Abstract
This paper describes history and technical evolution of portable devices which use energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF)-analysis to study works of art. The history starts in 1971, when the first transportable equipment was employed to examine the pigments of Raphael’s painting “La Deposizione” during restoration at the “Istituto Centrale del Restauro” in Rome. Then, paintings of all types were analyzed and metals (bronzes, brasses, gold and silver). The evolution of the exciting source is described (from radioisotopes or big size X-ray tubes, to miniaturized, dedicated X-ray tubes) and of X-ray detectors (from proportional gas counters, to N2-cooled Si or Ge-detectors, to Peltier cooled HgI2 and Si-PIN, to Peltier cooled Si-drift). Also, the pulse height analyzers had an important evolution, from a heavy box to a computer card, to very small electronic circuits included in the detector box. The most “modern” portable EDXRF device is currently composed of a small-size X-ray tube, a Si-drift detector, both properly collimated, a portable computer, and dedicated software for the processing of the data. The total weight of such a device is about 2 kg. The last evolution: from analysis of a limited number of points to a complete scanning of the artifact. A mechanics is also required, with a sophisticated software interfacing mechanics to measuring heads. Maps giving the distribution of all analyzed elements in all areas of the painting “La Fornarina” by Raphael could be obtained. Finally, an accurate analysis of the K or L-X rays of the elements present in the paintings allowed to determine the disposition of the pigment in the correct layer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction and Evolution of EDXRF-Devises
The use of energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF)-analysis to determine pigments in paintings and metals, to our knowledge, starts in 1971, and the first paper “Non-destructive analysis of chemical elements in paintings and enamels” by R. Cesareo et al., from the Institute of Physics, Faculty of Engineering, University of Rome, and M. Marabelli et al., from the Central Restoration Institute, Rome, was published in 1972 [1]. The paper was published in Archaeometry and reported EDXRF-analysis of various paintings, among them the “Deposition” by Raphael, located at Galleria Borghese (Fig. 1), Rome. The paintings were analyzed at the Istituto Centrale del Restauro, Rome, where they were under restoration.
The equipment used at the time, 48 years ago, may be considered today rather primitive, being composed of a radioactive source (of Cd-109, Am-241, Pm-147 or Co-57), or Kr, Ne, or Xe gas proportional counters with an energy resolution of about 18% at the energy of 6.4 keV (iron Kα-line) [2] and an electronic chain coupling the detector to a LABEN 400 pulse-height analyzer. The device had a total weight of about 50 kg and was transportable, not portable (Fig. 2).
Due to the poor energy resolution, the X-ray spectra were not easy to process. However, it was possible to get the following:
-
identify the typical pigments used by Raphael: malachite, lead-tin yellow, white lead, lapis lazuli, a Cu-pigment, cinnabar, azurite, ochre.
-
identify areas of modern restoration, through identification of “modern pigments” based on the detection of Zn-white and Ti-white industrially produced around 1850 and 1920 respectively [3], but also by pigments based on chromium, selenium, and cadmium produced only recently. The last point was particularly important for the restoration of the painting, and the restorers removed the pigment layer containing “modern” pigments.
Approximately at the same time, a portable EDXRF equipment was developed and used to analyze ancient metals (bronzes, brasses, gold, silver….) in museums, churches, open air, and so on. This equipment was characterized by a radioactive source, a gas proportional counter, and a single-channel analyzer (SCA) coupled to a scaler. The SCA was modified in order to select, keeping fixed the window (interval of energy). Six switchable channels determine the energy of well-defined single elements (for example, in the case of bronzes Cu, Sn, Pb; in the case of gold Au, Ag, and Cu). In such a manner, a portable equipment was constructed, able to analyze only selected elements, but with poor sensitivity. The device is shown in Fig. 3, and a typical gold EDXRF-spectrum showing how the SCA works is shown in Fig. 4 [4,5,6].
With such a device, Etruscan, Roman, and Greek bronzes were analyzed [4, 5], as well as Etruscan gold objects from various tombs and in museums, such as the pectoral (~ 675–650 B.C.) from the tomb Regolini-Galassi exposed at the Vatican Museum [6].
Soon after, the first revolution occurred: the new liquid N2-cooled semiconductor X-ray detectors, both Si(Li) and hyperpure Ge (HpGe) entered the market, with an energy resolution of 200–300 eV at 6.4 keV, much better than that of proportional gas counters, which is more than 1000 eV. The use of these detectors marked the first detector revolution and permitted to analyze pigments with much more resolution and accuracy. However, these detectors needed liquid nitrogen, and the total device, including a dewar of 5–10 L, is not portable, but only transportable (Figs. 5, 6, and 7). In the first phase, an equipment composed of radioactive sources and a Si(Li)-detector was employed to analyze several paintings under restoration at the Central Restoration Institute in Rome. An example is given by the study of the “Giudizio di Santa Lucia” by Lorenzo Lotto [7]. Using a set of two or four Am-241 point sources, many other paintings were analyzed in situ, such as La Fornarina by Raffaello in 1983 at National Museum of Palazzo Barberini in Rome (Fig. 6) [8]. This device consists in a HpGe detector equipped with confocal radioisotopic sources as shown in Fig. 5 [9]. Raffaello, Michelangelo (Tondo Doni), and Caravaggio (about twelves) paintings were analyzed in 2 to 3 years.
The second revolution happened at the beginning of the nineties with the development, around 1990–1995, of high-resolution small size, Peltier cooled HgI2 detectors (developed by Jan Iwanczyk and coworkers) (Fig. 8) [11], and, soon after, Peltier-cooled Si-PIN detectors (developed by John Pantazis and coworkers at AMPTEK) (Fig. 9) [12, 13]. These detectors had an energy resolution comparable to that of nitrogen-cooled Si detectors and allowed to assemble the first portable devices to carry out measurements in situ. However, the HgI2 detector revealed itself to be delicate versus time, and the Si-PIN was, therefore, generally preferred for portable devices, despite an important negative point: they accept only a reduced number of photons per second without losing energy resolution greatly increasing the required measuring time. Paintings and, for the first time, frescos were analyzed with the Si-PIN detector. Frescos from the church of S. Stefano Rotondo in Rome, painted by Antonio Tempesta in the year 1568, from the “Nolfi chapel” in the cathedral of Fano painted by Domenichino in 1618–1619 [14], from the church of S. Francesco in Arezzo painted by Piero della Francesca in 1452–1466 and from Giotto’s frescos in the chapel of the Scrovegni, painted in Padua in 1303–1305 (Fig. 9) [15, 16]. In frescos, the background is composed by plaster (CaCO3) that becomes CaSO4 and/or Cl (NaCl), due to pollution close to the sea. Then, alloys were analyzed such as the four panels from the Volvinius altar in the Basilica of St. Ambrose in Milan (824–859 A.C.) on gold and gilded-silver [17], the big sphere on gilded bronze located at the top of the basilica of St. Peter in Rome, and the famous marble statue of David by Michelangelo, particularly to detect and remove S due to pollution [18].
The described devices allowed to analyze circular areas of the order of 0.1 mm2 corresponding to circles with diameter of about 0.5 mm. To analyze much smaller areas, the method of capillary collimators developed by Kumakhov at the end of eighties [19] was also applied to a few cases, such as the analysis of a very small gold fragment from the God’s halo in the Chapel of the Scrovegni (Fig. 10).
The third revolution occurred in the first years of this century and is related to the Si-drift X-ray detector (SDD), first proposed by Gatti and coworkers in the seventies constructed by Longoni and Ketek scientists in the middle nineties [20, 21] and successively put in the market, first by Ketek and then by AMPTEK [12, 22] and by other companies.
Such a device was largely applied to study paintings [23, 24], frescos, gold, and silver, for example, pre-Columbian gold from the North of Peru [25, 26] (Fig. 11); gilded bronzes, for example a panel of the “Gate to Paradise,” a bronze door made by Lorenzo Ghiberti in Florence in 1425–1452 and brasses, such as the inscription on gilded brass at the top of the Trevi Fountain in Rome.
In the meantime, almost contemporaneously to the development of X-ray detectors, also dedicated and miniaturized X-ray tubes were developed (see Figs. 7, 8, 9, 11, and 12) [12, 27, 28], and small-size pulse-height analyzers (Figs. 7, 8, 9, 11, and 12), in such a manner that, currently, a complete equipment with X-ray tube and SDD-detector (including the MCA) can be assembled, with an energy resolution of the order of 130 eV at the Fe-Kα line, a number of processed photons/s of the order of 105 and a weight of about 2 kg, including the PC or tablet (Fig. 12). Such a device allows to analyze areas of the order up to 0.01 mm2 corresponding to diameter of about 0.1 mm.
All the described examples are related to point EDXRF analysis, i.e., the painting under study was analyzed in many points, generally according to areas of different color or composition. Finally, around 2010, the fourth revolution: a complete scan of a painting by Macro-XRF (MA-XRF) [29, 30] or µ-XRF (MA-XRF) [31]. A mechanical system is required to this aim, to rapidly move the device in the plane of the object.
MA-XRF allows a visualization of the distribution of elements, obtained by scanning the surface of the painting with a focused or collimated X-ray beam of mm or sub-mm dimensions, according to the size of the painting. The method was first employed to test the homogeneity of a pre-Columbian nose ornament composed on gold and silver alloys (Fig. 13) and was then applied in the investigation of ancient paintings, as elemental distribution images can reveal hidden sub-surface layers, including modifications made by the artist (pentimenti) or restoration on the surface. In this way, it can provide a unique insight into the creative process of the artist and the painting’s conservation history. From that moment, scanning was largely prevailing over point analysis, in spite of the fact that, sometimes, long-time optimized point analysis can add additional information.
In February 2020, a second “scanning equipment” developed by us (Fig. 14) scanned “La Fornarina,” a famous painting by Raphael (Fig. 15) at the Gallery of Palazzo Barberini [32] Rome, during the exhibitions of the commemoration for 500 years after Raphael’s death. The results of the scanning are shown in Fig. 16.
Eventually, to handle the huge number of data, new sophisticated software had to be developed since the manual inspection of millions of spectra would be impossible. This paves the way to a new and upcoming revolution. The digital revolution is where hardware has reached a miniaturization point where software advancements are more advantageous, extracting the most information possible from the data available.
2 Conclusions
During the years, energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) proved to be the ideal technique to analyze artifacts of all type, and the corresponding EDXRF equipment has had an impressive development during the last 50 years in all its instrumental components, as summarize in Table 1, i.e.,
-
X-ray sources: from radioactive sources to big X-ray tubes to air cooled, small size, dedicated X-ray tubes
-
X-ray detectors: from proportional gas counters to semiconductor Si or Ge nitrogen cooled detectors to Peltier-cooled Si-drift detectors
-
Pulse height analyzers: from big and heavy boxes to mini- electronic circuits incorporated in the detector box
-
Also the measurement modality changed versus time: from single point analysis to a complete scanning of the object to be studied
3 A look to the future
The following evolutions may be expected in the next future for EDXRF analysis in archeometry:
-
Miniaturized and dedicated X-ray tubes emitting a higher number of photons/s, allowing the scanning of a painting in µ-scanning mode and in a reasonable time
-
Si-drift detectors thicker (up to a few mm) and with larger area, to improve the efficiency of the EDXRF-device
-
A reliable software to process an enormous number of X-ray spectra, giving the relative intensity of all detected element and internal ratio (K and L-ratios)
-
A possible complementary and “portable” technique (for example X-ray diffraction or Raman spectroscopy) able to deduce the molecules associated to the elements deduced from EDXRF
The final goal would be a complete reconstruction, point by point, of the pigments employed by the artist, and, therefore, of the painting itself.
Change history
04 June 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-022-01138-z
References
R. Cesareo, F.V. Frazzoli, C. Mancini, S. Sciuti, L. Storelli, M. Marabelli, P. Mora, P. Rotondi, G. Urbani, Non destructive analysis of chemical elements in paintings and enamels. Archaeometry 14, 65 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.1972.tb00051.x
R. Cesareo, F.V. Frazzoli, S. Sciuti, Sensitivity of radioisotope XRF technique with particular reference to portable units. J. Radioanal. Chemistry 34, 157 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521518
R. Gettens, G.L. Stout, in Painting materials, ed. by Dover, (1966), pp.161
R. Cesareo, F.V. Frazzoli, C. Mancini, S. Sciuti, M. Marabelli, Rapid non-destructive analysis of ancient bronzes. Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 23,198 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-708X(72)90052-X
R. Cesareo, F.W. von Hase, Non-destructive radioisotope XRF analysis of early Etruscan gold objects. Kerntechnik 15, 565 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1515/kern-1973-0027
R. Cesareo, S. Sciuti, M. Marabelli, Non-destructive analysis of ancient bronzes. Stud. Conserv. 18, 64 (1973). https://doi.org/10.2307/1505459
R. Cesareo, M. Marabelli, L. Mora, Analisi di fluorescenza X del dipinto “giudizio di S. Lucia di L. Lotto durante il restauro”; Congr. Intern. Sulle Applicazione dei metodi nucleari nel campo delle opere d’arte; Roma-Venezia 24–29 maggio 1973; Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei 259–296.7 (1976). ISBN: 88–218–0014–8
G.E. Gigante, C. Maltese, S. Sciuti, RAPHAEL URBINAS - Il mito della Fornarina, Ed. ELECTA, Rome 1983, 34–40 and 74–77. ISBN: 2560846508903
G.E. Gigante, S Sciuti, A multipurpose energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer for low, medium and high-Z materials analysis. Int. J. Applied Radiation Isot. 35(6), 481–88 (1984). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0020708X84901686
G.E Gigante, C. Maltese, S. Rinaldi, S Sciuti, in situ ND analysis of XVI and XVII centuries Italian paintings, Proc. 27th International Symposium on Archaeometry, (Heidelberg 2–6 April '90), Archaeometry '90, ed. by E. Pernicka, G.A. Wagner (Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel). p. 255–264. ISBN 10: 3764325224
R. Cesareo, G.E. Gigante, P. Canegallo, A. Castellano, J.S. Iwanczyk, A. Dabrowski, Applications of non-cryogenic portable EDXRF systems in archaeometry. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A380, 440 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(96)00320-8
AMPTEK Inc., 6 de Angelo Drive, Bedford, MA, USA. https://www.amptek.com/
T. Pantazis, J. Pantazis, A. Huber, R. Redus, the historical development of the thermoelectrically cooled X-ray detector. X-Ray Spectrom. 39(2), 90–97 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.1227
A. Castellano, R. Cesareo, A portable instrument for EDXRF-analysis of sulfur; Nucl. Instrum. Methods in Phys. Res. B 129, 281–283 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-583x(97)00206-1
R. Cesareo, Non-destructive EDXRF-analysis of the golden haloes of Giotto’s frescos in the Chapel of the Scrovegni in Padua; Nucl. Instrum. and Methods in Phys. Res. B211, 133–137 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(03)01165-0
R. Cesareo, A. Castellano, G. Buccolieri, S. Quarta, M. Marabelli, Giotto in the Chapel of the Scrovegni: EDXRF-analysis of the golden haloes with a portable equipment. X-Ray Spectrometry 33, (2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.727
R. Cesareo et al., The golden altar of S. Ambrogio in Milan; non-destructive XRF analysis with a portable apparatus; “2nd Intern. Congress on Science and Safeguard of cultural heritage in the Mediterranean basin; Paris, July 5–9 541, (1999)
A. Castellano, G. Buccolieri, S. Quarta, M. Donativi, Portable EDXRF surface mapping of sulfate concentration on Michelangelo’s David X-Ray Spectrom. 35, 276–279 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.907
M.A. Kumakhov, Channeling of photons and new X-ray optics. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 48, 283–286 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583X(90)90123-C
P. Lechner et al., Si-drift detectors for high resolution room temperature X-ray spectroscopy. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A377, 346 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(96)00210-0
R. Cesareo, G.E. Gigante, A. Castellano, C. Fiorini, A. Longoni, A. Brunetti, Comparison between semiconductor detectors for portable EDXRF systems. SPIE Int. Symp. Denver 3771, 112–116 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.363697
KeteK GmbH. https://www.ketek.net/sdd/
M. Ioele, M. Marabelli, S. Ridolfi, R. Cesareo, Indagini non distruttive per lo studio delle tecniche pittoriche e per il restauro; in La Sacra Conversazione di Palma il Vecchio; a cura del Ministero degli Affari Esteri e dei Beni Culturali, ARTEMIDE, Roma.143–174 (2007). ISBN: 9788875750961
R. D’Amico, S. Ridolfi, M. Marabelli, R. Cesareo, in Artistic techniques, scientific research on L’Edicola, ed. by R. Guttuso, Euno (Bagheria, 2011), p. 83–112. ISBN:8897085350
R. Cesareo, R. Franco, A. Fernandez, A. Bustamante, J. Fabian, S. Zambrano A., S. Azeredo, R.T. Lopes, G. Ingo, C. Riccucci, G. Di Carlo, G.E. Gigante, Analysis of the spectacular gold and silver from the Moche tomb “Señora de Cao”. X-Ray Spectrometry 45(3), 138–154 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.2680
R. Cesareo et al., Analytical studies on metallurgy in pre-Columbian North of Peru; KDP AMAZON by Ethical Media on behalf of Geo4Fun. June (2020). https://www.amazon.com/dp/1518619045
Moxtek Inc. https://moxtek.com
Oxford Instrum. https://xray.oxinst.com
M. Alfeld et al., A mobile instrument for in situ scanning: macro-XRF investigation of historical paintings. J. Anal. At. Spectrometry 28, 760–767 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3JA30341A
S.A.B. Lins, G.E. Gigante, R. Cesareo, S. Ridolfi, A. Brunetti, Testing gold leaves thickness calculations’ accuracy through MC simulations and MA-XRF scanning; Appl. Sci. 10(10), 3582 (2020) (to be published). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103582
I. Reiche, M. Eveno, K. Müller et al., New insights into the painting stratigraphy of L’Homme blessé by Gustave Courbet combining scanning macro-XRF and confocal micro-XRF. Appl. Phys. A 122, 947 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-0457-1
A. Cosma, C. Merucci, S. Ridolfi, a cura: Raffaello da vicino. Nuove indagini e nuove scoperte sulla Fornarina casa editrice Officine Librarie (2021). ISBN-10: 9788833671314
Acknowledgements
One of the authors (S. Ridolfi) is the CEO of Ars-Meansure. Three authors are part of the European Doctorate on Archaeological and Cultural Materials Science (ED-ARCHMAT) that is an ITN-MSCA project to support research activities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
This paper is dedicated to our friend and mentor professor Sergio Mascarenhas. Sergio was not only an excellent physicist, but he was also a great lover of the arts, and particularly of the Italian Renaissance. He particularly adored Raphael and everywhere Sergio was active, there was a copy of “the school of Athens,” a well-known masterpiece by Raphael. Sergio was also curious about the correlation between Science and Art, and was always anxious about the progress of scientific methods applied to studies of artifacts. For this reason, we organized in Alghero, Italy, a symposium in his honor, for his 70 years, and now, we dedicate to him this paper, which concerns analyses with X-rays of Raphael’s paintings. Sergio was not only a great scientist and a great Brazilian. He was also a great friend, liked jokes, and was full of joy of living and sense of humor, as shown in Fig. 17 photo, taken at the Institute for Advanced Studies of Princeton, where he was invited in 1996.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cesareo, R., Gigante, G.E., Castellano, A. et al. From Raphael (La Deposizione) to Raphael (La Fornarina): a Circumnavigation Accompanying the Evolution of Energy-Dispersive XRF Devices. Braz J Phys 52, 54 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-021-01042-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-021-01042-y