Abstract
The response of climate change to the existing biotic stresses in legumes especially fungal diseases is a key global concern. The legumes are attacked by several yield-limiting fungal diseases, and dry root rot (DRR) or charcoal rot (CR) caused by Macrophomina phaseolina is an important disease in legumes. There have been noteworthy scientific reports on the issue of how climate change is expected to be accountable for the survival and spread of M. phaseolina in legumes and other crops. In particular, microsclerotia, which are the source of primary inoculum, play an important role in the life cycle of M. phaseolina, help in survival and spread as well as disease initiation and development. Adaptation strategies through crop management (rotating field and cropping practices, use of chemicals and bio-fungicides) and development of resistant varieties through breeding could be developed, evaluated and pooled to partially cope with the impact of M. phaseolina in legumes. The adaptation strategies can support to alleviate some of the climate change impacts in disease spread in legumes; however, eventually, there is a boundary as to how far leguminous crops can adapt to the changing climate and can combat with the DRR/CR, which is essential for durable food security. Understanding the current status of spread of M. phaseolina in legumes due to climate change and limitations of the existing mitigation strategies is important, and there are many breaks for the future study. This review discusses the current status of significance of M. phaseolina in legumes, impact of climatic factors on its life cycle, survival and spread in different leguminous crops, adaptation strategies and impact of climate change on it as well as highlights important knowledge gaps for potential future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Current studies have proved that agriculture is vulnerable to climate change. Higher temperatures due to global warming tend to reduce the yield of crops and favor the pest and disease emergence and proliferation (Ghini et al. 2012). Climate changes are likely to affect survival rates and spread of the pathogens in diverse patho-systems, modify host susceptibility, resulting in changes in the impact of diseases on crops (Sharma et al. 2019). Earlier reports showed that increase in temperature, CO2 concentration and drought due to climate change resulted in increased incidence/severity of crown & root rot and spot blotch diseases of wheat in Australia and South Asia (Sharma et al. 2007; Melloy et al. 2010).
The legumes, which are known for their best food supplements for the vegetarian populace, due to their high content of quality dietary protein (~ 25–28%), and other essential nutrients, minerals and micronutrients (Veni et al. 2016) specially in the developing countries, are challenged by several biotic and abiotic stresses especially in the present era of climate change. Among the biotic stresses, fungal disease, dry root rot (DRR)/charcoal rot (CR) caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid is one of the important diseases of food legumes worldwide (Indira and Gayatri 2003; Zhang et al. 2011). The pathogen has a widespread host range, causing economically important diseases in cereals and pulses. The pathogen infects approximately all food legumes, and inflicts severe yield losses predominately in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), soybean (Glycine max L.), mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek), pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L. (Mill sp.) and urdbean (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) (Iqbal and Mukhtar 2014).
The pathogen is favored by warm climate and low water stress. Earlier, it was restricted to few crops; however, due to climate change, i.e., water scarcity during cropping period due to reduced rainfall and global rise in temperature, several minor pathogens may attain the status of major pathogens, and DRR/CR is no exception. It has become a serious emerging problem in legumes throughout the world including India, Myanmar, Pakistan (Khan and Shuaib 2007; Lodha and Mawar 2020), Sub-Saharan Africa (Songa and Hillocks 1996) and USA (Wrather and Koenning 2006). The work done on various aspects of DRR/CR, including its management on legumes and other crops, has been already reviewed extensively (Gupta et al. 2012a; Lodha and Mawar 2020). This review discusses the available literature on MP with reference to its significance in legumes, infection cycle and impact of higher temperature and water stress on it, and spread of MP in legumes and its adaptation to other crops, disease management and knowledge gaps.
The economic impact of MP in legumes
Macrophomina phaseolina is both seed and soil-borne pathogen, infects seeds of several pulses and causes significant reduction of seed germination and viability (Bhattacharya et al. 1994; Sarita et al. 2014). The pathogen also causes seed infection during storage and deteriorating the seeds which results in substantial losses. The pathogen was responsible for seed deterioration in some stored legumes such as mungbean, urdbean, chickpea, soybean, pigeon pea and caused ~ 40% seed loss in South Asian countries (Rahman et al. 1999; Kumar and Singh 2000; Singh and Kumar 2002; Ali et al. 2010; Patil et al. 2012; Haider and Ahmed 2014; Ashwini and Giri 2014). The pathogen has reduced the seed germination and protein content (12.3%) of mungbean seeds (Kaushik et al. 1987; Patil et al. 1990). Relative humidity coupled with atmospheric temperature has a major role in the seed deterioration of legumes by MP, and increase in both the factors resulted in more infection, as infection percentage of seeds varied across the countries (Mbofung et al. 2013).
The pathogen also caused both pre-emergence and postemergence mortality in legumes. Foliar infection results in reduction in pod size, poor seed set which ultimately leads to the reduction in yield. Yield losses up to 30% in India (Kaushik et al. 1987; Raghuchander et al. 1993) and 44% in Pakistan (Bashir and Malik 1988) have been reported due to DRR in the mungbean. In urdbean and chickpea, it caused ~ 40% disease incidence in India (Indira and Gayatri 2003; Lakhran et al. 2018). During 1994, the estimated yield loss due to CR in soybean was 1.2 million metric tons in the top 10 soybean-producing countries (Wrather et al. 2001). Afterward, during 2003, a severe epidemic of soybean’s CR was reported in Iowa, USA (Wrather and Koenning 2006).
In addition, the average annual yield loss of grain soybean was 30–50% from Missouri (USA) (Wyllie 1988), and up to 80% from India (Gupta and Chauhan 2005). Under the hot and dry climatic conditions, many agricultural crops are predisposed to the infection and colonization by MP, resulting in drastic yield losses in chickpea (Lakhran et al. 2018), soybean (ElAraby et al. 2007) and sunflower (Khan 2007). The pathogen infected the common bean, pigeon pea, soybean and cowpea in Kenya (Songa and Hillocks 1996), but percent disease incidence or economic yield loss has not been estimated. However, CR caused 10% yield loss of cowpea production in Niger and Senegal, West Africa, which estimated value was about $US 146 million (Ndiaye et al. 2010). Besides, MP has also reduced the production of mungbean sprouts in the European countries (Fuhlbohm et al. 2013).
Disease cycle
Macrophomina phaseolina is a pathogen of warm climate, attacks hosts predominantly under low rains and with increased temperature up to 35–40 °C (Sarr et al. 2014). Pathogen completes disease cycle through four phases, i.e., germination, penetration, parasitic and saprophytic phase (Dhingra and Sinclair 1978, Fig. 1). The pathogen survives for maximum up to 3 years in the soil and in crop's debris in the form of microsclerotia (Su et al. 2001), which act as the source of primary inoculum during favorable conditions (Tonin et al. 2013). Microsclerotia (aggregation of hyphal cells) are spherical to oblong, black to chocolate brown, which germinate to produce hyphae during favorable conditions (28–35 °C).
When host is under water stress, these microsclerotia germinate on the root surface, produce appressoria and penetrate epidermal cell walls of the host through natural opening (Olaya and Abawi 1996). However, sometime during seed emergence, MP also infects through cotyledons, small rootlets or via root surface injuries. The hyphae infect the host-plant’s roots which enter the cortical tissue and grow intercellularly. Once the hyphae spread inside the root system, they infect vascular tissue, and produce mycelia and sclerotia (pathogenic phase of the fungus—Fig. 1) inside the vascular tissue, and plug the xylem vessels (Babu et al. 2007). This prevents water and nutrients from being transported from root to the upper part of the plants, resulting in wilting of the host, or dies permanently due to systemic infection.
During the infection process, several mechanical pressures and enzymatic reactions occur which leads to the production of toxins, viz., botryodiplodin/phaseolinone, which further leads to disease development (Bhatt and Vadhera 1997; Abbas et al. 2019). With the progression of disease, infected plants dry up, and root decay with shredded appearance. Charcoal-brown lesions on the roots and stems with production of dark mycelia, and black microsclerotia are reported as the prominent disease symptoms. Mycelial colonization followed by microsclerotia formation occurs in the host tissue, once the host’s tissue starts to decompose. These microsclerotia are released into the soil after decay of plant debris, and the infection cycle continues (Fig. 1). In the field, microsclerotia enable the MP to survive in the adverse climatic conditions. Therefore, microsclerotia play an important role in the life cycle and epidemiology of MP, and in disease initiation and development. Soil moisture, temperature and relative humidity are the main environmental factors that influence the survival and spread of this pathogen.
Role of the temperature in disease infection/development caused by MP
Current estimates of climate change indicate future rise in the global temperatures of 1 °C by 2025 and 3 °C by 2050 (Philipp and Edwards 2020), which will increase the survival and spread of thermophilic/drought pathogens. Drought and pathogenic fungi are important stress factors affecting the plant health. Drought is either no rain during the cropping period (Wilhite and Glantz 1985) or natural disaster of below-average rainfall in cropped areas, resulting in less atmospheric, surface water or groundwater supply for the longer period (Getis and Fellmann 2000). In developing countries, a prediction of future climate change led to drought to become more frequent and has become an important factor affecting crops (Valdes-Pineda et al. 2014).
Macrophomina phaseolina is a high-temperature loving pathogen, and its microsclerotia survive for a longer period under the higher temperatures and water stress conditions (Chamorro et al. 2015). In the infection cycle of MP, germination, penetration and parasitic phases are affected by the temperature. In the tropical humid climates, DRR/CR is becoming more intense with increase in temperature and moisture stress (Lodha and Mawar 2020). It has been reported that an increase in temperature (35–40 °C) triggers the pathogenic nature of microsclerotia and makes hosts vulnerable for infection (Olaya and Abawi 1996). This is due to, at the higher temperatures coupled with drought conditions, MP produces large number of microsclerotia (Akhtar et al. 2011), and also, increase in temperature causes increase in hydrolytic enzymes inside the microsclerotia which makes sclerotia more conducive for the infection (Kaur et al. 2012b). This evidence was supported by the findings of Kaur et al. (2012a), who reported the higher incidence of CR in pigeon pea was due to such atmospheric conditions.
In soybean-growing areas in the Central India, epiphytotics of CR occurred at temperature of 35–40 °C (Agarwal and Goswami 1974), and infection rate of ashy stem blight/DRR caused by MP in cowpea (Ratnoo et al. 1997) and other legumes (Lalita and Ahir 2020) was also highly favored by the higher temperatures (28–40 °C). In addition, recent reports revealed that the incidence of DRR and CR respective in chickpea and soybean in the tropical regions has extended many folds in last 2–3 years due to the prevalence of higher temperatures (35–40 °C) (Keote and Reddy 2019; Ishikawa et al. 2019). Hence, due to increase in temperature, shift in the geographical distribution, virulence pattern and emergence of MP in the new areas may be predicted in near future (Arias et al. 2011). Consequently, the adaptation of MP at larger numbers of crops may also increase in the future. Thus, alteration in temperature may affect susceptibility of the host-virulence mechanism of the pathogen (Ghini et al. 2012).
Role of other climatic factors in disease infection/development caused by MP
Soil moisture: If global temperature continues to rise, it will affect the rainfall resulting in intense water shortage. The WHO has estimated that half of the world’s population will be living in water-stressed areas by 2025. Due to reduced rainfall, under water stress (10–40% soil moisture), MP becomes more virulent for the infection of legumes, as has been studied in sunflower (Tossi and Zazzerini 1990) and in sorghum (Arora and Pareek 2013). Low soil moisture promotes the survival of microsclerotia for the longer period of time, resulting in increased saprophytic activity (Dhingra and Sinclair 1978; Maheswari and Ramakrishnan 1999); on the contrary, high soil moisture (< 80%) deters the microsclerotia survival (Arora and Pareek 2013). The highest survival of the microsclerotial population was recorded at 0–5 cm soil depth (Lodha 1993), and 25% soil moisture led to maximum infection in chickpea, and in soybean due to MP (Ratnoo et al. 1997; Wokocha 2000; Patel and Anahosur 2001).
Edaphic factors: Edaphic factors have also been reported to influence the life cycle of MP which alter the disease incidence. Sandy soil supported more infection by MP to legumes than the clay soil, as 78.33 and 51.56% wilting of chickpea have been reported in sandy and clay soils, respectively (Raj Krishan et al. 1999). The variable wilting percentage may be due to the physical and chemical properties of the soil, which alter the host–pathogen interaction, and such edaphic may be responsible for the occurrence of DRR/CR (Bashir 2017).
Relative humidity: Little work has been done on the effect of relative humidity on infection cycle of MP in legumes, in terms of disease initiation and development. A laboratory investigation revealed that MP grew efficiently at RH of 80–100%, and it declined at the lower humidity level (Ali et al. 1998). However, the role of RH in disease infection and development is still unclear.
Carbon dioxide: In addition to the temperature and water stress, CO2 is also an important factor affecting the growth and multiplication of the pathogens. Presently, CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is 410 ppm and it is the highest since the start of agriculture, and is increasing by 2.3 ppm annually (Dong et al. 2020). The increase in CO2 level will encourage the production of plant bio-mass and promote the growth of pathogenic microbes (Chakraborty et al. 2000). Under controlled conditions, increase in CO2 resulted in increased germination and production of microsclerotia of MP (Wyllie et al. 1984); however, elevated CO2 had no significant role on DRR incidence in chickpea as has been reported by Sharma (2012). In Brazil, rice blast and downy mildew of soybean increased with increased CO2 concentration (Goria 2009; Lessin and Ghini 2009), while severity of soybean rust reduced with increasing CO2 concentration (Lessin and Ghini 2011). Therefore, due to greenhouse gases, CO2 is rising day by day, and rising CO2 levels can affect DRR/CR spread and incidence in legumes at global level needs to be confirmed by conducting more experiments in the control conditions.
The spread of DRR/CR in legumes and climate change
The spread of pathogens is the result of dynamic processes involving host availability, susceptibility of host, pathogenic virulence and congenial climatic conditions over a long period of time. Influence in the climatic factors alters the diversity and distribution of the pathogens as well as disease spread in diverse eco-climatic regions. Climate has a major role in spread and infection of MP, which is a temperature loving pathogen and shows significant correlation with the soil moisture, relative humidity and temperature (Dhingra and Sinclair 1978).
Macrophomina phaseolina is a polyphagous pathogen, and has a wide range of geographical distribution. In legumes, earlier DRR/CR was major disease of soybean in India (Gupta et al. 2012a), but due to increase in temperature it has become an emerging disease of chickpea, mungbean and urdbean in the tropical regions (Khan and Souaib 2007; Su et al. 2001; Lalita and Ahir 2020). DRR/CR is also spreading in legumes in the South Asia, and Southeast Asia (Su et al. 2001; Gupta and Chauhan 2005), USA (Wrather and Koenning 2006) and presently posing a major threat in the African (Ndiaye et al. 2010) and European countries (Fuhlbohm et al. 2013). In soybean, the disease has spread in several states of the USA (ElAraby et al. 2007) and in the African countries (Songa and Hillocks 1996). In India, DRR/CR in legumes is distributed in the tropical regions, i.e., central and southern part of the country, but due to the future prediction of rise in temperature, it may spread in the northern parts of the country including temperate regions.
Worldwide, MP infects more than 500 crop species (Su et al. 2001; Iqbal and Mukhtar 2014). In addition to the food legumes, other dry season crops infected by MP are alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), moth bean (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.), peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), corn (Zea mays L.), pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) and cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) in areas where maximum temperature goes up to 35–40 °C (Diourte et al. 1995; Lodha et al. 2002). The pathogen also infects the cool season crops such as potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), cabbage (Brassica oleracea L., Beta vulgaris L.), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) where maximum temperature goes up to 25 °C (Suriachandraselvan et al. 2005).
Indeed, drought and rain periods during the crop cycles are deeply changing across the traditional agricultural areas worldwide, as reported by "The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change" (IPCC) reports in the last 15 years (IPPC 2007). One of the examples of that is the increase in rain periods during summer in some of the EU Mediterranean growing areas which were characterized by hot and dry summer up to 10 years ago. That has deeply changed the interaction between crops and climate in the different continents and Macrophomina specialization toward the crops in the last 15 years reflects this climate trend (Manici et al. 2014).
In contrast to the other soil-borne fungal pathogens that survive and proliferate in moisture conditions, MP survives in regions where change in climate results in higher temperatures and longer moisture stress (Saleh et al. 2010; Arora and Pareek 2013). Mediterranean countries are known for longer, dry, hot summers with no rain and relatively shorter, frosty rainy winters (Goldreich 2003). These types of climatic conditions favor the growth and multiplication of MP, and as a result, several crops such as strawberry, melon and cotton are attacked by the pathogen, causing substantial economic losses (Zveibil and Freeman 2005).
In the past, the yield production of crops had been considerably negligible due to MP attack in those provinces, where earlier it was isolated only occasionally (Yang and Navi 2005; Zhang et al. 2011). Besides, MP, in the 1980s and 1990s that impacted on several arable crops apart from legumes, includes sunflower, sorghum, cotton and soybean (Dhingra and Sinclair 1978; Wrather 1995) that has been reported to accountable for adaptation and losses in the last decade in several other horticultural crops, viz., vine, melon and strawberry (Aviles et al. 2008). In recent years, the adaptation of MP to horticultural crops such as strawberry (Koike 2008; Sanchez et al. 2016; Baggio et al. 2019) and melon (Cohen et al. 2016) which is threatening the horticultural production in California, Florida and in many other specialized horticultural cropping areas such as Chile (Sanchez et al. 2013) or Israeli (Chamorro et al. 2015) or Australia (Gomez et al. 2020) has been reported.
In Israel, MP has developed into the main threat to strawberry cultivation, and has become a key pathogen of importance in the other strawberry growing countries in the Mediterranean region (Freeman and Gnayem 2005). There, farmers adapt strawberry crop as an annual crop, and grow year after year without rotation. The pathogen proliferates in the remaining plant materials, generates inoculums for the following season’s crops. This, mutually with elevated temperatures of the soil, creates most favorable conditions for the proliferation and contagion of strawberry by MP (Chamorro et al. 2015). The pathogen threatening the sunflower production in Italy under water stressed conditions was also pathogenic on other crops like soybean, safflower, sorghum and melon (Manici et al. 1995). They also reported that at lower temperatures isolates of MP from north Italy (colder areas) grew superior to the other isolates, and also displayed excellent adaptability to 40 °C.
Climate change alters the plant–pathogen–environment interactions in different eco-climatic zones, resulting in a new distribution pattern. For the determining worldwide geographical distribution of the diseases, lower temperatures are often more significant than the higher temperatures. Consequently, for pathogens which are presently limited by low temperature, enhancement in the temperatures may cause a better ability to overwinter at high latitudes and also can be extended the range of pathogens (Hill and Dymock 1989). In this regard, no records are available for the impact of climate change on the spatial and temporal distribution of MP/DRR/CR in legumes and needs to be addressed. This will give knowledge on the distribution pattern of DRR/CR across the country and impact of climate change which will help in disease control strategies.
Role of pathogenic and genetic variability in adaptation of MP, and climate change
In the tropical and semiarid tropical areas, increase in temperature and water stress are expected to degrade the soil conditions (Bullok 1999). Investigation on the genetic variability of MP populations in mid-latitude areas suggests that the spreading probability of this pathogen would rise in combining years (Csondes et al. 2012). Since the microsclerotia can survive for a longer period of time and their germination and adaptation to specific crops may increase over a period of time (Kaur et al. 2013). Hence, an increase in variability is expected due to climate change (Tok et al. 2018).
Morphological variations among the isolates of MP have raised queries about possible alteration in pathogenic and genetic diversity in pathogen isolated/ associated with different cropping systems. Genetic variations in MP isolates isolated from different hosts such as cowpea (Muchero et al. 2011), peanut (Okwulehie 2001), sunflower (Aboshosha et al. 2007), beans (Mayek-Perez et al. 2002), sorghum (Das et al. 2008), soybean (Jana et al. 2005) and chickpea have been studied. Su et al. (2001) found that MP isolates from a given host were genetically similar to each other but distinct from those obtained from other hosts.
Likewise, MP also showed pathogenic variability among isolates collected from various hosts including legumes from different locations in Pakistan (Iqbal and Mukhtar 2014), India (Kumar et al. 2017) and Kansas, USA (Jimenez 2011). It was observed that the fungal population had the ability to change within 3 years from its original population as reported for Mycosphaerella graminicola (Chen and McDonald 1996). This is because of the sexual nature of pathogens and also of the use of different hosts in the same field. Perhaps, the same assumption can be drawn here in the case of MP, replacing genotypes with plant species. The high rate of genetic variability in MP isolates in response to altered temperature allowing it to adopt the new environment (Reyes‐Franco et al. 2006; Almeida et al. 2008).
Adaptation strategies in legumes against MP and future outlook
Leguminous crops are vulnerable to a large number of foliar, root rot and wilt diseases; however, DRR/CR is the disease of utmost importance which may flourish enormously due to climate change in near future, and it requires more research efforts. Climate change is envisaged in the form of extremes variation in the weather, i.e., drier and hotter summers, and less irregular rainfall in different geographical regions which will provide more favorable conditions for MP to complete its life cycle on leguminous plants and other hosts.
The present review revealed that climate change especially will have an important role in MP spread and development in legumes and other crops from one region to another region. High temperature and low soil moisture may increase disease incidence in the traditional areas and in new niches where the crops may be introduced, i.e., rice fallows in northeastern plain zones of India and Myanmar. The pathogenic and genetic variability among MP isolates has been explained for different hosts and few showed genetic adaptation due to alteration in temperature and crop rotation. However, more investigations are required on the genetic adaptation of MP with reference to different hosts under changing climate. Thus, understanding defense gene response in the host population may be of great significance for determining plants’ potential for adapting to climate change (Garrett et al. 2006). Studies have been conducted to identify the disease resistance genes sensitive to the higher temperatures for wheat rust (Chakraborty et al. 2011), and some other viral and bacterial diseases; however, no reports are available for DRR/CR. Therefore, future investigation is required to search the defense genes in legumes sensitive to the higher temperatures against DRR/CR.
Since higher temperatures and low soil moistures make MP more favorable for disease development in legumes; therefore, disease mitigation strategies should require adjustment under the increase in temperature and drought period. In particular, use of chemical fungicides (Pawar et al. 2015; Athira 2017) and bio-fungicides (Shahid and Khan 2016; Latha et al. 2017) has shown potential efficacy against DRR/CR and can be used as seed treatment or soil application prior to the sowing. Conversely, as far as MP is concerned, other schools of thought mentioned that these mitigation strategies are not effective nor economically acceptable for mitigation, because they are not economically sustainable, except for horticultural crops in greenhouse or other niche crops with high economic value, certainly not for legumes or any other field crop, and overall poor.
Therefore, cultural practices such as crop rotation with non-host annual crops (wheat and rice) can be adopted as an economic method for DRR/CR management (Singh et al. 1990). But, crop rotation may cause emergence of new races of the same pathogen by altering genetics of MP, and it may be able to become pathogenic to infect a number of additional hosts due to climate change adaptation (Almeida et al. 2008). Therefore, along with the crop rotation, soil solarization and soil amendments with zinc sulfate or neem cake or residues of Brassica-mixed farmyard manure (Ansari 2010; Latha et al. 2017) can be recommended in order to eradicate microsclerotia/MP populations from the soil.
In addition, if fungicides are used, the climate change may influence their efficacy (Juroszek and von Tiedemann 2011); hence, there is a need to investigate the effect of climate change on the efficacy of chemicals, their residue in the soil/plant and development of resistance in MP populations to the fungicides. Besides, in the changing climate scenario, pathogens are likely to produce more virulent strains, and management strategies should focus on this by identifying more aggressive antagonists.
As far as host-plant resistance is concerned, in the developing countries, the legume breeding programs do not have potential strategies and sufficient resources for the development and deployment of resistant varieties against DRR/CR associated with climate change. There are few resistant/tolerant sources against DRR/CR available for mungbean (Choudhary et al. 2011; Haseeb et al. 2013; Khan et al. 2016), urdbean (Iqbal et al. 2003), soybean (Talukdar et al. 2009; Pawlowski et al. 2015) and chickpea (Gupta et al. 2012b; Khan et al. 2013) in South Asia, but these resistant sources were region specific; therefore multi-location trials, at hot spot locations, to evaluate and identify the resistant sources at larger scale are needed to cope against MP strains existing in diverse eco-climates and the potential strains likely to emerge with climate change. This will help breeders in improving breeding approaches that will enable durable resistance over broader agro-climatic areas. In addition, rising atmospheric temperature and CO2 also influences the resistance behavior of genotypes (Chakraborty and Datta 2003) by changing the pathogen behavior (Kimball 1985); therefore, the newly developed breeding lines of legumes against MP should be evaluated under conditions of elevated temperature and CO2 and water stress in order to get durable resistant lines for their utilization/implication in climate change scenario.
In addition to the adoption of improved cultivars of legumes against DRR/CR, weather-based disease forecasting models are needs to be developed. It will assist to identify the meteorological factors like temperature and rainfall which will be significantly correlated with the disease. It will also help in the prediction of future scenarios of disease epidemics. Based on the future scenarios of disease epidemics, disease control strategies can be recommended and ⁄or improved so that suitable approaches may be developed prior to disease attack. Using these forecasting models and recent biotechnological approaches, regional impacts of climate change on disease management strategies need a relook in understanding the emerging scenario of host pathogen interactions. Thus, for effective management of the pathogen, distribution period of pathogens should be carefully investigated so that sound approaches may be developed prior to disease outbreak. In addition, understanding of period of overwintering of MP and its attack to the crops will probably facilitate the legume growers to apply prophylactic control measures at the right time in order to reduce the crop losses.
References
Abbas HK, Bellaloui N, Accinelli C, Smith JR, Shier WT (2019) Toxin production in soybean (Glycine max L.) plants with charcoal rot disease and by Macrophomina phaseolina, the fungus that causes the disease. Toxins 11:645
Aboshosha SS, Atta Alla SI, El-Korany AE, El-Argawy E (2007) Characterization of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates affecting sunflower growth in El-Behera governorate. Egypt Int J Agric Biol 9:807–815
Agarwal DK, Goswami BK (1974) Interrelationships between Macrophomina phaseoli (Maubl.) Ashby and M. incognita in soybean. Proc Ind Nat Sci Acad 39:701–704
Akhtar KP, Sarwar G, Arshad HMI (2011) Temperature response, pathogenicity, seed infection and mutant evaluation against Macrophomina phaseolina causing charcoal rot disease of sesame. Arch Phytopath Plant Prot 44:320–330
Ali A, Hall AM, Gladders P (1998) The biology and pathology of Rhizoctonia solani and Rhizoctonia oryzae isolated from crown rot of carrots in UK. Brighton Crop protection conference: pests & diseases-1998: 3. In: Proceedings of an international conference, Brighton UK, pp875–880.
Ali MZ, Khan MAA, Rahaman AKMM, Ahmed MAFMS, Ahsan, (2010) Study on seed quality and performance of some mungbean varieties in Bangladesh. Int J Expt Agric 1:10–15
Almeida AMR, Sosa-Gomez DR, Binneck E, Marin SRR, Zucchi MI, Abdelnoor RV, Souto ER (2008) Effect of crop rotation on specialization and genetic diversity of Macrophomina phaseolina. Trop Plant Pathol 33:257–264
Ansari MM (2010) Integrated management of charcoal rot of soybean causes M. phaseolina. Soybean Res 8:39–47
Arias RS, Ray JD, Mengistu A, Scheffler BE (2011) Discriminating microsatellites from Macrophomina phaseolina and their potential association to biological functions. Plant Pathol 60:709–718
Arora M, Pareek S (2013) Effect of soil moisture and temperature on the severity of Macrophomina charcoal rot of sorghum. Ind J Sci Res 4:155–158
Ashwini C, Giri G (2014) Control of seed-borne fungi in greengram and blackgram through bio-agents. Int J Appl Biol Pharm Technol 5:168–170
Athira K (2017) Efficacy of fungicide and bio-control agent against root rot of blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 6:2601–2607
Aviles MS, Castillo J, Bascon T, Zea-Bonilla PM, Martin-Sanchez RM, Jimenez P (2008) First report of Macrophomina phaseolina causing crown and root rot of strawberry in Spain. Plant Path 57:382
Babu BK, Saxena AK, Srivastava AK, Arora DK (2007) Identification and detection of Macrophomina phaseolina by using species-specific oligonucleotide primers and probe. Mycologia 99:797–803
Baggio JS, Cordova LG, Peres NA (2019) Sources of inoculum and survival of Macrophomina phaseolina in Florida strawberry fields. Plant Dis 103:2417–2424
Bashir M, Malik BA (1988) Diseases of major pulse crops in Pakistan—a review. Trop Pest Manag 34:309–314
Bashir MR (2017) Impact of global climate change on charcoal rot of sesame caused by Macrophomina phaseolina. J Hortic 4:1
Bhatt J, Vadhera I (1997) Histopathological studies on cohabitation of Pratylenchus thornei and Rhizoctonia bataticola on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Adv Plant Sci 10:33–37
Bhattacharya D, Dhar TK, Siddiqui KAI, Ali E (1994) Inhibition of seed germination by Macrophomina phaseolina is related to phaseolinone production. J Appl Bacteriol 77:129–133
Bullok P (1999) Soil information: uses and needs in Europe. Eur Soil Bureau Res Rep 6:171–182
Chakraborty S, Datta S (2003) How will plant pathogens adapt to host plant resistance at elevated CO2 under a changing climate? New Phytol 159:733–742
Chakraborty S, Luck J, Hollaway G, Fitzgerald G, White N (2011) Rust-proofing wheat for a changing climate. Euphytica 179:19–32
Chakraborty S, Tiedemann AV, Teng PS (2000) Climate change: potential impact on plant diseases. Environ Pollut 108:317–326
Chamorro M, Miranda L, Domínguez P, Medina JJ, Soria C, Romero F, López-Aranda JM, De los Santos B, (2015) Evaluation of biosolarization for the control of charcoal rot disease (Macrophomina phaseolina) in strawberry. Crop Prot 67:279–286
Chen R, McDonald BA (1996) Sexual reproduction plays a major role in the genetic structure of populations of the fungus Mycosphaerella graminicola. Genetics 142:1119–1127
Choudhary S, Choudhary AK, Sharma OP (2011) Screening of mungbean (Vigna radiata) genotypes to identify source of resistance to dry root rot. J Food Leg 24:117–119
Cohen R, Elkabetz M, Edelstein M (2016) Variation in the responses of melon and watermelon to Macrophomina phaseolina. Crop Prot 85:46–51
Csondes I, Cseh A, Taller J, Poczai P (2012) Genetic diversity and effect of temperature and pH on the growth of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates from sunflower fields in Hungary. Mol Biol Rep 39:3259–3269
Das IK, Fakrudin B, Arora DK (2008) RAPD cluster analysis and chlorate sensitivity of some Indian isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina from sorghum and their relationships with pathogenicity. Microbiol Res 163:215–224
Dhingra OD, Sinclair JB (1978) Biology and pathology of Macrophomina phaseolina. UFV, Imprensa Universitária, Viçosa/MG, Brasil
Diourte M, Starr JL, Jeger MJ, Stack JP, Rosenow DT (1995) Charcoal rot (Macrophomina phaseolina) resistance and the effects of water-stress on disease development in sorghum. Plant Pathol 44:196–202
Dong J, Gruda N, Li X, Tang Y, Zhang P, Duan D (2020) Sustainable vegetable production under changing climate: The impact of elevated CO2 on yield of vegetables and the interactions with environments-A review. J Cleaner Production 253:119920
ElAraby ME, Kurle JE, Stetina SR (2007) First report of charcoal rot (Macrophomina phaseolina) on soybean in Minnesota. Plant Dis 87:202
Freeman S, Gnayem N (2005) Use of plasticulture for strawberry plant production. Small Fruits Rev 4:21–32
Fuhlbohm J, Ryley MJ, Aitken EAB (2013) Infection of mungbean seed by Macrophomina phaseolina is more likely to result from localized pod infection than from systemic plant infection. Plant Pathol 62:1271–1284
Garrett KA, Dendy SP, Frank EE, Rouse MN, Travers SE (2006) Climate change effects on plant disease: genomes to ecosystems. Ann Rev Phytopathol 44:489–509
Getis J, Fellmann JD (2000) Introduction to Geography, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 99
Ghini R, Hamada E, Angelotti F, Costa LB, Bettiol W (2012) Research approaches, adaptation strategies, and knowledge gaps concerning the impacts of climate change on plant diseases. Plant Pathol 37:5–24
Goldreich Y (2003) The climate of Israel: observation, research and application. Springer, New York
Gomez AO, De Faveri J, Neal JM, Aitken EAB, Herrington ME (2020) Response of strawberry cultivars inoculated with Macrophomina phaseolina in Australia. Int J Fruit Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2019.1709114
Goria MM (2009) Impacto do aumento da concentração de CO2do ar sobre a brusone do arroz. MS Dissertation. Universidade Estadual Paulista. Botucatu SP.
Gupta GK, Chauhan GS (2005) Symptoms, identification and management of soybean diseases. Technical Bulletin 10. Indore, India, National Research Centre for Soybean.
Gupta GK, Sharma SK, Ramteke R (2012a) Biology, epidemiology and management of the pathogenic fungus Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid with special reference to charcoal rot of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). J Phytopathol 160:167–180
Gupta O, Rathi M, Mishra M (2012b) Screening for resistance against Rhizoctonia bataticola causing dry root rot in chickpea. J Food Leg 25:139–141
Haider A, Ahmed S (2014) Study on seed quality and performance of some mungbean varieties in Pakistan. J Biol Agric Health 4:161–165
Haseeb AF, Sahi ST, Ali S, Fiaz M (2013) Response of different mungbean varieties against Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid and in vitro studies of plant extracts against pathogen. Pak J Phytopathol 25:78–83
Hill MG, Dymock JJ (1989) Impact of climate change: agricultural/horticultural systems. DSIR Entomology Division Submission to the New Zealand Climate Change Programme, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Auckland, New Zealand, pp.16
Indira N, Gayatri S (2003) Management of blackgram root rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina by antagonistic microorganisms. Madras Agric J 90:490–494
IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of working group 1 to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Iqbal U, Mukhtar T (2014) Morphological and pathogenic variability among Macrophomina phaseolina isolates associated with mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) Wilczek from Pakistan. The Scientific World J, Article ID:950175, 1–9.
Iqbal SM, Ghafoor A, Arshad M, Bashir M (2003) Screening of urdbean (Vigna mungo L.) germplasm for resistance to charcoal rot disease. Pakistan J Plant Pathol 2:107–110
Ishikawa MS, Ribeiro NR, de Almeida AA, Balbi-Peña MI (2019) Identification of soybean genotypes resistant to charcoal rot by seed inoculation with Macrophomina phaseolina. J Agric Sci 11:213–219
Jana T, Sharma TR, Singh NK (2005) SSR-based detection of genetic variability in the charcoal root rot pathogen Macrophomina phaseolina. Mycol Res 109:81–86
Jimenez DRC (2011) Influence of Soils, Nutrition, and Water Relations upon Charcoal Rot Disease Processes in Kansas. Thesis, Kansas State University, Kansas, USA, MSc
Juroszek P, Tiedemann AV (2011) Potential strategies and future requirements for plant disease management under a changing climate. Plant Pathol 60:100–112
Kaur S, Chauhan VB, Brar SK, Dhillon GS (2013) Adaptability of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) to different temperature and pH. Int J Life Sci 1:81–88
Kaur S, Chauhan VB, Singh JP, Singh RB (2012a) Status of Macrophomina stem canker disease of pigeonpea in eastern Uttar Pradesh. J Food Leg 25:76–78
Kaur S, Dhillon GS, Brar SK, Chauhan VB (2012b) Carbohydrate degrading enzyme production by the plant pathogenic mycelia and pycnidia strains of Macrophomina phaseolina through koji fermentation. Ind Crops Prod 36:140–148
Kaushik CD, Chand JN, Saryavir, (1987) Seedborne nature of Rhizoctonia bataticola causing leaf blight of mungbean. J Mycol Plant Pathol 17:154–157
Keote GA, Reddy MSP (2019) Bio-inoculants used against chickpea dry root rot incited by Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler. J Mycopathological Res 57:107–111
Khan KA, Shoaib A, Akhtar S (2016) Response of Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek genotypes to charcoal rot disease. Mycopath 14:1–7
Khan KSH, Shuaib M (2007) Identification of sources of resistance in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) against charcoal rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. Afr Crop Sci Conf Proc 8:2101–2102
Khan RA, Bhat TA, Kumar K (2013) Screening of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm lines against dry root rot caused by Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butler. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 6:211–212
Khan RA, Towseef AB, Krishna K (2012) Management of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) caused by Rhizoctonia btaticola (Taub.) Butler. Int J Res Pharma Biomedical Sci 3:4
Khan SK (2007) Macrophomina phaseolina as causal agent for charcoal rot of sunflower. Mycopath 5:111–118
Kimball BA (1985) Adaptation of vegetation and management practices to a higher carbon dioxide world. In: Strains BR, Crute JD (eds) Direct effects of increasing carbon dioxide on vegetation. Washington, DC, USA, US Department of Energy, pp 185–204
Koike ST (2008) Crown rot of strawberry caused by Macrophomina phaseolina in California. Plant Dis 92:1253
Kumar K, Singh J (2000) Location, survival, transmission and management of seed-borne Macrophomina phaseolina, causing charcoal rot in soybean. Ann Plant Protect Sci 8:44–46
Kumar P, Gaur VK, Meena AK (2017) Screening of different Macrophomina phaseolina on susceptible (RMG-62) variety of mungbean. Int J Pure App Biosci 5:698–702
Lakhran L, Ahir RR, Choudhary M, Choudhary S (2018) Isolation, purification, identification and pathogenicity of Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) goid caused dry root rot of chickpea. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 7:3314–3317
Lalita L, Ahir RR (2020) In-vivo evaluation of different fungicides, plant extracts, biocontrol agents and organics amendments for management of dry root rot of chickpea caused by Macrophomina phaseolina. Leg Res 43:140–145
Latha P, Karthikeyan M, Rajeswari E (2017) Development of bioformulations for the management of blackgram dry root rot caused by Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub Butler). Adv Res 9:1–12
Lessin RC, Ghini R (2009) Efeito do aumento da concentração de CO2 atmosférico sobre o oídio e o crescimento de plantas de soja. Trop Plant Pathol 34:385–392
Lessin RC, Ghini R (2011) Impacto do aumento da concentração de CO2 atmosférico sobre a ferrugem asiática e o desenvolvimento de plantas de soja. Jaguariúna SP, Embrapa Meio Ambiente
Lodha S (1993) Fighting dry root rot of legumes and oilseeds. Indian Farming 43:11–13
Lodha S, Mawar R (2020) Population dynamics of Macrophomina phaseolina in relation to disease management: A review. J Phytopathol 168:1–17
Lodha S, Sharma SK, Agarwal RK (2002) Inactivation of Macrophomina phaseolina during composting and effect of compost on dry rot severity and on seed yield of clusterbean. Eur J Pl Pathol 108:253–261
Maheswari U, Ramakrishnan G (1999) Factors influencing the competitive saprophytic ability of Macrophomina phaseolina in groundnut. Madras Agric J 86:552–553
Manici LM, Bregaglio S, Fumagalli D, Donatelli M (2014) Modelling soil borne fungal pathogens of arable crops under climate change. Int J Biometeorol 58:2071–2083
Manici LM, Caputo F, Cerato C (1995) Temperature responses of isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina from different climatic regions of sunflower production in Italy. Plant Dis 79:834–838
Mayek-Perez N, Garcia-Espinosa R, Lopez-Castaneda C, Acosta- Gellegos JA, Simpson J (2002) Water relations histopathology and growth of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) during pathogenesis of Macrophomina phaseolina under drought stress. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 60:185–195
Mbofung GY, Goggi AS, Leandro LFS, Mullen RE (2013) Effects of storage temperature and relative humidity on viability and vigor of treated soybean seeds. Crop Sci 53:1086–1095
Melloy P, Hollaway G, Luck J, Norton R, Aitken ESC (2010) Production and fitness of Fusarium pseudograminearum inoculum at elevated carbon dioxide in FACE. Global Change Biol 16:3363–3373
Muchero W, Ehlers JD, Close TJ, Roberts PA (2011) Genic SNP markers and legume synteny reveal candidate genes underlying QTL for Macrophomina phaseolina resistance and maturity in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp.]. BMC Genomics 12:8–10
Ndiaye M, Termorshuizen AJ, van Bruggen AHC (2010) Effects of compost amendment and the biocontrol agent Clonostachys rosea on the development of charcoal rot (Macrophomina phaseolina) on cowpea. J Plant Pathol 92:173–180
Okwulehie IC (2001) Physiological studies in groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) infected with Macrophomina phaseolina (MAUB) Ashby. Int J Trop Plant Dis 19:25–37
Olaya G, Abawi GS (1996) Effect of water potential on mycelial growth and on production and germination of sclerotia of Macrophomina phaseolina. Plant Dis 80:1347–1350
Patel ST, Anahosur KH (2001) Influence of sowing time, soil moisture and pathogens on chickpea wilt and dry root rot incidence. Karnataka J Agric Sci 14:833–835
Patil D, Pawar P, Muley S (2012) Mycoflora associated with pigeon pea and chickpea. Int Multidisciplinary Res J 2:6
Patil SD, Memane SA, Konde BK (1990) Occurrence of seed-borne fungi of green gram. J Maharashtra Agric Uni 15:44–45
Pawar K, Mishra SP, Singh RK (2015) Efficacy of bioagents and fungicides against seed borne fungi of soybean. Ann Plant Soil Res 17:77–81
Pawlowski ML, Hill CB, Hartman GL (2015) Resistance to charcoal rot identified in ancestral soybean germplasm. Crop Sci 55:1230–1235
Philipp RA, Edwards ED (2020) Climate change and the need for agricultural adaptation. Curr Plant Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2019.12.006
Raghuchander T, Samiyappan R, Arjunan G (1993) Biocontrol of Macrophomina root rot of mungbean. Indian Phytopath 46:379–382
Rahman S, Vearasilp S, Srichuwong S (1999) Detection of seed borne fungi in mungbean and blackgram seeds. Sustainable technology development in crop production. pp.1–3.
Raj Krishan N, Tripathi N, Rajinder S (1999) Role of edaphic factors on the incidence of dry root-rot of sesame caused by Rhizoctonia bataticola (Taub.) Butl. Sesame Safflower News Lett 14:69–71
Ratnoo RS, Jain KL, Bhatnagar MK (1997) Variations in Macrophomina phaseolina isolates of Ash-gray stem blight of cowpea. J Mycol Plant Pathol 27:91–92
Reyes-Franco MC, Hernandez-Delgado S, Beas-Fernandez R, Medina-Fernandez M, Simpson J, Mayek-Perez N (2006) Pathogenic and genetic variability within Macrophomina phaseolina from Mexico and other countries. J Phytopathol 154:447–453
Saleh A, Ahmed H, Todd T, Travers S, Zeller K, Leslie J et al. (2010) Relatedness of Macrophomina phaseolina isolates from tallgrass prairie, maize, soybean and sorghum. Mol Ecol 19:79–91
Sanchez S, Henriquez JL, Urcola LA, Scott A, Gambardella M (2016) Susceptibility of strawberry cultivars to root and crown rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina. J Berry Res 6:345–354
Sanchez SM, Gambardella JL, Henriquez JL, Diaz I (2013) First report of crown rot of strawberry caused by Macrophomina phaseolina in Chile. Plant Dis 97:996
Sarita BAK, Singh R (2014) Study of seed-borne mycoflora of Mungbean treated with potassium nitrate during storage. J Adv Appl Sci Res 5:11–13
Sarr MP, Ndiaye M, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW (2014) Genetic diversity in Macrophomina phaseolina, the causal agent of charcoal rot. Phytopathol Mediterr 53:250–268
Shahid S, Khan MR (2016) Biological control of root rot of mungbean plants incited by M. phaseolina through microbial antagonists. Plant Pathol J 15:27–39
Sharma M (2012) Emerging disease scenario in pulses under climate Change. In: Dixit GP, Singh J (eds) Pulses: challenges and opportunity under changing climate scenario. Singh, N.P., pp 138–146
Sharma R, Duveiller E, Ortiz-Ferrara G (2007) Progress and challenge towards reducing wheat spot blotch threat in the Eastern Gangetic Plains of South Asia: is climate change already taking its toll? Field Crops Res 103:109–118
Sharma S, Hooda KS, Goswani P (2019) Scenario of plant diseases under changing climate. J Pharmacog Phytochem 8:2490–2495
Singh J, Kumar K (2002) Location, survival, transmission and control of seed borne, Macrophomina phaseolina causing dry root rot and leaf blight in urdbean. Annl Pl Prot Sci 10:111–113
Singh SK, Nene YL, Reddy MV (1990) Some histopathological observations of chickpea roots infected by Rhizoctonia bataticola. Internet Chickpea Newslet 23:24–25
Songa W, Hillocks RJ (1996) Legume hosts of Macrophomina phaseolina in Kenya and effect of crop species on soil inoculum level. J Phythopathol 144:387–391
Su G, Suh SO, Schneider RW, Russin JS (2001) Host specialization in the charcoal rot fungus, Macrophomina phaseolina. Phytopathol 91:120–126
Suriachandraselvan M, Aiyyanathan KEA, Vimala R (2005) Host range and cross inoculation studies on Macrophomina phaseolina from sunflower. Madras Agric J 92:238–240
Talukdar A, Verma K, Gowda DSS, Lal SK, Sapra RL, Singh KP, Singh R, Sinha P (2009) Molecular breeding for charcoal rot resistance in soybean I. Screening and mapping population development. Indian J Genet 69:367–370
Tok FM, Dervis S, Arslan M (2018) Host selective virulence, temperature response and genetic diversity in Macrophomina phaseolina isolates from sesame and peanut in southern turkey. Fresenius Environ Bull 27:7374–7380
Tonin R, Fatima B, Avozani A (2013) Efficacy of fungicides against M. phaseolina in cotton. Agropec Trop 43:460–466
Tossi L, Zazzerini A (1990) Influence of environmental factors and cultural techniques on Sclerotiam bataticola Taub. on sunflower Inf. Phytopathol 40:73–76
Valdes-Pineda R, Pizarro R, García-Chevesich P, Valdés JB, Olivares C, Vera M, Balocchi F, Pérez F et al (2014) Water governance in Chile: Availability, management and climate change. J Hydrology. 519(Part C):2538–2567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.016
Veni V, Murugan E, Mini ML, Vanniarajan C, Radhamani T (2016) Genetic relationship between yield and battering quality in blackgram (Vigna Mungo L.). Legume Res 39:355–358.
Wilhite DA, Glantz MH (1985) Understanding the drought phenomenon: The Role of Definitions. Water Int 10:111–120
Wokocha RC (2000) Effect of different soil moisture regimes on the development of the charcoal rot diseases of soybean caused by Macrophomina phaseolina. Global J Pure Appl Sci 6:599–602
Wrather JA (1995) Soybean disease loss estimates for the Southern United States, 1974 to 1994. Plant Dis 79:1076–1079
Wrather JA, Anderson TR, Arsyad DM, Tan Y, Ploper LD, Porta-Puglia A, Ram HH, Yorinori JT (2001) Soybean disease loss estimates for the top 10 soybean producing countries in 1998. Can J Plant Pathol 23:115–121
Wrather JA, Koenning SR (2006) Estimates of disease effects on soybean yields in the United States 2003 to 2005. J Nematol 38:173–180
Wyllie TD (1988) Charcoal rot of soybean-current status. In: Wyllie TD, Scott DH (eds) Soybean diseases of the north central region. APS Press, St. Paul, pp 106–113
Wyllie TS, Gangopadhyay WT, Blanchar R (1984) Germination and production of Macrophomina phaseolina microsclerotia as affected by oxygen and carbon dioxide concentration. Plant Soil 81:195–201
Yang X, Navi S (2005) First report of charcoal rot epidemics caused by Macrophomina phaseolina in soybean of Iowa. Plant Dis 89:526
Zhang JQ, Zhu ZD, Duan CX, Wang XM, Li HJ (2011) First report of charcoal rot caused by Macrophomina phaseolina on Mungbean in China. Plant Dis 95:872
Zveibil A, Freeman S (2005) First report of crown and root rot in strawberry caused by Macrophomina phaseolina in Israel. Plant Dis 89:1014–1014
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical responsibilities
I hereby declare that the review article compiled by myself is original and has not been published elsewhere and also simultaneously has not been submitted for the publication elsewhere.
Human and animal rights
The article does not contain any human and animal rights.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pandey, A.K., Basandrai, A.K. Will Macrophomina phaseolina spread in legumes due to climate change? A critical review of current knowledge. J Plant Dis Prot 128, 9–18 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-020-00374-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-020-00374-2