Abstract
A pot experiment was carried out to explore the role of glycinebetaine (GB) as foliar spray foliar on two pea (Pisum sativum L.) varieties (Pea 09 and Meteor Fsd) under saline and non-saline conditions. Thirty-two-day-old plants were subjected to two levels 0 and 150 mM of NaCl stress. Salt treatment was applied in full strength Hoagland’s nutrient solution. Three levels 0, 5 and 10 mM of GB were applied as foliar treatment on 34-day-old pea plants. After 2 weeks of foliar treatment with GB data for various growth and physiochemical attributes were recorded. Rooting-medium applied salt (150 mM NaCl) stress decreased growth, photosynthesis, chlorophyll, chlorophyll fluorescence and soluble protein contents, while increasing the activities of enzymatic (POD and CAT) and non-enzymatic (ascorbic acid and total phenolics) antioxidant enzymes. Foliar application of GB decreased root and shoot Na+ under saline conditions, while increasing shoot dry matter, root length, root fresh weight, stomatal conductance (g s), contents of seed ascorbic acid, leaf phenolics, and root and shoot Ca2+ contents. Of three GB (0, 5, 10 mM) levels, 10 mM proved to be more effective in mitigating the adverse effects of salinity stress. Overall, variety Pea 09 showed better performance in comparison to those of var. Meteor Fsd under both normal and salinity stress conditions. GB-induced modulation of seed ascorbic acid, leaf phenolics, g s, and root Ca2+ values might have contributed to the increased plant biomass, reduction of oxidative stress, increased osmotic adjustment and better photosynthetic performance of pea plants under salt stress.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Abiotic stresses (e.g., drought, salinity, cold and heat) adversely affect growth and yield of economically important crops and more than 50 % yield losses are direct result of these environmental factors (Rodriguez et al. 2005; Ahmad et al. 2012). Among these abiotic stresses soil salinity is a major issue which acts as a limiting factor for the productivity of crops and is expected to destroy about 50 % cultivable land up to the middle of twenty-first century (Mahajan and Tuteja 2005). High salt level in the irrigation water or soil causes hyperionic and hyperosmotic stress effects which leads to various metabolic disorders and ultimately plant death (Mahajan and Tuteja 2005).
Various growth, physiological and biochemical attributes, e.g., fresh and dry biomass (Shahbaz et al. 2011, 2012; Shaheen et al. 2012; Kausar et al. 2013), photosynthesis (Kanwal et al. 2011; Kausar and Shahbaz 2013; Perveen et al. 2010, 2013; Shahbaz et al. 2013; Kanwal et al. 2013), chlorophyll fluorescence (Kanwal et al. 2011; Habib et al. 2013; Perveen et al. 2013), water relations (Perveen et al. 2012a, 2014; Odjegba 2013), mineral nutrients (Perveen et al. 2012b) and activities of antioxidant enzymes (Perveen et al. 2011; Ashraf et al. 2012; Odjegba 2013) are severely inhibited under saline conditions (Shahbaz and Ashraf 2013). However, plants protect themselves from negative effects of salt stress by synthesis or accumulation of low-molecular-weight compatible organic compounds such as glycinebetaine (GB), proline (Pro) and raffinose (Wakeel et al. 2011; Chen and Murata 2002, 2011; Sakr et al. 2012), etc.
Glycinebetaine (N,N,N-trimethyl glycine) is a quaternary ammonium compound that is ubiquitous in occurrence (Rhodes and Hanson 1993) and known as an effective compatible solute that accumulates in the chloroplasts of certain plants under abiotic stress conditions like drought and salinity stresses (Robinson and Jones 1986; Giridarakumar et al. 2003). GB plays protective role against salt stress primarily by osmotic adjustment (Gadallah 1999), protection of photosynthetic machinery (Cha-Um and Kirdmanee 2010), stabilization of proteins structure (Makela et al. 2000) and scavenging of reactive oxygen species (Ashraf and Foolad 2007). However, GB accumulation varies not only under different environmental conditions, e.g., extreme temperatures (Karabudak et al. 2014), drought (Abbas et al. 2014), salinity (Girija et al. 2002) and alkaline stress (Cui et al. 2008), but also on type of plant species (Moghaieb et al. 2004), plant varieties (Hassine et al. 2008) and plant organelles (Zhu et al. 2003).
McCue and Hanson (1990) reported that activity of betaine aldehydehydrogenase, a GB synthesizing enzyme, is increased under salinity stress. Varshney et al. (1988), however, were of the view that choline and betaine accumulation was higher in salt sensitive Trifolium alexandrinum lines. Similarly, Wyn Jones et al. (1984) did not find positive correlation in accumulation of GB and salt tolerance in Elymus, Agropyron and Triticum genera. Accumulation of GB is a widespread and sporadic and varies in different plant species (Ashraf and Harris 2004). For example, the concentration of GB is tenfold more in sorghum than that found in maize (Grieve and Maas 1984; Rhodes et al. 1987). Yildiztugay et al. (2014) reported that osmolytes such as GB, proline and choline accumulate under mild level of salt stress in Sphaerophsa kotschyana plants. However, some other crops did not/little possess natural ability of GB-accumulation under abiotic stresses (Subbarao et al. 2001).
In recent decades, exogenous application of osmoprotectant such as proline, glycinebetaine and trehalose has helped reduce the negative effects of salinity stress (Hoque et al. 2008; Zeid 2009; Kausar et al. 2014).GB enables plant species to tolerate wide range of environmental stresses (Yang and Lu 2005) by helping plant cells with poor or no solute accumulation in osmotic adjustment (Ashraf and Foolad 2007). For example, under abiotic stresses foliar application of GB has been reported to increase growth of wheat (Shahbaz et al. 2011), rice (Cha-um et al. 2013) and maize (Reddy et al. 2013). Exogenous application of GB has been reported to stimulate growth of tomato (Chen et al. 2009), rice (Shahbaz and Zia 2011), canola (Sakr et al. 2012), soybean (Ali et al. 2012) and maize (Nawaz and Ashraf 2010; Kaya et al. 2013) although adverse effects of higher doses of GB have also been reported in grapevines (under low temperature) (Wilson 2001), kidney bean (under salt stress) (Lopez et al. 2002) and cotton (under normal conditions) (Makhdum and Shababuddin 2006). However, complete mechanism of GB-mediated salt-stress tolerance is not well-known in crop plants.
Pea (Pisum sativum L.) is an important leguminous crop that ranked on 4th position globally and occupies 2nd position in Pakistan on productivity basis (Shahid et al. 2011, 2012). It is an excellent source of proteins, carbohydrates, vitamins, minerals, salts and antioxidants (Hussein et al. 2006; Noreen and Ashraf 2009). Pea is cultivated in tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world (Javaid and Ghafoor 2002). Pea is cultivated on an area of 528.71 thousand hectares with total production of 441.53 thousand tons globally (Ashraf et al. 2011). In Pakistan pea is cultivated as winter crop and used as food and fodder throughout the country. It is cultivated on an area of 10.00 thousand hectares with total annual production of 82.00 thousand tons (Khan et al. 2013). Punjab is the leading province and contributes 70–80 % of total pea production (Zaidi et al. 2013). However, production level of pea could not meet the domestic needs as its annual consumption goes up to 160.00 thousand tons. Salt stress adversely affects germination rate, fresh and dry biomass, plant height, photosynthetic efficiency and mineral nutrients of pea crop (Shahid et al. 2011, 2012). No information is yet available on the effect of foliar application of GB on pea plants under salt stress conditions. So, keeping in view the protective role of GB and economic importance of pea crop a hypothesis was made whether or not foliar application of GB could be effective in ameliorating the deleterious effects of salt stress on pea plants. So the objectives of current study were to assess the effect of foliar spray of glycinebetaine on various growth (root and shoot fresh and dry weights and root and shoot length), physiological (gas exchange characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence) and biochemical (chlorophyll pigments, activities of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants, soluble proteins and mineral ions) attributes of pea plants under saline and non-saline regimes.
Materials and methods
Plant material and experimental design
To explore the role of foliarly applied glycinebetaine (GB) on various growth and physiochemical parameters of two pea (Pisum sativum L.) varieties (Pea 09 and Meteor Fsd) under saline (150 mM) and non-saline conditions, an experiment was carried out in the wire-house of Botanical Garden, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, under natural climatic conditions with average day and night temperatures 31.83 ± 4 °C and 10.66 ± 3 °C, respectively, 9.33 and 14.67 light and dark period at PPFD 800–1,100 µmol m−2 s−1, respectively, and relative humidity from 68.83 to 50 %. Seeds of two pea varieties (Pea 09 and Meteor Fsd) were obtained from Ayub Agricultural Research Institute (AARI), Faisalabad. Each plastic pot was filled with thoroughly washed river sand (10 kg per pot) and ten seeds per pot were sown. The design of the experiment was completely randomized with four replicates. When seedlings were 1 week old thinning was performed to reduce the number of plants to 6 in each pot. Plants were supplemented with full-strength Hoagland’s nutrient solution at the rate of 2 l per pot every week. Salt stress of 150 mM NaCl was applied after 36 days of sowing. To avoid osmotic shock to plants salt solution (NaCl + Hoagland’s nutrient solution) was applied by increasing the salt level gradually in aliquots of 50 mM NaCl every day up to day 3 until final volume 150 mM was attained. Salt treatment was applied at the rate of 2 l per pot every week until the end of experiment. Moisture content of sand were maintained by adding 150 ml water per pot every day. Glycinebetaine (mol. wt. 117.15 of Sigma Aldrich, Germany) solution was prepared by dissolving solid GB in distilled water and 0.1 % tween-20 to ensure effective penetration in leaf cells. Three levels of glycinebetaine, i.e., 0, 5 and 10 mM were applied at the rate of 25 ml per pot as foliar spray in the evening to avoid evaporation after 38 days of sowing. Data for various growth and physiochemical attributes were recorded after 2 weeks of foliar treatment with GB. Plastic zipper bags were used for the collection of fresh leaf samples during early morning to avoid desiccation and stored at −20 °C for determination of various biochemical attributes. Two plants were carefully up-rooted from each replication, measured shoot and root fresh weights (g plant−1), and shoot and root lengths (cm). Then the same plant material was oven-dried at 65 oC, and shoot and root dry weights (g plant−1) were recorded.
Physiological attributes
Determination of gas exchange characteristics
Net CO2 assimilation rate (A), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (g s) and sub-stomatal CO2 (C i) were determined by using a portable infrared gas analyzer (Analytical Development Company, Hoddesdon, LCA-4 ADC). The gas exchange measurements were performed in situ from 10.30 a.m. to 12.30 p.m. with some specific adjustments/specifications as mentioned in Perveen et al. (2010). PAR (Qleaf) at the surface of leaf was 941 µmol m−2 s−1.
Chlorophyll fluorescence determination
A Multi-Mode Chlorophyll Fluorometer of model OS5P-Sciences, Inc. Winn Avenue Hudson, USA, was used for the determination of maximum quantum photosynthetic yield (F v/F m) according to the method of Strasser et al. (1995). The oscillations were produced by light intensity of 2,800 μmol m−2 s−1. All the leaves were dark adapted for 30 min before recording the data for maximum fluorescence with all PSII reaction centers open (F m), minimum fluorescence with all PSII reaction centers open (F o), variable fluorescence (F v) and efficiency of quantum yield of PSII (F v/F m). Measuring beam frequency was 6 and 20 kHz for all measurements of F o and F m, respectively, during saturation flash. F o was recorded by weak red light of <0.1 µmol m−2 s−1 intensity. F m were recorded at 8,000 µmol m−2 s−1 saturation pulse of 0.8 s duration, while F v/F m, electron transport rate (ETR) and coefficient of nonphotochemical quenching (qN) were determined by 1,500 µmol m−2 s−1 actinic light intensity.
Following formulae were used for ETR and qN calculation:
where 0.84 is absorption coefficient of leaf and 0.5 is absorbed light fraction of PSII antennae.
Biochemical attributes
Determination of chlorophyll pigments
Arnon (1949) method was used for the determination of chlorophyll (chl. a and b) contents. Fresh leaf samples (0.1 g) were extracted in 5 ml acetone (80 %). The optical densities of the supernatant were recorded at wavelengths 645 and 663 nm using a UV–visible spectrophotometer (Model IRMECO U2020, Germany).
Chlorophyll contents were calculated by using the following formulae:
where v is the volume of the extract (ml), and w is the fresh leaf mass (g).
Determination of total phenolics
Total phenolic contents were determined by following the method of Julkenen-Titto (1985) using Folin and Ciocalteau’s phenol reagent (MP Biomedicals, USA). Fresh plant leaf (0.5 g) material was extracted in 80 % acetone. Then centrifuged extract at 10,000×g for 10 min. The aliquot (0.1 ml) was diluted with 2 ml of distilled H2O plus 1 ml of Folin and Ciocalteau’s phenol reagent. After shaking the mixture, 5 ml sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) (20 %) was added. Then to the above mixture was added distilled water and volume maintained to 10 ml in test tubes. After vortex read the OD at 750 nm on a spectrophotometer (US-Visible, IRMECO, GmbH, Germany).
Seed ascorbic acid (Asc) content determination
Mukherjee and Choudhuri (1983) method was used for the determination of ascorbic acid contents. Fresh seeds 250 mg were homogenized with trichloroacetic acid (6 %) and volume raised to 10 ml in test tubes. Then 4 ml extract was mixed with 2 ml of 2 % dinitrophenyl hydrazine and then one drop of thiourea (10 % dissolved in 70 % ethanol) was added. The mixture was boiled for 15 min. in a water bath at 95 oC. Then cooled down and added 5 ml of sulphuric acid (80 %) to the sample mixture. The absorbance was read at 530 nm and Asc values were calculated with the help of standard curve.
Antioxidant enzymes activities
Extraction of enzyme
Fresh leaf 0.5 g was homogenized in 10 ml of 50 mM cooled phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), placed on an ice bath and then centrifuged at 15,000×g for 20 min at 4 °C.
Determination of superoxide dismutase (SOD)
Giannopolitis and Ries (1977) method was used for SOD determination. For the appraisal of SOD enzyme activity, criteria of nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) photoreduction inhibition was used as one unit of SOD enzyme activity will be equal to the amount of enzyme that inhibit 50 % NBT photoreduction. SOD reaction mixture (1 ml) in plastic cuvettes consists of 500 μl phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 0.5 ml distilled H2O, 100 μl methionine, 50 μl NBT and 50 μl sample extract, which were kept under light for 20 min. After that optical density of irradiated aliquots was read at 560 nm using a spectrophotometer.
Catalase and peroxidase determination
CAT and POD activities were determined by following Chance and Maehly (1955) with slight modifications. The CAT reaction solution (3 ml) consisted of 1.9 ml phosphate buffer (50 mM; pH 7.0), 1 ml H2O2 (5.9 mM) and 0.1 ml enzyme extract. Reaction was initiated by adding an aliquot (100 μl) of the enzyme extract. Changes in enzyme activity were recorded by spectrophotometer at 240 nm after every 20 s for 2 min. For determination of POD activity reaction mixture consists of 750 μl phosphate buffer (50 mM; pH 5.0), 100 μl guaiacol (20 mM), 100 μl H2O2 (40 mM) and 100 μl enzyme extract. Changes in absorbance values of reaction mixture were read at 470 nm after every 20 s for 3 min by spectrophotometer.
Determination of total soluble proteins
Bradford (1976) method was used for the determination of total soluble protein contents. Fresh leaf (500 mg) was triturated with 10 ml of 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) in an ice bath. The aliquot was centrifuged at 10,000×g for 15 min at 4 °C.
Determination of mineral ions
Dried root or shoot material (0.1 g) was finely ground in digestion flasks with digestion mixture (2 ml) by following Allen et al. (1985) method. The digestion flasks were left for 24 h at room temperature. The flasks containing samples were heated by gradually increasing the temperature of hot plate up to 250 °C and kept at this temperature for 40 min. until fumes are produced, after which, 35 % H2O2 (0.5 ml) was poured down along the sides of flasks. When sample mixture became colorless, heating was stopped and the samples cooled down. Then volume of samples was maintained up to 50 ml with distilled water and the samples filtered and used for the determination of Ca2+, K+ and Na+ by flame photometer (Jenway PFP 7).
Application of state on data
Data were analyzed statistically using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for all parameters and calculated using computer software (Co-STAT). Snedecore and Cohran (1980) method was used for comparing mean values via least significant difference.
Results
Effect of salt (NaCl) and glycinebetaine (GB) on growth attributes
Root and shoot biomass and root and shoot lengths
Rooting-medium applied salt stress of 150 mM NaCl significantly decreased shoot and root fresh weights (Fig. 1a, b), shoot and root dry weights (Fig. 1c, d), and shoot and root lengths (Fig. 1e, f) of two pea varieties, pea 09 and meteor Fsd (Table 1). Of both varieties, Pea 09 was significantly higher in root and shoot fresh and dry biomass, and root length than Meteor Fsd under both control and salt stress conditions. Glycinebetaine (GB) applied as foliar spray did not alter these growth attributes significantly under non-stress and salt stress regimes. However, foliar application of GB increased shoot dry weight (Fig. 1b) and root fresh weight (Fig. 1c) in variety Pea 09, while decreased root fresh weight (Fig. 1c) and root length (Fig. 1f) in var. Meteor Fsd under non-saline conditions.
Effect of salt (NaCl) and glycinebetaine (GB) on physiological attributes
Effect on gas exchange characteristics
Gas exchange characteristics like net CO2 assimilation rate (A) (Fig. 1g), transpiration rate (E) (Fig. 1h) and stomatal conductance (g s) (Fig. 2a) significantly decreased in both pea varieties under salt stress of 150 mM NaCl (Table 1). Of two varieties, Pea 09 exhibited greater decline as compared to Meteor Fsd to net CO2 assimilation rate (A) under saline stress, while in var. Meteor Fsd the reduction in transpiration rate (E) was more prominent in comparison to that of Pea 09 under saline and non-saline regimes. Overall, var. Pea 09 was higher in g s value as compared to var. Meteor Fsd under both NaCl stress and non-stress conditions. Foliar application of GB significantly improved stomatal conductance of var. Pea 09 under non-stress condition only (Table 1).
Considerable (P ≤ 0.001) improvement was observed in sub-stomatal CO2 (C i) (Fig. 2b) of both pea varieties under salt prevailing regimes. GB had non-significant effect on C i of both varieties under salt stress as well as non-stress condition. Meteor Fsd showed better performance in maintaining the C i under salt-stressed conditions (Table 1).
Effect on chlorophyll fluorescence
Maximum quantum yield of photosystem-II (F v/F m) (Fig. 2c), electron transport rate (ETR) (Fig. 2d), non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) (Fig. 2e) and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) (Fig. 2f) remained uniform under saline regimes (Table 1). Foliar-applied GB did not alter these chlorophyll fluorescence attributes under both saline and non-saline condition except qN and NPQ. Foliar-applied GB prominently increased (P ≤ 0.001) the NPQ value of both pea varieties both under control and 150 mM NaCl level (Fig. 2f). However, var. Pea 09 showed high qN and NPQ values by foliar-applied GB under non-saline conditions. Of both varieties, Meteor Fsd was superior (P ≤ 0.05) in F v/F m ratio as compared to that of variety Pea 09 under both control and saline regimes. Among various concentration of GB, 10 mM was proved to be more effective as compared to others.
Effect of salt (NaCl) and glycinebetaine (GB) on biochemical attributes
Effect on chlorophyll pigments
Chlorophyll a, b (Fig. 2g, h) contents significantly (P ≤ 0.001) decreased, while chl. a/b ratio (Fig. 3a) increased (P ≤ 0.001) in both varieties of pea under salt stress. Contents of total chlorophyll (Fig. 3b) also decreased under salt stress in both pea varieties. Exogenously applied various levels of GB had no pronounced effect on chlorophyll contents of both varieties under both control (0 mM NaCl) and salt-stressed (150 mM NaCl) conditions (Table 1).
Effect on total phenolics
Total phenolic (Fig. 3c) contents of both pea varieties significantly (P ≤ 0.001) increased under saline condition (Table 2). Both pea varieties significantly (P ≤ 0.001) differed in total phenolics. Variety Pea 09 was superior to that of var. Meteor Fsd in total phenolic contents under saline and non-saline regimes (Fig. 3c). GB application as foliar spray significantly increased total phenolic contents of both pea varieties under both control and salt-stressed conditions (Table 2). However, var. Pea 09 accumulated more total phenolics than var. Meteor Fsd under non-saline conditions.
Effect on seed ascorbic acid
Root-medium applied salt stress markedly enhanced ascorbic acid (Fig. 3d) contents in pea seeds. Both pea varieties did not differ significantly in seed ascorbic acid contents. GB application as foliar spray had prominent effect (P ≤ 0.001) on the level of seed ascorbic acid contents in both varieties (Table 1). Of various GB levels, 10 mM GB significantly (P ≤ 0.001) enhanced seed ascorbic acid contents of both pea varieties under both control and 150 mM NaCl level (Fig. 3d).
Effect on activities of antioxidant enzymes
Salt stress did not alter activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) (Fig. 3e) in both pea varieties. Variety Pea 09 was higher in SOD enzymatic activity than that of Meteor Fsd under both control and 150 mM NaCl conditions. GB applied as foliar spray did not improve activity of SOD in both pea varieties under non-saline or saline regimes (Table 2).
Peroxidase (Fig. 3f) and catalase (Fig. 3g) activities were appreciably (P ≤ 0.001) elevated in both pea varieties subjected to saline regimes (Table 2). Variety Meteor Fsd showed high activity of CAT and POD as compared to variety Pea 09 under both control and 150 mM NaCl level. Foliar application of different GB levels did not alter the activities of POD and CAT in both varieties under control and saline conditions.
Effect on total soluble proteins
Salt stress significantly decreased total soluble protein (Fig. 3h) contents in both pea varieties (Table 2). This reduction (P ≤ 0.001) was higher in variety Meteor Fsd than that of variety Pea 09 under both control and 150 mM salt level (Fig. 3h). GB application as foliar spray did not alter the level of soluble proteins in both varieties of pea crop (Table 2).
Effect on mineral ions
Root and shoot K+ contents (Fig. 4a, b) significantly decreased in both pea varieties under saline stress. Both pea varieties showed uniform behavior in accumulation of shoot K+ (Fig. 4a) under both salt-stressed and non-stressed conditions; however, Meteor Fsd was prominently higher in accumulation of root K+ (Fig. 4b) as compared to that of variety Pea 09. Foliar-application of GB did not alter root and shoot K+ contents in both pea varieties (Table 2).
Root and shoot sodium ions significantly increased (Fig. 4c, d) in both pea varieties under salt stress. Variety Pea 09 was higher in root Na+ (Fig. 4d) contents to that of var. Meteor Fsd under salt stress condition. Foliar application of GB significantly decreased root and shoot Na+ contents in both pea varieties under 150 mM NaCl level (Table 2).
A marked reduction (P ≤ 0.001) in root and shoot Ca2+ (Fig. 4e, f) contents was observed in both pea varieties under saline regimes. Varietal behavior was uniform in shoot Ca2+ (Fig. 4e), while variety Pea 09 had high root Ca2+ (Fig. 4f) than that of Meteor Fsd under control and salt-stressed condition. Foliar-applied GB significantly increased shoot Ca2+ in var. Pea 09 (Fig. 4e) and root Ca2+ (Fig. 4f) in both pea varieties under both non-stressed and salt-stressed conditions (Table 2).
Discussion
Glycinebetaine regulates a plethora of physiological and biochemical phenomena under saline environment (Kaya et al. 2013). Glycinebetaine when applied externally to the plants ameliorates damaging effects of salinity stress by regulating various stomatal and non-stomatal factors under salt stress (Kausar et al. 2014). Photosynthetic machinery components such as ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (rubisco) (Nomura et al. 1998) and oxygen evolving complex of photosystem II (Murata et al. 1992) are protected by GB via enhancing antioxidant enzymes activities (Khan et al. 2014) and inhibiting peroxidation of membrane lipids (Demiral and Turkan 2004). GB accumulation led to improved photosynthesis through reduction in oxidative stress under salt stress (Khan et al. 2014). The current study was conducted to assess whether foliar spray of different concentrations of glycinebetaine can reduce negative effects of salinity stress on pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants or not.
In the current study, 150 mM NaCl stress drastically reduced plant growth of both pea varieties. High amount of salt in the rooting medium has been reported to decrease plant biomass of various crop species like canola (Shahbaz et al. 2013), pepper (De Pascale et al. 2003a), celery (De Pascale et al. 2003b), pea (Shahid et al. 2011, 2012) and wheat (Perveen et al., 2014). Although foliar application of 5 and 10 mM GB could not improve growth significantly under saline conditions, however, under control environment (0 mM NaCl) foliar-applied GB enhanced shoot dry weight, root fresh weight and root length of pea variety Pea 09. There are some reports which show non-significance of GB when applied exogenously in different crop species like sunflower (Ibrahim et al. 2006), cotton (Meek et al. 2003), kidney bean (Lopez et al. 2002) and tomato (Heuer 2003).
In the current study, under salinity stress of 150 mM NaCl chlorophyll contents (chl. a and b) and total chlorophyll decreased in both pea varieties. Similar results were reported by Shahid et al. (2012) in seven pea genotypes under 75 mM of NaCl. Foliar application of GB has no considerable effect on salinity-induced reduction in the chlorophyll content. Similarly, Akhter et al. (2007) was of the view that seed treatment with GB did not significantly change chl. b contents in wheat.
Long time exposure to NaCl stress leads to premature senescence of leaves and ultimately decreases photosynthetic rate (Cramer and Nowak 1992). Sodium and chloride ions’ accumulation in the leaf tissues decreases turgor potential within cell due to which stomata closed, resulting in reduced stomatal conductance (g s). In this study, 150 mM NaCl stress decreased all gas exchange parameters such as g s, transpiration rate (E) and principally net photosynthetic rate (A) of both varieties. Shahid et al. (2012) reported similar results in seven pea genotypes. GB plays a role in maintaining ionic balance and osmotic adjustment in various plant species under salinity stress (Sakamoto and Murata 2000; Yildiztugay et al. 2014). In this study, foliar-applied GB did not alter gas exchange characteristics. These results can be correlated with the findings of Meek and Oosterhuis (1999) in which GB did not improve photosynthetic rate of cotton. Contrarily, Raza et al. (2006) reported that photosynthetic rate (A) improved when glycinebetaine applied exogenously under NaCl stress in wheat. GB has been reported to enhance salt stress tolerance due to increased stomatal conductance and consequently high photosynthetic rate of field-grown tomato plants (Makela et al. 1999). In another report exogenous application of GB improved all gas exchange characteristics such as water use efficiency (WUE), sub-stomatal CO2 (C i), stomatal conductance (g s) and net CO2 assimilation rate (A) of maize under NaCl stress (Kausar et al. 2014). Timasheff (1992) reported that GB increases stomatal conductance due to increasing the amount of bound water in plant cells.
Kalaji et al. (2010) reported that photochemical efficiency of PSII (F v/F m) can be used as criteria for evaluating plant performance under stressful conditions. Lower F v/F m values indicate reduced electron transport rate and damaged PSII reaction centers under NaCl stress (Basu et al. 1998). In this study, all chlorophyll fluorescence attributes like F v/F m, ETR, qN and NPQ remained unaffected under salt stress. Similar to these results, salinity stress did not alter PSII activity in cotton and barley (Morales et al. 1992; Brugnoli and Bjorkman 1992). Under mild salt (150 mM NaCl) stress F v/F m did not get affected, while under high level of salt (300 mM NaCl) F v/F m significantly decreased in Sphaerophsa kotschyana plants (Yildiztugay et al. 2014). In this study, foliar applied GB did not alter F v/F m and ETR significantly, however, increased NPQ value under saline conditions in var. Pea 09 and qN and NPQ values in both pea varieties under non-saline conditions. Raza et al. (2006) reported that GB did not exert any significant effect on efficiency of photosystem II (F v/F m) in wheat under salt stress.
Plants tolerance criteria are related with low Na+ uptake and higher accumulation of beneficial K+ and Ca2+ to maintain optimal K+/Na+ ratio (Munns and Tester 2008). Our results can be related with earlier findings explained by Heuer (2003) that exogenously applied GB and proline did not reduced the uptake of sodium and chloride ions in the leaves and roots of tomato. GB as seeds’ treatment did not alter status of mineral nutrients in wheat plants both under non-stress or salt stress conditions (Akhter et al. 2007).
In this study, total phenolic and ascorbic acid contents increased under saline condition in both pea varieties. Contrary to our results, Navarro et al. (2006) reported that NaCl stress reduces the ascorbic acid and total phenolic contents in pepper. In previous studies it has been reported that GB can ameliorate unfavorable effects of salinity by up regulating enzymatic antioxidant activity (Raza et al. 2007; Nawaz and Ashraf 2010). In our study, CAT and POD enzymes’ activities increased under NaCl stress in both pea varieties; however, GB did not modulate antioxidant enzyme activities under either salt stress or non-stress conditions. GB is not always a compatible organic compound for all plant species (Ibrahim et al. 2006); it could be phytotoxic because various physiological and biochemical processes such as photosynthetic rate and activity of metabolic enzymes are negatively affected at higher concentrations of GB. It has been reported that the effect of GB varies according to environmental conditions, plant species, cultivars, concentration and number of application (Ashraf and Foolad 2007; Reddy et al. 2013).
In conclusion, 150 mM of NaCl markedly reduced root and shoot fresh and dry matter, lengths of root and shoot, photosynthetic pigments such as chl. a, b and total chlorophyll, A, E, g s and protein contents, while increasing root and shoot Na+ contents, and activity of non enzymatic (ascorbic acid, phenolics) and enzymatic (POD, CAT) antioxidants in both pea varieties. Application of GB as foliar spray (0, 5, 10 mM) increased dry matter of shoot, fresh weight of root and root length, stomatal conductance, NPQ, root and shoot Ca2+ (in Pea 09), ascorbic acid and total phenolic contents. Of various GB levels, 10 mM proved more effective in reducing Na+ content of root and shoot and increasing key metabolites in both pea varieties under saline conditions. Possible mechanism involved in GB-mediated abiotic stress tolerance includes induction of specific genes expression that encodes enzymes that scavenge reactive oxygen species and prevent excess ROS accumulation (Chen and Murata 2011). In this study, GB might have stabilized proteins structure and maintained membrane integrity by increasing activities of non-enzymatic antioxidants that might have led to scavenging of reactive oxygen species under salt stress. Furthermore, GB might be involved in the nutrients’ uptake as it is exhibited by increased root Ca2+ accumulation in root and shoot tissues. Overall, variety Pea 09 showed better performance in comparison to that of variety Meteor Fsd.
Author contribution
Miss. Nida Nusrat performed the experiment under the supervision of Dr. Muhammad Shahbaz while the third author (Dr. Shagufta Perveen) contributed in the form of help during lab analysis and manuscript write up.
References
Abbas SR, Ahmad SD, Sabir SMY, Shah AH (2014) Detection of drought tolerant sugarcane genotypes (Saccharum officinarum) using lipid peroxidation, antioxidant activity, glycine-betaine and proline contents. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 14(1):233–243
Ahmad P, Hakeem KR, Kumar A, Ashraf M, Akram NA (2012) Salt-induced changes in photosynthetic activity and oxidative defense system of three cultivars of mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Afr J Biotechnol 11:2694–2703
Akhter N, Akram NA, Shahbaz M (2007) Presowing seed treatments with glycinebetaine and mineral nutrients of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under saline conditions. Pak J Agric Sci 44(2):236–241
Ali RM, Kaviani B, Masouleh A (2012) The effect of exogenous glycine betaine on yield of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in two contrasting cultivars Pershing and DPX under soil salinity stress. Plant Omics, Southern Cross Publisher
Allen SK, Dobrenz AK, Schonhorst MH, Stoner JE (1985) Heritability of NaCl tolerance in germinating alfalfa seeds. Agron J 77:90–96
Arnon DT (1949) Copper enzyme in isolated chloroplasts polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–15
Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007) Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ Exp Bot 59:206–216
Ashraf M, Harris PJC (2004) Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Sci 166:3–16
Ashraf I, Pervez MA, Mand A, Ahmad R (2011) Effect of varying irrigation frequencies on growth, yield and quality of peas seed. J Agric Res 49(3):339–351
Ashraf MA, Ashraf M, Shahbaz M (2012) Growth stage-based modulation in antioxidant defense system and proline accumulation in two hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars differing in salinity tolerance. Flora 207(5):388–397
Basu PS, Sharma A, Sukumaran NP (1998) Changes in net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence in potato leaves induced by water stress. Photosynthetica 35:13–19
Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Ann Biochem 72:248–254
Brugnoli E, Bjorkman O (1992) Growth of cotton under continuous salinity stress influence on allocation pattern, stomatal and non stomatal components of photosynthesis and dissipation of excess light energy. Planta 187:335–347
Chance B, Maehly A (1955) Assay of catalase and peroxidase. Methods Enzymol 2:764–817
Cha-Um S, Kirdmanee C (2010) Effect of glycinebetaine on proline, water use, and photosynthetic efficiencies, and growth of rice seedlings under salt stress. Turk J Agric For 34:517–527
Cha-um S, Samphumphuang T, Kirdmanee C (2013) Glycinebetaine alleviates water deficit stress in indica rice using proline accumulation, photosynthetic efficiencies, growth performances and yield attributes. Aus J Crop Sci 7(2):213–218
Chen THH, Murata N (2002) Enhancement of tolerance to abiotic stress by metabolic engineering of betaines and other compatible solutes. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:250–257
Chen THH, Murata N (2011) Glycinebetaine protects plants against abiotic stress: mechanisms and biotechnological applications. Plant Cell Environ 34:1–20
Chen S, Gollop N, Heuer B (2009) Proteomic analysis of salt-stressed tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) seedlings: effect of genotype and exogenous application of glycinebetaine. J Exp Bot, erp075v1–erp075
Cramer GR, Nowak RS (1992) Supplemental manganese improves the relative growth, net assimilation and photosynthetic rates of salt-stressed barley. Physiol Plant 84(4):600–605
Cui XH, Fu-Shun H, Chen H, Chen J, Wang XC (2008) Expression of the Vicia faba VfPIP gene in Arabidopsis thaliana plants improves there drought resistance. J Plant Res 121:207–214
De Pascale E, Ruggiero C, Barbieri G, Maggio A (2003a) Physiological responses of pepper to salinity and drought. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 128:48–54
De Pascale S, Maggio A, Ruggiero C, Barbieri G (2003b) Growth, water relations, and ion content of field grown celery under saline irrigation (Apium graveolens L. var. dulce [Mill.] pers.). J Am Soc Hortic Sci 128:136–143
Demiral T, Turkan I (2004) Does exogenous glycinebetaine affect antioxidative system of rice seedlings under NaCl treatment. J Plant Physiol 161:1089–1100
Gadallah MAA (1999) Effect of proline and glycinebetaine on Vicia faba responses to salt stress. Biol Plant 42:249–257
Giannopolitis CN, Ries SK (1977) Superoxide dismutase. I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol 59:309–314
Giridarakumar S, Matta Reddy A, Sudhakar C (2003) NaCl effects on proline metabolism in two high yielding genotypes of mulberry (Morus alba L.) with contrasting salt tolerance. Plant Sci 165:1245–1251
Girija C, Smith BN, Swamy PM (2002) Interactive effects of sodium chloride and calcium chloride on the accumulation of proline and glycinebetaine in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Environ Exp Bot 47:1–10
Grieve CM, Maas EM (1984) Betaine accumulation in salt stressed sorghum. Physiol Plant 61:167–171
Habib N, Ashraf M, Shahbaz M (2013) Effect of exogenously applied nitric oxide on some key physiological attributes of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants under salt stress. Pak J Bot 45(5):1563–1569
Hassine AB, Ghanem ME, Bouzid S, Lutts S (2008) An inland and a coastal population of the Mediterranean xero-halophyte species Atriplex halimus L. differ in their ability to accumulate proline and glycinebetaine in response to salinity and water stress. J Exp Bot 59:1315–1326
Heuer B (2003) Influence of exogenous application of proline and glycinebetaine on growth of salt-stressed tomato plants. Plant Sci 165:693–699
Hoque MA, Okuma E, Nakamara Y, Shimoishi Y, Murata Y (2008) Proline and glycinebetaine enhance antioxidant defense and methylglyoxal detoxification systems and reduce NaCl induced damage in cultured tobacco cells. J Plant Physiol 165:813–824
Hussein MM, El-Gereadly NHM, El-Desuki M (2006) Role of puterscine in resistance to salinity of pea plants (Pisum sativum L.). J Appl Sci Res 2:598–604
Ibrahim M, Anjum A, Khaliq N, Iqbal M, Athar HR (2006) Four foliar applications of glycinebetaine did not alleviate adverse effects of salt stress on growth of sunflower. Pak J Bot 38(5):1561–1570
Javaid A, Ghafoor Anwar R (2002) Evaluation of local and exotic pea (Pisum sativum) germplasm for vegetative and dry grain traits. Pak J Bot 34(4):419–427
Julkenen-Titto R (1985) Phenolic constituents in the leaves of northern willows: methods for the analysis of certain phenolics. Agric Food Chem 33:213–217
Kalaji HM, Govindje E, Bosa K, Koscielniak J, Zuk-Golaszewska K (2010) Effects of salt stress on photosystem II efficiency and CO2 assimilation of two Syrian barley landraces. Environ Exp Bot 73:64–72
Kanwal H, Ashraf M, Shahbaz M (2011) Assessment of salt tolerance of some newly developed and candidate wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars using gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence attributes. Pak J Bot 43(6):2693–2699
Kanwal S, Ashraf M, Shahbaz M, Iqbal MY (2013) Influence of saline stress on growth, gas exchange, mineral nutrients and non-enzymatic antioxidatns in mungbean [(Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Pak J Bot 45(3):763–771
Karabudak T, Bor M, Ozdemir F, Turkan I (2014) Glycine betaine protects tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants at low temperature by inducing fatty acid desaturase7 and lipoxygenase gene expression. Mol Biol Rep 41(3):1401–1410
Kausar F, Shahbaz M (2013) Interactive effect of foliar application of nitric oxide (NO) and salinity on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pak J Bot 45(SI):67–73
Kausar F, Shahbaz M, Ashraf M (2013) Protective role of foliar-applied nitric oxide in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under saline stress. Turk J Bot 37(6):1155–1165
Kausar N, Nawaz K, Hussain K, Bhatti KH, Siddiqi EH, Tallat A (2014) Effect of exogenous applications of glycine betaine on growth and gaseous exchange attributes of two maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars under saline conditions. World Appl Sci J 29:1559–1565
Kaya C, Sonmez O, Aydemir S, Dilkilitas M (2013) Mitigation effects of glycinebetaine on oxidative stress and some key growth parameters of maize exposed to salt stress. Turk J Agric 37:188–194
Khan TN, Ramzan A, Jillani G, Mehmood T (2013) Morphological performance of peas (Pisum sativum) genotypes under rainfed conditions of potowar region. J Agric Res 51(1):51–60
Khan MIR, Asgher M, Khan NA (2014) Alleviation of salt-induced photosynthesis and growth inhibition by salicylic acid involves glycinebetaine and ethylene in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.). Plant Physiol Biochem 80:67–74
Lopez CML, Takahashi H, Yamazaki S (2002) Plant water relations of kidney bean plants treated with NaCl and foliarly applied glycinebetaine. J Agron Crop Sci 188:73–80
Mahajan S, Tuteja N (2005) Cold, salinity and drought stresses: an overview. Arch Biochem Biophys 444:139–158
Makela P, Kontturi M, Pheu E, Somersalo S (1999) Photosynthetic response of drought and salt-stressed tomato and turnip rape plants to foliar-applied glycinebetaine. Physiol Plant 105:45–50
Makela P, Karkkainen J, Somersalo S (2000) Effect of glycinebetaine on chloroplast ultrastructure, chlorophyll and protein content, and RuBPCO activities in tomato grown under drought or salinity. Biol Plant 43:471–475
Makhdum MI, Shababuddin MI (2006) Effects of different doses of glycine betaine and time of spray application on yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J Res (Science) 17(4):241–245
McCue RF, Hanson AD (1990) Drought and salt tolerance: towards understanding and application. TIBTECH 8:358–362
Meek CR, Oosterhuis DM (1999) Effects of foliar application of glycinebetaine on fieldgrown cotton. In: Oosterhuis DM (ed) Proc. 1999 cotton research meeting and summaries of research in progress. University of Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Special, Report 193, pp 103–105
Meek C, Oosterhuis D, Gorham J (2003) Does foliar-applied glycinebetaine affect endogenous betaine levels and yield in cotton? Crop Manage. doi:10.1094/CM-2003-0804-02-RS(Online
Moghaieb REA, Saneoka H, Fujita K (2004) Effect of salinity on osmotic adjustment, glycinebetaine accumulation and the betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase gene expression in two halophytic plants, Salicornia europaea and Suaeda maritima. Plant Sci 166:1345–1349
Morales F, Abadia A, Gomez-Aparis J, Abadia J (1992) Effects of combined NaCl and CaCl2 salinity on photosynthetic parameters of barley grown in nutrient solution. Physiol Plant 86:419–426
Mukherjee SP, Choudhuri MA (1983) Implications of water stress-induced changes in the levels of endogenous ascorbic acid and hydrogen peroxide in Vigna seedlings. Physiol Plant 58:166–170
Munns R, Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:651–681
Murata N, Mohanty PS, Hayashi H, Papageorgiou GC (1992) Glycinebetaine stabilizes the association of extrinsic proteins with the photosynthetic oxygen evolving complex. FEBS Lett 296:187–189
Navarro J, Flores M, Garrido PC, Martinez V (2006) Changes in the contents of antioxidant compounds in pepper fruits at different ripening stages, as affected by salinity. Food Chem 96:66–73
Nawaz K, Ashraf M (2010) Exogenous application of glycinebetaine modulates activities of antioxidants in maize plants subjected to salt stress. J Agron Crop 196:28–37
Nomura M, Hibino T, Takabe T, Sugiyama T, Yokota A, Miyake H, Takabe T (1998) Transgenically produced glycinebetaine protects ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase from inactivation in Synechococcus sp. PCC7942 under salt stress. Plant Cell Physiol 39:425–432
Noreen Z, Ashraf M (2009) Assessment of variation in antioxidative defense system in salt- treated pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars and its putative use as salinity tolerance markers. J Plant Physiol 166:1764–1774
Odjegba VJ (2013) Responses of Zea mays seedlings to salinity stress and exogenous nitrogen supply. Nat Sci 11(1):63–69
Perveen S, Shahbaz M, Ashraf M (2010) Regulation in gas exchange and quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) in salt stressed and non-stressed wheat plants raised from seed treated with triacontanol. Pak J Bot 42:3073–3081
Perveen S, Shahbaz M, Ashraf M (2011) Modulation in activities of antioxidant enzymes in salt stressed and non-stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants raised from seed treated with triacontanol. Pak J Bot 43(5):2463–2468
Perveen S, Shahbaz M, Ashraf M (2012a) Is pre-sowing seed treatment with triacontanol effective in improving some physiological and biochemical attributes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under salt stress? J Appl Bot Food Qual 85:41–48
Perveen S, Shahbaz M, Ashraf M (2012b) Changes in mineral composition, uptake and use efficiency of salt stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants raised from seed treated with triacontanol. Pak J Bot 44:27–35
Perveen S, Shahbaz M, Ashraf M (2013) Influence of foliar-applied triacontanol on growth, gas exchange characteristics, and chlorophyll fluorescence at different growth stages in wheat under saline conditions. Photosynthetica 51(4):541–551
Perveen S, Shahbaz M, Ashraf M (2014) Triacontanol-induced changes in growth, yield, leaf water relations, antioxidative defense system and some key osmoprotectants in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under saline stress. Turk J Bot 38:896–913
Raza SH, Athar HR, Ashraf M (2006) Influence of exogenously applied glycinebetaine on the photosynthetic capacity of two differently adapted wheat cultivars under salt stress. Pak J Bot 38(2):341–351
Raza SH, Athar HR, Ashraf M, Hameed A (2007) GB-induced modulation of antioxidant enzymes activities and ion accumulation in two wheat cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Env Exp Bot 60:368–376
Reddy KR, Henry WB, Seepaul R, Lokhande S, Gajanayake B, Brand D (2013) Exogenous application of glycinebetaine facilitates maize (Zea mays L) growth under water deficit conditions. Am J Exp Agric 3(1):1–13
Rhodes D, Hanson AD (1993) Quaternary ammonium and tertiary sulfonium compounds in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 44:357–384
Rhodes DP, Rich J, Myers AC, Rueter CC, Jamieson GC (1987) Determination of betaines by fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry: identification of glycinebetaine deficient genotypes of Zea mays. Plant Physiol 84:781–788
Robinson SP, Jones JP (1986) Accumulation of glycinebetaine in chloroplasts provides osmotic adjustment during salt stress. Aust J Plant Physiol 13:659–668
Rodriguez M, Canales E, Borras-Hidalgo O (2005) Molecular aspects of abiotic stress in plants. Biotecnologia Aplicada 22:1–10
Sakamoto H, Murata N (2000) Genetic engineering of glycinebetaine synthesis in plants: current status and implications for enhancement of stress tolerance. J Exp Bot 51:81–88
Sakr MT, El-Sarkassy NM, Fuller MP (2012) Osmoregulators proline and glycine betaine counteract salinity stress in canola. Agron Sus Dev 32(3):747–754
Shahbaz M, Ashraf M (2013) Improving salinity tolerance in cereals. Crit Rev Plant Sci 32:237–249
Shahbaz M, Zia B (2011) Does exogenous application of glycinebetaine through rooting medium alter rice (Oryza sativa L.) mineral nutrient status under saline conditions? J Appl Bot Food Qual 84(1):54–60
Shahbaz M, Masood Y, Perveen S, Ashraf M (2011) Is foliar-applied glycinebetaine effective in mitigating the adverse effects of drought stress on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)? J Appl Bot Food Qual 84:192–199
Shahbaz M, Ashraf M, Al-Qurainy F, Harris PJC (2012) Salt tolerance in selected vegetable crops. Crit Rev Plant Sci 31(4):303–320
Shahbaz M, Noreen N, Perveen S (2013) Triacontanol modulates photosynthesis and osmoprotectants in canola (Brassica napus L) under saline stress. J Plant Inter 8(4):250–259
Shaheen HL, Shahbaz S, Ullah I, Iqbal MZ (2012) Morpho-physiological responses of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to salt stress. Int J Agric Biol 14:980–984
Shahid MA, Pervez MA, Ashraf MY, Ayyub CM, Ashfaq M, Mattson NS (2011) Characterization of salt tolerant and salt sensitive pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes under saline regime. Pak J Life Soc Sci 9(2):145–152
Shahid MA, Pervez MA, Balal RM, Abbas T, Ayyub CM, Mattson NS, Riaz A, Iqbal Z (2012) Screening of pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes for salt tolerance based on early growth stage attributes and leaf inorganic osmolytes. Aust J Crop Sci 6(9):1324–1331
Snedecore GW, Cohran WG (1980) Statistical methods, 7th edn. The Iowa State University Press, Ames
Strasser RJ, Srivastava A, Govindjee (1995) Polyphasic chlorophyll ‘a’ fluorescence transients in plants and cyanobacteria. Photochem Photobiol 61:32–42
Subbarao GV, Wheeler RM, Levine LH, Stutte GW (2001) Glycinebetaine accumulation, ionic and water relations of red-beet at contrasting levels of sodium supply. J Plant Physiol 158:767–776
Timasheff SN (1992) A physicochemical basis for the selection of osmolytes by nature. In: Somero CN, Osmond CB, Bolis CL (eds) Water and life: comparative analysis of water relationships at the organismic, cellular and molecular levels. Springer, Berlin, pp 71–84
Varshney KA, Gangwar LP, Goel N (1988) Choline and betaine accumulation in Trifolium alexandrinum L. during salt stress. Egyptian J Bot 31:81–86
Wakeel A, Asif AR, Pitann B, Schubert S (2011) Proteome analysis of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) elucidates constitutive adaptation during the first phase of salt stress. J Plant Physiol 168:519–526
Wilson S (2001) Frost management in cool climate vineyards. Final Report to Grape and Wine Research & Development Corporation, Australia
Wyn Jones RG, Gorham J, McDonnell E (1984) Organic and inorganic solute contents as selection criteria for salt tolerance in the Triticeae. In: Staples R, Toennissen GH (eds) Salinity tolerance in plants: strategies for crop improvement. Wiley, New York, pp 189–203
Yang X, Lu C (2005) Photosynthesis is improved by exogenous glycinebetaine in salt stressed maize plants. Physiol Plant 124(3):343–352
Yildiztugay E, Ozfidan-Konakci C, Kucukoduk M, Duran Y (2014) Variations in osmotic adjustment and water relations of Sphaerophysa kotschyana: glycine betaine, proline and choline accumulation in response to salinity. Bot Stud 55:6
Zaidi MA, Amjad N, Shah S (2013) A study for the development of a vegetable planter for optimum stand establishment. Pak J Agric Sci 50(2):273–277
Zeid IM (2009) Trehalose as osmoprotectant for maize under salinity-induced stress. Res J Agric Biol Sci 5:613–622
Zhu MY, Ahn SJ, Matsumoto H (2003) Inhibition of growth and development of root border cells by Al. Physiol Plant 117:359–367
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by L.A.Kleczkowski.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nusrat, N., Shahbaz, M. & Perveen, S. Modulation in growth, photosynthetic efficiency, activity of antioxidants and mineral ions by foliar application of glycinebetaine on pea (Pisum sativum L.) under salt stress. Acta Physiol Plant 36, 2985–2998 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-014-1670-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-014-1670-1