Abstract
Purpose
Little is known about the effect of sports activity levels on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in long-term survivors of lower-extremity sarcoma.
Methods
Eighty-three long-term survivors of bone and soft tissue sarcoma of the lower extremities with a median follow-up of 14 (range: 5–35) years completed the University of California and Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scores before tumor resection, 1 year after surgery and at the latest follow-up, as well as a Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey at the latest follow-up. Simple linear regression models as well as stepwise variable selection with Akaike information criterion (AIC) were undertaken.
Results
The preoperative UCLA activity level (median: 9, range: 2–10) dropped to a median of 4 (range: 1–10) 1 year after surgery before increasing to a score of 6 (range: 2–10) 5 years after surgery. The long-term SF-36 physical health component summary score (PCS) was 49 (SD: 9), and the mental health component summary score (MCS) was 54 (SD: 7). A linear model with stepwise variable selection identified a negative correlation of PCS with age at surgery (estimate: –0.2; p = 0.02), UCLA score at the last follow-up (estimate: 1.4; p = 0.02) and UCLA score 1 year after surgery (estimate: 1.0; p = 0.02).
Conclusion
As not only the final activity levels but also the status immediately after surgery affect the PCS, higher early activity levels should be a goal of modern rehabilitation after sarcoma treatment. Further studies are needed to weigh the potential postoperative risks of higher sport activity levels against the benefits described in this study.
Level of evidence: Level 4.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
After treatment, many sarcoma survivors stay inactive and experience an increased risk for persistent impairment [1, 2]. Local morbidity as well as negative systemic therapy effects may contribute to these limitations and restrictions in activities of daily living [3, 4]. It is known that a sufficient amount of physical activity is crucial for the recovery of cancer patients, with potential benefits on muscular strength, aerobic fitness, anxiety and functional quality of life (QOL) [5,6,7,8]. Moreover, exercise guidelines have been defined for breast, prostate, colon and hematologic cancer groups [7, 9]. For patients with sarcoma of the lower extremities, similar exercise recommendations for 150 min of endurance training per week exist [10].
Previous case series of bone and soft-tissue sarcoma survivors reported moderate to high sports activity levels after years of rehabilitation, especially when patients were used to high sports activity levels before their oncologic life events [11, 12]. However, sports activity levels are an expression of individual habits and may not be solely taken as an overall outcome measure after sarcoma treatment, as healthy sarcoma survivors with good limb function might still not participate regularly in personally achievable sports activities. The degree of postoperative activity loss, not necessarily the sports activity level, may severely impact survivors after restricting oncologic life events [13].
In the literature, little is known about associations of sports activity with the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients after sarcoma resection. Findings on this topic should be of value for treatment specialists to further emphasize and advocate high postoperative activity levels in their patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze whether pre- and postoperative sports activity levels influence long-term HRQOL in survivors of sarcoma of the lower extremities. The following questions were asked: (1) How high were pre- and postoperative University of California and Los Angeles activity scores (UCLA) and the Short Form 36 health surveys (SF-36) at last follow-up? (2) What were the associations of UCLA activity scores on the SF-36 surveys?
Patients and Methods
Patients
This study comprised 105 long-term survivors of bone and soft-tissue sarcoma of the lower extremities. Patients were pooled from four different sarcoma cohorts and invited for interview [11, 12, 14, 15]. Patients prospectively completed an assessment of UCLA activity scores and SF-36 questionnaires at the time of interview. Additionally, at the time of interview, UCLA activity scores were retrospectively assessed at set time points 1 year before sarcoma resection as well as 1 year, 3 years and 5 years after resection. Inclusion criteria were (1) limb salvage surgery with resection of bone or soft tissue sarcoma in the (2) lower extremity, conducted in the (3) orthopedic department of the Medical University of Vienna between (4) 1972 and 2009 with (5) a minimal follow-up of 5 years after primary resection. Patients were excluded when interviews were not completed and data from SF-36 questionnaires or UCLA scores were missing. Twenty-two patients did not complete SF-36 short form questionnaires and were thus excluded from the statistical analysis.
Of the 83 patients included, 46 were male and 37 were female. The median age of patients at the time of surgery was 20 (range: 2–60) years. In total, 75% (n = 62) were treated for bone sarcomata, of whom 50% (n = 31) received treatment for osteosarcoma and the other 50% (n = 31) for Ewing sarcoma. Twenty-five percent (n = 21) of the study population was treated for soft tissue sarcoma in the lower extremities. In surgery, 30 (36%) patients received a proximal-tibial and distal-femoral replacement, 29 (35%) patients had soft tissue resection only, 12 (14%) patients received a proximal femoral replacement, 5 (5%) patients had a fibular pro-tibia operation, 4 (5%) patients underwent fibula resection, and 3 (4%) patients received a pelvic prosthesis. Twenty-nine (35%) patients received radiotherapy, and 28 (34%) patients received chemotherapy (VAIA protocol: 11 patients, VIDE-VAI/VAC protocol: 8 patients, EVAIA protocol: 6 patients, VACA protocol: 3 patients). The median follow-up was 14 (range: 5–35) years.
Outcome parameters
UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) sports activity score
The UCLA assessment is based on a scale from 1 to 10 depending on patients’ physical ability. Level 1 shows a total physical inability and dependency on others, while level 10 is defined as a maximum of activity a person can reach (for example, regular participation in challenging sports such as tennis or skiing). The frequency or intensity of various sports is not taken into consideration [16, 17]. The UCLA assessment was performed prospectively at the time of the interview and retrospectively for different set time points (preoperative, 1, 3, 5 years postoperative).
SF-36 (36-Item Short Form Health Survey)
The 36-Item SF-36 was used to measure HRQOL, which is defined as patient factors related to physical and mental health. In this questionnaire, 8 subcategories are summed as the “physical health component summary score” (PCS, including scales of physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain and general health, with a total of 21 items) and the “mental health component summary score” (MCS, including scales of vitality, social functioning, emotional role and mental health, with a total of 14 items). Physical health was defined by the PCS, and mental health was defined by the MCS in this study [18]. The SF-36 was evaluated postoperatively once at the time of interview.
Statistical analysis
Pairwise differences between preoperative values and values after 1 year and at the last follow-up were analyzed. Linear models for the MCS scale and PCS scale on sex, age at surgery, age at latest follow-up, and all UCLA scores were analyzed. Bonferroni correction of the p value for all effects on the main endpoint of MCS and PCS was performed. Naive p values are reported with respect to secondary endpoints. To disentangle the effect of the postoperative UCLA values from the differences to reported preoperative values, an interaction term between pre- and postoperative values was included in the regression models. Thereafter, a linear model with stepwise variable selection by AIC was performed with differences from preoperative values as well as between consecutive measurements. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Statistics were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 26 software (International Business Machines Corporation, IBM; Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
UCLA activity levels and SF-36 PCS and MCS summary scores
The median preoperative UCLA activity level was 9 (range: 2–10). The median UCLA decreased from the preoperative value to the first value after surgery (median: 4, range: 1–10) before increasing to a median of 6 (range: 2–10) (Fig. 1) 5 years postoperatively. The mean value for MCS was 54 (SD: 7), and that for PCS was 49 (SD: 9) at the last follow-up.
Associations of SF-36 scores with UCLA activity levels and their dependence on covariates
Simple linear regression models identified a negative association of the PCS scale, but not the MCS scale, with age at surgery and positive correlations with UCLA measurements after surgery at all set time points 1, 3 and 5 years postoperatively. In statistical analysis, a positive association with differences between self-reported preoperative UCLA and all postoperative UCLA measurements, but not with differences between the first measurement after surgery and consecutive measurements, could be seen. No associations of PCS with sex, follow-up period or reconstruction methods were observed (Table 1). To disentangle the effects of the postoperative UCLA values on PCS from the differences between reported preoperative and postoperative UCLA values, an interaction term between pre- and postoperative values was included in the regression models. However, no significant effect of the interaction term on PCS could be identified, suggesting that the most influential factor that determines PCS is the current latest follow-up value of UCLA rather than the difference from the preoperative value. A linear model with stepwise variable selection with Akaike information criterion (AIC) identified negative correlations of PCS with age at surgery (Estimate: –0.2; p = 0.02), correlations with UCLA at last follow up (Estimate: 1.4; p = 0.02) and correlations with UCLA 1 year after surgery (Estimate: 1.0; p = 0.02, Fig. 2). This result underlines that not only the final value of UCLA but also the status immediately after surgery affects PCS. Therefore, patients with identical UCLA values at last follow-up will tend to report higher PCS if the low after surgery is less pronounced (Fig. 3). A linear model with stepwise variable selection including age at surgery and all differences between consecutive UCLA values by AIC identified a negative correlation with age at surgery and a positive correlation with the difference between the first postoperative UCLA value and the preoperative UCLA value (Estimate: 1.2; p = 0.002).
Discussion
Patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities particularly suffer from major postoperative physical constraints inherent to tumor resections. These limitations may lead to lasting burdens on professional and personal life [3, 19]. Therefore, a deeper understanding of connections between physical ability and HRQOL after extremity sarcoma resection is mandatory for the promotion of convalescence through rapid and standardized physical rehabilitation programs. We found that sarcoma resection had permanent effects on the physical ability of our patient population, as the patients were not able to achieve their preoperative UCLA activity levels after surgery. We further found that early postoperative activity levels influenced long-term physical activity and performance. This information underlines the importance of early postoperative rehabilitation protocols and may further advocate physical exercise in this sensitive time frame with careful attention to patient-specific functional limitations (Table 2).
Limitations
By including patients treated with limb-salvage sarcoma surgery of the lower extremities between 1972 and 2009, a period spanning three decades was chosen. Because of this time frame, both surgical techniques and postoperative mobilization schemata changed over time. It must be assumed that subsequent patients had advantages in postoperative mobilization due to the progression of physiotherapeutic regimens. An inclusion of patients treated in the last century adds even further relevancy to this study, as modern physiotherapy and easier access to sport institutions might have substantial long-term benefits on potential postoperative rehabilitation and thus physical performance. In this study, no discrimination between different resection depths or compartments was undertaken, and thus no associations of sports activity and HRQOL on different localizations of the lower extremity could be analyzed. It must be assumed that patients with shallow sarcoma had advantages in postoperative mobilization due to fewer functional limitations and fewer restrictions of postoperative rehabilitation guidelines. Thus, a high early postoperative activity level should be understood as a multimodal result of successful rehabilitation protocols, high patient motivation, and fewer invading tumors. Conversely, a limited potential UCLA activity score needs to be assumed in patients with high surgical morbidity.
Postoperative decline in physical ability in long-term sarcoma survivors
In line with similar studies, this study showed that the postoperative UCLA sport activity scales never again reached preoperative values. Research on the positive effects of physical activity with respect to psychological and physical parameters in cancer patients and survivors has steadily gained importance over the last few years [20, 21]. However, only 20–40% of cancer patients reach the recommended amount of daily physical activity [22]. Huy et al. demonstrated that physical activity sharply decreases during chemo- and radiotherapy, while participation in rehabilitation programs was associated with an increase in physical activity even after therapy [23]. With the additional information that physical therapy improves many aspects of everyday life, such as cancer fatigue, muscular strength, anxiety and self-esteem, it is evident that participation in physical therapy and rehabilitation programs should be mandatory for cancer patients and survivors [6, 24,25,26]. This might be even more true for sarcoma patients after tumor resection in comparison to the general cancer population, as extremity tumors might lead to a more severe functional impairment due to localization and thus come with a higher scope for improvement and adjustment in physical therapy. A tendency toward active remobilization in cancer patient treatment can be observed internationally. However, there are only a few defined recommendations reporting on the efficacy of exercise on specific outcomes, such as physical function, fitness and QOL, in oncologic patients [9, 27, 28]. To ensure the maximum treatment effect, endurance and resistance training should always be personalized to patients’ sex, age and current therapy modality, as women, young patients and patients receiving platin-based chemotherapies are at a higher risk for physical activity decline [10]. Further studies comparing defined rehabilitation protocols both during the adjuvant treatment period and in long follow-ups are needed to provide the highest benefit for cancer patients, especially in patients surviving extremity sarcoma.
Associations of UCLA activity levels on the SF-36
This study showed that differences in pre- and postoperative UCLA sports activity scores resulted in a reduction of the SF-36 PCS and thus a decrease in patients’ HRQOL. As the UCLA sports activity level 1 year after surgery had associations with SF-36 PCS scores at the latest follow-up, the importance of early postoperative rehabilitation is shown. To draw further conclusions from these results, the best possible postoperative physical therapy would result in a less prominent decline in physical activities at an early postoperative stage. This result is of value for treatment specialists, as patients should be informed about the importance of early mobilization. Patients should be strictly advised to participate in rehabilitation programs and physiotherapy during the year after surgery to increase their physical capabilities and HRQOL even in the long run. In cases of extensive resections or limitations due to reconstructive procedures, such as implantation of modular megaprostheses or reconstruction of nerves and vessels, physical activity and sports should be closely monitored and allowed in safe intervals with potential postoperative risks weighted against benefits regarding HRQOL and physical performance described in this study. Raising awareness of physical limitations after cancer treatment is crucial, as bodily constraints can lead to massive burdens in professional as well as personal life and therefore have a huge impact on everyday life even years after primary surgery [3]. Several meta-analyses have reported on physical activity and its positive influence on HRQOL in cancer survivors [6, 28,29,30,31]. This current study shows similar relations between activity levels and SF-36 PCS in survivors of lower-extremity sarcoma. Thus, we recommend high postoperative activity levels to optimize mobilization and long-term physical performance.
Conclusion
The postoperative activity levels of survivors of lower-extremity sarcoma did not reach preoperative values. In conjunction, the early postoperative physical level reflects higher long-term physical activity and performance in these patients. This information emphasizes the importance of customized rehabilitation for the efficacy and safety of mobilization protocols. Further studies and guidelines are needed to optimize rehabilitation in this sensitive timeframe, especially in patients receiving extended resections and reconstructions due to extremity sarcoma.
Data availability
The datasets used for this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Ruggieri P, Mavrogenis AF, Mercuri M (2011) Quality of life following limb-salvage surgery for bone sarcomas. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 11(1):59–73. https://doi.org/10.1586/erp.10.91
Fernandez-Pineda I, Hudson MM, Pappo AS, Bishop MW, Klosky JL, Brinkman TM, Srivastava DK, Neel MD, Rao BN, Davidoff AM, Krull KR, Mulrooney DA, Robison LL, Ness KK (2017) Long-term functional outcomes and quality of life in adult survivors of childhood extremity sarcomas: a report from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. J Cancer Surviv 11 (1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0556-1
Ness KK, Mertens AC, Hudson MM, Wall MM, Leisenring WM, Oeffinger KC, Sklar CA, Robison LL, Gurney JG (2005) Limitations on physical performance and daily activities among long-term survivors of childhood cancer. Ann Intern Med 143(9):639–647. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-143-9-200511010-00007
Wampler MA, Galantino ML, Huang S, Gilchrist LS, Marchese VG, Morris GS, Scalzitti DA, Hudson MM, Oeffinger KC, Stovall M, Leisenring WM, Armstrong GT, Robison LL, Ness KK (2012) Physical activity among adult survivors of childhood lower-extremity sarcoma. J Cancer Surviv 6(1):45–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-011-0187-5
Schneider CM, Hsieh CC, Sprod LK, Carter SD, Hayward R (2007) Cancer treatment-induced alterations in muscular fitness and quality of life: the role of exercise training. Ann Oncol 18(12):1957–1962. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdm364
Speck RM, Courneya KS, Mâsse LC, Duval S, Schmitz KH (2010) An update of controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv 4(2):87–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-009-0110-5
Campbell KL, Winters-Stone KM, Wiskemann J, May AM, Schwartz AL, Courneya KS, Zucker DS, Matthews CE, Ligibel JA, Gerber LH, Morris GS, Patel AV, Hue TF, Perna FM, Schmitz KH (2019) Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus Statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable. Med Sci Sports Exerc 51(11):2375–2390. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000002116
Murnane A, Gough K, Thompson K, Holland L, Conyers R (2015) Adolescents and young adult cancer survivors: exercise habits, quality of life and physical activity preferences. Support Care Cancer 23(2):501–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2446-2
Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Galvão DA, Pinto BM, Irwin ML, Wolin KY, Segal RJ, Lucia A, Schneider CM, von Gruenigen VE, Schwartz AL (2010) American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42(7):1409–1426. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e0c112
Assi M, Ropars M, Rébillard A (2017) The Practice of Physical Activity in the Setting of Lower-Extremities Sarcomas: A First Step toward Clinical Optimization. Front Physiol 8:833. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00833
Hobusch GM, Lang N, Schuh R, Windhager R, Hofstaetter JG (2015) Do patients with ewing’s sarcoma continue with sports activities after limb salvage surgery of the lower extremity? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(3):839–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3622-x
Lang NW, Hobusch GM, Funovics PT, Windhager R, Hofstaetter JG (2015) What sports activity levels are achieved in patients with modular tumor endoprostheses of osteosarcoma about the knee? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(3):847–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3788-2
Fauske L, Bruland OS, Grov EK, Bondevik H (2015) Cured of primary bone cancer, but at what cost: a qualitative study of functional impairment and lost opportunities. Sarcoma 2015:484196. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/484196
Hobusch GM, Bollmann J, Puchner SE, Lang NW, Hofstaetter JG, Funovics PT, Windhager R (2017) What Sport Activity Levels Are Achieved in Patients After Resection and Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for a Proximal Femur Bone Sarcoma? Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(3):817–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4790-7
Hobusch GM, Cernakova M, Puchner SE, Kolb A, Panotopoulos J, Windhager R (2020) Sports activity after soft tissue sarcoma of the lower extremity. Disabil Rehabil 42(1):14–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1520929
Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M (2009) Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(4):958–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0358-5
Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC (1998) Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty 13(8):890–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(98)90195-4
Ellert U, Kurth BM (2013) Health related quality of life in adults in Germany: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 56(5–6):643–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-013-1700-y
Fidler MM, Frobisher C, Guha J, Wong K, Kelly J, Winter DL, Sugden E, Duncan R, Whelan J, Reulen RC, Hawkins MM (2015) Long-term adverse outcomes in survivors of childhood bone sarcoma: the British Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Br J Cancer 112(12):1857–1865. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.159
Bouillet T, Bigard X, Brami C, Chouahnia K, Copel L, Dauchy S, Delcambre C, Descotes JM, Joly F, Lepeu G, Marre A, Scotte F, Spano JP, Vanlemmens L, Zelek L (2015) Role of physical activity and sport in oncology: scientific commission of the National Federation Sport and Cancer CAMI. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 94(1):74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.12.012
Fernandes L, Holm CE, Villadsen A, Sørensen MS, Zebis MK, Petersen MM (2021) Clinically Important Reductions in Physical Function and Quality of Life in Adults with Tumor Prostheses in the Hip and Knee: A Cross-sectional Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 479(10):2306–2319. https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000001797
Rank M, Freiberger V, M. H (2012) Sporttherapie bei Krebserkrankungen – Grundlagen – Diagnostik – Praxis. Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart
Huy C, Schmidt ME, Vrieling A, Chang-Claude J, Steindorf K (2012) Physical activity in a German breast cancer patient cohort: one-year trends and characteristics associated with change in activity level. Eur J Cancer 48(3):297–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.08.005
Oberoi S, Robinson PD, Cataudella D, Culos-Reed SN, Davis H, Duong N, Gibson F, Götte M, Hinds P, Nijhof SL, Tomlinson D, van der Torre P, Cabral S, Dupuis LL, Sung L (2018) Physical activity reduces fatigue in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 122:52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.12.011
Dewhurst S Msc Mcsp PT, Tigue R Mscp PT, Sandsund C Msc M, Mein G Rrgn RGMHVM, Shaw C PhD RD (2020) Factors influencing people's ability to maintain their activity levels during treatment for soft tissue sarcoma - A qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract 36 (8):923-932.https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2018.1519622
Karimi M, Cox AD, White SV, Karlson CW (2020) Fatigue, Physical and Functional Mobility, and Obesity in Pediatric Cancer Survivors. Cancer Nurs 43(4):E239-e245. https://doi.org/10.1097/ncc.0000000000000712
Baumann FT, Jäger E, W B, (2012) Sport und körperliche Aktivität in der Onkologie. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg
Garcia MB, Ness KK, Schadler KL (2020) Exercise and Physical Activity in Patients with Osteosarcoma and Survivors. Adv Exp Med Biol 1257:193–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43032-0_16
Buffart LM, Kalter J, Sweegers MG, Courneya KS, Newton RU, Aaronson NK, Jacobsen PB, May AM, Galvão DA, Chinapaw MJ, Steindorf K, Irwin ML, Stuiver MM, Hayes S, Griffith KA, Lucia A, Mesters I, van Weert E, Knoop H, Goedendorp MM, Mutrie N, Daley AJ, McConnachie A, Bohus M, Thorsen L, Schulz KH, Short CE, James EL, Plotnikoff RC, Arbane G, Schmidt ME, Potthoff K, van Beurden M, Oldenburg HS, Sonke GS, van Harten WH, Garrod R, Schmitz KH, Winters-Stone KM, Velthuis MJ, Taaffe DR, van Mechelen W, Kersten MJ, Nollet F, Wenzel J, Wiskemann J, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Brug J (2017) Effects and moderators of exercise on quality of life and physical function in patients with cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 34 RCTs. Cancer Treat Rev 52:91–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.11.010
Gerritsen JK, Vincent AJ (2016) Exercise improves quality of life in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med 50(13):796–803. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-094787
Drake D, Falzer P, Xistris D, Robinson G, Roberge M (2004) Physical fitness training: outcomes for adult oncology patients. Clin Nurs Res 13(3):245–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773804265673
Funding
Open access funding provided by Medical University of Vienna.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: K.D., A.H., G.M.H.; Methodology: K.D., A.H., C.T., C.K., R.W., G.M.H.; Validation, review and editing: K.D., A.H., C.T., C.K., R.W., G.M.H.; Visualization: K.D., A.H., C.K., G.M.H.; Supervision: R.W., G.M.H.; Project administration: K.D., A.H.
All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The study was approved by the local ethics committee and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (protocol code 1719/2017).
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
One author (RW) received grants from De Puy Synthes, Johnson & Johnson Medical Limited and Zimmer Biomet and personal fees from Johnson & Johnson Medical Limited and Stryker European Operations Limited outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Döring, K., Hegelmaier, A.V., Trost, C. et al. Early postoperative gain in activity levels of lower extremity sarcoma survivors positively affects long-term physical activity and performance. Support Care Cancer 31, 193 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07644-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07644-3