Schelling [19–22] considered a simple model with individual agents who only care about the types of people living in their own local neighborhood. The spatial structure was represented by a one- or two-dimensional lattice. Schelling showed that an integrated society will generally unravel into a rather segregated one even though no individual agent strictly prefers this. We make some steps to generalize the spatial proximity model to a proximity model of segregation. That is, we examine models with individual agents who interact “locally” in a range of network structures with topological properties that are different from those of regular lattices. Assuming mild preferences about with whom they interact, we study best-response dynamics in random and regular non-directed graphs as well as in small-world and scale-free networks. Our main result is that the system attains levels of segregation that are in line with those reached in the lattice-based spatial proximity model. That is, Schelling's original results seem to be robust to the structural properties of the network. In other words, mild proximity preferences coupled with adjustment dynamics can explain segregation not just in regular spatial networks but also in more general social networks.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Albert R, Barabási A (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 74:47–97
Amaral L, Scala A, Barthélemy M, Stanley H (2000) Classes of small-world networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:11149–11152
Baldwin T, Rozenberg G (2004) Britain ‘must scrap multiculturalism’. The Times, April 2003
Barabási A, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286:509–512
Bollobás B (1985) Random graphs. Academic, New York
Dorogovtsev S, Mendes J (2003) Evolution of networks: fom biological nets to the Internet and WWW. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Echenique F, Fryer R (2005) On the measurement of segregation. Working Paper No. 11258, NBER
Fagiolo G (1998) Spatial interactions in dynamic decentralized economies: a review. In: Co-hendet P, Llerena P, Stahn H, Umbhauer G (eds) The Economics of networks. Interaction and behaviours. Springer, Berlin
Fagiolo G, Valente M, Vriend N (2007) Segregation in networks. J Econ Behav Organ 64: 316–336
Fershtman M (1997) Cohesive group detection in a social network by the segregation matrix index. Soc Networks 19:193–207
Freeman L (1972) Segregation in social networks. Sociol Methods Res 6:411–427
Freeman L (1978) On measuring systematic integration. Connections 2:9–12
Milgram S (1967) The small world problem. Psychol Today 2:60–67
Mitchell J (1978) On freeman's segregation index: an alternative. Connections 2:9–12
Newman M (2000) Models of the small world: a review. arXiv:cond-mat/ 0001118v2
Newman M (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45:167–256
Pancs R, Vriend N (2007) Schelling's spatial proximity model of segregation revisited. J Public Econ 91:1–24
Pastos-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2004) Evolution and structure of the Internet. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schelling T (1969) Models of segregation. Am Econ Rev 59:488–493
Schelling T (1971) Dynamic models of segregation. J Math Sociol 1:143–186
Schelling T (1971) On the ecology of micromotives. The Public Interest 25:61–98
Schelling T (1978) Micromotives and macrobehavior. W.W. Norton, New York
Scott J (2000) Social network analysis: a handbook. Sage, London
Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis. methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Watts D (1999) Small worlds. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Watts D (2003) Six degrees: the science of a connected age. W.W. Norton, New York
Watts D, Strogatz S (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393:440–442
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fagiolo, G., Valente, M., Vriend, N.J. (2009). A Dynamic Model of Segregation in Small-World Networks. In: Naimzada, A.K., Stefani, S., Torriero, A. (eds) Networks, Topology and Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 613. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68409-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68409-1_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68407-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68409-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)