Abstract
The purposes for performing negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in severe burns are diverse, but few reports comprehensively discussing its indications and methods have been published. We included patients with a ≥30% total burn area. There were 4 patients, and a total of 9 NPWT were performed. The therapy sites were the upper extremity (n = 2), the elbow (n = 1), the dorsum of the hand (n = 5), and the knee (n = 1). The purposes of the therapy were bridge-to-skin grafting (n = 5), dressing the artificial dermis (n = 1), therapy for bolstering the autograft (n = 1), bridge-to-flap surgery (n = 1), and covering the flap (n = 1). The devices used were bedside wall suction (n = 5) and dedicated device (n = 3). Therapy was converted to wall aspiration after use of the dedicated device in 1 case. NPWT is an effective option in severe burn treatment. For each purpose, it is necessary to consider the device used, negative pressure setting, starting date, frequency of dressing changes, and period of therapy. NPWT in severe burns also has the advantage of prioritizing life-prolonging treatment. If strict control of negative pressure is required, a dedicated device should be used rather than wall suction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a treatment that reduces inflammatory exudate and promotes the formation of granulation tissue by the application of negative pressure to the wound. NPWT was previously used for open wounds, but its application is expanding to include suture wounds, skin grafts, and skin flaps. NPWT is used for the treatment of various injuries including chronic wounds [1] and acute trauma [2]. In recent years, the number of reports on the use of NPWT for burns has been increasing [3, 4]. However, the purposes for using NPWT in severe burns are diverse, and few reports comprehensively discussing its indications and methods have been published. Here, we describe our experience with NPWT for severe burns at our hospital.
Patients and Methods
This was a case series study. We included patients with a ≥30% total burn area who underwent NPWT at our hospital between September 2020 and September 2022. In a single patient, each therapy was considered as 1 therapy for a different site and purpose of use. There were 4 patients, and a total of 9 NPWT were performed. Using the medical records and clinical photographs, we investigated each patient’s age, total burn surface area (TBSA), outcome, NPWT site, burn surface area (BSA) where NPWT was performed, purpose in using NPWT, device used, negative pressure setting, NPWT start date, frequency of dressing changes, period during which NPWT was performed, local outcome, and treatment after NPWT.
Results
Three patients were discharged with good outcomes, but 1 patient died of multiple organ failure. The NPWT sites were the upper extremity (upper arm to forearm) (n = 2), the elbow (n = 1), the dorsum of the hand (n = 5), and the knee (n = 1). The average (min, max) BSA where NPWT was performed was 2.2 (0, 7) %. The purposes of NPWT were bridge-to-skin grafting (n = 5), dressing the artificial dermis (n = 1), therapy for bolstering the autograft (n = 1), bridge-to-flap surgery (n = 1), and covering the flap (n = 1). Bedside wall suction was performed using the YOX DISPO S-701 (Koike Medical, Tokyo, Japan) (n = 5), the RENASYS NPWT system (Smith & Nephew, London, UK) (n = 2), or the VAC system (KCI, TX, USA) (n = 1). Therapy was converted to wall suction after use of the VAC system in 1 case. The negative pressure setting was −10 to −20 kPa for wall suction and −50 to −100 mmHg2 for the RENASYS and VAC systems. NPWT was started on average (min, max) 36.9 (14, 108) days after injury. The average (min, max) duration of NPWT was 16.1 (5, 35) days, and the dressing was changed every 3 to 7 days in patients who underwent NPWT for 8 days or more. Regarding the local outcome and treatment after NPWT, 2 patients received sheet skin grafts after the burn borders were demarcated. Two patients received mesh skin grafting, and 1 patient, flap surgery, after good granulation was obtained. One therapy for fixation of the skin graft resulted in good engraftment. In 1 therapy for fixation of the artificial dermis, the artificial dermis failed to engraft, and the therapy was switched to ointment therapy. In 1 therapy, NPWT was continued without granulation, although it was possible to maintain a moist environment (Table 1).
Cases
Patient A
The patient, a 53-year-old woman, doused herself in kerosene and set her clothes on fire, resulting in severe burn wounds. The TBSA was 40%. After the burn area had been reduced with skin grafts for deep burns on the elbow, flap surgery was performed. NPWT was performed 3 times. The first time was for wound bed preparation before skin grafting (therapy 1), the second time was to fix the skin graft (therapy 2), and the third time was performed on the skin flap (therapy 3). At 5 months postinjury, she has an elbow joint extension disorder, but she uses her left hand as a functional limb.
Patient B
A 61-year-old woman sustained burn injuries as a result of a fire at her home. The burn sites were the lower limbs, the anterior chest and abdomen, the hands, and the face, and the TBSA was 42%. NWPT were performed three times. The first and second NPWT were performed on the dorsum of the hand. After performing debridement of the third-degree burn on the dorsum of the hand on postinjury day 14, we covered the burn with artificial dermis and provided bolstering with NPWT (therapy 4). However, the artificial dermis failed to engraft, and the tendon was exposed, so a second NPWT was started on postinjury day 24 in preparation for flap surgery (therapy 5) (Fig. 1a, b, c). Dry necrosis of the tendon became apparent, but the surrounding granulation was good (Fig. 1d). On postinjury day 64, the patient underwent reverse radial forearm flap covering and tendon reconstruction with a palmaris longus tendon (Fig. 1e, f, g). Interdigital flap revision was performed, and 9 months after the flap surgery, the patient has functional use of the hand (Fig. 1h). This patient had a patellar exposure and a third NPWT, and third NPWT was performed before skin grafting for patellar exposure (therapy 6).
Patient C
A 61-year-old woman sustained burn injuries in a bonfire accident. The burn sites were the head, the face, the anterior chest, the upper limbs, and the back, and the TBSA was 55%. On postinjury days 5 and 8, escharotomy was performed, and artificial dermis was applied. Escharotomy for burns on the dorsum of the hand was also performed, but NPWT was performed instead of primary skin grafting to shorten the operation time and preserve the donor skin (therapy 7). While life-prolonging treatment was being given, trunk skin grafting was prioritized, but the patient died of multiple organ failure on postinjury day 47.
Patient D
A 47-year-old man sustained burn injuries when his clothing caught fire while he was working near an aluminum furnace. The burn sites were the chest, the abdomen, the upper limbs including the dorsum of the hand, the lower limbs, and the back, and the TBSA was 68%. Escharotomy was performed on postinjury day 10 for a full-layer burn on the dorsum of both hands (Fig. 2a). NPWT was performed on postinjury day 14 to prioritize skin grafting to the other burn areas (Fig. 2b, c) (therapies 8 and 9). Sheet skin grafting was performed on postinjury day 32 (Fig. 2d, e). The skin grafts took well, and 2 months postoperatively, the patient is continuing rehabilitation (Fig. 2f).
Discussion
NPWT has a wide variety of uses in severe burn treatment. Previously, we reported on the types of applications for NPWT in burn treatment [5] (Fig. 3). In this study, NPWT was used for bridge-to-skin grafting, dressing the artificial dermis, therapy for bolstering the autograft, bridge-to-flap surgery, and covering the flap. We examined the indications and methods for NPWT based on the cases in our hospital.
NPWT as Bridge-to-Skin Grafting (Wound Bed Preparation)
NPWT increases wound blood flow and reduces bacterial counts to prepare the wound bed for the skin graft. The use of NPWT before skin grafting has been reported to improve the survival rate of the skin graft and to reduce the infection rate of not only intractable ulcers but also burns [5]. In therapies 1 and 6, good granulation was obtained by use of NPWT, and good skin engraftment could be obtained. NPWT also serves as a “test of wound bed viability” to determine if the wound bed is suitable for skin grafting [6]. In addition, in severe burns, treatment of localized burns is not the only treatment target, and life-prolonging treatment may be prioritized. NPWT does not exacerbate life-threatening conditions and local treatment can be delayed until later [7]. In therapies 8 and 9, waiting and testing of the wound bed with NPWT allowed for planned and reliable use of less donor skin. In therapy 7, the patient died of multiple organ failure during NPWT, but waiting for hand treatment with NPWT allowed the other treatments to be prioritized. We used wall suction because strict negative pressure maintenance and regulation are not essential in NPWT for bridge-to-skin grafts. However, when wall suction is used, a discrepancy may exist between the meter and the actual negative pressure applied to the wound, so care must be taken. In treatment 6, in which bone exposure was observed, NPWT was performed for 5 weeks. However, because normal burn wounds respond well to NPWT, shorter duration of NPWT is usually considered sufficient.
NPWT as a Bolster Dressing for the Autograft
Because NPWT applies uniform pressure to the skin graft even in the presence of a large defect or moving parts, the use of NPWT for skin graft fixation is desirable [8]. Therefore, the use of NPWT for skin graft fixation provides benefits, including increased engraftment rates, decreased reoperation rates, hematoma prevention, and reduced shearing force [9]. In addition, reports have been published of skin grafts, including those on the joints of the upper limbs that no longer require splints when NPWT has been used [10]. In reports of pressure for bolstering skin grafts, the pressures ranged from −25 to −125 mmHg [11,12,13]. We set the pressure at 100 mmHg and had no loss of the graft nor necrosis due to overpressure. Although the proper amount of pressure remains controversial, it is better to use a dedicated device (such as the VAC or RENASYS) rather than wall suction to maintain a constant pressure for bolstering the dressing.
NPWT as a Bolster Dressing for Artificial Dermis
Artificial dermis may be considered when tendons or bones are exposed and no suitable wound bed is available for skin grafting. In addition, burn wounds to which artificial dermis is applied improve the engraftment rate as well as the quality of postoperative scars. NPWT has been reported to be used for fixation of artificial dermis. The advantage of using NPWT is that it reduces the time to skin graft by the promotion of early matrix formation [14, 15]. In therapy 4, NPWT was performed for this purpose, but the artificial dermis did not engraft. A certain level of wound bed viability is necessary for engraftment of artificial dermis, and the lack of viability in therapy 4 is thought to be the cause of the nonengraftment. When applying artificial dermis to burn wounds with exposed tendons or bones, the area of the exposed tendon or bone and surrounding tissue viability should be considered.
Bridge-to-Flap Surgery
The use of NPWT as the dressing while waiting for flap surgery is becoming common in severe extremity trauma. NPWT before flap surgery is expected to reduce edema, control the exudate, and protect against external contamination [16]. In the treatment of burns, skin flap surgery is often required for deep burns that expose tendons and bones [17, 18]. The duration of NPWT use varies with the waiting period for flap surgery. In therapy 5, NPWT were performed for 26 days before the flap surgery. It is possible to avoid flap surgery by performing NPWT for a long period of time and promoting granulation formation [7], but excessive expectations should be avoided, and NPWT should be considered a temporary bridge [16].
NPWT Over Flap
NPWT for local flaps reportedly improves flap blood flow and prevents edema [19]. Also, NPWT has been used for free flaps (skin containing), and early postoperative application has been suggested to minimize edema, rest the flap, reduce exudate from under the flap, and prevent venous congestion [20]. In therapy 3, NPWT was performed to reduce persistent exudate. It was previously reported that there is no issue even if NPWT is used on the flap starting the day of surgery [20], but in this case, NPWT was started 20 days after surgery. The RENASYS system was used to maintain constant pressure and to avoid overcompression of the flap. The foam was placed only on the edge of the flap, and the pressure was adjusted while allowing the color tone of the flap to be observed. Furthermore, it has also been reported that flap surgery and skin grafting are performed at the same time and NPWT is used for the dressing [21]. This method uses a combination of NPWT as an overflap and a skin graft bolster and is thought to be useful when both deep burns that require flap surgery and shallow burns that allow skin grafting coexist.
Others
Although not performed in this study, NPWT can reportedly prevent injury progression when applied to burn wounds in the early stage of the injury [22]. NPWT was also used for the donor site for the purpose of promoting epithelialization [23]. Although the patient had generalized burns, NPWT was used on all 4 extremities. This is thought to be because the extremities are easier than the trunk to seal in burn treatment. In this study, the dorsum of the hand was the site most frequently treated with NPWT, with 3 cases and 5 treatments. Full-body burns are often accompanied by burns on the hands [24]. The treatment of hand burns does not contribute much to the reduction of the TBA and requires a certain amount of donor skin and operation time, so it is often not possible to operate at the best timing. While we should strive to treat the hand at the optimal time, NPWT to the hand for bridging skin grafts and flap surgery is a realistic option for hands with severe burns.
Limitations
The main limitation of this study is that it was a single-center study. In addition, only 4 cases were reported, and long-term follow-up was not possible. Furthermore, the cost of treatment was not investigated.
Conclusion
Negative pressure wound therapy is an effective option in severe burn treatment. NPWT allows for wound bed preparation, covering with skin grafts and artificial dermis, and management before and after flap surgery. The use of NPWT in severe burns also has the advantage of prioritizing life-prolonging treatment. If strict control of negative pressure is required, a dedicated device should be used rather than wall suction.
References
de Oliveira Leite TF, Ribeiro da Silva E, Joviliano EE (2021) Effect of negative pressure wound therapy for legs in complex wound diabetic patients: therapeutic challenge and review. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 9:2050313X211025920
Grant-Freemantle MC, Ryan ÉJ, Flynn SO et al (2020) The effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressing in the treatment of open fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma 34:223–230
Lin DZ, Kao YC, Chen C et al (2021) Negative pressure wound therapy for burn patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Int Wound J 18(1):112–123
Kantak NA, Mistry R, Halvorson EG (2016) A review of negative-pressure wound therapy in the management of burn wounds. Burns 42:1623–1633
Oshima J, Sasaki K, Aihara Y et al (2022) Combination of three different negative pressure wound therapy applications and free flap for open elbow joint injury with extensive burns. J Burn Care Res 43(2):479–482
Dziewulski P, Villapalos J-L (2012) Acute management of facial burns. In: Jeschke MG, Kamolz L-P, Sjöberg F, Wolf SE (eds) Handbook of Burns: Acute Burn Care, Volume 1. Springer, Vienna, pp 291–302
Sahin I, Eski M, Acikel C et al (2012) The role of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of fourth-degree burns. Trends and new horizons. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 25(2):92–99
Nakamura Y, Ishitsuka Y, Sasaki K et al (2021) A prospective, phase II study on the safety and efficacy of negative pressure closure for the stabilization of split-thickness skin graft in large or muscle-exposing defects: the NPSG study. J Dermatol 48:1350–1356
Yin Y, Zhang R, Li S et al (2018) Negative-pressure therapy versus conventional therapy on split-thickness skin graft: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 50:43–48
Clark JM, Rychlik S, Harris J et al (2019) Donor site morbidity following radial forearm free flap reconstruction with split thickness skin grafts using negative pressure wound therapy. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 48:21
Isago T, Nozaki M, Kikuchi Y et al (2003) Skin graft fixation with negative-pressure dressings. J Dermatol 30:673–678
Timmers MS, Le Cessie S, Banwell P et al (2005) The effects of varying degrees of pressure delivered by negative-pressure wound therapy on skin perfusion. Ann Plast Surg 55:665–671
Ho MW, Rogers SN, Brown JS et al (2013) Prospective evaluation of a negative pressure dressing system in the management of the fibula free flap donor site: a comparative analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:1048–1053
Jeschke MG, Rose C, Angele P et al (2004) Development of new reconstructive techniques: use of Integra in combination with fibrin glue and negative pressure therapy for reconstruction of acute and chronic wounds. Plast Reconstr Surg 113(2):525–530
Bloemen MC, Van Der Wal MB, Verhaegen PD et al (2012) Clinical effectiveness of dermal substitution in burns by topical negative pressure: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Wound Repair Regen 20(6):797–805
Van Rysselberghe NL, Gonzalez CA, Calderon C et al (2022) Negative pressure wound therapy for extremity open wound management: a review of the literature. J Orthop Trauma 36(Suppl 4):S6–S11
Hur GY, Song WJ, Lee JW et al (2012) Elbow reconstruction using island flap for burn patients. Arch Plast Surg 39(6):649–654
Shen TY, Sun YH, Cao DX et al (1988) The use of free flaps in burn patients: experiences with 70 flaps in 65 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 81(3):352–357
Goldstein JA, Iorio ML, Brown B et al (2010) The use of negative pressure wound therapy for random local flaps at the ankle region. J Foot Ankle Surg 49:513–516
Bi H, Khan M, Li J et al (2018) Use of incisional negative pressure wound therapy in skin-containing free tissue transfer. J Reconstr Microsurg 34:200–205
Li RG, Ren GH, Tan XJ et al (2013) Free flap transplantation combined with skin grafting and vacuum sealing drainage for repair of circumferential or sub-circumferential soft-tissue wounds of the lower leg. Med Sci Monit 19:510–517
Kamolz LP, Andel H, Haslik W et al (2004) Use of subatmospheric pressure therapy to prevent burn wound progression in human: first experiences. Burns 30:253–258
Nuutila K, Siltanen A, Peura M et al (2013) Gene expression profiling of negative pressure-treated skin graft donor site wounds. Burns 39(4):687–693
Germann G (2017) Hand reconstruction after burn injury: functional results. Clin Plast Surg 44(4):833–844
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank F. Miyamasu, Medical English Communications Center, University of Tsukuba, for language revision of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Junya Oshima. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Junya Oshima, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the ethics committee of the University of Tsukuba (no. R03-202).
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from the participants included in this study.
Consent for Publication
The authors affirm that the human research participants of this study provided informed consent for publication of the images shown in Figs. 1 and 2.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Oshima, J., Inoue, Y., Sasaki, K. et al. Various Purposes of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Severe Burn Treatment: a Short Case Series Analysis. Indian J Surg 86, 554–560 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03902-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03902-0