Abstract
In addition to about 100 annual species, including some of the most important domesticated cereal crops, such as wheat, barley, and rye, the Triticeae tribe encompasses around 400 perennials. They comprise several species, belonging to the wheat tertiary gene pool and commonly referred to as wheatgrasses and wildryes, which, besides their utility as species per se, have worked as highly valuable sources to improve the crop resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, as well as quality and yield-related traits, and even to try conferring a perennial habitus to the typically annual wheat. Several structural rearrangements have accompanied the evolution of this mostly polyploid and cross-pollinating group of species, resulting in complex patterns of homoeology with wheat chromosomes. In spite of this, sufficient overall cytogenomic affinity between perennial Triticeae and the cultivated forms of Triticum has enabled development of a plentiful array of complete or partial amphiploids, addition and substitution lines of single alien chromosomes, as well as translocation and recombinant lines with segmental introgressions. The present contribution will focus on major achievements and latest advances in targeted gene transfer, mostly achieved by cytogenetic approaches aided by recent molecular and genomic tools, which have more significantly contributed, or have the potential, to enhance the breeding performance of cultivated wheats, in the light of a changing ecological and socioeconomic agricultural perspective. Several examples of wheat-perennial Triticeae combinations will be illustrated, involving species of the Thinopyrum genus, more closely related to wheat, but also more distant taxa, such as Leymus, Agropyron, Psathyrostachys, Elymus, and Dasypyrum.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Agropyron
- Elymus
- Leymus
- Thinopyrum
- Wheat tertiary gene pool
- Wheatgrasses
- Wildryes
- Alien gene transfer
- Chromosome engineering
11.1 Introduction
Species belonging to the Triticeae tribe of the grass family (Poaceae) have constantly played a decisive role in development and livelihood of mankind. In addition to about 100 annual such species, including some of the most important domesticated cereal crops (e.g., wheat, barley , and rye ), the tribe encompasses around 400 perennials. The latter group comprises several species, commonly referred to as wheatgrasses and wildryes , which, either as natural invaders or purposefully introduced and even selected by man, represent excellent sources of forage and habitat for livestock and wildlife, and also contribute to soil upkeep and to many other aspects of environmental management. In addition to their utility as species per se, many perennial grasses have been successfully hybridized with cultivated, annual cereal crops and notably wheat , for which they have worked as highly valuable sources to improve resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, as well as quality and yield-related traits, and even to try conferring a perennial habitus to the typically annual wheat.
The relative ease with which hybridization, both natural and man-made, and transfer of desirable attributes has been accomplished from several perennial Triticeae into wheat is due to the existence of sufficient cytogenetic and cytogenomic affinity between the former group of species, belonging to the wheat tertiary gene pool (Harlan and de Wet 1971), and the cultivated forms of Triticum. Based on this, not only complete or partial wheat-perennial Triticeae amphiploids, but also addition and substitution lines of single alien chromosome s, and even radiation-induced--> translocation or recombinant lines with segmental introgressions have been developed. In recent years, several extensive reviews have dealt with this ample field of basic and applied research (see, e.g., Li and Wang 2009; Wang 2011; Mujeeb-Kazi et al. 2013; Ceoloni et al. 2014a; Chaudhary et al. 2014). The present contribution will focus on major achievements and latest advances in gene transfer from those perennial Triticeae species that have more significantly contributed, or have the potential, to enhance the breeding performance of cultivated wheat s, both bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L., 2n = 6x = 42) and durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf., 2n = 4x = 28), in the light of a changing ecological and socioeconomic agricultural perspective.
11.2 A Brief Survey on the Cytogenomic Makeup of Perennial Triticeae
Depending on the taxonomic treatment, between 200 and 250 wheatgrass and wildrye species have been described worldwide, the majority being native to Eurasia and a few to North America, but, as a whole, spread and adapted to the most different environmental conditions of all continents (reviewed in Wang 2011). Not differently from the other representatives of the Triticeae tribe, perennial grasses represent fascinating and puzzling examples of reticulate evolution, in which besides polyploidization, hybridization and interspecific introgression among polyploid lineages and/or their diploid progenitors played a key role in shaping their genomes (e.g. Mahelka et al. 2011; Mason-Gamer 2013; Sun 2014). The resulting genomic heterogeneity has made taxonomic treatment of this ample group of species quite challenging, and often controversial. Moreover, as for other species groups, rather different criteria have animated classification systems through the years (e.g. Barkworth et al. 2009). Even the many genetic and cytogenetic approaches used to investigate intra- and interspecific genome relationships, from classical analyses of chromosome pairing in hybrids, to their “modern” version, with differentially painted genomes, based on genomic in situ hybridization (GISH), up to the ever increasing use of gene/sequence comparisons, and of the many other molecular tools recently available, in several cases still require a thorough interpretation. Thus, although the genome-based classifications proposed by Dewey (1984) and Löve (1984) remain important reference points, subsequent literature revealed them insufficient or incongruent in the face of new findings, and novel interpretations for some controversial biosystematics questions concerning perennial Triticeae species have been recently proposed (see, e.g., Mahelka et al. 2013; Wang and Lu 2014; Wang et al. 2015). As a matter of fact, it is quite obvious that, as more and robust information becomes available, taxonomic treatments change to reflect this information; however, extent and timing of their acceptance and adoption remain subjective. As a consequence, often multiple taxonomic treatments are in use at any given time (Barkworth and von Bothmer 2009). Because taxonomic consideration are not within the scopes of this chapter, in line with what stated by Yen et al. (2005), taxonomy will be used here as “a tool for species recognition,” and, perhaps primarily, as “a guide for germplasm utilization, and a common language for communication.” In this view, the currently most-used nomenclature will be employed here, both for genera and species names, and for their genomic formulas. Table 11.1 summarizes this information for perennial Triticeae species that are representatives of pivotal genomes and/or of genome combinations. In the following sections of the present chapter, those that, at various levels, have been involved in alien gene transfer into wheat will be recalled. Species of Hordeum genus (H genome) will be treated in a different chapter (Chap. 12).
Most recent classifications identify ~10 basic genome types represented among perennial Triticeae species, the majority of which are contained in varying combinations (and most likely, for what above said, in variously rearranged forms) in the numerous polyploid representatives (Table 11.1). Among them, genome P identifies the current Agropyron genus, formerly reported to comprise about 20 genera and 400–500 species, and now universally restricted to the “crested wheat grasses ” such as A. cristatum (Wang 2011). Diploid, tetraploid, and hexaploid species in this genus form a common gene pool, in which gene flow occurs among cross-pollinating species of the three ploidy levels. Tetraploid A. cristatum, the most common of the three crested wheatgrasses , represents a case of segmental autosomy, in that it probably originated from hybridization between diploid A. cristatum and A. mongolicum, both containing the same basic P genome, but distinguished from each other by structural rearrangements (see Han et al. 2014 and references therein; see also Sects. 11.3.2 and 11.3.3).
An important genus is Pseudoroegneria, whose St genome (designated S before Wang et al. 1995) characterizes its taxa, with diploid and auto- or near-autopolyploid representatives. Pseudoroegneria species have been prolific contributors, most probably as maternal parents (Zhang et al. 2009a; Mahelka et al. 2011), to many allopolyploids of different genera, notably Thinopyrum and Elymus (Table 11.1), hence St is definitely a core genome of the Triticeae tribe (Wang et al. 2010a, 2015; Mason-Gamer 2013).
Noteworthy is then the E genome of Thinopyrum species, whose symbol was differentiated into Ee and Eb to designate the haplomes of two diploid representatives of the genus, i.e., Th. elongatum and Th. bessarabicum, respectively (Wang et al. 1995). Alternative symbols, namely J, or Je, and Jb for the respective diploid species, are used, and also included in the genome formulas of Thinopyrum polyploids (Table 11.1; see also Chen et al. 1998; Fedak and Han 2005; Chang et al. 2010; Wang 2011). In fact, the genus encompasses a large number of perennial species and a wide range of ploidy levels, from diploidy up to decaploidy. As several examples will illustrate in the following sections, both the diploids and many polyploids, particularly the hexaploid Th. intermedium and the decaploid Th. ponticum, have been among the most extensively exploited in wheat breeding , not only among perennial Triticeae , but among wheat relatives as a whole (see Sect. 11.3). Consequently, many cytogenetic and cytogenomic aspects of their chromosome makeup have been extensively analysed. Relatively close relationships have been established for the genomes of diploid Th. elongatum and Th. bessarabicum (reviewed in Wang and Lu 2014), although accompanied by various types of chromosomal rearrangements, which differentiate their karyotypes and reduce interspecific pairing (see, e.g., Jauhar 1990; Wang and Hsiao 1989; Wang 1992). As expected, the level of intricacy of intergenomic relationships increases in polyploid representatives of the genus, making interpretation of their origin and definition of their genomic constitution highly debated (Zhang et al. 1996a, b; Chen et al. 1998; Chen 2005; Wang 2011; Wang and Lu 2014; Wang et al. 2015). A shared conviction is that the St (or S) genome from the Pseudoroegneria genus definitely enters in the genomic composition of both Th. intermedium and Th. ponticum. The St/S genome, in turn, shows close relatedness with the E (= Ee) and J (= Eb) genomes, as proved by extensive autosyndetic pairing (Wang 1989a, b, 1992; Jauhar 1995; Cai and Jones 1997) and cross-hybridization in Southern and GISH experiments (Zhang et al. 1996a; Liu et al. 2007). Thus, a conclusive definition of the genomic composition of Th. intermedium and Th. ponticum has been difficult to reach. The former has been described with various genome formulas, including EeEbSt (Wang and Zhang 1996) and E1E2St (Zhang et al. 1996b) or JJsS (Chen et al. 1998), while EeEbExStSt (reviewed in Li and Zhang 2002) or JJJJsJs (Chen et al. 1998) have been indicated for the latter. The controversy has particularly dealt with distinction between chromosomes considered on one hand of fully St/S-genome derivation (Zhang et al. 1996a), and, on the other, hypothesized to result from intergenomic rearrangements in the course of polyploid evolution, with presence of St/S genomic DNA confined to pericentromeric regions (as in Js type chromosomes, see Chen et al. 1998). In any case, hybridization to the St/S genomic DNA, whether complete or segmental, represents a distinctive mark of the genomic origin of the Thinopyrum chromosome(s) involved. However, the picture has been further complicated by evidence of hybridization of Js chromosomes with either genomic DNA or a repetitive sequence of the V genome of the genus Dasypyrum (see ahead), suggesting the involvement of V genome in the evolution of the Js genome (Kishii et al. 2005; Mahelka et al. 2011; Deng et al. 2013). Very recently, comprehensive reassessments have been provided for some of the most controversial issues of biosystematics and evolutionary relationships of perennial Triticeae species (Wang and Lu 2014; Wang et al. 2015, and references therein). One of them concerns the origin and genome constitution of Th. intermedium, which appears to be now nearly resolved. Presence of the St genome from Pseudoroegneria is substantiated by all studies, hence considered unequivocal. Moreover, based on assays with EST-SSR primer sequences derived from the putative diploid progenitor species carrying the St, Jb, and Je genomes , the St genome in Th. intermedium results the least modified from the present-day Pseudoroegneria diploids. On the other hand, the same assays showed both J and Js to differ from present day Je (Th. elongatum) and Jb (Th. bessarabicum) genomes , respectively: the former distinction (J vs. Je) would be based on presence of long-terminal repeat sequences of rye (R genome) origin, the latter (Js vs. Jb) on presence of repetitive sequences of Dasypyrum (V genome) derivation. Taking into account such evidence, a novel designation has been proposed for the Th. intermedium genome formula, that is JvsJrSt, with Jvs and Jr representing ancestral genomes of Jb and Je (Wang et al. 2015).
A complex history of genome rearrangements has been also described for species of the genus Elymus (Mahelka and Kopecky 2010; Zeng et al. 2013b; Sun 2014; Wang et al. 2014; Wang and Lu 2014), the largest genus in the Triticeae tribe, including, in its broadest sense, around 200 species that are widely distributed all over the world. Elymus is an exclusively allopolyploid genus, in which five basic genomes (St, H, Y, P, and W; Table 11.1) have been identified (Wang 2011; Wang and Lu 2014). Among them, the St genome is recognized as common to all Elymus species, while Y, another pivotal genome of the genus, is still of debated origin (Sun 2014; Wang and Lu 2014).
Chromosomal rearrangements were also frequently detected in species of the polyploid Leymus genus, such as tetraploid L. racemosus and L. multicaulis (Qi et al. 1997; Jia et al. 2002; Zhang et al. 2010; see Sect. 11.3.2). All Leymus species are based on the Ns-genome from Psathyrostachys (see ahead) and the Xm-genome of still unknown origin, with genomes P of Agropyron and F of Eremopyrum triticeum hypothetically considered in its ancestry (reviewed in Wang and Lu 2014). However, a different genomic constitution has been recently proposed (Anamthawat-Jónsson 2014). The study, based on FISH experiments with Leymus specific dispersed retroelement-like repeats as probes, showed them to be distributed over all Leymus chromosomes, without any differentiation between chromosomes. The same repeats were also abundant in the Ns genome progenitor in Leymus, i.e., Psathyrostachys. Experiments on Leymus chromosomes using Psathyrostachys genomic DNA as probes further supported the proposal of NsNs (Ns1Ns2) genome constitution for Leymus. The possibility that an Xm genome might have been involved in the beginning of the allopolyploidization process was not discarded, but in this case, the Ns genome specific elements would have spread predominantly and rapidly across genomes , leading to genome homogenization.
As mentioned, the Ns genome characterizes the predominantly diploid species of the small Psathyrostachys genus, containing species, such as P. huashanica, endemic to the Shaanxi Province of China, which has provided a number of desirable genes for wheat improvement (see Sect. 11.3.3.2).
Finally, the Vb genome is included in Table 11.1, which symbolizes the perennial representative of the Dasypyrum genus, currently considered to comprise two species only, the other one being the annual D. villosum, with a Vv genome designation (Gradzielewska 2006a; De Pace et al. 2011). D. breviaristatum is largely tetraploid, while D. villosum is strictly diploid. The origin and genomic constitution of 4x D. breviaristatum is debated. A general consensus exists on its autotetraploid origin. However, a direct derivation from D. villosum appears to contrast with the results of various types of investigations (reviewed in De Pace et al. 2011). Thus, the most likely candidate for the diploid species in which the genome duplication event occurred to give rise to the current 4x D. breviaristatum genome seems to be 2x D. breviaristatum rather than D. villosum (reviewed in De Pace et al. 2011). Nonetheless, several morphological and cytomolecular features are definitely indicative of a common ancestry of the two species, with differentiation between them probably due to adaptability to diverse ecogeographic areas occupied by the common ancestor. In comparison with D. villosum (Gradzielewska 2006b; De Pace et al. 2011), research on D. breviaristatum and, hence, exploitation of its positive attributes in wheat breeding , is very limited. However, some examples are given in Sect. 11.3.2.
11.3 Exploitation of Useful Traits
As above anticipated, exploitation of the ample variability present in perennial Triticeae germplasm has been accomplished through incorporation into the wheat genome of as much as the entire alien genome, particularly in the form of chromosome-doubled hybrids, i.e., amphiploids, down to a single chromosome or chromosome arm pair (either added or substituted), or just a small chromosomal segment. As expected, the relative degree of success has been strongly correlated with several factors, primarily interspecific and consequent intergenomic relatedness, but also degree of crossability , as well as stability of cross combinations and of their derived lines. For all these aspects, species belonging to the Thinopyrum genus turned out to be the most amenable (see, e.g., Jiang et al. 1994; Mujeeb-Kazi and Wang 1995; Wang 2011; Mujeeb-Kazi et al. 2013; Ceoloni et al. 2014a), hence the most extensively used in the production of one or more types of assembly with the wheat genome. Several examples of wheat–alien combinations will be illustrated in the following, both involving Thinopyrum spp. and also more distant wheat relatives among perennial Triticeae species, gathering them on the basis of the amount of alien genome(s) contribution.
11.3.1 Hybrids and Amphiploids
A plentiful array of hybrids and complete or partial amphiploids was obtained with representatives of many species and genera of perennial Triticeae (Wang 1989a, 1989b, 1992, 2011; Jiang et al. 1994; Mujeeb-Kazi and Wang 1995; Fedak and Han 2005; Mujeeb-Kazi et al. 2013; Ceoloni et al. 2014a, and references therein). Such hybrid combinations have provided fundamental knowledge of the intergenomic affinities between the donor species and the recipient wheat, and, as in most wide crosses, represented the first step in the course of targeted introgression of desired alien traits, generally associated with alien transfers of limited entity (see ahead, Sects. 11.3.2 and 11.3.3).
Moreover, amphiploids involving Thinopyrum species, sometimes referred to as “Tritipyrums” (e.g., Marais et al. 2014) or “Trigopiros” (e.g., Fradkin et al. 2012), obtained from colchicine-induced or even spontaneous doubling of the F1’s chromosome number, probably represent the only other case, besides that of the well-known triticale (× Triticosecale Wittmack; Larter 1976), that may have practical utility. In fact, as an alternative route to direct domestication of some perennial species, such as Th. intermedium and Th. ponticum (see, e.g., Cox et al. 2010; Bell et al. 2010; DeHaan et al. 2014), derivatives from hybridization of Thinopyrum species with either durum or bread wheat have long been looked to as possible gateways to development of a perennial wheat. Unlike conventional wheat, that requires tilling and seeding the soil every growing season, develops shallow roots and grows on soil exposed to wind and water erosion for much of the year, perennial wheat would be planted once and harvested several times, would take greater advantage of precipitation during its longer growing seasons, and, thanks to deeper and larger roots, would also reduce soil erosion, nitrogen losses and salinization, as well as sequester carbon from the atmosphere. It would also require fewer farming operations and less herbicide supply, additional key features for sustainability of cereal cropping in less developed regions and marginal lands. Furthermore, greater complexity of the perennial cereal crown may act as a barrier to soil diseases, and this, coupled with ample resistance to foliar diseases conferred by genes of the perennial donor species, can greatly reduce challenges that perennial wheat production might face in terms of disease control (e.g., Cox et al. 2005a, b; Hayes et al. 2012; Turner et al. 2013). Therefore, breeding programmes aimed at capitalizing on perenniality-associated traits, yet providing agronomically and economically acceptable yields, are being conducted in the United States, Australia and other countries, also pointing at a dual-purpose perennial wheat, able to produce grain and additional forage during summer and autumn, hence representing a sustainable and profitable option for mixed crop–livestock farming systems (Cox et al. 2006, 2010; Bell et al. 2010; Ward et al. 2011; Larkin et al. 2014).
Perennial habit embodies a highly complex suite of traits, expected to be largely quantitative in nature. Therefore, notwithstanding the evidence of a gene or genes on chromosome 4E of diploid Th. elongatum determining some ability of post-harvest regrowth (Lammer et al. 2004; see also Sect. 11.3.2), it is not surprising that a common outcome from studies on perennial wheat is that plants derived from intergeneric combinations tend to be perennial only when the proportion of their total genome derived from the perennial parent is conspicuous (Cox et al. 2002; Hayes et al. 2012; Larkin et al. 2014). As a matter of fact, similarly to the regrowth phenotype conferred by chromosome 4E, which results less strong and more environmentally dependent than that observed in the T. aestivum-Th. elongatum complete amphiploid (Lammer et al. 2004), in wheatgrass derivatives reasonable capacity to regrow post-harvest and yield grain over successive years are only observed when many chromosomes are added to wheat from the perennial donor species (Hayes et al. 2012; Larkin et al. 2014). On reviewing the genomic composition of the most promising wheat-perennial derivatives, it has been recently suggested that the best prospects for a productive breeding program in the medium term would derive from complete amphiploids between wheat (either tetraploid or hexaploid wheat) and a diploid perennial donor, such as Th. elongatum, contributing, as in the triticale case, a whole-genome equivalent (Mujeeb-Kazi et al. 2008; Larkin et al. 2014). Providing the necessary chromosomes for the desired “package” of perenniality traits are present, other possibilities for generating perennial wheat amphiploids are of course possible; in fact, besides Th. elongatum, successful donor perennial parents have largely included the polyploid Th. ponticum and Th. intermedium. Also in these cases, if the wheat parent was a hexaploid, an entry required at least 56 chromosomes to achieve any substantial post-harvest regrowth, and even this was no guarantee of a capacity to survive post-harvest (Cox et al. 2010; Hayes et al. 2012; Larkin and Newell 2014; Larkin et al. 2014). Clearly, it is the presence, not solely numerical, of critical alien chromosome s to assure perenniality traits, as the expression of robust perennial habit in partial amphiploids derived from various hybridization strategies demonstrates. One notable case is that of MT-2 lines, derived from an original T. durum/Th. intermedium decaploid amphiploid and, following chromosome loss, averaging 2n = 56, with around 30 Thinopyrum chromosomes (2:1 ratio between E (or J)-genome and St-genome chromosomes, see Table 11.1) and 26 wheat chromosomes (Jones et al. 1999). This genomic constitution contrasts with that of other octoploid partial amphiploids, such as OK-906 and Agrotana, having 40 wheat and only 16 Thinopyrym (E/J + St) chromosomes, characterized by an annual habit (Jones et al. 1999). In all cases, including primary types, as well as derivatives from their inter-crossing or even from backcrossing to the perennial parent, several rounds of breeding cycles and heavy selection will likely be required for the novel wheat type to achieve the desired performance and stability of all target traits. Such stability is expected to correspond to achievement of an inter-genomic “equilibrium,” following a variety of “revolutionary” changes triggered by newly established allopolyploid conditions (Ma and Gustafson 2008; Feldman and Levy 2012; Wang et al. 2014).
Apart from the “perenniality” suite of traits, the numerous amphiploids, both complete and partial types synthetized through the years, represent a key step to early assess expression into the recipient wheat background of the valuable attributes identified in perennial Triticeae germplasm. As for closer gene pools, mostly stress resistance genes, particularly those against fungal and viral diseases, with a frequently monogenic control, have been more easily detected and, through subsequent steps, handled for targeted transfer. Genes of this kind were shown to provide excellent resistance to leaf, stem and stripe rust, powdery mildew, karnal bunt, spot blotch, Stagonospora nodorum blotch, Fusarium head blight (FHB) or scab, tan spot, eyespot, barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV), wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) and its vector, wheat curl mite (WCM), and aphids (see, e.g., Oliver et al. 2006; Li and Wang 2009; Chang et al. 2010; Wang 2011; Zeng et al. 2013a). Remarkable tolerance to abiotic constraints, notably salinity, has also been detected in various amphiploid combinations involving various perennials, such as Th. elongatum, Th. bessarabicum and Th. distichum, and both bread and durum wheat (e.g., Dvorak and Ross 1986; King et al. 1997b; Colmer et al. 2006; Mujeeb-Kazi et al. 2013; Marais et al. 2014). Although major genes have been sometimes identified also for such more complex traits and eventually transferred into wheat (see Sects. 11.3.2 and 11.3.3), it was not infrequent to detect a truly quantitative type of inheritance, with several alien genes scattered on different chromosomes acting in an additive manner (Zhong and Dvorak 1995; Colmer et al. 2006; Mujeeb-Kazi et al. 2013). A similar outcome was observed for FHB resistance conferred by genes on Th. junceum chromosomes (McArthur et al. 2012), and for BYDV resistance from Th. elongatum (Anderson et al. 2010). In these instances, a “genome-wide” approach of transfer promotion can be profitably applied, by introducing into the hybrid or amphiploid genotype a recessive condition at the main wheat locus normally suppressing homoeologous chromosome pairing, i.e., Ph1 (reviewed in Ceoloni and Jauhar 2006; Qi et al. 2007; see also Sect. 11.3.3). This strategy is not only effective in capturing the most of the alien donor genetic determinants for a given polygenic trait, but also when multiple genes/quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for various desirable attributes are scattered in the alien genome(s). In fact, this was proved to be the case for a large number of complete or partial amphiploids (see, e.g., Chen 2005; Fedak and Han 2005; Wang 2011; Zeng et al. 2013a), and for some of these (e.g., for a T. aestivum-Th. bessarabicum amphiploid, Kazi 2011) extension of pairing and recombination promotion to potentially all wheat-alien homoeologous partners was successfully exploited in parallel with the more frequently pursued strategy of backcrossing the Ph1 amphiploid to a normal wheat genotype, to “scale down” the alien donor genomic component to single chromosome additions and substitution lines, and leaving the ph1 mutant effect to be active only on single, specific alien chromosome s (see Sect. 11.3.3).
11.3.2 Chromosome Addition and Substitution Lines
In general, starting from a hybrid or a complete/partial amphiploid combination with one or more appealing attributes for potential enhancement of wheat performance, a step forward for reduction of unwanted alien genetic material is the isolation of single alien chromosome addition and substitution lines into the wheat background. Molecular and phenotypic evaluation of these materials enables chromosomal assignment of gene(s) of interest, besides that genome and homoeologous group attribution of the specific alien chromosome (s). To this respect, sometimes the picture may be complicated by intergenomic rearrangements not seldom occurring in hybrids and amphiploids, as it is in the case of related genomes of polyploid Thinopyrum species (reviewed in Fedak and Han 2005), and hence maintained in derived addition and substitution lines. Various examples are illustrative of this phenomenon, including Th. junceum chromosomes in AJDAj5 and AJDAj6 addition lines, which, based on EST-SSR (Wang et al. 2010b) and RAPD (Wang et al. 2003) markers, appear as complexly restructured chromosomes, carrying portions with segmental homoeology to groups 1 + 5 and 2 + 5 + 1, respectively. Such complex patterns of homoeology with wheat chromosomes (Moustakas 1991; Wang et al. 2010b; Wang 2011) are likely the result of structural rearrangements differentiating the Eb and Ee genomes which make up the hexaploid Th. junceum genome (Table 11.1), and of the complex, reticulate evolution characterizing polyploid lineages of these and all Triticeae species (see Sect. 11.2).
The same reasoning can explain what observed in combinations with wheat of Thinopyrum chromosomes belonging to polyploid species, containing, besides E/J-type genomes , one or more St genomes, consistently proved to be closely related to E/J genomes (Zhang et al. 1996a; Fan et al. 2007; Liu et al. 2007; Wang 2011). Thus, the Th. intermedium chromosome present in addition line L1, derived from the TAF46 partial amphiploid with T. aestivum, was interpreted as a prevailingly St chromosome, with pericentromeric chromatin of E-genome derivation (Wang and Zhang 1996). The BYDV resistance gene present in TAF46 and L1 was allocated to the distal 7St region of the long arm of such a chromosome (Zhang et al. 1996b). Carrier of an St-E translocation was also considered one of the seven Th. intermedium chromosomes present in the Zhong 5 partial amphiploid, and from it incorporated into disomic additions Z1, Z2 and Z6, and substitutions Yi 4212 and HG 295 (Tang et al. 2000; Zhang et al. 2001; Ayala-Navarrete et al. 2009). All lines carrying this chromosome, showing group 2 homoeology, showed high resistance to BYDV.
The array of disease resistance phenotypes assigned to given Thinopyrum spp. chromosomes via evaluation of addition or substitution lines is indeed plentiful. Among the most relevant for having represented starting materials for subsequent use in breeding of their gene content, are various examples in which Th. ponticum chromosomes are involved. One notable case is that of the 6Ag chromosome, containing the durable and wide-spectrum stem rust resistance gene Sr26. Remarkably, since its identification in the 1950s (Shebeski and Wu 1952), Sr26 remains still effective against all known races of the causing agent, including all pathotypes belonging to the Ug99 lineage (FAO 2015). After several backcrosses with bread wheat cv. Thatcher of an original T. aestivum-Th. ponticum partial amphiploid with 2n = 56 (Shebeski and Wu 1952), addition and substitution lines were obtained. These, besides proving that the strong resistance was fully associated with the alien 6Ag chromosome, also showed the latter to be homoeologous to wheat group 6, and to compensate well for wheat 6A, consistently replaced by 6Ag in the substitution lines (Knott 1964). Since the 1960s, the long-lasting Sr26-based resistance was introduced in Australia in the form of a radiation -induced 6AgL-6AL translocation, derived from a 6Ag addition line (Knott 1961), which has been widely used commercially, in spite of the 6AgL-associated yield penalty (The et al. 1988). Further 6Ag manipulations subsequently undertaken to obviate this defect will be described ahead (Sect. 11.3.3).
Another valuable T. aestivum-Th. ponticum pre-breeding material is the 7Ag(7D) substitution line called Agrus. Initially the line was used as a source of the highly effective leaf rust resistance gene Lr19, and, as illustrated in the following section (Sect. 11.3.3), through different strategies (Sharma and Knott 1966; Sears 1973, 1978; see also ahead), 7Ag was engineered to give wheat translocation and recombinant lines carrying Lr19. In rather close linkage with Lr19, along the 7AgL arm, the Sr25 stem rust resistance gene was also found to be located (McIntosh et al. 1977, and both genes still provide strong resistance to the respective rust disease (e.g., Gennaro et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2010; FAO 2015). Of somewhat lower efficacy in time and space (Friebe et al. 1996; FAO 2015) has been the resistance to leaf and stem rust conferred by the Lr24 and Sr24 gene, respectively, located on a Th. ponticum 3AgL arm of a 3Ag Th. ponticum chromosome, substituted for wheat chromosome 3D in the TAP67 derivative line from the (T. aestivum × Th. ponticum) × T. aestivum cross (Bakshi and Schlehuber 1959). TAP 67, showing normal vigor and fertility and reasonably good yield, was used as donor of the Lr24 gene to a series of bread wheat recombinant lines mostly involving the homoeologous wheat 3DL arm (Sears 1973, 1978). Similarly to the Lr19 + Sr25 case, it was later discovered that Lr24 was linked to Sr24 in all recombinant and translocation lines of the same 3Ag chromosome (McIntosh et al. 1977). Based on GISH evidence, the 3Ag chromosome appears to belong to a Js (= St) genome of the donor species (Li et al. 2003).
As to valuable resistance sources associated to chromosomes of other Thinopyrum species, resistance to stem rust, including Ug99 strains (Xu et al. 2009), was found to be conferred by a Th. junceum chromosome, largely homoeologous to wheat group 4, present in the addition line HD3505 (Wang et al. 2010b). Besides this, a group 2 Th. junceum chromosome in the AJDAj3 addition line contained an effective gene(s) for resistance to FHB (McArthur et al. 2012).
Further, considering wheat cv. Chinese Spring-Th. elongatum disomic substitutions, chromosomes 2E and 3E provided excellent resistance to cereal yellow dwarf virus (CYDV), while substitution lines for 1E and 6E were significantly more resistant to Septoria tritici blotch compared to Chinese Spring (Anderson et al. 2010). However, neither chromosome by itself conferred resistance as high as that of several wheatgrass accessions; similarly, genes on multiple Th. elongatum chromosomes were apparently required for complete resistance to BYDV. On the other hand, the excellent resistance to FHB observed in 7E(7A), 7E(7B), and 7E(7D) substitution lines (Fig. 11.1), was shown to be due to the presence of a gene(s) for type II resistance on the 7EL arm (Shen et al. 2004; Shen and Ohm 2006). Transfer of this effective gene in both bread and durum wheat has been recently undertaken (Forte et al. 2011 and unpublished).
Molecular and cytogenetic techniques were used to identify a new wheat-Th. intermedium ssp. trichophorum substitution line from the cross of TE-3 partial amphiploid and the Chinese wheat line ML-13 (Hu et al. 2011). The Thinopyrum derived St-chromosome, substituting for wheat chromosome 1D, was proved to contain new gene(s) for stripe rust resistance. Furthermore, wheat-Th. intermedium lines carrying a group 4 homoeologous chromosome or its short arm were resistant to eyespot (Li et al. 2005). Eyespot resistance was similarly associated to a group 4 chromosome of Th. ponticum, but the same was not true for group 4 chromosomes of the diploid Th. elongatum and Th. bessarabicum species (Li et al. 2005).
On the other hand, taking into account tolerance to abiotic stresses, chromosomes of diploid Thinopyrum species with different homoeology to wheat chromosomes were shown to harbour genes enhancing wheat salt tolerance (Colmer et al. 2006). Dissection of this complex trait by use of addition or substitution lines, revealed Th. elongatum chromosome 3E to have a major dominant effect on salt tolerance, with 3E substitution lines showing superior “exclusion” of Na+ and better maintenance of K+ in flag leaves, higher dry mass and grain yields when compared with wheat cv. Chinese Spring (Omielan et al. 1991). It was, instead, the 5Eb of Th. bessarabicum to confer higher ability to “exclude” Na+ from both mature and newly developed leaves to substitution, and to a lesser extent, addition lines compared to normal wheat (Mahmood and Quarrie 1993). Although other Th. bessarabicum chromosomes are likely involved in fuller expression of the trait, attempts to transfer the 5Eb gene(s) were undertaken (King et al. 1997a). Partly homoeologous to wheat group 5 is also the Th. junceum chromosome (5Eb or 5J) present in the AJDAj5 addition line (see also above), resulting salt tolerant (Wang et al. 2003).
Another interesting trait that could allow wheat to better respond to environmental constraints, namely waterlogged conditions, was identified in diploid Th. elogatum chromosomes homoeologous to groups 2 and 4. In fact, presence of 2E and 4E in T. aestivum addition lines was associated with a positive effect on root growth and penetration in waterlogged soil (Taeb et al. 1993).
Investigation of addition lines of Th. bessarabicum, Th. elongatum and Th. intermedium chromosomes, mostly homoeologous to wheat group 1, have also provided interesting information as to the presence of several novel alleles for high molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS), known to play an important role in determining end-use quality in wheat (Niu et al. 2011). Novel HMW-GS have been also identified and fully characterized in Th. ponticum: some of them contain extra cysteine residues in their amino acid sequences, a feature that makes them potentially able to exert a positive influence on wheat dough properties (Liu et al. 2008). Similarly, good potential for improvement of wheat end-quality was shown for a HMW-GS gene located on a group 1 St chromosome of Th. intermedium ssp. trichophorum, present into spontaneously occurred substitution and homoeologous recombinant bread wheat lines (Li et al. 2013). The genomic sequence of the Thinopyrum -derived HMW-GS was characterized and designated Glu-1St#2x, since it closely resembled x-type wheat glutenins. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that Glu-1St#2x subunit clearly clustered with Glu-R1 from Secale cereale and Glu-E1 from Th. elongatum, and evolved earlier than the split of wheat Glu-1 homoeologous genes.
A peculiar trait that Thinopyrum species, besides that other Triticeae , showed to possess is blue aleurone. The blue pigmentation of aleuronic layer is due to the presence of anthocyanins, one of the major groups of flavonoid compounds that differ from those in red or white wheat grains, and play active roles in several human metabolic activities, such as antioxidant activity, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, and hypoglycemic effects (Abdel-Aal et al. 2006). Development of synthetic blue-seeded wheats from intergeneric crosses with Thinopyrum species has a long history in North America, Europe, and Asia (Morrison et al. 2004; Zheng et al. 2009). Blue aleurone represents an easily scorable marker, used in various genetic studies and breeding practice of wheat (reviewed in Zheng et al. 2009). Moreover, increased interest in health beneficial flavonoids, has attracted attention to the accumulation of anthocyanin pigments in blue-grained wheat as a new dietary source of these compounds, whose biosynthesis might be upregulated during seed development by blue-aleurone (Ba) genes. Analysis of substitution and addition lines of Thinopyrum chromosomes into wheat backgrounds showed effective Ba genes to be consistently associated with homoeologous group 4. A Th. ponticum 4Ag chromosome pair was found to substitute for a 4D pair in the blue-grained Blue Dark wheat developed in Canada and in Blue 58 produced in China (Zheng et al. 2009). Crossing the substitution line Blue 58 with euploid T. aestivum, Li et al. (1986) isolated monosomic substitution plants (2n = 41), in whose selfed progeny distinct seed colors (dark blue, medium-light blue, and white) were observed: dark blue seeds corresponded to disomic substitutions (2n = 42), seeds of medium-light blue color were of monosomic substitutions, whereas white seeds belonged to nullisomic plants (2n = 40). Thus, a clear-cut association between the grain color and the dosage of the Th. ponticum blue-grained gene (named Ba1) on 4Ag was established. A strong dosage effect was similarly observed for a gene, designated BaThb, on chromosome 4 J (= 4Eb) of diploid Th. bessarabicum (Shen et al. 2013). By molecular cytogenetic and marker analyses of spontaneous or induced translocation lines, the Ba genes of the two Thinopyrum species were assigned to non-colinear positions along the long arms of the respective group 4 chromosomes (Zheng et al. 2009; Shen et al. 2013).
Although in much more limited number, and never as complete sets, addition and substitution lines of chromosomes of perennial grasses more distantly related to wheat than the Thinopyrum genus have been obtained. Some involve species of the large Elymus genus, such the allohexaploid Elymus rectisetus, an apomictic species carrying the St, W, and Y genomes (Table 11.1). In backcross progeny from crosses with bread wheat, also attempted to transfer apomixis into wheat (Liu et al. 1994), a disomic addition for a 1Y chromosome was identified, exhibiting moderate resistance to both tan spot and Stagonospora nodorum blotch (Oliver et al. 2008), as well as a 1St addition with a good level of resistance to FHB (Dou et al. 2012; McArthur et al. 2012).
Chromosomes of another polyploid, mostly tetraploid, group of perennials, belonging to the Leymus genus (Table 11.1), were also shown to possess valuable traits for wheat improvement. Particularly noteworthy is the biological nitrification inhibition (BNI), i.e., the capacity of root exudates to suppress NO3 ¯ formation and keep the largest part of soil’s inorganic-N in the NH+ 4-form, found to be highly expressed in Volga or mammoth wildrye, L. racemosus, while virtually lacking in wheat. Analysis of wheat L. racemosus addition lines revealed that such BNI capacity is expressed in the genetic background of wheat cv. Chinese Spring, and is mostly controlled by one L. racemosus chromosome, named Lr#n, whose presence increases by about fourfolds that of the Chinese Spring control (Subbarao et al. 2007). However, the same Lr#n chromosome, recently shown to be homoeologous mostly to group 2 wheat chromosomes (Larson et al. 2012), does not provide tolerance to NH+ 4, which appears to be under the control of chromosome 7Lr#1-1, showing group 7 homoeology. Both attributes would be beneficial for a sustainable wheat production, since while NH+ 4 could represent the necessary signal to make the BNI capacity responsive to the environment, the ability to combat nitrification in intensive wheat farming systems has the potential to reduce nitrogen pollution from such systems (Subbarao et al. 2007).
Furthermore, two of the several wheat-L. racemosus addition lines developed in China showed high resistance to FHB (Wang and Chen 2008). From pollen irradiation of the MA7Lr monosomic addition line, with the alien chromosome showing homoeology to wheat group 7 chromosomes, a ditelosomic substitution line was isolated, where a pair of 7Lr#1S telocentric chromosomes, to which the FHB resistance gene(s) could to assigned, replaced wheat chromosome 7A.
Another attribute that could profitably be introgressed from L. racemosus into wheat is tolerance to Aluminium (Al) toxicity, a key factor limiting its production in acidic soils, which represent 40 % of the world’s cultivated land. Recently, two addition lines, for chromosome A (group 2 homoeology) and E (unknown homoeology) were shown to significantly enhance wheat Al tolerance in terms of relative root growth (Mohammed et al. 2013). The markedly increased tolerance conferred by chromosome E was attributed to improved cell membrane integrity. The same study also showed the importance of wheat chromosome 2B in the expression of the Al tolerance of L. racemosus chromosome A, not detected in the substitution line lacking this chromosome, and also the negative effect of other L. racemosus chromosomes on the same trait, evidently resulting from interaction between wheat and alien genes. Targeted chromosome engineering with the two positively contributing lines is expected to allow attainment of Al-tolerant wheat cultivars.
In the search for sources of tolerance to heat stress, one of the major factors limiting wheat production in tropical and subtropical environments, the same set of L. racemosus addition and substitution lines was evaluated under controlled and field stressful conditions (Mohammed et al. 2014). Chromosomes A, 2Lr#1 and 5Lr#1, added to lines TAC1, TAC12 and TAC13, showed early heading and maturity, which enabled these lines to fill their grains normally and escape the late heat stress occurring at the end of the season. In addition to this avoidance mechanism, the most tolerant TAC12 line probably possesses a heat tolerance mechanism correlated with a more efficient mitochondrial electron transport activity, hence cell viability (Mohammed et al. 2014). Higher mitochondrial efficiency under heat stress conditions also appeared to underlie the heat tolerance of TAC6 addition line, harboring a Leymus chromosome of homoeologous group 5. Yield-related traits were also observed in the various lines, among which TAC14, carrying the group 7 chromosome 7Lr#1, stood out for its considerable yield potential, resulting from both high tiller number and kernel weight. Interestingly, group 7 chromosomes of wheat (Quarrie et al. 2006) and Th. ponticum (Kuzmanovic et al. 2014), also carry genes for yield-contributing traits (see Sect. 11.3.3).
Analysis of addition/translocation lines of another Leymus species, i.e., L. multicaulis, into Chinese bread wheat cultivars, showed different Leymus chromosomes as capable to confer resistance to FHB, CYDV and stem rust (Zhang et al. 2010). Where revealed by use of SSR markers, homoeology of these chromosomes corresponded to wheat groups 1 and 3, to which most of the 24 tested lines appeared to be ascribable (Jia et al. 2002; Zhang et al. 2010). Both RFLP and SSR markers revealed as well rearranged chromosomes, of frequent occurrence in cross-pollinated species like L. racemosus (Qi et al. 1997) and L. multicaulis (Jia et al. 2002; Zhang et al. 2010; see Sect. 11.2). Curiously, all the added/translocated chromosomes of the 24 lines illustrated above appeared to belong to only one of Leymus genomes , namely Xm, of yet unknown origin (Wang 2011). Conversely, of Ns genome likely derivation are the three L. mollis chromosomes substituted into the 2n = 42 line selected among F5 progenies from the cross of an octoploid Tritileymus amphiploid (T. aestivum × L. mollis, 2n = 56) with T. durum (Zhao et al. 2013). The retained L. mollis chromosomes belong to homoeologous groups 1, 5 and 6. The triple alien substitution line, meiotically stable and well compensated, is remarkably resistant to stripe rust and of convenient short stature; thus, it can be employed as a bridge parent in wheat breeding via chromosome engineering .
Desirable genes for wheat improvement have also been identified in species of the genus Agropyron (P genome, Table 11.1) (Han et al. 2014 and references therein). A series of disomic addition lines was obtained from the cross of a Chinese accession of tetraploid A. cristatum with common wheat cv. Fukuhokomugi (Wu et al. 2006; Han et al. 2014). In all of them, SSR, EST-SSR and STS markers specific to the Agropyron chromosome were primarily related to homoeologous group 6; however, the group 6 markers, mainly located in the 6P pericentromeric region, were not completely identical among the different addition lines. Moreover, there were several markers belonging to other homoeologous groups distally located along the various 6Ps. Such rearrangements, probably differentiating the two P genomes of A. cristatum (see Sect. 11.2), led to distinguish four 6P types (6PI–6PIV) with different genetic make-up. Among them, 6PI was proved to carry a gene(s) conferring high grain number per spikelet and per spike and also gene(s) for resistance to wheat powdery mildew (Han et al. 2014).
Various novel disease resistance genes have been also identified on specific Vb chromosomes of the perennial tetraploid D. breviaristatum. Addition and substitution lines were isolated in the progeny of wheat-D. breviaristatum amphiploids crossed with cultivated wheat, including different addition lines carrying genes for stripe rust (Yang et al. 2008), as well as stem rust and powdery mildew (Liu et al. 2011) resistance. Marker data indicated that the Vb chromosomes in the latter two addition lines were rearranged with respect to wheat homoeologous groups. On the other hand, various molecular markers confirmed a group 2 homoeology for the Vb chromosome substituted into a Chinese bread wheat in place of chromosome 2D, able to confer stripe rust resistance at the adult plant stage (Li et al. 2014). Interestingly, FISH, C-banding, and PCR-based molecular marker analyses indicated that the 2Vb of D. breviaristatum was completely different from 2Vv of D. villosum, in line with the current view about the origin of 4x D. breviaristatum (see Sect. 11.2).
All the addition and substitution lines described above were obtained in the hexaploid background of T. aestivum. Development and maintenance of intra- and interspecific aneuploid types is known to be much more difficult at the tetraploid level (reviewed in Ceoloni and Jauhar 2006). Thus, a very limited number of chromosomes of alien species belonging to the secondary and tertiary gene pools (containing genomes that are nonhomologous to those of wheat) could be stably added to the T. durum genome or substituted for its component chromosomes. With the only notable exception of the complete set of D-genome disomic substitution lines, of which a complete set was developed in the variety Langdon, the remaining ones were mostly incomplete and/or of a monosomic type (reviewed in Ceoloni et al. 2005a). However, four out of the seven chromosome pairs of diploid Th. elongatum were added to T. durum cv. Stewart (Mochizuki 1960, 1962). Isozyme analysis allowed identification of the homoeology of the added chromosomes with those of wheat, showing individual relationship to group 1, 6, 3 and 4 (Ono et al. 1983). More recently, from an initial F1 hybrid between durum wheat cv. Langdon and a Th. elogatum accession tolerant to Fusarium heat blight, subjected to several backcrosses with the durum parent and selfings, a disomic addition line with 2n = 30 was obtained (Jauhar et al. 2009; Jauhar and Peterson 2011). Molecular markers allowed identification of group 1 homoeology of the added chromosome, hence named 1E, and will be useful in the transfer of the FHB resistance into durum wheat in a more stable chromosomal condition.
11.3.3 Segmental Introgression Lines
The excessive amount of alien genetic material makes the type of cytogenetic stocks described above still unsuited for practical breeding use; they represent, however, potent resources from which further chromosome manipulations can give rise to exploitable products where undesired linkage drag is largely minimized.
Although none of the wheat-alien transfers so far produced has probably equalled the worldwide success of the spontaneous 1BL.1RS wheat–rye translocation (Mujeeb-Kazi et al. 2013), for an appreciable number of the beneficial traits originating from perennial Triticeae the transfer into wheat has reached the final step, i.e., that of a segmental introduction(s) of sub-chromosomal entity, well harmonized with the wheat genomic environment. The most significant progress has been registered in the last few years, in coincidence with the great advancements in molecular genetic, cytogenetic, and genomic tools, and consequent ability to precisely monitor the alien introduction process and finely target the desired outcomes.
As with other alien sources not sharing with wheat completely homologous genomes , various methods have been used to induce translocations or recombination events between wheat chromosomes and those of perennial wheatgrasses and wildryes . While in the early attempts of chromosome engineering the use of radiation-induced--> translocations was almost invariably adopted (e.g., Sharma and Knott 1966; Knott 1968), genetic promotion of intergenomic homoeologous pairing and recombination has been later the method of election, particularly after the isolation of mutants at the Ph1 locus in both bread (Sears 1977) and durum wheat (Giorgi 1983). In a few instances, exchanges associated with cell culture-induced breakage and fusion (Banks et al. 1995), or the ability of Aegilops speltoides Ph I gene(s) to partly inhibit the wheat Ph1 effect (Wang et al. 2003), were the way followed to promote transfer of BYDV resistance and, respectively, salt tolerance from addition lines for a group 7 Th. intermedium chromosome (7Ai-1) and for a group 5 Th. junceum chromosome (AJDAj5). On the other hand, in a number of cases (see ahead) exchange products of potential breeding value have spontaneously occurred, probably as a result of the action of pairing promoting genes present in perennial Triticeae genomes , which, to various extent, appear to counteract the suppressing effect of wheat Ph genes (Dvorak 1987; Zhang and Dong 1995; Jauhar and Almouslem 1998; Jauhar and Peterson 2000; Kang et al. 2008; Mullan et al. 2009). Whatever the method adopted for promoting exchanges, segmental introductions that involved homoeologous chromosomes and were of relatively more limited length gave rise to the best compensating and hence useful products for breeding exploitation.
11.3.3.1 Transfers Involving Th. intermedium and Th. ponticum
Favoured by the close relationships of their E/J and St basic genomes (Table 11.1) with those of wheat, particularly D and A, Th. intermedium and Th. ponticum, and so diploid species of the same genus, result the most valuable species contributing to wheat cultivar development among perennial Triticeae , and probably among wild relatives altogether (e.g., Li and Wang 2009; Wang 2011; Mujeeb-Kazi et al. 2013). As for other alien donors, among the many useful genes that have been stably transferred from Thinopyrum species into compensating wheat translocation/recombinant lines, the more easily manageable genes conferring disease resistance prevail. Many of these were described in previous extensive reviews (e.g., Mclntosh et al. 1995; Friebe et al. 1996; Li and Wang 2009). In recent years, the list of exploitable resistance sources has widened, with addition of several new genes, and of genes previously included in transfer types unsuitable for breeding use (e.g., associated with excessive alien chromatin amount).
11.3.3.1.1 Introgressions from Th. intermedium
As to Th. intermedium, transfers into wheat include Pm40 (Luo et al. 2009) and Pm43 (He et al. 2009) for resistance to wheat powdery mildew, a disease toward which the donor species shows complete immunity (Wang et al. 2000). Both transfers appeared to consist of a spontaneously occurred cryptic translocation (the former on wheat 7BS, the latter on 2DL), giving rise to cytologically and phenotypically suitable bread wheat lines for use in breeding, especially in humid Chinese environments, where the disease is constantly epidemic. From the same wheat-Th. intermedium partial amphiploid used as donor material of the Pm43 gene, an additional, spontaneous translocation product was recently obtained, consisting of a bread wheat line with a pair of chromosomes 6A carrying a Th. intermedium segment which occupies most of the short arm, and contains a gene with dominant inheritance, determining an immune reaction to powdery mildew races collected from wheat fields of the Southwestern China (Tang et al. 2014). GISH analyses revealed the alien segment to originate from an St chromosome of the Thinopyrum donor species, which likely carries numerous Pm-type genes on different chromosomes and genomes . Various genes for resistance to rusts were also incorporated into wheat chromosomes within Th. intermedium chromosome segments. One such cases is that of the stem rust resistance gene Sr44 (initially designated as SrAgi, Mclntosh et al. 1995), which confers resistance to the Ug99 race complex (Pretorius et al. 2010), and, starting from addition and substitution lines for the complete 7Ai (or 7J) chromosome, has been incorporated into a compensating 7DL.7JS (= 7DL.7Ai-1S) Robertsonian translocation (Liu et al. 2013a), as well as into 7AL.7AS-7Ai-1S ph1b-induced homoeologous recombinant lines (Khan 2000). Distally located on the long arm of the same 7Ai chromosome, the Bdv2 gene conferring BYDV resistance is located; several subchromosomal introgression s containing Bdv2 were obtained, as either cell culture- or radiation -induced translocations (Banks et al. 1995; Crasta et al. 2000), or ph1b-induced homoeologous recombinants (Xin et al. 2001) into wheat 7DL. Lines carrying the shortest alien segment (particularly TC14, with just 20 % distal 7DL replaced by 7AiL, see e.g Ayala-Navarrete et al. 2009) have been deployed in breeding in China and Australia (Zhang et al. 2009b; Ayala-Navarrete et al. 2013). Multi-environment yield trials conducted in Australia showed the impact of TC14 on various genetic backgrounds to be generally benign, except for a frequent delayed maturity, which makes this translocation useful in BYDV-prone areas that experience a less pronounced terminal drought (Rosewarne et al. 2015).
An additional highly effective gene toward this relevant viral disease, named Bdv4, is located on a Th. intermedium chromosome with group 2 homoeology incorporated into the Zhong 5 partial amphiploid and derived substitution lines (see Sect. 11.3.2). A combination of translocations containing Bdv2 and Bdv4 is being endeavoured, which would likely confer to wheat an even stronger and more durable resistance than either gene alone, like that expressed by the wheatgrass donor species (Ayala-Navarrete et al. 2009).
11.3.3.1.2 Introgressions from Th. ponticum
Perhaps even more impacting on breeding are transfers originating from Th. ponticum. Among the many genes introduced from this species into the wheat background (see, e.g., Li and Wang 2009; Ceoloni et al. 2014a), one illustrative case of how chromosome engineering can be the key to effective exploitation of desirable alien variation is that of the stem rust resistance gene Sr26. As above anticipated (Sect. 11.3.2), a radiation -induced 6AgL-6AL (= 6Ae#1) translocation was introduced in Australia and from that many wheat cultivars carrying Sr26 have been released. However, although Sr26 still remains effective against all known races of stem rust, including all currently described pathotypes of the Ug99 lineage (FAO 2015), its resistance has only been used commercially in Australia, where use of 6Ae#1-bearing cultivars has been declining over the past two decades. The reason probably lies in the up to 15 % yield reduction associated with the presence of the 6Ae#1 segment carrying the target gene (Knott 1968; The et al. 1988), a segment that occupies about 90 % of 6AL (Friebe et al. 1996; Dundas et al. 2015). Work was therefore undertaken to reduce the segment size of the 6Ae#1 translocation present in the Australian cv. Eagle by induced recombination with its wheat homoeologues (Dundas and Shepherd 1998; Dundas et al. 2007). By use of biochemical and molecular markers , over 1400 critical individuals were effectively screened, and among them 11 were found to have reduced size of 6Ae#1 chromatin (Dundas et al. 2015). Of the seven proved to carry Sr26, five involved chromosome 6A, one 6D and the last an unidentified wheat chromosome. GISH-based physical mapping placed the Sr26 gene at the distal end of the Th. ponticum chromosome arm, and selected recombinant lines with around 30 % of distal 6AgL chromatin have already shown higher grain yields than the recurrent wheat cultivars in preliminary field evaluations (Dundas et al. 2015).
As mentioned before (Sect. 11.3.2), some Th. ponticum chromosome regions present the interesting occurrence of more than one useful gene for potential use in wheat. One such case concerns the distal portion of 3AgL arm, harbouring the Lr24 and Sr24 genes. Cultivars have been developed mostly from Agent, a spontaneous, compensating translocation carrying both genes in its terminal 3AgL segment, spanning about 30 % of the wheat 3DL arm (Friebe et al. 1996); however, several recombinant lines, involving mostly chromosome 3D but also 3B, were also obtained by genetically induced homoeologous recombination (Sears 1973, 1978). One of the 3BS.3BL-3AgL recombinant lines, carrying about 20 % of distal 3AgL, has been employed in recent years to introduce the two genes on a 3B chromosome of durum wheat (Ceoloni, unpublished). In contrast with the short-term protection provided in North America and South Africa, breakdown of leaf rust resistance conferred by Lr24 was only detected in Australia after almost 20 years of its extensive exploitation (Park et al. 2002), and the gene can still be useful in resistance gene combinations (Bariana et al. 2007). On the other hand, Lr24 confers complete immunity to all leaf rust pathotypes spread in China, where was recently tagged by a STS marker for MAS breeding (Zhang et al. 2011b), and in India (Kumar et al. 2010). As to Sr24, the gene maintains its efficacy in Australia and in many wheat producing regions worldwide, although some Ugandan “Ug99” pathotypes mutated in recent years to acquire virulence toward Sr24 (FAO 2015).
11.3.3.1.3 Transfers Involving Th. ponticum Group 7 Chromosomes
Amongst Sr genes effective against all Ug99 races emerged so far, besides Sr44 and Sr26 already described, Sr25 and Sr43, both from Th. ponticum, have to be recalled. The latter was originally introduced into common wheat in the form of chromosome substitution and translocation lines involving the alien group 7 chromosome, designated 7el2, and wheat chromosome 7D (Knott et al. 1977; Kibiridge-Sebunya and Knott 1983). However, even the best of the translocation lines (e.g., KS24-1 or KS24-2 in Kim et al. 1993), turned out to be 7DS.7el2L Robertsonian translocations , with the complete 7el2L arm determining undesirable linkage drag . Therefore, to eliminate unwanted alien genes, such as one enhancing yellow flour pigmentation (Yp) of the recipient bread wheat, a ph1b-mediated chromosome engineering strategy was applied to the 7DS-7el2S.7el2L KS10-2 initial translocation line (Niu et al. 2014). To identify new wheat lines carrying Sr43 on shortened alien segments, several stem rust resistant plants were screened for dissociation of Sr43 from one or more of the six codominant SSR markers located on 7DL, and two recombinants with Th. ponticum segments of limited size, interstitially located in the subterminal region of 7DL, were eventually isolated. GISH revealed the 7el2L portions to be inferior to 20 % of the recombinant 7DL; however, in both lines the yellow pigmentation was still higher than in wheat control lines, though inferior to the KS10-2 initial translocation line. Moreover, the Sr43 gene they contain could have a limited deployment because of its temperature-sensitive expression, making the gene largely ineffective at 26 °C (Niu et al. 2014).
No doubt, the most extensively targeted group 7 Thinopyrum chromosome is the one originally named 7Ag (Sears 1973) but also 7el1 (Sharma and Knott 1966; Knott et al. 1977), because of its nearly complete homology with 7el2, as probably deriving from a different accession of the same species. In fact, 7el1 and 7el2 not only show almost complete pairing (Dvorak 1975; Forte et al. 2014), but also exhibit considerable correspondence in gene content, particularly at the L arm level. Both arms possess genes controlling resistance to leaf rust (Lr19 on 7el1L and a weaker, unknown Lr gene on 7el2L), and to stem rust (Sr25 and Sr43, respectively), as well as genes determining yellow flour pigmentation (Yp) and Segregation distortion (Sd) (reviewed in Ceoloni et al. 2014a). Contrasting phenotypes for reaction to Fusarium head blight (FHB) differentiate the two 7el sources, 7el1 being susceptible and 7el2 bearing a major QTL in the distal end of its long arm (Shen and Ohm 2007; Forte et al. 2014).
The extensive work addressed to traits of 7el1 derivation, of both theoretical and practical value, has been enabled by availability of a wide array of translocation and recombinant lines involving this chromosome, produced both in bread and in durum wheat backgrounds. The consistent interest for 7el1 transfers was primarily addressed to the Lr19 gene, conferring a largely effective resistance to wheat leaf rust across time and space (Gennaro et al. 2009 and references therein). Using the 7el1(7D) substitution line, named Agrus, as starting material (Sect. 10.3.2), Lr19 was incorporated into bread wheat cultivars through both irradiation (Sharma and Knott 1966; Knott 1968) and induced homoeologous recombination (Sears 1973, 1978). Among the radiation -induced translocations, the one named T4 (= Agatha), consisting of a 70 % long 7el1L segment inserted onto the wheat 7DL arm (Fig. 11.2a; Dvorak and Knott 1977; Friebe et al. 1996), proved to have a good compensating ability (Friebe et al. 1994).
An additional resistance gene, namely Sr25, conferring resistance to several races of wheat stem rust (McIntosh et al. 1976; Knott 1989a), and recently shown to be effective even against Ug99 (Li and Wang 2009; Liu et al. 2010), enhanced the validity of T4. As such, this sizable translocation has been incorporated into several bread wheat varieties, including the CIMMYT cultivar Oasis 86 and various derivatives still bred in several world Countries endangered by Ug99 (e.g., DRRW 2011), and the Sweden cultivar Sunnan (Mclntosh et al. 1995). In India, the second largest wheat producer in the world after China, with about 12 % share in total world wheat production, cultivars with Lr19 + Sr25 have become popular, and besides the rust protection, this alien transfer seems to be associated with slow leaf senescence and increased yield (Sivasamy et al. 2010).
As to the Yp gene(s), also associated with Lr19 and Sr25, as it is one of its most likely candidates, i.e., Psy1 (coding for phytoene synthase, required for endosperm carotenoid accumulation, see Gallagher et al. 2004; Pozniak et al. 2007), the current perception by breeders and consumers seems to be changing as compared to the past. In fact, higher carotenoid content in the wheat grain is becoming a desirable trait for the multiple beneficial health effects determined by these compounds, leaving the aesthetic aspect of the increased flour yellowness of relatively minor importance (Ravel et al. 2013). However, reduction of pigmentation was attempted by various means in past years. By subjecting Agatha (= T4) to EMS treatment, Knott (1980, 1984) produced mutant lines with reduced flour pigment levels but poor agronomic performance (Knott 1984, 1989b): one (Agatha 28-4) was found to carry a point mutation for the Psy1-7el1 gene (Zhang and Dubcovsky 2008), the other (Agatha 235-6) has apparently lost a terminal portion of the original 7el1L segment, also including Sr25 (Friebe et al. 1994), but retains an intact Psy1-7el1 gene. A second Yp gene, more proximally located along the T4 7el1L segment, is possibly mutated in Agatha 235-6 (Zhang and Dubcovsky 2008). In a recent study (Rosewarne et al. 2015), Australian adapted genetic backgrounds carrying the original T4 translocation or each of Knott’s two mutant T4’s, were trialled over a wide range of Australian environments and growth conditions. The effects of T4 and mutant 28-4 on yield in the different sites were similar to those of previous reports by CIMMYT, indicating they provide a yield advantage in high yielding, particularly non-moisture-stressed, environments. For both lines the percentage effect of the translocation in comparison to non-T4 lines increased as the site yield increased. By contrast, the mutant 235-6 translocation was not found to provide a yield increase, but rather to cause depression of several yield-related traits even under water-favourable conditions, which suggests the loss of yield contributing gene(s), besides that yellow pigmentation and Sr25 resistance, in its rearranged 7el1L segment.
Additional white-endosperm, T4 derivatives were also obtained by gamma-ray irradiation (Marais 1992a), and via ph1b-induced recombination (Marais 1992b; Prins et al. 1997; Marais et al. 2001; Somo et al. 2014). Through the latter strategy, repeated rounds of homoeologous recombination eventually resulted in production of recombinants with the desired endosperm phenotype, but with their differently sized alien segments relocated from the wheat 7DL arm to 7BL. This event was accompanied by structural aberrations in the region of exchange, which, even in the absence of the Sd gene (named Sd1, see ahead), might be partly responsible for some detrimental effects on the breeding performance of the carrier lines. However, one recombinant line showed to have the aberrant region replaced by normal wheat chromatin, thus being potentially suitable for breeding exploitation (reviewed in Somo et al. 2014). In all such lines, a second Sd gene (named Sd2, see Groenewald et al. 2005) was hypothesized to be retained and to cause, similarly to Sd1, aberrant segregation of the recombinant chromosomes, particularly through the male germline, as well as negative effects on fertility and seed set. These undesirable Sd-associated effects were, however, manifested in heterozygotes only.
In a separate attempt (Zhang et al. 2005), Sears’ Transfer#1 primary recombinant line (Sears 1973, 1978) instead of the T4 translocated chromosome was fractionated into various 7D/7el1 secondary recombinant chromosomes. One of the selected recombinants was proved to have lost the very distal Yp gene, yet retaining Lr19 and the proximally associated Sd1 gene.
Genetic and physical mapping of all the breakpoints present in the several 7D/7el1 translocation/recombinant lines, by means of various molecular markers and genes/phenotypes assigned to deletion bins or chromosome segments revealed by GISH (e.g., Groenewald et al. 2005), showed substantial synteny and colinearity between the Th. ponticum and wheat group 7 chromosomes, and the critical alien genes, with a centromere-Sd1-Lr19- Yp/Sr25 order, to reside in the distal half of the arm, with the Lr19-to-telomere portion spanning about a quarter of it. This type of information is also instrumental to selection of the most suited lines for breeding applications, i.e., in principle, those that possess the minimum amount of alien chromatin exceeding the gene(s) of interest. Such a selection criterion becomes particularly stringent when the recipient species is durum wheat, markedly less tolerant to genic and chromosomal imbalances than hexaploid bread wheat (reviewed in Ceoloni et al. 2005a). For the same reason, chromosome engineering in this Triticum species poses more difficulties and has provided, as a whole, a relatively limited number of transfer lines of breeding value (Ceoloni et al. 2014b).
Nonetheless, the Lr19 + Sr25 + Yp association looked very appealing for a multitargeted improvement of the durum wheat crop. Therefore, a chromosome engineering strategy, based on the use of the ph1c mutant of durum cv. Creso (Giorgi 1983), was specifically targeted to the concomitant incorporation of the three genes into durum wheat (Ceoloni et al. 2005b). Through this approach, assisted by proper selection tools (molecular markers , FISH/GISH), the excessive length of 7el1 chromatin present on chromosome 7A of a primary recombinant line (Fig. 11.2b) was sufficiently shortened to give secondary and tertiary recombinant types still carrying all target genes and being well tolerated by the recipient durum genome (Fig. 11.2c, d; Ceoloni et al. 2005b, 2014a). From one of them, named R5-2-10 (Fig. 11.2c), with its 23 % of distal 7el1L including Lr19 + Sr25 + Yp but no Sd gene, exhibiting very good agronomic and quality performance (Gennaro et al. 2003, 2007), a variety was released in Italy in 2010 with the name of Cincinnato.
The 7AL-7el1L durum wheat recombinants, for several of which near-isogenic lines (NILs) have been obtained, represented a highly valuable tool to carry out a variety of studies, from integrated genetic and physical mapping of the 7L critical arms, with assignment of numerous markers and genes to several 7L sub-regions, to the analysis of some structural and functional characteristics associated with defined 7el1L portions. Among the most meaningful Th. ponticum traits that could be detected and precisely evaluated are traits with a great potential to positively impact on yield. Effects on yield parameters started to be associated to 7el1L introgression following field trials of NILs carrying the T4 translocation introduced by CIMMYT into the cultivar Oasis 86 and various other bread wheat cultivars (Singh et al. 1998; Reynolds et al. 2001; Monneveux et al. 2003). In all backgrounds, 10–15 % increase in biomass, grain yield and grain number/spike was observed compared to controls lacking the translocation. Through CIMMYT lines, such material has been extensively used in many breeding programs worldwide. However, no precise notion was available on the location along the sizable 7el1L segment of the multiple genes/QTL likely underlying the yield-contributing traits. NILs of some of the durum wheat-Th. ponticum recombinants developed in the background of the well adapted but rust-susceptible cv. Simeto, helped in gaining this knowledge. NILs of recombinant lines R5-2-10, R112-4 and R23-1, carrying 23, 28 and 40 % distal 7el1L, respectively, on the corresponding 7AL arms (Fig. 11.2c, d), have been field-tested in a central Italy environment where durum wheat is typically grown. Significant and differential impacts on relevant yield traits could be detected in homozygous carriers (HOM+) vs. non-carriers (HOM−) of the different 7el1L segments (Ceoloni et al. 2014b; Kuzmanovic et al. 2014). 7el1L genes/QTL determining positive effects on grain and tiller number, grain and biomass yield, flag leaf dimensions and chlorophyll content, were found to be all located within the distal 40 % of the alien arm. Most of them turned out to reside within the 28 %-long 7el1L segment of line R112-4, except for the locus/i controlling grain number per spike and per spikelet, present in the most proximal 7el1L portion of the total 40 % assayed, specific to R23-1 (Fig. 11.3).
Many of the valuable loci detected and confirmed across years appear to be readily exploitable in durum wheat breeding , as they are included in the R112-4 7el1L segment that has no undesirable linkage drag for the recipient species. Less straightforward may turn out to be the harnessing of the grain number per spike/spikelet locus, in most instances found to be associated with considerably decreased kernel weight and, at times, also depending on the wheat genotype, with other abnormal plant phenotypes. These have been tentatively attributed to the presence, in the same R23-1-specific 7el1L segment, of a Sd gene (probably Sd1, see also above), determining in durum wheat backgrounds a more or less severe segregation distortion of such a recombinant chromosome, always in the direction of self-elimination through the male germline (Ceoloni et al. 2014a).
Taking advantage of the 7el1-7el2 homologous relationships, via homologous recombination in hybrids between translocation/recombinant lines carrying the two long arms or portions of them, useful genes originally present in either one have been recently assembled in novel combinations in both bread wheat (Shen and Ohm 2007; Zhang et al. 2011a; Forte et al. 2014) and durum wheat backgrounds (Forte et al. 2014). Thus, both species have been equipped not only with Lr19 + Yp + Sr25 and yield-contributing QTLs of 7el1L origin, but also with a 7el2L-derived effective FHB resistance gene/QTL (named Fhb-7el 2 in Forte et al. 2014). The latter can considerably reinforce resistance to a disease which, favoured by climate changes, has recently become a threat also in unusual environments and toward largely susceptible species, such as durum wheat. In both transfer schemes, the bread wheat 7DS.7el2L centric translocation line (KS24-1 genotype, see above) was employed as donor of Fhb-7el 2 , while, depending on the target wheat species, the bread wheat T4 translocation onto 7D or durum wheat recombinant lines onto 7A were used as source of the 7el1L genes. In contrast to the nearly complete pairing and recombination between the 7el1L and 7el2L portions shared by the two cross parents of the bread wheat transfer, in T. aestivum × T. durum pentaploid F1s considerable reduction in pairing and recombination frequency was observed, mostly ascribable to the location of the parental 7elL portions on otherwise homologous 7D chromosomes vs. 7D and 7A homoeologs in the two F1 types. Nevertheless, pyramiding of target genes/QTL from the two Th. ponticum accessions into both wheat species, greatly assisted by use of advanced selection (MAS) and characterization (GISH) tools, was successfully achieved. Such materials, already exhibiting highly satisfactory agronomic performance (Forte et al. 2014), are expected to lead in the short-term run to durum and also bread wheat cultivars with potential to greatly contribute to enhanced security and safety of the wheat crop.
A highly significant example of multiple Th. ponticum gene introgression s with proved positive impact on breeding is that of the Chinese cultivar Xiaoyan 6, in which at least two wheat chromosomes (2A and 7D) carry chromosomal segments from Th. ponticum with genes contributing durable resistance to stripe rust and Septoria tritici blotch, wide environmental tolerance to high temperature, strong light, and hot-dry winds during grain-filling stages (Li et al. 2008 and references therein). Because of its superior performance under both drought and irrigated conditions, its strong yield stability under diverse environments and good bread-making quality, Xiaoyan 6 was cultivated as the main variety in Shaanxi Province for 16 years (1980–1995). Moreover, Xiaoyan 6 has been used as a core parent for wheat breeding in China in the past 20 years, with more than 50 wheat varieties apparently involving it in their pedigree. These varieties have been grown in more than 20 million hectares, and increased wheat grain production by 7.5 billion kg in total. Thus, Xiaoyan 6 provides an unparalleled example of successful wheat breeding through segmental alien introgression .
11.3.3.2 Additional Introgression s with Actual or Potential Impact on Wheat Improvement
Additional wheat- Thinopyrum derivatives have been used in breeding programs to combat major wheat production constraints. One such case concerned the Mayoor and Chirya lines, selected from the intergeneric combination between T. aestivum and Th. curvifolium (the latter containing two modified E or Je/Jb genomes , see Table 11.1; see also Liu and Wang 1993; Wang 2011), used to develop wheat varieties resistant to the spot blotch disease, caused by Bipolaris sorokiniana, in various parts of the world, particularly Central-Southern America and South Asia (Duveiller et al. 1998; Mujeeb-Kazi et al. 2013). Another interesting case is that of a wheat-Th. disticum derivative (the latter with a similar genome to that of Th. curvifolium, see Liu and Wang 1993), able to confer remarkable salt tolerance to Pakistani and Mexican varieties (see Mujeeb-Kazi et al. 2013).
A potentially appealing resource for wheat breeders has been recently produced which combines genes from two Thinopyrum species, namely the already mentioned Lr19 + Sr25 from 7el1L of Th. ponticum, and the Bdv2 gene from the closely homoeologous arm 7AiL of Th. intermedium (Ayala-Navarrete et al. 2013). Donors of the respective genes to the recombinant translocations were T4 mutant 28-4 (lacking the Yp gene, see above), with 70 % of wheat 7DL replaced by Th. ponticum chromatin, and TC14, with 20 % distal 7DL replaced by 7AiL (Ayala-Navarrete et al. 2009). Thus, from recombination in a ph1b background, desired recombinants were selected by MAS, containing all genes within a single block of alien chromatin as short as the distal 20 % of 7DL chromosome arm (Ayala-Navarrete et al. 2013).
Of similarly limited size was found to be the Th. elongatum 3EL segment replacing the most distal 3AL portion in the best of a series of recombinant lines (named 524–568) developed to improve bread wheat salt tolerance (Mullan et al. 2009). Thanks to high-resolution genetic and physical mapping of wheat-alien chromosome breakpoints, coupled with phenotypic analysis of the 3D-3E and 3A-3E recombinant set, the gene(s) responsible for the Na+ “exclusion” mechanism, previously ascribed to the alien 3E chromosome, turned out to be confined to the distal end of 3EL. This makes line 524–568 a good candidate to obviate or at least alleviate yield penalties caused by high accumulation of Na+ that modern commercial wheat varieties experience under salinity stress. Interestingly, a comparable level of 3E-wheat group 3 homoeologous recombination was detected in the absence of the wheat Ph1 gene and under the pairing promoting effect of gene(s) on Th. elongatum chromosome 3E, combined with absence of other Ph wheat genes on chromosomes 3A and 3D, as in 3E(3A) and 3E(3D) substitution lines (Mullan et al. 2009).
Also in a normal Ph1 background of the cross progeny to wheat of a wheat-Th. bessarabicum amphiploid, a T2JS-2BS·2BL translocation line was recovered (Qi et al. 2010). This, when compared to normal wheat lines, showed enhancement of many yield-related traits, namely more fertile spikes per plant, longer spikes, more grains per spike, and higher yield per plant. At the same time, the quite syntenic replacement included the wheat dominant allele for the Ppd-B1, controlling photoperiod response and determining early heading date (Snape et al. 2001). Thus, the T2JS-2BS.2BL translocation line headed considerably later than control lines. However, the size of the 2JS segments could be further engineered to eliminate the undesirable trait(s), and only exploit the positive yield attributes.
Transfers onto wheat of subchromosomal segments from perennial Triticeae genomes more distantly related to the former than those of Thinopyrum spp. have been documented in recent years. One interesting example concerns tetraploid crested wheatgrass, Agropyron cristatum (Table 11.1), which, besides genes for disease resistance and stress tolerance, was shown to harbour genes/QTL able to enhance wheat yield performance. Already in addition lines (Wu et al. 2006; Han et al. 2014; see Sect. 11.3.2), and, in translocations lines later obtained (Luan et al. 2010), several useful genes were allocated to A. cristatum chromosome 6P; Song et al. 2013; Ye et al. 2015). In particular, genes/QTL enhancing relevant traits such as number of fertile tillers and of grains per spike could be ascribed to specific 6P subregions, and were expressed in translocation lines with minimal amount of 6P chromatin (Luan et al. 2010; Ye et al. 2015). Precise characterization of these lines, including identification of 6P-specific markers, provides a good basis for the utilization of multiple A. cristatum genes in wheat improvement.
The same applies to a highly effective stripe rust resistance gene present on chromosome arm 3NsS of Psathyrostachys huashanica (Table 11.1), an endemic and endangered wild species in China, stably transferred onto wheat arm 3BS (Kang et al. 2011). The 3BL.3BS-3NsS translocation had a spontaneous occurrence in the selfed progeny of a 3Ns monosomic addition line into wheat. Of spontaneous occurrence were also numerous translocations detected in advanced backcross/selfed generations from a T. aestivum x Elymus repens cross, several of which fully expressed the high FHB resistance of the wild parent (Zeng et al. 2013b).
11.4 Concluding Remarks and Future Prospects
The examples above illustrated provide ample evidence of the richness of perennial Triticeae gene pools in beneficial traits for wheat improvement. Recent progress has also been described for many such traits in the path of their stable incorporation into the wheat genome, and, hence, of their well advanced “state of art” in view of practical exploitation as novel breeding materials. Although the history of distant hybridization involving this large group of wheat relatives goes back to the 1930s (Tsitsin 1960), the major progress, as, indeed, for wheat relatives in general, is concentrated in the very last years, in parallel with remarkable advancements in the amount of information and tools for Triticeae genomics and related fields of knowledge. Not only these extraordinary developments have speeded up and made much more effective characterization and selection procedures, but also have considerably increased the ability to capture novel variability for much more complex traits, e.g., yield-related traits, than those almost exclusively targeted in past years. Thus, the answer is now ready to Cox’s question of some years ago (Cox 1997), concerning the perspectives for deepening the wheat primary gene pool. He, in fact, while appreciating the fact that “humans have resorted to interspecific crossing to improve wheat’s pest resistance,” at the same time wondered “…why should wheat’s progenitors not be regarded as sources of useful genetic variation for all economic traits?” The rather obvious answer is in the above statements, that is to say we now can manipulate genomes with knowledge and tools virtually inconceivable just a few years ago. As a result, also the overall success of cytogenetic strategies in finely engineering the genomes of cultivated wheat species has been greatly enhanced. Thus, although the route from the trait identification stage to the output of practical products, ending with varietal release, may well remain relatively long and complex, a holistic and highly effective approach is nowadays applicable; no doubt, this will help to better cope with current and future environmental and social changes, and to meet the requirements for food security and safety sustainably.
In a broader and longer-run perspective, other approaches are expected to complement and even succeed in effecting finer manipulations than those currently achievable by chromosome engineering . In this context, disregarding a number of limitations, the transgenic approach, or perhaps better, where applicable, its cisgenic “version” (Holme et al. 2013), has the advantage of avoiding “linkage drag ” potentially associated with cytogenetics-based manipulations. A cisgenesis-mediated transfer of a gene coding for a MYB transcription factor isolated from Th. intermedium and conferring to the transformed wheat enhanced resistance to the take-all disease was recently described (Liu et al. 2013b). The number of “wild” genes available for this kind of transfer is expected to rapidly increase in a short-term run, as whole genome sequences of the wild donors of the A and D genome s to polyploidy wheats are already available (Jia et al. 2013; Ling et al. 2013). Further, to preferentially target genic regions and greatly reduce the repetitive sequence content of large Triticeae genomes , reduced representation-based approaches are available (Hirsch et al. 2014), and, among them, exome capture has been recently demonstrated to be a powerful approach for variant discovery in cultivated barley and related species (Mascher et al. 2013), as well as in rice and in polyploid wheat species (Saintenac et al. 2011; Winfield et al. 2012; Henry et al. 2014). For species with large genome size, such as cultivated wheats and the many polyploid perennial taxa discussed in the present context, an exome-wide basis can be cost-effective and high-throughput. In fact, even if a reference sequence is not available, a transcriptome assembly can be performed at relatively low cost and can serve as a starting point for the design of capture targets for any species (Henry et al. 2014). Furthermore, progress in chromosome genomics , i.e., genome analysis using chromosome-based approaches, allowed by high-throughput flow sorting technology and recently empowered by the high discriminatory capabilities of FISH labeling (Giorgi et al. 2013), enables isolation of pure chromosome fractions from virtually any genome, including the complex ones of polyploid wheats and of related Triticeae species (reviewed in Doležel et al. 2014; see also Chap. 13 in this book). Thus, specific alien chromosome s, or even recombinant/translocated wheat-alien chromosomes as those described in Sect. 11.3.3, can be the “substrate” for a highly focused exome capture or other gene-targeted approaches. Desirable variant alleles from a given donor species thus identified, can, on one hand, be made available for cisgenic manipulations, although these will retain their inherent drawback of random insertion and unpredictable expression of the delivered gene in the recipient genome. On the other hand, they can also serve as externally supplied DNA templates for targeted gene/allele correction or replacement via recent “genome editing” approaches, holding good promise also in a breeding perspective (reviewed in Podevin et al. 2013).
In conclusion, there is ample consensus on the absolute need that intensification of agricultural production necessary to “close the yield gap,” particularly crucial in the wheat case, has to imply a package of measures that only a changing landscape of breeding strategies can successfully harness. Technical or other types of limitations will have to be overcome before the latest ground-breaking strategies will be in place. Fortunately, however, several novel wheat materials, many reinforced with valuable genes from perennial Triticeae , have been developed in which yet untapped potential for breeding gains has been effectively unlocked, and many more are expected to be readily available in the near future. This effort, coupled with the ever paramount contribution of traditional breeding to incorporate the beneficial transfers into elite and adapted cultivars, will hopefully soften the highly complex scenario threatening mankind’s staple wheat crop.
References
Abdel-Aal EM, Young JC, Rabalski I (2006) Anthocyanin composition in black, blue, pink, purple, and red cereal grains. J Agric Food Chem 54:4696–4704
Anamthawat-Jónsson K (2014) Molecular cytogenetics of Leymus: mapping the Ns genome specific repetitive sequences. J Syst Evol 52:716–721
Anderson JM, Bucholtz DL, Sardesai N, Santini JB, Gyulai G, Williams CE, Stephen B, Goodwin SB (2010) Potential new genes for resistance to Mycosphaerella graminicola identified in Triticum aestivum-Lophopyrum elongatum disomic substitution lines. Euphytica 172:251–262
Ayala-Navarrete L, Tourton E, Mechanicos AA, Larkin PJ (2009) Comparison of Thinopyrum intermedium derivatives carrying barley yellow dwarf virus resistance in wheat. Genome 52:537–546
Ayala-Navarrete L, Mechanicos AA, Gibson JM, Singh D, Bariana HS, Fletcher J, Shorter S, Larkin PJ (2013) The Pontin series of recombinant alien translocations in bread wheat: single translocations integrating combinations of Bdv2, Lr19 and Sr25 disease-resistance genes from Thinopyrum intermedium and Th. ponticum. Theor Appl Genet 126:2467–2475
Bakshi JS, Schlehuber AM (1959) Identification of a substituted chromosome pair in a Triticum-Agropyron line. Proc Okla Acad Sci 1958:16–21
Banks PM, Larkin PJ, Bariana HS, Lagudah ES, Appels R, Waterhouse PM, Brettell RIS, Chen X, Xu HJ, Xin ZY, Qian YT, Zhou XM, Cheng ZM, Zhou GH (1995) The use of cell culture for subchromosomal introgressions of barley yellow dwarf virus resistance from Thinopyrum intermedium to wheat. Genome 38:395–405
Bariana HS, Brown GN, Bansal UK, Miah H, Standen GE, Lu M (2007) Breeding triple rust resistant wheat cultivars for Australia using conventional and marker-assisted selection technologies. Aust J Agric Res 58:576–587
Barkworth ME, von Bothmer R (2009) Scientific names in the Triticeae. In: Feuillet C, Muehlbauer GJ (eds) Genetics and genomics of the Triticeae. Part I – genetics of the Triticeae. Springer, New York, NY, pp 3–30. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-77489-3
Barkworth ME, Cutler DR, Rollo JS, Jacobs SWL, Rashid A (2009) Morphological identification of genomic genera in the Triticeae. Breed Sci 59:561–570. doi:10.1270/jsbbs.59.561
Bell LW, Wade LJ, Ewing MA (2010) Perennial wheat: a review of environmental and agronomic prospects for development in Australia. Crop Pasture Sci 61:679–690
Cai X, Jones S (1997) Direct evidence for high level of autosyndetic pairing in hybrids of Thinopyrum intermedium and Th. ponticum with Triticum aestivum. Theor Appl Genet 95:568–572
Ceoloni C, Jauhar PP (2006) Chromosome engineering of the durum wheat genome: strategies and applications of potential breeding value. In: Singh RJ, Jauhar PP (eds) Genetic resources, chromosome engineering, and crop improvement: cereals. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 27–59
Ceoloni C, Pasquini M, Simeone R (2005a) The cytogenetic contribution to the analysis and manipulation of the durum wheat genome. In: Royo C, Nachit MN, Di Fonzo N, Araus JL, Pfeiffer WH, Slafer GA (eds) Durum wheat breeding: current approaches and future strategies. Haworth Press, New York, NY, pp 165–196
Ceoloni C, Forte P, Gennaro A, Micali S, Carozza R, Bitti A (2005b) Recent developments in durum wheat chromosome engineering. Cytogenet Genome Res 109:328–344
Ceoloni C, Kuzmanović L, Gennaro A, Forte P, Giorgi D, Grossi MR, Bitti A (2014a) Genomes, chromosomes and genes of perennial Triticeae of the genus Thinopyrum: the value of their transfer into wheat for gains in cytogenomic knowledge and ‘precision’ breeding. In: Tuberosa R, Graner A, Frison E (eds) Advances in genomics of plant genetic resources. Springer Science, Dordrecht, pp 333–358. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7575-6_14
Ceoloni C, Kuzmanović L, Forte P, Gennaro A, Bitti A (2014b) Targeted exploitation of gene pools of alien Triticeae species for sustainable and multi-faceted improvement of the durum wheat crop. Crop Pasture Sci 65:96–111
Chang ZJ, Zhang XJ, Yang ZJ, Zhan HX, Li X, Liu C, Zhang CZ (2010) Characterization of a partial wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium amphiploid and its reaction to fungal diseases of wheat. Hereditas 147:304–312
Chaudhary HK, Kaila V, Rather SA, Badiyal A, Hussain W, Jamwal NS, Mahato A (2014) Wheat. In: Pratap A, Kumar J (eds) Alien gene transfer in crop plants, vol 2: achievements and impacts. Springer, New York, NY. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-9572-7_1
Chen Q (2005) Detection of alien chromatin introgression from Thinopyrum into wheat using S genomic DNA as a probe – a landmark approach for Thinopyrum genome research. Cytogenet Genome Res 109:350–359
Chen Q, Conner RL, Laroche A, Thomas JB (1998) Genome analysis of Thinopyrum intermedium and Thinopyrum ponticum using genomic in situ hybridization. Genome 41:580–586
Colmer TD, Flowers TJ, Munns R (2006) Use of wild relatives to improve salt tolerance in wheat. J Exp Bot 57:1059–1078
Cox TS (1997) Deepening the wheat gene pool. J Crop Prod 1:1–25
Cox TS, Bender M, Picone C, Van Tassel DL, Holland JB, Brummer CE, Zoeller BE, Paterson AH, Jackson W (2002) Breeding perennial grain crops. Crit Rev Plant Sci 21:59–91
Cox CM, Garrett KA, Bockus WW (2005a) Meeting the challenge of disease management in perennial grain cropping systems. Renew Agr Food Syst 20:15–24
Cox CM, Garrett KA, Cox TS, Bockus WW, Peters T (2005b) Reactions of perennial grain accessions to four major cereal pathogens of the great plains. Plant Dis 89:1235–1240
Cox TS, Glover JD, Van Tassel DL, Cox CM, DeHaan LR (2006) Prospects for developing perennial-grain crops. Bioscience 56:649–659
Cox TS, Van Tassel DL, Cox CM, DeHaan LR (2010) Progress in breeding perennial grains. Crop Pasture Sci 61:513–521
Crasta OR, Francki MG, Bucholtz DB, Sharma HC, Zhang J, Wang RC, Ohm HW, Anderson JM (2000) Identification and characterization of wheat–wheatgrass translocation lines and localization of barley yellow dwarf virus resistance. Genome 43:698–706
De Pace C, Vaccino P, Cionini PG, Pasquini M, Bizzarri M (2011) Dasypyrum. In: Kole C (ed) Wild crop relatives: genomic and breeding resources, cereals. Springer, Berlin, pp 185–292
DeHaan LR, Wang S, Larson SR, Cattani DJ, Zhang X, Kantarski T (2014) In: Batello C, Wade L, Cox S, Pogna N, Bozzini A, Choptiany J (eds) Current efforts to develop perennial wheat and domesticate Thinopyrum intermedium as a perennial grain. Proceedings of the FAO expert workshop, Rome, Italy, 28–30 Aug 2013, pp 72–89
Deng CL, Bai LL, Fu SL, Yin WB, Zhang YX, Chen YH, Wang RRC, Zhang XQ, Han FP, Hu ZM (2013) Microdissection and chromosome painting of the alien chromosome in an addtition line of wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium. PLoS One 8, e72564. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072564
Dewey DR (1984) The genomic system of classification as a guide to intergeneric hybridization with the perennial Triticeae. In: Gustafson JP (ed) Gene manipulation in plant improvement. Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, NY, pp 209–279
Doležel J, Vrána J, Cápal P, Kubaláková M, Burešová V, Šimková H (2014) Advances in plant chromosome genomics. Biotechnol Adv 32:122–136
Dou QW, Lei YT, Li XM, Mott IW, Wang RRC (2012) Characterization of alien grass chromosomes in backcross derivatives of Triticum aestivum-Elymus rectisetus hybrids by using molecular markers and multi-color FISH/GISH. Genome 55:337–347
DRRW—Durable Rust Resistance in Wheat. http://wheatrust.cornell.edu, Project impacts 2011: Appendix F—Project-Wide Impact Metrics and Varieties Released November 2011.
Dundas IS, Shepherd KW (1998) Shortening the Agropyron chromosome segment carrying gene Sr26 utilising chromosome engineering and molecular markers. In: Slinkard AE (ed) Proceedings of the 9th international wheat genetics symposium, vol 2. University Extension Press, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, pp 35–37.
Dundas IS, Anugrahwati DR, Verlin DC, Park RF, Bariana HS, Mago R, Islam AKMR (2007) New sources of rust resistance from alien species: meliorating linked defects and discovery. Aust J Agric Res 58:545–549
Dundas I, Zhang P, Verlin D, Graner A, Shepherd K (2015) Chromosome engineering and physical mapping of the Thinopyrum ponticum translocation in wheat carrying the rust resistance gene Sr26. Crop Sci 55:648–657
Duveiller E, Dubin HJ, Reeves J, McNab A (eds) (1998) Helminthosporium blights of wheat: spot blotch and tan spot. CIMMYT, Mexico, DF. ISBN 970-648-001-3
Dvorak J (1975) Meiotic pairing between single chromosomes of diploid Agropyron elongatum and decaploid A. elongatum in Triticum aestivum. Can J Genet Cytol 17:329–336
Dvorak J (1987) Chromosomal distribution of genes in diploid Elytrigia elongata that promote or suppress pairing of wheat homoeologous chromosomes. Genome 29:34–40
Dvorak J, Knott DR (1977) Homoeologous chromatin exchange in a radiation-induced gene transfer. Can J Genet Cytol 19:125–131
Dvorak J, Ross K (1986) Expression of tolerance of Na+, K+, Mg2+, Cl–, and SO2-4 ions and sea water in the amphiploid of Triticum aestivum x Elytrigia elongata. Crop Sci 26:658–660
Fan X, Zhang HQ, Sha LN, Zhang L, Yang RW, Ding CB, Zhou YH (2007) Phylogenetic analysis among Hystrix, Leymus and its affinitive genera (Poaceae: Triticeae) based on the sequences of a gene encoding plastid acetyl-CoA carboxylase. Plant Sci 172:701–707
FAO (2015) RUST SPORE – a global wheat rust monitoring system: rust report – stem (black) rust. http://www.fao.org/agriculture/crops/rust/stem/stem-pathotypetracker/stem-effectivesrgenes/en/. Accessed 4 Mar 2015
Fedak G, Han F (2005) Characterization of derivatives from wheat-Thinopyrum wide crosses. Cytogenet Genome Res 109:360–367
Feldman M, Levy AA (2012) Genome evolution due to allopolyploidization in wheat. Genetics 192:763–774
Forte P, Kuzmanovic L, Gennaro A, Bitti A, Ceoloni C (2011) Using wild species of Thinopyrum genus in breeding wheat resistant to Fusarium head blight. Proceedings of the joint meeting AGI-SIBV-SIGA, Assisi, Italy, abstract 6A.21. ISBN 978-88-904570-2-9
Forte P, Virili ME, Kuzmanović L, Moscetti I, Andrea Gennaro A, D’Ovidio R, Ceoloni C (2014) A novel assembly of Thinopyrum ponticum genes into the durum wheat genome: pyramiding Fusarium head blight resistance onto recombinant lines previously engineered for other beneficial traits from the same alien species. Mol Breeding 34:1701–1716
Fradkin M, Ferrari MR, Ferreira V, Grassi E, Greizerstein EJ, Poggio L (2012) Chromosome and genome composition of a Triticum x Thinopyrum hybrid by classical and molecular cytogenetic techniques. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59:231–237
Friebe B, Jiang J, Knott DR, Gill BS (1994) Compensation indices of radiation-induced wheat-Agropyronelongatum translocations conferring resistance to leaf rust and stem rust. Crop Sci 34:400–404
Friebe B, Jiang J, Raupp WJ, McIntosh RA, Gill BS (1996) Characterization of wheat-alien translocations conferring resistance to diseases and pests: current status. Euphytica 91:59–87
Gallagher CE, Matthews PD, Li F, Wurtzel ET (2004) Gene duplication in the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway preceded evolution of the grasses. Plant Physiol 135:1776–1783
Gennaro A, Borrelli GM, D’Egidio MG, De Vita P, Ravaglia S, Ceoloni C (2003) A chromosomally engineered durum wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum recombinant line with novel and promising attributes for varietal development. In: Pogna NE, Romanò M, Pogna EA, Galterio G (eds) Proceeding of the 10th international wheat genetics symposium. S.I.M.I, Rome, Italy, pp 881–883
Gennaro A, Forte P, Carozza R, Savo Sardaro ML, Ferri D, Bitti A, Borrelli GM, D’Egidio MG, Ceoloni C (2007) Pyramiding different alien chromosome segments in durum wheat: feasibility and breeding potential. Isr J Plant Sci 55:267–276
Gennaro A, Koebner RMD, Ceoloni C (2009) A candidate for Lr19, an exotic gene conditioning leaf rust resistance in wheat. Funct Integr Genomics 9:325–334
Giorgi B (1983) Origin, behaviour and utilization of a Ph1 mutant of durum wheat, Triticum turgidum (L.) var. durum. In: Sakamoto S (ed) Proceedings of the 6th international wheat genetics symposium, Kyoto. Plant Germplasm Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto, pp 1033–1040
Giorgi D, Farina A, Grosso V, Gennaro A, Ceoloni C, Lucretti S (2013) FISHIS: fluorescence in situ hybridization in suspension and chromosome flow sorting made easy. PLoS One 8, e57994. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057994
Gradzielewska A (2006a) The genus Dasypyrum – part 1. The taxonomy and relationships within Dasypyrum and with Triticeae species. Euphytica 152:429–440
Gradzielewska A (2006b) The genus Dasypyrum – part 2. A wild species used in wheat improvement. Euphytica 152:441–454
Groenewald JZ, Fourie M, Marais AS, Marais GF (2005) Extention and use of a physical map of the Thinopyrum-derived Lr19 translocation. Theor Appl Genet 112:131–138
Han H, Bai L, Su J, Zhang J, Song L, Gao A, Yang X, Li X, Liu W, Li L (2014) Genetic rearrangements of six wheat–Agropyron cristatum 6P addition lines revealed by molecular markers. PLoS One 9, e91066
Harlan J, de Wet JMJ (1971) Towards a rationale classification of cultivated plants. Taxon 20:509–517
Hayes RC, Newell MT, DeHaan LR, Murphy KM, Crane S, Norton MR, Wade LJ, Newberry M, Fahim M, Jones SS, Cox TS, Larkin PJ (2012) Perennial cereal crops: an initial evaluation of wheat derivatives. Field Crops Res 133:68–89
He RL, Chang ZJ, Yang ZJ, Yuan ZY, Zhan HX, Zhang XJ, Liu JX (2009) Inheritance and mapping of powdery mildew resistance gene Pm43 introgressed from Thinopyrum intermedium into wheat. Theor Appl Genet 118:1173–1180
Henry IM, Nagalakshmi U, Lieberman MC, Ngo KJ, Krasileva KV et al (2014) Efficient genome-wide detection and cataloguing of EMS-induced mutations using exome capture and next-generation sequencing. Plant Cell 26:1382–1397
Hirsch CD, Evans J, Buell CR, Hirsch CN (2014) Reduced representation approaches to interrogate genome diversity in large repetitive plant genomes. Brief Funct Genomics 13:257–67
Holme IB, Wendt T, Holm PB (2013) Intragenesis and cisgenesis as alternatives to transgenic crop development. Plant Biotechnol J 11:395–407
Hu LJ, Li GR, Zeng ZX, Chang ZJ, Liu C, Zhou JP, Yang ZJ (2011) Molecular cytogenetic identification of a new wheat-Thinopyrum substitution line with stripe rust resistance. Euphytica 177:169–177
DRRW – Durable Rust Resistance in Wheat, http://wheatrust.cornell.edu, Project impacts 2011: appendix F – project-wide impact metrics and varieties released, Nov 2011
Jauhar PP (1990) Multidisciplinary approach to genome analysis in the diploid species, Thinopyrum bessarabicum and Th. elongatum (Lophopyrum elongatum), of the Triticeae. Theor Appl Genet 80:523–536
Jauhar PP (1995) Meiosis and fertility of F1 hybrids between hexaploid bread wheat and decaploid tall wheatgrass (Thinopyrum ponticum). Theor Appl Genet 90:865–871
Jauhar PP, Almouslem AB (1998) Production and meiotic analyses of intergeneric hybrids between durum wheat and Thinopyrum species. In: Jaradat AA (ed) Proceedings of the 3rd international Triticeae symposium. Scientific Publishers, Enfield, NH, pp 119–126
Jauhar PP, Peterson TS (2000). Toward transferring scab resistance from a diploid wild grass, Lophopyrum elongatum, into durum wheat. In: Proceedings of the 2000 National Fusarium Head Blight Forum, Cincinnati, 10–21 Dec 2000, pp 201–204
Jauhar PP, Peterson TS (2011) Cytological and molecular characterization of homoeologous group-1 chromosomes in hybrid derivatives of a durum disomic alien addition line. Plant Genome 4:102–109
Jauhar PP, Peterson TS, Xu SS (2009) Cytogenetic and molecular characterization of a durum alien disomic addition line with enhanced tolerance to Fusarium head blight. Genome 52:467–483
Jia J, Zhou R, Li P, Zhao M, Dong Y (2002) Identifying the alien chromosomes in wheat-Leymus multicaulis derivatives using GISH and RFLP techniques. Euphytica 127:201–207
Jia J, Zhao S, Kong X, Li Y, Zhao G et al (2013) Aegilops tauschii draft genome sequence reveals a gene repertoire for wheat adaptation. Nature 496:91–95
Jiang J, Friebe B, Gill BS (1994) Recent advances in alien gene transfer in wheat. Euphytica 73:199–212
Jones TA, Zhang XY, Wang RRC (1999) Genome characterization of MT-2 perennial and OK-906 annual wheat x intermediate wheatgrass hybrids. Crop Sci 39:1041–1043
Kang HY, Zhang HQ, Wang Y, Jiang Y, Yuan HJ, Zhou YH (2008) Comparative analysis of the homoeologous pairing effects of phKL gene in common wheat x Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng ex Kuo. Cereal Res Commun 36:429–440
Kang H, Wang Y, Fedak G, Cao W, Zhang H, Fan X, Sha L, Xu L, Zheng Y, Zhou Y (2011) Introgression of chromosome 3Ns from Psathyrostachys huashanica into wheat specifying resistance to stripe rust. PLoS One 6, e21802. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021802
Kazi AG (2011) Utilization of Triticeae gene pool diversity for wheat improvement. Ph.D. dissertation, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan, pp 1–240
Khan IA (2000) Molecular and agronomic characterization of wheat-Agropyron intermedium recombinant chromosomes. Plant Breeding 119:25–29
Kibiridge-Sebunya I, Knott DR (1983) Transfer of stem rust resistance to wheat from an Agropyron chromosome having a gametocidal effect. Can J Genet Cytol 25:215–221
Kim NS, Armstrong K, Knott DR (1993) Molecular detection of Lophopyrum chromatin in wheat–Lophopyrum recombinants and their use in the physical mapping of chromosome 7D. Theor Appl Genet 85:561–567
King IP, Forster BP, Law CC, Cant KA, Orford SE, Gorham J, Reader S, Miller TE (1997a) Introgression of salt-tolerance genes from Thinopyrum bessarabicum into wheat. New Phytol 137:75–81
King IP, Law CN, Cant KA, Orford SE, Reader SM, Miller TE (1997b) Tritipyrum, a potential new salt-tolerant cereal. Plant Breeding 116:127–132
Kishii M, Wang RRC, Tsujimoto H (2005) (GISH analysis revealed new aspect of genomic constitution of Thinopyrum intermedium. Czec J Genet Plant Breed 41:92–95
Knott DR (1961) The inheritance of rust resistance. VI. The transfer of stem rust resistance from Agropyron elongatum to common wheat. Can J Plant Sci 41:109–123
Knott DR (1964) The effect on wheat of an Agropyron chromosome carrying rust resistance. Can J Genet Cytol 6:500–507
Knott DR (1968) Translocations involving Triticum chromosomes and Agropyron chromosomes carrying rust resistance. Can J Genet Cytol 10:695–696
Knott DR (1980) Mutation of a gene for yellow pigment linked to Lr19 in wheat. Can J Genet Cytol 22:651–654
Knott DR (1984) The genetic nature of mutations of a gene for yellow pigment linked to Lr19 in ‘Agatha’ wheat. Can J Genet Cytol 26:392–393
Knott DR (1989a) Genetic analysis of resistance. In: The wheat rusts—Breeding for resistance. Springer, Berlin, pp 58–83.
Knott DR (1989b) The effect of transfers of alien genes for leaf rust resistance on the agronomic and quality characteristics of wheat. Euphytica 44:65–72
Knott DR, Dvorak J, Nanda JS (1977) The transfer to wheat and homoeology of an Agropyron elongatum chromosome carrying resistance to stem rust. Can J Genet Cytol 19:75–79
Kumar J, Sivasamy M, Nisha R (2010) Performance of brown and black rust resistance genes in some wheat cultivars of central, peninsular, and south India. Ann Wheat Newsl 56:80–82
Kuzmanovic L, Gennaro A, Benedettelli S, Dodd IC, Quarrie SA, Ceoloni C (2014) Structural-functional dissection and characterization of yield-contributing traits originating from a group 7 chromosome of the wheatgrass species Thinopyrum ponticum after transfer into durum wheat. J Exp Bot 65:509–525
Lammer D, Cai X, Arterburn M, Chatelain J, Murray T, Jones S (2004) A single chromosome addition from Thinopyrum elongatum confers a polycarpic, perennial habit to annual wheat. J Exp Bot 55:1715–1720
Larkin PJ, Newell MT (2014) Perennial wheat breeding: current germplasm and a way forward for breeding and global cooperation. In: Batello C, Wade L, Cox S, Pogna N, Bozzini A, Choptiany J (eds) Perennial crops for food security – proceedings of the FAO expert workshop. Rome, Italy, 28–30 Aug 2013, pp 39–53
Larkin PJ, Newell MT, Hayes RC, Aktar J, Norton MR, Moroni SJ, Wade LJ (2014) Progress in developing perennial wheats for grain and grazing. Crop Pasture Sci 65:1147–1164
Larson SR, Kishii M, Tsujimoto H, Qi LL, Chen PD, Lazo GR, Jensen KB, Wang RRC (2012) Leymus EST linkage maps identify 4NsL–5NsL reciprocal translocation, wheat-Leymus chromosome introgressions, and functionally important gene loci. Theor Appl Genet 124:189–206
Larter EN (1976) Triticale. In: Simmonds NW (ed) Evolution of crop plants. Longman Group, London, pp 117–120
Li HJ, Wang XM (2009) Thinopyrum ponticum and Th. intermedium: the promising source of resistance to fungal and viral diseases of wheat. J Genet Genomics 36:557–565
Li D, Zhang XY (2002) Physical localization of the 18S-5.8S-26S rDNA sequence analysis of ITS regions in Thinopyrum ponticum (Poaceae: Triticeae): implications for concerted evolution. Ann Bot 90:445–452
Li ZS, Mu SM, Zhou HP, Wu J (1986) The establishment and application of blue-grained monosomics in wheat chromosome engineering. Cereal Res Commun 14:133–137
Li H, Chen Q, Conner RL, Guo B, Zhang Y, Graf RJ, Laroche A, Jia X, Liu G, Chu C (2003) Molecular characterization of a wheat–Thinopyrum ponticum partial amphiploid and its derivatives for resistance to leaf rust. Genome 46:906–913
Li HJ, Arterburn M, Jones SS, Murray TD (2005) Resistance to eyespot of wheat, caused by Tapesia yallundae, derived from Thinopyrum intermedium homoeologous group 4 chromosome. Theor Appl Genet 111:932–940
Li Z, Li B, Tong Y (2008) The contribution of distant hybridization with decaploid Agropyron elongatum to wheat improvement in China. J Genet Genomics 35:451–456
Li GR, Liu C, Li CH, Zhao JM, Zhou L, Dai G, Yang EN, Yang ZJ (2013) Introgression of a novel Thinopyrum intermedium St-chromosome-specific HMW-GS gene into wheat. Mol Breeding 31:843–853
Li GR, Zhao JM, Li DH, Yang EN, Huang YF, Liu C, Yang ZJ (2014) A novel wheat-Dasypyrum breviaristatum substitution line with stripe rust resistance. Cytogenet Genome Res 143:280–287
Ling HQ, Zhao S, Liu D, Wang J, Sun H et al (2013) Draft genome of the wheat A-genome progenitor Triticum urartu. Nature 496:87–90
Liu ZW, Wang RRC (1993) Genome constitution of Thinopyrum curvifolium, T. scirpeum, T. distichum, and T. junceum (Triticeae: Gramineae). Genome 36:641–651
Liu ZW, Wang RRC, Carman JG (1994) Hybrids and backcross progenies between wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and apomictic Australian wheatgrass [Elymus rectisetus (Nees in Lehm.) A. Löve and Connor]: karyotypic and genomic analyses. Theor Appl Genet 89:599–605
Liu Z, Li DY, Zhang XY (2007) Genetic relationships among five basic genomes St, E, A, B and D in Triticeae revealed by genomic southern and in situ hybridization. J Integr Plant Biol 49:1080–1086
Liu S, Gao X, Guangmin X (2008) Characterizing HMW-GS alleles of decaploid Agropyron elongatum in relation to evolution and wheat breeding. Theor Appl Genet 116:325–334
Liu S, Yu L-X, Singh RP, Jin Y, Sorrells ME, Anderson JA (2010) Diagnostic and co-dominant PCR markers for wheat stem rust resistance genes Sr25 and Sr26. Theor Appl Genet 120:691–697
Liu C, Li G, Yan H, Zhou J, Hu L, Lei M, Ran L, Yang Z (2011) Molecular and cytogenetic identification of new wheat-Dasypyrum breviaristatum additions conferring resistance to stem rust and powdery mildew. Breed Sci 61:366–372
Liu W, Danilova T, Rouse M, Bowden R, Friebe B, Gill BS, Pumphrey M (2013a) Development and characterization of a compensating wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium Robertsonian translocation with Sr44 resistance to stem rust (Ug99). Theor Appl Genet 126:1167–1177
Liu X, Yang L, Zhou X, Zhou M, Lu Y, Ma L, Maand H, Zhang Z (2013b) Transgenic wheat expressing Thinopyrum intermedium MYB transcription factor TiMYB2R-1 shows enhanced resistance to the take-all disease. J Exp Bot 64:2243–2253. doi:10.1093/jxb/ert084
Löve A (1984) Conspectus of the Triticeae. Feddes Repert 95:425–521
Luan Y, Wang XG, Liu WH, Li CY, Zhang JP, Gao AN, Wang YM, Yang XM, Li LH (2010) Production and identification of wheat-Agropyron cristatum 6P translocation lines. Planta 232:501–510
Luo PG, Luo HY, Chang ZJ, Zhang HY, Zhang M, Ren ZL (2009) Characterization and chromosomal location of Pm40 in common wheat: a new gene for resistance to powdery mildew derived from Elytrigia intermedium. Theor Appl Genet 118:1059–1064
Ma XF, Gustafson JP (2008) Allopolyploidization-accommodated genomic sequence changes in triticale. Ann Bot 101:825–832
Mahelka V, Kopecky D (2010) Gene capture from across the grass family in the allohexaploid Elymus repens (L.) Gould (Poaceae, Triticeae) as evidenced by ITS, GBSSI, and molecular cytogenetics. Mol Biol Evol 27:1370–1390
Mahelka V, Kopecky D, Pastova L (2011) On the genome constitution and evolution of intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium: Poaceae, Triticeae). Mol Biol Evol 30:2065–2086
Mahelka V, Kopecky D, Baum BR (2013) Contrasting patterns of evolution of 45S and 5S rDNA families uncover new aspects in the genome constitution of the agronomically important grass Thinopyrum intermedium (Triticeae). BMC Evol Biol 11:127
Mahmood A, Quarrie SA (1993) Effects of salinity on growth, ionic relations and physiological traits of wheat, disomic addition lines from Thinopyrum bessarabicum, and two amphiploids. Plant Breeding 110:265–276
Marais GF (1992a) Gamma-irradiation induced deletions in an alien chromosome segment of the wheat ‘Indis’ and their use in gene mapping. Genome 35:225–229
Marais GF (1992b) The modification of a common wheat-Thinopyrum distichum translocated chromosome with a locus homoeoallelic to Lr19. Theor Appl Genet 85:73–78
Marais GF, Marais AS, Groenwald JZ (2001) Evaluation and reduction of Lr19-149, a recombined form of the Lr19 translocation of wheat. Euphytica 121:289–295
Marais F, Simsek S, Poudel RS, Cookman D, Mohamed Somo M (2014) Development of hexaploid (AABBJJ) Tritipyrums with rearranged Thinopyrum distichum (Thunb.) Á Löve-derived genomes. Crop Sci 54:2619–2630
Mascher M, Richmond TA, Gerhardt DJ, Himmelbach A, Clissoldet L et al (2013) Barley whole exome capture: a tool for genomic research in the genus Hordeum and beyond. Plant J 76:494–505
Mason-Gamer RJ (2013) Phylogeny of a genomically diverse group of Elymus (Poaceae) allopolyploids reveals multiple levels of reticulation. PLoS One 8, e78449. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078449
McArthur RI, Zhu X, Oliver RE, Klindworth DL, Xu SS, Stack RW, Wang RRC, Cai X (2012) Homoeology of Thinopyrum junceum and Elymus rectisetus chromosomes to wheat and disease resistance conferred by the Thinopyrum and Elymus chromosomes in wheat. Chromosome Res 20:699–715
McIntosh RA, Dyck PL, Green GJ (1976) Inheritance of leaf rust and stem rust resistances in wheat cultivars Agent and Agatha. Aust J Agric Res 28:37–45
McIntosh RA, Dyck PL, Green GJ (1977) Inheritance of leaf rust and stem rust resistance in wheat cultivars Agent and Agatha. Aust J Agric Res 28:37–45
Mclntosh RA, Wellings CR, Park RE (1995) Wheat rusts: an atlas of resistance genes. CSIRO, Canberra, ACT
Mochizuki A (1960) Addition of individual chromosomes of Agropyron to durum wheat. Wheat Inf Serv 11:22–23
Mochizuki A (1962) Agropyron addition lines of durum wheat. Seiken Ziho 13:133–138
Mohammed YSA, Eltayeb AE, Tsujimoto H (2013) Enhancement of aluminum tolerance in wheat by addition of chromosomes from the wild relative Leymus racemosus. Breed Sci 63:407–416
Mohammed YSA, Tahir ISA, Kamal NM, Eltayeb AE, Ali AM, Tsujimoto H (2014) Impact of wheat-Leymus racemosus added chromosomes on wheat adaptation and tolerance to heat stress. Breed Sci 63:450–460
Monneveaux P, Reynolds MP, Gonzalez Aguilar J, Singh RP (2003) Effects of the 7DL.7Ag translocation from Lophopyrum elongatum on wheat yield and related morphophysiological traits under different environments. Plant Breed 122:379–384
Morrison LA, Metzger RJ, Lukaszewski AJ (2004) Origin of the Blue-Aleurone Gene in Sebesta blue wheat genetic stocks and a protocol for its use in apomixis screening. Crop Sci 44:2063–2067
Moustakas M (1991) Further evidence of the genome relationships between Thinopyrum bessarabicum and T. elongatum. Cytobios 68:197–206
Mujeeb-Kazi A, Wang RRC (1995) Perennial and annual wheat relatives in the Triticeae. In: Mujeeb-Kazi A, Hettel GP (eds) Utilizing wild grass biodiversity in wheat improvement: 15 years of wide cross research at CIMMYT, vol 2, CIMMYT Research Report No. CIMMYT, Mexico, DF, pp 5–13
Mujeeb-Kazi A, Cortes A, Gul A, Farooq M, Majeed F, Ahmad I, Bux H, William M, Rosas V, Delgad R (2008) Production and cytogenetics of a new Thinopyrum elongatum/Triticum aestivum hybrid, its amphiploid and backcross derivatives. Pakistan J Bot 40:565–579
Mujeeb-Kazi A, Kazi AG, Dundas I, Rasheed A, Ogbonnaya F, Kishii M, Bonnett D, Wang RRC, Xu S, Chen P, Mahmood T, Bux H, Farrakh S (2013) Genetic diversity for wheat improvement as a conduit to food security. In: Sparks DL (ed) Adv agron, vol 122. Academic, Burlington, MA, pp 179–257
Mullan DJ, Mirzaghaderi G, Walker E, Colmer TD, Francki MG (2009) Development of wheat–Lophopyrum elongatum recombinant lines for enhanced sodium ‘exclusion’ during salinity stress. Theor Appl Genet 119:1313–1323
Niu ZX, Klindworth R, Wang RRC, Jauhar PP, Larkin PJ, Xu SS (2011) Characterization of HMW glutenin subunits in Thinopyrum intermedium, Th. bessarabicum, Lophopyrum elongatum, Aegilops markgrafii, and their addition lines in wheat. Crop Sci 51:667–677
Niu Z, Klindworth DL, Friesen TL, Chao S, Ohm JB, Xu SS (2014) Development and characterization of wheat lines carrying stem rust resistance gene Sr43 derived from Thinopyrum ponticum. Theor Appl Genet 127:969–980
Oliver RE, Xu SS, Stack RW, Friesen TL, Jin Y, Cai X (2006) Molecular cytogenetic characterization of four partial wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum amphiploids and their reactions to Fusarium head blight, tan spot and Stagonospora nodorum blotch. Theor Appl Genet 112:1473–1479
Oliver RE, Cai X, Wang RC, Xu SS, Friesen TL (2008) Resistance to tan spot and Stagonospora nodorum blotch in wheat-alien species derivatives. Plant Dis 92:150–157
Omielan JA, Epstein E, Dvorak J (1991) Salt tolerance and ionic relations of wheat as affected by individual chromosomes of salt-tolerant Lophopyrum elongatum. Genome 34:961–974
Ono H, Nagayoshi T, Nakamura C, Shinotani K (1983) Triticum durum–Elytrigia elongata addition line – citological, morphological and biochemical characteristics. In: Sakamoto S (ed) Proceedings of the sixth international wheat genetics symposium, Kyoto. Plant Germplasm Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto, pp 1049–1053
Park RF, Bariana HS, Wallwork H, Wellings CR (2002) Detection of virulence for leaf rust resistance gene Lr24 in Australia. Aust J Agr Res 53:1069–1076
Podevin N, Davies HV, Hartung F, Nogué F, Casacuberta JM (2013) Site-directed nucleases: a paradigm shift in predictable, knowledge-based plant breeding. Trends Biotechnol 31:375–383
Pozniak C, Knox R, Clarke F, Clarke J (2007) Identification of QTL and association of a phytoene synthase gene with endosperm colour in durum wheat. Theor Appl Genet 114:525–537
Pretorius ZA, Bender CM, Visser B, Terefe T (2010) First report of a Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici race virulent to the Sr24 and Sr31 wheat stem rust resistance genes in South Africa. Plant Dis 94:784
Prins R, Marais GF, Pretorius ZA, Janse BJH, Marais AS (1997) A study of modified forms of the Lr19 translocation of common wheat. Theor Appl Genet 95:424–430
Qi LL, Wang SL, Chen PD, Liu DJ, Friebe B, Gill BS (1997) Molecular cytogenetic analysis of Leymus racemosus chromosomes added to wheat. Theor Appl Genet 95:1084–1091
Qi L, Friebe B, Zhang P, Gill BS (2007) Homoeologous recombination, chromosome engineering and crop improvement. Chromosome Res 15:3–19
Qi ZJ, Chen PD, Qian B, Zhuang L, Chen H, Chen T, Shen J, Guo J, Feng Y, Pei Z (2010) Characterization of a wheat–Thinopyrum bessarabicum (T2JS-2BS.2BL) translocation line. Theor Appl Genet 121:589–597
Quarrie SA, Pekic-Quarrie S, Radosevic R, Rancic D, Kaminska A, Barnes JD, Leverington M, Ceoloni C, Dodig D (2006) Dissecting a wheat QTL for yield present in a range of envi the QTL to candidate genes. J Exp Bot 57:2627–2637
Ravel C, Dardevet M, Leenhardt F, Bordes J, Joseph JL, Perretant MR, Exbrayat F, Poncet C, Balfourier F, Chanliaud E, Charmet G (2013) Improving the yellow pigment content of bread wheat flour by selecting the three homoeologous copies of Psy1. Mol Breeding 31:87–99
Redinbaugh MG, Jones TA, Zhang Y (2000) Ubiquity of the St chloroplast genome in St containing Triticeae polyploids. Genome 43:846–852
Reynolds MP, Calderini DF, Condon AG, Rajaram S (2001) Physiological basis of yield gains in wheat associated with the Lr19 translocation from Agropyron elongatum. Euphytica 119:137–141
Rosewarne G, Bonnett D, Rebetzke G, Lonergan P, Larkin PJ (2015) The potential of Lr19 and Bdv2 translocations to improve yield and disease resistance in the high rainfall wheat zones of Australia. Agronomy 5:55–70
Saintenac C, Jiang D, Akhunov ED (2011) Targeted analysis of nucleotide and copy number variation by exon capture in allotetraploid wheat genome. Genome Biol 12:R88
Sears ER (1973) Agropyron-wheat transfers induced by homoeologous pairing. In: Sears ER, Sears LMS (eds) Proceeding of the 4th international wheat genetics symposium. University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, pp 191–199
Sears ER (1977) An induced mutant with homoeologous pairing in common wheat. Can J Genet Cytol 19:585–593
Sears ER (1978) Analysis of wheat-Agropyron recombinant chromosomes. In: Sanchez-Monge E, Garcia-Olmedo F (eds) Interspecific hybridization in plant breeding. Proceedings of the 8th EUCARPIA congress. Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, pp 63–72, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Agrónomos
Sharma D, Knott DR (1966) The transfer of leaf rust resistance from Agropyron to Triticum by irradiation. Can J Genet Cytol 8:137–143
Shebeski LH, Wu YS (1952) Inheritance in wheat of stem rust resistance derived from Agropyron elongatum. Sci Agric 32:26–32
Shen Y, Shen J, Dawadondup, Zhuang L, Wang Y, Pu J, Feng Y, Chu C, Wang X, Qi Z (2013) Physical localization of a novel blue-grained gene derived from Thinopyrum bessarabicum. Mol Breeding 31:195–204
Shen X, Ohm H (2006) Fusarium head blight resistance derived from Lophopyrum elongatum chromosome 7E and its augmentation with Fhb1 in wheat. Plant Breeding 125:424–429
Shen X, Ohm H (2007) Molecular mapping of Thinopyrum-derived Fusarium head blight resistance in common wheat. Mol Breeding 20:131–140
Shen X, Kong L, Ohm H (2004) Fusarium head blight resistance in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum)-Lophopyrum genetic lines and tagging of the alien chromatin by PCR markers. Theor Appl Genet 108:808–813
Singh RP, Huerta-Espino J, Rajaram S, Crossa J (1998) Agronomic effects from chromosome translocations 7DL.7Ag and 1BL.1RS in spring wheat. Crop Sci 38:27–33
Sivasamy M, Kumar J, Menon MK, Tomar SMS (2010) Developing elite, durable disease resistant wheat cultivars combining high grain yield and end-use quality by introgressing effective genes employing conventional and modern breeding approaches. Ann Wheat Newsl 56:87–94
Snape JW, Butterworth K, Whitechurch E, Worland AJ (2001) Waiting for fine times: genetics of flowering time in wheat. Euphytica 119:185–190
Somo M, Chao S, Acevedo M, Zurn J, Cai X, Marais F (2014) A genomic comparison of homoeologous recombinants of the Lr19 (T4) translocation in wheat. Crop Sci 54:565–575
Song L, Jiang L, Han H, Gao A, Yang X, Li L, Liu W (2013) Efficient induction of wheat–Agropyron cristatum 6P translocation lines and GISH detection. PLoS One 8, e69501. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0069501
Subbarao GV, Ban T, Kishii M, Ito O, Samejima H, Wang HY, Pearse SJ, Gopalakrishinan S, Nakahara K, Zakir Hossain AKM, Tsujimoto H, Berry WL (2007) Can biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) genes from perennial Leymus racemosus (Triticeae) combat nitrification in wheat farming? Plant Soil 299:55–64
Sun G (2014) Molecular phylogeny revealed complex evolutionary process in Elymus species. J Syst Evol 52:706–711
Taeb M, Koebner RMD, Forster BP (1993) Genetic variation for waterlogging tolerance in the Triticeae and the chromosomal location of genes conferring waterlogging tolerance in Thinopyrum elongatum. Genome 36:825–830
Tang S, Li Z, Jia X, Larkin PJ (2000) Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) analyses of Thinopyrum intermedium, its partial amphiploid Zhong 5, and disease-resistant derivatives in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 100:344–352
Tang X, Shi D, Xu J, Li Y, Li W, Ren Z, Fu T (2014) Molecular cytogenetic characteristics of a translocation line between common wheat and Thinopyrum intermedium with resistance to powdery mildew. Euphytica 197:201–210
The TT, Latter BDH, McIntosh RA, Ellison FW, Brennan PS, Fisher J, Hollamby GJ, Rathjen AJ, Wilson RE (1988) Grain yields of near isogenic lines with added genes for stem rust resistance. In: Miller TE, Koebner RMD (eds) Proceedings of the seventh international wheat genetics symposium, Cambridge, UK, pp 901–906
Tsitsin NV (1960) Wide hybridization in plants. In: Tsitsin NV (ed) The significance of wide hybridization in the evolution and production of new species and forms of plant and animals. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, pp 2–30
Turner MK, DeHaan LR, Jin Y, Anderson JA (2013) Wheatgrass–wheat partial amphiploids as a novel source of stem rust and Fusarium head blight resistance. Crop Sci 53:1994–2005
Wang RR-C (1989a) Intergeneric hybrids involving perennial Triticeae. Genetics 8:57–64
Wang RR-C (1989b) An assessment of genome analysis based on chromosome pairing in hybrids of perennial Triticeae. Genome 32:179–189
Wang RR-C (1992) Genome relationships in the perennial Triticeae based on diploid hybrids and beyond. Hereditas 116:133–136
Wang RR-C (2011) Agropyron and Psathyrostachys. In: Kole C (ed) Wild crop relatives: genomic and breeding resources, cereals. Springer, Berlin, pp 77–108
Wang LS, Chen PD (2008) Development of Triticum aestivum-Leymus racemosus ditelosomic substitution line 7Lr#1S(7A) with resistance to wheat scab and its meiotic behavior analysis. Chinese Sci Bull 53:3522–3529
Wang RR-C, Hsiao CT (1989) Genome relationship between Thinopyrum bessarabicum and T. elongatum: revisited. Genome 32:802–809
Wang RR-C, Lu B (2014) Biosystematics and evolutionary relationships of perennial Triticeae species revealed by genomic analyses. J Syst Evol 52:697–705
Wang RR-C, Zhang XY (1996) Characterization of the translocated chromosome using fluorescence in situ hybridization and random amplified polymorphic DNA on two Triticum aestivum-Thinopyrum intermedium translocation lines resistant to wheat streak mosaic or barley yellow dwarf virus. Chromosome Res 4:583–587
Wang RR-C, von Bothmer R, Dvorak J, Fedak G, Linde-Laursen I, Muramatsu M (1995) Genome symbols in the Triticeae (Poaceae). In: Wang RRC, Jensen KB, Jaussi C (eds) Proceedings of 2nd international Triticeae symposium, 20–24 June 1994. Utah State University Publications on Design and Production, Logan, UT, pp 29–34
Wang HG, Liu SB, Qi ZJ, Kong FJ, Gao JR (2000) Application studies of Elytrigia intermedium in hereditary improvement of wheat. J Shandong Agric Univ (Nat Sci) 31:333–336
Wang RR-C, Li XM, Hu ZM, Zhang JY, Larson SR, Zhang XY, Grieve CM, Shannon MC (2003) Development of salinity-tolerant wheat recombinant lines from a wheat disomic addition line carrying a Thinopyrum junceum chromosome. Int J Plant Sci 164:25–33
Wang Q, Xiang J, Gao A, Yang X, Liu W, Li X, Li L (2010a) Analysis of chromosomal structural polymorphisms in the St, P and Y genomes of Triticeae (Poaceae). Genome 53:241–249
Wang RR-C, Larson SR, Jensen KB (2010b) Analyses of Thinopyrum bessarabicum, T. elongatum, and T. junceum chromosomes using EST-SSR markers. Genome 53:1083–1089
Wang QX, Gao AN, Yang XM, Li LH (2014) Chromosome changes after polyploidization in Triticeae. J Syst Evol 52:790–793
Wang RR-C, Larson SR, Jensen KB, Bushman S, DeHaan L, Wang S, Yan X (2015) Genome evolution of intermediate wheatgrass as revealed by EST-SSR markers developed from its three progenitor diploid species. Genome 58:63–70
Ward PR, Palta JA, Waddell HA (2011) Root and shoot growth by seedlings of annual and perennial medic, and annual and perennial wheat. Crop Pasture Sci 62:367–373
Winfield MO, Wilkinson PA, Allen AM, Barker GLA, Coghill JA et al (2012) Targeted re-sequencing of the allohexaploid wheat exome. Plant Biotechnol J 10:733–742
Wu J, Yang X, Wang H, Li H, Li L, Li X, Liu W (2006) The introgression of chromosome 6P specifying for increased numbers of florets and kernels from Agropyron cristatum into wheat. Theor Appl Genet 114:13–20
Xin ZY, Zhang ZY, Chen X, Lin ZS, Ma YZ, Xu HJ, Banks PM, Larkin PJ (2001) Development and characterization of common wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium translocation lines with resistance to barley yellow dwarf virus. Euphytica 119:161–165
Xu SS, Jin Y, Klindworth DL, Wang RR-C, Cai X (2009) Evaluation and characterization of seedling resistance to stem rust Ug99 races in wheat-alien species derivatives. Crop Sci 49:2167–2175
Yang ZJ, Zhang T, Liu C, Li GR, Zhou JP, Zhang Y, Ren ZL (2008) Identification of wheat Dasypyrum breviaristatum addition lines with stripe rust resistance using C-banding and genomic in situ hybridization. In: Appels R, Eastwood R, Lagudah E, Langridge P, Mackay M, McIntyre L, Sharp P (eds) Proceedings of the 11th international wheat genetics symposium. University Press, Sydney, Australia, http://hdl.handle.net/2123/3272
Ye X, Lu Y, Liu W, Chen G, Han H, Zhang J, Yang X, Li X, Gao A, Li L (2015) The effects of chromosome 6P on fertile tiller number of wheat as revealed in wheat-Agropyron cristatum chromosome 5A/6P translocation lines. Theor Appl Genet 128:797–811
Yen C, Yang JL, Yen Y (2005) Hitoshi Kihara, Áskell Löve and the modern genetic concept of the genera in the tribe Triticeae (Poaceae). Acta Phytotaxon Sin 43:82–93
Zeng J, Cao W, Fedak G, Sun S, McCallum B, Fetch T, Xue A, Zhou Y (2013a) Molecular cytological characterization of two novel durum-Thinopyrum intermedium partial amphiploids with resistance to leaf rust, stem rust and Fusarium head blight. Hereditas 150:10–16
Zeng J, Cao W, Hucl P, Yang Y, Xue A, Chi D, Fedak G (2013b) Molecular cytogenetic analysis of wheat – Elymus repens introgression lines with resistance to Fusarium head blight. Genome 56:75–82
Zhang W, Dubcovsky J (2008) Association between allelic variation at the Phytoene synthase 1 gene and yellow pigment content in the wheat grain. Theor Appl Genet 116:635–645
Zhang XY, Dong YS (1995) Cytogenetic research on hybrids of Triticum with both Th. ponticum and Th. intermedium as well as their derivatives. III. Primary detection of a genetic base for useful gene introgression from the two alien species into wheat. Acta Genet Sin 22:217–222
Zhang XY, Dong YS, Wang RRC (1996a) Characterization of genomes and chromosomes in partial amphiploids of the hybrid Triticum aestivum x Thinopyrum ponticum by in situ hybridization, isozyme analysis, and RAPD. Genome 39:1062–1071
Zhang XY, Koul A, Petroski R, Ouellet T, Fedak G, Dong YS, Wang RR-C (1996b) Molecular verification and characterization of BYDV-resistant germ plasms derived from hybrids of wheat with Thinopyrum ponticum and Th. intermedium. Theor Appl Genet 93:1033–1039
Zhang ZY, Xin ZY, Larkin PJ (2001) Molecular characterization of a Thinopyrum intermedium group 2 chromosome (2Ai-2) conferring resistance to barley yellow dwarf virus. Genome 44:1129–1135
Zhang W, Lukaszewski AJ, Kolmer J, Soria MA, Goyal S, Dubcovsky J (2005) Molecular characterization of durum and common wheat recombinant lines carrying leaf rust resistance (Lr19) and yellow pigment (Y) genes from Lophopyrum ponticum. Theor Appl Genet 111:573–582
Zhang C, Fan X, Yu HQ, Zhang L, Wang XL, Zhou YH (2009a) Different maternal genome donor to Kengyilia species inferred from chloroplast trnL-F sequences. Biol Plant 53:759–763
Zhang ZY, Lin ZS, Xin ZY (2009b) Research progress in BYDV resistance genes derived from wheat and its wild relatives. J Genet Genomics 36:567–573
Zhang X, Cai J, Anderson JM, Zhao M, Ohm HW, Kong L (2010) Identification of disease resistances in wheat-Leymus multicaulis derivatives and characterization of L. multicaulis chromatin using microsatellite DNA markers. Front Agric China 4:394–405
Zhang XL, Shen XR, Hao YF, Cai JJ, Ohm HW, Kong L (2011a) A genetic map of Lophopyrum ponticum chromosome 7E, harboring resistance genes to Fusarium head blight and leaf rust. Theor Appl Genet 122:263–270
Zhang N, Yang WX, Liu DQ (2011b) Identification and molecular tagging of leaf rust resistance gene (Lr24) in wheat. Agric Sci China 10:1898–1905
Zhao JX, Du WL, Wu J, Cheng XN, Gao Y, Pang YH, Chen XH, Liu SH, Yang QH, Fu J (2013) Development and identification of a wheat-Leymus mollis multiple alien substitution line. Euphytica 190:45–52
Zheng Q, Li B, Li HW, Li ZS (2009) Utilization of blue-grained character in wheat breeding derived from Thinopyrum ponticum. J Genet Genomics 36:575–580
Zhong GY, Dvorak J (1995) Chromosomal control of the tolerance of gradually and suddenly imposed salt stress in the Lophopyrum elongatum and wheat, Triticum aestivum L., genomes. Theor Appl Genet 90:229–236
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ceoloni, C., Kuzmanovic, L., Forte, P., Virili, M.E., Bitti, A. (2015). Wheat-Perennial Triticeae Introgressions: Major Achievements and Prospects. In: Molnár-Láng, M., Ceoloni, C., Doležel, J. (eds) Alien Introgression in Wheat. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23494-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23494-6_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23493-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23494-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)