Abstract
Leaf senescence can be described as the dismantling of cellular components during the terminal stage in the development of plant organs and tissues. In order to determine the leaf senescence process when stem girdling and leaf removal both exist. An experiment was carried out in Alhagi sparsifolia, which grew in the Cele oasis-desert transitional zone with the treatment of control (CK), phloem girdling (PG), leaf removal (LR), and combined girdling and removal (GR). Some parameters related to leaf senescence were measured at the 1st and 30th day post-girdling. The results showed that after PG and GR, leaf soluble sugar content, starch content, abscisic acid content, proline content, and malondialdehyde content increased substantially and leaf photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, photosynthetic pigment content, and water potential decreased substantially compared with CK. It also changed much more in PG leaves than in GR leaves. The change in LR leaves was opposite to that of PG and GR leaves, but the change was rather slight. The result of the present work implied that senescence of leaves treated with PG greatly accelerates, and the accumulation of carbohydrates and ABA in leaves is probably the main reason for this. Separate LR could play a role in delaying leaf senescence in plants; however, this delay effect was not obvious. Nevertheless, partial removal of leaves led to a significant compensation of girdling effects, i.e., senescence will be delayed significantly in girdled leaves when treated with partial LR.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Senescence is a highly regulated process that constitutes the final stage of a plant’s organ and tissue development (Buchanan-Wollaston et al. 2003; Parrott et al. 2010). Subject to genetic control, it is a highly regulated plant development process that rescues nutrients prior to cell death (Parrott et al. 2005, 2007). In-depth research has demonstrated that the leaf senescence process is far more complicated than the degradation of chlorophyll and protein; declines in photosynthetic activity (Wingler et al. 2006) and change of resources distributed to plant vegetative organs are also obvious characteristics of leaf senescence (Miller et al. 2000).
The initiation of senescence, and its acceleration and delay, can be triggered by various internal and external factors, such as alterations of the source/sink interactions and hormonal balance, or the supply of light, ultraviolet light, ozone, hormones, drought, nutrients, and water (Gregersen et al. 2008; Parrott et al. 2010). In addition to the above factors, it has been demonstrated that high levels of leaf carbohydrates (the so-called carbon “feast”) are highly involved with the leaf senescence process (Pourtau et al. 2004, 2006; Parrott et al. 2005, 2007, 2010; Wingler et al. 2006).
The leaf senescence process is also closely related to the source/sink relationship (Masclaux et al. 2000). Because a rise in the proportion of source organs is always accompanied by high levels of carbohydrates, and sink organs often exist as organs that consume carbohydrates, it is also possible for senescence induced by changes in the source/sink ratio to take hexokinase as a signal factor for induction. In previous experiments, researchers investigated changes in the plant senescence process by the removal of sink organs as the relationship between source and sink can influence senescence. Some results revealed that plant senescence had been dramatically inhibited by the removal of sink organs, especially of reproductive organs, such as soybean (Wittenbach 1982). One mechanism may be that seeds, as a powerful sink organ, always extracted a lot of nutrients from plants (e.g. leaves), eventually leading to plant senescence, and removal of sink organs can significantly decline this process (Nooden et al. 1978). In addition, the appearance of seeds (sing organs) may lead to a depravation of water relations, a depletion of available nutrients, or may produce several hormonal signals which regulate senescence (e.g. ethylene), and the removal of sink organs will slow down this process thus delay senescence (Mondal et al. 1978). While in other studies, researchers found that removal of sink organs did not influence the process of senescence, but rather altered the partitioning of plant constituents and the visual manifestations of senescence (Crafts-Brandner et al. 1984). Nevertheless, little empirical research has been conducted to observe the effects of removal of the sink organs (leaves) on senescence in the remaining leaves. Because leaf, as the organ for photosynthesis, is the main source of carbohydrates in plants, leaf removal (LR) will generally lessen whole plants’ carbohydrate levels. Moreover, phloem girdling (PG) typically results in accumulation of carbohydrates in leaves, which ultimately accelerates the process of leaf senescence (Nooden et al. 1978; Krapp and Stitt 1995). These two change plant carbohydrates through inconsistent mechanisms, since LR gives rise to declining concentrations of carbohydrates in plants by reducing the synthesis of photosynthetic products; whereas, girdling leads to accumulation of carbohydrates in leaves by blocking the transport of materials through phloem sieve tubes. However, they both have an obvious antagonistic effect that exists in the changes of carbohydrates in leaves.
We use A. sparsifolia as our plant material which is a perennial leguminous shrub. A. sparsifolia was able to reach the groundwater table in the river valleys (6.5 m) within a time span of 5–6 months after germination, so at early stage of plant growth, A. sparsifolia allocated more substance for the root growth to adapt the extreme drought (Vonlanthen et al. 2010). The formation of root biomass conformed to a logistic ‘slow–quick–slow’ growth curve, and total biomass decreased with intensity of soil drought (Zeng et al. 2012). Normal senescence of A. sparsifolia begins in late August, and during leaf senescence, the maximum photochemical quantum yield remained relatively high (Xue et al. 2012). In addition, leaf senescence of A. sparsifolia can induced by the reduction of daily sunshine period and increase of temperature (Xue et al. 2012). In our experiment, we increased the carbohydrate concentrations in leaves and observed the process of leaf senescence by conducting stem girdling of A. sparsifolia. We also achieved the purpose of reducing the concentrations of carbohydrates in plants by removing A. sparsifolia leaves, and thus observed whether the senescence process could be delayed by the removal of source organs. The main purpose of our study is to detect which factor, i.e., phloem transport or production of carbohydrates in source organs, is dominant in plant senescence, as well as investigating whether or not the acceleration of leaf senescence as a result of blocked transport of sieve tubes could be effectively delayed by the removal of source organs. This research will deepen our understanding of leaf senescence.
Materials and methods
Study site
Experiments were performed in the Desert Experimental Area in Cele National Field Research Station for Desert Steppe Ecosystems, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The research area was located in the Taklimakan Desert at an oasis-desert transitional zone on the southern rim of the Taklimakan Desert (35°17′55″–39°30′00″N, 80°03′24″–82°10′34″E).
Plant material
Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. which was 3-year old was used for this study. This is a spiny, clonal, perennial leguminous herb growing in arid and semi-arid regions with few leaves, and is about 1 m tall (Zeng et al. 2008). It is widely distributed in the transition zone between oasis and desert in the southern fringe of the Taklimakan Desert in Western China, and is one of the important dominant species in this region (Xue et al. 2011). As a deep-rooted plant, the stem girdling of A. sparsifolia may be interesting because the sink organ (root) is more active and consumes more carbohydrates.
Experimental design
On 21 August 2013, 12 square plots, each 4 × 4 m and with 10–12 plants, were set up on flat land. Of these, each quadrat was randomly selected for four different treatments: CK: control (remain intact); PG: phloem girdling (girdle phloem at the bottom of the stem); LR: leaf removal (remove about half of the total leaves); and GR: combine girdling and removal (we first girdled phloem at the bottom of the stem and then removed about half of the total leaves in branches), as shown in Fig. 1. Every treatment (CK, PG, LR, and GR) had three quadrats (each 4 × 4 m and with 10–12 plants). Girdling consisted in removing a 10–12 mm wide band of bark at the bottom of the main stem of each branch. LR consisted of removing one leaf, every other leaf, from the bottom to the top of each branch, so that each kind of leaf (young, mature, and elderly) was both removed and remained. Soluble sugar content, starch content, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (Tr), leaf abscisic acid (ABA) content, photosynthetic pigment content, leaf water status, proline (Pro) content, and malondialdehyde (MDA) content of A. sparsifolia were determined respectively on day 1 and 30 after the above treatments.
Measurement of parameters
Measurement of photosynthetic parameters
Pn, Gs, and Tr were measured in the field as Mittler et al. (2001) described using a Portable Photosynthesis System (Li-COR 6400 Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). The parameters were measured every 2 h from 06:00 to 18:00 (GMT + 6) on August 22 and September 20, 2013. As the measured leaves did not reach the standard size of the leaf chamber (2 cm × 3 cm), a scanner was employed to scan the measured leaves. In addition, Image Pro Plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Springs, MD, USA) read the surface area of the measured leaves, and was later used to calculate the actual values of Pn, Gs, and Tr. We selected the third leaf (count from top to base) on the eighth branch (count from base to top) as our measured leaf. Five replicate measurements were performed for each treatment.
Measurement of pigment, soluble sugar, and starch content
All leaves were of similar size and selected from the second to fifth leaf on each of the branches. We picked five leaves from each A. sparsifolia; thus, each quadrat had 50 leaves (5 × 10), for a total of 150 leaves (50 × 3). Every 30 leaves (total of five groups and 150 leaves) were homogenized using sand and MgCO3, and then 0.2 g leaves were extracted with 25 mL 80 % acetone. After centrifugation at 2500 rpm for 2 min, the absorbance of the solution was measured by a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Jenway, UK), at 470, 647, and 663 nm, with a correction for scattering, measured at 750 nm. The concentrations of Chl per unit leaf fresh weight were determined using the equation of Lichtenthaler (1987).
Leaves and roots were harvested at the 1st and 30th day, respectively, and then they were dried and ground to powder. We collected twenty leaves from each A. sparsifolia; thus, each quadrat had 200 leaves (20 × 10), for a total of 600 leaves (200 × 3). All leaves were selected from the third to twelfth leaf (count from top to base) on the sixth and seventh branches (count from base to top) on each plant. We collected one root on each plant in each quadrat, so we totally collected 30 roots (1 × 10 × 3). The roots we selected for measurement were all from the third secondary root (count from above to below). As the root system in A. sparsifolia was large, one secondary root will not influence the growth conditions of A. sparsifolia, so we can measure this parameter for twice on the 1st and 30th day respectively.
Six hundred leaves (each replicate was 120 leaves) and 30 roots (each replicate was six roots) were harvested at each treatment, and five replicate measurements were performed for each treatment. 0.5 g of ground leaves and roots were extracted with 4 mL of 80 % ethanol at 80 °C for 40 min (boiling ethanol), followed by two extractions with 2 mL of 80 % ethanol (20 % is water). The supernatants were combined and purified by 10 g activated carbon at 80 °C for 30 min. Ethanol (80 %) was added to the product to maintain a constant volume (25 mL) for measuring the amount of soluble sugar. Then, the remaining sample was dried at 45 °C to remove the ethanol, and boiled for 10 min with 3 mL double-distilled water in 7.5 mL centrifuge tubes. The samples were then cooled to 28 °C, and 4 mL HClO4 was added to decompose the starch. Starches were hydrolyzed for 15 min, and the resulting soluble sugar glucose was determined at 630 nm, as described previously (Li et al. 2011). Starch content was calculated using the following formula (Tang et al. 2015):
Leaf water potential measurement
Leaf water potential readings were conducted according to previous studies (Williams and Araujo 2002; Williams et al. 2012). Predawn water potential measurements began at about 4:30 am and were finished before sunrise using a pressure chamber (PMS Instruments Co., Corvallis, Oregon, USA). Midday measurements occurred between 11:30 pm and 12:30 pm (GMT + 6). Leaf blades used for the determination of water potential were covered with a plastic bag and quickly sealed. Petioles were then cut within 1–2 s, and the time between leaf excision and chamber pressurization was generally <10–15 s. We selected the third leaf (count from top to base) on the eighth branch (count from base to top) as our measured leaf just like the leaf selected for measurement of photosynthesis. Leaves chosen for midday water potential determinations were exposed to direct solar radiation. Five replicate measurements were performed for each treatment.
Measurement of ABA content
All leaves were selected from the second to seventh leaf on the ninth branch (count from base to top) on each plant. We collected five leaves from each A. sparsifolia; thus, each quadrat had 50 leaves (5 × 10), for a total of 150 leaves (50 × 3). ABA extraction was determined by the method as described by Veselov et al. (2008). All samples were taken in the morning at about 10:00 am (GMT + 6), weighed, and then frozen in liquid nitrogen. Frozen samples were ground to fine powder in liquid nitrogen. ABA was extracted in 80 % ethanol and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Distilled water was added to dilute the aqueous residue, then acidified with HCl (1 mol/L) to pH 2.5, then partitioned twice with peroxide-free diethyl ether (ratio of organic to aqueous phases was 1:3). The organic phase was transferred into 1 % sodium hydrocarbonate (pH 7–8, ratio of organic to aqueous phases was 3:1). The solution was re-extracted with diethyl ether, methylated with diazomethane, and immunoassayed using antibodies to ABA (Vysotskaya et al. 2004). For more details on the method and calculations, see Veselov et al. (2008).
Measurement of proline and MDA level
All leaves for Pro measurement were selected from the second to seventh leaf on the tenth branch (count from base to top) on each plant. We collected five leaves from each A. sparsifolia; thus, each quadrat had 50 leaves (5 × 10), for a total of 150 leaves (50 × 3). The measurement of proline level was conducted based on the method of Demiral and Türkan (2005). Each group of plant sample (0.5 g) was ground and mixed with 3 % (w/v) sulfosalicylic acid. Afterwards, homogenate was filtered through filter paper. After adding acid ninhydrin and glacial acetic acid, the mixture obtained was put in boiling water bath at 100 °C for 1 h. The reactant was then placed in an ice bath to terminate the reaction. The mixture was extracted with toluene, which was taken as a control. The extract was placed in a cuvette, and its absorbance was read at a wavelength of 520 nm. Proline concentration was calculated using a calibration curve and expressed as molproline g−1 FW (fresh weight).
All leaves for Pro measurement were selected from the second to seventh leaf on the eleventh branch (count from base to top) on each plant. We collected five leaves from each A. sparsifolia; thus, each quadrat had 50 leaves (5 × 10), for a total of 150 leaves (50 × 3). The measurement of MDA level was conducted based on the method of Rahman et al. (2012). Thiobarbituric acid (TBA) reactive substances representing the lipid per oxidation products were extracted through the homogenization of a 0.2 g leaf sample in 5 mL of solution containing 20 % trichloroacetic acid and 0.5 % 2-TBA. The mixture was heated at 95 °C for 30 min, and the reaction was arrested by a sudden ice bath. The cooled mixture was centrifuged at 5000×g for 10 min at 25 °C, and the absorbance of the supernatant at 532 and 600 nm was recorded. After subtracting the nonspecific turbidity at 600 nm, the MDA concentration was determined by its molar extinction coefficient, 155 M−1 cm−1 (Kosugi and Kikugawa 1985).
Data analysis
The differences of A. sparsifolia between treatments of CK, PG, LR and GR at day 1 and 30 were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using PASW Statistics 18.0 software (Macintosh, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for each parameter. Once significant differences were detected, LSD multiple range tests at p < 0.05 were employed to identify the statistically significant differences. Results shown in graphs are presented as the mean value ± standard deviation.
Results
Carbohydrate characteristics after phloem were girdled and leaf were removed
In our study, we found that only after 30 days, significant changes were observed in its soluble sugar content. First, in terms of the leaves, 30 days after treatment, compared to CK, soluble sugar content in A. sparsifolia treated with PG and GR increased by 86.6 and 38.8 % (p < 0.05), respectively; whereas, that under the treatment of LR decreased by 8.7 % (p > 0.05) (Fig. 2a). With respect to the roots, 30 days after treatment, compared to CK, soluble sugar content in A. sparsifolia treated with PG and GR dropped by 30.7 and 35.8 % (p < 0.05), respectively (Fig. 2b).
Just as with soluble sugar, on the first day of girdling, no significant changes in the starch content of leaves and roots in A. sparsifolia were observed (p > 0.05). On the 30th day of girdling, the starch content of leaves in A. sparsifolia increased 40.3 and 26.8 %, respectively, under FG and SG compared to CK (p < 0.05). The starch content of leaves in A. sparsifolia treated with LR dropped by 7.3 % (p > 0.05); whereas, that in roots, A. sparsifolia treated with PG, LR and GR declined by 22.9 % (p < 0.05), 9.4 % (p > 0.05) and 24.2 % (p < 0.05) respectively, compared to CK.
Photosynthesis characteristics after phloem were girdled and leaf were removed
Pn, Gs, and Tr were measured and summed up over all measurement time points in the whole day, and then their differences were compared. In our experiment, no significant changes in the Pn of A. sparsifolia treated with LR and GR on the first day were observed; however, Pn of A. sparsifolia treated with PG decreased 20.8 % (p < 0.05). Accordingly, Gs and Tr of A. sparsifolia treated with PG decreased by 13.3 % (Fig. 3a) and 28.3 % (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3e), respectively, on the first day.
On the 30th day of treatment, the Pn of A. sparsifolia under PG decreased by 84.2 % (p < 0.05) compared to CK; and a decrease of 58.3 % was observed in GR (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3d). Compared to CK, 30 days after girdling, Gs of A. sparsifolia treated with PG and GR decreased 71.5 and 41.2 % (p < 0.05), respectively; whereas, it rose 4.9 % when treated with LR (p > 0.05) (Fig. 3b). Changes in Tr were largely influenced by Gs. In our experiment, 30 days after treatment, Tr under PG and GR reduced by 46.1 and 21.4 % (p < 0.05), respectively; whereas, that under LR increased 4.9 % (p > 0.05) (Fig. 3f).
Photosynthetic pigments characteristics after phloem were girdled and leaf were removed
Our experiment found that 30 days after treatment, photosynthetic pigment content varied drastically among each kind of treatment. Compared with CK, Chl a, Chl b, total Chl, Car content, Chl a/b, and Chl/Car in A. sparsifolia leaves treated with PG fell decreased significantly (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4a–f). However, these parameters in the treatment of LR increased slightly. Similar to PG, Chl a, Chl b, total Chl, Car content, Chl a/b, and Chl/Car in A. sparsifolia leaves treated with PG had a great degree of decline; whereas compared with PG, the degree of decline was much less (Fig. 4a–f).
Water potential after phloem were girdled and leaf were removed
Our study found that on the 30th day of treatment, a significant change was observed in leaf water potential. Specifically, on the 30th day, predawn water potential in A. sparsifolia subjected to PG decreased by 70.9 % compared to CK (p < 0.05); whereas, midday water potential reduced by 38.5 % (p < 0.05) (Fig. 5a, b). Predawn water potential in A. sparsifolia subjected to GR treatment decreased by 30.0 % (p < 0.05); whereas, midday water potential reduced by 21.4 % (p < 0.05) (Fig. 5a, b).
Pro, MDA and ABA characteristics after phloem were girdled and leaf were removed
Our research found that after 30 days, Pro content had undergone significant changes, as demonstrated by an increase of 70.9 % (p < 0.05) under PG compared to CK, a rise of 23.2 % (p < 0.05) under GR treatment, and a fall of 4.9 % (p > 0.05) under LR compared to CK (Fig. 5c). In addition, 30 days of treatment made MDA content significantly change (Fig. 5d). Specifically, it increased 66.7 % (p < 0.05) under PG compared to CK, decreased 7.8 % (p > 0.05) under LR, and increased 15.1 % (p > 0.05) under GR (Fig. 5d). On the 30th day, compared to CK, ABA content in A. sparsifolia leaves subjected to PG and GR increased 248.3 and 80.0 % (p < 0.05), respectively; whereas, that in leaves subjected to LR fell 20.2 % (p > 0.05) (Fig. 5e).
Discussion
Senescence is a naturally occurring process for plant development, but high carbohydrate levels will accelerate the onset of the senescence process (Parrott et al. 2005, 2007). In the present study, changes in both soluble sugar and starch of A. sparsifolia leaves followed the same pattern in each treatment. Thirty days after treatment, soluble sugar and starch content in leaves treated with PG increased most obviously in leaves (Fig. 2), while the accumulation of carbohydrates in the leaves of many girdled plant species was also reported (Li et al. 2003; Regier et al. 2010). Soluble sugar and starch content of A. sparsifolia leaves subjected to GR also significantly increased, but to a less obvious extent in relation to PG; whereas, soluble sugar and starch content of A. sparsifolia leaves subjected to LR displayed a slight decline. Here, we believe that sugar, whether directly used to supply or store energy, could significantly accumulate after PG; whereas, individual LR did not have a significant impact on carbohydrate content. Nevertheless, when combining LR with girdling, we could find that the accumulation of carbohydrates had been distinctly slowed.
Previous research shows that there is a correlation between leaf carbohydrate content and senescence rate (Mahouachi et al. 2009; Pourtau et al. 2004, 2006; Parrott et al. 2005, 2007, 2010; Wingler et al. 2006). In the present study, accompanied by changes in carbohydrate concentration, the rate of senescence of A. sparsifolia also exhibited noticeable changes, which could be seen from the velocity of plant yellowing. As observed from the indicators of photosynthetic pigments (Fig. 4), A. sparsifolia leaves subjected to PG demonstrated greatly accelerated senescence; whereas, changes in photosynthetic pigments in leaves under GR also showed a consistent variation curve with photosynthetic pigments in the plant senescence process (Fig. 4). Regarding LR, senescence seems to be delayed to a certain degree (Fig. 4). In light of this result, we believe that PG and GR could clearly promote plant senescence, while LR could slightly reduce or delay plant senescence. Because of the strong relationship between this result and the contents of carbohydrates, our study demonstrates a similar conclusion to that made previously: in the process of senescence, whether it is natural or onset, the emergence or delay of senescence may be, to certain extent, induced by carbohydrate levels. Nevertheless, since we did not establish a linear relationship between the two factors, we will not exclude the role of other factors in the senescence induction process.
Weakened photosynthetic capacity of a plant is the principal symptom of senescence (Zhang et al. 2012). In our study, the reduction speed of photosynthesis under PG is the most obvious, followed by GR treatment. This has also proven that PG and GR treatments could greatly accelerate the senescence process; whereas, LR has clearly and effectively delayed senescence, and caused a drop in Pn induced by girdling. Curiously, however, a reduction in Pn does not seem entirely consistent with variation in carbohydrates, because our experiment found that 1 day of PG also significantly reduced Pn, although the decline was still quite weak in relation to 30 days after treatment (Fig. 3). Our result is similar to that found in previous studies: a decline in Pn as a result of girdling treatment has been evidenced by many experiments (Di Vaio et al. 2001; Zhou and Quebedeaux 2003; Urban et al. 2004), and an increase in Pn as a result of LR treatment has also been evidenced by previous study (Petrie et al. 2000).
On the first day after treatment, since we did not find any accumulation of carbohydrates in plant leaves, the reduction in Pn on the first day should not be attributed to a feedback regulation of carbohydrates. So, what causes the appearance of a reduced rate of photosynthesis to always occur before plant senescence? We ascribe it to Gs, i.e., similar to light, stomata are one of the most sensitive indicators that control the photosynthetic rate of plants (Li et al. 2015). Our experiment indeed observed that Gs under PG showed a noticeable decline on the first day; whereas, the other two treatments (LR, GR) exhibited no noticeable alteration compared to CK, which was quite close to changes in Pn as demonstrated on the first day. From the diurnal variations of Gs and photosynthetic rate, we could also observe consistency between the two factors; thus, we think that the reduction in Pn on the first day was mainly caused by limitations of Gs.
It is impossible to explain a reduction in Pn induced by girdling and leaf removal entirely by using senescence as a result of carbohydrate concentrations which was showed by previous study (Pérez et al. 2011); however, it is possible by using changes in Gs. In this case, we need to identify some factors that lead to changes in Gs for verification. As ABA has been proven to be an important factor leading to reduced Gs in many experiments (Zhang et al. 2015), our experiment confirmed the relationship between girdling and ABA content, as well as Pn of A. sparsifolia leaves. In other words, on the first day, carbohydrate content did not change significantly, but changes in ABA content began to appear under PG (Fig. 5e), which corresponded with declines in Gs, Tr, and Pn (Fig. 3). On the 30th day, ABA content in A. sparsifolia leaves subjected to PG and GR treatments rose dramatically, in which PG increased more significantly, while LR decreased slightly. This was probably because the obstruction in phloem sieve tubes caused by girdling blocked ABA from transporting downwards, thereby accumulating in leaves. Previous studies also support this view (Setter et al. 1980, 1981). ABA is a hormone that induces senescence. However, A. sparsifolia leaves subjected to PG which have more ABA content did not show symptoms of senescence on the first day, which might be entirely because ABA-induced senescence had a certain hysteretic nature. Therefore, we believe that in this experiment, induced senescence of leaves subjected to PG and GR should be resulted from a joint effect of increased carbohydrate concentrations and increased ABA content. Our result is similar to previous studies that have demonstrated that high ABA is always associated with induced senescence (Kumar et al. 2014).
A reduction of transpiration rate was found in the treatment of PG and GR, which may be caused by the increase of ABA levels inducing stomatal closure, which was found by previous studies (Weaver and Amasino 2001; Agüera et al. 2012).
Although Setter et al. (1980, 1981) explained changes in ABA content as a result of ABA’s failure to be transported from leaves to other organs, such as roots, we will not rule out the effect of other factors. Among the many environmental factors that have been proven to be able to cause changes in ABA content, drought is probably the most studied. Because water stress often leads to changes in plant ABA content, our experiment also studied the water status of A. sparsifolia, especially its predawn and midday leaf water potential. On the 30th day after treatment, the same variation pattern was displayed in both predawn and midday leaf water potential. Still, no noticeable changes were observed in the water potential of leaves subjected to LR; whereas, predawn and midday leaf water potential was significantly reduced under PG and GR, in which PG reduced more significantly (Fig. 5a, b). As a consequence, the reduction of water potential in A. sparsifolia might be caused by a change of carbohydrates, as we have evidenced above. Girdling caused high concentrations of carbohydrates to accumulate in leaves, resulting in relatively high osmotic potential which was shown by our results above. Moreover, with low water status, leaf senescence was accelerated, which was proven in both our study and previous work (Wolfe et al. 1988). Redistribution of most of the minerals takes place through phloem (Palmer et al. 2014), which is closely related to senescence (Mae and Ohira 1981; Distelfeld et al. 2014). So in our study, obstruction of mineral nutrients from roots to leaves may another reason for leaf senescence in girdled A. sparsifolia. In addition, stem girdling interrupts phloem transport of acropetal flow of cytokinin (Kong et al. 2011), thus reduced levels of cytokinin which subsequently resulted in the acceleration of leaf senescence (Dai and Dong 2011). So induced senescence may also regulated by the change of phytohormones (e.g. cytokinin) in girdled A. sparsifolia.
When plants exposed to adversity stress (e.g. osmotic pressure and temperature stress), the content of Pro and MDA tend to increase dramatically (An et al. 2015; Brand 2011). Drought, high salinity, and high temperature often lead to a substantial accumulation of Pro. In the present study, Pro increased in the treatment of PG and GR (Fig. 5c), which may be caused by low water potential, which was shown above. Under PG and GR, induced senescence was found, and a similar result has been obtained previously that demonstrated that Pro always accumulates during senescence (Rabiza-wider et al. 2004).
In senescence process in plants, a reduction in photosynthetic pigment content is an obvious fact, and has been considered as an important indicator of plant senescence (Hörtensteiner 2006; Wingler et al. 2006). In the present study, all of the pigments (Chl a, Chl b, and Car) decreased in the PG and GR leaves, in which senescence was obviously accelerated.
In some organs of species, such as radish cotyledons, the ratio of Chl a to Chl b increases slightly during senescence, which suggests that Chl b is degraded faster than Chl a during senescence (Suzuki and Shioi 2004). Some studies have also shown that Chl a is most strongly affected by leaf senescence as revealed by a significant decrease in the Chl a/Chl b ratio in leaves (Agüera et al. 2012). Our results support the assertion that the Chl a/Chl b ratio will decrease during senescence (Fig. 4e). Depending on the distinct divisions of Chl a and Chl b, Chl a has a greater absorption capacity of light energy than Chl b in the photosystem. Therefore, the ratio of Chl a/Chl b drops in the senescence process, which might partly explain why reduced Pn could not be entirely ascribed to reduced Gs, as we noted previously.
In addition to reduced Chl a/Chl b, we also observed reduced Chl/Car in the senescence process, which was evident in both GR and PG (Fig. 4f). It is not uncommon to get high degradation of Chl and high retention of Car in the senescence process (García-Plazaola et al. 2003). On the one hand, this shows that Chl is unstable and easier to be decomposed in relation to Car; whereas, on the other hand, it manifests the role of Car in the senescence process. While Car can also absorb some light energy and participate in the photochemical reaction in photosynthesis, one of its most important functions is to absorb residual light energy, quench reactive oxygen species and, thus, prevent membrane lipid peroxidation (Polívka and Frank 2010; Singh and Shah 2015; Ying et al. 2013). We have also proven this hypothesis by determining the content of MDA, because MDA is an indicator of plant cell membrane lipid peroxidation (Gaweł et al. 2003). The rising levels of MDA (Fig. 5d) are likely to represent plant membrane lipid peroxidation; whereas, the high retention of Car probably exists to respond to this situation during senescence.
In conclusion, PG treatment is able to significantly accelerate plant senescence, as demonstrated by leaf yellowing, and a sharp decline in photosynthetic pigments content and Pn. Induced senescence in PG leaves may be caused by high levels of carbohydrates and ABA content; low water condition may be also an important factor. Under PG treatment, carbohydrates and ABA formed by leaves could not be effectively transported to other organs and, thus, accumulated in leaves, thereby leading to accelerated senescence. Although LR would slow down the senescence process of plants, its delay on plant senescence was very limited. The treatment of GR is similar to PG, in that it significantly accelerates plant senescence, as demonstrated by the same parameter as PG. However, compared with PG, the senescence rate in GR leaves was much slower. This means that partial removal of leaves led to a compensation of girdling effects in the process of senescence.
References
Agüera E, Cabello P, de la Mata L, Molina E, de la Haba P (2012) Metabolic regulation of leaf senescence in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) plants. In: Nagata T (ed) senescence. Rijeka, InTech, pp 51–68
An X, Liao Y, Zhang J, Dai L, Zhang N, Wang B, Liu L, Peng D (2015) Overexpression of rice NAC gene SNAC1 in ramie improves drought and salt tolerance. Plant Growth Regul 76:211–223
Brand MH (2011) Tissue proliferation condition in micropropagated ericaceous plants. Plant Growth Regul 63:131–136
Buchanan-Wollaston V, Earl S, Harrison E, Mathas E, Navabpour S, Page T, Pink D (2003) The molecular analysis of leaf senescence—a genomics approach. Plant Biotechnol J 1:3–22
Crafts-Brandner SJ, Below FE, Harper JE, Hageman RH (1984) Effects of pod removal on metabolism and senescence of nodulating and nonnodulating soybean isolines II. Enzymes and Chlorophyll. Plant Physiol 75(2):318–322
Dai J, Dong H (2011) Stem girdling influences concentrations of endogenous cytokinins and abscisic acid in relation to leaf senescence in cotton. Acta Physiol Plant 33(5):1697–1705
Demiral T, Türkan I (2005) Comparative lipid peroxidation, antioxidant defense systems and proline content in roots of two rice cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Environ Exp Bot 53:247–257
Di Vaio C, Petito A, Buccheri M (2001) Effect of girdling on gas exchanges and leaf mineral content in the “Independence” nectarine. J Plant Nutr 24:1047–1060
Distelfeld A, Avni R, Fischer AM (2014) Senescence, nutrient remobilization, and yield in wheat and barley. J Exp Bot 65(14):3783–3798
García-Plazaola J, Hernández A, Becerril J (2003) Antioxidant and pigment composition during autumnal leaf senescence in woody deciduous species differing in their ecological traits. Plant Biol 5:557–566
Gaweł S, Wardas M, Niedworok E, Wardas P (2003) Malondialdehyde (MDA) as a lipid peroxidation marker. Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland: 1960) 57:453–455
Gregersen P, Holm P, Krupinska K (2008) Leaf senescence and nutrient remobilisation in barley and wheat. Plant Biol 10:37–49
Hörtensteiner S (2006) Chlorophyll degradation during senescence*. Ann Rev Plant Biol 57:55–77
Kong L, von Aderkas P, Owen SJ, Jaquish B, Woods J, Abrams SR (2011) Effects of stem girdling on cone yield and endogenous phytohormones and metabolites in developing long shoots of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). N For 43(4):491–503
Kosugi H, Kikugawa K (1985) Thiobarbituric acid reaction of aldehydes and oxidized lipids in glacial acetic acid. Lipids 20:915–921
Krapp A, Stitt M (1995) An evaluation of direct and indirect mechanisms for the “sink-regulation” of photosynthesis in spinach: changes in gas exchange, carbohydrates, metabolites, enzyme activities and steady-state transcript levels after cold-girdling source leaves. Planta 195:313–323
Kumar M, Singh V, Arora A, Singh N (2014) The role of abscisic acid (ABA) in ethylene insensitive Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflora Hort.) flower senescence. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 36:151–159
Li CY, Weiss D, Goldschmidt EE (2003) Girdling affects carbohydrate-related gene expression in leaves, bark and roots of alternate-bearing citrus trees. Ann Bot 92:137–143
Li N, Zhang S, Zhao Y, Li B, Zhang J (2011) Over-expression of AGPase genes enhances seed weight and starch content in transgenic maize. Planta 233:241–250
Li Y, Xu S, Gao J, Pan S, Wang G (2015) Bacillus subtilis-regulation of stomatal movement and instantaneous water use efficiency in Vicia faba. Plant Growth Regul. doi:10.1007/s10725-015-0073-7
Lichtenthaler HK (1987) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol 148:350–382
Mae T, Ohira K (1981) The remobilization of nitrogen related to leaf growth and senescence in rice plants (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Physiol 22(6):1067–1074
Mahouachi J, Iglesias DJ, Agustí M, Talon M (2009) Delay of early fruitlet abscission by branch girdling in citrus coincides with previous increases in carbohydrate and gibberellin concentrations. Plant Growth Regul 58:15–23
Masclaux C, Valadier M-H, Brugière N, Morot-Gaudry J-F, Hirel B (2000) Characterization of the sink/source transition in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) shoots in relation to nitrogen management and leaf senescence. Planta 211:510–518
Miller A, Schlagnhaufer C, Spalding M, Rodermel S (2000) Carbohydrate regulation of leaf development: prolongation of leaf senescence in Rubisco antisense mutants of tobacco. Photosynth Res 63:1–8
Mittler R, Merquiol E, Hallak-Herr E, Rachmilevitch S, Kaplan A, Cohen M (2001) Living under a ‘dormant’ canopy: a molecular acclimation mechanism of the desert plant Retama raetam. Plant J 25:407–416
Mondal MH, Brun WA, Brenner ML (1978) Effects of sink removal on photosynthesis and senescence in leaves of soybean (Glycine max L.) plants. Plant Physiol 61(3):394–397
Nooden L, Rupp D, Derman B (1978) Separation of seed development from monocarpic senescence in soybeans. Nat (Lond) 271:354–357
Palmer LJ, Palmer LT, Rutzke MA, Graham RD, Stangoulis JC (2014) Nutrient variability in phloem: examining changes in K, Mg, Zn and Fe concentration during grain loading in common wheat (Triticum aestivum). Physiol Plantarum 152(4):729–737
Parrott D, Yang L, Shama L, Fischer A (2005) Senescence is accelerated, and several proteases are induced by carbon “feast” conditions in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) leaves. Planta 222:989–1000
Parrott DL, McInnerney K, Feller U, Fischer AM (2007) Steam-girdling of barley (Hordeum vulgare) leaves leads to carbohydrate accumulation and accelerated leaf senescence, facilitating transcriptomic analysis of senescence-associated genes. New Phytol 176:56–69
Parrott DL, Martin JM, Fischer AM (2010) Analysis of barley (Hordeum vulgare) leaf senescence and protease gene expression: a family C1A cysteine protease is specifically induced under conditions characterized by high carbohydrate, but low to moderate nitrogen levels. N Phytol 187:313–331
Pérez P, Alonso A, Zita G, Morcuende R, Martínez-Carrasco R (2011) Down-regulation of Rubisco activity under combined increases of CO2 and temperature minimized by changes in Rubisco kcat in wheat. Plant Growth Regul 65:439–447
Petrie P, Trought M, Howell G (2000) Influence of leaf ageing, leaf area and crop load on photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and senescence of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Pinot noir) leaves. Vitis-Geilweilerhof 39:31–36
Polívka T, Frank HA (2010) Molecular factors controlling photosynthetic light harvesting by carotenoids. Acc Chem Res 43:1125–1134
Pourtau N, Marès M, Purdy S, Quentin N, Ruël A, Wingler A (2004) Interactions of abscisic acid and sugar signalling in the regulation of leaf senescence. Planta 219:765–772
Pourtau N, Jennings R, Pelzer E, Pallas J, Wingler A (2006) Effect of sugar-induced senescence on gene expression and implications for the regulation of senescence in Arabidopsis. Planta 224:556–568
Rabiza-wider J, Łukaszewska A, Skutnik E, Leszko M (2004) Ammonium and proline accumulation in senescing cut leaves of Zantedeschia. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 26:417–422
Rahman MM, Chongling Y, Rahman MM, Islam KS (2012) Effects of copper on growth, accumulation, antioxidant activity and malondialdehyde content in young seedlings of the mangrove species Kandelia candel (L.). Plant Biosyst 146:47–57
Regier N, Streb S, Zeeman SC, Frey B (2010) Seasonal changes in starch and sugar content of poplar (Populus deltoides × nigra cv. Dorskamp) and the impact of stem girdling on carbohydrate allocation to roots. Tree Physiol 30:979–987
Setter TL, Brun WA, Brenner ML (1980) Effect of obstructed translocation on leaf abscisic acid, and associated stomatal closure and photosynthesis decline. Plant Physiol 65:1111–1115
Setter TL, Brun WA, Brenner ML (1981) Abscisic acid translocation and metabolism in soybeans following depodding and petiole girdling treatments. Plant Physiol 67:774–779
Singh I, Shah K (2015) Evidences for suppression of cadmium induced oxidative stress in presence of sulphosalicylic acid in rice seedlings. Plant Growth Regul 76:99–110
Suzuki Y, Shioi Y (2004) Changes in chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in radish (Raphanus sativus) cotyledons show different time courses during senescence. Physiol Plant 122:291–296
Tang G, Li X, Lin L, Guo H, Li L (2015) Combined effects of girdling and leaf removal on fluorescence characteristic of Alhagi sparsifolia leaf senescence. Plant Biol. doi:10.1111/plb.12309
Urban L, Léchaudel M, Lu P (2004) Effect of fruit load and girdling on leaf photosynthesis in Mangifera indica L. J Exp Bot 55:2075–2085
Veselov D, Sharipova G, Veselov S, Kudoyarova G (2008) The effects of NaCl treatment on water relations, growth, and ABA content in barley cultivars differing in drought tolerance. J Plant Growth Regul 27:380–386
Vonlanthen B, Zhang X, Bruelheide H (2010) On the run for water–root growth of two phreatophytes in the Taklamakan Desert. J Arid Environ 74(12):1604–1615
Vysotskaya L, Kudoyarova G, Veselov S, Jones H (2004) Unusual stomatal behaviour on partial root excision in wheat seedlings. Plant, Cell Environ 27:69–77
Weaver LM, Amasino RM (2001) Senescence is induced in individually darkened Arabidopsis leaves, but inhibited in whole darkened plants. Plant Physiol 127:876–886
Williams L, Araujo F (2002) Correlations among predawn leaf, midday leaf, and midday stem water potential and their correlations with other measures of soil and plant water status in Vitis vinifera. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 127:448–454
Williams L, Baeza P, Vaughn P (2012) Midday measurements of leaf water potential and stomatal conductance are highly correlated with daily water use of Thompson Seedless grapevines. Irrig Sci 30:201–212
Wingler A, Purdy S, MacLean JA, Pourtau N (2006) The role of sugars in integrating environmental signals during the regulation of leaf senescence. J Exp Bot 57:391–399
Wittenbach VA (1982) Effect of pod removal on leaf senescence in soybeans. Plant Physiol 70:1544–1548
Wolfe D, Henderson D, Hsiao T, Alvino A (1988) Interactive water and nitrogen effects on senescence of maize. II. Photosynthetic decline and longevity of individual leaves. Agron J 80:865–870
Xue W, Li X, Lin L, Wang Y, Li L (2011) Effects of elevated temperature on photosynthesis in desert plant Alhagi sparsifolia S. Photosynthetica 49:435–447
Xue W, Li X, Zhu J, Lin L (2012) Effects of temperature and irradiance on photosystem activity during Alhagi sparsifolia leaf senescence. Biol Plant 56(4):785–788
Ying Y, Yue Y, Huang X, Wang H, Mei L, Yu W, Zheng B, Wu J (2013) Salicylic acid induces physiological and biochemical changes in three Red bayberry (Myric rubra) genotypes under water stress. Plant Growth Regul 71:181–189
Zeng J, Zeng F, Arndt S, Guo H, Yan H, Xing W, Liu B (2008) Growth, physiological characteristics and ion distribution of NaCl stressed Alhagi sparsifolia seedlings. Chin Sci Bull 53:169–176
Zeng F-J, Lu Y, H-F Guo, Liu B, Zeng J, Zhang L-G (2012) Ecological characteristics of Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. seedling roots under different irrigation treatments. Russ J Ecol 43(3):196–203
Zhang Z, Li G, Gao H, Zhang L, Yang C, Liu P, Meng Q (2012) Characterization of photosynthetic performance during senescence in stay-green and quick-leaf-senescence Zea mays L. inbred lines. PLoS ONE 7:e42936
Zhang H, Liu K, Wang Z, Liu L, Yang J (2015) Abscisic acid, ethylene and antioxidative systems in rice grains in relation with grain filling subjected to postanthesis soil-drying. Plant Growth Regul 76:135–146
Zhou R, Quebedeaux B (2003) Changes in photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism in mature apple leaves in response to whole plant source-sink manipulation. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 128:113–119
Acknowledgments
We thank Zichun Guo, Changjun Li, and Zhuyu Gu for their invaluable help with the experiments, and the farmers for their important field assistance. We also express gratitude to Jake Carpenter for polishing the English in this manuscript. This research was supported by the sustentation Project of Science and Technology of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (201433114), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41271494) and Key Project in the National Science and Technology Pillar Program (2009BAC54B03).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, GL., Li, XY., Lin, LS. et al. Impact of girdling and leaf removal on Alhagi sparsifolia leaf senescence. Plant Growth Regul 78, 205–216 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-015-0086-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-015-0086-2