Abstract
Nonlinear electrodynamics has been frequently employed in the study of black holes. Some of these black holes may be regular, while others are singular. In this work, we consider a nonlinear electrodynamics model known as inverse electrodynamics to obtain black hole solutions. We demonstrate that, in addition to these solutions not being regular, they are also not asymptotically flat. We investigate which energy conditions are violated in the presence of this type of source. Furthermore, we calculate thermodynamic quantities and find that there are two phases, with one of them being thermodynamically stable. Finally, we derive the geodesics for massive and massless particles in this spacetime. For the massive case, we observe that there are no bound orbits.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
With recent measurements of gravitational waves and images of black holes , these astrophysical objects are gaining relevance [1, 2]. Black holes arise as predictions of general relativity through Einstein equations [3] and they stand out due to their causal structure [4]. The boundary around a black hole from which nothing can escape is called the event horizon. The mass of an astrophysical black hole can vary from a few solar masses to over a billion solar masses [1, 2]. The black hole mass influences the size of its event horizon; the more massive the black hole, the larger the event horizon . The gravitational field of these objects makes them ideal for testing the nonlinearities of gravitational theory and exploring alternative theories of gravity [6].
An alternative to classical black holes is known as regular black holes [7]. Unlike typical black holes, regular black holes lack a singularity at their core [8], which is the point where geodesics are interrupted [9]. Instead, regular black holes possess a finite curvature of spacetime within their cores, avoiding divergences [10].
Regular black holes offer a potential solution to some of the problems associated with classical black holes, such as the information paradox. The first regular black hole metric was proposed by Bardeen in 1968 [11]. This metric can be interpreted as a solution to Einstein equations when gravity theory is coupled with nonlinear electrodynamics. The source of this electrodynamics can be either an electric or a magnetic charge [12, 13]. Bardeen’s solution initiated the study of regular solutions, which has expanded over time, encompassing several static solutions [14,15,16,17,18,19,20], rotating solutions [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28], and solutions in alternative theories of gravity [29,30,31,32,33,34]. Additionally, researchers have explored several properties of these black holes [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. While most regular solutions involve an electric or magnetic charge as the source, there are also nonsingular solutions that rely on a scalar field [43, 44], or a combination of these sources [45,46,47,48,49,50]. In the context of modified theories of gravity, in some cases it becomes complicated to obtain the proper sources, and thus it becomes simpler to consider an anisotropic fluid as the source [51,52,53].
In addition to generating regular solutions in the context of black holes, nonlinear electrodynamics brings changes in the study of the properties of these solutions. An example of this is in the study of the thermodynamics of black holes [54,55,56,57,58,59,60]. To maintain entropy’s relation to the black hole area, nonlinear electrodynamics alters the first law of thermodynamics. It is possible to use nonlinear electrodynamics to create solutions with several horizons [61, 62]. In the context of nonlinear electromagnetic theory, photons deviate from geodesic paths [8, 63], modifying the black holes shadows [64,65,66]. Although regular spacetimes are the main focus of the application of nonlinear electrodynamics in the context of black holes, not all spacetimes that arise from nonlinear electrodynamics will be regular [61, 67, 68].
The origin of nonlinear electrodynamics is linked to phenomena of quantum electrodynamics, such as photon-photon scattering [69, 70]. One of the most famous models of this type of theory is the Euler-Heisenberg electrodynamics [71]. Through the effective Lagrangian, this electrodynamics treats the photon-photon scattering through the interaction with virtual electron-positrons. Another model that predicts this interaction between photons is the Born-Infield electrodynamics [72], which arises in a context of regularizing some divergences that appear in Maxwell electromagnetism. The photon-photon scattering has been tested in high-energy Pb-Pb collisions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) [73]. In a Pb-Pb collision, the lead ions are highly charged and produce a strong electromagnetic field, which can generate virtual photons. When two virtual photons collide, they can create a real photon, which can be detected by the detectors at the LHC.
Nonlinear electrodynamics is associated with intriguing phenomena such as vacuum birefringence [74, 75]. Birefringence refers to the phenomenon where a material has different refractive indices for other polarization states of light [76]. In a vacuum where there are no material properties to affect the propagation of light, there is no birefringence. However, in the presence of a strong electromagnetic field, the vacuum itself can exhibit birefringence due to quantum effects [74]. This phenomenon is known as vacuum birefringence or vacuum polarization. The Euler-Heisenberg model presents birefringence in vacuum, while the Born-Infield electrodynamics has no birefringence. There are several models of electrodynamics that allow the existence of birefringence in vacuum. One of these models is the inverse electrodynamics [77]. This model is attractive since the birefringence appears even though the electromagnetic Lagrangian depends only on the electromagnetic scalar. Since this electrodynamics is already prominent in the context of electromagnetic theory, we want to explore what contributions it might generate in the context of black holes.
The structure of this article is organized as follows: In Sec. 2, we use the suggested electrodynamics model to check if it is possible to obtain black hole solutions with it. We also analyze the regularity of these solutions and which energy conditions can be violated. In Sec. 3, we calculate some thermodynamic quantities, such as the temperature and the heat capacity, to verify the thermodynamic stability of this solution. Section 4 is dedicated to studying massive and massless geodesics in this spacetime. Section 5 presents our conclusions and future perspectives. We adopt the metric signature \((+,-,-,-)\). We shall work in geometrodynamics units where \(G=\hbar =c=1\).
2 Spacetime, Energy Conditions, and Curvature Singularities
Let’s consider the theory described by the action
where \(\kappa =8\pi \), R is the curvature scalar, g is the determinant of the metric tensor, \(g_{\mu \nu }\), and L(F) is a general function of the electromagnetic scalar \(F=F^{\mu \nu }F_{\mu \nu }/4\), with \(F_{\mu \nu }\) being the electromagnetic tensor.
The field equations are given by [4]
where
with \(L_F=dL(F)/dL\).
If we consider a spherically symmetric spacetime, describes by the line element
and considering that the source is only magnetically charged, the only nonzero component of the electromagnetic tensor is \(F_{23}=q \sin \theta \).
The components of the field equations are
Once you have the equations of motion, there are two possible paths; impose the metric and obtain the matter content that generates it, or define the matter content and thus solve the equations of motion to obtain the line element.
The Lagrangian that describes the inverse electrodynamics is given by [77]
The Maxwell theory is recovered to \(\lambda =0\) or \(\Lambda =0\). The parameter \(\lambda \) is dimensionless, \(\Lambda \) has the unit of \(m^{-1/2}\), where m is the black hole mass, and \(\delta \) is just a positive number. Using (7), we find
Once we have a magnetic source, the scalar F is given by
Using (7), (8), and (9), we solve the field equation and we find
This solution is not asymptotically flat to \(\lambda \ne 0\), \(\Lambda \ne 0\), and \(\delta \ne 0\). If \(\lambda =0\) or \(\Lambda =0\), the Reissner-Nordstrom solution is recover. In Fig. 1 we see how the function f(r) behaves in terms of the radial coordinate. There are three horizons; a Cauchy horizon, an event horizon and a type of cosmological horizon.
2.1 Curvature Singularities
In order to verify the existence of curvature singularities, we need to analyze the curvature invariants, that are given by
where K is the Kretschmann scalar.
If we calculate the curvature scalar we get
If we choose \(\delta =1/2\), the curvature scalar will be constant and we have a de Sitter type spacetime. In this specific case, the inverse electrodynamics acts like a cosmological constant that permeates the entire spacetime. To \(\delta >1/2\), there is a curvature singularity at \(r\rightarrow \infty \). Although spatial infinity is singular, this point is located beyond the cosmological-type horizon. From the curvature scalar we do not find singularities at \(r=0\). However, to verify the existence of curvature singularities, the Kretschmann scalar can provide more information about the singularities than the curvature scalar [78]. In general, the Kretschmann scalar is not so clear. So that, if we consider the simplest cases, we find
This result implies in a curvature singularity at \(r=0\). This means that nonlinear electrodynamics will not always generate a regular solution.
2.2 Energy Conditions
Black hole solutions involving nonlinear electrodynamics usually violate the energy conditions associated with the stress-energy tensor. In order to analyze the energy conditions, we consider the matter sector, which is electromagnetic, written as an anisotropic fluid
where \(\rho \), \(p_r\), and \(p_t\) are the energy density, radial pressure, and tangential pressure, respectively. The fluid quantities are given by
The classical energy conditions are the null (NEC), weak (WEC), dominant (DEC), and strong (SEC) energy conditions, and are given by the inequalities [79]
As \(DEC_{1,2} \Longleftrightarrow ( (NEC_{1,2}) \hbox { and } (\rho -p_{r,t}\ge 0))\) we assume part of the DEC into the NEC and simply replace \(DEC_{1,2}\Longrightarrow \rho -p_{r,t}\ge 0\).
Using (19), we have
We see that \(NEC_1\) is identically satisfied and \(DEC_1=2DEC_3=2WEC_3\). It means that we only need to analyze \(NEC_2\), \(SEC_3\), \(DEC_2\), and \(WEC_3\). Substituting (10) in the energy conditions, we find
The only value \(\delta \) at which all energy conditions will be satisfied is for \(\delta =0\). The energy density, \(\rho =WEC_3\), is always positive while the condition \(DEC_2\) is always violated. If \(r>\frac{\sqrt{\left| q\right| } }{\Lambda ((4 \delta -1) \lambda )^{\frac{1}{8\delta } }}\), the strong energy condition is violated. If \(r>\frac{\sqrt{\left| q\right| } }{\Lambda ((2 \delta -1) \lambda )^{\frac{1}{8\delta } }}\), the null energy condition is violated.
3 Thermodynamics
Studying the thermodynamics of a black hole, we can find information about its stability. The first step in this process is to calculate the temperature of the black hole, which is given by [80]
where k is the surface gravity and \(r_+\) is the radius of the event horizon. For \(\lambda =0\), we recover the temperature of the Reissner-Nordstrom case, and if \(q=0\), we recover the Schwarzschild case. In Fig. 2, we analyze the behavior of the temperature as a function of the event horizon radius. To ensure the temperature remains positive, there must be a maximum and a minimum value for the event horizon radius. This type of behavior is already known from solutions such as the Reissner-Nordstrom-de Sitter solution.
We can extract information about the thermodynamic instability of this solution through the heat capacity, given by [57]
where S is the black hole entropy, that is given by the area law as [80]
with A being the black hole area. A thermodynamically stable solution is indicated by \(C>0\), while \(C<0\) signifies instability [81]. In Fig. 3, a discontinuity in the heat capacity is observed, signifying a phase transition. The black holes is unstable and will continue to evaporate until they reach a stable phase. Although there some values of \(r_+\) in which black holes can exhibit positive heat capacity, such configurations are deemed nonphysical due to their association with negative temperatures. Similarly, some cases of black holes with negative heat capacities; however, like their counterparts, the negative temperature renders these situations nonphysical. Alterations to the solution parameters do not significantly impact the thermodynamic stability of the solution. This behavior, with only one phase transition, is similar to what occurs with the Reissner-Nordstrom-de Sitter solution.
Usually, the first law of thermodynamics needs corrections in the mass term, internal energy, for black holes involving nonlinear electrodynamics. This generally occurs because the electromagnetic Lagrangian explicitly depends on the mass of the black hole. In the case we are considering in this work, the Lagrangian does not explicitly depend on the mass, so our temperature is the same if we consider the relation \(T=\partial m/\partial S\), but we can still examine the Smarr formula, the first law of thermodynamics in integral form, for our case.
To derive the Smarr formula for our problem, we will express the mass function in terms of entropy and the parameters of our solution as follows:
If we consider that the function \(m\left( S,q,\lambda ,\Lambda ,\delta \right) \) is a homogeneous function, we can determine the degree of homogeneity by rewriting the function as:
To isolate l, we choose the values; \(a=1\), \(b=1/2\), \(c=0\), \(d=-1/4\), and \(e=0\), thus obtaining:
Thus, we have a degree of homogeneity \(n=1/2\). With this, we can use the properties of a homogeneous function [82] and write the Smarr formula as:
where
Once we have the Smarr formula, the first law is given by
It is interesting to note that, usually, when dealing with solutions involving nonlinear electrodynamics, the first law of thermodynamics requires corrections to the mass term so that the temperature obtained from the first law matches the temperature derived from the surface gravity. However, our first law does not require this correction factor because both methods yield the same expression for the temperature. This is because such corrections are necessary when the electromagnetic Lagrangian, and consequently the energy-momentum tensor, explicitly depend on the black hole’s mass [57], which is not the case in our problem.
4 Geodesics
In this section, we will investigate the motion of particles in the previously obtained spacetime. To do this, we will use the Lagrangian formalism to obtain the equations of motion that describe the movement of particles in the spacetime in question.
Associated with the line element (4), we have the Lagrangian
where the dot represents the derivative with respect to the affine parameter \(\tau \). Using the Euler–Lagrange equations
and considering that the particles are moving in the equatorial plane,Footnote 1\(\theta =\pi /2\), we find that the equations of motion are
where E and \(\ell \) are the energy and the angular moment of the particle. For massive particles we have \(\epsilon =1\) and for massless particles we have \(\epsilon =0\).
4.1 Massless Particles
One thing we need to make clear is that photons, which are also massless particles, do not follow null geodesics when we are dealing with nonlinear electrodynamics. Therefore, the analysis we will conduct in this section does not encompass the trajectory of photons.
For massless particles we have
Using the equations (41) and (43), we find the conservation energy equation type
In the right side of the equation above we have the total energy and in the left side we have the kinetic energy, and the effective potential, that is written as
In the Fig. 4 we see that the effective potential for massless particles has a maximum value. This maximum tells us that there is a value of energy such that the particles remain in an unstable orbit. Particles with energy exceeding the effective potential’s maximum will be absorbed by the black hole, and if it has an energy value less than the effective potential maximum, the particles will be scattered. The position where the effective potential has its maximum value is obtained by solving \(V_{eff}'(r_0)=0\). In general, it is not possible to obtain \(r_0\) analytically. If \(q=0\) and \(\lambda =0\), we find that \(r_0=3m\), that is the radius of the photon orbit in the Schwarzschild case. If \(\lambda =0\), we find \(r_0=(3m+\sqrt{9m^2-8q^2})/2\), that is the radius of the photon orbit in the Reissner-Nordstrom case. If we compare the nonlinear cases with Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordstrom, we notice that for small values of the radial coordinate, the nonlinear values tend to the Reissner-Nordstrom case, as both have the same charge, and differ from the Schwarzschild case. For distant points, Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordstrom tend to the same value and differ significantly from the nonlinear cases.
From equation (45), we get
where \(b=\ell /E\) is the impact parameter. This is the differential equation that describes the motion of massless particles in the spacetime (10). In ideal situations, we could numerically integrate this equation and obtain the trajectories that massless particles follow in this spacetime. However, since the solution is neither asymptotically flat nor asymptotically de Sitter, certain infinities arise that make numerical resolution difficult. Nevertheless, we can still analyze the particle’s motion by examining the sign of the function G, since it is essentially the square of the particle’s radial velocity and therefore should not exhibit negative values.
In Fig. 5, we analyze the function G in terms of the particle’s impact parameter. The parameters related to the nonlinear electrodynamics have a greater influence at points far from the black hole. Since the change in sign occurs near the black hole, the only parameter that will significantly influence this behavior is the impact parameter, which is why we plot the graph considering only the variation of b. For large values of the radial coordinate, G is positive regardless of the chosen value of b, meaning all particles should be able to come from infinity. For small impact parameter values, the particles do not have a turning point (where \(G=0\)) and are absorbed by the black hole. In cases where there are turning points, the particles can return to infinity.
4.2 Massive Particles
To massive particles we have \(\epsilon =1\). Using the equations (41) and (43), we find the conservation energy equation type
The effective potential is given by
In Fig. 6, we analyze the effective potential for the case of massive particles. As with the case of massless particles, we notice that for small values of the radial coordinate, the nonlinear cases approach the Reissner-Nordstrom case, once they have the same charge, and are different from the Schwarzschild case. For large values of the radial coordinate, the nonlinear cases differ significantly from Schwarzschild and Reissner-Nordstrom. It is important to note that in the case of Reissner-Nordstrom and Schwarzschild, for certain values of the particles’ angular momentum, it is possible to have minimum points in the effective potential, thus indicating the presence of stable orbits. This is not true for nonlinear cases. Thus, nonlinearity eliminates the possibility of stable orbits for massive particles. The point where the potential is maximum is obtained by solving \(V'_{eff}(r_0)=0\). Similar to the massless case, it is not possible to solve this problem analytically.
From (48), we find
This is the differential equation that describes the motion of massive particles in the spacetime (10). As in the massless case, the equation of motion is problematic to solve, but we can analyze the motion by examining the change in sign of the function G.
From Fig. 7, we can observe that low energy particles can approach the black hole but encounter a returning point and are scattered, while high-energy particles can overcome the scattering potential and do not encounter any turning point, thus being absorbed by the black hole. In the case of angular momentum, the result is the opposite of that with total energy. The greater the particle’s angular momentum, the higher the scattering potential, causing massive particles to reach the turning point earlier. Particles with low angular momentum experience a weaker scattering potential, so they do not have turning points and are consequently absorbed by the black hole.
5 Conclusion
In this work, we obtain black hole solutions that arise when considering inverse electrodynamics, which is a model of nonlinear electrodynamics coupled with general relativity. This solution is magnetically charged and can fall into the Reissner-Nordstrom solution through a given choice of parameters. Through the curvature invariants, we verify that the metric is not asymptotically flat and has curvature singularities in the limits \(r\rightarrow 0\) and \(r\rightarrow \infty \). All energy conditions will be violated, however, the energy density of this solution is always positive.
We analyze the thermodynamic properties of this type of black hole. Through the surface gravity, we verify that, for specific values of the radius of the horizon of events, there are negative temperature values. To avoid these negative temperature values, we must have upper and lower limits on the event horizon size. The thermodynamic stability of this solution is verified through the heat capacity. We confirmed a phase transition between an unstable black hole and a stable black hole. Not all stable and unstable cases are physically viable since some have negative temperatures. These thermodynamic properties, such as limitations on the size of the horizon radius or the fact that the heat capacity exhibits only one phase transition, are also present in other charged solutions like Reissner-Nordstrom-de Sitter.
We study the behavior of massive and massless geodesics in this spacetime. We verified that, in the massless case, the effective potential of the black hole increases significantly with the charge value. At the same time, the other parameters do not change the maximum value of the effective potential. Particles with energy less than the maximum effective potential are scattered, and particles with higher energy are absorbed. As the potential has a maximum value, unstable circular orbits exist for particles with energy equal to the maximum effective potential. In this case, it is not possible to analytically obtain the value of the radius of the unstable orbit. Through the orbit equation, we determine the types of possible orbits. Some particles with a small impact parameter can come from infinity and be absorbed by the black hole, while others, with larger impact parameter values, encounter a turning point before reaching the black hole and are scattered back to infinity. For the massive case, similarly to the massless case, the effective potential has only one maximum without minimums, which is interesting since, in solutions such as Schwarzchild or Reissner-Nordstrom, a minimum is expected, thus creating stable orbits for massive particles. Although the angular momentum, l, changes the maximum value of the effective potential, the shape of the potential itself is not changed. In this way, regardless of the value of angular momentum, we will always have only one unstable orbit. When analyzing the orbit equation for massive particles, we see that particles with small angular momentum have a low scattering potential and end up being absorbed by the black hole, while those with large angular momentum encounter a turning point before the black hole and return to infinity. The energy of the particles also plays an important role: particles with sufficiently high energy can overcome the scattering potential and are absorbed by the black hole, while particles with low energy encounter the turning point before the event horizon and are scattered back to infinity.
Several other properties of solutions can be analyzed in future work. Some cases are quasinormal modes, tidal forces, black hole shadow, and matter accretion.
Data Availibility Statement
No Data associated in the manuscript.
Notes
Since the spacetime is spherically symmetric, there is no loss of generality by restricting the motion to the equatorial plane. This would not be the case for a rotating solution.
References
Abbott, B.P., et al.: [LIGO Scientific and Virgo], GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(24), 241103 (2016). arXiv:1606.04855
Akiyama, K., et al.: [Event Horizon Telescope], First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole. Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L1 (2019). arXiv:1906.11238
Chandrasekhar, S.: The mathematical theory of black holes. Published in: Oxford, UK: CLARENDON (1985) 646 P
Wald, R.M.: General Relativity. Chicago Univ, Pr (1984)
Harlow, D.: Jerusalem Lectures on Black Holes and Quantum Information. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015002 (2016). arXiv:1409.1231
Capozziello, S., De Laurentis, M.: Extended Theories of Gravity. Phys. Rept. 509, 167–321 (2011). arXiv:1108.6266
Ansoldi, S.: Spherical black holes with regular center: A Review of existing models including a recent realization with Gaussian sources. arXiv:0802.0330
Bronnikov, K.A.: Regular magnetic black holes and monopoles from nonlinear electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 63, 044005 (2001). [arXiv:gr-qc/0006014 [gr-qc]]
Bronnikov, K.A.,Rubin, S.G.: Black Holes, Cosmology and Extra Dimensions. WSP (2012) ISBN 978-981-4374-20-0, 978-981-4440-02-8
Bronnikov, K.A.: Regular black holes sourced by nonlinear electrodynamics. (2022). arXiv:2211.00743
Bardeen, J.M.: Non-singular general relativistic gravitational collapse. In Proceedings of the International Conference GR5, Tbilisi, U.S.S.R. (1968)
Ayon-Beato, E., Garcia, A.: The Bardeen model as a nonlinear magnetic monopole. Phys. Lett. B 493, 149-152 (2000). [arXiv:gr-qc/0009077 [gr-qc]]
Rodrigues, M.E., de Sousa Silva, M.V.: Bardeen Regular Black Hole With an Electric Source. JCAP 06, 025 (2018). arXiv:1802.05095
Peres, A.: Nonlinear Electrodynamics in General Relativity. Phys. Rev. 122, 273–274 (1961)
Ayon-Beato, E., Garcia, A.: Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5056-5059 (1998). arXiv:gr-qc/9911046 [gr-qc]]
Ayon-Beato, E., Garcia, A.: New regular black hole solution from nonlinear electrodynamics. Phys. Lett. B 464, 25 (1999). [arXiv:hep-th/9911174 [hep-th]]
Bronnikov, K.A.: Comment on ‘Regular black hole in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics’. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4641 (2000)
Dymnikova, I.: Regular electrically charged structures in nonlinear electrodynamics coupled to general relativity. Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 4417-4429 (2004). [arXiv:gr-qc/0407072 [gr-qc]]
Culetu, H.: On a regular charged black hole with a nonlinear electric source. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 54(8), 2855–2863 (2015). arXiv:1408.3334
Rodrigues, M.E., Junior, E.L.B., de Sousa Silva, M.V.: Using dominant and weak energy conditions for build new classe of regular black holes. JCAP 02, 059 (2018). arXiv:1705.05744
Bambi, C., Modesto, L.: Rotating regular black holes. Phys. Lett. B 721, 329–334 (2013). arXiv:1302.6075
Neves, J.C.S., Saa, A.: Regular rotating black holes and the weak energy condition. Phys. Lett. B 734, 44–48 (2014). arXiv:1402.2694
Toshmatov, B., Stuchlík, Z., Ahmedov, B.: Generic rotating regular black holes in general relativity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 95(8), 084037 (2017). arXiv:1704.07300
Rodrigues, M.E., Junior, E.L.B.: Comment on “Generic rotating regular black holes in general relativity coupled to non-linear electrodynamics”. Phys. Rev. D 96(12), 128502 (2017). arXiv:1712.03592
Franzin, E., Liberati, S., Mazza, J., Vellucci, V.: Stable rotating regular black holes. Phys. Rev. D 106(10), 104060 (2022). arXiv:2207.08864
Singh, B.P., Ali, M.S., Ghosh, S.G.: Rotating regular black holes in AdS spacetime and its shadow. (2022). arXiv:2207.11907
Torres, R.: Regular Rotating Black Holes: A Review. (2022) arXiv:2208.12713
Kubiznak, D., Tahamtan, T., Svitek, O.: Slowly rotating black holes in nonlinear electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 105(10), 104064 (2022). arXiv:2203.01919
Junior, E.L.B., Rodrigues, M.E., Houndjo, M.J.S.: Regular black holes in \(f(T)\) Gravity through a nonlinear electrodynamics source. JCAP 10, 060 (2015). arXiv:1503.07857
Rodrigues, M.E., Junior, E.L.B., Marques, G.T., Zanchin, V.T.: Regular black holes in \(f(R)\) gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 94(2), 024062 (2016). arXiv:1511.00569
Rodrigues, M.E., Fabris, J.C., Junior, E.L.B., Marques, G.T.: Generalisation for regular black holes on general relativity to \(f(R)\) gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 76(5), 250 (2016). arXiv:1601.00471
de Sousa Silva, M.V., Rodrigues, M.E.: Regular black holes in \(f(G)\) gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 78(8), 638 (2018). arXiv:1808.05861
Rodrigues, M.E., de Sousa Silva, M.V.: Regular multihorizon black holes in \(f(G)\) gravity with nonlinear electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 99(12), 124010 (2019). arXiv:1906.06168
Junior, E.L.B., Rodrigues, M.E., de Sousa Silva, M.V.: Regular black holes in Rainbow Gravity. Nucl. Phys. B 961, 115244 (2020). arXiv:2002.04410
Eiroa, E.F., Sendra, C.M.: Gravitational lensing by a regular black hole. Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 085008 (2011). arXiv:1011.2455
Macedo, C.F.B., Crispino, L.C.B.: Absorption of planar massless scalar waves by Bardeen regular black holes. Phys. Rev. D 90(6), 064001 (2014). arXiv:1408.1779
Stuchlík, Z., Schee, J.: Circular geodesic of Bardeen and Ayon–Beato–Garcia regular black-hole and no-horizon spacetimes. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24(02), 1550020 (2014). arXiv:1501.00015
Macedo, C.F.B., de Oliveira, E.S., Crispino, L.C.B.: Scattering by regular black holes: Planar massless scalar waves impinging upon a Bardeen black hole. Phys. Rev. D 92(2), 024012 (2015). arXiv:1505.07014
Macedo, C.F.B., Crispino, L.C.B., de Oliveira, E.S.: Scalar waves in regular Bardeen black holes: Scattering, absorption and quasinormal modes. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 25(09), 1641008 (2016). arXiv:1605.00123
Huang, H., Jiang, M., Chen, J., Wang, Y.: Absorption cross section and Hawking radiation from Bardeen regular black hole. Gen. Rel. Grav. 47(2), 8 (2015)
Tsukamoto, N.: Black hole shadow in an asymptotically-flat, stationary, and axisymmetric spacetime: The Kerr-Newman and rotating regular black holes. Phys. Rev. D 97(6), 064021 (2018). arXiv:1708.07427
Bernar, R.P., Crispino, L.C.B.: Scalar radiation from a source rotating around a regular black hole. Phys. Rev. D 100(2), 024012 (2019). arXiv:1906.03778
Bronnikov, K.A., Fabris, J.C.: Regular phantom black holes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 251101 (2006). [arXiv:gr-qc/0511109 [gr-qc]]
Bronnikov, K.A., Melnikov, V.N., Dehnen, H.: Regular black holes and black universes. Gen. Rel. Grav. 39, 973-987 (2007). [arXiv:gr-qc/0611022 [gr-qc]]
Bronnikov, K.A., Walia, R.K.: Field sources for Simpson-Visser spacetimes. Phys. Rev. D 105(4), 044039 (2022). arXiv:2112.13198
Cañate, P.: Black bounces as magnetically charged phantom regular black holes in Einstein-nonlinear electrodynamics gravity coupled to a self-interacting scalar field. Phys. Rev. D 106(2), 024031 (2022). arXiv:2202.02303
Bronnikov, K.A.: Black bounces, wormholes, and partly phantom scalar fields. Phys. Rev. D 106(6), 064029 (2022). arXiv:2206.09227
Rodrigues, M.E., Silva, M.V.d.S.: Source of black bounces in general relativity. Phys. Rev. D 107(4), 044064 (2023). arXiv:2302.10772
Bronnikov, K.A., Rodrigues, M.E., Silva, M.V.d.S.: Cylindrical black bounces and their field sources. Phys. Rev. D 108(2), 024065 (2023). arXiv:2305.19296
Alencar, G., Bronnikov, K.A., Rodrigues, M.E., Sáez-Chillón Gómez, D., Silva, M.V.d.S.: On black bounce space-times in non-linear electrodynamics. (2024). arXiv:2403.12897
Atazadeh, K., Hadi, H.: Source of black bounces in Rastall gravity. JCAP 01, 067 (2024). arXiv:2311.07637
Rodrigues, M.E., Silva, M.V.d.S.: Comment on “Source of black bounces in Rastall gravity”. JCAP 05, 012 (2024). arXiv:2402.17814
Fabris, J.C., Junior, E.L.B., Rodrigues, M.E.: Generalized models for black-bounce solutions in f(R) gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 83(10), 884 (2023). arXiv:2310.00714
Ma, M.S., Zhao, R.: Corrected form of the first law of thermodynamics for regular black holes. Class. Quant. Grav. 31, 245014 (2014). arXiv:1411.0833
Zhang, Y., Gao, S.: First law and Smarr formula of black hole mechanics in nonlinear gauge theories. Class. Quant. Grav. 35(14), 145007 (2018). arXiv:1610.01237
Gulin, L., Smolić, I.: Generalizations of the Smarr formula for black holes with nonlinear electromagnetic fields. Class. Quant. Grav. 35(2), 025015 (2018). arXiv:1710.04660
Maluf, R.V., Neves, J.C.S.: Thermodynamics of a class of regular black holes with a generalized uncertainty principle. Phys. Rev. D 97(10), 104015 (2018). arXiv:1801.02661
Rodrigues, M.E., Silva, M.V.d.S., Vieira, H.A.: Bardeen-Kiselev black hole with a cosmological constant. Phys. Rev. D 105(8), 084043 (2022). arXiv:2203.04965
Rodrigues, M.E., Vieira, H.A.: Bardeen solution with a cloud of strings. Phys. Rev. D 106(8), 084015 (2022). arXiv:2210.06531
Rodrigues, M.E., Silva, M.V.d.S.: Embedding regular black holes and black bounces in a cloud of strings. Phys. Rev. D 106(8), 084016 (2022). arXiv:2210.05383
Gao, C., Lu, Y., Yu, S., Shen, Y.G.: Black hole and cosmos with multiple horizons and multiple singularities in vector-tensor theories. Phys. Rev. D 97(10), 104013 (2018). arXiv:1711.00996
Rodrigues, M.E., de Sousa Silva, M.V., de Siqueira, A.S.: Regular multihorizon black holes in General Relativity. Phys. Rev. D 102(8), 084038 (2020). arXiv:2010.09490
Toshmatov, B., Ahmedov, B., Malafarina, D.: Can a light ray distinguish charge of a black hole in nonlinear electrodynamics?. Phys. Rev. D 103(2), 024026 (2021). arXiv:2101.05496
Stuchlík, Z., Schee, J.: Shadow of the regular Bardeen black holes and comparison of the motion of photons and neutrinos. Eur. Phys. J. C 79(1), 44 (2019)
Rayimbaev, J., Bardiev, D., Mirzaev, T., Abdujabbarov, A., Khalmirzaev, A.: Shadow and massless particles around regular Bardeen black holes in 4D Einstein Gauss–Bonnet gravity. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 31(07), 2250055 (2022)
de Paula, M.A.A., Lima Junior, H.C.D., Cunha, P.V.P., Crispino, L.C.B.: Electrically charged regular black holes in nonlinear electrodynamics: Light rings, shadows, and gravitational lensing. Phys. Rev. D 108(8), 084029 (2023). arXiv:2305.04776
Cataldo, M., Garcia, A.: Three dimensional black hole coupled to the Born-Infeld electrodynamics. Phys. Lett. B 456, 28–33 (1999). [arXiv:hep-th/9903257 [hep-th]]
Linares, R., Maceda, M., Martínez-Carbajal, D.: Test Particle Motion in the Born-Infeld Black Hole. Phys. Rev. D 92(2), 024052 (2015). arXiv:1412.3569
Adler, S.L.: Photon splitting and photon dispersion in a strong magnetic field. Annals Phys. 67, 599–647 (1971)
Costantini, V., De Tollis, B., Pistoni, G.: Nonlinear effects in quantum electrodynamics. Nuovo Cim. A 2(3), 733–787 (1971)
Heisenberg, W., Euler, H.: Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons. Z. Phys. 98(11–12), 714–732 (1936). [arXiv:physics/0605038 [physics]]
Born, M., Infeld, L.: Foundations of the new field theory. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 144(852), 425–451 (1934)
Aaboud, M., et al.: [ATLAS], Evidence for light-by-light scattering in heavy-ion collisions with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Nature Phys. 13(9), 852–858 (2017). arXiv:1702.01625
Melrose, D.B.: Quantum plasmadynamics: magnetized plasmas. Lecture notes in physics No. v. 854 Springer, New York. (2013)
Kim, C.M., Kim, S.P.: Vacuum birefringence at one-loop in a supercritical magnetic field superposed with a weak electric field and application to pulsar magnetosphere. Eur. Phys. J. C 83(2), 104 (2023). arXiv:2202.05477
Bain, A.K.: Crystal Optics: Properties and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated (2019)
Gaete, P., Helayël-Neto, J.A.: Remarks on inverse electrodynamics. Eur. Phys. J. C 81(10), 899 (2021). arXiv:2108.07929
Lobo, F.S.N., Rodrigues, M.E., de Sousa Silva, M.V., Simpson, A., Visser, M.: Novel black-bounce spacetimes: wormholes, regularity, energy conditions, and causal structure. Phys. Rev. D 103(8), 084052 (2021). arXiv:2009.12057
Visser, M.: Lorentzian wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking. AIP press [now Springer], New York (1995)
Wald, R.M.: The thermodynamics of black holes. Living Rev. Rel. 4, 6 (2001). [arXiv:gr-qc/9912119 [gr-qc]]
Stanley, H.E.: Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena. Oxford University Press, Ely House, London (1971)
Hankey, A., Stanley, H.E.: Systematic Application of Generalized Homogeneous Functions to Static Scaling, Dynamic Scaling, and Universality. Phys. Rev. B 6, 3515 (1972)
Acknowledgements
M.S. would like to thank Fundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (FUNCAP) for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M. S.: Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Investigation;Writing - original draft; Writing - review; editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
de S. Silva, M.V. Charged Black Hole with Inverse Electrodynamics. Int J Theor Phys 63, 220 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-024-05760-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-024-05760-2