Abstract
Non-lepidopteran pests are exposed to, and may be influenced by, Bt toxins when feeding on Bt maize that express insecticidal Cry proteins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). In order to assess the potential effects of transgenic cry1Ie maize on non-lepidopteran pest species and ecological communities, a 2-year field study was conducted to compare the non-lepidopteran pest abundance, diversity and community composition between transgenic cry1Ie maize (Event IE09S034, Bt maize) and its near isoline (Zong 31, non-Bt maize) by whole plant inspections. Results showed that Bt maize had no effects on non-lepidopteran pest abundance and diversity (Shannon–Wiener diversity index, Simpson’s diversity index, species richness, and Pielou’s index). There was a significant effect of year and sampling time on those indices analyzed. Redundancy analysis indicated maize type, sampling time and year totally explained 20.43 % of the variance in the non-lepidopteran pest community composition, but no association was presented between maize type (Bt maize and non-Bt maize) and the variance. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling analysis showed that sampling time and year, rather than maize type had close relationship with the non-lepidopteran pest community composition. These results corroborated the hypothesis that, at least in the short-term, the transgenic cry1Ie maize had negligible effects on the non-lepidopteran pest abundance, diversity and community composition.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The Asian corn borer (ACB), Ostrinia furnacalis (Guenée), (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) is one of the most destructive insect pests of maize (Zea mays L.) in China, as well as in the Philippines, Korea, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Japan and several islands in the Pacific Ocean (Nafus and Schreiner 1991; Afidchao et al. 2013). Currently, various approaches are utilized for ACB control, including insecticide applications, agricultural control strategies, mating disruption techniques and Trichogramma releases, although each of these approaches have limitations (Guo et al. 2014; Nafus and Schreiner 1991). Adoption of genetically modified (GM) maize that expresses Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Cry proteins can considerably reduce the population of ACB (Afidchao et al. 2013; He et al. 2003).
The cultivation of Bt crops has, in some cases, provided diverse economic and environmental benefits for the affected human population by reducing conventional insecticide applications, increasing crop yields, being less labor intensive and reducing ecological damage (Huang et al. 2005; Naranjo 2009; Wang et al. 2010). In addition, utilizing Bt crops is often compatible with other pest management methods (de la Poza et al. 2005). Given such positive economic and ecological returns, the total cultivation acreage of GM crops has increased an extraordinary 100-fold, since GM crops were first commercialized in 1996. This is especially true for Bt maize and Bt cotton (James 2014). However, there’s still scientific uncertainty whether or not long-term and large-scale sustainability of Bt crops will disrupt non-target arthropod community structures (Romeis et al. 2008, 2011; Wolt et al. 2010). Before new Bt crops can be introduced commercially, it is essential to conduct environmental risk assessments (ERA) to determine the potential adverse effects on non-target species such as parasitoids, predators, decomposers, pollinators, and other non-target herbivores.
The non-target herbivore community is important to the maize ecosystem because the species involved can act as a food source for natural enemies and can potentially compete with the targeted insect pests for food and refuge. Non-target herbivores are exposed to Bt proteins directly by feeding on Bt-modified plant tissues (Groot and Dicke 2002), and mediate the potential effects of Bt crops to natural enemies through tritrophic interactions (Chen et al. 2009). It is essential, therefore, that prior to being approved for commercial cultivation, Bt crops, must be assessed to determine their potential impacts on non-target herbivores.
Currently, the vast majority of studies dealing with the impact of Bt crops on non-target herbivore community biodiversity have focused on limiting major non-target herbivores (Bernal et al. 2002; Burgio et al. 2007; Chen et al. 2007, 2012; Li et al. 2007; Liu et al. 2005; Rauschen et al. 2010; Wang et al. 2005). However, a study by Crawley (1999) suggests that field research assessing the impact of GM crops on the demography of non-target arthropods needs to encompass not only their entire life history but should also include several generations beyond the present. A focused analysis of a single non-target pest in laboratory studies may fail to uncover the potential lethal effects of Bt proteins on non-target herbivores when the effects are not immediately manifested (Szenasi et al. 2014). Because of this possibility, field assessments of the effects of new Bt crops on non-target herbivore insect species that occur in agricultural ecosystems are necessary prior to commercialization of new Bt crops. Although Guo et al. (2014) had reported that Bt maize expressing Cry1Ac protein had negligible effects on the density of non-target herbivores, new types of Bt maize, however, must be assessed for, possible unintended effects on non-target herbivores (Zurbrügg and Nentwig 2009).
Event IE09S034 transgenic maize produces the novel insecticidal protein Cry1Ie, which is targeted against ACB, soybean pod borers, Leguminivora glycinivorella (Matsumura) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), and cotton bollworms, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) (Song et al. 2003; Zhang et al. 2013). Cry1Ie protein was encoded by the cry1Ie gene, which was initially identified from B. thuringiensis isolate Btc007 by the Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Song et al. 2003). A substantial body of literature has demonstrated that the Cry1Ie protein had no cross resistance with Cry1Ac, Cry1Ah, Cry1Ab, and Cry1F proteins (Han et al. 2009; He et al. 2013; Xu et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2014, 2013), and could be integrated into the maize genome using other Bt genes such as the cry1Ah gene (Yang et al. 2012).
Cry1 class proteins are lepidopteran-active proteins (Duan et al. 2010), so, to distinguish the non-lepidopteran, non-target herbivores found on transgenic cry1Ie maize from the targeted lepidopteran species, were collectively referred to these as “non-lepidopteran pests”. We surveyed the number of species (species richness) and the relative abundances of individuals of each species (species abundance) in Bt and non-Bt maize plots in 2012 and 2013. We then compared the non-lepidopteran pest abundance and diversity found in the Bt plots with the non-Bt maize plots. We were also interested in analyzing the non-target lepidopteran pest community composition and their responses to maize type (Bt and non-Bt maize), sampling time and year.
Materials and methods
Experimental design
The field trials were performed at the Langfang Experiment Station at the Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Hebei province (39°30′N, 116°36E) in 2012 and 2013. The seeds of Bt maize (Event IE09S034), and its corresponding non-transformed near isoline (Zong 31) used in this experiment were provided by the Institute of Crop Sciences, CAAS. Seeds were planted on 8 May 2012 and 29 May 2013. Bt and non-Bt maize were planted in a randomized block design involving three replications (Fig. 1). Each plot consisted of 25 rows spaced 60 cm apart, and plant spacing of 35 cm (length × width: 15 m × 15 m). Isolation belts between plots were established using 3 m wide bare aisles. Insecticides were not applied during the study. Other field management procedures were conducted according to local agricultural practices.
Sample collection
Species diversity and abundance of all non-lepidopteran pests occurring throughout the entire plant were recorded periodically at the 3rd (V3), 6th (V6), 9th (V9) 12th (V12) leaf stages, tasseling (VT), silking (R1), blister (R2), milk stage (R3), dent (R5) and physiological maturity (R6) in 2012 and 2013. In each plot, five points distributed at the two corner-to-corner diagonals (X shaped) (Fig. 1) were chosen and twenty plants in each point were randomly selected (100 plants in total per plot). The species and numbers of visible non-lepidopteran pests on leaves, stalks, tassels, sheaths, husks and ears were quickly counted. Easily recognized species were identified and recorded, while unknown species were stored in 5-ml plastic vials containing 75 % ethanol for later identification.
Statistical analysis
Measures of diversity were calculated using five diversity indices: (1) Shannon–Weaver diversity index (H’), H′ = −∑ s i=1 P i ln(P i ), where P i is the percentage of individuals belonging to the ith taxon of the total number of individuals surveyed (Shannon and Weaver 1949); (2) Simpson’s diversity index (D), \(D = 1 - \sum_{i = 1}^{s} {\frac{{N_{i} \left( {N_{i} - 1} \right)}}{{N\left( {N - 1} \right)}}}\), where N i is the number of individuals in the ith taxon; and N is the total number of individuals (Simpson 1949); (3) Number of species (S); (4) Pielou’s evenness index (J), J = H′/lnS, where S is the total number of species (Pielou 1966); (5) The total number of individuals (N). H′, D and J were calculated using diversity function of the Vegan package in R (Oksanen et al. 2015). Abundance was measured by computing the total number of individuals captured per plot during each sampling time (Slade and Blair 2000).
A 3-way unequally spaced repeated-measures ANOVA (‘proc mixed’ procedure in SAS) was conducted to investigate the effects of maize type (Bt and non-Bt) on the diversity and abundance of non-lepidopteran pests. Maize type (Bt and non-Bt maize), year and sampling time were fixed factors, and the block was a random factor (Piepho et al. 2004). Because significant interaction of maize type × year × sampling time were observed for number of species (S), their interaction was further analyzed with Tukey HSD post hoc test.
We then used redundancy analysis (RDA) to explore the relationships between non-lepidopteran pest community composition and maize type (Bt and non-Bt maize), year (2012 and 2013) and sampling time (V3, V6, V9, V12, VT, R1, R2, R3, R5 and R6 stage). RDA is a constrained ordination tool used to map species occurrences along environmental/land-use gradients (Houlahan et al. 2006; Palmer 1993; Rao 1964; Ter Braak 1986). This method focused on inter-sample distances with rare species downweighted (Nielsen et al. 2010). In this analysis, maize type, sampling time and year were used as the environmental variables, and block as the covariable. Monte Carlo permutation tests (999 permutations) were performed to test the significance of the canonical axes of RDA, and the critical probability level for detecting significance was set at α = 0.01. The significance of the maize type, year and sampling time was defined by returning the environmental variables squared correlation coefficient, r2, on all axes conjointly and by a permutations test (envfit function from the Vegan package in R with 999 Monte Carlo permutations) (Oksanen et al. 2015).
Non-lepidopteran pest assemblages among different samples were analyzed using nonmetric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) (Clarke 1993; Digby and Kempton 1987; Kruskal 1964; Kruskal and Whish 1978) with the packages Vegan and Mass of R version 3.0.3 (Oksanen et al. 2015). NMDS is a commonly used multivariate technique in arthropod community composition analysis (Wimp et al. 2005), which gives a comprehensive view of abundance, richness and family identity (Shepard 1962). Distances between communities per sample were computed by using the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index (Bray and Curtis 1957). Here, non-lepidopteran pests surveyed in our study were distributed into 120 samples (10 sampling time × 2 maize types × 2 year × 3 replications). The result of goodness of fit (isoMDS function, Vegan package in R) and Shepard diagram (stress plot function, Vegan Package in R) of non-metric fit between the ordination and the original data of non-lepidopteran pests illustrated that the ordination reflected the dissimilarity between samples well (Foulquier et al. 2013; Fig. 4). We also analyzed which factors (maize type, sampling time and year) were mainly responsible for the nMDS ordination of the non-lepidopteran pest community by envfit function of the Vegan package in R (Oksanen et al. 2015).
All statistical calculations were performed in SAS v. 9.2 statistics package (SAS Institute 2009) and R software environment (v. 3.2.3; R Development Core Team 2015). Non-lepidopteran pest abundance data were log(x + 1) prior to analysis to downweight the influence of dominant and rare species on the ordination (Luo et al. 2013; Meyer et al. 2012).
Results
Non-lepidopteran pest abundance and diversity in Bt and non-Bt maize
In 2012, there were 25,452 non-lepidopteran pests (22 species/families) documented in Bt maize plots and 23,105 (25 species/families) documented in non-Bt maize plots. In 2013, 14,815 individuals (25 species/families) and 18,258 (25 species/families) were documented in Bt and non-Bt maize plots, respectively—fewer than the amounts recorded in 2012 (Table S1). During both years, the corn leaf aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis (Fitch), heavily dominated the non-lepidopteran pest communities in the Bt and non-Bt maize plots. In 2012, R. maidis represented more than half of the total non-lepidopteran pest community found in the Bt and non-Bt maize plots (57.12 % for Bt maize and 56.09 % for non-Bt maize). Other relatively abundant species found in 2012 were Frankliniella tenuicornis (Uzel) (14.96 % for Bt maize and 14.64 % for non-Bt maize), R. padi L. (13.04 % for Bt maize and 8.51 % for non-Bt maize), Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisduval) (6.02 % for Bt maize and 7.87 % for non-Bt maize), Sitobion avenae (F.) (3.24 % for Bt and 4.99 % for non-Bt maize), Haplothrips aculeatus (F.) (1.69 % for Bt and 2.32 % for non-Bt maize), and Laodelphax striatellus (Fallen) (1.59 % for Bt and 1.98 % for non-Bt maize) (Table S1; Fig. 2). In 2013, R. maidis was even more dominant, accounting for 91.83 % of the non-lepidopteran pest community composition in Bt maize plots and 93.73 % in non-Bt maize plots, followed by Erthesina fullo (Thunberg) and L. striatellu. The percentages of all other species were below 1 % (Table S1; Fig. 2).
Impacts of maize type, year and sampling time on the non-lepidopteran pest abundance and diversity
Unequally spaced repeated-measures ANOVA results showed that maize type had no significant effect on the Shannon–Wiener diversity index (H′), Simpson’s diversity index (D), number of species (S), Pielou’s evenness index (J) and the total number of individuals (N) (Table 1). In contrast, the year, the sampling time and their interaction all had highly significant impacts on all of the abundance and diversity indices (Table 1). No interaction of year—maize type, and maize type—sampling time was detected in any of the diversity and abundance indices (Table 1). The significant interaction of year × maize type × sampling time was only observed in number of species (S) (Table 1, Table S2). There were no significant differences between number of species (S) in Bt and non-Bt maize plots for all the sampling time in the 2 years except for R1 stage in 2013 (t = −2.55, P = 0.013) (Table S2).
Effects of maize type, year and sampling time on non-lepidopteran pest community composition
The effects of maize type, year and sampling time on the non-lepidopteran pest community compositions were examined using redundancy analysis. Maize type, year and sampling time totally explained 20.43 % of the total variability in the community compositions as explanatory variables (P = 0.001, 999 Monte Carlo permutation test) (Table S3). Axis 1 and 2 explained 10.88 and 8.94 % of variations in community composition, respectively (P = 0.001 for axis 1 and 2, 999 Monte Carlo permutation test) (Fig. 3; Table S3). Figure 3 also clearly illustrated that axis 1 was correlated with year, and axis 2 was correlated with sampling time.
RDA also showed which factors (the maize types, sampling times and year) were most important to the non-lepidopteran pest community composition. Both sampling time (r 2 = 0.68, P = 0.001, 999 Monte Carlo permutations) and year (r 2 = 0.82, P = 0.001, 999 Monte Carlo permutations) had a significant correlation with the non-lepidopteran pests community composition, except maize type (r 2 = 0.00, P = 0.996, 999 Monte Carlo permutations) (Table S4).
The similarity of non-lepidopteran pest assemblages between Bt and non-Bt maize plots
Temporal variability within the overall non-lepidopteran pest community structure of Bt and non-Bt maize with 3 replications in 20 sampling times during the 2 years samples was further explored by nonmetric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) (Fig. 4). The distance between two points was estimated using the pairwise Bray–Curtis similarity index between sampling events (Wells et al. 2011). Differences in the non-lepidopteran pest community composition between all samples were visualized in an nMDS plot (Fig. 4), where an intuitive separation of samples attributed to sampling time and year was evidenced. In contrast, a clear separation of the samples according to maize type was not seen in nMDS plots (Fig. 4). This was substantiated by a more detailed analysis of similarity (ANOSIM). Significant correlations between year, sampling time and community composition were found, however, no correlation was detected between maize type and community composition (Table 2).
Discussion
Cry insecticidal proteins are produced in Bt crops throughout the entire growing season, non-target herbivores, therefore, have direct access to Bt proteins while feeding on Bt crops (Groot and Dicke 2002). As the area under cultivation with Bt crops has steadily increased worldwide, environmental risk assessments (ERA) of Bt crops on non-target arthropods have attracted increasing attention from a number of researchers (Devos et al. 2012; Guo et al. 2014; Habuštová et al. 2014; Romeis et al. 2008). Laboratory and field studies have evaluated the effects of Bt maize on non-target arthropods. For example, lab experiments have demonstrated that Cry1Ab maize had no negative effects on the intrinsic rate of R. padi and the spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Dutton et al. 2002), as well as the population parameters of R. maidis (Li et al. 2007). Likewise, Cry3Bb1 maize did not harm the life history parameters of T. urticae (Li and Romeis 2010) and Cry1F maize did not negatively affected egg production and hatching rate of the corn leafhopper Dalbulus maidis (Virla et al. 2010). Field surveys showed that Bt-maize had no significant impact on the field densities of the plant bug Trigonotylus caelestialium (Kirkaldy) (Heteroptera, Miridae) (Rauschen et al. 2009) and the leafhopper Zyginidia scutellaris (Herrich-Schäffer) (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) (Rauschen et al. 2010), as well as on the abundance and diversity of non-target arthropods (Guo et al. 2014; Habuštová et al. 2014; Svobodová et al. 2015). The abundance and species of non-target herbivores may not only reflect the potential effects that Bt crops have on non-target arthropods, but may also indirectly affect the abundance of parasitoids or predators through disruption of food webs (Balog et al. 2010; Lundgren et al. 2009; Svobodová et al. 2016). Therefore, evaluating the effects of Bt crops on non-target herbivore biodiversity should be an important step in environmental safety assessment of Bt crops. This will also aid in identifying species which are most likely to be at risk and selecting appropriate species for laboratory bioassay, higher-tier studies, and post-market environmental monitoring (Romeis et al. 2013, 2014). In addition, comparing the differences between Bt and non-Bt maize on non-target herbivore abundance and diversity may offer insight into the reasons why some species of secondary insect pests benefit from planting Bt crops. These include: (1) reducing insecticide application (Lu et al. 2010), (2) crops being more susceptible to non-target herbivores (Faria et al. 2007), (3) reducing competition from target pests (Pons et al. 2005; Zeilinger et al. 2015).
Methods for analyzing the effects of environmental variables on species and ecological communities are generally focused on the distributions of individual species, and differences in the community composition. Diversity indices (e.g., Shannon–Weiner’s, Simpson’s, Pielou’s diversity index), and relative abundance of the species are commonly used as the simplest expression of measuring the disturbance of community structure in agricultural areas (Clergue et al. 2005). The drawback to using these indices, however, is that they are often weak in identifying complex diversity patterns because they pool multispecies information into a single value for each sample (Ramette 2007). Multivariate analyses (e.g., redundancy analysis, RDA; nonmetric multidimensional scaling, nMDS; canonical correspondence analysis, CCA) of community diversity patterns do explain community composition very well and are also better tools for analyzing the response of community composition to environmental variables (Ramette 2007). Therefore, diversity indices and multivariate analyses are often combined together to assess the effects of Bt crops on non-target arthropods in the field, which help to obtain a more comprehensive view of species abundance, diversity and community composition of arthropods in the field. An increasing number of studies have adopted multivariate analyses, such as PRC, CCA and RDA to compare the non-target arthropod communities of Bt crops with those of non-Bt crops (Guo et al. 2014; Habuštová et al. 2014; Li and Liu 2013; Lu et al. 2014; Svobodová et al. 2013, 2016). All of these studies have demonstrated that non-target arthropod community in Bt crops are similar to those found in corresponding non-Bt crops, which has been further substantiated by our multivariate analyses results.
In the current study, Shannon–Weiner’s, Simpson’s, Pielou’s index, and species richness and abundance values were calculated to compare the differences of non-lepidopteran pest diversity and abundance between Bt and non-Bt maize plots. Results showed that maize type (Bt and non-Bt maize) had no significant effects on any of the indices analyzed (Table 1). In addition, the abundance of major insect pests were similar in the Bt and non-Bt maize plots, which was consistent with earlier research demonstrating that the densities of non-target herbivores were not affected significantly by Bt maize expressing Cry1Ac proteins (Guo et al. 2014). There was, however, a significant year and sampling time effect on those indices (Table 1). Significant year and sampling time effects indicated that environmental factors (e.g., weather, rainfall) had a greater impact on the non-lepidopteran pest diversity and abundance than the maize type itself (Bt or non-Bt). The significant effects of sampling year or time on arthropod communities and biodiversity has been observed in a number of other studies regarding the effects of Bt crops on non-target arthropods (Guo et al. 2014; Habuštová et al. 2014; Priestley and Brownbridge 2009; Svobodová et al. 2013).
RDA analysis embodied an accurate relation of maize type, sampling time, year and other undefined factors with variations in non-lepidopteran pest community composition. Maize type, sampling time and year totally explained 20.43 % of the variance in the non-lepidopteran pest community, while no association was also found between maize type and the variance. Therefore, most of the variance must have been attributable to other factors, including: (1) plot size and isolation between plots (Prasifka et al. 2005); (2) complex interactions among natural enemies, target pests and non-target herbivores.
The occurrence of changes in community structure in non-target arthropods was often the basis used by scientists to evaluate the potential effects of Bt maize on non-target arthropods (Li et al. 2008; Pons et al. 2005; Zhang et al. 2011). However, the quantitative measures of compositional dissimilarities between sites, i.e., the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity (Faith et al. 1987) of non-target arthropods communities between Bt and non-Bt crop plots were neglected (Guo et al. 2014). When analyzing the abundance and diversity indices of Bt versus non-Bt crops, the rarely occurring species may influence the results (Faith et al. 1987). While the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index may analyze the community compositions between Bt and non-Bt crops more effectively (Faith et al. 1987). In our study, nMDS, an ordination method, was initially used to measure the non-lepidopteran pest community dissimilarities between Bt and non-Bt maize from various sampling times during the 2 years. NMDS intuitively demonstrated the similarity of non-lepidopteran pest communities between the Bt and non-Bt maize plots by showing the Bray–Curtis distance between samples (Fig. 4). The multivariate permutation test of effects of maize type, sampling time and year on Bray–Curtis distance illustrated that sampling time and year had close relationships with the Bray–Curtis distances, but maize type did not. These results were in keeping with the previous conclusion mentioned above where environmental factors were found to greatly influence the non-lepidopteran pest community composition, whereas the Bt maize itself did not.
In summary, we found that Bt maize itself neither negatively nor positively affected the non-lepidopteran pest community biodiversity. This is contradictory to those previous studies that indicated the wide-scale adoption of Bt crops would lead to outbreaks of secondary pests (Faria et al. 2007; Lu et al. 2010). However, secondary pest outbreaks in Bt crop cultivation areas were driven by the reduction of broad-spectrum insecticide applications (Wu et al. 2002). For example, the population increases of mirid bugs in Bt cotton fields in China have been shown by over 10 years of field investigation to be directly related to reductions in insecticide use in this crop (Lu et al. 2010). In addition, our results also provide evidence indicating that sampling time and year to year variations can affect the abundance, diversity and community composition of non-lepidopteran pests in Bt and non-Bt maize plots. It is also necessary to mention that since our investigation was conducted during the same season in the 2 years, some cumulative effects of the Bt crop on non-lepidopteran species may have been overlooked (Bourguet et al. 2002). It is, therefore, imperative that the impacts of Bt maize on non-lepidopteran pest community characteristics need to be documented over an extended period of time on a broad range of Asian environments. Meanwhile, the complex interactions among Bt maize, target pests, non-target herbivores and herbivore enemies of Bt maize require additional study.
References
Afidchao MM, Musters CJM, de Snoo GR (2013) Asian corn borer (ACB) and non-ACB pests in GM corn (Zea mays L.) in the Philippines. Pest Manag Sci 69:792–801
Balog A, Kiss J, Szekeres D, Szénási Á, Markó V (2010) Rove beetle (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) communities in transgenic Bt (MON810) and near isogenic maize. Crop Prot 29:567–571
Bernal CC, Aguda RM, Cohen MB (2002) Effect of rice lines transformed with Bacillus thuringiensis toxin genes on the brown planthopper and its predator Cyrtorhinus lividipennis. Entomol Exp Appl 102:21–28
Bourguet D et al (2002) Ostrinia nubilalis parasitism and the field abundance of non-target insects in transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn (Zea mays). Environ Biosaf Res 1:49–60
Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27:325–349
Burgio G, Lanzoni A, Accinelli G, Dinelli G, Bonetti A, Marotti I, Ramilli F (2007) Evaluation of Bt-toxin uptake by the non-target herbivore, Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae), feeding on transgenic oilseed rape. Bull Entomol Res 97:211–215
Chen M et al (2007) Impacts of transgenic cry1Ab rice on non-target planthoppers and their main predator Cyrtorhinus lividipennis (Hemiptera: Miridae)—a case study of the compatibility of Bt rice with biological control. Biol Control 42:242–250
Chen M, Ye GY, Liu ZC, Fang Q, Hu C, Peng YF, Shelton AM (2009) Analysis of Cry1Ab toxin bioaccumulation in a food chain of Bt rice, an herbivore and a predator. Ecotoxicology 18:230–238
Chen Y et al (2012) Bt rice expressing Cry1Ab does not stimulate an outbreak of its non-target herbivore, Nilaparvata lugens. Transgenic Res 21:279–291
Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143
Clergue B, Amiaud B, Pervanchon F, Lasserre-Joulin F, Plantureux S (2005) Biodiversity: function and assessment in agricultural areas. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 25:1–15
Crawley MJ (1999) Bollworms, genes and ecologists. Nature 400:501–502
de la Poza M et al (2005) Impact of farm-scale Bt maize on abundance of predatory arthropods in Spain. Crop Prot 24:677–684
Devos Y, De Schrijver A, De Clercq P, Kiss J, Romeis J (2012) Bt-maize event MON 88017 expressing Cry3Bb1 does not cause harm to non-target organisms. Transgenic Res 21:1191–1214
Digby PGN, Kempton RA (1987) Multivariate analysis of ecological communities. Chapman and Hall, London
Duan JJ et al (2010) Extrapolating non-target risk of Bt crops from laboratory to field. Biol Lett 6:74–77
Dutton A, Klein H, Romeis J, Bigler F (2002) Uptake of Bt—toxin by herbivores feeding on transgenic maize and consequences for the predator Chrysoperla carnea. Ecol Entomol 27:441–447
Faith D, Minchin P, Belbin L (1987) Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69:57–68
Faria CA, Wäckers FL, Pritchard J, Barrett DA, Turlings TC (2007) High susceptibility of Bt maize to aphids enhances the performance of parasitoids of lepidopteran pests. Plos One 2:e600
Foulquier A, Volat B, Neyra M, Bornette G, Montuelle B (2013) Long-term impact of hydrological regime on structure and functions of microbial communities in riverine wetland sediments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 85:211–226
Groot AT, Dicke M (2002) Insect-resistant transgenic plants in a multi-trophic context. Plant J 31:387–406
Guo YY, Feng YJ, Ge Y, Tetreau G, Chen XW, Dong XH, Shi WP (2014) The cultivation of Bt corn producing Cry1Ac toxins does not adversely affect non-target arthropods. Plos One 9:e114228
Habuštová O, Doležal P, Spitzer L, Svobodová Z, Hussein H, Sehnal F (2014) Impact of Cry1Ab toxin expression on the non-target insects dwelling on maize plants. J Appl Entomol 138:164–172
Han HL, Li GT, Wang ZY, Zhang J, He KL (2009) Cross-resistance of Cry1Ac-selected Asian corn borer to other Bt toxins. Acta Phytophylacica Sin 36:329–334
He KL, Wang ZY, Zhou DR, Wen LP, Song YY, Yao Z (2003) Evaluation of transgenic Bt corn for resistance to the Asian corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J Econ Entomol 96:935–940
He MX, He KL, Wang ZY, Wang XY, Li Q (2013) Selection for Cry1Ie resistance and cross-resistance of the selected strain to other Cry toxins in the Asian corn borer, Ostrinia furnacalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Acta Entomol Sin 56:1135–1142
Houlahan JE et al (2006) The effects of adjacent land use on wetland species richness and community composition. Wetlands 26:79–96
Huang J, Hu R, Rozelle S, Pray C (2005) Insect-resistant GM rice in farmers’ fields: assessing productivity and health effects in China. Science 308:688–690
James C (2014) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2014. ISAAA Brief. 49. ISAAA, Ithaca
Kruskal JB (1964) Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29:1–26
Kruskal J, Whish M (1978) Multidimensional scaling. Sage, Beverly Hills
Li X, Liu B (2013) A 2-year field study shows little evidence that the long-term planting of transgenic insect-resistant cotton affects the community structure of soil nematodes. Plos One 8:e61670
Li Y, Romeis J (2010) Bt maize expressing Cry3Bb1 does not harm the spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, or its ladybird beetle predator, Stethorus punctillum. Biol Control 53:337–344
Li LL, Wang ZY, He KL, Bai SX, Hua L (2007) Effects of transgenic corn expressing Bacillus thuringiensis CrylAb toxin on population increase of Rhopalosiphum maidis Fitch. J Appl Ecol 18:1077–1080
Li Y, Meissle M, Romeis J (2008) Consumption of Bt maize pollen expressing Cry1Ab or Cry3Bb1 does not harm adult green lacewings, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Plos One 3:e2909
Liu XD, Zhai BP, Zhang XX, Zong JM (2005) Impact of transgenic cotton plants on a non-target pest, Aphis gossypii glover. Ecol Entomol 30:307–315
Lu YH et al (2010) Mirid bug outbreaks in multiple crops correlated with wide-scale adoption of Bt cotton in China. Science 328:1151–1154
Lu ZB et al (2014) No direct effects of two transgenic Bt rice lines, T1C-19 and T2A-1, on the arthropod communities. Environ Entomol 43:1453–1463
Lundgren JG, Gassmann AJ, Bernal J, Duan JJ, Ruberson J (2009) Ecological compatibility of GM crops and biological control. Crop Prot 28:1017–1030
Luo TH, Yu XD, Zhou HZ (2013) Effects of reforestation practices on staphylinid beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) in southwestern China forests. Environ Entomol 42:7–16
Meyer C, Gilbert D, Gillet F, Moskura M, Franchi M, Bernard N (2012) Using “bryophytes and their associated testate amoeba” microsystems as indicators of atmospheric pollution. Ecol Indic 13:144–151
Nafus DM, Schreiner IH (1991) Review of the biology and control of the Asian corn borer, Ostrinia furnacalis (Lep: Pyralidae). Trop Pest Manag 37:41–56
Naranjo SE (2009) Impacts of Bt crops on non-target invertebrates and insecticide use patterns. CAB Rev Perspect Agric Vet Sci Nutr Nat Resour 4:1–11
Nielsen UN et al (2010) The influence of vegetation type, soil properties and precipitation on the composition of soil mite and microbial communities at the landscape scale. J Biogeogr 37:1317–1328
Oksanen J et al Vegan: community ecology package R package version 2.2-1. http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org/. Accessed: 20th Jan 2015
Palmer MW (1993) Putting things in even better order: The advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74:2215–2230
Pielou EC (1966) The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J Theor Biol 13:131–144
Piepho HP, Büchse A, Richter C (2004) A mixed modelling approach for randomized experiments with repeated measures. J Agron Crop Sci 190:230–247
Pons X, Lumbierres B, Lopez C, Albajes R (2005) Abundance of non-target herbivores in transgenic Bt-maize: a farm scale study. Eurep J Entomol 102:73–79
Prasifka JR, Hellmich RL, Dively GP, Lewis LC (2005) Assessing the effects of pest management on nontarget arthropods: the influence of plot size and isolation. Environ Entomol 34:1181–1192
Priestley A, Brownbridge M (2009) Field trials to evaluate effects of Bt-transgenic silage corn expressing the Cry1Ab insecticidal toxin on non-target soil arthropods in northern New England, USA. Transgenic Res 18:425–443
Ramette A (2007) Multivariate analyses in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 62:142–160
Rao CR (1964) The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhyā Indian J Stat Ser A, pp 329–358. Indian Statistical Institute
Rauschen S et al (2009) Impact of Bt-corn MON88017 in comparison to three conventional lines on Trigonotylus caelestialium (Kirkaldy) (Heteroptera: Miridae) field densities. Transgenic Res 18:203–214
Rauschen S, Schultheis E, Hunfeld H, Schaarschmidt F, Schuphan I, Eber S (2010) Diabrotica-resistant Bt-maize DKc5143 event MON88017 has no impact on the field densities of the leafhopper Zyginidia scutellaris. Environ Biosaf Res 9:87–99
R Development Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna. http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed: 10th Dec 2015
Romeis J et al (2008) Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods. Nat Biotechnol 26:203–208
Romeis J et al (2011) Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants. Transgenic Res 20:1–22
Romeis J, Raybould A, Bigler F, Candolfi MP, Hellmich RL, Huesing JE, Shelton AM (2013) Deriving criteria to select arthropod species for laboratory tests to assess the ecological risks from cultivating arthropod-resistant genetically engineered crops. Chemosphere 90:901–909
Romeis J et al (2014) Potential use of an arthropod database to support the non-target risk assessment and monitoring of transgenic plants. Transgenic Res 23:995–1013
SAS Institute (2009) Base SAS® 9.2 procedures guide. SAS Institute, Cary
Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana
Shepard RN (1962) The analysis of proximities: multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. Psychometrika 27:125–139
Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversit. Nature 163:688
Slade NA, Blair SM (2000) An empirical test of using counts of individuals captured as indices of population size. J Mammal 81:1035–1045
Song FP et al (2003) Identification of cry1I-Type genes from Bacillus thuringiensis strains and characterization of a novel cry1I-Type Gene. Appl Environ Microb 69:5207–5211
Svobodová Z, Habuštová O, Sehnal F, Holec M, Hussein HM (2013) Epigeic spiders are not affected by the genetically modified maize MON 88017. J Appl Entomol 137:56–67
Svobodová Z, Skoková Habuštová O, Hutchison WD, Hussein HM, Sehnal F (2015) Risk assessment of genetically engineered maize resistant to Diabrotica spp.: influence on above-ground arthropods in the Czech Republic. Plos One 10:e0130656
Svobodová Z, Skoková Habuštová O, Boháč J, Sehnal F (2016) Functional diversity of staphylinid beetles (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) in maize fields: testing the possible effect of genetically modified, insect resistant maize. Bull Entomol Res 106:1–14
Szenasi A, Palinkas Z, Zalai M, Schmitz OJ, Balog A (2014) Short-term effects of different genetically modified maize varieties on arthropod food web properties: an experimental field assessment. Sci Rep. doi:10.1038/srep05315
Ter Braak CJ (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–1179
Virla EG, Casuso M, Frias EA (2010) A preliminary study on the effects of a transgenic corn event on the non-target pest Dalbulus maidis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae). Crop Prot 29:635–638
Wang ZY et al (2005) Effects of transgenic corn hybrids expressing Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin on survival and growth of the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hübner). Acta Entomol Sin 48:214–220
Wang YM, Zhang GA, Du JP, Liu B, Wang MC (2010) Influence of transgenic hybrid rice expressing a fused gene derived from cry1Ab and cry1Ac on primary insect pests and rice yield. Crop Prot 29:128–133
Wells GF, Park HD, Eggleston B, Francis CA, Criddle CS (2011) Fine-scale bacterial community dynamics and the taxa–time relationship within a full-scale activated sludge bioreactor. Water Res 45:5476–5488
Wimp GW, Martinsen GD, Floate KD, Bangert RK, Whitham TG (2005) Plant genetic determinants of arthropod community structure and diversity. Evolution 59:61–69
Wolt J et al (2010) Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants. Transgenic Res 19:425–436
Wu K, Li W, Feng H, Guo Y (2002) Seasonal abundance of the mirids, Lygus lucorum and Adelphocoris spp. (Hemiptera: Miridae) on Bt cotton in northern China. Crop Prot 21:997–1002
Xu L, Ferry N, Wang Z, Zhang J, Edwards MG, Gatehouse AMR, He K (2013) A proteomic approach to study the mechanism of tolerance to Bt toxins in Ostrinia furnacalis larvae selected for resistance to Cry1Ab. Transgenic Res 22:1155–1166
Yang ZJ, Lang ZH, Zhang J, Song FP, He KL, Huang DF (2012) Studies on insect-resistant transgenic maize (Zea mays L.) harboring Bt cry1Ah and cry1Ie genes. J Agric Sci Technol (Beijing) 14:39–45
Zeilinger AR, Olson DM, Andow DA (2015) Competitive release and outbreaks of non-target pests associated with transgenic Bt cotton. Ecol Appl. doi:10.1890/15-1314.1
Zhang B, Chen M, Zhang X, Luan H, Tian Y, Su X (2011) Expression of Bt-Cry3A in transgenic Populus alba × P. glandulosa and its effects on target and non-target herbivores and the arthropod community. Transgenic Res 20:523–532
Zhang YW et al (2013) Overexpression of a novel cry1Ie gene confers resistance to Cry1Ac-resistant cotton bollworm in transgenic lines of maize. Plant Cell Tiss Org 115:151–158
Zhang TT, He MX, Gatehouse AMR, Wang ZY, Edwards MG, Li Q, He KL (2014) Inheritance patterns, dominance and cross-resistance of Cry1Ab-and Cry1Ac-selected Ostrinia furnacalis (Guenée). Toxins 6:2694–2707
Zurbrügg C, Nentwig W (2009) Ingestion and excretion of two transgenic Bt corn varieties by slugs. Transgenic Res 18:215–225
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Dr. Xianghong Yu from Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences for the statistical analysis advice. This research was supported by the Genetically Modified Organisms Breeding Major Projects (2014ZX08011-003).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, J., He, K., Bai, S. et al. Effects of transgenic cry1Ie maize on non-lepidopteran pest abundance, diversity and community composition. Transgenic Res 25, 761–772 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-016-9968-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-016-9968-y