Abstract
The mortality of patients with malignant gliomas remains high despite the advancement in multi-modal therapy including surgery, radio- and chemotherapy. Glioma stem cells (GSCs), sharing some characteristics with normal neural stem cells (NSCs), contribute to the cellular origin for primary gliomas and the recurrence of malignant gliomas after current conventional therapy. Accordingly, targeting GSCs proves to be a promising avenue of therapeutic intervention. The specific tropism of NSCs to GSCs provides a novel platform for targeted delivery of therapeutic agents. Tropism and mobilization of NSCs are enhanced by hypoxia through upregulating chemotactic cytokines and activating several signaling pathways. Moreover, hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) produced under hypoxic microenvironment of the stem cell niche play critical roles in the growth and stemness phenotypes regulation of both NSCs and GSCs. However, the definite cellular and molecular mechanisms of HIFs involvement in the process remain obscure. In this review, we focus on the pivotal roles of HIFs in migration of NSCs to GSCs and potential roles of HIFs in dictating the fates of migrated NSCs and targeted GSCs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Malignant gliomas are the most common subtype of primary brain tumors, and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is uniformly fatal with a mean survival of 14 months after diagnosis despite aggressive surgery, radiation, and chemotherapies [1]. The discovery of a highly tumorigenic subpopulation of stem-like cells, termed glioma stem cells (GSCs), lents support to a new paradigm in cancer biology. GSCs are highly infiltrative and possess stem-like characteristics similar with normal neural stem cells (NSCs), including the expression of neural stem cell markers, the capacity for self-renewal and long-term proliferation, the formation of neurospheres and the ability to differentiate into multiple nervous system lineages [2–4]. However, GSCs exhibit significant distinctions from normal stem cells in chromosomal abnormalities, tumor formation and increased radio-/chemoresistance. GSCs contribute to the cellular origin for primary gliomas and the recurrence of malignant gliomas after current multi-modality therapies combining surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which suggests that targeting GSCs might offer a new avenue of therapeutic intervention [5–7].
Hypoxia is the essential characteristics of the solid tumors. Cellular responses to hypoxia are commonly regulated by the hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs). Hypoxia has been identified to a critical aspect of the microenvironment in GSCs and generally signifies unfavorable clinical outcome [8–14]. The fraction of brain tumor stem cells is increased under hypoxia in vitro [13, 15]. Moreover, hypoxia has been recognized as a major factor in resistance to radiation and chemotherapies because hypoxic cells prevent the radiation-induced DNA damage [16–19] and express multidrug resistance genes [20–23]. Consequently, hypoxia potentially provides therapeutic targets to sensitize glioma stem cells to cytotoxic therapies to improve glioma patient treatments [24–27].
Recent researches indicate that NSCs can specifically target malignant gliomas, which provides a novel platform for targeted delivery of therapeutic agents to gliomas with significant antitumor effects [28–32]. Chemotactic cytokines induced by hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) are responsible for directed migration of neural stem cells and other stem cells to hypoxic areas [33–37]. Hypoxia induced SDF-1/CXCR4, VEGF/VEGFR signaling pathways and Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) have been identified to mediate increased NSC tropism [38, 39]. The expression of such chemotactic cytokines are more upregulated in GSCs than their differentiated counterparts [7]. In this review, we focus on the pivotal roles of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) in migration of NSCs to GSCs and the potential roles of HIFs in dictating the fates of migrated NSCs and targeted GSCs.
Hypoxia-Inducible Factors (HIFs)
Hypoxia occurs in tumors due to rapid cell proliferation and aberrant blood vessel formation. Cellular responses to hypoxia are commonly regulated by the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) family of transcriptional factors [40, 41]. HIFs consist of an alpha (HIF-α) and a beta (HIF-β) subunit. Under conditions of abundant oxygen (>8–10 %), HIF-α proteins are translated but rapidly degraded. As oxygen levels decrease below 8–10 %, HIF-α proteins become increasingly stabilized. Once stabilized, HIF-α proteins bind to constitutively expressed HIF-β subunits in the nucleus, thus binding to DNA and activating transcription of hundreds of downstream genes that modulate cell survival, motility, metabolism, and angiogenesis [40, 42]. The consequent stabilization of HIF proteins in hypoxic cancer cells is thought to promote tumor progression, largely by inducing the localized expression of specific target genes encoding vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and proteins regulating cell motility and metastasis (CXCR4, E-cadherin) [43–47]. HIF-1α is universally expressed while HIF-2α shows a more restricted expression pattern. HIF-1α and HIF-2α share some target genes, including VEGF, whereas genes encoding glycolytic enzymes (PGK1, ALDA) are unique HIF-1α targets and those encoding TGF-α and cyclin D1 appear to be unique HIF-2α targets, at least in certain cell types [48].
NSC Tropism to Glioma Cells is Enhanced by HIFs
Transplantation of neural stem cells (NSCs) for therapeutic purposes was initially applied in Parkinson’s disease [49, 50]. Since then, a number of in vitro and in vivo studies have proved the promising application of NSC transplantation in the treatments of human CNS diseases, particularly for Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease, spinal cord injury, stroke and multiple sclerosis [51–56]. Until 2000, several researches demonstrated that NSCs possessed the unique migratory capacity and could efficiently cross the blood–brain barrier to target brain tumors far from the original transplanted site [57–59]. Subsequently, studies had proposed that NSCs might possess some natural abilities to suppress tumor growth and induce tumor cell apoptosis [28, 29]. These attractive findings soon ignited the conjectures of a novel therapeutic strategy to target these intractable brain tumors. As a result, the NSC inherent tropism towards brain tumors had led to the pursuit of applying NSC as a promising therapeutic tool and/or vehicle for tracking and suppression of malignant gliomas [32, 60–62].
Increasing evidences showed that stem cell migration was largely dependent on integrin binding to the extracellular matrix (ECM), various chemotactic cytokines and several involved signaling pathways. During this progress of migration, hypoxia has been identified to play a critical role in promoting tropism and mobilization of multiple stem cells, including NSCs (Fig. 1).
Several studies have found that hypoxic preconditioning increased stem cell mobilization. Exposure of mesenchymal stem cells to 1–3 % oxygen increased expression of the CXC chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR4) and stem cell migration rates [34, 35, 63–65]. Increased expression of CXCR4 after exposure of NSCs to hypoxia was also identified [38]. Ceradini et al. [66] and Chang et al. [67] found that CXCR4 positive stem/progenitor cells showed enhanced tropism to ischemic areas or tumor lesions, where stromal cell-derived factor (SDF-1) was induced by HIF-1 and overexpressed. Increasing data demonstrated that SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling induced by HIFs could be crucial for homing and migration of multiple stem cell types.
Chemokines induced by hypoxia, such as VEGF, EGF and several other factors, have also been identified to enhance NSC tropism. Zhao et al. [38] demonstrated that knockdown of HIF-1α in glioma cells blocked the hypoxia-induced migration of NSCs, which was due to decreased expression of SDF-1, VEGF and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) in glioma cells. Schmidt et al. [68] showed that tumor-upregulated VEGF was able to induce a long-range attraction of transplanted human NSCs toward brain tumors from distant sites. Data from our group showed that GSCs, compared to their differentiated cells, secreted much greater amounts of VEGF and bFGF [7]. These findings strongly suggest that GSCs potentially possess enhanced chemotaxis for NSC tropism compared with the differentiated cells, which had been further identified in our recent study (data unpublished).
The HIFs mediated NSCs tropism may involve activation of MMPs, VEGF, and some other molecular pathways. Activation of MMPs induced by hypoxia around injured tissues and tumors are identified to enhance NSC mobilization. Ingraham et al. [39] demonstrated that in 1 % O2, levels of HIF-1α were increased and adherence of NSCs to basement membrane-coated plates was reduced. Notably, a fivefold increase in MMP-9 mRNA was confirmed and specific inhibition of MMP-9 activity prevented the increase in proliferation and migration of NSCs. The increased MMP-9 expression and NSC migration were induced via activated Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. In line with this finding, several other studies showed that low O2 affected cell proliferation and activated the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, the downstream effectors of which had a wide variety of transcriptional gene targets, including MMP-9 and VEGF [69–71]. Existent data suggested that upregulated expression of chemokines and activation of MMPs by injured tissues and tumors act as signals for attraction of NSCs in hypoxic circumstance [33, 38, 72]. HIFs played an essential and pivotal role in hypoxia-induced NSC mobilization, possibly via the involvement of their downstream genes including MMPs and VEGF. These provide a novel insight into the mechanisms responsible for NSC mobilization and may be of great help in the development of new clinical mobilizing agents.
Taken together, large numbers of studies have been exploring the tropism of NSCs especially during the progress of neural injuries and brain tumors. HIFs have been identified to play important roles in initiating and promoting the process. Nonetheless, the definite mechanisms remain to be elucidated.
Influences of HIFs on NSC Fates
Neural stem cells (NSCs) have been recognized as the progenitor cells of the nervous system possessing a self-renewing capacity to differentiate into neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes in the mature nervous system. In the mammalian central nervous system, oxygen plays a critical role in regulating the growth and differentiation state of neural stem/progenitor cells [73–79] (Fig. 2). Commitment of NSCs toward specific phenotypes is strongly pre-conditioned by oxygen tension. Physiological hypoxia (2.0–5.0 %) enhances both NSC self-renewal and neurogenic abilities through HIF-1α [80–82], while atmospheric culture conditions (20 % O2) promotes NSC differentiation to astrocyte [82, 83]. In the brain, oxygen sensing is found to be integrated into normal signaling pathways controlling NSC proliferation and cell fate choice in their niche. Gustafsson et al. [84] showed that hypoxia blocked neuronal and myogenic differentiation in a Notch-dependent manner. The notch signaling pathway is a highly conserved cell signaling system present in most multicellular organisms. Hypoxia activated Notch-responsive promoters and increased expression of Notch direct downstream genes. The Notch intracellular domain (NICD) interacts with HIF-1α, thereby blocking terminal differentiation of neural precursors. Under increased oxygen concentrations, such interaction is abolished, allowing neural precursors to differentiate. This interaction between HIF-1α and Notch was also found in medulloblastoma stem cells in another study by Pistollato et al., in which they found that hypoxia, by maintaining Notch1 in its active form, maitained medulloblastoma stem cell viability and expansion [85]. Moreover, Mukherjee et al. [86] demonstrated that HIF-1α, being independent of HIF-β, interacted with NICD to promote development and survival of drosophila blood. These data indicate that HIFs may have a crucial influence on the development and survival of NSCs, and canonical notch pathway is largely involved in the process.
Survival and fate of transplanted NSCs are crucial in their applications for various therapeutic purposes, especially when NSCs are utilized as gene vectors migrating or grafted to the hypoxic microenvironment. Takeuchi et al. [87] showed the grafted NSCs, around the injured spinal cord, differentiated into neuronal and glial subpopulations at 21 days after transplantation. In another contusion injury model by Fujiwara et al. [88], transplanted NSCs were shown to differentiate into neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, and survive at least for 56 days. However, the definite fate of transplanted NSCs in tumor microenvironment is still far from being clarified when applied in targeting the glioma cells for therapeutic purposes.
Regulation of GSC Phenotypes by HIFs
The hypothesis of GSCs implies that GSCs, which possess similar “stemness” as normal NSC but exhibit aberrant behavior, potentially derive from mutational NSCs or dedifferentiated mature cells [89–92]. Similar molecular mechanism and signaling pathways, being involved in hypoxic microenvironment, could be operative in both NSCs and GSCs. Notably, recent reports have identified that hypoxia is a critical aspect of the microenvironment in GSCs and generally signifies unfavorable clinical outcome [8, 10, 12, 13]. Hypoxia has been found to play a key role in the regulation of the GSC phenotypes through HIFs and subsequent induction of specific GSC signature genes. There are functional differences between HIF-1α and HIF-2α in the response of glioma cells or/and GSCs to hypoxia. HIF-1α is widely expressed in various tumors. However, the effect of HIF-1α deficiency on tumor growth has not been fully identified. Mendez et al. [27] reported that knock down of HIF-1α in human and murine glioma cells reduced their migration in vitro and their invasion in vivo. In addition, knock down of HIF-1α reduces the capability of glioma cells to form tumor spheres, which suggested that HIF-1α might play a role in the survival and self-renewal potential of GSCs. However, their data did not show any significant differences in overall survival or grafted tumor volume between animals transplanted with cells knocked down for HIF-1α expression and control cells. In another study, reduction of HIF-1α by siRNA in glioma cells grown in mouse flanks led to decreased glioma growth, which involved the reduction of VEGF and GLUT-1, two known downstream targets of HIF-1α [93]. Additionally, hypoxia was reported to promote the self-renewal capacity of CD133-positive human GSCs, which involved the activation of HIF-1α and inhibition of GSC differentiation [12]. There were also evidences showing that hypoxia led to an enrichment of stem cell markers, e.g., CD133 in glioma cells [11, 13, 14, 17].
Similarly, it was found that the forced expression of HIF-2α induced GSC marker expression and augmented the tumorigenic potential of the non-stem population, which implied a specific role of HIF-2α in promoting glioma tumorigenesis [9]. Knockdown of HIF-2α in neuroblastoma and GSCs led to reduced levels of VEGF and poorly vascularized, highly necrotic tumors [94]. HIF-2α and multiple HIF-regulated genes were preferentially expressed in GSCs in comparison to non-stem tumor cells and normal neural progenitors [10]. Moreover, the stem cell regulator Oct4 as a specific HIF-2α target gene directly linked HIF2α to stem cell biology [95]. Similar result was reported by Heddleston et al. [9] that HIF-2α increased the percentage of CD133-positive cells in a sorted population of CD133-negative cells maintained even in serum containing medium and this HIF-2α expression also resulted in concomitant increases in the mRNA levels of the stem-cell associated genes c-Myc, Nanog and Oct.
Notably and interestingly, there are different opinions about the roles of HIF-1α and HIF-2α [96, 97]. Gordan et al. [98] demonstrated that HIF-2α enhanced the transcriptional activity of another stem cell related gene, c-Myc, whereas HIF-1α destabilized c-Myc complexes. Seidel et al. [14] showed that HIF-2α, but not HIF-1α knockdown, abrogated the hypoxia-dependent induction of the GSC phenotypes. Furthermore, HIF-2α induced a dramatic upregulation of a panel of genes for side population signature, while HIF-1α expression had no effect on the levels of tumor stem cell related genes.
In addition, hypoxia enhanced the expression of ATP-binding cassette transporters such as multidrug resistance-1 or ATP-binding cassette G2 (ABCG2) that conferred multidrug resistance on a variety of cancer cells including gliomas [8, 21, 99]. Together, these data linked HIFs to glioma invasion, angiogenesis and GSC biology, which underscore the promising approach of targeting HIFs in GSCs for glioma therapies.
Future Directions
Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) may play an important role in the migration of NSCs to GSCs. Meanwhile, HIFs are highly involved in the growth, migration, self-renewal and differentiation process of both NSCs and GSCs. Since hypoxia represents a typical component of glioma microenvironment, it would be interesting to know how the induced HIFs in gliomas affect the migration of adjacent NSCs, and how the HIFs subunits differentially regulate the “stemness” phenotypes of both the migrated NSCs and the targeted GSCs, especially given the sophisticated signal pathways existent in GSC niche. Taking into account that GSCs might be derived from NSCs, it is illusive to predict the final fate of the NSCs that have migrated to the hypoxic tumor niche. Could the NSCs exert a repressive effect on the glioma cells and/or GSCs, or exactly the opposite, undergo aberrant changes and recruited into glioma propagating cells? And what roles do the HIFs have in the two-way regulation on the normal NSCs and aberrant GSCs in the in vivo hypoxic niche? Further work is needed to answer these questions.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by Natural Science Foundation of China grants, No.: 30801177.
References
Van Meir EG, Hadjipanayis CG, Norden AD, Shu HK, Wen PY, Olson JJ (2010) Exciting new advances in neuro-oncology: the avenue to a cure for malignant glioma. CA Cancer J Clin 60(3):166–193
Galli R, Binda E, Orfanelli U et al (2004) Isolation and characterization of tumorigenic, stem-like neural precursors from human glioblastoma. Cancer Res 64(19):7011–7021
Singh SK, Hawkins C, Clarke ID et al (2004) Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells. Nature 432(7015):396–401
Yuan X, Curtin J, Xiong Y et al (2004) Isolation of cancer stem cells from adult glioblastoma multiforme. Oncogene 23(58):9392–9400
Bao S, Wu Q, McLendon RE et al (2006) Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature 444(7120):756–760
Eramo A, Ricci-Vitiani L, Zeuner A et al (2006) Chemotherapy resistance of glioblastoma stem cells. Cell Death Differ 13(7):1238–1241
Campos B, Wan F, Farhadi M et al (2010) Differentiation therapy exerts antitumor effects on stem-like glioma cells. Clin Cancer Res 16(10):2715–2728
Das B, Tsuchida R, Malkin D, Koren G, Baruchel S, Yeger H (2008) Hypoxia enhances tumor stemness by increasing the invasive and tumorigenic side population fraction. Stem Cells 26(7):1818–1830
Heddleston JM, Li Z, McLendon RE, Hjelmeland AB, Rich JN (2009) The hypoxic microenvironment maintains glioblastoma stem cells and promotes reprogramming towards a cancer stem cell phenotype. Cell Cycle 8(20):3274–3284
Li Z, Bao S, Wu Q et al (2009) Hypoxia-inducible factors regulate tumorigenic capacity of glioma stem cells. Cancer Cell 15(6):501–513
McCord AM, Jamal M, Shankavaram UT, Lang FF, Camphausen K, Tofilon PJ (2009) Physiologic oxygen concentration enhances the stem-like properties of CD133+ human glioblastoma cells in vitro. Mol Cancer Res 7(4):489–497
Soeda A, Park M, Lee D et al (2009) Hypoxia promotes expansion of the CD133-positive glioma stem cells through activation of HIF-1alpha. Oncogene 28(45):3949–3959
Bar EE, Lin A, Mahairaki V, Matsui W, Eberhart CG (2010) Hypoxia increases the expression of stem-cell markers and promotes clonogenicity in glioblastoma neurospheres. Am J Pathol 177(3):1491–1502
Seidel S, Garvalov BK, Wirta V et al (2010) A hypoxic niche regulates glioblastoma stem cells through hypoxia inducible factor 2 alpha. Brain 133(Pt 4):983–995
Platet N, Liu SY, Atifi ME et al (2007) Influence of oxygen tension on CD133 phenotype in human glioma cell cultures. Cancer Lett 258(2):286–290
Moeller BJ, Cao Y, Li CY, Dewhirst MW (2004) Radiation activates HIF-1 to regulate vascular radiosensitivity in tumors: roleof reoxygenation, free radicals, and stress granules. Cancer Cell 5(5):429–441
Blazek ER, Foutch JL, Maki G (2007) Daoy medulloblastoma cells that express CD133 are radioresistant relative to CD133- cells, and the CD133 + sector is enlarged by hypoxia. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67(1):1–5
Rich JN (2007) Cancer stem cells in radiation resistance. Cancer Res 67(19):8980–8984
Sheehan JP, Shaffrey ME, Gupta B, Larner J, Rich JN, Park DM (2010) Improving the radiosensitivity of radioresistant and hypoxic glioblastoma. Future Oncol 6(10):1591–1601
Liang BC (1996) Effects of hypoxia on drug resistance phenotype and genotype in human glioma cell lines. J Neurooncol 29(2):149–155
Comerford KM, Wallace TJ, Karhausen J, Louis NA, Montalto MC, Colgan SP (2002) Hypoxia-inducible factor-1-dependent regulation of the multidrug resistance (MDR1) gene. Cancer Res 62(12):3387–3394
Zhang W, Zhang H (2006) Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha suppressing apoptosis and increasing tolerance of lung cancer cells to chemotherapy. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 26(5):520–523
Kolenda J, Jensen SS, Aaberg-Jessen C et al (2011) Effects of hypoxia on expression of a panel of stem cell and chemoresistance markers in glioblastoma-derived spheroids. J Neurooncol 103(1):43–58
Semenza GL (2003) Targeting HIF-1 for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 3(10):721–732
Cairns RA, Papandreou I, Sutphin PD, Denko NC (2007) Metabolic targeting of hypoxia and HIF1 in solid tumors can enhance cytotoxic chemotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(22):9445–9450
Gillespie DL, Whang K, Ragel BT, Flynn JR, Kelly DA, Jensen RL (2007) Silencing of hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha by RNA interference attenuates humanglioma cell growth in vivo. Clin Cancer Res 13(8):2441–2448
Mendez O, Zavadil J, Esencay M et al (2010) Knock down of HIF-1alpha in glioma cells reduces migration in vitro and invasion in vivo and impairs their ability to form tumor spheres. Mol Cancer 9:133
Staflin K, Honeth G, Kalliomaki S, Kjellman C, Edvardsen K, Lindvall M (2004) Neural progenitor cell lines inhibit rat tumor growth in vivo. Cancer Res 64(15):5347–5354
Glass R, Synowitz M, Kronenberg G et al (2005) Glioblastoma-induced attraction of endogenous neural precursor cells is associated with improved survival. J Neurosci 25(10):2637–2646
Luo J, Zhang L, Tu H et al (2007) Experimental study on treatment of glioma by embryonic neural stem cell transplantation in rats. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 27(5):571–575
Tyler MA, Ulasov IV, Sonabend AM et al (2009) Neural stem cells target intracranial glioma to deliver an oncolytic adenovirus in vivo. Gene Ther 16(2):262–278
Kim SU (2011) Neural stem cell-based gene therapy for brain tumors. Stem Cell Rev 7(1):130–140
Xu Q, Wang S, Jiang X et al (2007) Hypoxia-induced astrocytes promote the migration of neural progenitor cells via vascular endothelial factor, stem cell factor, stromal-derived factor-1alpha and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 upregulation in vitro. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 34(7):624–631
Rosova I, Dao M, Capoccia B, Link D, Nolta JA (2008) Hypoxic preconditioning results in increased motility and improved therapeutic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 26(8):2173–2182
Liu H, Xue W, Ge G et al (2010) Hypoxic preconditioning advances CXCR4 and CXCR7 expression by activating HIF-1alpha in MSCs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 401(4):509–515
Lee SH, Lee YJ, Han HJ (2011) Role of hypoxia-induced fibronectin-integrin beta1 expression in embryonic stem cell proliferation and migration: involvement of PI3 K/Akt and FAK. J Cell Physiol 226(2):484–493
Raheja LF, Genetos DC, Wong A, Yellowley CE (2011) Hypoxic regulation of mesenchymal stem cell migration: the role of RhoA and HIF-1alpha. Cell Biol Int 35(10):981–989
Zhao D, Najbauer J, Garcia E et al (2008) Neural stem cell tropism to glioma: critical role of tumor hypoxia. Mol Cancer Res 6(12):1819–1829
Ingraham CA, Park GC, Makarenkova HP, Crossin KL (2011) Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 induced by Wnt signaling increases the proliferation and migration of embryonic neural stem cells at low O2 levels. J Biol Chem 286(20):17649–17657
Harris AL (2002) Hypoxia—a key regulatory factor in tumour growth. Nat Rev Cancer 2(1):38–47
Keith B, Simon MC (2007) Hypoxia-inducible factors, stem cells, and cancer. Cell 129(3):465–472
Pouyssegur J, Dayan F, Mazure NM (2006) Hypoxia signalling in cancer and approaches to enforce tumour regression. Nature 441(7092):437–443
Schioppa T, Uranchimeg B, Saccani A et al (2003) Regulation of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 by hypoxia. J Exp Med 198(9):1391–1402
Piovan E, Tosello V, Indraccolo S et al (2007) Differential regulation of hypoxia-induced CXCR4 triggering during B-celldevelopment and lymphomagenesis. Cancer Res 67(18):8605–8614
Wang X, Li C, Chen Y et al (2008) Hypoxia enhances CXCR4 expression favoring microglia migration via HIF-1alphaactivation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 371(2):283–288
Kubo M, Li TS, Kamota T, Ohshima M, Qin SL, Hamano K (2009) Increased expression of CXCR4 and integrin alphaM in hypoxia-preconditioned cellscontributes to improved cell retention and angiogenic potency. J Cell Physiol 220(2):508–514
Cronin PA, Wang JH, Redmond HP (2010) Hypoxia increases the metastatic ability of breast cancer cells via upregulation of CXCR4. BMC Cancer 10:225
Raval RR, Lau KW, Tran MG et al (2005) Contrasting properties of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) and HIF-2 in von Hippel-Lindau-associated renal cell carcinoma. Mol Cell Biol 25(13):5675–5686
Freed CR, Breeze RE, Rosenberg NL et al (1992) Survival of implanted fetal dopamine cells and neurologic improvement 12 to 46 months after transplantation for Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 327(22):1549–1555
Spencer DD, Robbins RJ, Naftolin F et al (1992) Unilateral transplantation of human fetal mesencephalic tissue into the caudate nucleus of patients with Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 327(22):1541–1548
Baetge EE (1993) Neural stem cells for CNS transplantation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 695:285–291
Armstrong RJ, Svendsen CN (2000) Neural stem cells: from cell biology to cell replacement. Cell Transplant 9(2):139–152
Temple S (2001) The development of neural stem cells. Nature 414(6859):112–117
Imitola J, Raddassi K, Park KI et al (2004) Directed migration of neural stem cells to sites of CNS injury by the stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha/CXC chemokine receptor 4 pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(52):18117–18122
Zhu J, Zhou L, XingWu F (2006) Tracking neural stem cells in patients with brain trauma. N Engl J Med 355(22):2376–2378
Carbajal KS, Schaumburg C, Strieter R, Kane J, Lane TE (2010) Migration of engrafted neural stem cells is mediated by CXCL12 signaling through CXCR4 in a viral model of multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(24):11068–11073
Aboody KS, Brown A, Rainov NG et al (2000) Neural stem cells display extensive tropism for pathology in adult brain: evidence from intracranial gliomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(23):12846–12851
Benedetti S, Pirola B, Pollo B et al (2000) Gene therapy of experimental brain tumors using neural progenitor cells. Nat Med 6(4):447–450
Herrlinger U, Woiciechowski C, Sena-Esteves M et al (2000) Neural precursor cells for delivery of replication-conditional HSV-1 vectors to intracerebral gliomas. Mol Ther 1(4):347–357
Yip S, Sabetrasekh R, Sidman RL, Snyder EY (2006) Neural stem cells as novel cancer therapeutic vehicles. Eur J Cancer 42(9):1298–1308
Aboody KS, Najbauer J, Danks MK (2008) Stem and progenitor cell-mediated tumor selective gene therapy. Gene Ther 15(10):739–752
Ahmed AU, Alexiades NG, Lesniak MS (2010) The use of neural stem cells in cancer gene therapy: predicting the path to the clinic. Curr Opin Mol Ther 12(5):546–552
Hung SC, Pochampally RR, Hsu SC et al (2007) Short-term exposure of multipotent stromal cells to low oxygen increases their expression of CX3CR1 and CXCR4 and their engraftment in vivo. PLoS ONE 2(5):e416
Wang Y, Deng Y, Zhou GQ (2008) SDF-1alpha/CXCR4-mediated migration of systemically transplanted bone marrow stromal cells towards ischemic brain lesion in a rat model. Brain Res 1195:104–112
Tang YL, Zhu W, Cheng M et al (2009) Hypoxic preconditioning enhances the benefit of cardiac progenitor cell therapy for treatment of myocardial infarction by inducing CXCR4 expression. Circ Res 104(10):1209–1216
Ceradini DJ, Kulkarni AR, Callaghan MJ et al (2004) Progenitor cell trafficking is regulated by hypoxic gradients through HIF-1 induction of SDF-1. Nat Med 10(8):858–864
Chang YC, Shyu WC, Lin SZ, Li H (2007) Regenerative therapy for stroke. Cell Transplant 16(2):171–181
Schmidt NO, Przylecki W, Yang W et al (2005) Brain tumor tropism of transplanted human neural stem cells is induced by vascular endothelial growth factor. Neoplasia 7(6):623–629
Zhang X, Gaspard JP, Chung DC (2001) Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor by the Wnt and K-ras pathways in colonic neoplasia. Cancer Res 61(16):6050–6054
Wu B, Crampton SP, Hughes CC (2007) Wnt signaling induces matrix metalloproteinase expression and regulates T cell transmigration. Immunity 26(2):227–239
Mazumdar J, O’Brien WT, Johnson RS et al (2010) O2 regulates stem cells through Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. Nat Cell Biol 12(10):1007–1013
Lamszus K, Lengler U, Schmidt NO, Stavrou D, Ergun S, Westphal M (2000) Vascular endothelial growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and placenta growth factor in human meningiomas and their relation to angiogenesis and malignancy. Neurosurgery 46(4):938–947 (Discussion 947–948)
Horie N, So K, Moriya T et al (2008) Effects of oxygen concentration on the proliferation and differentiation of mouse neural stem cells in vitro. Cell Mol Neurobiol 28(6):833–845
Zhao T, Zhang CP, Liu ZH et al (2008) Hypoxia-driven proliferation of embryonic neural stem/progenitor cells–role of hypoxia-inducible transcription factor-1alpha. FEBS J 275(8):1824–1834
Clarke L (2009) v. Low oxygen enhances primitive and definitive neural stem cell colony formation by inhibiting distinct cell death pathways. Stem Cells 27(8):1879–1886
Panchision DM (2009) The role of oxygen in regulating neural stem cells in development and disease. J Cell Physiol 220(3):562–568
Chen X, Tian Y, Yao L, Zhang J, Liu Y (2010) Hypoxia stimulates proliferation of rat neural stem cells with influence on the expression of cyclin D1 and c-Jun N-terminal protein kinase signaling pathway in vitro. Neuroscience 165(3):705–714
De Filippis L, Delia D (2011) Hypoxia in the regulation of neural stem cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 68(17):2831–2844
Lian JH, Pennant WA, Hyung LM et al (2011) Neural stem cells modified by a hypoxia-inducible VEGF gene expression system improve cell viability under hypoxic conditions and spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(11):857–864
Studer L, Csete M, Lee SH et al (2000) Enhanced proliferation, survival, and dopaminergic differentiation of CNS precursors in lowered oxygen. J Neurosci 20(19):7377–7383
Zhang CP, Zhu LL, Zhao T et al (2006) Characteristics of neural stem cells expanded in lowered oxygen and the potential role of hypoxia-inducible factor-1Alpha. Neurosignals 15(5):259–265
Santilli G, Lamorte G, Carlessi L et al (2010) Mild hypoxia enhances proliferation and multipotency of human neural stem cells. PLoS ONE 5(1):e8575
Pistollato F, Chen HL, Schwartz PH, Basso G, Panchision DM (2007) Oxygen tension controls the expansion of human CNS precursors and the generation of astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. Mol Cell Neurosci 35(3):424–435
Gustafsson MV, Zheng X, Pereira T et al (2005) Hypoxia requires notch signaling to maintain the undifferentiated cell state. Dev Cell 9(5):617–628
Pistollato F, Rampazzo E, Persano L et al (2010) Interaction of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha and Notch signaling regulates medulloblastoma precursor proliferation and fate. Stem Cells 28(11):1918–1929
Mukherjee T, Kim WS, Mandal L, Banerjee U (2011) Interaction between Notch and Hif-alpha in development and survival of Drosophila blood cells. Science 332(6034):1210–1213
Takeuchi H, Natsume A, Wakabayashi T et al (2007) Intravenously transplanted human neural stem cells migrate to the injured spinal cord in adult mice in an SDF-1- and HGF-dependent manner. Neurosci Lett 426(2):69–74
Fujiwara Y, Tanaka N, Ishida O et al (2004) Intravenously injected neural progenitor cells of transgenic rats can migrate to the injured spinal cord and differentiate into neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. Neurosci Lett 366(3):287–291
Vescovi AL, Galli R, Reynolds BA (2006) Brain tumour stem cells. Nat Rev Cancer 6(6):425–436
Calabrese C, Poppleton H, Kocak M et al (2007) A perivascular niche for brain tumor stem cells. Cancer Cell 11(1):69–82
Fine HA (2009) Glioma stem cells: not all created equal. Cancer Cell 15(4):247–249
Alcantara LSR, Chen Y, McKay RM, Parada LF (2011) Stem cells in brain tumor development. Curr Top Dev Biol 94:15–44
Gillespie DL, Whang K, Ragel BT, Flynn JR, Kelly DA, Jensen RL (2007) Silencing of hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha by RNA interference attenuates human glioma cell growth in vivo. Clin Cancer Res 13(8):2441–2448
Pietras A, Johnsson AS, Pahlman S (2010) The HIF-2alpha-driven pseudo-hypoxic phenotype in tumor aggressiveness, differentiation, and vascularization. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 345:1–20
Covello KL, Kehler J, Yu H et al (2006) HIF-2alpha regulates Oct-4: effects of hypoxia on stem cell function, embryonic development, and tumor growth. Genes Dev 20(5):557–570
Loboda A, Jozkowicz A, Dulak J (2010) HIF-1 and HIF-2 transcription factors–similar but not identical. Mol Cells 29(5):435–442
Bar EE (2011) Glioblastoma, cancer stem cells and hypoxia. Brain Pathol 21(2):119–129
Gordan JD, Bertout JA, Hu CJ, Diehl JA, Simon MC (2007) HIF-2alpha promotes hypoxic cell proliferation by enhancing c-myc transcriptional activity. Cancer Cell 11(4):335–347
Krishnamurthy P, Ross DD, Nakanishi T et al (2004) The stem cell marker Bcrp/ABCG2 enhances hypoxic cell survival through interactions with heme. J Biol Chem 279(23):24218–24225
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, S., Luo, X., Wan, F. et al. The Roles of Hypoxia-Inducible Factors in Regulating Neural Stem Cells Migration to Glioma Stem Cells and Determinating Their Fates. Neurochem Res 37, 2659–2666 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-012-0879-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-012-0879-x