Abstract
Fecal indicators are organisms or chemical constituents found in fecal material or wastewater from humans and other animals can contaminant surface waters and pose a serious threat to the environment and human health. Fecal pollution serves as a vehicle for disease transmission including pathogenic bacteria, viruses, or protozoa. Fecal waste also carries with it harmless commensal organisms that live in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and are often used as fecal indicators since they are present in high numbers. The type and amount of pathogens found in fecal pollution is dependent on the host source (human, agricultural animal, wildlife) and the prevalence of illness in the host population. Therefore, employing fecal indicators that provide information about human and other animal contributions is critical for estimating the likelihood that pathogens are present and for directing remediation efforts.
This chapter, which has been modified slightly for the purposes of this volume, was originally published as part of the Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology edited by Robert A. Meyers. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Fecal Coliform
- United States Environmental Protection Agency
- Much Probable Number
- Water Quality Criterion
- Fecal Indicator Bacterium
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Fecal Indicator Definition
Fecal indicators are organisms or chemical constituents found in fecal material or wastewater from humans and other animals can contaminant surface waters and pose a serious threat to the environment and human health. Fecal pollution serves as a vehicle for disease transmission including pathogenic bacteria, viruses, or protozoa. Fecal waste also carries with it harmless commensal organisms that live in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and are often used as fecal indicators since they are present in high numbers. The type and amount of pathogens found in fecal pollution is dependent on the host source (human, agricultural animal, wildlife) and the prevalence of illness in the host population. Therefore, employing fecal indicators that provide information about human and other animal contributions is critical for estimating the likelihood that pathogens are present and for directing remediation efforts.
Introduction
Fecal indicators when detected demonstrate the presence of fecal pollution. Fecal indicators play an important role in regulation. Governmental agencies charged with the protection of human health use indicators to assess recreational water quality. In much of the developed world, Escherichia coliand enterococciare the organisms used for this purpose. Their quantitative link to human health risk in recreational epidemiology studies has led to development of water quality criteria to limit their concentrations in the USA and worldwide.
Conventional indicator methods focus on the cultivation of E. coli or enterococci cells isolated from an environmental sample. Culture-based methods are inexpensive and do not require extensive laboratory training to implement. However, these methods are time consuming, requiring 18–24 h to process samples. They also have other limitations such as the inability to discriminate between different animal sources and the potential of indicator microorganisms to persist and sometimes proliferate in the environment. As new scientific discoveries provide a broader view of the different microbes or chemicals associated with fecal pollution and specific sources, new indicators are being identified. These indicators are often referred to as alternative indicators since they have not been fully validated for use for standard methods in water quality testing, but show promise to address some of the limitations associated with conventional fecal indicator approaches.
Some alternative indicators are common to all sources of fecal pollution and can be used as general fecal pollution indicators. Others are associated with a particular host or group of animals. Host-associated indicators are useful for fecal source identification approaches, which are aimed at improving estimates of potential health risk due to pathogens, or identifying major pollution sources that should be remediated. Alternative indicators may take the place of conventional indicators as technology advances. Technologies such as real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), flow cytometry, and advanced chemical analyses can detect previously uncultured microbes or chemicals associated with fecal pollution.
Impact of Fecal Pollution on Coastal Waters
Coastal waters are a valuable resource. Fecal pollution of beaches is not only a threat to human health [13, 52, 98, 195, 258], but can also result in economic losses to surrounding communities [113, 197]. Within the USA, the ocean and Great Lakes coasts encompass more than 15,000 miles of coastline and are the home of economic and recreational centers and unique and rich ecosystems. Many coastal areas are stressed because of dense development and subsequent anthropogenic impacts (Fig. 9.1). Studies have shown that with increasing urbanization, there is an increase of fecal pollution in waterways [91, 151, 261]. Agricultural land use in upper reaches of watersheds also contributes to fecal pollution in tributaries that ultimately discharge into the ocean or the Great Lakes [24, 261]. Fecal pollution is the major cause of biological water quality impairment in the USA and is the primary cause of recreational beach advisories and closing [252]. Currently, fecal pollution impacts are determined by measuring fecal indicator bacteria using conventional, culture-based approaches. In 2009, there were 18,682 advisories and closures at 2,876 beaches in the USA that are routinely monitored for fecal pollution.
The Link Between Waterborne Disease and Fecal Pollution
Fecal pollution may contain pathogens that can cause disease in humans. To date, there are more than 150 different agents of disease that can be considered waterborne pathogens. This list grows each year as additional emerging pathogens are identified. Table 9.1 lists common waterborne pathogens and their major host reservoirs. The primary reservoir of human viruses is humans themselves because viruses by nature are host specific; however, animal viruses may also be a concern if they are able to replicate in human hosts. Recent research has identified pigs as a reservoir of hepatitis E virus [99]. Sewage may contain high concentrations of human viruses and some studies have performed surveillance of the viral diseases in the community by monitoring sewage [213, 214]. Some pathogens are predominately found in nonhuman animal hosts, but if humans become infected, person-to-person or waterborne transmission may occur.
Exposure to contaminated water and potential waterborne pathogens most notably causes enteric illness, but skin, ear and eye, or respiratory illnesses may also occur [27, 39, 65, 141, 195, 258]. Many waterborne disease agents are passed through the fecal-oral route, so any activities that involve ingesting contaminated water present a health risk. Ingesting contaminated seafood may also result in exposure to waterborne pathogens (Table 9.2). For respiratory diseases, inhalation of water droplets or direct contact with mucus membranes can expose a person to a disease-causing agent. Direct contact of contaminated water with wounds could result in an infection.
Recreational waters are of particular concern because swimmers can come into direct contact with contaminated water. Shellfish beds can also be impacted by fecal pollution and are regularly monitored to assure that harvested shellfish has not been subjected to contamination. In the Great Lakes, nearshore coastal waters are a drinking water source to nearly 40 million people. Stringent treatment requirements provide safe drinking water, but both source water and treated drinking water are closely monitored for evidence of fecal pollution to assure that treatment protocols are adequate. For a more complete discussion of this topic, see Chaps. 3–5 of this volume.
Important Attributes of Indicators. Fecal indicators can either be general indicators of fecal pollution or associated with a particular animal source. Many watersheds and coastal waters have mixed land use; therefore, both general fecal indicators and source-associated indicators have an important role in assessing water quality. Ideally, fecal indicators should be present in high levels in fecal pollution so that they can be used as a sensitive measure of the level of contamination when diluted to small concentrations in the environment. Fecal indicators should provide information about host source contribution when possible, whether it is from humans, or different agricultural animals or wildlife. Detection methods should be relatively simple and affordable considering that much of the hands-on monitoring is done by local health departments. Methods should lend themselves to rapid testing so that beach notification can happen in a timely manner.
Clearly, no single indicator can meet all of these goals. Therefore, it is critical to have multiple indicators that can be used in concert if needed. Different indicators will behave differently in various environments, e.g., marine waters versus freshwater [9, 92, 180, 227, 229]. Certain indicators may be appropriate for investigating sources of fecal pollution, or setting remediation goals, whereas others are better suited for rapid detection for recreational water quality monitoring for any fecal pollution present. Water resource managers, public health officials, and researchers must work together to identify what information is needed and choose the most appropriate indicators. For example, E. coli is recommended for freshwater, but it has a very short half-life in the open waters of the Great Lakes [160]; therefore, highly persistent indicators such as Clostridium perfringensmay be more useful for long-term monitoring [71, 146, 169]. Enterococci qPCR is being developed for rapid beach testing [93, 106], but is a general indicator and host-associated indicators within the order Bacteroidales may be more useful for identifying sources [31, 72, 236].
Important Attributes of Fecal Indicators |
---|
Routine monitoring: Specific for fecal pollution |
Present when pathogens are present |
Correlate well to illnesses |
Easy to quantify |
Simple and cost-effective methodology |
Behave in the environment in the same manner as pathogens |
No growth outside of the host environment |
Amenable to rapid detection methodologies |
Investigations: Specific for a source of fecal pollution |
Sensitive, e.g., present in high numbers in most animals with a given source |
Known or predictable ecology |
Known or predictable relationship to pathogens |
Detection of Conventional Indicators
Common fecal indicators that are used for water quality monitoring or recreational beaches are listed in Table 9.3. All of these indicators were originally identified as constituents of fecal pollution using selective and differential culture techniques. The earliest methods data back to late 1800s and early 1900s [14, 66] for coliform bacteria. There are two culture approaches for enumerating bacteria in water samples. The most probable number (MPN) methods involve culture-based detection in liquid broth using a series of dilutions. The dilutions in which organisms are detected can be used to calculate a statistical estimate of enterococciconcentration for that sample. The second approach involves filtering samples through a membrane filter. The filter is transferred to solid selective media that is optimized for the growth of the target organisms and inhibitory for other organisms. Various chromogenic substrates or pH indicators can be incorporated to make the media differential for fecal indicator microorganisms. A review of conventional and novel indicators can be found in Edge and Boehm [69].
Culture-based methods continue to be widely used for detection of fecal indicator bacteria; however, the time required to obtain a result is a major limitation of these methods for providing rapid (e.g., 4 h) results of beach water quality to assure timely public notification. Molecular methods such as qPCR can be used for detection of traditional fecal indicators [106, 182, 267].
Coliforms. Coliform bacteria are a group of bacteria that were the first indicators of fecal pollution. Coliforms are gram-negative, rod-shaped, facultatively anaerobic, non-spore-forming bacteria found in warm-blooded animals, as well as in soil, water, and vegetation. Coliforms are not a specific taxonomic group of bacteria, but are classified based on a number of characteristics. These organisms are identified by fermentation of lactose with the production of acid and gas at 35–37°C. Coliforms are also negative for cytochrome oxidase and positive for β-galactosidase. Coliforms are measured by using an MPN [16] or by enumeration of colony-forming units (CFU) using membrane filtration and selective and differential media such as MI [249]. These organisms generally are within the family Enterobacteriaceaeand include the genera Citrobacter, Escherichia, Enterobacter, Hafnia, Klebsiella, and Serratia. Coliform bacteria were one of the earliest indicators of water quality used in the USA, with individual states setting limits of 50–2,400 coliforms per 100 ml of water as a standard for recreation waters in the 1950s and 1960s [66].
Fecal coliforms. Fecal coliforms are a subgroup of coliforms and refer more specifically to coliforms derived from feces. Like coliforms, they are not a specific taxonomic group; they are based upon several morphological and physiological characteristics. These are defined by the same criteria as coliforms, but are thermotolerant and will grow at 44.5°C. E. coli is one of the major fecal coliforms found in feces, in addition to members of Klebsiella, Enterobacter, and Citrobacter. The designation of fecal coliforms was intended to improve specificity; however, some organisms included in this group can be found free living in the environment, most notably Klebsiella[42, 83, 177]. Beach water samples have also been found that have evidence of fecal coliforms that have replicated in the environment [158].
The first national water quality criterion for recreational waters was based upon fecal coliforms. In 1968, the National Technical Advisory Committee, commissioned by the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration (now referred to as the Environmental Protection Agency), determined that 400 fecal coliforms per 100 ml corresponded to an adverse GI health effect [66]. Subsequent recommendations stated that for recreational waters, within a 30-day period, the geometric mean should not exceed 200 fecal coliforms per 100 ml, and 10% of the samples should not exceed 400 fecal coliforms per 100 ml. Fecal coliforms are no longer used for recreation waters in most states, but the basis of the 1968 criteria is still used for regulating water quality of wastewater treatment plant effluents and for assessing river water quality. Fecal coliforms are also still used for shellfish testing (water overlying the reefs and oyster meats).
Escherichia coli (E. coli). E. coli is a fecal coliform that has been suggested to be more specific for fecal pollution than testing for the group of fecal coliforms and was recommended as an indicator for freshwater in 1986 by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) [14, 247]. E. coli are present in the GI tract of most warm-blooded animals, and therefore a general indicator of fecal pollution. E. coli is a thermotolerant coliform that produces indole from tryptophan and it can be differentiated from other microorganisms based on β-glucuronidase activity. Selective and differential media tests for this activity using methods based on membrane filtration, modified mTEC [248], or MPN approaches such as the Colilert manufactured by IDEXX [68] are commonly used to identify E. coli in surface water samples. One testing methodology simultaneously detects coliforms and E. coli using β-galactosidase and β-glucuronidase activity, respectively, as discriminators [249]. Some epidemiology studies have shown a relationship between E. coli densities and GI illness [65, 195]. E. coli has some limitations as a fecal indicator at recreational beaches because it has been shown to persist and even grow in some aquatic environments, thereby potentially interfering with the relationship between E. coli and recent fecal pollution events [7, 26, 134, 265].
Enterococci. Enterococci are gram-positive cocci and are nearly universally present as commensal organisms in the intestine of human and nonhuman animal hosts. The most common species in human hosts are E. faecalis and E. faecium [58, 139]. The enterococci are a subgroup of the fecal streptococci. Fecal streptococci have also been referred to as Group D streptococci according to Lancefield serotyping. The fecal streptococci have historically been used as fecal indicators and include species from two genera: Enterococcus and Streptococcus. There are two Streptococcusspecies in the fecal streptococci group – Streptococcus bovis and Streptococcus equinus – that have been shown to survive poorly in water. Hence, in water, fecal streptococci and enterococci are thought to be equivalent [116].
In the USA and the EU, enterococci are used for monitoring marine bathing waters because epidemiology studies have linked their concentration to human health outcomes [256]. The standards are tied to approved culture-based methods for their quantification: multiple-tube fermentation, membrane filtration, and defined substrate assays. Clesceri et al. (1998) describe a multiple-tube method where azide dextrose broth is used followed by confirmation with Pfizer selective Enterococcus (PSE) media and brain-heart infusion broth with 6.5% NaCl. Both the EU and the USA have approved the use of defined substrate assays manufactured by IDEXX for the quantification of enterococci (Enterolert and Enterolert-E). The USEPA-approved method 1600 utilizes membrane filtration onto mEI media for quantification [250]. Studies that have compared these culture-based methods for quantifying enterococci often find the methods yield slightly different results [32].
The USEPA has developed a qPCR assay for the enumeration of enterococci which has been compared to membrane filtration results [106, 253]. Enterococci measured via qPCR often yield higher concentrations than culture-based measurements since it enumerates both live and dead bacteria [32]. Enterococci measured by qPCR have been linked to human health outcomes in epidemiology studies of marine and fresh water beaches [257–259]. Ongoing work is focused on better defining these links. As the USEPA formulated new recreational water quality criteria, qPCR for enterococci is expected to be included as a rapid method which allows beach managers and public health workers to post water quality advisories on the same day the sample is taken.
Clostridium perfringens. C. perfringens is member of the phylum Firmicutes and is a gram-positive, low GC content organism. C. perfringens was suggested as a potential indicator in 1963 [34], and gained acceptance in EU countries, but it was not chosen for use in the USA because it survives for long periods of time in the environment [14, 66]. Epidemiology studies report a relationship between C. perfringens and illness [268], while other studies found no relationship [39]. However, C. perfringens has been shown to be a useful fecal indicator in certain environments where other indicators are highly modulated by environmental factors. Studies in tropical waters suggested C. perfringens is a better indicator compared with fecal coliforms because it is a spore-forming organism and does not replicate in the environment [79, 80]. Because of its spore-forming ability, C. perfringens has been used as a tracer of long-term fecal pollution impacts in marine and freshwater systems [36, 54, 70, 110, 169]. C. perfringens has also been suggested as a good indicator in the open waters of the Great Lakes because it can serve as a conservative tracer of fecal pollution and may mimic protozoan cyst or oocyst survival [164, 169, 191].
Alternative indicators. Ongoing research studies have identified a broad array of new potential indicators of fecal pollution. Molecular-based methods have made possible the characterization of organisms that previously were either not recognized as associated with fecal pollution, or were difficult to detect due to complex cultivation requirements. Alternative indicators may also employ unique chemical constituents. Alternative indicators are being developed as general detection of fecal pollution, such as total Bacteroides[53, 59], as well as source identifiers associated with a particular animal group (Table 9.4).
Different sources of fecal pollution can contribute different types and concentrations of pathogens (Table 9.1 and Table 9.2). For example, human fecal sources, particularly sewage, contain waste from a large number of people and are considered a primary source of human enteric viruses. Cryptosporidiummay be associated with cattle waste. Fecal indicators that provide information about the source will improve our ability to estimate the health risk due to pathogens as well as direct remediation efforts to major contributing sources of fecal pollution. The development of qPCR methodology has also advanced simple presence/absence detection to quantitative estimates of fecal pollution and provides a platform for the implementation of rapid methods.
16S rRNA gene targets. Many of the alternative indicators that have been described are based on detection of the organisms based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence. This gene is highly conserved among bacteria and has been used extensively to assign taxonomy.
Bacteroidales. Members of the order Bacteroidales are potentially useful indicators of fecal contamination because they generally are found in high numbers in fecal material of humans and other warm-blooded animals and are unlikely to survive in the beach environment [74, 136]. Early studies identified unique sequences in the Bacteroides 16S rRNA gene from human and ruminant Bacteroidesspecies that are associated with respective fecal pollution sources [24, 136]. Sequencing of clone libraries demonstrated that sequences of members of the broader Bacteroidales group, rather than exclusively Bacteroides spp., are amplified with primers originally targeting total Bacteroides spp. [60]. Subsequent studies have used taxon-specific cloning to characterize Bacteroidales populations within humans and different animals and have identified a broad range of host-associated genetic markers [25, 60, 75, 78, 121, 133, 137, 138, 153, 165, 184]. Since culture techniques for isolation of these anaerobic bacteria are difficult to perform, molecular techniques have been developed to amplify, detect, and in some cases quantify the 16S rRNA genes of Bacteroides spp. from feces and ambient water [53, 59, 133, 153, 218, 262]. Many of these assays utilize the HF183 sequence first reported by Bernhard and Field [25]. The utility of the genetic markers has been tested extensively in fecal impacted environments, including beaches [1, 37, 84, 181, 207, 216]. In addition, numerous studies report information on the distribution of these host-associated genetic markers in target and non-target populations [3, 64, 133, 138, 143, 185, 224, 225, 228], relationship to pathogens [208, 209], and the decay of these genetic markers in marine and freshwaters [20, 61, 184, 210, 261].
Bifidobacterium. This genus represents another group of GI bacteria with particular species reported to be associated with human fecal pollution including B. adolescentis, B. dentium, and B. longum [35, 148, 155, 173]. Several technologies targeting Bifidobacterium genes are reported for multiplex PCR detection [35] and qPCR [150, 154]. Bifidobacterium typically occur at lower concentrations than Bacteroidales making them harder to detect in dilute ambient water samples [219] and exhibit a rapid decay based on bench-scale survival studies [201]. Thus, the detection of a Bifidobacterium host-associated genetic marker in a polluted water sample suggests a recent, high concentration contamination event.
Faecalibacterium. This genus of bacteria has been reported in humans and other animals and has been suggested as a potential target for development of host-associated genetic markers [81, 161, 246, 279]. Sewage and cattle have been shown to have a high abundance of Faecalibacterium [161, 226]. Additional characterization of this group is needed to characterize phylotypes that are associated with specific animal sources.
Lachnospiraceae. Lachnospiraceae are found in high abundance in human fecal samples [57, 77, 242], sewage [161], and cattle [226]. Lachnospiraceae are included in the group Clostridium coccoides [107, 150]. The proportions of Lachnospiraceae, Bacteroides, and Bifidobacterium of the human microbiota vary among different animal species, and quantification of these proportions has been proposed as a method for fecal pollution source identification [81]. Additional characterizations of this group are needed to characterize phylotypes that are associated with specific animal sources [161].
Gene product targets. Molecular methods have also allowed for detection of genes that serve a functional role in the organism. In some cases, the function may be linked to specific host microbe interactions, making these genetic markers potentially good host-associated alternative indicators [221]. Genetic markers have been identified with a variety of molecular methods, including subtractive hybridization, genome fragment enrichment, and other metagenomic approaches.
Toxin genes of E. coli. Specific subpopulations of E. coli contain genes coding for toxins, including heat-labile enterotoxin(LT) and heat-stable enterotoxin (ST). E. coli carrying toxins are generally clonal populations that are found within certain animal reservoirs and have been suggested as host-associated indicators. Specific sequences of the STII toxin gene were found to be associated with swine, but not present in sewage or dairy farm lagoons [132]. Cattle-associated LTIIa has also been reported [50, 131]. These toxin genes have a worldwide distribution [72]. The occurrence of E. coli positive for STII or LTIIa can be low in agricultural animal populations, potentially limiting the use of these genes for the identification of specific animal sources.
Esp gene. The enterococcal surface protein (esp) geneis a putative virulence factor in Enterococcus faecium that has been shown to be associated with enterococci from human origin [212]. Because this gene occurs at a low frequency, original detection methods involved an enrichment step where DNA is extracted from enterococci grown on selective media, followed by PCR. Comparison studies have shown the esp gene in enterococci to correlate with other human-associated genetic markers [4, 163] and this alternative indicator has been employed in numerous field studies [275]. Newer methods employ qPCR that can directly detect the esp gene [2].
gyrB. The genetic locus gyrB is a housekeeping gene (e.g., common to all bacteria because of a central function). Similar to 16S rRNA gene loci, housekeeping genes are generally highly conserved and therefore useful for identifying specific phylotypes. One study employed qPCR targeting gyrB in Bacteroides fragilis as an indicator of human specific fecal contamination [142].
Methanogens.Methanobrevibacter smithii is a dominant Archaea in the human gut [67]. The nifH gene of this organism has been used as a human-associated indicator [243]. Similar assays employing the same gene in Methanobrevibacter ruminantium have been developed [245]. Assays for quantification of the nifH target have also been developed [22, 128]. An Archaea genetic marker may prove useful because it may have a different survival or ecology compared with bacterial indicators and pathogens.
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. B. thetaiotaomicron is found in high numbers in humans compared with other animals and is described as a niche organism in the human gut [274]. A genomic fragment that was generated with universal primers as a second unexpected amplicon was found to distinguish B. thetaiotaomicron from other animal species [241]. PCR primers specific for B. thetaiotaomicron were developed based on the sequence of this 547-bp genomic fragment and have been tested against a number of fecal samples from humans and nonhuman sources [45, 241]. A putative gene for complex polysaccharide degradation has also been used as a genetic marker for qPCR since the trait is hypothesized to be involved in host-associated metabolic pathway [277].
Metagenomics. The majority of host-associated genetic markers available to date target the 16S rRNA gene from a limited number of different microorganisms. Advancements in DNA sequencing and sorting technologies now allow researchers to survey the entire genome of all members of fecal microbial community. Different strategies include the use of competitive hybridization approaches [101], microarrays [145, 272], and 454 pyrosequencing [161, 226, 246]. Whole genome and community approaches vastly expand the number of candidate source-associated genetic markers and may allow for the development of even more refined source identification methods.
Viruses
F specific (F+) coliphages. F+ coliphage RNA coliphages have serologically distinct groups that predominate in humans (groups II and III) which are distinct from those commonly found in other animals (group I and IV) [114]. Comparison studies of different alternative indicators suggest F+ coliphage types are reliable indicators of host sources, but the groups are not exclusive to either animal or human sources [28, 180]. Further, differential survival may influence source identification in natural waters and may need to be taken into account in interpreting source identification studies [38, 172]. However, viral indicators may correlate more closely to human viral pathogens as they may have a similar ecology in the environment.
Bacteroides phages. Phages infecting B. fragilis and B. thetaiotaomicron have been used as indicators of human fecal pollution [12, 126, 240]. Differential ability of host strains of Bacteroides to detect phages from different sources has been reported [196], as well as geographic variability. Culture methods have been developed to isolate diverse host Bacteroides strains [190]. In survival studies, two B. fragilis phages were shown to survive longer in seawater compared to MS2 coliphage [157].
Human polyomaviruses. Human polyomaviruses are widespread among human populations and have been suggested as indicators of human waste [6, 162]. This virus is excreted in the urine and therefore may be detected in the absence of human feces. Studies have compared detection of human polyomaviruses with detection of human Bacteroides HF183 genetic marker and enterococci carrying the esp gene and found a strong correlation [4, 163].
Chemicals. Chemical methods do not detect fecal bacteria. Instead, these methods are designed to detect chemical compounds associated with human activities or sanitary sewage. Chemical indicators may provide additional evidence as to source [87, 95]. These chemicals are often found in sewage treatment facility discharges and septic tank effluent. For example, optical brighteners are commonly found in laundry detergents and have been used to indicate the presence of human fecal pollution in environmental waters [41, 62]. Fecal sterols such as coprostanol are also reported to be associated with human fecal pollution [28, 115, 176, 239]. Other potential chemical fecal indicators include antibacterial compounds, pharmaceuticals, and caffeine [95, 278] (Table 9.5).
Quantification of Bacterial Indicators Using qPCR. Conventional or endpoint PCR allows for the selective amplification of a particular genetic marker at extremely low concentrations even in the presence of a mixture of heterologous DNA targets making it ideal for environmental applications. The final result of an endpoint PCR method is either the presence or absence of the DNA target. Even though the qualitative determination of fecal pollution in a water sample can be very useful information, researchers quickly recognized the added advantage of generating quantitative data. The ability to estimate the concentration of a DNA target in a known volume of water provides a means to investigate relationships between the concentration of a fecal indicator genetic marker and numerous factors such as illness rates in swimmers or efficiency of waste management practices.
qPCR relies on the continuous monitoring of PCR product accumulation as amplification occurs. Estimation of the concentration of a genetic marker is based on the theoretical premise that there is a log-linear relationship between the starting amount of DNA target in a reaction and the fractional thermal cycle where PCR product accumulation is first significantly detectable (Table 9.2); for review see [204]. qPCR applications designed to estimate fecal bacteria concentrations in recreational waters are gaining widespread attention due to the rapid nature of these methodologies (same day results), reports linking the occurrence of DNA targets to public health risk [106, 257, 258], and the development of host-associated fecal source identification assays [40, 133, 135, 138, 163, 185, 218, 222, 223]. However, there are many technical concerns that must be addressed before these qPCR applications are ready for implementation.
It is important to recognize that a qPCR method consists of several protocols linked in succession including sample collection, sample preparation, nucleic acid purification, target amplification, and data interpretation. Each of these steps plays a critical role in the successful estimation of a DNA target concentration in an environmental sample. In addition, the extremely high level of sensitivity make qPCR methods highly susceptible to cross-contamination during field sampling, nucleic acid purification, and genetic marker amplification (Fig. 9.2). As a result, numerous studies have been conducted to address issues such as density and distribution of genetic markers in primary and secondary sources [60, 133, 199, 224, 225, 228], sample matrix interference during qPCR amplification [140, 198, 224, 255], estimating decay rates of DNA targets in ambient water [18, 23, 184, 261], loss of target DNA during nucleic acid recovery [106, 170, 238], and selection of a mathematical model to transform raw qPCR data into an estimation of concentration [230, 231].
Microbial Source Identification.Identification of the sources of fecal pollution is important for both developing remediation strategies and for estimating the likelihood of pathogen occurrence. In most cases, the source of fecal pollution in a water body of interest is originally measured because of high amounts of conventional general fecal indicators (i.e., enterococci or E. coli). Methods and study designs for source identification, also referred to as “microbial source tracking” (MST) or “fecal source identification” (FSI), has been reviewed extensively [72, 206, 237].
Identifying fecal pollution sources involves understanding both the physical location of the inputs and the contributing host sources. Most source identification studies begin with spatial and temporal sampling since fecal pollution sources are rarely constant and the locations of inputs are not always obvious. Following release into the environment, the ecology of fecal indicators is greatly influenced by the residence time, type of water body (e.g., marine or freshwater, oligotrophic, or nutrient rich), predation, or even potential growth by some conventional indicators [31, 236]. Therefore, it is very difficult to take one or two samples and determine the major source contributing fecal pollution to an impacted body of water.
Spatial and temporal surveys are complemented by using alternative indicators that can provide information as to the host source of fecal pollution. Often, a first tier assessment will involve distinguishing human versus nonhuman fecal pollution [89, 181]. Cross reactivity needs to be considered, along with geographic relevance of a particular indicator. The possible fecal pollution sources within the watershed need to be considered when choosing the most appropriate alternative indicators. The use of alternative indicators for microbial source identification has been reviewed extensively [20, 72, 73, 206, 211, 235, 237].
Early approaches to microbial source identification focused on library-based methods, where either phenotypic traits or genotypes of indicator bacteria were characterized from a particular source and then compared to what was found in surface waters. Methods for characterizing E. coli or enterococci have included antibiotic resistance, ribotyping, and repetitive extragenic palindromic PCR [43, 44, 63, 103, 105, 159, 189, 217, 269]. There are multiple complications in using library-based methods that include applicability of the library across geographic locations, specificity of E. coli or enterococci indicators to a particular animal host, and complex genetic relationships among these indicators [10, 72, 159, 206, 236]. Further, creating a library is expensive and multiple water samples need to be analyzed because fecal pollution inputs are usually driven by storm events and can involve multiple animal sources. Most source identification methods have moved to marker-based, or non-library dependent, approaches. Marker-based approaches involve utilizing a chemical or biological constituent that is commonly found in the fecal pollution source of interest, in high abundance so that it can be detected easily and associated with a specific human or animal source (Figs. 9.3 and 9.4).
Ecology of Pathogens and Indicators in the Environment
The identification of a host-associated marker of fecal pollution goes beyond microbiology. Once the fecal indicator is discharged into the environment, it becomes necessary to understand the various fate and transport mechanisms that control the concentrations of indicators and pathogens at the point of sampling.
Fate processes include dark or photo-inactivation [32], growth [111], sorption and desorption to sediments [19, 94], and grazing by zooplankton [30]. Inactivation has received the most attention of these fate processes. Although a fair amount of work has examined the interaction of pathogens and indicators with sediments, the work has primarily been focused on porous media, and simplified conditions. More work on the interactions of microbial pollutants and sediments and particles in surface waters is needed, particularly given the widespread occurrence of some indicators and pathogens in sediments and beach sands [7, 26, 56, 117, 265, 275].
Transport processes that control indicator and pathogen transport in surface waters include advection and dispersion of waterborne organisms. These processes are fairly well understood [174] and once determined in a particular surface water, they can be used to model microbial pollution. The resuspension and deposition of sediment-bound organisms is more complicated. Some work has examined these processes for E. coli [119, 120] and fecal coliforms [234] in streams and lagoons. Yamahara et al. [275] present a conceptual model for how enterococci in beach sands are suspended into the water column. A better mechanistic understanding of how organisms in the sediment or sand are transported into the water column is warranted.
Of the fate and transport processes described above, perhaps the most important to consider when choosing an indicator for microbial source identification is the time scale of inactivation and its tendency to sorb to sediments. For example, if the goal is enterococci source identification for designing remediation strategies, then ideally, the persistence of the genetic marker will mirror that of enterococci. A health-protective goal may be to have no feces present in a water body. If this is the case, then a source identifier with very long-persistence may be needed. A source identifier that interacts strongly with sediments may be problematic as it may allow sediments to become a secondary, environmental source of the marker. Generally, sediments are believed to be a protective environment for microorganisms, particularly bacteria, where they may persist or even grow [276]. Future work on source identifiers will need to document the importance of sorption and interactions with sediments in general.
Estimating Risk of Pathogen Exposure Using Fecal Indicators
Using fecal indicators to link the presence of fecal pollution to waterborne disease risk is challenging. The types of pathogens that might be present will depend primarily on the source of fecal pollution. For example, sanitary sewer discharges (human sources) may contain high levels of human viruses, whereas wildlife is less likely to carry human viruses, but may contain protozoan and bacteria that can infect humans. Comprehensive models that integrate data from several research fields such as occurrence of pathogens in fecal sources, dose–response relationships, source identifier decay behaviors, acceptable health risk, and route of transmission can be used to estimate risk and are termed quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) [15, 232, 233]. The type of pathogen present will also depend on the prevalence of the disease-causing agent within the population at the time of contamination. Many human viruses are seasonal, and protozoans such as Cryptosporidiumare prevalent during certain times of the year, such as spring when calves can shed high concentrations of this microorganism.
Factors that Diminish the Relationship Between Indicators and Pathogens |
---|
Seasonality of certain pathogens |
Rate of infection in the host reservoir (herd, human population) |
Differential decay |
Differences in transport |
Differences in sedimentation rates and partitioning to soil, sand, and sediments |
Epidemiological Studies
Epidemiology studies have been conducted around the world to understand the correlative relationship between indicator concentrations and human health. The studies that have been conducted to date, and their methodologies, are summarized by Boehm and Soller (see Recreational Water Risk: Pathogens and Fecal Indicators. Most of the studies have focused on the health effects of recreational exposure to human fecal contamination from publicly owned treatment work discharges. These studies generally show a statistically significant correlation between enterococci and GI illness [256] in marine waters and E. coli and GI illness at freshwater beaches. Epidemiology studies are the cornerstone of the USA and EU water quality criteria and directives [31]. Acceptable illness rates are anchored to concentrations of indicator organisms in order to set acceptable contaminant levels. In the USA, 19 illnesses per 1,000 people is the acceptable illness level for marine water recreation, and in freshwater, the acceptable level is 8 illnesses per 1,000 people.
There are several important knowledge gaps in the understanding of how fecal contamination in recreational waters affects human health [31]. Few studies have documented the human health effects from exposure to nonhuman sources of fecal contamination including, but not limited to, bird and dog feces and urban and agricultural runoff [52, 98, 156]. A review of these studies suggests the relationship between indicator concentration and recreational waterborne illness risks is equivocal. Current studies with QMRA are trying to more fully understand the risks for exposure to animal feces in recreational waters [233].
Fecal Indicator Applications. There are numerous applications for fecal indicators and indicators need to be chosen that best serve a specific purpose or goal. One primary purpose of an indicator is to evaluate the public health risk for recreational water. In this case, general indicators may be employed since beach managers will need to know if fecal pollution is present and at what level. Since the presence of pathogens is highly dependent on the source of fecal pollution, adequate protection of public health will depend on assuming that the indicators are derived from sources that carry the highest pathogen burden. Rapid detection of a fecal indicator is more important than the level of information provided by the indicator since water quality can change rapidly in the beach environment [29]. Ultimately, the source of fecal pollution needs to be identified and remediated to remove the health risk.
Fecal indicators also serve as important tools for sanitary survey practices and for prioritizing remediation strategies. While daily monitoring with a general indicator such as enterococci or E. coli will provide information on the extent of fecal pollution, the source needs to be identified in order to take corrective actions. Both extensive mapping of the physical location of fecal pollution inputs (where is it coming from?) and determination of the host sources (is it human or nonhuman sources?) are necessary. Host-associated alternative indicators are best suited for these applications.
Source identifiers can also be used to evaluate the success of best management practices and influence of many green infrastructure efforts in agriculture and urban run-off settings. For example, the installation of tile drainage systems or constructed wetlands is commonly used to control the flow of agricultural waste across the landscape during rain events. Host-associated methods provide an excellent metric for estimating the efficiency of these waste management practices.
Rapid Methods for Indicators
Recreational water quality monitoring has traditionally relied upon culture-based methods and therefore test results are not available to the public until, at the earliest, the following day. It is well established that water quality can change in a matter of hours [29, 266]. A high priority for beach managers is to utilize rapid testing methods, many of which are based on qPCR of fecal indicators. Studies have compared different rapid methods [93]. New water quality criteria that are being formulated by the USEPA are expected to include rapid methods for enterococci using qPCR.
BEACH Act Legislation. The Beaches Environmental Assessment and Coastal Health (BEACH) Act of 2000 is an amendment to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (commonly known as the Clean Water Act). This legislation required states and tribes to adopt new or revised water quality standards by 2004. It also required the USEPA to publish new or revised criteria for pathogens and pathogen indicators. The BEACH Act authorized appropriations for states and tribes to develop and implement water quality monitoring and public notification programs at recreational beaches. The USEPA has identified scientific gaps that need to be filled in order to develop improved water quality criteria [251].
Future Directions
The identification of host-associated source identifiers represents the first step toward the successful implementation of a fecal indicator method. Several additional steps must be taken to complete the method development phase including method optimization, design of appropriate laboratory controls, and defining a data interpretation model. After method development, it is necessary to define the operational parameters of the method. In the case of qPCR, this might include factors such as generation of a calibration curve, defining the range of quantification, precision, and limit of detection. The next step is to characterize the robustness of the method by measuring specificity, host distribution of the source identifier, abundance of source identifier in target group, describing fate and transport mechanisms, establishing links to general fecal indicators, pathogens, and public health outcomes. Once the operational parameters and robustness of the method are adequately described, a multiple laboratory validation study should be conducted to address issues of reproducibility, variability between laboratories, normalization of results, standardization of controls, minimum requirements to establish laboratory efficiency, and requirements for laboratory training. It is important to note that this list is not comprehensive. There may be additional steps required depending on the intended use of the method.
Rapidly advancing technologies will provide new opportunities to expand the number and types of fecal indicators. Next-generation sequencing technologies have increased our capacity to analyze whole microbial communities, rather than single organisms. Advancing technologies will also allow for more detailed analyses of the dynamics of fecal indicators in the environment. Further, more sensitive, specific, and rapid detection strategies are needed to improve monitoring programs for devising pollution remediation strategies and for the protection of public health.
Abbreviations
- Alternative fecal indicators:
-
Fecal indicators that have not been fully validated for standard water quality methods, but show potential for increased sensitivity or specificity over current indicators.
- Commensal:
-
The general meaning of this word is sharing of food and originates from the Latin word cum mensa, meaning “sharing a table.” In the context of bacteria and host interactions, the bacteria benefit from the host without causing harm.
- Enterococci:
-
The term “enterococci” is a general reference to members of the genus Enterococcus: however, in the context of water quality standards, enterococci often refers to E. faecalis and E. faecium, which can be enumerated using selective and differential media.
- Escherichia coli (E. coli):
-
Gram-negative bacteria found in the gastrointestinal tract of almost all warm-blooded animals. These bacteria are easily cultured and can be enumerated using selective and differential media.
- Fecal indicator:
-
A chemical or biological constituent that is found in fecal matter that can be used to demonstrate the presence of contamination.
- Pathogen:
-
A microbe or microorganism such as a bacteria, virus, fungi, prion, or protozoan that causes disease in its animal or plant host.
- Polymerase chain reaction (PCR):
-
A scientific technique in molecular biology to amplify a single or few gene copies of a nucleic acid fragment across several orders of magnitude. Amplification results in the generation of thousands to millions of copies of a particular nucleic acid sequence.
- Quantitative PCR:
-
A technique based on PCR which simultaneously amplifies and quantifies a targeted nucleic acid molecule.
Bibliography
Ahmed W, Powell D, Goonetilleke A, Gardner T (2008) Detection and source identification of faecal pollution in non-sewered catchment by means of host-specific molecular markers. Water Sci Technol 58:579–586
Ahmed W, Stewart J, Gardner T, Powell D (2008) A real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for quantitative detection of the human-specific enterococci surface protein marker in sewage and environmental waters. Environ Microbiol 10:3255–3264
Ahmed W, Stewart J, Powell D, Gardner T (2008) Evaluation of Bacteroides markers for the detection of human faecal pollution. Lett Appl Microbiol 46:237–242
Ahmed W, Goonetilleke A, Powell D, Chauhan K, Gardner T (2009) Comparison of molecular markers to detect fresh sewage in environmental waters. Water Res 43:4908–4917
Ahmed W, Sawant S, Huygens F, Goonetilleke A, Gardner T (2009) Prevalence and occurrence of zoonotic bacterial pathogens in surface waters determined by quantitative PCR. Water Res 43:4918–4928
Ahmed W, Wan C, Goonetilleke A, Gardner T (2010) Evaluating sewage-associated JCV and BKV polyomaviruses for sourcing human fecal pollution in a coastal river in Southeast Queensland, Australia. J Environ Qual 39:1743–1750
Alm EW, Burke J, Spain A (2003) Fecal indicator bacteria are abundant in wet sand at freshwater beaches. Water Res 37:3978–3982
Alonso JL, Alonso MA (1993) Presence of Campylobacter in marine waters of Valencia. Spain Water Res 27:1559–1562
Anderson KL, Whitlock JE, Harwood VJ (2005) Persistence and differential survival of fecal indicator bacteria in subtropical waters and sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:3041–3048
Anderson MA, Whitlock JE, Harwood VJ (2006) Diversity and distribution of Escherichia coli genotypes and antibiotic resistance phenotypes in feces of humans, cattle, and horses. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:6914–6922
Arai T, Ikejima N, Itoh T, Sakai S, Shimada T, Sakazaki R (1980) A survey of Plesiomonas shigelloides from aquatic environments, domestic animals, pets and humans. J Hyg (Lond) 84:203–211
Araujo RM, Puig A, Lasobras J, Lucena F, Jofre J (1997) Phages of enteric bacteria in fresh water with different levels of faecal pollution. J Appl Microbiol 82:281–286
Arnone RD, Walling JP (2007) Waterborne pathogens in urban watersheds. J Water Health 5:149–162
Ashbolt NJ, Grabow OK, Snozzi M (2001) Indicators of microbial water quality. In: Fewtrell L, Bartram J (eds) Water quality: guidelines, standards, and health. IWA Publishing, London
Ashbolt NJ, Schoen ME, Soller JA, Roser DJ (2010) Predicting pathogen risks to aid beach management: the real value of quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA). Water Res 44:4692–4703
Association, A. P. H. (1999) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
Aw TG, Gin KY, Ean Oon LL, Chen EX, Woo CH (2009) Prevalence and genotypes of human noroviruses in tropical urban surface waters and clinical samples in Singapore. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:4984–4992
Bae S, Wuertz S (2009) Rapid decay of host-specific fecal Bacteroidales cells in seawater as measured by quantitative PCR with propidium monoazide. Water Res 43:4850–4859
Bai S, Lung WS (2005) Modeling sediment impact on the transport of fecal bacteria. Water Res 39:5232–5240
Balleste E, Bonjoch X, Belanche LA, Blanch AR (2010) Molecular indicators used in the development of predictive models for microbial source tracking. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:1789–1795
Baudart J, Lemarchand K, Brisabois A, Lebaron P (2000) Diversity of Salmonella strains isolated from the aquatic environment as determined by serotyping and amplification of the ribosomal DNA spacer regions. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1544–1552
Baums IB, Goodwin KD, Kiesling T, Wanless D, Diaz MR, Fell JW (2007) Luminex detection of fecal indicators in river samples, marine recreational water, and beach sand. Mar Pollut Bull 54:521–536
Bell A, Layton AC, McKay L, Williams D, Gentry R, Sayler GS (2009) Factors influencing the persistence of fecal Bacteroides in stream water. J Environ Qual 38:1224–1232
Bernhard AE, Field KG (2000) Identification of nonpoint sources of fecal pollution in coastal waters by using host-specific 16 S ribosomal DNA genetic markers from fecal anaerobes. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1587–1594
Bernhard AE, Field KG (2000) A PCR assay to discriminate human and ruminant feces on the basis of host differences in Bacteroides-Prevotella genes encoding 16 S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4571–4574
Beversdorf LJ, Bornstein-Forst SM, McLellan SL (2007) The potential for beach sand to serve as a reservoir for Escherichia coli and the physical influences on cell die-off. J Appl Microbiol 102:1372–1381
Bienfang PK, Defelice SV, Laws EA, Brand LE, Bidigare RR, Christensen S, Trapido-Rosenthal H, Hemscheidt TK, McGillicuddy DJ, Anderson DM, Solo-Gabriele HM, Boehm AB, Backer LC (2011) Prominent human health impacts from several marine microbes: history, ecology, and public health implications. Int J Microbiol 2011:152815
Blanch AR, Belanche-Munoz L, Bonjoch X, Ebdon J, Gantzer C, Lucena F, Ottoson J, Kourtis C, Iversen A, Kuhn I, Moce L, Muniesa M, Schwartzbrod J, Skraber S, Papageorgiou GT, Taylor H, Wallis J, Jofre J (2006) Integrated analysis of established and novel microbial and chemical methods for microbial source tracking. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5915–5926
Boehm AB (2007) Enterococci concentrations in diverse coastal environments exhibit extreme variability. Environ Sci Technol 41:8227–8232
Boehm AB, Keymer DP, Shellenbarger GG (2005) An analytical model of enterococci inactivation, grazing, and transport in the surf zone of a marine beach. Water Res 39:3565–3578
Boehm AB, Ashbolt NJ, Colford JM Jr, Dunbar LE, Fleming LE, Gold MA, Hansel JA, Hunter PR, Ichida AM, McGee CD, Soller JA, Weisberg SB (2009) A sea change ahead for recreational water quality criteria. J Water Health 7:9–20
Boehm AB, Yamahara KM, Love DC, Peterson BM, McNeill K, Nelson KL (2009) Covariation and photoinactivation of traditional and novel indicator organisms and human viruses at a sewage-impacted marine beach. Environ Sci Technol 43:8046–8052
Bolton F, Surman SB, Martin K, Wareing DR, Humphrey TJ (1999) Presence of Campylobacter and Salmonella in sand from bathing beaches. Epidemiol Infect 122:7–13
Bonde GJ (1963) Bacterial indicators of water pollution. A study of quantitative estimation. Teknisk Forlag, Copenhagen
Bonjoch X, Balleste E, Blanch AR (2004) Multiplex PCR with 16 S rRNA gene-targeted primers of bifidobacterium spp. to identify sources of fecal pollution. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:3171–3175
Bothner MH, Takada H, Knight IT, Hill RT, Butman B, Farrington JW, Colwell RR, Grassle JF (1994) Sewage contamination in sediments beneath a deep-ocean dump site off New-York. Mar Environ Res 38:43–59
Bower PA, Scopel CO, Jensen ET, Depas MM, McLellan SL (2005) Detection of genetic markers of fecal indicator bacteria in Lake Michigan and determination of their relationship to Escherichia coli densities using standard microbiological methods. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8305–8313
Brion GM, Meschke JS, Sobsey MD (2002) F-specific RNA coliphages: occurrence, types, and survival in natural waters. Water Res 36:2419–2425
Cabelli VJ, Dufour AP, McCabe LJ, Levin MA (1982) Swimming-associated gastroenteritis and water quality. Am J Epidemiol 115:606–616
Caldwell JM, Raley ME, Levine JF (2007) Mitochondrial multiplex real-time PCR as a source tracking method in fecal-contaminated effluents. Environ Sci Technol 41:3277–3283
Cao Y, Griffith JF, Weisberg SB (2009) Evaluation of optical brightener photodecay characteristics for detection of human fecal contamination. Water Res 43:2273–2279
Caplenas NR, Kanarek MS (1984) Thermotolerant non-fecal source Klebsiella pneumoniae: validity of the fecal coliform test in recreational waters. Am J Public Health 74:1273–1275
Carson CA, Shear BL, Ellersieck MR, Asfaw A (2001) Identification of fecal Escherichia coli from humans and animals by ribotyping. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1503–1507
Carson CA, Shear BL, Ellersieck MR, Schnell JD (2003) Comparison of ribotyping and repetitive extragenic palindromic-PCR for identification of fecal Escherichia coli from humans and animals. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1836–1839
Carson CA, Christiansen JM, Yampara-Iquise H, Benson VW, Baffaut C, Davis JV, Broz RR, Kurtz WB, Rogers WM, Fales WH (2005) Specificity of a Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron marker for human feces. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4945–4949
Center for Disease Control (2011) posting date. Escherichia coli O157:H7, General information
Chapron CD, Ballester NA, Fontaine JH, Frades CN, Margolin AB (2000) Detection of astroviruses, enteroviruses, and adenovirus types 40 and 41 in surface waters collected and evaluated by the information collection rule and an integrated cell culture-nested PCR procedure. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2520–2525
Charoenca N, Fujioka RS (1993) Assessment of Staphylococcus bacteria in Hawaii’s marine recreational waters. Water Sci Technol 27:283–289
Charoenca N, Fujioka RS (1995) Association of staphylococcal skin infections and swimming. Water Sci Technol 31:11–17
Chern EC, Tsai YL, Olson BH (2004) Occurrence of genes associated with enterotoxigenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in agricultural waste lagoons. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:356–362
Choi S, Jiang SC (2005) Real-time PCR quantification of human adenoviruses in urban rivers indicates genome prevalence but low infectivity. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7426–7433
Colford JM Jr, Wade TJ, Schiff KC, Wright CC, Griffith JF, Sandhu SK, Burns S, Sobsey M, Lovelace G, Weisberg SB (2007) Water quality indicators and the risk of illness at beaches with nonpoint sources of fecal contamination. Epidemiology 18:27–35
Converse RR, Blackwood AD, Kirs M, Griffith JF, Noble RT (2009) Rapid QPCR-based assay for fecal Bacteroides spp. as a tool for assessing fecal contamination in recreational waters. Water Res 43:48–4837
Davies CM, Long JA, Donald M, Ashbolt NJ (1995) Survival of fecal microorganisms in marine and freshwater sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1888–1896
DePaola A, Hopkins LH, Peeler JT, Wentz B, McPhearson RM (1990) Incidence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in U.S. coastal waters and oysters. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:2299–2302
Desmarais TR, Solo-Gabriele HM, Palmer CJ (2002) Influence of soil on fecal indicator organisms in a tidally influenced subtropical environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1165–1172
Dethlefsen L, Huse S, Sogin ML, Relman DA (2008) The pervasive effects of an antibiotic on the human gut microbiota, as revealed by deep 16 S rRNA sequencing. PLoS Biol 6:e280
Devriese LLA, van de Kerckhove A, Kilpper-Baelz R, Schleifer K (1987) Characterization and identification of Enterococcus species isolated from the intestines of animals. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37:257–259
Dick LK, Field KG (2004) Rapid estimation of numbers of fecal Bacteroidetes by use of a quantitative PCR assay for 16 S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:5695–5697
Dick LK, Bernhard AE, Brodeur TJ, Santo Domingo JW, Simpson JM, Walters SP, Field KG (2005) Host distributions of uncultivated fecal Bacteroidales bacteria reveal genetic markers for fecal source identification. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:3184–3191
Dick LK, Stelzer EA, Bertke EE, Fong DL, Stoeckel DM (2010) Relative decay of Bacteroidales microbial source tracking markers and cultivated Escherichia coli in freshwater microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:3255–3262
Dickerson JW Jr, Hagedorn C, Hassall A (2007) Detection and remediation of human-origin pollution at two public beaches in Virginia using multiple source tracking methods. Water Res 41:3758–3770
Dombek PE, Johnson LK, Zimmerley ST, Sadowsky MJ (2000) Use of repetitive DNA sequences and the PCR To differentiate Escherichia coli isolates from human and animal sources. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2572–2577
Dorai-Raj S, O’Grady J, Colleran E (2009) Specificity and sensitivity evaluation of novel and existing Bacteroidales and Bifidobacteria-specific PCR assays on feces and sewage samples and their application for microbial source tracking in Ireland. Water Res 43:4980–4988
Dufour AP (1984) Bacterial indicators of recreational water quality. Can J Public Health 75:49–56
Dufour AP, Schaub S (2007) The evolution of water quality criteria in the United Sates, 1922–2003. In: Wymer LJ (ed) Statistical framework for recreational water quality monitoring. Wiley, New York
Eckburg PB, Bik EM, Bernstein CN, Purdom E, Dethlefsen L, Sargent M, Gill SR, Nelson KE, Relman DA (2005) Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science 308:1635–1638
Eckner KF (1998) Comparison of membrane filtration and multiple-tube fermentation by the colilert and enterolert methods for detection of waterborne coliform bacteria, Escherichia coli, and enterococci used in drinking and bathing water quality monitoring in southern Sweden. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3079–3083
Edge TA, Boehm AB (2011) Classical and molecular methods to measure fecal indicator bacteria. In: Sadowsky MJ, Whitman RL (eds) The fecal indicator bacteria. ASM Press, Washington, DC
Edwards DD, McFeters GA, Venkatesan MI (1998) Distribution of Clostridium perfringens and fecal sterols in a benthic coastal marine environment influenced by the sewage outfall from McMurdo Station, Antarctica. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:2596–2600
Emerson DJ, Cabelli VJ (1982) Extraction of Clostridium perfringens spores from bottom sediment samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:1144–1149
Field KG, Samadpour M (2007) Fecal source tracking, the indicator paradigm, and managing water quality. Water Res 41:3517–3538
Field KG, Bernhard AE, Brodeur TJ (2003) Molecular approaches to microbiological monitoring: fecal source detection. Environ Monit Assess 81:313–326
Fiksdal L, Maki JS, LaCroix SJ, Staley JT (1985) Survival and detection of Bacteroides spp., prospective indicator bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:148–150
Fogarty LR, Voytek MA (2005) Comparison of bacteroides-prevotella 16 S rRNA genetic markers for fecal samples from different animal species. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5999–6007
Fong T-T, Lipp EK (2005) Enteric viruses of humans and animals in aquatic environments: health risks, detection, and potential water quality assessment tools. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69:357–371
Frank DN, St Amand AL, Feldman RA, Boedeker EC, Harpaz N, Pace NR (2007) Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:13780–13785
Fremaux B, Gritzfeld J, Boa T, Yost CK (2009) Evaluation of host-specific Bacteroidales 16 S rRNA gene markers as a complementary tool for detecting fecal pollution in a prairie watershed. Water Res 43:4838–4849
Fujioka RS (2001) Monitoring coastal marine waters for spore-forming bacteria of faecal and soil origin to determine point from non-point source pollution. Water Sci Technol 44:181–188
Fung DYC, Fujioka R, Vijayavel K, Sato D, Bishop D (2007) Evaluation of Fung double tube test for Clostridium perfringens and Easyphage test for F-specific RNA coliphages as rapid screening tests for fecal contamination in recreational waters of Hawaii (vol 15, pg 217, 2007). J Rapid Meth Aut Mic 15:411–411
Furet JP, Firmesse O, Gourmelon M, Bridonneau C, Tap J, Mondot S, Dore J, Corthier G (2009) Comparative assessment of human and farm animal faecal microbiota using real-time quantitative PCR. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 68:351–362
Gast RJ, Moran D, Dennett MR, Wurtsbaugh WA, Amaral-Zettler LA (2011) Amoebae and Legionella pneumophila in saline environments. J Water Health 9:37–52
Gauthier F, Neufeld JD, Driscoll BT, Archibald FS (2000) Coliform bacteria and nitrogen fixation in pulp and paper mill effluent treatment systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:5155–5160
Gawler AH, Beecher JE, Brandao J, Carroll NM, Falcao L, Gourmelon M, Masterson B, Nunes B, Porter J, Rince A, Rodrigues R, Thorp M, Walters JM, Meijer WG (2007) Validation of host-specific Bacteriodales 16 S rRNA genes as markers to determine the origin of faecal pollution in Atlantic Rim countries of the European Union. Water Res 41:3780–3784
Gerba CP, Rose JB, Haas CN, Crabtree KD (1996) Waterborne rotavirus: a risk assessment. Water Res 30:2929–2940
Gersberg RM, Rose MA, Robles-Sikisaka R, Dhar AK (2006) Quantitative detection of hepatitis A virus and enteroviruses near the United States-Mexico border and correlation with levels of fecal indicator bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:7438–7444
Gilpin B, James T, Nourozi F, Saunders D, Scholes P, Savill M (2003) The use of chemical and molecular microbial indicators for faecal source identification. Water Sci Technol 47:39–43
Goodwin KD, Pobuda M (2009) Performance of CHROMagar Staph aureus and CHROMagar MRSA for detection of Staphylococcus aureus in seawater and beach sand – comparison of culture agglutination, and molecular analyses. Water Res 43:4802–4811
Gourmelon M, Caprais MP, Mieszkin S, Marti R, Wery N, Jarde E, Derrien M, Jadas-Hecart A, Communal PY, Jaffrezic A, Pourcher AM (2010) Development of microbial and chemical MST tools to identify the origin of the faecal pollution in bathing and shellfish harvesting waters in France. Water Res 44:4812–4824
Graczyk TK, Sunderland D, Tamang L, Lucy FE, Breysse PN (2007) Bather density and levels of Cryptosporidium Giardia, and pathogenic microsporidian spores in recreational bathing water. Parasitol Res 101:1729–1731
Griffin DW, Gibson CJ 3rd, Lipp EK, Riley K, Paul JH 3rd, Rose JB (1999) Detection of viral pathogens by reverse transcriptase PCR and of microbial indicators by standard methods in the canals of the Florida Keys. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:4118–4125
Griffin DW, Lipp EK, McLaughlin MR, Rose JB (2001) Marine recreation and public health microbiology: quest for the ideal indicator. Bioscience 51:817–825
Griffith JF, Cao Y, McGee CD, Weisberg SB (2009) Evaluation of rapid methods and novel indicators for assessing microbiological beach water quality. Water Res 43:4900–4907
Grimes DJ (1975) Release of sediment-bound fecal coliforms by dredging. Appl Microbiol 29:109–111
Haack SK, Duris JW, Fogarty LR, Kolpin DW, Focazio MJ, Furlong ET, Meyer MT (2009) Comparing wastewater chemicals, indicator bacteria concentrations, and bacterial pathogen genes as fecal pollution indicators. J Environ Qual 38:248–258
Haake DA, Dundoo M, Cader R, Kubak BM, Hartskeerl RA, Sejvar JJ, Ashford DA (2002) Leptospirosis, water sports, and chemoprophylaxis. Clin Infect Dis 34:E40–E43
Hagedorn C, Robinson SL, Filtz JR, Grubbs SM, Angier TA, Reneau RB Jr (1999) Determining sources of fecal pollution in a rural Virginia watershed with antibiotic resistance patterns in fecal streptococci. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:5522–5531
Haile RW, Witte JS, Gold M, Cressey R, McGee C, Millikan RC, Glasser A, Harawa N, Ervin C, Harmon P, Harper J, Dermand J, Alamillo J, Barrett K, Nides M, Wang G (1999) The health effects of swimming in ocean water contaminated by storm drain runoff. Epidemiology 10:355–363
Halbur PG, Kasorndorkbua C, Gilbert C, Guenette D, Potters MB, Purcell RH, Emerson SU, Toth TE, Meng XJ (2001) Comparative pathogenesis of infection of pigs with hepatitis E viruses recovered from a pig and a human. J Clin Microbiol 39:918–923
Haley BJ, Cole DJ, Lipp EK (2009) Distribution, diversity, and seasonality of waterborne salmonellae in a rural watershed. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:1248–1255
Hamilton MJ, Yan T, Sadowsky MJ (2006) Development of goose- and duck-specific DNA markers to determine sources of Escherichia coli in waterways. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:4012–4019
Harrison S, Kinra S (2004) Outbreak of Escherichia coli O157 associated with a busy beach. Commun Dis Public Health 7:47–50
Hartel PG, Summer JD, Hill JL, Collins JV, Entry JA, Segars WI (2002) Geographic variability of Escherichia coli ribotypes from animals in Idaho and Georgia. J Environ Qual 31:1273–1278
Harvey S, Greenwood JR, Pickett MJ, Mah RA (1976) Recovery of Yersinia enterocolitica from streams and lakes of California. Appl Environ Microbiol 32:352–354
Harwood VJ, Whitlock J, Withington V (2000) Classification of antibiotic resistance patterns of indicator bacteria by discriminant analysis: use in predicting the source of fecal contamination in subtropical waters. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:3698–3704
Haugland RA, Siefring SC, Wymer LJ, Brenner KP, Dufour AP (2005) Comparison of Enterococcus measurements in freshwater at two recreational beaches by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and membrane filter culture analysis. Water Res 39:559–568
Hayashi H, Sakamoto M, Kitahara M, Benno Y (2006) Diversity of the Clostridium coccoides group in human fecal microbiota as determined by 16 S rRNA gene library. FEMS Microbiol Lett 257:202–207
He J, Jiang S (2005) Quantification of enterococci and human adenoviruses in environmental samples by real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:2250–2255
Higgins JA, Belt KT, Karns JS, Russell-Anelli J, Shelton DR (2005) tir- and stx-positive Escherichia coli in stream waters in a metropolitan area. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:2511–2519
Hill RT, Straube WL, Palmisano AC, Gibson SL, Colwell RR (1996) Distribution of sewage indicated by Clostridium perfringens at a deep-water disposal site after cessation of sewage disposal. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:1741–1746
Hipsey MR, Antenucci JP, Brookes JD (2008) A generic, process-based model of microbial pollution in aquatic systems. Water Resour Res 44:26
Horman A, Rimhanen-Finne R, Maunula L, von Bonsdorff C-H, Torvela N, Heikinheimo A, Hanninen M-L (2004) Campylobacter spp., Giardia spp., Cryptosporidium spp., Noroviruses, and indicator organisms in surface water in southwestern Finland, 2000–2001. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:87–95
Hou D, Rabinovici SJM, Boehm AB (2006) Enterococci predictions from partial least squares regression models in conjunction with a single-sample standard improve the efficacy of beach management advisories. Environ Sci Technol 40:1737–1743
Hsu FC, Shieh YS, van Duin J, Beekwilder MJ, Sobsey MD (1995) Genotyping male-specific RNA coliphages by hybridization with oligonucleotide probes. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:3960–3966
Hussain MA, Ford R, Hill J (2010) Determination of fecal contamination indicator sterols in an Australian water supply system. Environ Monit Assess 165:147–157
International Organization for Standardization (2000) Water quality – Detection and enumeration of intestinal enterococci ISO 7899–2:000
Ishii S, Ksoll WB, Hicks RE, Sadowsky MJ (2006) Presence and growth of naturalized Escherichia coli in temperate soils from Lake Superior watersheds. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:612–621
Ishii S, Yan T, Shivley DA, Byappanahalli MN, Whitman RL, Sadowsky MJ (2006) Cladophora (Chlorophyta) spp. harbor human bacterial pathogens in nearshore water of Lake Michigan. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:4545–4553
Jamieson R, Joy DM, Lee H, Kostaschuk R, Gordon R (2005) Transport and deposition of sediment-associated Escherichia coli in natural streams. Water Res 39:2665–2675
Jamieson RC, Joy DM, Lee H, Kostaschuk R, Gordon RJ (2005) Resuspension of sediment-associated Escherichia coli in a natural stream. J Environ Qual 34:581–589
Jeter SN, McDermott CM, Bower PA, Kinzelman JL, Bootsma MJ, Goetz GW, McLellan SL (2009) Bacteroidales diversity in ring-billed gulls (Laurus delawarensis) residing at Lake Michigan beaches. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:1525–1533
Jiang SC, Chu W (2004) PCR detection of pathogenic viruses in southern California urban rivers. J Appl Microbiol 97:17–28
Jiang S, Noble R, Chu W (2001) Human adenoviruses and coliphages in urban runoff-impacted coastal waters of Southern California. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:179–184
Jiang SC, Nobel R, Chu W (2001) Human adenoviruses and coliphage in urban runoff-impacted coastal waters of southern California. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:179–184
Jiang SC, Chu W, He JW (2007) Seasonal detection of human viruses and coliphage in Newport Bay, California. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:6468–6474
Jofre J, Blasi M, Bosch A, Lucena F (1989) Occurrence of bacteriophages infecting Bacteroides-Fragilis and other viruses in polluted marine-sediments. Water Sci Technol 21:15–19
Johnson CN, Flowers AR, Noriea NF III, Zimmerman AM, Bowers JC, DePaola A, Grimes DJ (2010) Relationships between environmental factors and pathogenic Vibrios in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:7076–7084
Johnston C, Ufnar JA, Griffith JF, Gooch JA, Stewart JR (2010) A real-time qPCR assay for the detection of the nifH gene of Methanobrevibacter smithii, a potential indicator of sewage pollution. J Appl Microbiol 109:1946–1956
Keymer DP, Miller MC, Schoolnik GK, Boehm AB (2007) Genomic and phenotypic diversity of coastal Vibrio cholerae is explained by environmental factors. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:3705–3714
Keymer DP, Lam L, Boehm AB (2009) Biogeographic patterns in genomic diversity among a large collection of Vibrio cholerae isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:1658–1666
Khatib LA, Tsai YL, Olson BH (2002) A biomarker for the identification of cattle fecal pollution in water using the LTIIa toxin gene from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59:97–104
Khatib LA, Tsai YL, Olson BH (2003) A biomarker for the identification of swine fecal pollution in water, using the STII toxin gene from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63:231–238
Kildare BJ, Leutenegger CM, McSwain BS, Bambic DG, Rajal VB, Wuertz S (2007) 16 S rRNA-based assays for quantitative detection of universal, human-, cow-, and dog-specific fecal Bacteroidales: a Bayesian approach. Water Res 41:3701–3715
Kinzelman J, McLellan SL, Daniels AD, Cashin S, Singh A, Gradus S, Bagley R (2004) Non-point source pollution: determination of replication versus persistence of Escherichia coli in surface water and sediments with correlation of levels to readily measurable environmental parameters. J Water Health 2:103–114
Kirs M, Smith DC (2007) Multiplex quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR for F+ −specific RNA coliphages: a method for use in microbial source tracking. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:808–814
Kreader CA (1995) Design and evaluation of Bacteroides DNA probes for the specific detection of human fecal pollution. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1171–1179
Lamendella R, Domingo JW, Oerther DB, Vogel JR, Stoeckel DM (2007) Assessment of fecal pollution sources in a small northern-plains watershed using PCR and phylogenetic analyses of Bacteroidetes 16 S rRNA gene. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 59:651–660
Layton A, McKay L, Williams D, Garrett V, Gentry R, Sayler G (2006) Development of Bacteroides 16 S rRNA gene TaqMan-based real-time PCR assays for estimation of total, human, and bovine fecal pollution in water. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:4214–4224
Layton BA, Walters SP, Lam LH, Boehm AB (2010) Enterococcus species distribution among human and animal hosts using multiplex PCR. J Appl Microbiol 109:539–547
Leach MD, Broschat SL, Call DR (2008) A discrete, stochastic model and correction method for bacterial source tracking. Environ Sci Technol 42:524–529
Leclerc H, Schwartzbrod L, Dei-Cas E (2002) Microbial agents associated with waterborne diseases. Crit Rev Microbiol 28:371–409
Lee CS, Lee J (2010) Evaluation of new gyrB-based real-time PCR system for the detection of B. fragilis as an indicator of human-specific fecal contamination. J Microbiol Meth 82:311–318
Lee DY, Weir SC, Lee H, Trevors JT (2010) Quantitative identification of fecal water pollution sources by TaqMan real-time PCR assays using Bacteroidales 16 S rRNA genetic markers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 88:1373–1383
Lemarchand K, Lebaron P (2003) Occurrence of Salmonella spp. and Cryptosporidium spp. in a French coastal watershed: relationship with fecal indicators. FEMS Microbiol Lett 218:203–209
Lemarchand K, Masson L, Brousseau R (2004) Molecular biology and DNA microarray technology for microbial quality monitoring of water. Crit Rev Microbiol 30:145–172
Leung HD, Chen G, Sharma K (2005) Effect of detached/re-suspended solids from sewer sediment on the sewage phase bacterial activity. Water Sci Technol 52:147–152
Lipp EK, Huq A, Colwell RR (2002) Effects of global climate on infectious disease: the cholera model. Clin Microbiol Rev 15:757–770
Lynch PA, Gilpin BJ, Sinton LW, Savill MG (2002) The detection of Bifidobacterium adolescentis by colony hybridization as an indicator of human faecal pollution. J Appl Microbiol 92:526–533
Mac Kenzie WR, Hoxie NJ, Proctor ME, Gradus MS, Blair KA, Peterson DE, Kazmierczak JJ, Addiss DG, Fox KR, Rose JB et al (1994) A massive outbreak in Milwaukee of cryptosporidium infection transmitted through the public water supply. N Engl J Med 331:161–167
Malinen E, Rinttila T, Kajander K, Matto J, Kassinen A, Krogius L, Saarela M, Korpela R, Palva A (2005) Analysis of the fecal microbiota of irritable bowel syndrome patients and healthy controls with real-time PCR. Am J Gastroenterol 100:373–382
Mallin MA, Williams KE, Esham EC, Lowe RP (2000) Effect of human development on bacteriological water quality in coastal watersheds. Ecol Appl 10:1047–1056
Marshall MM, Naumovitz D, Ortega Y, Sterling CR (1997) Waterborne protozoan pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev 10:67–85
Matsuki T, Watanabe K, Fujimoto J, Miyamoto Y, Takada T, Matsumoto K, Oyaizu H, Tanaka R (2002) Development of 16 S rRNA-gene-targeted group-specific primers for the detection and identification of predominant bacteria in human feces. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5445–5451
Matsuki T, Watanabe K, Fujimoto J, Kado Y, Takada T, Matsumoto K, Tanaka R (2004) Quantitative PCR with 16 S rRNA-gene-targeted species-specific primers for analysis of human intestinal bifidobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:167–173
Matsuki T, Watanabe K, Fujimoto J, Takada T, Tanaka R (2004) Use of 16 S rRNA gene-targeted group-specific primers for real-time PCR analysis of predominant bacteria in human feces. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:7220–7228
McBride GB, Salmond CE, Bandaranayake DR, Turner SJ, Lewis GD, Till DG (1998) Health effects of marine bathing in New Zealand. Int J Environ Health Res 8:173–189
McLaughlin MR, Rose JB (2006) Application of Bacteroides fragilis phage as an alternative indicator of sewage pollution in Tampa Bay, Florida. Estuar Coast 29:246–256
McLellan SL, Daniels AD, Salmore AK (2001) Clonal populations of thermotolerant Enterobacteriaceae in recreational water and their potential interference with fecal Escherichia coli counts. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4934–4938
McLellan SL, Daniels AD, Salmore AK (2003) Genetic characterization of Escherichia coli populations from host sources of fecal pollution by using DNA fingerprinting. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:2587–2594
McLellan SL, Hollis EJ, Depas MM, Van Dyke M, Harris J, Scopel CO (2007) Distribution and fate of Escherichia coli in Lake Michigan following contamination with urban stormwater and combined sewer overflows. J Great Lakes Res 33:566–580
McLellan SL, Huse SM, Mueller-Spitz SR, Andreishcheva EN, Sogin ML (2010) Diversity and population structure of sewage-derived microorganisms in wastewater treatment plant influent. Environ Microbiol 12:378–392
McQuaig SM, Scott TM, Harwood VJ, Farrah SR, Lukasik JO (2006) Detection of human-derived fecal pollution in environmental waters by use of a PCR-based human polyomavirus assay. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:7567–7574
McQuaig SM, Scott TM, Lukasik JO, Paul JH, Harwood VJ (2009) Quantification of human polyomaviruses JC Virus and BK Virus by TaqMan quantitative PCR and comparison to other water quality indicators in water and fecal samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:3379–3388
Medema GJ, Bahar M, Schets FM (1997) Survival of Cryptosporidium parvum, Escherichia coli, faecal enterococci and Clostridium perfringens in river water: influence of temperature and autochthonous microorganisms. Water Sci Technol 35:249–252
Mieszkin S, Yala JF, Joubrel R, Gourmelon M (2010) Phylogenetic analysis of Bacteroidales 16 S rRNA gene sequences from human and animal effluents and assessment of ruminant faecal pollution by real-time PCR. J Appl Microbiol 108:974–984
Miller WA, Miller MA, Gardner IA, Atwill ER, Byrne BA, Jang S, Harris M, Ames J, Jessup D, Paradies D, Worcester K, Melli A, Conrad PA (2006) Salmonella spp., Vibrio spp., Clostridium perfringens, and Plesiomonas shigelloides in marine and freshwater invertebrates from coastal California ecosystems. Microb Ecol 52:198–206
Mocé-Llivina L, Lucena F, Jofre J (2005) Enteroviruses and bacteriophages in bathing waters. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:6838–6844
Moe C (2002) Waterborne transmission of infectious agents. In: Hurst CJ, Crawfod RL, Knudsen GR, McInerney MJ, Stetzenbach LD (eds) Manual of environmental microbiology, 2nd edn. ASM Press, Washington, DC, pp 184–204
Mueller-Spitz SR, Stewart LB, Klump JV, McLellan SL (2010) Freshwater suspended sediments and sewage are reservoirs for enterotoxin-positive Clostridium perfringens. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:5556–5562
Mumy KL, Findlay RH (2004) Convenient determination of DNA extraction efficiency using an external DNA recovery standard and quantitative-competitive PCR. J Microbiol Methods 57:259–268
Muniesa M, Jofre J, Garcia-Aljaro C, Blanch AR (2006) Occurrence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 40:7141–7149
Muniesa M, Payan A, Moce-Llivina L, Blanch AR, Jofre J (2009) Differential persistence of F-specific RNA phage subgroups hinders their use as single tracers for faecal source tracking in surface water. Water Res 43:1559–1564
Nebra Y, Bonjoch X, Blanch AR (2003) Use of Bifidobacterium dentium as an indicator of the origin of fecal water pollution. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:2651–2656
Nevers MB, Boehm AB (2010) Modeling fate and transport of fecal bacteria in surface water. In: Sadowsky MJ, Whitman RL (eds) The fecal indicator bacteria. ASM Press, Washington, DC
Newton RJ, VandeWalle JL, Borchardt MA, Gorelick MH, McLellan SL (2011) Lachnospiraceae and Bacteroidales alternative fecal indicators reveal chronic human sewage contamination in an urban harbor. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:6972–6981
Nichols PD, Leeming R, Rayner MS, Latham V, Ashbolt NJ, Turner C (1993) Comparison of the abundance of the fecal sterol soprostanol and fecal bacerial groups in inner-shlef waters and sediments near Sydney, Australia. J Chromatogr 643:189–195
Niemela SI, Vaatanen P (1982) Survival in lake water of Klebsiella pneumoniae discharged by a paper mill. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:264–269
Noble RT, Fuhrman JD (2001) Enteroviruses detected by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction from the coastal waters of Santa Monica Bay, California: low correlation to bacterial indicator levels. Hydrobiologia 460:175–183
Noble RT, Allen SM, Blackwood AD, Chu W, Jiang SC, Lovelace GL, Sobsey MD, Stewart JR, Wait DA (2003) Use of viral pathogens and indicators to differentiate between human and non-human fecal contamination in a microbial source tracking comparison study. J Water Health 1:195–207
Noble RT, Moore DF, Leecaster MK, McGee CD, Weisberg SB (2003) Comparison of total coliform, fecal coliform, and enterococcus bacterial indicator response for ocean recreational water quality testing. Water Res 37:1637–1643
Noble RT, Griffith JF, Blackwood AD, Fuhrman JA, Gregory JB, Hernandez X, Liang X, Bera AA, Schiff K (2006) Multitiered approach using quantitative PCR to track sources of fecal pollution affecting Santa Monica Bay, California. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1604–1612
Noble RT, Blackwood AD, Griffith JF, McGee CD, Weisberg SB (2010) Comparison of rapid quantitative PCR-based and conventional culture-based methods for enumeration of Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli in recreational waters. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:7437–7443
Obiri-Danso K, Jones K (2000) Intertidal sediments as reservoirs for hippurate negative campylobacters, salmonellae and faecal indicators in three EU recognized bathing waters in North West England. Water Res 34:519–527
Okabe S, Shimazu Y (2007) Persistence of host-specific Bacteroides-Prevotella 16 S rRNA genetic markers in environmental waters: effects of temperature and salinity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 76:935–944
Okabe S, Okayama N, Savichtcheva O, Ito T (2007) Quantification of host-specific Bacteroides-Prevotella 16 S rRNA genetic markers for assessment of fecal pollution in freshwater. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 74:890–901
Palmer CJ, Tsai YL, Paszko-Kolva C, Mayer C, Sangermano LR (1993) Detection of Legionella species in sewage and ocean water by polymerase chain reaction, direct fluorescent- antibody, and plate culture methods. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3618–3624
Panicker G, Myers ML, Bej AK (2004) Rapid detection of Vibrio vulnificus in shellfish and Gulf of Mexico water by real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:498–507
Parveen S, Murphree RL, Edmiston L, Kaspar CW, Portier KM, Tamplin ML (1997) Association of multiple-antibiotic-resistance profiles with point and nonpoint sources of Escherichia coli in Apalachicola Bay. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:2607–2612
Parveen S, Hodge NC, Stall RE, Farrah SR, Tamplin ML (2001) Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of human and nonhuman Escherichia coli. Water Res 35:379–386
Payan A, Ebdon J, Taylor H, Gantzer C, Ottoson J, Papageorgiou GT, Blanch AR, Lucena F, Jofre J, Muniesa M (2005) Method for isolation of Bacteroides bacteriophage host strains suitable for tracking sources of fecal pollution in water. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5659–5662
Payment P, Franco E (1993) Clostridium perfringens and somatic coliphages as indicators of the efficiency of drinking water treatment for viruses and protozoan cysts. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:2418–2424
Pianetti A, Sabatini L, Bruscolini F, Chiaverini F, Cecchetti G (2004) Faecal contamination indicators, salmonella, vibrio and aeromonas in water used for the irrigation of agricultural products. Epidemiol Infect 132:231–238
Pina S, Puig M, Lucena F, Jofre J, Girones R (1998) Viral pollution in the environment and in shellfish: human adenovirus detection by PCR as an index of human viruses. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3376–3382
Pinto R, Abad F, Gajardo R, Bosch A (1996) Detection of infectious astroviruses in water. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:1811–1813
Pruss A (1998) Review of epidemiological studies on health effects from exposure to recreational water. Int J Epidemiol 27:1–9
Puig A, Queralt N, Jofre J, Araujo R (1999) Diversity of Bacteroides fragilis strains in their capacity to recover phages from human and animal wastes and from fecally polluted wastewater. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1772–1776
Rabinovici SJM, Bernknopf RL, Wein AM, Coursey DL, Whitman RL (2004) Economic and health risk trade-offs of swim closures at a Lake Michigan beach. Environ Sci Technol 38:2737–2745
Rajal VB, McSwain BS, Thompson DE, Leutenegger CM, Kildare BJ, Wuertz S (2007) Validation of hollow fiber ultrafiltration and real-time PCR using bacteriophage PP7 as surrogate for the quantification of viruses from water samples. Water Res 41:1411–1422
Rajal VB, McSwain BS, Thompson DE, Leutenegger CM, Wuertz S (2007) Molecular quantitative analysis of human viruses in California stormwater. Water Res 41:4287–4298
Ram JL, Thompson B, Turner C, Nechvatal JM, Sheehan H, Bobrin J (2007) Identification of pets and raccoons as sources of bacterial contamination of urban storm sewers using a sequence-based bacterial source tracking method. Water Res 41:3605–3614
Resnick IG, Levin MA (1981) Assessment of bifidobacteria as indicators of human fecal pollution. Appl Environ Microbiol 42:433–438
Rose JB, Mullinax RL, Singh SN, Yates MV, Gerba CP (1987) Occurrence of rotaviruses and enteroviruses in recreational waters of Oak Creek, Arizona. Water Resour 21:1375–1381
Saha ML, Khan MR, Ali M, Hoque S (2009) Bacterial load and chemical pollution level of the River Buriganga, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Botany 38:87–91
Sambrook J, Russell D (2001) Molecular cloning: a labortory manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York
Sandery M, Stinear T, Kaucner C (1996) Detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in environmental waters by PCR. J Appl Bacteriol 80:327–332
Santo Domingo JW, Bambic DG, Edge TA, Wuertz S (2007) Quo vadis source tracking? Towards a strategic framework for environmental monitoring of fecal pollution. Water Res 41:3539–3552
Santoro AE, Boehm AB (2007) Frequent occurrence of the human-specific Bacteroides fecal marker at an open coast marine beach: relationship to waves, tides and traditional indicators. Environ Microbiol 9:2038–2049
Savichtcheva O, Okayama N, Okabe S (2007) Relationships between Bacteroides 16 S rRNA genetic markers and presence of bacterial enteric pathogens and conventional fecal indicators. Water Res 41:3615–3628
Schriewer A, Miller WA, Byrne BA, Miller MA, Oates S, Conrad PA, Hardin D, Yang HH, Chouicha N, Melli A, Jessup D, Dominik C, Wuertz S (2010) Presence of Bacteroidales as a predictor of pathogens in surface waters of the central California coast. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:5802–5814
Schulz CJ, Childers GW (2011) Fecal Bacteroidales diversity and decay in response to temperature and salinity. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:2563–2572
Scott TM, Rose JB, Jenkins TM, Farrah SR, Lukasik J (2002) Microbial source tracking: current methodology and future directions. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5796–5803
Scott TM, Jenkins TM, Lukasik J, Rose JB (2005) Potential use of a host associated molecular marker in Enterococcus faecium as an index of human fecal pollution. Environ Sci Technol 39:283–287
Sedmak G, Bina D, MacDonald J (2003) Assessment of an enterovirus sewage surveillance system by comparison of clinical isolates with sewage isolates from Milwaukee, Wisconsin, collected August 1994 to December 2002. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:7181–7187
Sedmak G, Bina D, Macdonald J, Couillard L (2005) Nine-year study of the occurrence of culturable viruses in source water for two drinking water treatment plants and the influent and effluent of a wastewater treatment plant in Milwaukee, Wisconsin (August 1994 through July 2003). Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1042–1050
Semel JD, Trenholme G (1990) Aeromonas hydrophila water-associated traumatic wound infections: a review. J Trauma 30:324–327
Sercu B, Van De Werfhorst LC, Murray J, Holden PA (2009) Storm drains are sources of human fecal pollution during dry weather in three urban Southern California watersheds. Environ Sci Technol 43:293–298
Seurinck S, Verstraete W, Siciliano SD (2003) Use of 16 S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region PCR and repetitive extragenic palindromic PCR analyses of Escherichia coli isolates to identify nonpoint fecal sources. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:4942–4950
Seurinck S, Defoirdt T, Verstraete W, Siciliano SD (2005) Detection and quantification of the human-specific HF183 Bacteroides 16 S rRNA genetic marker with real-time PCR for assessment of human faecal pollution in freshwater. Environ Microbiol 7:249–259
Sghir A, Gramet G, Suau A, Rochet V, Pochart P, Dore J (2000) Quantification of bacterial groups within human fecal flora by oligonucleotide probe hybridization. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2263–2266
Shanks OC, Santo Domingo JW, Lamendella R, Kelty CA, Graham JE (2006) Competitive metagenomic DNA hybridization identifies host-specific microbial genetic markers in cow fecal samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:4054–4060
Shanks OC, Domingo JW, Lu J, Kelty CA, Graham JE (2007) Identification of bacterial DNA markers for the detection of human fecal pollution in water. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:2416–2422
Shanks OC, Atikovic E, Blackwood AD, Lu J, Noble RT, Domingo JS, Seifring S, Sivaganesan M, Haugland RA (2008) Quantitative PCR for detection and enumeration of genetic markers of bovine fecal pollution. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:745–752
Shanks OC, Kelty CA, Sivaganesan M, Varma M, Haugland RA (2009) Quantitative PCR for genetic markers of human fecal pollution. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:5507–5513
Shanks OC, White K, Kelty CA, Hayes S, Sivaganesan M, Jenkins M, Varma M, Haugland RA (2010) Performance assessment PCR-based assays targeting bacteroidales genetic markers of bovine fecal pollution. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:1359–1366
Shanks OC, White K, Kelty CA, Sivaganesan M, Blannon J, Meckes M, Varma M, Haugland RA (2010) Performance of PCR-based assays targeting Bacteroidales genetic markers of human fecal pollution in sewage and fecal samples. Environ Sci Technol 44:6281–6288
Shanks OC, Kelty CA, Archibeque S, Jenkins M, Newton RJ, McLellan SL, Huse SM, Sogin ML (2011) Community structure of cattle fecal bacteria from different animal feeding operations. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:2992–3001
Shibata T, Solo-Gabriele HM, Fleming LE, Elmir S (2004) Monitoring marine recreational water quality using multiple microbial indicators in an urban tropical environment. Water Res 38:3119–3131
Silkie SS, Nelson KL (2009) Concentrations of host-specific and generic fecal markers measured by quantitative PCR in raw sewage and fresh animal feces. Water Res 43:4860–4871
Sinton LW, Hall CH, Lynch PA, Davies-Colley RJ (2002) Sunlight inactivation of fecal indicator bacteria and bacteriophages from waste stabilization pond effluent in fresh and saline waters. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1122–1131
Sivaganesan M, Seifring S, Varma M, Haugland RA, Shanks OC (2008) A Bayesian method for calculating real-time quantitative PCR calibration curves using absolute plasmid DNA standards. BMC Bioinformatics 9:120
Sivaganesan M, Haugland RA, Chern EC, Shanks OC (2010) Improved strategies and optimization of calibration models for real-time PCR absolute quantification. Water Res 44:4726–4735
Soller JA, Bartrand T, Ashbolt NJ, Ravenscroft J, Wade TJ (2010) Estimating the primary etiologic agents in recreational freshwaters impacted by human sources of faecal contamination. Water Res 44:4736–4747
Soller JA, Schoen ME, Bartrand T, Ravenscroft JE, Ashbolt NJ (2010) Estimated human health risks from exposure to recreational waters impacted by human and non-human sources of faecal contamination. Water Res 44:4674–4691
Steets BM, Holden PA (2003) A mechanistic model of runoff-associated fecal coliform fate and transport through a coastal lagoon. Water Res 37:589–608
Stewart JR, Ellender RD, Gooch JA, Jiang S, Myoda SP, Weisberg SB (2003) Recommendations for microbial source tracking: lessons from a methods comparison study. J Water Health 1:225–231
Stewart JR, Gast RJ, Fujioka RS, Solo-Gabriele HM, Meschke JS, Amaral-Zettler LA, Del Castillo E, Polz MF, Collier TK, Strom MS, Sinigalliano CD, Moeller PD, Holland AF (2008) The coastal environment and human health: microbial indicators, pathogens, sentinels and reservoirs. Environ Health 7(Suppl 2):S3
Stoeckel DM, Harwood VJ (2007) Performance, design, and analysis in microbial source tracking studies. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:2405–2415
Stoeckel DM, Stelzer EA, Dick LK (2009) Evaluation of two spike-and-recovery controls for assessment of extraction efficiency in microbial source tracking studies. Water Res 43:4820–4827
Sullivan D, Brooks P, Tindale N, Chapman S, Ahmed W (2010) Faecal sterols analysis for the identification of human faecal pollution in a non-sewered catchment. Water Sci Technol 61:1355–1361
Tartera C, Lucena F, Jofre J (1989) Human origin of Bacteroides fragilis bacteriophages present in the environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:2696–2701
Teng LJ, Hsueh PR, Huang YH, Tsai JC (2004) Identification of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron on the basis of an unexpected specific amplicon of universal 16 S ribosomal DNA PCR. J Clin Microbiol 42:1727–1730
Turnbaugh PJ, Hamady M, Yatsunenko T, Cantarel BL, Duncan A, Ley RE, Sogin ML, Jones WJ, Roe BA, Affourtit JP, Egholm M, Henrissat B, Heath AC, Knight R, Gordon JI (2009) A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature 457:480–484
Ufnar JA, Wang SY, Christiansen JM, Yampara-Iquise H, Carson CA, Ellender RD (2006) Detection of the nifH gene of Methanobrevibacter smithii: a potential tool to identify sewage pollution in recreational waters. J Appl Microbiol 101:44–52
Ufnar JA, Ufnar DF, Wang SY, Ellender RD (2007) Development of a swine-specific fecal pollution marker based on host differences in methanogen mcrA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5209–5217
Ufnar JA, Wang SY, Ufnar DF, Ellender RD (2007) Methanobrevibacter ruminantium as an indicator of domesticated-ruminant fecal pollution in surface waters. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:7118–7121
Unno T, Jang J, Han D, Kim JH, Sadowsky MJ, Kim OS, Chun J, Hur HG (2010) Use of barcoded pyrosequencing and shared OTUs to determine sources of fecal bacteria in watersheds. Environ Sci Technol 44:7777–7782
USEPA (2000) Improved enumeration methods for recreational water quality indicators: Enterococci and Escherichia coli. EPA 821/R-97/004. US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC
USEPA (2002) Method 1603: Escherichia coli (E. coli) in water by membrane filtration using modified membrane-thermotolerant Escherichia coli agar (modified mTEC) EPA-821-R-02-023. US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC
USEPA (2002) Method 1604: total coliforms and Escherichia coli in water by membrane filtration using a simultaneous detection technique (MI Medium). US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC
USEPA (2006) Method 1600: Enterococci in Water by Membrane Filtration Using MEMBRANE-Enterococus Indoxyl-B-D-Glucoside agar (mEI) EPA-821-R-06-009. US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC
USEPA (2007) Critical path science plan for the development of new or revised recreational water quality criteria. 823-R-08-002. US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC
USEPA (2009) National water quality inventory: report to congress 2004 reporting cycle. EPA 841-R-08-001. US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC
USEPA (2010) Method A: Enterococci in water by TaqMan® quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay. US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC
Viau EJ, Goodwin KD, Yamahara KM, Layton BA, Sassoubre LM, Burns S, Tong H-I, Wong SHC, Boehm AB (2011) Human bacterial pathogens and fecal indicators in tropical streams discharging to Hawaiian coastal waters. Water Res 45:3279–3290
Volkmann H, Schwartz T, Kirchen S, Stofer C, Obst U (2007) Evaluation of inhibition and cross-reaction effects on real-time PCR applied to the total DNA of wastewater samples for the quantification of bacterial antibiotic resistance genes and taxon-specific targets. Mol Cell Probes 21:125–133
Wade TJ, Pai N, Eisenberg JN, Colford JM Jr (2003) Do U.S. Environmental Protection Agency water quality guidelines for recreational waters prevent gastrointestinal illness? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect 111:1102–1109
Wade TJ, Calderon RL, Sams E, Beach M, Brenner KP, Williams AH, Dufour AP (2006) Rapidly measured indicators of recreational water quality are predictive of swimming-associated gastrointestinal illness. Environ Health Perspect 114:24–28
Wade TJ, Calderon RL, Brenner KP, Sams E, Beach M, Haugland R, Wymer L, Dufour AP (2008) High sensitivity of children to swimming-associated gastrointestinal illness: results using a rapid assay of recreational water quality. Epidemiol 19:375–383
Wade TJ, Sams E, Brenner KP, Haugland R, Chern E, Beach M, Wymer L, Rankin CC, Love D, Li Q, Noble R, Dufour AP (2010) Rapidly measured indicators of recreational water quality and swimming-associated illness at marine beaches: a prospective cohort study. Environ Health 9:66
Walters SP, Gannon VPJ, Field KG (2007) Detection of Bacteroidales fecal indicators and the zoonotic pathogens E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Campylobacter in river water. Environ Sci Technol 41:1856–1862
Walters SP, Yamahara KM, Boehm AB (2009) Persistence of nucleic acid markers of health-relevant organisms in seawater microcosms: implications for their use in assessing risk in recreational waters. Water Res 43:4929–4939
Walters SP, Thebo AL, Boehm AB (2011) Impact of urbanization and agriculture on the occurrence of bacterial pathogens and stx genes in coastal waterbodies of central California. Water Res 45:1752–1762
Westrell T, Teunis P, van den Berg H, Lodder W, Ketelaars H, Stenstrom TA, de Roda Husman AM (2006) Short- and long-term variations of norovirus concentrations in the Meuse river during a 2-year study period. Water Res 40:2613–2620
Wetz JJ, Blackwood AD, Fries JS, Williams ZF, Noble RT (2008) Trends in total Vibrio spp. and Vibrio vulnificus concentrations in the eutrophic Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina, during storm events. Aquat Microb Ecol 53:141–149
Whitman RL, Nevers MB (2003) Foreshore sand as a source of Escherichia coli in nearshore water of a Lake Michigan beach. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:5555–5562
Whitman RL, Nevers MB, Korinek GC, Byappanahalli MN (2004) Solar and temporal effects on Escherichia coli concentration at a Lake Michigan swimming beach. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:4276–4285
Whitman RL, Ge Z, Nevers MB, Boehm AB, Chern EC, Haugland RA, Lukasik AM, Molina M, Przybyla-Kelly K, Shively DA, White EM, Zepp RG, Byappanahalli MN (2010) Relationship and variation of qPCR and culturable Enterococci estimates in ambient surface waters are predictable. Environ Sci Technol 44:5049–5054
Wiedenmann A, Kruger P, Dietz K, Lopez-Pila JM, Szewzyk R, Botzenhart K (2006) A randomized controlled trial assessing infectious disease risks from bathing in fresh recreational waters in relation to the concentration of Escherichia coli, intestinal enterococci, Clostridium perfringens, and somatic coliphages. Environ Health Perspect 114:228–236
Wiggins BA (1996) Discriminant analysis of antibiotic resistance patterns in fecal streptococci, a method to differentiate human and animal sources of fecal pollution in natural waters. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:3997–4002
Wilkes G, Edge T, Gannon V, Jokinen C, Lyautey E, Medeiros D, Neumann N, Ruecker N, Topp E, Lapen DR (2009) Seasonal relationships among indicator bacteria, pathogenic bacteria, Cryptosporidium oocysts, Giardia cysts, and hydrological indices for surface waters within an agricultural landscape. Water Res 43:2209–2223
Wong M, Kumar L, Jenkins TM, Xagoraraki I, Phanikumar MS, Rose JB (2009) Evaluation of public health risks at recreational beaches in Lake Michigan via detection of enteric viruses and a human-specific bacteriological marker. Water Res 43:1137–1149
Wu CH, Sercu B, Van de Werfhorst LC, Wong J, DeSantis TZ, Brodie EL, Hazen TC, Holden PA, Andersen GL (2010) Characterization of coastal urban watershed bacterial communities leads to alternative community-based indicators. PLoS One 5:e11285
Wyn-Jones AP, Carducci A, Cook N, D’Agostino M, Divizia M, Fleischer J, Gantzer C, Gawler A, Girones R, Höller C, Husman AM, Kay D, Kozyra I, López-Pila J, Muscillo M, Nascimento MS, Papageorgiou G, Rutjes S, Sellwood J, Szewzyk R, Wyer M (2011) Surveillance of adenoviruses and noroviruses in European recreational waters. Water Res 45:1025–1038
Xu J, Bjursell MK, Himrod J, Deng S, Carmichael LK, Chiang HC, Hooper LV, Gordon JI (2003) A genomic view of the human-Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron symbiosis. Science 299:2074–2076
Yamahara KM, Layton BA, Santoro AE, Boehm AB (2007) Beach sands along the California coast are diffuse sources of fecal bacteria to coastal waters. Environ Sci Technol 41:4515–4521
Yamahara KM, Walters SP, Boehm AB (2009) Growth of enterococci in unaltered, unseeded beach sands subjected to tidal wetting. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:1517–1524
Yampara-Iquise H, Zheng G, Jones JE, Carson CA (2008) Use of a Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron-specific alpha-1-6, mannanase quantitative PCR to detect human faecal pollution in water. J Appl Microbiol 105:1686–1693
Young TA, Heidler J, Matos-Perez CR, Sapkota A, Toler T, Gibson KE, Schwab KJ, Halden RU (2008) Ab initio and in situ comparison of caffeine, triclosan, and triclocarban as indicators of sewage-derived microbes in surface waters. Environ Sci Technol 42:3335–3340
Zheng G, Yampara-Iquise H, Jones JE, Carson CA (2009) Development of Faecalibacterium 16 S rRNA gene marker for identification of human faeces. J Appl Microbiol 106:634–641
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr. Alford Dufour for insightful discussion and for providing historical information on the use of traditional indicators and evolution of water quality criteria. The US Environmental Protection Agency, through its Office of Research and Development, funded and managed, or partially funded and collaborated in, the research described herein. It has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and has been approved for external publication. Any opinions expressed in this entry are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency; therefore, no official endorsement should be inferred. Any mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McLellan, S.L., Boehm, A.B., Shanks, O.C. (2013). Marine and Freshwater Fecal Indicators and Source Identification. In: Kanki, P., Grimes, D. (eds) Infectious Diseases. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5719-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5719-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5718-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5719-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)