Introduction

Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) metastasizes primarily to central lymph node (CLN). The necessity for central lymph node dissection (CLND) is controversial [13]. CLND is generally recommended in high-risk patients with old age, a large tumor, extrathyroidal extension, and so on [4, 5]. It is currently presumed that CLN metastasis is associated with high risk of locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis but do not directly correlate with survival rate [1, 6, 7]. Although nodal metastasis or recurrence does not affect survival rate directly, it can affect increased morbidity and mortality rate due to repeated surgery [810]. According to TNM classification established by the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) and the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC; 2002, 6th edition), the number of lymph node metastasis is one of the cardinal prognostic factors in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas [11]. N stage in PTC is divided into N1a and N1b according to the location of metastatic nodes. However, clinical implications of the number of metastatic lymph nodes in PTC has not been well understood. In addition, the prognostic significance of the number of CLN in PTC has not been determined and has been overlooked. Therefore, the direction of treatment according to the number of the CLN has not been issued well.

The slow and insidious disease progression of PTC disturbs a large, prospective, randomized study and entails controversy as to the ideal therapeutic modality [4, 12]. These problems make it difficult to clarify the prognostic function of some factors when they are analyzed with survival and local control rates. Male gender, older age, large tumor size, and massive extrathyroidal extension are known poor prognostic factors [5, 1315]. These factors have been anticipated to be relevant to local control rate rather than survival rate.

This study was designed to evaluate the prognostic value of the number of CLN metastasis in PTC. We investigated the relationship between the number of CLN metastasis and previously known prognostic factors, such as age, sex, tumor size, extrathyroidal extension, and lateral neck lymph node metastasis.

Methods

Study populations

A retrospective medical chart review of patients who were diagnosed with papillary thyroid cancer and treated at a Pusan National University Hospital from March 2008 to June 2009 was performed. This study was approved by the institutional review board. Preoperative assessment for cervical lymph node metastasis included a high-resolution ultrasound scan, fine needle aspiration cytology, and a computerized tomography (CT) scan. Based on this preoperative data, enrolled patients underwent total thyroidectomy with CLND, with or without lateral neck dissection (LND). Procedures for follicular, medullary, and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas were excluded from this analysis. Patients who underwent CLND for recurrent PTC after thyroidectomy also were excluded.

Surgical technique

Bilateral CLND was performed routinely accompanied with total thyroidectomy. This dissection was performed completely according to our techniques, previously described by Lee et al. [16].

The surgical technique for CLND is as follows. The recurrent laryngeal nerve is usually identified distally near the lower border of the cricothyroid muscle. After the thyroid is removed, the nerve is dissected retrograde to the point where it courses under the clavicles, the innominate artery, or the right carotid artery. The fibrofatty tissues are dissected off the nerve and usually reflected medially, and then dissected off the trachea. If possible, the specimen is removed en bloc. However, additional nodal tissues that are deep to the right recurrent laryngeal nerve may be removed separately. Particular attention is given to identify the parathyroid glands, and autotransplantation of the parathyroid glands was performed only when their vascularity was compromised. If there was a positive or suspicious finding in the lateral neck lymph node on radiographic finding, LND was accompanied. When multiple metastatic CLN were identified from frozen biopsy after ipsilateral CLND to tumor side, LND was performed even if it was clinically negative for lateral neck lymph nodes. LND comprehended the level II, III, and IV lymph nodes. Tumor size, extrathyroidal extension, lateral neck lymph node metastasis and the number of CLN metastasis were verified postoperatively with histopathology reports.

Relationship between the number of CLN metastasis and prognostic factors

Patients were divided into three groups—A, B, C—according to the number of metastatic lymph nodes when defining the relationship between tumor size, extrathyroidal extension, or lateral neck lymph nodes and the number of metastatic CLN. Group A had no CLN metastasis, group B had one or two nodal metastases, and group C had more than two nodal metastases. Instead of survival rate, we analyzed the relationship between generally accepted prognostic factors and the number of CLN metastasis due to short follow-up period. Age, gender, tumor size, extrathyroidal extension, and lateral neck lymph node metastasis were included. At first we analyzed whether risk factors were related to the rate of CLN metastasis. The rate of metastasis was defined as proportion of the patients with CLN metastasis in each group (patients with metastatic CLN/patients with or without risk factor) without considering the number of CLN metastasis. After finding significant risk factors, we analyzed the relationship between the risk factors and the number of CLN metastasis.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 15.0 software (Chicago, IL). When analyzing correlation between risk factors, which contains age group (<45, ≥45 years), gender, extrathyroidal extension, and lateral neck lymph node metastasis and the rate of CLN metastasis, a chi-square test was applied. The relationship between gender and the number of CLN metastasis was analyzed with a t test. The correlation between tumor size and the number of CLN metastasis was estimated with linear regression tests and Tukey tests. A logistic regression test was used to evaluate the relationship between the number of CLN metastasis and some risk factors, containing extrathyroidal extension and lateral neck lymph node metastasis.

Results

Demographic findings

A total of 258 patients were eligible for this study (222 women and 36 men; mean age, 49.8 years). Mean ages of men and women were 50.7 (±12.51) and 49.6 (±14.32) years, respectively. Mean follow-up period was 13.4 (±7.11) months. Most patients underwent total thyroidectomy with CLND (n = 182). Based on the indication mentioned above, LND combined with total thyroidectomy and CLND was performed in the remaining 76 patients. Group A had 113 patients, group B had 73 patients, and group C had 72 patients. Extrathyroidal extension was observed in 140 patients and lateral neck lymph node metastasis was found in 58 patients; and 18 patients presented only suspicious findings. Most patients with metastasis in the lateral neck also had metastatic node in CLN (56/58) except two patients, who presented skipped metastatic nodes in the lateral neck.

Age and gender

Seventy-one patients were younger than age 45 years, and 43 of these patients had positive CLN metastasis (60.6%). It did not differ from the rate of CLN metastasis in older patients (54.5%). The rate of CLN metastasis did not change according to gender (Table 1). Age and gender did not affect the rate of CLN metastasis. It was also found that age was not significantly related to the number of CLN metastasis (Pearson correlation = −0.073, P = 0.246). The average number of CLN metastasis in men and women was 2.47 (±0.48) and 1.86 (±1.76), respectively. There was no significant difference (P = 0.251). Age and gender seemed to have no effect on the rate or the number of CLN metastasis.

Table 1 Correlation between risk factors and CLN metastasis

Tumor size

We used to two methods to investigate the relationship between the number of CLN metastasis and tumor size. With the linear regression method, the size of primary tumors increased as the number of CLN metastasis increased (correlation coefficient = 0.277, P < 0.05; Fig. 1). Although the positive correlation between the number of metastatic CLN and tumor size was found, there were still many micropapillary thyroid cancer (<1 cm) that presented multiple CLN metastasis. The mean size of groups A, B, and C was 0.92 cm (±0.73), 1.17 cm (±0.93), and 1.41 cm (±0.84), respectively. Then, we compared the mean size of each group using the Tukey methods. Group C had significantly larger tumors than group A (P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference between groups A and B or between groups B and C in average tumor size (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Growing pattern of diameter of primary tumors as the number of CLN metastasis increased (linear regression method, tumor size = 0.957 + 0.088 × the number of CLN)

Fig. 2
figure 2

Average tumor size of each group (Tukey method). Average tumor size of group C differed from group A (p < 0.001). Differences between groups A and B, or groups B and C were not significant

Extrathyroidal extension

The rate of CLN metastasis was higher in patients with extrathyroidal extension than in patients without that (Table 1). The rate of extrathyroidal extension was 41.6% (47/113), 53.4% (39/73), and 75% (54/72) in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The odds ratio was 1.1611 when comparing group A with group B but it was not statistically significant (P = 0.115). The rate of extrathyroidal extension increased when comparing group C with group A and it was statistically significant (odds ratio = 4.213, P < 0.001; Table 2). There was a difference in the rate of extrathyroidal extension in each group and the possibility of extrathyroidal extension increased, especially in group C.

Table 2 Relationship between the number of metastatic CLN and the presence of extrathyroidal extension

Lateral neck lymph node metastasis

Lateral neck lymph node metastasis was related to a higher rate of CLN metastasis compared with negative lateral neck lymph node (Table 1). We investigated the relationship between the number of CLN metastasis and lateral neck lymph node metastasis. Lateral neck lymph node metastasis was identified in 58 patients and it was detected in level III (n = 46), IV (n = 41), and II (n = 29), consecutively. Group A presented 1.8% (2/113), group B 20.5% (15/73), and group C 56.9% (41/72) proportion of lateral neck lymph node metastasis. When comparing group A with B or group A with C, probability of lateral neck lymph node metastasis was found to increase according to the number of CLN metastasis. The odds ratio of group B was 14.353 (P < 0.001) and that of group C was 73.403 (P < 0.001; Table 3).

Table 3 Relationship between the number of metastatic CLN and the presence of lateral neck lymph node extension

Discussion

The number of regional lymph node metastasis is regarded as a prognostic factor and it guides treatment modality, especially in breast and gastric cancer [1719]. Also, in head and neck cancer, except papillary thyroid cancer, more than 1 metastatic lymph node is classified as N2 in the AJCC cancer staging system. It was found to be relevant to treatment modality and prognosis [20, 21]. But the number of CLN metastasis in PTC has not been considered as a prognostic factor. Even though most of the patients with PTC have a good survival rate, substantial recurrence rate and morbidity remain to be a problem. Recurrence is relevant to mortality especially in high risk group [22]. Cervical recurrence in PTC after the primary operation holds up to 30% [23, 24]. Repeated surgery after cervical recurrence may increase the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, hypocalcemia, and cosmetic problems. The prognostic value of the number of cervical (central or lateral) neck lymph nodes in PTC were confined to cervical recurrence [25]. Consequently, reducing the risk of cervical recurrence may contribute to the better prognosis. Although the prognostic implication of central lymph node has been studied, there are few articles regarding relevance of the number of CLN metastasis to the prognosis.

Various factors and the staging system have been used to predict the prognosis [5]. Age, sex, tumor size, extrathyroidal extension, and lateral neck lymph node metastasis are generally accepted variables that were related to survival and local control rates [14]. Besides this, family history, multifocality, and incomplete excision were regarded as prognostic parameters [13, 15, 26]. One of the useful staging systems is TNM staging defined by the AJCC (2002, 6th edition); it reflects the importance of lymph node metastasis [14]. It simply divides N stages into N1a and N1b, and this may be due to a good prognosis of PTC or relatively lower significance of the lymph node metastasis. Moreover, the number of metastatic CLN in TNM staging defined by the AJCC was not considered [14, 27]. This study was initiated from the hypothesis that the number of CLN has prognostic validity. Previously, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve test was performed to find cutoff number of CLN metastasis when dividing patients. The cutoff number was 1.5 or 2.5, and we divided the patients into three groups (patients with 0, 1 or 2, more than 3 metastatic lymph nodes; data not shown).

Some studies have shown that the metastasis to the CLN increased when tumor size increased [2830]. Tumor size greater than 3 cm is one of the risk factors for recurrence in the lymph node [13]. Tumor size exceeding 1 cm presented a high risk of ipsilateral CLN metastasis, which can be another risk factor for contralateral CLN metastasis, simultaneously [31]. We found that the number of CLN metastasis has positive correlation with tumor size. Because there were patients with small tumors with multiple metastatic CLN, correlation coefficient was not high. It seems to have reflected the molecular or pathologic characteristics of the tumors [25, 28]. More than two (group C) CLN metastases were significantly associated with larger tumor size than a lower number of nodal metastasis. This infers that the number of CLN is relevant to prognosis as well as only existence of the CLN by itself.

Many authors found that patients with extrathyroidal extension seemed to have higher mortality and recurrence rates than patients without that. The extrathyroidal extension itself was presumed to have a negative effect on survival and local control rates [29, 3236]. The evident extrathyroidal extension increased the rate of CLN metastasis and had an effect on the survival rate [25, 26, 37]. Distributions of patients with extrathyroidal extension in each group, A, B, and C, were different and the odds ratio increased as the number of CLN metastasis increased. Throughout this finding, we can suggest that the thyroid cancer and perithyroidal tissues should be removed more carefully if the number of CLN metastasis was at least three (group C).

Many reports dealing with metastatic patterns of PTC revealed that the first echelon of the thyroid is the central lymph node and it extends laterally through levels II, III, and IV [38, 39]. A positive node in CLN may hint probability of lateral neck lymph node metastasis. Lateral neck lymph node extension is associated with high rates of recurrence and distant metastasis [40] and needs to be managed more aggressively when it is suspicious. Our findings showed that patients with lateral neck lymph node extension had a higher rate of CLN metastasis than patients without that. We found that the higher number of CLN metastasis was involved in higher risk of lateral neck lymph node extension. In summary, it is important that further treatment for the lateral neck should be emerged if the number of metastatic CLN is more than 2 (group C).

We presumed that the number of CLN metastasis was ignored because the number of nodes was not adequately categorized and compared, in addition to insidious growth and a relatively good prognosis of PTC. Due to a short follow-up period, we could not analyze the relationship between the number of CLN metastasis and the survival or local control rates. This study was designed to be a cross-sectional study and we could not use the hazard model. To solve this problem, we used age, gender, tumor size, extrathyroidal extension, and lateral neck extension as prognostic indicators; this is a main limitation of our study.

Conclusions

The existence of CLN metastasis was related to negative prognostic factors, including extrathyroidal and lateral neck lymph node extensions. The number of CLN metastasis also was related to the poor prognostic factors, including tumor size, extrathyroidal extension, and lateral neck lymph node extension. Therefore, the number of CLN may suggest prognostic significance. Notably, lateral neck lymph node metastasis was strongly correlated with the number of CLN metastasis. Further study for longer period is needed to clarify the effect of the number of CLN on treatment results.