Abstract
Definition: Malignant tumor composed of mesenchymal cells producing osteoid and immature bone. Almost constantly intramedullary, rarely it may originate at the bony surface. Osteosarcomas may sometimes present with skip or more distant skeletal metastases, but it can be also skeletally multifocal at presentation. There are, consequently, several varieties of Osteosarcomas whose anatomo-clinical presentation, treatment, and prognosis, however, are not as distinctive as to justify a separate classification. Other osteosarcomas types, instead, are different in their clinical, pathologic, and therapeutic-prognostic features, and are classified as separate entities (periosteal osteosarcomas, parosteal osteosarcomas, low-grade central osteosarcomas).
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Classic osteosarcoma
- Telangiectatic osteosarcoma
- Secondary osteosarcoma
- Small cell osteosarcoma
- Osteosarcoma of the jaws
- High-grade osteosarcoma of the surface
- Multicentric osteosarcoma
- Periosteal osteosarcoma
- Parosteal osteosarcoma
- Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma
- Central low-grade osteosarcoma
- Extraskeletal osteosarcoma
Definition: Malignant tumor composed of mesenchymal cells producing osteoid and immature bone. Almost constantly intramedullary, rarely it may originate at the bony surface. Osteosarcomas may sometimes present with skip or more distant skeletal metastases, but it can be also skeletally multifocal at presentation. There are, consequently, several varieties of osteosarcomas whose anatomo-clinical presentation, treatment, and prognosis, however, are not as distinctive as to justify a separate classification. Other osteosarcomas types, instead, are different in their clinical, pathologic, and therapeutic-prognostic features, and are classified as separate entities (periosteal osteosarcomas, parosteal osteosarcomas, low-grade central osteosarcomas).
osteosarcomas varieties and their incidence on 100 cases
High-grade OS varieties | 90% |
• Classic osteosarcoma | 75 |
• Telangiectatic | 5 |
• Secondary | 4–5 |
• Of soft tissues | 3 |
• Of jaw bones | 2–3 |
• Small cell | <1 |
• Of bone surface | 1–2 |
• Multicentric | 0.5 |
Low-grade OS varieties | 10% |
• Parosteal | 4–5 |
• Central | 3 |
• Periosteal | 1–2 |
1 Classic Osteosarcoma
Epidemiology: It is the most frequent primary malignant tumor of bone, excluding myeloma considered a systemic neoplasm. Its incidence is of 2–3 cases/million/year (only 0.2% of all malignancies). Males are preferred (1.5:1). Most cases occur between 10 and 20 years of age, with a median age of 17. Older patients are usually secondary to radiation, Paget’s, chondrosarcoma, other primary bone tumors, or idiopathic.
Localization: Seventy percent of OS are localized around the knee or shoulder. Other locations are proximal or mid-femur, ilium, mid and distal tibia, proximal fibula, spine. Exceptions are the hand and foot. OS usually grow in the metaphysis or meta-diaphysis but tends to invade the epiphysis even in presence of a growth plate.
Clinical: Pain is usually the first symptom, often referred to trauma. In few weeks, it increases and painful swelling appears. High temperature and limited joint motion are advanced signs. Pathologic fracture may occur in osteolytic forms. Alkaline phosphatase is frequently elevated. Less frequently, also LDH may be increased.
Imaging: The plain X-ray is usually diagnostic. Typically, OS starts intramedullary, but breaches the cortex, and expands in the soft tissues. It is usually a combination of radiolucency and radiodensity, sometimes it is entirely eburneus with edges always faded. The pure osteolytic form is typical of the telangiectatic variety. The tumor soft tissue extension shows irregular, cloud-like radiodensities, and/or stripes of density perpendicular to the cortex (sunray image). Occasionally, it is purely radiolucent and it can be appreciated only by CT and MRI. At the periphery of the area where the tumor breaches the cortex, a triangular buttress of immature bone (Codman’s triangle) is seen. This is due to reactive bone acutely produced by the periosteum. Isotope bone scan is intensely hot even beyond the radiographic limits of the tumor. Rarely, it may reveal skips or distant bone metastasis. CT demonstrates intraosseous and extraosseous extension of the tumor and intratumoral radiodensities. With MRI, most OS exhibit the usual pattern of low T1, and high T2 signal. Sclerosing OS, however, have a low intensity on both T1 and T2 images. MRI is the best way to determine medullary tumor borders, epiphyseal invasion, skip metastasis. Contrasted CT and MRI show the relationship with vessels; but in some cases, an angiogram may be more reliable. Patient workup always includes CT of the lungs where metastasis may appear as radiodense round nodules.
Histopathology: OS is fleshy-soft in cellular areas with little matrix, firm and rubbery in fibroblastic areas with collagen production, gritty to stone-hard in osteogenic areas, and cartilaginous to myxoid in chondroblastic areas. Hemorrhage, necrosis, and cystic alterations are common. The most relevant diagnostic feature is constant permeation of marrow spaces, trapping host trabecular bone along its margins, predominantly. Cortex is also permeated and usually breached. An endosteal and periosteal production of reactive bone is associated. OS may invade the joint capsule and ligaments. Rarely, OS plugs are found in the adjacent veins. Skip metastasis, usually in the same but also in the adjacent cross-joint bone may be detected in a small percentage of cases. Microscopically, OS has a wide range of histological presentations but the characterizing feature is represented by high-grade sarcomatous cells producing osteoid and woven bone. The less osteogenic areas of the tumor (usually the periphery) are highly cellular and show more clear-cut features of high-grade malignancy as compared to more osteoid or bone-rich central areas of the tumor. Cells are large, with striking pleomorphism, hyperchromia, prominent nucleoli, frequent atypical mitoses, although some 10% of cases may show little anaplasia and lead to confusion with benign entities such as osteoblastoma, chondroblastoma, giant cell tumors, and a few others. Tumor osseous matrix varies from slender lace-like seams of osteoid to islands or dense sheets of woven bone. No regular trabeculae rimmed by osteoblasts are produced by OS cells. Where OS is intensely sclerotic, cells are scarce, small, with no mitoses; tissue is scarcely vascular and may be necrotic. In these areas, features of malignancy may be absent and diagnosis of OS is suggested by the permeative pattern of the tumor. Occasionally, OS is extensively chondroblastic (as a high-grade chondrosarcoma), or fibroblastic (similar to a fibrosarcoma). The osteoid-osseous production, which identifies the OS, may be found only in the microscopic study of the entire specimen. Reactive giant cells are seen, particularly in areas of hemorrhage. Particularly at the periphery of the tumor reactive osteogenesis associates and should not be confused with tumorous osteogenesis. Histochemical stains show a high content of alkaline phosphatase in OS cells.
Course and Staging: OS has a rapid course. At presentation, 80% of OS are stage II-B; only 5% are stage II-A. About 15% of OS are stage III. Because, without the use of chemotherapy, 80–90% of OS patients die of metastases, notwithstanding ablation of the primary tumor, it can be said that in 80–90% of cases occult micro metastases are present at the start. Metastatic spread occurs primarily to the lungs.
Treatment: Treatment of OS is based on chemotherapy (ctx) and surgery of both the primary tumor and the metastases. Postop ctx (adjuvant) started in 1971, pre- and postop ctx (neoadjuvant) was introduced in 1978. Presently, the most effective drugs are adriamycin (ADM), high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX), cisdiaminoplatinum (CDP), and ifosfamide (IFO). Preoperative ctx is started immediately after diagnosis. After a few cycles (approximately 2 months), the tumor is restaged, evaluating response: clinical (regression of pain, reduction and hardening of the tumor mass), laboratory (<serum alkaline phosphatase), and imaging (arrest of growth, ossification and capsulation of the tumor, regression of vascularity and edema, decreased isotope uptake). A precise method for evaluating response to ctx preoperatively does not exist. Dynamic isotope scan and contrasted MRI, however, are comparatively good indexes of response. Based on post-ctx staging study, surgery is performed. The entire tumor is sampled histologically and examined to quantify tumor necrosis. Good response is indicated by necrosis from 90 to 100%. Postop ctx is continued, starting 1–2 weeks after surgery, and lasting from 4 to 6 months. Usually, the same drugs as used preoperative are given in good responders. In poor responders, different drugs are administered or added in more prolonged trials.
Prognosis: Without chemotherapy, the 10 years survival rate was around 10–15%. With current ctx, the same figure is about 70%, for OS non-metastatic at presentation and involving the appendicular skeleton. Local recurrence was 2–3% after amputation. Presently, it is around 5% after conservative surgery. Metastases (mainly to the lungs) occur usually in the first 2–3 years. There are, however, rare cases of metastasis occurring even 5–10 years after treatment. The second most frequent site for metastasis is the skeleton.
Key points | |
---|---|
• Clinical | Young age, pain and swelling |
• Radiological | Central lesion, aggressive with radio-opacities |
• Histological | High-grade with osteoid/bone production |
• Differential diagnosis | None |
2 Telangiectatic Osteosarcoma
Definition: This variety (about 5/6% of all OS) is a completely osteolytic sarcoma, with a sponge-like structure filled of blood and scarce osteogenesis.
Epidemiology: Sex, age, and localization are the same as in classic OS.
Clinical: Clinically, the tumor has an aggressive course, with an expanding soft tissue mass, soft and tender on palpation, with increased local temperature. Pathologic fracture is not uncommon.
Imaging: Imaging shows a purely osteolytic lesion with ill-defined limits. Isotope scan shows an increased uptake. CT and MRI show the multicystic pattern (high signal in both T1 and T2, because of fluid and hemosiderin content) with fluid levels.
Histopathology: Grossly, the tumor is constituted by large cavities filled with blood. Neoplastic tissue constitutes the septa; it is very soft and can be very scarce, overwhelmed by hemorrhage. The permeative pattern is particularly evident, and cortex and periosteum are often extensively destroyed. Histologically under low power, the pattern is similar to an ABC. Only at higher power, the sarcomatous nature of cells becomes apparent, because all telangiectatic OS are high-grade malignant. Sometimes, however, the hemorrhage and necrosis are so massive that it is difficult to find viable cells and to appreciate anaplasia. Osteogenesis is usually focal and often it must be searched for in numerous sections, and rarely, may not be found at all yet with the overall clinical, gross, and histological patterns are entirely consistent with telangiectatic OS, with minus finding of osteoid or bone production by the sarcoma cells within the aneurysmal bone-cyst-like walls. Atypical mitoses are easily identified.
Course: The course is rapid, and the stage is almost regularly II-B or III.
Treatment and prognosis: Treatment and prognosis are the same as for classic OS. Some data suggest that response to preoperative ctx is particularly good, which can be explained by the rich vascularity of the tumor, enhancing the ability of the chemotherapeutic agents to reach the malignant cells.
Key points | |
---|---|
• Clinical | Young age, pain and swelling. Pathologic fracture possible |
• Radiological | Very aggressive and completely lytic |
• Histological | High-grade with lacunae |
• Differential diagnosis | Aneurysmal bone cyst |
3 Secondary Osteosarcoma
Definition: These OS on pre-existing lesions like Paget’s, fibrous dysplasia, bone infarct, chronic osteomyelitis, eventually treated, like after radiation.
Most of these cases are observed in advanced age, usually after the 50 years. Treatment is the same as for usual OS, except for the fact that patient age may contraindicate the use of the same ctx used in youngsters. Prognosis of secondary OS is generally worse as compared to primary OS, since the response to chemotherapy and advanced age of the patients are adverse parameters.
4 Small Cell Osteosarcoma
Definition: Tumor composed by small cells, similar to Ewing sarcoma, but producing bone matrix.
This is a rare variety (1–2% of all OS). Epidemiology, clinical presentation, and imaging are not consistently different from usual OS.
Histopathology: Characteristics round to ovoid shaped cells, with scanty cytoplasm, round to oval nuclei with fine to coarse chromatin and inconspicuous nucleoli, similar to Ewing sarcoma cells, but producing osteoid matrix. Immunohistochemical expression of SATB2, CD99 immunonegativity, and the absence of EWSR1 and FUS gene rearrangements are very useful in the differential diagnosis with Ewing sarcoma.
5 Osteosarcoma of the Jaws
Definition: Osteosarcoma of the jaws is radiologically and morphologically similar to osteosarcoma of other skeletal regions; the main differences involve later development, a high mortality associated with the local disease, fewer incidences of metastases, and its extreme rarity.
Incidence: Osteosarcoma occurring in the jaws is rare, constituting only 2–10% of all osteosarcomas, with an estimated incidence of 0.2–0.3 per million population. Patients affected by osteosarcoma of the jaws are one to two decades older than their peripheral counterparts with an average age of 33–36 years. Men and women are affected nearly equally.
Location: About 55–70% of cases arose in the mandible, and the remaining cases in maxilla or in facial bones.
Clinical: Swelling is the most common complaint in patients with osteosarcoma of the jaws often accompanied with pain. The latency period between first symptoms and clinical presentation is around 4 months.
Imaging: Radiographically, osteosarcoma of the jaws presents as mixed radiolucencies reflecting the extent of matrix formation and mineralization. Aggressive features such as cortical permeation and periosteal reaction are generally present in conventional high-grade tumors.
Histology: Histologically, the vast majority of osteosarcoma of the jaws are conventional high-grade tumors, demonstrating highly pleomorphic tumor cells producing a neoplastic bony matrix. The percentage of chondroblastic histotype is higher in osteosarcoma of the jaws than in other skeletal regions and can mimic chondrosarcoma. It should therefore be kept in mind that chondrosarcoma is exceedingly rare in the jaw bones, in particular in mandible. Osteosarcoma of the jaws should always be considered if cartilage is present in a gnathic biopsy and a fracture with callus formation can be ruled out. Immunohistochemistry with antibodies against SATB2 can help to confirm an osteoblastic lineage but is usually not required.
Almost all low-grade cases demonstrate a fibrous dysplasia-like morphology with only minimal atypia but unequivocal osteo-destructive growth. The nuclear immunohistochemical expression of MDM2 and the demonstration of MDM2 gene amplification using FISH analysis can help to distinguish low-grade osteosarcoma from fibrous dysplasia.
Course and Treatment: The five-year overall survival and disease-free survival range from 50 to 65%, and from 60 to 75%, respectively. Osteosarcoma of jaws have a high tendency toward local relapse (mandible 39–70%; maxilla 15–53%). In osteosarcoma of the jaws, hematogenous metastases are reported to affect only 6–21% of patients after an average time of 17–23 months. Wide resection is therefore widely accepted as the mainstay of treatment with five-year survival rates reaching up to 75% without additional (neo-)adjuvant therapy. Regarding adjuvant treatment in osteosarcoma of the jaws, conflicting results have been reported but there is general consent that postoperative chemo- or radiotherapy cannot cure patients with incomplete resection in the predominant number of cases.
6 High-Grade Osteosarcoma of the Surface
Definition: A high-grade OS arising on the bony surface with minimal involvement of the underlying cortex.
Apart from its site, it does not differ from the usual intramedullary OS in age, site, and histology. Imaging shows mixed non-mineralized and mineralized tumor matrix and some degree of periosteal reactive osteogenesis, but not the features specific of periosteal or parosteal OS. Histology is the same as in conventional OS. Treatment and prognosis also do not differ.
7 Multicentric Osteosarcoma
Definition: Almost synchronous appearance of multiple OS in the skeleton usually without pulmonary metastasis.
It is very rare (0.5% of all high-grade OS). Preferred age is from 5–15 years. (lower than usual OS). The number of foci varies from few to many, being distributed in the long bones but also in the trunk. They may involve locations, such as vertebrae, ribs and sternum, skull, hand and foot, epiphyses, where OS occurs very rarely. Usually one larger lesion is considered primary in the hypothesis that the others are metastatic deposits. All lesions are extensively sclerotic and do not easily breach the cortex. Histology is that of a usual osteoblastic generally extensively sclerotic high-grade OS. Whether it represents an early metastatic spread or a multicentric origin is unknown. The course is rapid and prognosis is regularly bad.
8 Periosteal Osteosarcoma
Definition: It is a predominantly chondroblastic OS of intermediate malignancy, originating from the periosteum usually in long bone diaphysis.
Epidemiology: Periosteal OS is rare (1/2% of all OS). It has a preference for males, with prevalence in the second decade of life.
Localization: Tibia and femur. Less frequent in humerus, rare in fibula and other long bones. Usually located in the diaphysis, occasionally in the metaphysis.
Clinical: Palpable mass and moderate pain. Slower growth rate than in usual OS.
Imaging: Periosteal, fusiform, radiolucent mass, with well-defined borders. It usually contains spiculated radiodensities perpendicular to the cortex that is either intact or superficially eroded, sometimes with a Codman triangle. Typically, the medullary canal is uninvolved. This is better demonstrated by CT and MRI.
Histopathology: The cut surface of the tumor is soft to rubbery with a translucent aura. The tumor forms large lobules, separated by streaks of ossification perpendicular to the cortex. Tissue is mainly chondroblastic, being more cellular at the periphery, with spindle cells and lace-like osteoid, more chondroid at the center of the lobuli where the tumor is similar to a low- to intermediate-grade chondrosarcoma. At the bony interface, the tumor can permeate for a small thickness into the cortex.
Course and Staging: It generally grows slower than usual OS, but much less slow than parosteal OS. The stage is I-A or I-B if there is intramedullary involvement.
Treatment and Prognosis: Treatment consists of en bloc resection with wide margins. Metastasis (lung) have been observed in about 15% of cases. Therefore, prognosis is good, after wide surgery and without chemotherapy.
Key points | |
---|---|
• Clinical | Young age, mild symptoms |
• Radiological | Surface lesion, diaphyseal with radio-opacities |
• Histological | Low-grade cartilaginous lesion, with increased cellularity and osteoid at the periphery of the lobules |
• Differential diagnosis | Periosteal chondrosarcoma, high-grade surface osteosarcoma |
9 Parosteal Osteosarcoma
Definition: This OS originates at the surface of the bone, with abundant production of dense bone and low-grade anaplasia. Progression of malignancy in high-grade OS may occur in about 10% of cases, particularly those with multiple recurrences or those previously mistaken and treated as benign bone tumor.
Epidemiology: It is infrequent (5/6% of all OS). Slight preference for females. Usually it appears between ages 20 and 40, very rare before the end of growth.
Localization: Almost exclusive of the long bones, it originates from the metaphysis. Rare in the diaphysis and exceptional in flat bones. The most typical site is the distal metaphysis of the femur in its posterior aspect (60% of cases).
Clinical: No or slight pain. There is a bony hard mass. Duration of symptoms not infrequently exceeds 1, 2, or even 5 years. It is not uncommon to see patients having undergone one or more surgical excisions and presenting with a local recurrence.
Imaging: Due to slow growth, parosteal OS is usually seen when it is large. It is a lobulated mass of osseous radiodensity, fused to the cortex with a broad base that tends to wrap around the bone. Radiodensity is maximal near the implant base while the outer margin tends to be blurred. Detailed radiographies show a mesh of trabeculae (“steel-wool” pattern), from ground glass to ivory density. Toward the diaphysis, the medullary canal is usually not involved. In metaepiphyses, the thin cortex is frequently breached with extension to the cancellous bone. This involvement increases with malignancy and with the standing duration of the tumor and is appreciated by CT in 60% of cases. CT scan, MRI, and angiography show the tumor adhering to or enwrapping the vascular bundle. Isotope scan is very hot.
Histopathology: Parosteal OS is composed of spindle cells and collagen fibers, embedding osseous trabeculae. Occasionally cartilage may be associated. Cells form long sweeping fascicles with parallel nuclei. Trabeculae appear also as parallel streamers with broken cement lines as pagetic mosaic. Bone is formed by metaplasia from tumor cells (fibro-osseous metaplasia) and trabeculae may not show osteoblastic rimming. Parosteal OS is a low grade tumor but may progress in malignancy, and transform into a high-grade OS. It is indeed not rare to find areas of different histological grade in the same case. Metastasis (lung, skeleton) have usually the same pattern as the most malignant part of the primary, and are often densely sclerotic. The nuclear immunohistochemical expression of MDM2 and the demonstration of MDM2 gene amplification using FISH analysis are useful to confirm the diagnosis.
Course and Staging: The course is usually slow. Parosteal OS is usually staged I-A or B. In dedifferentiated tumors, the stage is II.
Treatment and Prognosis: Surgery must aim to wide margins. Hemicylindric resection is usually possible in the popliteal region, through a double approach (medial and lateral), elevating the quadriceps. More often, a complete segmental resection of the affected bone is needed. When the tumor impinges on the vascular bundle, wide margins may often require vessel resection and reconstruction. Chemotherapy is only indicated after progression in high-grade lesions and it is the same as that used in classic OS. Local recurrence is the rule after intralesional surgery. Metastasis may be seen mainly when the underlying bone is invaded. Metastasis are less common as compared to conventional OS, about 2–10% in low-grade parosteal OS, but rising to about 60–70% in high-grade dedifferentiated parosteal OS.
Key points | |
---|---|
• Clinical | Long history of mild symptoms, pain, and swelling |
• Radiological | Surface, eburneus aspect |
• Histological | Low-grade malignancy, spindle cells, bone production |
• Differential diagnosis | Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma, high-grade surface osteosarcoma |
Amplicons | |
---|---|
• MDM2 12q15 | Gene amplification |
• CDK4 12q13-14 | Gene amplification |
Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma. In rare cases, within a typical parosteal osteosarcoma lytic areas (at imaging) can be found corresponding histologically to high-grade areas, showing therefore a dedifferentiation. Dedifferentiated parosteal OS is as malignant as conventional OS.
10 Central Low-Grade Osteosarcoma
Definition: It is an intramedullary low-grade bone producing tumor. It has been suggested to represent the central counterpart of parosteal OS.
Epidemiology: Rare (2/3% of all OS). There is no preference for sex. Age ranges from 10 to 60 years, the median being around 30.
Localization: Preferred sites are long bones, particularly distal femur and proximal tibia. Rare in flat bones; exceptions are hands and feet. It is usually centered in the metaphysis and, as it occurs mostly in the adult, it usually involves the epiphysis too.
Clinical: Mild to moderate pain and, less frequently, a moderate swelling. Clinical history is often of long duration. Pathologic fracture is rare.
Imaging: Usually, due to the slow course, tumors are large. The lesion appears mixed, lytic, and blastic. Even when lytic, some ground glass density can usually be found. Conversely, when it is sclerotic, some radiolucent areas are usually present. The bone contour may be expanded with a thin cortex that may present some discontinuity. In half of the cases, a soft tissue mass can be found, which can be either radiolucent or densely mineralized. Frequently, the tumor presents a coarse trabeculation similar to desmoid tumor of bone. A chronic periosteal reaction and thickening of the cortex are occasionally observed. Isotope scan is hot. CT and MRI are essential to define the extensions of the tumor.
Histopathology: Spindle cells producing collagen and bone. The tumor closely mimics the histological pattern of parosteal OS. The lesion is generally hypocellular. When osteogenesis is scarce, the tumor is similar to desmoid tumor or low-grade fibrosarcoma. Less frequently, it has the “Chinese characters” appearance of fibrous dysplasia. Bony trabeculae are generally parallel and composed of mature bone, differently from the woven bone of fibrous dysplasia. Occasionally foci of cartilage can be seen. The cells demonstrate slight atypia with few mitotic figures. Osteocytes of the bone trabeculae are normal. Almost regularly, the tumor has a permeative pattern. The nuclear immunohistochemical expression of MDM2 and the demonstration of MDM2 gene amplification using FISH analysis are useful to confirm the diagnosis.
Course and Staging: The course is slow. In about 15% of cases, the tumor shows a progression of malignancy, transforming into a high-grade OS. The stage of the tumor is I-A or I-B. Transformed tumors become stage II.
Treatment: Intralesional or marginal excision is almost regularly followed by local recurrence. Thus, surgery must obtain wide margins, which is usually feasible with conservative resection. Chemotherapy is not indicated, except in case of progression in malignancy.
Prognosis: Metastasis (lungs) are reported in 10% of cases, and mostly in tumors that progressed in malignancy. They can occur many years after the onset of symptoms. Thus, prognosis is good, unless the tumor becomes a high-grade OS.
Key points | |
---|---|
• Clinical | Long history of mild symptoms. Usually pain |
• Radiological | Central, mixed aspect |
• Histological | Low-grade bone production |
• Differential diagnosis | Osteoblastoma, high-grade osteosarcoma |
Amplicons | |
---|---|
• MDM2 12q15 | Gene amplification |
• CDK4 12q13-14 | Gene amplification |
11 Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma
Definition: A sarcoma arising in the extraskeletal somatic soft tissues in which neoplastic cells produce osteoid or bone matrix, or both.
Epidemiology: Rare, males, 50–80 years.
Location: Deep soft tissues of the thigh and buttocks.
Clinical: Progressively enlarging painless mass.
Imaging: X-rays, CT, and MRI reveal a large deep-seated soft tissue mass with variable mineralization. By definition, these lesions do not arise from bone, but secondarily involve the periosteum, cortex, or medullary canal.
Histopathology: Highly cellular, mitotically active tumors. There is usually considerable nuclear pleomorphism with necrosis and lace-like eosinophilic osteoid outlining individual cells or clusters of cells. Mineralized osteoid (bone) is relatively uncommon. Lobules of malignant cartilage may be present. All histological variants of osseous osteosarcoma may be seen.
Course and Staging: High-grade tumors, poor prognosis, high rate of metastasis.
Treatment: Wide or radical excision with systemic chemotherapy.
Selected Bibliography
Angelini A, Mavrogenis AF, Trovarelli G, Ferrari S, Picci P, Ruggieri P. Telangiectatic osteosarcoma: a review of 87 cases. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142(10):2197–207.
Asioli S, Righi A, Rucci P, Tarsitano A, Marchetti C, Bacchini P, Balbi T, Bertoni F, Foschini MP. p16 protein expression and correlation with clinical and pathological features in osteosarcoma of the jaws: experience of 37 cases. Head Neck. 2017;39(9):1825–31.
Aycan OE, Vanel D, Righi A, Arikan Y, Manfrini M. Chondroblastoma-like osteosarcoma: a case report and review. Skelet Radiol. 2015;44(6):869–73.
Azura M, Vanel D, Alberghini M, Picci P, Staals E, Mercuri M. Parosteal osteosarcoma dedifferentiating into telangiectatic osteosarcoma: importance of lytic changes and fluid cavities at imaging. Skelet Radiol. 2009;38(7):685–90.
Bacci G, Picci P, Ferrari S, Sangiorgi L, Zanone A, Brach del Prever A. Primary chemotherapy and delayed surgery for non-metastatic telangiectatic osteosarcoma of the extremities. Results in 28 patients. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(5):620–6.
Bacci G, Fabbri N, Balladelli A, Forni C, Palmerini E, Picci P. Treatment and prognosis for synchronous multifocal osteosarcoma in 42 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(8):1071–5.
Baumhoer D, Brunner P, Eppenberger-Castori S, Smida J, Nathrath M, Jundt G. Osteosarcomas of the jaws differ from their peripheral counterparts and require a distinct treatment approach. Experiences from the DOESAK registry. Oral Oncol. 2014;50(2):147–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.10.017. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
Bertoni F, Present D, Bacchini P, Pignatti G, Picci P, Campanacci M. The Istituto Rizzoli experience with small cell osteosarcoma. Cancer. 1989;64(12):2591–9. Review.
Bertoni F, Bacchini P, Donati D, Martini A, Picci P, Campanacci M. Osteoblastoma-like osteosarcoma. The Rizzoli Institute experience. Mod Pathol. 1993;6(6):707–16.
Bertoni F, Bacchini P, Fabbri N, Mercuri M, Picci P, Ruggieri P, Campanacci M. Osteosarcoma. Low-grade intraosseous-type osteosarcoma, histologically resembling parosteal osteosarcoma, fibrous dysplasia, and desmoplastic fibroma. Cancer. 1993;71(2):338–45.
Bertoni F, Bacchini P, Staals EL, Davidovitz P. Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma: the experience of the Rizzoli Institute. Cancer. 2005;103(11):2373–82.
Biagini R, Ruggieri P, De Cristofaro R, Torricelli P, Picci P, Bacci G. Multicentric osteosarcoma. Report of 5 cases. Chir Organi Mov. 1991;76(2):113–22.
Bishop JA, Shum CH, Sheth S, Wakely PE Jr, Ali SZ. Small cell osteosarcoma: cytopathologic characteristics and differential diagnosis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;133(5):756–61.
Campanacci M, Picci P, Gherlinzoni F, Guerra A, Bertoni F, Neff JR. Parosteal osteosarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66(3):313–21.
Cermik TF, Salan A, Firat MF, Berkarda S. Tc-99m MDP bone scintigraphy in a patient with multicentric osteosarcoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2003;28(7):599–600.
Cesari M, Alberghini M, Vanel D, Palmerini E, Staals EL, Longhi A, Abate M, Ferrari C, Balladelli A, Ferrari S. Periosteal osteosarcoma: a single-institution experience. Cancer. 2011;117:1731–5.
Choong PF, Pritchard DJ, Rock MG, Sim FH, McLeod RA, Unni KK. Low grade central osteogenic sarcoma. A long-term follow up of 20 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;(322):198–206.
Daffner RH, Kennedy SL, Fox KR, Crowley JJ, Sauser DD, Cooperstein LA. Synchronous multicentric osteosarcoma: the case for metastases. Skelet Radiol. 1997;26(10):569–78.
Devaney K, Vinh TN, Sweet DE. Small cell osteosarcoma of bone: an immunohistochemical study with differential diagnostic considerations. Hum Pathol. 1993;24(11):1211–25.
Dray MS, Miller MV. Pagets osteosarcoma and post-radiation osteosarcoma: secondary osteosarcoma at Middlemore Hospital, New Zealand. Pathology. 2008;40(6):604–10.
Dujardin F, Binh MB, Bouvier C, Gomez-Brouchet A, Larousserie F, Muret AD, Louis-Brennetot C, Aurias A, Coindre JM, Guillou L, Pedeutour F, Duval H, Collin C, de Pinieux G. MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool in the differential diagnosis of low-grade osteosarcomas and other primary fibro-osseous lesions of the bone. Mod Pathol. 2011;24:624–37.
Gambarotti M, Dei Tos AP, Vanel D, Picci P, Gibertoni D, Klein MJ, Righi A. Osteoblastoma-like osteosarcoma: high-grade or low-grade osteosarcoma? Histopathology. 2019;74(3):494–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13746. Epub ahead of print.
Goldstein-Jackson SY, Gosheger G, Delling G, Berdel WE, Exner GU, Jundt G, Machatschek JN, Zoubek A, Jürgens H, Bielack SS, Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group COSS. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma has a favourable prognosis when treated like conventional osteosarcoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2005;131(8):520–6.
Grimer RJ, Bielack S, Flege S, Cannon SR, Foleras G, Andreeff I, Sokolov T, Taminiau A, Dominkus M, San-Julian M, Kollender Y, Gosheger G, European Musculo Skeletal Oncology Society. Periosteal osteosarcoma—a European review of outcome. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41(18):2806–11.
Hamre MR, Severson RK, Chuba P, Lucas DR, Thomas RL, Mott MP. Osteosarcoma as a second malignant neoplasm. Radiother Oncol. 2002;65(3):153–7.
Hopper KD, Eggli KD, Haseman DB, Moser RP Jr. Osteosarcomatosis and metastatic osteosarcoma. Cancer Treat Res. 1993;62:163–71. Review.
Klein MJ, Siegal GP. Osteosarcoma: anatomic and histologic variants. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;125(4):555–81. Review.
Lee JS, Fetsch JF, Wasdhal DA, Lee BP, Pritchard DJ, Nascimento AG. A review of 40 patients with extraskeletal osteosarcoma. Cancer. 1995;76(11):2253–9.
Lee AF, Hayes MM, Lebrun D, Espinosa I, Nielsen GP, Rosenberg AE, Lee CH. FLI-1 distinguishes Ewing sarcoma from small cell osteosarcoma and mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2011;19:233–8.
Lee RJ, Arshi A, Schwartz HC, Christensen RE. Characteristics and prognostic factors of osteosarcoma of the jaws. A retrospective cohort study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;141(5):470–7.
Lidang Jensen M, Schumacher B, Myhre Jensen O, Steen Nielsen O, Keller J. Extraskeletal osteosarcomas: a clinicopathologic study of 25 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22(5):588–94.
Longhi A, Bielack SS, Grimer R, Whelan J, Windhager R, Leithner A, Gronchi A, Biau D, Jutte P, Krieg AH, Klenke FM, Grignani G, Donati DM, Capanna R, Casanova J, Gerrand C, Bisogno G, Hecker-Nolting S, De Lisa M, D’Ambrosio L, Willegger M, Scoccianti G, Ferrari S. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma: a European Musculoskeletal Oncology Society study on 266 patients. Eur J Cancer. 2017;74:9–16.
McCarter MD, Lewis JJ, Antonescu CR, Brennan MF. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma: analysis of outcome of a rare neoplasm. Sarcoma. 2000;4(3):119–23.
Mejia-Guerrero S, Quejada M, Gokgoz N, Gill M, Parkes RK, Wunder JS, Andrulis IL. Characterization of the 12q15 MDM2 and 12q13-14 CDK4 amplicons and clinical correlations in osteosarcoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2010;49(6):518–25.
Mervak TR, Unni KK, Pritchard DJ, McLeod RA. Telangiectatic osteosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;270:135–9.
Murphey MD, Robbin MR, McRae GA, Flemming DJ, Temple HT, Kransdorf MJ. The many faces of osteosarcoma. Radiographics. 1997;17(5):1205–31.
Murphey MD, wan Jaovisidha S, Temple HT, Gannon FH, Jelinek JS, Malawer MM. Telangiectatic osteosarcoma: radiologic-pathologic comparison. Radiology. 2003;229(2):545–53.
Murphey MD, Jelinek JS, Temple HT, Flemming DJ, Gannon FH. Imaging of periosteal osteosarcoma: radiologic-pathologic comparison. Radiology. 2004;233(1):129–38.
Nakajima H, Sim FH, Bond JR, Unni KK. Small cell osteosarcoma of bone. Review of 72 cases. Cancer. 1997;79(11):2095–106.
Okada K, Unni KK, Swee RG, Sim FH. High grade surface osteosarcoma: a clinicopathologic study of 46 cases. Cancer. 1999;85(5):1044–54.
Okada A, Hatori M, Hosaka M, Watanuki M, Itoi E. Secondary osteosarcoma arising after treatment for childhood hematologic malignancies. Ups J Med Sci. 2009;114(4):249–55.
Patel SR, Benjamin RS. Primary extraskeletal osteosarcoma—experience with chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(17):1331–3.
Picci P. Osteosarcoma (osteogenic sarcoma). Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:6. Review.
Picci P, Mercuri M, Ferrari S, Alberghini M, Briccoli A, Ferrari C, Pignotti E, Bacci G. Survival in high-grade osteosarcoma: improvement over 21 years at a single institution. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(6):1366–73.
Picci P, Sieberova G, Alberghini M, Balladelli A, Vanel D, Hogendoorn PC, Mercuri M. Late sarcoma development after curettage and bone grafting of benign bone tumors. Eur J Radiol. 2011;77(1):19–25.
Raymond AK. Surface osteosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;270:140–8. Review.
Raymond AK, Jaffe N. Osteosarcoma multidisciplinary approach to the management from the pathologist’s perspective. Cancer Treat Res. 2009a;152:63–84. Review.
Raymond AK, Jaffe N. Conditions that mimic osteosarcoma. Cancer Treat Res. 2009b;152:85–121. Review.
Revell MP, Deshmukh N, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM. Periosteal osteosarcoma: a review of 17 cases with mean follow-up of 52 months. Sarcoma. 2002;6(4):123–30.
Righi A, Gambarotti M, Longo S, Benini S, Gamberi G, Cocchi S, Vanel D, Picci P, Bertoni F, Simoni A, Franchi A, Dei Tos AP. Small cell osteosarcoma: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of 36 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015a;39(5):691–9.
Righi A, Gambarotti M, Benini S, Gamberi G, Cocchi S, Picci P, Bertoni F. MDM2 and CDK4 expression in periosteal osteosarcoma. Hum Pathol. 2015b;46(4):549–53.
Righi A, Paioli A, Dei Tos AP, Gambarotti M, Palmerini E, Cesari M, Marchesi E, Donati DM, Picci P, Ferrari S. High-grade focal areas in low-grade central osteosarcoma: high-grade or still low-grade osteosarcoma? Clin Sarcoma Res. 2015c;5:23.
Ritschl P, Wurnig C, Lechner G, Roessner A. Parosteal osteosarcoma. 2-23-year follow-up of 33 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1991;62(3):195–200.
Rose PS, Dickey ID, Wenger DE, Unni KK, Sim FH. Periosteal osteosarcoma: long-term outcome and risk of late recurrence. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453:314–7.
Schajowicz F, McGuire MH, Santini Araujo E, Muscolo DL, Gitelis S. Osteosarcomas arising on the surfaces of long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70(4):555–64.
Sheth DS, Yasko AW, Raymond AK, Ayala AG, Carrasco CH, Benjamin RS, Jaffe N, Murray JA. Conventional and dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma. Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. Cancer. 1996;78(10):2136–45.
Staals EL, Bacchini P, Bertoni F. High-grade surface osteosarcoma: a review of 25 cases from the Rizzoli Institute. Cancer. 2008;112(7):1592–9.
Tabone MD, Terrier P, Pacquement H, Brunat-Mentigny M, Schmitt C, Babin-Boilletot A, Mahmoud HH, Kalifa C. Outcome of radiation-related osteosarcoma after treatment of childhood and adolescent cancer: a study of 23 cases. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(9):2789–95.
Thariat J, Julieron M, Brouchet A, Italiano A, Schouman T, Marcy PY, Odin G, Lacout A, Dassonville O, Peyrottes-Birstwisles I, Miller R, Thyss A, Isambert N. Osteosarcomas of the mandible: are they different from other tumor sites? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012;82(3):280–95.
Vanel D, Picci P, De Paolis M, Mercuri M. Radiological study of 12 high-grade surface osteosarcomas. Skelet Radiol. 2001;30(12):667–71.
Weiss A, Khoury JD, Hoffer FA, Wu J, Billups CA, Heck RK, Quintana J, Poe D, Rao BN, Daw NC. Telangiectatic osteosarcoma: the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital’s experience. Cancer. 2007;109(8):1627–37.
Yoshida A, Ushiku T, Motoi T, Shibata T, Beppu Y, Fukayama M, Tsuda H. Immunohistochemical analysis of MDM2 and CDK4 distinguishes low-grade osteosarcoma from benign mimics. Mod Pathol. 2010;23(9):1279–88.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Picci, P. (2020). Osteosarcomas (OS). In: Picci, P., et al. Diagnosis of Musculoskeletal Tumors and Tumor-like Conditions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29676-6_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29676-6_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29675-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29676-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)