Abstract
Background
It has been documented that the smooth and move procedure—smoothing the proximal humeral surface while maintaining the coracoacromial arch—can provide clinically significant long-term improvement in function for patients having irreparable rotator cuff tears with retained active elevation. This study sought to demonstrate that clinically significant gains in comfort, function, and active motion can be realized as early as 6 weeks after this procedure.
Methods
We conducted a prospective cohort study of the 6-week clinical outcomes for 48 patients enrolled prior to a smooth and move procedure for irreparable rotator cuff tears. Prior rotator cuff repair had been attempted in 28 (70%).
Results
In 40 patients with preoperative and 6-week postoperative measurements, the Simple Shoulder Test scores improved from an average of 3.4 ± 2.8 preoperatively to 5.7 ± 3.5 at 6 weeks (p < 0.001), an improvement that exceeded the published values for the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The clinical outcomes were not worse for the 18 shoulders with irreparable tears of both the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. In 30 patients with preoperative and 6-week postoperative objective measurements of active motion, the average abduction improved from 93(± 43) to 123(± 47)° (p = 0.005) and the average flexion improved from 102(± 46) to 126(± 44)° (p = 0.023).
Conclusions
In addition to its previously documented long-term effectiveness for shoulders with irreparable rotator cuff tears and retained active elevation, this study demonstrates that the smooth and move procedure provides clinically significant improvement as early as 6 weeks after surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Rotator cuff tears are among the commonest of shoulder conditions, affecting a high percentage of individuals over the age of 60 [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Many of these tears are asymptomatic [7,8,9,10,11,12]. Non-operative management is effective in a high percentage of symptomatic degenerative cuff tears [1, 13,14,15]. Over one quarter of rotator cuff repair attempts fail to re-establish the integrity of the rotator cuff, yet patients are often clinically improved in spite of this failure, suggesting that there may be a beneficial effect of rotator cuff surgery even if the repair is not successful [16]. Because of these observations, the indications for rotator cuff repair cannot be clearly defined [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. The guidelines for the management of irreparable cuff tears are even less clear [26]: proposed treatment options include non-operative management [27,28,29], graft augmentation [30,31,32,33,34,35], superior capsular reconstruction [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43], subacromial spacers [44,45,46,47,48], tendon transfers [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59], debridement [60], tuberoplasty [61], and reverse total shoulder [62,63,64,65,66].
The smooth and move procedure offers a conservative surgical option for the management of symptomatic irreparable rotator cuff defects in shoulders with retained active elevation; the goal of this simple procedure is to smooth the surface of the proximal humeral convexity [67] while retaining the integrity of the coracoacromial arch and allowing immediate postoperative active motion [68]. A recent report of 151 patients with a mean age of 63.4 years at an average of 7.3 years after surgery found that in 77 shoulders with previously unoperated irreparable tears, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores improved from an average of 4.6 to 8.5 (p < 0.001). For 74 shoulders with irreparable cuff defects after failed prior repair attempts, SST scores improved from 4 to 7.5 (p < 0.001). These improvements exceeded the published values for the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the Simple Shoulder Test [69, 70]. In addition to its efficacy, simplicity, and low cost, one of the principal advantages of the smooth and move procedure is that the patient can begin actively using the shoulder immediately after surgery, avoiding the functional limitations that are necessary to protect a reconstruction while it heals [71, 72]. Another important advantage is that this conservative procedure does not preclude the subsequent consideration of more complex surgeries should it fail to yield the desired outcome.
In that one of the proposed advantages of the smooth and move procedure is that it allows early resumption of active function, we sought to document the early recovery after the smooth and move procedure in a prospective cohort study. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that this procedure would lead to clinically significant improvement in patient comfort, function, and active motion as early as 6 weeks after the surgery.
Materials and methods
In our practice, the range of management options is presented to patients with primary rotator cuff tears or failed prior repairs that we suspect are irreparable: non-operative management, attempted repair, superior capsular reconstruction, tendon transfers, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The option of a smooth and move procedure is presented to patients with retained active elevation above horizontal, but with refractory symptoms of pain, stiffness, and crepitance in association with a rotator cuff defect that we suspect cannot be durably repaired. Evidence that the cuff may be irreparable may include some combination of atraumatic onset of symptoms, older patient age, longstanding weakness of elevation or external rotation, cuff muscle atrophy, superior displacement of the humerus relative to the scapula on X-rays (Fig. 1), or rotator cuff imaging revealing poor tendon quality and quantity. The smooth and move is not offered to patients with glenohumeral arthritis, glenohumeral instability, pseudoparalysis, anterosuperior escape, or active infection. Patients are informed that the final determination of an irreparable tear is made at the time of surgery, i.e., that the size of the defect and the quality of the remaining tissue preclude secure anatomic tendon reattachment to bone [73]. Patients are informed (1) that the goal of the smooth and move surgery is not to repair the cuff defect, but rather to improve comfort and motion by resolving scar tissue, adhesions, capsular contracture, surface irregularities of bone and soft tissue, and any debris from prior repair attempts and (2) that they will be encouraged to resume active use of their arm immediately after surgery without concern for disrupting a repair or reconstruction.
Patients consenting to this procedure are invited to enroll in a prospective cohort study, the goal of which is to compare the Simple Shoulder Test scores and active shoulder range of motion before surgery and at 6 weeks after a smooth and move procedure. This analysis included all 48 consenting patients having a smooth and move procedure for irreparable cuff defects with retained active elevation performed by an individual surgeon (FAM) between February 1, 2015 and September 28, 2018.
At the preoperative clinic visit, demographic data and Simple Shoulder Test scores were collected. The active ranges of abduction, flexion, and cross-body adduction were measured by a research assistant (AW) using the observer-independent Kinect Motion Capture System as previously described and validated [74,75,76]. For the patients who were able to return for a 6-week postoperative visit, we repeated the Simple Shoulder Test and, when possible, the Kinect active motion measurements.
The surgical technique was as previously described [68]. The shoulder is approached through a deltoid split near the acromion in the raphe between its anterior and middle thirds; there is no detachment of the muscle origin; acromioplasty is avoided to preserve the integrity of the coracoacromial arch. The shoulder is thoroughly inspected to determine the extent of the rotator cuff defect and to verify that the tear is irreparable, i.e., good quality tendon could not be securely fixed to the normal insertion site with the arm at the side. All hypertrophic bursal tissue, adhesions, suture and exposed suture anchors are removed along with ragged tendon edges and prominent tuberosity bone (Fig. 2). The surgeon’s index finger is passed through the humeroscapular motion interface [67] to assure that all adhesions, including those between the subscapularis and the coracoid muscles, have been released. Biceps tenotomy is performed if the tendon is frayed or subluxated. The shoulder is gently manipulated through a full range of motion to resolve any capsular contracture. An experienced shoulder therapist (SEJ) instructs the patient in postoperative full range of motion stretching and deltoid strengthening exercises on the day of surgery. Patients are encouraged to resume their usual activities progressively as their shoulder comfort allows (Figs. 3 and 4) (Appendix Video—Function at 6 weeks after a smooth and move. Same patient as in Figs. 1, 2, 3, and 4).
(MOV 75158 kb)
The status of the rotator cuff was documented at surgery; as we suspected preoperatively, all 48 patients were found to have rotator cuff defects that were not reparable. Of these 48, 40 (83%) were able to return for a 6-week follow-up visit at which time the Simple Shoulder Test was repeated. The characteristics of the 8 patients who were unable to return were compared to those of the 40 patients who returned for follow-up using the unpaired t test. For the 40 patients with 6-week follow-up, the preoperative and 6-week SST scores were compared using the paired t test. Subgroup analyses were carried out for those patients with irreparable tears of the supraspinatus only and those having irreparable tears of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus.
We were able to obtain 6-week postoperative active range of motion measurements in 30 patients (63%). For these 30 patients, the preoperative and postoperative active motions were compared using the paired t test.
This study was approved by our Institutional Review Board STUDY00004686.
Source of funding
There was no extramural funding for this investigation.
Results
Of the 48 patients who were prospectively enrolled in this study, 19 (40%) were male; the average age was 64 ± 9 years (Table 1). These patients had substantial loss of shoulder comfort and function as indicated by an average preoperative SST score of 3.6 out of a possible 12. Prior cuff repair had been attempted in 34 (71%). An irreparable tear confined to the supraspinatus was found in 26 (54%) while both the supraspinatus and infraspinatus were involved in 22 (46%). Biceps tears were found in 15 (31%); one patient had biceps tendon fraying requiring tenotomy.
For the 40 patients who were able to return to clinic for follow-up at 6 weeks, the SST score improved from an average of 3.4 ± 2.8 preoperatively to 5.7 ± 3.5 at 6 weeks after surgery (p < 0.001) (Table 1). This average improvement in the SST at 6 weeks exceeded the published value of 2 for the minimal clinically important difference [69, 70]. The improvement in each of the 12 individual functions of the SST is shown in Fig. 5. The average improvement in the SST was not worse for the 18 (45%) of the shoulders with irreparable tears of both the supraspinatus and infraspinatus than for the 22 (55%) of shoulders with tears confined to the supraspinatus (Table 1).
The preoperative and surgical findings for the 8 patients (17%) unable to return to clinic for a 6-week clinical follow-up were not significantly different from those of the 40 patients (83%) with 6-week clinical follow-up (Table 1).
For the 30 shoulders with preoperative and 6-week postoperative range of motion measurements, active abduction improved from 93 ± 43 to 123 ± 47° (p = 0.005), active flexion from 102 ± 46 to 126 ± 44° (p = 0.023), and active cross-body adduction from − 5.5 ± 2.3 to − 3.6 ± 2.6 cm from the midline (p = 0.003) (Table 2).
There were no intraoperative complications or any postoperative complications within the first 6 weeks of this procedure.
Discussion
In addition to the previously documented long-term benefits of the smooth and move procedure, this prospective cohort study demonstrates that patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears and retained active motion can realize improvement in self-assessed shoulder comfort and function that exceeds the minimal clinically important difference as early as 6 weeks after the smooth and move procedure. These results complement those of the prior report demonstrating the clinically significant long-term improvement realized at an average of over 7 years after the smooth and move procedure for symptomatic irreparable rotator cuff tears in shoulders with retained active elevation [68]. In the prior study, 77 shoulders with previously unrepaired irreparable tears improved from an SST average of 4.6 to 8.5 (p < 0.001), and 74 shoulders with irreparable tears after a prior repair attempt improved from an SST average of 4.0 to 7.5 (p < 0.001).
The smooth and move is a conservative procedure that offers the opportunity for early resumption of shoulder activities without concern for disrupting the integrity of a reconstructive procedure, such as superior capsular reconstruction, tendon augmentation, or tendon transfer. Because it does not compromise essential shoulder structures, the smooth and move procedure does not preclude any of the other options that might be subsequently offered to patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears, should it prove unsuccessful. While there are other reports of non-repair surgeries for addressing irreparable cuff tears [60, 61, 77,78,79,80,81], it is not apparent that these procedures yield outcomes that are superior to those of the simple smooth and move procedure for patients with retained active elevation.
This study needs to be viewed in light of certain limitations. First, the purpose of the investigation was only to explore the early (6-week) improvements in shoulder comfort, function and active range of motion, realizing that a principal advantage of this procedure is that it allows early return to active use of the shoulder; the longer-term (7-year) outcomes for this procedure have been documented previously [68]. Secondly, this study does not compare the 6-week outcomes of the smooth and move to the 6-week results of other surgical approaches, such as graft augmentation, superior capsular reconstruction, or tendon transfers. Third, our definition of “irreparable” may differ from that of other surgeons; it is of note, however, that 71% of the shoulders in this cohort study had failed prior attempts at surgical repair. Finally, the number of cases in this analysis was relatively small; however, the number was sufficient to show clinically and statistically significant improvement in comfort, function, and objectively measured motion at 6 weeks after the smooth and move procedure.
Conclusion
The long-term effectiveness of the smooth and move procedure has been previously documented. This study complements the prior report by demonstrating that the smooth and move procedure provides clinically significant improvement as early as 6 weeks after surgery. This conservative procedure minimizes activity limitations during the patient’s recovery and does not preclude subsequent more complex reconstructions in the uncommon situation where the outcome of the smooth and move is not satisfactory.
References
Armstrong AD, Athwal GS. Rotator cuff tears. 2017; Rosemont, IL: OrthoInfo, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) https://orthoinfo.aaos.org/en/diseases%2D%2Dconditions/rotator-cuff-tears/. Accessed November 13, 2018
Keener JD, Steger-May K, Stobbs G, Yamaguchi K (2010) Asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: patient demographics and baseline shoulder function. J Shoulder Elb Surg 19(8):1191–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.017
Kim HM, Teefey SA, Zelig A, Galatz LM, Keener JD, Yamaguchi K (2009) Shoulder strength in asymptomatic individuals with intact compared with torn rotator cuffs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(2):289–296. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00219
Mall NA, Kim HM, Keener JD, Steger-May K, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Stobbs G, Yamaguchi K (2010) Symptomatic progression of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: a prospective study of clinical and sonographic variables. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(16):2623–2633. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.00506
Teunis T, Lubberts B, Reilly BT, Ring D (2014) A systematic review and pooled analysis of the prevalence of rotator cuff disease with increasing age. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23(12):1913–1921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.001
Vincent K, Leboeuf-Yde C, Gagey O (2017) Are degenerative rotator cuff disorders a cause of shoulder pain? Comparison of prevalence of degenerative rotator cuff disease to prevalence of nontraumatic shoulder pain through three systematic and critical reviews. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26(5):766–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.060
Jeong J, Shin DC, Kim TH, Kim K (2017) Prevalence of asymptomatic rotator cuff tear and their related factors in the Korean population. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26(1):30–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.05.003
Keener JD, Galatz LM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Steger-May K, Stobbs G, P R, Yamaguchi K (2015) A prospective evaluation of survivorship of asymptomatic degenerative rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(2):89–98. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00099
Keener JD, Hsu JE, Steger-May K, Teefey SA, Chamberlain AM, Yamaguchi K (2015) Patterns of tear progression for asymptomatic degenerative rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg 24(12):1845–1851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.038
Liem D, Buschmann VE, Schmidt C, Gosheger G, Vogler T, Schulte TL, Balke M (2014) The prevalence of rotator cuff tears: is the contralateral shoulder at risk? Am J Sports Med 42(4):826–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513519324
Moosmayer S, Tariq R, Stiris M, Smith HJ (2013) The natural history of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: a three-year follow-up of fifty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(14):1249–1255. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00185
Ro KH, Park JH, Lee SH, Song DI, Jeong HJ, Jeong WK (2015) Status of the contralateral rotator cuff in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 43(5):1091–1098. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515571554
Boorman RS, More KD, Hollinshead RM, Wiley JP, Mohtadi NG, Lo IKY, Brett KR (2018) What happens to patients when we do not repair their cuff tears? Five-year rotator cuff quality-of-life index outcomes following nonoperative treatment of patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg 27(3):444–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.009
Dunn WR, Kuhn JE, Sanders R, An Q, Baumgarten KM, Bishop JY, Brophy RH, Carey JL, Harrell F, Holloway BG, Jones GL, Ma CB, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Poddar SK, Smith MV, Spencer EE, Vidal AF, Wolf BR, Wright RW, Group MS (2016) 2013 Neer Award: predictors of failure of nonoperative treatment of chronic, symptomatic, full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg 25(8):1303–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.04.030
Kuhn JE, Dunn WR, Sanders R, An Q, Baumgarten KM, Bishop JY, Brophy RH, Carey JL, Holloway BG, Jones GL, Ma CB, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Poddar SK, Smith MV, Spencer EE, Vidal AF, Wolf BR, Wright RW, Group MS (2013) Effectiveness of physical therapy in treating atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22(10):1371–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.026
McElvany MD, McGoldrick E, Gee AO, Neradilek MB, Matsen FA 3rd (2015) Rotator cuff repair: published evidence on factors associated with repair integrity and clinical outcome. Am J Sports Med 43(2):491–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514529644
Chapman CG, Floyd SB, Thigpen CA, Tokish JM, Chen JD, Brooks JM (2018) Treatment for rotator cuff tear is influenced by demographics and characteristics of the area where patients live. JBJS Open Access 3(3):e0005. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.18.00005
Dunn WR, Kuhn JE, Sanders R, An Q, Baumgarten KM, Bishop JY, Brophy RH, Carey JL, Holloway GB, Jones GL, Ma CB, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Poddar SK, Smith MV, Spencer EE, Vidal AF, Wolf BR, Wright RW (2014) Symptoms of pain do not correlate with rotator cuff tear severity: a cross-sectional study of 393 patients with a symptomatic atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tear. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(10):793–800. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01304
Hsu JE, Tang A, Matsen FA 3rd (2017) Patient self-assessed shoulder comfort and function and active motion are not closely related to surgically documented rotator cuff tear integrity. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26(11):1938–1942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.05.011
Keener JD, Patterson BM, Orvets N, Chamberlain AM (2018) Degenerative rotator cuff tears: refining surgical indications based on natural history data. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. Epub ahead of print https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00480
Khan M, Simunovic N, Provencher M (2014) Cochrane in CORR(R): surgery for rotator cuff disease (review). Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(11):3263–3269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3869-2
Pappou IP, Schmidt CC, Jarrett CD, Steen BM, Frankle MA (2013) AAOS appropriate use criteria: optimizing the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(12):772–775. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-21-12-772
Paxton ES, Matzon JL, Narzikul AC, Beredjiklian PK, Abboud JA (2015) Agreement among ASES members on the AAOS clinical practice guidelines. Orthopedics 38(3):e169–e177. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20150305-53
Pedowitz RA, Yamaguchi K, Ahmad CS, Burks RT, Flatow EL, Green A, Wies JL, St Andre J, Boyer K, Iannotti JP, Miller BS, Tashjian R, Watters WC 3rd, Weber K, Turkelson CM, Raymond L, Sluka P, McGowan R (2012) American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on: optimizing the management of rotator cuff problems. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(2):163–167
Tashjian RZ (2011) AAOS clinical practice guideline: optimizing the management of rotator cuff problems. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19(6):380–383
Dines DM, Moynihan DP, Dines J, McCann P (2006) Irreparable rotator cuff tears: what to do and when to do it; the surgeon's dilemma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(10):2294–2302. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200610000-00025
Agout C, Berhouet J, Spiry C, Bonnevialle N, Joudet T, Favard L, French Arthroscopic S (2018) Functional outcomes after non-operative treatment of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears: prospective multicenter study in 68 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104(8S):S189–S192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.08.003
Goldberg BA, Nowinski RJ, Matsen FA 3rd (2001) Outcome of nonoperative management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res 382:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200101000-00015
Zingg PO, Jost B, Sukthankar A, Buhler M, Pfirrmann CW, Gerber C (2007) Clinical and structural outcomes of nonoperative management of massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(9):1928–1934. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.01073
Lewington MR, Ferguson DP, Smith TD, Burks R, Coady C, Wong IH (2017) Graft utilization in the bridging reconstruction of irreparable rotator cuff tears: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 45(13):3149–3157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517694355
Pandey R, Tafazal S, Shyamsundar S, Modi A, Singh HP (2017) Outcome of partial repair of massive rotator cuff tears with and without human tissue allograft bridging repair. Shoulder Elbow 9(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573216665114
Ranebo MC, Bjornsson Hallgren HC, Norlin R, Adolfsson LE (2018) Long-term clinical and radiographic outcome of rotator cuff repair with a synthetic interposition graft: a consecutive case series with 17 to 20 years of follow-up. J Shoulder Elb Surg 27(9):1622–1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.011
Seker V, Hackett L, Lam PH, Murrell GAC (2018) Evaluating the outcomes of rotator cuff repairs with polytetrafluoroethylene patches for massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 46(13):3155–3164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518801014
Sharma N, El Refaiy A, Sibly TF (2018) Short-term results of rotator cuff repair using GraftJacket as an interpositional tissue-matched thickness graft. J Orthop 15(2):732–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2018.05.037
Stone MA, Carre A, Trasolini N, Minneti M, Omid R (2018) Vascularized dermal autograft for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg 27(9):1664–1671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.069
Burkhart SS, Hartzler RU (2019) Superior capsular reconstruction reverses profound pseudoparalysis in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears and minimal or no glenohumeral arthritis. Arthroscopy 35(1):22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.07.023
Denard PJ, Brady PC, Adams CR, Tokish JM, Burkhart SS (2018) Preliminary results of arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction with dermal allograft. Arthroscopy 34(1):93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.265
Frank RM, Cvetanovich G, Savin D, Romeo AA (2018) Superior capsular reconstruction: indications, techniques, and clinical outcomes. JBJS Rev 6(7):e10. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00141
Hirahara AM, Andersen WJ, Panero AJ (2017) Superior capsular reconstruction: clinical outcomes after minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 46(6):266–278
Mihata T, Lee TQ, Fukunishi K, Itami Y, Fujisawa Y, Kawakami T, Ohue M, Neo M (2018) Return to sports and physical work after arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction among patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 46(5):1077–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517753387
Mihata T, Lee TQ, Hasegawa A, Kawakami T, Fukunishi K, Fujisawa Y, Itami Y, Ohue M, Neo M (2018) Arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction can eliminate pseudoparalysis in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 46(11):2707–2716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518786489
Pennington WT, Bartz BA, Pauli JM, Walker CE, Schmidt W (2018) Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction with acellular dermal allograft for the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: short-term clinical outcomes and the radiographic parameter of superior capsular distance. Arthroscopy 34(6):1764–1773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.009
Sethi P, Franco WG (2018) The role of superior capsule reconstruction in rotator cuff tears. Orthop Clin North Am 49(1):93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2017.08.015
Piekaar RSM, Bouman ICE, van Kampen PM, van Eijk F, Huijsmans PE (2018) Early promising outcome following arthroscopic implantation of the subacromial balloon spacer for treating massive rotator cuff tear. Musculoskelet Surg 102(3):247–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0525-5
Prat D, Tenenbaum S, Pritsch M, Oran A, Vogel G (2018) Sub-acromial balloon spacer for irreparable rotator cuff tears: is it an appropriate salvage procedure? J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 26(2):2309499018770887. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018770887
Rajnish RK, Chouhan DK, Agarwal S (2018) Arthroscopic subacromial spacer implantation in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: clinical and radiographic results of 39 retrospectives cases-is the pain relief enough? Arthroscopy 34(8):2268–2269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.05.013
Ruiz Iban MA, Lorente Moreno R, Ruiz Diaz R, Alvarez Sciamanna R, Paniagua Gonzalez A, Lorente Gomez A, Diaz Heredia J (2018) The absorbable subacromial spacer for irreparable posterosuperior cuff tears has inconsistent results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(12):3848–3854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5083-3
Yallapragada RK, Apostolopoulos A, Katsougrakis I, Selvan TP (2018) The use of a subacromial spacer-inspace balloon in managing patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears. J Orthop 15(3):862–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.004
Clark NJ, Elhassan BT (2018) The role of tendon transfers for irreparable rotator cuff tears. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 11(1):141–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-018-9468-1
Gerber C, Rahm SA, Catanzaro S, Farshad M, Moor BK (2013) Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for treatment of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: long-term results at a minimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(21):1920–1926. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.00122
Kany J, Grimberg J, Amaravathi RS, Sekaran P, Scorpie D, Werthel JD (2018) Arthroscopically-assisted latissimus dorsi transfer for irreparable rotator cuff insufficiency: modes of failure and clinical correlation. Arthroscopy 34(4):1139–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.052
Kolk A, Henseler JF, Overes FJ, Nagels J, Nelissen R (2018) Teres major tendon transfer in the treatment of irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears. Bone Joint J 100-B(3):309–317. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B3.BJJ-2017-0920.R1
Moroder P, Schulz E, Mitterer M, Plachel F, Resch H, Lederer S (2017) Long-term outcome after pectoralis major transfer for irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(3):239–245. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00485
Moursy M, Forstner R, Koller H, Resch H, Tauber M (2009) Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for irreparable rotator cuff tears: a modified technique to improve tendon transfer integrity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(8):1924–1931. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00515
Mun SW, Kim JY, Yi SH, Baek CH (2018) Latissimus dorsi transfer for irreparable subscapularis tendon tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg 27(6):1057–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.11.022
Namdari S, Voleti P, Baldwin K, Glaser D, Huffman GR (2012) Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for irreparable rotator cuff tears: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(10):891–898. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00841
Omid R, Lee B (2013) Tendon transfers for irreparable rotator cuff tears. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(8):492–501. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-21-08-492
Pogorzelski J, Horan MP, Godin JA, Hussain ZB, Fritz EM, Millett PJ (2018) Achilles tendon allograft-augmented latissimus dorsi tendon transfer for the treatment of massive irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2943-8
Wagner ER, Woodmass JM, Welp KM, Chang MJ, Elhassan BT, Higgins LD, Warner JJP (2018) Novel arthroscopic tendon transfers for posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: latissimus dorsi and lower trapezius transfers. JBJS Essent Surg Tech 8(2):e12. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.17.00062
Pander P, Sierevelt IN, Pecasse G, van Noort A (2018) Irreparable rotator cuff tears: long-term follow-up, five to ten years, of arthroscopic debridement and tenotomy of the long head of the biceps. Int Orthop 42(11):2633–2638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3991-y
Fenlin JM Jr, Chase JM, Rushton SA, Frieman BG (2002) Tuberoplasty: creation of an acromiohumeral articulation-a treatment option for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg 11(2):136–142. https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2002.121764
Ernstbrunner L, Suter A, Catanzaro S, Rahm S, Gerber C (2017) Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears before the age of 60 years: long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(20):1721–1729. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.00095
Gerber C, Canonica S, Catanzaro S, Ernstbrunner L (2018) Longitudinal observational study of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction: results after 15 years. J Shoulder Elb Surg 27(5):831–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.037
Mulieri P, Dunning P, Klein S, Pupello D, Frankle M (2010) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tear without glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(15):2544–2556. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.00912
Petrillo S, Longo UG, Papalia R, Denaro V (2017) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy: a systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg 101(2):105–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0474-z
Sevivas N, Ferreira N, Andrade R, Moreira P, Portugal R, Alves D, Vieira da Silva M, Sousa N, Salgado AJ, Espregueira-Mendes J (2017) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26(9):e265–e277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.039
Romeo AA, Loutzenheiser T, Rhee YG, Sidles JA, Harryman DT 2nd, Matsen FA 3rd (1998) The humeroscapular motion interface. Clin Orthop Relat Res 350:120-127
Hsu JE, Gorbaty J, Lucas R, Russ SM, Matsen FA 3rd (2017) Treatment of irreparable cuff tears with smoothing of the humeroscapular motion interface without acromioplasty. Int Orthop 41(7):1423–1430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3486-2
Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Green A, Porucznik CA, Powell AP (2010) Minimal clinically important differences in ASES and simple shoulder test scores after nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(2):296–303. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.01296
Tashjian RZ, Hung M, Keener JD, Bowen RC, McAllister J, Chen W, Ebersole G, Granger EK, Chamberlain AM (2017) Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale (VAS) measuring pain after shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26(1):144–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.06.007
Iannotti JP, Deutsch A, Green A, Rudicel S, Christensen J, Marraffino S, Rodeo S (2013) Time to failure after rotator cuff repair: a prospective imaging study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(11):965–971. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00708
Kurowicki J, Berglund DD, Momoh E, Disla S, Horn B, Giveans MR, Levy JC (2017) Speed of recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elb Surg 26(7):1271–1277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.11.002
Warner JJ (2001) Management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: the role of tendon transfer. Instr Course Lect 50:63–71
Hsu JE, Hulet DA, McDonald C, Whitson A, Russ SM, Matsen FA, 3rd (2018) The contribution of the scapula to active shoulder motion and self-assessed function in three hundred and fifty two patients prior to elective shoulder surgery. Int Orthop. Epub ahead of print https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4027-3
Matsen FA 3rd, Lauder A, Rector K, Keeling P, Cherones AL (2016) Measurement of active shoulder motion using the Kinect, a commercially available infrared position detection system. J Shoulder Elb Surg 25(2):216–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.07.011
Matsen FA 3rd, Tang A, Russ SM, Hsu JE (2017) Relationship between patient-reported assessment of shoulder function and objective range-of-motion measurements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(5):417–426. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00556
Berth A, Neumann W, Awiszus F, Pap G (2010) Massive rotator cuff tears: functional outcome after debridement or arthroscopic partial repair. J Orthop Traumatol 11(1):13–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-010-0084-0
Heuberer PR, Kolblinger R, Buchleitner S, Pauzenberger L, Laky B, Auffarth A, Moroder P, Salem S, Kriegleder B, Anderl W (2016) Arthroscopic management of massive rotator cuff tears: an evaluation of debridement, complete, and partial repair with and without force couple restoration. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(12):3828–3837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3739-9
Klinger HM, Spahn G, Baums MH, Steckel H (2005) Arthroscopic debridement of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears—a comparison of debridement alone and combined procedure with biceps tenotomy. Acta Chir Belg 105(3):297–301
Maillot C, Harly E, Demezon H, Le Huec JC (2018) Surgical repair of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears seems to be a better option than patch augmentation or debridement and biceps tenotomy: a prospective comparative study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 27(9):1545–1552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.05.023
Verhelst L, Vandekerckhove PJ, Sergeant G, Liekens K, Van Hoonacker P, Berghs B (2010) Reversed arthroscopic subacromial decompression for symptomatic irreparable rotator cuff tears: mid-term follow-up results in 34 shoulders. J Shoulder Elb Surg 19(4):601–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.001
Acknowledgements
We thank Susan DeBartolo, University of Washington, Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, for her editorial work on this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This was a Level II prospective cohort study approved by our Institutional Review Board (STUDY00004686). For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Informed consent
N/A.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Level of Evidence: Level II prospective cohort study
Investigation Performed at the University of Washington, Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Seattle, WA
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matsen, F.A., Whitson, A., Jackins, S.E. et al. Significant improvement in patient self-assessed comfort and function at six weeks after the smooth and move procedure for shoulders with irreparable rotator cuff tears and retained active elevation. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 43, 1659–1667 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04310-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04310-4