Abstract
Texture-engineered ceramics enable access to a vast array of novel texture-property relations leading to property values ranging between those of single crystals and isotropic bulk ceramics. Recently developed templated grain growth and magnetic alignment texturing methods yield high quality crystallographic texture, and thus significant advances in achievable texture-engineered properties in magnetic, piezoelectric, electronic, optical, thermoelectric, and structural ceramics. In this paper, we outline the fundamental basis for these texture-engineered properties and review recent contributions to the field of texture-engineered ceramics with an update on the properties of textured lead-free and lead-based piezoelectrics. We propose that further property improvements can be realized through development of processes that improve crystallographic alignment of the grain structure, create biaxial texture, and explore a wider array of crystallographic orientations. There is a critical need to model the physics of texture-engineered ceramics, and more comprehensively characterize texture, thus enabling testing of texture orientation-property relations and materials performance. We believe that in situ measurements of texture evolution can lead to a more fundamental and comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms of texture development.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
I. INTRODUCTION
The properties of ceramics are governed by a combination of intrinsic crystallographic and extrinsic microstructural characteristics. Many applications require the directional properties of single crystals, whereas others require the averaged isotropic properties of polycrystalline ceramics. Crystallographic texture is widely used to enhance the performance of anisotropic polycrystalline materials, especially when the use of single crystals is impractical or impossible. Single crystals are limited in most applications because they lack the mechanical integrity of polycrystalline ceramics and are often expensive, time-consuming to produce, and limited in size, geometry, and compositional range. In contrast polycrystalline ceramics are mechanically robust, can be produced over an extensive range of compositions, and functional properties can be tailored more readily with a range of dopants. Textured polycrystalline ceramics possess directional, single crystal-like properties as well as mechanical reliability and compositional versatility.
In this review, the term texture describes the preferred crystallographic orientation of grains in a polycrystalline material. Our objective is to demonstrate how a variety of directional ceramic properties can be accessed with control of crystallography in bulk polycrystalline ceramics. Morphological texture seen in thermal barrier coatings or patterned grinding surfaces is not addressed in this review. While thin film processes yield extraordinary orientation control, this paper focuses on the opportunities and challenges associated with textured bulk ceramics.
Crystallographic texture enables access to a wide variety of anisotropic ceramic properties. As reviewed below, texturing has been used extensively to tailor the performance of magnetic, ferroelectric, thermoelectric, and superconducting ceramics.1–4 For example, electrical properties can be enhanced by the elimination of high angle grain boundaries in materials with directional electronic or ionic conduction. Likewise, mechanical compliance and related properties, such as piezoelectricity, can be improved by limiting mechanical clamping caused by the misalignment of neighboring grains.2 Continuity of properties across grain boundaries is the primary goal of crystallographic texture in noncubic optical ceramics because the alignment of optic axes of each grain eliminates Mie scattering of photons at grain boundaries.5 Fracture toughness of ceramic materials is often enhanced in layered or fibrous microstructures obtained by crystallographic texture.6 Alternately, crystallographic texture can be used to create microstructural anisotropy, such as columnar or tabular grains. Such anisotropic microstructures are useful for controlling electrical conductivity or dielectric properties in ceramics, since these properties strongly depend on grain boundary effects.7
Although texture describes any nonrandom grain alignment in a polycrystalline material, only specific symmetry patterns, such as fiber or sheet (biaxial) texture symmetries, result in enhanced or single crystal-like properties.2 In fiber texture, a single crystallographic direction in each grain is preferentially aligned along a global texture axis, but grains are oriented randomly perpendicular to that axis. In sheet texture, grains are preferentially aligned in all three axes. These texture symmetries are illustrated in Fig. 1 with associated stereographic projections. In most textured materials, the property of interest is maximized along a single crystallographic direction, and fiber texture is sufficient to obtain enhanced single crystal-like properties. Sheet texture is substantially more difficult to produce as it requires simultaneous or sequential alignment of two crystallographic directions.
Crystallographic texture in ceramics is generally more difficult to produce than in metallic systems, where texture can be induced, or modified, via plastic deformation at lower temperatures than required for sintering and grain growth of ceramics. Some ceramics can be textured using high-temperature forging methods, but the temperatures required (e.g., 1750–1950 °C in Al2O3) make these methods impractical.8,9 During most ceramic fabrication processes, particles with aspect ratios other than unity are physically aligned. This incidental alignment persists during sintering and is often observed in ceramics fabricated by uniaxial pressing processes like die pressing, hot pressing, and spark plasma sintering. Subsequent sintering and grain growth lead to low quality (e.g., <20% texture fraction) crystallographic texture in these cases. Texture-engineered ceramics discussed in this paper are purposely textured by aligning crystalline powders before the sintering process and thus lead to texture fractions >90% in most cases.
The first widely studied texture-engineered ceramics were the magnetic hexaferrites, MeO·6Fe2O3 (Me = Ba, Sr) developed in the 1950s.1 In the decade preceding this development, BaFe12O19 single crystals were shown to have ideal magnetic properties along [001] (the c-axis), making these materials interesting as permanent magnets. In comparison, hexaferrite ceramics showed poor performance relative to single crystals since only a small fraction of grains were c-axis oriented.10 In 1952, Rathenau et al. produced textured BaFe12O19 ceramics by applying a magnetic field along the pressing axis during the powder compaction process to develop a strong [001] orientation parallel to the direction of the applied field as a result of magnetic alignment (MA) of the plate-like BaFe12O19 particles.1 This texture resulted in single crystal-like magnetic properties along the pressing direction. Because of the ease of the magnetic alignment process, [001] textured hexaferrite ceramics became the first widely studied and commercialized texture-engineered ceramic materials.
A large number of powder or sol–gel processing techniques are available for producing texture in ceramics. These processing methods are categorized by mechanical, electromagnetic, or thermal driving forces for particle alignment (Fig. 2). While all of these methods result in texture, it is noted that temperature is a scalar and cannot break symmetry (unlike mechanical and electromagnetic forces, which are vectors). As a result, uniformly applied heating alone cannot create texture, but enhances pre-existing textures via preferential growth of aligned grains. In contrast, thermal gradients may create primary texture, as seen in directional solidification.
Four general techniques have been developed in the last few decades to achieve ceramics with a high texture fraction (e.g., >90% of the material volume is textured), including the Rolling Assisted Biaxially Textured Substrates process (RABiTS, Fig. 3),11 powder-in-tube (PIT),12 templated grain growth (TGG) and reaction templated grain growth (RTGG),13,14 and strong (7–14 T) magnetic field alignment (MA) of particles.15 The RABiTS process is shown in Fig. 3 and is included here because it leads to biaxial texture, which is an important objective for texture-engineered bulk ceramics.
The TGG process for producing crystallographically textured ceramics was first reported in 1997.16 This process develops crystallographic texture by first orienting a minority (e.g., 5 vol%) of micrometer scale anisotropic particles (e.g., platelets or whiskers) in a dispersion of submicrometer equiaxed particles. As seen in Fig. 2, anisotropic particles can be oriented by a number of methods. Most commonly, fiber texture is produced by aligning plate-like particles via tape casting a high viscosity dispersion under the shear field of a doctor blade. During subsequent sintering and heat treatment, the larger oriented particles serve as templates for epitaxial nucleation of similarly oriented grains, which grow via an Ostwald ripening process after densification (Fig. 4). The texture produced by TGG provides access to property anisotropy approaching that of the corresponding single crystal while also possessing the mechanical robustness of polycrystalline ceramics. Variations of this process include alternative means for aligning the template particles, simultaneous alignment in multiple directions to produce sheet textures or the use of a precursor matrix powder that subsequently crystallizes to the desired phase by reactive RTGG. The template particles can be identical in crystal structure to the host (homoepitaxial) or may differ substantially in lattice parameter or space group (heteroepitaxial). As shown in Fig. 4 the template may also form in situ by topochemical conversion.13 Since TGG–type processes utilize standard ceramic powder processing techniques, textured ceramics are potentially less expensive to produce than single crystals.
Sakka’s group was the first to show that textured ceramics can be produced by orienting weakly magnetic (diamagnetic or paramagnetic) particles in a suspension using a strong magnetic field of 7–14 T.15 Subsequent sintering of the oriented particles results in a high texture fraction. Under MA, particles in a suspension experience an alignment torque based on the intrinsic magnetocrystalline anisotropy (MCA)17:
where B is the applied field, V is the particle volume, µ0 is the permeability of free space, and Δχ is the para- or diamagnetic anisotropy of the aligned material. The alignment torque is opposed by viscous resistance of the surrounding fluid. MA of particles is not dependent on particle morphology, and the factors controlling alignment (field strength, particle size, viscosity) are easier to experimentally control than particle aspect ratio. As with all colloidal dispersions, steady state alignment in MA systems is opposed by the randomizing effect of Brownian motion.
II. TEXTURE MEASUREMENTS
Developing fundamental relations between crystallographic orientation and properties requires measurements to determine not only the texture fraction but also the quality of grain alignment. Texture analysis is most commonly conducted by X-ray diffraction, but electron and neutron diffraction may also be used depending on the type of sample being analyzed. Electron and X-ray diffraction have less bulk penetrating capabilities than neutrons, so for materials that impede X-rays (e.g., lead-containing ceramics), neutron diffraction is an attractive choice.18 Scans of 2θ by these methods can be analyzed using the intensities of specific peak heights of interest normalized to those of the untextured sample. This method is widely favored and results in the Lotgering factor (LF or f(00l)).19 For example, the LF of the 00l orientation is:
where ∑I(00l) is the summation of the peak intensities of all 00l peaks (i.e., 001, 002…) in the textured sample pattern. ∑I(hkl) is the summation of the peak intensities of all hkl peaks which appear in the XRD pattern. ∑I0(00l) and ∑I0(hkl) are summations of the XRD peak intensities for an untextured sample. The Lotgering factor scales between 0 and 1 and the value is often expressed as a percentage.
It should be noted that while the Lotgering factor is a measure of the oriented material, it does not accurately account for how well the grains are aligned.19 Unfortunately, due to the ease of measurement and calculation, the LF is most often the only measure of texture reported. For some of the properties discussed below, it is apparent that more quantitative and comprehensive texture measures are necessary to provide fundamental insights into how texture fraction and grain alignment affect properties.
Similar analysis of the 2θ scans from X-ray or neutron diffraction was conducted by Jones et al.,18 which uses the integrated intensity of the peaks, thereby producing more quantitative comparisons between samples. The method for texture analysis of a material with both tetragonal and orthorhombic phases is shown in Eq. (3), where \(I_{00h}^{\,R}\) is the integrated intensity for a randomly oriented sample and I00h and Ih00 are from the textured sample.
The orientation distribution function (ODF) of the grains, which represents the probability of a given crystal orientation relative to a randomly oriented material,18 can be measured by rocking curves and pole figures which are obtained by X-ray, electron, or neutron diffraction. The ODF of the individual grain orientation can be evaluated by stereology on micrographs when the grain shape is anisotropic, or the data can be automatically obtained from electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). Brosnan et al. showed that while XRD rocking curve, XRD pole figure, and EBSD data yielded similar f, r, and FWHM values for [001] textured PMN–PT, the XRD rocking curve analysis was the most efficient method and gave a more complete description of texture fraction and texture orientation since it sampled a larger fraction of the material during analysis.20 The data generated by these analysis methods is shown in Fig. 5.
The March–Dollase equation was developed to quantify both texture fraction and quality of orientation. In this equation, the ODF [F(f, r, ω)] is given by:
where ω is the angle between the texture (orientation) axis and the scattering vector, f is the volume fraction of oriented material, r is the degree of orientation of the oriented material, and (1 − f) is the volume fraction of randomly oriented material. Note that the f value obtained from the March–Dollase fit is not equal to the f(00l) calculated from the Lotgering factor equation. The r parameter characterizes the width of the texture (orientation) distribution. For an untextured sample r = 1 and for a perfectly aligned sample of tabular grains r = 0.21 The March–Dollase equation can be simplified to the multiples of random distribution (MRD) by assuming f = 1 (a completely textured sample), thus allowing for the texture equation to be a function of only two variables, r and ω. The form of the MRD is given by:
Equation (5) is graphed in Fig. 6 to illustrate the effect of r on the shape and FWHM of the March–Dollase fit.
III. TEXTURED MAGNETIC CERAMICS
The majority of commercially produced magnetic ceramics, or ferrites, contain chemical combinations of some magnetic species, typically iron. As previously discussed, the first commercial textured ceramics were [001] textured BaFe12O19. Magnetic properties exhibit a pronounced crystallographic directional dependence, or MCA. MCA in magnetic materials originates primarily from spin–orbit interaction of electrons. Since electron orbits are determined by crystal structure, different crystallographic directions, planes (ferroplana), or cones result in different propensities for electron alignment.22 In a practical sense, specific crystallographic directions are commonly referred to as “easy” axes because magnetization in these directions requires less energy, and the opposite is true for “hard” axes. Crystal systems often have easy planes and cones, which have a lower energy barrier for magnetization.23
The majority of ferrite compounds are classified as cubic ferrites or hexagonal ferrites (hexaferrites).23 Crystal systems with an axis of high symmetry exhibit uniaxial anisotropy, and the crystallographic easy axes switch at specific temperatures making temperature an important consideration when aligning magnetic materials. For instance, in the Ba3Co2Fe24O41 hexaferrite system, the preferred direction for magnetization above 207 °C is the c-axis. Below 207 °C, the basal plane (ferroplana) becomes the easy magnetization plane, and below −53 °C a cone encapsulating the c-axis is easier to magnetize.24 It is also worth mentioning that lattice strain results in abnormal lattice parameters that affect the magnetization direction dependence slightly.24
Within crystalline materials, electron alignment exists in coherent localized regions called domains that usually align with the easy axes. One grain may contain multiple domains or one domain may contain multiple grains, depending on grain and domain sizes.23 Domains align under an applied magnetic field, and the amount of energy required is called the coercivity or Hc.23 The coercivity value is largely determined by crystallographic defects such as grain boundary misorientation, dislocations, or impurities which can pin domain movement. Furthermore, total material magnetization (when all the domains are aligned) is referred to as magnetic saturation Ms. After the external field is removed, the domains reorient themselves with the easy axes, and the residual magnetization is called remanence or Mr.23
In a ferrite, the degree of crystallographic orientation, with respect to the easy and hard axes, corresponds greatly to the magnetic remanence and slightly to the magnetic coercivity. Typically, Mr approaches Ms as texture quality improves, and the coercivity decreases slightly with increasing orientation as the grain boundary coherency improves. Greater coherency weakens the domain wall pinning mechanism.23
The effect of crystallographic alignment on magnetic properties was first observed for a textured BaFe12O19 M-type hexaferrite fabricated by magnetic alignment of a high solids content slurry of BaFe12O19 particles within an 11,000 Oe magnetic field. Textured BaFe12O19 ceramic had a magnetic remanence of 0.37 T and coercivity of 1200 Oe parallel to the basal plane while untextured BaFe12O19 had a magnetic remanence of 0.205 T and coercivity of 2600 Oe. Additionally, the magnetic properties were measured in different crystallographic directions (Fig. 7). While the texture fraction and degree of crystal orientation were not mentioned, this study effectively showed an avenue by which magnetic properties could be tailored using crystallographic orientation.
There is surprisingly little literature about textured bulk magnetic ceramics since the Rathenau study. In recent years, the advent of techniques for substantially improved texture quality such as TGG and RTGG, and high magnetic field alignment has renewed interest in oriented ferrites. In 2011, Chen et al. uniaxially pressed Ba3Co2Fe24O41 Z-type ferrites in a rotating in-plane magnetic field25 and sintered them for 2–16 h in air at 1200–1280 °C. This process resulted in Lotgering factors (f(001)) of 0.3–0.5 with high magnetic remanence and low coercivity relative to untextured Ba3Co2Fe24O41.25 In 2014, Jian et al. aligned needle-shaped α-FeOOH template particles in CoO and Fe2O3 powders to produce [001] textured CoFe2O4 ferrites with f(001) of 0.81 by RTGG.26 Magnetic properties of untextured and textured CoFe2O4 samples are compared in Fig. 8. The textured ceramic had higher saturation and remnant magnetization of 355 emu/cm3 and 90 emu/cm3 in plane, respectively, and 260 emu/cm3 and 15 emu/cm3 out of plane, respectively. By comparison, the untextured ceramic had an Ms of 320 emu/cm3 and Mr of 87 emu/cm3.26 Chang et al. used RTGG to create textured Ba3Co2Fe24O41 by tape casting BaFe12O19 platelets in a Ba2Co2Fe12O22 hexaferrite powder matrix.27 While the f(001) was only 0.39, the textured ceramic had increased magnetic permeability relative to the untextured sample, and reduced coercivity was observed perpendicular to the c-axis.27
IV. TEXTURED SUPERCONDUCTORS
Superconductors are a unique class of materials that display zero resistance to the flow of electricity below a critical temperature (Tc),28 making these materials attractive choices for advanced electrical conductors and powerful magnets. In 1986, high temperature superconducting (HTS) cuprate-based ceramics, including YBa2Cu3O7−δ (YBCO), were discovered to exhibit superconducting properties below 93 K. The development of materials with Tc higher than the boiling temperature of N2 (77 K) was a significant achievement because it resulted in easier and less expensive cooling for superconductivity. A variety of other HTS materials have been discovered, such as the Bi–Sr–Ca–Cu–O (BSCCO) family.29
In power transmission lines, YBCO-coated tapes and power cables with very high critical current density, Jc, of 106–107 A/cm2 in zero-field were fabricated using the RABiTS process.30,31 The RABiTS process was developed by Goyal et al.32 to produce biaxially textured superconducting wires and tapes. The RABiTS process achieves biaxial or sheet texture by taking advantage of the biaxial texture produced in rolled cubic metals and FCC and BCC alloys after recrystallization. Ni and Ni–W–Cr alloys are the most commonly used metals for the RABiTS process. The texture of the crystallized metal strip (e.g., 1 cm wide by 10 m in length) consists of a {100} cube plane parallel to the plane of the strip and a cube edge parallel to the rolling direction. Buffer layers, such as YSZ, are deposited on the metal strip by a number of thin film processes to mediate diffusion of the metal into the superconducting layer (∼1 µm thick). Additionally, the use of a buffer layer(s) minimizes both lattice mismatch and thermal expansion differences between the metal substrate and deposited superconducting layer. The process has not been applied to bulk ceramics.
The PIT process is another technique for fabrication of superconducting tapes and wires, primarily for ferropnictides and BSCCO materials. A silver tube is filled with superconductor powder and then the tube is cold worked, flat rolled, and groove rolled to produce wires of various thicknesses and diameters. The process controls crystallographic orientation at low temperature while maintaining very small grain sizes. Susner et al. fabricated superconducting PIT MgB2 wires.33 They reported no anisotropy in current density at zero field, but as the applied magnetic field (applied perpendicular to the wire axis) increased, they measured an increasing anisotropy. At 8 T, the critical current density parallel to the wire axis was Jc ∼ 104 A/cm2, while perpendicular to the axis, Jc ∼ 103 A/-cm2. Texture was reported as a function of particle aspect ratio, but no quantitative texture analysis was performed.
The critical current density is highly dependent on grain to grain connectivity and alignment. It has been shown that critical current density decreases exponentially above 2–3° of misorientation in the a–b plane even with a high degree of [001] orientation (Fig. 9).34 The strong dependence of Jc on the misorientation angle has led to research to minimize crystallographic misorientation, and to further improve current carrying capacities of HTS.
Untextured HTS ceramics have poor Jc ∼ 10–102 A/cm2 as a result of weak-link coupling of misaligned polycrystalline grains.29 Thus, bulk HTS production has been limited primarily to single crystal growth. However, the excellent properties of HTS single crystals is a strong motivation for research on fabrication of bulk textured HTS ceramics.35,36 The fabrication of bulk textured HTSs by slip casting,37 tape casting,38,39 and extrusion40 has been explored. The shear forces generated using these techniques contribute to grain alignment of anisotropic grains and Jc is improved to ∼103 A/cm2. Using a sharp thermal gradient, geometric constraint of thin samples, or casting onto textured substrates, grain alignment has been increased to yield Jc of ∼104 A/cm2.40,41
V. TEXTURED ION CONDUCTORS
Ceramics with high rates of either anion or cation conduction form an important class of materials that are finding applications as ion conducting membranes in fuel cells, and as high temperature, e.g. Na–S, battery electrolytes. Beta alumina has a hexagonal crystal structure and refers to all types of β and β″ aluminas incorporating Na+, K+, NH4+, or H3O+. The Na+ ion can be exchanged for K+, NH4+, or H3O+. Na-β and Na-β″ aluminas, stabilized by the addition of Mg2+ or Li+, are two of the most extensively used cationic conductors in high temperature batteries. These materials consist of alumina spinel layers separated by 2-dimensional conduction planes. In the conduction planes oxygen ions form bridges between two adjacent alumina spinel layers and sodium ions sit in specific crystallographic positions in the conduction planes, known as Beevers–Ross sites. The ionic conduction in beta alumina occurs by the migration or hopping of sodium ions between Beevers–Ross sites and anti-Beevers–Ross sites.42–44 Beta alumina batteries must be operated at 300 °C to achieve sufficiently high ionic conductivity. Ionic conduction through beta alumina grains occurs only along the conduction planes perpendicular to the c-axis.
In polycrystalline beta alumina, current carrying ions travel across the grain boundaries from the conduction plane of one grain to the conduction plane of another grain. The ionic conductivity of the grain boundary depends on the misorientation angle between the grains, i.e., low misorientation angles between the crystal lattices of the adjacent grains have a lower resistance than high misorientation angles.7,45–48 The ionic conductivity of untextured polycrystalline beta alumina is 3–5 times lower than the ionic conductivity of a beta alumina single crystal measured parallel to the conduction plane.49 The increased conductivity of textured beta alumina parallel to the conduction planes is attributed to reduced misorientation angles between grains,7,47,50,51 in addition to less tortuous and shorter conduction pathways.7,47,48,50
Fabrication of textured beta aluminas with preferred crystallographic orientations using uniaxial dry pressing,48,50,52–54 hot pressing,7,48,55–57 spark plasma sintering,58 microwave sintering,59 and slip casting under a magnetic field has been reported.60,61 However, the number of systematic studies on how the degree of misorientation and quality of texture in beta aluminas affects the ionic conductivity is scant. Some authors report textured microstructures based on qualitative microscopy,54,55 while others compare relative X-ray diffraction peak heights,50,57,61 or report orientation or texture coefficients,7,59,60 Thus, it is difficult to evaluate and compare the quality and degree of texture of these materials.
Lotgering factors (f(001)) of 0.30–0.43 were reported by Koganai et al.58 and Asaoka et al.,56 and Kishimoto48 obtained f(001) values of up to 0.58 for oriented beta aluminas. Even with low texture qualities, they observed up to an order of magnitude higher ionic conductivities along the texture direction compared to the ionic conductivity perpendicular to the texture direction.56 It would be worthwhile to investigate how much the ionic conductivity can be increased by improving texture quality of textured beta alumina, since increased ionic conductivity may improve the efficiency of beta alumina high temperature batteries and reduce operation temperatures.
Proton and anion conductors are of interest for solid oxide fuel cells, gas sensors, and gas separation membranes. Materials of interest for such applications include Aurivillius phases, perovskite- and Brownmillerite-like phases derived from Ba2In2O5, and Si- and Ge-based apatite structures. Bi4V2O11, for example, is an Aurivillius phase that consists of alternating (Bi2O2)2+ and perovskite-like (VO3.5)2− layers with oxygen vacancies in the VO3.52− layers. Oxygen is conducted by a vacancy mechanism through the 2-dimensional oxygen deficient perovskite layers.62–64 Ba2In2O5, and derivatives thereof, have been explored as oxygen and proton conductors.62,64,65 Ba2In2O5 consists of alternating layers of corner sharing InO6 octahedra and layers of InO4 tetrahedra. The perovskite layers are oxygen deficient, and the vacancies are ordered along the [010] direction forming one-dimensional paths for oxygen ion or proton diffusion in the tetrahedral layers. In apatite structures such as La9.33(SiO4)6O2, isolated SiO4 tetrahedra align to form channels parallel to the c-axis with a row of oxygen ions in the center.62,64–66 It is apparent that the discussed anion and proton conductors possess significant anisotropy in ionic conductivity and a substantial improvement in the ionic conductivity could be achieved by texturing, as indicated by the work of Fukuda et al.67
VI. TEXTURED THERMOELECTRICS
Textured thermoelectric (TE) ceramics have recently emerged as an important application for texture-engineering. Thermoelectric devices require a combination of a high electrical conductivity and low thermal conductivity to maximize the thermoelectric conversion efficiency. The thermoelectric figure of merit is ZT = S2σT/k where S is the Seebeck coefficient, σ the electrical conductivity and k is the thermal conductivity. Recent interest in ceramics for TEs has increased as researchers develop new means to recover lost heat from automobile exhaust and power plants. For the best thermoelectric materials today ZT = 1 and scientists are searching for ways to further increase ZT. The reader is directed to Medlin and Snyder’s review of the processing and properties of conventional TEs like PbTe and Bi2Te3.68 There are many reports in this review about how to increase TE performance through crystallographic texture, reduction of grain size, and utilization of nanostructuring strategies. Interestingly, the texturing approaches used for ceramics have yet to be explored for these systems.
Oxide ceramics are of special interest since they are stable in air and can operate at elevated temperatures where conventional TEs oxidize. Ceramic TEs have been extensively studied since the late 90s when a variety of cobaltites were proposed as potentially good thermoelectrics.69–71 Hejtmánek et al. predicted that NaxCoO2 and Ca3Co4O9 single crystals and thin films would have a 4× lower electrical resistivity in the ab plane and thus these materials should have a theoretical ZT of 4.72 Tani developed the RTGG process to texture a variety of these layered structure materials since anisotropic electric conductivity is important for TE applications, similar to Bi3Te2.13 He developed a process in which the template is consumed during the process and thus there is no relic of the template grains in the textured ceramic [see Fig. 4(b)].73 As an example, platelike β-Co(OH)2 particles were aligned in a matrix powder of CaCO3. Upon heating the materials underwent phase changes until [001] textured [Ca2CoO3]0.62[CoO2] formed. The properties were anisotropic with the electrical conductivity being 60% of the single crystal value. He showed that the electrical conductivity was strongly dependent on the FWHM of the oriented grain structure and pointed out the importance of ‘ultimate’ texture for application of textured thermoelectric ceramics.13
More recently, Koumoto et al. reviewed the status of thermoelectric ceramics.74 They compared the behavior of Ca3Co4O9 ceramics textured by RTGG, magnetic alignment and SPS.75–82 Although well-oriented ceramics with high texture fraction were produced, the ZT values were lower than predicted for single crystals. They also showed that while the electrical conductivity and thermal conductivity of [001] textured Ca3Co4O9 are strongly orientation dependent, the Seebeck coefficient is nearly temperature independent and the same for the untextured, c-axis and ab-plane oriented samples.83
Lee et al. recently reported that non-stoichiometric SrxBa1−xNb2O6 single crystals are promising n-type thermoelectrics.84 In a subsequent paper they textured SBN by RTGG using rod-shaped particles of Ba2NaNb5O15.85 The c-axis textured ceramic resulted in higher thermopower and electrical conductivity than the untextured ceramic. The above results show that TE applications of textured ceramics require both a high texture fraction and a narrow distribution of grain alignment due to the importance of electrical conductivity.
VII. TEXTURED PIEZOELECTRICS
Piezoelectricity describes the ability of non-centro-symmetric materials to develop an electric polarization proportional to an applied mechanical stress (direct piezoelectric effect), or to develop a mechanical strain (deformation) proportional to an applied electric field (converse piezoelectric effect). Piezoelectrics are essential components in a wide range of applications, including ultrasonic transducers, sensors, and actuators. The next generation of piezoelectric applications requires a significant increase in typical figure of merit coefficients (e.g., piezoelectric coefficient dij, electromechanical coupling coefficient kij and mechanical quality factor Qm.
The large piezoelectric effect exhibited for domain-engineered single crystals represents a significant advance in piezoelectric materials. By controlling grain orientation, textured piezoelectric ceramics have emerged as an alternative to single crystals. In this case the textured piezoelectrics can be domain-engineered like single crystals but at the grain by grain level (Fig. 10).
The most commonly used piezoelectrics are perovskites (general formula ABO3), tungsten-bronze structures, Aurivillius phases (or bismuth-layered structures), and perovskite layer structures. Tables I, II, SI and SII summarize the data since the 2004 review of textured piezoelectric ceramics2 as a function of crystal class showing the piezoelectric coefficients of different types of textured ceramics as a function of template type and texture fraction.
A. Textured perovskite piezoelectrics
Lead-based ceramics such as Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 (PZT), Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–PbTiO3 (PMN–PT), and Pb(In1/2Nb1/2)O3–Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–PbTiO3 (PIN–PMN–PT), as well as lead-free ceramics like (K,Na)NbO3 (KNN), Bi1/2Na1/2TiO3 (BNT), and BaTiO3 (BT) ceramics belong to the large family of perovskite ceramics. They are of greatest interest because of their exceptional piezoelectric properties.
B. Lead-based piezoelectrics
Lead-based piezoelectrics have dominated the piezoelectric market since 1950s due to the high dielectric and piezoelectric properties achieved with compositions close to the morphotrophic phase boundary (MPB). Highly [001]c oriented compositionally modified Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 (PZT) ceramics were successfully fabricated by slip casting in a high magnetic field.86 A high k31 value of 0.44 (1.3 times higher than that of its untextured oriented counterpart) was achieved in the [001]c oriented ceramics with a Lotgering factor (f(001)) of 0.77.
Textured relaxor ferroelectric Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–PbTiO3 (PMN–PT) ceramics have attracted attention due to the much higher piezoelectric properties than PZT-based ceramics. BaTiO3 (BT),87–89 SrTiO3 (ST),90 PMN–PT,91 and (Na1/2Bi1/2)TiO3–PbTiO3 (NBT–PT)92 templates have been used to texture [001]c oriented rhombohedral PMN–PT ceramics with compositions near the MPB by TGG. Ninety percent textured PMN–PT ceramics were initially produced by Sabolsky et al. using coarse (75–150 µm) tabular BaTiO3 templates.87 The measured d33* and Tc values were 1150 pC/N and 164 °C, respectively, but the resulting large grain sizes reduced the mechanical properties of the textured ceramics.
Subsequent work on textured PMN–PT ceramics focused largely on developing smaller templates with high aspect ratios to produce smaller grain sizes, higher texture qualities, and improved properties. Highly [001]c oriented PMN–PT ceramics with f(001) ∼ 0.94–0.99 were produced by Richter et al.88 using 5 vol% fine BT templates (∼10 µm), and a d33* value of 877 pm/V was obtained. Yan et al.89 textured PMN–PT with f(001) of 0.98 using 1 vol% fine BT templates. A static d33 of 1000 pC/N and a Tc of 162 °C were achieved. BT template particles do not react with the PMN–PT matrix and thus remain as residual inclusions in the textured ceramics, and, as a result, reduce both the strain response of the ceramics via mechanical clamping, and the dielectric properties via a composite effect. Brosnan et al.90 found that using SrTiO3 templates can eliminate this problem and yield higher piezoelectric response (static d33 = 940 pC/N), as the SrTiO3 templates dissolve into bulk PMN–PT. However, Sr2+ lowers the Curie temperature of PMN–PT to 103 °C. Amorin et al.91 showed that PMN–PT particles can be used as templates in PMN–PT to avoid both of these issues, but the templates were low aspect ratio and thus could not be efficiently aligned during fabrication. Recently, 5–15 µm NBT–PT platelets were used to template PMN–PT.92 Since these templates form a solid solution with PMN–PT, they result in high density and fine grain size (∼10 µm) ceramics with excellent texture quality (f001 ∼0.92), high piezoelectricity (d33 = 1016 pC/N) and a Curie temperature of 129 °C.
[001]c textured rhombohedral PMN–PT near the MPB showed high piezoelectric properties, but the low rhombohedral to tetragonal phase transition temperature (Tr–t) and low Curie temperature (TC, ∼90–170 °C) limit the working temperature. Tetragonal PMN–PT compositions distant from the MPB have higher Curie temperatures than rhombohedral PMN–PTs and thus there is no intermediate ferroelectric–ferroelectric phase transition. [111] oriented BT templates were used to texture tetragonal PMN–40PT ceramics, with an f(111) of 0.95.93 The textured PMN–40PT ceramics exhibited excellent piezoelectric properties between room temperature and the Curie temperature (205 °C).
Extensive effort has focused on texturing new systems with higher Tr–t and Tc, including modified PT,94 PIN–PMN–PT,95,96 Pb(Yb1/2Nb1/2)O3–Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–PbTiO3 (PYN–PMN–PT),97 and Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 (PMN–PZT).98,99 [001]c oriented Sm- and Mn-modified PbTiO3 ceramics textured to f(001) = 0.95 with 5 wt% NBT–PT were shown to have a Tc of 364 °C, a d33 of 127 pC/N and an large g33 (115 × 10−3 V m N−1).94 The authors hypothesized that self-polarization due to grain orientation along the spontaneous polarization direction plays an important role in achieving a large piezoelectric response in domain motion-confined materials. High piezoelectric properties (static d33 of 824 and 780 pC/N) and substantially improved phase transition temperatures (∼20–70 °C greater than PMN–PT) were demonstrated for [001]c textured PIN–PMN–PT (f(00l) of 0.90),95,96 templated with 5 vol% BT templates. Textured PIN–PMN–PT showed significantly improved strain versus field behavior relative to equiaxed ceramic and approach those of the single crystal (Fig. 11).100 Also, the coercive field of 8.3 kV/cm is much higher than that obtained with binary PMN–PT ceramics. Similar to PIN–PMN–PT, [001]c textured PIN–PMN–PT ceramics with f(00l) of 0.91 show a high level of strain (0.33%) and a higher Tc of 214 °C.97 Yan et al. fabricated textured PMN–PZT ceramics with f(001) of 0.90 and f(111) of 0.72 using (001) and (111) BT templates, respectively.98,99 In addition to the higher Tc of 204 °C, [001]c textured PMN–PT possessed a very high energy density of dg = 59,000 × 10−15 m2/N, which is comparable to that of the single crystal counterpart and 359% higher than that of the best commercial ceramics. [111] textured ceramics exhibited much higher piezoelectric anisotropic factor d15/d33 of 8.5 (versus 2.0 in the untextured counterpart), indicating “rotator” ferroelectric characteristics wherein the large shear piezoelectric response contributes longitudinal piezoelectric response in the non-polar direction (d33 = 1100 pC/N in [001] textured ceramics versus d33 = 112 pC/N in [111] textured ceramics).99
C. Lead-free piezoelectrics
For environmental reasons, there is tremendous interest in the development of lead-free piezoelectric ceramics as replacements for lead-based ceramics. Texture control is an important approach to enhance piezoelectric properties in lead-free ceramics. (K,Na)NbO3-based, Bi1/2Na1/2TiO3-based and BaTiO3-based ceramics are the primary lead-free textured piezoelectric ceramics under investigation owing to higher piezoelectric properties relative to other compositions.
D. Textured (K,Na)NbO3-based piezoelectrics
The (K,Na)NbO3-based system is considered to be a very promising candidate for lead-free piezoelectrics due to the high Curie temperatures and ferroelectric properties. Since the pioneering work of Saito et al., this system has become one of the most investigated textured piezoelectrics of the last decade.101 They reported that the combination of texture-engineering through RTGG and compositional design (Li+, Ta5+, and Sb5+ co-substitutions) results in a high piezoelectric coefficient of 416 pC/N, comparable to untextured commercial PZT ceramics. The Li+, Ta5+, and Sb5+ co-substitutions alter the phase structure of KNN and shift the polymorphic phase transition (PPT) temperature from about 200 °C to near room temperature.102–105 This PPT shift not only enhances the room temperature piezoelectric response of the ceramics, but also results in a substantial increase in the temperature dependence of the piezoelectric properties. Since many applications require a stable piezoelectric response over a wide temperature range, subsequent studies focused on texturing KNN-based systems with a PPT far above room temperature. Low concentrations of CuO dopants, or Li+, Ta5+, and Sb5+ substitutions, were added to KNN to aid in densification and texture development, and the ceramics were fabricated by TGG or RTGG with f(001) as high as 0.97.106–112 The modified ceramics show d33 of ∼146–218 pC/N, with a PPT above 150 °C. Tutuncu et al.113 used in situ X-ray diffraction to observe nucleation, texture development, and phase equilibria during TGG of Li+ doped KNN. Table II summarizes the piezoelectric properties of this class of textured ceramics as a function of texturing approach and texture fraction.
E. Textured Bi1/2Na1/2TiO3-based piezoelectrics
Bi1/2Na1/2TiO3 (BNT) and Bi1/2K1/2TiO3 (BKT) are important end members of a variety of piezoelectric solid solution compositions. These ceramics, such as BNT–BKT, BNT–BT, BKT–BT, and BNT–BKT–BT, form MPBs with enhanced piezoelectric properties relative to the end members. Various templates, such as KSr2Nb5O15 (KSNO), SrTiO3 (ST), Bi4Ti3O12 (B4TO), H1.07Ti1.73O4·nH2O (HTO), NaNbO3 (NN), SrBi4Ti4O15 (SBTO), Al2O3 and TiO2, were used to texture [001]c oriented BNT and BKT-based ceramics.114–122 Although highly textured BNT-based ceramics were fabricated, significant improvements in piezoelectric properties were precluded because of residual templates with little or no piezoelectric activity. Later, researchers synthesized BNT platelets to texture BNT-based ceramics.123–126 The piezoelectric response increased substantially with increasing texture and the textured ceramic had a d33 of 322 pC/N, or ∼200% higher than untextured ceramics. However, the depolarization temperature of the ceramics was not substantially reduced.123,124
F. Textured BaTiO3-based piezoelectrics
BaTiO3, with a Curie temperature of ∼120 °C and a d33 coefficient of ∼190 pC/N, is also a very promising lead-free candidate. TGG, RTGG and magnetic alignment have been used to fabricate [001]c, [110]c and [111]c oriented BT. Recent studies are summarized in Table II. Vriami et al.127 and Fu et al.128 fabricated [001]c textured BT ceramics with [001] BT templates, and found that samples with an f(00l) of 0.97 have a d33 of 274 pC/N. For a [110] grain oriented BaTiO3,128 the piezoelectric constant d31 was unchanged at 50 pC/N, while the d33 was 788 pC/N at f(110) = 0.85. [111] oriented BT ceramics with f(111) of ∼0.66 and f(001) of 0.95 were fabricated with [111] BT and [001] NaNbO3 templates, respectively.129,130
A and B site substituted BT such as (Ba,Ca)TiO3 (BCT), Ba(Zr,Ti)O3 (BZT), (Ba,Ca)(Zr,Ti)O3 (BCZT) and (Ba,Ca)(Ti, Sn)O3 (BCST) have received much attention since Ren et al.131 reported that a d33 of about 620 pC/N can be achieved in untextured BCZT ceramics. Texturing of substituted BT-based ceramics did show some improvements in piezoelectric properties, possibly being facilitated by enhanced polarization switching.132–137 However, their d33 values are still lower than that achieved in randomly oriented BCZT ceramics. Ye et al.138 suggested that this can be caused by the lower sintered density due to the introduction of BT or CT templates.
G. Textured bismuth-layered piezoelectrics
Bismuth-layered ceramics are of interest for high temperature and high power piezoelectric applications because they possess a high Tc and Qm.139 The bismuth-layered structure, also known as the Aurivillius structure, is a class of materials composed of layers of pseudo-perovskite unit cells of (Am−1BmO3m+1)2− layers separated by (Bi2O2)2+ layers oriented in the a–b plane. The term m represents the number of octahedral B-sites that lie along the [001] direction between the (Bi2O2)2+ layers.140 A number of bismuth-layered structure ceramics, such as Bi4Ti3O12 (BIT), SrBi4Ti4O15 (SBT),141 SrBi2Nb2O9 (SBN), and CaBi4Ti4O15 (CBT),142 have been textured by TGG and spark plasma sintering.139,143 To date these materials have significantly lower piezoelectric properties than lead-based and other lead-free textured piezoelectrics (Table SI).139–147
H. Textured tungsten-bronze piezoelectrics
Tungsten-bronze type materials, such as Ba2NaNb5O15 (BNN),148 KSr2Nb5O15 (KSN), 149 and Sr0.5Ba0.5Nb2O6 (SBN),149 have d33 values that are up to an order of magnitude higher than in textured Aurivillius phase materials. Efforts to texture-engineer tetragonal tungsten-bronze ceramics, including Ba2NaNb5O15 (BNN)148 and KSr2Nb5O15 (KSN) take advantage of the acicular morphology of BNN, KSN and KNN templates that form during molten salt synthesis.150 In all cases, high degrees of template alignment were achieved by extrusion, gated doctor blading and magnetic alignment. In most cases, there were significant gains in d33 relative to untextured ceramics, but the piezoelectric properties are significantly less than lead-based and other lead-free textured piezoelectrics (Table SII).148–155
VIII. TEXTURED CERAMICS FOR OPTICAL APPLICATIONS
Most optical applications require materials that are transparent, or at least translucent. Transparency in ceramics is achieved by limiting sources of scattering, absorption, and reflection of photons. Cubic ceramics like spinel (MgAl2O4) and yttrium aluminum garnet (Y3Al5O12, YAG) can achieve high transparency in a randomly oriented polycrystalline state, since there is no refraction when light passes from one grain to another (i.e., the refractive index in cubic materials is isotropic) regardless of the crystallographic orientation change from one grain to the other. The same is not true of non-cubic materials (e.g., alumina) and refraction at grain boundaries has a significant effect on reduced transparency due to refractive index anisotropy in different crystallographic directions. For this reason, efforts have been made to fabricate textured optical ceramics such that the grains are oriented in the transmission direction.
It should be noted that the optical transmission, Tth, of anisotropic ceramics can be improved by limiting the grain size to ≤200 nm (the short wave length end of the visible light spectrum).156 For example, 0.8 mm thick alumina plates with an average grain size of 300 nm had 83% Tth at a wave length of 620 nm. Further improvements require texture-engineered ceramics, in which the alignment of the crystalline orientation minimizes or eliminates scattering due to crystallographic misalignment (i.e., refractive index differences) between grains.
Magnetic alignment of alumina at 12 T, yielded 60–65% transmission at 600 nm for textured alumina with grain sizes in the tens of microns and a f(001) of 0.45.5,157 The highest reported in-line transmission of 91%Tth was reported for a textured alumina with a grain size of 100–500 nm, but the degree of crystallographic texture was not measured.158
Tetragonal strontium barium niobate, Sr0.6Ba0.4Nb2O6 (SBN60) was textured by Tanaka et al. using magnetic alignment to enhance the electro-optical properties relative to untextured ceramics.159 Similar compositions have been textured using TGG, but not to transparency. The Tanaka et al. paper is the first report of a highly translucent textured polycrystalline SBN60 (58%Tth). Figure 12 illustrates the significant improvement in optical transmittance achieved by texturing SBN60. The authors measured an apparent electro-optic coefficient of 342 pm/V for the textured material, or ∼95% of the value for single crystal SBN60, and thirteen orders of magnitude higher than untextured SBN ceramics.
Rare earth-doped fluorapatite (RE:Ca10(PO4)6F2 or RE:FAP), with a hexagonal crystal structure, has the potential to yield higher power lasers at room temperature, which is a great advantage over RE-YAG gain media which operate at cryogenic temperatures.160 The rare earth dopants (e.g., Nd3+, Yb3+) necessary for lasing fortuitously enhance the magnetic anisotropy of these materials and thus particles can be aligned at <2 T, which is much closer to a manufacturing reality because rare earth magnets can be used for processing. Textured Nd:FAP,160,161 and Yb:FAP162 were both demonstrated to be laser grade, but texture quality was not measured or analyzed in these materials. The application of textured ceramics in such a demanding application is considered to be a major advance for laser media ceramics.
An interesting phenomenon with regard to Nd:YAG ceramic materials is thermal birefringence-induced depolarization. Even though YAG is optically isotropic under ambient conditions, a slight birefringence occurs in laser gain media during use, reducing the lasing efficiency of the material.163 Similar losses occur in single crystal media cut in the [111] direction. The losses due to anisotropic dependence of lasing efficiency on crystallographic orientation were reduced by more than 90% by cutting the crystals in the [110] direction.164 This suggests that the lasing efficiency of YAG ceramics could be improved by [110] texturing. A unique process for orienting YAG reported by Arakawa et al.,165 takes advantage of the phase reactions between Y2O3 and Al2O3 to produce textured YAG. The process involves spin coating a sol–gel yttria precursor onto either (0001) or ( \(11\bar 20\) ) sapphire with a subsequent heat treatment at ∼1600 °C to achieve a pure YAG film with a Lotgering factor of up to 0.57 on (0001) sapphire and 0.23 on ( \(11\bar 20\) ) sapphire. The [211] direction was parallel to the growth direction of the YAG film on the (0001) sapphire crystal, with an epitaxial relationship between the substrate and film, while no epitaxial relationship was seen in the film grown on the ( \(11\bar 20\) ) sapphire crystal. While this technique is still in the early stages of development and has only been reported for a relatively large single crystal sapphire substrate, it opens the door to RTGG of YAG using alumina platelets and an yttria/alumina mixture matrix. The transmittance and texture quality data for the materials described above are summarized in Table III.
IX. TEXTURED THERMAL CONDUCTORS
In ceramics, heat is transported by phonons and the thermal conductivity of ceramics is determined by crystallographic factors such as bond strength, atomic weight, atomic coordination, and complexity of the unit cell.166,167 Materials with strong (covalent) bonds, low atomic weights, tetrahedral coordination of the atoms, and simple crystal structures are typically good phonon conductors and have high thermal conductivities. Therefore, inexpensive non-oxide ceramics, such as SiC, AlN, and Si3N4 (alpha and beta) are used in commercial applications, for example as heat sinks in the electronics industry.
SiC, AlN, and Si3N4 have anisotropic crystal structures, which result in anisotropic thermal conductivities. For AlN and SiC this crystallographic anisotropy is small, i.e., the ratio of thermal conductivity along the c-axis and along the a/b-axes is about 1.5, which suggests that little improvement is expected through texturing. For textured AlN with a Lotgering factor of 0.76, only a small anisotropy in thermal conductivity of 164.7 W/(K m) parallel and 154.6 W/(K m) perpendicular to the direction of alignment was observed.168 Others reported similar trends with Lotgering factors between 0.6 and 0.97 and measured thermal conductivities of 86.3 W/(K m) parallel and 83.7 W/(K m) perpendicular to the direction of alignment.169
In contrast, β-Si3N4 consists of a network of corner-shared Si–N4 tetrahedra that form channels parallel to the c-axis. Molecular dynamics calculations predict thermal conductivities of 450 W/(m K) and 170 W/(m K) along the c- and a-axes, respectively, in single crystals.167 Measured thermal conductivities of β-Si3N4 single crystals of 180 W/(m K) along the c-axis and 69 W/(m K) along the a-axis were reported.166,170 The experimental values are lower than the predicted single crystal values because of defects such as impurities, vacancies and dislocations.
Textured β-Si3N4 was produced by slip casting under a magnetic field,171,172 tape casting,170,173 and extrusion.174 The highest degree of texture, with an f(001) of 0.98, was obtained by slip casting at 12 T (Fig. 13),172 resulting in a thermal conductivity of 176 W/(m K) along and 62 W/(m K) perpendicular to the grain alignment direction, whereas the thermal conductivity of untextured β-Si3N4 is ∼115 W/(m K).
X. TEXTURED STRUCTURAL CERAMICS
Structural ceramics exhibit high elastic moduli, high hardness and wear resistance. However, brittleness (i.e., low resistance to the propagation of cracks) and strength variability (due to extrinsic defects in the material) compromise their use. The brittle fracture in ceramics is associated with low energy dissipation during fracture. Improvements in the fracture resistance can be ascribed to morphological phenomena such as grain bridging, interfacial bonding, as well as energy dissipating mechanisms acting during crack propagation (e.g., crack deflection, delamination).
A primary motivation for texturing structural ceramics is to enhance wear resistance by increasing the material’s hardness. There is a significant difference in the hardness of single crystals compared to polycrystalline ceramics. For example, Vicker’s hardness perpendicular to the basal surface (0001) in single crystal alumina is 23.0 GPa, while polycrystalline alumina samples commonly exhibit a hardness of 19.0 GPa, as reported by McColm.175 To date the data on hardness of single crystal sapphire and textured ceramics is quite variable; a problem associated with proper measurements of hardness. For example, Carisey et al. showed that the hardness of textured alumina perpendicular to the [0001] texture direction is 16.5 GPa compared to 16 GPa for untextured alumina.176
The hardness of single crystal β-Si3N4 is 34.4 GPa perpendicular to the (0001) surface.175 Nakamura et al.184 studied the hardness anisotropy in textured β-Si3N4 fabricated by extrusion and reported hardnesses of 17.0 GPa perpendicular to the (0001) surface and 12.6 GPa parallel to this surface. In this same work the hardness of untextured β-Si3N4 polycrystalline material was 15.6 GPa.
Single crystal silicon carbide exhibits a hardness of 33.0 GPa perpendicular to the (0001) surface, while untextured polycrystalline SiC has an isotropic hardness of 19.3 GPa.175 Work by Lee et al. on hot-forged SiC found the hardness on the (0001) surface to be 24.4 GPa while the hardness perpendicular [0001] direction was 26.8 GPa.177
Residual microstresses generated in the ceramic during cooling after sintering are affected by the anisotropic coefficient of thermal expansion and orientation of the grains. For instance, the thermal expansion anisotropy of single crystal Al2O3 is 7.2 × 10−6 °C−1 in the [0001] direction and 6.3 × 10−6 °C−1 in the \(\left[ {\bar 12\bar 10} \right]\) direction. Residual stresses can be reduced in textured materials by aligning grains. For example, Vedula et al. predicted residual stresses (maximum principal stresses, σ11) after sintering to be ∼530 MPa for untextured alumina compared to ∼415 MPa in [0001] textured alumina.178
Regarding the fracture behavior of single crystal alumina, toughness anisotropy depends on the different cleavage energy of crystallographic planes. According to Salem et al., the basal (0001) plane of an alumina single crystal showed a 45% higher resistance toward cleavage than the prism planes of the crystal structure, measured using the chevron notch method.179 Interestingly, magnetic field [001]-oriented 3 mol% yttria stabilized tetragonal zirconia had an indentation fracture toughness in [001] direction that was 54% higher than in the perpendicular direction, and 49% higher than that of untextured zirconia.180 These findings suggest that texturing microstructures in polycrystalline ceramics can be effective if properly oriented with respect to the applied load. Nevertheless, not only the crystallographic texture but also the morphology of the textured microstructures (e.g., elongated grains with high aspect ratio) may influence the fracture behavior of polycrystalline ceramics. For example, Pavlacka and Messing textured alumina by TGG, obtaining a [0001]-fiber textured material (Fig. 1).187 They reported indentation-strength effective toughness values of 4.58 MPa m1/2 when measured parallel to the basal surface of [0001] oriented alumina and 2.55 MPa m1/2 when measured perpendicular to the basal surface. In this work, the property anisotropy is due to the of crack propagation behavior. In each crack mode, the crack is macroscopically straight, which indicates that there is no difference in the tortuosity of the crack path. The difference between the two crack modes, and thus the origin of this property anisotropy, is the ability of the crack to travel through an oriented grain. As discussed above, the hardness of alumina is higher parallel to the basal surface than perpendicular to it. Therefore the crack is more likely to travel through grains when toughness is measured perpendicular to the basal surface than when it is measured parallel to the basal surface. This finding indicates that texturing structural ceramics using TGG can also increase the fracture energy of the material, thus enhancing the damage tolerance of the final ceramic part.
In an untextured polycrystalline ceramic, crack propagation usually follows a path perpendicular to the applied stress field (mode I fracture). In contrast, textured ceramics, such as textured α-alumina, can affect the direction of crack propagation due to the relatively low fracture energy of the interfaces between templated grains, thus promoting delamination.181–186 The competition between crack penetration and delamination in a textured material can be described by the energy-based model illustrated in Fig. 14(a), which is based upon the He and Hutchinson criterion for cracks propagating in bimaterials.183 In this figure, regions for penetration through the textured grain or deflection along the interfaces between oriented tabular grains are schematically illustrated. Figure 14(a) shows the two modes of crack propagation possible between “brick-like” textured grains. The curve Gd/Gp represents the ratio between the critical energy release rate of the potential deflected crack (Gd) and the critical energy release rate of the potential penetrating crack (Gp). In monolithic structural ceramics there is, in general, little mismatch in the Young’s moduli between grains (α ≈ 0) and the crack deflects if the interfacial fracture resistance (Γi) is less than 25% of the fracture resistance of the grain (Gc) (i.e., Γi/Gc ≤ 0.25). Both Gc and Γi can be influenced by the anisotropy of the crystal.181,182 Measurements of interfacial fracture toughness, Γi, of textured alumina compared to the fracture energy in untextured alumina, Gc, resulted in ∼1/3 [represented in Fig. 14(a) by the solid symbol], showing the potential of texturing for favoring delamination, and thus enhanced energy dissipation.181
To increase the capability of a textured microstructure to deflect a propagating crack a novel approach was proposed using layered ceramics with compressive residual stresses.182 This concept was demonstrated in an alumina-based layered ceramic with textured layers embedded between layers of equiaxed alumina. The textured layers consist of alumina grains aligned parallel to the layer plane. Due to the different coefficients of thermal expansion of the layers, tensile and compressive residual stresses develop in the equiaxed and textured layers, respectively. According to He and Hutchinson, the incorporation of compressive residual stresses shifts the Gd/Gp curve upwards, thus promoting delamination [see Fig. 14(a)]. Figure 14(b) shows a typical crack path within the textured layer designed with compressive stresses. It is demonstrated that the combination of compressive residual stresses in textured layers together with the relatively low interfacial energy between the basal planes of the oriented alumina grains favor delamination, thus increasing the overall toughness of the system.
MAX phases are ternary nitrides and carbides with the general formula Mn+1AXn, where M is an early transition metal, A is an A group element (columns 13–16 in the periodic table), and X is carbon or nitrogen, with n = 1–3. MAX phases have received a lot of attention due to their unique combination of high elastic constants of 178–340 GPa, high hardnesses of 1.4–8 GPa, compressive strengths of up to 1.9 GPa, and a fracture toughnesses of 4.5–16 MPa m1/2.188 MAX phases even show some degree of plasticity, which makes them machinable and resistant to thermal shock. MAX phases have a layered hexagonal crystal structure (space group P63/mmc) and consist of alternate near-close-packed layers of edge sharing M6X octahedra and layers of A atoms in between those layers.188
MAX phase crystals grow preferentially along the basal plane to form platelets, which suggests that a significant improvement of properties can be expected by texturing. Ti2AlC, Ti3SiC2, Ti3AlC2, and Nb4AlC3 have been textured by hot pressing,189 slip casting under a magnetic field,190–195 electrophoretic deposition,196 and spark plasma sintering.197,198 Spark plasma sintering, hot pressing, and electrophoretic deposition under a magnetic field produce textures with Lotgering factors (f(001)) of 0.69–0.75 and the mechanical properties of the samples are somewhat improved compared to untextured ceramics.197,198 Highly textured MAX phases produced by slip casting under a magnetic field have a f(001) of 0.95–0.97 and significantly improved properties.190–195 For high Lotgering factors of 0.97, the bending strength and fracture toughness of Nb4AlC3 was improved to 1219 MPa and 17.9 MPa m1/2, respectively.192 It is interesting to note that the mechanical properties improved both parallel and perpendicular to the orientation direction, e.g., the flexural strength of isotropic polycrystalline Ti3AlC2 is 320 MPa, but textured Ti3AlC2 with an f(00l) of 0.69 has a flexural strength of 1261 MPa parallel and 1005 MPa perpendicular to the texturing direction.195 A significant improvement of the fracture toughness from 6.9 MPa m1/2 for isotropic Ti3AlC2 ceramics to 13.1 MPa m1/2 parallel and 14.6 MPa m1/2 perpendicular to the texturing direction was also reported.195
XI. FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN TEXTURE-ENGINEERED CERAMICS
There have been major advances in tailoring the piezoelectric and thermoelectric properties of bulk ceramics through crystallographic texturing and thus some of the materials discussed above are promising candidates for future commercialization. A few papers demonstrate that there are enormous opportunities for enhanced properties in textured optical, ionic conducting, structural and thermal ceramics. There is surprisingly little fundamental research on the physics of texture-property relations which points to a need for basic research to understand how fundamental material properties correlate with texture quality.
The texture fractions resulting from most fabrication techniques are >95%, and thus texture fraction is not believed to be the property-limiting factor. However, the alignment of the grains is problematic because the degree of misorientation in the orientation distribution function limits the property values that can be achieved. For example, as predicted for piezoelectric materials, a misalignment of 10° reduces the d33 by >25% compared to the single crystal values.199 Current research on texture-engineered ceramics demonstrates that there is considerable room for improvement in the uniaxial alignment by TGG and magnetic alignment. This is especially evident when the FWHM of textured bulk ceramics is compared to the <1° FWHM achieved by various thin film growth processes and the RABiTS process. In contrast, the best orientation achieved by TGG ranges from 5 to 20° FWHM.14,200 Recently, we showed that combining magnetic alignment of template particles and TGG resulted in a FWHM of 5°.201 High field magnetic alignment alone yields a FWHM of 8–12°.
Most of the fabrication techniques reported in the literature result in fiber-textured ceramics. Processing methods that produce biaxially-textured ceramics with orientation distributions similar to that of thin films would be a major advance in the field of texture-engineered ceramics. We expect that the properties of biaxially textured ceramics with a narrow orientation distribution would approach those of single crystals. Additionally, novel orientation patterns, such as seen in Fig. 15, have the potential to yield properties that are not seen in single crystals or traditionally textured materials.17 Further study of texturing ceramics with [111] and [011] textures would likewise advance the potential of textured ceramics.
Current magnetic alignment and TGG processes are still batch processes. In the case of magnetic alignment, the use of a high field (10 T) is problematic. While TGG-type processes build on existing tape casting, and other scalable powder processes, lack of commercial sources of anisotropic templates by design (e.g., size, composition, aspect ratio and crystallographic orientation) have slowed commercialization. Clearly, there is a need to engineer these processes and to develop new methods to overcome the limitations of existing textured ceramics fabrication processes.
An important challenge in future texture-engineered ceramics research is to determine how to quantify texture fraction and the orientation distribution so that properties can be better correlated with texture. As reported by Jones et al., the Lotgering factor, texture fraction, and orientation parameters from the March–Dollase equation are insufficient for establishing accurate and comprehensive correlations of texture quality and properties.202 A coupled issue is how to utilize the enormous data sets obtained with various texture analysis tools. Such challenges need to be overcome so that we can test theory and establish new structure–property relations for textured ceramics.
Finally, there is little fundamental understanding about texture evolution as a function of template–matrix interactions, grain growth, and interactions between growing grains. A comprehensive analysis of texture evolution by in situ techniques would provide valuable insights into how process parameters can be used to obtain high quality textured ceramics. Finally, we believe that texture-engineered ceramics hold much promise and that their development will expand the commercial applications of ceramic materials and facilitate greater understanding of the link between grain orientation and properties.
Change history
01 March 2018
An Erratum to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2018.31
References
G.W. Rathenau, J. Smit, and A.L. Stuyts: Ferromagnetic properties of hexagonal iron-oxide compounds with and without a preferred orientation. Z. Physik 133, 250 (1952).
G.L. Messing, T. Trolier-McKinstry, E.M. Sabolsky, C. Duran, S. Kwon, B. Brahmaroutu, P. Park, H. Yilmaz, P.W. Rehrig, K.B. Eitel, E. Suvaci, M. Seabaugh, and K.S. Oh: Templated grain growth of textured piezoelectric ceramics. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 29, 45 (2004).
S. Jin and J.E. Graebner: Processing and fabrication techniques for bulk high- Tc superconductors: A critical review. Mater. Sci. Eng., B 7, 243 (1991).
E. Guilmeau, H. Itahara, T. Tani, D. Chateigner, and D. Grebille: Quantitative texture analysis of grain-aligned (Ca2CoO3)0.62CoO2 ceramics processed by the reactive-templated grain growth method. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 064902 (2005).
X. Mao, S. Wang, S. Shimai, and J. Guo: Transparent polycrystalline alumina ceramics with orientated optical axes. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91, 3431 (2008).
H. Imamura, K. Hirao, M.E. Brito, M. Toriyama, and S. Kanzaki: Further improvement in mechanical properties of highly anisotropic silicon nitride ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 83, 495 (2000).
G.E. Youngblood and R.S. Gordon: Texture-conductivity relationships in polycrystalline lithia-stabilized β″-alumina. Ceramurgia Intl. 4, 93 (1978).
A.H. Heuer, D.J. Sellers, and W.H. Rhodes: Hot-working of aluminum oxide: I. Primary recrystallization and texture. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 52, 468 (1969).
A. Carman, E. Pereloma, and Y. Chen: Hot forging of a textured α-SiAlON ceramic. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89, 478 (2006).
J.J. Went, G.W. Rathenau, E.W. Gorter, and G.W. van Oosterhout: Hexagonal iron-oxide compounds as permanent-magnet materials. Phys. Rev. 86, 424 (1952).
A. Goyal, R. Feenstra, F.A. List, M. Paranthaman, D.F. Lee, D.M. Kroeger, D.B. Beach, J.S. Morrell, T.G. Chirayil, D.T. Verebelyi, X. Cui, E.D. Specht, D.K. Christen, and P.M. Martin: Using RABiTS to fabricate high-temperature superconducting wire. JOM 51, 19 (1999).
S. Jin, R.C. Sherwood, R.B. van Dover, T.H. Tiefel, and D.W. Johnson, Jr.: High TC superconductors-composite wire fabrication. Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 203 (1987).
T. Tani: Texture engineering of electronic ceramics by the reactive-templated grain growth method. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 114, 363 (2006).
H. Yilmaz, G.L. Messing, and S. Trolier-McKinstry: (Reactive) templated grain growth of textured sodium bismuth titanate (Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3–BaTiO3) ceramics–I. Processing. J. Electroceram. 11, 207 (2003).
Y. Sakka and T.S. Suzuki: Textured development of feeble magnetic ceramics by colloidal processing under high magnetic field. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 113, 26 (2005).
M.M. Seabaugh, I.H. Kerscht, and G.L. Messing: Texture development by templated grain growth in liquid phase sintered α-alumina. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80, 1181 (1997).
T.S. Suzuki, T. Uchikoshi, and Y. Sakka: Control of texture in alumina by colloidal processing in a strong magnetic field. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 7, 356 (2006).
J.L. Jones, B.J. Iverson, and K.J. Bowman: Texture and anisotropy of polycrystalline piezoelectrics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90, 2297 (2007).
F.K. Lotgering: Topotactical reactions with ferrimagnetic oxides having hexagonal crystal structures-I. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 9, 113 (1959).
K.H. Brosnan, G.L. Messing, R.J. Meyer, Jr., and M.D. Vaudin: Texture measurements in 〈001〉 fiber-oriented PMN–PT. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89, 1965 (2006).
W.A. Dollase: Correction for preferred orientation in powder diffractometry: Application of the March model. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 19, 267 (1986).
L.D. Landau, L.P. Pitaevskii, and E.M. Liftshitz: Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, 2nd ed., Vol. 8, Course of Theoretical Physics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 2004).
R.C. Pullar: A review of the synthesis, properties and applications of hexaferrite ceramics. Prog. Mater. Sci. 57, 1191 (2012).
A.L. Stuijts, G.W. Rathenau, and G.H. Weber: Ferroxdure II and III, anisotropic permanent magnet materials. In Ferrites, J. Smit and H.P.J. Wijn, eds., Vol. 16 (Philips Technical Library, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 1959); p. 141.
Y. Chen, A. Daigle, T. Fitchorov, B. Hu, M. Geiler, and A. Geiler: Electronic tuning of magnetic permeability in Co2Z hexaferrite toward high frequency electromagnetic device miniaturization. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 202502 (2011).
G. Jian, F. Meng, D. Zhou, Q. Fu, Z. Du, and C. Yan: Fabrication of textured CoFe2O4 ceramics by novel RTGG method using rod-like α-FeOOH particles as templates. Mater. Chem. Phys. 162, 380 (2015).
P. Chang, L. He, D. Wei, and H. Wang: Textured z-type hexaferrite Ba3Co2Fe24O41, ceramics with high permeability by reactive templated grain growth method. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 36, 2519 (2016).
J.P. Rush, C.J. May-Miller, K.G.B. Palmer, N.A. Rutter, A.R. Dennis, Y-H. Shi, D.A. Cardwell, and J.H. Durrell: Transport Jc in bulk superconductors: A practical approach?. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 26, 6800904 (2016).
B. Raveau: Texturing of high- Tc superconductors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 12, R115 (1999).
C. His, N. Chardon, R. Kuentzler, and S. Vilminot: Elaboration and characterization of YBa2Cu3O7−x thick tapes. J. Mater. Sci. 26, 4829 (1991).
D.M. Feldmann, T.G. Holesinger, R. Feenstra, and D.C. Larbalestier: A review of the influence of grain boundary geometry on the electromagnetic properties of polycrystalline YBa2Cu3O7−x films. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91, 1869 (2008).
A. Goyal, M.P. Paranthaman, and U. Schopp: The RABiTS approach: Using rolling-assisted biaxially textured substrates for high-performance YBCO superconductors. MRS Bull. 29, 552 (2004).
M.A. Susner, T.W. Daniels, M.D. Sumption, M.A. Rindfleisch, C.J. Thong, and E.W. Collings: Drawing induced texture and the evolution of superconductive properties with heat treatment time in powder-in-tube in situ processed MgB2 strands. Supercond. Sci. Tech. 25, 065002 (2012).
D. Dimos, P. Chaudhari, J. Mannhart, and F.K. LeGoues: Orientation dependence of grain-boundary critical currents in YBa2Cu3O7−δ bicrystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 219 (1988).
G-Z. Li, J-W. Li, and W-M. Yang: A combined powder melt and infiltration growth technique for fabricating nano-composited Y−Ba−Cu−O single-grain superconductor. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 28, 105002 (2015).
Y. Shi, J.H. Durrell, A.R. Dennis, K. Huang, D.K. Namburi, D. Zhou, and D.A. Cardwell: Multiple seeding for the growth of bulk GdBCO-Ag superconductors with single grain behaviour. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30, 015003 (2017).
A. Bhargava, J. Schwartz, J.A. Alarco, and I.D.R. Mackinnon: Progress towards slip-casting YBa2Cu3O7−x monoliths. Mater. Lett. 30, 199 (1997).
L.C. Pathak: Fabrication and sintering characteristics of doctor blade YBCO-Ag tapes. Ceram. Int. 30, 417 (2004).
S.E. Dorris, M.T. Lanagan, D.M. Moffatt, H.J. Leu, C.A. Youngdahl, U. Balachandran, A. Cazzato, D.E. Bloomberg, and K.C. Goretta: Y2BaCuO5 as a substrate for YBa2Cu3Ox. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 28, 1415 (1989).
P.J. McGinn, W. Chen, N. Zhu, U. Balachandran, and M.T. Lanagan: Texture processing of extruded YBa2Cu3O6+ x wires by zone melting. Phys. C 165, 480 (1990).
G.S. Grader and D.W. Johnson, Jr.: Forming methods for high Tc superconductors. Thermochim. Acta 174, 239 (1991).
K.G. Frase, G.C. Farrington, and J.O. Thomas: Proton transport in the β/β″-aluminas. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 14, 279 (1984).
J.V.L. Beckers, K.J. van der Bent, and S.W. de Leeuw: Ionic conduction in Na+-β-alumina studied by molecular dynamics simulation. Solid State Ionics 133, 217 (2000).
J.W. Fergus: Ion transport in sodium ion conducting solid electrolytes. Solid State Ionics 227, 102 (2012).
L.C. de Jonghe and J.B. Hall: Ion current concentration in grain boundaries of sodium beta alumina. Scr. Mater. 10, 285 (1976).
L.C. De Jonghe: Grain boundaries and ionic conduction in sodium beta alumina. J. Mater. Sci. 14, 33 (1979).
C.K. Kuo, A. Tan, and P.S. Nicholson: Solid state ionics impedance analysis as a tool for designing β″-alumina microstructures. Solid State Ionics 48, 315 (1991).
A. Kishimoto and K. Shimokawa: Preferential orientation dependent mechanical and electrical properties in Naβ-alumina ceramics. Key Eng. Mater. 301, 147 (2006).
A. Hooper: A study oft he electrical properties of single-crystal and polycrystalline β-alumina using complex plane analysis. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 10, 1487 (1977).
A. Tan, C.K. Kuo, and P.S. Nicholson: Preparation and characterization of textured polycrystalline Na and K-β-aluminas. Solid State Ionics 42, 233 (1990).
A. Tan, C. Kun Kuo, and P.S. Nicholson: The influence of grain-boundaries on the conductivity and ion-exchange rate of β″-alumina polycrystalline isomorphs. Solid State Ionics 45, 137 (1991).
T. Ohta, M. Harata, and A. Imai: Preferred orientation on beta-alumina ceramics. Mater. Res. Bull. 11, 1343 (1976).
A.V. Virkar, G.R. Miller, and R.S. Gordon: Resistivity-microstructure relations in lithia-stabilized polycrystalline β″-alumina. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 61, 250 (1978).
E. Butchereit, J. Schoonman, H.W. Zandbergen, C. Lutz-Elsner, M. Schreiber, and P. Wang: Microstructure-conductivity relationships in solid anisotropic ionically conducting materials. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 369, 433 (1995).
A.P. De Kroon, F. Gstrein, G.W. Schafer, and F. Aldinger: Ionic conductivity of dense K-β-alumina ceramics: Microstructural dependence and the influence of phase transformations. Solid State Ionics 133, 107 (2000).
H. Asaoka, R. Ogawa, H. Hayashi, and A. Kishimoto: Influence of kinds of aluminum source on the preferential orientation and properties of Naβ-alumina ceramics. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 114, 719 (2006).
J.L. Shi, J.H. Gao, and Z.X. Lin: The relation between microstructure and ionic conductivity of hot-pressed β-Al2O3. J. Mater. Sci. 24, 1827 (1989).
K. Koganei, T. Oyama, M. Inada, N. Enomoto, and K. Hayashi: C-axis oriented β″-alumina ceramics with anisotropic ionic conductivity prepared by spark plasma sintering. Solid State Ionics 267, 22 (2014).
R. Subasri and H. Näfe: Texture in Na-β-Al2O3 due to microwave processing. Mater. Chem. Phys. 112, 16 (2008).
Y. Sakka, A. Honda, T.S. Suzuki, and Y. Moriyoshi: Fabrication of oriented ß-alumina from porous bodies by slip casting in a high magnetic field. Solid State Ionics 172, 341 (2004).
Y. Sakka, T.S. Suzuki, and T. Uchikoshi: Fabrication and some properties of textured alumina-related compounds by colloidal processing in high-magnetic field and sintering. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 28, 935 (2008).
V.V. Kharton, F.M.B. Marques, and A. Atkinson: Transport properties of solid oxide electrolyte ceramics: A brief review. Solid State Ionics 174, 135 (2004).
K.R. Kendall, C. Navas, J.K. Thomas, and H-C. Zur Loye: Recent developments in oxide ion conductors: Aurivillius phases. Chem. Mater. 8, 642 (1996).
N. Mahato, A. Banerjee, A. Gupta, S. Omar, and K. Balani: Progress in material selection for solid state oxide fuel cell technology: A review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 72, 141 (2015).
L. Malavasi, C.A.J. Fisher, and M.S. Islam: Oxide-ion and proton conducting electrolyte materials for clean energy applications: Structural and mechanistic features. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 4370 (2010).
K. Fukuda, T. Asaka, S. Hara, M. Oyabu, A. Berghout, E. Béchade, O. Masson, I. Julien, and P. Thomas: Crystal structure and oxide-ion conductivity along c-axis of Si-deficient apatite-type lanthanum silicate. Chem. Mater. 25, 2154 (2013).
K. Fukuda, M. Okabe, and T. Asaka: Microtexture of c -axis-oriented polycrystalline lanthanum silicate oxyapatite formed by reactive diffusion. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 99, 2816 (2016).
D.L. Medlin and G.J. Snyder: Interfaces in bulk thermoelectric materials: A review for current opinion in colloid and interface science. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 14, 226 (2009).
H. Ohta, W-S. Seo, and K. Koumoto: Thermoelectric properties of homologous compounds in the ZnO–In2O3 system. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79, 2193 (1996).
I. Terasaki, Y. Sasago, and K. Uchinokura: Large thermoelectric power in NaCo2O4 single crystals. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 56, R12685 (1997).
S. Li, R. Funahashi, I. Matsubara, K. Ueno, and H. Yamada: High temperature thermoelectric properties of oxide Ca9Co12O28. J. Mater. Chem. 9, 1659 (1999).
J. Hejtmánek, M. Veverka, K. Knížek, H. Fujishiro, S. Hebert, Y. Klein, A. Maignan, C. Bellouard, and B. Lenoir: Cobaltites as Perspective Thermoelectrics, edited by J. Yang (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 886, Warrendale, PA, 2006) 1274-F01-07.1.
H. Itahara, S. Tajima, and T. Tani: Synthesis of β-Co(OH)2 platelets by precipitation and hydrothermal methods. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 110, 1048 (2002).
K. Koumoto, R. Funahashi, E. Guilmeau, Y. Miyazaki, A. Weidenkaff, Y. Wang, and C. Wan: Thermoelectric ceramics for energy harvesting. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 96(1), 1 (2013).
Y. Zhou, I. Matsubara, S. Horii, T. Takeuchi, R. Funahashi, M. Shikano, J. Shimoyama, K. Kishio, W. Shin, N. Izu, and N. Murayama: Thermoelectric properties of highly grain-aligned and densified Co-based oxide ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 93, 2653 (2003).
R. Funahashi, S. Urata, T. Sano, and M. Kitawaki: Enhancement of thermoelectric figure of merit by incorporation of large single crystals in Ca3Co4O9 bulk materials. J. Mater. Res. 18, 1646 (2003).
M. Prevel, E.S. Reddy, O. Perez, W. Kobayashi, I. Terasaki, C. Goupil, and J.G. Noudem: Thermoelectric properties of sintered and textured Nd-Substituted Ca3Co4O9 ceramics. JJAP 46, 97 (2007).
M. Prevel, S. Lemonnier, Y. Klein, S. Hebert, D. Chateigner, B. Ouladdiaf, and J.G. Noudem: Textured Ca3Co4O9 thermoelectric oxides by thermoforging process. J. Appl. Phys. 98, 093706 (2005).
E. Guilmeau, R. Funahashi, M. Mikami, K. Chong, and D. Chateigner: Thermoelectric properties-texture relationship in highly oriented Ca3Co4O9 composited. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 1490 (2004).
Y.H. Liu, Y.H. Lin, Z. Shi, C.W. Nan, and Z.J. Shen: Preparation of Ca3Co4O9 and improvement of its thermoelectric properties by spark plasma sintering. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 88, 1337 (2005).
H.Q. Liu, Y. Song, S.N. Zhang, X.B. Zhao, and F.R. Wang: Thermoelectric properties of Ca3−xYxCo4O9+δ ceramics. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 70, 600 (2009).
J.G. Noudem, D. Kenfaui, D. Chateigner, and M. Gomina: Granular and lamellar thermoelectric oxides consolidated by spark plasma sintering. J. Electron. Mater. 40, 1100 (2011).
H. Itahara, J. Sugiyama, and T. Tani: Enhancement of electrical conductivity in thermoelectric [Ca2CoO3]0.62[CoO2] ceramics by texture improvement. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43, 5134 (2004).
S. Lee, R.H.T. Wilke, S. Trolier-McKinstry, S. Zhang, and C.A. Randall: SrxBa1−xNb2O6−δ ferroelectric-thermoelectrics: Crystal anisotropy, conduction mechanism, and power factor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 031910 (2010).
S. Lee, S. Dursun, C. Duran, and C.A. Randall: Thermoelectric power factor enhancement of textured ferroelectric SrxBa1−xNb2O6−δ. J. Mater. Res. 26(1), 26 (2011).
Y. Miwa, S. Kawada, M. Kimura, S. Omiya, N. Kubodera, A. Ando, T.S. Suzuki, T. Uchikoshi, and Y. Sakka: Processing and enhanced piezoelectric properties of highly oriented compositionally modified Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 ceramics fabricated by magnetic alignment. Appl. Phys. Express 8, 041501 (2015).
E.M. Sabolsky, S. Trolier-McKinstry, and G.L. Messing: Dielectric and piezoelectric properties of 〈001〉 fiber-textured 0.675 Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–0.325PbTiO3 ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 93, 4072 (2003).
T. Richter, S. Denneler, C. Schuh, E. Suvaci, and R. Moos: Textured PMN–PT and PMN–PZT. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91, 929 (2008).
Y. Yan, Y.U. Wang, and S. Priya: Electromechanical behavior of [001]-textured Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–PbTiO3 ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 192950 (2012).
K.H. Brosnan: Processing, properties, and application of textured 0.72Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–0.28PbTiO3 ceramics. Ph.D thesis, Pennsylvania State University, 2007.
H. Amorin, H. Ursic, P. Ramos, J. Holc, R. Moreno, D. Chateigner, J. Ricote, and M. Alguero: Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–PbTiO3 textured ceramics with high piezoelectric response by a novel templated grain growth approach. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 97, 420 (2014).
S.F. Poterala, S. Trolier-McKinstry, R.J. Meyer, Jr., and G.L. Messing: Processing, texture quality, and piezoelectric properties of 〈001〉C textured (1 −x)Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)TiO3–x PbTiO3 ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 110, 14105 (2011).
Y. Yan, L. Yang, Y. Zhou, K.H. Cho, J.S. Heo, and S. Priya: Enhanced temperature stability in 〈111〉 textured tetragonal Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–PbTiO3 piezoelectric ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 118, 104101 (2015).
Y. Yan, J.E. Zhou, D. Maurya, Y.U. Wang, and S. Priya: Giant piezoelectric voltage coefficient in grain-oriented modified PbTiO3 material. Nat. Commun. 7, 1 (2016).
Y. Chang, J. Wu, Y. Sun, S. Zhang, X. Wang, B. Yang, G.L. Messing, and W. Cao: Enhanced electromechanical properties and phase transition temperatures in [001] textured Pb(In1/2Nb1/2)O3–Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–PbTiO3 ternary ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 82902 (2015).
D. Wei, Q. Yuan, G. Zhang, and H. Wang: Templated grain growth and piezoelectric properties of 〈001〉-textured PIN–PMN–PT ceramics. J. Mater. Res. 30, 2144 (2015).
C. Duran, S. Dursun, and E. Akça: High strain, 〈001〉-textured Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–Pb(Yb1/2Nb1/2)O3–PbTiO3 piezoelectric ceramics. Scr. Mater. 113, 14 (2016).
Y. Yan, K. Cho, D. Maurya, A. Kumar, S. Kalinin, K. Armen, and S. Priya: Giant energy density in [001]-textured Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–PbZrO3–PbTiO3 piezoelectric ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 42903 (2013).
Y. Yan and S. Priya: Strong piezoelectric anisotropy d15/ d33 in 〈111〉 textured Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 82909 (2015).
S.J. Zhang, J. Luo, W. Hackenberger, N.P. Sherlock, R.J. Meyer, Jr., and T.R. Shrout: Electromechanical characterization of Pb(In1/2Nb1/2)O3–Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)–PbTiO3 crystals as a function of crystallographic orientation and temperature. J. Appl. Phys. 105, 104506 (2009).
Y. Saito, H. Takao, T. Tani, T. Nonoyama, K. Takatori, T. Homma, T. Nagaya, and M. Nakamura: Lead-free piezoceramics. Nature 432, 84 (2004).
Z.P. Yang, Y.F. Chang, and L.L. Wei: Phase transitional behavior and electrical properties of lead-free (K0.44Na0.52Li0.04)(Nb0.96−xTaxSb0.04)O3 piezoelectric ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 042911 (2007).
J.G. Wu and D.Q. Xiao: Compositional dependence of phase structure and electrical properties in (K0.42Na0.58)NbO3–LiSbO3 lead-free ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 102, 114113 (2007).
J. Fuentes, J. Portelles, M.D. Durruthy-Rodriguez, H. H’Mok, O. Raymond, J. Heiras, M.P. Cruz, and J.M. Siqueiros: Dielectric and piezoelectric properties of the KNN ceramic compound doped with Li, La and Sb. Appl. Phys. A 117, 709 (2015).
Y.B. Wei, Z. Wu, Y.M. Jia, J. Wu, Y.C. Shen, and H.S. Luo: Dual-enhancement of ferro-/piezoelectric and photoluminescent performance in Pr3+ doped (K0.5Na0.5)NbO3 lead-free ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 042902 (2014).
Y. Chang, S.F. Poterala, Z. Yang, S. Trolier-McKinstry, and G.L. Messing: 〈001〉 textured (K0.5Na0.5)(Nb0.97Sb0.03)O3 piezoelectric ceramics with high electromechanical coupling over a broad temperature range. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 232905 (2009).
Y. Chang, S. Poterala, Z. Yang, and G.L. Messing: Enhanced electromechanical properties and temperature stability of textured (K0.5Na0.5)NbO3-based piezoelectric ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94, 2494 (2011).
H. Takao, Y. Saito, Y. Aoki, and K. Horibuchi: Microstructural evolution of crystalline-oriented (K0.5Na0.5)NbO3 piezoelectric ceramics with a pintering aid of CuO. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89, 1951 (2006).
A. Hussain, J.S. Kim, T.K. Song, M.H. Kim, W.J. Kim, and S.S. Kim: Fabrication of textured KNNT ceramics by reactive template grain growth using NN templates. Curr. Appl. Phys. 13, 1055 (2013).
Y. Saito and H. Takao: Synthesis of polycrystalline platelike KNbO3 particles by the topochemical micro-crystal conversion method and fabrication of grain-oriented (K0.5Na0.5)NbO3 ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27, 4085 (2007).
A.B. Haugen, G. Henning, F. Madaro, M.I. Morozov, G. Tutuncu, J.L. Jones, T. Grande, and M. Einarsrud: Piezoelectric K0.5Na0.5NbO3 ceramics textured using needlelike K0.5Na0.5NbO3 templates. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 97, 3818 (2014).
Y. Li, C. Hui, M. Wu, Y. Li, and Y. Wang: Textured (K0.5Na0.5)NbO3 ceramics prepared by screen-printing multilayer grain growth technique. Ceram. Int. 38S, S283 (2012).
G. Tutuncu, Y. Chang, S. Poterala, J.L. Jones, and G.L. Messing: In situ observations of template grain growth in (Na0.5K0.5)0.98Li0.02NbO3 piezoceramics: Texture development and template-matrix interactions. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 95, 2653 (2012).
F. Gao, R.Z. Hong, J.J. Li, Y.H. Yao, and C.S. Tian: Effect of different templates on microstructure of textured Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3–BaTiO3 ceramics with RTGG method. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 28, 2063 (2008).
W. Bai, J. Hao, F. Fu, W. Li, B. Shen, and J. Zhai: Structure and strain behavior of 〈001〉 textured BNT-based ceramics by template grain growth. Mater. Lett. 97, 137 (2013).
M. Deng, X. Li, Z. Zhao, T. Li, Y. Dai, and H. Ji: Crystallographic textured evolution in 0.85Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3–0.04BaTiO3–0.11K0.5Bi0.5TiO3 ceramics prepared by reactive-templated grain growth method. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 25, 1873 (2014).
F. Gao, X. Liu, C. Zhang, L. Cheng, and C. Tian: Fabrication and electrical properties of textured (Na,K)0.5Bi0.5TiO3 ceramics by reactive-templated grain growth. Ceram. Int. 34, 403 (2008).
D. Hu, K. Mori, X. Kong, K. Shinagawa, S. Wada, and Q. Feng: Fabrication of [100]-oriented bismuth sodium titanate ceramics with small grain size and high density for piezoelectric materials. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 34, 1169 (2014).
H. Zou, Y. Sui, X. Zhu, B. Liu, J. Xue, and J. Zhang: Texture development and enhanced electromechanical properties in 〈001〉-textured BNT-based materials. Mater. Lett. 184, 139 (2016).
T. Shoji, Y. Yoshida, and T. Kimura: Mechanism of texture development in Bi0.5(Na,K)0.5TiO3 templated by platelike Al2O3 particles. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91, 3883 (2008).
T. Shoji, K. Fuse, and T. Kimura: Mechanism of texture development in Bi0.5(Na,K)0.5TiO3 prepared by the templated grain growth process. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 92, S140 (2009).
X. Jing, Y. Li, Q. Yang, J. Zeng, and Q. Yin: Influence of different templates on the textured Bi0.5(Na1−xKx)0.5TiO3 piezoelectric ceramics by the reactive templated grain growth process. Ceram. Int. 30, 1889 (2004).
D. Maurya, Y. Zhou, Y. Yan, and S. Priya: Synthesis mechanism of grain-oriented lead-free piezoelectric Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3–BaTiO3 ceramics with giant piezoelectric response. J. Mater. Chem. C 1, 2102 (2013).
D. Maurya, Y. Zhou, Y. Wang, Y.K. Yan, J.F. Li, D. Viehland, and S. Priya: Giant strain with ultra-low hysteresis and high temperature stability in grain oriented lead-free K0.5Bi0.5TiO3–BaTiO3–Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 piezoelectric materials. Sci. Rep. 5, 8595 (2014).
H. Zhang, P. Xu, E. Patterson, J. Zang, S. Jiang, and J. Rödel: Preparation and enhanced electrical properties of grain-oriented (Bi1/2Na1/2)TiO3-based lead-free incipient piezoceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 35, 2501 (2015).
S. Ma, Y. Zhang, Z. Liu, X. Dai, and J. Huang: Preparation and enhanced electric-field-induced strain of textured 91BNT–6BT–3KNN lead-free piezoceramics by TGG method. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 27, 3076 (2016).
D. Vriami, D. Damjanovic, J. Vleugels, and O. Van Der Biest: Textured BaTiO3 by templated grain growth and electrophoretic deposition. J. Mater. Sci. 50, 7896 (2015).
F. Fu, B. Shen, Z. Xu, and J. Zhai: Electric properties of BaTiO3 lead-free textured piezoelectric thick film by screen printing method. J. Electroceram. 33, 208 (2014).
S. Wada, K. Takeda, T. Muraishi, H. Kakemoto, T. Tsurumi, and T. Kimura: Preparation of [110] grain oriented barium titanate ceramics by templated grain growth method and their piezoelectric properties. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46, 739 (2007).
A.N. Kamlo, P.M. Geffroy, M. Pham-Thi, and P. Marchet: +111−-Textured BaTiO3 ceramics elaborated by templated grain growth using NaNbO3 templates. Mater. Lett. 113, 149 (2013).
W. Liu and X. Ren: Large piezoelectric effect in Pb-free ceramics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 257602 (2009).
T. Sato and T. Kimura: Preparation of 〈111〉 textured BaTiO3 ceramics by templated grain growth method using novel template particles. Ceram. Int. 34, 757 (2008).
S.K. Ye, J.Y.H. Fuh, and L. Lu: Structure and electrical properties of 〈001〉 textured (Ba0.85Ca0.15)(Ti0.9Zr0.1)O3 lead-free piezoelectric ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 252906 (2012).
E.M. Sabolsky, L. Maldonado, M.M. Seabaugh, and S.L. Swartz: Textured-Ba(Zr,Ti)O3 piezoelectric ceramics fabricated by templated grain growth (TGG). J. Electroceram. 25, 77 (2010).
W. Bai, D. Chen, P. Li, B. Shen, J. Zhai, and Z. Ji: Enhanced electromechanical properties in 〈001〉-textured (Ba0.85Ca0.15) (Zr0.1Ti0.9)O3 lead-free piezoceramics. Ceram. Int. 42, 3429 (2016).
S. Zhukov, Y.A. Genenko, J. Koruza, J. Schultheiß, H.v. Seggern, W. Sakamoto, H. Ichikawa, T. Murata, K. Hayashi, and T. Yogo: Effect of texturing on polarization switching dynamics in ferroelectric ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 012907 (2016).
J. Schultheiß, O. Clemens, S. Zhukov, H.v. Seggern, W. Sakamoto, and J. Koruza: Effect of degree of crystallographic texture on ferro- and piezoelectric properties of Ba0.85Ca0.15TiO3 piezoceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. (2017). doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.14749.
S. Ye, J. Fuh, L. Lu, Y-I. Chang, and J-R. Yang: Structure and properties of hot-pressed lead-free (Ba0.85Ca0.15)(Zr0.1Ti0.9)O3 piezoelectric ceramics. RSC Adv. 3, 20693 (2013).
S. Endo, H. Nagata, and T. Takenaka: Fabrication and high power piezoelectric characteristics of textured (Sr0.7Ca0.3)2Bi4Ti5O18. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 53, 3 (2014).
H. Zhang, H. Yan, X. Zhang, M.J. Reece, J. Liu, Z. Shen, Y. Kan, and P. Wang: The effect of texture on the properties of Bi3.15Nd0.85Ti3O12 ceramics prepared by spark plasma sintering. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 475, 92 (2008).
T. Kimura, Y. Sakuma, and M. Murata: Texture development in piezoelectric ceramics by templated grain growth using heterotemplates. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 25, 2227 (2005).
M. Kimura, H. Ogawa, T. Sawada, K. Shiratsuyu, N. Wada, and A. Ando: Piezoelectric properties in textured ceramics of bismuth layer-structured ferroelectrics. J. Electroceram. 21, 55 (2008).
H. Chen, B. Shen, J. Xu, and J. Zhai: Textured Ca0.85(Li,Ce)0.15Bi4Ti4O15 ceramics for high temperature piezoelectric applications. Mater. Res. Bull. 47, 2530 (2012).
H. Chen and J. Zhai: Enhanced piezoelectric properties of CaBi2Nb2O9 with Eu modification and templated grain growth. Key Eng. Mater. 515, 1367 (2012).
H. Hao, H. Liu, and S. Ouyang: Processing and property of textured lead-free SrTi4Bi4O15 piezoelectric ceramics. J. Electroceram. 21, 255 (2008).
T. Li, X. Li, Z. Zhao, H. Ji, and Y. Dai: Structures and electrical properties of textured Ca0.85(LiCe)0.075Bi4Ti4O15 ceramics prepared by the reactive templated grain growth. Integr. Ferroelectr. 162, 1 (2015).
J. Liu, Z. Shen, M. Nygren, Y. Kan, and P. Wang: SPS processing of bismuth-layer structured ferroelectric ceramics yielding highly textured microstructures. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 26, 3233 (2006).
Q.X. Bao, L.H. Zhu, Q.W. Huang, and J. Xv: Preparation of textured Ba2NaNb5O15 ceramics by templated grain growth. Ceram. Int. 32(7), 745 (2006).
S. Dursun, E. Mensur-Alkoy, and S. Alkoy: Fabrication of textured lead-free strontium barium niobate (SBN61) bulk ceramics and their electrical properties. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 36, 2479 (2016).
Y. Chang, S. Lee, S. Poterala, C.A. Randall, and G.L. Messing: A critical evaluation of reactive templated grain growth (RTGG) mechanisms in highly [001] textured Sr0.61Ba0.39Nb2O6 ferroelectric-thermoelectrics. J. Mater. Res. 26(24), 3044 (2011).
L. Wei, X. Chao, X. Han, and Z. Yang: Structure and electrical properties of textured Sr1.85Ca0.15NaNb5O15 ceramics prepared by reactive templated grain growth. Mater. Res. Bull. 52, 65 (2014).
L. Liu and Z. Hou: Fabrication of grain-oriented KSr2Nb5O15 ceramics by a brush technique. Mater. Lett. 186, 105 (2017).
S. Alkoy and S. Dursun: Processing and properties of textured potassium strontium niobate (KSr2Nb5O15) ceramic fibers—Texture development. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 95(3), 937 (2012).
S. Alkoy and S. Dursun: Processing and properties of textured potassium strontium niobate (KSr2Nb5O15) ceramic fibers-effect of texture on the electrical properties. IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelectr., Freq. Control 60, 2044 (2013).
S. Tanaka, T. Takahashi, and R. Furushima: Fabrication of c-axis-oriented potassium strontium niobate (KSr2Nb5O15) ceramics by a rotating magnetic field and electrical property. J. Ceram. Soc. Japan 118, 722 (2010).
R. Apetz and M.P.B. van Bruggen: Transparent alumina: A light-scattering model. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 86, 480 (2003).
P. Liu, H. Yi, G. Zhou, J. Zhang, and S. Wang: HIP and pressureless sintering of transparent alumina shaped by magnetic field assisted slip casting. Opt. Mater. Exp. 5, 441 (2015).
A. Pringuet, T. Takahashi, S. Baba, Y. Kamo, Z. Kato, K. Uematsu, and S. Tanaka: Fabrication of transparent grain-oriented polycrystalline alumina by colloidal processing. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 99, 3217 (2016).
S. Tanaka, T. Takahashi, and K. Uematsu: Fabrication of transparent crystal-oriented polycrystalline strontium barium niobate ceramics for electro-optical application. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 34, 3723 (2014).
J. Akiyama, Y. Sato, and T. Taira: Laser demonstration of diode-pumped Nd3+-doped fluorapatite anisotropic ceramics. Appl. Phys. Exp. 4, 002703 (2011).
Y. Sato, J. Akiyama, and T. Taira: Micro-domain controlled anisotropic laser ceramics assisted by rare-earth trivalent, in Pacific Rim Laser Damage 2011: Optical Materials for High Power Lasers, edited by J. Shao, K. Sugioka, and C.J. Stolz (Proc. of SPIE 8206, Bellingham, WA, 2012) p. 82061T-1.
Y. Sato, M. Arzakantsyan, J. Akiyama, and T. Taira: Anisotropic Yb:FAP laser ceramics by micro-domain control. Opt. Mater. Exp. 4, 214969 (2006).
I. Shoji, Y. Sato, S. Kurimura, V. Lupei, T. Taira, A. Ikesue, and K. Yoshida: Thermal-birefringence-induced depolarization in Nd:YAG ceramics. Opt. Lett. 27, 234 (2002).
I. Shoji and T. Taira: Intrinsic reduction of the depolarization loss in solid-state lasers by use of a (110)-cut Y3Al5O12 crystal. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 3048 (2002).
S. Arakawa, H. Kadoura, T. Uyama, K. Takatori, Y. Takeda, and T. Tani: Formation of preferentially oriented Y3Al5O12 film on a reactive sapphire substrate: Phase and texture transitions from Y2O3. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 36, 663 (2016).
K. Watari: High thermal conductivity non-oxide ceramics. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 109, S7 (2001).
N. Hirosaki, S. Ogata, C. Kocer, H. Kitagawa, and Y. Nakamura: Molecular dynamics calculation of the ideal thermal conductivity of single-crystal. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 65, 134110 (2002).
T.S. Suzuki and Y. Sakka: Preparation of oriented bulk 5 wt% Y2O3–AlN ceramics by slip casting in a high magnetic field and sintering. Scr. Mater. 52, 583 (2005).
T.S. Suzuki, T. Uchikoshi, and Y. Sakka: Effect of sintering additive on crystallographic orientation in AlN prepared by slip casting in a strong magnetic field. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 29, 2627 (2009).
B. Li, L. Pottier, J.P. Roger, D. Fournier, K. Watari, and K. Hirao: Measuring the anisotropic thermal diffusivity of silicon nitride grains by thermoreflectance microscopy. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 19, 1631 (1999).
X. Zhu, T.S. Suzuki, T. Uchikoshi, and Y. Sakka: Texturing behavior in sintered reaction-bonded silicon nitride via strong magnetic field alignment. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 28, 929 (2008).
X.W. Zhu, Y. Sakka, Y. Zhou, K. Hirao, and K. Itatani: A strategy for fabricating textured silicon nitride with enhanced thermal conductivity. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 34, 2585 (2014).
K. Hirao, K. Watari, M.E. Brito, M. Toriyama, and S. Kanzaki: High thermal conductivity in silicon nitride with anisotropic microstructure. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79, 2485 (1996).
Y. Akimune, F. Munakata, K. Matsuo, N. Hirosaki, Y. Okamoto, and K. Misono: Raman spectroscopy analysis of structural defects in hot isostatically pressed silicon nitride. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 107, 339 (1999).
McColm: Ceramic Hardness, 1st ed. (Plenum Press, New York, 1990).
T. Carisey, I. Levin, and D.G. Brandon: Microstructure and mechanical properties of textured Al2O3. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 15, 283 (1995).
S. Lee, Y. Lee, Y. Kim, R. Xie, M. Mitomo, and G. Zhan: Mechanical properties of hot-forged silicon carbide ceramics. Scr. Mater. 52, 153 (2005).
V.R. Vedula, S.J. Glass, D.M. Saylor, G.S. Rohrer, W.C. Carter, S.A. Langer, and E.R. Fuller, Jr.: Residual stress predictions in polycrystalline alumina. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 84, 2947 (2001).
J.A. Salem, J.L. Shannon, and R.C. Bradt: The effect of texture on the crack growth resistance of alumina. Presented at the 89th Annual Meeting of the American Ceramic Society (1987). Available at: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19880004824.pdf (accessed 20 December 2016).
L. Zhang, J. Vleugels, L. Darchuk, and O. Van der Biest: Magnetic field oriented tetragonal zirconia with anisotropic toughness. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 31, 1405 (2011).
R. Pavlacka, R. Bermejo, Y. Chang, D.J. Green, and G.L. Messing: Fracture behavior of layered alumina microstructural composites with highly textured layers. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 96, 1577 (2013).
Y. Chang, R. Bermejo, and G.L. Messing: Improved fracture behavior of alumina microstructural composites with highly textured compressive layers. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 97, 3643 (2014).
M-Y. He and J.W. Hutchinson: Crack deflection at an interface between dissimilar elastic materials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 25, 1053 (1989).
M. Nakamura, K. Hirao, Y. Yamauchi, and S. Kanzaki: Tribological properties of unidirectionally aligned silicon nitride. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 84, 2579 (2001).
W. Wu, Y. Sakka, and T.S. Suzuki: Microstructure and anisotropic properties of textured ZrB2 and ZrB2–MoSi2 ceramics prepared by strong magnetic field alignment. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 11, 218 (2014).
X. Zhu and Y. Sakka: Textured silicon nitride: Processing and anisotropic properties. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 9, 1 (2008).
R. Pavlacka and G. Messing: Processing and mechanical response of highly textured Al2O3. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 30, 2917 (2010).
Z.M. Sun: Progress in research and development on MAX phases: A family of layered ternary compounds. Int. Mater. Rev. 56, 143 (2011).
M. Shamma, E.N. Caspi, B. Anasori, B. Clausen, D.W. Brown, S.C. Vogel, V. Presser, S. Amini, O. Yeheskel, and M.W. Barsoum: In situ neutron diffraction evidence for fully reversible dislocation motion in highly textured polycrystalline Ti2AlC samples. Acta Mater. 98, 51 (2015).
C. Hu, Y. Sakka, H. Tanaka, T. Nishimura, and S. Grasso: Fabrication of textured Nb4AlC3 ceramic by slip casting in a strong magnetic field and spark plasma sintering. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94, 410 (2011).
C. Hu, Y. Sakka, T. Nishimura, S. Guo, S. Grasso, and H. Tanaka: Physical and mechanical properties of highly textured polycrystalline Nb4AlC3 ceramic. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 12, 044603 (2011).
C. Hu, Y. Sakka, S. Grasso, T. Nishimura, S. Guo, and H. Tanaka: Shell-like nanolayered Nb4AlC3 ceramic with high strength and toughness. Scr. Mater. 64, 765 (2011).
C. Hu, Y. Sakka, S. Grasso, T. Suzuki, and H. Tanaka: Tailoring Ti3SiC2 ceramic via a strong magnetic field alignment method followed by spark plasma sintering. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94, 742 (2011).
K. Sato, M. Mishra, H. Hirano, T.S. Suzuki, and Y. Sakka: Fabrication of textured Ti3SiC2 ceramic by slip casting in a strong magnetic field and pressureless sintering. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 122, 817 (2014).
H.B. Zhang, C.F. Hu, K. Sato, S. Grasso, M. Estili, S.Q. Guo, K. Morita, H. Yoshida, T. Nishimura, T.S. Suzuki, M.W. Barsoum, B.N. Kim, and Y. Sakka: Tailoring Ti3AlC2 ceramic with high anisotropic physical and mechanical properties. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 393, 35 (2015).
M. Mishra, Y. Sakka, C. Hu, T.S. Suzuki, T. Uchikoshi, and L. Besra: Textured Ti3SiC2 by EPD in a strong magnetic field. Key Eng. Mater. 507, 15 (2012).
Y. Mizuno, K. Sato, M. Mrinalini, T.S. Suzuki, and Y. Sakka: Fabrication of textured Ti3AlC2 by spark plasma sintering and their anisotropic mechanical properties. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 121, 366 (2013).
T. Lapauw, K. Vanmeensel, K. Lambrinou, and J. Vleugels: A new method to texture dense Mn+1AXn ceramics by spark plasma deformation. Scr. Mater. 111, 98 (2016).
V.I. Aleshin, I.P. Raevskii, and E.I. Sitalo: Electromechanical properties of a textured ceramic material in the (1 −x)PMN–x PT system: Simulation based on the effective-medium method. Phys. Solid State 50, 2150 (2008).
M. Pham-Thi, H. Hemery, and H. Dammak: X-ray investigation of highly oriented (1 −x)PbMg1/3Nb2/3O3–(x)PbTiO3 ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 25, 2433 (2005).
S.F. Poterala, R.J. Meyer, and G.L. Messing: Low-field dynamic magnetic alignment and templated grain growth of diamagnetic PMN–PT ceramics. J. Mater. Res. 28, 2961 (2013).
J.L. Jones, E.B. Slamovich, and K.J. Bowman: Critical evaluation of the Lotgering degree of orientation texture indicator. J. Mater. Res. 19, 3414 (2004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This author was Editor in Chief during the review and decision stage. For the JMR policy on review and publication of manuscripts authored by editors, please refer to http://www.mrs.org/editor-manuscripts/.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Messing, G.L., Poterala, S., Chang, Y. et al. Texture-engineered ceramics—Property enhancements through crystallographic tailoring. Journal of Materials Research 32, 3219–3241 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2017.207
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2017.207