Abstract
Purpose
Fracture union is a complex biological process, which depends upon several systemic and local factors. Disturbance of any of these factors may lead to nonunion of the fracture. These nonunions have a huge impact on quality of life as well as socioeconomical aspects. The platelets on activation release a number of growth factors and differentiation factors, which play important role in fracture healing. This study aimed to look for efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of established fracture nonunions of long bones.
Methods
A total of 94 patients with established nonunion of long bone (35 tibia, 30 femur, 11 humerus, 4 radius, 12 ulna, 2 with both radius and ulna) were included in this study. We injected 15–20 ml of autologous platelet-rich plasma (>2,000,000 platelets/μl) under image intensifier at each nonunion site. The fracture union was evaluated clinically and radiologically regularly at monthly interval till 4 months.
Results
Eighty-two patients had their fracture united at the end of 4 months. Thirty-four patients showed bridging trabeculae on X-rays at the end of 2 months, while 41 patients showed bridging trabeculae at the end of third month. Twelve patients did not show any attempt of union at 4 months and were labeled as failure of treatment. There were no complications.
Conclusion
Platelet-rich plasma is a safe and effective treatment for the treatment of nonunions. More studies are needed to look into molecular mechanism of this fracture healing acceleration by platelet-rich plasma.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Nonunion remains a significant source of morbidity and has a significant impact on quality of life. Autologous cancellous bone is considered to be the gold standard for the treatment of nonunions [1, 2]; however, the limited supply and donor-site morbidity associated with autogenous bone graft have led the researchers to explore newer alternatives like allograft, bone substitutes, demineralized bone matrix, growth factors, cell therapy and gene therapy which have their own set of advantages and disadvantages [3–6].
Recently, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been a breakthrough in the stimulation and acceleration of bone and soft tissue healing. The platelets on activation release a number of growth factors and differentiation factors like platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor (TGF-β), platelet factor 4 (PF4), interleukin-1 (IL-1), platelet-derived angiogenesis factor (PDAF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), platelet-derived endothelial growth factor (PDEGF), epithelial cell growth factor (ECGF), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), osteocalcin, osteonectin, fibrinogen, vitronectin, fibronectin and thrombospondin-1, which play an important role in intracellular signaling pathways that induce the production of proteins needed for the regenerative processes, such as cellular proliferation, matrix formation, osteoid production and collagen synthesis, required for fracture healing [7–13].
Keeping in view the important role of platelets in fracture healing, the present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of nonunion of fractures of long bones.
Materials and methods
The study was funded by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and was conducted at the Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, over a period of 27 months (October 2008–January 2011) prospectively. After documenting the successful results of the procedure, more patients were treated with this method over the next 3 years. Ethical committee clearance was obtained before starting the study. A total of 94 patients were included in this study.
The inclusion criteria were:
-
1.
Patients with clinical and radiological signs of nonunion of the long bones,
-
2.
Stable internal fixation/or stable reduction with plaster immobilization,
-
3.
Acceptable alignment of fracture fragments,
-
4.
More than 90 % contact between the fracture fragments.
The nonunion was defined as a fracture of duration more than 6 months after injury or time from last fracture site operation, which had not shown progressive evidence of healing process throughout the past 3 months [14, 15].
The exclusion criteria were:
-
1.
Gap nonunions,
-
2.
Presence of local or systemic infection,
-
3.
Pseudarthrosis,
-
4.
Patients unfit for autologous donation (platelet count <130 × 109/l, age >60 years, hypofibrogenemia, patient on medicines known to influence platelet function like aspirin),
-
5.
Patient unwilling to give written informed consent.
A total of 94 patients with established nonunion of long bone (35 tibia, 30 femur, 11 humerus, 4 radius, 12 ulna, 2 with both radius and ulna) were treated by platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Their area-wise distribution is given in Table 1. Sixty-six patients were males, and 28 were females. Seventy-one patients had previously undergone open reduction and internal fixation, while 23 patients were being treated by closed reduction and plaster application.
A total of 100 ml of autologous whole blood was aspirated from cubital vein with all aseptic precautions in each patient on the morning of surgery, and PRP was prepared in the blood bank facility within the hospital and transferred to operation theater immediately thereafter for injection. PRP preparation involved a series of centrifugation and separation cycles to concentrate platelets without inducing their premature activation. Quality control of platelet concentrate in all cases confirmed the platelet count of a minimum of 2,000,000/μl and leuko-reduction. We injected 15–20 ml of autologous platelet-rich plasma in each patient under image intensifier using a 14G intravenous cannula or a bone marrow biopsy needle (Fig. 1).
All the patients were assessed clinico-radiologically for healing of fracture at monthly follow-up till 3 months. The absence of localized tenderness, abnormal mobility and pain was considered clinical criterion for union. Radiological union was assessed with the help of anteroposterior, lateral and two oblique X-rays at each visit. Radiographic union was considered when at least three cortices out of four showed continuity on anteroposterior and lateral views [16].
Results
Eighty-two patients had their fracture united at the end of 4 months. Thirty-four patients showed bridging trabeculae on X-rays at the end of 2 months, while 41 patients showed bridging trabeculae at the end of third month. Additional seven patients showed union at the end of fourth month (Figs. 2, 3). Twelve patients (five femur, four tibia, one humerus, one with radius, one with both radius and ulna) did not show any attempt of union at 4 months and were labeled as failure of treatment. The two tibial fractures, which did not unite, had been treated conservatively in plaster cast, and the fracture was in the distal one-third of tibia. Another two tibial fractures and humeral fracture were treated by open reduction and plate fixation and were in mid-shaft. The all five femur fractures, which failed to unite, were located in the middle one-third and had been previously treated using an interlocking nail. One radius fracture, which failed to unite, was present in the proximal one-third of the shaft of radius and had been previously treated using a plate. One patient with both radius and ulna fracture was previously treated with open reduction and plating for both bones. These 12 patients required a revision surgery with stable fixation and autologous iliac cancellous bone grafting.
The average time between injury and platelet injection was 9.1 months (range 7–24 months). In the patients where the fracture united, it was observed that the platelet injection had been given within 2–4 months of diagnosis of nonunion. However, in the 12 patients where the fracture failed to unite, it was seen that the platelet concentrate had been injected 12 months or later after the diagnosis of nonunion. In one patient with tibia fracture, there was a broken implant with instability too. There were no complications seen associated with platelet injection in any patient.
Discussion
Despite continuous advances in the treatment of long-bone fractures, disturbances of healing processes remain a difficult challenge. Approximately 10 % of treated fractures require further surgical procedures because of impaired healing [17, 18]. The preferred management of delayed union and nonunion is to provide the essential elements for bone formation. The autologous cancellous bone remains the gold standard of treatment.
As compared to classic open grafting techniques, percutaneous administration of substances with osteoinductive and osteogenic properties offers the advantage of decreased morbidity as well as decreased costs and hospitalization time [14, 17]. The local application of bone marrow and bone morphogenetic protein-7 has been shown to be capable of increasing bone defect healing [19–21]. While BMP is prohibitively expensive, bone marrow aspirate injection has been used with some success in India [21]. Although bone marrow has both osteoinductive and osteogenic properties, several authors have shown that the level of osteoprogenitor cells in the bone marrow aspirate is highly variable [22–24].
The numerous growth factors present in platelets such as platelet-derived growth factor, transforming growth factor-β, insulin-like growth factors I and II, epidermal growth factor play an important role in bone healing. The desired platelet concentrations can be achieved more reliably; moreover, autologous platelets have been demonstrated to promote tissue healing in other clinical situations [25–30]. In nonunion, platelet concentrate might stimulate the prematurely terminated bone healing processes [13, 31].
The working definition of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a volume of autologous plasma that has a platelet concentration of 1,000,000 platelets/μl in a 5-ml volume of plasma [17]. Exogenous application of platelet-associated growth factors have been shown to stimulate proliferation of osteoblasts in culture [26, 32] and has been demonstrated to stimulate the recruitment and proliferation of osteoblasts in defects in skulls of rabbits and to augment the healing of tibial fractures in rats in a dose-dependent manner [33, 34]. More importantly, the application of autologous platelet-rich plasma used as source for growth factors has been demonstrated clinically in maxillofacial and mandibular defects as well as lumbar fusion with promising results [8, 35–38].
However, there is paucity of evidence to support the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma in achieving union in cases with nonunion. Gandhi et al. [39] measured the levels of PDGF and TGF beta in fracture hematoma of patients who had sustained fresh fractures of foot and ankle. They observed the absence of these factors in cases of nonunion. On application of PRP, these fractures united at an average of 8.5 weeks. Bielecki et al. [40] used percutaneous injection of autologous platelet-rich gel in nonunion and delayed union. They could achieve union in all cases of delayed union and in only 13 of 20 cases of nonunion at an average of 10.3 weeks after the injection. It was observed that the healing could be achieved only in cases where the average time from initial operation to injection was <11 months.
Most authors have used platelet-rich plasma in their investigations [13, 41]. However, they have used a combination of PRP and thrombin in a dose ranging from 1000 to 5000 units [12, 37, 42, 43]. After activation of clotting system by thrombin, a series of proteolytic reactions is initiated in PRP that ultimately results in platelet degranulation and the conversion of soluble fibrinogen into insoluble fibrin. Moreover, thrombin itself stimulates fibroblast proliferation and synthesis of type IV collagen and active mediators such as NF-kappa-B [12, 37, 39, 40]. We believe that sufficient thrombin is produced due to local trauma while thoroughly infiltrating the fracture site with a needle. There are, in addition, issues related to the availability and cost of thrombin. The bovine source of thrombin has attendant transmissible risks [44], and it is unacceptable to Hindus due to the religious sentiments. Hence, we chose to inject platelets without thrombin.
We used 20 ml of PRP arbitrarily in the absence of standard recommendations. We used very high concentration of platelet (nearly 5 times the normal values) and very high volumes (20 ml), hitherto unreported in the literature. We believe it was necessary as in nonunion, the process of healing has halted completely and the local growth factor levels are abysmally low. No previous trials have used such high doses of platelets, and we believe that this could be the possible explanation for the high rates of union that could be achieved in our study.
Although the majority of reported studies describe the use of PRP having soft tissue healing potential and chondrogenic potential of activated peripheral blood stem cells [45, 46], the optimum dose of PRP for nonunion is not described and consensus is lacking regarding the production and characterization of PRP, but our study does demonstrate the efficacy of this method by currently used doses in nonunion of long bones in the setting of mechanical stability without bone gaps or voids. Moreover, the method was proven to be safe without any adverse effects.
Our study has a few limitations. Firstly, it is not a randomized study; secondly, we used centrifugation for concentrating platelets, which may lead to the fragmentation of the platelets and early release of growth factors and cytokines, reducing bioactivity [47]. Ultrafiltration to prepare PRP may be a more scientific and efficient method [40]. Thirdly, we are not able to conclude whether the method will be effective in the presence of bone defects as we selected only fractures with near total contact between the fracture fragments. One recent article has stressed upon proper and careful selection of patients for effective outcome of PRP in the treatment of nonunion [48].
Even though our study is not a randomized study, yet a large sample size of 82 patients out of 94 patients achieving a complete union is compelling evidence supporting this technique. The administration of platelet-rich plasma into the nonunion site of long-bone fractures aided in their union. These encouraging results warrant further research in the form of randomized controlled trials to better elucidate the findings of this study.
References
Bauer TW, Muschler GF (2000) Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:10–27
Fleming JE Jr, Cornell CN, Muschler GF (2000) Bone cells and matrices in orthopedic tissue engineering. Orthop Clin North Am 31(3):357–374
Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E (2005) Bone substitutes: an update. Injury 36(Suppl 3):S20–S27
Finkemeier CG (2002) Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(3):454–464
Saikia KC, Bhattacharya TD, Bhuyan SK, Talukdar DJ, Saikia SP, Jitesh P (2008) Calcium phosphate ceramics as bone graft substitutes in filling bone tumor defects. Indian J Orthop 42(2):169–172
Younger EM, Chapman MW (1989) Morbidity at bone graft donor sites. J Orthop Trauma 3(3):192–195
Sánchez AR, Sheridan PJ, Kupp LI (2003) Is platelet-rich plasma the perfect enhancement factor? A current review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18(1):93–103
Marx RE, Carlson ER, Eichstaedt RM, Schimmele SR, Strauss JE, Georgeff KR (1998) Platelet-rich plasma: growth factor enhancement for bone grafts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 85(6):638–646
Harrison P, Cramer EM (1993) Platelet alpha-granules. Blood Rev 7(1):52–62
Bucholz RW, Einhorn TA, Marsh JL (2006) Bone and joint healing. In: Bucholz RW, Heck-man JD, Court-Brown C (eds) Rockwood & Green’s fractures in adults, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 300–311
Schilephake H (2002) Bone growth factors in maxillofacial skeletal reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31(5):469–484
Mehta S, Watson JT (2008) Platelet rich concentrate: basic science and current clinical applications. J Orthop Trauma 22(6):432–438
Gandhi A, Doumas C, Dumas C, O’Connor JP, Parsons JR, Lin SS (2006) The effects of local platelet rich plasma delivery on diabetic fracture healing. Bone 38(4):540–546
Wilkins RM, Chimenti BT, Rifkin RM (2003) Percutaneous treatment of long bone nonunions: the use of autologous bone marrow and allograft bone matrix. Orthopedics 26(5 Suppl):s549–s554
Heckman JD, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, Frey JJ, Kilcoyne RF (1994) Acceleration of tibial fracture-healing by non-invasive, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76(1):26–34
Corrales LA, Morshed S, Bhandari M, Miclau T 3rd (2008) Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(9):1862–1868
Wilkins RM, Kelly CM (2003) The effect of allomatrix injectable putty on the outcome of long bone applications. Orthopedics 26(5 Suppl):s567–s570
Simpson AHRW, Mills L, Noble B (2006) The role of growth factors and related agents in accelerating fracture healing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(6):701–705
Dimitriou R, Dahabreh Z, Katsoulis E, Matthews SJ, Branfoot T, Giannoudis PV (2005) Application of recombinant BMP-7 on persistent upper and lower limb non-unions. Injury 36(Suppl 4):S51–S59
Friedlaender GE, Perry CR, Cole JD, Cook SD, Cierny G, Muschler GF et al (2001) Osteogenic protein-1 (bone morphogenetic protein-7) in the treatment of tibial nonunions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(Suppl 1(Pt 2)):S151–S158
Goel A, Sangwan SS, Siwach RC, Ali AM (2005) Percutaneous bone marrow grafting for the treatment of tibial non-union. Injury 36(1):203–206
Connolly JF (1995) Injectable bone marrow preparations to stimulate osteogenic repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 313:8–18
Healey JH, Zimmerman PA, McDonnell JM, Lane JM (1990) Percutaneous bone marrow grafting of delayed union and nonunion in cancer patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 256:280–285
Hernigou P, Poignard A, Beaujean F, Rouard H (2005) Percutaneous autologous bone-marrow grafting for nonunions. Influence of the number and concentration of progenitor cells. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(7):1430–1437
Mishra A, Pavelko T (2006) Treatment of chronic elbow tendinosis with buffered platelet-rich plasma. Am J Sports Med 34(11):1774–1778
Bielecki TM, Gazdzik TS (2006) Percutaneous injection of autogenous growth factors in patient with nonunion of the humerus. A case report. J Orthop 3(3):15
Calori GM, D’Avino M, Tagliabue L, Albisetti W, d’ Imporzano M, Peretti G (2006) An ongoing research for evaluation of treatment with BMPs or AGFs in long bone non-union: protocol description and preliminary results. Injury 37(Suppl 3):S43–S50
Fréchette J-P, Martineau I, Gagnon G (2005) Platelet-rich plasmas: growth factor content and roles in wound healing. J Dent Res 84(5):434–439
George JN (2000) Platelets. Lancet 355(9214):1531–1539
Slater M, Patava J, Kingham K, Mason RS (1995) Involvement of platelets in stimulating osteogenic activity. J Orthop Res 13(5):655–663
Dallari D, Fini M, Stagni C, Torricelli P, Nicoli Aldini N, Giavaresi G et al (2006) In vivo study on the healing of bone defects treated with bone marrow stromal cells, platelet-rich plasma, and freeze-dried bone allografts, alone and in combination. J Orthop Res 24(5):877–888
Lind M (1998) Growth factor stimulation of bone healing. Effects on osteoblasts, osteomies, and implants fixation. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 283:2–37
Beck LS, Amento EP, Xu Y, Deguzman L, Lee WP, Nguyen T et al (1993) TGF-beta 1 induces bone closure of skull defects: temporal dynamics of bone formation in defects exposed to rhTGF-beta 1. J Bone Miner Res 8(6):753–761
Nielsen HM, Andreassen TT, Ledet T, Oxlund H (1994) Local injection of TGF-beta increases the strength of tibial fractures in the rat. Acta Orthop Scand 65(1):37–41
Whitman DH, Berry RL, Green DM (1997) Platelet gel: an autologous alternative to fibrin glue with applications in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55(11):1294–1299
Anitua E (1999) Plasma rich in growth factors: preliminary results of use in the preparation of future sites for implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14(4):529–535
Lowery GL, Kulkarni S, Pennisi AE (1999) Use of autologous growth factors in lumbar spinal fusion. Bone 25(2 Suppl):47S–50S
Parsons P, Butcher A, Hesselden K, Ellis K, Maughan J, Milner R et al (2008) Platelet-rich concentrate supports human mesenchymal stem cell proliferation, bone morphogenetic protein-2 messenger RNA expression, alkaline phosphatase activity, and bone formation in vitro: a mode of action to enhance bone repair. J Orthop Trauma 22(9):595–604
Gandhi A, Bibbo C, Pinzur M, Lin SS (2005) The role of platelet-rich plasma in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Clin 10(4):621–637
Bielecki T, Gazdzik TS, Szczepanski T (2008) Benefit of percutaneous injection of autologous platelet-leukocyte-rich gel in patients with delayed union and nonunion. Eur Surg Res 40(3):289–296
Ogino Y, Ayukawa Y, Kukita T, Koyano K (2006) The contribution of platelet-derived growth factor, transforming growth factor-beta1, and insulin-like growth factor-I in platelet-rich plasma to the proliferation of osteoblast-like cells. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 101(6):724–729
Bielecki T, Gazdzik TS, Szczepanski T (2006) Re: “The effects of local platelet rich plasma delivery on diabetic fracture healing”. What do we use: platelet-rich plasma or platelet-rich gel? Bone 39(6):1388; author reply 1389
Alsousou J, Thompson M, Hulley P, Noble A, Willett K (2009) The biology of platelet-rich plasma and its application in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: a review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(8):987–996
Lomax C, Traub O (2009) Topical thrombins: benefits and risks. Pharmacotherapy 29(7 Pt 2):8S–12S
Di Matteo B, Filardo G, Kon E, Marcacci M (2015) Platelet-rich plasma: evidence for the treatment of patellar and Achilles tendinopathy—a systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg 99(1):1–9
Turajane T, Thitiset T, Honsawek S, Chaveewanakorn U, Aojanepong J, Papadopoulos KI (2014) Assessment of chondrogenic differentiation potential of autologous activated peripheral blood stem cells on human early osteoarthritic cancellous tibial bone scaffold. Musculoskelet Surg 98(1):35–43
Gonshor A (2002) Technique for producing platelet-rich plasma and platelet concentrate: background and process. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 22(6):547–557
Say F, Türkeli E, Bülbül M (2014) Is platelet-rich plasma injection an effective choice in cases of non-union? Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 81(5):340–345
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) for funding this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malhotra, R., Kumar, V., Garg, B. et al. Role of autologous platelet-rich plasma in treatment of long-bone nonunions: a prospective study. Musculoskelet Surg 99, 243–248 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-015-0378-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-015-0378-8