Introduction

The seaweed processing industry has an annual demand of 7.5–8.0 million t of biomass with most of this derived from farms (Reddy et al. 2008). Since the introduction of seaweed farming to Malaysia in 1978, this industry has gained significance as an economic driver, especially in Sabah. This is primarily due to the important roles of carrageenan in various industries (Sade et al. 2006; Hayashi et al. 2010). The seaweed species which are widely cultivated for carrageenan production in Malaysia are Kappaphycus alvarezii, Kappaphycus striatum, and Eucheuma denticulatum (McHugh 2003; Phang 2006; Sade et al. 2006).

The Malaysian government has introduced the Economic Transformation Programme and identified seaweed farming as one of the 131 entry point projects (EPPs) under the National Key Economic Areas (NKEAs), which has targeted an increase in the seaweed production to 150,000 t by 2020 (ETP Handbook 2012). As a result of this program, the seaweed industry is expected to generate 12,700 job opportunities and contribute up to RM 1.4 billion (~US$0.43 billion) to the gross national income by 2020. However, this target seems difficult to achieve with current cultivation practices. The current problems faced by local cultivators are unpredictable environmental changes, attacks by predators, epiphytes, and diseases, where most of the cultures will be lost, and lack of healthy seaweed seedlings for cultivation (Mendoza et al. 2002; Hurtado et al. 2006; Vairappan 2006; Vairappan et al. 2008; Hayashi et al. 2010).

Micropropagation and subsequent acclimatization of the micropropagated seaweeds to the open sea is an option to provide healthier and epiphyte-free seedlings, in order to overcome these problems while achieving the national goal of commercial cultivation (Bixler and Porse 2011). Previous studies have revealed that the application of commercial extracts from brown seaweeds (Ascophyllum nodosum) in cultivation of K. alvarezii has resulted in higher growth rate and reduced epiphyte load on cultures (Loureiro et al. 2010; Borlongan et al. 2011). Although, the studies of micropropagating Eucheuma and Kappaphycus were started in the early 1990s, followed by optimization of culture media, plant growth regulators, and even culture conditions, but the studies of acclimatization are still limited (Dawes and Koch 1991; Baweja et al. 2009; Yong et al. 2011, 2014).

Direct planting out of the micropropagated seaweeds to the open sea without going through the nursery acclimatization phase may cause shock and stress to the seaweeds due to sudden changes in environmental conditions which will reduce their resistance to diseases and epiphytes. In order to obtain the higher growth rate and survival rate, a nursery system is recommended to provide a buffer condition to the seaweed culture before their adaption to the open sea environment. Acclimatization is necessary for micropropagated plants to adapt for in vivo or ex vivo conditions according to Dunstan and Turner (1984). In this study, acclimatization protocol for micropropagated K. alvarezii was established through application of fertilizers (brown seaweed extracts). The best fertilizer among the tested fertilizers was determined and applied in the subsequent acclimatization studies viz. frequency of medium change and culture density. Controlled parameters during the nursery acclimatization, such as nutrients, salinity, and temperature, should be closer to the natural conditions to provide a transition period for seaweeds to adapt to the open sea environment.

Materials and methods

Preparation of micropropagated K. alvarezii for acclimatization

Kappaphycus alvarezii micropropagules were cultivated according to Yong et al. (2014) under the optimized culture conditions. Micropropagated seedling samples in the range of 20 ± 5 g were selected to conduct acclimatization study in an outdoor nursery during the rainy season. In each cycle, the K. alvarezii was cultured in a cubic-shaped white fiberglass water tank with the capacity of 220 L each for 14 days, with continuous aeration throughout the experimental period. Seawater was filtered with filter cloth and pumped into the culture tank prior to use for experimental seaweed cultivation. The salinity and water temperature of the seawater were in the range of 30 to 35 ppt and 25 to 40 °C, respectively. The weights of K. alvarezii were recorded weekly for daily growth rate (DGR) determination using the formula DGR = {[(Wt / W0) ^ (1 / t)] − 1} × 100 % as recommended by Yong et al. (2013). The determined daily growth rates were then further analyzed for significant differences by one-way ANOVA using SPSS software version 16 (SPSS Inc.).

Application of fertilizers (brown seaweed extracts)

A total of three fertilizers were selected based on their source of seaweed extract and availability in Malaysian market, namely Acadian Marine Plant Extract powder (AMPEP), Gofar600 (GF), and natural seaweed extract (NSE). AMPEP is extracted from A. nodosum (Hurtado et al. 2009), whereas GF and NSE are the mixture extracts of several brown seaweeds including A. nodosum, Sargassum, and Laminaria with different ratios of concentration according to the manufacturer (Gofar Agro Specialties). Four treatments were tested: (a) filtered seawater only (control), (b) filtered seawater enriched with 3 mg L−1 AMPEP, (c) filtered seawater enriched with 3 mg L−1 GF, and (d) filtered seawater enriched with 3 mg L−1 NSE. The concentration of the fertilizer was determined in the beginning of the experiments and during the renewal of medium. For each treatment, four replicates (n = 4) were tested, and the medium was renewed once every 3 days. The determined fertilizer was then applied for the next parameter optimization study.

Frequency of medium change

Four treatments were tested with filtered seawater enriched with NSE (selected based on previous experiment): (a) medium change daily, (b) medium change once every 3 days, (c) medium change once every 5 days, and (d) medium change once every 7 days. The determined frequency of medium change was then applied for the culture density test.

Culture density test

The experiment was conducted with filtered seawater enriched with NSE, together with daily medium change, which were selected based on the previous experiment. Four treatments were tested: (a) 0.40, (b) 0.55, (c) 0.70, and (d) 0.85 g seedlings L−1. The culture density was determined at the beginning of the test, and the ratio of seedlings to the medium was adjusted through the quantity of seedlings.

Field trials

With all three parameters applied, a batch of ten acclimatized and ten non-acclimatized (as control) K. alvarezii seedlings, weighing 45 ± 5 g each, were transplanted to seaweed farms located at Semporna, Sabah. Both acclimatized and non-acclimatized K. alvarezii seedlings were grown in the seaweed farm using the traditionally practiced long-line method, together with the farm-propagated K. alvarezii. After 4 weeks of farming, cultivated seaweeds were harvested and observed. The experiment was carried out in triplicate. The survival rate and average growth rate of the K. alvarezii were determined in order to validate the success of nursery acclimatization. Data obtained were subjected to further analysis of significant differences by one-way ANOVA using SPSS software version 16 (SPSS Inc.).

Results and discussion

Effects of fertilizer treatment

In the 2-week acclimatization study to select the best fertilizer among AMPEP, GF, and NSE, the result showed statistically significant differences in their daily growth rate (F (3,12) = 18.386, p < 0.05). The highest daily growth rate was achieved by treating the seaweed cultures with NSE (5.94 ± 0.21 % day−1), followed by GF, AMPEP, and control (5.19 ± 0.39, 4.55 ± 0.17, and 4.32 ± 0.48 % day−1, respectively) as shown in Fig. 1. Morphologically, there were no obvious differences observed between the K. alvarezii seedlings obtained from each treatment. Thus, NSE was selected for subsequent acclimatization studies.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Daily growth rates of the seaweed cultures exposed to different fertilizer treatments at 3 mg L−1 in an outdoor nursery during acclimatization. Error bars correspond to the standard deviation (n = 4). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05)

Among the tested fertilizers, only AMPEP has been reported to be widely used in experimental cottonii cultivation (Hurtado et al. 2009; Hayashi et al. 2010), whereas no literature report was available on the application of GF and NSE in seaweed cultivation. These fertilizers were selected based on their contents, which were composed of brown seaweed extracts. Thus, the fertilizers are believed to contain more essential nutrients as compared with artificial nutrients (Baweja et al. 2009). As reported by Hurtado et al. (2009), extract of A. nodosum consists of macronutrients and micronutrients which are needed to improve the growth of K. alvarezii. In this study, the application of NSE in culture media showed better growth performance.

Previous studies on the extract of A. nodosum reported a positive influence on the growth and health of K. alvarezii (Hurtado et al. 2009; Loureiro et al. 2010, 2014; Borlongan et al. 2011). The use of A. nodosum extracts was first reported by Hurtado et al. (2009) with its application in tissue culture of Kappaphycus varieties. The study by Hurtado et al. (2009) showed that addition of A. nodosum extract into the culture medium promoted shoot formation of Kappaphycus varieties in shorter period. Besides, Kappaphycus cultures also showed higher growth rate and lower populations of epiphytes after soaking in the extract of A. nodosum solution (Loureiro et al. 2010; Borlongan et al. 2011). Furthermore, the extract of A. nodosum was also found to be efficient in promoting growth of K. alvarezii while reducing the cover of Neosiphonia sp. (Borlongan et al. 2011). The brown seaweed extract is also a potential elicitor of the natural defenses of K. alvarezii against pathogens as well as in ameliorating the negative impacts of long-term exposure to oxidative busts (Loureiro et al. 2012).

In the current study, K. alvarezii appeared to have better growth when cultivated in mixed-algae extracts namely GF and NSE. Generally, a greater variety of algae extracts will supply a wider range of nutrients to the crops. There are about 400 species of Sargassum found throughout all oceans, and Sargassum was first described nearly 200 years ago by Agardh in 1820 (Liu et al. 2012). About 200 bioactive compounds, such as meroterpenoids, phlorotannins, fucoidans, sterols, and glycolipids, have been identified from this genus. Its wide range of pharmacological properties suggests that Sargassum is a rich source of health maintaining and promoting agents (Liu et al. 2012). The uses of Sargassum are not limited to human consumption only, but as plant growth promoter as well (Williams and Feagin 2010; Kumari et al. 2011, 2013). Alginate from the Sargassum sinicola has been shown to promote the growth of the microalga Chlorella sorokiniana (Yabur et al. 2007).

Laminaria has also a long history as a soil conditioner in sandy soils with low organic matter content (Haslam and Hopkins 1996). The role of seaweed as soil conditioners is associated with biological mineralization of the seaweed and the interaction between soil particles and organic compounds derived either directly or indirectly from the seaweed (Stephenson 1968). Thorsen et al. (2010) also revealed the advantages of the use of Laminaria in agriculture as a nutrient provider, seed germination promoter, and rooting agent. Besides, Laminaria is rich in bioactive compounds which have been found to be pharmaceutically important as antimicrobial, antitumor, antioxidant, antiviral, anticoagulant, and other activities which might be useful in treating K. alvarezii to overcome infections (Wang et al. 2010; Peng et al. 2012; Saha et al. 2012; Kim et al. 2013).

The application of seaweed extract as fertilizer is cheaper and environmental friendly. Considering the wide range of nutrients and growth regulators supplied in the seaweed extracts, they can be fully applied and replace the artificial media which are chemically produced (Hurtado et al. 2009). When more types of seaweed extracts are mixed together in a fertilizer, more varieties of functioning elements are available to promote faster and healthier growth. Besides, problems such as eutrophication and harmful alga blooms, which are usually caused by the artificial fertilizer, may be avoided or eliminated by using the seaweed extracts as fertilizer.

Frequency of medium change

K. alvarezii cultivated with daily medium change achieved the highest growth rate (6.98 ± 0.12 %) and was significantly different from the other three treatments (F (3,12) = 8.440, p < 0.05) (Fig. 2). Morphologically, there were no obvious differences or abnormalities found on the seedlings in all treatments. Thus, for the next experiment, the addition of NSE with daily medium change was used to determine the optimum culture density.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Daily growth rates of the seaweed cultures exposed to different frequencies of medium change in an outdoor nursery during acclimatization. Error bars correspond to the standard deviation (n = 4). Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05)

The frequency of medium change is often related to the availability of nutrients in the medium and the period of the nutrients to be used up. As in the acclimatization stage, manual addition of nutrient supplements should be minimized to prepare the seaweed explants to adapt to the natural environment. Therefore, only fertilizer was added, instead of complete culture medium as used in micropropagation. The availability of nutrients can only be maintained by changing the medium, and the frequency of change decides the growth performance of the seaweed explants. Besides, daily medium change also maintains the salinity of the medium in an outdoor nursery to overcome desalination due to salt precipitation. However, the frequency of medium change has always been used as a fixed variable, rather than a manipulated variable in other published seaweed cultivation studies.

Acclimatization of reproductive cells of K. striatum prior to transfer to the field was carried out in a concrete tank with flow-through water system to maintain the nutrient concentration in the culture medium as reported by Luhan and Sollesta (2010). High frequencies of medium change also prepare the seaweed explants to adapt to the natural sea condition. However, cost of operation is another factor that needs to be considered in the nursery set up for commercial cultivation.

Culture density

In the 2-week acclimatization study, K. alvarezii explants showed the highest growth rate (7.14 ± 0.30 % day−1) at a culture density of 0.40 g L−1which was significantly different (F (3,24) = 50.227, p < 0.05) from the other density treatments (Fig. 3). However, there was no morphological difference observed or sign of disease in all treatments.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Daily growth rates of the seaweed cultures exposed to different culture densities in an outdoor nursery during acclimatization. Error bars correspond to the standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05)

Similar to the study of medium change frequency, the study of culture density is closely related to the availability of nutrient content in the medium. As in higher density of cultivation, the nutrients might not be enough for all the explants in a given period, and the growth of the explants may be affected. Besides, light penetration may be reduced due to self-shading of the explants (Manríquez-Hernández 2013). With the decrease of nutrient availability and lower light penetration, the photosynthesis rate of the seaweeds is likely to decrease, and finally, high culture density may actually reduce the productivity of the cultivation (Bidwell et al. 1985).

Higher cultivation density also may reduce the water flow in the medium, and therefore, the seaweeds might suffer from nutrient depletion. According to Glenn and Doty (1992), water motion affects seaweed growth rates by decreasing the thickness of the unstirred layer of water around the thallus, thereby enhancing the diffusion rate of materials into and out of the thallus. As the culture density increases, the weaker is the diffusion for the entry and exit of materials into the center of the thallus, and the greater might be the water motion requirement, which will then lead to higher cost of operation in commercial cultivation.

Field trials

In the field, the average daily growth rate of the surviving acclimatized K. alvarezii was significantly higher (F (1,4) = 12.108, p < 0.05) than non-acclimatized K. alvarezii (3.91 ± 0.16 and 3.56 ± 0.07 % day−1, respectively). These results were greater than the result reported by Yassir (2012), who recorded 3.39 ± 0.18 % day−1 for farm-propagated K. alvarezii (Fig. 4). The survival rate of the acclimatized K. alvarezii was 83.33 ± 5.77 %, which was significantly higher (F (1,4) = 25.000, p < 0.05) than that of the non-acclimatized K. alvarezii (50.00 ± 10.00 %). We infer that the unrecovered acclimatized K. alvarezii seedling was either untied from the culture line due to strong waves or consumed by predators such as sea turtle, whereas unrecovered non-acclimatized K. alvarezii was believed to be affected by epiphytes or “ice-ice” disease. Furthermore, there were no epiphytes observed on the acclimatized K. alvarezii, whereas the non-acclimatized and farm-propagated K. alvarezii were covered with Neosiphonia sp. (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Average daily growth rates of the acclimatized and non-acclimatized K. alvarezii in field trials as compared with farm-propagated K. alvarezii. Error bars correspond to the standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05)

Fig. 5
figure 5

Photos of a acclimatized, b non-acclimatized, and c farm-propagated K. alvarezii after 4 weeks of cultivation in a commercial seaweed farm in Semporna, Sabah. The epiphyte coverage on the thallus of the farm-propagated K. alvarezii was obviously higher than that of the non-acclimatized K. alvarezii. Besides, neither epiphytes nor abnormality was found in acclimatized K. alvarezii

According to Borlongan et al. (2011) and Loureiro et al. (2012), epiphyte infections of K. alvarezii could be reduced by exposing the explants to the extracts of A. nodosum, both in the laboratory or seaweed farm. Addition of extract of A. nodosum to K. alvarezii in vitro was found able to reduce stress, while promoting growth (Loureiro et al. 2014). In a commercial farm, the epiphytes are never fully removed. According to Vairappan et al. (2008), about 90 % of commercial farms in the major seaweed production countries are suffering from epiphyte infections, and there is still no effective solution to fully remove the epiphytes from these farms.

Epiphyte cover on the non-acclimatized seaweeds is believed to be due to stress caused by sudden change of environment and weakening of the resistance to the epiphytes. According to Vairappan (2006), epiphyte outbreaks and “ice-ice” disease are more common when the seaweeds were in stress conditions, especially during the dry and hot seasons. After being infected by the Neosiphonia sp., the productivity of the farms was decreased for about 20 %, and the carrageenan quality dropped as well (Vairappan et al. 2008). By applying the optimized culture conditions in an outdoor nursery, the production of acclimatized K. alvarezii was found to be more promising and attractive as compared with the commonly farmed seaweeds.

In conclusion, the acclimatization of micropropagated K. alvarezii using filtered seawater with the addition of NSE, daily medium change, and a culture density of 0.40 g L−1 in the outdoor nursery was found to promote faster and healthier growth of K. alvarezii. With reference to the farming result, the acclimatization was successful in ensuring the survival and epiphyte resistance of the micropropagated K. alvarezii. These findings are important for acclimatization of micropropagated seaweeds in the nursery prior to their use as seedlings in the seaweed farming industry.