Abstract
This study has been carried out to determine water quality of Sangı Stream (West Anatolia, Turkey) and to compare the performance of indices used. Five biotic and three diversity indices have been used for determination of water quality of Sangı Stream. The assessment of water quality has been done based on benthic macroinvertebrate and physicochemical parameters. The following biotic indices have been used: Saprobi Index (SI), Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP), Average Score per Taxon (ASPT), Family Biotic Index (FBI), Belgian Biotic Index (BBI), as well as the following diversity indices: Shannon–Weaver index (SWDI), Simpsons index (SDI), Margalef index (MDI) and Evenness (E1). Principal component analysis (PCA) has been applied to the physicochemical variables. The similarities between the sampling stations have been clustered by using Cluster analysis (CLUS). Our results have shown the presence of 9 taxonomic groups in Sangı Stream: Crustacea, Oligochaeta, Gastropoda, Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Odonata, Coleoptera, and Diptera. The water quality along the Sangı Stream has varied from high class quality in station 1, 2, 3 and 4, to good and moderate quality in station 5 and 6. The results indicate that the SI, BMWP, FBI and ASPT were sufficient in the estimation of water quality in the examined watercourse. This study has clearly shown that a specific biotic index according to the ecological characteristics of Turkey should be developed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Rapid population growth, changes in consumption habits and industrial developments from the last half of the 20th century to this time have caused significant water problems both on a global and regional scale [1–4].
While traditional water quality monitoring programs have focused on physicochemical monitoring, the limnologists have recently been increasingly reliant on biological assessments that provide important information about freshwater ecosystem conditions [5–18].
Biomonitoring studies by using bioindicators allow us to have information about the effects (chronic) that the aquatic habitat has been exposed to in the past [19, 20]. The most important advantage of using bioindicator groups to characterize the general condition of water is that they do well in reflecting the historical past of the stress sources in a region. Benthic macroinvertebrates form one of the indicator groups mostly used in determining the water quality [16].
Biotic indices are the focus of biological monitoring studies based on benthic macroinvertebrates. One of the difficulties in presenting biological observations is summarizing data and presenting it in specific ways. Therefore, various indices are used in Europe for water quality assessment studies using benthic invertebrates [21]. The Saprobi index in Germany, Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP) and Average Score Per Taxon (ASPT) in England, Belgian Biotic Index (BBI) in Belgium all seem to give the most reliable results specific to their geographic regions. The Yeşilırmak BMWP biotic index (Y-BMWP) has been recently developed for use only in the Yeşilırmak river basin in Turkey [22].
This study aims to assess the water quality of Sangı Stream. In addition, we aim to compare the results of five biotic indices and three diversity indices correlation with physicochemical characteristics of Sangı Stream (West Anatolia, Turkey).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study Area
Izmir, an area of historical importance, is located on the Aegean coast in West Anatolia of Turkey. Sangı Stream has been chosen as a study area because it is an important drinking water source for Izmir. The stream is one of the important water sources of the Tahtalı Dam basin in the Menderes district of Izmir. Sangı Stream is also used as a water source for irrigating the surrounding agricultural fields.
This study has been carried out on Sangı Stream in the Tahtali Dam Basin in Western Turkey. The length of the Sangı Stream is 25 km2. Sangı Stream flows from the Sandı Mountain (700 m) to the west of Tahtali Dam (Fig. 1).
The sampling stations have been chosen according to the criteria for selecting operational monitoring sites given in WFD Annex V 1.3.2. [23]. The research has been conducted from February 2018 to March 2019 at six monitoring stations that have included the upstream (stations 1, 2, 3) and downstream (stations 4, 5, 6) parts of the stream. The sampling has been carried out on monthly in over a year at Sangı Stream. The characteristics of the sampling stations are presented in Table 1.
The sampling has been carried out from each station by using a kick-net with the classic 50 × 30 cm size and 250 µm mesh size according to the guidelines in scientific literature [24]. The collected samples have been fixed in ethyl alcohol (70%) and formaldehyde (4%) throughout the field study. The samples have been categorized and diagnosed to the lowest possible taxonomic level under a stereomicroscope.
Physicochemical Parameters
Simultaneously with macroinvertebrate sampling, water samples have been taken and analysed for the following parameters, PO4-P, NH4-N, NO2-N, NO3-N, Cl– and BOD5, using spectrophotometer and the proper kits. All analyses have been done by following the standard methods [25]. Water temperature (°C), pH, electrical conductivity (EC) and dissolved oxygen (DO) have been measured in the field using portable equipment.
Data Analysis
Saprobi Index (SI), Average Score Per Taxon (ASPT), Belgian Biotic Index (BBI), Family Biotic Index (FBI), Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP), Shannon–Wiener (SWDI), Simpson’s (SDI), Margalef (MDI) and Evenness (E1) indices have been applied on benthic macroinvertebrate data set by using ASTERICS Software Program [24]. The Bray–Curtis similarity index has been used to determine the similarities between the sampling stations based on macroinvertebrates [26]. The UPGMA algorithm has been used to illustrate similarity-based clustering relationships between sampling stations [27]. Pearson’s based correlation analysis has been performed by using SPSS version 20.0. PCA has been applied to transform the content from large data tables into a smaller data set that can be more easily visualized and analysed [28–31].
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The results of the analysed physicochemical variables of the water in six sampling stations located along the stream are presented in Table 2.
The mean value of T°C has varied from 11.9°C in station 1 in the source area of the stream, up to 16.5°C in stations 4 and 5. On the other hand, pH has shown small alteration, with minimum value of 6.80 in station 4 and maximum value of 7.11 in station 1, meaning that in all stations the stream water is alkaline [32, 33].
The increase in EC in drinking water indicates that the water is contaminated, or that sea water is mixed into the water. According to the One-Way Anova test, EC has varied significantly between stations (p < 0.05). The highest mean value of EC in this study has been recorded in station 4 (369.2 μS/m) in the downstream area.
Dissolved oxygen is a vital variable for a healthy aquatic life [34, 35]. The mean value of DO concentration has varied from 13.4 mg/L (station 1) to 9.65 mg/L (station 4). BOD5 is the amount of dissolved molecular oxygen used by microorganisms during the 5-day incubation period to oxidize the structure of organic substances in water at 20°C. The mean values of BOD5 in sampling stations has ranged from 1.16 mg/L in station 1 to 4.75 mg/L in station 4 [32, 33]. According to the One-Way Anova test, BOD5 has varied significantly between stations (p < 0.05).
Elements that limit efficiency in aquatic environments are mostly PO4-P, NH4-N, NO2-N, NO3-N [36]. The NO3-N range has been from 0.78 mg/L in station 1 to 2.55 mg/L in station 4. The increase of NO3- in station 4 and 5 has shown these two stations to be rich with nutrients caused by discharges of agricultural and domestic wastes in the vicinity of Sangı Stream. The minimum mean value of PO4-P has been 0.04 mg/L, registered in stations 1 and 2, and the maximum has been 3.19 mg/L in station 4. The minimum mean value of NO2-N has been 0.08 mg/L in station 1, and the maximum has been 2.66 mg/L in station 4. The minimum mean value of NH4-N has been 0.05 mg/L in station 1, and the maximum has been 3.72 mg/L in station 4. According to the One-Way Anova test, PO4-P, NH4-N, NO2-N, NO3-N have varied significantly between stations (p < 0.05).
In this study, the subdividing of the sampling points into two groups has caused the PCA analysis to show a clear spatial and temporal division (Fig. 2). According to PCA analysis, total variance has been explained as 93.9% in axis 1 and 2 where eigenvalues have been greater than 1. PCA 1 has positive loading on temperature, ToC, EC, BOI5, NH4-N, NO2-N, NO3-N, CI– and PO4-P and negative loading on DO and pH. Positive loadings on NH4-N, NO2-N, NO3-N and PO4-P have been related to organic pollution. Thus, the resulting components of PCA analysis represent pollution from agricultural and domestic wastewaters.
In this study, a total of 5.363 benthic macroinvertebrate samples have been collected, belonging to nine groups: Crustacea, Oligochaeta, Gastropoda, Epheme-roptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Odonata, Coleoptera and Diptera. Among all the taxonomic groups the following have been dominant: Ephemeroptera in station 1 (50.7%); Diptera in stations 2, 5 and 6 (14.1, 15.9 and 15.3%); and Crustacea in stations 3 and 4 (11.8, 11.5%) (Table 3).
EPT-Taxa (%) has been one of the metrics with the best response to the physicochemical variables of freshwater. It is indicated that EPT taxa are sensitive to anthropogenic factor while Oligochaeta taxa are tolerant to anthropogenic factor in freshwater ecosystems [37]. In this study, the highest EPT-Taxa values have been obtained in station 1 (75%) during all seasons while the lowest EPT-Taxa values have been obtained in station 2 (57.1%) in autumn (Table 4).
Indicator organisms that define the condition of the environment are used in biological monitoring studies. Bacteria, protozoans, algae, benthic macroinvertebrates, macrophytes and fish can be used as indicator organisms [38]. Benthic macroinvertebrates are the most advantageous group among all these groups. Habitat demands of benthic macroinvertebrates are more limited than other groups. Their mobility is lower. They are not displaced when they are affected by adverse conditions and they can be tracked more easily in the event of changes in community components and the loss of susceptible species. It is easier to diagnose, gather and hide than some other groups. It is found at any time of the year and its life cycles take longer than some other groups [39–45].
Cluster analysis dendrogram (UPGMA method) shows the similarities of the sampling stations (Fig. 3). According to the Bray–Curtis similarity index, the stations 1 and 2 (94%) have been the most similar to each other. The second most similar stations to each other have been determined to be stations 3 and 4 (93%). All of these close similarities and dissimilarities are likely related to the ecological and physical characteristics of the sampling stations. If we compare the bottom structure and physical characteristic of these stations, the matching sampling points are fairly similar to each other while stations 5 and 6 are different from the others. The bottom structure of stations 5 and 6 has a sandy-muddy sediment type because of their low incline and flow. These stations are close to the Tahtali Dam.
The biotic indices indicate that the Sangı Stream is slightly polluted by agricultural activities. Table 5 summarizes the biological quality scores and quality classes in Sangı Stream. Water quality classes have varied from moderate (according to BMWP 5th and 6th) to high class. According to the BMWP (original), the highest score values have been obtained in stations 1 and 2 while the lowest scores have been obtained in stations 5 and 6. According to ASPT (original), the highest score values have been obtained in station 1 while the lowest scores have been obtained in station 6. According to the SI, the water quality class is oligosaprobic/betamesosaprobic at sites 1, 2 and 3 (Class I–II) while the water quality class is betamesosaprobic at sites 4, 5 and 6.
The average species diversity of the stations has been determined by using SDI, SWDI and MDI in Sangı Stream. According to SDI, the highest diversity values have been obtained in stations 1 and 2 while the lowest scores have been obtained in stations 5 and 6. According to SWDI, the highest diversity values have been obtained in station 2 while the lowest scores have been obtained in station 4. According to MDI, the highest diversity values have been obtained in station 2 while the lowest scores have been obtained in station 6. Species richness is a simple number of species, while species evenness determines how equal the abundance of species is. [46]. The low evenness value indicates that there is no balance in distribution of the species and the community is dominated by a taxon or some taxa [47]. According to [48], if the SWDI value is higher than “3”, it indicates unpolluted water; if the diversity value is between 1 and 3, it indicates moderate pollution, and a value smaller than “1” indicates heavy pollution. According to [49], the diversity value ranges from 0 (low density) to 1 at SDI.
Comparative analyses of biotic indices in stream systems in Turkey have been made on a regional basis in recent years [8, 14, 17, 18, 50–55].
In this study, the random sample cases (10% select case) have been made on the basis of biotic indices and physicochemical parameters to verify data sets and to determine that the data has been transferred without errors in the SPSS version 20.0. Table 6 indicates the correlations of biotic and diversity indices.
As a result of the correlation analysis, SI has a significant positive correlation with FBI (r = 0.942, p < 0.01). BMWP (original) has a significant positive correlation with ASPT (original) (r = 0.848, p < 0.01), while BMWP (original) has a significant negative correlation with FBI (r = –0.795, p < 0.01). On the other hand, BMWP (Original) has a significant negative correlation with SDI (r = –0.841, p < 0.01). Note that the increase in index values of SI, FBI, BMWP and ASPT shows good ecological quality, while the increase in BBI shows bad ecological quality.
Table 7 summarizes the Pearson correlation analyses between the biotic and diversity indices and the physicochemical parameters. A significant correlation has been found between T°C and SI (r = –0.751, p < 0.05), between pH and SI (r = 0.826, p < 0.05), and between DO and SI (r = –0.751, p < 0.05). According to correlation between physicochemical parameters and indices, a significant correlation value has been determined between NO2-N, BOI5, T°C, pH and DO and BMWP (original) and SWDI. All physicochemical parameters except T°C and pH have shown a significantly correlation with BBI. According to the analysis results, the benthic macroinvertebrates are sensitive to changes in temperature and oxygen in water, and as temperature increases and oxygen decreases, sensitive organisms are replaced by tolerant organisms [56].
CONCLUSIONS
According to the results, it can be predicted that the pollution factors from intense agricultural activities and urbanization may cause serious pollution pressure on Sangı Stream in the future. This study shows that the BMWP, ASPT, FBI and SI appear to be more appropriate than the BBI. The BBI implemented in various streams studies in Turkey has shown reliable results reflecting the quality of the streams. However, BBI has not shown a significant correlation with other indexes used in Sangı Stream. The fact that there are very few similar studies makes it difficult to determine their availability in Turkey. More studies are needed on this subject, and they should be carried out in streams in different regions.
Intermittent monitoring studies should be carried out in the Tahtalı Dam basin to prevent the negative effect from waste. This study shows that there is a great need for development of a reference biotic index for Turkey to assess surface waters in Turkey with high accuracy. The development of a Turkish biotic index will also enable it to be used in Mediterranean and Aegean countries with similar climatic and geographical characteristics. This index will be an important criterion for determining the water quality of freshwater ecosystems on a global scale. Therefore, this study is very important in terms of data generation.
REFERENCES
Alavaisha, E., Lyon, S.W., and Lindborg, R., Assessment of water quality across irrigation schemes: a case study of Wetland agriculture impacts in Kilombero Valley, Tanzania, Water, 2019, vol. 11, no. 4, art. ID 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040671
Ertaş, A., Tüney Kızılkaya, İ., and Yorulmaz, B., Determination of diversity and species composition of the benthic macroinvertebrates in Sangı stream (Izmir, Turkey), J. Wildl. Biodiversity, 2020, vol. 4, nos. 19–30, pp. 19–30. https://doi.org/10.22120/jwb.2020.125757.1137
Sukatar, A., Ertaş, A., Gülle, İ., et al., Trophic state assessment of brackish Bafa Lake (Turkey) based on community structure of zooplankton, LimnoFish, 2020, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 88–99. https://doi.org/10.17216/limnofish.680070
Ertaş, A., Boz, T., and Tüney-Kızılkaya, İ., Determination of benthic macroinvertebrate fauna and some physicochemical properties of Balaban Lake (Menderes-Izmir), Aquat. Sci. Eng., 2021, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 116–125. https://doi.org/10.26650/ASE2020821658
Dügel, M. and Kazanci, N., Assessment of water quality of the Büyük Menderes River (Turkey) by using ordination and classification of macroinvertebrates and environmental variables, J. Freshwater Ecol., 2004, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 605–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2004.9664741
Duran, M., Monitoring water quality using benthic macroinvertebrates and physicochemical parameters of Behzat Stream in Turkey, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 2006, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 709–717.
Sukatar, A., Yorulmaz, B., Ayaz, D., et al., Emiralem deresi’nin (İzmir-Menemen) bazi fiziko-kimyasal ve biyolojik (bentik makroomurgasizlar) özelliklerinin incelenmesi, Suleyman Demirel Univ. Fen Bilimleri Enst. Derg., 2006, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 328–333.
Kalyoncu, H., Yorulmaz, B., Barlas, M., et al., Aksu Çayi’nin su kalitesi ve fizikokimyasal parametrelerin makroomurgasız çeşitliliği üzerine etkisi, Fırat Üniv. Fen Müh. Bil. Dergisi, 2008, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 23–33.
Kalyoncu, H., Barlas, M., Yıldırım, M.Z., et al., Gastropods of two important streams of Gökova Bay (Mula, Turkey) and their relationships with water quality, Int. J. Sci. Technol., 2008, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 27–36.
Çamur-elipek, B., Arslan, N., Kirgiz, T., et al., Analysis of benthic macroinvertebrates in relation to environmental variables of Lake Gala, a National Park of Turkey, Turk. J. of Fish. Aquat. Sci., 2010, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 235–243. https://doi.org/10.4194/trjfas.2010.0212
Taşdemir, A., Yıldız, S., Özbek, M., et al., The macrobenthic (Oligocheta, Chironomidae, Amphipoda) fauna of Tahtali reservoir (Izmir), J. Fish. Sci., 2010, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 376–383. https://doi.org/10.3153/jfscom.2010040
Zeybek, M., Kalyoncu, H., and Ertan, Ö.O., Species composition and distribution of mollusca in relation to water quality, Turk. J. of Fish. Aquat. Sci., 2012, vol. 12, pp. 721–729. https://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v12_3_21
Başören, Ö. and Kazancı, N., Water quality assessment of Fırtına Stream (Rize, Turkey) by using various macroinvertebrate based metrics and physicochemical variables, Rev. Hydrobiol., 2016, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–16.
Zeybek, M., Macroinvertebrate-based biotic indices for evaluating the water quality of Kargı Stream (Antalya, Turkey), Turk. J. Zool., 2017, vol. 41, pp. 476-48. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1602-10
Serdar, O. and Verep, B., The investigation of water quality of İyidere and Çiftekavak Streams using physico-chemical and biotic indexes, Int. J. Pure Appl. Sci., 2018, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 61–71. https://doi.org/10.29132/ijpas.398725
Akyildiz, G.K. and Duran, M., Evaluation of the impact of heterogeneous environmental pollutants on benthic macroinvertebrates and water quality by long-term monitoring of the buyuk menderes river basin, Environ. Monit. Assess., 2021, vol. 193, no. 5, art. ID 280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-08981-8
Ertaş, A. and Yorulmaz, B., Assessing water quality in the Kelebek Stream branch (Gediz River Basin, West Anatolia of Turkey) using physicochemical and macroinvertebrate-based indices, Aquat. Res., 2021, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 260–278. https://doi.org/10.3153/AR21020
Yorulmaz, B. and Ertaş, A., Water quality assessment of Selendi Stream and comparative performance of the indices based on benthic macroinvertebrates and physicochemical parameters, Biologia, 2021, vol. 76, pp. 2599–2607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-021-00756-3
Aera, C.N., M’Erimba, C.M., and Nzula, K., Effect of organic effluents on water quality and benthic macroinvertebrate community structure in Njoro River, Kenya, J. Environ. Anal. Toxicol., 2019, vol. 9, no. 2161-0525, art. ID 601. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0525.1000601
El Sayed, S.M., Hegab, M.H., Mola, H.R.A., et al., An integrated water quality assessment of Damietta and Rosetta branches (Nile River, Egypt) using chemical and biological indices, Environ. Monit. Assess., 2020, vol. 192, art. ID 228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8195-4
Korycińska, M. and Królak, E., The use of various biotic indices for evaluation of water quality in the lowland rivers of Poland (Exemplified by the Liwiec River), Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 2006, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 419–428.
Kazancı, G.N., Türkmen, G., and Ekingen, P., Preparation of a biotic index (Yeşilırmak-BMWP) for water quality monitoring of Yeşilırmak River (Turkey) by using benthic macroinvertebrates, Rev. Hydrobiol., 2013, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–29.
WFD Water Framework Directive. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. PE-CONS 3639/1/00 REV 1 EN, 2000.
AQEM Consortium. The AQEM sampling method to be applied in STAR, Chapters 7–8, 2002.
American Public Health Association (APHA)., Method 2130, Turbidity, standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, in American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation, Washington D.C., 1998, 20th ed.
Clarke, K.R., Somerfield, P.J., and Chapman, M.G., On resemblance measures for ecological studies, including taxonomic dissimilarities and a zero-adjusted Bray-Curtis coefficient for denuded assemblages, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 2006, vol. 1, no. 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2005.12.017
Shrestha, S. and Kazama, F., Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study of the Fuji River basin, Japan, Environ. Modell. Software, 2007, vol. 22, pp. 464–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.02.001
Liu, C.W., Lin, K.H., and Kuo, Y.M., Application of factor analysis in the assessment of groundwater quality in a blackfoot disease area in Taiwan, Sci. Total Environ., 2003, vol. 313, pp. 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00683-6
Singh, K.P., Malik, A., and Mohan, D., Multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of Gomti River (India)—a case study, Water Res., 2004, vol. 38, no. 18, pp. 3980–3992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.06.011
Singh, K.P., Malik, A., and Sinha, S., Water quality assessment and apportionment of pollution sources of Gomti river (India) using multivariate statistical techniques)—a case study, Anal. Chim. Acta, 2005, vol. 538, pp. 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.02.006
Varol, M. and Sen, B., Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study of Behrimaz Stream, Turkey, Environ. Monit. Assess., 2009, vol. 159, art. ID 543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0650-6
Bytyqi, P., Ymeri, P., and Czikkely, M., The Application of Benthic Diatoms in Water Quality Assessment in Lepenci River Basin, Kosovo, J. Ecol. Eng., 2019, vol. 20, pp. 43–57. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/113409
Etemi, F.Z., Bytyçi, P., and Ismaili, M., The use of macroinvertebrate based biotic indices and diversity indices to evaluate the water quality of Lepenci river basin in Kosovo, J. Environ. Sci. Health, 2020, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 748–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2020.1738172
Wetzel, R.G., Limnology: Lake and Reservoir Ecosystems, San Diego: Acad. Press, 2001.
Tanyolac, J., Limnology, Ankara: Hatipoğlu Press, 2004, 3rd ed.
Moss, D., Furse, M.T., and Wright, J.F., The prediction of the macro-invertebrate fauna of unpolluted running-water sites in Great Britain using environmental data, Freshwater Biol., 1987, vol. 17, no.1, pp. 41–52.
Ode, P.R., Rehn, A.C., and May, J.T., A quantitative tool for assessing the integrity of southern coastal California streams, Environ. Manage., 2005, vol. 35, pp. 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0035-8
Sladecek, V., System of water quality from the biological point of view, Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. Ergebn, 1973, no. 7, pp. 1–218.
Armitage, P.D., Moss, D., and Wright, J.F., The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running water sites, Water Res., 1983, vol. 17, pp. 333–347.
Metcalfe-Smith, J.L., Biological water quality assessment of rivers: use of macroinvertebrate communities, in The Rivers Handbook 2, Calow, P. and Petts, G.E., Eds., Oxford: Blackwell, 1994, pp. 144–170.
Knoben, R.A.E., Roos, C., and Oirschot, M.C.M., Biological Assessment Methods for Watercourses, UN/ECE Task Force on Monitoring and Assessment, Lelystad, 1995.
Ghetti, P.F., Application Manual: Extended Biotic Index – Macroinvertebates in Quality Control of Running Water Environments, Trento, 1997.
De Pauw, N. and Heylen, S., Biotic index for sediment quality assessment of watercourses in Flanders, Belgium, Aquat. Ecol., 2001, vol. 35, pp. 121–133.
Iliopoulou-Georgudaki, J., Kantzaris, V., and Katharios, P., An application of different bioindicators for assessing water quality; a case study in the rivers Alfeios and Pineios (Peloponnisos, Greece), Ecol. Indic., 2003, vol. 2, no. 4, 345–360.
Scuri, S., Torrisi, M., and Cocchioni, D., The European Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC in the evaluation of the ecological status of watercourses. Case study: the river Chienti (central Apennies, Italy), Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol., 2006, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 498–505.
Hill, M.O., DECORANA—a FORTRAN Program for Detrended Correspondence Analysis and Reciprocal Averaging, Ithaca: Cornell University, 1979.
Magurran, A.E., Species abundance distributions: pattern or process?, Funct. Ecol., 2005, vol. 19, pp. 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0269-8463.2005.00930.x
Mason, C.F., Biology of Freshwater Pollution, New York: Prentice Hall, 2002.
Ghosh, D. and Biswas, J.K., Macroinvertebrate diversity indices: A quantitative bioassessment of ecological health status of an oxbow lake in Eastern India, J. Adv. Environ. Health Res., 2005, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 78–90.
Kantzaris, V., Iliopoulou-Georgudaki, J., and Katharios, P., A comparison of several biotic indices used for water quality assessment at the Greek Rivers, Fresenius Environ. Bull., 2002, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1000–1007.
Öz, N., and Şengörür, B., The determining of water quality with biotic indices in the Melen River and its tributaries, Fresenius Environ. Bull., 2004, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 69–70.
Ogleni, N. and Topal, B., Water quality assessment of the Mudurnu River (Turkey), using biotic indices, Water Resour. Manage., 2011, vol. 25, art. ID 2487.
Yorulmaz, B., Sukatar, A., and Barlas, M., Comparative analysis of biotic indices for evaluation of water quality of Esen River in South-West Anatolia, Turkey, Fresenius Environ. Bull., 2015, vol. 24, no. 1A, pp. 188–194.
Zeybek, M., Kalyoncu, H., and Karakuş, B., The use of BMWP and ASPT indices for evaluation of water quality according to macroinvertebrates in Değirmendere Stream (Isparta, Turkey), Turk. J. Zool., 2014, vol. 38, pp. 603–613. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1310-9
Akay, E. and Dalkıran, N., Assessing biological water quality of Yalakdere stream (Yalova, Turkey) with benthic macroinvertebrate-based metrics, Biologia, 2020, vol. 75, pp. 1347–1363. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-019-00387-9
Walczyńska, A. and Sobczyk, L., The underestimated role of temperature–oxygen relationship in large-scale studies on size-to-temperature respons, Ecology and Evolution, 2017, vol. 7, no. 18, pp. 7434–7441. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3263
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are thankful to Merve Yaşartürk and Tuğba Boz for the support and experience.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alperen Ertaş, Bülent Yorulmaz Comparative Performance of the Indices Used for Bioassessment of Water Quality of Sangı Stream (West Anatolia, Turkey). Russ J Ecol 53, 318–327 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413622040026
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413622040026