Abstract
Large inputs of atmospheric N from dry deposition accumulate on vegetation and soil surfaces of southern Californian chaparral and coastal sage scrub (CSS) ecosystems during the late-summer and early-fall and become available as a pulse following winter rainfall; however, the fate of this dry season atmospheric N addition is unknown. To assess the potential for dry season atmospheric N inputs to be incorporated into soil and/or vegetation N pools, an in situ N addition experiment was initiated in a post-fire chaparral and a mature CSS stand where 10 × 10 m plots were exposed to either ambient N deposition (control) or ambient +50 kg N ha−1 (added N) added as NH4NO3 during a single application in October 2003. After 1 year of N addition, plots exposed to added N had significantly higher accumulation of extractable inorganic N (NH4−N + NO3−N) on ion exchange resins deployed in the 0–10 cm mineral soil layer and higher soil extractable N in the subsurface (30–40 cm) mineral soil than plots exposed to ambient N. Chaparral and CSS shrubs exposed to added N also exhibited a significant increase in tissue N concentration and a decline in the tissue C:N ratio, and added N significantly altered the shrub tissue δ 15N natural abundance. Leaching of inorganic N to 1 m below the soil surface was on average 2–3 times higher in the added N plots, but large within treatment variability cause these differences to be statistically insignificant. Although a large fraction of the added N could not be accounted for in the shrub and soil N pools investigated, these observations suggest that dry season N inputs can significantly and rapidly alter N availability and shrub tissue chemistry in Mediterranean-type chaparral and CSS shrublands of southern California.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Atmospheric N deposition from human activities has significantly increased since the beginning of the industrial revolution (Galloway and others 1994; Vitousek and others 1997; Fenn and others 1998, 2003a). Most of the anthropogenic N is from fertilizer use (80 Tg N/year; 1 Tg N = 1012 g N); however, an additional 20–25 Tg N/year is produced from fossil fuel burning and deposited as nitrogen oxides in terrestrial and marine systems (Galloway and others 1994; Vitousek and others 1997). Anthropogenic N deposition represents a significant input of N into many southern Californian semi-arid ecosystems (Bytnerowicz and Fenn 1996; Fenn and others 2003a). In heavily polluted areas, oxidized N compounds including NO, NO2, HNO3, peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) and particulate NO3 are important components of dry atmospheric deposition, whereas in areas close to agricultural enterprises, such as in Riverside and San Bernardino counties, compounds such as NH3 and particulate NH4 may be larger sources of atmospheric N (Bytnerowicz and Fenn 1996). Wet deposition, which comprises only about 10–15% of annual N deposition in southern California, is primarily composed of NH4 and NO3 (Bytnerowicz and Fenn 1996). Concentrations of atmospheric N close to urban source areas are 20 times higher than in remote areas, resulting in 20–45 kg N ha−1 to be deposited to heavily polluted southern Californian shrublands annually (Riggan and others 1985; Bytnerowicz and others 1987; Bytnerowicz and Fenn 1996; Meixner and Fenn 2004); however, some more exposed locales can receive up to 145 kg N ha−1 annually (Fenn and Poth 2004).
High N deposition leads to significant increases in the production of nitrate (NO3) in soil (Riggan and others 1985; Fenn and others 1996; Vourlitis and Zorba 2007). This is especially true for southern California chaparral and coastal sage scrub (CSS) soils, where soil NO3 concentration is typically 10–20-times higher than ammonium (NH4) concentration because of rapid nitrification (Vourlitis and Zorba 2007). Because NO3 is highly mobile in soil (Paul and Clark 1989), NO3 can be rapidly exported to groundwater and aquatic systems where it accumulates causing a cascade of ecological changes (Riggan and others 1985; Carpenter and others 1998). In southern California, groundwater and aquatic systems are critical sources for drinking water for urban, suburban, and rural populations, and stream water concentrations of NO3 in highly polluted areas often exceed the maximum contaminant level of 10 mg/l set by the US Environmental Protection agency (US EPA 1995; Carpenter and others 1998; Fenn and Poth 1999). Given that most of atmospherically derived N (>90%) falls on terrestrial surfaces, and thus must be “processed” by terrestrial ecosystems before it is exported to groundwater and downstream aquatic ecosystems (Fenn and Poth 1999; Meixner and Fenn 2004; Li and others 2006), understanding the possible N deposition-induced alterations to terrestrial N storage and cycling is critically important to predicting terrestrial export of N to aquatic systems.
Chaparral and coastal sage scrub (CSS) are the dominant semi-arid ecosystems of southern California (Keeley 2000), and many chaparral and CSS shrublands are adjacent to urban areas and exposed to high levels of atmospheric N (Riggan and others 1985; Byterowicz and Fenn 1996; Padgett and others 1999; Fenn and others 2003b). Also known as “soft-chaparral,” CSS shrubs tolerate more xeric conditions than chaparral shrubs and are restricted to drier, low-elevation habitats on fine-textured soils that limit the infiltration of water (Westman 1981). During late-summer and early-fall, drought-deciduous CSS shrubs are dormant and the physiological activity of evergreen chaparral shrubs is at a seasonal minimum owing to the lack of rainfall and low soil water availability (Poole and Miller 1975; Gray and Schlesinger 1981; Oechel and others 1981). CSS has a lower rate of annual net primary production than chaparral; however, during the spring growing season CSS shrubs can accumulate 2–3 times more biomass than evergreen chaparral shrubs and CSS is more responsive than chaparral to added N (Gray and Schlesinger 1981, 1983). Chaparral shrubs are also thought to be more efficient in regenerating stored tissue N than CSS shrubs (Gray 1983) and have a deeper root system with less horizontal proliferation of roots at the soil surface (Hellmers and others 1955). Fire is an important agent of disturbance that has a return interval of every 48–66 years (Davis and Michaelsen 1995). Depending on intensity, fire causes ecosystem N storage to decline; however, ash deposited from the charred remains of shrubs and litter is rapidly mineralized following fire causing a transient increase in available inorganic N (DeBano and Conrad 1978; DeBano and others 1979; Dunn and others 1979; Rundel 1983; Riggan and others 1985, 1994; Stock and Lewis 1986; Grogan and others 2000).
The majority of dry atmospheric N deposition in southern California accumulates during the summer and early fall when inversion conditions trap pollutants in the lower atmosphere (Bytnerowicz and others 1987; Bytnerowicz and Fenn 1996; Padgett and others 1999; Fenn and others 2003a). Furthermore, because rainfall and fog are infrequent during the summer and early fall, dry N deposition that accumulates on shrub and soil surfaces becomes available as a pulse after the first rainfall or heavy fog event (Riggan and others 1985; Bytnerowicz and Fenn 1996; Fenn and others 1998, 2003b). The fate of this N pulse is largely unknown, and the potential for atmospheric N to be retained in Mediterranean-type shrublands is likely to be a function of the intensity and/or duration of the precipitation event, state of ecosystem development following fire, and the time scales of the vegetation and soil microbial response to rainfall and N (Poole and Miller 1975; Gray and Schlesinger 1981; Riggan and others 1994; Bilbrough and Caldwell 1997; Richstein and others 2002; D’Odorico and others 2003).
Chaparral and CSS shrub physiology is substantially limited by drought during the summer and early fall when the majority of N is deposited, causing a potential temporal asynchrony between N availability and biotic demand (Fenn and others 2003b; Meixner and Fenn 2004). Thus, we hypothesize that N deposited during the fall will result in a significant but transient increase in available N; however, the aboveground N storage of chaparral and CSS shrubs will not be significantly affected by dry season N inputs because drought-induced limitations in physiological activity will constrain the utilization of these available N pulses.
To determine whether N deposited during the dry summer and early-fall increases soil N availability and/or alters shrub tissue chemistry in chaparral and CSS ecosystems, N fertilizer (NH4NO3) was added to a CSS and chaparral stand in fall 2003. Unfortunately the chaparral stand experienced a fire prior to N addition, and given the differences in recent fire history, quantitative comparisons between the chaparral and CSS response to N addition are problematic and not the focus of this report. Rather, we focus on whether dry season N addition causes changes in soil and shrub tissue chemistry in these different Mediterranean-type ecosystems after only 1 year of exposure. The results reported here represent the first year of an in situ N addition experiment that will be conducted over a minimum of 5 years.
Materials and Methods
Site Description and Experimental Design
N-addition experiments were conducted at the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve (SMER: 33°29'N:117°09'W) and the Sky Oaks Field Station (SOFS: 33°21'N:116°34'W), which are research reserves managed by San Diego State University. These sites were chosen because they are secure and long-term field manipulative experiments are both encouraged and logistically feasible. In addition, these reserves have a rich history of ecological research that extends over several decades, and this long-term data base will be useful for interpreting the results obtained over the course of this field experiment.
The SMER field site is located in SW Riverside County, California, USA at an elevation of 338 m and is composed of CSS vegetation on a 9–11°S-SW facing slope. Soil is a sandy clay loam of the Las Posas Series derived of igneous and weathered Gabbro parent material (Knecht 1971) with a bulk density of 1.22 g cm−3. SMER receives an average of 36 cm of rainfall annually. The site is approximately 35 years old and is dominated almost entirely by mature, drought deciduous shrubs Artemisia californica Less. and Salvia mellifera Greene (nomenclature according to Munz 1974) that support considerable standing dead wood. Shrub cover is 0.5–2.5 m2 m−2 and density is 2–6 shrubs m−2 at the end of the summer drought and spring rainy seasons, respectively. Herbaceous species in the understorey are limited to Gnaphalium californicum, and the cover and density of this species comprise approximately 1 and 25%, respectively of the total plant cover and density during the spring rainy season.
SOFS is located in NE San Diego County, California, USA at an elevation of 1,418 m on a 4–10° SE-SW facing slope. The stand was approximately 50 years old when it burned in July 2003. Unfortunately this unplanned perturbation limits the potential for direct comparison to the mature CSS stand; however, given the extensive pre-fertilization (and fire) measurements and the unprecedented opportunity to assess the long-term effects of N deposition on a regenerating chaparral stand, fertilization proceeded as scheduled in fall 2003. Before fire the site was a virtual monoculture of the evergreen shrub Adenostoma fasciculatum H. & A. After fire the stand was again dominated by A. fasciculatum but Ceanothus sp. became a sub-dominant toward the end of the first year of N addition. Prior to the fire shrub cover was 0.83 m2 m−2 and density was 1.3 shrubs m−2, whereas 5 months post-fire shrub cover was 0.02 m2 m−2 and density was 0.4 shrubs m−2. A. fasciculatum resprouts were present as soon as 2 months post-fire, and herbaceous “fire-followers” and Ceanothus sp. that largely depend on fire-induced germination (Keeley 2000) began to appear shortly after the spring 2004 rainy season. The site receives an average of 53 cm of precipitation annually (mostly rain with occasional snow), and the soil is an Ultic Haploxeroll derived of micaceous schist (Moreno and Oechel 1992) with a sandy loam texture and a bulk density of 1.34 g cm−3.
Published estimates of atmospheric N pollution exposure are not available for the research sites; however, data for regions similar to SMER and SOFS are available from the US EPA (http://www.epa.gov/). For SOFS, data averaged for Escondido and Alpine, CA located approximately 55 km from SOFS indicates a mean (±1 SD) annual atmospheric NO2 exposure of 31.4 ± 2.5 μg m−3. For SMER, data from Camp Pendelton Marine Base (33 km to the SW) and Escondido, CA (56 km to the SSE) indicate a potential annual NO2 exposure of 30.8 ± 1.8 μg m−3. Estimates of NH4 + NO3 inputs of atmospheric N deposition derived from throughfall traps (Vourlitis and others unpublished) and a high-resolution (4 km) model (Tonnesen unpublished) suggest that both sites receive approximately 2–4 kg N ha−1 annually.
The experimental layout at each site consisted of a randomized design where four-10 × 10 m plots were randomly selected to receive 50 kg N ha−1 as granular NH4NO3 (added N) in October 2003 and an additional four-10 × 10 m plots served as un-manipulated controls. The δ 15N natural abundance of the NH4NO3 fertilizer was −0.8‰. Given the estimated background levels of atmospheric N deposition (2–4 kg N ha−1 annually), plots exposed to added N received 52–54 kg N ha−1 year−1, whereas control plots received a maximum of 4 kg N ha−1 year−1. The added N treatment is generally higher than the average estimates of N deposition for urban chaparral shrublands (25–35 kg N ha−1 year−1; Riggan and others 1985; Bytnerowicz and Fenn 1996; Fenn and others 2003b); however, the spatial pattern of N deposition in southern California is highly variable and poorly understood, and sites at slightly higher elevations can receive between 40 and 145 kg N ha−1 year−1 (Meixner and Fenn 2004; Fenn and Poth 2004). In light of the large spatial variation in estimated N deposition, we decided to expose the chaparral and CSS shrublands to N deposition levels that were intermediate for low and high elevation southern Californian urban shrublands and forests.
Granular NH4NO3 was added during a single application using a handheld spreader. Given that some of the dry anthropogenic N deposition to southern California shrublands is from gaseous N (Bytnerowicz and Fenn 1996) the use of granular NH4NO3 does not account for possible foliar N uptake. However, drought deciduous CSS shrubs are virtually leafless and the conductance of evergreen shrubs is at a seasonal minimum during the dry summer and fall months (Poole and Miller 1975; Gray and Schlesinger 1981) when the majority of atmospheric dry deposition occurs (Bytnerowicz and Fenn 1996; Padgett and others 1999; Fenn and others 2003a), so foliar N uptake is presumably low when inputs of dry N deposition are at a seasonal maximum. Application of granular N fertilizer also does not simulate potential atmospheric N inputs from wet deposition; however, because wet deposition accounts for only 10–15% of the total atmospheric N deposited to southern California shrublands (Bytnerowicz and Fenn 1996; Padgett and others 1999; Fenn and others 2003a) and rainfall and/or fog events are infrequent during the late summer and early fall, the inability to adequately simulate wet deposition presumably does not limit the ability to determine the effects of dry season N inputs on the short term soil–plant N dynamics.
Field Sampling
Soil and shrub tissue samples were collected quarterly at each site between January 2003 and September 2004 to coincide with the seasonal variation in rainfall (spring = March–April, summer = June–July, fall = September–October, and winter = January), and samples were obtained from 2–4 randomly chosen points in each plot.
Soil samples were obtained from the surface (0–10 cm) and subsurface (30–40 cm) mineral layers using a 4.7 cm diameter × 10 cm deep (173.5 cm3) bucket auger or a 1.8 cm diameter × 10 cm deep (25.5 cm3) T-bar. As opposed to soil surface samples, which were collected quarterly, subsurface soil samples were obtained in the spring and fall. Samples were transferred from the core samplers to polyethylene (Whirl-Pak) sample bags and immediately returned to the lab and stored at 4°C until laboratory analysis (described below).
Mixed anion–cation resin bags (n = 4 per plot) were installed in the surface (0–10 cm) mineral soil following soil sampling. Resin bags consisted of 15 g anion (USF-A244B) and 15 g cation (USF-C211) exchange resin (US Filter, Rockford, IL, USA) that were mixed within 6.25 × 15.0 cm nylon bags (160 mesh). Resin bags were deployed for the first time during the summer 2003 field sampling campaign and were exchanged on a seasonal (3 month) basis. Immediately after field sampling resin bags were returned to the lab and stored at 4°C until analysis.
Approximately 10–15 cm long samples of live apical shoots (leaf + stem) of A. fasciculatum (chaparral) and A. californica and S. mellifera (CSS) shrubs were randomly collected seasonally (n = 2–4 sub-samples per plot). Apical stems were selected because these stems represent current-years growth (Gill and Mahall 1986). Shrub tissue sub-samples collected at each random point were pooled by plot, dried at 70°C for 1 week, and ground to pass through a 40 mesh sieve using a mechanical mill (Thomas-Wiley Mini Mill, Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ, USA).
The potential for N loss from leaching was measured using passive lysimeters (Gee and others 2002) installed 1 m below the soil surface (n = 3 per treatment at each site), which is generally below the surface rooting zone (Jobbagy and Jackson 2000). The lysimeters (Drain Gauge, Decagon, Inc., Pullman, WA, USA) consisted of two parts, a 50 cm long divergence control tube that funneled water into the drain gauge and a 100 cm long × 20.3 cm diameter gauge equipped with a fiberglass wick to hold captured water and a gauge to measure the flow of water through the lysimeters. Gauges were installed in December 2003, and flow rates were monitored by a solid-state datalogger (CR 10X, Campbell Scientific, Inc., Ogden, UT, USA). Water samples retained by the passive lysimeters were retrieved every 3 months using a 50 ml syringe.
Laboratory Analysis
Bulk density was determined from samples collected from the bucket auger because these samples experienced minimal compaction and the volume of the sampler was fixed. The fresh sample was weighed to determine the fresh weight of soil per unit volume and the bulk density was converted to a dry weight basis using the gravimetric soil moisture data (described below). Sub-samples of fresh soil were then removed for gravimetric soil moisture and soil extractable NH4 and NO3 analyses (described below) and the remaining soil was air dried and passed through a 2 mm sieve to remove large rocks and other debris.
Gravimetric soil water content was determined from 10 g of fresh soil that was placed into pre-weighed porcelain crucibles. Soil was then dried at 105°C for 2–4 days and reweighed to determine the soil dry weight. Percent gravimetric soil water was calculated as [(w f-w d)/w d]×100 where w f was the fresh weight of the soil sample and w d was the dry weight of the soil sample after drying at 105°C (Robertson and others 1999).
Extractable NO3-N and NH4-N from soil samples and resin bags was determined as soon as possible (usually 1–4 days) after sample collection. Short-term (up to 1 week) storage at 4°C does not preclude the accumulation of NH4 and NO3 (Binkley and Hart 1989), and unfortunately the potential for inorganic N accumulation during cold storage is unknown for our soils. However, although the absolute value of soil extractable NH4 and NO3 may be affected by cold storage, soils collected from added-N and control plots were stored and processed using the same protocol and relative differences between added-N and control soils were presumably unaffected by cold storage. For soil extractable NH4 and NO4, 10 g of fresh soil was added to 40 ml of 2 M KCl and continuously agitated on an orbital shaker for 1 h (Mulvaney 1996). The supernatant was filtered using a 0.2 μm filter and the NH4−N (Hofer 2001) and NO3−N (Knepel 2001) concentration of the extract was measured colorimetrically using an auto-analyzer (Quikchem 3000, Lachat Instruments, Milwaukee, WI, USA). Soil extractable N concentration determined from fresh soil was converted to a dry soil weight basis using the gravimetric soil moisture data and expressed as the mass of N per unit ground area basis by multiplying the soil extractable N concentration by the soil bulk density. Accumulated NH4−N and NO3−N from resin bags were extracted in a similar manner except that the resin bags were extracted in 100 ml of 2 M KCl. Resin extractable N that accumulated in the resin bags was expressed as a mass of N per bag.
Total N and P of soil and shrub tissue were determined using a micro-Kjeldahl method where 0.4 g of soil or 0.2 g of shrub tissue was digested for 3 h at 390°C in 3.5 ml concentrated H2SO4 and a catalyst containing 1.5 g K2SO4 and 0.015 g Se. Digests were measured colorimetrically for N (Sardina 2001) and P (Sardina 2000) using an auto-analyzer (Quikchem 3000, Lachat Instruments, Milwaukee, WI, USA). Approximately 50 mg of dried soil and 7 mg of dried plant tissue was analyzed for C and N and the δ 15N natural abundance at the Kansas State University, Stable Isotope Mass Spectrometry Laboratory. Isotopic and elemental analysis was conducted using a mass spectrometer (ThermoFinnigan Delta Plus, Thermo Electron, Bremen, Germany) coupled to a CHN analyzer (CE 1110, Carlo-Erba, Milan, Italy), respectively.
The concentration of leached inorganic N retrieved from the passive lysimeters was analyzed colorimetrically for NH4−N (Diamond 2001) and NO3−N (White 2001) using an auto-analyzer (Quikchem 3000, Lachat Instruments, Milwaukee, WI, USA). Leaching rates were calculated as the average concentration of NH4−N or NO3−N (mg N l−1) multiplied by the total flow rate (l cm−2) measured between December 2003 and October 2004.
Statistical Analysis
Differences in response variables as a function of N addition and time were assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Separate ANOVAs were conducted for periods before (winter-fall 2003) and after (winter-fall 2004) N-addition to determine whether response variables differed significantly between control and added N plots before and after N addition. A two-way ANOVA with depth and N addition as fixed effects was performed on the annual average of response variables that did not show a statistically significant temporal trend (that is, total soil N, P, C, and δ15N natural abundance). Data were analyzed using NCSS 2004 statistical software (Hintze 2004). Data were tested for normality and heteroscedasticity prior to analyses, and response variables violating these assumptions were LN-transformed (Zar 1984).
The temporal kinetics of cumulative N capture on anion–cation exchange resins was estimated using an exponential equation of the form N t = N 0[1−exp(-kt)], where N t is the cumulative N extracted from sequential harvest of anion–cation resin bags, N 0 is the maximum potentially accumulated N, and k is the rate constant (Stanford and Smith 1972). This model was chosen over other models (that is, linear or other non-linear models) because the temporal trend in resin accumulated N was non-linear over time and this model is commonly used to describe mineralization kinetics (Stanford and Smith 1972) even though resin accumulated N may not be synonymous with mineralization (Binkley and Hart 1989). Coefficients were estimated using non-linear least-squares regression, and the equality of added N and control cumulative curves was assessed using ANOVA (Hintze 2004).
Mean differences in the total amount of inorganic N leached below the surface (1 m) rooting zone were assessed using a two-tailed t-test (degrees of freedom = 4) on LN-transformed data to satisfy the assumption of normality.
Results
Seasonal Trends in Soil Moisture
Surface (0–10 cm) mineral soil moisture in chaparral during the winter and spring rainy season was 10–11% in 2003 and 5–9% in 2004 (Figure 1a), whereas subsurface (30–40 cm) mineral soil moisture was approximately 8% for both 2003 and 2004 (Figure 1c). During the summer and fall dry season, surface soil moisture was 1–3% in 2003 and 2004 and subsurface soil moisture was 2–4% (Figure 1a, c). In CSS, surface soil moisture in 2003 was 8–10 % during the winter and spring and 2–4 % during the summer and fall, whereas in 2004, surface soil moisture was 4–6 % during the winter and spring and 1–2 % during the summer and fall (Figure 1b). Similarly, subsurface soil moisture was on average 13 and 7% during the spring of 2003 and 2004, respectively, and 6% during the fall of 2003 and 2004 (Figure 1d).
Soil Chemistry
Greater than 94% of the seasonal variation in inorganic N (NH4−N + NO3−N) accumulation on ion exchange resins deployed in the surface (0–10 cm) mineral soil of chaparral and CSS was described by the exponential model. In chaparral, approximately 78% of the total inorganic N accumulation for 2004 occurred during the first 6 months of observation (winter and spring), whereas in CSS nearly 98% of the total inorganic N accumulation occurred during the first 6 months (Figure 2). This period corresponds to the winter and spring rainy season when surface soil moisture content was at a seasonal maximum (Figure 1a, b). Inorganic N accumulation during the last 6 months of observation (summer and fall) was substantially lower for chaparral and CSS (Figure 2), and the decline in resin N accumulation was coincident with a decline in surface soil moisture (Figure 1a, b). Experimental N addition significantly increased the accumulation of inorganic N on ion exchange resins (Figure 2). In chaparral, the mean ± 1 SE (n = 4) resin-accumulated N was 44.4 ± 3.1 and 22.8 ± 5.1 mg N bag−1 year−1 in added N and control plots, respectively (F 2,36 = 30.2; p < 0.001; Figure 2a). In CSS, added N plots accumulated 12.8 ± 2.5 mg N bag−1 year−1 whereas control plots accumulated 7.7 ± 2.3 mg N bag−1 year−1 (F 2,36 = 5.5; p < 0.05; Figure 2b). Most of the resin accumulated N in chaparral and CSS (50–80%) was in the form of NO3−N.
The soil extractable inorganic N (NO3 + NH4) content of the surface mineral soil (0–10 cm) was not significantly affected by N addition (Figure 3a, b); however, the extractable N content of the subsurface (30–40 cm) mineral soil increased significantly in response to N addition for chaparral (F 1,6 = 7.12; p < 0.05; Figure 3c) and CSS (F 1,6 = 5.60; p = 0.05; Figure 3d). Soil extractable N also varied significantly over time in chaparral surface and subsurface soil (Figure 3a, c), but in CSS temporal trends in soil extractable N were less consistent (Figure 3b, d). In general, soil extractable N in chaparral surface soil increased immediately following fire (fall 2003) and reached a maximum value in January 2004, whereas soil extractable N in the subsurface mineral soil was consistently higher in the fall of each year. Prior to the chaparral fire, surface and subsurface soil extractable N was similar in chaparral and CSS (0.5 and 0.2 g N m−2, respectively), but after fire, chaparral control plots had 2–4 times higher soil extractable N pools than CSS control plots (Figure 3). As observed with the resin accumulated inorganic N most (50–80%) of the soil extractable N was in the form of NO3−N.
Added N failed to significantly alter total N, C, and P pools in both chaparral and CSS; however, several variables were significantly affected by soil depth (Table 1). In chaparral, total N, P, and C content, and N:P ratio declined significantly as a function of depth whereas the soil C:N ratio increased significantly as a function of depth (Table 1). In CSS, only total soil C content declined significantly as a function of depth (Table 1). Chaparral soil δ 15N natural abundance increased significantly as a function of N addition and depth, whereas in CSS, soil δ 15N natural abundance increased significantly as a function of depth only (Table 1).
Rates of NH4−N, NO3−N, and total inorganic N leaching in chaparral were 2–3 times higher in added N plots than in control plots; however, high within-treatment variability caused these differences to be statistically insignificant (Table 2). In contrast, no leachate was retrieved from CSS plots during any of the sampling events because the lysimeters were always empty. In addition, no flow was ever recorded from the CSS lysimeters, indicating that rain water was lost as runoff and/or used effectively by CSS shrubs.
Tissue Chemistry
Prior to N addition the tissue N and P concentration of the chaparral shrub A. fasciculatum in added N and control plots was nearly identical and a significant increase in both tissue N (Figure 4a) and P (Figure 4c) occurred after the July 2003 fire. After N addition the tissue N and P concentration was significantly higher in A. fasciculatum shrubs exposed to added N and the relative difference between control and added N shrubs was particularly large during the winter and spring 2004 sample periods. In CSS, the average tissue N and P concentration of A. californica and S. mellifera shrubs prior to N addition was similar in control and added N plots and both declined significantly between the spring and fall 2003 sample dates (Figure 4b, d). After N addition the average tissue N concentration was significantly higher in shrubs exposed to added N (F 1,6 = 16.25; p < 0.01), and tissue N concentration tended to be higher in the winter and spring whereas tissue P concentration tended to be higher during the spring and fall.
Tissue δ 15N natural abundance varied significantly as a function of N addition and time and there were significant interactions between N addition and time for both chaparral and CSS after N addition (Figure 5). Prior to N addition the δ 15N natural abundance for chaparral and CSS shrub tissue increased significantly between the summer and fall 2003 sample campaigns and differences between control and added N plots were negligible. After the addition of NH4NO3 fertilizer, which had a δ 15N natural abundance of −0.8‰ (Figure 5), the tissue δ 15N of A. fasciculatum exposed to added N was consistently lower than shrubs exposed to ambient N (F 1,6 = 11.36; p < 0.05), and these relative differences became larger over time causing a significant N × time interaction (F 3,18 = 3.34; p < 0.05; Figure 5a). In CSS, the average δ 15N natural abundance of A. californica and S. mellifera shrub tissue was significantly higher in added N plots (F 1,6 = 49.44; p < 0.001), and as with chaparral, these relative differences became larger over time causing a significant N × time interaction (F 3,18 = 3.53; p < 0.05; Figure 5b).
The increase in tissue N for chaparral and CSS shrubs exposed to added N caused a decrease in the tissue C:N ratio (Figure 6). Prior to N addition the tissue C:N ratio of A. fasciculatum declined over time and differences between shrubs in control and added N plots were negligible (Figure 6a). After N addition, the A. fasciculatum tissue C:N ratio was on average 5–10 units lower in added N plots between winter and summer (F 1,6 = 8.62; p < 0.05) and the tissue C:N ratio increased significantly over time (F 3,18 = 49.44; p < 0.001; Figure 6a). In CSS, the average tissue C:N ratio of A. californica and S. mellifera shrubs prior to N addition was highest in the spring and fall and differences between added N and control plots were small (Figure 6b). After N addition, the average tissue C:N ratio was consistently 5–10 units lower for CSS shrubs exposed to added N (F 1,6 = 11.20; p < 0.05) and the tissue C:N ratio for both control and added N shrubs was highest in the summer and fall (F 3,18 = 14.04; p < 0.001; Figure 6b).
Discussion
Possible Fate of Added N
Dry N deposition accumulates on vegetation and soil surfaces of chaparral and coastal sage scrub (CSS) ecosystems during the summer and early fall (Bytnerowicz and others 1987; Bytnerowicz and Fenn 1996; Padgett and others 1999; Fenn and others 2003a) and becomes available as a pulse after the onset of winter rainfall (Riggan and others 1985; Fenn and others 2003b). Given the potential for a temporal asynchrony between N availability and biotic demand (Fenn and others 2003b; Meixner and Fenn 2004), we hypothesized that N deposited during the fall would result in a significant but transient increase in available N; however, the aboveground N storage of chaparral and CSS shrubs would not be significantly affected by dry season N inputs because drought-induced limitations in physiological activity constrain the utilization of these available N pulses.
Our results indicate that dry season N addition significantly increased the accumulation of inorganic N (NH4 + NO3) on ion exchange resins deployed in the surface (0–10 cm) mineral soil of chaparral and CSS (Figure 2). In contrast, the surface soil extractable inorganic N pool was not affected by added N whereas the subsurface (30–40 cm) soil extractable N was significantly enhanced by N addition (Figure 3). The lack of correspondence between the resin and soil extractable N data for the surface mineral soil is presumably a function of the integration time associated with each measurement technique. For example, soil extractable N provides an instantaneous estimate of N availability whereas ion exchange resins integrate N availability over a longer period of time providing a potentially better index of N availability (Bundy and Meisinger 1994; Binkley and Hart 1989). Because N accumulation on ion exchange resins is affected by a variety of processes, including N input, mineralization–immobilization reactions, soil transport, plant uptake, and gaseous efflux and/or leaching (Binkley and Hart 1989), the mechanism for the increase in N availability in response to added N is unknown.
Assuming that the ion exchange resins provide an effective index of N availability (Binkley and Hart 1989), these data suggest that only a fraction of the N added was recovered from chaparral and CSS surface mineral soil. For example, accounting for the surface area of the resin bags, an estimated 2.2 and 0.5 g m−2 more inorganic N accumulated in resin bags deployed in added N plots of chaparral and CSS, which amounts to only 44 and 11%, respectively, of the N added as NH4NO3 (5 g N m−2). These data suggest that most of the added N was lost and/or sequestered in other ecosystem N pools.
The mean (±1 SE) annual flux of inorganic N from leaching in the regenerating chaparral stand was 128 ± 28 and 239 ± 70 mg N m−2 in control and added N plots, respectively (p > 0.05; Table 2), suggesting that leaching losses in chaparral stands were not significantly affected by added N. However, the low sample size (n = 3) resulted in low statistical power, and although leaching may not have been statistically different between added N and control chaparral plots, the significantly higher resin accumulated N and subsurface soil extractable N observed in added N plots suggest that bulk soil N transport may have been higher in added N plots. Assuming that chaparral shrubs are deep rooted (Hellmers and others 1955) and added N shrubs responded with increased root production (Kummerow and others 1982), it is possible that large subsurface N transport from bulk flow was assimilated by deep roots before being captured by the lysimeters. In the mature CSS stand; however, no leachate was recovered from the passive lysimeters in 2004 (Table 2). These data suggest that more rainfall was exported by runoff and/or the CSS shrubs were efficient in using the available soil water and N. CSS shrubs have shallower root systems than chaparral shrubs and a more extensive lateral spread of surface roots (Hellmers and others 1955), and CSS shrubs rapidly assimilate available N during the spring growing season (Gray and Schlesinger 1983; Gray 1983). Thus, it is possible that surface soil moisture and N were effectively assimilated by CSS shrubs, limiting the fraction of water and N exported to 1 m. However, CSS is also associated with fine-textured soils that limit the infiltration of water (Westman 1981), suggesting that a larger fraction of water and N was exported by surface runoff in CSS. The relatively smaller difference in resin extractable N between CSS plots exposed to added and ambient N (Figure 2) is consistent with this interpretation.
The increase in aboveground tissue N concentration for chaparral and CSS shrubs exposed to added N (Figure 4) suggests that added N stimulated plant N uptake and increased aboveground N storage. Furthermore, the observed decline in the chaparral and CSS tissue C:N ratio with added N (Figure 6) suggests that short-term increases in tissue C storage per unit added N were minimal (Rastetter and others 1992). However, aboveground tissue N concentration is often a poor indicator of aboveground N pool size because it is sensitive to N uptake, allocation, and aboveground biomass production (Chapin 1980). Although aboveground shrub biomass data are currently being processed, preliminary estimates indicate that the significant differences in aboveground tissue N concentration observed following N addition (Figure 4) probably did not translate to significant differences in aboveground N storage, supporting our hypothesis that the aboveground N storage of chaparral and CSS shrubs would not be significantly affected by dry season N inputs.
There are several other possible avenues of N sequestration and/or loss; however, the importance of these pools and fluxes has not yet been quantified, and thus, remains speculative. First, the relatively high C content and C:N ratio of chaparral and CSS soil (Table 1) and the rapid disappearance of added N in the surface soil (Figure 3) suggest that immobilization of added N was a distinct possibility (Jeffries and Maron 1997; Aber and others 1998; Currie 1999; Micks and others 2004; Sigüenza and others 2005). Secondly, nitrogen loss from gaseous emission of NO and N2O has been found to be several times higher in southern Californian coniferous forests exposed to long-term (decades) atmospheric N deposition and is significantly stimulated by soil moisture (Fenn and others 1996), suggesting that N losses during the winter and spring rainy season, when N accumulation on ion exchange resins was highest (Figure 2), may be substantial. Thirdly, root N uptake and turnover represent a significant avenue of N storage and cycling. Chaparral and CSS shrubs have an estimated root:shoot ratio of approximately 0.5 and store up to 30% of N below ground (Mooney and Rundel 1979; Gray and Schlesinger 1983), and annual fine root production greatly exceeds aboveground production (Kummerow and others 1981) indicating that belowground C and N fluxes are large and dynamic. Furthermore, root production of Mediterranean-type shrubs is significantly stimulated by added N (Kummerow and others 1982), and the chaparral and coastal sage shrubs observed here presumably respond in a similar manner. Herbaceous plants may also sequester large amounts of added N, especially in the recovering chaparral stand where the cover of herbaceous plants increased rapidly following fire. In CSS, however, the cover of annual plants is at least 1–2 orders of magnitude below the cover of A. californica and S. mellifera, and N addition experiments indicate that CSS shrubs are more nitrophilous than herbaceous annuals (Padgett and Allen 1999). Thus, the importance of annual herbs in sequestering added N at the CSS manipulation site is presumably minimal. Finally, as mentioned above, given the relatively steep slope of the study sites, runoff is a potentially important avenue of N loss.
Temporal Trends
Inorganic N accumulation in ion exchange resins was highest during the winter and spring rainy season (Figure 2) when soil moisture was at a seasonal maximum (Figure 1a, b). This result is not surprising given that N accumulation in ion exchange resins is sensitive to temporal variations in mineralization and soil N transport, both of which increase with concomitant increases in soil moisture (Binkley and Hart 1989). However, substantial differences in soil extractable N and resin accumulated N were observed between the chaparral and CSS stands (Figures 2, 3), and although differences in inorganic N pools and fluxes could be caused by many site-specific variables, the largest differences were observed following the July 2003 fire in the chaparral stand. For example, soil extractable N content was on average 0.5 and 0.2 g m−2 in the surface and subsurface mineral soil, respectively, at both sites prior to fire, whereas after fire, chaparral surface and subsurface soil extractable N pools were 1.0 and 0.8 g m−2, respectively, higher in the recently burned chaparral stand (Figure 3). Resin accumulated N was 3–4 times higher in the recently burned chaparral stand (Figure 2), especially during the first 6 months of observation when soil moisture was at a seasonal maximum (Figure 1a, b), suggesting that N mobility and/or mineralization may have been stimulated by fire. Transient increases in soil extractable N pools (DeBano and Conrad 1978; DeBano and others 1979; Dunn and others 1979; Rundel 1983; Stock and Lewis 1986; Grogan and others 2000), N mineralization (Marion and Black 1988), and soil N transport are frequently observed in post-fire chaparral, and differences in resin accumulated N (Figure 2), lysimeter water yield, and N leaching between the CSS and chaparral stands (Table 2) are consistent with differences in pore water (Chorover and others 1994) and stream flow discharges (Riggan and others 1994) observed between mature and recently burned and coniferous forest and chaparral stands.
The tissue N and P concentration of A. fasciculatum also increased substantially following fire (Figure 4a, c) whereas the tissue C:N ratio declined (Figure 6a), a result that is also consistent with those from other regenerating Mediterranean-type ecosystems (Rundel and Parsons 1980; Black 1987; Gillon and others 1999). The initial post-fire increase in tissue N and P is thought to be due to the fire-induced increase in available N (Figure 3) and P (Kutiel and Naveh 1987; Marion and Black 1988) and luxury consumption of N and P in regenerating shrubs (Rundel and Parsons 1980; Gillon and others 1999). However, tissue N and P concentration returned to pre-fire levels by the summer and fall of 2004 (12–15 months post-fire) suggesting that internal N and P were rapidly diluted as shrub biomass production ensued.
The seasonal pattern in tissue N and P concentration observed for CSS shrubs (Figure 4b, d) is consistent with that reported for A. californica and S. mellifera (Gray 1983). Rapid N and P uptake during the winter–spring growing season lead to an increase in tissue N and P concentration; however, internal N and P reserves become diluted during the late spring and summer when biomass production reaches a seasonal peak (Mooney and Rundel 1979; Gray and Schlesinger 1981; Gray 1983). Tissue N and P concentration during the summer and fall continued to decline presumably because low soil moisture during the summer and fall (Figure 1) limited N and P mineralization and/or transport.
Soil δ 15N natural abundance increases with depth because inputs of 15N-depleted litterfall cause surface soil to be depleted in 15N (Nadelhoffer and Fry 1988; Högberg 1997), and the spatial patterns of soil δ 15N natural abundance in chaparral and CSS were consistent with this pattern (Table 1). However, soils exposed to chronic atmospheric N deposition reportedly have a higher δ 15N natural abundance because N deposition enhances processes such as nitrification, leaching, and denitrification that discriminate against 15N (Heaton 1986; Högberg 1991; Emmett and others 1998; Korontzi and others 2000). For chaparral (but not CSS) soil, the enrichment of soil exposed to added N (Table 1) was consistent with this pattern, and presumably, the 15N enrichment of chaparral soil with added N may have stemmed from larger leaching (Table 2) and/or gaseous N losses (Fenn and others 1996).
Plant δ 15N natural abundance is a function of the δ 15N of the source N, although net fractionation of N during uptake may cause tissue δ 15N to be either higher or lower than the soil δ 15N value (Nadelhoffer and Fry 1988; Handley and Raven 1992). Chaparral shrubs are thought to have a deeper rooting depth than CSS shrubs and CSS shrubs tend to have a wider dispersion of surface roots than chaparral shrubs (Hellmers and others 1955). These data imply that chaparral shrubs should acquire more N from deeper soil layers that are relatively more enriched in 15N. However, during the winter and spring of 2003, when plant N uptake is at a seasonal maximum (Gray 1983), tissue δ 15N natural abundance of chaparral and CSS shrubs was strongly depleted (−5.5‰ for A. fasciculatum and −4.2‰ for A. californica and S. mellifera; Figure 5), suggesting that chaparral and CSS shrubs were obtaining N from an 15N-depleted surface soil N source. Between spring and summer 2003 substantial 15N enrichment was observed for chaparral and CSS shrubs, which is presumably due to translocation of plant nitrogen during growth causing enrichment in tissue 15N (Evans 2001). After summer 2003, tissue 15N natural abundance showed little temporal variation for the drought-deciduous CSS shrubs, presumably because of rapid leaf abscission (Gray and Schlesinger 1981). CSS shrubs tend to regenerate a lower percentage of internal reserves than chaparral shrubs (Gray 1983), which may explain why continued 15N enrichment of CSS shrub tissue was not observed during the fall. Similar seasonal patterns for CSS control shrubs were observed in 2004; however, the depletion of tissue 15N was not as pronounced during the spring and summer growing season (Figure 5). The reason for the interannual difference in 15N depletion is unknown but may have been due to interannual differences in soil moisture (Figure 1), which affect N mineralization and availability and/or nutrient acquisition by CSS shrubs.
Seasonal variations in the tissue 15N for chaparral shrubs after summer 2003 were more difficult to interpret owing to the fire. Fire causes significant mortality of surface roots (Neary and others 1999) and increases the δ 15N value of soil (Handley and Raven 1992), thus regenerating shrubs typically acquire available N from deeper soil horizons that are enriched in 15N (Högberg 1997; Grogan and others 2000). Leaching losses of N also cause soil 15N enrichment (Högberg 1991; Emmett and others 1998), and leaching losses were larger in the regenerating chaparral stand (Table 2). Both these fire-induced alterations to the chaparral N cycle could explain the substantial tissue 15N enrichment observed for chaparral shrubs after summer 2003 (Figure 5). In contrast, A. fasciculatum is an evergreen chaparral shrub, and after the initial increase in tissue N following fire (Figure 4a), A. fasciculatum would presumably regenerate internal N more efficiently than CSS shrubs (Gray 1983), again causing tissue 15N enrichment (Evans 2001). Unfortunately, neither explanation can be excluded given the data provided.
Added N significantly altered the tissue δ 15N natural abundance of chaparral and CSS shrubs (Figure 5); however, the response was not consistent between shrubland types. For example, CSS shrubs exposed to added N were significantly more enriched in 15N than control shrubs, and when averaged for the year, the δ 15N of CSS shrubs exposed to added N (−0.6‰) was closer to the δ15N of the NH4NO3 fertilizer (−0.8‰) than the control shrubs (−2.4‰) (Figure 5). Again, assuming that the tissue δ 15N natural abundance is broadly indicative of the source N (Nadelhoffer and Fry 1988; Handley and Raven 1992), these data suggest that the fertilizer N source deposited during the dry season was an important source of N for CSS shrubs exposed to added N. The N fertilizer response of regenerating chaparral shrubs is more difficult to interpret; however, the tissue 15N of regenerating shrubs in control plots may be substantially enriched in 15N if these shrubs acquired a larger proportion of available N from deeper soil horizons and/or were more efficient in recycling internal N reserves (Högberg 1997; Grogan and others 2000). In contrast, chaparral shrubs in added N plots would also have access to a NH4NO3 fertilizer source that was presumably depleted in 15N (δ 15N = −0.8‰) relative to the ambient source N, which may explain the relative tissue 15N depletion of chaparral in added N plots (Högberg 1991; Handley and Raven 1992). Without information on the δ 15N natural abundance of the ambient source N this interpretation is clearly speculative.
Caveats, Limitations, and Implications
Our data suggest that a small portion of the N added during summer dry season was incorporated into chaparral and CSS available soil N pools following winter rainfall, which altered tissue chemistry of the dominant chaparral CSS shrubs. However, this research has many caveats that limit the potential for extrapolating our results to the anthropogenic N deposition regime of southern California. First, the use of NH4NO3 fertilizer as a surrogate atmospheric N source does not simulate N input from wet deposition and may not adequately simulate N input of gaseous and particulate N, which are important constituents of dry deposition in southern California (Bytnerowicz and Fenn 1996; Fenn and others 2003a). Secondly, the amount of N added (50 kg N ha−1) is consistent with maximum N deposition observed in extremely polluted areas of southern California but is approximately two times higher than the average annual N deposition observed for most polluted chaparral and CSS shrublands (Riggan and others 1985; Fenn and others 2003a; Fenn and Poth 2004). Thirdly, the scale of our experiment, the divergent fire history, and the lack of replication for chaparral and CSS stands severely limit the potential for direct comparison of the chaparral and CSS response to added N and precludes the extrapolation of these results to other southern Californian chaparral and CSS ecosystems. Finally, many of the key N pools and fluxes, such as microbial immobilization, root and herbaceous annual N uptake and storage, and gaseous N emission are currently unknown but subject to ongoing research. Thus, the mechanisms of how N addition altered N storage and cycling are poorly understood making interpretation of these data speculative.
Given these limitations, our initial observations suggest that dry season N additions can significantly and rapidly alter N availability in Mediterranean-type chaparral and CSS shrublands of southern California. However, potentially significant but unsubstantiated losses of added N suggest that the semi-arid terrestrial ecosystems studied here were unable to sequester high dry season N inputs. Leaching losses of N, though not significantly different between added N and control plots, suggest substantial export of dry-season-derived N from recovering chaparral stands. Given the potential for large N losses from post-fire chaparral, groundwater and aquatic systems, which are critical sources for drinking water for urban, suburban, and rural populations of southern California, may be particularly vulnerable to high levels of atmospheric N deposition. This interpretation is consistent with research conducted in southern Californian coniferous forests (Fenn and Poth 1999) and regenerating chaparral stands (Riggan and others 1994) exposed to chronic atmospheric N deposition. Continued N addition will provide the opportunity to assess the longer term response of Mediterranean-type shrublands to dry-season N inputs and the potential for these semi-arid shrublands to sequester and/or export added N.
References
Aber J, McDowell W, Nadelhoffer K, Magill A, Berntson G, Kamakea M, McNulty S, Currie W, Rustad L, Fernandez I. 1998. Nitrogen saturation in temperate forest ecosystems. BioScience 48:921–34
Bilbrough CJ, Caldwell MM. 1997. Exploitation of springtime ephemeral N pulses by six great basin plant species. Ecology 78:231–43
Binkley D, Hart SC. 1989. The components of nitrogen availability assessments in forest soils. Adv Soil Sci 10:57–112
Black CH. 1987. Biomass, nitrogen, and phosphorus accumulation over a southern California fire cycle chronosequence. Plant Response to Stress-Functional Analysis in Mediterranean Ecosystems. In: Tenhunen JD, Catarino FM, Lange OL, Oechel WC, Eds. New York: Springer. p 445–58
Bundy LG, Meisinger JJ. 1994. Nitrogen availability indices. Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Microbiolgical and biochemical properties. In: Weaver RW, Angle S, Bottomley P, Bezdicek D, Smith S, Tabatabai A, Wollum A, Eds. Soil Science Society of America Book Series No. 5, Soil Science Society of America, Madison. p 951–84
Bytnerowicz A, Fenn ME. 1996. Nitrogen deposition in California forests: a review. Environ Pollution 92:127–46
Bytnerowicz A, Miller PR, Olszyk DM. 1987. Dry deposition of nitrate, ammonium, and sulfate to a Ceanothus crassifolius canopy and surrogate surfaces. Atmos Environ 21:1749–57
Carpenter S, Caraco NF, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Sharpley AN, Smith VH. 1998. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Issues in Ecology 3, Ecological Society of America. pp. 12
Chapin FS III. 1980. The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–60
Chorover J, Vitousek PM, Everson DA, Esperanza AM, Turner D. 1994. Solution chemistry profiles of mixed-conifer forests before and after fire. Biogeochemistry 26:115–44
Currie WS. 1999. The responsive C and N biogeochemistry of the temperate forest floor. Trends Ecol Evol 14:316–20
Davis FW, Michaelsen J. 1995. Sensitivity of fire regime in chaparral ecosystems to climate change. Global Change and Mediterranean-type Ecosystems. In: Moreno JM and Oechel WC, Eds, Ecological studies 117, New York: Springer, p 435–56
DeBano LF, Conrad CE. 1978. The effect of fire on nutrients in a chaparral ecosystem. Ecology 59:489–97
DeBano LF, Eberlein GE, Dunn PH. 1979. Effects of burning on chaparral soils: I. soil nitrogen. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:504–9
Diamond D. 2001. Determination of ammonia in soil extracts by flow injection analysis. Lachat QuikChem Method 12-107-06-3-C, Milwaukee: Lachat Instruments
D’Odorico P, Laio F, Porporato A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 2003. Hydrologic controls on soil carbon and nitrogen cycles. II. A case study. Adv Water Resour 26:59–70
Dunn PH, DeBano LF, Eberlein GE. 1979. Effects of burning on chaparral soils: II. Soil microbes and nitrogen mineralization. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:509–14
Emmett BA, Kjonaas OJ, Gundersen P, Koopmans C, Tietema A, Sleep D. 1998. Natural abundance of 15N in forests across a nitrogen deposition gradient. Forest Ecol Manage 101:9–18
Evans RD. 2001. Physiological mechanisms influencing plant nitrogen isotope composition. Trends Plant Sci 6:121–6
Fenn ME, Poth MA. 1999. Temporal and spatial trends in streamwater nitrate concentrations in the San Bernardino Mountains, southern California. J Environ Qual 28:822–36
Fenn ME, Poth MA. 2004. Monitoring nitrogen deposition in throughfall using ion exchange resin columns: A field test in the San Bernardino Mountains. J Environ Qual 33:2007–14
Fenn ME, Poth MA, Johnson DW. 1996. Evidence for nitrogen saturation in the San Bernardino Mountains in southern California. Forest Ecol Manage 82:211–30
Fenn ME, Poth MA, Aber JD, Baron JS, Bormann BT, Johnson DW, Lemly AD, McNulty SG, Ryan DF, Stottlemyer R. 1998. Nitrogen excess in North American ecosystems: predisposing factors, ecosystem responses, and management strategies. Ecol Appl 8:706–33
Fenn ME, Baron JS, Allen EB, Rueth HM, Nydick KR, Geiser L, Bowman WD, Sickman JO, Meixner T, Johnson DW, Neitlich P. 2003a. Ecological effects of nitrogen deposition in the western United States. Bioscience 53:404–420
Fenn ME, Haeuber R, Tonnesen GS, Baron JS, Grossman-Clarke S, Hope D, Jaffe DA, Copeland S, Geiser L, Rueth HN, Sickman JO. 2003b. Nitrogen emissions, deposition, and monitoring in the western United States. Bioscience 53:391–403
Galloway JN, Levy H III, Kasibhatla PS. 1994. Year 2020: consequences of population growth and development on deposition of oxidized nitrogen. Ambio 23:120–3
Gee GW, Ward AL, Caldwell TG, Ritter JC. 2002. A vadose zone water fluxmeter with divergence control. Water Resources Research 38:10.1029/2001WR000816
Gill BS, Mahall BE. 1986. Quantitative phenology and water relations of and evergreen and deciduous chaparral shrub. Ecol Monogr 56:127–43
Gillon D, Houssard C, Valette JC, Rigolot E. 1999. Nitrogen and phosphorus cycling following prescribed burning in natural and managed Aleppo pine forests. Can J Forest Res 29:1237–47
Gray JT. 1983. Nutrient use by evergreen and deciduous shrubs in southern California. I. Community nutrient cycling and nutrient-use efficiency. J Ecol 71:21–41
Gray JT, Schlesinger WH. 1981. Biomass, production, and litterfall in the coastal sage scrub of Southern California. Am J Botany 68:24–33
Gray JT, Schlesinger WH. 1983. Nutrient use by evergreen and deciduous shrubs in Southern California. II. Experimental investigations of the relationship between growth, nitrogen uptake, and nitrogen availability. J Ecol 71:43–56
Grogan P, Burns TD, Chapin FS III. 2000. Fire effects on ecosystem nitrogen cycling in a Californian bishop pine forest. Oecologia 122:537–44
Handley LL, Raven JA. 1992. The use of natural abundance of nitrogen isotopes in plant physiology and ecology. Plant Cell Environ 15:965–85
Heaton THE. 1986. Isotopic studies of nitrogen pollution in the hydrosphere and atmosphere: a review. Chem Geol 59:87–102
Hellmers H, Horton JS, Juhren G, O’Keefe J. 1955. Root systems of some chaparral plants in southern California. Ecology 36:667–78
Hintze J. 2004. NCSS and PASS. Number Cruncher Statistical Systems, Kaysville, UT, USA. http://www.NCSS.com
Hofer S. 2001. Ammonia (Salicylate) in 2M KCl soil extracts. Lachat QuikChem Method 12-107-06-2-A, Lachat Instruments, Inc., Milwaukee, WI, USA
Högberg P. 1991. Development of 15N enrichment in a nitrogen-fertilized forest plant–soil system. Soil Biol Biochem 23:335–338
Högberg P. 1997. 15N natural abundance in soil–plant systems. Tansley Review No. 95. New Phytol 137:179–203
Jefferies RL, Maron JL. 1997. The embarrassment of riches: atmospheric deposition of nitrogen and community and ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol 12:74–8
Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB. 2000. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol Appl 10:423–36
Keeley JE. 2000. Chaparral. North American terrestrial vegetation, 2nd Edn. In: Barbour MG, Billings WD, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 203–54
Knecht AA. 1971. Soil Survey for Western Riverside Area California. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service
Knepel K. 2001. Nitrate in 2M KCl soil extracts. Lachat QuikChem Method 12-107-04-1-B, Milwaukee: Lachat Instruments
Korontzi S, Macko SA, Anderson IC, Poth MA. 2000. A stable isotopic study to determine carbon and nitrogen cycling in a disturbed southern California forest ecosystem. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 14:177–188
Kummerow J, Montenegro G, Krause D. 1981. Biomass, phenology and growth. In: Miller PC, editor. Resource use by Chaparral and Matorral. New York: Springer, pp 69–96
Kummerow J, Avila G, Aljaro ME, Araya S, Montenegro G. 1982. Effect of fertilizer on fine root density and shoot growth in Chilean matorral. Botanical Gazette 143:498–504
Kutiel P, Naveh Z. 1987. The effect of fire on nutrients in a pine forest. Plant Soil 104:269–74
Li X, Meixner T, Sickman JO, Miller AE, Schimel JP, Melack JM. 2006. Decadal-scale dynamics of water, carbon and nitrogen in a California chaparral ecosystem: DAYCENT modeling results. Biogeochemistry 77:217–45
Marion GM, Black CH. 1988. Potentially available nitrogen and phosphorus along a chaparral fire cycle chronosequence. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:1155–62
Meixner T, Fenn ME. 2004. Biogeochemical budgets in a Mediterranean catchment with high rates of atmospheric N deposition−importance of scale and temporal asynchrony. Biogeochemistry 70:331–56
Micks P, Aber JD, Boone RD, Davidson EA. 2004. Short-term soil respiration and nitrogen immobilization response to nitrogen applications in control and nitrogen-enriched temperate forests. Forest Ecol Manage 196:57–70
Mooney HA, Rundel PW. 1979. Nutrient relations of the evergreen shrub, Adenostoma fasciculatum, in the California chaparral. Botanical Gazette 140:109–13
Moreno JM, Oechel WC. 1992. Factors controlling postfire seedling establishment in southern California chaparral. Oecologia 90:50–60
Mulvaney RL. 1996. Nitrogen-inorganic forms. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai A, Johnson CT, Sumner ME, Eds. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America Book Series No. 5, Soil Science Society of America, Madison. p 1123–84
Munz PA. 1974. A flora of Southern California. Berkeley: University of California Press. p 1086
Nadelhoffer KJ, Fry B. 1988. Controls on natural nitrogen-15 and carbon-13 abundances in forest soil organic matter. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:1633–1640
Neary DG, Klopatek CC, Debano LF, Ffolliott PF. 1999. Fire effects on belowground sustainability: a review and synthesis. Forest Ecol Manage 122:51–71
Oechel WC, Lawrence W, Mustafa J, Martinez J. 1981. Energy and carbon utilization. In: Miller PC, Ed. Resource use by Chaparral and Matorral. New York: Springer, pp 151–83
Padgett PE, Allen EB. 1999. Differential responses to nitrogen fertilization in native shrubs and exotic annuals common to Mediterranean coastal sage scrub of California. Plant Ecol 144:93–101
Padgett PE, Allen EB, Bytnerowicz A, Minich RA. 1999. Changes in soil inorganic nitrogen as related to atmospheric nitrogenous pollutants in southern California. Atmos Environ 33:769–81
Paul EA, Clark FE. 1989. Soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic, San Diego
Poole DK, Miller PC. 1975. Water relations of selected species of chaparral and coastal sage communities. Ecology 56:1118–1128
Rastetter EB, McKane RB, Shaver GR, Melillo JM. 1992. Changes in C storage by terrestrial ecosystems: How C–N interactions restrict responses to CO2 and temperature. Water Air Soil Pollut 64:327–44
Reichstein M, Tenhunen JD, Roupsard O, Ourcival JM, Rambal S., Dore S, Valentini R. 2002. Ecosystem respiration in two Mediterranean evergreen Holm Oak forests: drought effects and decomposition dynamics. Global Change Biol 16:27–39
Riggan PJ, Lockwood RN, Lopez EN. 1985. Deposition and processing of airborne nitrogen pollutants in Mediterranean-type ecosystems of southern California. Environ Sci Technol 19:781–9
Riggan PJ, Lockwood RN, Jacks PM, Coiver CG. 1994. Effects of fire severity on nitrate mobilization in watersheds subject to chronic atmospheric deposition. Environ Sci Technol 28:369–75
Robertson GP, Coleman DC, Bledsoe CS, Sollins P. 1999. Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New York
Rundel PW. 1983. Impact of fire on nutrient cycles in Mediterranean-type ecosystems with reference to chaparral. In: Kruger FJ, Mitchell DT, Jarvis JUM, Eds. Mediterranean-type ecosystems: the role of nutrients. New York: Springer, pp 192–207
Rundel PW, Parsons DJ. 1980. Nutrient changes in two chaparral shrubs along a fire-induced age gradient. Am J Botany 67:51–8
Sardina A. 2000. Total phosphorus in Kjeldahl digests. Lachat QuikChem Method 13-115-01-1-B, Milwaukee: Lachat Instruments
Sardina A. 2001. Total nitrogen in Kjeldahl digests of soils and plants: block digestor method. Lachat QuikChem Method 13-107-06-2-D, Milwaukee: Lachat Instruments
Sigüenza C, Crowley DE, Allen EB. 2005. Soil microorganisms of a native shrub and exotic grasses along a nitrogen deposition gradient in Southern California. Appl Soil Ecol, in press
Stanford G, Smith SJ. 1972. Nitrogen mineralization potentials of soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 36:465–72
Stock WD, Lewis OAM. 1986. Soil nitrogen and the role of fire as a mineralizing agent in a South African coastal fynbos ecosystem. J Ecol 74:317–28
United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) (1995) National primary drinking water regulations, Report number EPA 811-F-95-002-C. Washington, DC
Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson PA, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman DG. 1997. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol Appl 7:737–50
Vourlitis GL, Zorba G. 2007. Nitrogen and carbon mineralization of semi-arid shrubland soil exposed to long-term atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Biol Fertility Soils doi:10.1007/s00374-006-0137-y
Westman WE. 1981. Factors influencing the distribution of species of Californian coastal sage scrub. Ecology 62:439–455
White J. 2001. Determination of nitrate by flow injection analysis. Lachat QuikChem Method 12-107-04-1-G, Milwaukee: Lachat Instruments
Zar JH 1984. Biostatistical analysis, 2nd Edn. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, p 718
Acknowledgments
This research was supported in part by the NSF-CAREER (DEB-0133259) and NIH-NIGMS-SCORE (S06 GM 59833) programs. The authors thank Robert Mustard and David Faber for elemental analysis, R. Fagan of the Kansas State University-Stable Isotope Mass Spectrometry Laboratory (SIMSL) for conducting the stable isotope analyses, and the over 25 graduate and undergraduate student assistants whose effort made this research possible. Permission to use the SOFS and SMER research sites was graciously granted by the SDSU Field Station Programs. Comments provided by S. Hastings (SDSU) and E. Allen (UCR) of earlier versions of this manuscript are gratefully appreciated.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vourlitis, G.L., Pasquini, S. & Zorba, G. Plant and Soil N Response of Southern Californian Semi-arid Shrublands After 1 Year of Experimental N Deposition. Ecosystems 10, 263–279 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-007-9030-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-007-9030-2