Abstract
Purpose
Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is defined as a structural lateral spinal curvature ≥ 10° in otherwise healthy children and is the most common pediatric spinal deformity. IS is known to have a strong genetic component; however, the underlying etiology is still largely unknown. Animal models have been used historically to both understand and develop treatments for human disease, including within the context of IS. This intended audience for this review is clinicians in the fields of musculoskeletal surgery and research.
Methods
In this review article, we synthesize current literature of genetic animal models of IS and introduce considerations for researchers.
Results
Due to complex genetic and unique biomechanical factors (i.e., bipedalism) hypothesized to contribute to IS in humans, scoliosis is a difficult condition to replicate in model organisms.
Conclusion
We advocate careful selection of animal models based on the scientific question and introduce gaps and limitations in the current literature. We advocate future research efforts to include animal models with multiple characterized genetic or environmental perturbations to reflect current understanding of the human condition.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is a structural lateral curvature of the spine ≥ 10° with a rotatory component [1] that affects 2–3% of otherwise healthy children across most populations [2, 3]. Current therapeutic options are limited to bracing, surgery, and physical therapy, with spinal fusion surgery being the only treatment option for severe progressive curvatures. IS runs in families and is believed to have a significant genetic component [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13], with multiple genetic risk loci identified including those in or near ADGRG6/GPR126 [14,15,16,17,18,19] and LBX1 [17, 20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. However, IS etiology is still poorly understood, despite decades of research. The genetic and phenotypic complexity of IS [33], difficulty in obtaining musculoskeletal tissue samples, and unique biomechanical [34] and hormonal factors hypothesized to contribute to IS in humans have all made IS a challenging disease to understand. Nevertheless, dozens of animal models of scoliosis have been created, helping to bridge gaps in understanding of the disease.
Animal models of scoliosis have been developed through environmental, surgical, and genetic methodologies, which are used most often today. Genetic regions of interest may be disrupted within an animal model to determine its function in axial development; these mutations may be induced constitutively (permanent gene disruption across cell types) or conditionally (tissue-specific).
In this review, we provide a brief overview of the history of animal modeling and considerations for choosing a species as a model for scoliosis research, followed by an overview of genetic animal modeling used in IS research to date. The intended audience for this review is clinician scientists in the fields of musculoskeletal research and orthopedic surgeons seeking updated information regarding the development of scoliotic animal models for genetic research. We build upon previous IS animal model reviews [35,36,37,38,39] and conclude by noting gaps in the current literature and providing recommendations for future research efforts.
A brief history of comparative medicine
Comparative medicine is based on the principle that animals share phenotypic and genetic traits with humans, and that discoveries made within animals can gain understanding of human disease. Although observational animal research was recorded as early as the sixth century B.C. [40], the birth of comparative anatomy largely occurred during the Renaissance, notably through Andreas Vesalius’ 1543 De Humani Corporis Fabrica (The Structure of the Human Body) [41]. Centuries later, Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species (1859) and Gregor Mendel’s work on the basic laws of heritability (1865) established genetic relationships between individuals and species, providing a foundation for comparative medicine. By 1902, William Castle had bred mouse (Mus musculus) lines for research purposes, followed by Clarence Little’s creation of the genetically homogenous strain of dilute brown non-agouti (dba) mice [42]. Through the last century, animal and cell culture models have greatly improved our understanding of cellular structures and biochemical interactions underlying human physiological processes.
Today, animal models are crucial for basic and translational research efforts. Significant pre-clinical data, usually including validation of safety and efficacy in animal models, are required by the Food and Drug Administration prior to initiating clinical trials for pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and biologics. The first step in such efforts is creating an appropriate animal model to mirror the human condition; this ensures that (1) the pathology of the condition is understood and (2) there is a model in which potential clinical treatments can be evaluated. To date, IS research efforts using animal models have largely aimed to understand IS etiology. The following section introduces considerations for scoliosis researchers selecting an animal model.
Considerations for selecting an animal model
Researchers must carefully examine how closely the animal models the human condition, which may include the underlying pathophysiology and genetics of the organism, similarity of phenotypic endpoints to the human, and the similarity of the animal and human disease [43, 44]. Key factors include: (1) relevance of the model to the scientific question, (2) cost and feasibility, (3) resources and reagents compatible with the species, and (4) ethical considerations for the use of the species for research, as detailed below:
(1) Relevance of the model to the scientific question: Animals selected for research must be similar enough to the human condition or system to provide relevant data. When designing genetic studies, it is important to examine genetic homology between the animal and human, as genes under study may be duplicated, deleted, or significantly divergent between the two species. Animal models should be evaluated for three types of validity, which indicates the strength in which research findings translate to the human condition [44]:
-
Face validity indicates shared phenotypic or symptomatic manifestations of the clinical condition under study, where ideally the disease condition occurs naturally in the model.
-
Construct validity is the degree of underlying biology shared with the human condition, which can include similarity of the target organ or structure. Advances of molecular genetics now allow study of genetic variation and molecular pathways at the individual nucleotide level within animal models, adding a significant level of specificity to the study of the human condition when the mutational variants are known.
-
Predictive validity indicates a model’s similar response to therapeutic agents as in humans. Treatment responses even between mammalian systems can differ remarkably in certain disease contexts [45,46,47,48,49].
Proper evaluation of validity is necessary for researchers to interpret data and address its limitations, thus ensuring more effective clinical translation of the research findings.
(2) Cost and feasibility: Popular animal systems used in musculoskeletal research vary widely in cost of procurement and upkeep. A complete evaluation of costs associated with an animal model ensures that care for the animals is budgeted for.
(3) Available resources and reagents: Common animal models (i.e., mouse) have a greater array of resources and commercially available reagents, including well-annotated genomes. Reagents designed for use in one animal species (e.g., antibodies) may not react to others. Custom-made reagents can be created, albeit through an increased cost [50].
(4) Ethical considerations: Federal, national and institutional scientific boards require animal research to be evaluated on the basis of ethics, including justification and documentation of minimization efforts for animal suffering. A review of ethical considerations specifically for musculoskeletal research has previously been published by Allen et al. [51].
Popular animal models for IS research
Table 1 provides an overview of pros and cons associated with different research models for musculoskeletal research, as well as common research applications. Differences in spinal anatomy between popular animal models have been reviewed previously [52,53,54,55,56,57].
Rodents: Mouse (Mus musculus) is the most popular mammalian animal model for the study of multiple human disorders, including disorders of the musculoskeletal system [40, 58]. The mouse genome is approximately 85% identical to the genome of Homo sapiens [59]. Mice have cheaper husbandry costs compared to other mammals (i.e., rats, rabbits), and have a wide selection of available reagents, including antibodies and assays, and the genomes of commonly used strains are well annotated. Rats (Rattus) are also popular models for human disease [60,61,62] and in some situations have some unique advantages as a model for research. The larger body size allows for more sophisticated surgical approaches and physiological measurements. Additionally, the rat has proven to be an excellent model for human spinal cord injury, with a response process closely mimicking that of the human [63,64,65].
Despite the genetic, hormonal and developmental similarities of mouse to human, mice are quadruped, presenting significant biomechanical differences to human and, it has been proposed, a resistance to developing scoliosis spontaneously [36].
Zebrafish: The zebrafish (Danio rerio) is a popular animal model with several advantages including a well-defined genome, easily manipulated and transparent embryos, fast generation times, and low husbandry costs compared to mammals [66,67,68]. Zebrafish embryos contain a ciliated organ (Kupffer’s vesicle), thought to be responsible for the determination of left/right body axis, and an appropriate model for investigating ciliopathies [69]. Numerous resources and reagents are available including transgenic lines in which developing structures during early embryonic stages can be visualized. Zebrafish International Resource Consortium (ZIRC) is a federally supported zebrafish database providing resources for researchers.
Zebrafish have been a popular animal model in scoliosis research, thoroughly reviewed by Grimes et al. [70]. Bony fish present unique advantages for scoliosis research, as they naturally develop a degenerative scoliosis with advanced age, as well as other spontaneous spinal curvatures upon environmental or genetic disturbances [38, 71, 72]. The cranial-to-caudal biomechanical load placed on the spine of the zebrafish swimming through viscous water has been hypothesized to mimic the biomechanical load on the human spine [71]. Although yet proven, bony fish appear to be more susceptible to mechanical strain of the spine, spinal curve initiation, and severe curve progression compared to quadrupeds [38].
Despite these advantages, key differences in the physiology of the zebrafish must be considered when translating research findings to humans. The Reissner fiber, a proteinaceous strand that runs along the spinal column of most vertebrates, has been implicated in onset of scoliosis-like curvatures in several zebrafish models [73, 74], but has not yet been demonstrated as present in humans (see Bony Fishes). Hormonal differences between fish and humans are substantial, some of which have been implicated in IS development [75] (i.e., leptin [76, 77], melatonin [78,79,80,81,82], estrogen [80, 83]).
Avian models: Some of the earliest models of scoliosis were created in avians, including the pinealectomized chicken [84,85,86,87,88]. Avians are bipedal when on land and thus present some biomechanical similarities to humans. The removal of the pineal gland created a three-dimensional spinal deformity that was then compared morphologically to that of human IS. Multiple concerns including postural mechanical forces, surgical specificity, lack of consistent reproducibility, and endocrine metabolic differences between the human and avian species have led to question the relevance of the avian models.
Non-human primates: Non-human primates have only been used as scoliosis models within a few studies, likely due to their expense and unclear utility as a scoliosis model. In the 1970s, researchers used a rib excision technique, which had previously been used to induce scoliosis in rabbits [89], to induce scoliosis in thirteen baboons (Papio papio, Papio hamadryas). However, no animals developed scoliosis [90]. This technique again failed to produce scoliosis in monkeys (species not specified) a decade later [91]. Surgical attempts to produce scoliosis in Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) via sacrospinalus muscle resection [92] or excision of the intercostal nerves and erector spinae muscle were also largely unsuccessful [90]. Pinealectomy, which was used to induce scoliosis across multiple studies in avians and smaller mammals [37], also failed to induce scoliosis in any macaques [93].
The reasons for the failures to produce an idiopathic-like scoliosis in non-human primates are unclear, although differences in biomechanical loading and posture are certain to play a role [90]. One study compared spinal muscle composition in humans to Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), the most common non-human primate model, to determine the animal’s suitability as an experimental scoliosis model [94]. After significant differences in superficial muscle tissue composition were found, the authors were not able to recommend Rhesus macaques as a model for scoliosis, although the deep tissue muscles appeared similar. Interestingly, degenerative scoliosis appears to be common among older captive macaques [95]. In one study, 46.6% of captive macaques displayed some degree of degenerative scoliosis (n = 58, age 0–27 years), which was their most frequently observed osteopathology [96]. The failures of surgical techniques to produce a scoliosis curvature highlight the importance of differences between species when it comes to the spinal column and scoliosis. Further research with non-human primates may be needed to help elucidate the pathogenesis of human scoliosis.
Other models: Larger mammals, including rabbits and pigs, have been used for decades in musculoskeletal research conditions including osteoarthritis [97] and osteoporosis [98]. Two recent publications focus on the mini pig as a model of scoliosis, the first created a scoliotic deformity through a surgical posterior medial costotransversectomy [99], and the second through the use of a torsional tension device [100]. Both of these models rely on the biomechanical aspects of the growing spine to induce a scoliotic deformity, and potentially aid us in understanding growth modulation techniques of the spine. Larger mammalian models more closely resemble humans in terms of the genome, endocrine systems, and bone characteristics.
Genetic animal models of IS
Idiopathic scoliosis (IS) research progress has been hindered by the lack of developmentally appropriate animal models to aid in understanding the complex biomechanics of the growing human spine. Some have proposed that the unique structural–mechanical challenges of bipedalism on the spinal column are key factors driving IS, due to the relatively few observations of scoliosis in non-bipedal animals [101,102,103]. Despite these challenges, researchers have developed numerous animal models to inform our understanding of scoliosis pathology including birds, mammals, and bony fishes. Figure 1 provides examples of several genetic animal models that exhibit abnormal axial spinal curvatures and are commonly used for research.
Early animal models of scoliosis involved a surgical pinealectomy, performed in chickens, rats, and mice, resulting in some animals developing spinal curvatures [37]. As the pineal gland secretes melatonin, this led to an interest in the melatonin pathway as related to the etiology of IS (reviewed by Girardo et al. [81]). Recently, a bipedal mouse model of scoliosis deficient in melatonin was found to have reduced incidences of scoliosis, as well as improved bone mineral density, after treatment with exogenous melatonin [104].
The concept of bipedalism as a factor contributing to spinal imbalance and curvature led to another surgical technique involving the amputation of the forelimbs in rats and mice, creating an artificial model of bipedalism [101, 105]. In rabbit and mouse resection of the lower ribs within the thoracic cavity was also found to result in spinal curvatures [89].
Spontaneous or environmentally induced models of scoliosis have been observed. A thoracic scoliosis developed spontaneously in a line of Japanese white rabbits; this line was later found to have high serum melatonin [106]; however, a genetic cause to date has not been pinpointed. Recently, a stranded minke whale was observed with a severe scoliotic spine, which was believed to be initiated by blunt traumatic injury to two vertebrae followed by compensatory biomechanical, compensatory spinal curvatures [107].
Recent animal models of scoliosis have largely been created using genetics techniques, including CRISPR–Cas9, the Cre–Lox system, and transient models modifying RNA expression. Conditional genetics allow the researcher to specifically ablate or alter gene expression in defined tissues or a specific tissue lineage both spatially and temporally. By targeting a specific tissue lineage, one can study the mutational effects on the pathophysiology of a specific tissue/organ as related to the disease of interest [108]. These techniques are extremely useful to circumvent embryonic lethality of a particular mutation or variant [108]. The availability of tools for the Cre–Lox system and CRISPR–Cas9 is particularly robust in mouse, while CRISPR–Cas9 or antisense morpholino oligonucleotides are the current standard for genetic approaches in the zebrafish model system. Comprehensive summaries of genetic scoliosis models to date are provided in Table 2 (mammalian models) and Table 3 (non-mammalian models).
Despite being quadruped, the murine nervous, endocrine, and musculoskeletal systems share significant similarities with humans compared to non-mammalian models. One of the first genetic murine models of scoliosis reported was in a Gdf5;Gdf6 (Growth Differentiating Factor-5, -6) double mutant, which developed spinal curvature as well as defects in skeletal patterning and joint tissues [109]. After discovering a translocation affecting CHD2 (Chromodomain DNA Helicase Protein 2) in a patient with scoliosis and developmental delay, a heterozygous Chd2 ± mouse was created showing marked spinal kyphosis, growth retardation, and reduced body fat [110]. Mice homozygous for a deletion in Fgfr3 (Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3) developed kyphoscoliosis at 2 months of age, which was then partially corrected with the bone anabolic agent PTHrP-1–34 [111], suggesting that bone metabolism has a role in scoliosis, a concept that has been implicated in select populations of human AIS patients [112,113,114,115,116].
Use of conditional genetics has pinpointed the role of cartilaginous tissues during the development of scoliosis in mice. A gain-of-function Npr2 (Natriuretic Peptide Receptor 2) mutation expressed specifically in chondrocyte lineages expressing Col11a2 (Collagen Type XI Alpha 2 Chain) was discovered in a family with scoliosis, tall stature, and macrodactyly, which then caused bony overgrowth and severe kyphosis in mouse [117]. Chondrocyte-specific deletion of Ptpn11 (Tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 11, encoding Shp2) at 4 weeks of age in mice led to juvenile scoliosis whereas constitutive deletion led to severe skeletal defects, including scoliosis [118]. Chondrocyte-specific knockdown of Sox9, an essential transcription factor for chondrocyte differentiation, was found to cause multiple musculoskeletal and developmental abnormalities in mice, including severe kyphosis [119]. Osteochondroprogenitor-specific depletion of Gpr126/Adgrg6 (Adhesion G Protein-Coupled Receptor G6), variants in which were implicated in IS by multiple GWAS [14,15,16,17,18,19], was found to cause a late-onset scoliosis in mouse, as well as an abnormal sternum phenotype similar to pectus excavatum [120]. Deletion of Prmt5 (Protein Arginine Methyltransferase 5) in the same osteochondroprogenitor cell lineages in mouse was found to produce early-onset scoliosis [121].
Clinical investigations have shown a potential proprioceptive mechanosensory deficit in IS individuals, thus leading to study of this regulatory system in murine models. Murine mutants null for Runx3 (Runt-related Transcription Factor 3) and Egr3 (Early Growth Response 3) both exhibited a scoliosis phenotype. A third mouse model with selective loss of Piezo2 (Piezo Type Mechanosensitive Ion Channel Component 2) in proprioceptive neurons also led to spinal kyphosis and scoliosis, again indicating the potential role of the proprioceptive system in maintaining spinal alignment [122].
Bony fishes: Fish models, first championed by the curveback guppy, which spontaneously developed isolated spinal curvatures, was one of the first established genetic models of scoliosis and was used to suggest that scoliosis was not exclusive to bipedalism [38, 71, 123].
The authors later identified a major quantitative trait locus (QTL) in the curveback guppy containing over 100 genes, including the candidate IS gene mtnr1b [123], but due to the lack of genetic resources in the guppy the causal mutation(s) were never fully defined.
Recently, zebrafish (Danio rerio) have become prominent in scoliosis research, with key advantages and available resources as listed in Overview of Popular Animal Models. Initial overexpression experiments in zebrafish of mutations in POC5 [124] (POC5 Centriolar Protein) and near LBX1 [125] (Ladybird Homeobox-1) were used to validate human genetic findings.
Zebrafish models have shown that tissue-specific mutations in motile cilia genes, including ptk7 (Protein Tyrosine Kinase 7), lead to phenotypes that resemble aspects of IS including late-onset spine curvatures without vertebral malformations, and a higher penetrance and severity in female mutant fish [72, 126]. Curvatures were associated with defects in cerebrospinal fluid flow, hypothesized as linked to malfunctioning motile cilia of the brain’s ependymal cells [70]. The ptk7 model sparked additional interest in ependymal cilia defects as related to IS pathology [124, 127], which were also seen in kif6−/− (Kinesin Family Member 6) scoliotic zebrafish [128, 129]. Further research pinpointed neuroinflammation as a potential cause of the scoliosis or progression of the scoliosis in ptk7 mutant fish; interestingly, as treatment of the ptk7 mutant zebrafish with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (e.g., aspirin and N-acetyl cysteine) drastically reduced the incidence of spinal curvatures [130].
Recent studies have implicated the Reissner fiber, a threadlike glycoprotein strand running the length of the spinal cord central canal, as essential for proper spine morphogenesis in larval zebrafish [131, 132]. Moreover, these studies show that the loss of motile cilia function and disrupted cerebrospinal fluid flow are tightly correlated with the disassembly of the Reissner fiber. Whether these mechanisms are shared with IS in humans remains controversial, as it is unclear whether humans possess a Reissner fiber past infancy [133, 134]. Regardless, the mechanism of how the Reissner fiber is controlling spine morphogenesis warrants further research. Recent studies implicating the stimulation of the cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons (CSF-cNs) by physically interacting with the Reissner fiber are intriguing [135]. This is even more relevant in light of recent work showing that alterations in the expression of urotensin neuropeptides in CSF-cNs can lead to improper control of the body axis and result in scoliotic curvatures in zebrafish. Additional recent work has found that defects in sco-spondin (encoded by SSPO), the main protein component of the Reissner fiber, cause scoliosis in zebrafish and is a conserved mechanism, along with neuroinflammation, across different genetic zebrafish models of scoliosis [131].
Current limitations and future directions of IS animal modeling
With the exception of mutant Adgrg6 mice [120], which also show a pectus excavatum phenotype [120], and potentially kif7co63 zebrafish [136], which have not yet been fully characterized, there is currently a lack of animal models that show isolated, IS-like spinal curvatures without secondary phenotypes, including hydrocephalus, skeletal malformations, degeneration, or bone quality defects. Additionally, with a few exceptions [71, 72], most animal models of scoliosis have not shown sexual dimorphism. Severe IS presents in females by a 9:1 ratio, which has been hypothesized as being caused by differences in the prepubertal growth spurt [137, 138], muscle mass [137], inflammatory responses [139], and hormones [138, 140, 141].
IS is now largely understood as a complex genetic disease caused by combinations of mutations that alone are mildly deleterious, perhaps in combination with environmental risk factors [142]. Most animal models to date have manipulated single genes or variants to determine the effect of the genomic region in isolation. Future animal modeling research may move towards combinatorial approaches, where 2 + characterized mutations are induced within one model, or genetic models are combined with environmental or epigenetic perturbations also suspected to contribute to IS [143].
Conclusion
IS is a multifactorial condition that has been challenging to model in animals due to complex genetic and unique biomechanical factors believed to cause disease onset. Despite these challenges, genetic animal models have served as crucial tools to understand spinal development and pathology, test scientific hypotheses, and validate potential mutations found in human data. We advocate careful selection of animal models depending on the scientific question, and careful consideration of IS-like curvatures within the context of the animal model being studied. Future research directions may include induction of multiple mutations or environmental effects within one animal model to reflect current understanding of the human condition.
Data and/or code availability
This is a narrative review; no data and or/code was generated.
Abbreviations
- IS:
-
Idiopathic scoliosis
- GWAS:
-
Genome-wide association study
- QTL:
-
Quantitative trait locus
References
Miller NH, Schwab DL, Sponseller PD et al (2001) Characterization of idiopathic scoliosis in a clinically well-defined population. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:349–357
Roach JW (1999) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Clin N Am 30(3):353–365 (vii-viii)
Asher MA, Burton DC (2006) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long term treatment effects. Scoliosis 1(1):2
Cowell HR, Hall JN, MacEwen GD (1972) Genetic aspects of idiopathic scoliosis. A Nicholas Andry Award essay, 1970. Clin Orthop Relat Res 86:121–131
Riseborough EJ, Wynne-Davies R (1973) A genetic survey of idiopathic scoliosis in Boston, Massachusetts. J Bone Jt Surg Am 55(5):974–982
Bonaiti C, Feingold J, Briard ML et al (1976) Genetics of idiopathic scoliosis. Helv Paediatr Acta 31(3):229–240
Czeizel A, Bellyei A, Barta O et al (1978) Genetics of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Med Genet 15(6):424–427
Kesling KL, Reinker KA (1997) Scoliosis in twins. A meta-analysis of the literature and report of six cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22(17):2009–2014 (discussion 2015)
Inoue M, Minami S, Kitahara H et al (1998) Idiopathic scoliosis in twins studied by DNA fingerprinting: the incidence and type of scoliosis. J Bone Jt Surg Br 80(2):212–217
Aksenovich TI, Zaidman AM, Zorkol’tseva IV et al (1999) New models of inheritance of complex characteristics and their use in segregation analysis of idiopathic scoliosis. Genetika 35(2):255–262
Andersen MO, Thomsen K, Kyvik KO (2007) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in twins: a population-based survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(8):927–930
Ward K, Ogilvie J, Argyle V et al (2010) Polygenic inheritance of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a study of extended families in Utah. Am J Med Genet A 152A(5):1178–1188
Tang NL, Yeung HY, Hung VW et al (2012) Genetic epidemiology and heritability of AIS: A study of 415 Chinese female patients. J Orthop Res 30(9):1464–1469
Kou I, Takahashi Y, Johnson TA et al (2013) Genetic variants in GPR126 are associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nat Genet 45(6):676–679
Xu JF, Yang GH, Pan XH et al (2015) Association of GPR126 gene polymorphism with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Chinese populations. Genomics 105(2):101–107
Qin X, Xu L, Xia C et al (2017) Genetic variant of GPR126 gene is functionally associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in Chinese population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(19):E1098–E1103
Man GC, Tang NL, Chan TF et al (2018) Replication study for the association of GWAS-associated loci with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis susceptibility and curve progression in a Chinese population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44:464–471
Kou I, Watanabe K, Takahashi Y et al (2018) A multi-ethnic meta-analysis confirms the association of rs6570507 with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Sci Rep 8(1):11575
Liu G, Liu S, Lin M et al (2018) Genetic polymorphisms of GPR126 are functionally associated with PUMC classifications of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in a Northern Han population. J Cell Mol Med 22(3):1964–1971
Takahashi Y, Kou I, Takahashi A et al (2011) A genome-wide association study identifies common variants near LBX1 associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Nat Genet 43(12):1237–1240
Fan YH, Song YQ, Chan D et al (2012) SNP rs11190870 near LBX1 is associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in southern Chinese. J Hum Genet 57(4):244–246
Nelson LM, Chettier R, Ogilvie JW, et Al (2011) Candidate genes for susceptibility of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis identified through a large genome-wide association study. In: Scoliosis research society 46th annual meeting & course, Louisville, KY
Gao W, Peng Y, Liang G et al (2013) Association between common variants near LBX1 and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis replicated in the Chinese Han population. PLoS ONE 8(1):e53234
Jiang H, Qiu X, Dai J et al (2013) Association of rs11190870 near LBX1 with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis susceptibility in a Han Chinese population. Eur Spine J 22(2):282–286
Londono D, Kou I, Johnson TA et al (2014) A meta-analysis identifies adolescent idiopathic scoliosis association with LBX1 locus in multiple ethnic groups. J Med Genet 51(6):401–406
Grauers A, Wang J, Einarsdottir E et al (2015) Candidate gene analysis and exome sequencing confirm LBX1 as a susceptibility gene for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 15(10):2239–2246
Chettier R, Nelson L, Ogilvie JW et al (2015) Haplotypes at LBX1 have distinct inheritance patterns with opposite effects in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. PLoS ONE 10(2):e0117708
Cao Y, Min J, Zhang Q et al (2016) Associations of LBX1 gene and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis susceptibility: a meta-analysis based on 34,626 subjects. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 17:309
Zhu Z, Xu L, Leung-Sang Tang N et al (2017) Genome-wide association study identifies novel susceptible loci and highlights Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in the development of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Hum Mol Genet 26(8):1577–1583
Liu S, Wu N, Zuo Y et al (2017) Genetic polymorphism of LBX1 is associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in northern Chinese Han population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(15):1125–1129
Nada D, Julien C, Samuels ME et al (2018) A replication study for association of LBX1 locus with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in French-Canadian population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43(3):172–178
Li YL, Gao SJ, Xu H et al (2018) The association of rs11190870 near LBX1 with the susceptibility and severity of AIS, a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 54(Pt A):193–200
Dunwoodie SL, Kusumi K (2018) The genetics and development of scoliosis. Springer, Cham (p. 1 online resource (XII, 199 pages 29 illustrations, 12 illustrations in color))
Sarwark JF, Castelein RM, Maqsood A et al (2019) The biomechanics of induction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: theoretical factors. J Bone Jt Surg Am 101(6):e22
Gorman KF, Breden F (2007) Teleosts as models for human vertebral stability and deformity. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 145(1):28–38
Janssen MM, de Wilde RF, Kouwenhoven JW et al (2011) Experimental animal models in scoliosis research: a review of the literature. Spine J 11(4):347–358
Man GC, Wang WW, Yim AP et al (2014) A review of pinealectomy-induced melatonin-deficient animal models for the study of etiopathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Int J Mol Sci 15(9):16484–16499
Boswell CW, Ciruna B (2017) Understanding idiopathic scoliosis: a new zebrafish school of thought. Trends Genet 33(3):183–196
Liu Z, Gray RS (2018) Animal models of idiopathic scoliosis. In: Kusumi K, Dunwoodie SL (eds) The genetics and development of scoliosis. Springer, Cham, pp 107–138
Ericsson AC, Crim MJ, Franklin CL (2013) A brief history of animal modeling. Mo Med 110(3):201–205
Pozeg ZI, Flamm ES (2009) Vesalius and the 1543 Epitome of his De humani corporis fabrica librorum: a uniquely illuminated copy. Pap Bibliogr Soc Am 103(2):199–220
Morse HC (1978) Origins of inbred mice. Academic Press, New York, p xvi
van der Worp HB, Howells DW, Sena ES et al (2010) Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies? PLoS Med 7(3):e1000245
McGonigle P, Ruggeri B (2014) Animal models of human disease: challenges in enabling translation. Biochem Pharmacol 87(1):162–171
Mestas J, Hughes CC (2004) Of mice and not men: differences between mouse and human immunology. J Immunol 172(5):2731–2738
Martignoni M, Groothuis GM, de Kanter R (2006) Species differences between mouse, rat, dog, monkey and human CYP-mediated drug metabolism, inhibition and induction. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2(6):875–894
Cheon DJ, Orsulic S (2011) Mouse models of cancer. Annu Rev Pathol 6:95–119
Zschaler J, Schlorke D, Arnhold J (2014) Differences in innate immune response between man and mouse. Crit Rev Immunol 34(5):433–454
Hugenholtz F, de Vos WM (2018) Mouse models for human intestinal microbiota research: a critical evaluation. Cell Mol Life Sci 75(1):149–160
Weller MG (2018) Ten basic rules of antibody validation. Anal Chem Insights 13:1177390118757462
Allen MJ, Hankenson KD, Goodrich L et al (2017) Ethical use of animal models in musculoskeletal research. J Orthop Res 35(4):740–751
Casaroli G, Wade K, Villa T, Wilke HJ (2018) In: Biomechanics of the spine. p 279–296
Alini M, Eisenstein SM, Ito K et al (2008) Are animal models useful for studying human disc disorders/degeneration? Eur Spine J 17(1):2–19
Drespe IH, Polzhofer GK, Turner AS et al (2005) Animal models for spinal fusion. Spine J 5(6 Suppl):209S-216S
Sharif-Alhoseini M, Khormali M, Rezaei M et al (2017) Animal models of spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord 55(8):714–721
Schimandle JH, Boden SD (1994) Spine update. The use of animal models to study spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19(17):1998–2006
Stavrakis AI, Loftin AH, Lord EL et al (2015) Current Animal Models of Postoperative Spine Infection and Potential Future Advances. Front Med (Lausanne) 2:34
Gomes PS, Fernandes MH (2011) Rodent models in bone-related research: the relevance of calvarial defects in the assessment of bone regeneration strategies. Lab Anim 45(1):14–24
Mural RJ, Adams MD, Myers EW et al (2002) A comparison of whole-genome shotgun-derived mouse chromosome 16 and the human genome. Science 296(5573):1661–1671
Josephson A, Greitz D, Klason T et al (2001) A spinal thecal sac constriction model supports the theory that induced pressure gradients in the cord cause edema and cyst formation. Neurosurgery 48(3):636–645
O’Connor G, Jeffrey E, Madorma D et al (2018) Investigation of Microbiota Alterations and Intestinal Inflammation Post-Spinal Cord Injury in Rat Model. J Neurotrauma 35(18):2159–2166
Harikrishnan VS, Krishnan LK, Abelson KSP (2019) A novel technique to develop thoracic spinal laminectomy and a methodology to assess the functionality and welfare of the contusion spinal cord injury (SCI) rat model. PLoS ONE 14(7):e0219001
Byrnes KR, Fricke ST, Faden AI (2010) Neuropathological differences between rats and mice after spinal cord injury. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI 32(4):836–846
Szpirer C (2020) Rat models of human diseases and related phenotypes: a systematic inventory of the causative genes. J Biomed Sci 27(1):84
Kjell J, Olson L (2016) Rat models of spinal cord injury: from pathology to potential therapies. Dis Model Mech 9(10):1125–1137
Chakrabarti S, Streisinger G, Singer F et al (1983) Frequency of gamma-ray induced specific locus and recessive lethal mutations in mature germ cells of the zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. Genetics 103(1):109–123
Grunwald DJ, Streisinger G (1992) Induction of recessive lethal and specific locus mutations in the zebrafish with ethyl nitrosourea. Genet Res 59(2):103–116
Tavares B, Santos Lopes S (2013) The importance of zebrafish in biomedical research. Acta Med Port 26(5):583–592
Essner JJ, Amack JD, Nyholm MK et al (2005) Kupffer’s vesicle is a ciliated organ of asymmetry in the zebrafish embryo that initiates left-right development of the brain, heart and gut. Development 132(6):1247–1260
Grimes DT, Boswell CW, Morante NF et al (2016) Zebrafish models of idiopathic scoliosis link cerebrospinal fluid flow defects to spine curvature. Science 352(6291):1341–1344
Gorman KF, Breden F (2009) Idiopathic-type scoliosis is not exclusive to bipedalism. Med Hypotheses 72(3):348–352
Hayes M, Gao X, Yu LX et al (2014) ptk7 mutant zebrafish models of congenital and idiopathic scoliosis implicate dysregulated Wnt signalling in disease. Nat Commun 5:4777
Cantaut-Belarif Y, Sternberg JR, Thouvenin O et al (2018) The Reissner fiber in the cerebrospinal fluid controls morphogenesis of the body axis. Curr Biol 28(15):2479-2486e4
Troutwine B, Gontarz P, Minowa R et al (2019) The Reissner fiber is highly dynamic in vivo and controls morphogenesis of the spine. bioRxiv
Yaman O, Dalbayrak S (2014) Idiopathic scoliosis. Turk Neurosurg 24(5):646–657
Liu Z, Tam EM, Sun GQ et al (2012) Abnormal leptin bioavailability in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an important new finding. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(7):599–604
Zanatta LC, Boguszewski CL, Borba VZ et al (2014) Osteocalcin, energy and glucose metabolism. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 58(5):444–451
Morcuende JA, Minhas R, Dolan L et al (2003) Allelic variants of human melatonin 1A receptor in patients with familial adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(17):2025–2028
Moreau A, Wang DS, Forget S et al (2004) Melatonin signaling dysfunction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(16):1772–1781
Letellier K, Azeddine B, Parent S et al (2008) Estrogen cross-talk with the melatonin signaling pathway in human osteoblasts derived from adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. J Pineal Res 45(4):383–393
Girardo M, Bettini N, Dema E et al (2011) The role of melatonin in the pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 1):S68-74
Man GC, Wong JH, Wang WW et al (2011) Abnormal melatonin receptor 1B expression in osteoblasts from girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pineal Res 50(4):395–402
Zamecnik J, Krskova L, Hacek J et al (2016) Etiopathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Expression of melatonin receptors 1A/1B, calmodulin and estrogen receptor 2 in deep paravertebral muscles revisited. Mol Med Rep 14(6):5719–5724
Machida M, Dubousset J, Imamura Y et al (1993) An experimental study in chickens for the pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(12):1609–1615
Machida M, Dubousset J, Imamura Y et al (1995) Role of melatonin deficiency in the development of scoliosis in pinealectomised chickens. J Bone Jt Surg Br 77(1):134–138
Bagnall K, Raso VJ, Moreau M et al (1999) The effects of melatonin therapy on the development of scoliosis after pinealectomy in the chicken. J Bone Jt Surg Am 81(2):191–199
Akel I, Kocak O, Bozkurt G et al (2009) The effect of calmodulin antagonists on experimental scoliosis: a pinealectomized chicken model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(6):533–538
Fagan AB, Kennaway DJ, Oakley AP (2009) Pinealectomy in the chicken: a good model of scoliosis? Eur Spine J 18(8):1154–1159
Langenskiold A, Michelsson JE (1961) Experimental progressive scoliosis in the rabbit. J Bone Jt Surg Br 43-B:116–120
Robin GC, Stein H (1975) Experimental scoliosis in primates. Failure of a technique. J Bone Jt Surg Br 57(2):142–145
Thomas S, Dave PK (1985) Experimental scoliosis in monkeys. Acta Orthop Scand 56(1):43–46
Stilwell DL Jr (1962) Structural deformities of vertebrae. Bone adaptation and modeling in experimental scoliosis and kyphosis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 44-A:611–634
Cheung KM, Wang T, Poon AM et al (2005) The effect of pinealectomy on scoliosis development in young nonhuman primates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(18):2009–2013
Bagnall KM, Ford DM, McFadden KD et al (1983) A comparison of vertebral muscle fiber characteristics between human and monkey tissue. Acta Anat (Basel) 117(1):51–57
Simmons HA (2016) Age-associated pathology in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Vet Pathol 53(2):399–416
Hernandez-Godinez B, Ibanez-Contreras A, Perdigon-Castaneda G et al (2010) Radiographic incidence of spinal osteopathologies in captive rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Comp Med 60(5):396–399
McCoy AM (2015) Animal models of osteoarthritis: comparisons and key considerations. Vet Pathol 52(5):803–818
Permuy M, Lopez-Pena M, Munoz F et al (2019) Rabbit as model for osteoporosis research. J Bone Miner Metab 37(4):573–583
Cervera-Irimia J, Gonzalez-Miranda A, Riquelme-Garcia O et al. (2019) Scoliosis induced by costotransversectomy in minipigs model. Med Glas (Zenica) 16(2):184–190
Wijdicks SPJ, Lemans JVC, Overweg G et al (2021) Induction of a representative idiopathic-like scoliosis in a porcine model using a multidirectional dynamic spring-based system. Spine J 21(8):1376–1386
Machida M, Murai I, Miyashita Y et al (1999) Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. Experimental study in rats. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(19):1985–1989
Castelein RM, van Dieen JH, Smit TH (2005) The role of dorsal shear forces in the pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis—a hypothesis. Med Hypotheses 65(3):501–508
Xiao J, Wu ZH, Qiu GX et al (2007) Upright posture impact on spine susceptibility in scoliosis and progression patterns of scoliotic curve. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 87(1):48–52
Liu H, Liu Z, Man CW et al (2019) The effect of exogenous melatonin on reducing scoliotic curvature and improving bone quality in melatonin-deficient C57BL/6J mice. Sci Rep 9(1):6202
Machida M, Saito M, Dubousset J et al (2005) Pathological mechanism of idiopathic scoliosis: experimental scoliosis in pinealectomized rats. Eur Spine J 14(9):843–848
Sobajima S, Kin A, Baba I et al (2003) Implication for melatonin and its receptor in the spinal deformities of hereditary lordoscoliotic rabbits. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(6):554–558
de Reuver S, Ijsseldijk LL, Homans JF et al (2021) What a stranded whale with scoliosis can teach us about human idiopathic scoliosis. Sci Rep 11(1):7218
Lewandoski M (2001) Conditional control of gene expression in the mouse. Nat Rev Genet 2(10):743–755
Settle SH Jr, Rountree RB, Sinha A et al (2003) Multiple joint and skeletal patterning defects caused by single and double mutations in the mouse Gdf6 and Gdf5 genes. Dev Biol 254(1):116–130
Kulkarni S, Nagarajan P, Wall J et al (2008) Disruption of chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 2 (CHD2) causes scoliosis. Am J Med Genet A 146A(9):1117–1127
Gao C, Chen BP, Sullivan MB et al (2015) Micro CT analysis of spine architecture in a mouse model of scoliosis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 6:38
Cheng JC, Qin L, Cheung CS et al (2000) Generalized low areal and volumetric bone mineral density in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Miner Res 15(8):1587–1595
Guo X, Chau WW, Chan YL et al (2003) Relative anterior spinal overgrowth in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results of disproportionate endochondral-membranous bone growth. J Bone Jt Surg Br 85(7):1026–1031
Zhu F, Qiu Y, Yeung HY et al (2006) Histomorphometric study of the spinal growth plates in idiopathic scoliosis and congenital scoliosis. Pediatr Int 48(6):591–598
Cheung CS, Lee WT, Tse YK et al (2006) Generalized osteopenia in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis—association with abnormal pubertal growth, bone turnover, and calcium intake? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(3):330–338
Wang WW, Man GC, Wong JH et al (2014) Abnormal response of the proliferation and differentiation of growth plate chondrocytes to melatonin in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Int J Mol Sci 15(9):17100–17114
Miura K, Namba N, Fujiwara M et al (2012) An overgrowth disorder associated with excessive production of cGMP due to a gain-of-function mutation of the natriuretic peptide receptor 2 gene. PLoS ONE 7(8):e42180
Kim HK, Aruwajoye O, Sucato D et al (2013) Induction of SHP2 deficiency in chondrocytes causes severe scoliosis and kyphosis in mice. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(21):E1307–E1312
Henry SP, Liang S, Akdemir KC et al (2012) The postnatal role of Sox9 in cartilage. J Bone Miner Res 27(12):2511–2525
Karner CM, Long F, Solnica-Krezel L et al (2015) Gpr126/Adgrg6 deletion in cartilage models idiopathic scoliosis and pectus excavatum in mice. Hum Mol Genet 24(15):4365–4373
Liu Z, Ramachandran J, Vokes SA et al (2019) Regulation of terminal hypertrophic chondrocyte differentiation in Prmt5 mutant mice modeling infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Dis Model Mech 12(12):041251
Assaraf E, Blecher R, Heinemann-Yerushalmi L et al (2020) Piezo2 expressed in proprioceptive neurons is essential for skeletal integrity. Nat Commun 11(1):3168
Gorman KF, Christians JK, Parent J et al (2011) A major QTL controls susceptibility to spinal curvature in the curveback guppy. BMC Genet 12:16
Patten SA, Margaritte-Jeannin P, Bernard JC et al (2015) Functional variants of POC5 identified in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. J Clin Investig 125(3):1124–1128
Guo L, Yamashita H, Kou I et al (2016) Functional investigation of a non-coding variant associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in zebrafish: elevated expression of the ladybird homeobox gene causes body axis deformation. PLoS Genet 12(1):e1005802
Hayes M, Naito M, Daulat A et al (2013) Ptk7 promotes non-canonical Wnt/PCP-mediated morphogenesis and inhibits Wnt/beta-catenin-dependent cell fate decisions during vertebrate development. Development 140(8):1807–1818
Catanzariti J-F, D’hulster-Hocquet L, Le Berre M, Delaplace C, Boukelifa M, Thevenon A (2017) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow and ciliopathy. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2017.07.221
Buchan JG, Gray RS, Gansner JM et al (2014) Kinesin family member 6 (kif6) is necessary for spine development in zebrafish. Dev Dyn 243(12):1646–1657
Konjikusic MJ, Yeetong P, Boswell CW et al (2018) Mutations in Kinesin family member 6 reveal specific role in ependymal cell ciliogenesis and human neurological development. PLoS Genet 14(11):e1007817
Van Gennip JLM, Boswell CW, Ciruna B (2018) Neuroinflammatory signals drive spinal curve formation in zebrafish models of idiopathic scoliosis. Sci Adv 4(12):eaav781
Rose CD, Pompili D, Henke K et al (2020) SCO-spondin defects and neuroinflammation are conserved mechanisms driving spinal deformity across genetic models of idiopathic scoliosis. Curr Biol 30(12):2363-2373.e6
Troutwine BR, Gontarz P, Konjikusic MJ et al (2020) The Reissner fiber is highly dynamic in vivo and controls morphogenesis of the spine. Curr Biol 30(12):2353-2362.e3
Rodriguez EM, Oksche A, Hein S et al (1984) Comparative immunocytochemical study of the subcommissural organ. Cell Tissue Res 237(3):427–441
Galarza M (2002) Evidence of the subcommissural organ in humans and its association with hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Rev 25(4):205–215
Orts-Del’Immagine A, Cantaut-Belarif Y, Thouvenin O et al (2020) Sensory neurons contacting the cerebrospinal fluid require the Reissner fiber to detect spinal curvature in vivo. Curr Biol 30(5):827–839
Terhune EA, Cuevas MT, Monley AM et al (2020) Mutations in KIF7 implicated in idiopathic scoliosis in humans and axial curvatures in zebrafish. Hum Mutat 42(4):392–407
Burwell RG (2003) Aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis: current concepts. Pediatr Rehabil 6(3–4):137–170
Latalski M, Danielewicz-Bromberek A, Fatyga M et al (2017) Current insights into the aetiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(10):1327–1333
Burwell RG, Aujla RK, Grevitt MP et al (2009) Pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in girls—a double neuro-osseous theory involving disharmony between two nervous systems, somatic and autonomic expressed in the spine and trunk: possible dependency on sympathetic nervous system and hormones with implications for medical therapy. Scoliosis 4:24
Lowe TG, Edgar M, Margulies JY et al (2000) Etiology of idiopathic scoliosis: current trends in research. J Bone Jt Surg Am 82-A(8):1157–1168
Raggio CL (2006) Sexual dimorphism in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Clin N Am 37(4):555–558
Grauers A, Einarsdottir E, Gerdhem P (2016) Genetics and pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 11:45
Peng Y, Wang SR, Qiu GX et al (2020) Research progress on the etiology and pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Chin Med J (Engl) 133(4):483–493
Liu Z et al (2021) An adhesion G protein-coupled receptor is required in cartilaginous and dense connective tissues to maintain spine alignment. Elife 10:e67781
Irie K et al (2016) Histopathology of a wavy medaka. J Toxicol Pathol 29(2):115–118
Gao W et al (2017) Rare coding variants in MAPK7 predispose to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Hum Mutat 38(11):1500–1510
Mathieu H et al (2021) Genetic variant of TTLL11 gene and subsequent ciliary defects are associated with idiopathic scoliosis in a 5-generation UK family. Sci Rep 11(1):11026
Marie-Hardy L et al (2021) The orthopedic characterization of cfap298(tm304) mutants validate zebrafish to faithfully model human AIS. Sci Rep 11(1):7392
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript. No funding was received for conducting this study. No funds, grants, or other support was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ET: data collection, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, approval of final version of manuscript, agree to be accountable for the work. AM: data collection, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, approval of final version of manuscript, agree to be accountable for the work. MC: data collection, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, approval of final version of manuscript, agree to be accountable for the work content. CW: data collection, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, approval of final version of manuscript, agree to be accountable for the work content. RG: data collection, writing—review and editing, approval of final version of manuscript, agree to be accountable for the work. NH-M: writing—review and editing, supervision, approval of final version of manuscript, agree to be accountable for the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.
Ethics approval
This is a narrative review; no ethics approval was required.
Consent
This is a narrative review; no consenting was performed.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Terhune, E.A., Monley, A.M., Cuevas, M.T. et al. Genetic animal modeling for idiopathic scoliosis research: history and considerations. Spine Deform 10, 1003–1016 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-022-00488-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-022-00488-7