipidemia. Hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia were determined by need for daily medication, and obstructive sleep apnea by need for overnight continuous positive airway pressure therapy.
Patients were referred to the bariatric surgery clinic by the transplant team after failed clinical management of morbid obesity. All patients referred to our team were offered bariatric surgery after meeting eligibility criteria based on the National Institute of Health Guidelines on obesity [14], with no additional criteria assigned based on transplant status. Surgical procedure, either laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (rRYGB), was chosen based on patient condition following the same criteria standards used for non-OSOT patients, except in the following situations: LSG was preferred for patients after liver transplant to maintain endoscopic access to the biliary tree, but was avoided for patients with lung transplant due the high reported rate of postoperative reflux [15, 16] and potential for aspiration. LSG and rRYGB were performed as previously described [17]. rRYGB is the routine approach in our institution when performing a primary gastric bypass.
Outcomes reviewed included perioperative adverse event rate, change in immunosuppressive dosage or blood levels, organ rejection, readmission, comorbidity management, weight loss 12 and 24 months after bariatric surgery, and mortality. Early readmission was defined as readmission occurring within the first 30 days after surgery. Comorbidity management and weight loss were assessed by medication usage and percentage of excess body weight loss, respectively. Continuous variables are expressed as mean (SD) or median (range), and categorical variables are reported as number (percentage). Potential factors associated with adverse events were assessed using univariate logistic regression models. Findings are presented as odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results were considered statistically significant when P value was found to be less than 0.05. SPSS software, version 25.0, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM Corp) was used for data analysis.
Results
During the study period, 38 patients met inclusion criteria, 28 underwent LSG, and 10 underwent rRYGB. Median (range) time from transplant to bariatric surgery was 54.3 (10.0–253.0) months. Demographic information, comorbidities, and organ transplant history are detailed in Table 1. Four patients had undergone previous bariatric surgery and were converted from adjustable gastric band to LSG (2) and from LSG to rRYGB (2).
Operative details are included in Table 2. Conversion to open procedure occurred in only 1 patient due to dense adhesions during rRYGB. Thirty-day postoperative adverse event rate was 23.7%, with a higher rate after rRYGB than after LSG; however, no events required radiologic or surgical intervention. Immediate postoperative adverse events included fever (1), hyperkalemia (1), and acute increase in creatinine requiring intravenous fluids (2) in the LSG group and prolonged postoperative ileus (1) and mild diabetic ketoacidosis with increase in creatinine (1) in the rRYGB group. Early readmission rate was 7.9%. After LSG, 1 liver recipient was readmitted due to abdominal pain related to a gastric ulcer, and 1 combined liver and kidney recipient was readmitted due to nausea, vomiting, and acute kidney injury. After rRYGB, 1 heart recipient required early readmission due to abdominal pain and shortness of breath, but workup was unremarkable. No leaks were documented in either group.
Follow-up data were available for 30 (78.9%) patients after 12 months and for 19 (50.0%) after 24 months. Later than 30-day readmissions occurred after LSG in 3 liver recipients due to dehydration, gastric sleeve stenosis, and incarcerated incisional hernia from previous band port 4, 6, and 7 months after surgery, respectively. Gastric sleeve stenosis was refractory to endoscopic dilation and was subsequently managed and resolved with laparoscopic seromyotomy. The incarcerated incisional hernia was repaired laparoscopically. Later than 30-day readmissions after rRYGB were due to tricuspid valve regurgitation requiring replacement in 1 heart recipient 9 months after surgery and acute rejection noted as an increase in serum creatinine in 2 kidney recipients 3 and 7 months after surgery. One of the patients with rejection was nonadherent with postoperative instructions and immunosuppressive medications.
Outcomes of weight loss and comorbidity management are summarized in Table 3. Excess body weight loss 12 months after surgery was higher than 50% for both procedures and higher than 90% in the rRYGB group after 24 months. Most patients had better comorbidity control after bariatric surgery. One heart recipient died 20 months after rRYGB due to adverse effects of the tricuspid valve replacement previously mentioned.
Univariate logistic regression analysis did not find that the type of surgical procedure affected adverse events rate (rRYGB vs LSG; OR: 0.64, CI 0.12–2.55; P = 0.58). Patient characteristics (age, gender, preoperative BMI, obesity-related comorbidities) and transplant history (transplanted organ, history of organ rejection, time from OSOT to bariatric surgery, chronic corticosteroid use) were not associated with increased adverse events rate in the entire cohort (Table 4).
Regarding immunosuppressive medication, none of the patients required substantial adjustments to tacrolimus dosage (Fig. 1). There was also no notable change in tacrolimus blood through levels (Fig. 2), despite 2 kidney recipients presenting with signs of organ rejection, as previously mentioned.
Discussion
Our study shows that bariatric surgery can be safely performed in patients after OSOT. Time from transplant to bariatric surgery in our cohort was approximately 4 years, with the earliest being only 10 months after transplant. However, we agree with current recommendations of waiting at least 1 year after OSOT because adverse effects associated with immunosuppression are highest during the first year [18].
In the current study, 30-day adverse event rate was 23.7%, which is higher than usual. Rate of adverse event has a wide range of variation, from 0.6 to 10.3%, depending on multiple factors, including bariatric center operative volume [19]. The early readmission rate of 7.9% is also higher than the 5% reported in a cohort of 187,000 patients undergoing primary bariatric surgery [20]. The mortality rate of 2.6% reported in this study is similar to previous reports of bariatric surgery in patients with previous OSOT [9, 21]; however, mortality in our study was due to an adverse event in the transplanted organ not directly related to bariatric surgery.
Recent studies assessing the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database reported perioperative risks of bariatric surgery in patients with and without history of OSOT and demonstrated a higher incidence of readmissions and adverse events, such as leaks and surgical site infections; however, no information about transplant organ and graft rejection or failure was documented [22, 23].
It is debatable whether patients after OSOT would need higher doses of immunosuppressive agents, and postsurgery time interval may have an effect [9, 13]. While there was no notable change in tacrolimus daily dosage or blood levels over time in our study, 2 patients had organ rejection after rRYGB. Previous reports, including a total of 19 patients undergoing LSG after liver transplant, had no episodes of rejection [24, 25]. There is marked concern regarding the malabsorptive effect of bariatric surgery in these patients, especially with rRYGB.
Despite the higher risk of adverse events and graft rejection, our patients experienced considerable weight loss and improvement of comorbidities. In our study, 12 months after bariatric surgery, patients in both procedure groups achieved a loss of more than 50% excess body weight, and weight loss was even higher at 24-month follow-up, especially in the rRYGB group. Improvement in comorbidity control with a reduction in prescribed medications was also noted in a majority of patients. We recommend that patients with previous OSOT undergo bariatric surgery only in places with active transplant programs, as close collaboration with the transplant team is necessary to achieve better outcomes.
Our study did not reach a level of significance to determine predictors of adverse events probably due to the small patient population. Other limitation is that this was a retrospective analysis lacking a control group. Comparison could be made with a morbidly obese OSOT group without bariatric surgery to clarify whether there is measurable benefit. Also, a longer follow-up is advisable to assess for long-term outcomes, such as malnutrition and effect on graft function and survival. Consequently, further studies with more patients and longer follow-up are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of bariatric surgery after OSOT.
Conclusion
Bariatric surgery is safe in patients after transplant and achieves considerable weight loss and improvement of obesity-related comorbidities. However, it presents with higher adverse event and readmission rates. No change in immunosuppressive dosage is required without signs of organ rejection.
References
Hales CM, Fryar CD, Carroll MD, et al. Trends in obesity and severe obesity prevalence in US youth and adults by sex and age, 2007-2008 to 2015-2016. Jama. 2018;319(16):1723–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.3060.
Hoogeveen EK, Aalten J, Rothman KJ, et al. Effect of obesity on the outcome of kidney transplantation: a 20-year follow-up. Transplantation. 2011;91(8):869–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e3182100f3a.
Moctezuma-Velazquez C, Márquez-Guillén E, Torre A. Obesity in the liver transplant setting. Nutrients. 2019;11(11):2552. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11112552.
Meier-Kriesche HU, Arndorfer JA, Kaplan B. The impact of body mass index on renal transplant outcomes: a significant independent risk factor for graft failure and patient death. Transplantation. 2002;73(1):70–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-200201150-00013.
Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, et al. Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg. 2004;240(3):416–23; discussion 423-414. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000137343.63376.19.
Sjöström L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–93. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa035622.
Elli EF, Gonzalez-Heredia R, Sanchez-Johnsen L, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy surgery in obese patients post-organ transplantation. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(3):528–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2015.11.030.
Tsamalaidze L, Stauffer JA, Arasi LC, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity in patients after orthotopic liver transplant: a matched case-control study. Obes Surg. 2018;28(2):444–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2847-7.
Yemini R, Nesher E, Winkler J, et al. Bariatric surgery in solid organ transplant patients: long-term follow-up results of outcome, safety, and effect on immunosuppression. Am J Transplant. 2018;18(11):2772–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14739.
Andalib A, Aminian A, Khorgami Z, et al. Early postoperative outcomes of primary bariatric surgery in patients on chronic steroid or immunosuppressive therapy. Obes Surg. 2016;26(7):1479–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1923-0.
Major P, Droś J, Kacprzyk A, et al. Does previous abdominal surgery affect the course and outcomes of laparoscopic bariatric surgery? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(7):997–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2018.03.025.
Diwan TS, Lichvar AB, Leino AD, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic analysis of immunosuppressive agents after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Clin Transpl. 2017;31(6):e12975. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12975.
Rogers CC, Alloway RR, Alexander JW, et al. Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid, tacrolimus and sirolimus after gastric bypass surgery in end-stage renal disease and transplant patients: a pilot study. Clin Transpl. 2008;22(3):281–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00783.x.
National Institutes of Health. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults--the evidence report. Obes Res. 1998;6(Suppl 2):51s–209s.
Yeung KTD, Penney N, Ashrafian L, et al. Does sleeve gastrectomy expose the distal esophagus to severe reflux?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2020;271(2):257–65. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003275.
Mandeville Y, Van Looveren R, Vancoillie PJ, et al. Moderating the enthusiasm of sleeve gastrectomy: up to fifty percent of reflux symptoms after ten years in a consecutive series of one hundred laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies. Obes Surg. 2017;27(7):1797–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2567-z.
Tsamalaidze L, Elli EF. Bariatric surgery is gaining ground as treatment of obesity after heart transplantation: report of two cases. Obes Surg. 2017;27(11):3064–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2908-y.
Suraweera D, Dutson E, Saab S. Liver transplantation and bariatric surgery: best approach. Clin Liver Dis. 2017;21(2):215–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cld.2016.12.001.
Ibrahim AM, Ghaferi AA, Thumma JR, et al. Variation in outcomes at bariatric surgery centers of excellence. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(7):629–36. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0542.
Lazzati A, Chatellier G, Katsahian S. Readmissions after bariatric surgery in France, 2013-2016: a nationwide study on administrative data. Obes Surg. 2019;29(11):3680–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04053-6.
Modanlou KA, Muthyala U, Xiao H, et al. Bariatric surgery among kidney transplant candidates and recipients: analysis of the United States renal data system and literature review. Transplantation. 2009;87(8):1167–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e31819e3f14.
Montgomery JR, Cohen JA, Brown CS, et al. Perioperative risks of bariatric surgery among patients with and without history of solid organ transplant. Am J Transplant. 2020;20:2530–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.15883.
Fagenson AM, Mazzei MM, Zhao H, et al. Bariatric surgery outcomes in patients with prior solid organ transplantation: an MBSAQIP analysis. Obes Surg. 2020;30(6):2313–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04490-8.
Khoraki J, Katz MG, Funk LM, et al. Feasibility and outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy after solid organ transplantation. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(1):75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2015.04.002.
Lin MY, Tavakol MM, Sarin A, et al. Safety and feasibility of sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese patients following liver transplantation. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(1):81–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2410-5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human or Animal Subjects
All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Portions of this manuscript have been published in abstract form: Diaz Vico T, Elli EF. O-126 Minimally invasive bariatric surgery for obese patients after solid organ transplantation: safety and feasibility. Obes Surg 2019;29:150.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, Y.L., Elli, E.F. Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery After Solid Organ Transplantation. OBES SURG 30, 4899–4904 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05013-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05013-1