Introduction

Over the last few decades, antibiotic environmental residues have accelerated the development and spread of bacterial resistance in the aquatic environment, and the antibiotics are believed to pose potential risks to ecosystems and human even at a trace levels (Huang et al. 2020; Li et al. 2020a, b). Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) has been frequently used to prevent infections as a sulfonamide antibiotic. During the conventional wastewater treatment methods, the removal efficiency of SMX cannot achieve the desired effect due to its low biodegradability and long-term resistance in the environment (Chen and Wang 2021; Guo et al. 2020). Therefore, it is urgent to exploit effective methods and high-performance materials to deal with SMX from the aquatic environments (Li et al. 2020a, b; Yazdanbakhsh et al. 2020).

Among the various wastewater treatment technologies, the chemical oxidation process has built its position by achieving the complete degradation of toxic, recalcitrant compounds and microorganisms (Seid-Mohammadi et al. 2019). Commonly, the performance of chemical oxidation process is depended on the production of strong reactive intermediates, e.g., sulfate \(\left({\mathrm{SO}}_{4}^{\bullet -}\right)\) , hydroxyl (OH) and iodate \(\left({\mathrm{IO}}_{3}^{\bullet -}\right)\) via proper activation methods. Because oxidants themselves cannot directly destruct organic compounds, reactive radicals with much stronger oxidizing capacity should be generated by effective activation (Du et al. 2019a, b; Oh et al. 2016). For instance, H2O2 and persulfate activated by transition metal catalysts to produce highly reactive radicals have been shown to entirely degrade the persistent organic pollutants to CO2 and H2O or convert them to a less toxic product (Antony et al. 2020; Du et al. 2019a, b). Therefore, more efforts should be taken to develop alternative oxidants with advanced activation technology and promote the otherwise sluggish degradation reactions.

Over the past decades, researchers have developed the application of periodate \(\left({\mathrm{IO}}_{4}^{-}\right)\) -based chemical oxidation processes capable of removing recalcitrant organic contaminants from aquatic environment (Long et al. 2021). Although periodate is a strong oxidant (+ 1.60 V) thermodynamically, it requires efficient activation to produce highly reactive intermediates because periodate itself cannot achieve the oxidative decomposition of organic pollutants without activation process (e.g., UV irradiation, ultrasound, alkaline, freezing and reactive catalysts) (Bokare and Choi 2015; Choi et al. 2018; Gozmen et al. 2009; Lee et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2021a, b; Zong et al. 2021). Bendjama found that the degradation rate of the dye by \({{UV/}{{IO}}}_{4}^{-}\) oxidation process was drastically advanced compared to direct UV alone because of the involvement of reactive iodine radicals in the degradation pathway (Bendjama et al. 2018). Lee et al. observed that the \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}/US\) system provided effective and rapid remediation of the wastewater containing PFOA (Lee et al. 2016). In their study, \({\mathrm{IO}}_{2}^{\bullet -}\) was likely to react with \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) to form less effective radicals \({\mathrm{IO}}_{4}^{\bullet }\), which can result in a decrease in PFOA degradation. Furthermore, Bokare and Choi used the KIO4/KOH system to generate 1O2 under neutral and near-alkaline conditions (Bokare and Choi 2015). For many approaches that have been studied, specific equipment and external energy consumption are needful for its activation. Therefore, transition metals might be one of the most promising options due to the high efficiency and easy management. Nevertheless, few relevant studies have been investigated, and the related mechanism deserves further exploration. For instance, Lee et al. employed bimetallic nanoparticles (nFe0-Ni and nFe0-Cu) to activate periodate, and \({\mathrm{IO}}_{3}^{\bullet }\) was generated as dominant reactive radicals for contaminants degradation (Lee et al. 2014). Specially, manganese oxides activate periodate to generate singlet oxygen (1O2) and iodate radicals \(\left({\mathrm{IO}}_{3}^{\bullet }\right)\). The oxidative reactivity of manganese oxidants followed the order of MnO2 > Mn3O4 > Mn2O3 (Du et al. 2020).

Manganese dioxide (MnO2), as the most strong nature oxidants and the most-attractive oxide materials, is environmental friendly, relatively inexpensive, and rich natural abundance (Huang et al. 2018; Taujale et al. 2016). In nature, MnO2 can be found in many phase structures such as α-, β-, γ- and δ-MnO2, and all these polymorphs are constituted of MnO6 octahedral units (Huang et al. 2018). According to previous studies, it was evidenced that MnO2 in various polymorphs showed the different catalytic and oxidative reactivity due to its physical and chemical properties (Li et al. 2018). Huang et al. discovered that the interfacial conductivity of the manganese dioxide could be important in the oxidative reaction because higher electrical conductivity will result in the faster electron transferability (Huang et al. 2018). Moreover, Saputra et al. found that the exposure of MnO6 edges in two-tunnel structure will show higher activity than the single-tunnel structure by investigating the structure of α-, β- and γ-MnO2 (Saputra et al. 2012). In previous studies, different MnO2 polymorphs were commonly used to effectively activate oxone or persulfate to degrade contaminants in heterogeneous system. For instance, the oxidative reactivity of MnO2 with different phase structures was tested in heterogeneous activation of PMS for phenol degradation and followed in the order of α-MnO2 > γ-MnO2 > β-MnO2 (Saputra et al. 2013). In addition, one-dimensional MnO2 with different crystallographic phases, α- and β-MnO2 were investigated to activate PDS for selective degradation of organic pollutants, and singlet oxygen (1O2) was revealed to be the dominant ROS in this study (Zhu et al. 2019). Therefore, based on the previous research, we have found that MnO2 was an efficient advanced oxidation system for degradation of sulfanilamide. However, the different crystallographic MnO2 structures may show different activities in activation of periodate for organic pollutants degradation. Meantime, the relevant researches were rarely reported, and the underlining mechanism like electrochemical characterization and degradation product has not yet been elucidated.

Herein, in an effort to demonstrate the different MnO2 polymorphs activating \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\), we synthesized α-, β-, γ- and δ-MnO2 by a hydrothermal method and evaluated their efficiency for \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) activation. As one of the most frequently used sulfamethoxazole antibiotics, SMX was used as a chemical probe to quantify the oxidative reactivity of MnO2. The objectives of this study are to discuss the several reaction factors and the catalyst reusability, identify and characterize major SMX transformation product(s), propose the catalytic degradation mechanism of the oxidation system via main reactive radicals. The exploration of MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system provides distinctive insight into the working mechanism of periodate-based chemical oxidation process and offers another prototype for the precise and rational design of more efficient activator for the degradation of aqueous antibiotic contaminants.

Experimental section

Chemicals

Sulfamethoxazole (SMX), ciprofloxacin (CIP), sulfamerazine (SMR), furfuryl alcohol (FFA), acetonitrile (ACN, 99.9%), rhodamine B (RhB), p-benzoquinone (BQ), methylene blue (MB) and phenol (C6H5OH) were purchased from Aladdin Industrial Corporation. Acid Orange 7 (AO7), 5-methylisoxazole (C4H5NO, 95%), 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMP) and 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrrolidine-N-oxide (DMPO) were supplied by Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. Sodium periodate (NaIO4), potassium permanganate (KMnO4), ammonium persulfate ((NH4)2S2O8), manganese sulfate monohydrate (MnSO4·H2O), bisphenol S (BPS), sulfanilamide (C6H8N2O2S), sodium chloride (NaCl), sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), tert-butyl alcohol (TBA, 99.7%), phosphoric acid (H3PO4), sodium fluoride (NaF) were provided by Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co,. Ltd. All the solutions prepared using deionized (DI) water (> 18.25 MΩ).

Activators preparation and characterization

α-, β-, γ- and δ- types of MnO2 polymorphs were prepared by a hydrothermal method (Yang et al. 2020), and the reaction was based on the redox reactions of Mn2+ ions with oxidizing agent. Detailed procedures are presented in Supporting Information (Text S1). The prepared α-, β-, γ- and δ-MnO2 samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8 DISCOVER) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Thermo Scientific K-Alpha).

Experiment procedure and analytical methods

Experiments were conducted in 250-ml glass flask under magnetic stirring (rotary speed = 500 rpm) at an ambient temperature, and then, the pH of the solution was adjusted with 1 M H2SO4 or NaOH except for experiments investigating the pH effect. The reaction temperature was kept at 25℃ through a thermostat circulator. Typically, NaIO4 (2 mM) was spiked into 100 ml solution containing SMX (10 mg/L) and 0.1 g/L of the respective activator to start the degradation reaction. Besides, the photocatalytic experiment has been performed using a source of visible light, which was placed at a height of 10 cm from the solution. As the oxidation reaction proceeded, aliquots of 1 ml were withdrawn at different intervals, immediately mixed with 1 ml sodium thiosulfate to terminate the reaction, and samples were filtered by a nylon membrane (0.22 μm) for HPLC analysis. For the recycle tests of the catalysts, after each run, the catalyst was obtained by filtration and washed with DI water and ethanol several times, and then dried at 60℃ for 8 h. All experiments were performed in at least duplicate.

To quantitatively examine the oxidative reactivity of different parameters in MnO2/periodate system, rate constants for the oxidative reactivity (k) were calculated based on the pseudo-first-order kinetics (Eq. 1).

$${\text{ln}}\left(\frac{{\text{C}}_{0}}{{\text{C}}_{\text{t}}}\right)= \text{ } {\text{K}}_{\text{obs}}{\text{t}}$$
(1)

where C0 is the SMX concentration before the reaction, Ct is the concentration at time t min of SMX in the MnO2/periodate system, and Kobs represents the pseudo-first-order rate constant (min−1).

The concentration of sulfamethoxazole was analyzed using a RIGOL L-3000 HPLC with a UV detector set at λ = 278 nm. AC-18 column (5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm) was used to separate the organics, while the mobile phase with a flow rate of 1 ml/min eluent, which consisted of a binary mixture of 45% acetonitrile and 55% water. The reactive radicals generated by periodate were observed on a JES-FA200 electron paramagnetic resonance spectrometer measurement using 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) or 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinol (TEMP) as spin-trapping agent. UV–Vis absorption spectra were measured in a 1-cm quartz cuvette using a METASH UV-5500(PC) spectrophotometer. Electrochemical characterization was performed with an VMP-3 (Bio-Logic SAS, France). In addition, degradation products of SMX were determined using LC-Q-TOF–MS analysis (Text S2).

Results and discussion

Characterization of catalyst

The different structures of MnO2 samples were confirmed by the XRD patterns, as shown in Fig. 1a and b, which corresponded well to α-MnO2 (JCPDS 44–0141), β-MnO2 (24–0735), γ- MnO2 (14–0644) and δ-MnO2 (80–1098), respectively, according to the previous researches (Deng et al. 2017; Jia et al. 2016; Li et al. 2018; Saputra et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2020). No miscellaneous peaks and noticeable deviation appear in the pattern, clearly suggesting the purity of the catalyst. Compared to α- and β-MnO2, other crystal structure featured broader peaks and low intensity of diffraction peak, indicating the lower crystallinity and small grain sizes. As depicted in Fig. 1a, α-MnO2 did not change significantly after the reaction, suggesting that the crystal form of α-MnO2 is relatively stable in the whole reaction. In general, α-, β-, γ- and δ-MnO2 structures are all formed by the chains of MnO6 octahedra, which are interlinked in different ways and constructed tunnels or interlayers with the gaps of different dimensions (Li et al. 2018; Saputra et al. 2013). Thereinto, α-MnO2 was composed of double chains of edge-sharing MnO6 octahedra with (2 × 2) and (1 × 1) tunnels (Zhu et al. 2019). β-MnO2 consists of single strands of edge-sharing MnO6 octahedra with (1 × 1) tunnel, whereas γ- MnO2 was provided with random intergrowth of (1 × 1) and (1 × 2) tunnel forms (Yang et al. 2020). With the presence of K+ and H2O in the mezzanines, δ-MnO2 was constructed with the 2D layer structure (Devaraj and Munichandraiah 2008). Therefore, periodate activated by different crystallographic MnO2 may manifest different oxidation activities due to the difference among the structures of MnO2.

Fig. 1
figure 1

(a) XRD pattern of α-MnO2 in α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system before and after reaction, (b) XRD pattern of β-, γ- and δ-MnO2 samples

Periodate activation on different crystalline MnO2 for SMX degradation

Figure 2a shows the adsorption and degradation profiles of sulfamethoxazole against time on various MnO2 materials. For different MnO2 structures without the presence of periodate, control experiments showed negligible adsorption of SMX at less than 5% in 120 min, and \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) alone cannot degrade SMX. With the combination of MnO2 and periodate, the performance of MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system was obviously better than others, and the activities of four MnO2 samples were significantly different. For the δ-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) process, it showed the minimum degradation rate of SMX, and less than 60% SMX removal was achieved after 120 min. However, SMX degradation could nearly reach 95% within 120 min in the α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\), β-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) and γ-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system. Figure 2b shows that the SMX degradation curves of different MnO2 polymorphs can be fitted by the first-order kinetics. As shown in Fig. S1, α-MnO2 presented high reactivity toward SMX in both dark and light conditions, with a similar k value of 0.0649 min–1 (without light) and 0.0698 min–1 (with light), respectively. Therefore, α-MnO2 exhibited weak photocatalytic activity under solar light due to the slight enhancement of the k value upon light irradiation. As it can be seen, the catalytic activity of periodate activated by different crystallographic MnO2 decreases in the order: α-MnO2 > β-MnO2 > γ-MnO2 > δ-MnO2. Compared to structure of α-MnO2 and β-MnO2, α-MnO2 feature (2 × 2) tunnels will show higher catalytic activity than (1 × 1) channels structured β-MnO2 due to the more exposure of MnO6 edges (Saputra et al. 2013). In addition, the difference of various MnO2 surface areas and active sites may also be result in the differences of catalytic activities according to the previous studies (Liu et al. 2009). Thus, under α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system, α-MnO2 could possess higher surface area and more active sites than others, which could deduce that the related radical species may be bounded to the catalytic surface and SMX degradation may partly occur on the surface of catalyst (authenticated in Sect. 3.4).

Fig. 2
figure 2

(a) Sulfamethoxazole degradation on different MnO2 samples, (b) pseudo-first-order oxidation rate constants (k) of SMX by different MnO2 structures. Reaction conditions: [α-MnO2]0 = [β-MnO2]0 = [γ-MnO2]0 = [δ-MnO2]0 = 0.2 g/L, [Sulfamethoxazole]0 = 10 mg/L, [\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\)]0 = 2.0 mM, pH = 7

Effect of Experimental conditions and Repetitive Use of α-MnO2

To further understand the impacts of SMX removal by α-MnO2/periodate process, several experimental factors on SMX degradation were investigated, including the pH, periodate concentration and α-MnO2 dosage. Previous studies reported that the species of periodate and SMX could be strongly influenced by solution pH (Du et al. 2020; Lee et al. 2014; Sun et al. 2020). In Fig. 3a, the initial of solution pH, i.e., from pH 5 to 7, the SMX degradation slightly increased from 0.0605 to 0.0649 min−1. The result in this phenomenon could be attributed to the predominant form of SMX in the acidic condition. Under different pH values, SMX exists in different forms, including protonate, non-protonated and deprotonated forms, and deprotonated form would result in the higher activation of periodate at pH = 7 (Qi et al. 2014). When the pH was further increased to 9, the SMX degradation significantly inhibited in the α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system, which could be due to the periodate speciation change depending on pH. Therefore, it was unfavorable for the activation of periodate species due to the transformation from \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) (E0 =  + 1.6 V) to H2I2 \({\text{O}}_{10}^{4-}\) (E0 =  + 0.7 V) as the solution pH shifted from the neutral to alkaline zone (Eqs. 23) (Li et al. 2017). Moreover, compare to the dimerized species (H2I2 \({\text{O}}_{10}^{4-}\)), \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) species could be more efficient for 1O2 generation (Bokare and Choi 2015). Although the SMX removal process was influenced at pH = 9, almost 95% of the contaminants was still eliminated after 120 min, suggesting that the α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system was suitable for a wide pH range.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of (a) solution pH, (b) catalyst dosage, (c) \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) concentration on SMX degradation by the α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system and (d) reusability of α-MnO2. Reaction conditions: [Sulfamethoxazole]0 = 10 mg/L, [\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\)]0 = 2 mM (for a, b, and d), [α-MnO2]0 = 0.2 g/L (for a, c, and d), pH = 7 (for b-d)

$${{2}{\text{H}}_{3}{\text{IO}}}_{6}^{2-}{\leftrightarrow {\text{H}}_{2}{{\text{I}}}_{2}{\text{O}}}_{10}^{4-}+{\text{2H}}_{2}{\text{O}}$$
(2)
$${\mathrm{H}}_{4}{\mathrm{IO}}_{6}^{-}\leftrightarrow {\mathrm{IO}}_{4}^{-}+{2\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O}$$
(3)

As indicated in Fig. 3b, in order to obtain the optimum α-MnO2 dosage, SMX degradation rate was investigated with different α-MnO2 dosage from 0.1 g/L to 0.3 g/L, achieving 0.031 min−1, 0.0649 min−1 and 0.1331 min−1. An increase in catalyst dosage from 0.1 g/L to 0.2 g/L led to an increase in the degradation from 60% to 91.1% within 30 min, which suggests that more active sites on the surface of catalyst were accessible for periodate activation (Chadi et al. 2019). But SMX degradation did not show obviously increase when further increasing catalytic dose from 0.2 g/L to 0.3 g/L. Therefore, the reasonable dosage of α-MnO2 was 0.2 g/L. To assess the effect of initial periodate concentration in SMX degradation, the degradation efficiency in α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system is detailed in Fig. 3c. When the \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) concentration was set as 2 mM, the removal efficiency of SMX markedly increased from 48.2% with 0.5 mM of \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) to 91.1% with 2 mM of \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) in 30 min. The result suggests that the more extensive contact between \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) and active sites was facilitated by the increased concentration of \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\). Particularly, when the dose of \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) reached to 3 mM, catalyst provides a limited number of active sites; thus, the increase of \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) from 2 to 3 mM did not enhance the SMX degradation (Long et al. 2021). Hence, 2 mM \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) was selected as the appropriate dose in the experiment.

As known, the stability and reusability of catalyst are an important factor for its potential applications. To evaluate the recycle utilization performance of as-obtained α-MnO2, several cycling experiments were further conducted with simple process of filtration and drying. As displayed in Fig. 3d, α-MnO2 could be repeatedly used to activate periodate in the second round, and the SMX removal efficiency remained approximately 97% within 60 min. Thereafter, the SMX removal efficiency gradually decreased to 86.1 and 78.4% in 60 min, respectively, for the third and fourth rounds. On the one hand, the decrease activity of the activator was possibly attributed to the oxidation product adsorption on the activator surface and the slight manganese leaching (Fig. S2) (Li et al. 2020a, b; Wang et al. 2015). On the other hand, based on the XPS of the fresh and used α-MnO2, the oxidation–reduction of Mn species may also explain the inevitable decrease of catalytic activity in aqueous α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) suspensions over four cycles. Nevertheless, the XRD image after the reaction can be seen that the crystalline phase of α-MnO2 was still observed, indicating the good stability of α-MnO2.

Identification of the SMX Transformation Product

Transformation products of SMX in the α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system were analyzed using LC-Q-TOF–MS. Based on the analysis, six major degradation intermediates were identified, including 4-acetylbenzenesulfonamide (m/z 276), sulfanilic acid (m/z 158), malonic acid (m/z 105), 5-methylisoxazol-3-amine (m/z 99), oxalic acid (m/z 90), ammonium formate (m/z 64). The detailed information and MS2 spectra of oxidation products are shown in Table 1 and Figs. S38. According to the integrated degradation and previous studies, the main degradation steps are proposed in Fig. 4, including the elimination of sulfonamide bond, hydroxylation and direct oxidation (Chen and Wang 2021; Li et al. 2020a, b; Wang et al. 2020; Zong et al. 2021). For the pathway I, the cleavage of S–N bond resulted in SMX molecule produced TP4 and TP6; the intermediate TP4 would further decompose to TP2. As depicted in Fig. S9, the time-dependent concentrations of 5-methylisoxazole gradually decreased during the degradation of SMX, while for sulfanilamide, its concentration slightly decreased. Therefore, the degradation of 5-methylisoxazole supported the proposed pathway I with the involvement of TP4. According to the previous CuOx/persulfate system (Lalas et al. 2021), the pathway II could be identified by hydroxylation on the benzene ring, followed by cleavage of the isoxazole, resulting in the formation of TP7. In pathway III, two types of organic acid were generated during the degradation of SMX, including malonic acid and oxalic acid, which indicated the transformation of SMX. At last, the relevant transformation products were converted to carbon dioxide and water through a serious of chemical reactions, which can be confirmed that the degradation and mineralization of SMX indeed occurred.

Table 1 Accurate mass and structures of SMX and its oxidation products
Fig. 4
figure 4

Possible pathways of SMX oxidation by the α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system

The Mechanism for Activating Periodate

Identification for the involved reactive species via chemical quenching experiments is of great significance to understand the underlying mechanism in the α-MnO2-activated \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) oxidation process. As shown in Fig. 5a, the addition of 10 mM or 200 mM tert-butyl alcohol (k2(TBA, OH ) = 3.8–7.6 × 108 M−1 s−1) showed an adverse impact on SMX degradation, suggesting that OH may exist in the process (Zong et al. 2021). On the contrary, the inhibition effect of TBA indicates that \({IO}_{3}^{\bullet }\) should not be the dominant ROS in SMX degradation because TBA cannot be reactive toward \({\mathrm{IO}}_{3}^{\bullet }\) (Chadi et al. 2019). Additionally, when nitrobenzene (NB) was used as the chemical probe for OH (k2(NB, OH) = 3.9 × 109 M−1 s−1); accordingly, the removal efficiency of NB (42%) is observed in Fig. S10, which indicated that a small amount of OH was produced (Zhu et al. 2019). Moreover, the α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) reaction was carried out in the presence of chloride ion that was reported to be reactive with hydroxyl radicals to produce hypochlorous acid radicals (k2(Cl-, OH) = 4.3 × 109 M−1 s−1) (Buxton et al. 1988) (Eq. 4). As depicted in Fig. S11, the observation that degradation of SMX exhibited negligible change after the addition of \({\text{Cl}}^{-}\) did not support the role of OH as a dominant ROS in the α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system because ClOH•- has lower activity than OH (Wang and Wang 2020). Meanwhile, the presence of OH in the aqueous phase can also be verified by using EPR experiment, whereas no certain signal in the reaction was observed by using DMPO as a spin trapping agent. In accordance with above results, the inhibition effect of TBA could be considered as a probability that TBA as a hydrophilic compound has a lower affinity to the surfaces of catalyst. Therefore, phenol (k2(Phol, OH)  = 6.6 × 109 M−1 s−1) was introduced to quench the radicals on the catalytic surface as a hydrophobic compound (Yang et al. 2015). The addition of phenol significantly quenched the SMX degradation, indicating that OH may be formed on the surface of α-MnO2 (Fig. 5a). Thus, fluoride was subsequently added to enhance the generation of free OH radical in solution since the fluoride ions present in the Helmholtz layer are able to promote the desorption of surface-bound OH radicals into solution from the surface of α-MnO2, through a fluorine hydrogen bond (Xu et al. 2007). As fluoride concentration in the Helmholtz layer is increased, the rate of desorption of surface-bound OH is promoted, thus accelerating the degradation of SMX in solution. In the presence of NaF, the reaction rate of SMX degradation was increased from 0.0857 min−1 to 0.101 min−1 in 30 min, which could further determine the existence of surface-bound OH during the oxidative removal of SMX (Fig. 5a). All in all, the contribution of OH and \({\mathrm{IO}}_{3}^{\bullet }\) to contaminant removal is supposed to be insignificant in the \({\mathrm{\alpha }-\mathrm{MnO}2/{\text{IO}}}_{4}^{-}\) system, and the underlying mechanism of \({\mathrm{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) activation by α-MnO2 could be dominated by a non-radical pathway.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Quenching effects of (a) TBA, phenol, NF, (b) FFA, K2Cr2O7, NaN3, (c) BQ and Na2CO3 in the α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) process; (d) EPR spectra of TEMP and DMPO adducts in the α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system. Reaction condition: [Sulfamethoxazole]0 = 10 mg/L, [\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\)]0 = 2 mM, [α-MnO2]0 = 0.2 g/L, pH = 7, [TEMP] = 0.23 g/L, [DMPO] = 100 mM

$${\mathrm{Cl}}^{-}+\mathrm{OH}\to {\mathrm{ClOH}}^{-}$$
(4)

Considering the production of OH on the catalyst surface, potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) was subsequently employed to identify the possible electron transfer for the formation of ROS in aqueous phase (Huang and Zhang 2019). As shown in Fig. 5b, the removal efficiency of SMX was obviously inhibited with 2 mM K2Cr2O7, suggesting that the oxidative system could generate ROS through solution-phase electrons transfer. As known, the dominant ROS of some periodate-based processes on contaminant degradation was frequently implicated to the role of singlet oxygen (1O2) (Bokare and Choi 2015; Du et al. 2020; Sun et al. 2020). To investigate the possible role of 1O2, sodium azide ((k2(NaN3, 1O2) = 1 × 109 M−1 s−1) and furfuryl alcohol ((k2(FFA, 1O2) = 1.2 × 108 M−1 s−1) were used to quench the oxidation by 1O2 (Bokare and Choi 2015). The addition of azide ions and FFA caused a noticeable decline in SMX degradation rate from 0.0649 min−1 to 0.0106 min−1 and 0.0092 min−1, indicating that the generation of 1O2 was involved in the oxidative degradation process (Fig. 5(b)). However, sodium azide and FFA cannot only quench 1O2, but also hydroxyl radicals with a second-order rate of 1.2 × 1010 M−1 s−1 and 1.5 × 1010 M−1 s−1, respectively. Therefore, in order to further confirm the role of 1O2 in α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system, rhodamine B (RhB) was introduced to the indicator of singlet oxygen because RhB has unique degradation behaviors. When RhB was degraded by 1O2, the maximum peak blue-shift would occur and continue throughout the degradation process due to the N-de-ethylation of RhB (Ma et al. 2020). As Fig. 6 shows, the maximum absorption peak of RhB exhibited distinct blue shift during the oxidative reaction, while other reaction systems were decreased vertically at 554 nm. Additionally, we also used the methylene blue (MB) to examine the maximum peak change because MB with conjugated N-ethyls has the same degradation behaviors as RhB and found that the result of MB was consistent with RhB (Fig. 6d). In addition to the above analysis, the identification of 1O2 in α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) process was also determined by EPR technique using DMPO as a singlet oxygen scavenger (Zhu et al. 2019). As depicted in Fig. 5d, the characteristic 1:1:1 triplet signal of TEMPOL adducts by 1O2 oxidation was observed, which was another specific evidence of 1O2 generation. Thus, for the above results, we concluded that 1O2 was generated and served as the major reactive species for SMX degradation in the α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) process.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Time-dependent UV-absorption spectra of degradation of RhB or MB by (a) α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\)/RhB, (b) α-MnO2/RhB, (c) \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\)/RhB and (d) α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\)/MB. Reaction condition: [Rhodamine B]0 = [Methylene blue]0 = 10 mg/L, [\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\)]0 = 2 mM, [α-MnO2]0 = 0.2 g/L, pH = 7

According to previous researches, the formation of 1O2 can be resulted from the direct oxidation or recombination of superoxide radicals \(\left({\mathrm{O}}_{2}^{\bullet -}\right)\), which could be generated as the reaction between \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) and dissolved oxygen or produced by manganese dioxide (Chadi et al. 2019; Du et al. 2020; Zhu et al. 2019). In order to investigate the generation of \({\mathrm{O}}_{2}^{\bullet -}\) species during the oxidation, sodium carbonate \({{((k}_{2}\text{(}{\text{CO}}}_{3}^{2-}, {\mathrm{O}}_{2}^{\bullet -})\) = 5 × 108 M−1 s−1) was employed to determine the possible involvement of \({\mathrm{O}}_{2}^{\bullet -}\) in the system (Bokare and Choi 2015). As illustrated in Fig. 5c, the SMX removal efficiency was clearly inhibited in the α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system when 10 mM and 15 mM of \({\mathrm{CO}}_{3}^{2-}\) were introduced, respectively. However, when the concentrations of \({\text{CO}}_{3}^{2-}\) increased from 10 to 15 mM, the inhibitory impact of \({\text{CO}}_{3}^{2-}\) did not show obvious change, indicating that the involvement of \({\mathrm{O}}_{2}^{\bullet -}\) needs further confirmation. Hence, benzoquinone \((({k}_{2}\left(BQ, {O}_{2}^{\bullet -}\right)\) = 2.9 × 109 M−1 s−1) was used as a more selective scavenger for \({O}_{2}^{\bullet -}\), and the SMX degradation was virtually completely inhibited by the addition of 5 mM BQ (Wang et al. 2021a, b). According to above results, we found that \({\mathrm{O}}_{2}^{\bullet -}\) was produced in the α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system, and the quenching experiments of \({\mathrm{O}}_{2}^{\bullet -}\) may inhibit the formation of 1O2, which would lead to a reduction in the SMX degradation. Therefore, a plausible mechanism for α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) activation was proposed as displayed in Eqs. 512 and Fig. 7. The -OH groups were first absorbed into the surface of α-MnO2 and combined with active sites to form \(\equiv MN\left(IV\right)-OH\), and then, a metastable manganese intermediate \(\left(\equiv \mathrm{MN}\left(\mathrm{IV}\right)-\mathrm{O}-{\mathrm{IO}}_{3}^{-}\right)\) was generated by reacting with \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) (Eq. 5) (Pan et al. 2021). Afterward, \({\mathrm{O}}_{2}^{\bullet -}\) can be generated as an intermediate product through reaction of \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) with dissolved oxygen (Eq. 6) (Lin and Yamada 1999). However, the SMX oxidation efficiency was not significantly suppressed with continuous N2 purging (Fig. S12), which indicates that the formation of \({\mathrm{O}}_{2}^{\bullet -}\) was not entirely depended on the presence of dissolved oxygen. Therefore, according to previous studies, \({\mathrm{O}}_{2}^{\bullet -}\) can be also produced by the reaction of \(\equiv \mathrm{MN}\left(\mathrm{IV}\right)-\mathrm{O}-{\mathrm{IO}}_{3}^{-}\) and \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) along with the rupture of \({\text{Mn}}\left({\text{IV}}\right)\text{-O}\) (Eq. 7) (Chan et al. 2018; Du et al. 2019a, b; Zhu et al. 2019). Later, 1O2 was generated from the direct oxidation of \({\mathrm{O}}_{2}^{\bullet -}\) by Mn (IV) or residual periodate (Eqs. 78), which is thermodynamically favored \([{E}_{0}{\bullet (}^{1}{O}_{2}/{O}_{2}^{\bullet -}\) = -0.34 VNHE and E0 (Mn(IV)/Mn(III)) = 0.95 VNHE or E0 (\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\)/\({\text{IO}}_{3}^{-}\))) = 0.7 VNHE]. Moreover, the recombination of superoxide radicals can then generate 1O2 and H2O2 (Eq. 10). Thus, we investigated the presence of H2O2 in the oxidation process by using molybdate ((NH4)6Mo7O24) because peroxomolybdic acid complex formed by H2O2 and molybdate has an absorption peak at 350 nm (Chai et al. 2004). Figure S13 shows that the concentration of H2O2 in the degradation process increased along with the magnified oxidation system, and the content of H2O2 exhibited a continuous enhancement in 10 min while gradually decreased after 10 min. Besides, OH can also participate in the degradation through \({O}_{2}^{\bullet -}\) acted as a precursor to form 1O2 (Eq. 11) (Chadi et al. 2019; Sun et al. 2020). In summary, this activation mechanism shows that \({O}_{2}^{\bullet -}\) and OH were involved in 1O2 generation, which played a particularly essential role in the SMX degradation.

Fig. 7
figure 7

The plausible mechanism of periodate activation catalyzed over α-MnO2 for the degradation of sulfamethoxazole

$$\equiv Mn\left(IV\right)-OH+{IO}_{4}^{-}\to \equiv Mn\left(IV\right)-O-{IO}_{3}^{-}+{OH}^{-}$$
(5)
$${IO}_{4}^{-}+{O}_{2}+{2OH}^{-}\to {IO}_{3}^{-}+{20}_{2}^{-}+{H}_{2}O$$
(6)
$$2\left[\equiv Mn\left(IV\right)-O-{IO}_{3}^{-}\right]+{IO}_{4}^{-}+{3H}_{2}O\to 2[\equiv Mn\left(III\right)-OH]+{2O}_{2}^{-}+{3IO}_{3}^{-}+{4H}^{+}$$
(7)
$$\equiv Mn\left(IV\right)-O-{IO}_{3}^{-}+{O}_{2}^{-}+{OH}^{-}\to \equiv Mn\left(III\right)-OH+{IO}_{4}^{-}{+}^{1}{O}_{2}$$
(8)
$${3IO}_{4}^{-}+{2O}_{2}^{-}+{H}_{2}O\to {IO}_{3}^{-}+{2}^{1}{O}_{2}+{2OH}^{-}$$
(9)
$${2O}_{2}^{-}+{2H}_{2}{O\to }^{1}{O}_{2}+{H}_{2}{O}_{2}+{2OH}^{-}$$
(10)
$$OH+{O}_{2}^{-}{\to }^{1}{O}_{2}+{OH}^{-}$$
(11)
$${}^{1}{O}_{2}+Org\to {Org.}_{OX}$$
(12)

To analyze the surface properties of α-MnO2 catalyst, the XPS spectra of pristine and treated catalysts are recorded in Fig. 8a&b. The peaks in the Mn 2p3/2 binding energies at 640.8 eV identified as Mn (III), and those at 642 eV and 643.1 eV assigned to Mn (IV) (Peng et al. 2017; Zhu et al. 2019). Compare to fresh α-MnO2, the peak of Mn (III) was enhanced after the reaction. In addition, the deconvolution peaks of O1s show three spectral bands at 529.6 eV, 531.2 eV and 532.4 eV, representing the metal oxides, surface hydroxyl and physically adsorbed water on the surface, respectively (Tan et al. 2017; Yang et al. 2020). During the activation of periodate, the percentage of surface hydroxyl increased from 8.66% to 18.98% in the used catalyst, revealing the surface of α-MnO2 was hydroxylated during the degradation process. In order to determine the role of surface hydroxyl groups in the oxidative reaction, phosphate ions were employed because \({{\text{H}}_{2}{\text{PO}}}_{4}^{-}\) can replace the surface hydroxyl groups through strongly bonding with the active sites (Lin et al. 2019). As shown in Fig. S14, the addition of 1 mM \({{\text{H}}_{2}{\text{PO}}}_{4}^{-}\) resulted in an obvious inhibition of SMX removal, suggesting that periodate was unable to successfully bond with active sites via the surface hydroxyl groups when the surface hydroxyl groups were replaced by the phosphate. Meanwhile, the transformation of the surface hydroxyl groups and the alteration of surface redox states on the activator attributed to the electron transfer from \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) to Mn (IV) during the generation of 1O2, wherein the surface hydroxyl groups of catalyst were acted as an outer-sphere bridge between the periodate and α-MnO2 (Ramaswamy and Mukerjee 2011). In addition, Fig. S16 shows the recorded cyclic voltammetry (CV) curve of α-MnO2 during the reaction, which indicates the α-MnO2 with a more effective redox property can make electron transfer feasible for the reaction. Moreover, the proposed mechanism with the involvement of \({O}_{2}^{\bullet -}\), OH and Mn (IV) intermediates was in agreement with the previous inference in Sect. 3.2. Therefore, the α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system endowed the activator with higher catalytic effect and better electron-transfer mediating ability, which could be a favorable choice for selective destruction of antibiotic pollutants (Detailed information in Text S3).

Fig. 8
figure 8

XPS spectra of α-MnO2 in the α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system before and after reaction: (a) Mn 2p3/2, and (b) O1s

Conclusions

In summary, we performed a novel chemical oxidation process to investigate periodate activation on alpha-MnO2, which aimed at boosting the reaction efficiency of \({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\)-based process for selective destruction of antibiotic pollutants. Among the four phases of MnO2 catalysts, α-MnO2 exhibited the best catalytic performance for periodate activation and SMX degradation. Under optimized conditions, about 91.05% SMX could be removed within 30 min. The degradation efficiency increased with increasing the dosages of α-MnO2 and periodate, but the alkaline pH exerted significantly negative effect on the SMX degradation. As inferred from the quenching agents, chemical probes and EPR analysis, singlet oxygen (1O2) was unveiled be to the primary reactive oxygen species, which was generated from \({O}_{2}^{\bullet -}\) and OH Meanwhile, the high catalytic reactivity of α-MnO2 can be attributed to the electron transfer through the change of manganese valence states and surface hydroxyl groups. Also, SMX and its product information were identified through three degradation pathways in α-MnO2/\({\text{IO}}_{4}^{-}\) system. This study of periodate activation by manganese dioxides will be of scientific significance in antibiotic wastewater remediation, and the understanding of advanced oxidation process by manganese-based minerals or sediment with low cost.