Abstract
A library of 22 novel 2-substituted fluorinated benzimidazoles (5a-v) was synthesized under microwave conditions in yields of between 85–96% and tested for their antimicrobial and antioxidant activity. Two trioxygenated derivatives 5p and 5r had minimum bactericidal concentration values ranging between 14.5–115.7 μM (5p) and 25.6–74.3 μM (5r) against S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae. The benzimidazole 5e with a CF3 substituent had the best antifungal activity at 94.3 µM against C. albicans. Compounds 5p and 5r also showed good antioxidant activities of 386.6 and 306.7 µM respectively, comparable to that of ascorbic acid. Docking studies of 5 h and 5r into the active site of topoisomerase II DNA-gyrase indicated that interaction with the Mn2+ ion in the active site of the enzyme was crucial for antibacterial activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Resistance to antibiotics is one of the major health concerns plaguing mankind in the 21st century. There is a constant need for new and improved antibiotics to fight of strains of bacteria that have become resistant to currently prescribed antibiotics. The benzimidazole moiety has gained importance in recent years having antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, anticancer, antioxidant, anthelmintic, antiparasitic, antimycobacterial, antidiabetic, antihypertensive, analgesic, antipsychotic, anticoagulant, cardiovascular, and anti-inflammatory properties (Navarrete-Vázquez et al. 2001; Tomic et al. 2004; Biron 2006; Kuş et al. 2009; Narasimhan et al. 2010; Vyas and Ghate 2010; Arora 2011; Kalyankar et al. 2012; Barot et al. 2013; Gurvinder et al. 2013; Jain et al. 2013; Keri et al. 2015; Yoon et al. 2014; Singla et al. 2015). Synthesizing novel compounds with the benzimidazole moiety can therefore produce lead compounds for the pharmaceutical industry.
Benzimidazoles are generally synthesized by coupling reactions between o-phenylenediamines with carboxylic acids, carboxylic acid chlorides or aldehydes and in some cases esters and amides (Khanna et al. 2012; Panda et al. 2012; Keri et al. 2015; Prajapti et al. 2015; Azizian et al. 2016; Carvalho et al. 2015; Kattimani et al. 2015; Rithe et al. 2015; Saberi 2015; Saleh et al. 2015). In most cases, these reactions are carried out in the presence of acid catalysts containing Sn, Ti, Zr, Bi, In, Co, Ce, B, Zn, and Hf (Zhang et al. 2007), Ir (Tateyama et al. 2016), La (Kamal et al. 2014), acetic acid (Jain et al. 2013) and p-toluenesulfonic acid (Xiangming et al. 2007; Funel et al. 2014), basic catalysts such as NaOH (Rajasekhar et al. 2010), KOH (Al-Mohammed et al. 2013), or inorganic salts for example NaHSO3 (Jain et al. 2013), and Na2S2O5 (Yoon et al. 2015). There have been greener synthetic procedures reported recently, which made use of solvents such as methanol and water (Borhade et al. 2012; Chen et al. 2012; Rao et al. 2014), while other methods have been employed such as the grinding method (Banerjee et al. 2014), ultrasound (Patil et al. 2014) and visible light (Park et al. 2014). In recent years, there has been much interest in microwave syntheses (Das et al. 2012; Jacob 2012; Gawande et al. 2014). Using microwave synthesis, benzimidazoles were synthesized without the use of catalysts and organic solvents (Abdullah et al. 2012; Eren and Bekdemir 2014). Its advantages are, therefore, that it is a green technique, cheaper, carried out in shorter times and uses less energy than conventional synthesis.
In our study, we have synthesized fluorinated benzimidazole derivatives from o-phenyldiamine (methyl 3-amino-4-(4-fluoroaniline)benzoate) and various substituted aldehydes using three methods, conventional organic synthesis with a sodium metabisulphite catalyst and ethanol as solvent, the grinding method with iodine as a catalyst and under microwave conditions with no catalyst or solvent, and compared the yields and reaction times of these methods. We synthesized a total of 22 2-substituted fluorinated benzimidazoles (5a–5v) and tested them for their antimicrobial and antioxidant activity.
Materials and methods
General experimental procedures
All chemicals were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich via Capital Lab, South Africa. Organic solvents were redistilled and dried according to standard procedures. Silica gel 60 F254 plates (Merck) were used for thin layer chromatography. Crude compounds were purified by column chromatography using silica gel (60–120 mesh) and a mobile phase of varying ratios of EtOAc:Hexane. Melting points were recorded using a Stuart Scientific SMP3 apparatus. UV spectra were obtained on a Varian Cary UV-vis spectrophotometer in MeOH. Infrared (IR) spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer 100 Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer with universal attenuated total reflectance sampling accessory.
Microwave assisted reaction: All reactions which involved microwave irradiation were performed using a CEM Discover, Explorer-12 Hybrid microwave. 1H, 13C and all two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance (2D NMR) spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance instrument operating at 400 MHz. Chemical shifts are reported in δ values (ppm) relative to an internal standard of tetramethylsilane and referenced to the solvent line of CDCl3 (7.24 ppm for 1H; 77.0 ppm for 13C), CD3OD (3.31 ppm for 1H; 49.0 ppm for 13C) or DMSO-d 6 (2.5 ppm for 1H; 39.5 ppm for 13C). High-resolution mass data were obtained using a Bruker micro TOF-Q II ESI instrument operating at ambient temperature. The purity of the compounds were determined by analytical high performance liquid chromatography on a Shimadzu-20A5 fitted with a C8 (150 mm × 5 μm) column using a mobile phase (A) of 0.1M KHPO4 buffer and (B) methanol, with a linear gradient of 0 to 70% over a period of 60 min at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1.
General procedure for the preparation of methyl 4-fluoro-3-nitrobenzoate (2)
4-Fluoro-3-nitrobenzoic acid (0.5 g, 2.7 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (5 mL) and conc. H2SO4 (0.5 mL) at room temperature. The reaction mixture was heated with stirring in a 10 mL microwave process vial for 10 min at 80 °C. After completion of the reaction (as evident from thin layer chromatography (TLC)), the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure, the reaction mixture basified by sodium bicarbonate and the aqueous layer extracted into ethyl acetate (3 × 5 mL). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure to yield 2 as a cream-colored powder (95%).
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.73 (1H, dd, J = 7.2, 2.2 Hz, H-2), 8.31 (1H, m, H-6), 7.38 (1H, dd, J = 10.2, 8.8 Hz, H-5), 3.95 (3H, s, H-8); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 164.1 (C-7), 158.1 (d, J CF = 270.0 Hz, C-4), 137.3 (C-3), 136.5 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, C-6), 127.8 (C-2), 127.2 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, C-1), 118.8 (d, J = 21.2 Hz, C-5), 52.9 (C-8); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −110.55.
General procedure for the preparation of methyl 4-(4-fluoroaniline)-3-nitrobenzoate (3)
Methyl-4-fluoro-3-nitrobenzoate 2 (0.5 g, 2.34 mmol) and 4-fluorophenyl aniline (0.36 mL, 2.34 mmol) were mixed in dimethylformamide (2 mL). The reaction mixture was subject to microwave irradiation with stirring in a 10 mL microwave process vial for 5 min at 80 °C. After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was washed with water (2 × 10 mL) followed by 10% Na2CO3 (10 mL). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford 3 as a crude product. The solid was purified by column chromatography (30% ethyl acetate in hexane) to afford the desired product as a reddish solid in a yield of 90%.
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 9.67 (1H, s, NH-10), 8.90 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-2), 7.95 (1H, dd, J = 9.0, 2.0 Hz, H-6), 7.29 (2H, dd, J = 8.8, 4.7 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.18 (2H, t, J = 8.8 Hz, H-3a/5a), 7.03 (1H, d, J = 9.0 Hz, H-5), 3.89 (3H, s, H-8); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 165.3 (C-7), 161.2 (d, J CF = 245.8 Hz, C-4a), 146.4 (C-4), 136.0 (C-2), 133.5 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, C-1a), 132.1 (C-3), 129.24 (C-6), 127.5 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 119.2 (C-1), 116.9 (d, J = 22.7 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 115.3 (C-5), 52.2 (C-8); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −114.14.
General procedure for the preparation of methyl 3-amino-4-(4-fluoroaniline) benzoate (4)
Methyl 4-(4-fluoroaniline)-3-nitrobenzoate 3 (0.5 g, 1 mmol), Zn (0.06 g, 0.5 mmol), and ammonium formate (0.54 g, 5 mmol) were added to methanol (5 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 10 min. Upon completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), it was filtered through Celite 545 to remove the zinc. The filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure and the solid purified by column chromatography (30% ethyl acetate in hexane) to afford the desired product as a brown solid with a yield of 92%.
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.50 (1H, d, J = 1.7 Hz, H-2), 7.47 (1H, dd, J = 8.2, 1.7 Hz, H-6), 7.03 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, H-5), 6.99 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H, H-2a/6a), 6.95 (2H, dd, J = 9.0, 8.3 Hz, H-3a/5a), 5.55 (s, 1H, NH-10), 3.85 (3H, s, H-8), 3.16 (2H, s, NH-9); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.0 (C-7), 158.3 (d, J CF = 239.4 Hz, C-4a), 138.3 (C-1a), 137.1 (C-4), 136.0 (C-3), 123.6 (C-1), 122.6 (C-6), 120.6 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 118.4 (C-2), 116.7 (C-5), 116.1 (d, J = 22.5 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 51.8 (C-8); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −121.46.
General procedure for the preparation of fluorinated benzimidazoles (5a–5v)
Microwave method
The mixture of methyl 3-amino-4-(4-fluoroaniline) benzoate 4 (1 mmol) and various aldehydes (1 mmol) were heated in a 5 mL microwave process vial for 5–10 min at 110 °C to obtain compounds (5a–5v). After completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture was washed with water (2 × 5 mL) followed by brine solution (10 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted into ethyl acetate (3 × 5 mL). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, concentrated under reduced pressure and the obtained solid purified by column chromatography (30–50% ethyl acetate in hexane) to afford the desired products in good yields (85–96%).
Grinding (mechanochemical) method
A mixture of methyl 3-amino-4-(4-fluoroaniline) benzoate 4 (1 mmol), various aldehydes (1 mmol), and iodine (10 mol %) were ground together using a mortar and pestle at room temperature between 5–45 min (Table 1). After completion of the reaction (confirmed by TLC), the mixture was treated with aqueous Na2S2O3. The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 5 mL), and the organic layer dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. The solid obtained was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate) to afford the desired product (5a–5v) in moderate to good yields (10–56%).
Conventional method
3-Amino-4-(4-fluoroaniline) benzoate 4 (1 mmol), various aldehydes (1 mmol) and Na2S2O5 (20 mol%) was refluxed in ethanol (20 mL) between 8–18 h. After completion of the reaction (as evident from TLC), the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the crude mass washed with water (2 × 10 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 25 mL), and the organic layer dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford 5a–5v as crude products. The solid obtained was purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate) to afford the desired product in good yields (60–90%).
Spectral data
Methyl 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5a)
White solid (90% yield, 99% purity); mp 160–162 °C; UV λmax (MeOH) nm (log ε) 247 (2.63), 302 (2.19); IR υ max 3069 (CH), 1713 (C=O), 1357 (C-F), 1185 (C-O) cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.58 (1H, bs, H-4), 7.98 (1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-6), 7.54 (2H, d, J = 7.4 Hz, H-2b/6b), 7.38 (1H, m, H-4b), 7.32 (2H, m, H-2a/6a), 7.29 (2H, m, H-3b/5b), 7.23 (1H, m, H-7), 7.20 (2H, m, H-3a/5a), 3.94 (3H, s, H-11); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.4 (C-10), 162.4 (d, J CF = 248.6 Hz, C-4a), 154.0 (C-2), 142.2 (C-8), 140.2 (C-9), 132.2 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, C-1a), 130.0 (C-4b), 129.2 (C-6b), 129.1 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 129.07 (C-2b), 129.0 (C-1b), 128.5 (2C, C-3b/5b), 125.4 (C-5), 125.1 (C-6), 122.2 (C-4), 117.1 (d, J = 22.7 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 109.3 (C-7), 52.1 (C-11); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −108.08; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 347.1198 C21H16FN2O2 (calcd. 347.1196).
Methyl 1,2-bis(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5b)
Yellow solid (90% yield, 98% purity); mp 130–132 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 247 (2.7), 301 (2.4); IR υmax 3071 (CH), 1711 (C=O), 1379 (C–F), 1157 (C-O) cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.56 (1H, bs, H-4), 7.99 (1H, dd, J = 8.6, 1.4 Hz, H-6), 7.54 (2H, dd, J = 8.8, 5.2 Hz, H-2b/6b), 7.29 (2H, dd, J = 8.9, 4.8 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.23 (2H, m, H-3a/5a), 7.19 (1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-7), 7.02 (2H, t, J = 8.8 Hz, H-3b/5b), 3.95 (3H, s, H-11); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.3 (C-10), 163.7 (d, J CF = 250.4 Hz, C-4b), 162.5 (d, J CF = 249.2 Hz, C-4a), 153.0 (C-2), 142.1 (C-8), 140.2 (C-9), 132.2 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, C-1a), 131.5 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2C, C-2b/6b), 129.2 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 125.6 (C-5), 125.2 (C-6), 122.1 (C-4), 117.3 (d, J = 23.0 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 115.8 (d, J = 21.8 Hz, C-3b/5b), 110.0 (C-7), 52.2 (C-11); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −110.71, −109.46; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 365.1111 C21H15F2N2O2 (calcd. 365.1102). * C-1b could not be detected.
Methyl 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5c)
Yellow solid (86% yield, 96% purity); mp 185–187 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 251 (3.23), 304 (2.85); IR υ max 3059 (CH), 1708 (C=O), 1357 (C–F), 1181 (C–O), 729 (C–Cl ) cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.58 (1H, bs, H-4), 8.01 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-6), 7.51 (2H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-2b/6b), 7.31 (4H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-2a/6a, H-3b/5b), 7.25 (2H, d, J = 6.44 Hz, H-3a/5a), 7.20 (1H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-7), 3.95 (3H, s, H-11); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.3 (C-10), 162.5 (d, J CF = 249.2 Hz, C-4a), 152.8 (C-2), 142.0 (C-8), 140.1 (C-9), 136.5 (C-4b), 132.1 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, C-1a), 130.7 (2C, C-2b/6b), 129.1 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 128.9 (C-3b), 127.4 (C-1b), 125.7 (C-5), 125.3 (C-6), 122.2 (C-4), 117.3 (d, J = 22.8 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 110.1 (C-7), 52.2 (C-11); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −110.35; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 381.0818 C21H15ClFN2O2 (calcd. 381.0806).
Methyl 2-(4-bromophenyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5d)
Cream colored solid (82% yield, 97% purity); mp 203–205 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 253 (3.28), 305 (2.92); IR υ max 3072 (CH), 1707 (C=O), 1357 (C–F), 1153 (C–O), 523 (C–Br) cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.57 (1H, s, H-4), 8.00 (1H, dd, J = 8.6, 1.4 Hz, H-6), 7.47 (2H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-3b/5b), 7.42 (2H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-2b/6b), 7.29 (2H, dd, J = 9.0, 4.8 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.23 (2H, t, J = 10.8 Hz, H-3a/5a), 7.19 (1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-7), 3.95 (3H, s, H-11); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.3 (C-10), 162.6 (d, J CF = 249.2 Hz, C-4a), 152.8 (C-2), 142.1 (C-8), 140.2 (C-9), 132.2 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, C-1a), 131.9 (2C, C-3b/5b), 130.9 (2C, C-2b/6b), 129.1 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 127.9 (C-5), 125.7 (C-1b), 125.4 (C-6), 124.9 (C-4b), 122.2 (C-4), 117.4 (d, J = 22.8 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 110.1 (C-7), 52.2 (C-11); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −110.53; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 425.0310 C21H15BrFN2O2 (calcd. 425.0301).
Methyl 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5e)
White solid (84% yield, 98% purity); mp 171–173 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 250 (2.83), 304 (2.5); IR υ max 3081 (CH), 1712 (C=O), 1358 (C–F), 1196 (C–O) cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.59 (1H, bs, H-4), 8.01 (1H, dd, J = 8.6, 1.4 Hz, H-6), 7.68 (2H, d, J = 8.3 Hz, H-3b/5b), 7.58 (2H, d, J = 8.3 Hz, H-2b/6b), 7.30 (2H, dd, J = 8.9, 4.8 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.24 (2H, t, J = 10.5 Hz, H-3a/5a), 7.21 (1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-7), 3.95 (3H, s, H-11); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.2 (C-10), 162.6 (d, J CF = 249.4 Hz, C-4a), 152.3 (C-2), 142.3 (C-8), 140.3 (C-9), 132.6 (C-1b), 132.1 (d, J = 3.16 Hz, C-1a), 131.8 (q, J CF = 260.0 Hz, C-7b), 129.7 (2C, C-3b/5b), 129.1 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 125.8 (C-5), 125.6 (C-6), 125.5 (q, J = 3.9 Hz, 2C, C-2b/6b), 122.5 (C-4), 117.5 (d, J = 22.8 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 110.2 (C-7), 52.2 (C-11); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −62.98; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 415.1078 C22H15F4N2O2 (calcd. 415.1070).
Methyl 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5f)
Yellow solid (70% yield; 98% purity); mp 214–216 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 229 (2.84), 320 (2.47); IR υ max 3078 (CH), 1714 (C=O), 1510 (N–O), 1380 (C–F), 1204 (C–O) cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.60 (1H, bs, H-4), 8.18 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, H-3b/5b), 8.04 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-6), 7.76 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, H-2b/6b), 7.32 (2H, m, H-2a/6a), 7.27 (2H, m, H-3a/5a), 7.23 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-7), 3.96 (3H, s, H-11); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.1 (C-10), 162.9 (d, J CF = 250.2 Hz, C-4a), 151.2 (C-4b), 148.4 (C-2), 142.0 (C-8), 140.3 (C-9), 134.9 (C-1b), 131.8 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, C-1a), 130.3 (2C, C-2b/6b), 129.2 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 126.2 (C-5), 126.1 (C-6), 123.7 (2C, C-3b/5b), 122.6 (C-4), 117.7 (d, J = 22.8 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 110.4 (C-7), 52.3 (C-11); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −109.63; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 392.1055 C21H15FN3O4 (calcd. 392.1047).
Methyl 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-p-tolyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5g)
White solid (80% yield, 96% purity); mp 156–158 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 214 (3.21), 250 (3.36), 304 (2.93); IR υ max 3074 (CH), 1711 (C=O), 1381 (C–F), 1185 (C–O) cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.57 (1H, bs, H-4), 7.98 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 1.3 Hz, H-6), 7.43 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, H-2b/6b), 7.29 (2H, dd, J = 8.7, 4.8 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.21 (2H, t, J = 8.7 Hz, H-3a/5a), 7.18 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-7), 7.13 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, H-3b/5b), 3.94 (3H, s, H-11), 2.34 (3H, s, H-7b); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.3 (C-10), 162.5 (d, J CF = 248.7 Hz, C-4a), 154.0 (C-2), 140.6 (C-8), 140.1 (2C, C-4/4b), 132.4 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, C-1a), 129.4 (2C, C-3b/5b), 129.3 (2C, C-2b/6b), 129.2 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 125.7 (C-1b), 125.5 (C-5), 125.1 (C-6), 121.8 (C-4), 117.2 (d, J = 22.8 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 110.0 (C-7), 52.2 (C-11), 21.4 (C-7b); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −111.18; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 361.1354 C22H18FN2O2 (calcd. 361.1352).
Methyl 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5h)
White solid (78% yield, 98% purity); mp 138–140 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 225 (2.90), 258 (3.00), 307 (2.75); IR υ max 3080 (CH), 1710 (C=O), 1385 (C–F), 1180 (C–O) cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.54 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-4), 7.96 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 1.5 Hz, H-6), 7.48 (2H, d, J = 8.9 Hz, H-2b/6b), 7.29 (2H, dd, J = 8.7, 4.8 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.21 (2H, t, J = 8.7 Hz, H-3a/5a), 7.16 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-7), 6.83 (2H, d, J = 8.9 Hz, H-3b/5b), 3.94 (3H, s, H-11), 3.79 (3H, s, H-7b); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.6 (C-10), 162.5 (d, J CF = 248.6 Hz, C-4a), 161.0 (C-4b), 154.0 (C-2), 142.3 (C-8), 140.3 (C-9), 132.6 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, C-1a), 131.0 (2C, C-2b/6b), 129.2 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 125.3 (C-5), 124.8 (C-6), 121.8 (C-4), 121.3 (C-1b), 117.2 (d, J = 22.7 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 114.1 (2C, C-3b/5b), 109.9 (C-7), 55.3 (C-7b), 52.1 (C-11); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −111.23; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 377.1310 C22H18FN2O3 (calcd. 377.1301).
Methyl 2-(4-aminophenyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5i)
Orange solid (75% yield, 97% purity); mp 225–227 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 233 (3.51), 327 (3.41); IR υ max 3473 (NH), 3077 (CH), 1710 (C=O), 1382 (C–F), 1197 (C–O) cm−1; 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6 , 400 MHz) δ 8.26 (1H, d, J = 1.3 Hz, H-4), 7.83 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 1.3 Hz, H-6), 7.52 (2H, dd, J = 8.7, 5.0 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.44 (2H, t, J = 8.7 Hz, H-3a/5a), 7.21 (2H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-2b/6b), 7.17 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-7), 6.49 (2H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-3b/5b), 5.61 (2H, s, H-7b), 3.88 (3H, s, H-11); 13C NMR (DMSO-d 6, 100 MHz) δ 166.7 (C-10), 161.8 (d, J CF = 244.9 Hz, C-4a), 155.1 (C-2), 150.6 (C-4b), 142.4 (C-8), 140.5 (C-9), 132.9 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, C-1a), 130.4 (2C, C-2b/6b), 129.9 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 123.9 (C-5), 123.6 (C-6), 120.0 (C-4), 117.0 (d, J = 22.9 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 115.4 (C-1b), 113.1 (2C, C-3b/5b), 110.0 (C-7), 52.0 (C-11); 19F NMR (DMSO-d 6, 376.5 MHz) δ −112.32; HRMS (m/z): 362.1307 C21H17FN3O2 (calcd. 362.1305).
Methyl 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5j)
White solid (80% yield, 96% purity); mp 252–254 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 226 (2.88), 259 (2.92), 308 (2.74); IR υ max 3058 (CH), 1710 (C=O), 1384 (C-F), 1196 (C-O) cm−1; 1H NMR (MeOH- d 4, 400 MHz) δ 8.41 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz, H-4), 7.97 (1H, dd, J = 8.6, 1.4 Hz, H-6), 7.42 (2H, dd, J = 8.7, 4.9 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.38 (2H, d, J = 8.7 Hz, H-2b/6b), 7.33 (2H, t, J = 8.7 Hz, H-3a/5a), 7.27 (1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-7), 6.76 (2H, d, J = 8.7 Hz, H-3b/5b), 3.94 (3H, s, H-11); 13C NMR (MeOH– d 4, 100 MHz) δ 168.8 (C-10), 164.1 (d, J CF = 246.7 Hz, C-4a), 161.1 (C-4b), 156.6 (C-2), 143.0 (C-8), 141.5 (C-9), 133.8 (d, J = 3.4 Hz, C-1a), 132.4 (2C, C-2b/6b), 130.9 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 126.5 (C-5), 125.9 (C-6), 121.7 (C-4), 120.8 (C-1b), 118.1 (d, J = 23.2 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 116.5 (2C, C-3b/5b), 111.5 (C-7), 52.7 (C-11); 19F NMR (MeOH- d 4, 376.5 MHz) δ −113.54; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 385.0970 C21H15FN2O3Na (calcd. 385.0964).
Methyl 2-(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5k)
Brown solid (90% yield, 87% purity); mp 184–186 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 205 (3.18), 235 (3.30), 337 (3.23); IR υ max 3049 (CH), 1707 (C=O), 1363 (C–F), 1196 (C–O) cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.54 (1H, bs, H-4), 7.94 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 1.4 Hz, H-6), 7.45 (2H, d, J = 8.9 Hz, H-2b/6b), 7.34 (2H, dd, J = 8.8, 4.8 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.24 (2H, t, J = 8.8 Hz, H-3a/5a), 7.13 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-7), 6.59 (2H, d, J = 8.9 Hz, H-3b/5b), 3.95 (3H, s, H-11), 2.98 (6H, s, H-7b/8b); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.5 (C-10), 162.3 (d, J CF = 248.0 Hz, C-4a), 154.8 (C-4b), 151.1 (C-2), 142.4 (C-8), 140.4 (C-9), 133.1 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, C-1a), 130.5 (2C, C-2b/6b), 129.3 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 124.9 (C-1b), 124.3 (C-6), 121.3 (C-4), 117.0 (d, J = 22.8 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 115.7 (C-5), 111.4 (C-3b/5b), 109.4 (C-7), 52.0 (C-11), 40.0 (2C, C-7b/8b); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −111.47; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 390.1620 C23H21FN3O2 (calcd. 390.1618).
Methyl 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(4-(methylthio)phenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5l)
Yellow solid (90% yield, 90% purity); mp 182–184 °C; UV λmax (MeOH) nm (log ε) 207 (3.16), 238 (3.21), 277 (2.96), 316 (3.14); IR υ max 3059 (CH), 1697 (C=O), 1377 (C–F), 1155 (C–O) cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.55 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz, H-4), 7.97 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 1.4 Hz, H-6), 7.46 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-2b/6b), 7.30 (2H, dd, J = 7.2, 4.8 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.22 (2H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, H-3a/5a), 7.19 (1H, d, J = 7.3 Hz, H-7), 7.14 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-3b/5b), 3.94 (3H, s, H-11), 2.46 (3H, s, H-7b); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.3 (C-10), 162.5 (d, J CF = 249.1 Hz, C-4a), 153.5 (C-2), 142.2 (2C, C-9/4b), 140.1 (C-9), 132.3 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, C-1a), 129.6 (2C, C-2b/6b), 129.2 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 125.6 (C-1b), 125.5 (2C, C-3b/5b), 125.2 (C-6), 124.8 (C-5), 121.8 (C-4), 117.3 (d, J = 22.8 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 109.9 (C-7), 52.2 (C-11), 14.9 (C-7b); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −110.83; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 415.0885 C22H17FN2O2SNa (calcd. 415.0892).
Methyl 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(naphthalen-2-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5m)
Yellowish solid (85% yield, 99% purity); mp 169–171 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 210 (3.33), 252 (3.62), 311 (3.10); IR υ max 3064 (CH), 1701 (C=O), 1362 (C–F), 1156 (C–O) cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.61 (1H, bs, H-4), 8.09 (1H, s, H-2b), 8.01 (1H, dd, J = 8.6, 1.2 Hz, H-6), 7.80 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, H-9b), 7.75 (2H, t, J = 8.8 Hz, H-4b/7b), 7.58 (1H, dd, J = 8.2, 1.6 Hz, H-10b), 7.51 (1H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, H-5b*), 7.47 (1H, t, J = 7.0 Hz, H-6b*), 7.33 (2H, dd, J = 8.2, 4.7 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.22 (1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-7), 7.20 (2H, t, J = 8.2 Hz, H-3a/5a), 3.96 (3H, s, H-11); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.4 (C-10), 162.5 (d, J CF = 248.8 Hz, C-4a), 154.0 (C-2), 142.4 (C-8), 140.3 (C-9), 133.7 (C-3b), 132.8 (C-1b), 132.6 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, C-1a), 130.0 (C-2b), 129.2 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 128.7 (C-7b), 128.2 (C-4b), 127.5 (C-9b#), 127.7 (C-6b#), 126.7 (C-5b), 126.4 (C-5), 125.8 (C-10b), 125.5 (C-8b), 125.2 (C-6), 122.2 (C-4), 117.2 (d, J = 22.8 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 110.0 (C-7), 52.2 (C-11); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −110.01; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 397.1349 C25H18FN2O2 (calcd. 397.1352). * and # assignments may be interchanged.
(E)-Methyl 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-styryl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5n)
White solid (87% yield, 97% purity); mp 210–212 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 227 (3.21), 268 (3.04), 332 (3.06); IR υ max 3078 (CH), 1704 (C=O), 1635 (C=C), 1392 (C-F), 1154 (C-O) cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.52 (1H, bs, H-4), 8.05 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz, H-1b), 7.95 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 1.0 Hz, H-6), 7.46 (2H, m, H-4b/8b), 7.43 (2H, m, H-2a/6a), 7.31–7.35 (5H, m, H-5b, H-6b, H-7b, H-3a/5a), 7.13 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-7), 6.74 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz, H-2b), 3.94 (3H, s, H-11); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.4 (C-10), 162.8 (d, J CF = 249.1 Hz, C-4a), 152.5 (C-2), 142.3 (C-8), 139.6 (C-9), 138.9 (C-1b), 135.5 (C-3b), 130.9 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, C-1a), 129.5 (2C, C-5b/7b), 129.4 (2C, d, J = 8.8 Hz, C-2a/6a), 128.8 (C-6b), 127.4 (2C, C-4b/8b), 125.6 (C-5), 124.9 (C-6), 121.5 (C-4), 117.3 (d, J = 23.9 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 112.8 (C-2b), 109.6 (C-7), 52.2 (C-11); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −110.43; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 373.1355 C23H18FN2O2 (calcd. 373.1352).
Methyl 2-(6-chloroquinolin-2-yl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5o)
Yellowish solid (85% yield, 98% purity); Purity 98%; mp 228–230 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 257 (3.43), 321 (2.94), 336 (2.98); IR υ max 3068 (CH), 1702 (C=O), 1386 (C–F), 1190 (C–O), 750 (C–Cl) cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.64 (1H, bs, H-4), 8.47 (1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-9b), 8.21 (1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-10b), 8.03 (1H, dd, J = 8.6, 1.3 Hz, H-6), 7.72 (1H, d, J = 9.2 Hz, H-4b), 7.46 (2H, m, H-5b/7b), 7.38 (2H, dd, J = 9.2, 4.8 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.24 (2H, t, J = 9.2 Hz, H-3a/5a), 7.19 (1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-7), 3.96 (3H, s, H-11); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.3 (C-10), 162.5 (d, J CF = 247.3 Hz, C-4a), 151.2 (C-2), 149.2 (C-1b), 147.3 (C-8b), 141.9 (C-8), 141.2 (C-9), 136.5 (C-10b), 135.8 (C-6b), 133.7 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, C-1a), 129.6 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 128.8 (C-7b*), 128.6 (C-5b*), 128.5 (C-4b), 126.2 (C-3b), 126.0 (C-6), 125.8 (C-5), 122.7 (C-4), 121.6 (C-9b), 116.3 (d, J = 22.8 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 110.7 (C-5), 52.2 (C-11); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −112.10; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 432.0931 C24H16ClFN3O2 (calcd. 432.0915). *assignments may be interchanged.
Methyl 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(2-hydroxy-4,6-dimethoxyphenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5p)
White solid (65% yield, 99% purity); mp 68–70 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 229 (2.86), 267 (2.33), 297 (3.93); IR υ max 3398 (O–H), 3074 (CH), 1712 (C=O), 1359 (C–F), 1153 (C–O) cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.51 (1H, bs, H-4), 8.00 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 1.0 Hz, H-6), 7.31 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-7), 7.26 (2H, dd, J = 8.6, 4.9 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.16 (2H, t, J = 8.6 Hz, H-3a/5a), 6.32 (1H, d, J = 1.9 Hz, H-3b), 5.77 (1H, d, J = 1.9 Hz, H-5b), 3.94 (3H, s, H-11), 3.77 (3H, s, H-8b), 3.15 (3H, s, H-9b); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.2 (C-10), 163.1 (C-4b), 162.2 (d, J CF = 247.1 Hz, C-4a), 160.1 (C-2b), 157.6 (C-6b), 151.8 (C-2), 140.4 (C-8), 138.5 (C-9), 133.8 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, C-1a), 126.9 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 125.5 (C-5), 125.0 (C-6), 120.7 (C-4), 116.3 (d, J = 22.8 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 110.0 (C-7), 96.2 (C-1b), 94.0 (C-3b), 90.8 (C-5b), 55.4 (C-8b), 54.3 (C-9b), 52.2 (C-11); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −112.41; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 445.1168 C23H19FN2O5 Na (calcd. 445.1176).
Methyl 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5q)
Cream solid (65% yield, 97% purity); mp 230–232 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 226 (3.17), 264 (2.91), 313 (2.85); IR υ max 3501 (O-H), 3062 (CH), 1712 (C=O), 1377 (C–F), 1177 (C–O) cm−1; 1H NMR (MeOH– d 4, 400 MHz) δ 8.40 (1H, d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-4), 7.97 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 1.5 Hz, H-6), 7.42 (2H, dd, J = 8.7, 4.9 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.33 (2H, t, J = 8.7 Hz, H-3a/5a), 7.26 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-7), 7.01 (1H, d, J = 2.1 Hz, H-2b), 6.86 (1H, dd, J = 8.2, 2.2 Hz, H-6b), 6.7 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, H-5b), 3.95 (3H, s, H-11); 13C NMR (MeOH– d 4, 100 MHz) δ 168.8 (C-10), 164.1 (d, J CF = 246.8 Hz, C-4a), 156.9 (C-2), 149.2 (C-3b), 146.6 (C-4b), 143.0 (C-8), 141.5 (C-9), 133.8 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, C-1a), 130.9 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 126.5 (C-5), 125.9 (C-6), 123.1 (C-6b), 121.6 (C-4), 121.2 (C-1b), 118.1 (2C, d, J = 23.2 Hz, C-3a/5a), 117.7 (C-2b), 116.3 (C-5b), 111.5 (C-7), 52.7 (C-11); 19F NMR (MeOH- d 4, 376.5 MHz) δ −113.67; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 379.1094 C21H16FN2O4 (calcd. 379.1110).
Methyl 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(2,3,4-trihydroxyphenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5r)
Green solid (85% yield, 99% purity); mp 214–216 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 230 (3.27), 322 (3.0); IR υ max 3483 (O-H), 3069 (CH), 1709 (C=O), 1345 (C–F), 1152 (C–O) cm−1; 1H NMR (MeOH– d 4, 400 MHz) δ 8.34 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz, H-4), 7.92 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 1.4 Hz, H-6), 7.46 (2H, dd, J = 8.7, 4.9 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.36 (2H, t, J = 8.7 Hz, H-3a/5a), 7.12 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-7), 6.35 (1H, d, J = 8.9 Hz, H-6b), 6.15 (1H, d, J = 8.9 Hz, H-5b), 3.93 (3H, s, H-11); 13C NMR (MeOH– d 4, 100 MHz) δ 168.9 (C-10), 164.4 (d, J CF = 247.2 Hz, C-4a), 155.2 (C-2), 149.5 (C-4b), 149.4 (C-2b), 141.5 (C-8), 141.0 (C-9), 134.6 (C-3b), 134.2 (d, J = 3.3 Hz, C-1a), 131.1 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 126.5 (C-5), 125.8 (C-6), 121.0 (C-4), 120.4 (C-6b), 118.3 (d, J = 23.3 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 111.0 (C-7), 107.8 (C-5b), 106.5 (C-1b), 52.7 (C-11); 19F NMR (MeOH– d 4, 376.5 MHz) δ −113.12; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 417.0874 C21H15FN2O5Na (calcd. 417.0863).
Methyl 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(thiophen-2-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5s)
White solid (74% yield, 90% purity); mp 156–158 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 219 (3.26), 254 (3.28), 322 (3.18); IR υ max 3073 (CH), 1711 (C=O), 1386 (C-F), 1192 (C–O) cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.53 (1H, bs, H-4), 7.95 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 1.0 Hz, H-6), 7.41 (2H, dd, J = 8.2, 4.8 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.39 (1H, d, J = 4.4 Hz, H-3b), 7.30 (2H, t, J = 8.2 Hz, H-3a/5a), 7.03(1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-7), 7.02 (1H, bs, H-5b), 6.95 (1H, t, J = 4.4 Hz, H-4b), 3.93 (3H, s, H-11); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.3 (C-10), 163.2 (d, J CF = 249.6 Hz, C-4a), 149.0 (C-2), 142.2 (C-8), 142.1 (C-1b), 140.6 (C-9), 131.7 (d, J = 3.4 Hz, C-1a), 130.2 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 129.4 (C-3b), 129.2 (C-5b), 127.7 (C-4b), 125.5 (C-5), 125.1 (C-6), 121.7 (C-4), 117.5 (d, J = 22.8 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 109.7 (C-7), 52.1 (C-11); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −109.62; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 353.0761 C19H14FN2O2S (calcd. 353.0760).
Methyl 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(furan-2-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5t)
Dark brown solid (76% yield, 98% purity); mp 139–141 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 258 (3.15), 313 (3.11), 326 (3.01); IR υ max 3069 (CH), 1711 (C=O), 1359 (C–F), 1195 (C–O) cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.53 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz, H-4), 7.96 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 1.4 Hz, H-6), 7.48 (1H, bs, H-3b), 7.40 (2H, dd, J = 8.5, 4.7 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.29 (2H, td, J = 8.5, 2.2 Hz, H-3a/5a), 7.06 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-7), 6.39–6.40 (2H, m, H-4b/5b), 3.93 (3H, s, H-11); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.3 (C-10), 163.0 (d, J CF = 249.2 Hz, C-4a), 145.7 (C-2), 144.9 (C-3b), 143.6 (C-8), 140.0 (C-9), 131.7 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, C-1a), 129.8 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 125.7 (C-5), 125.4 (C-6), 122.0 (C-4), 117.2 (d, J = 22.8 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 113.6 (C-5b), 111.8 (C-4b), 109.8 (C-7), 52.1 (C-11); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −110.00; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 337.0994 C19H14FN2O3 (calcd. 337.0988).
Methyl 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-propyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5u)
Cream solid (70% yield, 100% purity); mp 102–104 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 227 (3.16), 267 (2.40); IR υ max 3083 (CH), 1715 (C=O), 1360 (C–F), 1166 (C–O) cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.49 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz, H-4), 7.94 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 1.4 Hz, H-6), 7.34 (2H, dd, J = 8.2, 5.2 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.29 (2H, t, J = 8.2 Hz, H-3a/5a), 7.05 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-7), 3.92 (3H, s, H-11), 2.76 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1b), 1.76–1.86 (2H, sestet, H-2b), 0.94 (3H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H-3b); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.4 (C-10), 162.8 (d, J CF = 249.3 Hz, C-4a), 156.9 (C-2), 141.7 (C-8), 139.5 (C-9), 131.2 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, C-1a), 129.2 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 125.1 (C-5), 124.8 (C-6), 121.2 (C-4), 117.3 (d, J = 22.8 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 109.6 (C-7), 52.1 (C-11), 29.4 (C-1b), 21.1 (C-2b), 13.9 (C-3b); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −110.53; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 335.1161 C18H17FN2O2Na (calcd. 335.1172).
Methyl 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-hexyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5v)
Brown solid (70% yield, 61% purity); mp 66–68 °C; UV λ max (MeOH) nm (log ε) 227 (3.53), 264 (2.81); IR υ max 3075 (CH), 1708 (C=O), 1399 (C–F), 1156 (C–O) cm−1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.48 (1H, bs, H-4), 7.94 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 1.2 Hz, H-6), 7.36 (2H, dd, J = 8.6, 5.0 Hz, H-2a/6a), 7.30 (2H, t, J = 8.6 Hz, H-3a/5a), 7.06 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-7), 3.94 (3H, s, H-11), 2.76 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1b), 1.77 (2H, quintet, J = 7.5 Hz, H-2b), 1.25–1.35 (2H, m, H-3b), 1.23–1.26 (2H, m, H-5b), 0.88–0.90 (2H, m, H-4b), 0.84 (3H, t, J = 6.8 Hz, H-6b); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.6 (C-10), 162.9 (d, J CF = 249.0 Hz, C-4a), 157.2 (C-2), 141.7 (C-8), 139.6 (C-9), 131.5 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, C-1a), 129.2 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2C, C-2a/6a), 124.8 (C-5), 124.5 (C-6), 121.3 (C-4), 117.2 (d, J = 22.8 Hz, 2C, C-3a/5a), 109.4 (C-7), 52.0 (C-11), 31.3 (C-4b), 28.9 (C-3b), 27.6 (C-1b), 27.6 (C-2b), 22.4 (C-5b), 13.9 (C-6b); 19F NMR (CDCl3, 376.5 MHz) δ −110.80; HRESIMS m/z (pos): 355.1816 C21H24FN2O2 (calcd. 355.1822).
Single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis
Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained by slow evaporation in a combination of ethyl acetate and n-hexane at room temperature. The crystal evaluation and data collection were performed on a Bruker Smart APEX II diffractometer with Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). The diffractometer to crystal distance was set at 4 cm. The initial cell matrix was obtained from three series of scans at different starting angles. Each series consisted of 12 frames collected at intervals of 0.5° in a 6° range with the exposure time of 10 s per frame. The final cell constants were calculated from a set of 4762 strong reflections from the actual data collection. Data collection method involved ω scans of width 0.5°. Data reduction was carried out using the program System Administrator’s Integrated Network Tool+. The structure was solved by direct methods using SHELXS and refined. Non-H atoms were first refined isotropically and then by anisotropic refinement with full-matrix least-squares calculations based on F2 using SHELXS. All H atoms were positioned geometrically and allowed to ride on their respective parent atoms. All H atoms were refined isotropically. The absorption correction was based on fitting a function to the empirical transmission surface as sampled by multiple equivalent measurements. The final least-squares refinement of 265 parameters against 4762 data resulted in residuals R (based on F 2 for I ≥ 2σ) and wR (based on F 2 for all data) of 0.0465 and 0.1048, respectively. The final difference Fourier map was featureless. The programs Olex-2 and Ortep-3 were used within the WinGX software package to prepare artwork representation (Spek 2003; Farrugia 2012). Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the structure in this paper has been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB21EZ, UK. Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge on quoting the depository number CCDC 1454700 (fax: +44-1223-336-033; E-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
In vitro antimicrobial studies
The synthesized compounds were tested for their antibacterial and antifungal activity in vitro against the Gram +ve bacterial strains: Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (ATCC BAA-1683) and Gram -ve strains (Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Klebsiella pneumonia (ATCC 31488), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853)) using ciprofloxacin and ampicillin as standards. For the antifungal assay Candida albicans (ATCC 10231) was used with tioconazole as the reference drug. A disc diffusion assay was used as an initial screening test to select potentially active compounds using a concentration of 10 mg mL−1. Minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) were only carried out on compounds that showed a zone of inhibition between 8–35 mm (5b, 5e, 5h, 5k–l, and 5o–t).
The microbial cultures were grown overnight at 37 °C in nutrient broth (UKZN Biolab, South Africa), adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland standard using distilled water and lawn inoculated onto Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) plates. A volume of 10 μL of each sample (23.20–32.04 µM in 1 mL DMSO) was inoculated onto antibiotic assay discs (6 mm diameter) and placed on the MHA plates which were incubated overnight at 37 °C for 24 h. After the incubation period, zones of inhibition were measured in mm. Compounds showing an inhibition zone of >9 mm were selected to determine their MBC values using the broth dilution assay with ampicillin and ciprofloxacin as the controls following the method in Andrews (2001).
For the broth dilution method the microbial cultures (adjusted to 0.5 McFarland) were prepared as described previously for the disc diffusion method. The test compounds were dissolved in DMSO (10 mg mL−1) and subject to a 50% serial dilution in 1 mL Eppendorf tubes with Mueller-Hinton broth, inoculated with bacterial cultures (20 μL) and then incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. The total volume in each Eppendorf was 200 μL. A volume of 10 µL of each dilution was spotted on MHA plates and incubated at 37 °C for 18 h to determine the MBC (µM). Ampicillin, ciprofloxacin and tioconazole served as the standard drugs for the antimicrobial and antifungal studies, respectively. All experiments were performed in duplicate.
In vitro antioxidant studies
The scavenging activity (antioxidant capacity) of the synthesized fluorinated benzimidazole compounds (5a–5v) on the stable radical, DPPH was evaluated according to a method by Murthy et al. (2012) with some modifications. A volume of 150 μL of methanolic solution of the test compounds at different concentrations (1000, 500, 200, 50, 20 and 10 μg mL−1) was mixed with 2850 μL of the methanolic solution of DPPH (0.1 mM). An equal amount of MeOH and DPPH without sample served as a control. After 30 min of reaction at room temperature in the dark, the absorbance was measured at 517 nm against methanol as a blank using a UV spectrophotometer as mentioned above. The percentage free radical scavenging activity was calculated according to the following equation:
Where “Acontrol” is the absorbance of the control reaction (containing all reagents except the test compound) and “Asample” is the absorbance of the reagents with a particular test compound.
Molecular docking methodology
The “Prepare Protein” module was used to protonate the amino acid residues of the X-ray structure of topoisomerase II DNA-gyrase (PDB ID: 2XCT, resolution 3.35 Å). The native ligand and water molecules were removed from the protein, while the manganese ion (Mn2+) present in the active site was retained. Different conformations of the representative compounds (RCs) (5h and 5r) were generated at physiological pH using the “Prepare Ligands” module and subsequently minimized. The partial atomic charges on each atom were developed using the CHARMm force field. A binding sphere of diameter 7.6 Å was developed around the active site residues. The automated docking was performed using the CDocker algorithm (Wu et al. 2003) by generating new conformations of the ligands using the molecular dynamics method. The best pose of each RC was chosen based on the scoring function (-CDOCKER energy), and subjected further to binding energy calculations.
Results and discussion
Chemistry
Three fundamental methodologies were used in this study: microwave, conventional and mechanochemical synthesis. A series of 22 novel benzimidazole molecules (5a–5v) were synthesized employing these synthetic methods with different substituents at C-2 on the benzimidazole skeleton. The different substituents were all aldehyde derived (Table 1). These contained para halogenated phenyl groups, phenyl groups with para substituted electron donating and withdrawing groups as well as other heterocyclic ring moieties such as quinoline, furan, naphthalene and thiophene, and the alkyl chains butane and heptane. In addition to the different substituents present on the aromatic ring attached to C-2, an ester moiety was present at C-5 and a 4-fluorophenyl moiety at N-1 (Scheme 1).
The synthesis started with the esterification of 4-fluoro-3-nitrobenzoic acid (1), since the subsequent nucleophilic step is easier to perform with esters rather than acids due to the acidic nature of benzoic acids. The conversion to the ester (2) occurred in 95% yield. The fluoro substituent on the ester was then substituted with 4-fluoroanilne producing 3 in a 90% yield. Prior to the aldehyde being added, the nitro group of the methyl benzoate (3) was reduced (92% yield) with zinc and ammonium formate forming the o-diamino phenyl precursor (4) to the benzimidazoles (Scheme 1).
In the last step of the synthesis, different aldehydes were added to the precursor 4 using three methods: (i) without the use of solvents or catalysts in a microwave at 110 °C, (ii) grinding equimolar amounts of 4 and the aldehydes in the presence of iodine as a catalyst at room temperature and (iii) refluxing the amino benzoate (4) and various aldehydes with ethanol in the presence of Na2S2O5 to produce 22 benzimidazoles (5a–v). The probable mechanism of the final step is imine formation of the aldehyde with the primary amino group followed by nucleophilic attack by the secondary amine to the imine carbon. Proton transfer from one nitrogen to the other followed by loss of H2 resulted in the formation of the benzimidazoles 5a–5v (Scheme 2). Their structures were confirmed by NMR spectroscopy (1D and 2D NMR) and single crystal X-ray diffraction. Of the three methods used for the synthesis, the best results were achieved under microwave conditions at 110 °C for 3–8 min with yields of between 85–96% (Table 1).
Structural elucidation
Using 5i (methyl 2-(4-aminophenyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate) as a representative fluorinated benzimidazole, H-7, H-6 and H-4 on the benzimidazole core skeleton occurs at δ Η 7.17 (d, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.83 (dd, J = 8.5, 1.5 Hz) and 8.26 (d, J = 1.3 Hz) respectively. The ester methyl resonance (H-11) occurred as a singlet at δ Η 3.89. The ester carbonyl resonance (C-10) was identified from the HMBC correlation to H-11 and appeared at δ C 166.7. The two aromatic C-N singlet resonances, C-8 and C-9 were assigned to δ C 142.4 and 140.5. C-8 was distinguished from C-9 by a heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC) to H-6. C-5 to which the ester group was attached was assigned to δ C 123.9 and showed an HMBC correlation to H-7. C-2 of the imidazole core skeleton was present at δ C 155.1.
The aromatic protons of phenyl group H-2a/6a appeared as a dd at δ Η 7.52 (J = 9.8, 5.0 Hz), coupling to both F and H-3a/5a, the latter appearing as a triplet at δ Η 7.44, due to the same J values (8.6 Hz) for both coupling to the F and to H-2a/6a. The C-4a fluorinated carbon resonance occurred as a doublet at δ C 161.8 (J = 244.9 Hz). These assignments were supported by HMBC correlations between C-4a and H-2a/6a as well as H-3a/5a and C-1a, which occurred at δ 132.9 (d, J = 3.0 Hz). C-2a/6a appeared as a doublet at δ 129.9 (J = 8.9 Hz) and C-3a/5a appeared as a doublet at δ 117.0 (J = 22.9 Hz).
For the phenyl group (B) attached to C-2, the aromatic proton resonance of H-2b/6b appeared as a doublet at δ Η 7.21 (J = 8.6 Hz) and H-3b/5b appeared at δ H 6.49 (d, J = 8.6 Hz). An HMBC correlation between the corresponding C-3b/5b carbon resonance at δ 113.1 and the proton resonance at δ H 5.61 (NH2) confirmed the assignment of C-3b/5b. The H-2b/6b resonance was confirmed by a HMBC correlation with C-2. Selected HMBC correlations used in the structural elucidation of 5i are provided in Fig. 1.
Antimicrobial activity
The trioxygenated derivatives 5p and 5r showed broad spectrum activity against all strains of bacteria (S. aureus, E. coli, K. pneumonia and P. aeruginosa) with the exception of MRSA. Compound 5p had MBC values of 115.7, 92.5 115.7 and 14.5 µM and 5r MBC values of 74.3, 49.6, 37.2 and 25.6 µM against S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae, respectively. The activity of both these compounds were 10 fold greater than ampicillin in the same assay. Compound 5r was 2b,3b,4b-trisubstituted with hydroxyl groups at each of the positions on the aromatic B ring and 5p was 2b,4b,6b-trisubstituted with a hydroxy group at the 2b-position and methoxy groups at the 4b and 6b positions. Consequently, these were the only two trioxygenated molecules from the 22 compounds that was synthesized. Even the dihydroxy substituted compound 5q showed poor antimicrobial activity in comparison to 5p and 5r. It is likely that this trioxygenation has something to do with its broad spectrum activity. However, the test compounds were not as active as ciprofloxacin, whose MBC was at least one order of magnitude better than the test compounds, including 5r and 5p.
The benzimidazole 5a with an unsubstituted 2-phenyl group was relatively unreactive and when the halogens, F (5b), Cl (5c), and Br (5d) were placed at the para position of the 2-substituted phenyl group, only the fluorinated compound showed some form of antibacterial activity, showing the best activity against K. pneumonia at 107.3 µM. This activity was enhanced when the fluorine was replaced with a trifluoromethyl group (5e), which was active against MRSA with an MBC of 70.7 μM and against K. pneumonia (24.3 μM) and C. albicans (94.3 μM). Compounds 5f-5o, 5q, 5s, and 5t with various substituents at the para position of the 2-substituted phenyl group (Table 1) were all inactive as antimicrobial agents.
Antioxidant activity
For antioxidant activity, the DPPH radical scavenging activity assay was used. The DPPH radical scavenging assay measures the ability to scavenge free radicals in situ (Murthy et al. 2012). The trioxygenated compounds 5r (IC50 of 306.71 μM) and 5p (IC50 of 386.55 μM) with hydroxy and methoxy groups showed antioxidant activity comparable to ascorbic acid (264.50 μM). Two other compounds, 5q (IC50 of 1129.0 μM) with dihydroxy moieties and 5j with a monohydroxy group (IC50 of 1326.93 μM) was approximately four times worse than ascorbic acid. All the other compounds were five times or more, worse than ascorbic acid. Thus, the only compounds that could be considered as having antioxidant potential were 5r and 5p. Other methods to test for antioxidant activity was not carried out as this was only a preliminary antioxidant test for these compounds.
Molecular docking
Several drugs including ciprofloxacin and lomefloxacin exhibit antibacterial action by inhibiting bacterial type II topoisomerases (topoisomerase IV and DNA-gyrase) (Mitscher 2005). In order to support the antibacterial results and gain some insight into the binding characteristics of the compounds with bacterial proteins, two representative compounds (RCs), 5r (most potent) and 5h (least potent) were docked into the empty active site of topoisomerase II DNA-gyrase. 3D-coordinates of the enzyme co-crystallized with its inhibitor, ciprofloxacin (pdb id: 2XCT (Bax et al. 2010)), were downloaded from the RCSB protein data bank. A binding sphere covering the active site was generated and docking of the RCs was performed using the CDOCKER module (Wu et al. 2003) implemented in Discovery Studio ver 4.0 (Accelrys) along with ciprofloxacin.
The binding affinity of the docked compounds was assessed by computing their binding energies (BEs) [Ecomplex-(Eprotein+Eligand)]. The more negative the BE, the stronger the interaction with the enzyme. Compound 5r exhibited stronger interaction (BE = −124.2 kcal mol−1) with the enzyme in comparison to 5h (BE = −24.3 kcal mol−1). This consequently supports the experimental results as 5r showed the highest MBC in the experimental assay performed. The BE of 5r had a difference of approximately 30 kcal mol−1 from the computed BE of ciprofloxacin (−156 kcal mol−1).
The best docked pose of 5r and 5h in the active site of topoisomerase II DNA-gyrase (Fig. 2) showed that both the RCs interacted with similar amino acid residues (Arg458, Lys460 and Glu477). This was also observed for ciprofloxacin (Fig. 3). Compound 5r (Fig. 2a), the most active antibacterial agent, formed a classical hydrogen bond with Ser 1084 (1.98 Å) and four non-classical hydrogen bonds with Arg458 (2.61 Å), Lys460 (2.45 Å) and Glu477 (2.71 Å, 2.76 Å). The least active compound (5h) displayed three hydrogen bonds with Glu477 (2.61 Å) and Lys460 (3.03 Å, 3.05 Å) in addition to hydrophobic interactions with Arg458 (Fig. 2b). The fewer and relatively longer hydrogen bond distances in 5h could have led to its weaker binding with the enzyme and in turn lower activity. Ciprofloxacin (the native ligand) fitted nicely into the active site of the enzyme through five hydrogen bonds with Glu477 (2.78 Å, 2.80 Å), Lys460 (2.34 Å, 2.40 Å) and Arg458 (2.14 Å) amino residues and formed another two co-ordinate bonds with Mn2+ (Fig. 3). However, both compounds failed to show any interaction with Mn2+, which may be responsible for them not being as active as ciprofloxacin. (Tables 2 and 3)
Crystal structure
The crystal structure of the parent compound, methyl 2-(4-(dimethylamino)phenyl)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-5-carboxylate (5k) was obtained and the refinement data are contained in the Supplementary file (Table S1). Compound 5k crystallized in the monoclinic P 21/c space group with two molecules in the asymmetric unit. The ester group and N-dimethyl group point away from each other and all groups are in the plane except the 4-fluoro phenyl group, which is perpendicular to the benzimidazole moiety on N-1. Weak hydrogen bond interactions (C–H…O, C–H…F and C–H…N) were observed in the crystal structure (Table 4). Further selected bond lengths were described in the supplementary file (Table S2). An ortep diagram of 5k is given in Fig. 4.
Conclusion
We have developed an efficient, cost effective and faster route for 2-substituted fluorinated benzimidazoles via a solvent and catalyst free microwave method. Compounds 5p and 5r with trioxygenated substitution showed better activity than ampicillin against the microbial strains used in the assays. These two compounds could be good leads for antimicrobial agents and will lead to further trioxygenated substituted benzimidazoles being synthesized in order to improve on the antibacterial activity and possibly find an excellent candidate to be developed into an antiobiotic.
References
Abdullah JM, Sulaiman MM, Mohammed SJ (2012) Microwave-assisted one-pot synthesis of 2-aryl (1H) benzimidazoles without catalyst. J Educ Sci 25(1):58–63
Al-Mohammed NN, Alias Y, Abdullah Z, Shakir RM, Taha EM, Hamid AA (2013) Synthesis and antibacterial evaluation of some novel imidazole and benzimidazole sulfonamides. Molecules 18:11978–11995
Andrews JM (2001) Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations. J Antimicrob Chemother 48(S1):5–16
Arora S (2011) Study of some benzimidazole compounds as antibacterial and antifungal agents. J Pharm Sci Res 3(7):1310–1314
Azizian J, Torabi P, Noei J (2016) Synthesis of benzimidazoles and benzoxazoles using TiCl3OTf in ethanol at room temperature. Tetrahedron Lett 57(2):185–18
Banerjee M, Chatterjee A, Kumar V, Bhutia ZT, Khandare DG, Majik MS, Roy BG (2014) A simple and efficient mechanochemical route for the synthesis of 2-aryl benzothiazoles and substituted benzimidazoles. RSC Adv 4:39606–39611
Barot KP, Nikolova S, Ivanov I, Ghate MD (2013) Novel research strategies of benzimidazole derivatives: a review. Mini-Rev Med Chem 13(10):1–27
Bax BD, Chan PF, Eggleston DS, Fosberry A, Gentry DR, Gorrec F, Giordano I, Hann MM, Hennessy A, Hibbs M, Huang J, Jones E, Jones J, Brown KK, Lewis CJ, May EW, Saunders MR, Singh O, Spitzfaden CE, Shen C, Shillings A, Theobald AJ, Wohlkonig A, Pearson ND, Gwynn MN (2010) Type IIA topoisomerase inhibition by a new class of antibacterial agents. Nature 466:935–943
Biron KK (2006) Antiviral drugs for cytomegalovirus diseases. Antiviral Res 71:154–163
Borhade AV, Tope DR, Patil DR (2012) An efficient synthesis of benzimidazole by cyclization–oxidation processes using Fe/MgO as a heterogeneous recyclable catalyst. J Chem Pharm Res 4(5):2501–2506
Carvalho LCR, Ribeiro D, Seixas RSGR, Silva AMS, Nave M, Martins AC, Erhardt S, Fernandes E, Cabrita EJ, Marques MMB (2015) Synthesis and evaluation of new benzimidazole based COX inhibitors: a naproxen-like interaction detected by STD-NMR. RSC Adv 5:49098–49109
Chen C, Chen C, Li B, Tao J, Peng J (2012) Aqueous synthesis of 1-H-2-substituted benzimidazoles via transition-metal-free intramolecular amination of aryl iodides. Molecules 17:12506–12520
Das R, Mehta D, Bhardawaj H (2012) An overview on microwave mediated synthesis. Int J Res Dev Pharm Life Sci 1(2):32–39
Eren B, Bekdemir Y (2014) Simple, mild, and highly efficient synthesis of 2-substituted benzimidazoles and bis-benzimidazoles. Quim Nova 37(4):643–647
Farrugia LJ (2012) WinGX and ORTEP for windows: an update. J Appl Cryst 45:849–854
Funel JA, Brodbeck S, Guggisberg Y, Litjens R, Seidel T, Struijk M, Abele S (2014) Diastereospecific enolate addition and atom-efficient benzimidazole synthesis for the production of L/T calcium channel blocker ACT-280778. Org Process Res Dev 18:1674–1685
Gawande MB, Shelke SN, Zboril R, Varma RS (2014) Microwave-assisted chemistry: synthetic applications for rapid assembly of nanomaterials and organics. Acc Chem Res 47:1338–1348
Gurvinder S, Maninderjit K, Mohan C (2013) Benzimidazoles: The latest information on biological activities. Int Res J Pharm 4(1):82–87
Jacob J (2012) Microwave assisted reactions in organic chemistry: A review of recent advances. Int J Chem 4(6):29–43
Jain ZJ, Kankate RS, Chaudhari BN, Kakad RD (2013) Action of benzimidazolo-piperazinyl derivatives on dopamine receptors. Med Chem Res 22:520–530
Kalyankar TM, Pekamwar SS, Wadher SJ, Tiprale PS, Shinde GH (2012) Review on benzimidazole derivative. Int J Chem Pharm Sci 3(4):1–10
Kamal A, Narasimha Rao MP, Swapna P, Srinivasulu V, Bagul C, Shaik AB, Mullagiri K, Kovvuri J, Reddy VS, Vidyasagar K, Nagesh N (2014) Synthesis of β-carboline–benzimidazole conjugates using lanthanum nitrate as a catalyst and their biological evaluation. Org Biomol Chem 12:2370–2387
Kattimani PP, Kamble RR, Meti GY (2015) Expedient synthesis of benzimidazoles using amides. RSC Adv 5:29447–29455
Keri RS, Hiremathad A, Budagumpi S, Nagaraja BM (2015) Comprehensive review in current developments of benzimidazole-based medicinal chemistry. Chem Biol Drug Des 86(1):19–65
Khanna L, Panda SS, Khanna P (2012) Synthetic routes to symmetric bisbenzimidazoles: A review. Mini-Rev Org Chem 9(4):381–396
Kuş C, Ayhan-Kılcıgil G, Tunçbilek M, Altanlar N, Çoban T, Can-Eke B, Iscan M (2009) Synthesis, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of some benzimidazole derivatives. Lett Drug Des Discovery 6(5):1–6
Mitscher LA (2005) Bacterial topoisomerase inhibitors: quinolone and pyridone antibacterial agents. Chem Rev 105:559–592
Murthy PS, Manjunatha MR, Sulochannama G, Naidu MM (2012) Extraction, characterization and bioactivity of coffee anthocyanins. Eur J Biol Sci 4(1):13–19
Narasimhan B, Sharma D, Kumar P (2010) Benzimidazole: a medicinally important heterocyclic moiety. Med Chem Res 21(3):269–283
Navarrete-Vázquez G, Cedillo R, Hernández-Campos A, Yépez L, Hernández-Luis F, Valdez J, Morales R, Cortés R, Hernández M, Castillo R (2001) Synthesis and antiparasitic activity of 2-(trifluoromethyl)-benzimidazole derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 11:187–190
Panda SS, Malik R, Jain SC (2012) Synthetic approaches to 2-arylbenzimidazoles: A review. Curr Org Chem 16(16):1905–1919
Park S, Jung J, Cho EJ (2014) Visible-light-promoted synthesis of benzimidazoles. Eur J Org Chem 2014:4148–4154.
Patil AA, Kamble SB, Rashinkar GS, Salunkhe RS (2014) Ultrasound promoted synthesis of 1,2-disubstituted benzimidazoles using aqueous hydrotropic solution. Chem Sci Rev Lett 3(10):214–220
Prajapti SK, Nagarsenkar A, Guggilapu SD, Babu BN (2015) B(C6F5)3 as versatile catalyst: an efficient and mild protocol for the one-pot synthesis of functionalized piperidines and 2-substituted benzimidazole derivatives. Tetrahedron Lett 56:6795–6799
Rajasekhar KK, Ananth VS, Nithiyananthan TS, Hareesh G, Kumar PN, Reddy RSP (2010) Comparative study of conventional and microwave induced synthesis of selected heterocyclic molecules. Int J ChemTech Res 2(1):592–597
Rao SS, Reddy CVR, Dubey PK (2014) An ultrasound mediated green synthesis of benzimidazolylthiounsaturatednitriles using water as a green solvent. Org Chem Int:5. doi:10.1155/2014/403803
Rithe SR, Jagtap RS, Ubarhande SS (2015) One pot synthesis of substituted benzimidazole derivatives and their charcterization. J Chem 8(2):213–217
Saberi A (2015) Efficient synthesis of Benzimidazoles using zeolite, alumina and silica gel under microwave irradiation. Iranian J Sci Technol 39(A1):7–10
Saleh V, Khazaei A, Abizadeh H, Saednia S (2015) Synthesis, characterization, and application of poly(N,N’-dibromo-N-ethylnaphthyl-2,7-disulfonamide) as an efficient reagent for the synthesis of 2-arylbenzimidazole and 2-aryl-1-arylmethyl-1H-1,3-benzimidazole derivatives. Org Chem Int:9. doi:10.1155/2015/635630
Singla M, Ranjan R, Mahiya K, Mohapatra SC, Ahmad S (2015) Nitric oxide inhibition, antioxidant, and antitumour activities of novel copper(II) bis-benzimidazole diamide nanocoordination complexes. New J Chem 39:4316–4327
Spek AL (2003) Single-crystal structure validation with the program PLATON. J Appl Cryst 36:7–13
Tateyama K, Wada K, Miura H, Hosokawa S, Abe R, Inoue M (2016) Dehydrogenative synthesis of benzimidazoles under mild conditions with supported iridium catalysts. Catal Sci Technol 6:1677–1684
Tomic M, Kundakovic M, Butorovic B, Jana B, Andric D, Rogli G, Ignjatovic D, Rajacic SK (2004) Pharmacological evaluation of selected arylpiperazines with atypical antipsychotic potential. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 14:4263–4266
Vyas KV, Ghate M (2010) Substituted benzimidazole derivatives as angiotensin II–AT1 receptor antagonist: a review. Mini-Rev Med Chem 10(14):1366–1384
Wu G, Robertson DH, Brooks CL, Vieth M (2003) Detailed analysis of grid-based molecular docking: A case study of CDOCKER-A CHARMm-based MD docking algorithm. J Comput Chem 24(13):549–62
Xiangming H, Huiqiang M, Yulu W (2007) p-TsOH catalyzed synthesis of 2-arylsubstituted benzimidazoles. ARKIVOC 13:150–154
Yoon YK, Ali MA, Wei AC, Choon TS, Ismail R (2015) Synthesis and evaluation of antimycobacterial activity of new benzimidazole aminoesters. Eur J Med Chem 93:614–624
Yoon YK, Ali MA, Wei AC, Choon TS, Osman H, Parang K, Shirazi AN (2014) Synthesis and evaluation of novel benzimidazole derivatives as sirtuin inhibitors with antitumor activities. Bioorg Med Chem 22:703–710
Zhang ZH, Yin L, Wang YM (2007) An expeditious synthesis of benzimidazole derivatives catalyzed by lewis acids. Catal Commun 8:1126–1131
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Centre for High Performance Computing (CHPC), an initiative supported by the Department of Science and Technology of South Africa for the Discovery Studio facility. This research was supported by grants from the National Research Foundation (NRF), South Africa, and the South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shintre, S.A., Ramjugernath, D., Singh, P. et al. Microwave synthesis, biological evaluation and docking studies of 2-substituted methyl 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-1H-benzimidazole-5-carboxylates. Med Chem Res 26, 484–498 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-016-1763-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-016-1763-z