Abstract
The current agricultural system is confronted with the challenge of excessive reliance on chemical-based fertilizers and pesticides. While these inputs have revolutionized agriculture, they also pose significant environmental risks. As a result, the utilization of agriculturally important microorganisms has become imperative to ensure sustainable agriculture in an environmentally friendly manner. These microorganisms can serve as biofertilizers, offering a wide range of plant growth-stimulating traits such as nitrogen fixation, nutrient solubilization, synthesis of siderophores and phytohormones, etc. By establishing symbiotic relationships, they enhance soil fertility, improve nutrient availability, and promote plant growth, thereby reducing the rely on synthetic fertilizers. Moreover, beneficial microorganisms act as natural adversaries to pests, providing an alternative to chemical pesticides. Microbes also enhance crop resilience to abiotic stresses such as drought and salinity through the production of stress-tolerant compounds, modulation of plant hormones, and improved nutrient uptake efficiency. Furthermore, they contribute to climate-smart agriculture by sequestering carbon in the soil, thereby mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. The use of microbial consortia further enhances plant growth, disease suppression, and stress tolerance. Additionally, microorganisms play an imperative role in biofortifying food crops, improving nutrient absorption, and addressing malnutrition. In summary, microorganisms offer diverse applications in sustainable agriculture, providing transformative solutions for crop-based food production.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Abiotic stress
- Agriculturally important microorganisms
- Beneficial microorganisms
- Biofertilizers
- Crops
- Microbial consortia
10.1 Introduction
Sustainable agriculture has attracted a lot of attention recently as a way to meet the rising global food demand while reducing the negative environmental effects of traditional farming practices, which rely on chemical fertilizers and pesticides. In this context, the incorporation of microorganisms into agricultural systems has emerged as a promising and comprehensive strategy, in which agriculturally important microbes can be used as biofertilizers and biopesticide agents and ensure eco-friendly agricultural practices [1, 2]. However, the intricate interplay among microorganisms, plants, and soil forms the basis of the microbial-plant-soil nexus, which is fundamental to sustainable agriculture. In order to fully explore the potential of agriculturally important microorganisms for sustainable crop production, it is important to understand their mechanisms of action. These microorganisms possess diverse traits and functions that contribute to improved plant growth, improved nutrient availability, and improved soil health [3, 4]. By elucidating these mechanisms, targeted strategies can be developed to optimize their effectiveness and application in agricultural systems. The utilization of microorganisms as biofertilizers is a noteworthy application in the realm of sustainable agriculture. Microorganisms possessing diverse plant growth-promoting characteristics, including nitrogen fixation and phosphate solubilization, play a vital role in enhancing soil fertility and nutrient accessibility [5]. Biofertilizers facilitate nutrient uptake and augment crop productivity by creating symbiotic relationships with plants, thereby mitigating the need for synthetic fertilizers and their associated environmental hazards [6]. In addition, microorganisms have enormous potential as biocontrol agents in pest control. Beneficial microorganisms can act as natural enemies of pests, inhibiting their growth, reproduction, and pathogenicity [7]. This biological control approach offers an environmentally friendly alternative to chemical pesticides and minimizes negative impacts on ecosystems and human health. The ability of crops to withstand abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, and extreme temperatures is essential for ensuring sustainable agricultural production [8]. Various mechanisms have been identified through which microorganisms can enhance plant tolerance and adaptation to stress [3, 8, 9]. Some of the methods used to enhance plant growth and resilience include producing stress-tolerant compounds, modifying plant hormone levels, and enhancing nutrient uptake efficiency [10]. Integrating these stress-tolerant microorganisms into agricultural practices offers prospective options for maintaining crop yields in challenging environments. In addition, the application of microbial-based products shows potential for implementing climate-smart agricultural practices. Microbial organisms have the ability to sequester carbon within the soil, thereby decreasing the amount of greenhouse gas especially carbon dioxide and serving as a means of climate change mitigation [11]. Microbial consortia, consisting of compatible microorganisms, have demonstrated increased synergistic impacts on plant growth and productivity. Microbial consortia are now an efficient way for improving crop growth, disease suppression, and stress tolerance in plants compared to single microbial inoculants, by utilizing the various functional properties of different microorganisms [12]. Microbial inoculants are also important for biofortifying food crops, which can help alleviate global malnutrition and enhance human health [13,14,15]. They have the potential to improve the absorption and availability of vital nutrients, including iron, zinc, and selenium, in crops [16]. This improvement enhances the nutritional quality of crops, addressing nutrient deficiencies in vulnerable populations.
This chapter sheds light on the diverse roles of microorganisms as key components in sustainable agriculture and highlights their immense potential for various applications. Comprehensive understanding and effective use of microorganisms are critical to unlocking transformative and long-lasting solutions for sustainable plant-based food production.
10.2 The Microbial-Plant-Soil Nexus: A Holistic Approach to Sustainable Agriculture
The microbial-plant-soil nexus embodies a comprehensive and scientifically sound tactic to achieving the goals of sustainable agriculture. It recognizes the complicated interactions between microorganisms, plants, and soil within agricultural ecosystems [17]. This approach highlights the use of beneficial microbes in augmenting plant growth, soil health, and promoting sustainable agricultural practices. Microorganisms play a key and indispensable role in nutrient cycling, a fundamental process in agricultural systems [18]. They actively contribute in the decomposition of complex organic matter, breaking it down into simpler forms that can be readily absorbed by plants [19]. Moreover, microorganisms contribute to nitrogen fixation, converting atmospheric N into a biologically usable form for plants. Through these processes, microorganisms improve nutrient accessibility, thereby promoting plant growth and reducing the need for synthetic fertilizers [20]. Furthermore, microorganisms exert a profound influence on soil structure and health. They actively contribute to the formation of soil aggregates, which enhance soil structure, porosity, and water infiltration [21]. These improvements in soil structure, in turn, enhance soil fertility and nutrient retention capacity. Additionally, certain microbes possess plant growth-promoting traits such as phytohormone production, nutrient solubilization, and facilitation of nutrient uptake by plants [2]. The microbial-plant-soil nexus also plays a crucial role in disease suppression within agricultural systems. Beneficial microorganisms act as natural antagonists against plant pathogens by actively competing for resources, producing antimicrobial compounds, and inducing systemic resistance in plants [22]. These activities effectively reduce the occurrence and severity of plant diseases. By harnessing biocontrol agents derived from microorganisms, farmers can minimize the use of chemical pesticides, which can have detrimental effects on the environment and human health [7]. Various strategies can be implemented to fully harness the potential of the microbial-plant-soil nexus. One such strategy involves the application of microbial biofertilizers, which contain beneficial microorganisms that enhance nutrient availability and promote plant growth [2]. These biofertilizers can be applied to seeds, roots, or soil to establish thriving and beneficial microbial communities, ultimately enhancing overall crop productivity. Furthermore, biopesticides derived from microorganisms offer an environmentally friendly alternative for pest control. Microbial-based biopesticides, such as Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and entomopathogenic fungi, specifically target pests while minimizing harm to nontarget organisms and reducing the risk of pest resistance development [23]. Integrating the microbial-plant-soil nexus into sustainable agricultural systems necessitates the adoption of soil management practices that support microbial activity [17]. This includes minimizing soil disturbance, maintaining soil organic matter through cover cropping and crop rotation, and reducing the use of chemical inputs that can disrupt microbial communities. By implementing these practices, farmers can foster a healthy and productive microbial ecosystem within the soil.
10.3 Understanding the Mechanisms of Action of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms
Agriculturally important microorganisms show imperative contribution in augmenting plant growth through diverse arrays of mechanisms. These microorganisms exert both direct and indirect influences on plant growth and development. Directly, they facilitate plant growth via phytostimulation and bio-fertilization. On the contrary, in the indirect way, they function as “bio-pesticides” or “biocontrol” agents [24]. The direct mechanisms employed by agriculturally important microorganisms encompass the facilitation of nutrient uptake and enhancement of nutrient availability. They possess the capacity to fix nitrogen [25], solubilize phosphorus and other essential mineral nutrients [26], and mineralize organic compounds [24]. Moreover, these microorganisms produce phytohormones such as “IAA,” “ethylene,” “cytokinins,” and “gibberellins,” which elicit plant growth responses [27]. The production of siderophores, which facilitate iron uptake, can be regarded as both a direct and indirect mechanism [28]. In addition to their direct effects, agriculturally important microorganisms exhibit indirect mechanisms that contribute to the promotion of plant growth. These encompass the production of antibiotics and hydrolytic enzymes, which help in combating plant pathogens and supporting plant health [29]. They also have the capability to induce systemic resistance in plants, thereby enhancing defense mechanisms against pathogens [8]. Furthermore, these microorganisms secrete exopolysaccharides (EPS), which foster soil aggregation and improve soil structure, ultimately benefiting plant growth [30].
The multifaceted activities of agriculturally important microorganisms establish them as precious contributors to plant growth and development. By harnessing these beneficial interactions, these microorganisms present promising prospects for promoting sustainable agriculture and ensuring ecological balance.
10.4 Microbial Agents as Biofertilizers for Improving Crop Productivity
Biofertilizers, classified as organic fertilizers, consist of microbial strains possessing plant growth-promoting characteristics. The excessive use of chemical-based fertilizers in recent years has raised concerns about their detrimental effects on the environment. Consequently, there is a growing public interest in adopting eco-friendly strategies. Utilizing biofertilizers is revolutionizing agricultural practices by providing an environmentally sustainable approach and reducing dependence on agrochemicals. This transformation hinges upon the careful selection of microbial strains to ensure optimal results. Microbial strains, including bacteria, fungi, and mycorrhizae such as “Bacillus,” “Rhizobium,” “Lactobacillus,” ‘Azotobacter,” “Pseudomonas,” “photosynthetic bacteria,” “Trichoderma sp., “Glomus sp.,” “Gigaspora sp.,” “Pezizella sp.,” and “yeasts” exhibit a wide range of capabilities, such as nitrogen fixation, solubilization of phosphate, zinc, iron, and potassium, as well as the production of phytohormones and cellulolytic enzymes [2, 31,32,33]. These strains are primarily utilized as biofertilizers [2, 33]. Through the processes of nitrogen fixation, phosphate, potassium, and zinc solubilization, secretion of plant growth-regulating substances like hormones and vitamins and facilitation of organic matter biodegradation, biofertilizers play a crucial role in augmenting the plant growth and also contribute in maintaining soil health [2, 34]. Biofertilizers are widely acknowledged as microbial inoculants that effectively enhance nutrient availability in the soil, addressing the multifaceted challenges stemming from intensive chemical fertilizer usage [35]. In addition to their role in facilitating nutrient uptake by plants, biofertilizers exert a significant influence on various vital plant physiological processes, including the augmentation of water absorption and the promotion of photosynthetic rates [36]. Extensive research has documented the capacity of biofertilizers to enhance both abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in plants [8, 37]). Moreover, they play a pivotal role in the bioremediation of pesticides, contributing to the mitigation of their environmental impact [38,39,40]. Functioning as effective biocontrollers and biofertilizers exhibit noteworthy antagonistic properties against a diverse range of soil-borne plant pathogens, encompassing Rhizoctonia root rot, chill wilt, Pythium root rot, mung bean root rot, and parasitic nematodes [2, 41]. Advancements in bioformulation technologies are imperative for the successful commercialization of proficient microbial strains that possess biocontrol and plant growth-promoting capabilities. Several essential characteristics define an exemplary biofertilizer: (1) it must demonstrate environmental friendliness; (2) the microbial strains employed in its formulation must be nonpathogenic; (3) it should provide crops with high-quality nutrients; and (4) it should exhibit an extended shelf life [2, 42]. The meticulous selection of microorganisms possessing desirable traits stands as a pivotal factor in biofertilizer production. A comprehensive understanding of the interactions between microorganisms, crops, and the environment is vital to enhance crop growth [2, 43]. Microbes utilized in bioformulations undergo rigorous testing under in situ and in vivo conditions to ascertain the preservation of desired properties and the attainment of desired outcomes [44]. Furthermore, the chosen microbes for biofertilizer formulation should exhibit genetic stability, target specific crops, maintain synchrony with the native microbial population, and demonstrate survivability even in the absence of a host [5, 45]. The development of biofertilizers has traditionally focused on single microbial strains, but recent research emphasizes the advantages of employing multiple strains in the form of microbial consortia. These consortia act synergistically through diverse mechanisms, resulting in heightened effectiveness for crop enhancement [46, 47]. The process of biofertilizer development is intricate and requires rigorous assessments to meet stringent quality standards. Ensuring the viability of microorganisms is of paramount importance, enabling them to sustain soil fertility even after extended periods of storage [2, 48]. Biofertilizers can be formulated as dried powder, granules, or liquid, utilizing different carrier materials to support microbial growth and facilitate efficient delivery [49]. Liquid biofertilizers, in particular, can incorporate specialized cell protectants to extend their shelf life and require lower application dosages compared to other formulations [50]. The selection of an appropriate carrier material is a critical consideration, as it plays a significant role in preserving cell viability during storage and transportation [51]. The ideal carrier material should be nontoxic, possess high moisture absorption and water retention capacities, have a prolonged shelf life, and be easily processable [52]. Encapsulation of the inoculants with the carrier material ensures convenient handling, efficacy, and long-term storage capabilities [53].
The evaluation of biofertilizer efficacy can vary based on crop specificity. Various strategies can be employed, including seed treatment and soil application, for the utilization of specific biofertilizers [54]. In the context of paddy cultivation, seedling treatment with biofertilizers emerges as the preferred approach [55]. Following the application of biofertilizers to the soil, seeds, or roots, microorganisms establish colonization in the vicinity of the roots, thereby promoting growth in the targeted crop [56]. The root exudates excreted by plants facilitate the proficient colonization of microorganisms within the rhizosphere, optimizing their establishment and function [45].
10.5 Microbes as Biocontrol Agents and Their Potential for Pest Management
Pest management plays a pivotal role in modern agriculture and ecosystem preservation. However, traditional methods of pest control relying on chemical pesticides have proven to be environmentally harmful, posing risks to ecosystems, human health, and nontarget organisms [57,58,59]. Consequently, there is a growing interest in developing sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives for pest management. Microbes, including bacteria, fungi, viruses, and nematodes, have emerged as promising biocontrol agents due to their effective pest control capabilities while minimizing the negative impacts associated with conventional approaches [60]. For over a century, the study of microbes and their role in the health of living beings has been widely recognized. In modern agriculture, microbes have gained prominence as natural pesticides when combined with hybrid seeds, high-yield varieties, and regular irrigation, making them a leading trend in the agricultural sector [61]. Researchers are exploring sustainable methods to safeguard crops from insects and pathogens while enhancing soil health by harnessing the power of beneficial microorganisms. These microorganisms serve as natural biocontrol agents, inhibiting the growth of harmful pests and diseases while promoting plant growth and development [62, 63]. Among the bacteria used in agriculture, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) has long been employed due to its insecticidal proteins, making it a valuable and environmentally friendly biopesticide. Recent studies have suggested its potential use as a biofertilizer to enhance plant growth and its application in the development of transgenic plants (Liliana [64, 65]). Pseudomonas chlororaphis isolates are also utilized as biopesticides, providing protection to plants against a wide range of microbial pathogens, insects, and nematodes [66]. Entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) offer an environmentally sustainable approach to biocontrol against insect pests [67]. With over 700 species identified from approximately 90 different genera, these fungi have the ability to infect and induce disease in insects under favorable conditions [67]. Notable strains include Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae, Hirsutella, Isaria, Lecanicillium, and Beauveria [68, 69]. These fungi produce spores that attach to the pest’s cuticle, penetrate it, and ultimately lead to the pest’s demise. Fungal biocontrol agents are particularly effective against pests such as aphids, whiteflies, and thrips, and they offer a lower risk of developing resistance compared to chemical pesticides [67]. Insect-specific viruses, such as nucleopolyhedroviruses and granuloviruses, have shown great potential as biocontrol agents. These viruses selectively infect and eliminate their host insects [70, 71]. Microbial biocontrol agents provide numerous benefits for pest management. They demonstrate precise targeting, effectively controlling pests while minimizing harm to beneficial organisms. Moreover, these agents are environmentally friendly and pose no toxicity risks to humans. They also have the advantage of rapid degradation, reducing the potential for persistent residues in soil, water, and food [60]. Furthermore, their utilization supports sustainability and organic farming practices by decreasing reliance on synthetic pesticides. They can be seamlessly integrated into pest management programs, complementing other control methods.
10.6 Microbial Role in Enhancing Crop Resilience to Abiotic Stresses
Abiotic stress has emerged as a significant global concern, causing substantial agricultural losses on a widespread scale [72]. It encompasses the detrimental effects of nonliving environmental factors that impose stress on various species. These factors comprise extreme light conditions (both high and low), radiation (UV-B and UV-A), temperature fluctuations (both high and low), water-related challenges (drought, flooding, and submergence), chemical influences (heavy metals and pH), salinity resulting from excessive Na + levels, deficiency or excess of essential nutrients, gaseous pollutants (such as ozone and sulfur dioxide), mechanical factors, and other less common stressors [73]. These stressors can manifest individually or in combination. In agricultural settings, crops and plants regularly encounter stress due to a complex interplay of these factors, resulting in distinct effects [72, 74]. The accumulation of heavy metals in plants has detrimental consequences for their growth, photosynthetic activity, and crop yield [75]. Salinity stress disrupts various physiological processes, including seed germination, seedling establishment, vegetative growth, ionic toxicity, osmotic pressure, and oxidative damage [76,77,78]. Drought stress adversely affects key components of photosynthesis, such as photosystem-I and photosystem-II, and impairs the functionality of enzymes like ascorbate peroxidase, glutathione reductase, and superoxide dismutase [79]. Cold stress induces cell and tissue dehydration, crystallization of cellular water, reduced membrane conductivity, increased leakage of reactive electrolytes, decreased weight, and lower relative water content, ultimately leading to poor crop yield [80]. Plants require a unique response tailored to their environmental conditions to adapt to specific abiotic stress conditions. Recent research indicates that each abiotic stress situation necessitates a precise, personalized plant response, and the interaction of two or more stress factors may require a distinct response [72]. When two or more stresses occur simultaneously, an opposing response may be required. For instance, a common field scenario involves the combination of heat and drought stress. Under heat stress conditions, plants open stomata to cool the leaves through transpiration. However, when heat stress is combined with drought stress, plants are unable to open stomata, resulting in higher leaf temperatures [81]. Microbes employ various biochemical and molecular mechanisms to mitigate the adverse impacts of different abiotic stresses on plant growth and development [82].
Plants receive protection against abiotic stressors through various mechanisms employed by microorganisms. These include the synthesis of phytohormones, osmolytes, and exopolysaccharides (EPS), as well as the activity of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase and the induction of stress-responsive genes (Upadhayay et al., 2023). Plant-associated microorganisms, such as endophytes, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria [82], have been recognized for their ability to enhance crop yield and improve stress tolerance. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) play a vital role in this regard by producing phytohormones like indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), cytokinins, and abscisic acid. They also produce antioxidants such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT), and glutathione reductase (GR). Additionally, PGPR possess the enzyme ACC deaminase, which aids in the degradation of the ethylene precursor ACC, thereby helping to alleviate the adverse effects of abiotic stress and induce systemic tolerance [83, 84]. The presence of PGPR with ACC deaminase enzyme enables the regulation of ethylene production by converting ACC into alpha-ketobutyrate and ammonia, providing relief from stress [85]. AMF colonization has shown increased tolerance to water stress by enabling hyphae to reach water sources inaccessible to non-colonized plants via soil pores that are inaccessible to root hairs. Khalvati et al. [86] demonstrated water transport to the roots under drought conditions. Kavroulakis et al. [87] observed tolerance to water stress in Solanum lycopersicum cv ACE 55 by Fusarium solani, resulting in increased net CO2 assimilation rate, enhanced antioxidant activity, and stomatal conductance. Mathur et al. [88] demonstrated drought resistance in Triticum aestivum through the colonization of Rhizophagus intraradices and Funneliformis spp., leading to increased relative water content, chlorophyll content, and restoration of electron transport in PS-II. Bacillus sp. and Enterobacter sp. provide drought tolerance in Triticum aestivum and Zea mays through the production of indole-3-acetic acid and salicylic acid [89]. Funneliformis mosseae enhances tolerance to low temperatures in Solanum melongena L. by improving photochemical reactions, activating the antioxidant defense system, accumulating protective molecules, and reducing membrane damage [90]. Rhizoglomus intraradices enhances salinity tolerance in Pisum sativum by improving nutrient uptake and promoting the accumulation of compatible osmolytes [91]. Kocuria rhizophila regulates plant hormones like abscisic acid and indole-3-acetic acid and improves nutrient acquisition, thereby providing salinity tolerance in Zea mays [92]. Table 10.1 illustrates the use of a various microbial strains to successfully mitigate a variety of stressors faced by plants.
10.7 Microbial Products and Soil Carbon Sequestration: A Pathway to Climate-Smart Agriculture
Climate change is a crucial global issue that has garnered significant attention from the scientific community worldwide. The primary driver behind climate change is human activities, which have contributed to a steady increase in global temperatures. Since the late nineteenth century, the Earth’s average surface temperature has risen by approximately 0.9 °C, largely attributed to the substantial surge in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions resulting from human-induced activities [99]. The period of industrialization, which commenced in the 1750s, witnessed a rapid and substantial rise in atmospheric CO2 concentration from 277 to 400 parts per million (ppm) [99, 100]. Since around 1920, fossil fuel combustion has become the dominant contributor to CO2 emissions, disrupting the natural carbon cycle and necessitating the implementation of carbon sequestration measures [99, 101]. Carbon sequestration refers to the process of capturing and storing atmospheric CO2 in the soil over an extended period. This method is predominantly achieved by incorporating crop residues and organic matter into the soil [102]. Additionally, indirect sequestration can occur through chemical reactions that transform CO2 into inorganic compounds like “calcium carbonate (CaCO3)” or “magnesium carbonates (MgCO3)” [99, 103]. On the other hand, direct sequestration involves the fixation of CO2 into plant biomass through photosynthesis [104]. Various natural elements function as either carbon sources or sinks, depending on their capacity to absorb or release carbon. “Organic matter decomposition,” “respiration and digestion activities,” “volcanoes,” and “water bodies” serve as natural carbon sources [105], while forests, photosynthesis, Earth’s crust, soil, oceans, and freshwater bodies act as carbon sinks [99, 106]. Maintaining a balanced carbon cycle necessitates a proportional release of carbon from sources and sinks [107]. Carbon sequestration is influenced by a multitude of factors. These factors include the rate of production and decomposition of soil organic matter, the composition of the parent material, the position of the landscape, temperature and precipitation patterns, the presence of living organisms, and various management practices [99, 108]. Among these factors, SOM plays a significant role in modifying soil carbon stocks, thereby affecting the potential for soil sequestration [109]. Numerous processes contribute to the release and transport of SOM within the soil, influencing its physical, chemical, and biological characteristics, and ultimately impacting the potential for carbon sequestration [108]. The microbes found in rhizospheric soil, specifically known as “plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria” or “PGPR,” have the capability to enhance soil microbial functioning, creating a positive contribution to global climate change. PGPR constitutes a significant portion of the overall microbial community and plays a crucial role in carbon sequestration [110]. The mechanisms by which PGPR mitigate climate change and sequester carbon involve multiple pathways [99]. PGPR plays a vital role in nutrient cycles, including those of “C” and “N” [111]. They exert improvement in the production of “glomalin” in the rhizospheric milieu by promoting mycorrhizal colonization [112]. Glomalin acts as an important reservoir of C and N in the soil [113]. Moreover, PGPR has the ability to directly enhance plant growth and allocate more C to plant biomass, thereby facilitating effective carbon recycling [99]. Additionally, research has shown that PGPR affects soil quality by regulating the amount of C in micro- and macroaggregates [112]. Soil microbial activities are directly or indirectly influenced by elevated temperature and carbon dioxide levels. High-temperature conditions enhance microbial activities, creating a positive feedback loop for climate change. Similarly, low moisture conditions can have comparable effects [114]. The maintenance of ecosystem C aggregation relies on achieving a balance between plant productivity and heterotrophic respiration, which is accomplished through the decomposition of SOM [99, 115].
Several studies have extensively documented the beneficial impacts of elevated CO2 levels on plant growth, as well as the increased input of photosynthetic C into soils [116]. These increased carbon inputs can promote microbial growth, leading to an increase in soil microbial communities under elevated CO2 [117]. Consequently, this may accelerate soil organic matter decomposition, potentially resulting in net carbon losses in the soil. Elevated carbon dioxide levels also stimulate rhizosphere priming effects, enhancing the decomposition of soil organic matter through microbial activity [118, 119]. The enzymatic activity of PGPR facilitates the decomposition of soil organic matter [120]. Moisture levels play a vital role in shaping the activities of microbial communities involved in climate change processes. In different soil environments, microbial activity tends to increase under conditions of drought and water stress. This response is primarily attributed to the decrease in water levels and the introduction of O2 into previously oxygen-depleted soils [99]. Peatlands and wetlands are recognized as crucial reservoirs that store substantial amounts of C in terrestrial ecosystems [99, 121]. Consequently, the heightened degradation of resilient and stable organic matter under dry conditions can have significant implications for the global C cycle dynamics [122].
10.8 Microbial Consortia: An Effective Way for Plant Growth
The rhizosphere, a thriving area of soil, is teeming with a variety of different microorganisms. These subterranean microbes interact in complex ways both with each other and with plant roots, mutually benefiting plant growth. Plant signalling molecules such as root exudates play a crucial role and shape the rich spectrum of microbial diversity in this zone. The plant growth-promoting rhizomicrobes are a selected group of rhizosphere inhabitants that contribute to plant development through an impressive repertoire of mechanisms [12, 123]. From phosphate solubilization to nitrogen fixation to the production of plant growth hormones and antimicrobial compounds, these PGPRs serve as excellent substitutes for chemical inputs that often upset the delicate balance of soil biological and chemical properties. While biofertilizers typically feature a single microbial strain, pioneering research shows that the application of co-inoculation or consortium biofertilizers containing two or more microbial strains consistently produce more profound benefits for plant growth [12, 124]. Numerous scientific studies have advocated the utilization of microbial consortia as a promising approach to enhance plant growth, health, and survival, both under challenging environmental conditions and in natural settings [46, 47, 125, 126]. These consortia have been observed to stimulate plant roots, inducing the secretion of increased amounts of amino acids, growth regulators, and sugars. Moreover, they enhance the plant roots’ ability to efficiently utilize minerals and other constituents present in the rhizosphere [46, 47, 124, 126]. This symbiotic interaction contributes to improved nitrogen fixation, thereby enabling plants to adapt to changes in environmental conditions more effectively [126]. Within the framework of field experiments, the inoculation of rice crops with a consortium comprising three distinct bacterial strains, namely, “Burkholderia ubonensis (la3c3),” “Burkholderia vietnamiensis (la1a4),” and “Citrobacter bitternis (p9a3m),” showed noteworthy improvement in both grain yield and quality and also reduced the use of nitrogen fertilizer by up to 25% [127]. In the study conducted by Kumar et al. [38,39,40], the tetra combination of A. chlorophenolicus, B. megaterium, Enterobacter sp., and P. aeruginosa exhibited significant improvements in plant height, grain yield, and straw yield for wheat under both greenhouse and field conditions. The application of a talc-based formulation including a consortium consisting of K. pneumoniae, Erwinia sp., and P. nitritireducens showed an extraordinary per-plant cumin seed yield (0.42 g). This notable formulation not only elevated essential agronomic parameters such as plant height, dry weight, and 100 seed weight but also resulted in a substantial enhancement in the overall yield, indicating a promising role of bacterial consortium in cumin cultivation [128]. A consortium comprising Erwinia sp. (nitrogen fixer), C. arthrosphaerae (phosphorus solubilizer), and P. gessardii (potassium solubilizer) enhanced growth and physiological parameters, including root/shoot length and biomass, chlorophyll, carotenoids, phenolics, flavonoids, and soluble sugar content in barley crops compared to the untreated control [129]. Tyagi et al. [130] showed that a tri-inoculant formulation (“Serendipita indica,” ‘Rhizophagus intraradices,” and “Azotobacter chroococcum”) increased root and shoot length, fresh and dry weight, membrane electrolyte leakage, chlorophyll content, relative water content, and antioxidant enzyme activities (POX) significantly increased, CAT, PPO, SOD) in maize plants under drought conditions compared to the uninoculated control. The study by Kapadia et al. [131] showed that a microbial consortium consisting of Bacillus sp., Delftia sp., Enterobacter sp., and Achromobacter sp. significantly increased growth and mineral uptake of salt stressed tomatoes. The consortium treatment resulted in increased leaf, shoot and root dry weight, leaf count, shoot length, root length, secondary roots, and improved chlorophyll content compared to the control group, ultimately helping the plants to thrive in a saline environment.
10.9 Contribution of Microorganisms in Biofortification of Food Crops
To address the needs of an expanding world population, it is crucial to implement strategies that optimize biomass productivity. “Green revolution” has contributed a lot in terms of giving to higher crop yields. But a specific type of micronutrient deficiency, known as “hidden hunger,” affects nearly half of the global population, leading to malnutrition [132]. In addition to macronutrients (N, P, K) and calories, essential micronutrients such as zinc, iron, selenium, etc. are vital for human health [15, 16]. The widespread presence of micronutrient deficiencies in low- and middle-income countries has a significant impact on human health [16, 133]. The lack of micronutrients poses a significant health burden, especially in regions with inadequate access to proper nutrition. According to the “United Nations System Standing Committee on Nutrition (UNSSCN, [134]),” more than 50% of child mortality cases are directly or indirectly attributed to micronutrient deficiencies, which also contribute to major risk factors for maternal mortality [16]. Micronutrients such as iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), and selenium (Se) are essential for vital biological processes and must be obtained through the diet [13,14,15]. Inadequate intake of these micronutrients can lead to various health problems and increase the risk of developing several diseases [15, 16, 135].
Crop biofortification offers a promising solution to these challenges by enhancing the nutrient content of staple foods, particularly targeting low-income households that struggle to afford a diverse diet. Traditional approaches such as plant breeding, agronomic strategies, and genetic engineering have been employed for biofortification, but their effectiveness has been inconsistent, and they are laborious and costlier approaches [136]. In recent years, the utilization of naturally occurring soil microorganisms, specifically plant growth-promoting microbes like bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi, has emerged as a viable approach for crop biofortification ([3, 4, 45, 55] and 2022d). The interactions between plants and these microbes play a pivotal role in improving soil nutrition and facilitating the movement of micronutrients to different plant parts through processes such as solubilization, mobilization, and translocation of micronutrients [15, 16]. Microorganisms employ diverse strategies to enhance micronutrient uptake in plants, including the production of siderophores and other chelating substances, secretion of organic acids, proton extrusion, modification of root morphology and anatomy, reduction of anti-nutritional factors like phytic acid in food grains, secretion of phenolics and related compounds, and production of phytohormones as signaling molecules [3, 4, 16, 25, 45, 137]. The exploration of these potential plant growth-promoting (PGP) bacteria offers an alternative to chemical crop protection agents while also promoting environmental health and sustainability [13, 14, 138]. This makes them highly suitable for extensive use in organic agriculture. Several microorganisms have been identified and listed in Table 10.2 for their application in crop biofortification.
10.10 Challenges and Opportunities for Commercializing Microbial Products in Sustainable Agriculture
Microbe-based products, including biofertilizers and biopesticides, hold significant potential for sustainable agriculture. However, several challenges hinder their wide acceptance and successful implementation. To address them effectively, it is crucial to understand the issues faced by microbial-based products.
-
I.
Limited awareness and understanding: One of the main obstacles faced by microbial-based products is the insufficient awareness and understanding among farmers, agronomists, and policy-makers regarding the advantages and appropriate utilization of these products. It is imperative to develop educational initiatives and outreach programs that effectively disseminate knowledge and enhance confidence in these innovative solutions.
-
II.
Regulatory hurdles: Regulatory frameworks for microbial products often lack clarity or exhibit regional variations, which present a challenge in their commercialization. The lengthy and expensive registration processes further hinder manufacturers and limit market access. To overcome these obstacles, it is crucial to streamline regulations and establish clear guidelines that facilitate the smooth commercialization of microbial products.
-
III.
Product variability and efficacy: The effectiveness of microbial products can be influenced by factors such as environmental conditions, crop species, and management practices, leading to variability in their performance. Ensuring consistent product efficacy across diverse agricultural systems and improving product stability are crucial challenges that require attention.
-
IV.
Quality control and standardization: Maintaining product quality and standardization is critical to the successful commercialization of microbial products. The development of standardized production protocols, quality control measures, and certification programs will increase product reliability and consumer confidence.
-
V.
Limited scalability and production costs: Manufacturing microbial products faces the challenge of increasing production and achieving cost efficiencies. Efficient production processes, optimized fermentation techniques, and research into alternative microbial strains are required to overcome these obstacles.
-
VI.
Market acceptance and competitiveness: Microbial-based products compete with traditional agrochemicals that already dominate the market. It is crucial to convince farmers of the long-term benefits, cost-effectiveness, and environmental benefits of microbial products in order to achieve market acceptance and encourage their widespread use.
-
VII.
Research and development gaps: Sustained research and development efforts are essential to identify and characterize novel microbial strains, refine formulation methods, and gain a comprehensive understanding of the complex interactions between microbes, plants, and the environment. Bridging these knowledge gaps will encourage innovation and accelerate the development of more efficient and impactful microbial products.
It is essential to encourage collaboration between researchers, industry stakeholders, policy-makers, and farmers to resolve these challenges. This collaborative effort will facilitate the exchange of knowledge and spur innovation in the field of microbial products. Increased investments in research, capacity building, and infrastructure are essential for accelerating the development of these products and driving advancements. In addition, public-private partnerships can play a crucial role in facilitating technology transfer, expanding market access, and providing regulatory support. By addressing these obstacles, we can unlock the maximum potential of microbial products and increase their adoption via sustainable agriculture. Utilizing the power of beneficial microorganisms provides numerous opportunities to improve agricultural productivity, reduce reliance on chemical additives, and promote environmentally responsible agricultural practices.
10.11 Conclusion and Future Prospects
In conclusion, the integration of microorganisms into sustainable agriculture presents promising solutions for enhancing crop productivity, soil health, and environmental sustainability. Microbes play pivotal roles as biofertilizers, biocontrol agents, and stress-tolerant enhancers, promoting eco-friendly practices and reducing reliance on synthetic inputs. Their contributions to climate-smart agriculture, microbial consortia, and biofortification of food crops underscore their significance in achieving sustainable and resilient agricultural systems. Unlocking the potential of microorganisms holds tremendous prospects for advancing and transforming sustainable crop-based food production.
Looking ahead, advanced microbial formulations offer exciting prospects for revolutionizing agricultural practices. The incorporation of nanotechnology into microbial formulations, e.g., nanobiofertilizers, can lead to improved nutrient delivery and controlled release systems, thus optimizing nutrient uptake by plants [9]. In addition, the development of encapsulated biofertilizers can protect microorganisms and ensure their viability and stability during storage and application. These formulation advances have the potential to improve the efficiency and potency of microbial products, resulting in higher plant productivity and optimized resource utilization.
References
Fenibo EO, Ijoma GN, Nurmahomed W, Matambo T (2022) The potential and green chemistry attributes of biopesticides for sustainable agriculture. Sustainability 14(21):14417
Khan A, Panthari D, Sharma RS, Punetha A, Singh AV, Upadhayay VK (2023a) Biofertilizers: a microbial-assisted strategy to improve plant growth and soil health. In: Advanced microbial techniques in agriculture, environment, and health management. Elsevier, pp 97–118
Singh J, Singh AV, Upadhayay VK, Khan A, Chandra R (2022) Prolific contribution of pseudomonas protegens in Zn biofortification of wheat by modulating multifaceted physiological response under saline and non-saline conditions. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 38(12):227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-022-03411-4
Upadhayay VK, Khan A, Singh J, Singh AV (2022a) Bacterial assisted improved Zn consignment in root and shoot of rice plant by zinc solubilizing Serratia marcescence bearing plant probiotic traits. Adv Biores 13(1):01–08
Kour D, Rana KL, Yadav AN, Yadav N, Kumar M, Kumar V, Vyas P, Dhaliwal HS, Saxena AK (2020) Microbial biofertilizers: bioresources and eco-friendly technologies for agricultural and environmental sustainability. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 23(101487):101487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101487
Ortiz A, Sansinenea E (2022) The role of beneficial microorganisms in soil quality and plant health. Sustainability 14(9):5358
Elnahal AS, El-Saadony MT, Saad AM, Desoky ESM, El-Tahan AM, Rady MM et al (2022) The use of microbial inoculants for biological control, plant growth promotion, and sustainable agriculture: a review. Eur J Plant Pathol 162(4):759–792
Upadhayay VK, Maithani D, Dasila H, Taj G, Singh AV (2023a) Microbial services for mitigation of biotic and abiotic stresses in plants. In: Advanced microbial techniques in agriculture, environment, and health management. Elsevier, pp 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-91643-1.00003-x
Upadhayay VK, Chitara MK, Mishra D, Jha MN, Jaiswal A, Kumari G, Ghosh S, Patel VK, Naitam MG, Singh AK, Pareek N, Taj G, Maithani D, Kumar A, Dasila H, Sharma A (2023b) Synergistic impact of nanomaterials and plant probiotics in agriculture: a tale of two-way strategy for long-term sustainability. Front Microbiol 14:1133968. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1133968
Kumar A, Patel JS, Meena VS, Ramteke PW (2019) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: strategies to improve abiotic stresses under sustainable agriculture. J Plant Nutr 42(11–12):1402–1415
Six J, Frey SD, Thiet RK, Batten KM (2006) Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70(2):555–569
Kaushal M, Devi S, Kumawat KC, Kumar A (2023) Microbial consortium: a boon for a sustainable agriculture. In: Parray JA (ed) Climate change and microbiome dynamics. Climate change management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21079-2_2
Khan A, Singh J, Upadhayay VK, Singh AV, Shah S (2019a) Microbial biofortification: a green technology through plant growth promoting microorganisms. In: Sustainable green technologies for environmental management. Springer, Singapore, pp 255–269
Khan MA, Asaf S, Khan AL, Adhikari A, Jan R, Ali S, Imran M, Kim K-M, Lee I-J (2019b) Halotolerant rhizobacterial strains mitigate the adverse effects of NaCl stress in soybean seedlings. Biomed Res Int 2019:9530963. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9530963
Upadhayay VK, Singh J, Khan A, Lohani S, Singh AV (2019) Mycorrhizal mediated micronutrients transportation in food based plants: a biofortification strategy. In: Mycorrhizosphere and Pedogenesis. Springer, Singapore, pp 1–24
Upadhayay VK, Singh AV, Pareek N (2018) An insight in decoding the multifarious and splendid role of microorganisms in crop biofortification. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 7:2407–2418. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.706.286
Babalola OO, Fadiji AE, Enagbonma BJ, Alori ET, Ayilara MS, Ayangbenro AS (2020) The nexus between plant and plant microbiome: revelation of the networking strategies. Front Microbiol 11:548037. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.548037
Khatoon Z, Huang S, Rafique M, Fakhar A, Kamran MA, Santoyo G (2020) Unlocking the potential of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on soil health and the sustainability of agricultural systems. J Environ Manag 273:111118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111118
Etesami H, Hemati A, Alikhani HA (2019) Microbial bioconversion of agricultural wastes for rural sanitation and soil carbon enrichment. Microbial interventions in agriculture and environment. Rhizosphere, Microbiome and Agro-Ecology 2:179–204
Rajkumar R, Kurinjimalar C (2021) Microbes and plant mineral nutrition. In: Soni R, Suyal DC, Bhargava P, Goel R (eds) Microbiological activity for soil and plant health management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2922-8_5
Kaviya N, Upadhayay VK, Singh J, Khan A, Panwar M, Singh AV (2019) Role of microorganisms in soil genesis and functions. In: Mycorrhizosphere and pedogenesis. Springer, Singapore, pp 25–52
Dimkić I, Janakiev T, Petrović M, Degrassi G, Fira D (2022) Plant-associated bacillus and pseudomonas antimicrobial activities in plant disease suppression via biological control mechanisms-a review. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 117:101754
Qadri M, Short S, Gast K, Hernandez J, Wong ACN (2020) Microbiome innovation in agriculture: development of microbial based tools for insect pest management. Front Sustain Food Syst 4:547751
Upadhyay SK, Srivastava AK, Rajput VD, Chauhan PK, Bhojiya AA, Jain D, Chaubey G, Dwivedi P, Sharma B, Minkina T (2022) Root exudates: mechanistic insight of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable crop production. Front Microbiol 13:916488. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.916488
Khan A, Singh AV, Pareek N, Arya P, Upadhayay VK, Kumar Jugran A, Kumar Mishra P, Goel R (2023b) Credibility assessment of cold adaptive pseudomonas jesenni MP1 and P. palleroniana N26 on growth, rhizosphere dynamics, nutrient status, and yield of the kidney bean cultivated in Indian central Himalaya. Frontiers. Plant Sci 14:1042053. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1042053
Goswami D, Thakker JN, Dhandhukia PC (2016) Portraying mechanics of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a review. Cogent Food & Agriculture 2:1127500. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2015.1127500
Contreras-Cornejo HA, Ramírez-Ordorica A, Álvarez-Navarrete M, Macías-Rodríguez L (2022) The role of Phytohormones in cross-communication between plants and Rhizo-microbes. In: Microbial cross-talk in the rhizosphere. Singapore, Springer Nature Singapore, pp 59–97
Ahmed E, Holmström SJ (2014) Siderophores in environmental research: roles and applications. Microb Biotechnol 7(3):196–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12117
Hakim S, Naqqash T, Nawaz MS, Laraib I, Siddique MJ, Zia R et al (2021) Rhizosphere engineering with plant growth-promoting microorganisms for agriculture and ecological sustainability. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 5:617157
Olagoke FK, Bettermann A, Nguyen PTB, Redmile-Gordon M, Babin D, Smalla K et al (2022) Importance of substrate quality and clay content on microbial extracellular polymeric substances production and aggregate stability in soils. Biol Fertil Soils 58(4):435–457
Gangwar M, Saini P, Nikhanj P, Kaur S (2017) Plant growth-promoting microbes (PGPM) as potential microbial bio-agents for eco-friendly agriculture. In: Advances in soil microbiology: recent trends and future prospects: Volume 2: soil-microbe-plant interaction. Springer, Singapore, pp 37–55
Rehmaan IU, Jan B, Khan NF, Islam T, Rehman S, Sheergojri IA et al (2022) Nitrogen biofertilizers: role in sustainable agriculture. In: Advances in plant nitrogen metabolism. CRC Press, pp 170–184
Roshani KA, Singh AV, Upadhayay VU, Prasad B (2020) Development of potential microbial consortia and their assessment on wheat (Triticum aestivum) seed germination. Environ Ecol 38(1):6–16
Dhir B (2017) Biofertilizers and biopesticides: eco-friendly biological agents. In: Advances in environmental biotechnology. Springer, Singapore, pp 167–188
Shahwar D, Mushtaq Z, Mushtaq H, Alqarawi AA, Park Y, Alshahrani TS, Faizan S (2023) Role of microbial inoculants as bio fertilizers for improving crop productivity: a review. Heliyon 9(6):e16134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16134
Bhat MA, Mishra AK, Jan S, Bhat MA, Kamal MA, Rahman S et al (2023) Plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria in plant health: a perspective study of the underground interaction. Plan Theory 12(3):629
Masmoudi F, Alsafran M, Jabri HA, Hosseini H, Trigui M, Sayadi S et al (2023) Halobacteria-based biofertilizers: a promising alternative for enhancing soil fertility and crop productivity under biotic and abiotic stresses—a review. Microorganisms 11(5):1248
Kumar A, Jha MN, Singh D, Pathak D, Rajawat MVS (2021a) Prospecting catabolic diversity of microbial strains for developing microbial consortia and their synergistic effect on lentil (Lens esculenta) growth, yield and iron biofortification. Arch Microbiol 203(8):4913–4928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02446-9
Kumar A, Maurya BR, Raghuwanshi R (2021b) The microbial consortium of indigenous rhizobacteria improving plant health, yield and nutrient content in wheat (Triticum aestivum). J Plant Nutr 44(13):1942–1956. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2021.1884706
Kumar M, Yadav AN, Saxena R, Paul D, Tomar RS (2021c) Biodiversity of pesticides degrading microbial communities and their environmental impact. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 31:101883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101883
Jiao X, Takishita Y, Zhou G, Smith DL (2021) Plant associated rhizobacteria for biocontrol and plant growth enhancement. Front Plant Sci 12:634796. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.634796
Mahanty T, Bhattacharjee S, Goswami M, Bhattacharyya P, Das B, Ghosh A, Tribedi P (2017) Biofertilizers: a potential approach for sustainable agriculture development. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24(4):3315–3335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8104-0
Santoyo G (2022) How plants recruit their microbiome? New insights into beneficial interactions. J Adv Res 40:45–58
Mishra J, Arora NK (2016) Bioformulations for plant growth promotion and combating Phytopathogens: a sustainable approach. In: Arora N, Mehnaz S, Balestrini R (eds) Bioformulations: for sustainable agriculture. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2779-3_1
Upadhayay VK, Singh AV, Khan A (2022b) Cross talk between zinc-solubilizing bacteria and plants: a short tale of bacterial-assisted zinc biofortification. Front Soil Sci 1:788170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2021.788170
Maheshwari DK, Das A, Dheeman S, Pandey P (2023a) An overall insight into the attributes, interactions, and future applications of “microbial consortium” for plant growth promotion with contemporary approaches. In: Sustainable agrobiology: design and development of microbial consortia. Springer, Singapore, pp 3–22
Maheshwari DK, Kumar S, Kumar P, Kumar S, Dheeman S (2023b) Effect of microbial consortium vs. perfected chemical fertilizers for sustainable crop growth. In: Maheshwari DK, Dheeman S (eds) Sustainable agrobiology. Microorganisms for sustainability, vol 43. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9570-5_14
Pirttilä AM, Mohammad Parast Tabas H, Baruah N, Koskimäki JJ (2021) Biofertilizers and biocontrol agents for agriculture: how to identify and develop new potent microbial strains and traits. Microorganisms 9(4):817. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9040817
Malusá E, Sas-Paszt L, Ciesielska J (2012) Technologies for beneficial microorganisms inocula used as biofertilizers. TheScientificWorldJOURNAL 2012:491206. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/491206
Allouzi MMA, Allouzi SMA, Keng ZX, Supramaniam CV, Singh A, Chong S (2022) Liquid biofertilizers as a sustainable solution for agriculture. Heliyon e12609:e12609
Sahu PK, Brahmaprakash GP (2016) Formulations of biofertilizers – approaches and advances. In: Singh D, Singh H, Prabha R (eds) Microbial inoculants in sustainable agricultural productivity. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2644-4_12
Parveen N, Mishra R, Singh DV, Kumar P, Singh RP (2023) Assessment of different carrier materials for the preparation of microbial formulations to enhance the shelf life and its efficacy on the growth of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). World J Microbiol Biotechnol 39(7):180
Schoebitz M, López MD, Roldán A (2013) Bioencapsulation of microbial inoculants for better soil–plant fertilization. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 33:751–765
Kumar S, Sindhu SS, Kumar R (2022) Biofertilizers: an ecofriendly technology for nutrient recycling and environmental sustainability. Curr Res Microb Sci 3:100094
Upadhayay VK, Singh AV, Khan A, Singh J, Pareek N, Raghav A (2022c) FE-SEM/EDX based zinc mobilization analysis of Burkholderia cepacia and Pantoea rodasii and their functional annotation in crop productivity, soil quality, and zinc biofortification of paddy. Front Microbiol 13:852192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.852192
Basu A, Prasad P, Das SN, Kalam S, Sayyed RZ, Reddy MS, El Enshasy H (2021) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as green bioinoculants: recent developments, constraints, and prospects. Sustainability 13(3):1140
Aktar MW, Sengupta D, Chowdhury A (2009) Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards. Interdiscip Toxicol 2(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10102-009-0001-7
Pathak VM, Verma VK, Rawat BS, Kaur B, Babu N, Sharma A, Dewali S, Yadav M, Kumari R, Singh S, Mohapatra A, Pandey V, Rana N, Cunill JM (2022) Current status of pesticide effects on environment, human health and it’s eco-friendly management as bioremediation: a comprehensive review. Front Microbiol 13:962619. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.962619
Sharma A, Kumar V, Shahzad B, Tanveer M, Sidhu GPS, Handa N, Kohli SK, Yadav P, Bali AS, Parihar RD, Dar OI, Singh K, Jasrotia S, Bakshi P, Ramakrishnan M, Kumar S, Bhardwaj R, Thukral AK (2019) Worldwide pesticide usage and its impacts on ecosystem. SN Applied Sci 1:1446. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1485-1
Ayilara MS, Adeleke BS, Akinola SA, Fayose CA, Adeyemi UT, Gbadegesin LA, Omole RK, Johnson RM, Uthman QO, Babalola OO (2023) Biopesticides as a promising alternative to synthetic pesticides: a case for microbial pesticides, phytopesticides, and nanobiopesticides. Front Microbiol 14:1040901. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1040901
Chattopadhyay P, Banerjee G, Mukherjee S (2017) Recent trends of modern bacterial insecticides for pest control practice in integrated crop management system. 3. Biotech 7:60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0717-6
Köhl J, Kolnaar R, Ravensberg WJ (2019) Mode of action of microbial biological control agents against plant diseases: relevance beyond efficacy. Front Plant Sci 10:845. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00845
Koza NA, Adedayo AA, Babalola OO, Kappo AP (2022) Microorganisms in plant growth and development: roles in abiotic stress tolerance and secondary metabolites secretion. Microorganisms 10(8):1528. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081528
Jouzani GS, Valijanian E, Sharafi R (2017) Bacillus thuringiensis: a successful insecticide with new environmental features and tidings. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101(7):2691–2711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8175-y
Pardo-López L, Soberón M, Bravo A (2013) Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal three-domain cry toxins: mode of action, insect resistance and consequences for crop protection. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37(1):3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00341.x
Anderson AJ, Kim YC (2018) Biopesticides produced by plant-probiotic pseudomonas chlororaphis isolates. Crop Protection (Guildford, Surrey) 105:62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.11.009
Bamisile BS, Akutse KS, Siddiqui JA, Xu Y (2021) Model application of entomopathogenic fungi as alternatives to chemical pesticides: prospects, challenges, and insights for next-generation sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci 12:741804. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.741804
Vivekanandhan P, Swathy K, Murugan AC, Krutmuang P (2022) Insecticidal efficacy of Metarhizium anisopliae derived chemical constituents against disease-vector mosquitoes. J Fungi (Basel, Switzerland) 8(3):300. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8030300
Wang H, Peng H, Li W, Cheng P, Gong M (2021) The toxins of Beauveria bassiana and the strategies to improve their virulence to insects. Front Microbiol 12:705343. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.705343
Ibarra JE, Rincón-Castro D (2008) Insect viruses diversity, biology, and use as bioinsecticides. Tropical Biology and Conservation Management 5:1–10
Williams T, López-Ferber M, Caballero P (2021) Nucleopolyhedrovirus coocclusion technology: a new concept in the development of biological insecticides. Front Microbiol 12:810026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.810026
Mittler R (2006) Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends Plant Sci 11(1):15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2005.11.002
Pereira A (2016) Plant abiotic stress challenges from the changing environment. Front Plant Sci 7:1123. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01123
Suzuki N, Rivero RM, Shulaev V, Blumwald E, Mittler R (2014) Abiotic and biotic stress combinations. New Phytol 203(1):32–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12797
Uzu G, Sobanska S, Aliouane Y, Pradere P, Dumat C (2009) Study of lead phytoavailability for atmospheric industrial micronic and sub-micronic particles in relation with lead speciation. Environ Pollut 157(4):1178–1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2008.09.053
Feng ZT, Deng YQ, Fan H, Sun QJ, Sui N, Wang BS (2014) Effects of NaCl stress on the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Ulmus pumila L. seedlings in sand culture. Photosynthetica 52(2):313–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-014-0032-y
Guo J, Li Y, Han G, Song J, Wang B (2018) NaCl markedly improved the reproductive capacity of the euhalophyte Suaeda salsa. Funct Plant Biol 45(3):350–361. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP17181
Zhao KF, Song J, Fan H, Zhou S, Zhao M (2010) Growth response to ionic and osmotic stress of NaCl in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive maize. J Integr Plant Biol 52(5):468–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00947.x
Hoekstra FA, Golovina EA, Buitink J (2001) Review. In TRENDS in plant science (Vol. 6, issue 9). http://plants.trends.com
Jia Y, Zou D, Wang J, Sha H, Liu H, Inayat MA, Sun J, Zheng H, Xia N, Zhao H (2017) Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid, glutamic acid, and calcium chloride on Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under cold stress during the early vegetative stage. J Plant Growth Regul 36(1):240–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-016-9634-x
Rizhsky L, Liang H, Mittler R (2002) The combined effect of drought stress and heat shock on gene expression in tobacco. Plant Physiol 130(3):1143–1151. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.006858
Inbaraj MP (2021) Plant-microbe interactions in alleviating abiotic stress—a mini review. In: Frontiers in Agronomy, vol 3, Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2021.667903
Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA (2009) Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. In agronomy for sustainable development (Vol. 29, issue 1, pp. 185–212). https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008021
Porcel R, María Zamarreño Á, María García-Mina J, Aroca R (2014) Involvement of plant endogenous ABA in bacillus megaterium PGPR activity in tomato plants. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/14/36
Saleem M, Arshad M, Hussain S, Bhatti AS (2007) Perspective of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) containing ACC deaminase in stress agriculture. In. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 34(10):635–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-007-0240-6
Khalvati MA, Hu Y, Mozafar A, Schmidhalter U (2005) Quantification of water uptake by arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae and its significance for leaf growth, water relations, and gas exchange of barley subjected to drought stress. Plant Biol 7(6):706–712. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-872893
Kavroulakis N, Doupis G, Papadakis IE, Ehaliotis C, Papadopoulou KK (2018) Tolerance of tomato plants to water stress is improved by the root endophyte fusarium solani FsK. Rhizosphere 6:77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2018.04.003
Mathur S, Tomar RS, Jajoo A (2019) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) protects photosynthetic apparatus of wheat under drought stress. Photosynth Res 139(1–3):227–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-018-0538-4
Jochum MD, McWilliams KL, Borrego EJ, Kolomiets MV, Niu G, Pierson EA, Jo YK (2019) Bioprospecting plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria that mitigate drought stress in grasses. Front Microbiol 10:2106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02106
Pasbani B, Salimi A, Aliasgharzad N, Hajiboland R (2020) Colonization with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mitigates cold stress through improvement of antioxidant defense and accumulation of protecting molecules in eggplants. Sci Hortic 272:109575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109575
Parihar M, Rakshit A, Rana K, Tiwari G, Jatav SS (2020) The effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation in mitigating salt stress of pea (Pisum Sativum L.). Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 51(11):1545–1559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2020.1784917
Li X, Sun P, Zhang Y, Jin C, Guan C (2020) A novel PGPR strain Kocuria rhizophila Y1 enhances salt stress tolerance in maize by regulating phytohormone levels, nutrient acquisition, redox potential, ion homeostasis, photosynthetic capacity and stress-responsive genes expression. Environ Exp Bot 174:104023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104023
Arun KD, Sabarinathan KG, Gomathy M, Kannan R, Balachandar D (2020) Mitigation of drought stress in rice crop with plant growth-promoting abiotic stress-tolerant rice phyllosphere bacteria. J Basic Microbiol 60(9):768–786. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.202000011
Silambarasan S, Logeswari P, Cornejo P, Kannan VR (2019) Role of plant growth–promoting rhizobacterial consortium in improving the Vigna radiata growth and alleviation of aluminum and drought stresses. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:27647–27659
Tahiri A-I, Meddich A, Raklami A, Alahmad A, Bechtaoui N, Anli M, Göttfert M, Heulin T, Achouak W, Oufdou K (2022) Assessing the potential role of compost, PGPR, and AMF in improving tomato plant growth, yield, fruit quality, and water stress tolerance. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 22(1):743–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00684-w
Ali B, Wang X, Saleem MH, Hafeez A, Afridi MS, Khan S et al (2022) PGPR-mediated salt tolerance in maize by modulating plant physiology, antioxidant defense, compatible solutes accumulation and bio-surfactant producing genes. Plan Theory 11(3):345
Manjunatha BS, Nivetha N, Krishna GK, Elangovan A, Pushkar S, Chandrashekar N, Aggarwal C, Asha AD, Chinnusamy V, Raipuria RK, Watts A, Bandeppa S, Dukare AS, Paul S (2022) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Shewanella putrefaciens and Cronobacter dublinensis enhance drought tolerance of pearl millet by modulating hormones and stress-responsive genes. Physiol Plant 174(2):e13676. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13676
Jha Y, Mohamed HI (2023) Inoculation with Lysinibacillus fusiformis strain YJ4 and Lysinibacillus sphaericus strain YJ5 alleviates the effects of cold stress in maize plants. Gesunde Pflanzen 75(1):77–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00666-7
Sarfraz R, Hussain A, Sabir A, Ben Fekih I, Ditta A, Xing S (2019) Role of biochar and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to enhance soil carbon sequestration-a review. Environ Monit Assess 191(4):251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7400-9
Misra AK, Bharadwaj V, Rastogi A (2018) Monitoring the carbon dioxide concentration at different land use patterns in Pantnagar (India) and surroundings. Clim Chang Environ Sustain 6(2):119–126
Fosbøl PL, Suleman H, Svendsen HF, Hauschild MZ (2022) Introduction to sustainable carbon capture. In: Sustainable Carbon Capture. CRC Press, pp 1–28
Hussain S, Hussain S, Guo R, Sarwar M, Ren X, Krstic D et al (2021) Carbon sequestration to avoid soil degradation: a review on the role of conservation tillage. Plan Theory 10(10):2001
Yoo Y, Kim I, Lee D, Yong Choi W, Choi J, Jang K, Park J, Kang D (2022) Review of contemporary research on inorganic CO2 utilization via CO2 conversion into metal carbonate-based materials. J Ind Eng Chem 116:60–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2022.09.007
Gayathri R, Mahboob S, Govindarajan M, Al-Ghanim KA, Ahmed Z, Al-Mulhm N et al (2021) A review on biological carbon sequestration: a sustainable solution for a cleaner air environment, less pollution and lower health risks. Journal of King Saud University-Science 33(2):101282
Reddy PP (2015) Causes of climate change. In: Climate resilient agriculture for ensuring food security. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2199-9_2
Nadeem M, Khalid R, Kanwal S, Mujtaba G, Qadir G, Ahmed M, Hayat R (2023) Soil microbes and climate-smart agriculture. In: Global agricultural production: resilience to climate change. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 107–147
Tarin MWK, Fan L, Tayyab M, Sarfraz R, Chen L, He T (2018) Effects of bamboo biochar amendment on the growth and physiological characteristics of Fokienia hodginsii. Appl Ecol Environ Res 16(6):8055–8074. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1606_80558074
Elbasiouny H, El-Ramady H, Elbehiry F, Rajput VD, Minkina T, Mandzhieva S (2022) Plant nutrition under climate change and soil carbon sequestration. Sustainability 14(2):914
Khan N, Jhariya MK, Raj A, Banerjee A, Meena RS (2021) Soil carbon stock and sequestration: implications for climate change adaptation and mitigation. In: Ecological intensification of natural resources for sustainable agriculture. Springer, Singapore, pp 461–489
Song W, Tong X, Liu Y, Li W (2020) Microbial community, newly sequestered soil organic carbon, and δ15N variations driven by tree roots. Front Microbiol 11:314. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00314
Rai PK, Singh M, Anand K, Saurabh S, Kaur T, Kour D et al (2020) Role and potential applications of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable agriculture. In: New and future developments in microbial biotechnology and bioengineering. Elsevier, pp 49–60
Walley FL, Gillespie AW, Adetona AB, Germida JJ, Farrell RE (2014) Manipulation of rhizosphere organisms to enhance glomalin production and C sequestration: pitfalls and promises. Can J Plant Sci 94(6):1025–1032. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps2013-146
Treseder KK, Turner KM (2007) Glomalin in ecosystems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71(4):1257–1266
Sofi JA, Lone AH, Ganie MA, Dar NA, Bhat SA, Mukhtar M, Dar MA, Ramzan S (2016) Soil microbiological activity and carbon dynamics in the current climate change scenarios: a review. Pedosphere 26(5):577–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60068-6
Bhattacharyya SS, Ros GH, Furtak K, Iqbal HM, Parra-Saldívar R (2022) Soil carbon sequestration–an interplay between soil microbial community and soil organic matter dynamics. Sci Total Environ 152928:152928
Bhattacharyya P, Varghese E, Dash PK, Padhy SR, Das A, Santra P, Mohapatra T (2023) Anticipated atmospheric CO2 elevation differentially influenced the soil microbial diversities in crop, grassland, and forest: a meta-analysis. Rhizosphere 25:100630
Kuzyakov Y, Horwath WR, Dorodnikov M, Blagodatskaya E (2018) Effects of elevated CO2 in the atmosphere on soil C and N turnover. In: Developments in soil science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 207–219
He M, Li Q, Chen L, Qin S, Kuzyakov Y, Liu Y, Zhang D, Feng X, Kou D, Wu T, Yang Y (2023) Priming effect stimulates carbon release from thawed permafrost. Glob Chang Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16750
Nie M, Bell C, Wallenstein MD, Pendall E (2015) Increased plant productivity and decreased microbial respiratory C loss by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under elevated CO 2. Sci Rep 5:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09212
Shahbaz M, Kuzyakov Y, Sanaullah M, Heitkamp F, Zelenev V, Kumar A, Blagodatskaya E (2017) Microbial decomposition of soil organic matter is mediated by quality and quantity of crop residues: mechanisms and thresholds. Biol Fertil Soils 53:287–301
Orella J, Africa DR, Bustillo CH, Pascua N, Marquez C, Adornado H, Aguilos M (2022) Above-and-belowground carbon stocks in two contrasting peatlands in The Philippines. Forests 13(2):303
Bardgett RD, Freeman C, Ostle NJ (2008) Microbial contributions to climate change through carbon cycle feedbacks. ISME J 2(8):805–814
Mondal S, Pramanik K, Pal P, Mitra S, Ghosh SK, Mondal T et al (2023) Multifaceted roles of root exudates in light of plant-microbe interaction. In: Unravelling plant-microbe synergy. Academic Press, pp 49–76
Carneiro B, Cardoso P, Figueira E, Lopes I, Venâncio C (2023) Forward-looking on new microbial consortia: combination of rot fungi and rhizobacteria on plant growth-promoting abilities. Applied Soil Ecology: A Section of Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 182(104689):104689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104689
Odoh CK, Sam K, Zabbey N, Eze CN, Nwankwegu AS, Laku C, Dumpe BB (2020) Microbial consortium as biofertilizers for crops growing under the extreme habitats. In: Plant microbiomes for sustainable agriculture. Springer, Cham, pp 381–424
Verma RK, Sachan M, Sharma S (2020) Microbial consortia: emerging conglomerate for better and superior sustainable agricultural practices. In: The plant microbiome in sustainable agriculture. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, pp 141–155
Ríos-Ruiz WF, Torres-Chávez EE, Torres-Delgado J, Rojas-García JC, Bedmar EJ, Valdez-Nuñez RA (2020) Inoculation of bacterial consortium increases rice yield (Oryza sativa L.) reducing applications of nitrogen fertilizer in san Martin region, Peru. Rhizosphere 14:100200
Yadav A, Yadav K (2022) Comparative growth analysis of cumin plants (Cuminum cyminum L.) treated with glycerol and talc based phosphate solubilizing bacterial consortia. Journal of applied and natural. Science 14(4):1374–1386. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v14i4.3859
Kaur T, Devi R, Kumar S, Sheikh I, Kour D, Yadav AN (2022) Microbial consortium with nitrogen fixing and mineral solubilizing attributes for growth of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Heliyon 8(4):e09326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09326
Tyagi J, Mishra A, Kumari S, Singh S, Agarwal H, Pudake RN, Varma A, Joshi NC (2023) Deploying a microbial consortium of Serendipita indica, Rhizophagus intraradices, and Azotobacter chroococcum to boost drought tolerance in maize. Environ Exp Bot 206:105142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.105142
Kapadia C, Sayyed RZ, El Enshasy HA, Vaidya H, Sharma D, Patel N, Malek RA, Syed A, Elgorban AM, Ahmad K, Zuan ATK (2021) Halotolerant microbial consortia for sustainable mitigation of salinity stress, growth promotion, and mineral uptake in tomato plants and soil nutrient enrichment. Sustainability 13(15):8369. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158369
Majumder S, Datta K, Datta SK (2019) Rice biofortification: high iron, zinc, and vitamin-a to fight against “hidden hunger”. Agronomy 9(12):803
Bourassa MW, Osendarp SJM, Adu-Afarwuah S, Ahmed S, Ajello C, Bergeron G, Black R, Christian P, Cousens S, de Pee S, Dewey KG, Arifeen SE, Engle-Stone R, Fleet A, Gernand AD, Hoddinott J, Klemm R, Kraemer K, Kupka R, McLean E et al (2019) Review of the evidence regarding the use of antenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation in low- and middle-income countries. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1444(1):6–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14121
United Nations System Standing Committee on Nutrition (UNSSCN) (2004) 5thReport on the world nutrition situation nutrition for improved development outcomes. SCN, Geneva
Upadhayay VK, Singh AV, Khan A, Pareek N (2021) Influence of zinc solubilizing bacterial co-inoculation with zinc oxide supplement on rice plant growth and Zn uptake. Pharm Innovat 10:113–116
Upadhayay VK, Singh AV, Khan A, Sharma A (2022d) Contemplating the role of zinc-solubilizing bacteria in crop biofortification: an approach for sustainable bioeconomy. Front Agron 4:903321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2022.903321
Upadhayay VK (2022) Bacterial based Biofortification. Vigyan Varta 3(4):99–101
Singh J, Singh AV, Upadhayay VK, Khan A (2020) Comparative evaluation of developed carrier based bio-formulations bearing multifarious PGP properties and their effect on shelf life under different storage conditions. Environ Ecol 38(1):96–103
Ali M, Ahmed I, Tariq H, Abbas S, Zia MH, Mumtaz A, Sharif M (2023) Growth improvement of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and zinc biofortification using potent zinc-solubilizing bacteria. Front Plant Sci 14:1140454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1140454
Yuan Y, Liu D, Huang X, Wang S, Qiu R, Zhang Z, Ming J (2023) Effect of Enterobacter sp. EG16 on selenium biofortification and speciation in pak choi (Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis). Sci Hortic 310:111723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111723
Marfetán JA, Gallo AL, Farias ME, Vélez ML, Pescuma M, Ordoñez OF (2023) Exiguobacterium sp. as a bioinoculant for plant-growth promotion and selenium biofortification strategies in horticultural plants. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 39(5):134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-023-03571-x
Ahmad M, Hussain A, Dar A, Luqman M, Ditta A, Iqbal Z, Ahmad HT, Nazli F, Soufan W, Almutairi K, Sabagh AE (2023) Combating iron and zinc malnutrition through mineral biofortification in maize through plant growth promoting bacillus and Paenibacillus species. Front Plant Sci 13:1094551. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1094551
Sarwar S, Khaliq A, Yousra M, Sultan T (2022) Iron biofortification potential of siderophore producing rhizobacterial strains for improving growth, yield and iron contents of groundnut. J Plant Nutr 45(15):2332–2347. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2022.2063733
Sun Z, Yue Z, Liu H, Ma K, Li C (2021) Microbial-assisted wheat iron biofortification using endophytic Bacillus altitudinis WR10. Front Nutr 8:704030. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.704030
Kushwaha P, Srivastava R, Pandiyan K, Singh A, Chakdar H, Kashyap PL, Bhardwaj AK, Murugan K, Karthikeyan N, Bagul SY, Srivastava AK, Saxena AK (2021) Enhancement in plant growth and zinc biofortification of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by Bacillus altitudinis. Journal of. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 21(2):922–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00411-5
Mansani M, Polapally R, Subramaniam G, Vadlamudi S, Sayyed RZ, Hesham Ali EE, Maizatulakmal Y, Ali Tan KZ, Hazem SK, Bee H (2021) Co-inoculation of bacillus spp. for growth promotion and iron fortification in sorghum. Sustainability 13(21):12091. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112091
Shakeel M, Hafeez FY, Malik IR, Farid A, Ullah H, Ahmed I et al (2023) Serratia marcescens strain FA-4 enhances zinc content in rice grains by activating the zinc translocating enzymes. SABRAO J Breed Genet 55(2):495–507
Ullah A, Farooq M, Hussain M (2020) Improving the productivity, profitability and grain quality of kabuli chickpea with co-application of zinc and endophyte bacteria Enterobacter sp. MN17 Archiv Fur Acker- Und Pflanzenbau Und Bodenkunde 66(7):897–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1644501
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Upadhayay, V.K. et al. (2023). Prolific Microbial Agents as Key Products for Sustainable Agriculture. In: Soni, R., Suyal, D.C., Morales-Oyervides, L. (eds) Microbial Bioactive Compounds. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40082-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40082-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-40081-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-40082-7
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)