Introduction

Following on from the work described in papers [13] we continue here the study of plastic bonded explosives (PBXs) by means of the modified Czechoslovak manometric method (vacuum stability test) which was developed mainly for studying the thermal stability of propellants [24] and which is generally known under the name of STABIL [13]. This study is compatible with a recently published analogous paper about PBXs with a Formex P1 matrix as the binder [1] and is to be considered as a continuation of paper [2].

This study is focused on PBXs with a polyisobutylene binder (PIB), softened by dioctyl sebacate (DOS), i.e., with the C4 matrix, whose active fillers are attractive cyclic nitramines BCHMX (cis-1,3,4,6-tetranitro-octahydroimidazo-[4,5-d]imidazole), RDX (1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazinane), HMX (1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocane), and ε-HNIW (2,4,6,8,10,12-hexanitro-2,4,6,8,10,12-hexaazaisowurtzitane, ε-CL-20) [58]. These explosives are treated in this paper from the point of view of their behavior under the STABIL measurement conditions. Outputs are compared with detonation velocities of the PBXs studied, with their impact sensitivities, and with the results of an analogous study of the Formex P1 type explosives [1].

Experimental

Preparation of plastic bonded explosives

The C4 matrix refers to a non-energetic binder containing 25 wt.% of polyisobutylene, 59 wt.% of dioctyl sebacate (DOS), and 16 wt.% of the oil HM46. Preparation of the binder was carried out by mixing small pieces of two types of polyisobutylene (disintegrated by rolling) with the sebacate and the HM46 oil. The plastic explosives themselves were prepared [57] by mixing 91 wt.% of the particular nitramine with 9 wt.% of the binder. The formulations were mixed in a computer controlled Brabender Plastograph at 70 °C under vacuum for 70 min. The samples prepared were then extruded using a 40 mm single screw extrusion machine to obtain long charges of plastic explosive with a diameter of 16 mm [57]. The RDX used was a product of Dyno Nobel (a mixture of Classes 2 and 5 according to the MIL-DTL-398B standard), β-HMX was imported from Russia and its particle size distribution was close to Class 3 as described in the MIL-DTL-4544C standard, and ε-HNIW was a product of the Explosia Pardubice pilot plant production unit. For the PBX preparation in this research we used purified and recrystallized ε-HNIW (from an ethyl acetate––n-heptane system) containing 1 % of impurities. HNIW with reduced sensitivity (RS-HNIW), prepared in our laboratory [9], was also included in this study. BCHMX was prepared by a two step laboratory synthesis at the Institute of Energetic Materials [10]. Samples of the PBXs used are shown in Table 1 and in the Figures as follows: RDX-C4, HMX-C4, BCHMX-C4, HNIW-C4, and RS-HNIW-C4.

Table 1 A survey of results from the STABIL measurement and of data taken from the literature about detonation velocities and impact sensitivities of the explosives studied

STABIL vacuum stability test

We used a modernized STABIL 16-Ex apparatus [11] (manufactured by OZM Research; the original apparatus is described in Ref. [2]). The amount of the samples used for measurements was 1 g. Tests were performed over 360 min. The temperature for the isothermal measurements was chosen to be 120 °C. The samples in evacuated glass test tubes were placed into the heating block and heated to the desired temperature. Pressure transducers continuously estimated the pressure increase in the glass tubes. The results were in the form of time dependence of the gas pressure evolved per 1 g sample––the corresponding curves up to 360 min measurement are shown in Fig. 1; here the large increase in pressure in the first period of decomposition is caused mainly by the moisture content in the PBXs studied (these samples are the “technical grade” quality). Straight lines were obtained by linearization of the data for each curve for isothermal exposure over 50–320 min and presented in Table 1; the slopes of these lines, k, correspond to the reaction velocity of evolution of gaseous products in a zero-order reaction [1, 2, 4] and, therefore, k represents the specific rate constant (here the k values are in kPa g−1 min−1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Recordings of gaseous product development during isothermal exposure at 120 °C of the PBXs studied

Other characteristics of the PBXs studied or their nitramine fillers

Experimental detonation velocities of the PBXs studied were taken from Elbeih et al. [57]. Impact sensitivity data of the crystalline fillers of PBXs were taken from paper [12] for RDX, β-HMX, and BCHMX; and from paper [13] for ε-HNIW and RS-ε-HNIW; the data for the C4 PBXs prepared from these nitramines are published in paper [14] excluding sensitivity of RS-HNIW-C4 which was determined by means of a method from Elbeih et al. [14] i.e., using a standard impact tester (Julius Peters) with exchangeable anvil, with the amount of tested substance being 50 mm3, and with a 2 kg drop hammer weight (the probit analysis [15] was used to determine the probability levels of the initiation).

Results and discussion

As already mentioned, Fig. 1 implies that the formation of gaseous products is a zero-order reaction in the observed initiation phase of the PBXs’ decomposition. Thus the rate of thermal decomposition is equal to the specific rate constant, k, of the reaction. Figure 1 also shows the high thermal reactivity of the BCHMX-C4 explosive; this nitramine is more sensitive than RDX, β-HMX, and ε-HNIW, as well as other kinds of PBXs based on BCHMX and the nitramines mentioned [1, 7, 8]. This fact is explained partially by the molecular structure of BCHMX [16] and partially by its solubility in plasticizers of solvents [17, 18] which can eliminate the stabilizing influence of the crystal lattice [18] (about this effect see also in [19, 20]); the effect of the crystal lattice, of course, is increased in energetic materials with crowded molecules [21].

In a previous paper [1] it has already been mentioned that autocatalysis is missing during detonation [22, 23], which means that the kinetic data of such low-temperature processes can only be extrapolated to detonation conditions in which the influence of autocatalysis is excluded [2, 4, 22]. On this basis, it can be supposed that a relationship exists between the kinetic characteristics of the curves in Fig. 1 and the detonation velocities of the explosives studied (as has already been shown in zeman et al. [2]). Figure 2 is a confirmation of this assumption; here specific rate constants from thermal decomposition show a linear relationship to the detonation velocities of PBXs containing RDX, β-HMX, and RS-ε-HNIW. The data for BCHMX-C4 and HNIW-C4 do not correlate, however, due to the higher thermal reactivity of these PBXs (see in Fig. 1); this difference in the case ε-HNIW versus RS-ε-HNIW rests in the crystal disorders in the first kind mentioned, compared with the more orderly crystals with rounded edges in the case of RS-ε-HNIW [13, 24].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Relationship between experimental detonation velocities and specific rate constants of thermal decomposition of the PBXs studied

On the basis of the well-known relationships between detonation parameters and sensitivities to mechanical impulses [3, 4, 14, 25], the characteristics of the low-temperature zero-order decomposition of energetic materials should also correlate with their sensitivities [1, 2, 4]. In this paper we used the impact sensitivities of the PBXs’ nitramine’s fillers (NA), i.e., pure RDX, β-HMX, ε-HNIW, RS-ε-HNIW, and BCHMX, and also those of the corresponding PBXs studied. As Figs. 3 and 4 show, in both cases mentioned, logarithmic relationships have resulted.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Logarithmic relationship between impact sensitivities of the pure explosive fillers and specific rate constants of the zero-order thermal decomposition of the PBXs studied in the sense of Fig. 1

Fig. 4
figure 4

Logarithmic relationship between impact sensitivities of the PBXs studied and specific rate constants of the zero-order thermal decomposition of these PBXs in the sense of Fig. 1

According to the comparison with the impact sensitivity of pure nitramines (NA) in Fig. 3, data for HNIW-C4, i.e., with the disturbed crystals of HNIW, good correlation has been found between the data of RDX-C4 and HMX-C4. It looks as if HNIW, with impact sensitivity 4–4.5 J, is a variant of its ε-modification. On the other hand, data for RS-HNIW-C4 and BCHMX-C4 create a pair of explosives with sterically crowded molecules of nitramine fillers. This division distinguishes the C4 PBXs from analogous explosives with Formex P1 binder where the relationship mentioned has only one shape [1].

Analogous comparisons on the basis of impact sensitivities of the group of PBXs studied (Fig. 4) show a division of these explosives into a subgroup with nitramine fillers with crowded molecules and a subgroup with a pair of HMX-C4 and RDX-C4. Besides the initiation reactivity of the pure nitramine fillers, the bulk moduli of the final PBXs might play some role here (for this see, for example, information in Haycraft et al. [26]; Qiu et al. [27]), mainly in the slope of the relation cited for the HMX and RDX based PBXs (in comparison with Fig. 3). This assumption might be supported by the relationships in Fig. 5 (i.e., relationships between impact sensitivities of PBXs and their pure nitramine fillers): here a relation with a positive slope should equate to the dominating initiation reactivity of nitramine fillers, while in a relation with negative slope the elastic properties of the corresponding PBXs should be the prevailing influence.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Comparison of impact sensitivities of PBXs and their pure nitramine fillers (NA)

Comparison of the specific rate constant, k, of the thermal decomposition from the study of PBXs with the Formex P1 binders (see Zeman et al. [1]) with those of C4 PBXs from this study gives Fig. 6. The binder cited contains 25 % of styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) and 75 % of an oily material. This comparison shows that the k values of Formex explosives are higher than those of the C4 PBXs. However, the rate constants of both the PBXs with the HNIW and BCHMX fillers are relatively close; to this fact an intercept value near zero corresponds with the appropriate line in Fig. 5. On the other hand, the thermal reactivity of the Formex explosives with RDX and HMX fillers is of a higher order compared with their C4 analogs. This higher reactivity might be caused by the SBR binder in the Formex PBXs (especially influence of the aromatic part of the binder).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Comparison of the specific rate constants (in kPa g−1 min−1) of thermal decomposition of the C4 (this paper) and Formex P1 Zeman et al. [1] PBXs

Conclusions

Using a modification of the vacuum isothermal stability test, the Czech system STABIL [14], in the study of the thermal reactivity of plastic bonded explosives with the C4 matrix, pressure–time curves in the first 5 h of measurement are obtained which correspond closely to the zero-order reaction of gaseous products formation. Due to this fact, a dependency exists between the corresponding zero-order reaction velocities (the specific rate constants) and detonation velocities of the explosives studied. As was to be expected, relationships exist between the impact sensitivities not only of the pure nitramine’s fillers but also of the PBXs on their base, on the one hand, and the specific rate constants of the zero-order thermal decomposition of the PBXs studied, on the other. However, these relationships are not consistent for all the PBXs studied because the PIB (C4) matrix does not fully eliminate the specific influence of the nitramine filler’s molecular structure (crowding in their molecules) on the initiation reactivity of the corresponding PBXs. This represents a difference from the recently studied PBXs with Formex P1 binder (SBR matrix) [1] where their matrices increase the reactivity of the nitramine fillers to such an extent that the above-mentioned specific influence of molecular structure is practically eliminated there. The results of this paper dispel again a widely held view about HNIW being a relatively sensitive explosive (about this sensitivity see already Elbeih et al. [13]; Chen et al. [28]).