Abstract
This paper presents an adaptive synchronization approach for fractional-order chaotic systems with fractional-order \(1<q<2\) and unknown system parameters based on the Mittag–Leffler function and the generalized Gronwall inequality. A sufficient condition is obtained. The numerical simulations are given to verify the effectiveness of this synchronization scheme.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Recently, synchronization of chaotic systems has been focused on more attentions in nonlinear science due to its potential applications in science and engineering. Up to now, various synchronization schemes have been proposed, such as complete synchronization (CS) [1], generalization synchronization (GS) [2], projective synchronization (PS) [3], impulsive synchronization (IS) [4], lag synchronization (LS) [5, 6], outer synchronization [7] and so on. Nevertheless, many chaotic systems in practical situations are usually with fully or partially unknown parameters. Such unknown parameters usually appear in the control input law for chaos control and synchronization. Therefore, how to estimate the unknown parameters is a key issue and prerequisite in chaos control and synchronization. Adaptive control theory [8] is an effective tool to this problem. Thus, adaptive synchronization of chaotic systems has been attracted more and more attentions in practical chaos applications.
As physical interpretation of the fractional derivative becomes clear, a large number of real-world physical systems, such as viscoelasticity, dielectric polarization, electromagnetic waves and fractional kinetics, can be more accurately described by fractional-order differential equations [9–11]. In recent years, chaos has been observed in many physical fractional-order systems, e.g., electronic circuits [12, 13], micro-electro-mechanical systems [14] and gyroscopes [15], and many modified fractional-order systems, e.g., the fractional-order Lorenz chaotic system [16], the fractional-order Chua’s circuit [13], the fractional-order Arneodo chaotic system [17], the fractional-order Duffing chaotic system [18], the fractional-order Rossler chaotic system [17], the fractional-order Sprott chaotic system [19], the fractional-order Chen system [17] and the fractional-order Lu system [17]. Similarly, synchronization for fractional-order chaotic systems has been also attracted much attention in both theoretical and applied perspectives, since it is usually a prerequisite of practical application in chaos engineering, such as chaotic communications [20] and authenticated encryption schemes [21].
Up to now, many synchronization approaches on fractional-order chaotic systems have been reported for fractional-order \(0<q<1\) [17, 19, 22–25]. However, there are many fractional-order systems with fractional-order \(1<q<2\) in the real world, for example, the fractional diffusion-wave equation [26], the space-time fractional diffusion equation [27], the fractional telegraph equation [28], the super-diffusion systems [29], the time fractional reaction-diffusion systems [30] and the time fractional heat conduction equation [31]. Nevertheless, a few results on synchronization of fractional-order chaotic system with fractional-order \(1<q<2\) have been considered. Hence, how to synchronize fractional-order chaotic systems with fractional-order \(1<q<2\) is an opening problem.
Motivated by the above-mentioned discussions, an adaptive synchronization scheme for fractional-order chaotic systems with fractional-order \(1<q<2\) and with unknown parameters is presented in this paper. The linear parameter update laws are used in our scheme. Based on the Mittag–Leffler function and the generalized Gronwall inequality, a sufficient condition is obtained. This adaptive synchronization approach is applied to a fractional-order Lorenz chaotic system and a modified fractional-order Chua’s chaotic system with fractional-order \(1<q<2\) and with partially or fully unknown parameters.
2 Preliminaries and main results
The Caputo fractional derivative is widely used in engineering applications due to its initial conditions have the same form as integer-order differential equations. The Caputo fractional derivative is defined as follows:
where \(D^{q}\) is called the Caputo derivative of fractional-order \(q\) of function \(h(t), n\) is the first integer that is not less than \(q, h^{(n)}(t)={\text {d}}^{n}h(t)/{\text {d}}t^{n}\), and \(\varGamma (n-q)=\int _0^{+\infty } {t^{(n-q-1)}\mathrm{e}^{-t}{\text {d}}t}\).
In this paper, the fractional-order chaotic systems are described as
where \(x\in R^{n\times 1},\;f(x,a)\in R^{n\times 1}\). \(a\in R^{m\times 1}\) is the vector of unknown parameters, and its estimation is denoted by \(a_0\). We assume that system (1) displays a chaotic attractor for \(a=a_0\) in the following paper.
Now, the fractional-order chaotic system (1) can be modified as follows,
where \(P_n (x,a)\in R^{n\times 1}\) is the nonlinear part including all unknown parameters, and \(P_l \in R^{n\times n}\) is a constant matrix.
In this paper, we assume that
where \(y\in R^{n\times 1},\; e=({\begin{array}{ll} {y-x}&{a-a_0 } \end{array} })^{\mathbf{T}}\). \(\Psi _l (x,a_0 )\in R^{n\times (n+m)}\) and \(\Psi _n (e,x,a_0 )\in R^{n\times 1}\) are real matrices. \(\Psi _n (e,x,a_0 )\) and \(\Psi _l (x,a_0 )e\) represent the nonlinear and linear parts with respect to \(e\), respectively. In fact, there are many fractional-order chaotic systems such as the Lorenz chaotic system [16], the modified Chua’s chaotic system [13], the Arneodo chaotic system [17], the Rossler chaotic system [17], the Sprott chaotic system [19], the Chen chaotic system [17], the Lu chaotic system [17], the stretch-twist-fold (STF) flow chaotic system [21] and so on. In these systems, the nonlinear terms [denoted by \(P_n (x,a)\)] are all polynomials, which can be easily implemented with electronic circuits. It is not hard to see that all these systems satisfy Eq. (3).
In order to realize chaotic synchronization for the fractional-order chaotic system (2) with unknown parameters, system (2) is chosen as drive system, and the response system with linear parameter update law is designed as
where \(y\in R^{n\times 1}\) is the state vector. \(\kappa (x,y,a)\in R^{n\times 1}\) is a controller. \(\varLambda \in R^{m\times (n+m)}\) is a constant matrix. The linear parameter update law is \(D^{q}a=\varLambda e\). The adaptive synchronization errors are denoted as \(e=(e^{(s)},e^{(a)})^{\mathbf{T}}\in R^{(n+m)\times 1}, e^{(s)}=(y-x)\in R^{n\times 1}, e^{(a)}=(a-a_0 )\in R^{m\times 1}, e_i^{(s)} =(y_i -x_i )\in R(i=1,2,\ldots ,n)\), and \(e_j^{(a)} =(a_j -a_{j0} )\in R(j=1,2,\ldots ,m)\).
Remark
Since \(\varLambda \) is a constant matrix, the parameter update law is a linear update law.
Definition
Giving the drive system (2) and the response system (4) with linear parameter update law, it is said to be adaptive synchronization if there exist a controller \(\kappa (x,y,a)\in R^{n\times 1}\) and a constant matrix \(\varLambda \in R^{m\times (n+m)}\) such that
Lemma 1
[32] If fractional-order \(q\ge 1\) and \(p=1,2,q\), then
where \(L\in R^{n\times n}, M_{q,p} ({\bullet })\) denotes the two-parameter function of Mittag–Leffler type, i.e., \(M_{q,p} (z)=\sum \nolimits _{n=0}^\infty \) \({\frac{z^{n}}{\varGamma (qn+p)}} (q>0, p>0, z\in C)\). \(\left\| {\bullet } \right\| \) denotes the induced matrix norm.
Lemma 2
[33] (generalized Gronwall inequality) Giving a interval \([0,T)\) (some \(T\le +\infty \)), if fractional-order \(q>0, 0<b_1 (t)\le K\) (\(K\) is a constant) is a non-decreasing continuous function in \([0,T), b_2 (t)>0\) is a non-decreasing function locally integrable in \([0,T)\), and if \(b(t)>0\) is locally integrable in \([0,T)\) with
in this interval \([0,T)\), then \(b(t)\le b_2 (t)M_{q,1} [b_1 (t)\varGamma (q)t^{q}]\).
Lemma 3
[34]: If \(p\) is a real number, \(l_i >0(i=1,2)\) is positive real constant, \(0<q<2\) and \(0.5\pi q<\beta <\min (\pi ,q\pi )\), then
where \(\left| {\arg (z)} \right| \le \beta \) and \(\left| z \right| \ge 0\).
Now, we are in the position to state the main result of this paper.
Theorem
Let \(\kappa (x,y,a)=[Q-\Psi _l (x,a_0 )]e\). The fractional-order chaotic system (2) and the fractional-order system (4) are said to be adaptive synchronization, if the next two conditions are fulfilled,
-
(i)
for any \(x\),
- (ii)
where \(Q\in R^{n\times (n+m)}\) is a suitable constant matrix, \(P\in R^{n\times (n+m)}\) is a constant matrix satisfying \(P(i,j)=P_l (i,j)(1\le j\le n)\), and \(P(i,j)=0(n+1\le j\le n+m)\). Here, \(P(i,j)\) and \(P_l (i,j)\) are the elements of matrix \(P\) and \(P_l\), respectively. \(\left( {{\begin{array}{c} {\Psi _n (e,x,a_0 )} \\ 0 \\ \end{array}}}\right) \in R^{(n+m)\times 1}\), \(\left( {{\begin{array}{c} {P+Q} \\ \varLambda \\ \end{array} }} \right) \in R^{(n+m)\times (n+m)}\). \(\omega =\) \( -\max \left[ \mathrm{Re}\lambda \left( {{\begin{array}{c} {P+Q} \\ \varLambda \\ \end{array} }} \right) \right] =\min \left| {\mathrm{Re}\lambda \left( {{\begin{array}{c} {P+Q} \\ \varLambda \\ \end{array} }} \right) } \right| \) is the minimum absolute value of the real part of the eigenvalue of matrix \(\left( {{\begin{array}{c} {P+Q} \\ \varLambda \\ \end{array} }} \right) \).
Proof
According to system (2) and (4), the adaptive synchronization error system can be shown as
Since \(P_n (y,a)-P_n (x,a)=\Psi _l (x,a_0 )e+\Psi _n (e,x,a_0 )\), the system (5) can be rewritten as
It follows from \(D^{q}a_0 =0\) and \(D^{q}a=D^{q}(a-a_0 )=D^{q}e^{(a)}\) that
Invoking \(\kappa (x,y,a)=[Q-\Psi _l (x,a_0 )]e\) and \(e=(e^{(s)},e^{(a)})^{\mathbf{T}}\), one can derive that,
Using \(P(i,j)=P_l (i,j)(1\le j\le n)\) and \(P(i,j)=0(n+1\le j\le n+m)\), system (8) can be rewritten as
Therefore,
where matrix \(\left( {{\begin{array}{c} {\Psi _n (e,x,a_0 )} \\ 0 \\ \end{array} }} \right) \in R^{(n+m)\times 1}\).
Let \(e(1)\) and \(e(2)\) be the initial conditions for system (9). Taking Laplace transform on Eq. (9), we obtain
where \(G=\left( {{\begin{array}{c} {P+Q} \\ \varLambda \\ \end{array} }} \right) \), \(\Phi _n [e(t),x(t)]=\left( {{\begin{array}{c} {\Psi _n [e(t),x(t),a_0 ]} \\ 0 \\ \end{array} }} \right) \), and \(L(.)\) denotes the Laplace transform. So, we can derive that
Taking Laplace inverse transform on Eq. (11) via the Mittag-Leffler function in two-parameter, the solution \(e(t)\) of fractional-order system (9) can be shown as
where \(\Phi _n [e(\tau ),x(\tau )]=\left( {{\begin{array}{c} {\Psi _n [e(\tau ),x(\tau ),a_0 ]} \\ 0 \\ \end{array} }} \right) \). The matrix \(M_{q,1} (Gt^{q}), M_{q,2} (Gt^{q})\) and \(M_{q,q} (G(t-\tau )^{q})\) denote the two-parameter function of Mittag-Leffler type.
According to Lemma 1 and Eq. (12), the following result can be yielded,
Due to \(\mathrm{Re}[\lambda \left( {{\begin{array}{c} {P+Q} \\ \varLambda \\ \end{array} }} \right) ]<0\), \(G=\left( {{\begin{array}{c} {P+Q} \\ \varLambda \\ \end{array} }} \right) \) is a stable matrix. So,
where \(l_0 >0\).
According to the inequality (13), the following result can be obtained
Since for any \(x\). So, \(\left. {\Phi _n (e,x)} \right| _{e=0} =0, \mathop {\lim } \limits _{e\rightarrow 0} \frac{\left\| {\Phi _n (e,x)} \right\| }{\left\| e \right\| }=0\) for any \(x\). Hence, there exists a positive constant \(\beta \) such that
Thus, the inequality (14) can be rewritten as
From the inequality (15), one has the follows,
According to Lemma 2 (generalized Gronwall inequality), the inequality (16) can be turned to
According to Lemma 3, the inequality (17) can be turned to
that is
Due to \(\omega =-\max \left[ \mathrm{Re}\lambda \left( {{\begin{array}{c} {P+Q} \\ \varLambda \\ \end{array} }} \right) \right] >[\varGamma (q)]^{1/q}\), therefore \(\omega >0\) and \([\varGamma (q)]^{1/q}-\omega <0\). Then,
From the inequality (19), the following result is derived,
So, the zero solution in the error system (9) is asymptotically stable. It implies,
Therefore, the fractional-order system (4) and the fractional-order chaotic system (2) can be arrived to synchronization. The proof is completed. \(\square \)
3 Illustrative example
In order to verify the effectiveness of the above synchronization scheme, we illustrate two examples: (1) the fractional-order Lorenz chaotic system with fractional-order \(q=1.08\) and with partially or fully unknown parameters [16]; (2) the modified fractional-order Chua’s chaotic system with fractional-order \(q=1.1\) and with fully unknown parameters [35]. The numerical results are in agreement with the theoretical analysis.
3.1 Adaptive synchronization of the fractional-order Lorenz chaotic system with fractional-order \(q=1.08\)
The fractional-order Lorenz system is described by
where \(a_i (i=1,2,3)\) is the system parameters [16]. The fractional-order Lorenz system displays a chaotic attractor for \(a_1 =a_{10} =10, a_2 =a_{20} =28, a_3 =a_{30} =8/3\) and \(q=1.08\), as shown in Fig. 1.
Case 1. Parameter \(a_1\) is unknown in the fractional-order system
Let \(a_1\) be the unknown parameter in the fractional-order Lorenz system (21), and its estimation be \(a_{10} =10\).
Now, the fractional-order system (21) can be modified as
So,
Therefore, the response system with linear parameter update laws is
where \(\varLambda \in R^{1\times 4}, \kappa (x,y,a)=[Q-\Psi _l (x,a_{10} )]e\), and \(a=a_1\).
Now, we can obtain the follows,
and
It is easily to obtain the follows,
and
So,
Therefore, the first condition in the Theorem is satisfied.
Now, select suitable constant matrices \(Q\in R^{3\times 4}\) and \(\varLambda \in R^{1\times 4}\) such that
So, the second condition in the Theorem is true. These results indicate that the adaptive synchronization between drive system (22) and response system (23) with linear parameter update law can be arrived.
For example, let \(Q=\left( {{\begin{array}{cccc} {-1}&{} 0&{} 0&{} 0 \\ 0&{} 0&{} 0&{} 0 \\ 0&{} 0&{} 0&{} 0 \\ \end{array} }} \right) \) and \(\varLambda =\left( {{\begin{array}{llll} 0&{} 0&{} 0&{} {-1} \\ \end{array} }} \right) \). So,
Therefore,\(\lambda _i =-1(i=1,2,3), \lambda _4 =-8/3\), and \(-\max \left[ \mathrm{Re}\lambda \left( {{\begin{array}{c} {P+Q} \\ \varLambda \\ \end{array} }} \right) \right] =1>[\varGamma (q)]^{1/q}=0.9627\), respectively. Simulation results are displayed in Fig. 2. All the initial conditions in this paper are \((x_{10} ,x_{20} ,x_{30}) =(3,4,5)\) and \((y_{10} ,y_{20} ,y_{30})=(10,20,30)\), respectively. Here \(a_1 (0)=15\).
Case 2. Parameters \(a_2\) and \(a_3\) are unknown in the fractional-order system
Let \(a_2\) and \(a_3\) be the unknown parameters in the fractional-order Lorenz system (21), and their estimation be \(a_{20}=28\) and \(a_{30} =8/3\), respectively.
Now, the fractional-order system (21) can be adapted as
So,
Therefore, the response system with linear parameter update laws is
where \(a=\left( {{\begin{array}{ll} {a_2 }&{} {a_3 } \\ \end{array} }} \right) ^{\mathbf{T}}\), \(\varLambda \in R^{2\times 5}\), \(\kappa (x,y,a)=[Q-\Psi _l (x,a_0 )]e\) and \(a_0 =\left( {{\begin{array}{ll} {a_{20} }&{} {a_{30} } \\ \end{array} }} \right) ^{\mathbf{T}}\).
Now, we have the follows,
and
It is easily to derive the follows,
and
Hence,
Therefore, the first condition of the Theorem is fulfilled.
Now, select suitable constant matrices \(Q \in R^{3\times 5}\) and \(\varLambda \in R^{2\times 5}\) such that
So, the second condition in the Theorem is fulfilled. These results imply that the adaptive synchronization between drive system (24) and response system (25) with linear parameter update law can be realized.
For example, let \(Q=\left( {{\begin{array}{ccccc} 0&{} {-10}&{} 0&{} 0&{} 0 \\ 0&{} 0&{} 0&{} 0&{} 0 \\ 0&{} 0&{} {-1}&{} 0&{} 0 \\ \end{array} }} \right) \) and \(\varLambda =\left( {{\begin{array}{ccccc} 0&{} 0&{} 0&{} {-1}&{} {-1} \\ 0&{} 0&{} 0&{} 1&{} {-1} \\ \end{array} }} \right) \). So,
Therefore, \(\lambda _1 =-10, \lambda _{2,3} =-1, \lambda _{4,5} =-1\pm j\), and \(-\max \left[ \mathrm{Re}\lambda \left( {{\begin{array}{c} {P+Q} \\ \varLambda \\ \end{array} }} \right) \right] =1>[\varGamma (q)]^{1/q}=0.9627\), respectively. Simulation results are shown in Fig. 3. Here \(a_2 (0)=20, a_3 (0)=5\), respectively.
Case 3. Parameters \(a_1, a_2\), and \(a_3\) are unknown in the fractional-order system
Let \(a_1, a_2\) and \(a_3\) be the unknown parameters in the fractional-order Lorenz system (21), and their estimation be \(a_{10}=10, a_{20}=28\) and \(a_{30} = 8/3\), respectively.
The fractional-order system (21) can be rewritten as
So,
Therefore, the response system with linear parameter update laws is
Where \(a=\left( {{\begin{array}{lll} {a_1 }&{a_2 }&{a_3 } \end{array} }} \right) ^{\mathbf{T}}, \varLambda \in R^{3\times 6}, \kappa (x,y,a)=[Q-\Psi _l (x,a_0 )]e\) and \(a_0 =\left( {{\begin{array}{lll} {a_{10} }&{a_{20} }&{a_{30} } \end{array} }} \right) ^{\mathbf{T}}\).
Now, the following results can be gained,
and
It is easily to get the follows,
and
So,
Therefore, the first condition of the Theorem is fulfilled.
Now, select suitable constant matrices \(Q\in R^{3\times 6}\) and \(\varLambda \in R^{3\times 6}\) such that
So, the second condition in the Theorem is fulfilled. These results indicate that the adaptive synchronization between drive system (26) and response system (27) with linear parameter update law can be achieved.
For example, let \(Q=\left( {{\begin{array}{cccccc} {-1}&{} 0&{} 0&{} 0&{} 0&{} 0 \\ 0&{} 0&{} 0&{} 0&{} 0&{} 0 \\ 0&{} 0&{} {-1}&{} 0&{} 0&{} 0 \\ \end{array} }} \right) \) and \(\varLambda =\left( {{\begin{array}{cccccc} 0&{} 0&{} 0&{} {-1}&{} 1&{} 0 \\ 0&{} 0&{} 0&{} {-1}&{} {-1}&{} 0 \\ 0&{} 0&{} 0&{} {-1}&{} {-1}&{} {-1} \\ \end{array} }} \right) \). So,
Therefore, \(\lambda _i =-1(i=1,2,3), \lambda _{4,5} =-1\pm j, \lambda _6 =-1\), and \(-\max \left[ \mathrm{Re}\lambda \left( {{\begin{array}{c} {P+Q} \\ \varLambda \\ \end{array} }} \right) \right] =1>[\varGamma (q)]^{1/q}=0.9627\), respectively. Simulation results are presented in Fig. 4. Here \(a_1 (0)=15, a_2 (0)=20\), and \(a_3 (0)=5\), respectively.
3.2 Adaptive synchronization of the modified fractional-order Chua’s chaotic system with fractional-order \(q=1.1\)
In 2010, the simplest modified Chua’s chaotic circuit was built by Muthuswamy and Chua [35]. In this paper, based on this modified Chua’s chaotic circuit, the modified fractional-order Chua’s chaotic system can be shown as
where \(a_i (i=1,2)\) is the system parameter. The modified fractional-order Chua’s system (28) displays a chaotic attractor for \(a_1 =a_{10} =1/2, a_2 =a_{20} =1.2\) and \(q=1.1\). Its chaotic attractor is displayed as Fig. 5.
Now, let \(a_1\) and \(a_2\) be the unknown parameters in the modified fractional-order Chua’s system (28), and their estimation be \(a_1 =a_{10} =1/2\) and \(a_2 =a_{20} =1.2\), respectively.
Now, the fractional-order system (28) can be adapted as
So,
Therefore, the response system with linear parameter update laws is
where \(a=\left( {{\begin{array}{ll} {a_1 }&{} {a_2 } \\ \end{array} }} \right) ^{\mathbf{T}}, \varLambda \in R^{2\times 5}, \kappa (x,y,a)=[Q-\Psi _l (x,a_0 )]e\) and \(a_0 =\left( {{\begin{array}{ll} {a_{10} }&{} {a_{20} } \\ \end{array} }} \right) ^{\mathbf{T}}\).
Now, we have the follows,
and
It is easily to derive the follows,
and
Here \(A=(e_2 -e_{a_2 } )^{2}+(e_2 -e_1 )^{2}+0.25e_3^4 -e_{a_1 } e_2 (e_2 -e_1 )\). Therefore,
According to the boundedness of the modified Chua’s chaotic system (28), there exist a real positive constant \(N\) such that
Hence,
Therefore, the first condition of the Theorem is fulfilled.
Now, select suitable constant matrices \(Q \in R^{3\times 5}\) and \(\varLambda \in R^{2\times 5}\) such that
So, the second condition in the Theorem is fulfilled. These results imply that the adaptive synchronization between drive system (28) and response system (30) with linear parameter update law can be realized.
For example, let \(Q=\left( {{\begin{array}{ccccc} {-1}&{} {-1}&{} 0&{} 0&{} 0 \\ 0&{} {-1}&{} 0&{} 0&{} 0 \\ 0&{} 1&{} {-1}&{} 0&{} 0 \\ \end{array} }} \right) \) and \(\varLambda =\left( {{\begin{array}{ccccc} 0&{} 0&{} 0&{} {-1}&{} {-1} \\ 0&{} 0&{} 0&{} 1&{} {-1} \\ \end{array} }} \right) \). So,
Therefore, \(\lambda _{1,2,3} =-1, \lambda _{4,5} =-1\pm j\), and \(-\max \left[ \mathrm{Re}\lambda \left( {{\begin{array}{c} {P+Q} \\ \varLambda \\ \end{array} }} \right) \right] =1>[\varGamma (q)]^{1/q}=0.9557\), respectively. Simulation results are shown in Fig. 6. Here \(a_1 (0)=1, a_2 (0)=-1\), respectively.
4 Conclusions
The adaptive synchronization for fractional-order chaotic systems with fractional-order \(1<q<2\) has been presented in this paper. A sufficient condition on synchronization of fractional-order chaotic systems with fractional-order \(1<q<2\) and unknown parameters is obtained theoretically by using the Mittag–Leffler function and the generalized Gronwall inequality. Only the linear parameter update laws are used in our synchronization scheme. Furthermore, this adaptive synchronization approach is applied to the fractional-order Lorenz chaotic system with partially or fully unknown parameters for fractional-order \(q=1.08\) and the modified fractional-order Chua’s chaotic system with partially or fully unknown parameters for fractional-order \(q=1.1\). The numerical results agree with the theoretical analysis well.
References
Pecora, L.M., Carroll, T.L.: Synchronization in chaotic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 821–824 (1990)
Kacarev, L., Parlitz, U.: Generalized synchronization, predictability, and equivalence of unidirectionally coupled dynamical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1816–1819 (1996)
Mainieri, R., Rehacek, J.: Projective synchronization in the three-dimensional chaotic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3042–3045 (1999)
Yang, T., Chua, L.O.: Impulsive stabilization for control and synchronization of chaotic systems: theory and application to secure communication. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I 44, 976–988 (1997)
Rosenblum, M.G., Pikovsky, A.S., Kurths, J.: From phase to lag synchronization in coupled chaotic oscillators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4193–4196 (1997)
Taherion, S., Lai, Y.C.: Observability of lag synchronization of coupled chaotic oscillators. Phys. Rev. E 59, R6247–R6250 (1999)
Montbrió, E., Kurths, J., Blasius, B.: Synchronization of two interacting populations of oscillators. Phys. Rev. E 70, 056125 (2004)
Adloo, H., Roopaei, M.: Review article on adaptive synchronization of chaotic systems with unknown parameters. Nonlinear Dyn. 65, 141–159 (2011)
Naber, M.: Time fractional Schrodinger equation. J. Math. Phys. 45, 3339–3352 (2004)
Hilfer, R.: Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics. World Scientific, Singapore (2000)
Chen, L.P., He, Y.G., Chai, Y., Wu, R.C.: New results on stability and stabilization of a class of nonlinear fractional-order systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 75, 633–641 (2014)
Jia, H.Y., Chen, Z.Q., Qi, G.Y.: Chaotic characteristics analysis and circuit implementation for a fractional-order system. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I. 61, 845–853 (2014)
Hartley, T.T., Lorenzo, C.F., Qammer, H.K.: Chaos in a fractional order Chua’s system. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I: Fundam. Theory Appl. 42, 485–490 (1995)
Aghababa, M.P.: Chaos in a fractional-order micro-electro-mechanical resonator and its suppression. Chin. Phys. B 21, 100505 (2012)
Aghababa, M.P., Aghababa, H.P.: The rich dynamics of fractional-order gyros applying a fractional controller. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part I J. Syst. Control Eng. 227, 588–601 (2013)
Grigorenko, I., Grigorenko, E.: Chaotic dynamics of the fractional Lorenz system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 034101–034104 (2003)
Zhou, P., Ding, R., Cao, Y.X.: Multi drive-one response synchronization for fractional-order chaotic systems. Nonlinear Dyn. 70, 1263–1271 (2012)
Ge, Z.M., Ou, C.Y.: Chaos in a fractional order modified Duffing system. Chaos Solitons Fract. 34, 262–291 (2007)
Asheghan, M.M., Delshad, S.S., Beheshti, M.T.H., Tavazoei, M.S.: Non-fragile control and synchronization of a new fractional order chaotic system. Appl. Math. Comput. 222, 712–721 (2013)
Kiani, B.A., Fallahi, K., Pariz, N., et al.: A chaotic secure communication scheme using fractional chaotic systems based on an extended fractional Kalman filter. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 14, 863–879 (2009)
Muthukumar, P., Balasubramaniam, P., Ratnavelu, K.: Synchronization of a novel fractional order stretch-twist-fold (STF) flow chaotic system and its application to a new authenticated encryption scheme (AES). Nonlinear Dyn. 77, 1547–1559 (2014)
Martínez-Martínez, R., Mata-Machuca, J.L., Martínez-Guerra, R., León, J.A., Fernández-Anaya, G.: Synchronization of nonlinear fractional order systems. Appl. Math. Comput. 218, 3338–3347 (2011)
Zhou, P., Zhu, W.: Function projective synchronization for fractional-order chaotic systems. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 12, 811–816 (2011)
Wang, G.S., Xiao, J.W., Wang, Y.W., Yi, J.W.: Adaptive pinning cluster synchronization of fractional-order complex dynamical networks. Appl. Math. Comput. 231, 347–356 (2014)
Odibat, M.: A note on phase synchronization in coupled chaotic fractional order systems. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 13, 779–789 (2012)
Mainardi, F.: The fundamental solutions for the fractional diffusion-wave equation. Appl. Math. Lett. 9, 23–28 (1996)
Gorenflo, R., Mainardi, F., Moretti, D., Pagnini, G., Paradisi, P.: Fractional diffusion: probability distributions and random walk models. Phys. A 305, 106–112 (2002)
Beghin, L., Orsingher, E.: The telegraph process stopped at stable-distributed times and its connection with the fractional telegraph equation. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 6, 187–204 (2003)
Li, C.P., Zhao, Z.G., Chen, Y.Q.: Numerical approximation of nonlinear fractional differential equations with subdiffusion and superdiffusion. Comput. Math. Appl. 62, 855–875 (2011)
Gafiychuk, V., Datsko, B.: Mathematical modeling of different types of instabilities in time fractional reaction–diffusion systems. Comput. Math. Appl. 59, 1101–1107 (2010)
Zhang, W., Cai, X., Holm, S.: Time-fractional heat equations and negative absolute temperatures. Comput. Math. Appl. 67, 164–171 (2014)
De la sen, M.: About robust stability of Caputo linear fractional dynamics systems with time delays through fixed theory. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011, 867932 (2011)
Ye, H., Gao, J., Ding, Y.: A generalized Gronwall inequality and its application to a fractional equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 328, 1075–1081 (2007)
Podlubny, I.: Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, San Diego (1999)
Muthuswamy, B., Chua, L.O.: One simplest chaotic circuit. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 20, 1567–1580 (2010)
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61104150), Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Chongqing (cstc2013jcyjjq40001), the Science and Technology Project of Chongqing Education Commission (KJ130517) and Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (cstc2013jcyjA00026).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, P., Bai, R. The adaptive synchronization of fractional-order chaotic system with fractional-order \(\varvec{1}<\varvec{q}<\varvec{2}\) via linear parameter update law. Nonlinear Dyn 80, 753–765 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-1903-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-1903-x