Abstract
We determined the acidity constants of tebuconazole and penconazole, two fungicides from the group of 1,2,4-triazoles. Potentiometric titrations were performed in a 20 % (v/v) acetonitrile/water mixture at 25 °C and at a fixed ionic strength (KNO3, 0.1 mol·dm−3). The pK a values (representing thermodynamic constants) were determined to be 5.0 ± 0.1 and 5.2 ± 0.1 for tebuconazole and penconazole, respectively. These values could be used in pure water solutions to consider the protonated or deprotonated forms when studying the field behavior of these fungicides. Molecular modeling calculations allowed identifying the N4 atom as the protonation site.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Agrochemicals include organic molecules with various building blocks and functional groups. When they are dispersed in the field, their physical, chemical and ecotoxicological properties, mostly related to their structure, are of major importance for their environmental behavior. Among those, the acid/base properties are of special interest, because they determine the chemical form present: a neutral molecule or a charged ion (either a cation and/or an anion, depending on the molecular structure). Because the soil and its main components (clays, Fe- and Mn-oxyhydroxides, humic substances, etc.) exhibit different surface charges according to the environmental pH [1], the acidity constant K a (or the pK a) of the pesticides are crucial for determining their behavior in the soil environment.
Here we focus on two pesticides of the (benzo)triazole family for which some quantitative structure-properties relationships are already available [2]: tebuconazole and penconazole (Table 1; Fig. 1). They are known to behave as systemic fungicides, with both curative and protective actions, mainly applied to orchards and vineyards [3] where the soil pH is commonly within the range from 4 to 8. According to their structure (Fig. 1), both tebuconazole and penconazole can be expected to behave as weak bases, the N4 nitrogen atom in the 1,2,4-triazole ring being the most probable target for protonation (see Sect. 3.1 below); unfortunately, their pK a values are unknown (tebuconazole) or of dubious value (penconazole) [4]. The knowledge of their correct values is essential, in order to predict the nature of the species (neutral molecule or protonated one) present in the environment.
These triazole molecules are poorly water soluble, and require water-miscible co-solvents in order to be solubilized. Acetonitrile is a very adequate cosolvent for use in RP-HPLC analysis of this class of compounds [5, 6] due to its aprotic and polar nature and because it is fully miscible with water. Therefore, a mixture of acetonitrile and water was chosen here for the potentiometric determination of the pK a of the two fungicides.
2 Experimental
2.1 Reagents
Analytical-grade tebuconazole was supplied by the Institute of Industrial Organic Chemistry (Warsaw, Poland) with a purity of 99.9 ± 0.1 %; analytical standard penconazole was purchased from Fluka (Pestanal, 99.1 %). All reagents and acetonitrile (AN) were of analytical grade (Fluka), and dissolved in high purity de-ionized carbonate-free water (Milli-Q system: resistivity 18.2 MΩ·cm, TOC < 10 μg·dm−3).
2.2 Potentiometric Measurements
The pK a values of tebuconazole and penconazole were determined by potentiometric titration in a 20 % (v/v) acetonitrile/water solvent mixture, according to a slight modification of the method described by Fikri et al. [7]. Each triazole compound (0.01 g) was dissolved in 20 % AN (100 cm3, at a fixed 0.1 mol·dm−3 ionic strength using KNO3), then sonicated (Bransonic model 200, power = 19 W, frequency = 40 Hz) for 20 min. Nitric acid (0.1 mol·dm−3) was added in equivalent amount to 20 cm3 of the triazole solution and this mixture of strong acid and protonated weak base was subsequently titrated with 0.01 mol·dm−3 KOH (in the 20 % AN solvent) in a thermostatted cell (25 °C) under nitrogen atmosphere (Linde, 5.0). The exact concentration of the KOH solution was determined by titration with HNO3 (0.1 mol·dm−3; Normadose Prolabo). The titration was performed (Fig. 2) using the automatic titrator Metrohm 716 DMS Titrino coupled to a Metrohm 727 Ti Stand, a Metrohm 722 stirrer and equipped with a glass/calomel pH electrode (Metrohm, pH = 0–14/0–80 °C; KCl 3 mol·dm−3). The set parameters are the dynamic mode, a 1 mV·min−1 signal drift and a 5 cm3·min−1 maximal flow-rate. The titration started after pH equilibrium was reached in the cell. The combined glass electrode was calibrated with pH = 7.00 and 4.00 aqueous buffers and then with a 0.05 mol·kg−1 potassium hydrogenophthalate solution in the 20 % AN solvent (pHS = 4.58 [8, 9]). All procedures were performed in triplicates.
The titration curves were fitted using the ProtoFit (version 2.1) software [10] to calculate the pK a values and using the Davies activity coefficient corrections calculated from the data in the mixed solvent system [11]. According to Fikri et al. [7], such a calculated value can be considered as numerically equal to the value in pure water, within the experimental uncertainties (±0.05).
2.3 Molecular Modeling
For each compound, the geometries of the two enantiomers were optimized by molecular mechanics (MM2 force field) with HyperChem [12] and further refined by the PM6 semi-empirical molecular orbital method with MOPAC [13, 14]. The gas phase formation enthalpies at 298 K were also computed from MOPAC.
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 Protonation Site
Due to the presence of a single chiral center (asymmetric carbon atom) in both molecular structures, each consists of two (R or S) enantiomers (Fig. 1), whose properties can be somewhat different; the studied samples were racemic mixtures, however.
According to our molecular theoretical quantum calculations of gas phase formation enthalpies (Table 2), the N4 protonation is favored by ca. 50–65 kJ·mol−1, compared to N2 protonation, whatever the studied fungicide and its enantiomer form.Footnote 1
Any further protonation on the N2 atom of the triazole ring will be hindered, due to both steric hindrance and electrostatic repulsion. Moreover, there are no other protonable or deprotonable sites on either of these two molecules.
3.2 Protonation Constants
The acidity constants, pK a, of the two triazole compounds were determined from potentiometric titrations in a 20 % (v/v) AN solvent mixture at 25 °C (Fig. 2). Due to the introduction of activity coefficient corrections during the data treatment, our calculated pK a values can be considered as the thermodynamic ones.
However, it will be more useful to have information about the pK a value in pure water. In order to estimate the effect of the 20 % AN solvent mixture, we refer to our previous study on amino-2 pyridine derivatives [7]: it appears that the values of aqueous pK a should be approximately 0.02 unit higher than those determined in the 20 % AN solvent, which is within the experimental uncertainties (±0.05).
This is why we consider that our values are a good estimate (better than ±0.1 unit) of the aqueous pK a of these two fungicides, i.e. for the equilibrium between the protonated and the free molecular triazole (±0.1; at 25 °C):
Until now, there has been limited information about the dissociation constant of tebuconazole and penconazole (Tables 1, 3). According to the IUPAC Pesticides Properties Database [4], tebuconazole is considered to be a very weak base, without any numerical value; for penconazole, the low value given (1.51, see Table 1) is not in accordance with the structure of the compound, which would correspond to a medium-strength acid. Few other data are cited in the literature (see Table 3); in all cases, they are lower than our experimental values, indicating a somewhat weaker basic behavior for the corresponding molecule, which is, once more, not coherent with its structure. Furthermore, the SPARC-calculated values [15] are too low to be realistic, and should be ignored.
4 Conclusion
The aqueous pK a values, determined for the first time in this study, allow prediction of the environmental behavior of either tebuconazole or penconazole according to the acid/base properties of the soil solution and of the soil sorption complex. If stability constant data become available, their possible complexation with metal cations present in the soil solution or added as pesticides (e.g., Cu [17, 18]) could now be estimated for a better knowledge of the speciation of these triazole fungicides.
Notes
We have also tested the new PM7 method in MOPAC 2012. This method, which is still under development, gave enthalpy values within 5.3 % of the PM6 values. The relative stabilities of the protonated forms were unchanged.
References
Stumm, W., Morgan, J.J.: Aquatic Chemistry: Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natural Waters. Wiley, New York (1996)
Bhhatarai, B., Gramatica, P.: Modelling physico-chemical properties of (benzo)triazoles, and screening for environmental partitioning. Water Res. 45, 1463–1471 (2011)
Komárek, M., Čadková, E., Chrastný, V., Bordas, F., Bollinger, J.C.: Contamination of vineyard soils with fungicides: A review of environmental and toxicological aspects. Environ. Int. 36, 138–151 (2010)
IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry): Pesticide properties database; online available: http://pesticides.iupac.org/
Noga, S., Michel, M., Buszewski, B.: Effect of functionalized stationary phases on the mechanism of retention of fungicides in RP-LC elution. Chromatographia 73, 857–864 (2011)
Qiu, J., Dai, S., Zheng, C., Yang, S., Chai, T., Bie, M.: Enantiomeric separation of triazole fungicides with 3-μm and 5-μm particle chiral columns by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Chirality 23, 479–486 (2011)
Fikri, K., Debord, J., Bollinger, J.C., Clédat, D., Pénicaut, B., Robert, J.M.H.: RP-HPLC lipophilicity studies for some (hetero)arylamides derived from 2-amino 4,6-dimethyl pyridine: Introduction of an hydrogen-bond descriptor. J. Liq. Chrom. Rel. Technol. 34, 1356–1366 (2011)
Longhi, P., Mussini, T., Rondinini, S.: Predicting standard pH values for reference buffer solutions in solvent mixtures with water. Anal. Chem. 58, 2290–2292 (1986)
Rosés, M., Rafols, C., Bosch, E.: Autoprotolysis in aqueous organic solvent mixtures. Anal. Chem. 65, 2294–2299 (1993)
Turner, B.F., Fein, J.B.: ProtoFit: A program for determining surface protonation constants from titration data. Comput. Geosci. 32, 1344–1356 (2006); ProtoFit v.2.1 rev.1 (November 2005) available free at: http://protofit.sourceforge.net/protofit_download.html
Gagliardi, L.G., Castells, C.B., Rafols, C., Rosés, M., Bosch, E.: Static dielectric constants of acetonitrile/water mixtures at different temperatures and Debye-Hückel A and a0 B parameters for activity coefficients. J. Chem. Eng. Data 52, 1103–1107 (2007)
HyperChem version 8, HyperCube Inc., Gainesville: http://www.hyper.com
Stewart, J.J.P.: Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods, V: Modification of NDDO approximations and application to 70 elements. J. Mol. Model. 13, 1173–1213 (2007)
Stewart, J.J.P.: MOPAC2009, Stewart Computational Chemistry, Colorado Springs: http://OpenMOPAC.net
Hilal, S.H., Karickhoff, S.W., Carreira, L.A.: A rigorous test for SPARC’s chemical reactivity models: Estimation of more than 4300 ionization pK a’s. Quant. Struct. Act. Relat. 14, 348–355 (1995). SPARC online calculator (v. 4.6, October 2011) available free at: http://archemcalc.com/sparc/
Chimuka, L., Michel, M., Cukrowska, E., Buszewski, B.: Influence of temperature on mass transfer in an incomplete trapping supported liquid membrane extraction of triazole fungicides. J. Separ. Sci. 32, 1043–1050 (2009)
Arias, M., Paradelo, M., López, E., Simal-Gándara, J.: Influence of pH and soil copper on adsorption of metalaxyl and penconazole by the surface layer of vineyard soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54, 8155–8162 (2006)
Čadková, E., Komárek, M., Kaliszová, R., Száková, J., Vaněk, A., Bordas, F., Bollinger, J.C.: The influence of copper on tebuconazole sorption onto soils, humic substances and ferrihydrite. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 20, 4205–4215 (2013)
Acknowledgments
M. Komárek is grateful for the support obtained from the internal grant of the Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences (42900/1312/3166). Research at GRESE, University of Limoges, is supported by the ‘Conseil Régional du Limousin’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Čadková, E., Komárek, M., Debord, J. et al. pK a Constant Determination of Two Triazole Pesticides: Tebuconazole and Penconazole. J Solution Chem 42, 1075–1082 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-013-0012-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-013-0012-z