Abstract
In a two-country trade framework with uncertainty on the production costs and R&D outcomes, we analyze a unilateral policy aimed at incentivizing a domestic firm to find a clean technology. Under Bertrand competition, the optimal policy is a subsidy to domestic production. We compare the full information benchmark to the case where the firm’s R&D effort is unobservable by her government. In both informational contexts, we show the irrelevance of a tariff as a trade sanction against foreign emissions: when the goods are themselves perfect substitutes, the trade policy is a perfect substitute to the environmental policy, the latter being akin to a hidden tariff. When the goods are differentiated, we show instead that the trade policy cannot be decoupled from the environmental policy: these policies become complementary under moral hazard in innovation.
I thank Larbi Dohni, Essi Eerola, David Martimort, Michael Rauscher and the participants in the SCSE conference, Montréal, JMA, Nancy, EAERE conference, Southampton, Euresco conference, Maratea, and Montesquieu Bordeaux 4 seminar for their comments. All errors are mine.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bagnoli, M., and Bergstrom, T. (1989), Log-Concavity Probability and its Applications, Mimeo, University of Michigan.
Barrett, S. (1994a), Strategic Environmental Policy and International Trade, Journal of Public Economics, 54: 325–338.
Barrett, S. (1994b), Self-Enforcing International Environmental Agreements, Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 878–894.
Barrett, S. (1997), Toward a Theory of International Environmental Cooperation, in: C. Carraro (edr), New Directions in the Economic Theory of the Environment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 239–280.
Bouët, A. (2001), Tariffs, Voluntary Export Restraints and Research and Development, European Economic Review, 45, 323–336.
Carraro, C., and Siniscalco, D. (1993), Environmental Policy Reconsidered: the Role of Technological Innovation, Nota di lavoro, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattel, 62.93.
Conrad, K. (1993), Taxes and Subsidies for Pollution Intensive Industries as Trade Policy, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25, 121–135.
Conrad, K. (1996a), Optimal Environmental Policy for Oligopolistic Industries under Intraindustry Trade, in: C. Carraro, Y. Katsoulacos and A. Xepapadeas (eds), Environmental Policy and Market Structure, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 65–83.
Conrad, K. (1996b), Choosing Emission Taxes under International Price Competition, in: C. Carraro, Y. Katsoulacos and A. Xepapadeas (eds), Environmental Policy and Market Structure, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 85–98.
Copeland, B.R. (2000), Trade and Environment: Policy Linkages, Special Issue on Trade and Environment, Environment and Development Economics, 405–432.
Grossman, S., and Hart, O. (1983), An Analysis of the Principal-Agent’s Problem, Econometrica, 51: 7–45.
Hiriart, Y. (2002), Global Pollution Control: Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection in International Trade Context, Mimeo, Université de Toulouse.
Holmström, B. (1979), Moral Hazard and Observability, Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 74–91.
Ludema, R., and Wooton, I. (1997), International Trade Rules and Environmental Cooperation under Asymmetric Information, International Economic Review, 38: 605–625.
Fauroux R., and Spitz, B. (2000), Notre État, Hachette, Paris, p.251.
Shavell, S. (1979), Risk Sharing and Incentives in the Principal and Agent Relationship, Bell Journal of Economics, 10: 55–73.
Ulph, A. (1996), Environmental Policy and International Trade when Governments and Producers Act Strategically, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, 265–281.
Ulph, A., and Ulph, D. (1995), Trade, Strategic Innovation and Strategic Environmental Policy — A general Analysis, Environmental Policy and Market Structure, in: C. Carraro, Y. Katsoulacos and A. Xepapadeas (eds), Dordrecht: Kluwer, 181–208.
Walz, U., and Wellisch, D. (1997), Is Free Trade in the Interest of Exporting Countries when there is Ecological Dumping?, Journal of Public Economics, 66(2): 275–291.
Zhao, J. (2000), Trade and Environment Distorsions: Coordinated Intervention, Special Issue on Trade and Environment, Environment and Development Economics, 5, 361–375.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hiriart, Y. (2003). Unilateral Pollution Control. In: Marsiliani, L., Rauscher, M., Withagen, C. (eds) Environmental Policy in an International Perspective. Economy & Environment, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0333-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0333-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6274-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0333-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive