Abstract
Background
Spinal arteriovenous fistula (AVF) represents the most common type of spinal vascular lesions and is often associated with progressive neurological dysfunction.
Method
Here, we present a unique case of a spinal vascular malformation that does not fit the traditional classification schemes. The patient presented with progressive neurologic deficits resembling partial Brown-Sequard syndrome and was subsequently found to have a lesion resembling type I spinal AVF. However, this intradural fistula drained into the ventral venous plexus rather than dorsal.
Conclusion
Recognizing these rare anatomical variants is paramount in achieving successful obliteration and improved functional outcome for patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Relevant surgical anatomy
Initial investigation with CT-angiography and MRI revealed a vascular lesion ventral to the C6 spinal cord level (Figs. 1 and 2). Further preoperative characterization of the lesion using spinal angiography confirmed the presence of an arteriovenous fistula, which was confined within the dural root sleeve and supplied by a radiculomeningeal artery with no anterior spinal artery (ASA) involvement (Fig. 3). Given this latter characteristic, the lesion most resembled a type I AVM as an intradural fistula fed by a radiculomeningeal branch of the right vertebral artery. However, it consisted of a drainage into the ventral venous plexus rather than dorsal (Fig. 4). Traditionally, the presence of this ventral drainage would have classified the fistula as type IV AVM, but this was a notable exception since there was no involvement of the spinal artery (Table 1) [3, 4]. Prompt recognition of this unique vascular anatomy was important in deciding the best treatment approach for this patient.
Description of technique
Because the lesion was located within the dural root sleeve, a posterior approach with ipsilateral C5–C7 laminectomy, partial C5–C6 facetectomy, and a durotomy was performed to expose the C7 nerve root. Once the arterialized vein was identified ventral to the spinal cord, Doppler ultrasound assisted in confirming the arterialized flow. A temporary clip was initially placed and the Doppler ultrasound showed absence of arterial flow distal to the clip, again verifying the fistula. After no changes in neuromonitoring were observed with the clip in place for 20 min, a permanent clip was used to occlude the fistula. On postoperative day 1, CT-angiography was obtained demonstrating complete obliteration (Fig. 5). At 6-month follow-up, the patient showed signs of functional recovery.
Indication
The closer resemblance of the fistula to type I AVM argued for a simpler management with surgical disconnection [3, 7]. For intradural AVFs, microsurgical technique offers a more reliable visualization and direct access to the fistula point compared to an endovascular approach, and successful obliteration can be achieved in 94–100% of cases. In comparison, endovascular obliteration is associated with higher risks of treatment failure and recurrence, as well as major complications afterwards [1, 4, 5, 8, 9]. As this and previously described cases have demonstrated, a posterior cervical approach with lateral extension allows for adequate exposure and access to lesions located on the ventral/ventrolateral spinal cord [2, 6, 8].
Limitations
Surgical treatment is not without risk, including perioperative blood loss, pseudomeningocele, spinal instability, or new or worsened postoperative neurological deficits. In contrast, although endovascular embolization might confer better short-term outcomes, it is associated with higher recanalization rates and sufficient data on its efficacy is still lacking [3, 4, 7, 8].
How to avoid complications
During the procedure, care should be taken to preserve the branches of ASA when occluding the fistula. In addition, there is a possibility of cerebrospinal fluid leak due to the interruption of the dural sleeve, which can be controlled, for instance, using fat graft over the resected area. Each of these intraoperative measures helps to ensure the success of the procedure and minimize the risk of complications [4, 9].
Perioperative considerations
Spinal angiography remains the gold standard for diagnosis of an AVF, which should be obtained preoperatively to identify and accurately delineate its complex vascular anatomy. Postoperative spinal angiogram is important in confirming complete occlusion of the fistula [4, 5]. At subsequent follow-ups, MRI can be useful in assessing signs of recovery, generally seen within 6 months of treatment [9].
Information for patients
It is important for patients to be aware that despite the high rates of complete obliteration of the AVF with surgical intervention, functional outcomes are more variable, in particular, depending on the severity of the initial neurologic impairment. Nevertheless, improved long-term outcomes can be achieved with either stabilization of preoperative symptoms or recovery of previous neurologic dysfunction [4, 8].
Summary
-
Dural arteriovenous fistulas represent the vast majority of cases of spinal vascular lesions.
-
Spinal AVFs form abnormal communications between the arterial and venous systems and are associated with severe neurological dysfunction.
-
The American/British/French and Spetzler classification systems are widely accepted to characterize spinal AVMs.
-
Anatomic variants of spinal AV fistulas still exist, adding to the complexity in identifying and managing this condition.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging or angiography and computed tomography angiography are initial studies that can help in identifying the lesion.
-
Spinal angiography remains to be the diagnostic test of choice for spinal vascular lesions.
-
For spinal AVFs, surgical repair allows for better obliteration rates than endovascular treatment.
-
The success of surgical intervention depends on the location and precise anatomy of the lesion, surgeon’s expertise, and preoperative neurological status of the patient.
-
Prompt identification and recognition of the anatomic anomalies of spinal AVFs impact the surgical technique and clinical outcome for patients.
-
Modification to the traditional classification scheme should be considered given that a thorough understanding of the anatomy of spinal vascular lesions is paramount in determining approach to treatment.
Patient consent was obtained for use of patient’s clinical information, including patient consent to submission of the case report.
Abbreviations
- AVF:
-
Arteriovenous fistula
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- AVM:
-
Arteriovenous malformation
- ASA:
-
Anterior spinal artery
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- ABF:
-
American British French
References
Bakker NA, Uyttenboogaart M, Luijckx GJ, Eshghi OS, Mazuri A, Metzemaekers JD, Groen RJ, Van Dijk JM (2015) Recurrence rates after surgical or endovascular treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: a meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 77(1):137–144
Bulsara KR, Hebert R, Gimbel D, Abbed K (2013) Type I spinal arteriovenous fistulae exception: a case for reclassification. Neurochirurgie 59:69–74
Chibbaro S, Gory B, Marsella M et al (2015) Surgical management of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Clin Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2014.07.024
Flores BC, Klinger DR, White JA, Batjer HH (2017) Spinal vascular malformations: treatment strategies and outcome. Neurosurg Rev 40:15–28
Kim LJ, Spetzler RF (2006) Classification and surgical management of spinal arteriovenous lesions: arteriovenous fistulae and arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 59:S195–S201
Martin NA, Khanna RK, Batzdorf U (1995) Posterolateral cervical or thoracic approach with spinal cord rotation for vascular malformations or tumors of the ventrolateral spinal cord. J Neurosurg 83(2):254–261
Medel R, Crowley RW, Dumont AS (2009) Endovascular management of spinal vascular malformations: history and literature review. Neurosurg Focus. https://doi.org/10.3171/FOC.2009.26.1.E7
Ropper AE, Gross BA, Du R (2012) Surgical treatment of type I spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. Neurosurg Focus. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.1.FOCUS11344
Watson JC, Oldfield EH (1999) The surgical management of spinal dural vascular malformations. Neurosurg Clin N Am 10(1):73–87
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This case was reported in the April 2013 issue of Neurochirurgie and a reclassification system was proposed to subdivide type I into dorsal and ventral extramedullary lesions [1].
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Vascular Neurosurgery - Arteriovenous malformation
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
Microsurgical disconnection of intradural arteriovenous fistula with ventral venous drainage (MP4 229594 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, S., Choi, D.B. & Bulsara, K.R. Cervical spinal arteriovenous fistula with ventral perimedullary venous drainage. Acta Neurochir 162, 961–965 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04116-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04116-8