Abstract
Background and aims
The survival and coexistence of plants in water-limited environments are related to their ability to coordinate water acquisition and regulation of water loss. To assess the coordination among below and aboveground hydraulic traits and the diversity of water-use strategies, we evaluated rooting depth and several leaf hydraulic traits of 15 species in campos rupestres, a seasonally-dry biodiversity hotspot in central Brazil.
Methods
We assessed the depth of plant water acquisition by excavating roots and analyzing the stable isotope composition of hydrogen (δD) and oxygen (δ18O) in the xylem and soil water. We also measured mid-morning stomatal conductance, leaf-water potential at turgor loss point (ѰTLP) and pre-dawn leaf water potentials (ѰPD) during wet and dry seasons.
Results
We demonstrated that rooting depth is a good predictor of seasonal variations in stomatal conductance and ѰPD. Shallow-rooted plants had greater variation in stomatal conductance and ѰPD than deep-rooted plants. Woody plants with shallower roots also had lower ѰTLP than deep-rooted plants, revealing higher drought resistance.
Conclusion
We demonstrate that shallow-rooted species, more exposed to variation in water availability, have mechanisms to confer drought resistance through turgor maintenance. Our results support the theory of hydrological niche segregation and its underlying trade-offs related to drought resistance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Water shortage is an important driver of niche partitioning, coexistence and functional trait differentiation leading to high diversity of water-use strategies in water-limited ecosystems (Bartelheimer et al. 2010; Jackson et al. 1996; Rossatto et al. 2013; Schwinning et al. 2004). In these ecosystems, plants generally exhibit contrasting sets of traits related to drought resistance or avoidance that allow spatial and temporal hydrological partitioning of water allowing the species niche to segregate (Schwinning and Ehleringer 2001; Silvertown et al. 2015). The hydrological niche segregation (HNS) framework proposes that plants within a community should exploit different water sources by specializing on: 1) occupying soil patches with different moisture regimes, for example along a toposequence (see Cosme et al. 2017); 2) having different recruitment opportunities between years, depending on water availability; and 3) having different rooting depths or phenologies (e.g. drought- deciduous and evergreen species with contrasting water demands) (Silvertown et al. 2015). The HNS is predicted to exist in a wide range of ecosystems where species occurrences and individual performance are affected by spatial and temporal variation in water availability. To occupy each niche patch, coordination between hydraulic traits is necessary to insure a positive water balance and avoid a negative carbon balance.
Deep rooting to access water in deep soil layers or groundwater pools is an important trait allowing species survival in water-limited ecosystems (Dawson and Pate 1996; Nepstad et al. 1994; Oliveira et al. 2005a; West et al. 2012). Stable isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen from soil and plant xylem water have been used to describe the spatial differences in water sources used by co-occurring species (Dawson et al. 2002). Because shallow soils are more prone to evaporation and evaporation causes isotope fractionation, enriching the soil water in deuterium (D) and oxygen (18O), shallow-rooted plants tend to show more enriched values of xylem water isotope compared to deep-rooted plants (Dawson et al. 2002). Dimorphic-rooted plants usually exhibit seasonal variation in xylem-water isotope composition, indicating changes in water source from shallow to deep soil (Dawson and Pate 1996; Nie et al. 2011; Quesada et al. 2008; Rossatto et al. 2013). Species-rich communities in environments with seasonal variation in water availability provide an excellent opportunity to understand the mechanisms underlying both spatial and temporal HNS.
During periods of water deficits, root restriction in water uptake associated with high atmospheric vapor pressure deficit (VPD) can cause a decline in whole plant water potential. Consequently, stomatal conductance and leaf water potential (ΨL) may interact as a feedback mechanism, in which ΨL has a key role controlling stomatal guard-cell movement (Brodribb et al. 2003; Klein 2014) and restricting plant water loss. Long term drought cycles might favor species with lower values of leaf water potential at turgor loss point (ΨTLP), which reflects the ability of the cell to maintain its turgor as soil water potential declines (Bartlett et al. 2012). When the water loss is severe, cell pressure and volume declines until the turgor is completely lost, until ΨTLP is reached (Ding et al. 2014). Drought avoidance and tolerance are likely to occur through HNS however, with a few exceptions (Pivovaroff et al. 2015), studies explicitly investigating the association of leaf water relations with rooting depth at the community scale are missing.
The campos rupestres of Central Brazil occur under seasonally dry climates and over quartzite rock outcrops in mountaintops, conditions that generate periods of significant water deficits for vegetation. The vegetation is dominated by perennial species of small trees, woody shrubs, rosettes, sedges and grasses over impoverished soils (Le Stradic et al. 2015; Oliveira et al. 2015). This ecosystem supports one of the highest levels of plant biodiversity on earth, for instance about 1590 species were recorded in 200 km2 (Giulietti et al. 1987; Silveira et al. 2016), but little is known about the mechanisms that generate and maintain this diversity. The hydrological niche segregation (HNS) framework proposes that partitioning of water resources is a potential mechanism allowing plant coexistence within species-rich communities (Araya et al. 2011). Here we explore water-uptake strategies and water regulation by evaluating root and leaf hydraulic traits in a campos rupestres plant community. Considering the high levels of biodiversity and marked seasonality in rainfall, the campos rupestres plant communities represent an excellent model to investigate the existence of a hydraulic trait spectrum integrating rooting depth, stomatal regulation capacities, and traits related to drought resistance for a broad number of species. We expect that plants acquire water through diverse root architectures, exhibiting spatial (along the soil profile) and seasonal partitioning of water. We hypothesize that 1) shallow-rooted species have wider variations in stomatal conductance between rainy and dry seasons than deep-rooted plants in order to maintain a favorable water status during the dry season, i.e. water acquisition traits (rooting depth) are negatively related to stomatal regulation capacity; 2) rooting depth is strongly related to leaf drought resistance, with shallow-rooted species being more exposed to seasonal water deficits and therefore more resistant to water stress (more negative ΨTLP) than deep-rooted species. Strong empirical evidence linking below- and aboveground hydraulic traits is missing in the literature (but see Pivovaroff et al. 2015). Understanding the diversity of plant hydraulic traits is particularly important to unravel the underlying mechanisms that allow species coexistence in hyper-diverse communities and to predict how communities will respond to longer and more severe droughts (Silvertown et al. 2015).
Materials and methods
Study area
The research was carried out between 2011 and 2014 in a campos rupestre site at Serra da Canastra National Park, Minas Gerais, Brazil (20°15′40″S and 46°25′25″W). The site has an elevation of 1200 m and a seasonal climate. Mean historical annual rainfall (1995–2010) is 1293 mm, falling mostly in the wet season (November to April), and mean annual temperature ranges between 19 °C to 23 °C. Plants at the site are exposed to high ultraviolet radiation and wide daily variations in temperature (mean = 18 °C, max = 27.6 °C and min = 4.5 °C), high vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and strong seasonal water fluctuation (Fig. S1) (Jacobi et al. 2007; Porembski and Barthlott 2000). Quartzite rock outcrops characterize the site, which has shallow soils, comprised of a narrow organic layer covering a sandy soil within coarse gravels from the matrix rocks. Campos rupestres soils present low nutrient availability, especially phosphorus and potassium (Oliveira et al. 2015). The dominant plant families are Velloziaceae, Fabaceae, Poaceae and Asteraceae and the estimated number of species for this biodiversity hotspot is higher than 5000 (Silveira et al. 2016). The total number of vascular plants in the campos rupestres at Serra da Canastra National Park is 768 species (Romero and Nakajima 1999).
Data collection
To determine community composition and species relative abundance, we surveyed all the species in six randomized circular plots of 8 m of diameter. The circular plots were placed at least 100 m apart from each other. We measured plant height (n = 5 per species) of the fifteen most abundant species that represent the main life forms of the campos rupestres community inside the plots (Table 1). To evaluate the root architecture of plants, we excavated the entire root system of 3–4 individuals per species across all plots.
To determine the depth of the water source used by the plants, we analyzed the stable isotope composition of hydrogen (deuterium) (δDxyl) and oxygen (δ18O) of the xylem water of 15 species (Table 1) and soil water at different depths. We collected suberized stem segments from woody plants and junctions between roots and shoots not exposed to evaporation in grasses and rosettes (n = 2–6 per species) in the peak of the dry season (September 2011; Dawson and Ehleringer (1998)). High evaporation in shallow soil during peak dry season generates a gradient in the stable isotope composition of soil water along the vertical soil profile (Dawson et al. 2002). Within each species, we only sampled mature individuals within the same size class to avoid possible confounding effects of plant size on rooting depth. In the same period, we collected the soil samples using an auger in six different soil depths (5, 15, 30, 60 and 90 cm) in the center of each plot. Deeper excavation was not possible because the bedrock lies at 1 m depth. During the three-year study, we collected water from twenty-two rainfall events from November 2011 to July 2013. We sealed each vial tightly, wrapped with parafilm® and cooled them to avoid evaporation prior to analysis. We collected soil samples in the same plots and depths used for the isotope analysis to determine the gravimetric soil water content based on the relative difference between fresh and dried soil at 65 °C for 72 h.
To evaluate the temporal variation in the depth of water source used by a subset species, we sampled xylem water of six species with contrasting underground architecture and rooting depths (i.e. Campomanesia pubescens, Eremanthus seidellii, Lessingianthus warmingianum, Mimosa clausenii, Vellozia intermedia, and V. nivea). Soil- and xylem water samples were collected on the same individuals in the wet season (November 2011), in the transition between the wet and the dry season (June 2011) and in the dry season (August 2012) (n = 3–6).
We extracted water from soil and plant tissue samples using the cryogenic distillation method (Dawson and Ehleringer 1998) at the Laboratory of Isotope Ecology, CENA - University of São Paulo. The water samples from rain events were analyzed at the Stable Isotope Ratio Facility for Environmental Research at the University of Utah. The oxygen isotopic ratio (δ18O = 18O/16O) and deuterium isotopic ratio (δD = 2H/H) were determined using a high temperature elemental analyzer coupled with a mass spectrometer (Thermo Finningan Delta Plus XL). The data were expressed in delta (δ) whose notation is ‰ relative to international Vienna mean ocean water standard (V-SMOW) (Gonfiantini 1978).
To characterize temporal physiological adjustments in the species studied, we measured xylem pre-dawn water potential (Ѱpd) and leaf stomatal conductance (g s ) from June to August 2012 (n = 5 individuals/species/month). In the evening before the Ѱpd measurements, we wrapped the leaves with plastic bags to avoid nocturnal transpiration and to ensure that leaf Ѱpd would approximately represent soil water potential where roots were placed (Donovan et al. 2001; Donovan et al. 2003). We measured Ѱpd between 2 to 6 AM using a Scholander pressure bomb (PMS, model 1000, USA). We measured the mid-morning g s between 8:30 to 10:30, which is the theoretical period of maximum g s , in two leaves per individual in five individuals per species, using a steady-state porometer (Delta T Devices, Cambridge, England).
We constructed pressure-volume (P-V) curves using the bench drying technique in May 2014 (Turner 1988) to estimate the water potential at turgor loss point (ѰTLP) in five expanded terminal leaves per species. We recut the leaves under water and let them rehydrate inside a black plastic bag during 2 h before the start the P-V curve construction. We first weighted the hydrated leaves in a precision balance (0.0001 g) to obtain the weight at full turgor and immediately placed them in a pressure chamber (PMS, model 1000, USA) to get the initial water potential. We repeated this process several times while leaves were dehydrating under ambient conditions (20 °C). After all the procedure, we dried the leaves at 65 °C for 72 h before we measured leaf dry weight.
Statistical analysis
We performed all statistical analysis using R version 3.3.2 (R Core Team 2012). We used linear mixed effect models and compared statistical significance between two types of model. We compared a model including soil depth, species and season as fixed effects, with a null model, which used no fixed effects. Random effects in both models included plants and repeated measures within plants. We did a multiple comparisons of means using Tukey contrasts to identify differences between soil depths, species and season differences among the subset of six species of plants with the lsmeans package (Bates et al. 2015; Lenth 2016). For soil analyses, we grouped the samples from 5 to 15 cm to represent superficial soil and 60 to 90 cm to represent the deeper soil profile. We used an ANCOVA to identify differences in slopes of relationship between δ18O and δD for the global, regional, plant and soil meteoric water lines.
We used the siar package (Parnell and Jackson 2013) to compute an isotope-mixture model that takes the isotope data and fits into a Bayesian framework and fit a mean water uptake depth from the xylem water content by analyzing the distribution of isotopic concentration in soil water. The model assumes that each target value comes from a Gaussian distribution with an unknown mean and standard deviation (Parnell et al. 2013). We tested if rooting depth, estimated by δDxyl, was a good predictor of the variation in Ѱpd, gs, average of plant height and ѰTLP using linear regression models. We calculated the difference between average Ѱpd measured in June (wettest month in the study) and August (driest month), the delta Ѱpd (ΔѰpd). We used the coefficient of variation (CV) of g s calculated by CV = (M/SD)*100, (M = mean, SD = Standard Deviation) as an index of seasonal variation in stomatal conductance and tested if there was a linear relationship between rooting depth (δDxyl) and this variable. The CV provides a measure of data dispersion around the mean allowing us to compare variation between groups with different magnitude of values of g s . We also performed a quantile regression between plant height and rooting depth (δDxyl) (Cade and Noon 2003) fixed the τ = 0.75 using the quantreg package (Koenker 2017). Finally, in order to detect general group trends based on rooting depth and each trait studied (δDxyl, δ18Oxyl, ΔѰpd, Cvg s , ѰTLP, and plant height), we submitted the bivariate matrix to a hierarchical cluster analysis based on the Euclidean distance between species. After that, we organized the data to a single matrix with six leaf hydraulic traits to find the overall functional clustering as a function of rooting depth and the coordination of leaf traits.
Results
Diversity of root morphologies
We found a wide variety of root morphologies and grouped them into five main categories (Fig. S2; Table 1, Fig. 1): (1) Classical dimorphic (D) root system, with distinct tap and lateral roots, having access to deep water, found on five of our study species; (2) the sobole (S) type, also known as underground tree, stem-tuber or underground stem, was found only for Campomanesia pubescens (Myrtaceae). This root type grows parallel to the soil surface with no taproot, and only has access to shallow-soil water (Fig. S2); (3) lignotuber (L) systems with a large numbers of fine roots growing at different angles in shallow soil layers (found in the following species: Lessingianthus warmingianum and Mikania sp., both Asteraceae); (4) fasciculate (F) fibrous type was found in grasses, sedges and (5) fasciculate Velloziaceae (VF) species type. In grasses and sedges, fine roots grow from small rhizomes and bulbs and only reached shallow soils, while in Velloziaceae species, the fasciculate roots are thicker than in grasses and are able to grow into intermediate soil layers (Fig. S2; Fig. 1).
δD and δ18O from rainfall, soil and xylem water
The δ18O of rainfall events collected at Serra da Canastra varied from −16.1 to 0.6 ‰, whereas δD ranged from −119.8 to 20.6 ‰. The local meteoric water line (LMWL) showed little deviation from global meteoric water line (GMWL), the slope of LMLW was 8.40, only 0.36 higher than GMWL (ANCOVA; t = 1.98; p = 0.054). There was a complete overlap between soil and xylem isotope water lines with similar slope values between them (soil = 4.56 and xylem = 4.65; ANCOVA; t = 0.21; p = 0.64). The slope between soil and xylem water line was about 3.5 lower than the regional water line (ANCOVA; t = −6.38; p < 0.001) indicating a strong evaporative loss and very low relative humidity during the sampling work (Fig. 1).
The δD and δ18O of bulk soil water in the dry season (September 2011) showed a marked vertical gradient, with an increase of the heavier isotope in shallow soil (Figs. 1 and 2; Table 1). The bulk-soil water δD values ranged from −105.6 to −10.7‰ and δ18O from −13.8 to 7.1 ‰. The average δD was less negative (−20.8 ± 6.9‰) in shallow soils (15 cm) than in deep soils (−78.3 ± 23.7‰, at 90 cm) (Multiple Comparisons with Tukey contrast, Z value = −5.672, p < 0.001). Average δ18O was also higher in shallow (3.9 ± 2.3‰) than in deep soils (−8.9 ± 4.7‰) (Multiple Comparisons with Tukey contrast, Z value = −6.272, p < 0.001). An increase in soil volumetric water content in deep soils accompanied the gradient of decreasing heavy water isotopes with depth (Fig. 2a, b). The xylem water isotopic composition (δ18Oxyl and δDxyl) overlapped with the soil isotopic composition gradient in the dry season (Fig. 1; see dashed gray and black continuous lines). The average δDxyl ranged from −97‰ for the E. seidelli to −26‰ for Grass 2 and the average δ18Oxyl from −13‰ for M. clausenii to 1.5‰ for Loudetiopsis sp.
Grasses and a species of sedge with fasciculate fibrous roots (Grass 1 and 2, Loudetiopsis sp., Rhynchospora cosanguinea) were the shallowest-rooted species, with the less negative average δDxyl ranging from −26‰ to −39‰, and the main water source from 15 cm of soil (Table 1). The fasciculate roots in Velloziaceae species were able to uptake water from intermediate to deep soil and they used a deeper water source, less enriched in D in the dry season (V. nivea, δDxyl = −73 ± 1‰, V. intermedia, δDxyl = −67 ± 4‰) than in the wet season (V. nivea, δDxyl = −29 ± 7‰/ V. intermedia, δDxyl = −43 ± 8‰) (Fig. 3). The sobole type (C. pubescens) was only able to uptake water from shallow soils in both wet (δDxyl = −40 ± 4‰) and dry seasons (δDxyl = −48 ± 3‰; Table 1, Fig. 3). C. pubescens showed significantly higher dry-season δDxyl (−56 ± 15‰) than in E. seidelli (−96 ± 32‰), the deepest-rooted plants (Multiple Comparisons with Tukey contrast, Z value = −4.809, p < 0.001). Lignotuber-bearing species L. warmingianum and Mikania sp. had shallower root systems then E. seidelli and other dimorphic-rooted species (Multiple Comparisons with Tukey contrast, Z value = −4.809, p < 0.001). Lignotuber root systems had many buds and large numbers of fine roots growing at different angles in shallow soil layers. The dwarf tree E. seidelli and the shrubs Mimosa clausenii, Leandra aurea, Microlicia cuneata and Myrsine guianensis were the deepest-rooted species. They had a classical dimorphic root system with distinct tap and lateral roots, having access to deep water. They had the most negative values of δDxyl with values ranging from −95‰ to −78‰, indicating they accessed water deeper than 60 cm (Table 1). Both E. seidelli and M. clausenii used deuterium-depleted water from deep soil layers during the dry season and deuterium-enriched water during rainy season (Fig. 3). Variations to a less enriched water source in D and 18O in the wet season, similar to the isotopic signature of rain, suggest the ability of dimorphic-rooted species to seasonally change their water source.
The two deepest-rooted species E. seidelli and M. clausenii presented the most conspicuous contrast between plant heights. Even though both plants were capable of acquiring water from deepest soil, the average height of the small three E. seidelli (157 cm) was seven times greater than M. clausenii (21 cm), indicating plant height was not related to depth of water uptake (δDxyl, Fig. 4d; R2 = 0.12; F = 1.83; p = 0.19). However, when we explored the quantile regression we showed that plants with contrasting heights (small and tall plants) used deeper soil water (Fig. 4d), while shallow soil was only explored by small plants (below 1 m).
Physiological parameters
The ѰPD ranged from −0.75 to −0.1 MPa in June, the wettest month, −1.4 to −0.15 in July and −1.6 to −0.15 in August, the driest month. Eight species in this study did not show significant reductions in ѰPD during the transition to the dry season transition, when soil volumetric water content declined (see Supplementary material S1, S3 and S4). These eight species, with exception of one grass (Loudetiopsis sp., upward-pointing grey triangle, Fig. 4a), had xylem water contributions from deep soil water (from 60 to 90 cm depth) (Table 1). There was a positive linear relationship between average δDxyl and ∆ѰPD (R2 = 0.38; F = 8.24; p < 0.05; y = 0.006× + 1.0495). When we removed two species (Loudetiopsis sp. and Vellozia sp.), evaluated as outliers by theoretical quantiles and Cook’s distance inspection (Aguinis et al. 2013), average δDxyl explained 69% of ∆ѰPD (R2 = 0.69; F = 24.88; p < 0.0001; y = 0.012× + 1.205).
A strong positive relationship was observed between averaged δDxyl and coefficient of variation of stomatal conductance (Fig. 4b; R2 = 0.78; p < 0.0001; F = 46.26; y = 0.576× + 73.76), meaning that shallow-rooted plants have a wider variation in seasonal stomatal conductance than deep-rooted plants (Supplementary material S5). The ѰTLP of the grasses and the sedge diverged from the woody and rosette species, with substantial variation between individuals, ranging from −1.3 to −2.54 MPa. The sobole rooted species C. pubescens and rosette Vellozia sp. had the lowest ѰTLP -3.02 ± 0.15 and −3.09 ± 0.39 MPa, respectively. The lignotuber species had intermediate ѰTLP, 2.04 MPa for L. warmingianum and −1.75 MPa for Mikania sp. The three deepest-rooted plants E. seidelli, M. clausenii and L. aurea had less negative ѰTLP ranging from −1.4 to −1.8 MPa. The ѰTLP was not related to δDxyl (R2 = 0.01; F = 0.241; p = 0.63; y = −0.003×-2.347) when we considered grasses and woody species together (Fig. 4c). However, when we considered only woody species, the δDxyl explained 40% of variation in ѰTLP (Fig. 4c; R2 = 0.40; F = 6.12; p < 0.03; y = −0.023×-3.928). Assuming that lignotubers may decouple rooting depth from aboveground hydraulic functioning because of their hydraulic trait differences (Küppers et al. 1987), we found that the δDxyl explained 87% of variation in ѰTLP, when we considered only woody species without lignotubers (R2 = 0.87; F = 50.81; p < 0.0001; y = −0.038×-5.230).
Species were separated in two groups by the Euclidian distance criterion: deep-rooted (continuous line, Fig. 5) and shallow-rooted species (dotted line, Fig. 5), indicating that rooting depth is a key trait defining plant water use strategies. Within the deep-rooted group, E. seidelli and M. clausenii and the two Velloziaceae species (open diamond and open triangle, Fig. 5) formed two separate groups.
Discussion
We found substantial evidence to support our hypothesis of vertical root partitioning of soil volume based on root architecture and the strong vertical gradient of the δD and δ18O in the bulk of soil and xylem water during dry season. Additionally, the results support our second hypothesis that rooting depth is strongly related to water stress avoidance mechanisms, such as stomatal regulation and leaf ѰTLP. Letten et al. (2015) and Silvertown et al. (2015) highlighted the need to identify differences in physiological processes and the diversification of hydraulically related traits that might allow HNS in spatial and temporal scales. Our results demonstrate the functional coordination between belowground water acquisition traits (rooting depth) and aboveground water relations (stomatal control and water potential at leaf turgor loss point) that allow survival, growth and partition of water use in this seasonally dry environment. Taken together, our results provide evidence on the existence of a spectrum of hydraulically related traits that are evolutionary viable in this environment and that might be implicated in the coexistence of a high number of plant species in the campos rupestres communities (Araya et al. 2011; Alcantara et al. 2015; Castro et al. 2016; Letten et al. 2015; Silvertown et al. 2015).
Diversity of root morphologies and depth
Several rooting types accessed water in a variety of depths in campos rupestres and they were well correlated with δDxyl and δD or δ18O in the bulk soil (Fig. 1; Fig. S2). This high diversity of underground architectures is expected in water-limited environments (Schenk and Jackson 2002). The ability of plants to grow through the rock fissures enables roots to segregate along quartzite rock outcrops accessing deeper soil layers and spreading horizontally (Poot and Lambers 2003; Schwinning 2010). For example, two woody plants L. aurea and C. pubescens, were able to adjust their root size and architecture to grow into rock fissures allowing roots to forage for water stored in the rocky matrix (see Oliveira et al. 2016).
One third of the species in our survey showed dimorphic root systems. The δDxyl of dimorphic rooted plants showed 2.6 times less enrichment in D during the dry season (average δDxyl = −86‰; see Fig. 1 and Fig. 4) in contrast with the fasciculate root type (δDxyl = −33‰). We do not have δD and δ18O data for bulk soil water during the rainy season, making the interpretation of changes in δDxyl composition between seasons in dimorphic roots difficult (Fig. 3). However the higher net seasonal changes in δDxyl composition for dimorphic rooted plants (Fig. 3) indicates that this root architecture allows plants to use water from many sources in the soil as observed in other communities (Dawson et al. 2002; Oliveira et al. 2005b; Rossatto et al. 2013).
Grasses with fasciculate roots were hydrologically partitioned from the other study species, with a major proportion of water uptake in the shallowest soils. Our cluster analysis separated the fasciculate root type in all analyses (Figs. 4 and 5), showing the clear functional divergence between grasses and others plants. This is consistent with a recent meta-analysis showing that woody and non-woody plants are functionally contrasting (Díaz et al. 2016). About 80% of worldwide grasses present root systems in the first 30 cm of soil depth (Jackson et al. 1996) and the niche diversification within the grass functional type is explained based on temporal recruitment of niche rather than resource-mediated mechanisms (Schwinning and Kelly 2013). To cope with seasonal water restrictions in the upper soil layers grasses use non-structural carbohydrate reserves as osmotically active molecules to keep physiological activity and tissue turgor under drought conditions (de Souza et al. 2005). Furthermore, some grasses also show C4 metabolism, further facilitating survival in open, hot and dry environments and reduce foliar area during the dry season (de Souza et al. 2005; Garcia et al. 2009; Sarmiento and Monasterio 1983). Leaf senescence during the dry season might explain the lack of correlation between rooting depth of and leaf TLP, suggesting that grasses invest in drought-avoidance instead of tolerance.
We also demonstrated that shallow soil space is partitioned by other woody shallow-rooted species able to coexist with grasses. These species exhibited greater diversity in root architectures, for instance, lignotuber/xylopodium, stem-tuber underground system (sobole, underground tree) being furcate along the horizontal surface (Apezzato-da-Glória 2003), and the rosette Velloziaceae species with typical monocotyledonous fasciculate roots, which are thicker and deeper than grasses (Fig. S2). In contrast with grasses, these shallow-rooted woody species are evergreen and, therefore, must invest in drought-tolerance traits since they are subject to a high variation on water availability in the upper soil layers (Meinzer et al. 2016).
Soil depth imposes a limit to the investment in plant height in our survey. While shallow soils (not more than 100 cm) only support shorter plants, both short and tall trees explored the deep soil layers. For instance, the tallest treelet E. seidelli (about 200 cm) that had access to water stored deeper in the soil and exhibited similar isotopic water source to the shrub M. clausenii (about 20 cm height). Plant height or bud height disposition and architecture are usually used for a priori plant categorization in life-forms (growth form), and then used as predictors of the depth of soil water uptake by plants in savannas (Rossatto et al. 2013). Blondel (2003) stressed that many studies rely on intuition to partition a priori species into groups, making it hard to define categories without quantitative methods. Our results show that predicting root depth using growth form defined by plant height can be misleading in campos rupestres.
Linking rooting depth with above-ground water relations
Small differences in root architecture can minimize plant competition for water during prolonged droughts (Araya et al. 2011; Silvertown et al. 1999). We demonstrated that rooting depth is a good predictor of leaf water use strategies in a perennial campos rupestres community. The acquisition of deep-water sources allowed plants to buffer the effects of seasonal water deficits to the extent that the deep-rooted plants showed less variation in their ѰPD, a proxy of plant water stress (Fig. 4) (Ivanov et al. 2012; Meinzer et al. 2013; Nepstad et al. 1994; Oliveira et al. 2005a). On the other hand, the shallow-rooted species are subject to a high variation in water availability in the upper soil layers as seen by the larger variation in their ѰPD (Fig. 4). In those plants, we identify two main drought responses / strategies. The short-term response is related to avoidance strategy (hours to months), where we identified a continuum of stomatal control responses dependent of root depth. The medium term response (months to years) is related to drought resistance expressed in structural reinforcement and osmoregulation and represented by the continuum of variation in TLP (Meinzer et al. 2016; Mitchell et al. 2016). The integration of these short and medium term responses allow partitioning of the shallow soil layers.
The stomatal closure during the dry season represents an important mechanism of short-term regulation of water loss (Fig. 5). Pioneering studies in Cerrado had already suggested that some species have contrasting rates of stomatal conductance between seasons to regulate water loss (Ferri 1944). The water loss control must be unrelated to leaf or branch senescence to avoid the costs of producing new tissues imposed by trade-offs on nutrient economy in the nutrient-impoverished ecosystems, as campos rupestres (Abrahão et al. 2014; Oliveira et al. 2015). This study showed that below and aboveground hydraulically related traits divergence allowed specialization along the soil space by showing the presence of hydrological niche axes: at one end, drought avoiders, shallow-rooted plants with higher variation in stomatal conductance between seasons, and at the other end the drought tolerant deeper-rooted plants with lower seasonal variation in g s .
Campos rupestres plants also exhibit a wide range of variation in drought resistance, as shown by the variation in ѰTLP between species. ѰTLP values varied from those found in semi-desert biomes as in shallow-rooted C. pubescens and Vellozia sp. (−3 MPa) to values close to those observed in tropical wet forests (−1 MPa) (Bartlett et al. 2012). When considering all species, we did not find a correlation between ѰTLP and rooting depth (Fig. 4). This is expected because several species in this community are drought avoiders and might not invest in costly structural foliar traits that confer resistance (e.g. drought-deciduous grasses). However, when we consider only evergreen woody plants, we found that access to soil water (rooting depth) is a good predictor of ѰTLP (Fig. 4). More negative ѰTLP for shallow-rooted plants suggest this to be an important drought tolerance trait for species that are subject to more frequent changes of soil water potential. In contrast, deep-rooted species can avoid water shortage by accessing stored water in deep soil layers and invest their carbon in roots rather than expensive structural reinforcement traits (Bartlett et al. 2012; Mitchell et al. 2016).
We also found contrasting leaf ѰTLP within woody shallow-rooted species (Fig. 4). Plants with lignotubers showed lower ѰTLP than Velloziaceae group and C. pubescens with sobole root type. We believe that the lignotuber structure might work as a hydraulic capacitor and buffer the effects of drought and fluctuating water supplies (Lenz et al. 2006; Myers 1995; Oliveira et al. 2014). Even if the main function of lignotubers is still under debate, there is some evidence of carbon source importance to late dry season sprouting (see Bond and Midgley 2003). We believe that the soluble sugar content might increase the tissue osmotic potential creating a pressure gradient to hold water molecules and increase water storage. Root relative capacitance tends to be higher in soils with shallower water table (Dietrich et al. 2013). Thus, if lignotubers act as a buffer against water scarcity, we hypothesize that lignotuber plants prioritize investment in well-developed underground structures rather than building robust leaf cell walls (Ding et al. 2014; Lenz et al. 2006). As an alternative hypothesis, if lignotubers have higher tissue capacitance, the δDxyl of this group of plants may not represent the soil depth where these plants are taking up water, but rather represent a mixture of many sources of water (soil plus stored water).
Our results clearly show that we must consider species differences in root architecture when predicting leaf ѰTLP based on root depth. In fact, there is a higher functional diversity related to leaf ѰTLP within shallow-rooted plants. The narrower hydrological niche in shallow-rooted plants can cause overlap in water uptake, which may lead to differences on the underlying mechanisms that lead to segregation, e.g. differences in leaf ѰTLP (Schwinning and Kelly 2013). Despite the peculiarities of each species to cope with water deficits, root depth was a good predictor of ѰTLP for woody species.
Conclusion
Our results show that rooting depth is a good predictor of seasonal stomatal conductance, variations in pre-dawn leaf water potentials, and drought resistance traits such as leaf turgor loss point for woody plants, evidencing functional integration of below and aboveground hydraulic traits. We demonstrated that leaf hydraulic traits co-vary with rooting depth, forming one axis of trait variation for a broad range of species in a biodiversity hotspot. We believe that this diversity of hydraulic strategies is implicated in the coexistence of an extremely high level of plant biodiversity in the campos rupestres. Our results support previous work by Letten et al. (2015), which empirically demonstrated that soil moisture depth emerged as a best predictor of species co-occurrence in a fire-prone, sandstone and low nutrient costal heathland in Australia. We believe our findings clearly illustrate ecological mechanisms driving niche partitioning and its underlying tradeoffs.
References
Abrahão A, Lambers H, Sawaya ACHF, Mazzafera P, Oliveira RS (2014) Convergence of a specialized root trait in plants from nutrient-impoverished soils: phosphorus-acquisition strategy in a nonmycorrhizal cactus. Oecologia 176:345–355. doi:10.1007/s00442-014-3033-4
Aguinis H, Gottfredson RK, Joo H (2013) Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying and handling outliers. Organ Res Methods 16:270–301. doi:10.1177/1094428112470848
Alcantara S, Mello-Silva R, Teodoro GS, Drequeceler K, Ackerly DD, Oliveira RS (2015) Carbon assimilation and habitat segregation in resurrection plants: a comparison between desiccation-and non-desiccation-tolerant species of Neotropical Velloziaceae (Pandanales). Funct Ecol 29:1499–1512. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12462
Apezzato-da-Glória B (2003) Morfologia de sistemas subterrâneos. ESALQ/USP, Ribeirao Preto
Araya YN, Silvertown J, Gowing DJ, McConway KJ, Linder HP, Midgley G (2011) A fundamental, eco-hydrological basis for niche segregation in plant communities. New Phytol 189:253–258. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03475.x
Bartelheimer M, Gowing D, Silvertown J (2010) Explaining hydrological niches: the decisive role of below-ground competition in two closely related Senecio species. J Ecol 98:126–136. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01598.x
Bartlett MK, Scoffoni C, Sack L (2012) The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 15:393–405. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01751.x
Bates D, Machler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48
Blondel J (2003) Guilds or functional groups: does it matter? Oikos 100:223–231. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12152.x
Bond WJ, Midgley JJ (2003) The evolutionary ecology of sprouting in woody plants. Int J Plant Sci 164:103–114
Brodribb TJ, Holbrook NM, Edwards EJ, Gutierrez MV (2003) Relations between stomatal closure, leaf turgor and xylem vulnerability in eight tropical dry forest trees. Plant Cell Environ 26:443–450. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00975.x
Cade BS, Noon BR (2003) A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists. Front Ecol Environ 1:412–420. doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0412:AGITQR]2.0.CO;2
Castro SAB, Silveira FAO, Marcato MS, Lemos-Filho JP (2016) So close, yet so different: divergences in resource use may help stabilize coexistence of phylogenetically-related species in a megadiverse grassland. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants doi:10.1016/j.flora.2016.11.018
Cosme LHM, Schietti J, Costa FRC, Oliveira RS (2017) The importance of hydraulic architecture to the distribution pattern of trees in a central Amazonian forest. New Phytol 215:113–125. doi:10.1111/nph.14508
Dawson TE, Ehleringer JR (1998) Plants, isotopes and water use: a catchment-scale perspective. In: Kendall C, McDonnell J (eds) Isotope tracers in catchment hydrology. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Dawson TE, Pate JS (1996) Seasonal water uptake and movement in root systems of Australian phraeatophytic plants of dimorphic root morphology: a stable isotope investigation. Oecologia 107:13–20. doi:10.1007/bf00582230
Dawson TE, Mambelli S, Plamboeck AH, Templer PH, Tu KP (2002) Stable isotopes in plant ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:507–559
de Souza A, de Moraes MG, Ribeiro RCLF (2005) Gramíneas do cerrado: carboidratos não-estruturais e aspectos ecofisiológicos. Acta Bot Bras 19:81–90
Díaz S, Kattge J, Cornelissen JHC, Wright IJ, Lavorel S, Dray S, Reu B, Kleyer M, Wirth C, Prentice IC (2016) The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 529:167–171. doi:10.1038/nature16489
Dietrich RC, Bengough AG, Jones HG, White PJ (2013) Can root electrical capacitance be used to predict root mass in soil? Ann Bot 112:457–464. doi:10.1093/aob/mct044
Ding Y, Zhang Y, Zheng Q-S, Tyree MT (2014) Pressure-volume curves: revisiting the impact of negative turgor during cell collapse by literature review and simulations of cell micromechanics. New Phytol 203:378–387. doi:10.1111/nph.12829
Donovan LA, Linton MJ, Richards JH (2001) Predawn plant water potential does not necessarily equilibrate with soil water potential under well-watered conditions. Oecologia 129:328–335. doi:10.1007/s004420100738
Donovan LA, Richards JH, Linton MJ (2003) Magnitude and mechanisms of disequilibrium between predawn plant and soil water potentials. Ecology 84:463–470. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0463:MAMODB]2.0.CO;2
Ferri MG (1944) Transpiração de plantas permanentes dos “cerrados”. Bol Fac Filos Ciênc Univ São Paulo 41:161–224
Garcia RJF, Longhi-Wagner HM, Pirani JR, Meirelles ST (2009) A contribution to the phytogeography of Brazilian campos: an analysis based on Poaceae. Brazilian J Bot 32:703–713. doi:10.1590/s0100-84042009000400009
Giulietti AM, De Menezes NL, Pirani JR, Meguro M, Wanderley MDGL (1987) Flora da Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais: caracterização e lista das espécies. Boletim de Botânica da Universidade de São Paulo 9:1–151
Gonfiantini R (1978) Standards for stable isotope measurements in natural compounds. Nature 271:534–536. doi:10.1038/271534a0
Ivanov VY, Hutyra LR, Wofsy SC, Munger JW, Saleska SR, de Oliveira RC Jr, de Camargo PB (2012) Root niche separation can explain avoidance of seasonal drought stress and vulnerability of overstory trees to extended drought in a mature Amazonian forest. Water Resour Res 48. doi:10.1029/2012wr011972
Jackson RB, Canadell J, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED (1996) A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108:389–411. doi:10.1007/bf00333714
Jacobi CM, do Carmo FF, Vincent RC, Stehmann JR (2007) Plant communities on ironstone outcrops: a diverse and endangered Brazilian ecosystem. Biodivers Conserv 16:2185–2200. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9156-8
Klein T (2014) The variability of stomatal sensitivity to leaf water potential across tree species indicates a continuum between isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Funct Ecol 28:1313–1320. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12289
Koenker R (2017) Quantreg: quantile regression. R package version 5.33. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=quantreg
Küppers M, Neales TF, Küppers BIL, Swan AG, Myers BA (1987) Hydraulic flow characteristics in the lignotuberous mallee Eucalyptus behriana F. Muell in the field. Plant Cell Environ 10:27–37. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1987.tb02076.x
Le Stradic S, Buisson E, Fernandes GW (2015) Vegetation composition and structure of some Neotropical mountain grasslands in Brazil. J Mt Sci 12:864–877. doi:10.1007/s11629-013-2866-3
Lenth RV (2016) Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans. J Stat Softw 69:1–33. doi:10.18637/jss.v069.i01
Lenz TI, Wright IJ, Westoby M (2006) Interrelations among pressure-volume curve traits across species and water availability gradients. Physiol Plant 127:423–433. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00680.x
Letten AD, Keith DA, Tozer MG, Hui FKC (2015) Fine-scale hydrological niche differentiation through the lens of multi-species co-occurrence models. J Ecol 103:1264–1275. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12428
Meinzer FC, Woodruff DR, Eissenstat DM, Lin HS, Adams TS, McCulloh KA (2013) Above- and belowground controls on water use by trees of different wood types in an eastern US deciduous forest. Tree Physiol 33:345–356. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpt012
Meinzer FC, Woodruff DR, Marias DE, Smith DD, McCulloh KA, Howard AR, Magedman AL (2016) Mapping ‘hydroscapes’ along the iso-to anisohydric continuum of stomatal regulation of plant water status. Ecol Lett 19:1343–1352. doi:10.1111/ele.12670
Mitchell PJ, O'Grady AP, Pinkard EA, Brodribb TJ, Arndt SK, Blackman CJ, Duursma RA, Fensham RJ, Hilbert DW, Nitschke CR (2016) An ecoclimatic framework for evaluating the resilience of vegetation to water deficit. Glob Chang Biol. doi:10.1111/gcb.13177
Myers BA (1995) The influence of the lignotuber on hydraulic conductance and leaf conductance in Eucalyptus behriana seedlings. Aust J Plant Physiol 22:857–863
Nepstad DC, de Carvalho CR, Davidson EA, Jipp PH, Lefebvre PA, Negreiros GH, da Silva ED, Stone TA, Trumbore SE, Vieira S (1994) The role of deep roots in the hydrological and carbon cycles of Amazonian forests and pastures. Nature 372:666–669. doi:10.1038/372666a0
Nie Y-p, Chen H-s, Wang K-l, Tan W, Deng P-y, Yang J (2011) Seasonal water use patterns of woody species growing on the continuous dolostone outcrops and nearby thin soils in subtropical China. Plant Soil 341:399–412. doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0653-2
Oliveira RS, Bezerra L, Davidson EA, Pinto F, Klink CA, Nepstad DC, Moreira A (2005a) Deep root function in soil water dynamics in cerrado savannas of central Brazil. Funct Ecol 19:574–581. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2005.01003.x
Oliveira RS, Dawson TE, Burgess SSO, Nepstad DC (2005b) Hydraulic redistribution in three Amazonian trees. Oecologia 145:354–363. doi:10.1007/s00442-005-0108-2
Oliveira RS, Christoffersen BO, Barros FV, Teodoro GS, Bittencourt P, Brum MMJ, Viani RAG (2014) Changing precipitation regimes and the water and carbon economies of trees. Theor Exp Plant Physiol 26:65–82. doi:10.1007/s40626-014-0007-1
Oliveira RS, Galvao HC, de Campos MCR, Eller CB, Pearse SJ, Lambers H (2015) Mineral nutrition of campos rupestres plant species on contrasting nutrient-impoverished soil types. New Phytol 205:1183–1194. doi:10.1111/nph.13175
Oliveira RS, Abrahão A, Pereira C, Teodoro GS, Brum M, Alcantara S, Lambers H (2016) Ecophysiology of Campos Rupestres plants. In: Fernandes GW (ed) Ecology and conservation of mountaintop grasslands in Brazil. Springer International Publishing
Parnell A, Jackson A (2013) Siar: stable isotope analysis in R. R package version 4.2. Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=siar. Accessed 23 March 2014
Parnell AC, Phillips DL, Bearhop S, Semmens BX, Ward EJ, Moore JW, Jackson AL, Grey J, Kelly DJ, Inger R (2013) Bayesian stable isotope mixing models. Environmetrics 24:387–399. doi:10.1002/env.2221
Pivovaroff AL, Pasquini SC, De Guzman ME, Alstad KP, Stemke JS, Santiago LS (2015) Multiple strategies for drought survival among woody plant species. Funct Ecol. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12518
Poot P, Lambers H (2003) Are trade-offs in allocation pattern and root morphology related to species abundance? A congeneric comparison between rare and common species in the south-western Australian flora. J Ecol 91:58–67. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00738.x
Porembski S, Barthlott W (2000) Granitic and gneissic outcrops (inselbergs) as centers of diversity for desiccation-tolerant vascular plants. Plant Ecol 151:19–28. doi:10.1023/a:1026565817218
Quesada CA, Hodnett MG, Breyer LM, Santos AJB, Andrade S, Miranda HS, Miranda AC, Lloyd J (2008) Seasonal variations in soil water in two woodland savannas of central Brazil with different fire history. Tree Physiol 28:405–415. doi:10.1093/treephys/28.3.405
Romero R, Nakajima JN (1999) Espécies endêmicas do Parque Nacional da Serra da Canastra, Minas Gerais. Rev Bras Bot 22:259–265
Rossatto DR, Sternberg LSL, Franco AC (2013) The partitioning of water uptake between growth forms in a Neotropical savanna: do herbs exploit a third water source niche? Plant Biol 15:84–92. doi:10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00618.x
Sarmiento G, Monasterio M (1983) Life forms and phenology. In: Bourliere F (ed) Ecosystems of the world. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Schenk HJ, Jackson RB (2002) Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below-ground/above-ground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems. J Ecol 90:480–494. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00682.x
Schwinning S (2010) The ecohydrology of roots in rocks. Ecohydrology 3:238–245. doi:10.1002/eco.134
Schwinning S, Ehleringer JR (2001) Water use trade-offs and optimal adaptations to pulse-driven arid ecosystems. J Ecol 89:464–480. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00576.x
Schwinning S, Kelly CK (2013) Plant competition, temporal niches and implications for productivity and adaptability to climate change in water-limited environments. Funct Ecol 27:886–897. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12115
Schwinning S, Sala OE, Loik ME, Ehleringer JR (2004) Thresholds, memory, and seasonality: understanding pulse dynamics in arid/semi-arid ecosystems. Oecologia 141:191–193. doi:10.1007/s00442-004-1683-3
Silveira FAO, Negreiros D, Barbosa NPU, Buisson E, Carmo FF, Carstensen DW, Conceição AA, Cornelissen TG, Echternacht L, Fernandes GW, Garcia QS, Guerra TJ, Jacobi CM, Lemos-Filho JP, Le Stradic S, Morellato LPC, Neves FS, Oliveira RS, Schaefer CE, Viana PL, Lambers H (2016) Ecology and evolution of plant diversity in the endangered campo rupestre: a neglected conservation priority. Plant Soil 1–24. doi:10.1007/s11104-015-2637-8
Silvertown J, Dodd ME, Gowing DJG, Mountford JO (1999) Hydrologically defined niches reveal a basis for species richness in plant communities. Nature 400:61–63. doi:10.1038/21877
Silvertown J, Araya Y, Gowing D (2015) Hydrological niches in terrestrial plant communities: a review. J Ecol 103:93–108. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12332
Team RC (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Turner NC (1988) Measurement of plant water status by the pressure chamber technique. Irrig Sci 9:289–308. doi:10.1007/bf00296704
West AG, Dawson TE, February EC, Midgley GF, Bond WJ, Aston TL (2012) Diverse functional responses to drought in a Mediterranean-type shrubland in South Africa. New Phytol 195:396–407. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04170.x
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge CAPES agency for the scholarships granted to MB and AA; financial support by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) with a scholarship to GST (2010/50327-8 and 2012/21015-3) and grant to RSO (2010/10204-0; 2011/52072-0). We thank Dr. Lucy Rowland for reviewing the manuscript; Caroline S. Muller and José Carmelo for helping in the field work, Dr. Plinio B. de Camargo, Dr. Marcelo Z. Moreira and Mr. Geraldo de Arruda for allowing the use of laboratory facilities at CENA-USP, ICMBio for allowing this study at PNSC, and Canastra Adventure and Dona Vicentina for the logistic support. The authors confirm do not have conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Richard Whalley.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 2509 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brum, M., Teodoro, G.S., Abrahão, A. et al. Coordination of rooting depth and leaf hydraulic traits defines drought-related strategies in the campos rupestres, a tropical montane biodiversity hotspot. Plant Soil 420, 467–480 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3330-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3330-x