Abstract
In this study, we demonstrated nano-flow injection analysis (nano-FIA) with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Q-TOFMS) for 17 highly polar intermediates produced during glycolysis, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, and the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). We optimized the analytical conditions for nano-flow injection/Q-TOFMS, and set the flow rate and ion source temperature to 1000 nL/min and 150 °C, respectively. Under optimal conditions, a single run was finished within 3 min, and the RSD value of 50 sequential injections was 4.2%. The method also showed quantitativity of four stable-isotope-labeled compounds (r2 > 0.99), demonstrating its robustness, high repeatability, and specificity. In addition, we compared three sample-preparation methods for rodent blood samples and found that protein precipitation with threefold methanol was the most effective. Finally, we applied the method to plasma samples from the serotonin syndrome (SS) model and control rats, the results of which were evaluated by principal component analysis (PCA). The two groups showed clearly separated PCA score plots, suggesting that the method could successfully catch the differences in metabolic profiles between SS and control rats. The results obtained from our new method were further validated by using the established gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method, which demonstrated that there were good correlations between the two methods (R = 0.902 and 0.958 for lactic acid and malic acid, respectively, each at p < 0.001), thus proving the validity of our method. The method described here enables high-throughput analysis of metabolites and will be of use for the rapid analysis of metabolic profiles.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Endogenous metabolites in biological fluids show a high diversity in their chemical structures and properties. It is therefore difficult to analyze the entire metabolome using a single analytical method. Mass spectrometry (MS) is a core technology in metabolomics due to its high sensitivity and selectivity. In general, to identify metabolites by MS, it is necessary to use chromatographic techniques, e.g., gas chromatography (GC) [1], liquid chromatography (LC) [2], or capillary electrophoresis (CE) [3, 4]; these techniques are powerful tools for the analysis of metabolites because retention time information can be obtained via chromatography, which is helpful in identifying target compounds. However, chromatography takes a long time and requires tedious validation methods. In addition, to detect metabolites in biological fluids, a multi-step sample preparation is mandatory prior to instrumental analysis. In particular, the extraction, concentration, and derivatization steps can potentially bias analytical results, leading to their misinterpretation. Simple sample preparation and rapid data acquisition methods are therefore required for metabolomics [5] with some simple methods such as ambient ionization MS having already been used for this purpose [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Ambient ionization MS techniques, such as desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) [6], direct analysis in real time (DART) [7], probe electrospray ionization (PESI) [8,9,10,11], and paper spray ionization (PSI) [12, 13], have been developed, which allow rapid analysis with minimal sample preparation. Our research group has also succeeded in developing a combination of PESI and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) [9,10,11]. Ambient ionization MS has been successfully applied to high-throughput analysis though special ion sources are necessary for ambient ionization and there are some difficulties associated with performing ambient ionization techniques.
Flow injection analysis (FIA) is one of the simplest classical techniques and involves the injection of samples directly into a mass spectrometer. FIA has been recently applied to the analysis of metabolites [14,15,16,17,18], and an advantage of FIA is that it eliminates the need for chromatographic separation, allowing high-throughput data acquisition within 30 s per sample. The combined use of an autosampler with FIA enables the successful performance of high-throughput analysis of multiple samples. There is also no requirement for additional apparatus to conduct FIA/MS.
FIA/MS is conventionally operated at flow rates ranging from a few hundred μL/min to 1 mL/min. However, the sensitivity of conventional FIA/MS is insufficient for the detection of compounds at low concentrations. Although it is necessary to perform sample preparation steps such as concentration in order to detect trace-level compounds, unstable metabolites may decompose during sample preparation [19]. Thus, it is important to improve the sensitivity of FIA/MS and also to simplify the sample preparation steps. In general, the sensitivity of LC/MS can be increased by reducing the flow rate, and the nano-flow rate, which ranges from several hundred nL/min to a few μL/min, can actually enhance the efficiency of desolvation, ionization, and ion transfer, resulting in improvements in sensitivity [20]. Nano-flow LC/MS (nano-LC/MS) has been recently applied not only to proteomics [21, 22] but also to the analysis of small molecules [23, 24]. Nano-LC/MS enables the detection of endogenous molecules at low concentrations in biological fluids such as serum and plasma. Thus, it is expected that nano-flow injection analysis (nano-FIA) will enable the highly sensitive analysis of endogenous molecules. However, it is essential for FIA/MS to be combined with a highly selective mass spectrometer, because FIA/MS lacks chromatographic separation. In addition, to perform FIA/MS, it is preferable that the mass spectrometer used can execute high-speed data acquisition. Quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Q-TOFMS) meets such demands, allowing both accurate mass measurement and high-speed data acquisition. Q-TOFMS has been widely used for the identification of drugs [25, 26] and endogenous metabolites [27,28,29] in biological fluids.
In this study, we developed nano-flow injection/Q-TOFMS (nano-FI/Q-TOFMS) for the analysis of intermediates produced during glycolysis, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, and the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). We also applied this method to the serotonin syndrome (SS) model and control rats to validate its practicality.
Experimental section
Reagents
Authentic standards of the intermediates produced during glycolysis, the TCA cycle, and the PPP were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co., LLC (St. Louis, MO, USA). Stable isotopes of glucose 6-phosphoric acid-13C6, citric acid-D4, succinic acid-D6, and fumaric acid-D4 were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. (Tewksbury, MA, USA), while l-glutamic acid-13C5, 15N1 was obtained from Taiyo Nippon Sanso Corporation (Tokyo, Japan). HPLC-grade methanol and chloroform were purchased from Kanto Chemical Co. Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). Milli-Q water (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was used throughout the experiments.
Animal experiments and sample collection
Serum samples were obtained from ICR mice (male, 10 weeks old) under isoflurane anesthesia. Animal experiments using SS model rats were performed according to our previous report [30]. This animal study was approved by the Animal Experimental Committee of Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine (No. 27356).
Sample preparation
Evaluation of sample preparation methods
To evaluate appropriate sample preparation methods, we compared protein precipitation (PP) or liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) procedures. Frozen mouse serum was thawed on ice, and then PP or LLE procedures were carried out. For PP, cold methanol was added to samples, where the volume ratio of methanol to serum was changed to 1:1 or 3:1 (v/v). After vortexing, followed by centrifugation, at 19,000×g at 4 °C for 3 min, the supernatant was collected. For LLE, cold chloroform-methanol solvent mix (2:1, v/v) was added to the samples. After vortexing, ultrapure water was added to each sample and they were further vortexed. After centrifugation, the upper layer was collected in a fresh tube and evaporated using a centrifugal concentrator (CVE-3100, EYELA, Tokyo Rikakiki Co., Tokyo, Japan). The dried residue was reconstituted with a 75% aqueous solution of methanol. All samples were then filtered through 0.22-μm polyethersulfone (PES) membrane filter capsules (Merck KGaA) prior to analysis.
Evaluation of the method’s quantitativity
Five microliters mixed internal standard (IS) solution (glucose 6-phosphoric acid-13C6, citric acid-D4, succinic acid-D6, and fumaric acid-D4) was added to 45 μL of mouse serum. The final concentrations of spiked ISs were as follows: 1, 5, 10, and 25 μg/mL for glucose 6-phosphoric acid-13C6 and fumaric acid-D4; 5, 10, and 25 μg/mL for citric acid-D4; and 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, and 25 μg/mL for succinic acid-D6, respectively. The spiked serum and blank mouse serum were subjected to the extraction procedure described above.
Preparation of plasma samples from the SS model and control rats
Frozen plasma was thawed on ice, then 5 μL l-glutamic acid-13C5, 15N1 (100 μg/mL) aqueous solution was added to 45 μL of plasma. The samples were treated with threefold volume methanol, as described above.
Analytical conditions and data analysis
Nano-FIA was performed using a ParadigmMS4 pump system (Michrom BioResources Inc., Auburn, CA, USA) and a PAL autosampler system (CTC Analytics AG, Zwingen, Switzerland). The flow rate was set to 1000 nL/min and a 50% methanol solution was used as the mobile phase.
Mass spectrometry was performed using a TripleTOF 5600 quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) equipped with a CaptiveSpray Ionization (CSI) source (Bruker, Bremen, Germany). The ionization voltage was set to 4 kV, and the heated interface temperature was set to 150 °C. The exact masses of the product ions and other MS parameters for each compound are shown in Table 1. Calculation of peak areas of the analytes was carried out using MultiQuant ver. 3.0.2 software (Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA). Multivariate analysis was performed using SIMCA-P+13 software (Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden), and box-and-whisker plots were made using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). Statistical differences among the intermediates were evaluated using Welch’s t test. The p values were adjusted to control multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) procedure proposed by Benjamini and Hochberg [31], and the adjusted values were expressed as q values (with a significance level at 0.05). A GCMS-TQ8040 gas chromatograph-triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) was used to validate the results obtained from the newly developed method. Details of the analytical conditions used for GC/MS/MS were given in our previous reports [32, 33]. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated using the R software package (version 3.6.1) [34].
Results and discussion
Development of nano-FI/Q-TOFMS
We first analyzed authentic standard solutions of various metabolites using nano-FI/Q-TOFMS to optimize the analytical conditions (Table 1). Following optimization of the flow rate, total ion current (TIC) peak areas of three representative metabolites were inversely proportional to the flow rate used for the method, although the reproducibility was extremely low at a flow rate of 500 nL/min (see Electronic Supplementary Material (ESM) Fig. S1). As already mentioned, nano-flow improves the efficiency of desolvation, ionization, and ion transfer, resulting in higher sensitivity [20]. However, it is difficult to regulate the actual flow rate of nano-FIA if the flow rate is extremely low, which makes ESI become unstable. Also, the peak area values at each flow rate did not change based on any changes in ion source temperature (ESM Fig. S1). Consequently, we determined that the optimal flow rate and ion source temperature were 1000 nL/min and 150 °C, respectively, the latter being the default temperature of CSI. Next, we compared three different injection volumes (1, 2, and 5 μL). As shown in ESM Fig. S2, the largest peak area was obtained with an injection of 5 μL. However, the reproducibility was low with a 5-μL injection, and we set the injection volume to 2 μL.
In this study, we used a CSI source which can perform ESI in an enclosed space, which makes it possible to introduce all ions into the mass spectrometer [35]. To optimize declustering potential (DP), which is a drift voltage at the ion entrance, we continuously ramped up the DP from − 150 to 0 V and monitored the intensity of product ions derived from the three metabolites (ESM Fig. S3). Their intensities increased slightly depending on the voltage, with the highest intensities observed at 0 V, demonstrating that the drift voltage did not contribute to ion transfer in the CSI source. Thus, we selected 0 V for the DP in our method; this can also avoid in-source CID, which is advantageous for generating precursor ions.
To compare the sensitivity of nano- and conventional FIA, we analyzed standard solutions using both methods. As shown in Fig. 1, a higher sensitivity for fructose 6-phosphoric acid was obtained using nano-FIA compared with that obtained by conventional FIA. Moreover, wider peak widths were obtained with nano-FIA, allowing the simultaneous detection of a large number of analytes because many SRM transitions can be set to a method. As shown in ESM Table S1, the peak areas of 22 target metabolites showed values that were 7.6 to 66 times higher following nano-FIA compared with conventional FIA.
Optimization of sample preparation
We investigated whether the sample preparation method could affect the results of nano-FIA, by comparing three different procedures. As shown in ESM Fig. S4, it was apparent that the PP with threefold volume methanol provided the best peak shape, while the other procedures resulted in poor peak shapes. In FIA, the sample is diluted by diffusion in the mobile phase, and this leads to matrix effects of diverse magnitudes across the peak, and a split peak shape can be observed at high matrix concentrations, especially at the peak center [37]. This is likely what is causing the peak distortions in PP with equal volume methanol and LLE results, where these samples were not sufficiently diluted in sample preparation (ESM Fig. S4). It was therefore determined that PP using threefold volume methanol was the most straightforward and suitable sample preparation method for nano-FIA.
Detection and identification of metabolites in biological fluids
Next, we investigated whether our new nano-FI/Q-TOFMS method could identify the metabolites in mouse serum. We analyzed mouse serum in accordance with the optimized method. All compounds could be detected using the negative ionization mode, and the mass accuracies of their product ions were lower than ca. 6 mDa (Table 1). Generally, intermediates of the PPP are not retained in a reversed-phase column because they are highly hydrophilic. They can also be easily adsorbed onto the surface of the stainless-steel parts of a column because they have a phosphoric acid moiety within their molecules [38]. Previously, CE/MS [39, 40] or hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) [41, 42] column- and metal-free [43] column-based LC/MS have been used for the analysis of phosphorylated organic compounds. In contrast, our system was able to detect the intermediates of the PPP much more simply, as described earlier.
Evaluation of the analytical method
To evaluate the linearity of the regression line ranging from 0.1 to 25 μg/mL, stable-isotope-labeled glucose 6-phosphoric acid-13C6, citric acid-D4, succinic acid-D6, and fumaric acid-D4 were added to mouse serum and pretreated with methanol for protein precipitation, where triplicate analyses were performed for each point though one outlier, which was determined by the Smirnov-Grubbs test, was found at 25 μg/mL for glucose 6-phosphoric acid-13C6, and thus, the outlier was omitted from construction of the regression line. The regression coefficient (r2) of each line was greater than 0.99 (Fig. 2), which indicates that nano-FI/Q-TOFMS shows an acceptable quantitativity.
In addition, we calculated lower limit of detection (LLOD) values using the regression lines by the following equation: LLOD = 3.3σ/S, where σ is the standard deviation of blank serum and S is a slope of the regression line. The LLOD values of glucose 6-phosphoric acid-13C6, citric acid-D4, succinic acid-D6, and fumaric acid-D4 were 2.2, 2.0, 0.11, and 0.78 μg/mL, respectively, demonstrating satisfactory sensitivity.
As mentioned earlier, glucose 6-phosphoric acid-13C6 is generally adsorbed onto the surface of stainless-steel columns, which may result in low repeatability, although our system showed good linearity (r2 = 0.999) and repeatability (RSD = 1.5–19%) for glucose 6-phosphoric acid-13C6.
We further evaluated the robustness and stability of the system. We performed 50 continuous analyses, where we monitored l-glutamic acid-13C5, 15N1 in supernatant obtained from mouse serum following protein precipitation. As shown in Fig. 3, the peak areas of l-glutamic acid-13C5, 15N1 did not fluctuate during the analyses (RSD = 4.2%) and there was no decrease in sensitivity. These results demonstrated that nano-FI/Q-TOFMS is a highly robust system with high repeatability.
Application to plasma samples of the SS model and control rats
To evaluate the practical applicability of our system, plasma samples from the SS model and control rats (n = 6 of each) were analyzed by nano-FI/Q-TOFMS. The raw data are shown in ESM Table S2, and multivariate analysis was applied to the normalized data with IS. The model and control groups were clearly separated in their principal component analysis (PCA) score plots, demonstrating that there is a difference in the metabolic profiles of the SS model and control groups (Fig. 4a). The SS model group was widely plotted PCA score plots, which may be due to individual differences resulting from the syndrome; this was supported by the results of their rectal temperature measurements [30]. Additionally, the loading plots showed that the levels of all metabolites were higher in the model group (Fig. 4b). Most of the metabolites were significantly elevated in the model rats (ESM Fig. S5), suggesting SS-induced upregulation of catabolism, which may be due to abnormal muscle contractions such as myoclonus [44]. A significant test also demonstrates that fumaric acid and sedoheptulose 7-phosphoric acid were not significantly different between two groups (ESM Table S3).
To validate the present results, the established GC/MS/MS-based metabolome analysis [32, 33] was applied to plasma samples taken from the SS model rats [30], and the results of representative metabolites such as lactic and malic acids were compared. As shown in Fig. 5, the results between nano-FI/Q-TOFMS and GC/MS/MS were closely correlated for both lactic and malic acids, proving that nano-FI/Q-TOFMS can obtain similar results to GC/MS/MS.
Limitations of the study and future perspectives
Although the nano-FI/Q-TOFMS method described here enabled us to perform high-throughput analysis of endogenous metabolites related to central energy metabolism in blood samples, it is essential to increase the number of target metabolites if we are to expand the present method to metabolome analysis.
It is impossible to differentiate between isomers by the present method when they produce the same product ion spectra. However, the combined use of ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) with MS has been recently applied to the analysis of small molecules [45, 46]. Thus, the use of IMS could compensate for the lack of chromatographic separation in FIA/MS. Furthermore, non-targeted metabolome analysis could be performed using a data-independent acquisition (DIA) method based on sequential window acquisition of all theoretical mass spectra (SWATH) analysis.
Conclusion
We successfully achieved high-throughput metabolite analysis using a nano-FI/Q-TOFMS approach. We proved that this method is robust and has high repeatability, with a single run being completed within 3 min. We applied the method to samples from the SS model and control rats, and demonstrated that it can easily discriminate between their metabolic profiles. In particular, it was possible to accurately determine highly polar intermediates of the PPP in spite of their tendency to adsorb onto the surface of stainless steel. In addition, sample preparation for this method was finished with minimum steps in comparison with the number required for LC/MS and GC/MS. The present method allows high-throughput analysis, which can prevent bias arising from the degradation of target compounds. Thus, it is expected that this method is able to be a compensatory method for the chromatographic analysis of metabolites. Although the number of target compounds in this preliminary study was limited, we plan to increase this number and this work is currently underway.
References
Tsugawa H, Bamba T, Shinohara M, Nishiumi S, Yoshida M, Fukusaki E. Practical non-targeted gas chromatography/mass spectrometry-based metabolomics platform for metabolic phenotype analysis. J Biosci Bioeng. 2011;112(3):292–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.05.001.
Zhou J, Yin Y. Strategies for large-scale targeted metabolomics quantification by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Analyst. 2016;141(23):6362–73. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6an01753c.
Soga T. Capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry for metabolomics. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;358:129–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-244-1_8.
Ramautar R, Somsen GW, de Jong GJ. CE-MS for metabolomics: developments and applications in the period 2016-2018. Electrophoresis. 2019;40(1):165–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201800323.
Zampieri M, Sekar K, Zamboni N, Sauer U. Frontiers of high-throughput metabolomics. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2017;36:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.12.006.
Takats Z, Wiseman JM, Gologan B, Cooks RG. Mass spectrometry sampling under ambient conditions with desorption electrospray ionization. Science. 2004;306(5695):471–3. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1104404.
Cody RB, Laramee JA, Durst HD. Versatile new ion source for the analysis of materials in open air under ambient conditions. Anal Chem. 2005;77(8):2297–302. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac050162j.
Hiraoka K, Nishidate K, Mori K, Asakawa D, Suzuki S. Development of probe electrospray using a solid needle. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2007;21(18):3139–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.3201.
Zaitsu K, Hayashi Y, Murata T, Ohara T, Nakagiri K, Kusano M, et al. Intact endogenous metabolite analysis of mice liver by probe electrospray ionization/triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry and its preliminary application to in vivo real-time analysis. Anal Chem. 2016;88(7):3556–61. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04046.
Hayashi Y, Zaitsu K, Murata T, Ohara T, Moreau S, Kusano M, et al. Intact metabolite profiling of mouse brain by probe electrospray ionization/triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry (PESI/MS/MS) and its potential use for local distribution analysis of the brain. Anal Chim Acta. 2017;983:160–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2017.06.047.
Zaitsu K, Hayashi Y, Murata T, Yokota K, Ohara T, Kusano M, et al. In vivo real-time monitoring system using probe electrospray ionization/tandem mass spectrometry for metabolites in mouse brain. Anal Chem. 2018;90(7):4695–701. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b05291.
Liu J, Wang H, Manicke NE, Lin JM, Cooks RG, Ouyang Z. Development, characterization, and application of paper spray ionization. Anal Chem. 2010;82(6):2463–71. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac902854g.
Wang H, Liu J, Cooks RG, Ouyang Z. Paper spray for direct analysis of complex mixtures using mass spectrometry. Angew Chem Int Ed Eng. 2010;49(5):877–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200906314.
Madalinski G, Godat E, Alves S, Lesage D, Genin E, Levi P, et al. Direct introduction of biological samples into a LTQ-Orbitrap hybrid mass spectrometer as a tool for fast metabolome analysis. Anal Chem. 2008;80(9):3291–303. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac7024915.
Beckmann M, Parker D, Enot DP, Duval E, Draper J. High-throughput, nontargeted metabolite fingerprinting using nominal mass flow injection electrospray mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(3):486–504. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.500.
Draper J, Lloyd AJ, Goodacre R, Beckmann M. Flow infusion electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry for high throughput, non-targeted metabolite fingerprinting: a review. Metabolomics. 2012;9(S1):4–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-012-0449-x.
Nanita SC, Kaldon LG. Emerging flow injection mass spectrometry methods for high-throughput quantitative analysis. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408(1):23–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-9193-1.
Fuhrer T, Heer D, Begemann B, Zamboni N. High-throughput, accurate mass metabolome profiling of cellular extracts by flow injection-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2011;83(18):7074–80. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac201267k.
Fang M, Ivanisevic J, Benton HP, Johnson CH, Patti GJ, Hoang LT, et al. Thermal degradation of small molecules: a global metabolomic investigation. Anal Chem. 2015;87(21):10935–41. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03003.
Wilm M, Mann M. Analytical properties of the nanoelectrospray ion source. Anal Chem. 1996;68(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac9509519.
Emmett MR, Caprioli RM. Micro-electrospray mass spectrometry: ultra-high-sensitivity analysis of peptides and proteins. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 1994;5(7):605–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/1044-0305(94)85001-1.
Ishihama Y. Proteomic LC-MS systems using nanoscale liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2005;1067(1–2):73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2004.10.107.
David A, Abdul-Sada A, Lange A, Tyler CR, Hill EM. A new approach for plasma (xeno)metabolomics based on solid-phase extraction and nanoflow liquid chromatography-nanoelectrospray ionisation mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2014;1365:72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.09.001.
Uehara T, Yokoi A, Aoshima K, Tanaka S, Kadowaki T, Tanaka M, et al. Quantitative phosphorus metabolomics using nanoflow liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and culture-derived comprehensive global internal standards. Anal Chem. 2009;81(10):3836–42. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac9002062.
Zaitsu K, Nakayama H, Yamanaka M, Hisatsune K, Taki K, Asano T, et al. High-resolution mass spectrometric determination of the synthetic cannabinoids MAM-2201, AM-2201, AM-2232, and their metabolites in postmortem plasma and urine by LC/Q-TOFMS. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129(6):1233–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1257-4.
Kusano M, Zaitsu K, Taki K, Hisatsune K, Nakajima J, Moriyasu T, et al. Fatal intoxication by 5F-ADB and diphenidine: detection, quantification, and investigation of their main metabolic pathways in humans by LC/MS/MS and LC/Q-TOFMS. Drug Test Anal. 2018;10(2):284–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.2215.
Plumb R, Granger J, Stumpf C, Wilson ID, Evans JA, Lenz EM. Metabonomic analysis of mouse urine by liquid-chromatography-time of flight mass spectrometry (LC-TOFMS): detection of strain, diurnal and gender differences. Analyst. 2003;128(7):819–23. https://doi.org/10.1039/b304296k.
Lenz EM, Bright J, Knight R, Wilson ID, Major H. Cyclosporin A-induced changes in endogenous metabolites in rat urine: a metabonomic investigation using high field 1H NMR spectroscopy, HPLC-TOF/MS and chemometrics. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2004;35(3):599–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2004.02.013.
Williams RE, Major H, Lock EA, Lenz EM, Wilson ID. D-Serine-induced nephrotoxicity: a HPLC-TOF/MS-based metabonomics approach. Toxicology. 2005;207(2):179–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2004.08.023.
Zaitsu K, Noda S, Iguchi A, Hayashi Y, Ohara T, Kimura Y, et al. Metabolome analysis of the serotonin syndrome rat model: abnormal muscular contraction is related to metabolic alterations and hyper-thermogenesis. Life Sci. 2018;207:550–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2018.06.031.
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 1995;57(1):289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x.
Zaitsu K, Hayashi Y, Suzuki K, Nakayama H, Hattori N, Takahara R, et al. Metabolome disruption of the rat cerebrum induced by the acute toxic effects of the synthetic cannabinoid MAM-2201. Life Sci. 2015;137:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2015.05.013.
Sato T, Zaitsu K, Tsuboi K, Nomura M, Kusano M, Shima N, et al. A preliminary study on postmortem interval estimation of suffocated rats by GC-MS/MS-based plasma metabolic profiling. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015;407(13):3659–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-8584-7.
R Development Core Team. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, editor. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria; 2011.
Chapman JD, Edgar JS, Goodlett DR, Goo YA. Use of captive spray ionization to increase throughput of the data-independent acquisition technique PAcIFIC. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2016;30(9):1101–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7544.
Nanita SC, Pentz AM, Bramble FQ. High-throughput pesticide residue quantitative analysis achieved by tandem mass spectrometry with automated flow injection. Anal Chem. 2009;81(8):3134–42. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac900226w.
Nanita SC. Quantitative mass spectrometry independence from matrix effects and detector saturation achieved by flow injection analysis with real-time infinite dilution. Anal Chem. 2013;85(24):11866–75. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac402567w.
De Vijlder T, Boschmans J, Witters E, Lemière F. Study on the loss of nucleoside mono-, di- and triphosphates and phosphorylated peptides to a metal-free LC–MS hardware. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2011;304(2–3):83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2010.05.022.
Harada K, Ohyama Y, Tabushi T, Kobayashi A, Fukusaki E. Quantitative analysis of anionic metabolites for Catharanthus roseus by capillary electrophoresis using sulfonated capillary coupled with electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry. J Biosci Bioeng. 2008;105(3):249–60. https://doi.org/10.1263/jbb.105.249.
Soga T, Igarashi K, Ito C, Mizobuchi K, Zimmermann HP, Tomita M. Metabolomic profiling of anionic metabolites by capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2009;81(15):6165–74. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac900675k.
Bajad SU, Lu W, Kimball EH, Yuan J, Peterson C, Rabinowitz JD. Separation and quantitation of water soluble cellular metabolites by hydrophilic interaction chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2006;1125(1):76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2006.05.019.
Yang S, Sadilek M, Lidstrom ME. Streamlined pentafluorophenylpropyl column liquid chromatography-tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry and global (13)C-labeled internal standards improve performance for quantitative metabolomics in bacteria. J Chromatogr A. 2010;1217(47):7401–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.09.055.
Yamada M, Lee XP, Fujishiro M, Iseri K, Watanabe M, Sakamaki H, et al. Highly sensitive determination of alendronate in human plasma and dialysate using metal-free HPLC-MS/MS. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2018;30:14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2017.11.003.
Boyer EW, Shannon M. The serotonin syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(11):1112–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra041867.
May JC, McLean JA. Ion mobility-mass spectrometry: time-dispersive instrumentation. Anal Chem. 2015;87(3):1422–36. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac504720m.
Mairinger T, Causon TJ, Hann S. The potential of ion mobility-mass spectrometry for non-targeted metabolomics. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2018;42:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.10.015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K. Zaitsu conceived the idea and supervised the experiments. K. Taki and K. Zaitsu designed the experiment and wrote the manuscript. K. Taki performed all the experiments, and K. Taki and K. Zaitsu executed the bioinformatics analysis. K. Zaitsu, Y. Hayash, and S. Noda performed the animal experiments. K. Zaitsu and T. Taki discussed the results. A. Ishii and H. Tsuchihashi commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict interest.
Animal experiments
The animal study was approved by the Animal Experimental Committee of Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine (No. 27356). We executed animal experiments in accordance with the Regulations on Animal Experiments in Nagoya University and Fundamental Guidelines for Proper Conduct of Animal Experiment and Related Activities in Academic Research Institutions (Notice No. 71 of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan, 2006).
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 279 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taki, K., Noda, S., Hayashi, Y. et al. A preliminary study of rapid-fire high-throughput metabolite analysis using nano-flow injection/Q-TOFMS. Anal Bioanal Chem 412, 4127–4134 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02645-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-020-02645-1