Introduction

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) has become a first-line treatment of choice for noncommunicating hydrocephalus, though use of ETV in younger infants is still controversial because of its poor success rate [1, 24]. Some recent evidence suggests that the rate of success of ETV is not age-dependent but etiology-dependent, and that ETV has a lower rate of success for hydrocephalus associated with myeloschisis than other conditions [58]. On the other hand, for patients older than 1 year of age who have already been shunted, ETV has a higher rate of success than for patients undergoing primary treatment, including those with myeloschisis [4, 916]. However, patients with myeloschisis are known to have various degrees and types of cerebral and cerebellar malformations other than Chiari II malformation, some of which could be causes of failure of ETV [6, 1722].

In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the findings of radiological examination of ventricular and paraventricular anatomy of patients with myeloschisis and intraoperative videos of endoscopically treated patients. We then characterized the anatomical features related to success or failure of ETV in patients with myeloschisis.

Materials and methods

Between January 2000 and April 2007, 18 patients underwent V-P shunt placement within 1 month after repair of myeloschisis as primary treatment, and two patients were observed conservatively according to our treatment algorithm (Fig. 1). Only one patient, who was transferred from another hospital at 3 months of age, underwent ETV as a primary procedure after confirmation of both noncommunicating hydrocephalus by CT ventriculography and lack of narrowing of the third ventricular floor and prepontine cistern by MRI. Two patients underwent ETV as a secondary procedure for shunt malfunction at the ages of 15 months and 7 years. Neither had narrowing of the third ventricle floor or prepontine cistern. ETV was performed with a small-diameter, rigid-rod neuroendoscope with a working channel (Oi-HandyPro: Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) [23].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Diagram of the treatment algorithm for patients with myeloschisis and hydrocephalus

Radiological and endoscopic findings for these 21 patients with myeloschisis were reviewed retrospectively. In the case of radiological examination, those findings that could interfere with the procedures of endoscopic surgery were evaluated by preoperative MRI or CT scans, such as huge massa intermedia, sloping of the third ventricular floor associated with elongation of the brainstem, narrow anteroposterior length of the third ventricular floor, and narrow prepontine cistern with crowding of the posterior fossa. When evaluation of a finding was difficult due to lack of sagittal view on MRI or CT scans, the case involved was omitted from analysis. In the case of endoscopic examination, the existence of a narrow foramen of Monro, hypertrophy of the anterior commissure, sloping of the third ventricular floor, huge massa intermedia, and opaque third ventricular floor were evaluated by reviewing video tapes of the operations.

Results

The anatomical features that could interfere with the procedures of endoscopic surgery as evaluated by preoperative MRI or CT scans were as follows (Table 1): (1) huge massa intermedia in 12 of 19 cases (63.2%), (2) steep slope of the third ventricular floor associated with elongation of the brainstem in 3 of 10 cases (30%), (3) narrow anteroposterior length of the floor of the third ventricle in 2 of 10 cases (20%), and (4) narrow prepontine cistern with crowding of the posterior fossa in 8 of 21 cases (38.1%) (Fig. 2). The only patient who underwent ETV as primary treatment had neither a narrow third ventricular floor nor a narrow prepontine cistern, and ETV was safely performed (Figs. 3 and 4).

Fig. 2
figure 2

MR images of a newborn with myeloschisis demonstrate typical findings of fused thalamus (huge massa intermedia), narrow anteroposterior length of the third ventricular floor, and narrow prepontine cistern with crowding of the posterior fossa associated with colpocephalic dilation of the lateral ventricles. The patient underwent V-P shunt placement after repair of myeloschisis

Fig. 3
figure 3

MR images of another patient who underwent ETV as primary treatment at the age of 3 months also demonstrate huge massa intermedia, though neither the third ventricular floor nor the prepontine cistern is narrow, and ETV was safely performed

Fig. 4
figure 4

a Endoscopic view of the right foramen of Monro in the same patient as in Fig. 3. b Huge massa intermedia (arrow). c Opaque third ventricular floor

Table 1 Anatomical features that may interfere with procedures of endoscopic surgery as evaluated by preoperative MRI or CT scan

Endoscopic findings were as follows (Table 2): (a) a narrow foramen of Monro was found in none of the patients in our series, (b) hypertrophy of the anterior commissure was found in one of three cases (Fig. 5), (c) sloping of the third ventricular floor was found in one of three cases (Fig. 6), (d) huge massa intermedia were found in all three cases, and (e) opaque third ventricular floors were found in all three cases (Figs. 4 and 6).

Fig. 5
figure 5

A 7-year-old girl with shunt malfunction. a MRI demonstrates large massa intermedia, though neither the anteroposterior length of the third ventricular floor nor the prepontine cistern is narrow. The anterior commissure is large (arrow), and b endoscopic view reveals a large anterior commissure seen within the foramen of Monro

Fig. 6
figure 6

A 15-month-old boy with shunt malfunction. MRI reveals sloping of the third ventricular floor (a), and, although the intraoperative endoscopic view shows an opaque third ventricular floor (b), ETV procedures could be completed (c)

Table 2 Endoscopic findings for ventricular anatomy in patients with ETV

A huge massa intermedia and opaque third ventricular floor were identified in all ETV cases but did not interfere with the endoscopic procedures with the Oi-HandyPro. None of the patients who underwent ETV exhibited the above-noted radiological findings 3 or 4, and the endoscopic procedures were safely performed in them. ETV was successful in two previously shunted patients but failed in one patient undergoing primary treatment.

Discussion

Shunt surgeries for pediatric hydrocephalus are established methods of treatment but feature high rates of complication, especially in young infants [24]. Although endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) has become a first-line treatment of choice for noncommunicating hydrocephalus [25], use of it in infants is still controversial [14]. One reason for the poor rate of success of ETV in infants may involve specific features of CSF dynamics, in which the major CSF pathway has not developed and the minor pathway plays a significant role in transmission of CSF [26]. Another possibility is that altered ventricular and paraventricular anatomy interferes with procedures, especially in patients with myeloschisis [1, 6, 1722]. Anatomical abnormalities associated with myeloschisis that may interfere with endoscopic procedures have been reported to include the following: (1) narrow foramen of Monro, (2) huge massa intermedia, (3) large anterior commissure, (4) narrow third ventricular floor, (5) opaque third ventricular floor, (6) sloping of the third ventricle floor associated with elongation of the brainstem, (7) narrow prepontine cistern with crowding of the posterior fossa, and (8) thick arachnoid adhesions in the prepontine cistern [6, 1722]. The small-diameter, rigid-rod Oi-HandyPro neuroendoscope is a useful piece of equipment to perform safe procedures even through small corridors such as narrow foramen of Monro [23], but narrow third ventricular floor and prepontine cistern were considered as contraindications of ETV [1]. Therefore, our treatment strategy for hydrocephalus associated with myeloschisis is to perform shunt surgery as primary treatment if necessary. Then, ETV was performed in patients with shunt malfunction only when narrowing of the third ventricular floor and the prepontine cistern were excluded by the preoperative image (Fig. 1).

In this retrospective study, almost all of the above-noted findings (1 to 8) were identified radiologically and/or endoscopically. Peretta et al. reported that, in 7 patients (3 with myelomeningocele) of 355 undergoing ETV, endoscopic procedures were aborted due to significant alterations in the anatomy of the foramen of Monro and the third ventricular floor [27], though in our small series, no procedures were aborted. This is probably because, as already mentioned, we selected candidate for ETV by preoperative imaging. Although in all our three patients with ETV the foramen of Monro was not narrow, huge massa intermedia and opaque third ventricular floor were identified in all the cases, but the procedures were performed safely by the Oi-HandyPro neuroendoscope [23].

Because ETV for pediatric hydrocephalus has a higher rate of success in patients who have already been shunted than in those undergoing primary treatment [4, 916], ETV should be considered when patients have been diagnosed with shunt malfunction. However, in patients with narrowing of the third ventricular floor and/or prepontine cistern, shunt revision should be considered. In addition, if these findings are identified intraoperatively during an attempt at ETV, prompt conversion to shunt surgery is very important to avoid unnecessary injury of vital structures and severe complications.

Conclusions

Huge massa intermedia and opaque third ventricular floor were frequently observed in patients with myeloschisis but did not interfere with endoscopic procedures in our series. The small-diameter, rigid-rod Oi-HandyPro neuroendoscope with high-resolution imaging was useful for this particular population of patients. However, shunt revision should be considered in patients with narrow anteroposterior length of the third ventricular floor and/or narrow prepontine cistern with crowding of the posterior fossa.