1 Introduction

High-temperature superconducting (HTS) coated conductors are commercial available nowadays, and HTS coils have drawn extensive attention of large-scale applications, such as transformers, superconducting fault current limiters, and motors [1,2,3,4]. The prediction of AC losses of HTS coils is necessary for optimal designs of these devices. The finite element model (FEM) is generally used to analyze the electromagnetic characteristics of HTS coils. Among various numerical methods, the FEM based on H formulation draws a lot of popularity [5,6,7,8]. The two-dimensional (2-D) axial symmetrical model fully accords with the real geometry of a circular pancake coil, which can accurately estimate the electromagnetic characteristics inside the coil [6, 7, 9]. The HTS infinitely long stack will be a good approximation of circular coils if the coil radius is sufficiently large. The symmetry of the stack model indicates that only one fourth of the model needs to be calculated, which can speed up the computation of AC losses. Therefore, an infinitely long stack model has also been utilized to calculate the AC loss of HTS coils [5, 10,11,12].

Until now, few studies have been carried out on the coil radius over which the AC losses of HTS circular coils can be well described by the stack model [13]. To clarify the validation of infinitely long stack approximation, a systematical comparison of AC losses of the stack model and the axial symmetric model is needed. This paper compares the transport AC losses of both the infinitely long stack and circular pancake coils with different radii by use of the FEM simulation based on H formulation. A new parameter called “critical radius” is defined to quantitatively assess the applicable cases of an infinitely long stack model. Besides, a method of AC loss estimation of HTS pancake coils is proposed.

2 The Finite Element Model

The FEM is based on H formulation and E-J power law, which is implemented in the COMSOL Multiphysics [14]. Both infinitely long stack model [5] and axisymmetric model [9] are established by use of the magnetic-field-formulation interface, as shown in Fig. 1. The numerical model has been validated in our previous works [15,16,17]. In order to reduce the computation time of the problem, only half of the geometry for the 2-D axisymmetric model and one quarter of the geometry for the infinitely long stack model have been calculated based on the model symmetry. For the 2-D axisymmetric model, the bottom boundary condition along the r-axis is Hr = 0. For the infinitely long stack model, the left boundary condition along the y-axis is Hy = 0, and the bottom boundary condition along the x-axis is Hx = 0. The turn numbers of HTS coils are assumed to be 10, 20, 40, and 80, respectively, and the coil radii change from 0 to 100 mm.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Numerical model of HTS coils: a 2-D axisymmetric model; b infinitely long stack model

Rectangular-mapped meshes and free triangular meshes are employed in the HTS tapes and air region, respectively. For YBCO tapes, there are 80 elements along the tape width and a total of 9 elements across the tape thickness (2 elements in copper layers on either side, 3 elements in substrate, 1 element in the YBCO layer, and 1 element in the Ag layer), which are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mapped and free triangular meshes for HTS tapes and air domain, respectively

In the FEM simulation, we use the real dimensions of Superpower SCS4050 tapes, which are composed of a YBCO layer, a silver overlayer, a hastelloy substrate, and copper stabilizers on both sides, as shown in the inset of Fig. 1b. The geometric and electrical parameters of the tape are shown in Table 1. The self-field critical current of the YBCO tape at liquid nitrogen temperature is 103.5 A. The resistivity of the YBCO layer is non-linear and can be expressed by a power-law relation

$$ \rho(J)=\frac{E_{\mathrm{C}}}{J_{\mathrm{C}}(B)}\left|\frac{J}{J_{\mathrm{C}}(B)}\right|^{n-1}, $$
(1)

where EC = 1 μ V/cm is the electrical field criterion for the critical current; n is the power-law exponent; JC(B) is the critical current density under a magnetic field, which can be calculated by JC(B) = IC(B)/(hSC ×wtape); and IC(B) is the critical current of the tape under an external field, which can be described by the Kim model as [20]

$$ I_{\mathrm{C}} (B)=\frac{I_{\mathrm{C}}}{\left( 1+\sqrt{B_{\parallel}^{2} + k^{2}B_{\bot }^{2}}/B_{0}\right)^{\alpha}} $$
(2)

where k, B0, and α are the anisotropic parameters of critical current and B and B are magnetic field components parallel and perpendicular to the wide surface of the tape, respectively. The field dependence of normalized critical current iC(iC = IC(B)/IC) for the experimental tape at 77 K is shown in Fig. 3, where data shown by symbols are measured data and the solid lines are calculated from (2) using the parameters k = 1.736, B0 = 0.0809, and α = 0.451. A good agreement between experimental results and calculated values is obtained.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The measured (symbols) and calculated (solid lines) critical current of HTS tapes under external magnetic field

Table 1 The specifications used in the numerical model

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 Influence of Pancake Coil Radii on AC Losses

Assuming that the applied current is I(t) = Ip sin(ωt), the peak current, Ip, applied to the HTS tapes increases from 10 to 60 A. The AC losses of the infinitely long stack are calculated firstly and used as reference, as shown in Fig. 4. It is found that the average AC losses per unit length increase with the tapes’ number. For the case of the 10-tape stack, the losses are 5.02 × 10− 4 J/cycle/m at Ip = 40 A, which is four times lower than the losses of the 80-tape stack with the same transport current.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The AC losses of an infinitely long stack with different tape numbers

In order to investigate the effect of coil radii on AC losses, we calculated the AC losses of the HTS single-pancake (SP) coils with an inner radius changing from 0 to 100 mm. The calculated results for HTS coils with 40 turns are shown in Fig. 5, in which AC losses of HTS coils are normalized by those of an infinitely long stack. It is found that the AC losses of HTS coils are much lower than those of an infinitely long stack for small inner radii. With the increase of the inner radius, the AC losses of HTS coils gradually increase to the same value as an infinitely long stack.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The AC losses of 40-turns single pancake coils with different coil radii normalized to those of an infinitely long stack

To clarify the reason for lower AC losses of circular coils with small inner radii, the AC losses per turn for the case of 40-turn coils with different radii are shown in Fig. 6. Here, we define the turns of HTS coils (HTS stack) from the innermost (upmost) turn to the outermost (downmost) turn as 1st, 2nd, …, 40th turn. The losses per turn in the HTS coil are normalized by the average loss of the coil. We find that for lower inner radii of HTS coils, the losses per turn exhibit a strong asymmetry along the coil radial direction, and the losses of inner turns are much lower than the average loss. This is because when the coil radius is relatively small, the perpendicular magnetic fields in inner turns are partly cancelled by the other half of the circular coil, as shown in Fig. 7. The perpendicular fields of the HTS coil with low radius are lower than that of an infinitely long stack, and the AC losses of the HTS coils are thus reduced. With the increase of coil radii, the AC losses per turn exhibit weaker asymmetry along the radial direction and gradually approach the loss curve of an infinitely long stack.

Fig. 6
figure 6

The AC losses per turn for 40-turn coils with different radii (lines with symbols) and stack (green line) at Ip = 30 A normalized by the average loss

Fig. 7
figure 7

The absolute value of perpendicular magnetic flux at Ip = 30 A and ωt = 3π/2: a 40-tape stack, b 40-turn coil with Rin = 0 mm

3.2 A New Parameter to Assess the Validation of Infinitely Long Stack Approximation

The normalized ratios of average AC losses in circular coils with different turns to those in an infinitely long stack at Ip = 30 A are shown in Fig. 8. It is found that at lower inner radii, the larger the coil turn is, the larger the normalized ratio is. This indicates that the influence of coil radii on the AC losses become less noticeable for HTS coils with larger turns. The normalized ratios for HTS coils with different turns increase to nearly the same value for inner radii larger than 10 mm. It indicates that the influence of the coil turns on the AC losses can be negligible for HTS coils with larger radii.

Fig. 8
figure 8

The AC losses of single pancake coils with different turns normalized to those of an infinitely long stack at Ip = 30 A

To assess the validation of infinitely long stack approximation, we propose a new parameter, RC, a critical radius above which the ratio of AC losses of HTS coils to the infinitely long stack is larger than 0.90. That is to say, when the coil radius is larger than the critical radius, the infinitely long stack approximation will overestimate the AC losses of actual circular coil by a maximum percentage of 10%. For the case of the 40-turn circular coil, RC = 9.6 mm, as shown in Fig. 5. The critical radii for SP coils with different turns (N = 10, 20, 40, and 80) are calculated and listed in Table 2. It is shown that the critical radius of the 10-turn coil is 9.0 mm, and it slightly increases with the turn number. Since the minimum bending diameters for most commercial available YBCO-coated conductors are larger than 25 mm, the infinitely long stack approximation is adequate for HTS SP coils.

Table 2 Critical radii for circular SP coils with different turns

The critical radii of double pancakes and four pancakes are also obtained by FEM simulation. The normalized ratios of AC losses at peak current 10 A are shown in Fig. 9. It is found that the critical radii for single, double, and four pancakes are 9.6, 19, and 39 mm, respectively. It indicates that the critical radii increase linearly with the number of pancakes and can be described by

$$ R_{C} = 9.6\ast N_{p} , $$
(3)

where Np is the number of pancakes. It is worth noting that (3) holds only for YBCO coils wound from 4-mm tapes. For YBCO tapes with other widths, however, the value of RC may be different.

Fig. 9
figure 9

The AC losses of pancake coils with different coil radii normalized to those of an infinitely long stack at Ip = 10 A. Each pancake consists of 40 turns

3.3 The AC Loss Estimation of HTS Pancake Coils

The estimation of AC losses of HTS pancake coils is important for optimizing the design of HTS devices and the cryogenic system. The AC losses of the HTS stack corresponding to the case of SP coils as a function of stacked-tapes number for different applied currents are shown in Fig. 10. The average AC loss \(P_{\text {avg\_stack}} \) for tape number N and peak current Ip can be obtained by interpolating the AC loss data in Fig. 10. As mentioned above, the AC losses of HTS pancake coils with coil radii larger than RC can be well approximated by an infinitely long stack. Therefore, the AC losses of HTS pancake coils with coil radii larger than RC can be easily calculated by

$$ P_{\text{coil}} (N,\,I_{\mathrm{p}} )={\sum}_{i = 1}^{N} {2\pi r_{i} } \cdot P_{\text{avg\_stack}} (N,\,I_{\mathrm{p}} ), $$
(4)

where \(P_{\text {avg\_stack}} \) is the average loss per cycle calculated by the stack model, ri is the radius of the i th turn, and Pcoil is the AC loss of HTS pancake coils with a turn number of N.

Fig. 10
figure 10

The average AC losses of the HTS stack with different tapes for different applied currents

It is found from Fig. 4 that the average AC losses of the HTS stack increase with the increasing turn number. When the coil radii are larger than RC, HTS pancake coils exhibit nearly the same average loss as the HTS stack. For HTS pancake coils with the same total length, the larger the coil radii are, the less turns of HTS coils are. Therefore, the total AC losses of HTS coils with the same total length will decrease with increasing coil radii. These findings are helpful for reducing AC losses of HTS coils.

4 Conclusions

A comparison of AC losses of HTS pancake coils and infinitely long stack has been presented using an axisymmetric model and an infinitely long stack model, respectively. The FEM model is based on H formulation and implemented in COMSOL Multiphysics. The influence of coil radii on AC losses of SP coils with different turns (N = 10, 20, 40, and 80) is investigated. It is found that the AC losses of HTS coils will gradually increase to the same value as an infinitely long stack with increasing coil radii. We propose a new parameter, RC, above which the ratio of AC losses of HTS coils to the infinitely long stack is larger than 0.90, to assess the validation of infinitely long stack approximation. It is found that the critical radius of a 10-turn SP coil is 9.0 mm, and it slightly increases with increasing turn number. Taking the minimum bending diameters of commercial available YBCO-coated conductors with 4-mm width into account, the infinitely long stack approximation is adequate for HTS SP coils. Besides, the critical radii increase linearly with the number of pancakes. Finally, a method of AC loss estimation of HTS pancake coils is proposed, which can be used for the optimal design of practical HTS devices.