Abstract
Freshwater ecosystems are vitally important which supports biological diversity. With this aim, a total of eight biotic and three species diversity indices were used to determine water quality of Kozluoluk Stream in West Anatolia of Turkey. The biotic indices were: Saprobi (SI), Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP-O, BMWP-S and BMWP-G), Average Score per Taxon (ASPT), Family Biotic Index (FBI), Belgian Biotic Index (BBI), EPT-Taxa [%], and species diversity indices consisted of: Shannon–Weaver (SWDI), Simpsons (SDI) and Margalef (MDI). Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to the physicochemical and biotic dataset. Similarities between the sampling stations were clustered by using cluster analysis (CLUS). Pearson-based correlations were used to determine which index is more suitable in determining water quality of the stream. The nine taxonomic groups were found in Kozluoluk Stream consisting of Amphipoda, Oligochaeta, Gastropoda, Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Odonata, Coleoptera and Diptera. The 1st and 2nd stations (90%) were the most similar stations in terms of benthic macroinvertebrate species distribution. The results indicate that the ASPT, BBI, BMWP-O, BMWP-S, BMWP-G and EPT-Taxa [%] are more proper than FBI and SI indices to determine the water quality of Kozluoluk Stream. The water quality along the stream varied from good class in upstream stations, to moderate in downstream stations. This study clearly showed that the specific biotic index according to the ecological characteristics of Turkey should be developed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The amount of unpolluted water resources is decreasing day by day due to the global warming, increasing population and urbanization (Ertaş et al., 2020, 2021a, b; Manjarrés-Hernández et al., 2021; Sukatar et al., 2020). The various researches, such as biomonitoring methods, have been applied to protect drinking water resources in recent years (Zeybek, 2017). At the beginning of the monitoring studies, the various physicochemical properties of the water source are determined primarily in freshwater systems. In recent years, besides these data, the necessity of knowing the biological richness of fauna has been put forward and many studies on benthic macroinvertebrates have been conducted in Turkey (Başören & Kazancı, 2016; Çamur-Elipek et al., 2010; Duran & Akyıldız, 2011; Kalyoncu et al., 2008; Koşalşahin & Zeybek, 2019; Taşdemir et al., 2010; Zeybek et al., 2012). As a result of the studies, comments can be made about the characteristics of many water sources owing to the species used as ecological indicators.
Biotic indices are the focus of biological monitoring studies based on benthic macroinvertebrates. One of the difficulties in presenting biological observations is summarizing data and presenting it in specific ways. Therefore, various indices are used in Europe for water quality assessment studies using benthic invertebrates (Korycińska, & Królak, 2006). The Saprobi in Germany, Biological Monitoring Working Party—BMWP, Average Score Per Taxon—ASPT, in England, and Belgian Biotic Index—BBI, in Belgium seem to give the most reliable results specific to geographic regions (Yorulmaz et al., 2015). The Yeşilırmak BMWP biotic index (Y-BMWP) was recently developed for use only in the Yeşilırmak river basin in Turkey (Kazancı et al., 2013).
Izmir with its historical importance is localizing on the Aegean coast in the West Anatolia of Turkey. Kozluoluk Stream is determined as a study area because it is an important drinking water source for Izmir. The stream is one of the important water sources of the Tahtalı Dam basin in Menderes district of Izmir. Kozluoluk Stream is used as irrigation water source for the surrounding agricultural fields. We hypothesized that the fact that the study area is a residential area that receives migration and the continuation of intensive agricultural activities around the stream causes a negative impact on the quality of the stream. With this reason, this study aims to assess the water quality of the Kozluoluk Stream, using eight biotic indices and three diversity indices accordance with physicochemical characteristics of Kozluoluk Stream. In addition, we aimed to compare the results of biotic and diversity indices in accordance with physicochemical characteristics of Kozluoluk Stream.
Methods
Study area
The study area is located 36 km south of the city centre of Izmir, within the area surrounded by Yeniköy and Efemçukuru villages. The study was carried out monthly at five sampling points in the stream. Sampling stations are given in Fig. 1.
This study was carried out between October 2019 and August 2020. Sampling stations were chosen according to WFD Annex V 1.3.2. (WFD, 2000). Sampling was carried out from each station by using a kick net with classic 50 × 30 cm in size and 250 µm mesh size according to the literature (AQEM Consortium, 2002). Collected samples were fixed in ethyl alcohol (70%) and formaldehyde (4%) throughout the field study. The samples were categorized and diagnosed to the genus and species level under ZEISS Stereo Discovery.V12 stereomicroscope.
Physicochemical parameters
Water samples were taken and analysed for orthophosphate (PO4–P), ammoniacal nitrogen (NH4–N), nitrate (NO2–N), nitrite (NO3–N) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) using spectrophotometer and proper kits. All analyses were done by following the standard methods (APHA, 2005). Water temperature (ºC), turbidity (TU), pH, electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved oxygen (DO), oxygen saturation (Sat. O2) were measured in the field by portable equipment (Oxi 315i/ SET WTW Oxygen meter and Waterproof Multiparameter).
Data analysis
Saprobic index (SI), Average Score Per Taxon (ASPT), Belgian Biotic Index (BBI), Family Biotic Index (FBI), EPT-Taxa [%], modifications of Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP); BMWP-O (Original), BMWP-S (Spanish), BMWP-G (Greek), Shannon–Wiener (SWDI), Simpson’s (SDI) and Margalef (MDI) diversity indices were applied on benthic macroinvertebrate data set by using ASTERICS Software Programme (AQEM Consortium, 2002). The Bray–Curtis similarity index was used to determine the similarities between the sampling stations based on macroinvertebrates (Clarke et al., 2006). The unweighted pair-group average linkage (UPGMA) algorithm was used to illustrate similarity-based clustering relationships between sampling stations (Shrestha & Kazama, 2007). Pearson-based correlation analysis was performed by using SPSS version 20.0. PCA was applied to transforms information content in large data tables into a smaller data set that can be more easily visualized and analysed (Liu et al., 2003; Singh et al., 2004, 2005; Varol & Şen, 2009).
Results and discussion
Physicochemical variables
Summary statistics of physicochemical variables are shown in Table 1.
The water temperature values varied between 10.2 and 14.7 °C in Kozluoluk Stream. The highest T°C values were measured in the 5th station, while the lowest T°C values were measured in the 1st station. Although the temperature values are very important in dividing the streams into regions and in the classification of the streams, the temperature in the spring extensions is generally at low levels (Schmitz, 1954). The pH values varied between 6.80 and 7.15 in this stream. The highest pH values were measured in the first three station, while the lowest pH values were measured in the 5th station. The EC values varied between 101 and 223 μS/m in this stream. The highest EC values were measured in the 5th station, while the lowest EC values were measured in the 1st station. It is known that EC values increase as pollution increases in freshwater (Verep et al., 2005). The 5th station is located in an area used as a picnic and agricultural area and is occasionally exposed to the pollutant effect created by humans. The TU values varied between 1.56 and 4.80 ppt in this stream. The highest TU values were measured in the 5st station, while the lowest TU values were measured in the 1th station. The increase in the amount of suspended solids that prevent the light transmission of water increases the turbidity (Wetzel, 2001). It is recommended not to exceed 1 NTU (turbidity unit) by EPA and World Health Organization (WHO). The DO values varied between 11.0 and 15.3 mg L−1 in this stream. The highest DO and Sat. O2 values were measured in the 1st station, while the lowest DO and Sat. O2 values were measured in the 5th station. It is expected that the oxygen value will be low in regions that are under pollution pressure due to the polluting factors in their environments (Kara & Çömlekçioğlu, 2004; Uyanık et al., 2005). The BOD values varied between 0.54 and 2.93 mg L−1 in this stream. The highest BOD values were measured in the 5th station, while the lowest BOD values were measured in the 1th station. Kocataş (2008) states that the BOD value of a region gives the amount of organic matter, in other words, the amount of pollutants in that region. The highest NH4–N, NO2–N, NO3–N and PO4 values were measured in the 5th station, while the lowest NH4–N, NO2–N, NO3–N and PO4 values were measured in the 1th station in Kozluoluk Stream. Akyıldız and Duran (2021) stated that these parameters with high values in the downstream of the basin could be explained by the distinct pollutant sources.
Benthic macroinvertebrates
In this study, a total of 1.946 benthic macroinvertebrate individuals were collected; all the specimens collected belong to nine groups: Amphipod, Oligochaeta, Gastropoda, Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Odonata, Coleoptera and Diptera. The maximum numbers of individual were collected at 2nd station (411 individuals), while the minimum numbers of individual were collected at 5th station (352 individuals). Insecta was the most dominant invertebrate group in this stream. The lowest number of individuals was determined in autumn, while the highest number of individuals was determined in spring (Fig. 2). The maximum density of benthic fauna was observed during spring, and this can be related to the availability of phytoplankton population in the form of food supply (Wetzel, 2001). Spring drifts that drive the vegetation have also been one of the factors affecting the amount of benthic fauna. On the other hand, decline in the density of benthic fauna during autumn may be due to increased load of suspended solids, reduced transparency and increased water flow (Ertaş & Yorulmaz, 2021; Ertaş et al., 2020, 2021a, 2021b; Yorulmaz & Ertaş, 2021).
Ephemeroptera was the most dominant group of all season in Kozluoluk Stream (Fig. 3).
Insects are the richest group represented with 19 families: Ephemeroptera (5), Plecoptera (2), Trichoptera (3), Odonata (2), Coleoptera (3) and Diptera (4) that make up 76% of the macroinvertebrates of the Kozluoluk Stream. Crustacea were represented with 1 family: Gammaridae, which consists 4.16% of macroinvertebrates; Annelida were represented with 1 family: Naididae, which consists 4.16% of macroinvertebrates; and Mollusca were represented with 4 families: Planorbidae, Viviparidae, Bithyniidae and Lymnaeidae, which consists 15.68% of macroinvertebrates.
The dominance of benthic macroinvertebrate species according to the stations is given in Fig. 4. Gammarus sp. was dominant at the 3rd, 4th and 5th stations. In Kozluoluk Stream, Baetis sp., Baetis alpinus Pictet, 1843, and Baetis rhodani Pictet, 1843, were dominant in upstream point of the stream. Hydropsyche sp. and Hydropsyche angustipennis Curtis, 1834, were dominant in downstream point of the stream. In other stream systems, these species are profusely distributed in downstream and are tolerant of organic pollution in rather slow (Stroot, 1984; Faessel, 1985).
The high number of species in 1st, 2nd and 3rd stations is related as the result of increased O2 level and flow velocity in these stations. These stations are also far from the domestic settlements. In terms of diversity, the richest were sampling 4th station with 22 families each, 8 of them belonging to Ephemeroptera–Plecoptera– Trichoptera (EPT) group that are sensitive to low dissolved oxygen conditions in water (Ertaş & Yorulmaz, 2021). The increase in the percentage of EPT-Taxa leads to an increase in water quality in direct proportional (Ertaş & Yorulmaz, 2021; Lenat, 1993). One Coleoptera, Oligochaeta and Odonata families composed the rest of the macroinvertebrates in 2nd stations. According to Ertaş et al., (2020, 2021a), Baetis sp. are predominantly found in the less organically polluted stream section where the water quality is Class I-II. In Selendi Stream, the most dominant taxon in the upstream points of the stream was Ephemeroptera (Yorulmaz & Ertaş, 2021). The number of EPT families of other stations has decreased compared to the 2nd station.
Cluster analysis dendrogram (UPGMA method) was shown the similarities of the sampling stations (Fig. 5). As a result of the Bray–Curtis similarity index, the 1st and 2nd stations (90%) were the most similar to each other. The second most similar stations to each other were determined at the 4th and 5th stations (81%). Similarity analysis based on benthic invertebrates was frequently used in freshwater studies (Zeybek et al., 2014; Zeybek, 2017; Serdar & Verep, 2018; Koşalşahin & Zeybek, 2019; Yorulmaz et al., 2021).
The ecological structure of Kozluoluk Stream shows that it is under the impact of anthropogenic activities. The biotic and diversity index values and water quality classes of the stations are shown in Table 2.
All diversity indices have shown the highest values in 3rd station, whereas the lowest values are registered in 5th station. These results indicate that the upstream stations of the stream are unpolluted, whereas the reason for the low species diversity at the 5th station is moderately pollution. The 5th station is moderately disturbed due to many domestic and agricultural wastes discharged in this part of the stream. The highest BOD value was seen at the 5th station which showed the presence of organic pollution in the water. BOD represents the amount of oxygen consumed by bacteria and other microorganisms, while they decompose organic matter under aerobic conditions at a specified temperature (Wetzel, 2001). Oxygen depletion in this station is characterized by low species diversity. Although diversity indices are insufficient to assess toxicity and physical changes, they are useful for assessing organic pollution and eutrophication (Plafkin et al., 1989; Kalyoncu et al., 2008; Akay & Dalkıran, 2020; Yorulmaz & Ertaş, 2021).
The BMWP-O, BMWP-S and BMWP-G values were highest in 1st and 2nd. These two stations were classified in Class II. The stream water quality is decreasing and becomes of moderate quality (3rd, 4th and 5th stations). BBI index qualifies the water quality at all the stations in Class I-High except 5th station. According to SI, all the stations are Betamesosaprob-Class II. According to FBI, the water quality is Class II in all stations of the stream. These index scores indicate that the upstream of the stream with good water quality is under minimal human impact and lack of waste discharge because the region is far from inhabited areas. The physical and chemical change in water quality is moderate in the downstream of the stream which is close to urban and rural areas where human activities are more intense.
The metric that gave the best response to the physicochemical variables of water was EPT-Taxa [%]. These metrics are indicated that Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera taxa are sensitive to anthropogenic effects, while Oligochaeta taxa are tolerant to anthropogenic effects in aquatic ecosystems (Ode et al., 2005). In this study, the highest EPT-Taxa [%] values are obtained at the upstream stations. These stations are the upstream part of the stream, and they are less affected by domestic wastes. On the contrary, the 4th and 5th stations are downstream part of the stream. These stations are mostly affected the domestic wastes. The cause of low EPT-Taxa [%] values at the downstream stations in stream is of the pollution that accumulates in the stream as a result of the anthropogenic activities. Other factors depend on the physical properties of the stream such as high temperature, low stream incline and reduction of stream flow.
Our results show that there are differences between indices in water quality classification as a result of applied different indices. It is very difficult to determine the reliability of the index to be chosen for the evaluation of river quality in a country (Yorulmaz & Ertaş, 2021). EPT-Taxa [%], BMWP-O, BMWP-S, BMWP-G and ASPT indices seem more reliable in our research and better reflect the environmental situation, as they are based on the abundance of species sensitive to environmental variables. The fact that Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera contain groups of organisms that are very sensitive to pollution explains why EPT-Taxa [%] shows high water quality (Lenat, 1993). Our results indicate that high number of EPT-Taxa [%] was reported upstream, in 1st, 2nd and 3rd stations; however, with the increased level of pollution in 4th and 5th stations, the number of EPT families is decreased.
Comparative analysis of biotic indices in stream systems in Turkey has been made on a regional basis in recent years. Kantzaris et al. (2002) stated that the BMWP, ASPT and Land Quality Indicators (LQI) were insufficient in evaluating water quality, while BBI and IBE were proper. Ogleni and Topal (2011) stated that the BMWP and ASPT were sufficient to evaluate water quality. Yorulmaz et al. (2015) applied five biotic indices and noted that the FBI was insufficient in evaluating water quality, while ASPT, BMWP, SI and BBI were appropriate. Zeybek (2017) found that the most appropriate indices for the physical and chemical indices were BMWP-O and ASPT-O and ASPT-C. Yorulmaz and Ertaş (2021) found that the BMWP (Polish), BMWP (Spanish), BMWP (Hungarian), BMWP (Greek) versions and all versions of ASPT indices are more proper than FBI and BBI indices to determine the water quality of Selendi Stream. Ertaş and Yorulmaz (2021) found that the BMWP (Original), BMWP (Spanish), BMWP (Greek) and ASPT indices are suitable for assessing the water quality in Kelebek Stream. Ertaş et al., (2021a, 2021b) found that the BBI, BMWP (Original), BMWP (Spanish) and EPT-Taxa [%] are suitable for assessing the water quality in Karabal Stream.
In this study, the random sample cases (10% select case) were made on the biotic indices and physicochemical parameters to verify data sets and to determine that the data were transferred without errors in the SPSS version 20.0. Table 3 indicates the correlations of biotic and diversity indices.
As a result of the correlation analysis, the highest positive significant correlation was found between the BMWP-O, BMWP-S and BMWP-G. The BMWP-O is the positively significant correlated with ASPT (r- 0.986, p˂0.01). ASPT is the positively significant correlated with BBI (r- 0.969, p˂0.01). BMWP-G is the positively significant correlated with BBI (r- 0.961, p˂0.01). The highest negative significant correlation was found between FBI and EPT-Taxa [%] (r- − 0.963, p˂0.01). All the biotic indices are significantly correlated with EPT-Taxa [%], except SI. However, the increase in index values of ASPT, BBI, BMWP-O, BMWP-S and BMWP-G and EPT-Taxa [%] shows good ecological quality.
In this study, the subdivision of sampling points into two groups caused the PCA analysis to show a clear spatial and temporal division. According to PCA analysis, total variance was explained as 83.1% in axes 1 and 2 where eigenvalues were greater than 1. High oxygen concentration and species abundance factors are considered in EPT-Taxa [%], BMWP and ASPT (Paisley et al., 2013). BMWP-O, BMWP-S, BMWP-G, EPT-Taxa [%], ASPT and BBI are positively correlated with DO, Sat. O2 and pH in the stream, while they are negatively correlated with PO4–P, NH4–N, NO2–N and NO3–N (Fig. 6). The increase in pollution in the stream ecosystem causes the score values of these indexes to decrease. On the contrary, SI is used to associate species with specific levels of organic pollution (Suryani et al., 2018). SI is positively correlated with PO4–P, NH4–N, NO2–N and NO3–N in the stream. Our PCA results showed similarity with Suryani et al. (2018). In this study, PCA analysis revealed the significant relationship (p < 0.05) between indices and physicochemical parameters in Kozluoluk Stream.
Conclusion
The main polluting factors are agricultural runoff and land use, as well as domestic wastewater discharged directly into the stream from the 3rd station. While upstream stations are good quality by populated areas and distance from agricultural activities, in downstream part of the stream is moderately polluted and this is reflected in the macroinvertebrate community and distribution. Increased pollution at 5th station resulted in the disappearance of sensitive species from this part of the stream, and the emergence of more pollution-tolerant species adapted to specific habitats. In our study, ASPT, BBI, BMWP-O, BMWP-S, BMWP-G and EPT-Taxa [%] indices are suitable to assessment water quality of Kozluoluk Stream. The condition of the pollution should be monitored by conducting intermittent monitoring studies in Kozluoluk Stream. Determination of suitable biotic indices for use in freshwater systems in Turkey and development of a biotic index specific to Turkey are seen as a need.
References
Akay, E., & Dalkıran, N. (2020). Assessing biological water quality of Yalakdere stream (Yalova, Turkey) with benthic macroinvertebrate-based metrics. Biologia, 75, 1347–1363. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-019-00387-9
Akyildiz, G. K., & Duran, M. (2021). Evaluation of the impact of heterogeneous environmental pollutants on benthic macroinvertebrates and water quality by long-term monitoring of the buyuk menderes river basin. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193, 280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-08981-8
APHA (American Public Health Association). (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (21st ed.). American Public Health Association.
AQEM Consortium. (2002). The AQEM sampling method to be applied in STAR. Chapters 7–8. http://www.eu-star.at/pdf/AqemMacroinvertebrateSamplingProtocol.pdf
Başören, Ö., & Kazancı, N. (2016). Water quality assessment of Fırtına Stream (Rize, Turkey) by using various macroinvertebrate based metrics and physicochemical variables. Review of Hydrobiology, 9(1), 1–16.
Çamur-Elipek, B., Arslan, N., Kirgiz, T., Öterler, B., Güher, H., & Özkan, N. (2010). Analysis of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Relation to Environmental Variables of Lake Gala, a National Park of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 10(2), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.4194/trjfas.2010.0212
Clarke, K. R., Somerfield, P. J., & Chapman, M. G. (2006). On resemblance measures for ecological studies, including taxonomic dissimilarities and a zero-adjusted Bray-Curtis coefficient for denuded assemblages. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 1(7), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2005.12.017
Duran, M., & Akyıldız, G. K. (2011). Evaluating benthic macroinvertebrate fauna and water quality of Suleymanli Lake (Buldan-Denizli) in Turkey. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica, 63(2), 169–178.
Ertaş, A., Boz, T., & Tüney-Kızılkaya, İ. (2021). Determination of benthic macroinvertebrate fauna and some physicochemical properties of Balaban Lake (Menderes- Izmir). Aquatic Science and Engineering, 36(3), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.26650/ASE2020821658
Ertaş, A., Tüney-Kızılkaya, İ, & Yorulmaz, B. (2020). Determination of diversity and species composition of the benthic macroinvertebrates in Sangı stream (Izmir Turkey). Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity, 4, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.22120/jwb.2020.125757.1137
Ertaş, A., Yaşartürk, M., Boz, T., & Tüney-Kızılkaya, İ. (2021). Evaluation of the water quality of karabal stream (Gediz River, Turkey) and comparative performance of the used ındices. Acta Aquatica Turcica, 17(3), 334–349. https://doi.org/10.22392/actaquatr.819579
Ertaş, A., & Yorulmaz, B. (2021). Assessing water quality in the Kelebek Stream branch (Gediz River Basin, West Anatolia of Turkey) using physicochemical and macroinvertebrate-based indices. Aquatic Research, 4(3), 260–278. https://doi.org/10.3153/AR21020
Faessel, B. (1985). Les Trichopteres. Bulletin Francaise de la Peche et de la Pisciculture, 299, 1–41.
Kalyoncu, H., Yorulmaz, B., Barlas, M., Yıldırım, M. Z., & Zeybek, M. (2008). Aksu Çayı’nın su kalitesi ve fizikokimyasal parametrelerin makroomurgasız çeşitliliği üzerine etkisi. Fırat Üni Fen ve Müh Bil Dergisi, 20(1), 23–33.
Kantzaris, V., Iliopoulou- Georgudaki, J., Katharios, P., & Kaspiris, P. (2002). A comparison of several biotic indices used for water quality assessment at the Greek Rivers. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 11(11), 1000–1007.
Kara, C., & Çömlekçioğlu, U. (2004). Investigation of karacay’s (Kahramanmaraş) pollution with biological and psycho-chemical parameters (in Turkish with English abstract). Kahramanmaraş Sütçüimam University Journal of Science and Engineering, 7(1), 1–7.
Kazancı, G. N., Türkmen, G., Ekingen, P., & Başören, Ö. (2013). Preparation of a biotic index (Yeşilırmak-BMWP) for water quality monitoring of Yeşilırmak River (Turkey) by using benthic macroinvertebrates. Review of Hydrobiology, 6(1), 1–29.
Kocataş, A. (2008). Ecology and environmental biology (10th ed.). Ege University Faculty of Science Press.
Korycińska, M., & Królak, E. (2006). The use of various biotic indices for evaluation of water quality in the Lowland Rivers of Poland (Exemplified by the Liwiec River). Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 15(3), 419–428.
Koşalşahin, S., & Zeybek, M. (2019). Diversity and Species Composition of the Macrobenthic Invertebrates in Sürgü Stream (Malatya, Turkey). Journal of Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, 10(1), 60–67p. https://doi.org/10.29048/makufebed.529074
Lenat, D. (1993). Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 12, 220–222.
Liu, C. W., Lin, K. H., & Kuo, Y. M. (2003). Application of factor analysis in the assessment of groundwater quality in a blackfoot disease area in Taiwan. The Science of the Total Environment, 313, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00683-6
Manjarrés-Hernández, A., Guisande, C., García-Roselló, E., Heine, J., Pelayo-Villamil, P., Pérez-Costas, E., González-Vilas, L., González-Dacosta, J., Duque, S. R., Granado-Lorencio, C., & Lobo, J. M. (2021). Predicting the effects of climate change on future freshwater fish diversity at global scale. Nature Conservation, 43, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.43.58997
Ode, P. R., Rehn, A. C., & May, J. T. (2005). A quantitative tool for assessing the integrity of southern coastal California streams. Environmental Management, 35, 493–504.
Ogleni, N., & Topal, B. (2011). Water quality assessment of the Mudurnu River (Turkey), using biotic indices. Water Resources Managemant, 25, 2487–2508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9822-1
Paisley, M. F., Trigg, D. J., & Walley, W. J. (2013). Revision of the biological monitoring working party (BMWP) score system derivation of present-only and abundance-related scores from field data. River Research and Applications, 30, 887–904. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2686
Schmitz, W. (1954). Fundamentals of the investigation of the temperature conditions in the watercourses (in German). Ber. Limnol. Flusstation, Freudenthal, 6, 29–50.
Serdar, O., & Verep, B. (2018). The ınvestigation of water quality of iyidere and çiftekavak streams using physico-chemical and biotic ındexes. International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 4(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.29132/ijpas.398725
Shrestha, S., & Kazama, F. (2007). Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: A case study of the Fuji river basin, Japan. Environmental Modelling and Software, 22, 464–475.
Singh, K. P., Malik, A., Mohan, D., & Sinha, S. (2004). Multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of Gomti River (India): A case study. Water Research, 38, 3980–3992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.06.011
Singh, K. P., Malik, A., & Sinha, S. (2005). Water quality assessment and apportionment of pollution sources of Gomti river (India) using multivariate statistical techniques—A case study. Analytica Chimica Acta, 538, 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.02.006
Stroot, P. (1984). Faunistique et r6partition longitudinale des Trichopteres dans une riviere salmonicole de basse montagne, en Belgique. Hydrobiologia, 108, 245–258.
Sukatar, A., Ertaş, A., Gülle, İ, & Tüney-Kızılkaya, İ. (2020). Trophic State Assessment of Brackish Bafa Lake (Turkey) Based on Community Structure of Zooplankton. Limnofish- Journal of Limnology and Freshwater Fisheries Research, 6(2), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.17216/limnofish.680070
Suryani, S. A. M. P., Arya, I. W., & Suparta, I. M. (2018). Pollution with saprobic ındex and nutrition value coefficient of fish. International Journal of Life Sciences, 2(2), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijls.v2n2.134
Taşdemir, A., Yıldız, S., Özbek, M., Ustaoğlu, M. R., & Balık, S. (2010). The macrobenthic (Oligocheta, Chironomidae, Amphipoda) fauna of Tahtali reservoir (Izmir). Journal of FisheriesSciences.com, 4(4), 376–383. https://doi.org/10.3153/jfscom.2010040
Uyanık, S., Yılmaz, G., Yeşilnacar, M. I., Aslan, M., & Demir, O. (2005). Rapid assessment of river water quality in Turkey using benthic macroinvertebrates. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 14, 268–272.
Varol, M., & Şen, B. (2009). Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: A case study of Behrimaz Stream, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 159, 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0650-6
Verep, B., Serdar, O., Turan, D., & Şahin, C. (2005). Determination of water quality in terms of physico-chemical structure of the River Iyidere (Trabzon). Ecology, 14(57), 26–35.
Wetzel, R. G. (2001). Limnology lake and reservoir ecosystems. Academic Press.
WFD Water Framework Directive. (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. PE-CONS 3639/1/00 REV 1 EN, 62 pp.
Yorulmaz, B., & Ertaş, A. (2021). Water quality assessment of Selendi Stream and comparative performance of the indices based on benthic macroinvertebrates and physicochemical parameters. Biologia, 76, 2599–2607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-021-00756-3
Yorulmaz, B., Sukatar, A., & Barlas, M. (2015). Comparative analysis of biotic indices for evaluation of water quality of Esen River in South-West Anatolia, TURKEY. Fresenius Enviromental Bulletin, 24(1a), 188–94.
Zeybek, M. (2017). Macroinvertebrate-based biotic indices for evaluating the water quality of Kargı Stream (Antalya, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Zoology, 41, 476–548. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1602-10
Zeybek, M., Kalyoncu, H., & Ertan, Ö. O. (2012). Species composition and distribution of mollusca in relation to water quality. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 12, 721–729. https://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v12_3_21
Zeybek, M., Kalyoncu, H., Karakuş, B., & Özgül, S. (2014). The use of BMWP and ASPT indices for evaluation of water quality according to macroinvertebrates in Değirmendere Stream (Isparta, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Zoology, 38, 603–613. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1310-9
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful for the support and experience to Burak Gökçe
Funding
This study is supported by Ege University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit, Project Number: FGA-2020–21348.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by AE, TB and ITK. The first draft of the manuscript was written by AE. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ertas, A., Boz, T. & Tüney Kızılkaya, I. Comparative analysis of benthic macroinvertebrate-based biotic and diversity indices used to evaluate the water quality of Kozluoluk Stream (West Anatolia of Turkey). COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 22, 381–390 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42974-021-00061-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42974-021-00061-8